• Loading metrics

Update on the Mapping of Prevalence and Intensity of Infection for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Call for Action

  • Martha Idalí Saboyá ,

    Affiliation Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

  • Laura Catalá,

    Affiliation Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

  • Rubén Santiago Nicholls,

    Affiliation Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

  • Steven Kenyon Ault

    Affiliation Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America

Update on the Mapping of Prevalence and Intensity of Infection for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Call for Action

  • Martha Idalí Saboyá, 
  • Laura Catalá, 
  • Rubén Santiago Nicholls, 
  • Steven Kenyon Ault


It is estimated that in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) at least 13.9 million preschool age and 35.4 million school age children are at risk of infections by soil-transmitted helminths (STH): Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). Although infections caused by this group of parasites are associated with chronic deleterious effects on nutrition and growth, iron and vitamin A status and cognitive development in children, few countries in the LAC Region have implemented nationwide surveys on prevalence and intensity of infection. The aim of this study was to identify gaps on the mapping of prevalence and intensity of STH infections based on data published between 2000 and 2010 in LAC, and to call for including mapping as part of action plans against these infections. A total of 335 published data points for STH prevalence were found for 18 countries (11.9% data points for preschool age children, 56.7% for school age children and 31.3% for children from 1 to 14 years of age). We found that 62.7% of data points showed prevalence levels above 20%. Data on the intensity of infection were found for seven countries. The analysis also highlights that there is still an important lack of data on prevalence and intensity of infection to determine the burden of disease based on epidemiological surveys, particularly among preschool age children. This situation is a challenge for LAC given that adequate planning of interventions such as deworming requires information on prevalence to determine the frequency of needed anthelmintic drug administration and to conduct monitoring and evaluation of progress in drug coverage.

Author Summary

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are part of the group of neglected infectious diseases (NID) in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), and are associated with several adverse chronic effects on child health. Although control interventions such as periodic administration of anthelmintic drugs, health education, improved access to safe water and sanitation, among others, are acknowledged to be an important means to reduce morbidity and to achieve control, epidemiological information on prevalence status is lacking at the lowest sub-national administrative levels (municipalities, districts or provinces) in many countries thus hindering decision making regarding not only the treatment, but also the monitoring of progress in deworming coverage, the assessment of epidemiological impact on parasite prevalence and load and, therefore, the achievement of the overall public health goals. Epidemiological surveys can be expensive and require time and effort for their implementation, which could explain the low number of studies published with data on prevalence and intensity of infection in the Americas. The use of alternative methodologies, for instance those based on geographical information systems and remote sensing technologies, or of sentinel surveillance in schools may help countries in the task of collecting information and support the implementation of integrated control programs against STH.


Helminth infections impose a great and often silent burden of morbidity and mortality on poor populations in developing countries. The most common helminth infections are caused by soil-transmitted helminths (STH): roundworms (Ascaris lumbricoides), whipworms (Trichuris trichiura), and hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). Worldwide estimates suggest that A. lumbricoides infects 1.221 billion people, T. trichiura, 795 million, and hookworms, 740 million. Infections occur most frequently in the Americas, China and East Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa [1].

STH are amongst the most prevalent pathogenic organisms on the planet, estimated to infect almost one-sixth of the global population with the highest rates among school-age children (SAC) who are frequently infected with two or more species at a time [2]. Stunting usually occurs between 6 months and 2 years of age, overlapping with the period in which STH begin to emerge [3]. STH infection primarily affects physical and cognitive development [4]. A. lumbricoides can cause malnutrition; hookworms damage the intestinal mucosa leading to bleeding, loss of iron and anemia, and infections by T. trichiura cause chronic reduction of food intake [5]. During pregnancy, mild or severe infections by hookworms can cause anemia in the mother and damage to the fetus, leading to low birth weight [6]. In areas where helminths are common, deworming activities can be done once or twice a year among the population at risk (those with no access to improved sanitation facilities), including deworming for pregnant women after the first trimester. Deworming during pregnancy reduces severe maternal anemia, increases birth weight and reduces infant mortality [7]. Thus, regular treatment against helminth infections produces both immediate and long-term benefits, contributing significantly to improving the growth and cognitive development of affected individuals, especially children.

In 2001, the World Health Assembly adopted Resolution WHA/54.19 [8] urging all Member States where STH are endemic to attain “a minimum target of regular administration of chemotherapy to at least 75% and up to 100% of all SAC at risk of morbidity by 2010”. On October 2009, the Directing Council of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) approved Resolution CD49.R19 [9] stating the commitment of PAHO's Member States to eliminate or reduce neglected diseases, among them STH, to levels such that they are no longer considered public health problems by the year 2015, and hence help to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. In PAHO's Resolution, STH and schistosomiasis were classified as diseases whose prevalence can be drastically reduced with available cost-effective interventions. Regarding STH, the following goal to be reached by 2015 was defined: reducing prevalence among SAC in high risk areas (prevalence >50%) to less than 20% as measured by quantitative egg count in feces. The Resolution also mentioned several interventions to reach the STH control goal, especially those related with improved access to safe water and basic sanitation, preventive chemotherapy and health education through inter-sectoral collaboration.

According to WHO/PAHO estimates, in LAC there were 13.9 million preschool-age children (PSAC) and 35.4 million SAC in need of preventive chemotherapy for STH in 2012. These estimates have been calculated based mainly on the percentage of people without access to improved sanitation facilities, differentiated by rural and urban areas, due to the fact that STH prevalence and intensity of infection in LAC are not well mapped [10].

The purpose of this paper is to present the status of the mapping of prevalence and intensity of STH infection and to identify information gaps in LAC for the 2000–2010 period based on a literature search. This study is a call for action in LAC to address the existing information gaps in order to prioritize integrated interventions for STH control based on solid evidence, increase efforts towards reduction of the morbidity caused by these parasites, and reach the targets in the WHO and PAHO resolutions.

Materials and Methods

Data selection

A wide literature search was conducted to collect data on STH prevalence and intensity of infection (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworms) among preschool (1–4 years of age) and school-age (5–14 years of age) children for the 2000–2010 period at the lowest subnational administrative levels in LAC countries (Checklist S1). The decision to include studies published between 2000 and 2010 was taken arbitrarily by the authors considering this 10-year period to have sufficient updated information on the status of STH mapping in the Region to establish the current information availability, reflecting the level of interest on this issue in the Region. A database was built including information from 236 studies, of which 120 met the inclusion criteria [11][130]. There are 45 countries and territories in LAC with at least 13,591 units at second subnational level that may be districts, municipalities or provinces depending on the geopolitical structure of each country or territory. Once the information was collected, a preliminary report was published in PAHO's website [131]. That document is the main information source for the analysis presented here.

