Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Tribendimidine and Albendazole for Treating Soil-Transmitted Helminths, Strongyloides stercoralis and Taenia spp.: Open-Label Randomized Trial

  • Peter Steinmann,

    Affiliations Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

  • Xiao-Nong Zhou,

    Affiliation National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

  • Zun-Wei Du,

    Affiliation Helminthiasis Division, Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Simao, People's Republic of China

  • Jin-Yong Jiang,

    Affiliation Helminthiasis Division, Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Simao, People's Republic of China

  • Shu-Hua Xiao,

    Affiliation National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

  • Zhong-Xing Wu,

    Affiliation Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Wuxi, People's Republic of China

  • Hui Zhou,

    Affiliation National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

  • Jürg Utzinger

    Affiliation Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland



Tribendimidine is an anthelminthic drug with a broad spectrum of activity. In 2004 the drug was approved by Chinese authorities for human use. The efficacy of tribendimidine against soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichuris trichiura) has been established, and new laboratory investigations point to activity against cestodes and Strongyloides ratti.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In an open-label randomized trial, the safety and efficacy of a single oral dose of albendazole or tribendimidine (both drugs administered at 200 mg for 5- to 14-year-old children, and 400 mg for individuals ≥15 years) against soil-transmitted helminths, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Taenia spp. were assessed in a village in Yunnan province, People's Republic of China. The analysis was on a per-protocol basis and the trial is registered with (number ISRCTN01779485). Both albendazole and tribendimidine were highly efficacious against A. lumbricoides and, moderately, against hookworm. The efficacy against T. trichiura was low. Among 57 individuals who received tribendimidine, the prevalence of S. stercoralis was reduced from 19.3% to 8.8% (observed cure rate 54.5%, p = 0.107), and that of Taenia spp. from 26.3% to 8.8% (observed cure rate 66.7%, p = 0.014). Similar prevalence reductions were noted among the 66 albendazole recipients. Taking into account “new” infections discovered at treatment evaluation, which were most likely missed pre-treatment due to the lack of sensitivity of available diagnostic approaches, the difference between the drug-specific net Taenia spp. cure rates was highly significant in favor of tribendimidine (p = 0.001). No significant adverse events of either drug were observed.


Our results suggest that single-dose oral tribendimidine can be employed in settings with extensive intestinal polyparasitism, and its efficacy against A. lumbricoides and hookworm was confirmed. The promising results obtained with tribendimidine against S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. warrant further investigations. In a next step, multiple-dose schedules should be evaluated.

Author Summary

More than a billion people are infected with intestinal worms and, in the developing world, many individuals harbor several kinds of worms concurrently. There are only a handful of drugs available for treatment, and drug efficacy varies according to the worm species. We compared the efficacy of a single oral dose of tribendimidine, a new broad-spectrum worm drug from China, with the standard drug albendazole for the treatment of hookworm, large roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), whipworm (Trichuris trichiura) and, for the first time, Strongyloides stercoralis and tapeworm (Taenia spp.). Our single-blind randomized trial was conducted in a village in Yunnan province, southwest China. Both drugs showed high efficacy against A. lumbricoides and a moderate efficacy against hookworm. Among 57 tribendimidine recipients, the prevalence of S. stercoralis was reduced from 19.3% to 8.8%, and that of Taenia spp. from 26.3% to 8.8%. Similar prevalence reductions were noted among the 66 albendazole recipients. Taking into account additional infections only discovered at treatment evaluation, the difference between the drug-specific Taenia spp. net cure rates was highly significant in favor of tribendimidine. In view of our promising results, multiple-dose schedules with tribendimidine against S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. should be evaluated next.


There is a growing awareness of the intolerable burden due to the so-called neglected tropical diseases [1]. Hence, new initiatives are underway for their control [2]. For helminth infections, the mainstay of control in high-burden areas rests on regular administration of anthelminthic drugs [1][5]. However, only a handful of drugs that have been developed many years ago are available [6], and there is considerable concern that resistance might develop, e.g., following repeated exposure of helminths to sub-curative doses. Reduced efficacy of common anthelminthic drugs is a major problem in veterinary medicine already, but for humans, it is of no clinical relevance thus far [7]. Another issue is that in a world where intestinal polyparasitism is common, yet neglected [8][12], and frequently used treatment regimens are only effective against a limited number of helminths [6], some species which are not effectively controlled by common drugs might increase in relative frequency, e.g., Strongyloides stercoralis and Taenia spp.

