Pyrethroid resistance is envisioned to be a major problem for the vector control program since, at present, there are no suitable chemical substitutes for pyrethroids. Cross-resistance to knockdown agents, which are mainly used in mosquito coils and related products as spatial repellents, is the most serious concern. Since cross-resistance is a global phenomenon, we have started to monitor the distribution of mosquito resistance to pyrethroids. The first pilot study was carried out in Vietnam. We periodically drove along the national road from the north end to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam and collected mosquito larvae from used tires. Simplified susceptibility tests were performed using the fourth instar larvae of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus. Compared with the other species, Ae. aegypti demonstrated the most prominent reduction in susceptibility. For Ae. aegypti, significant increases in the susceptibility indices with a decrease in the latitude of collection points were observed, indicating that the susceptibility of Ae. aegypti against d-allethrin was lower in the southern part, including mountainous areas, as compared to that in the northern part of Vietnam. There was a significant correlation between the susceptibility indices in Ae. aegypti and the sum of annual pyrethroid use for malaria control (1998–2002). This might explain that the use of pyrethroids as residual treatment inside houses and pyrethroid-impregnated bed nets for malaria control is attributable to low pyrethroid susceptibility in Ae. aegypti. Such insecticide treatment appeared to have been intensively administered in the interior and along the periphery of human habitation areas where, incidentally, the breeding and resting sites of Ae. aegypti are located. This might account for the strong selection pressure toward Ae. aegypti and not Ae. albopictus.
Pyrethroid is one of the most successful insecticidal chemicals for controlling insect pests and vectors of household and public health importance. However, extensive treatment of photo-stable and highly effective pyrethroids sometimes causes resistance to insect populations. Resistance to pyrethroids belonging to the knockdown agent groups that have been used as the spatial repellents, such as mosquito coils and related products, is the most serious concern. Since this is a global phenomenon, we have started to monitor the distribution of mosquito resistance to pyrethroids and the first pilot study was carried out in Vietnam. Our study concluded that Aedes aegypti, the most important vector of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever, demonstrated the prominent reduction in susceptibility against d-allethrin, one of the most popular pyrethroids for spatial repellents. The extensive treatment of photo-stable pyrethroids for malaria control seemed to be one of the attributable factors. In order to effectively manage pyrethroid resistance, the establishment of a feasible insecticide management system and a regular monitoring system of pyrethroid susceptibility will be essential.
Citation: Kawada H, Higa Y, Nguyen YT, Tran SH, Nguyen HT, Takagi M (2009) Nationwide Investigation of the Pyrethroid Susceptibility of Mosquito Larvae Collected from Used Tires in Vietnam. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3(3): e391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000391
Editor: Jeffrey M. Bethony, George Washington University, United States of America
Received: July 7, 2008; Accepted: February 9, 2009; Published: March 10, 2009
Copyright: © 2009 Kawada et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study is sponsored by the Core University Program and is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Collaborative Study on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Vietnam: Enhancement of Research Capacity. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
One of the most successful events in the development of pesticide chemicals was the discovery of pyrethrum and the successful synthesis of pyrethroids. For example, allethrin , a classical synthetic pyrethroid, continues to be used for preventing mosquito bites without any toxicological and operational problems. There are two main groups of pyrethroids: one possessing high knockdown activity but low killing activity and the other possessing high killing activity. The pyrethroids in the former group, such as d-allethrin, are aptly labeled as knockdown agents, and those in the latter group, as killing agents. Generally, the pyrethroids belonging to the latter group exhibit high photostability that enables their outdoor use, for example, as agricultural pesticides. Nowadays, photo-stable pyrethroids are emerging as the predominant insecticides for vector control. In fact, photo-stable pyrethroids comprise 40% of the insecticides used annually on a global level for indoor residual spraying against malaria vectors and 100% of the WHO-recommended insecticides for the treatment of mosquito nets. The exception is the use of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) in African countries .
