Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

A high-throughput phenotypic screen identifies clofazimine as a potential treatment for cryptosporidiosis

  • Melissa S. Love ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Melissa S. Love, Federico C. Beasley

    Affiliation California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Federico C. Beasley ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Melissa S. Love, Federico C. Beasley

    Affiliation California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Rajiv S. Jumani,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America

  • Timothy M. Wright,

    Affiliation California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Arnab K. Chatterjee,

    Affiliation California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Christopher D. Huston,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America

  • Peter G. Schultz,

    Affiliations California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America, Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America

  • Case W. McNamara

    Affiliation California Institute for Biomedical Research, La Jolla, California, United States of America


Cryptosporidiosis has emerged as a leading cause of non-viral diarrhea in children under five years of age in the developing world, yet the current standard of care to treat Cryptosporidium infections, nitazoxanide, demonstrates limited and immune-dependent efficacy. Given the lack of treatments with universal efficacy, drug discovery efforts against cryptosporidiosis are necessary to find therapeutics more efficacious than the standard of care. To date, cryptosporidiosis drug discovery efforts have been limited to a few targeted mechanisms in the parasite and whole cell phenotypic screens against small, focused collections of compounds. Using a previous screen as a basis, we initiated the largest known drug discovery effort to identify novel anticryptosporidial agents. A high-content imaging assay for inhibitors of Cryptosporidium parvum proliferation within a human intestinal epithelial cell line was miniaturized and automated to enable high-throughput phenotypic screening against a large, diverse library of small molecules. A screen of 78,942 compounds identified 12 anticryptosporidial hits with sub-micromolar activity, including clofazimine, an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of leprosy, which demonstrated potent and selective in vitro activity (EC50 = 15 nM) against C. parvum. Clofazimine also displayed activity against C. hominis–the other most clinically-relevant species of Cryptosporidium. Importantly, clofazimine is known to accumulate within epithelial cells of the small intestine, the primary site of Cryptosporidium infection. In a mouse model of acute cryptosporidiosis, a once daily dosage regimen for three consecutive days or a single high dose resulted in reduction of oocyst shedding below the limit detectable by flow cytometry. Recently, a target product profile (TPP) for an anticryptosporidial compound was proposed by Huston et al. and highlights the need for a short dosing regimen (< 7 days) and formulations for children < 2 years. Clofazimine has a long history of use and has demonstrated a good safety profile for a disease that requires chronic dosing for a period of time ranging 3–36 months. These results, taken with clofazimine’s status as an FDA-approved drug with over four decades of use for the treatment of leprosy, support the continued investigation of clofazimine both as a new chemical tool for understanding cryptosporidium biology and a potential new treatment of cryptosporidiosis.

Author summary

Diarrheal diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality in the developing world. A recent multi-site study investigating diarrheal disease identified Cryptosporidium as one of the leading causes, responsible for upwards of 25% of cases in some regions. Currently approved therapy for cryptosporidiosis is limited to nitazoxanide, which is approved only for children ages 1–11 years. Nitazoxanide demonstrates moderate efficacy in immunocompetent patients and poor efficacy in immunodeficient patients. The limited treatment options underscore an opportunity to reduce the global burden of diarrheal disease by developing novel medicines with increased efficacy against Cryptosporidium spp. We report the largest high-throughput screen for anticryptosporidial compounds to date, leading to the identification of the FDA-approved drug clofazimine as a potential new treatment for cryptosporidiosis, and as a tool to probe the biology of this pathogen.


Cryptosporidium species are apicomplexan protozoans that are important causes of diarrhea in humans and some domestic animals. The parasite relies on an oral-fecal route of transmission, and ingestion of water or food contaminated with Cryptosporidium oocysts may lead to infection. Upon ingestion, oocysts are activated, releasing four sporozoites which then invade host epithelial cells in the small intestine [1]. In some severe cases, infection may expand beyond the gastrointestinal tract and into the respiratory tract—a complication most often seen in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [24]. The life cycle is not well understood, although Cryptosporidium undergoes both asexual and sexual replication within a single host, ultimately leading to the generation of environmentally-hardy infectious thick-walled oocysts that are excreted with the host feces [5]. Acute and persistent watery diarrhea with concomitant oocyst shedding are hallmarks of cryptosporidiosis [6]. Clinically, the two most relevant species that cause human cryptosporidiosis are C. hominis and C. parvum, and distribution of each species varies greatly depending on the region and geography. A large molecular epidemiology study carried out by the Global Enteric Multi-Center Study (GEMS) revealed Cryptosporidium spp. to be the second-leading cause of life-threatening diarrheal disease in young children [7]. A second study by MAL-ED confirmed the significant contribution of Cryptosporidium to diarrheal disease burden in infants 12 months and younger [8]. While rotavirus continues to be the most common cause of severe pediatric diarrheal disease, 8–30.5% of cases, dependent upon location and age range, are now attributed to cryptosporidiosis [913].

In general, severe infectious diarrheal diseases cause dehydration and malnutrition due to low retention of nutrients [14]. Young children are particularly vulnerable to the untoward effects of severe diarrhea, which can result in death or stunted development [8, 15]. Currently, there is only one approved drug to treat Cryptosporidium infections—nitazoxanide [16]. The efficacy of nitazoxanide has been questioned [17] and appears to be dependent upon a competent immune system. This is notable because young children and immunodeficient individuals are disproportionally affected by cryptosporidiosis [18], and nitazoxanide demonstrates very poor efficacy in AIDS patients [19], highlighting an urgent unmet medical need among this comorbid patient population.

Drug discovery efforts against cryptosporidiosis have been limited to a few targeted mechanisms in the parasite and whole cell phenotypic screens against small, focused collections of compounds [2022]. The most advanced compound from these efforts, bumped kinase inhibitor 1294 (BKI-1294), is a putative inhibitor of C. parvum calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 (CDPK1) [23] which is a validated target in other protozoans, including Toxoplasma gondii [24] and Plasmodium spp. [25]. BKI-1294 has demonstrated efficacy in a mouse model of chronic cryptosporidiosis when dosed once per day for ten consecutive days at 100 mg/kg [23]. Active compounds have also emerged from screens for inhibitors of inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase [26], and polyamine analogues [27]. Despite these efforts there remains a dearth of compounds in the drug discovery pipeline, a limited biological understanding, and a lack of available tools to study this parasite. Therefore, we undertook a high-throughput screen to identify compounds that may lead to effective new treatments for cryptosporidiosis.