High prevalences of soil-transmitted helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichuris trichiura) and, consequently, a high level of intestinal multiparasitism, have recently been described from Nongyang, a settlement in Manguo administrative village, located in southwest Yunnan province, People's Republic of China [13]. Whilst S. stercoralis is endemic in the People's Republic of China [14], the local epidemiology of this parasite is not well understood. A prevalence of ∼15% was found in Nongyang [15]. Taeniasis and infections with the larval stage of Taenia solium that causes cysticercosis, have been documented throughout the People's Republic of China. Most infections occur in counties inhabited by non-Han nationalities whose traditional diets include the consumption of raw or undercooked meat [14],[16]. However, there is a paucity of epidemiologic data for taeniasis from the People's Republic of China, at least in the English literature [17]. In a recent cross-sectional survey, we found an egg-prevalence of Taenia spp. of 3.5% among 3220 individuals in Eryuan county, northwest Yunnan province [18]. In Nongyang, the prevalence of Taenia spp. was 5.1% [13].

The benzimidazoles, i.e., albendazole and mebendazole, are the most widely used drugs for the control of soil-transmitted helminthiasis [1],[19]. Both drugs have some effect against S. stercoralis and Taenia spp., but triple doses are recommended to achieve high cure rates [6],[20]. The drug of choice for treating S. stercoralis is ivermectin [21],[22]. Praziquantel and niclosamide are the recommended drugs against Taenia spp. [23][26]. Large-scale administration of ivermectin is the cornerstone of control programs targeting filarial infections, most notably onchocerciasis [27]. However, Onchocerca volvulus is not endemic in the People's Republic of China. Additionally, ivermectin is highly efficacious against A. lumbricoides, shows some activity against T. trichiura, but fails to cure hookworm infections. Since hookworms are common in the People's Republic of China, ivermectin is not commonly used for soil-transmitted helminth control in this country. These issues might explain why ivermectin is registered for human use in the People's Republic of China, but not readily available. Ivermectin, however, is produced at large scale for veterinary medicine, the bulk of which is exported.

Tribendimidine is an anthelminthic drug that has been registered in the People's Republic of China for use in humans [6],[28]. Tribendimidine is a symmetrical diamidine derivative of amidantel [28], its CAS registration number is 115103-15-6. Used at the current standard dose of 200 mg for children aged 5 to 14 years, and 400 mg for individuals aged ≥15 years, tribendimidine is safe and efficacious against A. lumbricoides, hookworm, and Enterobius vermicularis [28]. It also shows some activity against T. trichiura [29],[30], cestodes [28], and some trematodes [31],[32]. New research revealed in vitro and in vivo activity of tribendimidine against Strongyloides ratti [33].

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of single-dose oral tribendimidine for treating intestinal helminth infections in a rural setting where polyparasitism is common, with a focus on the effects on S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. Comparison is made with single-dose oral albendazole as half of the participants were administered either drug. The primary outcome measures were the reduction of the infection prevalence of intestinal helminths, and the frequency and severity of adverse events. The secondary outcome measure was the Kato-Katz-derived egg count reduction of common soil-transmitted helminths. Multiple stool samples were collected before and after drug administration and examined by different diagnostic tools to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity.

Materials and Methods

Study site and population

The study was carried out in Nanweng, a village in Menghai county, Xishuangbanna prefecture, Yunnan province, People's Republic of China, from May to July 2007. Nanweng has 81 resident families and is situated on the slope of a mountain, 1650 m above sea level at 21.77 N latitude and 100.40 E longitude. The village is exclusively inhabited by the Bulang ethnic group. Its economic basis is provided by the surrounding tea plantations and the more distant, partially irrigated rice and other crop fields. Untreated tap water is delivered to every house but no sanitation facilities are available in the entire village.

Field and laboratory procedures

The leader of the Menghai-based county Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) briefed the village authorities about the study. Village leaders then informed the residents who were all invited to participate. Over a 3-week period, 20–30 families were enrolled weekly, and household as well as individual questionnaires that have been used before [15],[18] were administered. Children below the age of 15 years were assisted by their parents or legal guardians to answer the questions, and infants younger than 2 years were excluded from the study. Participants were asked to provide a large stool sample in pre-labeled collection containers. Filled containers were collected daily and exchanged by empty ones with the goal to obtain 3 stool samples per participant. The evaluation of the treatment efficacy commenced 2 weeks post-treatment and followed the same field procedures. Stool samples were collected over a 2-week period, again aiming to obtain 3 samples per study participant.

Stool samples were collected in the village between 07:00 and 09:00 a.m., transferred to the laboratory in Menghai city, and processed within a maximum of 6 hours of receipt. First, ∼10 g of stool were placed on a gauze which was embedded on a wire mesh in a glass funnel equipped with a sealable rubber tube, the so-called Baermann device [33]. The funnel was then filled with de-ionized water and illuminated from below with an incandescent bulb. Second, for the Koga agar plate test [34], ∼2 g of stool were placed in the centre of a 9 cm Petri dish with freshly prepared nutrient agar. Third, a single 41.7 mg Kato-Katz thick smear [35] was prepared on a microscope slide and helminth eggs were enumerated after a clearing time of 30–60 min.

