Figures
Abstract
Background
Early life is a critical period for neurodevelopment, where factors such as maternal nutrition and breastfeeding duration significantly impact the growth of head circumference and cognitive development in children. Our study aimed to explore the associations between maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy, duration of breastfeeding, and their impacts on child head circumference and cognitive outcomes.
Methods and findings
Our study utilised data from the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood 2010 cohort, which enrolled 700 mother–child pairs between 2008 and 2010 with 86% clinical follow-up at age 10. Pregnancy dietary patterns, described as ‘Varied’ and ‘Western,’ were derived from food frequency questionnaires and used to model quantitative metabolite scores via sparse partial least squares modelling of blood metabolome data. Cognitive development was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 2.5 years and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children at age 10. Head circumference was measured from 20 weeks gestation to 10 years, and calibrated using related anthropometric measures. Growth trajectories were evaluated using linear mixed models and latent class trajectory models. Parental and child genetic influences for cognition and head circumference were controlled by including polygenic risk scores derived from genomic data. We found that a Western dietary pattern during pregnancy was associated with lower cognitive scores at age 2.5 (β −1.24 [−2.16, −0.32], p = 0.008) and reduced head circumference growth (p-interaction < 0.0001). We found that a Varied dietary pattern during pregnancy was associated with higher estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) at age 10 (β 1.29 [0.27, 2.3], p = 0.014). Additionally, head circumference growth was associated with higher cognitive scores at age 10 (β 3.40 [1.21, 5.60], p = 0.002), and it partly mediates the association between the Varied dietary pattern and estimated IQ (proportion mediated 13.5% [0.01, 0.71], p = 0.034). Extended breastfeeding duration was also independently associated with increased head circumference growth (p-interaction < 0.0001). These patterns and correlations were consistent even after adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for genetic influences.
Conclusions
Our findings reveal that a Western dietary pattern during pregnancy is associated with lower cognitive scores at age 2.5 and decreased head circumference growth, suggesting potential adverse impacts on early neurodevelopment. Conversely, a Varied dietary pattern is linked with a higher estimated IQ at age 10, with head circumference growth contributing to this positive outcome. These findings highlight the critical role of maternal nutrition during pregnancy, and duration of breastfeeding, in promoting optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes. Effective public health strategies should therefore focus on enhancing maternal dietary practices to support better cognitive and physical development in children.
Author summary
Why was this study done?
- Early neurodevelopment is influenced by maternal nutrition during pregnancy and breastfeeding, but the specific impacts of dietary patterns on cognitive outcomes and head circumference growth, an indicator of early brain development, in children remain unclear.
- The study sought to investigate the role of maternal diet and breastfeeding in shaping cognitive outcomes and head circumference growth in children.
What did the researchers do and find?
- The study analysed 700 mother–child pairs from the COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood 2010 (COPSAC2010) cohort, assessing maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and breastfeeding duration.
- In pregnancy, a Western dietary pattern was linked to reduced early cognitive scores and head circumference growth, while a Varied dietary pattern and longer breastfeeding were associated with improved head circumference growth and IQ.
- Head circumference growth partially mediated the positive impact of a Varied dietary pattern on cognitive outcomes.
What do these findings mean?
- These findings highlight the importance of a balanced maternal diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding to optimise child neurodevelopment.
- The study’s observational design means residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded, and results are most applicable to developed countries.
Citation: Horner D, Jepsen JRM, Chawes B, Vinding R, Rosenberg JB, Mohammadzadeh P, et al. (2025) Maternal dietary patterns, breastfeeding duration, and their association with child cognitive function and head circumference growth: A prospective mother–child cohort study. PLoS Med 22(4): e1004454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454
Academic Editor: Lars Åke Persson, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Received: July 30, 2024; Accepted: March 4, 2025; Published: April 10, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Horner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Participant-level personally identifiable data are protected under the Danish Data Protection Act and European Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (GDPR), which prohibit distribution even in pseudo-anonymized form. Participant-level data can be made available under a data transfer agreement as part of a collaboration effort. Data requests should be directed to COPSAC’s Data Protection Officer (DPO), Ulrik Ralfkiaer, PhD, at administration@dbac.dk, for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. To ensure compliance with these regulations, all data transfer agreements will adhere to institutional and ethical guidelines.