A phenotypic assay for high-throughput screening

As a starting point, we developed a whole-cell phenotypic screening platform for testing a library of small molecules. A high-content screen of C. parvum-infected human intestinal epithelial HCT-8 cells was previously developed in a 384-well format by Bessoff et al. [20] to measure C. parvum proliferation over a 48-h period. We modified this assay for automated dispensing and further miniaturization to 1536-well format, both critical factors to support a high-throughput screening campaign (Fig 1). A small pilot screen was initiated and assay quality was determined by calculating the Z’ value. Despite miniaturization, the 1536-well assay had comparable Z’ values (0.2–0.5; S1 Table) to the published 384-well assay format when comparing control wells containing DMSO to wells treated with the positive controls nitazoxanide (NTZ) and 5-fluoro-2’deoxyuridine (FDU). Like the 384-well assay, a strict hit cut-off for parasite proliferation was applied to avoid high false-positive hit rates created by higher than average well-to-well variability (Fig 2). Initial pilot screens with a final compound concentration of 1.88 μM confirmed that typical hit reconfirmation rates of 40–50% were observed when applying a 70% inhibition cut-off. Because a significant decrease in hit reconfirmation, reflecting a significantly higher false-positive rate, was observed when the hit cut-off was reduced, the 70% inhibition cut-off was applied for all primary screens.

Fig 1. Screening images and software analysis.

Representative images and software analysis from 1536-well High Content Imaging on Cellomics CellInsight CX5. (Left) Images of two wells either mock-treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 10 μM nitazoxanide (NTZ). A merged image of the two fluorescent channels are artificially colored to show contrast: DAPI in cyan and FITC in red. Well area for each full-sized image is 802,511.39 μm2. (Right) Zoomed-in images from the inset white squares in the left panel (area is 24,318.53 μm2) are shown. The image overlays are applied by the imaging software to assess the assay metrics: HCT-8 cell count and Cryptosporidium spot count. First, the host cell nuclei are identified and counted based on DAPI signal; cell debris and other particles are rejected based on a size filter (orange). Next, a region of interest, or “cell area” is drawn around each host cell nuclei to encompass where Cryptosporidium parasites may be located. Finally, the software identifies and counts “spots” within the “cell area” based on signal from the FITC-conjugated Vicia villosa lectin (red).

Fig 2. High-throughput screening results of 78,942 compounds shows inherent variability.

Scatter plot of normalized activity all compounds screened at 1.88 μM (Black = Bioactives; Gray = GHCDL). A strict cut-off of 70% inhibition of C. parvum proliferation (dotted red line) was applied to yield 812 primary hits. Neutral controls (0.125% DMSO; Blue = Bioactives; Lavender = GHCDL) and inhibitor controls (0.5 μM FDU; Red = Bioactives; Light red = GHCDL) are also shown to demonstrate the inherent variability in the assay.

The miniaturized, fully automated design of the C. parvum proliferation assay enables a screen throughput of approximately 40,000 compounds per assay. We screened two modestly sized compound libraries to validate this assay and identify new anticryptosporidial compounds: a Bioactive (10,000) set assembled by the California Institute for Biomedical Research (Calibr), and the Global Health Chemical Diversity Library (GHCDL; 69,000) provided by the University of Dundee Drug Discovery Unit. A primary screen of these libraries revealed highly divergent hit rates that varied by 70-fold and yielded 106 reconfirmed hits (75 from the Bioactive set; 31 from the GHCDL; Table 1). These hits were resupplied from high-purity powder stocks and assayed in dose-response. Compounds with a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) against intracellular C. parvum of less than 1 μM (49 from Bioactives and 18 from GHCDL) and no discernable HCT-8 cytotoxicity (≥ 10-fold the observed EC50 value) were deemed selective, potent hits (10 from Bioactives and 2 from GHCDL; S2 Table). The high attrition of screen hits at this stage was directly attributable to false positives from compounds that demonstrated poor selectivity and were generally cytotoxic to the host HCT-8 line and/or against additional counter-screened mammalian cell lines (HepG2 and HEK293T). The remaining selective compounds were advanced for hit validation against Cryptosporidium hominis.

Table 1. Screening results, including compound totals for each library.

Anticryptosporidial activity of screening hits confirmed against C. hominis

Methods for continuous, in vitro cultivation of Cryptosporidium spp. have not been well established. Instead, in vivo oocyst propagation of C. parvum is performed in calves, a more promiscuous Cryptosporidium species for animal and human infections. For C. hominis, gnotobiotic piglets are the primary means of propagation. The calf is the more accessible model, making C. parvum the more convenient species to screen. However, C. hominis is equally clinically relevant with regards to human cryptosporidiosis. Thus, compounds identified against C. parvum were counter-screened against C. hominis to confirm that these compounds were active against both species. Given that the genomes of these two species exhibit extremely high synteny and sequence identity (95–97%) [28], compound potency was expected to also be highly correlated. High purity powders of the 10 filtered C. parvum Bioactives screen hits and both GHCDL screen hits were tested against C. hominis (TU502) to confirm activity against both species. Surprisingly, the species-specific activities the screening hits and control compounds, NTZ and FDU, were determined to be only modestly correlated (R2 = 0.7445; Fig 3). While no compounds demonstrated species-exclusive activity, there were notable outliers with differential activities between species, including the known compounds clofazimine and cyclosporine (~20-fold more potent against C. parvum).

Fig 3. Screening hits show activity against two species of Cryptosporidium.

Twelve filtered hits and multiple controls were tested against C. parvum and C. hominis for cross-species confirmation. Data points are log-transformed EC50 values. Controls and compounds of interest are denoted with a square symbols and labeled. The correlation is shown by the trendline slope (solid line, m = 0.7445) compared to a perfect linear correlation (dotted line, m = 1).

Clofazimine, a potent inhibitor of Cryptosporidium asexual development

Validated compounds that had the greatest potency were all derived from the Bioactive compound collection comprised of known drugs and annotated compounds. The five most potent compounds against C. parvum were Gö6976 (EC50 = 2.5 nM; S1 Fig), monensin (EC50 = 7 nM), clofazimine (EC50 = 15 nM; Fig 4A), cyclosporine (EC50 = 48 nM), and MST-312 (EC50 = 61 nM). Three of these compounds were designed to target mammalian enzymes: Gö6976 is a potent inhibitor of protein kinase C (isotypes α and β) and of the tyrosine kinases JAK 2 and FLT3 [29, 30], whereas MST-312, also known as Telomerase Inhibitor IX, is a potent, reversible inhibitor of telomerase activity and arrests cells in the G0-G1 phase during the cell cycle [31]. Finally, cyclosporine is an inhibitor of the phosphatase activity of calcineurin with potent immunosuppressive properties that is indicated for graft-versus-host disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and other immune-related diseases [32]. The other two compounds, monensin and clofazimine (CFZ), are both antibiotics. Monensin is an ionophore antibiotic commonly added to cattle feed [33, 34] and CFZ is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of leprosy, a disease caused by chronic infection of the bacteria Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis. The inherent limitation of phenotypic screens prevents elucidation of whether the inhibition of C. parvum proliferation is attributable to modulation of the human host cell or to direct inhibition of a Cryptosporidium target. Regardless, Gö6976, MST-312, cyclosporine, and monensin all demonstrated a limited therapeutic index when activity against C. parvum was compared to toxicity for mammalian cell lines, or had undesirable effects, and these compounds were therefore deprioritized. The remaining compound, CFZ, is of particular interest based on a very good safety profile in humans with dosage regimens lasting up to three years [35].