The lowest 45 ml of the liquid in the Baermann funnel were drained after 2 h, centrifuged, and the sediment was examined for S. stercoralis larvae at low magnification (40×). Koga agar plates were inspected for helminth larvae at similar magnification after a 2-day incubation period at 28°C in a humid chamber. Subsequently, all plates were rinsed with 12 ml sodium acetate–acetic acid–formaline (SAF) solution [36], gently scraped, and the eluent was centrifuged. The sediment was examined for helminth larvae, i.e., S. stercoralis and hookworms. Helminth larvae were differentiated based on established anatomical criteria, i.e., considering the buccal cavity and genital primordium of first-stage (L1) S. stercoralis larvae (buccal cavity: short; genital primordium: prominent), and the tip of the tail of third-stage (L3) S. stercoralis larvae (tip of the tail: cut). Samples were considered positive if larvae were detected at any stage and by any test. Helminth eggs in the Baermann and Koga sediment were also noted.

Randomization and drug administration

Study participants who had submitted at least 1 stool sample were listed according to their identification number in ascending order. Subsequently, a random sequence of 0's and 1's was generated in Excel (Microsoft Corp.) by the study coordinator, and aligned with the list of eligible study participants. Individuals matched with a “0” were assigned albendazole, whereas those with a “1” were assigned tribendimidine. Albendazole and tribendimidine were purchased from Shanxi Hanwang Medicine Co. Ltd. (Han Zhong, People's Republic of China) and Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Zibo, People's Republic of China), respectively. Drugs were administered as single 200 mg oral dose for children aged 5 to 14 years, and 400 mg for individuals ≥15 years of age. Drugs at the appropriate dosage according to participants' age were packed in identical envelopes labeled with the participant's name only. Hence, our study was an open-label trial, i.e., participants did not know which drug they received. Participants were asked to avoid alcohol consumption on the day of drug administration. After dinner time, teams of fieldworkers visited the village, met the participants at home and asked them about signs of acute or chronic illness, and alcohol consumption. Women aged ≥14 years were asked about pregnancy. Drugs were handed out together with fresh bottled water to healthy, non-drunk and non-pregnant participants, and drug intake was observed. Those treated were asked to report any potential drug-related signs or symptoms including sleeping troubles to the accompanying medical doctor.

Ethical considerations and end-of-study treatment

The study was approved by the institutional research commission of the Swiss Tropical Institute (Basel, Switzerland). Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Basel (EKBB), Switzerland (reference no. 149/07) and the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Shanghai, People's Republic of China). The trial is registered with under the registration number ISRCTN01779485. The study procedures, potential risks, and benefits were explained to the village leaders. After their consent to perform the study, field workers visited the homes of the selected families where detailed information was provided to all potential participants, and questions were answered. Emphasis was placed on voluntary participation and the option to quit the study at any moment without further obligation. Written confirmation that full information had been provided and individual participation was voluntary (informed consent) was obtained from the head of each participating household or a literary substitute (adult child or relative), and this procedure was approved by the above-mentioned ethical committees.

A single 200 mg (for children aged 5 to 14 years), or 400 mg (individuals aged ≥15 years) oral dose of albendazole was offered to those participants who were not eligible for randomization because they had failed to provide any stool sample. The assessment of their health status and the treatment procedures followed the same protocol as for study participants, but the treatment outcome was not assessed.

Locally-used remedies for Taenia spp. infection and ivermectin for treating S. stercoralis at the standard dose (200 µg/kg) were provided at the end-of-study follow-up. Finally, albendazole was provided to the village authorities for later distribution to untreated inhabitants and participants who still harbored active infections.

Data management and statistical analysis

The target sample size was 130 individuals, based on the following assumptions: Prevalence of S. stercoralis: 20%; efficacy of tribendimidine and albendazole against S. stercoralis: 85% (similar to ivermectin at standard dosage [37]) and 0%, respectively, with a confidence level of 95% and a power of 80%.

The questionnaire data were double-entered and cross-checked in EpiData version 3.1 (EpiData Association; Odense, Denmark). The laboratory data were examined for internal consistency, and merged with the questionnaire data. Statistical analysis was done with STATA version 9.2 (StataCorp; College Station, USA). Our final study cohort consisted of individuals aged ≥5 years who had submitted at least 2 stool samples at baseline, did not suffer from any chronic or acute illness, had not drunk alcohol on the day of drug administration, for women were not pregnant, had taken the randomly assigned drug, and had again at least 2 stool samples examined at the end-of-study survey. Thus, statistical analyses only considered treated individuals with complete diagnostic data records, stratified by drug (see Figure 1, end points of the right arm). Multiple stool readings at baseline and follow-up were required in order to boost diagnostic sensitivity [13],[15].

Figure 1. Participation and stool sample submission compliance in a community-based open label efficacy study involving repeated stool sample collection and anthelminthic treatment by either albendazole or tribendimidine; Nanweng village, Yunnan province, People's Republic of China.

