• Loading metrics

The invasive giant African snail Lissachatina fulica as natural intermediate host of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Troglostrongylus brevior, and Crenosoma vulpis in Colombia

  • Felipe Penagos-Tabares ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia, Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Malin K. Lange,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Juan Vélez,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliations CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia, Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Jörg Hirzmann,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Jesed Gutiérrez-Arboleda,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

  • Anja Taubert,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Carlos Hermosilla,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Hessen, Germany

  • Jenny J. Chaparro Gutiérrez

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

The invasive giant African snail Lissachatina fulica as natural intermediate host of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Troglostrongylus brevior, and Crenosoma vulpis in Colombia

  • Felipe Penagos-Tabares, 
  • Malin K. Lange, 
  • Juan Vélez, 
  • Jörg Hirzmann, 
  • Jesed Gutiérrez-Arboleda, 
  • Anja Taubert, 
  • Carlos Hermosilla, 
  • Jenny J. Chaparro Gutiérrez



Several metastrongyloid lungworms are unreported pathogens in Colombia. Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis target the cardiopulmonary system of domestic and wild canids. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior infect felids and considering that six wild felid species exist in Colombia, knowledge of feline lungworm infections is important for their conservation. The zoonotic metastrongyloids Angiostrongylus costaricensis and Angiostrongylus cantonensis can cause severe gastrointestinal and neurological diseases. Angiostrongylus costaricensis has been reported in Colombia, while Ang. cantonensis is present in neighbouring countries. Research on the epidemiology of metastrongyloids in Colombia and South America more broadly requires evaluating the role that gastropods play as intermediate hosts in their life cycles. This study assessed the prevalence of metastrongyloid larvae in populations of the invasive giant African snail, Lissachatina fulica, in Colombia.

Methodology/Principal findings

A total of 609 Lissachantina fulica were collected from 6 Colombian municipalities. The snails were then cryo-euthanized, artificially digested and the sediments examined microscopically for the presence of metastrongyloid larvae. Based on morphological characteristics 53.3% (56/107) of the snails from Puerto Leguízamo (Department of Putumayo) were infected with Ael. abstrusus larvae, 8.4% (9/107) with Ang. vasorum larvae, 6.5% (7/107) with T. brevior larvae and 5.6% (6/107) with C. vulpis larvae, being the region with highest prevalences of the four species. Snails from Andes (Department of Antioquia) and Tulúa (Department of Valle del Cauca) were positive for Ang. vasorum larvae with a prevalence of 4.6 (11/238) and 6.3% (4/64), respectively. Species identifications were confirmed by PCR and sequencing.


This epidemiological survey reports for first time the presence of Ael. abstrusus, T. brevior, C. vulpis and Ang. vasorum in L. fulica in a number of regions of Colombia.

Author summary

Several lungworm species are neglected pathogens in Colombia. Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis target the cardiopulmonary system of domestic and wild canids. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior infect domestic cats as well as wild felids. Angiostrongylus costaricensis and Angiostrongylus cantonensis may cause severe gastrointestinal or neurological diseases in humans, respectively. Snails/slugs are necessary intermediate hosts in the life cycles of these parasites. We assessed the prevalence of metastrongyloid larvae in 609 specimens of the giant African snail, Lissachatina fulica, from 6 Colombian municipalities. In Puerto Leguízamo, 53.3% of the snails were infected with Ael. abstrusus larvae, 8.4% with Ang. vasorum larvae, 6.5% with T. brevior larvae and 5.6% with C. vulpis larvae. Snails from Andes and Tulúa were positive for Ang. vasorum larvae with a prevalence of 4.6 and 6.3%, respectively. This epidemiological study reports for first time the presence of Ael. abstrusus, T. brevior, C. vulpis and Ang. vasorum in the invasive giant African snail in various parts of Colombia.


The giant African snail, Lissachatina (= Achatina) fulica, is originally native to east Africa [1]. It is now one of the most widely distributed and invasive snail species in tropical and subtropical terrestrial ecosystems, and consequently is included among 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species [2]. As in other South American countries [3], its presence in Colombia has been reported, in 27 of the 32 departments, with the departments of Meta, Valle del Cauca, Putumayo and Caquetá facing a critical ecological threat because of its presence [4]. The giant African snail is a highly invasive alien species in Colombia and is targeted by national campaigns or eradication [4]. Besides the ecological, agricultural and economic threats associated with this introduced snail, it acts as intermediate host of many metastrongyloid nematode species that can cause disease in animals and humans [56]. This invasive species constitutes an important intermediate host in the epidemiology of metastrongyloid parasites and contributes to their global dissemination [78].

Since 2000 approximately, parasites such as the canine cardio-pulmonary nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum and the feline lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus have gained increased attention of the veterinary scientific community because of their detection in domestic and wild animals in many countries and their spread into previously non-endemic regions [5,912]. Symptoms of canine Ang. vasorum infections can vary from asymptomatic subclinical infections to cases exhibiting severe cardiopulmonary disorders and coagulopathies that can be fatal [13]. Cases have been reported in Europe, Africa and North and South America [5,9,11,14,15]. It is considered one of the most pathogenic cardiopulmonary nematodes in canids as well as other carnivores [10,16]. Several intermediate gastropod hosts have been reported [1719], including experimentally infected L. fulica [20].

Aelurostrongylus abstrusus is distributed worldwide and is one of the most important lung parasites in felids [21]. Clinical manifestations of feline aelurostrongylosis are typical of most other respiratory diseases [22]. In addition to domestic cats, Ael. abstrusus infections are also reported in several wild felid species that may serve as definitive hosts [23,24]. Various species of gastropods have been reported as intermediate hosts [19,2528].

Troglostrongylus brevior is another feline-infecting lungworm that can cause signs ranging from subclinical to severe life-threatening conditions [29]. Its life cycle, symptoms and morphology are very similar to those of Ael. abstrusus, which has caused confusion in the past [30]. As far as we know, the only intermediate host species reported for T. brevior is Cornu aspersum by experimental infection [31]. There is little information on the biology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunology of T. brevior [32].