Fig 4. In vitro characterization of CFZ.

(A) Chemical structure of CFZ. (B) CFZ inhibited C. parvum proliferation by ≥ 70% at every point of the asexual life cycle. The first asexual life cycle after infection was evenly divided into six 3-h blocks, and labeled as hours post infection (hpi). Infected cells were treated by one of four compounds at the EC99 for 3 h followed by drug washout, and then allowed to continue growing until 48 hpi, when they were fixed, stained, imaged, and analyzed for C. parvum proliferation. EC99 values: NTZ = 8 μM; FDU = 100 nM; CFZ = 30 nM; BKI-1294 = 2 μM. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments.

We further characterized CFZ in an assay evaluating the cidal activity throughout the parasite lifecycle. We examined short, three-hour compound treatments of in vitro cultures, followed by compound washout, that covered the complete asexual life cycle, believed to be 13–15 h post invasion [36]. The first treatment group had compound added to the cell monolayers 2 h prior to infection with C. parvum sporozoites from excysted oocysts. The treatment interval lasted 3 h before washout with fresh medium; infected cells were allowed to grow until 48 h post infection before fixation. We treated assay plates with NTZ, FDU, BKI-1294, and CFZ at their EC50, EC99, or 3×EC99 value at the designated intervals throughout the lifecycle (EC99 data shown; Fig 4B). Strikingly, CFZ inhibited parasite growth >75% at the EC99 at every time point, indicating that the effect of CFZ is irreversible within 3 h of treatment at any point throughout the parasite’s asexual life cycle. FDU, a cytotoxic pyrimidine analog, also showed strong inhibition of growth across all time points. Though FDU is generally cytotoxic, it has been previously shown to be a substrate of C. parvum thymidine kinase and inhibit C. parvum growth without affecting HCT-8 host cells [37]. Interestingly, both nitazoxanide and BKI-1294 showed the greatest effect on parasite growth at the end of the life cycle (10–13 h post infection), and at all other time points showed <60% inhibition, even when concentrations were increased to 3×EC99 (S2 Fig). As CFZ is very lipophilic, we sought to determine whether intracellular accumulation was affecting the strong inhibition across each time point. Upon pre-treatment with each compound in a dose-response titration, we observed that both FDU and CFZ were retained by host cells and exhibited near equipotent inhibition of C. parvum proliferation despite compound removal from the assay media by repeated washes (S3 Table). This retention effect likely contributes to the high inhibition of C. parvum proliferation observed at each time point in the washout assay. However, high retention, and subsequent high activity against parasite proliferation, may be a desirable property to promote high in vivo efficacy. The excellent activity profile of CFZ compared to BKI-1294 supported in vivo pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies in a mouse model of cryptosporidiosis.

In vivo pharmacokinetics and efficacy of clofazimine

CFZ has been reported to have two remarkable properties: a long drug half-life (~70 days) [38] and very high tissue distribution. This leads to a notable accumulation of CFZ throughout the body [39], including the skin, producing a strong but reversible pigmentation with chronic administration. In anticipation of advancing CFZ to a mouse model of cryptosporidiosis to determine its efficacy, we characterized the pharmacokinetic properties of this compound solubilized in corn oil or prepared as a suspension in methylcellulose and Tween 80 (MC-Tween). Healthy CD-1 mice dosed with 20 mg/kg CFZ (4 mg/mL) prepared in either formulation demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles. Plasma concentrations of CFZ peaked at 445 ± 61 ng/mL (corn oil) and 288 ± 2 ng/mL (MC-Tween) within the first 24 h after oral administration (Fig 5A). The extended biological half-life was evident as plasma concentrations remained stable for at least 20 hours after the initial maximal concentration. Mice dosed with an equivalent amount of BKI-1294 reached a higher peak (1282 ± 154 ng/mL), though the plasma concentration rapidly dropped to 6.7 ± 0.3 ng/mL within the first 24 h post dosing. Pharmacokinetic analysis was further extended to a three-day evaluation of CFZ and BKI-1294 elimination in the feces and urine of mice following a single oral dose. Within the first 24 h after oral administration, the mean (± SEM) fecal excretion was 14.8% ± 3.1% for CFZ in corn oil and 25.7% ± 13.3% for CFZ in MC-Tween, while BKI-1294 was only excreted unchanged at 8.9% ± 0.5% (Fig 5B). Continued evaluation of feces for the next 48 h showed mean excretion values < 2% for either formulation of CFZ. Parallel collection and analysis of urine over the first 48 h period revealed < 0.15% of the CFZ dosage versus 1.6% of BKI-1294 excreted in the urine (S3 Fig). In the absence of a clearly defined pharmacokinetic profile for anticryptosporidial compounds, we surmise that the detectable presence of CFZ in the feces confirms CFZ exposure throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract.

Fig 5. Pharmacokinetic properties of CFZ.

(A) Plasma concentration of CFZ or BKI-1294 in mice dosed with 20 mg/kg compound. CFZ was formulated in either corn oil (black) or MC-Tween (gray); BKI-1294 was formulated in 7% Tween 80, 3% ethanol, and 90% water (white). Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Unchanged CFZ or BKI-1294 recovered in the feces of mice dosed in (A). Recovery was measured each day for three days. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3).

The juvenile IFNγ-/- mouse is susceptible to C. parvum infection via the oral route [40]. Despite the previously reported lethality, in our hands, C. parvum-infected IFNγ-/- mice remained overtly asymptomatic, with infection marked by an acute period of intense oocyst shedding (3- to 8-days post infection (p.i.); reproducibly peaking at approximately one thousand oocysts per milligram of feces). This reproducible fecal oocyst shedding was measured by flow cytometry to quantify therapeutic efficacy of CFZ benchmarked against the recently published anticryptosporidial compound BKI-1294 (Fig 6A). Three daily oral doses of 10 mg/kg were given over a three-day period beginning at the onset of high-level oocyst shedding (day 4 p.i.). Within 24 h of the end of treatment (day 7), BKI-1294 had reduced oocyst shedding to 18.1% ± 2.2% of mock-dosed mice, while CFZ treatment reduced shedding to below 1% of the control group and below the reliable limit of detection (Fig 6A, inset). Rapid efficacy of CFZ was evident. Within two days of the treatment onset, shedding was reduced to 2.5% ± 1.7% of the control group, suggesting that single-dose treatment might be efficacious. To evaluate the potential for single-dose efficacy, mice were orally gavaged with an augmented infective titer of C. parvum (1×106 oocysts) and treated with one 100 mg/kg oral dose of CFZ on day 4 (Fig 6B). A rapid reduction in oocyst shedding was observed for the CFZ group, with counts decreasing to the reliable limit of detection by the second day after treatment (1.5% ± 0.4% of mock-treated mice; Fig 6B, inset). In contrast, the control group of mice continued shedding close to 1×103 oocysts per milligram of feces with the gradual onset of self-resolution not apparent until day 8 p.i. (4 days post treatment).

Fig 6. CFZ is efficacious in a mouse model of acute cryptosporidiosis.

