Identification of potent anti-Cryptosporidium new drug leads by screening traditional Chinese medicines

Cryptosporidium spp. are gastrointestinal opportunistic protozoan parasites that infect humans, domestic animals, and wild animals all over the world. Cryptosporidiosis is the second leading infectious diarrheal disease in infants less than 5 years old. Cryptosporidiosis is a common zoonotic disease associated with diarrhea in infants and immunocompromised individuals. Consequently, cryptosporidiosis is considered a serious economic, veterinary, and medical concern. The treatment options for cryptosporidiosis are limited. To address this problem, we screened a natural product library containing 87 compounds of Traditional Chinese Medicines for anti-Cryptosporidium compounds that could serve as novel drug leads and therapeutic targets against C. parvum. To examine the anti-Cryptosporidium activity and half-maximal inhibitory doses (EC50) of these compounds, we performed in vitro assays (Cryptosporidium growth inhibition assay and host cell viability assay) and in vivo experiments in mice. In these assays, the C. parvum HNJ-1 strain was used. Four of the 87 compounds (alisol-A, alisol-B, atropine sulfate, and bufotalin) showed strong anti-Cryptosporidium activity in vitro (EC50 values = 122.9±6.7, 79.58±13.8, 253.5±30.3, and 63.43±18.7 nM, respectively), and minimum host cell cytotoxicity (cell survival > 95%). Furthermore, atropine sulfate (200 mg/kg) and bufotalin (0.1 mg/kg) also showed in vivo inhibitory effects. Our findings demonstrate that atropine sulfate and bufotalin are effective against C. parvum infection both in vitro and in vivo. These compounds may, therefore, represent promising novel anti-Cryptosporidium drug leads for future medications against cryptosporidiosis.


Introduction
Cryptosporidiosis is present all around the world; however, it is more common in areas with poor sanitation and hygiene. Diarrhea is common in infected immunocompromised or immunosuppressed individuals, and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, especially among AIDS patients [1]. Cryptosporidium parasites are resistant to common disinfectants, including chlorine, making it difficult to eliminate the pathogen [2]. No vaccines are available to prevent the condition, and treatment options are limited, with rehydration therapy being the most common [3].
Only one drug, nitazoxanide, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat cryptosporidiosis [4]. Nitazoxanide remains the most effective current treatment for cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent individuals, whereas no consistently effective medication exists to treat immunodeficient patients or children under 2 years [5], during HIV coinfection, even long-term NTZ treatment was ineffective [6]. Drug discovery research has recently concentrated on developing novel drugs that are effective against Cryptosporidium spp. With a variety of new chemical entities, recent developments in this area provide reason for optimism [7]. Clofazimine also exhibited efficacy against Cryptosporidium, making it a potentially new cryptosporidiosis treatment and a novel chemical tool for understanding Cryptosporidium biology [8]. In both vivo and in vitro studies, chitosan, a natural polysaccharide, greatly reduced parasite shedding in infected newborn mice [9]. Bicyclic azetidines currently block C. parvum phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase, allowing for target-based therapeutic development for anticryptosporidial drugs [10]. Several additional chemotherapeutic drugs have been studied in livestock for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis showing efficacy against diarrhea in dairy calves [11][12][13], however, we need more screening to develop and identify new drug lead compounds to combat this infectious pathogen. Some treatments, such as paromomycin, are effective in preventing Cryptosporidium oocyst shedding, clinical disease, and death in calves, lambs, and goat kids, but they are not licensed for use in calves [14]. As a result, the development of new drugs is a priority.
Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs), which encompass ancient herbal medicines and wellness practices long embraced in China and its neighboring countries, have been recognized as a model of complementary and alternative medicine that has gained popular international interest and use over time [15]. Compounds in the TCMs are effective against trypanosomiasis [16], malaria [17], toxoplasmosis [18], and cancer [19]. The goal of this study was to find potential new anti-Cryptosporidium compounds from a library of 87 different TCMs. Drug screening analysis was performed both in vitro and in vivo. This screening led to the identification of two compounds that showed growth-inhibitory effects on Cryptosporidium both in vitro and in vivo that could be developed as new drug leads against Cryptosporidiosis.