Funding: All funding received by COPSAC is listed on www.copsac.com. This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant no. R16-A1694 to KB and R269-2017-5 to JRMJ, RV, JR, and PM); the Ministry of Health (Grant no 903516 to KB); the Danish Council for Strategic Research (Grant no 0603-00280B to KB); the Capital Region Research Foundation (to BC, KB, and JS); and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 946228 to BC). MAR is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant no NNF21OC0068517). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: Authors have read the journal’s policy, and have the following competing interests: BE is a member of the Advisory Board of Eli Lilly Denmark A/S, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck Pharma A/S, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. BE has also received lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Otsuka Pharma Scandinavia AB, Eli Lilly Company, and Lundbeck Pharma A/S. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The funding agencies had no role in the design or conduct of the study; the collection, management, or interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. No pharmaceutical company was involved in the study.
Abbreviations: ACME, Average Causal Mediation Effect; COPSAC2010, COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood 2010; CCS, Cognitive composite score; COPSYCH, The COpenhagen Prospective Study on Neuro-PSYCHiatric Development study; Bayley-III, Danish Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development; FFQ, Food frequency questionnaire; FSIQ, Full Scale Intelligence Quotient; GWAS, Genome-wide association study; IQ, Intelligence quotient; PCA, Principal component analysis; PRS, Polygenic risk score; sPLS, Sparse partial least square; WISC-IV, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition.
Introduction
Cognition is a complex trait and encompasses the ability to learn, reason, and solve problems [1]. Childhood intelligence is an important factor in predicting future outcomes such as health [2], education [3], and occupation [4]. While heritability estimates for intelligence are high in adult populations [5], estimates are lower in childhood, increasing through adolescence [6]. This suggests that environmental factors may exert a greater influence in early life [7,8].
Head circumference is a reliable indicator of brain growth during early life and is strongly correlated with brain volume [9]. The perinatal period is a crucial time for brain development and approximately 90% of adult brain volume is reached by age 5 [10], suggesting that this is a sensitive period of neurodevelopment. Accordingly, head circumference has been associated with cognitive abilities in both childhood [11] and adulthood [12,13]. Longitudinal measurements of head circumference growth are strongly associated with cognition in children born preterm [14,15]; however, studies are limited in the general population [16].
Given this critical period of rapid brain expansion during pregnancy [17,18], the interplay between nutrition, genetics, and environmental factors is essential for supporting healthy neurodevelopment [19]. Although genetics play a significant role in shaping neurodevelopmental outcomes, including cognitive abilities and head circumference [20,21], early-life environmental influences, such as maternal and child nutrition, may be influential during early development. Maternal diet, as assessed through isolated nutrients or food groups, has thus been shown to have long-term effects on cognitive development, intelligence, and behavioural outcomes [22,23]. Focussing on overall dietary patterns rather than single nutrients, studies have found that children of mothers following unhealthy dietary clusters during pregnancy have a lower intelligence quotient (IQ) at age 8 compared to those born to mothers adhering to healthier, fruit- and vegetable-rich diets [46]. Nutrition in early life, including breastfeeding, is another contributing factor to child neurodevelopment [24,25]. However, previous research has not adequately disentangled the potential independent, additive, or pleiotropic effects of maternal and child dietary intake on brain morphological or cognitive outcomes. Furthermore, whilst assessing individual nutrients or food groups is informative [26], this approach overlooks the potential synergistic effects of nutrients [27]. Dietary patterns, however, offer a broader perspective on nutrient intake, capturing overall dietary habits and their potential interactions. Yet, reliance on food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) introduces recall bias [28], and few studies have mitigated this limitation by incorporating objective biomarkers [29].
In this study, we leverage data from the COpenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood 2010 (COPSAC2010) cohort of 700 mother–child pairs. We hypothesise that pregnancy and early-life dietary influences are associated with cognitive development and head circumference growth in childhood. Our dietary exposures include objective measures of pregnancy dietary patterns via blood metabolome modelling, and duration of breastfeeding. We utilise comprehensive neuropsychological assessments to evaluate cognition, and an extensive longitudinal dataset of up to 15 head circumference measurements, up to the age of 10. Furthermore, we examine the contributions of maternal and child genetic influences, and child metabolome dietary scores to explore these interrelationships.
Methods
Study population
The COPSAC2010 cohort includes 700 mother–child pairs with extensive phenotyping from 15 clinical visits and exposure assessments beginning in pregnancy [30]. The COpenhagen Prospective Study on Neuro-PSYCHiatric Development study (COPSYCH) was nested within COPSAC2010 at age 10 years [31].