Fecal oocyst recovery from IFN-γ-/- mice commenced three days after oral delivery of C. parvum oocysts. Line graph data are weight-adjusted mean oocyst counts ± SD (n = 4); inset bar graphs are mean % recovery relative to mock-treated control mice ± SEM (n = 4). (A) Mice were infected with 104 oocysts then treated orally with 10 mg/kg BKI-1294 (light gray) or CFZ (dark gray) on days 4, 5, and 6 p.i. Dotted line is the reliable limit of detection. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to determine significance between mice treated with compound vs mice treated with vehicle: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. (B) Mice were infected with 106 oocysts then treated orally with a single dose of 100 mg/kg CFZ on day 4. Multiple Student’s t-tests were used to determine significance between vehicle-treated and CFZ-treated mice: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.


Phenotypic screens have been used extensively for neglected tropical diseases to spearhead drug discovery efforts and generate tool compounds for chemical biology. Here we describe the automation and miniaturization of a previously established high-content imaging phenotypic assay to identify 12 anticryptosporidial compounds. The ultimate objective of this work is to discover novel leads for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis and to identify diverse small molecules with anticryptosporidial activity that may become valuable chemical probes to study Cryptosporidium biology. The most promising hit compound, clofazimine (CFZ), is an FDA-approved riminophenazine antibiotic used for the treatment of leprosy that is recognized by the World Health Organization as an essential medicine. The discovery of CFZ as an anticryptosporidial compound, and the subsequent demonstration of efficacy in a mouse model of acute cryptosporidiosis has provided a novel chemical tool to help study and define the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that drive in vivo efficacy, and a potential drug repurposing candidate for the treatment of human cryptosporidiosis.

Aside from CFZ, the ability to prioritize anticryptosporidial screening hit compounds currently presents a challenge because a consensus profile of predictive in vitro ADME and in vivo pharmacokinetic characteristics has yet to be established. Recent insights from Gorla et al. [26] showed that in vivo efficacy of C. parvum inosine-5’-monophosphate dehydrogenase (CpIMPDH) inhibitors correlated well with the compounds’ uptake and intracellular accumulation in Caco-2 cells, an established model for human intestinal epithelial cells. Conversely, high Caco-2 permeability and systemic exposure in blood plasma within this series had no correlation to efficacy in a mouse model of acute cryptosporidiosis. While these correlations are rational given the intestinal pathogenesis of this parasite, validation for whether intestinal bioaccumulation is a general characteristic of efficacious anticryptosporidial compounds or a specific driver of efficacy for the CpIMPDH inhibitor series evaluated by Gorla et al. remains to be determined. To this end, the in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles of CFZ become of considerable interest.

CFZ is known to have limited oral bioavailability, requiring it to be encapsulated as a micronized suspension in a lipid-wax base (Lamprene®; Novartis) to promote higher absorption in the treatment of the Mycobacterium spp. responsible for leprosy. Its non-optimal systemic exposure has been particularly restrictive for the development of CFZ in the treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis [41]. While compounds for the treatment of tuberculosis require high systemic exposure, this same pharmacokinetic property may not be a limitation for the treatment of Cryptosporidium infections, which primarily affect the epithelium of the small intestine. The intestinal permeability and high lipophilicity of CFZ ensures retention and exposure throughout the gastrointestinal tract, reportedly leading to the highest deposition of CFZ in the jejunum and ileum [39]. Furthermore, the high bioaccumulation in the small intestine and limited compound solubility can lead to crystalline-like CFZ deposits within the cytoplasm of macrophages [42] and intestinal epithelial cells. These intestinal epithelial crystalline-like CFZ deposits are observed with as few as five doses of 200 mg/kg administered over a two-week period in a mouse model [43]. Chronic dosing (8 weeks at ~10 mg/kg/day in mice) has also been shown to lead to CFZ distribution and bioaccumulation in the mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen and fatty tissue [39]. Whereas the selective partitioning of CFZ into specific tissues may be limiting for the treatment of systemic disease, these properties appear to be favorable for efficacy against C. parvum in a mouse model of acute cryptosporidiosis.

We have not as yet established whether CFZ directly targets a parasitic pathway or modulates a host-mediated pathway essential to parasite proliferation. However, the differential in vitro activity between C. parvum (EC50 = 15 nM) and C. hominis (EC50 = 340 nM) assayed in the same in vitro host cell line are suggestive of a parasite-directed mechanism. Interestingly, CFZ has been noted to have both antibiotic and anti-inflammatory effects, and perhaps not surprisingly, it does not have a clearly defined mechanism of action (MOA) associated with either activity. CFZ has been implicated in the disruption of the Kv1.3 potassium channel, suggesting a potential mechanism by which CFZ selectively modulates immunosuppression involving Kv1.3-expressing T cells [44]. Mechanistic studies in mycobacterium suggest CFZ may directly compete with menaquinone, an essential cofactor of the electron transfer chain [45]. Interestingly, Cryptosporidium has a unique, atypical mitochondrial assembly and genes encoding proteins for electron transport or oxidative phosphorylation have yet to be identified [46]. Previously no known homologs to human potassium voltage-gated (Kv) channels have been identified in the relevant Cryptosporidium spp. [47], thus confounding the mechanism by which CFZ may inhibit parasite proliferation.

Regardless of a defined MOA, its status as an FDA-approved drug and over four decades of use for the treatment of leprosy warrants further investigation of CFZ as a possible repurposing candidate for treatment of cryptosporidiosis. Recently, a target product profile (TPP) for an anticryptosporidial compound was proposed by Huston et al. [48] and highlights the need for a short dosing regimen (< 7 days) and formulations for young children (0–24 months). CFZ has a long history of use and has demonstrated a good safety profile for a disease that requires chronic dosing for a period of time ranging 3–36 months. The safety profile for young children and infants is not yet well defined and will require additional investigation. However, the targeted dosing regimen of < 7 days is a fraction of the minimal time frame for which this drug is administered to leprosy patients, and the once-daily oral administration of 10 mg/kg CFZ for three days in a mouse model of cryptosporidiosis is likely to translate favorably to human treatment. Importantly, it may be possible that all three doses could be delivered within a single 12 to 24–hour period to achieve rapid efficacy, comparable to the single-dose cure. The differential activity of CFZ between Cryptosporidium spp. raises an additional consideration that will require testing to determine the dose and regimen to treat C. hominis. These parameters will continue to be relevant as CFZ is evaluated in cryptosporidiosis clinical trials, and as the remaining 11 hits from this screen are investigated for further preclinical development.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol (S13013) was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, San Diego (Animal Welfare Assurance Number: A3033-01). All efforts were made to minimize suffering of animals employed in this study.