Pyrethroid resistance to photo-stable pyrethroids is envisioned to be a major problem for the vector control program since, at present, there are no chemical substitutes for pyrethroids. Moreover, cross-resistance to knockdown agents is the most serious concern. Since this is a global phenomenon, we have started to monitor the distribution of mosquito resistance to pyrethroids. The first pilot study was carried out in Vietnam. In the course of the National Dengue Control Program in Vietnam, the ecological differences between two dengue vectors, namely, Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse), that are of different geographical origins have become a subject of discussion. The ecological differences in the vectors may be the reason for the differences in the epidemics occurring nationwide. In order to examine the nationwide distribution of the two species and pyrethroid resistance, used tires, one of the main breeding grounds of the two species, were targeted for larval collection. Used tires were suitable targets for our study as a standard breeding sites because they were extensively and commonly distributed along roads in Vietnam. In the present paper, distribution analysis of pyrethroid-susceptibility of the larvae of three major mosquito species, namely, Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say), that were collected from used tires located along the national road in Vietnam was carried out. The relationships between pyrethroid susceptibility and the geographical factors and province based annual pyrethroid use are also discussed.
Materials and Methods
Collection of mosquito larvae from used tires
We periodically drove along the national road from the north end to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam (7–16 December 2006; 17–20 March, 15–20 May, and 1–12 July 2007; and 7–16 January 2008) and collected mosquito larvae from used tires (Figure 1). Whenever we encountered the used tires, most of which were found along the periphery of repair shops, while driving along a systematically determined route, the geographical position (with a global positioning system [GPS]), number of tires, presence of water in the tires, existence of mosquito larvae in the tires, and environmental characteristics such as land with vegetation within a 25-m radius and distribution of houses along the road were recorded. Mosquito larvae were collected from tires with larvae (6–20 tires per site) by netting (5 times per tire). The collected larvae, except those used for the susceptibility test, were placed in 1.5 ml plastic vials containing ethanol solution for identification at a later time.
Simplified knockdown bioassay using the mosquito larvae
The bioassay for the detection of knockdown susceptibility was carried out on the day of collection by using the mosquito larvae obtained from the collection sites from where we could procure an adequate number of insects. The larvae collected from each collection site were briefly identified on the day of collection, and fourth instar larvae of the Stegomyia group, which occasionally comprised a mixed population of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus individuals, were used for the susceptibility test. Each larva was placed in a glass vial with 20 ml of water. An emulsifiable concentrate of 90% d-T80-allethrin was diluted with water to obtain a 250 ppm solution. After releasing the larva, 32 or 8 microliters of the solution was added in each vial to obtain a concentration of 0.4 and 0.1 ppm, respectively. Twenty larvae from each site were used for each concentration regime. Knockdown of the larvae was observed for 30 min. Larvae that sank to the bottom of the glass vial and could not swim, float, or were paralyzed were judged as knocked down larvae; the time to knockdown was recorded for each larva. After the test, each larva was placed in a 1.5 ml plastic vial containing ethanol solution for identification at a later time. After identification, individual knockdown data were summarized for each mosquito species (Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus). The median knockdown times (KT50s), i.e., the time required for 50% knockdown, were scored according to the 6 following categories: 1, <5 min; 2, 5–10 min; 3, 10–15 min; 4, 15–20 min; 5, 20–30 min; and 6, >30 min. The susceptibility index was calculated as the product of the scores at 0.1 and 0.4 ppm. Thus, mosquitoes with susceptibility index of 1 were considered to be the most susceptible and those with susceptibility index of 36 were considered to be the least susceptible to d-allethrin.