The scientific literature search was done through the online databases of PubMed (including MEDLINE), LILACS (including SciELO), BIREME and Cochrane. Additionally, we carried out a search of information published in the websites of health ministries, NGOs and FBOs reporting data on deworming activities to PAHO and WHO from 2005 to 2010, as well as information published on the websites of PAHO country offices in LAC. The online database search was done using MeSH terms to facilitate an ample retrieval of published information on STH prevalence and intensity of infection in LAC. The following MeSH terms and subheadings were used for searches on PubMed: ((“Helminthiasis”[Mesh] OR (“Helminthiasis/epidemiology”[Mesh] OR “Helminthiasis/parasitology”[Mesh] OR “Helminthiasis/statistics and numerical data”[Mesh]))) AND (“Child”[Mesh] OR (“Child/epidemiology”[Mesh] OR “Child/statistics and numerical data”[Mesh])). The following terms were also used for searches on PubMed to recover more papers: 1) ‘Prevalence intestinal parasites child’ restricted by country, sub-regions in LAC (Central American Isthmus, Latin Caribbean, Andean area, Southern Cone, Non-Latin Caribbean) and publication year of study; 2) ‘Soil transmitted helminths prevalence’ restricted by country, sub-regions in LAC (Central American Isthmus, Latin Caribbean, Andean area, Southern Cone, Non-Latin Caribbean) and publication year of study; and 3) ‘Ascaris lumbricoides or Trichuris trichiura or hookworms or Necator americanus or Ancylostoma duodenale’ by country, sub-regions in LAC (Central American Isthmus, Latin Caribbean, Andean area, Southern Cone, Non-Latin Caribbean) and publication year of study. Additionally, for the search of papers in BIREME and LILACS databases, the following terms were used: 1) “Helminthiasis” AND “prevalence” by country and LAC; and 2) “Intestinal parasites” AND “prevalence” by country and LAC.

The following were the inclusion criteria: 1) studies with data on prevalence and intensity of infection published from 2000 to 2010 including the geographical location of the study so as to enable the identification of the municipal or local level; and 2) studies including STH prevalence data disaggregated by age groups. The following were the exclusion criteria: 1) studies undertaken before 1995; 2) reports with data on intensity of infection not using WHO classification parameters (mild, moderate and high), and 3) studies with no data on their geographical location or including data on prevalence and intensity of infection of limited use for the present analysis (e.g. studies reporting prevalence data only for adults, or studies in children with eosinophilia). Given the limited number of data published on STH prevalence and intensity of infection in the Region, no restriction was established regarding sample size, type of study (community-based or among school children, base line or intervention monitoring) or laboratory diagnostic methods used, as the aim was not to verify the existence of accurate data for the two indicators in the Region, but to explore existing information and gaps on mapping (Figure S1).

After reviewing the articles and reports, information was extracted from those that met the inclusion criteria and then a database was built with the following variables: name of country; name of geographical location of study; name of geographical locations within the first and second subnational levels corresponding to the geographical location of the study (in those cases where no information on this regard appeared, the publication year was recorded), sample size, STH prevalence, prevalence of infection by species, intensity of infection and age group of study subjects. Each value of prevalence and intensity of infection registered on the database was denominated a data point. In those studies that included data for several geographical locations at the lowest subnational level (e.g., municipalities), data were registered for each of these locals and, therefore, we were able to extract more than one prevalence or intensity of infection data point from several studies.


A descriptive analysis of the number of studies including data on prevalence and intensity of infection published from 2000 to 2010 was done by country, age group and prevalence and intensity of infection range. Although the search was restricted to studies published from 2000 to 2010, some authors included results from surveys conducted before the study publication date, and for this reason our analysis included data only from studies carried out from 1995 onwards. Besides the analysis of frequency and proportion distributions, the geographic locations of prevalence and intensity of infection data points for preschool and school age children were mapped, as this was useful to visualize gaps in data publishing. The database was made with MS Excel 2010 and the analysis with Tableau 7.0.


A total of 236 publications were found, of which 120 met the selection criteria established for the study; the publications corresponded to 18 countries: Brazil (39 publications, 32.5%), Argentina (11, 9.2%), Colombia (10, 8.3%), Venezuela, Mexico, Ecuador (9, 7.5% each), Peru (7, 5.8%), Cuba (5, 4.2%), Honduras, Bolivia (4, 3.3% each), Guatemala (3, 2.5%), Haiti, Costa Rica, Belize (2, 1.7% in each country), Saint Lucia, Paraguay, Nicaragua and Guyana (1, 0.8% each). All publications were articles published in scientific journals. Although some documents were found in the websites of health ministries, NGOs and FBOs, none of them included information meeting the inclusion criteria. The studies recovered by the Cochrane database had no information on their geographic location and, therefore, they were not considered.

A total of 335 data points on STH prevalence were registered and analyzed for 18 countries out of which 12.0% were for preschool-age children (40 prevalence data points), 56.7% for school-age children (190 prevalence data points) and the remaining 31.3% (105 prevalence data points) were registered for children under 15 years of age because authors did not differentiate by age groups, although they did state in the methodology that the study had been undertaken among children under 15 years of age. Another 687 data points on prevalence by STH species were also extracted, of which 40.2% corresponded to A. lumbricoides, 35.5% to T. trichiura, 19.5% to hookworms (undifferentiated by species), 2.9% to A. duodenale, and 1.9% to N. americanus. Additionally, 151 data points were extracted for intensity of infection.

The main characteristics of the 335 data points for STH infection prevalence were the following: 1) 27.8% of prevalence data points showed values over 50%, 34.9% between >20 and 50%, and 37.3% below 20%; 2) 63% of prevalence data points corresponded to data published by four countries (Argentina, Brazil, Honduras and Mexico); 3) 35% or more of STH prevalence data from Belize, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico and Venezuela showed values over 50%. Prevalence ranges found in each country are shown in Table 1. The geographic locations of STH prevalence data points for PSAC and SAC by prevalence ranges are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1. Data points found for STH prevalence among PSAC in LAC, 2000–2010.

Source: PAHO based on literature search for Latin American and the Caribbean. Numbers indicate number of data points found for the same geographical location. (Image created using

Figure 2. Data published for STH prevalence among SAC in LAC, 2000–2010.

Source: PAHO based on literature search for Latin American and the Caribbean. Numbers indicate number of data points found for the same geographical location. (Image created using

Table 1. Number and relative frequency of data points found for STH prevalence ranges by country, LAC 2000–2010.

A total of 151 infection intensity data points from seven countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras and Venezuela) were registered and analyzed. The following were their main characteristics: 1) The largest number of data points was found for Honduras (41.7%), Bolivia and Brazil (15.9% each); 2) 56.9% of infection intensity data corresponded to SAC, 17.8% to PSAC and 25.1% to children under 15 years of age; 3) 37.1% showed light, 34.4%, moderate and 28.5% heavy intensity infections (Table 2); 4) 65.1% of the data points on heavy intensity infections corresponded to A. lumbricoides (28 data points), and 5) no data on intensity of infection published after 2005 were found.

Table 2. Number and relative frequency of data points found for each category of STH intensity of infection by country, 2000–2010.

The most recent year in which prevalence data points were found varied among countries. Regarding prevalence data points for SAC, and taking as the most recent data those from studies conducted after 2005, we observed that 10 countries (out of 16 with data points) had studies conducted from 2005 to 2010. As for preschool age children, six countries (out of 11 with data points) had studies, while nine countries had studies for children under 15 years of age (out of 16 with data points).