Experimental compounds

Two compound libraries were assayed against Cryptosporidium parvum in vitro. The first, the Bioactives Set, was a compilation of 10,453 known bioactive compounds, including approved drugs and annotated tool compounds. The second was a diversity set designed by the University of Dundee Drug Discovery Unit, generously gifted for screening against C. parvum, totaling 68,689 unique drug-like compounds. The Global Health Chemical Diversity Library is a lead-like diversity library prepared for screening against the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation priority pathogens. The compounds were commercially sourced from reputable vendors, selected to have lead-like physicochemical properties, enhanced Fsp3 character, enrichment in novel chemotypes, and filtered to remove unwanted groups. 200 compounds from this library were not tested due to insufficient source volume or transfer failures. Data from the GHCDL portion of the screen will be made available online from the University of Dundee Drug Discovery Unit, published at ChEMBL-Neglected Tropical Disease ( Resupplied compounds for confirmation were high-purity powders (> 95% purity) from Selleck Chemicals, Calbiochem, Ambinter, Enzo Life Sciences, NCI, ChemDiv, or Life Chemicals. Screen control compounds were 30 μM nitazoxanide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5 μM floxuridine (Sigma-Aldrich) as controls for C. parvum inhibition, and 10 μM puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for host cell cytotoxicity. Clofazimine (USP reference standard) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All source plates were 384-well acoustic transfer-compatible plates (Labcyte) with compounds pre-diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at either 1 mM (Bioactives) or 2 mM (all others). For single-point testing, compounds were transferred into 1536-well tissue culture-treated, black-walled, clear-bottomed, low base microwell plates (Greiner) with an ECHO liquid handler (Labcyte) to a final concentration of 1.88 μM. For dose-response testing, compounds were serially diluted 1:3 in 11-points and then transferred into triplicate 1536-well plates, with a top concentration of 12.5 μM. Primary screening was done with a single replicate, whereas single-point reconfirmation and dose-response testing was carried out in triplicate (3 technical replicates). The number of biological replicates for filtered hits is indicated in S2 Table.

HCT-8 host cell culture

Human ileocecal adenocarcinoma (HCT-8; ATCC CCL244) cells were maintained in T-75 tissue culture flasks with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with L-glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI-FBS), 100 IU penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. At confluency, cells were trypsinized, washed, and resuspended in assay medium: RPMI 1640 (-) phenol red, supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated horse serum (ATCC), 100 IU penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Cells were then plated (5 μL/well) into 1536-well assay plates at a density of 5.5×105 cells/mL (2,750 cells/well). Cells were allowed to grow for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified tissue culture incubator.

Cryptosporidium infection of HCT-8 cells

C. parvum oocysts (Iowa strain, isolated from infected calves) were purchased from the Sterling Parasitology Laboratory, University of Arizona, and stored at 4°C for ≤ 3 months in an antibiotic solution (0.01% Tween 20 containing 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL gentamicin). C. hominis oocysts (TU502, isolated from gnotobiotic piglets) were purchased from the Tzipori Laboratory, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, and stored at 4°C for ≤ 2 weeks in an antibiotic solution (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin). For infection of assay plates, 24 h after cell seeding, oocysts were excysted and prepared for inoculation as previously described [49]. Briefly, the oocysts were diluted into 1 mL pre-warmed 10 mM HCl and then incubated in a 37°C water bath for 10 min. Oocysts were then pelleted at 3,000×g for 1 min in a microcentrifuge (Thermo), and the supernatant was carefully aspirated. Oocysts were resuspended in 2 mM sodium taurocholate in DPBS++ (with 0.9 mM CaCl2 and 0.5 mM MgCl2) and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. After incubation in bile salts, the oocysts were diluted 1:100 and free sporozoites and intact oocysts were enumerated to determine the percentage of excystation. The oocysts were then diluted with assay medium to 1.04×106 oocysts/mL (3,125 oocysts/well) and dispensed (3 μL/well, 8 μL/well final volume) with a MultiFlo FX Multi-Mode Dispenser (Biotek). Plates were then spun at 150×g for 3 min in a Sorvall Legend XTR benchtop centrifuge (Thermo). Infected cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified tissue culture incubator covered with metal assay lids (The Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation) for 48 h.

High-content imaging of Cryptosporidium proliferation

Following incubation, infected cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Plates were then washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Prior to staining, cells were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for a maximum of 15 min at room temperature, and then washed twice with PBS-T (1× PBS with 0.1% Tween 20). To prevent non-specific binding, the cells were blocked with SuperBlock T20 blocking agent (Thermo) for 1 h at room temperature. Cryptosporidium parasites were stained with 1 μg/mL fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Vicia villosa lectin (Vector Laboratories) in 1:10 diluted SuperBlock in PBS-T, supplemented with 3 μM 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to visualize host cell nuclei. Staining was for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Finally, cells were washed twice with PBS-T and the plates were sealed with adhesive foil. The plates were imaged with a CellInsight CX5 High Content Screening Platform (Thermo) with a 10× objective. Two channels were used: 384/440 nm for DAPI-stained nuclei, and 485/521 nm for FITC-lectin-labeled Cryptosporidium parasites. For 1536-well format assays (primary screening, triplicate reconfirmation, and dose-response reconfirmation, one microscopic field (802,511.39 μm2) per well, and for the 384-well washout assay, 4 fields per well were captured. The software identified primary objects (HCT-8 host cells) and spots within allowed distances to the nuclei (Cryptosporidium). Both cytotoxicity against HCT-8 cells (number of nuclei relative to DMSO-treated controls) and Cryptosporidium inhibition (spot counts relative to DMSO-treated controls) were assessed.

Data analysis

Images were processed by the HCS Studio Scan software, and Selected Object Count (HCT-8 cells) and Spot Count (Cryptosporidium) were analyzed in Genedata Screener (v13.0-Standard). Spot Count and Selected Object Count were normalized to neutral controls minus inhibitors (floxuridine for Spot Count, and puromycin for Selected Object Count). For single-point primary assay plates, an additional run-wise median correction was applied to reduce screen artifacts (e.g. uneven dispense), whereas no correction was applied to triplicate reconfirmation and dose-response plates. For primary screening, a compound is considered a hit by a ≥ 70% reduction in Corrected Spot Count. Compounds that caused moderate cytotoxicity were filtered out (i.e., excluding all Corrected Selected Object Counts ≤ -60%). Dose-response curves were fit with Genedata Analyzer using the Smart Fit function. Final filtered hits included those with an EC50 (half-maximal effective concentration) ≤ 1 μM, with a CC50 (half-maximal cytotoxic concentration) ≥ 10-fold greater than the EC50 value.