Knockdown test using adult mosquitoes
In order to confirm the validity of adopting a simplified larval bioassay as a substitute method for determining adult knockdown susceptibility, we performed a knockdown test using several adult colonies of Ae. aegypti with known larval susceptibility indices. Four Ae. aegypti colonies collected in the field in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh city, Ben Tre, Ben Luc, Long An; all colonies were collected in 2007) and 1 standard colony (transferred from Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd., Hyogo, Japan) that had been maintained in a laboratory after collection were used in the bioassay. A mosquito coil containing 0.3% d-T80-allethrin was cut into pieces of 0.5 g. A piece of the coil was ignited at both sides and burned completely in a glass chamber (70×70×70 cm) that contained a small battery-operated fan for moving the air. Immediately after the mosquito coil burned out, 3 to 5 day old 20 blood-unfed female mosquitoes were released into the chamber, and their knockdown was observed for 20 min. The test was performed in triplicate. The KT50 values were calculated by Bliss' probit method .
Univariate analysis was performed to analyze the effects of several factors on susceptibility. Latitude at each collection points were used as the geographical factor. Province based annual pyrethroid uses for malaria control in 1998–2002 (National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Vietnam, unpublished data) were also used for the analysis. Province-based data were transformed into a raster image using the spline function with ArcGIS 9.2 (ESRI Japan Corp.) to obtain extrapolated values at the collection points. The extrapolated values were log transformed and the susceptibility indices were categorized into two levels, ≥36 and <36, for the statistical analysis using JMP 7.0 (SAS Institute Inc.).
Geographical distribution of mosquito species
Larvae were collected from used tires along roads in Vietnam from 527 collection points throughout the collection surveillance. Used tires were extensively and commonly distributed. Collection sites were categorized into 5 areas: (1) northern mountainous area (172–506 m in height), (2) northern plain area, (3) eastern coastal area, (4) southern mountainous area (103–1563 m in height), and (5) southern wetlands. Among the 19188 tires surveyed in total during the investigation, 4757 were examined and 2468 contained water (51.9%); 852 contained mosquitoes (34.5%), and of these 653 contained dengue vector mosquitoes (Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus) (26.5%). In total, 8771 Ae. aegypti, 5916 Ae. albopictus, and 11356 Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae were collected. In the northern part of Vietnam, Ae. albopictus was dominant, and this dominance gradually reduced toward the south. Ae. aegypti was dominant in the southern part. In the eastern coastal areas of the southern part, almost 100% of the Aedes larvae collected were Ae. aegypti. However, in the mountainous areas, the number of Ae. albopictus increased, suggesting that the distribution of the 2 species is determined by different environmental gradients (Figure 2) .
Relationships between the susceptibilities of adult and larval Ae. aegypti to d-allethrin
Figure 3 shows the correlation between the larval susceptibility index and the adult KT50 of the same colony of Ae. aegypti for samples collected from several places in Vietnam. The adult KT50 for the standard strain, which showed normal susceptibility to insecticides was 3.74 min, and its larval susceptibility index was 6. In contrast to the standard strain, the field-collected strains showed higher KT50s and larval susceptibility indices. Further, a relatively high correlation was observed between the knockdown susceptibility of larvae and that of adults, indicating that the present simplified knockdown test is a good reflection of adult susceptibility.
Susceptibility distribution of mosquito larvae collected from used tires in Vietnam
Distribution of susceptibility indices for Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus are shown in Figure 4. The number of points where the susceptibility tests were carried out was 67 for Ae. aegypti, 50 for Ae. albopictus, and 73 for Cx. quinquefasciatus. The average susceptibility index and the proportion of mosquitoes with susceptibility indices greater than 20 was 24.9 and 59.7% for Ae. aegypti, 8.48 and 8.0% for Ae. albopictus, and 12.6 and 21.9% for Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively. When compared with the other species, reduction in susceptibility was most prominent in Ae. aegypti (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P<0.0001; Tukey's HSD test, P = 0.05). In contrast, the reduction in the susceptibility of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus was moderate. The susceptibility of the abovementioned species to d-allethrin was lower in the southern part (<13°N) than in the northern part (>13°N) of Vietnam. For Ae. aegypti, univariate analysis showed significant increases in the susceptibility indices with decrease in the latitude of the collection points (χ2 = 36.7, p<0.0001). In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the susceptibility indices and latitude of collection points in Ae. albopictus (χ2 = 2.57, p = 0.109) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (χ2 = 2.43, p = 0.119). In Ae. aegypti, significant correlation between the susceptibility indices and the sum of annual pyrethroid use for malaria control during 1998 and 2002 (χ2 = 5.95, p = 0.0147) was also observed. No significant correlations were seen between the susceptibility indices and the sum of annual pyrethroid use for malaria control in Ae. albopictus (χ2 = 0.945, p = 0.331) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (χ2 = 0.224, p = 0.636).