Crenosoma vulpis is another globally-distributed metastrongyloid, known as the fox lungworm, that invades the bronchi, bronchioles and trachea of wild and domestic canids [33]. Canine crenosomosis is generally characterized by bronchitis with a dry, unproductive cough [34]. However, high parasite burdens can be manifested as a chronic and productive cough [35]. This helminth is endemic in the European and North American red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations [36,37]. In South America C. vulpis has been recently reported in Chile, where 1% (2/200) of dogs tested were positive for the parasite [38]. Various gastropod species have been reported to be involved in the life cycle of C. vulpis [19,39].

Lissachantina fulica is a known intermediate host of potentially life-threatening human metastrongyloid parasites, the zoonotic species Angiostrongylus cantonensis and Angiostrongylus costaricensis [40]. In Colombia, Ang. cantonensis has not been reported, while at least 10 human infections by Ang. costaricensis have been diagnosed [41]. Neural angiostrongylosis and abdominal angiostrongylosis are infrequently diagnosed because of the poor knowledge of clinicians resulting from the neglected status of these diseases. Nevertheless, in some cases these parasitoses are well tolerated and their subclinical presentation has been described [42, 43].

The parasitic diseases discussed here are considered neglected and their prevalence underestimated in Colombia and South America in general, and therefore further research evaluating their epidemiological status in the region is urgently needed, particularly given the increasing spread of L. fulica. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the epidemiological status of metastrongyloid parasites in L. fulica populations from the Andean, Pacific and Amazonian Colombian biogeographic regions.

Material and methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved on February 2, 2016 by the ethics committee for animal experimentation of the University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia, order N° 101. The giant African snail is not among the specially protected fauna regulated by the Act on Nature Conservation and Landscape Management of Colombia.

Study areas and snail collection

In total, 609 L. fulica were collected between February and October of 2016. Of these, 438 were from the Andean region municipalities of: Andes (5° 39′ 20″ N, 75° 52′ 49″ W) (n = 238), Ciudad Bolívar (5° 50′ 58″ N, 76° 1′ 13″ W) (n = 100), and Cañasgordas (6° 44′ 59″ N, 76° 1′ 33″ W) (n = 100), located in the Department of Antioquia. Snails from the Pacific region were collected in the town of Tuluá, Department of Valle del Cauca (4° 5′ 5″ N, 76° 11′ 55″ W) (n = 64), and the Amazonian region of Puerto Leguízamo, Department of Putumayo (0° 11′ 38″ S, 74° 46′ 50″ W) (n = 107). The specific locations within the Colombian map are shown in Fig 1. The snails were frozen and sent to the parasitology laboratory of the Veterinary Medicine School at the University of Antioquia in Medellín.

Fig 1. Sampling locations of giant African snails Lissachatina fulica in Colombia.

Cañasgordas, Ciudad Bolívar and Andes (1.Department of Antioquia) are in the Andean region. Tuluá (2.Department Valle del Cauca) is in the Pacific region and Puerto Leguízamo (3.Department of Putumayo) is in the Amazonian region. This figure has public domain images. (Sources: and

Processing of samples

The snails were morphologically identified, weighed, cut into small pieces and immersed in a digestion solution (10 g pepsin powder 2000 FIP-U/g, 8.5 g NaCl, 30 mL HCl 37% and distilled water to complete 1 L of solution) overnight at 40°C in 50 mL Falcon tubes under constant shaking. Then, the samples were sieved through a 300 μm-metal sieve to remove any undigested material and further passed through a 25 μm-metal sieve. The remnants retained in the last sieving were transferred to 15 mL Falcon tubes and centrifuged at 400 g for 10 min. The pellets were re-suspended and examined microscopically with a light microscope at 4x, 20x and 40x magnification. Metastrongyloid larvae were counted and collected by pipetting. In cases of high larval burden (more than 50 larvae per snail) only 10% of the larvae were viewed at higher magnifications.

Morphological identification of metastrongyloid larvae

Larval stages of metastrongyloids were identified by means of body measurement (length/width ratio) and the form (non-rhabditiform) and ratio of oesophagus to body lengths (1:3–1:2) in comparison to other nematodes [10] following Lange et al. 2018 [20]. To distinguish between different metastrongyloid larval stages, the distinct tail morphology of each genus was examined. For illustration of L1, L2 and L3 of Ang. vasorum, Ael. abstrusus and Crenosoma sp. please see Lange et al. 2018, Fig 2 [20] and regarding L1 see Fig 2. The lungworm species were identified by typical morphometric characteristics [5,9,19,31,39,4448]. One general feature of metastrongyloid larvae is the non-rhabditiform oesophagus, which forms 1 ⁄ 3–1 ⁄ 2 of the total larval length [9]. Angiostrongylus vasorum (310–400 μm × 14–16 μm) is characterized by a small cup as a cephalic button which emerges on the oral extremity and its tail tip with a dorsal spine and sinus wave curve [5,36,43,44,48]. Aulerostrongylus abstrusus (300–415 μm × 18–19 μm) has a slender anterior extremity with a short/terminal oral opening leading into a narrow vestibule and its tail is S-shaped with visible dorsal kink, distinct deep dorsal, ventral, incisures, a terminal knob-like extremity [5,19,35,45,48]. Troglostrongylus brevior (300–357 μm × 16–19 μm) has a clear and pointed anterior extremity with a sub-terminal oral opening and its tail gradually tapered to dorsal incision, dividing the extremity into two appendices (shallow ventral one, slender dorsal one) S-shaped tail is not as obvious as in Ael. abstrusus, ending straight, gradually tapered [5,31,46,47]. Crenosoma vulpis (240–310 μm × 13 μm) has a pointed and straight tail without indentations and entirely pointed [5,19,39]. The lengths of metastrongyloid larvae vary strongly depending on lungworm species, developmental stage and size of the respective intermediate host [9,44].and were thus not considered as reliable inter-species differentiation feature.