Mammalian cell cytotoxicity assays

Two mammalian cell lines were used for counter-screening for general cytotoxicity of hit compounds: human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T; ATCC CRL-3216) and human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2; ATCC HB-8065). Each were maintained in T-150 tissue culture flasks with DMEM supplemented with 10% HI-FBS, 100 IU penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. At 80% confluency, cells were trypsinized, washed, and resuspended in assay medium: DMEM supplemented with 2% HI-FBS, 100 IU penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Compounds were pre-spotted into tissue culture-treated white solid-bottomed 1536-well plates (Greiner) in a 1:3 dose-response dilution (top concentration 20 μM). HEK293T and HepG2 cells were diluted to 75×103 cells/mL and 150×103 cells/mL, respectively, and 5 μL/well were dispensed into assay plates with a MultiFlo FX Multi-Mode Dispenser (Biotek). Cells were incubated with metal lids (The Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation) at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified tissue culture incubator for 72 h. At the completion of the assay, CellTiter-Glo (Promega) was prepared at 1:2 (reagent:water) of the manufacturer’s instructions, and 2 μL were dispensed into each well. After a 5 min incubation at room temperature, luminescence readings were measured with an EnVision Multilabel Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer). Relative fluorescence units were uploaded into Genedata Screener (v13.0-Standard), and data normalized to DMSO- and puromycin-treated wells. A four-parameter non-linear regression curve fit was applied to dose-response data using Genedata to determine the half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) of each compound.

Washout assay

Infected cells were treated in six 3-h increments over the course of 15 h (the presumed in vitro asexual lifecycle of C. parvum). HCT-8 cells were seeded (25 μL/well) into clear-bottomed 384-well plates (Greiner) at a density of 6.0×105 cells/mL (15,000 cells/well) in assay medium, and allowed to grow 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified tissue culture incubator, covered with a custom metal lid (The Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation) to reduce evaporation. After 24 h, and 2 h before infecting with C. parvum oocysts (time -2 hpi), the treatment time course was initiated. Compounds (NTZ, FDU, BKI-1294, and CFZ) were used at their EC50, EC99, and 3×EC99 value to determine the extent of parasite proliferation inhibition resulting from a 3-h exposure to each compound. DMSO was used as a negative control. Cell medium was removed from designated wells and replaced with medium containing either compound or DMSO. At time 0 (infection), C. parvum (Iowa strain) oocysts were excysted as above, diluted in assay medium to 1.04×106 oocysts/mL (15,625 oocysts/well) and dispensed (15 μL/well, 40 μL/well final volume). Plates were then spun at 150×g for 3 min, and kept at 37°C with 5% CO2 in a humidified tissue culture incubator during drug treatment intervals. At the end of each 3 h time point, infected cells were carefully washed three times with fresh, pre-warmed assay medium, and the next set of wells for the subsequent time point were treated. The final time point extended to 18 h, to cover re-invasion of merozoites into new HCT-8 cells. After the final compound treatment was washed off, infected cells were allowed to grow until 48 h post infection.

To examine if cellular accumulation of compound was inhibiting parasite proliferation, host cells were pretreated for 3 h with NTZ, FDU, BKI-1294, or CFZ (in 1:3 11pt dose-response; top concentrations were 30 μM for NTZ; 0.5 μM for FDU; 12.5 μM for BKI-1294 and CFZ), washed, and then infected with C. parvum. A set of parallel wells were also treated and not washed prior to infection. 48 hpi, infected cells were imaged as described above, and EC50s for each compound pre- and post-wash were determined.

Pharmacokinetic studies of clofazimine in mice

Male CD-1 fasted mice (three per group) were dosed per os with 20 mg/kg CFZ, formulated at 4 mg/mL in either 100% corn oil or 0.5% methylcellulose/0.5% Tween 80, or 20 mg/kg BKI-1294 formulated at 4 mg/mL in 7% Tween 80, 3% ethanol, and 90% water, and then monitored for plasma concentration, renal excretion, fecal excretion, as well as other clinical markers of adverse events (severe weight loss, lethargy, hunched posture, social isolation) for a total of 72 h.

Mouse cryptosporidiosis model

Four week old female C57BL/6 IFNγ-/- mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and acclimated for four to ten days in specific pathogen-free conditions in the Health Sciences Biomedical Research Facility at the University of California, San Diego. Mice were provided water and chow (Teklad 2920X) ad libitum. For inoculation, C. parvum oocysts were adjusted to a final density of 5×104/mL in cold, sterile, distilled water. Mice were infected via oral gavage with 200 μL (104 oocysts) using a 20G×1.5” feeding needle. On days 4, 5, and 6 post-infection, mice were gavaged with 10 mL/kg clofazimine (USP reference standard, Sigma Aldrich) solubilized in food-grade corn oil. Treatment regimens included 10 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 0 mg/kg (vehicle only; n = 4 per group). Certain assays also involved gavage of characterized anticryptosporidial BKI-1294 (a kind gift from W. Van Voorhis, U Washington), administered at 10 mg/kg mouse as a 10 mL/kg emulsified suspension in 0.5% methylcellulose + 0.5% Tween-80. At intervals between 3 and 30 days post-infection mice were weighed and temporarily placed in isolation to allow for collection of feces (3 pellets/mouse/sampling point). Pellets were weighed and placed in 0.5 mL 2.5% potassium dichromate solution, and stored at 4°C until processing.

Quantitative detection of fecal oocyst load

Oocysts were extracted via a modified discontinuous sucrose gradient technique [50]. Briefly, Sheather’s solution was freshly prepared by dissolving 156.25 g sucrose and 2.5 mL phenol in 100 mL water. Fecal pellets were removed from storage then homogenized by vortexing and pipetting. In microcentrifuge tubes, 0.2 mL fecal homogenate was overlaid on 0.75 mL of solution with a specific gravity of 1.064 (20% Sheather’s and 0.1% Tween 80 in PBS), overlaid on 0.75 mL of solution with a specific gravity of 1.103 (33% Sheather’s and 0.1% Tween 80 in PBS). Oocysts were floated from feces by centrifugation at 1,000×g for 20 min and collected with a pipet tip from the 1.064/1.103 specific gravity interface. Oocysts were rinsed once in cold PBS, pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000×g for 10 min, and resuspended in PBS. 50 μL aliquots were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with 0.25 μg fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated mouse anti-Cryptosporidium antibody (OW50-FITC, BioRad 2402–3007), then diluted to 200 μL with PBS. Samples were analyzed using a Guava EasyCyte flow cytometer and CytoSoft Data Acquisition and Analysis software (v5.3; Guava Technologies, Inc.), using a 100 s sampling interval, 0.59 μL/s flow rate, and logical gating of forward and side light scatter and OW50-FITC fluorescence signals. Each experimental run included positive and negative controls to calibrate region settings discriminating the oocyst-FITC population from background signals. Oocyst counts/mL sample values were exported to Excel (Microsoft Corp.) for normalization to counts/mg feces. Final graphing and statistical analyses of data were done using GraphPad Prism software (v6, GraphPad Software, Inc.). Two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction (Fig 4A) and unpaired multiple t-tests with False Discovery Rate approach (Fig 4B) were performed on % Vehicle data to determine significance between vehicle-treated and compound-treated mice.

Supporting information

S2 Table. Activities of 12 filtered hits against Cryptosporidium spp., host cells, and mammalian cytotoxicity lines.

Screening controls, BKI-1294, and 12 filtered hits from both libraries. Compounds from Bioactives and GHCDL are sorted by potency against C. parvum.


S3 Table. Accumulation of clofazimine from pre-treatment of host cells inhibits C. parvum growth.