Dietary exposures
Our main exposures included dietary pattern metabolite scores, assessed from global blood metabolomics profiles taken at 24 weeks gestation (HD4 platform, Metabolon (NC, USA)), derived from sparse partial least squares (sPLS) modelling, and breastfeeding duration (length of breastfeeding in days). Dietary pattern metabolite scores were modelled on dietary patterns during pregnancy, as identified from a validated 360-item semi-quantitative FFQ completed by mothers at recruitment (24 weeks gestation), with a 1-month recall period [32,33]. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified dietary patterns based on calculated estimates of energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients derived from pregnancy FFQs. The first principal component reflected a “Varied dietary pattern” (44.3% of variance), characterised by positive associations with a wide range of FFQ-derived food groups, including whole grains, fish, eggs, and nuts. The second principal component reflected a “Western dietary pattern” (10.7% of variance), characterised by positive associations with FFQ-derived food groups such as animal fats, refined grains, and high-energy drinks, and negative associations with fruits, fish, and vegetables (S1 Fig) [30]. Nutrient intake data and principal component loadings are detailed S1 Table. These dietary patterns were used to derive the metabolite scores in the sPLS models. Breastfeeding duration, measured as the length of breastfeeding in days, was also considered as a dietary exposure. Further details regarding the blood metabolomics analysis, derivation of dietary pattern metabolite scores via sPLS modelling, and data normalisation procedures for breastfeeding duration can be found in the Supplementary Methods. In subanalysis, dietary pattern metabolite scores were modelled for other maternal and child blood metabolome time points (maternal 1-week postpartum and children at 6 months, 18 months, and 6 years), trained on the pregnancy time point. Metabolite scores and breastfeeding length were internally z-scored at each time point, thus reflecting a change of 1 standard deviation (SD) within the population. When assessing the relationships between specific dietary exposures and neurodevelopmental outcomes, exposures were evaluated independently.
Cognitive ability
Cognition was assessed at 2.5 years [34] as reflected in the cognitive composite score (CCS) derived from the 3rd edition of the Danish [35] Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) [36]. CCS was standardised with age-corrected means of 100 and a SD of 15, ranging from 50 to 150. For cognition at 10 years, the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) was estimated, based on selected tests from the fourth edition of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition (WISC-IV) [37], including Matrices, Vocabulary, Digit Span, Letter-Number Sequencing, Coding, and Symbol Search. Estimated FSIQ likewise utilised age-corrected means of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, ranging from 40 to 160. Previous studies have reported moderate longitudinal correlations between CCS and FSIQ [38].
Head circumference growth
Head circumference was measured using a tape measure at each of the 14 scheduled clinical visits, with the largest diameter serving as the measurement parameter (1 week–10 years). Foetal head circumference measurements were added from the week 20 prenatal screening programme using the Danish Føto-database [39].
In our main analysis, calibration of child head circumference was performed to account for potential confounding of related growth metrics. This was achieved by regressing head circumference against age (gestational age-adjusted), sex, length (0–18 months) or height (2–10 years), weight, and waist circumference at each visit. The residuals from this regression model were then used to create a calibrated measure of head circumference for each visit, and subsequently z-scored. Foetal head circumference was likewise calibrated for gestational age, sex, femur length, and abdominal circumference at measurement. Covariates with extreme outliers (those exceeding ± 6 SDs) and deviations exceeding ± 2 SD from an individual’s global growth trajectory were removed prior to calibration. Missing calibration covariates were imputed from linear mixed models on individual child growth trajectories. Head circumference measurements ± 3 SD were visually inspected to ensure data was in keeping with repeated growth measurements. In sensitivity analysis, head circumference measurements that lay outside of 2 SD of an individual’s global growth trajectory were removed (1.0%) and separately, head circumference was adjusted only for child age and sex.
We modelled head circumference longitudinally using latent class growth trajectories and linear mixed models. We considered latent class models with 2–5 latent classes. The optimal fit was a 3-class linear growth model, selected based on the smallest Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, and biological interpretation. The “lcmm” R-package was used [40]. Linear mixed models were applied with variable slopes and intercepts, the slopes and intercepts were treated as random effects, allowing for modelling of individual head circumference growth and head circumference in early life, respectively. Accordingly, these random effects were extracted, the “lme4” R-package was used for modelling [41] and both slopes and intercepts were scaled (estimates are interpreted as per SD change).