Fig 2. Metastrongyloid larvae found in Lissachatina fulica from different regions of Colombia.

(A) Aelurostrongylus abstrusus L1, scale bar 20 μm. (B) Troglostrongylus brevior L1, scale bar 50 μm. (C) Crenosoma vulpis L1, scale bar 50 μm. (D) Angiostrongylus vasorum L1, scale bar 50 μm.

Confirmation of metastrongyloid larvae via PCR and sequencing

The previously described morphological tail characteristics allowed larvae identification to the genus level. Therefore, for these larvae, those of each genus from a single snail were pooled and underwent additional PCR analyses to identify them at species level. After digestion with proteinase K, DNA from the pooled larvae was isolated using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with a final elution volume of 50 μL. To enhance the sensitivity of the molecular diagnosis, nested PCRs were performed. Following a conventional PCR with the universal nematode specific primers NC1/NC2 [49] specific real-time PCR analyses for individual species were performed as described in the literature [19]. Molecular confirmation was attained with the duplex-real-time PCR for Ael. abstrusus and T. brevior with melt analysis was carried out, amplifying the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS-2) region from the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) of 220 bp (Ael. abstrusus) and 370 bp (T. brevior). This PCR was conducted using the forward primers TrogloF, AeluroF and the single reverse primer MetR [50]. For confirm the infections by Ang. vasorum and C. vulpis a probe-based duplex-real-time PCR was performed amplifying a partial ITS-2 region as reported by Jefferies et al. 2011 [51]. To account for the inhibitory effects deriving from snail tissue [18, 52], samples were diluted 10 fold with sterile water and tested again with the above PCR conditions. In those cases in which the real-time PCRs were negative or inconclusive and the quantity of the amplicon-DNA from the first PCR was low we performed a second nested conventional PCR with primers NC1/MetR followed by direct sequencing or sequencing after cloning. In addition, we also sequenced some of the samples identified by real-time PCR for confirmation. Hence, 21 samples were purified and sent to a commercial sequencing service (LGC Genomics, Berlin, Germany). The sequences obtained were verified by eye with the software Chromas Lite (version 2.01) and the TCG microsatellite triplet repeat (as part of the ITS-2 region) and nucleotide polymorphisms were used to discriminate between the different reported genotypes by comparing sequences in GenBank via the BLAST algorithm ( The statistical analysis (p-value and Pearson’s correlation coefficient) were carried out using Free Statistics Software (v1.2.1), Office for Research Development and Education ( The value was considerate significant if p < 0.05.


In the 609 processed samples, metastrongyloid larvae were identified morphologically, and were found to belong to the following genera: Aelurostronglyus, Troglostrongylus, Crenosoma and Angiostrongylus (Fig 2). Molecular analyses with PCR allowed the identification of each lungworm species and overall prevalence in snails from each Colombian region is shown in Table 1. The distinction between different Angiostrongylus species was difficult by means of microscopy. Several of the Angiostrongylus spp. positive samples contained larvae that resembled Ang. vasorum (n = 24) and some showed characteristics of Ang. cantonensis (n = 2). However, larvae identified as probable A. cantonensis were not molecularly confirmed because DNA could not be amplified. For larvae of Ael. abstrusus, T. brevior, Ang. vasorum and C. vulpis morphological identification was confirmed by PCR and sequencing. Molecular biological analyses revealed total prevalences that varied with location and species (Table 1). Larval burden ranged from 1 to 314 larvae per snail for Ael. abstrusus and from 1 to 286 larvae per snail for T. brevior (Figs 3 and 4; to see larval burden of each region see S1 Fig). Larval burden for C. vulpis ranged from 1 to 208 larvae per snail. No relationships between the larval burden and the snail weight were found (Figs 3 and 4). Co-infections involving two species were detected by means of microscopy and PCR in 19.1% (16/84) of all lungworm positive snails (Fig 5). Co-infections consisting of more than two species were not detected.

Fig 3. Larval burden categories for Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis, Troglostrongylus brevior and unknown Aelurostrongylus sp. per infection.

In this graphic are referred 96 infections, 2 infections of unknown Angiostrongylus spp. were not included. Species identification was confirmed via PCR and corroborate by sequencing.

Fig 4. Relationship between (log10 axes) snail weight and Aelurostrongylus spp., Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis and Troglostrongylus brevior larval burden.

Here, the larval burden was plotted as a function of the snail weight. P-value: 0.065 and Pearson Correlation coefficient (r-value): 0.167. Aelurostrongylus includes genotypes A, AB and B of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus as well as one unknown Aelurostrongylus sp.

Fig 5. Mono- and co-infections with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis and Troglostrongylus brevior, unknown Aelurostrongylus sp. and Angiostrongylus sp.

Table 1. Prevalence of metastrongyloid lungworm larvae in Lissachatina fulica from 5 geographic regions of Colombia.

From the 84 snails positive for metastrongyloid larvae by microscopy, 29 yielded sufficient DNA from larvae pools for sequence analysis, and 25 of those 29 were selected for identification or confirmation by sequencing. Specimens of Ael. abstrusus, Ang. vasorum, C. vulpis and T. brevior could be confirmed via sequencing with an identity of 99–100% to known GenBank entries (Table 2). Regarding samples positive for Ael. abstrusus in PCR, sequencing revealed genotype variation with similarities to European genotypes of Ael abstrsus of 99% (genotype A), 94% (genotype AB) and 92% (genotype B, Table 2). Aelurostrongylus abstrusus genotype A isolates (n = 11) contained a microsatellite sequence with 7–10 times TCG from ITS2 sequence. In contrast to genotype B (n = 3), which among other nucleotide variations, contained 4 TCG repeat units in the microsatellite and has never been reported before. Genotype AB showed an intermediate number of TCG repeats of 15 (see S1 Table). In addition to these four species one sample contained a sequence for which no match was found in GenBank. It showed 82% similarity to European Ael. abstrusus isolates, thus probably belonging to the genus of Aelurostrongylus (Table 2).