A total of 335 data points on STH prevalence from 18 LAC countries were found in the 120 articles included in the present study that were then registered and analyzed; 12.0% of the data were for PSAC, 56.7% for SAC and 31.3% for children under 15 years of age. We found that 60% of the prevalence data points showed prevalence levels above 20%. If these data were to be used for decision making regarding deworming in those geographic areas, it could be concluded that in more than half of such places deworming would be necessary for all children under 15 years of age (excluding children under 1 year of age) at least once a year. We also registered and analyzed 151 infection intensity data points from seven countries, of which 37.1% showed light, 34.4%, moderate and 28.5%, heavy intensity infections; no data published on intensity of infections were found after 2005. Our analysis suggests that there is a significant gap in data published on STH prevalence and intensity of infection in LAC, especially for PSAC.

No restriction was established regarding sample size, sample randomization, type of study (community-based or among SAC, baseline or post-intervention monitoring) or laboratory diagnostic methods used, and, therefore, the study does not allow for making any inferences. Nevertheless, this information is useful to recognize existing data gaps on prevalence and intensity of infection for STH, independently of the quality of the few data found, and emphasizes the need to make a call for action aimed at collecting evidence-based information required to define needed deworming activities for public health purposes in LAC countries. The results also emphasize the need to promote the development of studies that are epidemiologically robust, with a certain standardization of both the epidemiological and laboratory methods, following WHO guidelines, that will provide reliable information on the epidemiological situation of STH and allow for comparability between studies done in different geographical regions and at different points in time. Another limitation of the study could be the fact that the data from some reports published by health ministries and organizations (NGOs and FBOs), as well as from undergraduate and graduate theses and other type of documents containing information on studies about prevalence and intensity of infection could have been omitted due to the methodology used for data recovery that focused mainly on published indexed data accessible on the web. Due to the aforementioned limitations and the bias that this could represent for this study, inferences or use of these data to estimate prevalence and intensity of infection for STH and its distribution in LAC, or for making decisions on deworming activities to be implemented in any area of the 18 countries included in the analysis should not be done. Countries are encouraged to conduct their own scientifically sound studies of prevalence and intensity of STH infection, where data gaps are seen.

During the period from January 2000 to June 2010 data on STH prevalence and intensity of infection at the local level were recovered only for 18 LAC countries (Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia and Venezuela) despite the fact that it is estimated that at least 30 countries in the Americas are endemic for STH infections according to a document published by PAHO in 2010 [131]. In this report, LAC countries were classified into four groups based on the estimated number of PSAC and SAC at risk of STH infections, as well as on the presence of other neglected infectious diseases (NIDs) targeted for preventive chemotherapy as one of the tools to reach their control and elimination. This classification of countries in four groups was done from analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables. The group of quantitative variables included sanitation coverage, population at risk for STH, deworming coverage on PSAC and SAC population, population at risk, prevalence and treatment coverage for onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, blinding trachoma and lymphatic filariasis. The qualitative variables included inter-programmatic actions already in implementation in the countries, partners supporting deworming, needs of technical cooperation, progress on mapping, and opportunities for integrated actions.

These four groups included 33 countries as follows: the first group comprised 11 countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Mexico, Peru, Dominican Republic, Saint Lucia and Suriname) concentrating 66.8% of PSAC and 67.4% of SAC at risk of STH infections in the Region. The second group included six countries (Belize, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama and Venezuela) with 26.8% of PSAC and 26.1% of SAC at risk. The third group comprised three countries (Argentina, Paraguay and Nicaragua) with 5.4% of children at risk from both age groups, and the fourth group of 13 countries registering 1% of children at risk from both age groups. If deworming activities were focused in the 17 countries in groups 1 and 2, 94% of PSAC and SAC at risk of STH infections in the Region would be reached and protected [132].

Of the 335 data points from the 18 LAC countries analyzed in the study, 62.7% of data points showed STH infection prevalence above 20% (including both ranges, 20–50% and >50%). If these data were representative of the geographic areas to which they correspond, and if a country was interested in implementing deworming using these data without waiting for data of a survey of prevalence to make a decision on number of treatment rounds needed, it would be necessary to conduct deworming at least once a year for all children aged between 1 and 15 years there. According to information provided by PAHO's Regional NID Program, by 2011 a total of eight countries (Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Mexico, Belize, Honduras, Nicaragua and Cuba) had deworming programs at national and subnational levels while four other countries had started updating their mapping of prevalence and intensity of infection at national level (Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador and Honduras), while Suriname had finished a national survey in 2010. As a result of the advocacy activities waged by PAHO and other regional partners, and based on meetings held with national health authorities, it is expected that by 2013 at least 11 countries from groups 1, 2 and 3 prioritized by PAHO (Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Peru, Colombia, Panama, Argentina, Paraguay and Venezuela) will update their mapping of STH prevalence and intensity of infection, and that four countries will conduct mapping to evaluate the impact of their national deworming programs (Belize, Mexico, Nicaragua and Saint Lucia) (Table 3).

Table 3. Overview of current status of implementation of deworming programs and progress on STH mapping, 2011–2012.

Although the methodologies recommended by PAHO/WHO to estimate STH prevalence and intensity of infection indicate that surveys among SAC are enough to establish prevalence and intensity of infection levels in a community [133], the amount of published prevalence data found in the present study for PSAC (12.0%) is very low compared with the data recovered for SAC (56.7%). The lack of information regarding PSAC is a challenge for the Region where, according to estimates made for 2011 based on the WHO-recommended algorithm [10], one fifth of PSAC and SAC were at risk of STH infections (around 13.9 and 35.4 million of a total of 61 and 155 million PSAC and SAC, respectively).

Although this indicator of children at risk of infection is an indirect way of identifying areas and population groups requiring massive deworming interventions, it does not take into account differences within countries regarding ecological zones and deworming activities that may be underway. Therefore, mapping (be it through population-based surveys, sentinel surveillance or the use of methods based on geographic information systems and remote sensing technologies that combine epidemiological, demographic, climate, social and economic variables to estimate geographic areas and populations at risk of several diseases) should be promoted in all LAC countries to identify the administrative units at second subnational level (districts, municipalities or provinces depending on the geopolitical structure of each country or territory) and focus on the implementation of deworming interventions among population groups at risk due to their living conditions. Such mapping should be promoted not only as a baseline to start deworming and other interventions in each country, but also as part of the monitoring and evaluation of progress towards STH control goals, as well as to modulate deworming activities (increasing, sustaining or reducing them).

According to data from the PAHO Regional NID Program, the countries that have conducted national mass deworming programs maintaining coverage above 75% for more than five years are Mexico (two or three rounds per year for SAC), Nicaragua (one round per year for PSAC and SAC), Dominican Republic (one round per year for SAC) and Honduras (a round per year for SAC). However, it is worth noting that despite the limitations already mentioned, our study found data published on prevalence levels above 20% and even above 50%. This may indicate that it is necessary to insist on mapping differentiated by ecological zones and population groups living in at-risk conditions that perpetuate STH transmission cycles given that national averages, and sometimes even subnational averages, can mask the real local situation.