Both floxuridine and clofazimine exhibit activity even after washout, indicating that an adequate amount of compound accumulated in host-cells to affect parasite proliferation within the 48 h assay timeframe.


S1 Fig. Structures of top screening hits.

The five most potent compounds against C. parvum were from the Bioactive library: Gö6976 (EC50 = 2.5 nM), monensin (EC50 = 7.0 nM), clofazimine (EC50 = 15 nM; Fig 4A), cyclosporine (EC50 = 48 nM), and MST-312 (EC50 = 61 nM). GHCDL-1 (EC50 = 1.42 μM) and GHCDL-2 (EC50 = 293 nM) were the only two hits that reconfirmed from the GHCDL with an EC50 ≤ 1 μM and CC50/EC50 ≥ 10-fold upon initial reconfirmation testing.


S2 Fig. Washout data of clofazimine and controls at their EC50 and 3×EC99.

The first asexual life cycle after infection was evenly divided into six 3-h blocks, and labeled as hours post infection (hpi). Infected cells were treated by one of four compounds at either the EC50 (A) or 3×EC99 (B) for 3 h followed by drug washout, and then allowed to continue growing until 48 hpi, when they were fixed, stained, imaged, and analyzed for C. parvum proliferation. EC50, 3×EC99 values: NTZ = 2.8 μM, 24 μM; FDU = 17 nM, 300 nM; CFZ = 15 nM, 90 nM; BKI-1294 = 400 nM, 6 μM. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments.


S3 Fig. Percent recovery of clofazimine and BKI-1294 in urine.

Unchanged CFZ formulated in either corn oil (solution) or MC-Tween (suspension), or BKI-1294 recovered in the urine of mice dosed in Fig 5. Recovery was measured each day for three days. Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3).



We would like to thank the University of Dundee Drug Discovery Unit for design and supply of the Global Health Chemical Diversity Set. Execution of the high-content screen was expertly enabled by Calibr’s HTS team and Compound Management Group. In addition, we thank the following for contributing to the development of the mouse cryptosporidiosis mouse model: Dr. Elizabeth Winzeler for providing initial access and support to a BSL2-level vivarium to establish this model, Dr. Jan Meade for guidance on the purification of C. parvum oocysts from mouse feces, and Dr. Wes Van Voorhis’ gift of BKI-1294 which proved to be invaluable for assay validation. We are also grateful to both the Sterling Laboratory (University of Arizona) and the Tzipori Laboratory (Tufts University) for providing Cryptosporidium oocysts for these studies.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: MSL FCB RSJ TMW AKC CDH PGS CWM.
  2. Data curation: MSL FCB.
  3. Formal analysis: MSL FCB.
  4. Funding acquisition: PGS.
  5. Investigation: MSL FCB.
  6. Methodology: MSL FCB RSJ CDH CWM.
  7. Project administration: CDH PGS CWM.
  8. Supervision: CWM.
  9. Validation: MSL FCB.
  10. Visualization: MSL.
  11. Writing – original draft: MSL FCB CWM.
  12. Writing – review & editing: MSL FCB RSJ TMW AKC CDH PGS CWM.


