Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Responsible Use of Pop Culture and Communication in the Face of Ebola Virus

  • Brandon Brown ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Brandon Brown, Melissa Nasiruddin, Alexander Dao, Monique Halabi

    brandon.brown@ucr.edu

    Affiliation University of California, Irvine Program in Public Health, Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention, Irvine, California, United States of America

  • Melissa Nasiruddin ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Brandon Brown, Melissa Nasiruddin, Alexander Dao, Monique Halabi

    Affiliation Midwestern University, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, Arizona, United States of America

  • Alexander Dao ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Brandon Brown, Melissa Nasiruddin, Alexander Dao, Monique Halabi

    Affiliation A.T. Still University, School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mesa, Arizona, United States of America

  • Monique Halabi

    Contributed equally to this work with: Brandon Brown, Melissa Nasiruddin, Alexander Dao, Monique Halabi

    Affiliation California State University Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

Responsible Use of Pop Culture and Communication in the Face of Ebola Virus

  • Brandon Brown, 
  • Melissa Nasiruddin, 
  • Alexander Dao, 
  • Monique Halabi
PLOS
x

Introduction

Tense music and flashy title cards on the evening news instill a sense of impending doom as we learn that the number of persons infected by Ebola is estimated to reach the millions in a matter of weeks [1]. Disheveled scientists in white coats spit microbiological jargon like it is poetry, hastening down laboratory hallways with desperate and bemused political leaders in tow. Their conversation continues offscreen, over a montage of men clad in hazmat suits scrambling to treat patients while their families wait, fearing the worst. A Hail Mary of a scientific breakthrough suddenly surfaces—a vaccine that still needs testing, prototype nanobots, or new rapid testing methods to battle the widespread infection. The audience awaits a miracle.

This exposition echoes both archetypes of Hollywood and the media’s response to epidemics around the world. Though hidden deep in the flash and pop of panic-inducing graphics, there is valuable information that can be used for educational purposes. The ease of access to popular culture, media, and technology offers the opportunity to benefit from Ebola’s pervasive presence through dissemination of correct and useful information both locally and across the globe.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the current outbreak of Ebola is one of the largest in recorded history, having spread across Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone [2]. A small number of imported cases were also reported in Spain, Italy, the United States, other western African nations, and as of December 2014, the United Kingdom; most of these imported cases were health care workers who had been exposed to the pathogen while providing aid to the stricken parts of western Africa [2,3]. The CDC reports, as of May 26, 2015, that Ebola has infected at least 27,000 people and killed over 11,000 individuals worldwide [2].

Social media continues to develop as a mainstream reference point for sharing and discussing current events. Its role as a platform for discourse has been noticeably growing in the wake of the Ebola epidemic [4]. Prior studies emphasize the use of multiple modes of communication in order to maintain the propagation of correct information to broad populations [5,6]. Despite the low general knowledge of Ebola in the US, there are avenues of information dissemination that can be more quickly utilized to impact a wider audience. In order to provide accurate, consistent information, our leading health-focused institutions should bolster their use of technology and apply popular culture to reach and inform a greater portion of the public.

Current Use of Pop Culture in the Ebola Epidemic

The CDC, the World Health Organization (WHO), and other public health agencies have leveraged popular social media to distribute up-to-date and accurate information on Ebola [7,8], while social websites such as Reddit, to which users can submit content organized by areas of interest, allow for the assimilation of unverified information [9]. A literature review on the use of social networking sites for influencing health behavior demonstrated a particularly valuable aspect of social media: its cost-effective ability to reach hard-to-reach underserved and minority populations [10]. Health information reaches consumers at various levels that differ based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. For example, data from the Health Information National Trends Survey found that individuals who sought out health information tended to have regular health care access and were more likely to earn over US$50,000 in income; conversely, males, people older than 65 years of age, and people identifying as Hispanic were less likely to seek out that information [11]. Because of differences in how these groups receive, trust, and process health information, mechanisms by which pertinent health information is disseminated must be diversified in order to maximize the audience reached. This can be done through media accessed by members of multiple socioeconomic and cultural strata. Examples of useful media include film, books, pamphlets, the Internet, and crowdsource mapping, among others. Smart phone apps and health reminders through text messages are some ways that technology has been used to help raise awareness about the epidemic [12,13], but there are still other ways that social media and popular culture can be used to further spread vital public health information. The public is eager for this information, as clearly demonstrated with the success of television programs such as the Dr. Oz show in promoting information-seeking behavior [14].