The low amount of data published on STH intensity of infection in LAC during the period under study (151 data points from seven countries) is also noteworthy, especially the lack of data published for this indicator after 2006 at the lowest subnational administrative levels. It may be that this indicator was not estimated in the studies found, or that it was estimated but not included in the publications. However, it has been clearly documented that moderate to heavy intensity infections have significant implications for children's physical and cognitive development, as well as for severe or even fatal complications among children under 15 years of age, especially school age children [4][6]. Our study also found that in 63% of the data published intensity of infection ranged from moderate to heavy. It is important to suggest to health authorities in LAC countries that when massive and sustained deworming is implemented, the indicator showing the fastest change towards reduction is intensity of infection and that this has a remarkably positive impact on the well-being of children [134]. The reduction in infection prevalence will be slower, as it depends on the effect of other social determinants such as access to safe water, basic sanitation, nutrition, use of footwear and housing improvement (e.g., eliminating dirt floors, adding ventilation, lighting), amongst others.

In 2011, PAHO published an updated mapping of NIDs in LAC based on secondary sources of information [135]. The study included data on STH prevalence at first subnational level (departments, states or provinces depending on each country's characteristics) for several countries and the aim was to have an approximate idea of which areas would need to implement deworming activities at least once a year. The study also concluded that there were information gaps for several countries. Through this new search of scientific literature, PAHO's Regional NID Program wanted to analyze data availability at the lowest subnational administrative levels and learn about the status of mapping.

As indicated by WHO, mapping based on secondary sources (i.e., surveys published in recent years, official reports on prevalence surveys, undergraduate and graduate papers on STH prevalence) are useful as a first approach when the epidemiological status of a given geographic area is unknown. However, mapping quality varies according to the quality of the data published in the different secondary sources and it does not replace the power and strength of population-based studies whose aim is to establish baseline epidemiological data for STH or evaluate the impact of deworming programs, particularly those conducted at large scale and sustained through time [133].

Despite the limitations of this study, the dataset has been useful for further analysis. PAHO's Regional Neglected Infectious Diseases Program joined efforts with the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute to develop ecological niche-based models and Bayesian geostatistical models to predict the disease distribution at municipality level including STH. This dataset was shared to contribute to a manuscript on geostatistical meta-analysis of STH in South America whose results were published in 2013 and the data were included on the Global Database for Mapping, Control, and Surveillance of Neglected Tropical Diseases (GNTD) [136]. The dataset was shared also with the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) as part of a joint initiative to carry out analysis on correlation between STH prevalence and some determinants as access to water and sanitation, education and housing features whose results were published in 2013 [137].

Even though by the time that this study was completed data for STH in LAC were not available on the Global Atlas for Helminth Infections (GAHI) nor on the GNTD, countries in LAC could benefit from data already available by 2013, and thus have useful data to support control activities for STH. Additionally, PAHO encourages countries in LAC to share information with the aforementioned initiatives that contribute for a better understanding of distribution of prevalence of STH and thus support countries in LAC to move forward the agenda for the control and elimination of neglected infectious diseases, in general, and in particular of STH.


It is necessary and urgent to update the mapping of STH prevalence and intensity of infection in several LAC countries in order to make better evidence-based decisions regarding deworming activities. The data available for PSAC are insufficient to know the real situation of STH prevalence and intensity of infection in many countries in the LAC region, and although more data for SAC population were found, these data are only from a limited number of countries and some second administrative levels.

It is also necessary to prioritize the operational research agenda within governments and interested groups in order to develop STH mapping activities. Mapping is necessary to know where are the populations at risk and which age groups are at risk of STH infection, as well as the municipalities where authorities need to focus their efforts (if these data are available), and also for monitoring and evaluation purposes to know the impact of interventions, not only deworming, but also nutrition, education, and environmental interventions and integrated actions to reduce child morbidity and mortality and improve child development.

Without enough accurate and specific data about STH prevalence and intensity of infection by age group (PSAC and SAC) in LAC, it will be difficult to identify with certainty the main needs, resources to be assigned and places where integrated actions, including deworming, must be focused in order to reach the regional and global deworming goals for children at risk and reduce the prevalence and intensity of infections by STH.

Supporting Information

Checklist S1.

PRISMA checklist. Source: PAHO based on literature search for Latin American and the Caribbean.


Figure S1.

Flowchart of included studies. Source: PAHO based on literature search for Latin American and the Caribbean.



We would like to acknowledge Eng. Roberto Saenz for his assistance in producing the prevalence maps.

Author Contributions

Analyzed the data: MIS LC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MIS LC RSN SKA. Wrote the paper: MIS LC RSN SKA.