Table 2. Identification of metastrongyloids from Colombian giant African snails Lissachatina fulica by BLAST search of their ITS2 sequences.


This survey was aimed at assessing the prevalences of metastrongyloid lungworm species in giant African snail populations from five municipalities of Colombia and adding novel data on the presence of lungworms of domestic animals and wildlife.

The existence of the feline lungworm Ael. abstrusus in the definitive host population in Colombia, namely domestic cats, has been known since 2003 but has been reported only rarely since [5355]. The high prevalence detected indicates that Putumayo is a hotspot for this parasite. Large areas of tropical rainforest of Colombia form the natural habitat of six wild felid species: ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), oncillas (Leopardus tigrinus), margay wildcats (Leopardus wiedii), cougars (Puma concolor), Jaguarundies (Puma (junior synonym: Herpailurus) yagouaroundi) and Jaguars (Panthera onca) [56], populations of which are decreasing and are in greater or lesser degree of threat [57,58]. All these wild felid species could be affected by high prevalences of Aelurostrongylus spp., especially considering the high pathogenicity and mortality associated with aelurostrongylosis [21]. Thus, new knowledge on the epidemiological status of lungworm species in wild cat populations from South America is needed to strengthen and consolidate more successful conservation programmes [5]. Additionally, the two different Aelurostrongylus genotypes (A and AB) here detected indicate that there is probably more genetic variation in this genus in South America, a region where limited molecular studies have been carried out [5], without reports of other taxa of the genus. This is in line with a report on genetic variability of Ang. vasorum isolates from South America and Europe [52]., Those three discovered genotypes (A, B, AB) showed different similarity to sequences originating from Europe published in GenBank. Genotype A (99% similarity) can be considered as identical to European isolates. Genotype B, however, shows only 92% similarity to European isolates. With differences of more than 5% a cryptic species or a subspecies could be hypothesised. However, we only analysed larvae, not adults, and for such a hypothesis more analyses would be necessary. Therefore, we here call these different isolates genotypes of Ael. abstrusus. The genotype AB shows similarities to both genotype A and B (see S2 Fig, S3 Fig, S4 Fig, S1 and S2 Tables). Whether or not genotype AB may represent a hybrid between the other two genotypes is to be answered in the future, conducting in-depth genetic analyses with a larger sample size and also involving isolates from final hosts. Overall, our sequence analysis of ITS2 provides evidence that either Ael. abstrusus is a species complex comprised of three distinct genotypes (A, B, AB) which may be cryptic species or that it is possible that the genetic variants could represent different Aelurostrongylus species. Similar observations exist for several parasites [59]. As for the unknown species which is probably belonging to genus Aelurostrongylus (genotype C, 82% similarity to the European genotypes of Ael. abstrusus, Table 2, S2 Fig), it cannot be yet stated that this is an undiscovered species. It could also represent an already known species for which no sequence was published in GenBank, yet. This should be considered in future studies of lungworms from wild felids in Colombia. and also in other South American countries, where research on lungworms is missing [5].

Angiostrongylus vasorum was reported in two Colombian crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) in 1961 and 2014 [60,61], but not yet in the Colombian domestic dog population. Few data exist on the prevalence of Ang. vasorum in intermediate hosts in other countries and these data vary considerately (1.6–43% prevalence in slug populations) depending on the sampling areas [7,18,19,52,62]. These reports correspond well to the observed rather low Ang. vasorum prevalence in this survey. Since Ang. vasorum displays a patchy distribution pattern with hyperendemic foci being in close proximity to areas of low prevalence [36,62,63], further extended epidemiological surveys in Colombia are required to detect hotspots of this canine angiostrongylosis. Surprisingly, recent results of the sequencing of samples positive for Ang. vasorum from Colombia [64] revealed identity with the European strain and not with the South American strain, which has been suggested as being another species, Ang. raillieti [65]. As for the other two lungworm species, C. vulpis and T. brevior, no reports in Colombia existed prior to our study.

Considering larval burdens, the majority of snails carried fewer than 50 larvae for each of the four found lungworm species (Fig 3). Similar findings have been described before for Ang. vasorum in natural slug populations [19]. Snails carrying a high larval burden (more than 50 larvae) can be considered most dangerous for the definitive host population since a higher infection dose leads to more severe clinical manifestations [66,67]. These low loads observed in Ang. vasorum are in line with previous reports in the majority of gastropod species investigated [18,19]. For instance, in Denmark and Germany the percentage of slugs harbouring more than 100 larvae was 14% [17] and 3.3% [19], respectively. Similar findings were also reported for the closely related species Ang. costaricensis in which 82% of the slugs were infected with low loads [68]. In the present survey, burdens of 100 or more larvae per snail were observed in only 14.3% and 12.5% of the snails regarding C. vulpis, and T. brevior, respectively and only 10.5% concerning Ael. abstrusus, which is in line with another study [19].The observation that the majority of gastropods contain a low metastrongyloid larval burden, with a small minority harbouring high burdens has been described as overdispersion [69], that may lead to subclinical infections, which are frequently observed in the definitive hosts of the four parasite species [21,29,34,70]. It is possible to speculate, therefore, that low larval burdens in gastropods may relate to their innate immune system, with effective formation of so-called invertebrate extracellular phagocyte traps (InEPTs) by gastropod haemocytes in response to metastrongyloid lungworm larvae, which has recently been shown [71]. This question requires, however, further in-depth investigation of how gastropods defend themselves against invading metastrongyloid parasites [72]. The maximal metastrongyloid larval burden found in this survey was 314 Ael. abstrusus larvae (Fig 3), which is slightly lower than the 392 Ang. vasorum burden found in a Danish slug [17] and much lower than the 546 Ang. vasorum larvae found in a German slug [19]. The majority of lungworm positive snails were larger (over 10 g) and probably therefore older. Larger and older snails/slugs have in general more environmental exposure to larvae excreted in faeces, which makes more likely their contact and infection with Ang. cantonensis and Ang. vasorum [19,73,74]. Co-infections in the definitive hosts are frequently reported for the two cat lungworm species [75] and the two dog lungworm species [76]. Conversely, in the intermediate hosts, reports of metastrongyloid co-infections are rather scarce. To the best of our knowledge, there has been only one report of multiple simultaneous infections of Ang. vasorum, C. vulpis and Ael. abstrusus in slugs, in Germany [19]. The survey conducted here reports mixed infections of T. brevior and Ael. abstrusus, T. brevior and C. vulpis, and T. brevior and Ang. vasorum for the first time in gastropod hosts (Fig 5), although these co-infections were only occasionally detected.