The most plausible procedure for investigating the knockdown susceptibility of mosquitoes to pyrethroids is to acquire an adequate number of field-collected female adults or laboratory-reared colonies by rearing field-collected larvae and to carry out a knockdown bioassay with the adults and the actual pyrethroid formulation, such as a mosquito coil, in a laboratory. However, it was impossible for us to follow this procedure since 190 field-collected larval samples were acquired in the present study. Susceptibility tests were, therefore, performed on the day of collection according to a simplified protocol by using the fourth instar larvae. In many cases, the adult susceptibility scores correlated with the larval susceptibility scores ,. This is, however, not always true for all cases since mosquitoes might develop different resistant mechanisms with different metabolic pathways in the larval and adult stages. In the present study, the authors focused on knockdown that might not be chiefly dependent on the enhancement of metabolic activity but may be dependent on the nervous insensitivity controlled by the kdr gene. The simple bioassay with mosquito larvae that is presented in this paper might be a convenient and cost-effective method for evaluating mosquito knockdown resistance in the field.
The present paper reports some interesting points concerning the distribution of pyrethroid resistance among mosquitoes in Vietnam. The most prominent observation is that the susceptibility of Ae. aegypti to d-allethrin decreased significantly with decrease in the latitude of the collection points. Vu et al. reported similar tendency in pyrethroid susceptibility in Ae. aegypti in Vietnam . The authors conducted WHO standard bioassay using adult Ae. aegypti collected in 22 places in 11 provinces and cities in four different regions of Vietnam and found that the mosquitoes were susceptible to pyrethroids in many places in the North and Centre regions but they were resistant in the South and Central Highlands in Vietnam. They concluded this discrepancy in pyrethroid susceptibility in different regions to be due to the longer and extended use of pyrethroids in malaria and dengue fever control programs and in agriculture in the Southern and Central Highlands. Actually, a lot of pyrethroids have been treated as residual treatment inside houses and pyrethroid-impregnated bed nets for malaria control (Figure 5) as a part of the National Malaria Control Program ,,. The pyrethroid use for malaria control seems to be important factor in developing pyrethroid resistance in Ae. aegypti in highland region, since the DF/DHF cases are not serious  and forest malaria continues to be endemic ,, in highland region as compared to the other regions and consequently the amount of pyrethroid treatment for dengue vector control in highland region is lower than the other regions (Figure 5). The pyrethroid treatment for malaria vector control appears to have been intensively conducted in the interior and along the periphery of human habitation areas, where incidentally, the breeding and resting sites of Ae. aegypti are located. This might account for the strong selection pressure toward Ae. aegypti and not so much toward Ae. albopictus since Asian Ae. aegypti is generally a domestic and endophagic that has a greater preference for indoor breeding than Ae. albopictus ,,,,. Several papers report the pyrethroid resistance of both Asian Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Most of them report that Ae. aegypti had higher pyrethroid resistance than Ae. albopictus, indicating pyrethroid resistance was affected by ecological differences in mosquitoes ,,,.
The blanks in the map indicate that no data were available.