The infection status was determined based on the pooled results from the different diagnostic methods (i.e., soil-transmitted helminths and Taenia spp.: all tests; S. stercoralis: Baermann and Koga agar plate tests). Pearson's χ2-test and Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, were used to assess the association between infection and demographic variables. Treatment outcomes by drug and the differences between albendazole and tribendimidine were explored by calculating drug-specific prevalence reductions, and analyzing the difference between the observed cure rates (2-sample test of proportions). The infection intensity for the common soil-transmitted helminths was determined based on the quantitative Kato-Katz thick smear readings, multiplied by a factor of 24. Infection intensities for individual study participants were obtained by calculating the arithmetic mean of the available egg counts. The arithmetic mean of the averaged egg counts among the infected yielded a summery measure of infection intensity among the infected population. The individual infection intensities were subsequently stratified according to the classification proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) [38]. The effects of albendazole and tribendimidine on the infection intensities in the respective groups were analyzed using a paired t-test, and drug-specific infection intensity reductions were compared by a 2-sample test of proportions.



We counted 294 family members, aged above 2 years, in the 81 resident families. Another 60 individuals were recorded in the village registry but they had either left the village, were younger than 2 years, or refused to answer the questionnaire. Figure 1 shows that 106 (36%) of the eligible participants provided none (n = 57), or only a single (n = 49) stool sample of sufficient quantity to perform all diagnostic tests. The remaining 188 individuals (64%) were 5 to 87-year-old and among them, 17 could not be treated due to pregnancy (n = 8), ill health (n = 5) or other reasons (n = 4). The randomization of the 171 participants with complete parasitological baseline data who were eligible for treatment resulted in equal-sized groups for single-dose oral tribendimidine or albendazole administration, but stool sample submission at baseline and actual treatment rates were somewhat lower among tribendimidine recipients.

Of the 91 participants treated with albendazole, 2 to 3 sufficiently large stool samples were available from 66 individuals (73%) at the end-of-study follow-up. A similar stool sample submission rate was observed for the 80 tribendimidine recipients (71%). The final cohort consisted of 123 individuals who received either albendazole (n = 66) or tribendimidine (n = 57), and submitted at least 4 (2 pre- plus 2 post-treatment) sufficiently large stool samples to carry out the full range of diagnostic tests. While drop-out rates were similar for males and females (42.2% versus 41.5%), full participation ranged from 21% for 10 to 14-year-olds to 58% for those aged ≥40 years (data not shown).

Helminth infections at baseline

Considering the joint results of the 2 to 3 Kato-Katz, Koga agar plate and Baermann tests, our final cohort showed high prevalences of T. trichiura (87.8%), hookworm (74.8%), and A. lumbricoides (72.4%). The prevalences of Taenia spp. and S. stercoralis were 26.0% and 17.9%, respectively.

Table 1 shows that Taenia spp. infections were significantly more prevalent among males (33.9%) than females (18.0%, χ2 = 4.01, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.045) and increased with age, albeit not significantly (p = 0.163). An increase with age was also noted in the prevalence of S. stercoralis infections. No S. stercoralis were diagnosed among pre-school children and students as opposed to farmers (p = 0.121); Taenia spp. was also more common among farmers (27.3%) than pre-school children and students (8.3%, p = 0.292). Illiterates had a lower A. lumbricoides prevalence than those with formal education (50.0% vs. 79.2%, χ2 = 9.32, df = 1, p = 0.002), reflecting the generally lower prevalence among older age groups. Table 1 also summarizes the infection intensities for the common soil-transmitted helminths according to the Kato-Katz results. While most hookworm and T. trichiura infections were of light intensity, a considerable number of moderate and a few heavy infections were noted for A. lumbricoides.

Table 1. Baseline prevalence of S. stercoralis, Taenia spp., A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and hookworm infections, and Kato-Katz test-derived infection intensities, among 123 study participants from Nanweng village, Yunnan province, People's Republic of China who had submitted at least 2 stool samples before and after treatment with either albendazole or tribendimidine, stratified by demographic variables.

Efficacy of tribendimidine and albendazole

As detailed in Table 2, single-dose oral albendazole and tribendimidine significantly reduced the prevalence of A. lumbricoides (albendazole: from 75.8% to 0; tribendimidine: from 68.4% to 5.3%; both p<0.001), and hookworm (albendazole: from 69.7% to 21.2%; tribendimidine: from 80.7% to 38.6%; both p<0.001). Whilst the difference between the drug-specific cure rates against A. lumbricoides showed borderline significance in favor of albendazole, there was no difference in the efficacy of the two drugs against hookworm. Although neither albendazole nor tribendimidine resulted in a significant reduction in the prevalence of T. trichiura, single-dose oral albendazole was significantly more efficacious than tribendimidine in curing T. trichiura (p = 0.014). Single-dose albendazole and tribendimidine significantly reduced the arithmetic mean egg counts among those who were infected at baseline (all p<0.05) except for tribendimidine administered to individuals with T. trichiura (p = 0.136). Both drugs decreased the mean egg counts of A. lumbricoides and hookworm to a similar extent, but mean T. trichiura egg counts declined significantly more following albendazole than tribendimidine treatment (p = 0.005).