  1. 1. de Silva NR, Brooker S, Hotez PJ, Montresor A, Engels D, et al. (2003) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: updating the global picture. Trends Parasitol 19 (12) 547–51.
  2. 2. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A, Savioli L, Molyneux DH (2009) Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet 373 (9674) 1570–5.
  3. 3. Drake LJ, Jukes MCH, Sternberg RJ, Bundy DAP (2000) Geohelminth Infections (Ascariasis, Trichuriasis, and Hookworm): Cognitive and developmental impacts. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 11: 245–51.
  4. 4. Dickson R, Awasthi S, Williamson P, Demellweek C, Garner P (2000) Effects of Treatment for Intestinal Helminth Infection on Growth and Cognitive Performance in Children: Systematic Review of Randomised Trials. BMJ 320 (7251) 1697–701.
  5. 5. Hall A, Hewitt G, Tuffrey V, de Silva N (2008) A review and meta-analysis of the impact of intestinal worms on child growth and nutrition. Matern Child Nutr 4 (Suppl. 1) 118–236.
  6. 6. Bundy DA, Chan MS, Savioli L (1995) Hookworm infection in pregnancy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 89: 521–22.
  7. 7. Christian P, Khatry SK, West KP (2004) Antenatal anthelmintic treatment, birth-weight, and infant survival in rural Nepal. Lancet 364: 981–83.
  8. 8. World Health Organization (2001). Resolution WHA54.19. Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections. Fifty-fourth World Health Assembly. Geneva: WHO. Available: Accessed 14 May 2011.
  9. 9. Pan American Health Organization (2009a). Resolution CD49.R9. Elimination of Neglected Diseases and Other Poverty-Related Infections. Forty-ninth Directing Council. Washington DC: PAHO. Available: Accessed 20 November 2010.
  10. 10. World Health Organization (2011) Soil-transmitted helminthiases: estimates of the number of children needing preventive chemotherapy and number treated. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 86: 257–68.
  11. 11. Gamboa MI, Basualdo JA, Kozubsky L, Costas E, Cueto Rua E, et al. (1998) Prevalence of intestinal parasitosis within three population groups in La Plata, Argentina. Europ J Epidemiol 14: 55–61.
  12. 12. Guignard S, Arienti H, Freyre L, Lujan H, Rubinstein H (2000) Prevalence of enteroparasites in a residence for children in the Cordoba Province, Argentina. Europ J Epidemiol 16: 287–93.
  13. 13. Lura MCE, Beltramino DM, Elena F, de Carrera EF (2002) Prevalencia de helmintiosis intestinales en escolares de la ciudad de Santa Fe. Medicina (B Aires) 62: 29–36.
  14. 14. Beltramino D, Lura MC, Carrera E (2003) El tratamiento antihelmíntico selectivo frente al tratamiento masivo. Experiencia en dos comunidades hiperendémicas. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 13: 10–18.
  15. 15. Gamboa MI, Basualdo JA, Córdoba MA, Pezzani BC, Minvielle MC, et al. (2003) Distribution of intestinal parasitoses in relation to environmental and sociocultural parameters in La Plata, Argentina. J Helminthol 77: 15–20.
  16. 16. Soriano SV, Manacorda AM, Pierangeli NB, Navarro MC, Giayetto AL, et al. (2005) Parasitosis intestinales y su relación con factores socioeconómicos y condiciones de hábitat en niños de Neuquén, Patagonia, Argentina. Parasitol Latinoam 60: 154–61.
  17. 17. Navone GT, Gamboa MI, Oyhenart EE, Orden AB (2006) Parasitosis intestinales en poblaciones Mbyá-Guaraní de la Provincia de Misiones, Argentina: aspectos epidemiológicos y nutricionales. Cad. Saúde Pública 22: 1089–100.
  18. 18. Menghi CI, Iurvaro FR, Dellacasa MA, Gatta CL (2007) Investigación de parásitos intestinales en una comunidad aborigen de la provincia de Salta. Medicina (B Aires) 67: 705–08.
  19. 19. Milano AMF, Oscherov EB, Palladino AC, Bar AR (2007) Enteroparasitosis infantil en un área urbana del nordeste argentino. Medicina (B Aires) 67: 238–42.
  20. 20. Zonta ML, Navone GT, Oyhnart EE (2007) Parasitosis intestinales en niños de edad preescolar y escolar: situación actual en poblaciones urbanas, periurbanas y rurales en Brandsen, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Parasitol Latinoam 62: 54–60.
  21. 21. Zonta ML, Oyhenart EE, Navone GT (2010) Nutritional status, body composition, and intestinal parasitism among the Mbyá-Guaraní communities of Misiones, Argentina. Am J Hum Biol 22: 193–200.
  22. 22. Aimpun P, Hshieh P (2004) Survey for intestinal parasites in Belize, Central America. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 35: 506–11.
  23. 23. Philip Castillo. Baseline Parasitological Survey, Southern Region, Belize C.A. (2005). Report available on paper in the file of the Regional Program for Neglected and Parasitic Diseases. PAHO.
  24. 24. Flores A, Esteban JG, Angles RC, Mas-Coma S (2001) Soil-transmitted helminth infections at very-high altitude in Bolivia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 272–77.
  25. 25. Tanner S, Leonard WR, McDade T, Reyes-Garcia V, Godoy R, et al. (2009) Influence of helminth infections on childhood nutritional status in lowland Bolivia. Am J Hum Biol 21: 651–56.
  26. 26. Monrroy SL, Jimenez S, Lopez R, Soto M, Benefice E (2009) Prevalencia de parasitismo intestinal en niños y mujeres de comunidades indígenas del río Benín. Visión Científica 2 37–46.
  27. 27. Muñoz Ortiz V, Borda Garcia MA, Churqui Cuyaure CF, Frade Vargas C (2009) Intestinal parasites in children of incarcerated mothers of Center at the Feminine Orientation of Obrajes, La Paz, Bolivia: High prevalence of Blastocystis hominis. Biofarbo 17: 39.
  28. 28. Kobayashi J, Hasegawa H, Forli A, Nishimura NF, Yamanaka A, et al. (1995) Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in five farms in Holambra, São Paulo. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 37: 13–18.
  29. 29. Ferreira CB, Junior OM (1997) Enteroparasitoses em escolares do distrito de Martinésia, Uberlandia, MG: Um estudo-piloto. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 30: 373–77.
  30. 30. Ferreira MR, Souza W, Perez EP, Lapa T, Carvalho AB, et al. (1998) Intestinal Helminthiasis and Anaemia in Youngsters from Matriz da Luz, District of São Lourenço da Mata, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 93: 289–93.
  31. 31. Ferreira MU, Ferreira CS, Monteiro CA (2000) Secular trends in child intestinal parasitic diseases in São Paulo city, Brazil (1984–1996). Rev Saúde Pública 34 (6 Suppl) 73–82.
  32. 32. Rocha RS, Silva JG, Peixoto SV, Caldeira RL, Firmo JO, et al. (2000) Assessment of schistosomiasis and other intestinal parasitoses in school children of the Bambuí municipality, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33: 431–36.
  33. 33. Scolari C, Torti C, Beltrame A, Matteelli A, Castelli F, et al. (2000) Prevalence and distribution of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections in urban and indigenous schoolchildren in Ortigueira, State of Parana, Brasil: implications for control. Trop Med Int Health 5: 302–07.
  34. 34. Fontbonne A, Freese-de-Carvalho E, Duarte Acioli M, Amorim de Sá G, Pessoa Cesse EA (2001) Risk factors for multiple intestinal parasites in an indigenous community of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 17: 367–73.
  35. 35. Prado MS, Barreto ML, Strina A, Faria JAS, Nobre AA, et al. (2001) Prevalence and intensity of infection by intestinal parasites in d children in the City of Salvador (Bahia State, Brazil). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 34: 99–101.
  36. 36. Camposa MR, Valenciab LIO, Fortesb BPMD, Bragab RCC, Medronhob RA (2002) Distribuição espacial da infecção por Ascaris lumbricoides. Rev Saúde Pública 36: 69–74.
  37. 37. Carvalho OS, Guerra HL, Campos YR, Caldeira RL, Massara CL (2002) Prevalence of intestinal helminths in three regions of Minas Gerais State. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 35: 597–600.