In addition to Ang. vasorum, other lungworm larvae of the genus Angiostrongylus that resembled Ang. cantonensis were detected in two regions of Colombia (Table 1) via microscopy. This parasite has never been reported in Colombia, but is present Ecuador, Brazil and the Caribbean islands [77]. In recent decades, several cases of human meningoencephalitis of unknown aetiology have been reported in Colombia [78], which might correspond to cases of human angiostrongyliasis that were unreported or unrecognized [77]. Further specific investigations on this zoonosis are necessary to confirm whether or not it is already circulating in definitive and intermediate hosts as well as in exposed human populations, in order to take measures to inform the Colombian public health institutions and protect society from this life-threatening parasitosis. Although other metastrongyloid nematodes of wildlife were not detected in the snails, it cannot be excluded that they may have been overlooked in co-infections in some samples because of possible DNA degradation.


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large-scale survey confirming by molecular analysis the presence of Ael. abstrusus, Ang. vasorum, T. brevior and C. vulpis infections in intermediate hosts in Colombia. The records of T. brevior and C. vulpis represent the first report of these parasites in this country and the first confirmation via molecular techniques of these parasites in South America, demonstrating both 100% similarity to the European genotypes. Interestingly, a hotspot of Ael. abstrusus (with high genetic variability) and 1 potentially undescribed nematode which could belong to the genus Aelurostrongylus were here reported in the Amazonian region, specifically in Putumayo. On the basis of records of Ang. cantonensis in neighbouring countries and previous reports in Colombia of Ang. costaricensis, further research on L. Fulica as well as other natural populations of gastropods such as veronicellid slugs and Cornu aspersum should be undertaken in Colombia. The biology of invasive species in the region and their interactions with the native fauna requires more attention and investigation by the national authorities. Thus, more epidemiological and basic research on all these parasites in natural populations of paratenic hosts (such as birds, amphibians, crabs, amongst others) and intermediate hosts in other geographic areas is needed. In the same way data regarding prevalence in humans, domestic animals and wild definitive hosts are required in Colombia as well as in other countries of South, Central and North America to increase knowledge of the impact, dynamics, genetic variation and environmental factors associated with these neglected parasitoses.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Relationship between (log10 axes) snail weight and Aelurostrongylus spp., Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis and Troglostrongylus brevior larval burden.

A) Larval burden per snail and snail weight of all 609 snails and those collected in B) Puerto Leguízamo (n = 107), C) Andes (n = 238), D) Tuluá (n = 64), E) Cañasgordas (n = 100) and F) and Ciudad Bolívar (n = 100).


S2 Fig.

Alignment CO Aelurostrongylus genotypes A, AB, B and C. Alignment of ITS2 sequences from Ael. abstrusus isolates detected during the present study in Lisachatina fulica in Colombia (CO). Genotype A is found worldwide and is identical with European isolates of Ael. abstrusus, whereas genotypes AB, B, and unknown species C were so far only described from Colombia.


S3 Fig. Multiple sequence alignment of Aelurostrongylus ITS2 sequences.

Alignment of ITS2 sequences from Ael. abstrusus isolates detected in Colombia (CO) with all current sequences (12/2018) available from GenBank database. Sequences were aligned using the program MAFFT-L-INS-i [1, See S1 Text.] and manual curated. Sequence labels consist of country code, accession number and genotype; BR Brazil, DE Germany, IL Israel, IT Italy, MT Malta, JP Japan. The TCG microsatellite triplet repeat and nucleotide polymorphisms served to discriminate between the different Aelurostrongylus genotypes are highlighted. Genotype A is found worldwide and is identical with Ael. abstrusus, whereas genotypes AB, B, and C were so far only described from Colombia.


S4 Fig. Corresponding phylogenetic tree of Aelurostrongylus genotypes (Maximum-Likelihood PhyML).

Phylogenetic analysis using web service [2, See S1 Text.], Metastrongylus salmi as outgroup, branches support values in percent with values < 50% not shown, scale-bar indicates the number of substitutions per site).


S1 Table. Estimates of evolutionary divergence between Aelurostrongylus ITS2-Sequences with TGC-microsatellite.


S2 Table. Estimates of evolutionary divergence between Aelurostrongyluso ITS2-Sequences without the TGC-microsatellite.

The number of base differences per site from between sequences are shown. This analysis involved 20 nucleotide sequences. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 449 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [3. See S1Text.].


S1 Text. Supporting information references.



We are particularly grateful to Dr David Villar (Veterinary Medicine School, University of Antioquia, Colombia) for his valuable advice and suggestions regarding the manuscript. We also thank Angela Rosa Diaz Majerus, Juan Eugenio Lopera and Christine Henrich for their excellent technical assistance and support in the laboratory, Maritza Usúga for collecting the snails and Jose David Zapata for assisting in the digestion procedure. We also thank Boehringer Ingelheim and Dr. Kathrin Schug for kindly providing lungworm larvae as PCR control.