Table 2. Prevalence and cure rates of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, hookworm, S. stercoralis, and Taenia spp., and Kato-Katz-derived infection intensity reductions among 123 study participants from Nanweng village, Yunnan province, People's Republic of China who submitted at least 2 stool samples before and after treatment with single-dose oral albendazole or tribendimidine.

Single-dose albendazole and tribendimidine resulted in prevalence reductions of S. stercoralis of 6.1% and 10.5%, respectively, which was not statistically significant (both p>0.05). The prevalence of Taenia spp. was reduced from 25.8% to 10.6% after albendazole administration (p = 0.024), whilst among the tribendimidine recipients, the prevalence was lowered from 26.3% to 8.8% (p = 0.014). Table 2 also shows that after administration of albendazole, S. stercoralis larvae could still be found among 7 of the previously 11 infected individuals (observed cure rate: 36.4%). Among those treated with tribendimidine, 6 out of 11 individuals were larvae-free (observed cure rate: 54.5%; difference: 18.1%, p = 0.394). The baseline Taenia spp. prevalence of 25.8% and 26.3% among those given albendazole and tribendimidine was reduced by 58.8% and 66.7%, respectively (difference: 7.9%, p = 0.645).

Taking into account S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. infections that had only been recognized at treatment evaluation (these infections were most likely missed pre-treatment due to the lack of diagnostic sensitivity of the available tests), the efficacy of the drugs was lower (Table 3). In both treatment groups, S. stercoralis was diagnosed in 2 individuals previously declared uninfected. Hence, the net cure rate was 18.2% for albendazole and 36.4% for tribendimidine recipients (difference: 18.2%, p = 0.338). The number of “new” Taenia spp. infections in the albendazole group diagnosed during follow-up equaled the number of recoveries (n = 10), resulting in a zero overall cure rate. Among tribendimidine recipients, only 2 additional Taenia spp. infections were found; the prevalence reduction showed borderline significance (−14.0%, p = 0.058). The net cure rate of Taenia spp. in the tribendimidine recipients was 53.3%, significantly different from the albendazole group (difference: 53.3%, p = 0.001).

Table 3. Prevalence and net cure rates of S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. taking into account “new” infections discovered at follow-up among previously “negative” participants.

Adverse events

No adverse events were mentioned by participants treated with single-dose oral albendazole. In the tribendimidine group, an 87-year-old woman reported mild sleeping disorders, headache, dizziness, and gastrointestinal symptoms, including a single episode of vomiting. This subject had a light infection with T. trichiura and hookworm at baseline. Upon treatment evaluation, the participant did not submit any further stool samples, and hence was excluded from the final cohort.


To our knowledge, this is the first investigation assessing the safety and efficacy of single-dose tribendimidine for treating S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. infections, and the first clinically-monitored use of tribendimidine in a setting with high rates of intestinal multiparasitism. Indeed, infections with one of the three main soil-transmitted helminths were found in 72.4–87.8% of the study participants, and only 4 of the 123 individuals in our final cohort (3.3%) harbored none of these helminths. The prevalence of S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. at baseline was 17.9% and 26.0%, respectively. Our study was an open-label trial, comparing a single oral dose of albendazole with that of tribendimidine, with both drugs administered at either 200 mg or 400 mg according to participants' age.

The final study cohort comprised less than 50% of those initially contacted. Whilst the cohort had a similar sex distribution than the total population of Nanweng village, it was considerably biased toward older age groups. We screened multiple stool samples for intestinal helminths and randomly assigned the participants to either albendazole or tribendimidine. Treatment outcome was assessed 2 to 4 weeks after dosing using multiple stool samples and a diversity of diagnostic approaches. The prevalence of S. stercoralis was not significantly reduced by either albendazole or tribendimidine, and no significant drug-specific difference was observed. Among individuals infected with Taenia spp. at baseline, the observed cure rates of 58.8% for albendazole and 66.7% for tribendimidine showed statistical significance (both p<0.05). During follow-up, however, additional infections were found, mainly Taenia spp. among those who had received albendazole, and the difference between the drug-specific overall cure rates was 53.3% (p = 0.001). The observed cestocidal effect of tribendimidine, for the time being, should rather be regarded as an indication of a possible activity than as a proof-of-concept. This is due to the obvious diagnostic challenges encountered in field-based clinical studies on large cestodes.