  1. 1. Fayer R. Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Veterinary parasitology. 2004;126(1–2):37–56. pmid:15567578
  2. 2. Vakil NB, Schwartz SM, Buggy BP, Brummitt CF, Kherellah M, Letzer DM, et al. Biliary cryptosporidiosis in HIV-infected people after the waterborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Milwaukee. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(1):19–23. pmid:7494565
  3. 3. Lopez-Velez R, Tarazona R, Garcia Camacho A, Gomez-Mampaso E, Guerrero A, Moreira V, et al. Intestinal and extraintestinal cryptosporidiosis in AIDS patients. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 1995;14(8):677–81.
  4. 4. Collinet-Adler S, Ward HD. Cryptosporidiosis: environmental, therapeutic, and preventive challenges. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2010;29(8):927–35.
  5. 5. Tzipori S, Ward H. Cryptosporidiosis: biology, pathogenesis and disease. Microbes Infect. 2002;4(10):1047–58. pmid:12191655
  6. 6. CDC. Parasites—Cryptosporidium (also known as "Crypto"): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [updated 08/05/2015; cited 2016 08/31].
  7. 7. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. pmid:23680352
  8. 8. Platts-Mills JA, Babji S, Bodhidatta L, Gratz J, Haque R, Havt A, et al. Pathogen-specific burdens of community diarrhoea in developing countries: a multisite birth cohort study (MAL-ED). The Lancet Global health. 2015;3(9):e564–75. pmid:26202075
  9. 9. Dillingham RA, Lima AA, Guerrant RL. Cryptosporidiosis: epidemiology and impact. Microbes Infect. 2002;4(10):1059–66. pmid:12191656
  10. 10. Fayer R, Morgan U, Upton SJ. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30(12–13):1305–22. pmid:11113257
  11. 11. Mbae CK, Nokes DJ, Mulinge E, Nyambura J, Waruru A, Kariuki S. Intestinal parasitic infections in children presenting with diarrhoea in outpatient and inpatient settings in an informal settlement of Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:243. pmid:23705776
  12. 12. Gatei W, Wamae CN, Mbae C, Waruru A, Mulinge E, Waithera T, et al. Cryptosporidiosis: prevalence, genotype analysis, and symptoms associated with infections in children in Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(1):78–82. pmid:16837712
  13. 13. Tellevik MG, Moyo SJ, Blomberg B, Hjollo T, Maselle SY, Langeland N, et al. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis, Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia among Young Children with and without Diarrhea in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(10):e0004125. pmid:26452235
  14. 14. Shirley DA, Moonah SN, Kotloff KL. Burden of disease from cryptosporidiosis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(5):555–63. pmid:22907279
  15. 15. Guerrant RL, DeBoer MD, Moore SR, Scharf RJ, Lima AA. The impoverished gut—a triple burden of diarrhoea, stunting and chronic disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(4):220–9. pmid:23229327
  16. 16. Alinia™. [Package insert]. Tampa, FL: Romark Pharmaceuticals; 2007.
  17. 17. Sparks H, Nair G, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, White AC Jr. Treatment of Cryptosporidium: What We Know, Gaps, and the Way Forward. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2015;2(3):181–7. pmid:26568906
  18. 18. Cabada MM, White AC Jr. Treatment of cryptosporidiosis: do we know what we think we know? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010;23(5):494–9. pmid:20689422
  19. 19. Amadi B, Mwiya M, Sianongo S, Payne L, Watuka A, Katubulushi M, et al. High dose prolonged treatment with nitazoxanide is not effective for cryptosporidiosis in HIV positive Zambian children: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:195. pmid:19954529
  20. 20. Bessoff K, Sateriale A, Lee KK, Huston CD. Drug repurposing screen reveals FDA-approved inhibitors of human HMG-CoA reductase and isoprenoid synthesis that block Cryptosporidium parvum growth. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013;57(4):1804–14. pmid:23380723
  21. 21. Bessoff K, Spangenberg T, Foderaro JE, Jumani RS, Ward GE, Huston CD. Identification of Cryptosporidium parvum active chemical series by Repurposing the open access malaria box. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2014;58(5):2731–9. pmid:24566188
  22. 22. Fritzler JM, Zhu G. Novel anti-Cryptosporidium activity of known drugs identified by high-throughput screening against parasite fatty acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP). The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012;67(3):609–17. pmid:22167242
  23. 23. Castellanos-Gonzalez A, White AC Jr., Ojo KK, Vidadala RS, Zhang Z, Reid MC, et al. A novel calcium-dependent protein kinase inhibitor as a lead compound for treating cryptosporidiosis. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2013;208(8):1342–8. pmid:23878324
  24. 24. Ojo KK, Larson ET, Keyloun KR, Castaneda LJ, Derocher AE, Inampudi KK, et al. Toxoplasma gondii calcium-dependent protein kinase 1 is a target for selective kinase inhibitors. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2010;17(5):602–7.
  25. 25. Kato N, Sakata T, Breton G, Le Roch KG, Nagle A, Andersen C, et al. Gene expression signatures and small-molecule compounds link a protein kinase to Plasmodium falciparum motility. Nature chemical biology. 2008;4(6):347–56. pmid:18454143
  26. 26. Gorla SK, McNair NN, Yang G, Gao S, Hu M, Jala VR, et al. Validation of IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors in a mouse model of cryptosporidiosis. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2014;58(3):1603–14. pmid:24366728
  27. 27. Yarlett N, Waters WR, Harp JA, Wannemuehler MJ, Morada M, Bellcastro J, et al. Activities of DL-alpha-difluoromethylarginine and polyamine analogues against Cryptosporidium parvum infection in a T-cell receptor alpha-deficient mouse model. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2007;51(4):1234–9. pmid:17242149
  28. 28. Sheoran A, Wiffin A, Widmer G, Singh P, Tzipori S. Infection with Cryptosporidium hominis provides incomplete protection of the host against Cryptosporidium parvum. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2012;205(6):1019–23. pmid:22279124
  29. 29. Martiny-Baron G, Kazanietz MG, Mischak H, Blumberg PM, Kochs G, Hug H, et al. Selective inhibition of protein kinase C isozymes by the indolocarbazole Go 6976. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1993;268(13):9194–7. pmid:8486620
  30. 30. Grandage VL, Everington T, Linch DC, Khwaja A. Go6976 is a potent inhibitor of the JAK 2 and FLT3 tyrosine kinases with significant activity in primary acute myeloid leukaemia cells. British journal of haematology. 2006;135(3):303–16. pmid:16956345
  31. 31. Seimiya H, Oh-hara T, Suzuki T, Naasani I, Shimazaki T, Tsuchiya K, et al. Telomere shortening and growth inhibition of human cancer cells by novel synthetic telomerase inhibitors MST-312, MST-295, and MST-1991. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2002;1(9):657–65. pmid:12479362
  32. 32. Matsuda S, Koyasu S. Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine. Immunopharmacology. 2000;47(2–3):119–25. pmid:10878286
  33. 33. Brumbaugh GW, Edwards JF, Roussel AJ Jr., Thomson TD. Effect of monensin sodium on histological lesions of naturally occurring bovine paratuberculosis. Journal of comparative pathology. 2000;123(1):22–8. pmid:10906252
  34. 34. Mollenhauer HH, Morre DJ, Rowe LD. Alteration of intracellular traffic by monensin; mechanism, specificity and relationship to toxicity. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1990;1031(2):225–46. pmid:2160275
  35. 35. Li W, Ye G, Yang Z, Tao M, Luo J, Wang C, et al. Effect of three-year multidrug therapy in multibacillary leprosy patients. Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and the Peking Union Medical College = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh yuan, Chung-kuo hsieh ho i k'o ta hsueh hsueh pao. 1990;5(1):37–40. pmid:2371263
  36. 36. Tzipori S. W G. The Biology of Cryptosporidium. In: P F., editor. Contributions to Microbiology. 6. Basel: Karger; 2000. p. 1–32. pmid:10943505
  37. 37. Sun XE, Sharling L, Muthalagi M, Mudeppa DG, Pankiewicz KW, Felczak K, et al. Prodrug activation by Cryptosporidium thymidine kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285(21):15916–22. pmid:20231284
  38. 38. Holdiness MR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of clofazimine. A review. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1989;16(2):74–85. pmid:2656045
  39. 39. Baik J, Stringer KA, Mane G, Rosania GR. Multiscale distribution and bioaccumulation analysis of clofazimine reveals a massive immune system-mediated xenobiotic sequestration response. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2013;57(3):1218–30. pmid:23263006
  40. 40. You X, Mead JR. Characterization of experimental Cryptosporidium parvum infection in IFN-gamma knockout mice. Parasitology. 1998;117(Pt 6):525–31.
  41. 41. Cholo MC, Steel HC, Fourie PB, Germishuizen WA, Anderson R. Clofazimine: current status and future prospects. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2012;67(2):290–8. pmid:22020137
  42. 42. Baik J, Rosania GR. Macrophages sequester clofazimine in an intracellular liquid crystal-like supramolecular organization. PloS one. 2012;7(10):e47494. pmid:23071814
  43. 43. Levine S, Saltzman A. Clofazimine enteropathy: possible relation to Peyer's patches. International journal of leprosy and other mycobacterial diseases: official organ of the International Leprosy Association. 1986;54(3):392–8.
  44. 44. Faouzi M, Starkus J, Penner R. State-dependent blocking mechanism of Kv 1.3 channels by the antimycobacterial drug clofazimine. British journal of pharmacology. 2015;172(21):5161–73. pmid:26276903
  45. 45. Lechartier B, Cole ST. Mode of Action of Clofazimine and Combination Therapy with Benzothiazinones against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2015;59(8):4457–63. pmid:25987624
  46. 46. Henriquez FL, Richards TA, Roberts F, McLeod R, Roberts CW. The unusual mitochondrial compartment of Cryptosporidium parvum. Trends in parasitology. 2005;21(2):68–74. pmid:15664529
  47. 47. Prole DL, Marrion NV. Identification of putative potassium channel homologues in pathogenic protozoa. PloS one. 2012;7(2):e32264. pmid:22363819
  48. 48. Huston CD, Spangenberg T, Burrows J, Willis P, Wells TN, van Voorhis W. A Proposed Target Product Profile and Developmental Cascade for New Cryptosporidiosis Treatments. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(10):e0003987. pmid:26447884
  49. 49. Gut J, Nelson RG. Cryptosporidium parvum: synchronized excystation in vitro and evaluation of sporozoite infectivity with a new lectin-based assay. The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. 1999;46(5):56s–7s. pmid:10519247
  50. 50. Arrowood MJ, Sterling CR. Isolation of Cryptosporidium oocysts and sporozoites using discontinuous sucrose and isopycnic Percoll gradients. The Journal of parasitology. 1987;73(2):314–9. pmid:3585626