• Loading metrics

Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy of Kato-Katz, Koga Agar Plate, Ether-Concentration, and FLOTAC for Schistosoma mansoni and Soil-Transmitted Helminths

  • Dominik Glinz,

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Kigbafori D. Silué,

    Affiliations Université de Cocody-Abidjan, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

  • Stefanie Knopp,

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

  • Laurent K. Lohourignon,

    Affiliation Université de Cocody-Abidjan, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

  • Kouassi P. Yao,

    Affiliation Université de Cocody-Abidjan, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

  • Peter Steinmann,

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

  • Laura Rinaldi,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Regional Center for Monitoring Parasites (CREMOPAR), Naples, Italy

  • Giuseppe Cringoli,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Regional Center for Monitoring Parasites (CREMOPAR), Naples, Italy

  • Eliézer K. N'Goran,

    Affiliations Université de Cocody-Abidjan, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

  • Jürg Utzinger

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy of Kato-Katz, Koga Agar Plate, Ether-Concentration, and FLOTAC for Schistosoma mansoni and Soil-Transmitted Helminths

  • Dominik Glinz, 
  • Kigbafori D. Silué, 
  • Stefanie Knopp, 
  • Laurent K. Lohourignon, 
  • Kouassi P. Yao, 
  • Peter Steinmann, 
  • Laura Rinaldi, 
  • Giuseppe Cringoli, 
  • Eliézer K. N'Goran, 
  • Jürg Utzinger



Infections with schistosomes and soil-transmitted helminths exert a considerable yet underappreciated economic and public health burden on afflicted populations. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for patient management, drug efficacy evaluations, and monitoring of large-scale community-based control programs.

Methods/Principal Findings

The diagnostic accuracy of four copromicroscopic techniques (i.e., Kato-Katz, Koga agar plate, ether-concentration, and FLOTAC) for the detection of Schistosoma mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth eggs was compared using stool samples from 112 school children in Côte d'Ivoire. Combined results of all four methods served as a diagnostic ‘gold’ standard and revealed prevalences of S. mansoni, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides stercoralis and Ascaris lumbricoides of 83.0%, 55.4%, 40.2%, 33.9% and 28.6%, respectively. A single FLOTAC from stool samples preserved in sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin for 30 or 83 days showed a higher sensitivity for S. mansoni diagnosis (91.4%) than the ether-concentration method on stool samples preserved for 40 days (85.0%) or triplicate Kato-Katz using fresh stool samples (77.4%). Moreover, a single FLOTAC detected hookworm, A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura infections with a higher sensitivity than any of the other methods used, but resulted in lower egg counts. The Koga agar plate method was the most accurate diagnostic assay for S. stercoralis.


We have shown that the FLOTAC method holds promise for the diagnosis of S. mansoni. Moreover, our study confirms that FLOTAC is a sensitive technique for detection of common soil-transmitted helminths. For the diagnosis of S. stercoralis, the Koga agar plate method remains the method of choice.

Author Summary

Infections with parasitic worms (e.g., Schistosoma mansoni, hookworm, roundworm, whipworm, and threadworm) are still widespread in the developing world. Accurate diagnosis is important for better patient management and for monitoring of deworming programs. Unfortunately, methods to detect parasite eggs or larvae in stool samples lack sensitivity, particularly when infection intensities are low. The most widely used method for the diagnosis of S. mansoni, hookworm, roundworm and whipworm in epidemiological surveys is the Kato-Katz technique. Recently, the FLOTAC technique has shown a higher sensitivity than the Kato-Katz method for the diagnosis of hookworm, roundworm and whipworm, but no data are available for S. mansoni. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the FLOTAC with the Kato-Katz, ether-concentration and Koga agar plate techniques for S. mansoni and other parasitic worm infections using stool samples from 112 school children from Côte d'Ivoire. FLOTAC showed the highest sensitivity for S. mansoni diagnosis. Egg counts, however, were lower when using FLOTAC, an issue which needs further investigations. The FLOTAC, Kato-Katz and ether-concentration techniques failed to accurately detect threadworm larvae, and hence, the Koga agar plate remains the method of choice for this neglected parasite.


Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis are widespread in many parts of the developing world where they negatively impact on human health and wellbeing, and thus exacerbate poverty [1][4]. Schistosomiasis is caused by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma; in Africa both S. mansoni and S. haematobium are endemic [2], [5][7]. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis is caused by intestinal nematodes; hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus), the roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), the whipworm (Trichuris trichiura), and the threadworm (Strongyloides stercoralis) [1], [3], [8], [9]. A detailed understanding of the epidemiology of these parasitic worm infections is important for the design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of helminth control programs [10], [11].

Commonly used diagnostic methods for these parasites rely on the detection of helminth eggs or larvae in human stool. These copromicroscopic approaches have drawbacks, such as low sensitivity for the detection of light-intensity infections [12], [13]. At present, the Kato-Katz technique is the most widely used copromicroscopic method in epidemiological surveys pertaining to human intestinal helminth infections because of its simplicity [14], low cost, and the established system to stratify infection intensity into different classes based on cut-offs of egg-counts [15]. The small amount of stool analyzed (usually 41.7 mg) explains why the Kato-Katz technique has a low sensitivity to detect eggs whenever they are present at low frequency or appear highly clustered (theoretical analytic sensitivity = 24 eggs per gram of stool (EPG)) [16], [17]. The sensitivity can be increased by examining multiple Kato-Katz thick smears prepared from the same stool sample or, better yet, from multiple stool samples [12],[18][22]. This point highlights the appeal of parasitological diagnostic methods capable of screening a larger amount of stool, e.g., 0.5 g or even 1 g in the case of the ether-concentration method [23] or the FLOTAC technique [24].