In Vietnam, 24 tonnes of DDT was used for residual treatment against malaria vectors in 1993 and 1994. However, since the abandoning of DDT sprays in 1995, only pyrethroids (residual spraying of λ-cyhalothrin and α-cypermethrin and occasionally deltamethrin, and permethrin-impregnated bed nets) have been extensively used in large amounts, unlike in the other Asian countries ,. Although details regarding the amount of insecticides used for dengue control in Vietnam have not been published, 21,000 liters of photo-stable pyrethroid formulations such as λ-cyhalothrin, deltamethrin, and permethrin was reported to be used for dengue control in 20 southern provinces in 2007 . The extensive use of photo-stable pyrethroids, therefore, seems to have been very common in southern Vietnam.
Insecticides still provide the most promising countermeasures for controlling malaria, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), and other arthropod-borne diseases. On an average, at the global level, 547 tones of DDT, 39 tones of organophosphates, 23 tones of carbamates, and 41 tones of pyrethroids are used as active ingredients annually for indoor residual spraying against malaria vectors . The average total amount of pyrethroids used annually as active ingredients between 2003 and 2005 at the global level was 161 tones, which is 16% of the total insecticide consumption and 36% of the total insecticide consumption if the amount of DDT, which is exclusively used in African countries, is excluded. Among pyrethroids that are used for vector control, 98.7% comprise photo-stable pyrethroids such as α-cypermethrin, cypermethrin, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, etofenprox, λ-cyhalothrin, and permethrin.
On the other hand, the most popular and long-standing formulations using pyrethroids are mosquito coils, mosquito mats, and liquid vaporizers. Pyrethroids belonging to the knockdown agent group, such as allethrin, pyrethrin, and prallethrin, are used in these formulations. In particular, d-allethrin still continues to be used in these types of formulations. The use of pyrethroids for preventing mosquito bites as a “spatial repellent” ,,,,,,,,, is believed to be biorational since mosquitoes develop minimum physiological resistance, since it does not kill the affected insects and causes no selection pressure on insect populations. Several factors are believed to play major roles in inducing pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. The most serious factor is the uncontrolled use of photo-stable pyrethroids. Photo-stable pyrethroids persist on substrates such as wall and floor surfaces for long periods and hence continue to kill insects that make contact with these substrates. This induces a strong selection pressure on the insect population resulting in a population of resistant offspring. Ultra-low volume (ULV) space sprays are commonly applied for the emergency control of dengue vectors in urban areas. Space sprays by themselves do not induce a very strong selection pressure; however, uncontrolled treatment at high frequency facilitates the development of resistance. In the past, the use of pyrethroids in aqueous environments was impossible since pyrethroids are highly toxic to aqueous organisms. However, recently, a new pyrethroid with low fish toxicity has been commercially produced and is widely used in aqueous environments such as paddy fields. This might cause considerable selection pressure on the mosquito larvae distributed in such environments. The discovery of the phenoxybenzyl alcohol moiety accelerated the development of photo-stable pyrethroids that could be used for agricultural purposes. These “second generation” pyrethroids have been used worldwide as good vector control agents with various application techniques such as residual spraying, ULV spraying, and bed net treatment (long-lasting insecticide-treated net [LLITN]). However, photo-stable and highly effective pyrethroids might accelerate the development of pyrethroid resistance in mosquito populations. The most serious problem is that resistance to a single pyrethroid causes cross-resistance to all other pyrethroids, including knockdown agents. In fact, many reports concerning pyrethroid resistance have emerged after the successful application of pyrethroids as vector control agents . Therefore, the uncontrolled use of such pyrethroids might lead to the end of the golden age of pyrethroids.
Humans have invented insecticides to ensure comfort and to achieve ideal conditions. Good insecticides, therefore, should be as effective as possible so that the abovementioned goals are realized. However, the development and manufacturing costs of insecticides should be as low as possible. It is, therefore, our duty to use insecticides in the most effective and prudent manner possible in order to maintain their effectiveness and sustain their use. In order to effectively manage pyrethroid resistance, the establishment of a feasible insecticide management system and a regular monitoring system of pyrethroid susceptibility will be essential. Moreover, it is expected that the use of photo-unstable knockdown agents as spatial repellents, which effectively interfere with disease transmission without causing any selection pressure to insect populations, will be reconsidered.