Polygenic risk scores
Maternal and child genotypes in the COPSAC2010 cohort were analysed using the Illumina Infinium HumanOmniExpressExome BeadChip. To calculate a polygenic risk score (PRS) for intelligence, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) from the UK Biobank was utilised (n = 391,124) measuring fluid intelligence [42]. For child head circumference PRS scores, we utilised a GWAS derived from child head circumference measurements (n = 29,192) [21]. As COPSAC2010 participated in this consortium study, we contacted the authors who re-ran the GWAS with COPSAC2010 excluded. The PRS-CS method, which integrates millions of SNPs across the genome for enhanced precision, was applied. This method is well-validated in European populations and ensures that the PRS captures genome-wide genetic predispositions rather than being limited to specific loci. The strong genetic basis of intelligence and head circumference, combined with the robust GWAS methodologies, supports the relevance of these PRS to our outcomes. For head circumference, parameters were manually tuned during analysis using a grid search approach to optimise the global scaling factor. PRS were z-scored to mean 0 and SD 1 for interpretation.
Information on covariates
Potential confounders were identified with a directed acyclic graph and existing literature [13,43–46]. In multivariable analysis, we included the following covariates: pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index (BMI), child sex, birthweight, gestational age, smoking during pregnancy, antibiotic use during pregnancy, pre-eclampsia during pregnancy, household income at birth (low (<€50,000), medium (€50,000–€110,000), high (>€110,000)), maternal education level at birth (numerically coded as: 1 (elementary and college education), 2 (medium education), 3 (university education)) and maternal age. All missing covariate data were imputed for analysis, based on other available covariate data.
To control for genetic confounding, we included maternal and child intelligence and head circumference genetic scores in further multivariable analysis. Likewise in sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for any child neurodevelopmental disorders at 10 years, a child Western dietary pattern at 10 years [29], parental head circumference and outcomes from two prenatal randomised controlled trials: n3-long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation and high-dose vitamin D during pregnancy [30].
Analysis plan
This study did not have a prospective analysis plan established prior to its commencement. Hypothesis-driven analyses were planned in mid-2023, based on existing literature and the study’s specific objectives. No data-driven changes to the analysis were made, and no modifications were implemented in response to peer review comments.
Statistical analysis
Linear regression models were used to examine the association between dietary variables and cognitive scores, as well as the association between head circumference and cognitive scores. Linear mixed models were used to assess the associations between dietary variables and head circumference growth, incorporating interaction terms with time and random effects to account for individual trajectories over multiple visits. In subanalysis, we employed nested linear and linear mixed models, comparing them using likelihood ratio tests (using the anova() function in R, specifying a Chi-square test) to assess the statistical significance of model differences. To handle the issue of missing metabolite scores (14.7% missing), essential for balanced anova comparison modelling, we imputed missing data using the missMDA package [47]. Causal mediation analysis was conducted with multivariable models using the mediation package in R (v4.5.0), employing 1,000 iterations. We removed the second twin child in twin pairs (n = 5) from our analysis, since the exposures of interest were not independent. The statistical analyses were designed in 2022 based on hypotheses derived from existing literature and the comprehensive data in the COPSAC2010 cohort. All data analyses were performed with the statistical software R version 4.1.1. Other R packages utilised in this analysis include tidyverse (v1.3.1), dplyr (v1.0.10), broom (v0.7.12), psych (v2.1.9), stats (v4.4.1), scatterplot3d (v.3.41), ggpubr (v0.4.0), lubridate (v1.8.0) and tableone (v0.13.0).
Results
Baseline characteristics and dietary exposures
Dietary exposures included dietary pattern metabolite scores derived from maternal blood metabolome data (available for 684 mothers) and breastfeeding duration data (available for 687 mother–child pairs). Outcomes assessed were cognition, evaluated in 627 (90.2%) children at 2.5 years and 586 children (84.3%) at 10 years, and head circumference growth, based on 9,501 measurements collected from 20 weeks gestation to 10 years (8.5% data missing). Each child in the main analysis contributed a median of 15 head circumference measurements (interquartile range 13–15). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between participants and non-participants at the 10-year visit (S2 Table) nor between male and female children (S3 Table).