  38. 38. Muniz PT, Ferreira MU, Ferreira CS, Conde WL, Monteiro CA (2002) Intestinal parasitic infections in young children in São Paulo, Brazil: prevalences, temporal trends and associations with physical growth. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96: 503–12.
  39. 39. Fontes G, Oliveira KKL, Oliveira AKL, Rocha EMM (2003) Influence of specific treatment of intestinal parasites and schistosomiasis on prevalence in students in Barra de Santo Antônio, AL. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 625–28.
  40. 40. Morrone FB, Carneiro JA, dos Reis C, Cardoza CM, Ubal C, et al. (2004) Study of enteroparasites infection frequency and chemotherapeutic agents used in pediatric patients in a community living in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 46: 77–80.
  41. 41. Quadros RM, Marques S, Arruda AAR, Delfes PSWR, Medeiros IAA (2004) Intestinal parasites in nursery schools of Lages, southern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 37: 422–23.
  42. 42. Tashima NT, Simoes MJS (2004) Enteroparasitic occurrence in fecal samples analyzed at the University of Western São Paulo-Unoeste clinical laboratory, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo state, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 46: 243–48.
  43. 43. Ferreira GR, Andrade CFS (2005) Some socioeconomic aspects related to intestinal parasitosis and evaluation of an educational intervention in scholars from Estiva Gerbi, SP. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38: 402–05.
  44. 44. Pereira CW, Santos FN (2005) Prevalência de geo-helmintíases em crianças atendidas na rede pública de saúde de Neópolis, município do estado de Sergipe. Rev Bras Anal Clin 37: 113–16.
  45. 45. Bóia MN, Carvalho-Costa FA, Sodré FC, Eyer-silva WA, Lamas CC, et al. (2006) Mass treatment for intestinal helminthiasis control in an Amazonian endemic area in Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 48: 189–95.
  46. 46. Brito LL, Barreto ML, Silva RCR, Assis AMO, Reis MG, et al. (2006) Moderate-and low-intensity co-infections by intestinal helminths and Schistosoma mansoni, dietary iron intake, and anemia in Brazilian children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 939–44.
  47. 47. Aguiar JIA, Gonçalves AQ, Sodré FC, Pereira SR, Bóia MN, et al. (2007) Intestinal protozoa and helminths among Terena Indians in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul: high prevalence of Blastocystis hominis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 40: 631–34.
  48. 48. Carvalho-Costa FA, Gonçalves AQ, Lassance SL, Silva Neto LM, Salmazo CAA, et al. (2007) Giardia lamblia and other intestinal parasitic infections and their relationships with nutritional status in children in Brazilian Amazon. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 49: 147–53.
  49. 49. Carvalho TB, Carvalho LR, Mascarini LM (2006) Occurrence of enteroparasites in day care centers in Botucatu (São Paulo state, Brazil) with emphasis on Cryptosporidium sp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterobius vermicularis. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 48: 269–73.
  50. 50. Moraes LRS (2007) Household solid waste bagging and collection and their health implications for children living in outlying urban settlements in Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 23: S643–49.
  51. 51. Basso RMC, Silva-Ribeiro RT, Soligo DS, Ribacki SI, Callegari-Jacques SM, et al. (2008) Evolution of the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis among school children in Caxias do Sul, RS. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 41: 263–68.
  52. 52. Frei F, Juncanse C, Ribeiro-Paes JT (2008) Epidemiological survey of intestinal parasite infections: analytical bias due to prophylactic treatment. Cad Saude Publica, Rio de Janeiro 24: 2919–25.
  53. 53. Jardim-Botelho A, Brooker S, Geiger SM, Fleming F, Lopes ACS, et al. (2008) Age patterns in undernutrition and helminth infection in a rural area of Brazil: associations with ascariasis and hookworm. Trop Med Int Health 13: 458–67.
  54. 54. Machado ER, Santos DS, Costa-Cruz JM (2008) Enteroparasitas e comensais em crianças de quatro bairros da periferia de Uberlândia, Estado de Minas Gerais. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 41: 581–85.
  55. 55. Menezes AL, Lima VM, Freitas MT, Rocha MO, Silva EF, et al. (2008) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in children from public daycare centers in the city of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 50: 57–9.
  56. 56. Miné JC, Rosa JA (2008) Frequency of Blastocystis hominis and other intestinal parasites in stool samples examined at the Parasitology Laboratory of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences at the São Paulo State University, Araraquara. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 41: 565–69.
  57. 57. Batista T, Trevisol FS, Trevisol DJ (2009) Parasitoses intestinais em pré-escolares matriculados em creche filantrópica no sul de Santa Catarina. Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina 38: 39–45.
  58. 58. Korkes F, Kumagai FU, Belfort RN, Szejnfeld D, Abud TG, et al. (2009) Relationship between intestinal parasitic infection in children and soil contamination in an urban slum. J Trop Pediatr 55: 42–45.
  59. 59. Maia MM, Fausto MA, Vieira EL, Benetton ML, Carneiro M (2009) Intestinal parasitic infection and associated risk factors, among children presenting at outpatient clinics in Manaus, Amazonas state, Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 103: 583–91.
  60. 60. Silva NA (2009) Avaliação de parasitoses intestinais em crianças de uma escola municipal de Passo Fundo-RS. Published on Web Site of Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Ulbra Carazinho. Available on:
  61. 61. Palhano-Silva CS, Araújo AJG, Lourenço AEP, Bastos OMP, Santos RV, et al. (2009) Intestinal Parasitic Infection in the Suruí Indians, Brazilian Amazon. Interciencia 34: 259–64.
  62. 62. Toledo MJO, Paludetto AW, MouraI FT, Nascimento ES, Chaves M, et al. (2009) Evaluation of enteroparasite control activities in a Kaingáng community of Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 43: 1–9.
  63. 63. Fonseca EOL, Teixeira MG, Barreto ML, Carmo EH, Costa MCN (2010) Prevalence and factors associated with geohelminth infections in children living in municipalities with low HDI in North and Northeast Brazil. Cad Saude Publica, Rio de Janeiro 26: 143–52.
  64. 64. Mascarini-Serra LM, Telles CA, Prado MS, Mattos SA, Strina A, et al. (2010) Reductions in the prevalence and incidence of geohelminth infections following a city-wide sanitation program in a Brazilian urban centre. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e588.
  65. 65. Neto AHAM, Perira APMF, Alencar MFL, Souza-Junior PRB, Dias RC, et al. (2010) Prevalence of intestinal parasites versus knowledge, attitudes, and practices of inhabitants of low-income communities of Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Parasitol Res 107: 295–307.
  66. 66. Silva LP, Silva RMG (2010) Occurrence of enteroparasites in centers of child education the municipality of Patos of Minas, MG, Brazil. Biosci J Uberlândia 26: 147–51.
  67. 67. Reyes P, Agudelo CA, Moncada L, Cáceres E, Lopez C, et al. (1999) Desparasitación Masiva, Estado Nutricional y Capacidad de Aprendizaje en Escolares de una Comunidad Rural. Rev Salud Publica (Bogotá) 1: 255–65.
  68. 68. Ordóñez LE, Angulo ES (2002) Malnutrition and its association with intestinal parasitism among children from a village in the Colombian Amazonian region. Biomedica [Article in Spanish] 22: 486–98.