We thank D. T. Trinh, National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam, T. V. Phong, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam, Huynh Thi Thuy Tran, Ly Huynh Kim Khanh, and Lu Lee Loan, Pasteur Institute in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, C. Tsurukawa, the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan; T. Otaguro and N. Takamura, the School of Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan; and Y. Kuroda, K. Misaki, N. Ukishiro, and Y. Sakata, Sumika Techno-Service Co. Ltd., Hyogo, Japan, for providing technical support, for rearing and providing the experimental insects, and for assisting in this study. This study is sponsored by the Core University Program and is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Collaborative Study on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Vietnam: Enhancement of Research Capacity.
Conceived and designed the experiments: HK YH YTN HTN MT. Performed the experiments: HK YH YTN SHT. Analyzed the data: HK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HK MT. Wrote the paper: HK.
- 1. Schechter MS, Green N, Laforge FB (1949) Constituents of pyrethrum flowers XXIII. Cynerolone and the synthesis of related cyclopentenolones. J Amer Chem Soc 71: 3165–3173.
- 2. Zaim M, Jambulingam P (2007) Global insecticide use for vector-borne disease control, 3rd ed. World Health Organization.
- 3. Bliss CI (1934) The method of probits - A correction. Science 79: 409–410.
- 4. Higa Y, Nguyen TY, Kawada H, Tran HS, Nguyen TH, et al. (Unpublished) Nationwide investigation on the infestation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in used tires in Vietnam
- 5. Kawada H, Shono Y, Itoh T, Abe Y (1993) Laboratory evaluation of insect growth regulators against several species of anopheline mosquitoes. Jpn J Sanit Zool 44: 349–353.
- 6. Nazni WA, Lee HL, Azahari AH (2005) Adult and larval insecticide susceptibility status of Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) mosquitoes in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Trop Biomed 22: 63–68.
- 7. Vu DH, Nguyen TBN, Do TH, Nguyen TBL (2004) Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti to insecticides in Viet Nam. Dengue Bull 28: 179–183.
- 8. Verlé P, Lieu TTT, Kongs A, der Stuyft PV, Coosemans M (1999) Control of malaria vectors: cost analysis in a province of northern Vietnam. Trop Med Int Hlth 4: 139–145.
- 9. Hung LQ, de Vries PJ, Giao PT, Nam VS, Binh TQ, et al. (2002) Control of malaria: a successful experience from Viet Nam. Bull WHO 80: 660–666.
- 10. Nam NV, de Vries PJ, Toi LV, Nagelkerke N (2005) Malaria control in Vietnam: the Binh Thuan experience. Trop Med Int Hlth 10: 357–365.
- 11. Nguyen TH (1994) Country report on dengue fever/dengue haemorrhagic fever and Japanese encephalitis in Vietnam. Trop Med 36: 170–176.
- 12. Erhart A, Thang ND, Hung NQ, Toi LV, Hung LX, et al. (2004) Forest malaria in Vietnam: A challenge for control. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 110–118.
- 13. Erhart A, Thang ND, Ky PV, Tinh TT, Overmeir1 CV, et al. (2005) Epidemiology of forest malaria in central Vietnam: a large scale cross-sectional survey. Malaria Journal 4: 58.
- 14. Thang ND, Erhart A, Speybroeck N, Hung LX, Thuan LK, et al. (2008) Malaria in central Vietnam: analysis of risk factors by multivariate analysis and classification tree models. Malaria Journal 7: 28.
- 15. Hawley WA (1988) The biology of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc (Suppl. 1) 4: 1–39.
- 16. Edman JD, Kittayapong P, Linthicum K, Scott T (1997) Attractant resting boxes for rapid collection and surveillance of Aedes aegypti (L.) inside houses. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 13: 24–27.
- 17. Ishak H, Miyagi I, Toma T, Kamimura K (1997) Breeding habitats of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in villages of Barru, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 28: 844–850.
- 18. Higa Y, Tsuda Y, Tuno N, Takagi M (2001) Preliminary field experiments on exophagy of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in peridomestic habitat. Med Entomol Zool 52: 105–116.
- 19. Tsuda Y, Suwonkerd W, Chawprom S, Prajakwong S, Takagi M (2006) Different spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus along an urban-rural gradient and the relating environmental factors examined in three villages in northern Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22: 222–228.
- 20. Ping LT, Yatiman R, Gek LS (2001) Susceptibility of adult field strains of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Singapore to pirimiphos-methyl and permethrin. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 17: 144–146.
- 21. Ponlawat A, Scott JG, Harrington LC (2005) Insecticide Susceptibility of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus across Thailand. J Med Entomol 42: 821–825.
- 22. Jirakanjanakit N, Rongnoparut P, Saengtharatip S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Duchon S, et al. (2007) Insecticide Susceptible/Resistance Status in Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand During 2003–2005. J Econ Entomol 100: 545–550.
- 23. Pethuan S, Jirakanjanakit N, Saengtharatip S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Kaewpa D, et al. (2007) Biochemical studies of insecticide resistance in Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Trop Biomed 24: 7–15.
- 24. Epidemiological and virological vector surveillances for dengue control program in southern Vietnam (2008) Pasteur Institute, Ho Chi Minh City (in Vietnamese)
- 25. MacIver DR (1964) Mosquito coils Part II. Studies on the action of mosquito coil smoke on mosquitoes. Pyrethrum Post 7: 7–14.
- 26. Chadwick PR (1970) The activity of dl-allethrolone d-trans chrysanthemate and other pyrethroids in mosquito coils. Mosq News 30: 162–170.
- 27. Winney R (1975) Pyrethrins and pyrethroids in coils–a review. Pyrethrum Post 13: 17–22.
- 28. Birley MH, Mutero CM, Turner IF, Chadwick PR (1987) The effectiveness of mosquito coils containing esbiothrin under laboratory and field conditions. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 81: 163–171.
- 29. Kawada H, Maekawa Y, Tsuda Y, Takagi M (2004) Laboratory and field evaluation of spatial repellency with metofluthrin-impregnated paper strip against mosquitoes in Lombok Island, Indonesia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 20: 292–298.
- 30. Kawada H, Maekawa Y, Tsuda Y, Takagi M (2004) Trial of spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated paper strip against Anopheles and Culex in shelters without walls in Lombok, Indonesia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 20: 434–437.
- 31. Kawada H, Maekawa Y, Takagi M (2005) Field trial of the spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated plastic strip against mosquitoes in shelters without walls (Beruga) in Lombok, Indonesia. J Vec Ecol 30: 181–185.
- 32. Kawada H, Nguyen TY, Nguyen TH, Trang SM, Nguyen DV, et al. (2005) Field evaluation of spatial repellency with metofluthrin impregnated resin strips against mosquitoes in Hai Phong city, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 350–353.
- 33. Kawada H, Iwasaki T, Lu LL, Trang TK, Nguyen MTN, et al. (2006) Field evaluation of spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated latticework plastic strips against Aedes aegypti (L.) and analysis of environmental factors affecting its efficacy in My Tho city, Tien Giang, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 1153–1157.
- 34. Kawada H, Temu EA, Minjas JN, Matsumoto O, Iwasaki T, et al. (2008) Field evaluation of spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated latticework plastic strips against mosquitoes of Anopheles gambiae group in Bagamoyo, coastal Tanzania. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. in press.
- 35. African network for vector resistance (2005) Atlas of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors of the WHO African region. World Health Organization.