Demonstrated Advantages of Pop Culture and Diverse Technology in Public Health Campaigns

Aside from the ability to triage accurate information, pop culture and technology flaunt remarkable education and fundraising potential. The “ALS [amyotrophic lateral sclerosis] ice bucket challenge” that permeated social media in 2014 produced over a 3,500% increase of donations in a single month, as compared to the previous year [15]. Pop-culture icons such as superheroes and zombies shine as tools for education and discussion of complex scientific concepts. Their use establishes a middle ground between scientists and the general public, placing scientific concepts in a comfortable and familiar mental landscape [1618]. Additionally, the wide reach of technology makes it possible to recruit more help in advancing knowledge through crowd sourcing for research and science projects. The Health Maps website and the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, for example, have recently begun collaborating with humanitarian agencies such as Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross to create outbreak maps that benefit aid workers in addressing disease outbreaks [1921]. This form of crowdsourcing and other technologically based intervention efforts could be modified for Ebola.

Previous Examples of Pop Culture in Public Health Campaigns

In the past, different audiences have been reached through increasingly creative avenues [22]. For example, Delta Airlines is currently on their sixth in-flight safety video that uses humor to deliver their low-interest safety message [23]. Comedy helps the airline teach safety information to an otherwise unenthusiastic group of passengers, capturing their attention with a variety of humorous examples in the videos. Using pop culture in the delivery of pertinent Ebola information may help pique the interest of previously uninformed individuals, prompting them to follow the outbreak in a manner that shadows lightness over a very serious health issue, making it easier to absorb. This is not to say that these light-hearted messages should downplay the seriousness of the problems; rather, they should ease the digestibility but never overshadow the true gravity of the issues themselves. Such tactics ought to be verified for tact and integrity before being disseminated to the public.

Films such as 2011’s Contagion have also been useful in teaching the public about how local health departments and the CDC respond to crises, and in some ways it has even impacted how health scientists respond to and work to prevent outbreaks [24]. Ultraviolet (UV)-light-producing robots are becoming popular in hospital room sterilization [25,26], and the advent of smartphones allows consumers to purchase game applications that allow them to design and observe the virulence and transmission patterns of fictional pathogens [27]. These hyperboles of film are quickly becoming commonplace.

Another example of the use of familiar, relatable subject matter to disperse relevant public health and safety information was the CDC’s introduction of zombies into the public health realm in mid-2011. Following the catastrophic 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan, the CDC created a dramatized public health bulletin to prepare for a zombie apocalypse, in an effort to draw readers in and bolster awareness for the importance of disaster preparedness [28]. The authors of the educational bulletin used the popular media phenomenon of a zombie apocalypse as a valuable teaching tool to reach audiences that they may not have reached otherwise.