A Western dietary pattern metabolite score in pregnancy was characterised with increased intakes of animal fats, refined grains, and high-energy drinks, and a lower score was associated with increased intakes of fish, breakfast cereals, fruits, and vegetables (Fig 1A). A Varied dietary pattern metabolite score was characterised with increased intakes of coffee and breakfast cereals, and lower intakes of snacks and energy drinks (Fig 1B). The mean (SD) breastfeeding duration was 247 days (sd = 165) (Fig 1F).
This figure presents the associations between the Western and Varied dietary patterns metabolite scores during pregnancy and food frequency-derived food groups. Panels A and B depict these associations for the Western and Varied dietary patterns, respectively. Panel C presents a scatter plot with a regression line showing the strong association between Western and Varied dietary patterns, with ellipses for high and low breastfeeding duration. Panels D, E, and F display the distribution of our data in density plots for the Western dietary pattern metabolite score in pregnancy, Varied dietary pattern metabolite score in pregnancy, and breastfeeding duration, respectively.
The Western dietary pattern was associated with numerous covariates (Table 1). Furthermore, a Western dietary pattern was negatively associated with a varied dietary pattern (p < 0.001) and breastfeeding duration (p < 0.001), reflecting the interconnected nature of these dietary exposures in our observational data (Figs 1C and S2). Detailed correlations can be visualised in a comprehensive heatmap (S3 Fig).
Dietary patterns in pregnancy are associated with child cognition at 2.5 and 10 years
The mean CCS, assessed at 2.5 years, was 104.8 (sd = 9.7). Scores were higher amongst girls than boys (105.9 (10.3) versus 103.7 (9.1) (t test, p = 0.004)). FSIQ population mean, assessed at 10 years, was 102.7 (12.1). Girls had higher FSIQ cognitive scores compared to boys (104.5 (11.3) versus 101.1 (12.6), t test, p < 0.001).
In univariate analysis, the Western dietary pattern metabolite score in pregnancy (per 1 SD change) was negatively associated with CCS (β −1.43 [−2.18, −0.67], p < 0.001) and FSIQ at 10 years (β −2.45 [−3.42, −1.47], p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, these results were consistent for CCS (β −1.24 [−2.16,–0.32], p = 0.008), whereas FSIQ no longer reached statistical significance (β −0.96 [−2.07,0.15], p = 0.09) (Tables 2 and S4 for WISC-IV composite scores). Findings were comparable after further adjusting for genetic confounding.
There was no univariate association between the Varied dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy and CCS (β 0.42 [−0.35,1.20], p = 0.280), but a significant association with FSIQ (β 2.39 [1.40,3.37], p < 0.001). This association remained significant after multivariable adjustment (β 1.29 [0.27,2.30], p = 0.014), and after further adjusting for genetic confounding. Breastfeeding duration (per SD change) was not univariately associated with CCS (β 0.08 [−0.74,0.89], p = 0.85), but was associated with FSIQ at age 10 years (β 1.47 [0.45,2.50], p = 0.005). This finding became insignificant after multivariable adjustment (β 0.43 [−0.59,1.44], p = 0.412).
Sensitivity analyses adjusting for prenatal nutrient supplementation randomised controlled trials (RCT)s, child Western dietary patterns, parental head circumference, and any neurodevelopmental diagnosis at 10 years did not change the inference of our findings (S5 Table). There were no significant differences found in relation to child sex, as determined through statistical interaction (S6 Table).
In subanalysis, we assessed the temporality of the significant associations between the Western dietary pattern and CCS scores, as well as the Varied dietary pattern and FSIQ scores. To do this, we calculated dietary pattern metabolite scores at four additional postnatal time points: for mothers at 1-week postpartum and for children at 6 months, 18 months (for CCS), and additionally at 6 years (for FSIQ). For the Western dietary pattern, despite collinearity between scores (S7 Table), adding postnatal metabolite scores improved CCS model prediction (r2 increase from 0.035 to 0.043, p = 0.038). However, FSIQ prediction for the Varied dietary pattern was not improved when considering postnatal metabolite scores (p = 0.68).
Head circumference growth in early life is positively associated with child cognition at 10 years
Head circumference cross-sectionally was not univariately associated with CCS at 2.5 years (β −0.33 [−1.14,0.48], p = 0.420), but was significantly associated with FSIQ at 10 years (β 1.21 [0.25,2.16], p = 0.013).