Ethical approval
All animal experiments described in this study were approved by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Ethical Committee, and adhered to the relevant laws and regulations on the treatment and use of laboratory animals set forth by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine Regulations for Animal Experiments, Japan, (Animal exp: 20-208; Pathogen exp: 201982), and were approved by the Committee on the Animal Experiments of the Tohoku University (2021171).

Compound preparation
The Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan provided the natural drug library used in this study. There are 96 chemicals in this library. In the experiments, 87 readily available chemicals were used. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and kept at −80˚C at a concentration of 10 mM. Nitazoxanide (Wako, Osaka, Japan) served as standard comparative control for C. parvum. All chemical stock solutions were made fresh on the day of the experiment.

Parasites
Both in vitro and in vivo research used the same parasite strain. C. parvum oocysts, strain HNJ-1 [20], were provided by Dr. Matsubayashi, Osaka Prefecture University, Japan. Oocysts were maintained in experimentally infected SCID mice (CB17/Icr-Prkdcscid/CrlCrlj) and isolated from feces by using discontinuous sucrose as previously described [21] and stored at 4˚C in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4).

In vitro cultures of C. parvum
C. parvum oocysts that were less than 3 months old at the time of collection were used in all tests. The HCT-8 cell line derived from human ileocecal adenocarcinoma (ATCC # CCL-225) was cultured in maintenance medium RPMI 1640 with L-Gln (Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan) and supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 15 mM HEPES, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), Penicillin (100 U/ml), Streptomycin (100 μg/ml), Amphotericin B (0.25 μg/ml) solution. Every two days, the cells were passaged in vitro at 70-80 percent confluency. The cells were incubated at 37˚C, in 5% CO 2 .

In vitro C. parvum growth inhibition assay
The primary screening of compounds for C. parvum was performed as follows: HCT-8 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2 × 10 4 cells/well and allowed to grow overnight.
Before infecting cells, Cryptosporidium oocysts were excysted to sporozoites. 87 compounds were tested against C. parvum at a single concentration of 1 μM. Each compound was tested once. Infected HCT-8 cells and uninfected HCT-8 cells were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, in medium containing 0.1% DMSO. Nitazoxanide was used as a standard comparative drug. In vitro inhibition assays were carried out as previously described [22,23]. Briefly, oocysts were suspended in 1 ml of 0.1% sodium hypochlorite in PBS, incubated for 5 min at 4˚C, centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, and washed three times in PBS. The oocysts were then suspended in excystation solution consisting of 0.75% sodium taurocholate and 0.25% trypsin dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (with 93.4 mM K 2 HPO 4 and 6.5 mM KH 2 PO 4 ; pH 8.0) and incubated at 37˚C for 1 h. The oocyst/sporozoite suspensions were then rinsed in 1 x PBS (with 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , and 2 mM KH 2 PO 4 ; pH 7.5) once more before being filtered through a 5-μm pore-size PVDF filter (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) with 5 ml syringe to remove the oocyst wall. HCT-8 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, USA) and incubated overnight. The cells were then infected with C. parvum sporozoites (4 ×10 4 sporozoites/well) containing in RPMI-1640 medium for 3 h. After 3h inoculation, the non-infected parasite or debris were washed with new RPMI-1640 media. At this point, in RPMI-1640 medium containing 1 μM library compounds were added. Infected cells were incubated for an additional 45 h. Following incubation, the infected cells were fixed for 10 minutes in ice-cold 100% methanol at room temperature. Plates were then carefully rinsed 3 times with PBS. The parasite infected cells were then blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 minutes and then stained with Sporo-Glo (an anti-Cryptosporidium polyclonal antibody) (Waterborne Environmental, Inc., VA, USA) protected from light for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, cells were washed twice with 1 x PBS-T (1 x PBS supplemented with 0.01% Tween). A Keyence BZ-II 9000 was used to capture the images (KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). The plates were imaged with a HS all-in-one fluorescence microscope using a 20 x objective. The image output was imported into Microsoft excel for data organization and analyses. All C. parvum parasite in the well were counted. Compounds that showed more than 60% inhibition of C. parvum growth relative to the DMSO control were selected as hit compounds.
For a second investigation, four selective hit compounds were used to determine the halfmaximum inhibitory concentration (EC 50 ). The parasites were treated with various doses of compounds (ranging from 0.008-1 μM). HCT-8 cells (2 × 10 4 cells/well) were grown for 24 h before being infected with 4 × 10 4 C. parvum sporozoites in 96-well plates. The sporozoites that did not invade were washed with RPMI-1640 3 h after inoculation and treated with the four hit compounds from the original screening at 0.008-1 μM, then incubated for another 45 h. Sporo-Glo was used for C. parvum staining as described above. Fluorescence microscopy with a Keyence BZ-II 9000 imager was used to count all Cryptosporidium in the wells (KEY-ENCE, Osaka, Japan). EC 50 vales were determined by analyzing dose-response curves made by GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, CA, USA).

Host cell viability assay
HCT-8 cells (4 × 10 4 cells/well) 100 μl were seeded in 96-well plates, cultured for 24 h, and then treated for 48 h with different concentrations of hit compounds (10 1 , 1, 10 −1 , 10 −2 , 10 −3 , 10 −4 μM). After a 48-h incubation period, equilibrate the 96-well plates in room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes. Then, equal volume of Cell-Titer Glo (Promega) reagent was added to each treated well, the plate was shaken on an orbital shaker for 2 minutes then incubated for 10 minutes at RT. The luminescence was quantified by the GloMax Navigator plate reader (Promega, Japan) and the cell viability was evaluated as directed by the kit manufacturer. The luminescence signal of control wells containing DMSO was set to 100% cell viability. HCT-8 cells were treated with various concentrations of four selective target compounds (ranging from 1.56-200 μM) to determine the half-maximal cellular cytotoxic concentration (CC 50 ) values. Graph Pad Prism 7.0.1 was used to determine CC 50 values.

In vivo C. parvum growth inhibition assay
The growth inhibitory effect of the hit compounds was assessed in a mouse model infected with C. parvum oocysts. In this experiment, four-week-old female SCID mice (Charles River Laboratories, Shizuoka, Japan) were used. In the infected groups, mice were orally inoculated with 1.0 × 10 5 C. parvum oocysts by using sterile gavage needles. Initially, four compounds were tested at different concentrations to figure out the optimum dosages. Six groups of mice were given oral dosages of 50, 25, and 12.5 mg/kg body weight (BW) of two compounds (alisol-A and alisol-B). Another six groups of mice were given oral doses of atropine sulfate (100, 50, and 25 mg/kg BW) and bufotalin (1, 0.5, and 0.1 mg/kg BW, respectively). Based on their survivability, two compounds were chosen: atropine sulfate and bufotalin. Each compound group had three concentrations, and had three mice in each group. One group of mice was orally administered atropine sulfate at doses of 200, 100, and 50 mg/kg BW. Bufotalin was given orally at three different doses to the other mouse group: 0.1, 0.05, and 0.025 mg/kg BW. In another mouse group, nitazoxanide was given orally at 100 mg/kg BW as a standard comparative drug. The positive control group consisted of infected and untreated mice, whereas the negative control group consisted of noninfected and untreated mice. Treatment began on the third day after infection and lasted until the thirteenth day. The body weight and condition were checked every day, and treatment was given based on the body weight. On days 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, fecal samples were taken. The total number of oocysts per gram was calculated after counting the oocysts in the feces using the sugar flotation method. The treated and untreated mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation on day 14, and a thorough necropsy was performed.

Histopathological analysis and immunohistochemistry
We performed a histopathological analysis to evaluate the growth inhibitory effects and toxicity of the hit compounds in C. parvum-infected mice. In brief, ileum was collected, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and paraffin-embedded. Each section was cut to a thickness of 4 μm for hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed following standard techniques using the Envision+ system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) and 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB)(Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). Anti-Toxoplasma gondii (RH strain) rabbit polyclonal IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used as the primary antibody. The antibody cross reacts with C. Parvum. To reduce the endogenous peroxidase activity, the sections were incubated with 3% H 2 O 2 for 5 minutes. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4˚C. After washing with PBS with Tween 20 (PBST), sections were incubated with Envision+ single polymer solution (Agilent Technologies Inc.) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. The severity of C. parvum infection was evaluated in the most severe area, and scored from-to 3+ (-, no oocysts; 1+, mild focal infection; 2+, moderate multifocal infection; 3+, severe diffuse infection). Sub-effects of drugs (hepatocellular damage) were evaluated for major histological changes in karyomegaly, hepatocellular hypertrophy, and interstitial fibrosis/inflammation. We also checked the organs (liver, heart, lung, kidney, and intestines) alteration at necropsy whether it has abnormal or normal.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) assay
We used SEM to see examine the effects of the chemicals on the tissues of the bowel. Tissue samples from each experimental animal's distal ileum were biopsied and immediately immersed in a fixative combination of 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) for 1 week at 4˚C. The samples were then carefully washed three times with 0.1 M PB and immersed in 1% tannic acid for 2 h at 4˚C. After rinsing with 0.1 M PB, the samples were further treated with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB for conductive staining [24]. The conductive-stained samples were then dehydrated in a succession of increasing ethanol concentrations (70, 80, 90, 95, and 100%), transferred to t-butyl alcohol, and dried in a freeze drier (VFD-21S, Vacuum Device, Ibaraki, Japan). The dried samples were mounted on an aluminum metal plate and osmium coated by an osmium coater (HPC-1SW, Vacuum Device, Ibaraki, Japan). Following the procedure outlined above, the specimens were examined using a field emission SEM (Regulus 8100, Hitachi High Technologies, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis
Microsoft Excel was used to calculate the percentage of inhibition. The EC 50 vales were calculated by using a nonlinear regression sigmoidal dose-response curve fit, available in GraphPad Prism 7.01. (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). The difference in parasitemia between control and drug-treated groups was considered statistically significant for P < 0.05 by using a oneway ANOVA with the post-hoc Tukey HSD test.

In vitro screening of Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCMs)
Initial screening of TCM library products was carried out to identify compounds that inhibit C. parvum growth by more than 60% at a concentration of 1 μM. Nine of the 87 compounds tested inhibited C. parvum growth (Fig 1 and

Host cell viability assay
Using HCT-8 cells as a model, we determined the cytotoxicity of these compounds. The eight compounds were tested for their effect on the viability of HCT-8 cells. Alisol-A, alisol-B, atropine sulfate, and bufotalin were selected as target compounds because they inhibited parasite development by a high percentage (72.3%-92.9%) and cell viability was greater than 95% in the presence of these four compounds (Table 1). In addition, the half-maximal cellular cytotoxicity (CC 50 ) of these four compounds ranged from 10.9-59.6 μM ( Table 2).

In vivo C. parvum growth inhibition
The chemotherapeutic efficacy of single daily doses of all four compounds at different dose levels was evaluated in vivo in the mouse model. Mice treated with alisol-A and alisol-B at 50, 25, and 12.5 mg/kg, respectively, experienced adverse effects and died at concentrations of 50 and 25 mg/kg body weight. Moreover, there was no significant reduction in the numbers of oocysts discharged in the feces of these mice and no significant difference in their body weight (S1 Fig and S1 Table). Both histopathological and scanning electron microscopy findings showed that Compounds with a growth reduction of more than 60% (dot line) were considered to be compound that inhibit C. parvum parasite growth. Blue dots represent the compounds and the red dot represents the comparative drug nitazaxonide (10 μM). This is single experiment with the means of triplicate wells.