Limitations of Diverse Technology/Pop Culture in Public Health Campaigns

Although the instantaneous dispersal of information through social media is one of the advantages to using pop culture to spread relevant public health information, it may also be seen as a double-edged sword. The rapidity of information release allows for the chance of spreading incorrect or misleading information, which can be seen in the media frenzy regarding the Ebola outbreak in West Africa and the resulting panic surrounding isolated cases of Ebola in the US [29]. With social media, text messaging, phone calls, radio, and television, there are many avenues of information collection that allow for the rapid dissemination of misinformation. The consequences of this were seen in late 2014 in Nigeria, when a prescription for a salt-water bath for Ebola prevention quickly spread through social media, eventually encouraging people to drink excessive amounts of salt water and leading to a few reported deaths [30,31]. Another limitation relates to the idea that organized sources of social media may provide information only to the technologically literate individuals that seek this information, potentially alienating a substantial segment of the public that are impacted by these public health issues.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Rather than frighten the public through scattered, gloomy newscasts about new Ebola cases, well-known popular culture tools should be used to disperse relevant health precaution information to a greater target audience using an entertaining, more recognizable form. Many consumers prefer to take initiative and seek desired information on their own by turning to the Internet for health information, with nearly 75% of Internet users searching for information about health in the past year [32]. Popular culture can be used to educate mass populations about important information regarding the Ebola outbreak, being used as a hook to draw audiences in and as a familiar vehicle for information dissemination. With the fifth season of the popular zombie series The Walking Dead recently premiering (15 million viewers in February 2015), this is an ideal time to use this popular culture tool in relation to the Ebola outbreak, whether it be through social media websites, large-scale public health website bulletins, commercials, or other outlets. Those professionals in charge of disseminating information must consistently be on the lookout for what characters are popular in the current time, and they must be creative in how these icons can be related to a disease or outbreak.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the individuals that have responsibly used social media for saving lives and distributing correct information on Ebola.