  69. 69. Urbina D, Arzuza O, Young G, Parra E, Raimundo Castro R, et al. (2003) Rotavirus type A and other enteric pathogens in stool samples from children with acute diarrhea on the Colombian northern coast. Int Microbiol 6: 27–32.
  70. 70. Botero JH, Castaño A, Montoya MN, Ocampo NE, Hurtado MI, et al. (2003) A preliminary study of the prevalence of intestinal parasites in immunocompromised patients with and without gastrointestinal manifestations. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 45: 19.
  71. 71. Giraldo-Gómez JM, Lora F, Henao LH, Mejía S, Gómez-Marín JE (2005) Prevalencia de Giardiasis y parásitos intestinales en preescolares de hogares atendidos en un programa estatal en Armenia, Colombia. Rev Salud Publica (Bogotá) 7: 327–38.
  72. 72. Alvarado BE, Vásquez LR (2006) Social determinants, feeding practices and nutritional consequences of intestinal parasitism in young children. Biomedica [Article in Spanish] 26: 82–94.
  73. 73. Restrepo BN, Restrepo MT, Beltrán JC, Rodríguez M, Ramírez RE (2006) Nutritional status of indigenous children aged up to six years in the Embera-Katio Indian reserve in Tierralta, Cordoba, Colombia. Biomedica [Article in Spanish] 26: 517–27.
  74. 74. Meza DLM, Socarrás SL, Sanabria MBJ, Egea E (2008) Association between atopy, allergic asthma and specific IgE antibodies for Ascaris in a group of children of a city of the north coast of Colombia. Salud Uninorte. Barranquilla (Col.) 2008; 24: 172–80 Available:
  75. 75. Londoño AL, Mejía S, Gómez-Marín JE (2009) Prevalence and risk factors associated with intestinal parasitism in preschool children from the urban area of Calarcá, Colombia. Rev Salud Pública (Bogotá) 11: 72–81.
  76. 76. Arias JA, Guzmán GE, Lora-Suárez FM, Torres E, Gómez JE (2010) Prevalence of intestinal protozoa in 79 children 2 to 5 years old from a state nursery program in Circasia, Quindío. Infection 14: 31–38.
  77. 77. Hernández F, Denis León D, Ana Brenes A, Robinson C (1998) Parasitismo intestinal en un precario de San José, Costa Rica. Rev Costarric Cienc 19: 3–4.
  78. 78. Hernández-Chavaría F, Matamoros-Madrigal MF (2005) Parásitos intestinales en una comunidad Amerindia, Costa Rica. Parasitol Latinoam 60: 182–85.
  79. 79. Mendoza D, Núñez FA, Escobedo A, Pelayo L, Fernández M, Torres D, et al. (2001) Parasitosis intestinales en 4 círculos infantiles de San Miguel del Padrón, Ciudad de La Habana, 1998. Rev Cubana Med Trop 53: 189–93.
  80. 80. Núñez FA, González OM, Bravo JR, Escobedo AA, González I (2003) Parasitosis intestinales en niños ingresados en el Hospital Universitario Pediátrico del Cerro, La Habana, Cuba. Rev Cubana Med Trop 55: 19–26.
  81. 81. Wordemann M, Polman K, Menocal-Heredia LT, Junco-Diaz RJ, Collado-Madurga AM, et al. (2006) Prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasites in Cuban children. Trop Med Int Health 11: 1813–20.
  82. 82. Escobedo AA, Cañete R, Núñez FA (2007) Intestinal protozoan and helminth infections in the Municipality San Juan y Martínez, Pinar del Río, Cuba. Trop Doct 37: 236–38.
  83. 83. Wordemann M, Diaz RJ, Heredia LM, Madurga AM, Espinosa AR, et al. (2008) Association of atopy, asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis and intestinal helminth infections in Cuban children. Trop Med Int Health 13: 180–86.
  84. 84. Espín Villacres VH, Rubio Altuna MS (2008) Prevalencia de parásitos en niños de 1 a 13 años en las poblaciones de Cotogchoa y San Jacinto del Bua en 1995. Banco de Información Científico-Médica, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador 19 p.
  85. 85. Andrade C, Alava T, De Palacio IA, Del Poggio P, Jamoletti C, et al. (2001) Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in the city of Portoviejo (Ecuador). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 96: 1075–79.
  86. 86. Cooper PJ, Chico ME, Bland M, Griffin GE, Nutman TB (2003) Allergic symptoms, atopy, and geohelminth infections in a rural area of Ecuador. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168: 313–17.
  87. 87. Quizhpe E, San Sebastián M, Hurtig AK, Llamas A (2003) Prevalencia de anemia en escolares de la zona amazónica de Ecuador. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 13: 355–61.
  88. 88. Sackey ME, Weigel MM, Armijos RX (2003) Predictors and nutritional consequences of intestinal parasitic infections in rural Ecuadorian children. J Trop Pediatr 49: 17–23.
  89. 89. Rinne S, Rodas EJ, Galer-Unti R, Glickman N, Glickman LT (2005) Prevalence and risk factors for protozoan and nematode infections among children in an Ecuadorian highland community. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 99: 585–92.
  90. 90. Jacobsen KH, Ribeiro PS, Quist BK, Rydbeck BV (2007) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in young Quichua children in the highlands of rural Ecuador. J Health Popul Nutr 25: 399–405.
  91. 91. Jacobsen KH, Ribeiro PS, Quist BK, Rydbeck BV (2008) Prevalencia de parasitismo intestinal en niños quechuas de zonas rurales montañosas de Ecuador. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 23: 125–28.
  92. 92. Moncayo AL, Vaca M, Amorim L, Rodriguez A, Erazo S, et al. (2008) Impact of long-term treatment with ivermectin on the prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections. PLoS One 2: e293.
  93. 93. Cook DM, Swanson RC, Dennis L, Eggett DL, Booth GM (2009) A retrospective analysis of prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites among school children in the Palajunoj Valley of Guatemala. J Health Popul Nutr 27: 31–40.
  94. 94. Jensen LA, Marlin JW, Dyck DD, Laubach HE (2009) Prevalence of multi-gastrointestinal infections with helminth, protozoan and Campylobacter spp. in Guatemalan children. J Infect Dev Ctries 3: 229–34.
  95. 95. Jensen LA, Marlin JW, Dyck DD, Laubach HE (2009) Effect of tourism and trade on intestinal parasitic infections in Guatemala. J Community Health 34: 98–101.
  96. 96. Lindo JF, Validum L, Ager AL, Campa A, Cuadrado RR, et al. (2002) Intestinal parasites among young children in the interior of Guyana. West Indian Med J 51: 25–7.
  97. 97. Beach MJ, Streit TG, Addiss DG, Prospere R, Roberts JM, et al. (1999) Assessment of combined ivermectin and albendazole for treatment of intestinal helminth and Wuchereria bancrofti infections in Haitian schoolchildren. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60: 479–86.
  98. 98. Champetier de Ribes G, Fline M, Desormeaux AM, Eyma E, Montagut P, et al. (2005) Intestinal helminthiasis in school children in Haiti in 2002. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 98: 127–32.
  99. 99. Kaminsky RG, Retes EH (2000) Helmintiasis en niños en Amapala, Honduras. Honduras pediátrica 21: 7–9.
  100. 100. Smith HM, Dekaminsky RG, Niwas S, Soto RJ, Jolly PE (2001) Prevalence and intensity of infections of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura and associated socio-demographic variables in four rural Honduran communities. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 96: 303–14.
  101. 101. Instituto de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitología Antonio Vidal (2005). Manual de Manejo de Enfermedades Parasitarias en Honduras – 1a ed. Tegucigalpa, 102 p.
  102. 102. Zuñiga VC (2004) Evaluación de la situación epidemiológica de las geo-helmintiasis en Honduras después de varias intervenciones de desparasitación dirigidas a escolares entre el 2001 y el 2003. Secretaria de Salud de Honduras. Informe de Evaluación Nacional del Programa 2004.
  103. 103. Rodríguez-Guzmán LM, Hernández-Jerónimo EJ, Rodríguez-García R (2000) Parasitosis intestinal en niños seleccionados en una consulta ambulatoria de un hospital. Rev Mex Pediatr 67: 117–22.
  104. 104. Diaz E, Mondragon J, Ramirez E, Bernal RM (2003) Epidemiology and control of intestinal parasites with nitazoxanide in children in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68: 384–85.