In the current trial, albendazole generally performed slightly better than tribendimidine in curing common soil-transmitted helminth infections. The most notable difference was seen with T. trichiura, confirming earlier observations that single-dose albendazole is somewhat more efficacious than single-dose tribendimidine against this nematode [6]. The observed cure rates against hookworm and T. trichiura following single-dose albendazole are rather low compared to the results of a recent meta-analysis of this and other WHO-recommended anthelminthics commonly used against common soil-transmitted helminth infections [39]. We speculate that this observation is rather reflecting the rigorous diagnostic approach employed than an unusually low susceptibility of local hookworm and T. trichiura to albendazole. For example, hookworm infections could not only be detected by the widely used Kato-Katz technique, but also by the Koga agar plate method. However, the low cure rates observed in this study should also be seen as a warning sign and call for monitoring of drug efficacy and the potential emergence of drug resistance [38].

The inclusion of only 123 individuals who met our sample submission requirements into the final study cohort reduced the reported compliance rate but increased the reliability of the results due to the increased overall sensitivity of the employed diagnostic methods [15]. Indeed, a lower prevalence was found among those 175 participants who had at least 1 stool sample analyzed, but the drug-specific efficacies were similar (data not shown).

The discovery of notable numbers of infections among those who were deemed negative before treatment can be explained by at least 2 mechanisms, or a combination thereof. First, it is conceivable that the baseline evaluation fell within the prepatent period of recent infections. Second, it is well known that parasitological diagnosis of both S. stercoralis [40] and Taenia spp. [25],[41] lacks sensitivity. For S. stercoralis, the main remedy for this challenge is screening of multiple stool specimens [21], whilst for Taenia spp., sensitive coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests provide valuable alternatives [23],[25],[26],[41]. The current diagnostic ‘gold’ standard to confirm treatment success in taeniasis is the recovery of the tapeworm scolex. Alternatively, the absence of proglottids from stools and underwear over a period of 3 months also provides solid proof of cure. However, such extensive observation is usually only feasible in hospital settings. Re-infection after treatment can almost certainly be excluded for Taenia spp., and it is rather unlikely for S. stercoralis. We speculate that in our study, the limited sensitivity of the diagnostic tools was more significant since the 3 to 5-week period between baseline and follow-up investigation is rather short for any notable level of re-infections.

We are confident that our results are valid despite the imperfect sensitivity of the employed diagnostic tests, not least due to our rigorous sampling effort. This assumption is supported by the following observations. For S. stercoralis, the numbers of “new” infections at follow-up was similar in both treatment groups (both n = 2), thus reducing the observed cure rate but not affecting the overall conclusion that both drugs exhibit some effect at the employed dosage. A mathematical model [42] for the prediction of “true” prevalence further suggested an underestimation of the S. stercoralis prevalence by the employed procedures within the range actually observed in the present trial [15]. After a study involving extensive stool sample collection and analysis by the Baermann technique, Dreyer and co-workers [43] suggested that at least 4 stool samples need to be collected to accurately assess the S. stercoralis infection status, and that only those with at least 2 positive test results should be included in clinical drug trials. In our study, we only included those individuals who had at least 2 stool specimens examined with 2 different diagnostic approaches. Thus, at least 4, and ideally 6, results were available to judge the infection status of the participants both before and after drug administration. Among the 22 S. stercoralis positives at baseline, 6, 6, 3, 5, 1 and 1 individuals had 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 positive test results, respectively. The 10 arguably cured individuals had 1 (n = 3), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 2) and 4 (n = 2) positive baseline test results. Our findings indicate that participants with only 1 or 2 positive tests at baseline were not more likely to be considered cured at treatment evaluation than those with multiple positive tests. However, infections were still found in all participants with 5 or 6 positive tests at baseline. The four individuals who were only found to be infected at treatment evaluation then had 1, 1, 2 and 3 positive test results. Finally, the observed activity of albendazole against Taenia spp. among those who were found to be infected at baseline has to be put into perspective with the high number of “newly” detected infections at treatment evaluation. Among tribendimidine recipients, only few additional Taenia spp. infections were found, indeed indicating that single-dose tribendimidine, but not albendazole, might have some effect against Taenia spp.

Unfortunately, the eggs of T. saginata, T. solium, and T. asiatica cannot be readily distinguished microscopically [23],[25]. Hence, we are not in a position to determine their relative frequency in our study population. However, the reported and observed diets suggest that the locally dominant species is T. solium or possibly T. asiatica since Bulang favor raw pork over raw beef.

As a next step, the efficacy of multiple-dose tribendimidine could be assessed as our results indicate some, albeit currently unsatisfactory effect of this drug against S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. In future studies with a focus on these 2 parasites rather than the common soil-transmitted helminths, the reference drug should be praziquantel or niclosamide for Taenia spp., and ivermectin for S. stercoralis. Alternatively, triple-dose albendazole might be used as reference treatment [20]. When further investigating the efficacy of tribendimidine against large cestodes, including Taenia spp. in humans, we propose to treat a small group of confirmed taeniasis cases who agreed to submit multiple stool samples and observe proglottids in their stools and underwear over extended time periods.

Infections with A. lumbricoides and hookworm are the main targets for single-dose mass chemotherapy using albendazole or mebendazole. Discussions are underway in the People's Republic of China for the larger-scale use of tribendimidine. Efficacy of the latter drug on other intestinal parasites would be of considerable public health significance, which is explained by the geographic overlap of different helminth infections, including S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. Treatment of individuals with multiple species parasite infections, including S. stercoralis and Taenia spp., is likely to occur. Hence, there is a pressing need to determine the most efficacious tribendimidine treatment regimen for S. stercoralis and Taenia spp. since the exposure of the parasites to sub-curative doses exacerbates the risk of resistance development. Therefore, pharmacovigilance needs to also cover non-target parasites to assure timely detection of emerging resistance.

Supporting Information

Alternative Language Abstract S1.

Translation of the Abstract into Chinese by Shu-Hua Xiao

(0.05 MB PDF)

Alternative Language Abstract S2.

Translation of the Abstract into German by Peter Steinmann

(0.04 MB PDF)

Protocol S1.

This is the study protocol of the research reported as submitted to the Ethics Committee of the Unviversity and State of Basel (EKBB) on 3 May 2007.

(0.37 MB DOC)


We thank the village population and local authorities of Nanweng village. The great efforts of the local staff from the Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases in Simao and the Center for Disease Control in Menghai are duly acknowledged.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PS XNZ ZWD SHX ZXW JU. Performed the experiments: PS ZWD JYJ HZ. Analyzed the data: PS. Wrote the paper: PS XNZ SHX JU. Designed and implemented the study, managed and analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript: PS. Designed the study, facilitated and supervised part of the study implementation and revised the manuscript draft: XNZ. Assisted in the design and implementation of the study: ZWD JYJ HZ. Designed the study, supervised part of the study implementation and revised the manuscript draft: SHX and ZXW. Designed the study, supervised PS and revised the manuscript draft: JU.