  1. 1. Prasad GS, Singh D, Senani S, Medhi R. Eco-friendly way to keep away pestiferous Giant African snail, Achatina fulica Bowdich from nursery beds. Current Science. 2004;87(12):1657–1659.
  2. 2. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database: invasive species specialist group Auckland. New Zealand; 2000.
  3. 3. Thiengo SC, Faraco FA, Salgado NC, Cowie RH, Fernandez MA. Rapid spread of an invasive snail in South America: the giant African snail, Achatina fulica, in Brasil. Biol Invasions. 2007;9(6):693.
  4. 4. De La Ossa-Lacayo A, De La Ossa J. Caracol africano gigante Achatina fulica bowdich 1822 (Mollusca: Gastropoda-achatinidae) en zona urbana de Sincelejo Y Sampués, Sucre, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal-RECIA. 2014;6(2):299–304
  5. 5. Penagos-Tabares F, Lange MK, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, Taubert A, Hermosilla C. Angiostrongylus vasorum and Aelurostrongylus abstrusus: Neglected and underestimated parasites in South America. Parasit vectors. 2018;11(1):208. pmid:29587811
  6. 6. Guo Jing, Wu Rui-shan, Zhang Jia-en, Zhao Ben-liang, Hui-rong YANG. Overview and perspective on the current research status for the giant snail Achatina fulica in China. Journal of Southern Agriculture. 2015;46(4).
  7. 7. Fontanilla I. Achatina fulica (Lissachatina) Bowdich: its molecular phylogeny, genetic variation in global populations, and its possible role in the spread of the Rat Lungworm Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen). University of Nottingham, 2010; pp. 633.
  8. 8. Alicata JE. The presence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in islands of the Indian Ocean and probable role of the giant African snail, Achatina fulica, in dispersal of the parasite to the Pacific islands. Can J Zool. 1966;44(6):1041–1049. pmid:5981486
  9. 9. Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Conboy G. Canine and feline cardiopulmonary parasitic nematodes in Europe: emerging and underestimated. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:62. pmid:20653938
  10. 10. Taubert A, Pantchev N, Vrhovec MG, Bauer C, Hermosilla C. Lungworm infections (Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus) in dogs and cats in Germany and Denmark in 2003–2007. Vet Parasitol. 2009;159(2):175–180. pmid:19019555
  11. 11. Kistler WM, Brown JD, Allison AB, Nemeth NM, Yabsley MJ. First report of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Hepatozoon from a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from West Virginia, USA. Vet Parasitol. 2014;200(1–2):216–220. pmid:24412356
  12. 12. Giannelli A, Capelli G, Joachim A, Hinney B, Losson B, Kirkova Z, et al. Lungworms and gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats: a European perspective. Int J Parasitol. 2017; 47(9):517–528. pmid:28455237
  13. 13. Di Cesare A, Traversa D. Canine angiostrongylosis: recent advances in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Vet Med. 2014;2014(5):181–192.
  14. 14. Bwangamoi O. Angiostrongylus vasorum and other worms in dogs in Uganda. Vet Rec. 1972;91(11). 92: 267.
  15. 15. Bourque A, Whitney H, Conboy G. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in a coyote (Canis latrans) from Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. J Wildlife Dis. 2005;41(4):816–819.
  16. 16. Gillis-Germitsch N, Manser MB, Hilbe M, Schnyder M. Meerkats (Suricata suricatta), a new definitive host of the canid nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum. Int J Parasitol: Parasites Wildl. 2017;6(3):349–353.
  17. 17. Ferdushy T, Kapel CM, Webster P, Al-Sabi MN, Gronvold J. The occurrence of Angiostrongylus vasorum in terrestrial slugs from forests and parks in the Copenhagen area, Denmark. J Helminthol. 2009;83(4):379–383. pmid:19460193
  18. 18. Patel Z, Gill AC, Fox MT, Hermosilla C, Backeljau T, Breugelmans K, et al. Molecular identification of novel intermediate host species of Angiostrongylus vasorum in Greater London. Parasitol Res. 2014;113(12):4363–4369. pmid:25195057
  19. 19. Lange M, Penagos-Tabares F, Hirzmann J, Failing K, Schaper R, Van Bourgonie Y, et al. Prevalence of Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Crenosoma vulpis larvae in native slug populations in Germany. Vet Parasitol. 2018;254:120–130. pmid:29656996
  20. 20. Sauerländer R, Eckert J. Die Achatschnecke (Achatina fulica) als experimenteller Zwischenwirt für Angiostrongylus vasorum (Nematoda). Z Parasitenk. 1974;44(1):59–72.
  21. 21. Elsheikha HM, Schnyder M, Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Wright I, Lacher DW. Updates on feline aelurostrongylosis and research priorities for the next decade. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):389. pmid:27387914
  22. 22. Traversa D, Lia RP, Iorio R, Boari A, Paradies P, Capelli G, et al. Diagnosis and risk factors of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Strongylida) infection in cats from Italy. Vet parasitol. 2008;153(1):182–186.
  23. 23. West B, Wilson P, Hatch C. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection in the Cheetah. J Helminthol. 1977;51: 210–211. pmid:599269
  24. 24. González P, Carbonell E, Urios V, VV. R. Coprology of Panthera tigris altaica and Felis bengalensis euptilurus from the Russian Far East. J Parasitol. 2007;93(948–50).
  25. 25. Hamilton JM. On the Migration, Distribution, Longevity and Pathogenicity of Larvae of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in the Snail, Helix aspersa. J Helminth. 1963;43(3–4):319–325.
  26. 26. Lopez C, Panadero R, Paz A, Sanchez-Andrade R, Diaz P, Diez-Banos P, et al. Larval development of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Angiostrongylidae) in experimentally infected Cernuella (Cernuella) virgata (Mollusca, Helicidae). Parasitol Res. 2005;95(1):13–16. pmid:15614583