  105. 105. Faulkner CT, Garcia BB, Logan MH, New JC, Patton S (2003) Prevalence of endoparasitic infection in children and its relation with cholera prevention efforts in Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Pública/Pan Am J Public Health 14: 31–41.
  106. 106. Quihui-Cota L, Valencia ME, Crompton DWT, Phillips S, Hagan P, et al. (2004) Prevalence and intensity of intestinal parasitic infections in relation to nutritional status in Mexican schoolchildren. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98: 653–59.
  107. 107. Belkind-Valdovinos U, Belkind-Gerson J, Sánchez-Francia D, Espinoza-Ruiz MM, Lazcano-Ponce E (2004) Evaluación de la nitazoxanida en dosis única y por tres días en parasitosis intestinal. Salud Pública Mex 46: 333–40.
  108. 108. Quihui L, Valencia ME, Crompton DWT, Phillips S, Hagan P, et al. (2006) Role of the employment status and education of mothers in the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Mexican rural schoolchildren. BMC Public Health 6: 225.
  109. 109. Galván-Ramírez ML, Rivera N, Loeza ME, Avila X, Acero J, et al. (2007) Nitazoxanide in the treatment of Ascaris lumbricoides in a rural zone of Colima, Mexico. J Helminthol 81: 255–59.
  110. 110. Guerrero MT, Hernández MY, Rada ME, Aranda A, Hernández MI (2008) Parasitosis intestinal y alternativas de disposición de excreta en municipios de alta marginalidad. Rev Cub Salud Pública [online journal] 34 (2) Available:
  111. 111. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez C, Trujillo-Hernández B, Martínez-Contreras A, Pineda-Lucatero A, Millán-Guerrero RO (2007) Frequency of intestinal helminthiasis and its association with iron deficiency and malnutrition in children from western Mexico. [Article in Spanish]. Gac Med Mex 143: 297–300.
  112. 112. Rosewell A, Robleto G, Rodríguez G, Barragne-Bigot P, Amador JJ, et al. (2010) Soil-transmitted helminth infection and urbanization in 880 primary school children in Nicaragua, 2005. Trop Doct 40: 141–3.
  113. 113. Zunini M, Nuñez MT (2001) Prevalence of intestinal parasitosis in scholarships on community level. Centro de documentación, Representación de OPS/OMS en Argentina 9 p.
  114. 114. Ibáñez HN, Jara CC, Guerra MA, Díaz LE (2004) Prevalencia del enteroparasitismo en escolares de comunidades nativas del Alto Marañón. Amazonas, Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Pública 21: 126–33.
  115. 115. Casapí M, Joseph SA, Núñez C, Rahme E, Gyorkos TW (2006) Parasite risk factors for stunting in grade 5 students in a community of extreme poverty in Peru. Int J Parasitol 36: 741–47.
  116. 116. Iannacone J, Benites MJ, Chirinos L (2006) Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in primary schoolchildren of Santiago de Suco, Lima, Peru. Parasitol Latinoam 61: 54–62.
  117. 117. Izquierdo A, Mendoza D, Sarría C, Álvarez G, Tejada J, et al. (2006) Prevalencia de parasitosis intestinal en niños de nivel primario de la institución educativa Juan María Rejas de la localidad Tacneña de Pachía, Perú. Revista Ciencias Médicas. Available at:
  118. 118. Crotti D, D'Annibale ML, Basileo M, La Torre G (2007) Preliminary survey of human intestinal parasitosis in a Peruvian Andean zone. Struttura Complessa di Microbiologia, Sezione di Parassitologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Italy 15: 181–86.
  119. 119. Iannacone J, Alvariño L (2007) Helmintos intestinales en escolares de Chorillos y Pachacamac, Lima. Biologist 5: 27–34.
  120. 120. Carpio In, Díaz JR, Belanude MT, Chavez YV, Bedoya DY, et al. (2007) Presencia de Strongyloides stercolaris en un estudio de enteroparasitosis en escolares del asentamiento humano “La Candelaria”, distrito de Chancay, Provincia de Huaral, departamento de Lima. Acta Médica Peruana 24: 177–80.
  121. 121. Kurup R, Singh Hunjan G (2010) Intestinal parasites in St Lucia: a retrospective, Laboratory-based study. J Rural Trop Public Health 9: 24–30.
  122. 122. Ortiz D, Afonso C, Hagel I, Rodriguez O, Ortiz C, et al. (2000) Influencia de las infecciones helmínticas y el estado nutricional en la respuesta inmunitaria de niños venezolanos. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 8: 156–63.
  123. 123. Rivero-Rodríguez Z, Chourio-Lozano G, Diaz I, Cheng R, Rucsón G (2000) Enteroparásitos en escolares de una institución pública del municipio Maracaibo, Venezuela. Invest Clin 41: 37–57.
  124. 124. Miller SA, Rosario CL, Rojas E, Scorza JV (2003) Intestinal parasitic infection and associated symptoms in children attending day-care centres in Trujillo, Venezuela. Trop Med Int Health 8: 342–47.
  125. 125. Díaz AI, Rivero RZ, Bracho MA, Castellanos SM, Acurero E, et al. (2006) Prevalencia de enteroparásitos en niños de la etnia Yukpa de Toromo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Rev Med Chil 134: 72–8.
  126. 126. Figuera L, Kalale H, Marchán E (2006) Relación entre la helmintiasis intestinal y el estado nutricional-hematológico en niños de una escuela rural en el estado Sucre Venezuela. Kasmera 34: 14–24.
  127. 127. Devera R, Ortega N, Suarez M (2007) Parásitos intestinales en la población del Instituto Nacional del Menor, Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela. Rev Soc Ven Microbiol 27: 349–63.
  128. 128. Solano L, Acuña I, Barón MA, Morón de Salim A, Sánchez A (2008) Influencia de las parasitosis intestinales y otros antecedentes infecciosos sobre el estado nutricional antropométrico de niños en situación de pobreza. Parasitol Latinoam 63: 12–19.
  129. 129. Stranieri M, Silva I, Molina Y, Monges D, Montenegro L, et al. (2009) Intestinal parasitic infestations among students of Carabobo educational unit, Belén, Carlos Arevalo Municipality, Carabobo State, Venezuela. Comunidad y Salud 7: 23–8.
  130. 130. Rivero de RZ, Maldonado IA, Bracho MA, Castellanos SM, Torres Y, et al. (2009) Prevalence of enteroparasites, rotavirus and adenovirus in apparently healthy children. Kasmera 37: 62–73.
  131. 131. Pan American Health Organization (2011) Prevalence and intensity of infection of Soil-transmitted Helminths in Latin America and the Caribbean Countries: Mapping at second administrative level 2000–2010. Washington D.C. 106 p. Available: Accessed: 1 September 2012.
  132. 132. Pan American Health Organization (2010). Control and Elimination of Five Neglected Diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2010–2015. Analysis of Progress, Priorities and Lines of Action for Lymphatic filariasis, Schistosomiasis, Onchocerciasis, Trachoma and Soil-transmitted helminthiases. Washington, D.C. 93 p. Available: Accessed 1 September 2012.
  133. 133. World Health Organization (2011). Helminth control in school age children: a guide for managers of control programmes - 2nd ed. Geneva, 76 p.
  134. 134. Crompton DW, Nesheim MC (2002) Nutritional impact of intestinal helminthiases during the human life cycle. Annu Rev Nutr 22: 35–59.
  135. 135. Schneider MC, Aguilera XP, Barbosa da Silva Junior J, Ault SK, Najera P, et al. (2011) Elimination of Neglected Diseases in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Mapping of Selected Diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5 (2) e964.
  136. 136. Chammartin F, Scholte RGC, Guimarães LH, Tanner M, Utzinger J, et al. (2013) Soil-transmitted helminth infection in South America: a systematic review and geostatistical meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 13: 507–18.
  137. 137. Colston J, Saboyá M (2013) Soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Latin America and the Caribbean: modelling the determinants, prevalence, population at risk and costs of control at sub-national level. Geospat Health 7: 321–340.