References

  1. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Questions and Answers: Estimating the Future Number of Cases in the Ebola Epidemic–Liberia and Sierra Leone, 2014–2015.: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/qa-mmwr-estimating-future-cases.html. Accessed on October 29, 2014
  2. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 Ebola Outbreak in West Africa. CDC, 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/index.html. Accessed on May 26, 2015
  3. 3. Ebola Virus Disease- United Kingdom. (2014). Global alert and response. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/csr/don/30-december-2014-ebola/en/
  4. 4. Merchant RM, Ha YP, Wong CA, Schwartz HA, Sap M, Ungar LH, et al. The 2013 US Government Shutdown (#Shutdown) and Health: An Emerging Role for Social Media. Am J Public Health. October 2014; 16: e1–e3 [Epub ahead of print].
  5. 5. Dyar OJ, Castro-Sanchez E, Holmes AH. What makes people talk about antibiotics on social media? A retrospective analysis of Twitter use. J Antimicrob Chemother. September 2014; 69(9): 2568–2572. pmid:24862092
  6. 6. Morris JT, Mueller JL, Jones ML. Use of Social Media During Public Emergencies by People with Disabilities. West J Emerg Med. August 2014; 15(5): 567–574. pmid:25157303
  7. 7. CDC.gov. “#EbolaFact: Here’s what you need to know about when a person can spread the disease to others.” 29 Oct 2014, 12:33 p.m. Twitter post. https://twitter.com/CDCgov/status/527543653489987584.
  8. 8. WHO. “Dr Aylward: 13,703 #Ebola cases have been reported so far; 13,676 cases in Guinea, Liberia & Sierra Leone.” 29 Oct 2014, 6:46 a.m. Twitter post. https://twitter.com/WHO/status/527456383445508096.
  9. 9. Reddit (2014) Ebola. www.reddit.com/r/ebola.
  10. 10. Park K, Calamaro C. A systematic review of social networking sites: Innovative platforms for health research targeting adolescents and young adults. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013;45(3):256–264. pmid:23676115
  11. 11. Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Hesse B. (2006). Cancer-Related Information Seeking: Hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Journal of Health Communication, 11, 147–156. pmid:16641080
  12. 12. Klibanoff E. The Red Cross Is Using Text Messaging To Take Down Ebola. National Public Radio, 2014. http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2014/10/27/357647182/the-red-cross-is-using-text-messaging-to-take-down-ebola. Accessed on October 28, 2014
  13. 13. Mark M. Doctors look to technology in Ebola battle. The Guardian, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/08/doctors-technology-ebola-africa. Accessed on October 27, 2014
  14. 14. Bootsman N, Blackburn DF, Taylor J. The Oz craze: The effect of pop culture media on health care. Can Pharm J (Ott). March 2014; 147(2): 80–82.
  15. 15. The ice bucket. Nature; editorial. 22 October 2014; 514(7523). http://www.nature.com/news/the-ice-bucket-1.16189.
  16. 16. Zehr EP. Avengers Assemble! Using pop-culture icons to communicate science. Adv Physiol Educ. June 2014; 38(2): 118–123. pmid:25039082
  17. 17. Nasiruddin M, Halabi M, Dao A, Chen K, Brown B. Zombies–a pop culture resource for public health awareness. Emerg Infect Dis. May 2013; 19(5): 809–813. pmid:23697881
  18. 18. Brown B, Cabral A, Nasiruddin M, Soohoo M. Childhood idols-shifting from superheroes to public health heroes. Journal of Public Health 2015 Feb 16. pii: fdv013. E-pub ahead of print.
  19. 19. Cassano J. Inside the crowdsourced map project that is helping contain the Ebola epidemic. October 2014. http://www.fastcolabs.com/3037350/elasticity/inside-the-crowdsourced-map-project-that-is-helping-contain-the-ebola-epidemic. Accessed on February 9, 2015.
  20. 20. Healthmap. 2015.: http://www.healthmap.org/en/. Accessed on February 9, 2015.
  21. 21. Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team. 2015.: http://hot.openstreetmap.org/. Accessed on February 9, 2015
  22. 22. Brown B. Public health education using pop culture and media. Front Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;2:231. pmid:25426486
  23. 23. Delta Airlines Safety Video-Version 6. May 2014. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbLV3gnhj60. Accessed February 9, 2015.
  24. 24. Collier N. Uncovering text mining: a survey of current work on web-based epidemic intelligence. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(7):731–49. pmid:22783909
  25. 25. Stibich M, Stachowiak J, Tanner B, Berkheiser M, Moore L, Raad I, et al. Evaluation of a pulsed-xenon ultraviolet room disinfection device for impact on hospital operations and microbial reduction. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;32(3):286–8. pmid:21460515
  26. 26. Martinez M, Vercammen P, Hannah J. Germ-zapping robot Gigi sets its sights on Ebola. CNN, 2014. http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/16/us/germ-zapping-robot-ebola/. Accessed on October 27, 2014.
  27. 27. Bloom D. Ebola boosts sales of iPhone game which makes players wipe out humanity with a deadly virus. Daily Mail, 2014. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2803899/Ebola-boosts-sales-iPhone-game-makes-players-wipe-humanity-deadly-virus-users-naming-theirs-outbreak.html#ixzz3HQ6ZRbRy. Accessed on October 27, 2014.
  28. 28. Khan AS. Preparedness 101: zombie apocalypse. Public Health Matters. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. http://blogs.cdc.gov/publichealthmatters/2011/05/preparedness-101-zombie-apocalypse/. Accessed on October 27, 2014.
  29. 29. Feuer A. The Ebola Conspiracy Theories. The New York Times, Sunday Review. 18 October 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/sunday-review/the-ebola-conspiracy-theories.html. Accessed on January 29, 2015.
  30. 30. Emmanuel O, Ibeh N, AuduO. Ebola sparks panic across Nigeria as citizens scramble for salt-water bath “remedy”. Premium Times. 8 August 2014. http://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/166257-ebola-sparks-panic-across-nigeria-as-citizens-scramble-for-salt-water-bath-remedy.html. Accessed on June 1, 2015.
  31. 31. Neporent L. Nigerian Ebola Hoax Results in Two Deaths. ABC News. 30 September 2014. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/nigerian-ebola-hoax-results-deaths/story?id=25842191. Accessed on June 1, 2015.
  32. 32. Fox, S. D. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed on January 29, 2015.