  27. 27. Ohlweiler FP, Guimarães MCdA, Takahashi FY, Eduardo JM. Current distribution of Achatina fulica, in the State of São Paulo including records of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda) larvae infestation. Rev I Med Trop. 2010;52(4):211–214.
  28. 28. Cardillo N, Clemente A, Pasqualetti M, Borrás P, Rosa A, Ribicich M. First report of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in domestic land snail Rumina decollata, in the Autonomous city of Buenos Aires. InVet. 2014;16(1):15–22.
  29. 29. Mehlhorn H. Troglostrongylus brevior. In: Mehlhorn H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Parasitology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2016: 196.
  30. 30. Traversa D, Di Cesare A. Feline lungworms: what a dilemma. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:423–430. pmid:23928099
  31. 31. Giannelli A, Ramos RA, Annoscia G, Di Cesare A, Colella V, Brianti E, et al. Development of the feline lungworms Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior in Helix aspersa snails. Parasitology. 2014;141(4):563–569. pmid:24477103
  32. 32. Otranto D, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F. Troglostrongylus brevior and a nonexistent ‘dilemma’. Trends in parasitology. 2013;29(11):517–518. pmid:24080064
  33. 33. Bihr T, Conboy GA. Lungworm (Crenosoma vulpis) infection in dogs on Prince Edward Island. Canad Vet J. 1999;40(8):555.
  34. 34. Cobb MA, Fisher MA. Crenosoma vulpis infection in a dog. Vet Rec. 1992;130:452. pmid:1621347
  35. 35. Conboy G. Helminth parasites of the canine and feline respiratory tract. Vet Clin N Am-Small 2009;39(6):1109–1126.
  36. 36. Schug K, Krämer F, Schaper R, Hirzmann J, Failing K, Hermosilla C, et al. Prevalence survey on lungworm (Angiostrongylus vasorum, Crenosoma vulpis, Eucoleus aerophilus) infections of wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in central Germany. Parasit vectors. 2018;11(1):85. pmid:29409523
  37. 37. Nevárez A, López A, Conboy G, Ireland W, Sims D. Distribution of Crenosoma vulpis and Eucoleus aerophilus in the lung of free-ranging red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005;17(5):486–489. pmid:16312245
  38. 38. Oyarzún-Cadagán JA. Pesquisa de nematodos pulmonares en perros y gatos de las ciudades de Río Bueno y La Unión, Provincia del Ranco, Chile. M.Sc. Thesis, Universidad Austral De Chile Valdivia. 2013. Available from:
  39. 39. Colella V, Mutafchiev Y, Cavalera MA, Giannelli A, Lia RP, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Development of Crenosoma vulpis in the common garden snail Cornu aspersum: implications for epidemiological studies. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:208. pmid:27079792
  40. 40. Spratt DM. Species of Angiostrongylus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) in wildlife: A review. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2015;4(2):178–189. pmid:25853051
  41. 41. Rodríguez G. Lethal hematocheziadue to abdominal angiostrongylosis. Biomédica. 2000;20(2):120–130.
  42. 42. Romero-Alegría A, Belhassen-García M, Velasco-Tirado V, Garcia-Mingo A, Alvela-Suárez L, Pardo-Lledias J, et al. Angiostrongylus costaricensis: Systematic Review of Case Reports. Adv Infect Dis. 2014;4:36–41.
  43. 43. Chen D, Zhang Y, Shen H, Wei Y, Huang D, Tan Q, et al. Epidemiological survey of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in the west-central region of Guangdong Province, China. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(2):305–314. pmid:21301874
  44. 44. Ash LR. Diagnostic Morphology of the Third-Stage Larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, and Anafilaroides rostratus (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea). J Parasitol. 1970;56(2):249–253. pmid:5445821
  45. 45. Guilhon J, Cens B. Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) Etude biologique et morphologique. Ann Parasit Hum Comp. 1973;48:567–596.
  46. 46. Di Cesare A, Crisi PE, Di Giulio E, Veronesi F, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Talone T, et al. Larval development of the feline lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in Helix aspersa. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(9):3101–3108. pmid:23743614
  47. 47. Brianti E, Giannetto S, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Lungworms of the genus Troglostrongylus (Strongylida: Crenosomatidae): neglected parasites for domestic cats. Vet Parasitol. 2014;202:104–12. pmid:24566126
  48. 48. Traversa D, Guglielmini C. Feline aelurostrongylosis and canine angiostrongylosis: a challenging diagnosis for two emerging verminous pneumonia infections. Vet Parasitol. 2008;157(3–4):163–174. pmid:18775603
  49. 49. Gasser RB, Chilton NB, Hoste H, Beveridge I. Rapid sequencing of rDNA from single worms and eggs of parasitic helminths. Nucleic Acids Research. 1993;21(10):2525. pmid:8506152
  50. 50. Annoscia G, Latrofa MS, Campbell BE, Giannelli A, Ramos RA, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Simultaneous detection of the feline lungworms Troglostrongylus brevior and Aelurostrongylus abstrusus by a newly developed duplex-PCR. Vet Parasitol. 2014;199(3–4):172–178. pmid:24238839
  51. 51. Jefferies R, Morgan ER, Helm J, Robinson M, Shaw SE. Improved detection of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infection using real-time PCR and indirect ELISA. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(6):1577–1583. pmid:21537986
  52. 52. Jefferies R, Morgan ER, Shaw SE. A SYBR green real-time PCR assay for the detection of the nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum in definitive and intermediate hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166(1–2):112–118. pmid:19717239