  1. 1. Hotez PJ, Molyneux DH, Fenwick A, Kumaresan J, Ehrlich Sachs S, et al. (2007) Control of neglected tropical diseases. N Engl J Med 357: 1018–1027.
  2. 2. Fenwick A (2006) New initiatives against Africa's worms. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100: 200–207.
  3. 3. Brooker S, Clements ACA, Bundy DAP (2006) Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv Parasitol 62: 221–261.
  4. 4. Lammie PJ, Fenwick A, Utzinger J (2006) A blueprint for success: integration of neglected tropical disease control programmes. Trends Parasitol 22: 313–321.
  5. 5. Utzinger J, de Savigny D (2006) Control of neglected tropical diseases: integrated chemotherapy and beyond. PLoS Med 3: e112.
  6. 6. Utzinger J, Keiser J (2004) Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: common drugs for treatment and control. Expert Opin Pharmacother 5: 263–285.
  7. 7. Geerts S, Gryseels B (2000) Drug resistance in human helminths: current situation and lessons from livestock. Clin Microbiol Rev 13: 207–222.
  8. 8. Raso G, Luginbühl A, Adjoua CA, Tian-Bi NT, Silué KD, et al. (2004) Multiple parasite infections and their relationship to self-reported morbidity in a community of rural Côte d'Ivoire. Int J Epidemiol 33: 1092–1102.
  9. 9. Buck AA, Anderson RI, MacRae AA (1978) Epidemiology of poly-parasitism. I. Occurrence, frequency and distribution of multiple infections in rural communities in Chad, Peru, Afghanistan, and Zaire. Tropenmed Parasitol 29: 61–70.
  10. 10. Petney TN, Andrews RH (1998) Multiparasite communities in animals and humans: frequency, structure and pathogenic significance. Int J Parasitol 28: 377–393.
  11. 11. Drake LJ, Bundy DAP (2001) Multiple helminth infections in children: impact and control. Parasitology 122: (Suppl.)S73–81.
  12. 12. Cox FEG (2001) Concomitant infections, parasites and immune responses. Parasitology 122: (Suppl.)S23–38.
  13. 13. Steinmann P, Du ZW, Wang LB, Wang XZ, Jiang JY, et al. (2008) Extensive multiparasitism in a village of Yunnan province, China, revealed by a suite of diagnostic methods. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 760–769.
  14. 14. Yu SH, Xu LQ, Jiang ZX, Xu SH, Han JJ, et al. (1994) Nationwide survey of human parasite in China. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 25: 4–10.
  15. 15. Steinmann P, Zhou XN, Du ZW, Jiang JY, Wang LB, et al. (2007) Occurrence of Strongyloides stercoralis in Yunnan province, China and comparison of diagnostic methods. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 1: e75.
  16. 16. Ito A, Urbani C, Qiu JM, Vuitton DA, Qiu DC, et al. (2003) Control of echinococcosis and cysticercosis: a public health challenge to international cooperation in China. Acta Trop 86: 3–17.
  17. 17. Rajshekhar V, Joshi DD, Doanh NQ, van De N, Zhou XN (2003) Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis in Asia: epidemiology, impact and issues. Acta Trop 87: 53–60.
  18. 18. Steinmann P, Zhou XN, Li YL, Li HJ, Chen SR, et al. (2007) Helminth infections and risk factor analysis among residents in Eryuan county, Yunnan province, China. Acta Trop 104: 38–51.
  19. 19. WHO (2006) Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control interventions: a manual for health professionals and programme managers. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  20. 20. Horton J (2000) Albendazole: a review of anthelmintic efficacy and safety in humans. Parasitology 121: (Suppl.)S113–132.
  21. 21. Concha R, Harrington WJ, Rogers AI (2005) Intestinal strongyloidiasis: recognition, management, and determinants of outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol 39: 203–211.
  22. 22. Naquira C, Jimenez G, Guerra JG, Bernal R, Nalin DR, et al. (1989) Ivermectin for human strongyloidiasis and other intestinal helminths. Am J Trop Med Hyg 40: 304–309.
  23. 23. Craig P, Ito A (2007) Intestinal cestodes. Curr Opin Infect Dis 20: 524–532.
  24. 24. Montresor A, Palmer K (2006) Taeniasis/cysticercosis trend worldwide and rationale for control. Parasitol Int 55: (Suppl.)S301–303.
  25. 25. OIE/WHO/FAO (2005) WHO/FAO/OIE guidelines for the surveillance, prevention and control of taeniasis/cysticercosis;. In: Murrell KD, editor. Paris: World Organization for Animal Health.
  26. 26. García HH, Gonzalez AE, Evans CA, Gilman RH (2003) Taenia solium cysticercosis. Lancet 362: 547–556.
  27. 27. Gyapong JO, Kumaraswami V, Biswas G, Ottesen EA (2005) Treatment strategies underpinning the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6: 179–200.
  28. 28. Xiao SH, Wu HM, Tanner M, Utzinger J, Wang C (2005) Tribendimidine: a promising, safe and broad-spectrum anthelminthic agent from China. Acta Trop 94: 1–14.
  29. 29. Xiao SH, Wu ZX, Zhang JH, Wang SQ, Wang SH, et al. (2007) Clinical observation on 899 children infected with intestinal nematodes and treated with tribendimidine enteric coated tablets. Chin J Parasitol Para Dis 25: 372–375 (in Chinese).
  30. 30. Zhang JH, Xiao SH, Wu ZX, Qiu DC, Wang SH, et al. (2008) Tribendimidine enteric coated tablet in treatment of 1,292 cases with intestinal nematode infection–a phase IV clinical trial. Chin J Parasitol Para Dis 26: 6–9 (in Chinese).
  31. 31. Keiser J, Engels D, Büscher G, Utzinger J (2005) Triclabendazole for the treatment of fascioliasis and paragonimiasis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 14: 1513–1526.
  32. 32. Keiser J, Xiao SH, Chollet J, Tanner M, Utzinger J (2007) Evaluation of the in vivo activity of tribendimidine against Schistosoma mansoni, Fasciola hepatica, Clonorchis sinensis, and Opisthorchis viverrini. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51: 1096–1098.
  33. 33. García LS (2007) Diagnostic medical parasitology. Washington D.C.: ASM Press. pp. 1–1202.
  34. 34. Koga K, Kasuya S, Khamboonruang C, Sukhavat K, Ieda M, et al. (1991) A modified agar plate method for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 45: 518–521.
  35. 35. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J (1972) A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 14: 397–400.
  36. 36. Marti H, Escher E (1990) SAF - an alternative fixation solution for parasitological stool specimens. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 120: 1473–1476 (in German).
  37. 37. Marti H, Haji HJ, Savioli L, Chwaya HM, Mgeni AF, et al. (1996) A comparative trial of a single-dose ivermectin versus three days of albendazole for treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis and other soil-transmitted helminth infections in children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 55: 477–481.
  38. 38. WHO (2002) Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser No. 912: 1–57.
  39. 39. Keiser J, Utzinger J (2008) Efficacy of current drugs against soil-transmitted helminth infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 299: 1937–1948.
  40. 40. Nielsen PB, Mojon M (1987) Improved diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis by seven consecutive stool specimens. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 263: 616–618.
  41. 41. Allan JC, Velasquez-Tohom M, Torres-Alvarez R, Yurrita P, Garcia-Noval J (1996) Field trial of the coproantigen-based diagnosis of Taenia solium taeniasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg 54: 352–356.
  42. 42. Marti H, Koella JC (1993) Multiple stool examinations for ova and parasites and rate of false-negative results. J Clin Microbiol 31: 3044–3045.
  43. 43. Dreyer G, Fernandes-Silva E, Alves S, Rocha A, Albuquerque R, et al. (1996) Patterns of detection of Strongyloides stercoralis in stool specimens: implications for diagnosis and clinical trials. J Clin Microbiol 34: 2569–2571.