The ether-concentration method is often used for the diagnosis of helminth infections, particularly in specialized laboratories [23], [25][27]. Importantly, it allows the concurrent diagnosis of intestinal protozoa, and is sometimes used in combination with the Kato-Katz method to enhance diagnostic sensitivity for helminths, and hence to deepen our understanding of polyparasitism [28][30]. An important feature of the ether-concentration method is that it uses preserved stool samples, fixed in either sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin (SAF) [23], or diluted formalin [24], thus allowing sample storage and analysis at later time points. However, considerable inter-laboratory discrepancies have been noted for helminth and particularly intestinal protozoa diagnosis [26], . The Koga agar plate technique allows direct observation of S. stercoralis and hookworm larvae hatched from fresh stool samples incubated on nutrient agar in a humid chamber, usually after 48 hours [31].

Recent studies suggest that the FLOTAC technique [24] holds promise for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections in humans [32][34]. Its potential for the diagnosis of S. mansoni has yet to be investigated. The FLOTAC technique takes advantage of the fact that during flotation, parasitic elements such as helminth eggs gather in the apical portion of the flotation column and can be readily translated, i.e., cut transversally for subsequent viewing under a microscope. Thus, parasitic elements are separated from fecal debris, facilitating their identification and enumeration. Protocols have been developed for the FLOTAC basic technique (theoretical analytic sensitivity = 1 EPG), the FLOTAC dual technique, the FLOTAC double technique, and the FLOTAC pellet technique (all: theoretical analytic sensitivity = 2 EPG) [24]. Importantly, in a single FLOTAC examination usually ∼1 g of stool is analyzed, and hence a single FLOTAC allows a 24-fold higher amount of stool to be examined than a single Kato-Katz thick smear, which is an important factor explaining the higher sensitivity of the FLOTAC technique.

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different techniques and sampling efforts, i.e., single and multiple Kato-Katz thick smears, ether-concentration and the FLOTAC method, for the detection and quantification of helminth eggs. The performance of the Koga agar plate technique for the detection of helminth larvae was also assessed. Particular emphasis was placed on the diagnosis of S. mansoni.


Ethical considerations and treatment

The study was cleared by the institutional research commissions of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Basel, Switzerland) and the Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques (CSRS; Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire), and was approved by local and national health authorities of Côte d'Ivoire. The school director and teachers were informed about the objectives and procedures of the study. Parents, legal guardians, and children were informed about the study and sufficient time was given to ask questions. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all participating children. Participation was voluntary and children could withdraw from the study at any time without further obligations. At the end of the study, all children attending the school of Azaguié-IRFA (“Institut de Recherches sur les Fruits et Agrumes”) were treated free of charge with praziquantel (single 40 mg/kg oral dose using a ‘dose-pole’) and mebendazole (single 500 mg oral dose) according to WHO recommendations [35]. Additionally, children infected with S. stercoralis were treated with ivermectin (single 200 µg/kg oral dose).

Study area and participants

The study was carried out in June 2008 in the primary school of Azaguié-IRFA, located in a rural setting of Azaguié in the region of Agboville, south Côte d'Ivoire (geographical coordinates: 05°36′10.5″ N latitude, 04°00′58.5″ W longitude). The village is located 56 km north of Abidjan, the economic capital of Côte d'Ivoire. In the school year 2007/2008, 200 children attended grades 1–6. We aimed for a sample size of 120 school children, similar to our preceding FLOTAC research carried out elsewhere in Côte d'Ivoire [32]. Allowing for a drop out of ∼10%, we randomly selected 133 school children from all grades and invited them to submit a single fresh morning stool.

Field and laboratory procedures

School children were given plastic containers (125 ml) for stool collection. Upon submission, each container was labeled with a unique identification number and transferred within 1–2 hours to the CSRS in Abidjan. Stool samples were processed at the day of collection, usually within 2–3 hours after reaching the laboratory. Stool specimens were collected over six consecutive days (one sample from each of 12 children on day 1 and one sample from each of 20 children on the following 5 days).

As depicted in Figure 1, each fresh stool sample was subjected to the Kato-Katz method (3 thick smears), the Koga agar plate method (1 examination), and the FLOTAC dual technique (1 examination, fresh stool sample homogenized in SAF). Additionally, ∼5 g of the fresh stool were preserved in 25 ml SAF. After 9 days of preservation, these samples were filtered in order to remove large fibers (wire mesh aperture: 250 µm) and split into 5 sub-samples, each weighing ∼1 g. Among them, 3 sub-samples were examined with the FLOTAC dual technique 10, 30, and 83 days post-stool collection, 1 sub-sample was subjected to the ether-concentration method 40 days post-stool collection, and the fifth sub-sample was used as back-up and was finally discarded.

Figure 1. Diagnostic methods used to detect S. mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections.

The flowchart details the diagnostic approaches and their temporal sequence, as well as the amount of stool examined for the detection of helminth eggs and larvae, and the comparison of the different diagnostic tools applied to 112 stool samples from school children in Azaguié-IRFA, Côte d'Ivoire, in June 2008.

Processing of stool samples was as follows. First, triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears (41.7 mg each) were prepared. Slides were read twice; first within 30–60 min for detection of hookworm eggs and again after ∼2 hours for diagnosis of S. mansoni, A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and other helminths. For each helminth species, the number of eggs was counted under a microscope by one of four experienced laboratory technicians and recorded separately for both readings.

Second, a hazelnut-sized stool sample (average weight = 2.29 g) was placed in the middle of an agar plate. The plates were incubated in a humid chamber at 28°C for 48 hours. Plates were inspected under a microscope for the characteristic traces of hookworm and S. stercoralis larvae. Subsequently, the plates were rinsed with SAF, the solutions centrifuged and the sediment examined for larvae under a microscope by one experienced laboratory technician. The technician was blinded to the preceding Kato-Katz test results.

Third, the samples for FLOTAC were prepared as follows: the filtered stool suspensions were filled up to 10 ml with SAF and equally split into two 15-ml Falcon tubes. Three ml of ether were added to each tube to facilitate the removal of fatty compounds that could interfere with egg detection under a microscope. The Falcon tubes were shaken rigorously for at least 1 min and then centrifuged for 2 min at 170 g. The supernatant was discarded and each pellet suspended in 6 ml of either flotation solution FS4 (sodium nitrate: 315 g NaNO3 suspended in 685 ml H2O; specific gravity (s.g.) = 1.20) or FS7 (zinc sulphate: 685 g ZnSO4 H2O suspended in 685 ml H2O; s.g. = 1.35) [24]. In the present study, the FLOTAC dual technique was employed (i.e., one of two different FS in each of the two chambers of the same FLOTAC apparatus). From a panel of 14 different FS [36], we selected FS4 because it had proved to be useful for soil-transmitted helminth diagnosis in previous studies carried out in Côte d'Ivoire and Zanzibar [32], [33]. FS7 was chosen because it was particularly suitable for the detection of S. mansoni eggs in fecal samples obtained from infected mice and hamster (J. Keiser, L. Rinaldi, and J. Utzinger; unpublished data). Each suspension was transferred into one of the two 5-ml chambers of the FLOTAC apparatus. The apparatus was centrifuged (using a Hettich Universal 320 centrifuge; Tuttlingen, Germany) at 160 g for 5 min. Subsequently, the upper portion in the FLOTAC apparatus was translated, and the observation grid examined under a microscope at 100× magnification by one experienced laboratory technician. The technician was blinded to the preceding Kato-Katz and ether-concentration test results. Helminth eggs were counted and reported for each species in each chamber separately.

Fourth, the ether-concentration method was performed as described in detail elsewhere [27].

Data management and statistical analysis

Data were double-entered in Microsoft Office Access 2007, cross-checked using EpiInfo (TM 3.4.1), and analyzed with STATA version 9.1 (StataCorp LP; College Station, TX). The different diagnostic methods were compared using 2-way contingency tables of frequencies, and agreement between 2 diagnostic techniques was determined (e.g., Kato-Katz versus ether-concentration, and Kato-Katz versus FLOTAC for S. mansoni diagnosis). Kappa (ĸ) statistic was employed to determine the strength of agreement using the following cut-offs: (i) ĸ<0.00 indicating no agreement; (ii) ĸ = 0.00–0.20 indicating poor agreement; (iii) ĸ = 0.21–0.40 indicating fair agreement; (iv) ĸ = 0.41–0.60 indicating moderate agreement; ĸ = 0.61–0.80 indicating substantial agreement; and (v) ĸ = 0.81–1.00 indicating almost perfect agreement [37], [38]. It is important to note that ĸ values depend on the marginal distributions of contingency tables. We employed a test of marginal homogeneity and, since significant values were obtained, raked ĸ values were calculated throughout [39], [40].

The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each method, considering the combined results from all different methods, FS, and at all time points investigated, as diagnostic ‘gold’ standard. Hence, any positive test result, regardless of the technique employed, was considered a true-positive result. Following this approach specificity was set to be 100%, justified by the direct observation of parasite eggs [21], [26], [32], [33].

Helminth-specific egg counts were expressed as EPGs for three among the four techniques. For the Kato-Katz method, the number of helminth eggs in each of the three thick smears prepared from a single fresh stool sample collected from each participant were added and then multiplied by a factor 8 to obtain EPGs. For the ether-concentration method, EPGs were estimated by dividing the number of helminth eggs with the amount of stool examined after 40 days of preservation (∼1 g; see Figure 1), that is one-fifth of the total amount of weighed stool that was preserved and used for four different tests with the remaining fifth part of the preserved stool sample finally discarded. For the examination of stool samples with the FLOTAC dual technique, FS-specific EPGs were estimated as follows. For the fresh stool sample (∼1 g; see Figure 1), the number of counted helminth eggs was divided by the exact amount of stool and multiplied with a factor 2 (stool sample was equally aliquoted to one of the two FLOTAC chambers) and, additionally, with a factor 1.2 (stool sample was solved in 6 ml FS, but only 5 ml was filled into the FLOTAC apparatus). For the SAF-preserved stool, the number of counted helminth eggs was divided by one-fifth of the total amount of weighed stool (∼1 g; see Figure 1), and then multiplied by factors 2 and 1.2 as described above. Since EPGs were not normally distributed (as assessed by quantile normal plots), the geometric mean (GM), including 95% confidence intervals (CI), was calculated and graphically displayed. Our assumption was that non-overlapping 95% CIs indicate statistical significance (p<0.05).

Post-calibration for FLOTAC

A post-calibration was performed 4 months post-stool collection to determine whether FS4 and FS7 are indeed among the most suitable FS for the FLOTAC technique for differential helminth diagnosis. For this purpose, we employed a composite human stool sample (∼100 g), pooling stool from 8 selected children with high-intensity helminth infections who provided a second stool sample just before administering anthelmintic drugs. This composite stool sample was preserved in SAF and transferred to Naples, Italy. From the panel of 14 different available FS [36], a total of 9 were selected, including FS4 and FS7. At least 3 replicates were examined for each of the 9 FS with and without a prior ether washing step, to allow an appraisal of the effect of ether on helminth diagnosis.


Study cohort

We obtained one sufficiently large stool sample to perform triplicate Kato-Katz, multiple FLOTAC, a single ether-concentration, and a single Koga agar plate test from 112 school children. Our study cohort comprised 61 (54.5%) boys. The median age was 10 years (range: 6–15 years).

Prevalence of S. mansoni and soil-transmitted helminths

The combined results from the different copromicroscopic techniques were considered as diagnostic ‘gold’ standard. As shown in Figure 2, eggs of S. mansoni were detected in 93 children (83.0%). The overall prevalences of hookworm, T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides were 55.4%, 40.2% and 28.6%, respectively. S. stercoralis larvae were detected in the stools of 38 children (33.9%).

Figure 2. Prevalence of S. mansoni and soil-transmitted helminth infections.

Bar charts indicate the prevalence of S. mansoni (A) and soil-transmitted helminth infections, i.e., hookworm (B), T. trichiura (C), and A. lumbricoides (D) among 112 school children from Azaguié-IRFA, Côte d'Ivoire, in June 2008. Results are stratified by diagnostic methods. The combined results from the different methods were considered as diagnostic ‘gold’ standard. Fresh stool examinations were subjected to triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears, a single Koga agar plate test, and a single FLOTAC examination. The fresh stool sample for FLOTAC (0 days) was homogenized in SAF. The SAF-preserved stool samples were examined once with the ether-concentration method (after 40 days) and 3 times with the FLOTAC method (at days 10, 30, and 83 post-stool collection). Prevalence estimates for S. mansoni using the FLOTAC method only considered the results of FS7. With regard to soil-transmitted helminth infections, the combined results of FS4 and FS7 were considered.

Methods comparison for the diagnosis of S. mansoni

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of 3 different techniques for S. mansoni diagnosis. Whilst a single Kato-Katz thick smear revealed S. mansoni at a prevalence of 56.3%, the cumulative prevalence after examination of 3 Kato-Katz thick smears was 64.3%; an increase of 14.2%. The observed S. mansoni prevalence based on a single ether-concentration test was 70.5%. Subjecting a fresh stool sample homogenized in SAF to the FLOTAC dual technique, but considering only results from FS7, revealed a S. mansoni prevalence of 53.6%. Preservation of stool samples in SAF for 10, 30, and 83 days, and examination with FLOTAC FS7 revealed point prevalence estimates of 72.3–75.9%.

Table 1. Prevalence, sensitivity, and negative predicted value (NPV) derived by different diagnostic methods.

The highest sensitivity for S. mansoni diagnosis (91.4%) was found for the FLOTAC dual technique after 30 and 83 days of preservation in SAF. The sensitivity of a single ether-concentration test was 85.0%, whereas triplicate or only a single Kato-Katz revealed sensitivities of 77.4% and 67.7%, respectively.

Table 2 shows 2-way contingency tables comparing the results of a single FLOTAC (fresh stool, SAF preservation for 10, 30, or 83 days) and the single ether-concentration test (SAF preservation for 40 days) with the combined results of the triplicate Kato-Katz thick smear readings. Using fresh stool samples for FLOTAC (homogenized in SAF) and Kato-Katz, 51 S. mansoni infections were concurrently detected by both techniques, whereas 21 additional infections were diagnosed by triplicate Kato-Katz only, and 9 additional infections were detected by FLOTAC only. The agreement between these 2 methods was moderate (raked ĸ = 0.49). Comparing the results of FLOTAC performed with stool samples preserved in SAF for 10, 30, or 83 days with triplicate Kato-Katz from fresh stool, both methods concurrently detected between 69 and 71 S. mansoni infections, whereas 12–16 additional infections were only found by the FLOTAC technique and 1–3 infections were only detected by triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears. Substantial agreement was found for the stool samples preserved in SAF for 10 days (raked ĸ = 0.76) or 83 days (raked ĸ = 0.71), and an almost perfect agreement after 30 days of SAF preservation (raked ĸ = 0.84).

Table 2. Agreement between different diagnostic techniques for the detection of S. mansoni.

The ether-concentration method and triplicate Kato-Katz diagnosed 69 S. mansoni infections concurrently, whereas 10 infections were only found by the ether-concentration method and 3 were detected by triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears only, owing to a substantial agreement (raked ĸ = 0.79).

Triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears revealed a mean infection intensity of 121.2 EPG (95% CI: 86.8–169.2 EPG). The mean infection intensity based on a single ether-concentration examination was 110.7 EPG (95% CI: 76.0–161.1 EPG). These mean egg counts were significantly higher than those obtained with the FLOTAC dual technique, regardless of whether FS4 or FS7 were employed (Figure 3A). There was one exception: a single FLOTAC performed on stool samples preserved in SAF for 83 days and using FS7 revealed similar EPGs as triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and a single ether-concentration test.

Figure 3. Geometric mean (GM) fecal egg counts according to different diagnostic techniques.

Bar charts indicate the GM of fecal egg counts (as expressed in eggs per gram of stool (EPG) according to different techniques for the diagnosis of S. mansoni (A), hookworm (B), A. lumbricoides (C), and T. trichiura (D) in stool samples from 112 school children from Azaguié-IRFA, Côte d'Ivoire, in June 2008. The results for the FLOTAC method are presented separately for FS4 and FS7. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the GM.

Using FS4 with stool preserved in SAF for 10 days resulted in the detection of only 10 (8.9%), and after 83 days of preservation of no S. mansoni-positive individuals. The use of FS7, on the other hand, revealed 81 (72.3%) and 85 (75.9%) infections after 10 and 83 days of preservation, respectively. While the observed S. mansoni fecal egg counts in FS4 decreased over time to zero, an increase was observed in FS7 from a mean of 32.3 EPG (95% CI: 24.7–42.3 EPG) at day 10 to 57.7 EPG (95% CI: 41.5–80.2 EPG) at day 83.

Figure 4 shows that the shape of S. mansoni eggs was somewhat altered when using the FLOTAC dual technique and employing FS7. However, the characteristic lateral spine remained, and hence unambiguous diagnosis was ascertained.

Figure 4. S. mansoni eggs detected by the Kato-Katz or FLOTAC method.

The pictures show a S. mansoni egg as seen under a light microscope using 100× magnification. S. mansoni egg without deformation as seen in a Kato-Katz thick smear (A), and egg deformed through the influence of zinc sulphate in FS7 and centrifugation as seen under the FLOTAC reading disc (B).

Methods comparison for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths

For hookworm, the observed prevalence increased from 12.5% after a single to 21.4% after triplicate Kato-Katz examination, an increase of 71.2%. For T. trichiura there was an increase from 8.0% to 12.5% (+56.3%). No increase was observed for A. lumbricoides; a prevalence of 19.6% was obtained already after the first Kato-Katz thick smear reading (Figure 2B–D and Table 1).

Analyses with the Koga agar plate method revealed 28 (25.0%) hookworm infections. The highest observed prevalence of hookworm infection was obtained with the FLOTAC dual technique using fresh stool samples homogenized in SAF (43.8%). The observed prevalence at days 10 and 83 post-conservation decreased to 31.3% and 17.0%, respectively. A single Kato-Katz revealed a hookworm infection intensity of 165.7 EPG (95% CI: 97.0–282.4 EPG), whereas triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears suggested an intensity of less than half of this value (64.6 EPG; 95% CI: 32.8–127.2 EPG). The difference in fecal egg counts determined by the Kato-Katz and the FLOTAC techniques in both FS (fresh stool: FS4 = 18.1 EPG; 95% CI: 11.3–29.2 EPG, and FS7 = 18.7 EPG; 95% CI: 11.3–30.9 EPG) was significant. In the preserved stool samples, the observed EPGs for hookworm decreased significantly in FS4 from day 10 (13.3 EPG; 95% CI: 7.4–23.8 EPG) to day 83 (2.7 EPG; 95% CI: 1.2–5.9 EPG) (Figure 3B). In FS7, the fecal egg counts also decreased, but the difference showed no statistical significance after 10 and 83 days of SAF conservation (from 18.1 EPG (95% CI: 11.5–28.6 EPG) to 11.1 EPG (95% CI: 6.1–20.2 EPG)).

The highest prevalence of A. lumbricoides was estimated by a single FLOTAC from fresh stool homogenized in SAF (20.5%), but triplicate Kato-Katz showed only a marginally lower prevalence (19.6%). The examination of stool samples preserved in SAF for 83 days using FLOTAC or an ether-concentration test at day 40 after stool collection resulted in observed prevalences of 10.7% and 12.5%, respectively. The A. lumbricoides fecal egg counts determined with Kato-Katz were significantly higher than those obtained with FLOTAC, except for the results generated after 83 days of stool preservation. There was a significant increase for A. lumbricoides egg counts both with FS4 (from 148.4 EPG (95% CI: 39.9–551.5 EPG) to 1159.3 EPG (95% CI: 596.6–2252.7 EPG); a 7.8-fold increase) and with FS7 (from 181.2 EPG (95% CI: 60.0–546.9 EPG) to 1688.5 EPG (95% CI: 889.4–3205.8 EPG); a 9.3–fold increase) when comparing the 10 and 83 post-stool collection preservation time points (Figure 3C).

The highest observed T. trichiura prevalence (32.1%) was obtained with a single FLOTAC examined after 30 days of stool preservation in SAF. Considerably lower prevalences were obtained with a single ether-concentration test (20.5%) and triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears (12.5%). The T. trichiura fecal egg count for a single Kato-Katz thick smear was 56.3 EPG (95% CI: 22.4–141.4 EPG). For triplicate Kato-Katz, the respective egg count was 24.0 EPG (95% CI: 11.4–50.6 EPG). Consistently more T. trichiura eggs were found in FS4 than in FS7, but the difference was only significant at day 30 post-preservation (FS4 = 35.1 EPG, 95% CI: 24.4–50.4 EPG; FS7 = 15.8 EPG, 95% CI: 10.2–24.4 EPG). There was an apparent increase of egg counts over the course of stool preservation in SAF, i.e., in FS4 from 17.5 EPG (95% CI: 11.2–27.2 EPG) to 39.6 EPG (95% CI: 25.8–60.8 EPG), a 2.3-fold increase, and in FS7 from 11.8 EPG (95% CI: 7.9–17.5 EPG) to 22.2 EPG (95% CI: 14.3–34.7 EPG), a 1.9-fold increase (Figure 3D).

S. stercoralis larvae were found on Koga agar plates prepared with stool samples from 38 children but only 1 of these 38 infection was diagnosed after triplicate Kato-Katz examinations and 2 of these 38 infections were detected with FLOTAC in the fresh stool samples processed in SAF. No S. stercoralis larvae were found in the preserved samples, neither by FLOTAC nor by ether-concentration.

Post-calibration of FLOTAC

The use of FS7 resulted in the highest S. mansoni fecal egg count (average: 38.3 EPG, SD: 2.7 EPG; 6 replications), but stool samples had to be washed with ether as otherwise, due to the darkening effect of organic debris, accurate reading was not feasible. For hookworm diagnosis, FS4 produced the highest fecal egg count (average: 103.2 EPG, SD: 23.6 EPG; 6 replications). Of note, hookworm eggs were readily detected only in the absence of ether for sample preparation. With regard to A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, the results from the post-calibration were less clear-cut than those for S. mansoni and hookworm, as all tested FS resulted in relatively high egg count averages for A. lumbricoides (306.0–515.0 EPG, SD: 22.2–176.8 EPG; 3–4 replications) and T. trichiura (6.0–26.0 EPG, SD: 2.8–15.0 EPG; 3–4 replications), whenever an ether washing step was included.


Accurate diagnosis is key for adequate patient management and for guiding the design, implementation, and monitoring of community-based infectious disease control programs [13], [41]. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of two widely used techniques for detection and quantification of helminth eggs in fecal samples – the Kato-Katz thick smear using fresh stool, and the ether-concentration method using SAF-preserved samples – with the recently developed FLOTAC technique. Particular emphasis was placed on the diagnosis of S. mansoni because of the public health importance of intestinal schistosomiasis [2], [5][7], and because the FLOTAC method had not previously been investigated for this parasite. Additionally, the Koga agar plate method was employed, mainly for the diagnosis of S. stercoralis, but also for the detection of hookworm larvae.

Best results, i.e., high sensitivities (87.1–91.4%) for detecting S. mansoni eggs (prevalence: 72.3–75.9%), were achieved after stool samples were homogenized, preserved in SAF, and examined after 10–83 days with the FLOTAC dual technique. Almost as sensitive was a single ether-concentration (85.0%), revealing a S. mansoni prevalence of 70.5%. Triplicate Kato-Katz examinations resulted in a prevalence estimate of 64.3%. A single Kato-Katz and FLOTAC using fresh stool revealed considerably lower S. mansoni point prevalences of 56.3% and 53.6%, respectively. It should be noted, however that neither FLOTAC, nor the ether-concentration test, nor multiple Kato-Katz readings detected ‘all’ S. mansoni or ‘all’ soil-transmitted helminth infections. There was moderate to almost perfect agreement between the FLOTAC or ether-concentration method and triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears according to raked ĸ values.

With regard to soil-transmitted helminth diagnosis, our results confirm that a single FLOTAC is more sensitive than multiple Kato-Katz thick smears for the detection of hookworm, A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura eggs in fecal samples [32][34]. A single FLOTAC using fresh stool processed with SAF was also more sensitive than a single ether-concentration test for the diagnosis of hookworm, A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura infections. Finally, for hookworm diagnosis, a single FLOTAC using fresh stool was more sensitive than a single Koga agar plate test.

The design of our study allowed investigating the effect of the duration of stool preservation on helminth species-specific diagnosis. The duration of stool fixation had a considerable effect on the diagnostic performance of copromicroscopic techniques. While the number of S. mansoni infections detected after 10, 30, and 83 days of stool preservation in SAF remained constant (81–85 infections), there was an apparent increase in fecal egg counts from day 10 to day 83, from 32.3 EPG to 57.7 EPG (considering only FS7). The observed prevalence of hookworm and A. lumbricoides decreased with increasing duration of SAF conservation before FLOTAC analysis. For example, while the point prevalence of hookworm was 43.8% for FLOTAC using fresh stool, it decreased to 17.0% after stool samples had been preserved in SAF for 83 days. On the other hand, there was no apparent decline in the prevalence of T. trichiura over the 83-day SAF preservation period. Higher fecal egg counts were observed for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura as a function of stool preservation duration. Regarding hookworm diagnosis, there was a sharp decrease in fecal egg counts as a function of preservation time using SAF, suggesting a negative impact of this preservation medium on hookworm eggs. However, during the post-calibration investigation and subsequent studies, it was found that the introduction of an ether washing step resulted in lower hookworm egg counts. Indeed, considerably higher hookworm egg counts were revealed in SAF-preserved stool samples in the absence of ether, whereas destroyed hookworm eggs could be observed after exposure of the sample to ether.

These observations indicate that the prolonged preservation of stool in SAF in combination with ether used for sample preparation might destroy the fragile hookworm eggs. To test this hypothesis, it will be interesting to investigate the exact influence of the preservation media alone, i.e., we still lack data on the influence of SAF and/or ether on helminth egg counts. The underlying mechanisms resulting in increasing S. mansoni, A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura fecal egg counts estimates with time of preservation, and for the higher diagnostic sensitivity, yet lower egg counts when using FLOTAC as opposed to the Kato-Katz thick smear method, remain elusive and are the subject of ongoing deliberations and studies. We speculate that the helminth larvae are able to further develop and gain weight in these environmentally resistant eggs. This might lead to a change in density, and hence altered floating behavior of the eggs. However, these apparent fluctuations give rise to fears regarding the consistency of the diagnostic performance of FLOTAC when performed after non-standardized preservation time, on different populations, and by different laboratories.

The somewhat higher fecal egg counts of S. mansoni, A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura using FLOTAC at later time points of stool conservation, and the consistently higher fecal egg counts using Kato-Katz might be explained by the following additional reasons. First, helminth eggs should not be considered “inert elements”. Instead, interactions occur between the different compartments within a floating fecal suspension (e.g., FS components, parasitic elements, fixative, ether, and residues of the host alimentation), and these might be complex [24]. New research is therefore needed to elucidate potential interactions between these compartments. Second, the high fecal egg counts derived from the Kato-Katz thick smear readings shown in Fig. 3 might be misleading. EPG values obtained from Kato-Katz thick smear readings are not continuous due to the multiplication factor used (i.e., a factor 24 for a single, and a factor 8 for triplicate Kato-Katz thick smear readings). Hence, the minimum positive value for a single measurement is 24 EPG. Third, there are additional reasons why the Kato-Katz technique might overestimate fecal egg counts. For example, when scraping the plastic spatula of the Kato-Katz kit across the upper surface of the fine-meshed screen placed on top of the stool sample, the feces is sieved, and helminth eggs are concentrated [42], [43], an issue we are currently investigating.

The available results pose considerable challenges for articulating recommendations regarding the optimal deployment of diagnostic tools for patient diagnosis, drug efficacy evaluations, and surveillance in areas where soil-transmitted helminths and S. mansoni are co-endemic. While the results pertaining to S. mansoni clearly argue for SAF-conservation of stool samples and their analysis with FS7 at a later time point, the data regarding common soil-transmitted helminth infections suggest that immediate diagnosis with FS4 should be pursued. Important trade-offs between time and fecal egg counts also exist for different soil-transmitted helminth species. Sound conclusions can probably only be drawn once more results and experience from the field are available, but it is clear that a method which needs different times and solutions to reliably diagnose distinct helminth species infections in a poly-parasitized patient is not ideal.

The current study is part of a broad attempt at validating the FLOTAC technique for human helminth diagnosis. Although we knew from previous investigations that FS4 is particularly suitable for the detection of soil-transmitted helminth eggs [32], , and prior investigations with fecal pellets obtained from S. mansoni-infected mice and hamster revealed that FS7 is suitable for detection of S. mansoni eggs, this issue has never been addressed in a systematic manner, using a single pool of stool of uniform characteristics. In a post-calibration approach, we employed a composite human stool sample of ∼100 g, pooling stool from a few selected children with high-intensity helminth infections. The results of the post-calibration underscore that the ether washing step potentially destroys hookworm eggs after a certain conservation period in SAF. No S. mansoni eggs were found when using FS4, and only few hookworm eggs were found in FS7. With regard to A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, the results from the post-calibration were less clear-cut than those for S. mansoni and hookworm, as a number of FS resulted in high fecal egg counts for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura.

Regarding parasitological S. stercoralis diagnosis, it is conventionally either done with the Koga agar plate method – as in the present study – or the Baermann method [12], [21], [31], [44][46]. Our study offered an opportunity to also obtain preliminary results with FLOTAC for S. stercoralis diagnosis. Only 2 individuals were found positive for S. stercoralis when fresh stool samples were subjected to FLOTAC, whereas the Koga agar plate method revealed 38 infections. One of the 2 samples determined as S. stercoralis-positive using the FLOTAC method contained so many larvae that they were even observed in the Kato-Katz thick smears. Of note, the tegument of the S. stercoralis larvae detected by FLOTAC showed signs of degeneration, which might be due to the SAF preservation, the prior washing step with ether, the FS, or a combination of these chemicals. More research is needed to determine whether the FLOTAC technique might be further adapted to allow S. stercoralis diagnosis.

In conclusion, the high sensitivity of a single FLOTAC examination for diagnosing common soil-transmitted helminth infections has been confirmed, but fecal egg counts are consistently lower when compared to the Kato-Katz method. This is an important issue and warrants additional studies. Importantly, we have shown that the FLOTAC method holds promise for the detection of S. mansoni eggs, particularly in well-homogenized stool samples after preservation in SAF for at least 10 days. Further validation of the FLOTAC technique is under way in different parts of the world, as this technique might become an indispensable tool for patient management and rigorous monitoring of anthelmintic drug efficacy studies and community-based helminth control programs.

Supporting Information


We express our deep thanks to the headmaster and the teachers, and especially to all the school children of Azaguié-IRFA in south Côte d'Ivoire, who participated in this study. The expert help by the laboratory technicians at CSRS and the Université de Cocody-Abidjan is duly acknowledged. We thank the FLOTAC team at the Department of Pathology and Animal Health at the University of Naples ‘Federico II’ in Naples, Italy, for their support and commitment. Useful comments and suggestions by external referees are duly acknowledged. We are grateful to Yvette Endriss and Benjamin Speich from the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute for taking photographs of Schistosoma mansoni eggs and generating Figure 4.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DG KDS SK PS GC EKN JU. Performed the experiments: DG KDS LKL EKN. Analyzed the data: DG KPY LR GC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GC EKN JU. Wrote the paper: DG SK PS LR GC JU.


  1. 1. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, et al. (2006) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet 367: 1521–1532.
  2. 2. Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L (2006) Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 368: 1106–1118.
  3. 3. Hotez PJ (2008) Hookworm and poverty. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1136: 38–44.
  4. 4. King CH (2010) Parasites and poverty: the case of schistosomiasis. Acta Trop 113: 95–104.
  5. 5. van der Werf MJ, de Vlas SJ, Brooker S, Looman CWN, Nagelkerke NJD, et al. (2003) Quantification of clinical morbidity associated with schistosome infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Acta Trop 86: 125–139.
  6. 6. Steinmann P, Keiser J, Bos R, Tanner M, Utzinger J (2006) Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infect Dis 6: 411–425.
  7. 7. Utzinger J, Raso G, Brooker S, de Savigny D, Tanner M, et al. (2009) Schistosomiasis and neglected tropical diseases: towards integrated and sustainable control and a word of caution. Parasitology 136: 1859–1874.
  8. 8. de Silva NR, Brooker S, Hotez PJ, Montresor A, Engels D, et al. (2003) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: updating the global picture. Trends Parasitol 19: 547–551.
  9. 9. Olsen A, van Lieshout L, Marti H, Polderman T, Polman K, et al. (2009) Strongyloidiasis – the most neglected of the neglected tropical diseases? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 103: 967–972.
  10. 10. Brooker S, Kabatereine NB, Smith JL, Mupfasoni D, Mwanje MT, et al. (2009) An updated atlas of human helminth infections: the example of East Africa. Int J Health Geogr 8: 42.
  11. 11. Utzinger J, Müller I, Vounatsou P, Singer BH, N'Goran EK, et al. (2003) Random spatial distribution of Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infections among school children within a single village. J Parasitol 89: 686–692.
  12. 12. Knopp S, Mgeni AF, Khamis IS, Steinmann P, Stothard JR, et al. (2008) Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths in the era of preventive chemotherapy: effect of multiple stool sampling and use of different diagnostic techniques. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e331.
  13. 13. Bergquist R, Johansen MV, Utzinger J (2009) Diagnostic dilemmas in helminthology: what tools to use and when? Trends Parasitol 25: 151–156.
  14. 14. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J (1972) A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 14: 397–400.
  15. 15. WHO (2002) Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser 912: 1–57.
  16. 16. Enk MJ, Lima AC, Massara CL, Coelho PM, Schall VT (2008) A combined strategy to improve the control of Schistosoma mansoni in areas of low prevalence in Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 140–146.
  17. 17. de Vlas SJ, Gryseels B (1992) Underestimation of Schistosoma mansoni prevalences. Parasitol Today 8: 274–277.
  18. 18. Utzinger J, Booth M, N'Goran EK, Müller I, Tanner M, et al. (2001) Relative contribution of day-to-day and intra-specimen variation in faecal egg counts of Schistosoma mansoni before and after treatment with praziquantel. Parasitology 122: 537–544.
  19. 19. Engels D, Sinzinkayo E, de Vlas SJ, Gryseels B (1997) Intraspecimen fecal egg count variation in Schistosoma mansoni infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 57: 571–577.
  20. 20. Booth M, Vounatsou P, N'Goran EK, Tanner M, Utzinger J (2003) The influence of sampling effort and the performance of the Kato-Katz technique in diagnosing Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm co-infections in rural Côte d'Ivoire. Parasitology 127: 525–531.
  21. 21. Steinmann P, Du ZW, Wang LB, Wang XZ, Jiang JY, et al. (2008) Extensive multiparasitism in a village of Yunnan province, People's Republic of China, revealed by a suite of diagnostic methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 760–769.
  22. 22. Berhe N, Medhin G, Erko B, Smith T, Gedamu S, et al. (2004) Variations in helminth faecal egg counts in Kato-Katz thick smears and their implications in assessing infection status with Schistosoma mansoni. Acta Trop 92: 205–212.
  23. 23. Marti H, Escher E (1990) SAF - an alternative fixation solution for parasitological stool specimens. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 120: 1473–1476.
  24. 24. Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Maurelli MP, Utzinger J (2010) FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nat Protoc 5: 503–515.
  25. 25. Allen AVH, Ridley DS (1970) Further observations on the formol-ether concentration technique for faecal parasites. J Clin Pathol 23: 545–546.
  26. 26. Bogoch II, Raso G, N'Goran EK, Marti HP, Utzinger J (2006) Differences in microscopic diagnosis of helminths and intestinal protozoa among diagnostic centres. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25: 344–347.
  27. 27. Utzinger J, Botero-Kleiven S, Castelli F, Chiodini PL, Edwards H, et al. (2010) Microscopic diagnosis of sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin-fixed stool samples for helminths and intestinal protozoa: a comparison among European reference laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 267–273.
  28. 28. Raso G, Luginbühl A, Adjoua CA, Tian-Bi NT, Silué KD, et al. (2004) Multiple parasite infections and their relationship to self-reported morbidity in a community of rural Côte d'Ivoire. Int J Epidemiol 33: 1092–1102.
  29. 29. Sayasone S, Vonghajack Y, Vanmany M, Rasphone O, Tesana S, et al. (2009) Diversity of human intestinal helminthiasis in Lao PDR. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 103: 247–254.
  30. 30. Steinmann P, Utzinger J, Du ZW, Zhou XN (2010) Multiparasitism: a neglected reality on global, regional and local scale. Adv Parasitol 73: 21–50.
  31. 31. Koga K, Kasuya S, Khamboonruang C, Sukavat K, Nakamura Y, et al. (1990) An evaluation of the agar plate method for the detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in northern Thailand. J Trop Med Hyg 93: 183–188.
  32. 32. Utzinger J, Rinaldi L, Lohourignon LK, Rohner F, Zimmermann MB, et al. (2008) FLOTAC: a new sensitive technique for the diagnosis of hookworm infections in humans. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102: 84–90.
  33. 33. Knopp S, Rinaldi L, Khamis IS, Stothard JR, Rollinson D, et al. (2009) A single FLOTAC is more sensitive than triplicate Kato-Katz for the diagnosis of low-intensity soil-transmitted helminth infections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 103: 347–354.
  34. 34. Knopp S, Glinz D, Rinaldi L, Mohammed KA, N'Goran EK, et al. (2009) FLOTAC: a promising technique for detecting helminth eggs in human faeces. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 103: 1190–1194.
  35. 35. WHO (2006) Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control interventions: a manual for health professionals and programme managers. Geneva: World Health Organization. 62 p.
  36. 36. Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Capelli G, Scala A (2004) The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Vet Parasitol 123: 121–131.
  37. 37. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20: 37–46.
  38. 38. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.
  39. 39. Agresti A, Ghosh A, Bini M (1995) Raking Kappa: describing potential impact of marginal distributions on measures of agreement. Biom J 37: 811–820.
  40. 40. Kalton G, Flores-Cervantes I (2003) Weighting methods. J Off Stat 19: 81–97.
  41. 41. Peeling RW, Smith PG, Bossuyt PM (2006) A guide for diagnostic evaluations. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: S2–6.
  42. 42. WHO (1994) Bench aids for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites. Geneva: World Health Organization. 20 p.
  43. 43. Katz N, Coelho PM, Pellegrino J (1970) Evaluation of Kato's quantitative method through the recovery of Schistosoma mansoni eggs added to human feces. J Parasitol 56: 1032–1033.
  44. 44. Steinmann P, Zhou XN, Du ZW, Jiang JY, Wang LB, et al. (2007) Occurrence of Strongyloides stercoralis in Yunnan province, China, and comparison of diagnostic methods. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 1: e75.
  45. 45. Stothard JR, Pleasant J, Oguttu D, Adriko M, Galimaka R, et al. (2008) Strongyloides stercoralis: a field-based survey of mothers and their preschool children using ELISA, Baermann and Koga plate methods reveals low endemicity in western Uganda. J Helminthol 82: 263–269.
  46. 46. Glinz D, N'Guessan NA, Utzinger J, N'Goran EK (2010) High prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis among school children in rural Côte d'Ivoire. J Parasitol 96: 431–433.