  53. 53. Salamanca J, Gil B, Cortés J. Parasitosis pulmonar por Aelurostrongylus abstrusus en un felino. Rev Fac Med Vet Zoo. 2003;50(2):30–34.
  54. 54. Echeverry DM, Giraldo MI, Castaño JC. Prevalence of intestinal helminths in cats in Quindío, Colombia. Biomédica. 2012;32(3):430–436. pmid:23715191
  55. 55. Sánchez-Rojas I, Cabrera-Gutiérrez E, Cuellar-Ramón J, Murcia-Bastidas C, Sánchez-Manchola L, Sánchez-Monge E. Diagnóstico postmortem de Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Railliet, 1898) en un felino mestizo: primer reporte en el municipio de Florencia, Departamento del Caquetá, Colombia. Rev Electrón Vet. 2017;18(5):1–9.
  56. 56. Hunter Luke. Wild cats of the world. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
  57. 57. Payán E, L. T. The tigrilladas in Colombia. CatNews. 2006;44:25–28.
  58. 58. González-Maya JF, Charry DZ, Arévalo ÁH, Cepeda AA, Reina SB, Uribe CC, et al. Traditional uses of wild felids in the Caribbean region of Colombia: new threats for conservation? Lat Am J Conserv. 2010;1(1): 64–69.
  59. 59. Morgan ER, Clare EL, Jefferies R, Stevens JR. Parasite epidemiology in a changing world: can molecular phylogeography help us tell the wood from the trees?. Parasitology. 2012 Dec;139(14):1924–38. pmid:22917112
  60. 60. Gonçalves P. Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) novo parasito do cão no Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil)–Nematoda, Metastrongyloidea. Rev Fac Agron Vet. 1961;4:35–40.
  61. 61. Varela-Arias N, Toro-Mesa D, Caicedo-Martínez JA, Ospina-Chiriví J. Coinfección entre Distemper Canino y un Verme Pulmonar en un Cerdocyon thous en Estado Silvestre en el Municipio de Pereira. Mem Conferenc Intern Med Fauna Silvest, Exót. 2014;10(2):145–159.
  62. 62. Aziz NA, Daly E, Allen S, Rowson B, Greig C, Forman D, et al. Distribution of Angiostrongylus vasorum and its gastropod intermediate hosts along the rural-urban gradient in two cities in the United Kingdom, using real time PCR. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):56.
  63. 63. Maksimov P, Hermosilla C, Taubert A, Staubach C, Sauter-Louis C, Conraths FJ, et al. GIS-supported epidemiological analysis on canine Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis infections in Germany. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):108. pmid:28241853
  64. 64. Lange M, Penagos-Tabares F, Vélez J, Gutiérrez J, Hirzmann J, Chaparro-Gutiérrez J, et al. Regional report on Angiostrongylus vasorum in Colombia: Genetic similarity to European lineage. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports. 2018;13:21–23.
  65. 65. Jefferies R, Shaw S, Viney M, Morgan E. Angiostrongylus vasorum from South America and Europe represent distinct lineages. Parasitology. 2009;136(1):107–115. pmid:19126274
  66. 66. Schnyder M, Fahrion A, Riond B, Ossent P, Webster P, Kranjc A, et al. Clinical laboratory and pathological findings in dogs experimentally infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Parasitol Res. 2010;107(6):1471–1480. pmid:20700604
  67. 67. Philbey AW, Krause S, Jefferies R. Verminous pneumonia and enteritis due to hyperinfection with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in a kitten. J Comp Pathol. 2014;150(4):357–360. pmid:24679855
  68. 68. Laitano AC, Genro JP, Fontoura R, Siqueira S, Branco L, Maurer RL, et al. Report on the ocurrence of Angiostrongylus costaricensis in southern Brazil, in a new intermediate host from the genus Sarasinula (Veronicellidae, Gastropoda). Rev Soc Bras Med Tro. 2001;34(1):95–97.
  69. 69. Anderson RM, Gordon DM. Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology. 1982;85 (Pt 2):373–398.
  70. 70. Di Cesare A, Traversa D. Canine angiostrongylosis: recent advances in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Vet Med. 2014;2014(5):181–192.
  71. 71. Lange MK, Penagos-Tabares F, Muñoz-Caro T, Gärtner U, Mejer H, Schaper R, et al. Gastropod-derived haemocyte extracellular traps entrap metastrongyloid larval stages of Angiostrongylus vasorum, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus brevior. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):50. pmid:28143510
  72. 72. Penagos-Tabares F, Lange MK, Seipp A, Gärtner U, Mejer H, Taubert A, et al. Novel approach to study gastropod-mediated innate immune reactions against metastrongyloid parasites. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(4):1211–1224. pmid:29441415
  73. 73. Yousif F, Lämmler G. The Effect of Some Biological and Physical Factors on Infection of Biomphalaria glabrata with Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Z Parasitenk. 1975;47:191–201. pmid:1189582
  74. 74. Ferdushy T, Kapel CM, Webster P, Al-Sabi MN, Gronvold JR. The effect of temperature and host age on the infectivity and development of Angiostrongylus vasorum in the slug Arion lusitanicus. Parasitol Res. 2010;107(1):147–151. pmid:20369254
  75. 75. Jefferies R, Vrhovec MG, Wallner N, Catalan DR. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Troglostrongylus sp. (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) infections in cats inhabiting Ibiza, Spain. Vet Parasitol. 2010;173(3–4):344–348. pmid:20674179
  76. 76. Barutzki D, Schaper R. Natural infections of Angiostrongylus vasorum and Crenosoma vulpis in dogs in Germany (2007–2009). Parasitol Res. 2009;105 Suppl 1:S39–48.
  77. 77. Valente R, Robles MDR, Navone GT, Diaz JI. Angiostrongylus spp. in the Americas: geographical and chronological distribution of definitive hosts versus disease reports. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(3):143–152. pmid:29412352
  78. 78. Velez-van-Meerbeke A, Medina-Silva N, Besada-Lombana S, Mojica-Madero JA. Epidemiología de la enfermedad por meningococo en Colombia. Infectio. 2017;21(1):19–24. Available from: