Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Summary of sampling procedures.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 1.

Means, standard deviations, 25th percentiles, median, 75th percentiles and ranges for study variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Rotated Component Matrix showing the correlation between the first 4 factors and reporting of participation in health education activity or source of information.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlation matrix between dengue knowledge, level and strength of self-efficacy and dengue preventative behaviours.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Goodness of fit Indices for structural equation model of reporting dengue preventive behaviours.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Figure 2.

Final structural model of factors influencing.

** Significant at the .01 level. * Significant at the .05 level. (NS) Not significant. SE = Self-Efficacy, Factor 1 = Mass Media (TV, Radio, Newspaper), Factor 2 = Local Contact (Gotong-royong, Public Announcement, Outdoor Media), Factor 3 = Small Group Contact (Small Group Discussion, Demonstration), Factor 4 = Direct Information-Giving Session (Public Lecture, Individual Advice), L1 = Pooled Level of Self-efficacy (Scene 1), L2 = Pooled Level of Self-efficacy (Scene 2), L3 = Pooled Level of Self-efficacy (Scene 3), S1 = Pooled Strength of Self-efficacy (Personal Domain), S2 = Pooled Strength of Self-efficacy (Family Domain), S3 = Pooled Strength of Self-efficacy (Community Domain).

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Table 5.

Model mediation effect findings for structural equation model of reporting dengue preventive behaviours.

More »

Table 5 Expand