Compound Parasite inhibition (%) Host cell viability (%)
Alisol-A 78. treatment with alisol-A or alisol-B led to no notable reduction of oocysts (S2 Fig). We, therefore, focus on the other two compounds. Atropine sulfate at 200 mg/kg showed modest efficacy (67.8% inhibition) against C. parvum, and bufotalin demonstrated significant inhibitory activity (78.1% inhibition) at 0.1 mg/kg and led to a rapid reduction in the number of oocysts in feces compared to the control group (Fig 4 and Table 3).

Histopathological observations with immunohistochemistry
On examining a part of the small intestine, C. parvum infection and inflammation was most prominent in the ileum. In the positive control group (non-treated group), thickening of the mucosal layer, interstitial fibrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration were observed (Fig 5D  and 5E; the severity of C. parvum infection; Score: 3+) compared to the negative control group (Fig 5A-5C; Score: -). C. parvum oocysts were observed as tiny round basophilic organisms in the Hematoxylin & Eosin (HE), attached to the surface of the small intestinal villi of the intestinal crypt (Fig 5E, 5H, 5K and 5N). In immunohistochemical experiments, C. parvum oocyst showed a positive reaction and were clearly distinct from those observed in the HE (Fig 5F, 5I, 5L and 5O). For the nitazoxanide-treated groups, a number of attached C. parvum oocysts were also observed in the ileum (Fig 5G-5I; Score: 2+). In the atropine-sulfate-treated groups, C. parvum infection led to a smaller number of oocysts being attached to the intestinal villi than in the positive control group (Fig 5J-5L; Score: 2+). Bufotalin-treated mice showed a significant reduction in the number of oocysts compared to the positive control group (Fig 5M-5O; Score: 1+). These results indicate that bufotalin is the most effective of the compounds tested in terms of anti-Cryptosporidium activity in vivo. Some histological findings (karyomegaly, hepatocellular hypertrophy, or interstitial inflammation) were observed in all examined livers (S3 Fig), it suspected sub-effect of compounds or infection, but there was no difference in distribution and severity between experimental groups.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Next, we looked to see if there were any differences in the effects of the TCM compounds on host cells and tissues following C. parvum invasion. To achieve this, we examined the intestines of mice infected with C. parvum under SEM. SEM observation revealed ileal tissues on the surface of the intestine mucosa after infection with C. parvum and treatment with the TCM compounds. No abnormalities were detected in the intestinal epithelial tissues except that we found parasite oocysts attached to the ileal mucosa in mice treated with the comparative drug nitazoxanide (Fig 6G-6I). However, atropine sulfate- (Fig 6J-6L) and bufotalin (Fig 6M-6O)-  treated mice showed no visible parasites in their intestine relative to the control groups ( Fig  6A-6F), thereby confirming our findings in this study (Fig 6).

Discussion
TCMs have a great variety of chemical structures, as well as extremely powerful pharmacological activity and relatively mild toxicities [25]. TCMs include a huge number of active chemicals, some of which have been used to generate novel medications to treat important diseases such as vascular disease and cancer [26]. Infection and transmission of Cryptosporidium parasites are difficult to manage; new medications to control infection and decrease the growth of apicomplexan parasites are needed. In this study, we found that atropine sulfate and bufotalin displayed the most anti-Cryptosporidium activity of 87 TCM compounds investigated. Bufotalin is widely used in anticancer therapy [27]. Previously, these TCM compounds were tested against Plasmodium falciparum and four (berberine chloride, coptisine chloride, palmatine chloride, and dehydrocorydaline nitrate) were found to have anti-malarial activity [17]. Moreover, TCM compounds have been tested against Toxoplasma gondii [18], with baicalein and luteolin being shown to have potential as anti-toxoplasmosis drugs. Notably, these TCM compounds that were effective in earlier studies were not effective against cryptosporidiosis. It is surprising that there is no overlap in the hits vs. Plasmodium and Toxoplasma, given the related of these species with Cryptosporidium. It might be due to the different enzyme related to metabolic cyclic pathways or functions related to either host or parasite factors. Our study is thus the first to reveal the inhibitory effects of atropine sulfate and bufotalin against Cryptosporidium parasite in vitro and in vivo.
Alisol-A, alisol-B, atropine sulfate, and bufotalin have low EC 50 values, implying that they could be useful in developing a new anti-cryptosporidiosis compounds. All four compounds were also shown to have minimum cytotoxicity in human intestinal cells (HCT-8). Earlier report mentioned that bufotalin has modest cytotoxicity in mammals and was active against trypanosomiasis [28]. Also, bufotalin effectively suppressed the growth of xenografted R-HepG2 cells in an in vivo investigation, with minimal body weight loss or spleen toxicity  [29]. With an IC 50 of 3.7 μM against Cryptosporidium parvum, nitazoxanide is the only limited-activity medication currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of cryptosporidiosis in humans [30]. Atropine sulfate and bufotalin had a strong inhibitory impact in vitro but appeared to have a considerable inhibitory effect in vivo in SCID mice, and bufotalin had the greatest inhibitory effect. In this study, bufotalin showed a significant reduction in oocyst excretion at a concentration of 0.1 mg/kg, whereas atropine sulfate showed a moderate reduction in oocyst excretion at a concentration of 200 mg/kg. Moreover, bufotalin had potent inhibitory effects at lower doses than nitazoxanide. It is unclear why alisol-A and alisol-B inhibit C. parvum growth in vitro but have no effect in vivo. One of the factors might be the lack of adequate intestinal exposure to these drugs. Because it is likely that prolonged intestinal exposure of these TCMs is crucial for the efficacy in vivo. This is important because it may be that modifications of alisol-A and alisol-B would produce compounds with better intestinal exposure and in vivo efficacy. The nature of the chemical compounds, whether the drug compounds are permeable or less permeable to the small intestine would be the other factors [31]. However, variables such as host cell metabolism or the parasite's capacity to target only specific molecules could restrict the compound's effectiveness.
Although the molecular mechanisms of the anti-Cryptosporidium activity of TCMs remain unclear, they may target enzyme-related molecules. Earlier studies reported, according to an ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) and toxicity study, atropine crosses the blood-brain barrier, which is crucial for efficient treatment of viral illness [32]. Moreover, submicronic atropine sulfate respiratory fluid has the potential to be employed as a prophylactic strategy against organophosphorous poisoning, with various advantages over intramuscular injection, including early blood absorption and atropinization [33]. Calciumdependent protein kinases play important roles in calcium signaling in T. gondii and C. parvum, making them interesting targets for antiparasitic drug research [34,35]. In addition, the regulation of calcium ions is required for the activity of calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), which are found in C. parvum [36]. Furthermore, alisol-B is known to inhibit the endoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ ATPase [37], and most believe that nitazoxanide anticryptosporidial effect is off-target, as Cryptosporidium species has an alternative PFOR that nitazoxanide and more potent PFOR inhibitors have no effect in vitro [38]. It may be that atropine sulfate and bufotalin suppress Cryptosporidium via a different target(s) than that of nitazoxanide.
Bufotalin, one of the naturally occurring bufodienolides, has pharmacological and toxicological features that include anticancer activity and cardiotoxicity [39]. Bufotalin was found to be less harmful to Het-1A human esophageal squamous cells, implying that it has a high selectivity for cancer cells [40]. Atropine sulfate was found to have a considerable inhibitory impact and bufotalin had a potent inhibitory impact, which could be attributed to blocking a parasite metabolic route or the targeting of several enzymes in host cell-dependent pathways. Our future studies will explore the mechanisms of these compounds against enzyme-related molecules because it is unknown if these compounds are working by virtue of inhibiting Cryptosporidium factors or host factors.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that the compounds atropine sulfate and bufotalin could be useful in the development of new anti-Cryptosporidium medications. More research is needed, however, to understand the exact mechanism behind the anti-Cryptosporidium activity of these compounds.