For the latent class growth trajectory modelling, our analysis focussed on two classes; ‘Increasing’ (26%) and ‘Reference’ (74%) (Fig 2). In univariate analysis, children in the ‘Increasing’ head circumference latent class had 4.87 IQ points higher score at 10 years in FSIQ compared with children in the ‘Reference’ group (β 4.87 [2.62,7.12], p < 0.001). This association remained significant in the multivariable model (β 3.40 [1.21,5.60], p = 0.002) and when further adjusting for genetic confounding (Table 3, see S8 Table for WISC composite scores).
This figure presents the two latent class trajectories analysed in the main analysis, namely “Reference” (74%, n = 511) and “Increasing” (26%, n = 177). The trajectories show the calibrated head circumference z-scores at 15 time points from the foetal ultrasound scan (20 weeks gestation) to the 10-year clinical visit. Head circumference measurements were adjusted for child length/height, weight, waist size, sex, and gestation-adjusted age at each clinical visit.
In linear mixed models, the slope, representing head circumference growth (per SD change), was similarly positively associated with FSIQ (β 2.03 [1.08,2.97], p < 0.001). This association remained significant in multivariable modelling (β 1.27 [0.34,2.20], p = 0.008) and when further adjusting for genetic confounding (Table 3). Model intercepts were also predictive of FSIQ in univariate (β 1.93 [0.94,2.93], p < 0.001) and multivariable models (β 1.29 [0.33,2.26], p = 0.009), and after genetic confounding adjustment (Table 3).
As a sensitivity analysis, we assessed the potential moderation of child genetics scores for head circumference and intelligence, on the association between head circumference and FSIQ at 10 years. In interaction analysis, we found no significant moderating effect of child head circumference PRS (p-interaction = 0.442), however, there was a significant and positive moderation of the child intelligence and head circumference on latent classes (p-interaction = 0.034), suggesting that for children who have a higher PRS for intelligence, and adhere to the ‘Increasing’ latent class, there is a stronger association with FSIQ (S4A Fig). Moderating effects were stronger in the WISC perceptual reasoning index (p-interaction = 0.020) (S4B Fig).
Despite strong associations with FSIQ at age 10 years, we found no association between head circumference growth measures and CCS scores at 2.5 years (Table 3).
A pregnancy Western dietary pattern is negatively associated and breastfeeding duration positively associated with head circumference growth
In univariate analysis, significant associations were observed between calibrated head circumference at age 10 years and both Western (β −0.19 [−0.2,−0.11], p < 0.0001) and Varied (β 0.17 [0.09,0.25], p < 0.0001) dietary patterns during pregnancy, as well as with breastfeeding duration (β 0.09 [0.00,0.17], p = 0.040). In multivariable longitudinal models, including all 15 time points, we observed that our three dietary variables of interest were all strongly associated with head growth, as indicated by significant interaction terms (p-interaction < 0.0001) (S5 Fig). After mutually adjusting for these variables, only the Western dietary pattern (p-interaction = 0.020) and breastfeeding duration (p-interaction = 0.0001) remained significant (S5 Fig). Therefore, we opted to exclude the Varied dietary pattern from subsequent modelling.
In multivariable linear mixed modelling, both the pregnancy Western dietary pattern (p-interaction < 0.0001) and breastfeeding duration (p-interaction < 0.0001) independently contributed to head circumference growth over time, with distinct associations (Fig 3 and S9 Table). The pregnancy Western dietary pattern showed a negative association, indicating smaller child head circumference over time, while breastfeeding length exhibited a positive association, suggesting larger head circumference with longer duration of breastfeeding. Comparable results were observed when using uncalibrated head circumference (p-interaction < 0.0001) and with head circumference data outliers (1.0%) removed (p-interaction < 0.001). Child sex did not significantly moderate the associations of the Western dietary pattern (p = 0.14) and breastfeeding length (p = 0.51) (S6 Fig).
This figure presents the predicted head circumference z-scores (with 95% CL) of a Western dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy (p < 0.0001) and breastfeeding duration (p < 0.0001) on longitudinal measures of head circumference in a multivariable linear mixed model (± 1 SD of the exposure). Head circumference measures are adjusted at each visit for child length/height, weight, waist circumference, sex, and age. Panels A and C show the predicted head circumference estimates with 95% confidence limits for the Western dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy and breastfeeding duration, respectively. Panels B and D show the interaction term effects at each clinical visit for the Western dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy and breastfeeding duration, respectively.
In subanalysis, adjustments for maternal (p = 0.003) and paternal head circumference (p < 0.0001) significantly contributed to head circumference growth modelling. Yet, these further adjustments did not alter the estimates between the Western dietary pattern, breastfeeding duration, and head circumference growth, indicating no confounding from parental traits linked to the inheritable nature of these phenotypes.
To explore the temporal associations of a Western diet on child head growth, we included maternal metabolome-derived Western dietary scores from postnatal stages (1-week postnatal), and children at 6 months, 18 months, and 6 years into our models. Adding these four additional metabolite score time points did not improve our modelling (anova p = 0.63). A similar finding was observed for the Varied dietary pattern (anova p = 0.58). However postnatal Western dietary pattern metabolite scores showed independent associations with head circumference growth at 1 week postpartum (p-interaction < 0.001), 6 months (p-interaction = 0.011), and 18 months (p-interaction = 0.005), but not at 6 years (p-interaction = 0.904) (S7 Fig). Varied dietary pattern metabolite scores in children did not show independent associations with head circumference growth (p-interaction > 0.16) (S7 Fig).
To assess the dynamic genetic contributions to head circumference growth over time, we included child and maternal PRSs for intelligence, and child head circumference as interaction terms with clinical visits, to capture growth trajectories (S8 Fig). Child intelligence PRS (anova p = 0.014) and child head circumference PRS (anova p = 0.006) independently improved head circumference growth modelling, compared to models without these genetic interaction terms, whereas maternal intelligence PRS (anova p = 0.51) showed no improvement. In models mutually adjusted for child intelligence and head circumference PRS, the child intelligence PRS displayed a significant main effect (p = 0.002), implying a direct influence on head circumference, while the child head circumference PRS did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.071). Interaction effects revealed a differential pattern: the intelligence PRS interaction was not significant (p-interaction = 0.204), while the head circumference PRS interaction was significant (p-interaction = 0.038). Notably, the Western dietary pattern and breastfeeding duration interactions persisted (p-interaction ≤ 0.0001), emphasising their independent associations with head circumference, distinct from intelligence or head circumference genetic influences.
Mediating role of head circumference growth in the association between a varied dietary pattern in pregnancy and child cognition at age 10
In sensitivity analysis, we explored whether head circumference growth may mediate the significant association between the Varied dietary pattern and child cognition at age 10 using causal mediation analysis. We found that head circumference growth significantly mediated this association in multivariable modelling. The Average Causal Mediation Effect (ACME) was 0.182 (p = 0.022), accounting for 13.5% of the total effect (Proportion Mediated, p = 0.034), indicating a substantial mediation effect.
Discussion
Our prospective mother–child cohort study identified a nuanced interplay between dietary patterns during pregnancy, head circumference growth trajectories, and cognitive function in children. We identified a strong negative association between a Western dietary pattern in mid-pregnancy, assessed through objective blood metabolomics, with child cognition at 2.5 years of age, and a decrease in growth of the child’s head circumference in early life. A Varied dietary pattern in pregnancy and breastfeeding duration were positively associated with head circumference growth, and our mediation analysis revealed that head circumference growth may serve as a mediator in the positive association between a Varied dietary pattern and estimated IQ at 10 years. Both intelligence and head circumference genetics were independently associated with head circumference growth, yet our dietary findings were independent of these genetic influences, including adjustments for parental head circumference. These findings not only shed light on the intricate links between nutrition and developmental outcomes, but underscore the importance of maternal and early-life dietary choices in relation to cognitive trajectories in children.
Our study resonates with previous research that underlines the significance of diet in promoting neurodevelopment in childhood. The ALSPAC cohort using a clustering methodology to assess pregnancy dietary patterns, found that mothers in the “meat and potatoes” and “white bread and coffee” clusters during pregnancy had offspring with lower IQ at 8 years of age compared to children of mothers in the “fruit and vegetables” cluster [48]. Another study found that adherence to an “aquatic products, fresh vegetables, and homonemeae” pattern in pregnancy was associated with a decreased risk of offspring being ‘at risk’ or ‘emerging’ in cognitive and gross motor development at 1 year as assessed by Bayley-III [49]. Our study uses objective dietary assessments in pregnancy to examine associations with postnatal head circumference growth. Previous research has shown positive associations between maternal folate concentrations during pregnancy and foetal head growth [50]. Child nutrition is also known to contribute, where studies have notably found that malnutrition, as measured by infant growth anthropometrics, is negatively associated with child head circumference and cognition [51,52]. We complement these studies by finding predictive value of child dietary metabolite scores and breastfeeding duration with head circumference [51,52]. Finally, our study complements existing research where head circumference growth in early life is an important determinant for later childhood cognition [13,53].
We did not observe a direct association between head growth and cognitive scores at 2.5 years in our study, suggesting that prenatal dietary effects on child cognition in early life may operate through mechanisms not directly linked to changes in brain volume, as indicated by head circumference. Regarding potential mechanisms, literature suggests that maternal gut [54] and child meconium [55] microbiome may be associated with child head circumference growth in early life, and maternal high-fat diets have been shown to have a significant reduction in both maternal and child microbiome diversity [56]. Pre-clinical studies suggest that maternal dysbiosis modulates foetal neurodevelopment [57], further investigations are warranted to understand the interplay between the microbiome and maternal diet on child neurodevelopment.
Our study had many strengths, including the use of pregnancy and early-life samples, enabling us to identify potential risk factors and determine the directionality of associations. We objectively derived dietary patterns from blood metabolomics in pregnancy, based on the results of a FFQ analysed using unbiased PCA, resulting in findings that more accurately reflect the dietary patterns existing in the population [58]. Further, the use of an objectively measured metabolome signature overcomes some of the limitations associated with using FFQs. The increasing utilisation and validation of metabolomics for assessing dietary exposures underscores the growing importance of this method in enhancing the reliability and accuracy of dietary assessments [59]. Accordingly, we have in previous work externally validated the Western dietary pattern metabolite score in an independent cohort [29]. Leveraging the longitudinal design of our study with repeated measures in our metabolome datasets, alongside the comprehensive data and detailed phenotyping from the COPSAC2010 cohort, we were able to facilitate temporal analysis and genetic characterisation. This enabled us to demonstrate that our findings were independent of genetic contributions. Moreover, adjustments for parental head circumference did not alter our findings, reinforcing that the observed dietary effects on child growth are not confounded by highly heritable genetic factors related to parental traits [21,60]. Regarding the limitations of our observational study, despite extensive adjustments for genetic and phenotypic factors, residual confounding due to unmeasured variables related to maternal or child phenotypes cannot be entirely excluded, and some associations may be spurious; however, supplemental analysis adjusting for maternal genetic risk for intelligence did not change our findings. Our observational data do not allow us to elucidate the critical window, if any, of these dietary effects. Nevertheless, the strong coefficients between maternal and child Western dietary metabolome signatures give us confidence in our modelling, and previous research suggests that diets prior to and during pregnancy tend to be stable [61]. Finally, our findings should only be interpreted in the context of a developed country where the study was set. Previous studies in mostly low- to middle- income countries have identified malnutrition and stunting as key determinants of head circumference growth and cognition outcomes in children [62–64]. This underscores the imperative role of ensuring proper nutritional intake during early childhood. Finally, in the context of modelling head circumference growth, child metabolome Western dietary pattern scores independently predicted growth up to 18 months, indicating their potential as an objective clinical tool for monitoring growth.
Our research emphasises the importance of healthy dietary patterns during pregnancy and breastfeeding for optimal offspring neurodevelopment. We report a negative association between a Western dietary pattern during pregnancy and offspring cognition and head circumference growth in early life. Our findings support the hypothesis of a prenatal programming effect of a Western dietary pattern during pregnancy on offspring neurodevelopment. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these observed associations. Overall, the findings of this study have meaningful public health implications, emphasising the need for intensifying efforts to encourage healthy and balanced dietary patterns during pregnancy, and promoting breastfeeding practices, to optimise offspring neurodevelopment.
Governance
We are aware of and comply with recognised codes of good research practice, including the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. We comply with national and international rules on the safety and rights of patients and healthy subjects, including Good Clinical Practice as defined in the EU’s Directive on Good Clinical Practice, the International Conference on Harmonisation’s good clinical practice guidelines and the Helsinki Declaration. We follow national and international legislation on General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Danish Act on Processing of Personal Data and the practice of the Danish Data Inspectorate.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Nutrient constituents and principal component loadings for dietary patterns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Baseline characteristics and cognition scores stratified by participation in COPSYCH 10-year clinical visit.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Baseline characteristics and cognition scores stratified by child sex.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Associations between Western dietary pattern metabolite score and WISC-IV composite scores.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Subanalysis; multivariable regression modelling of dietary exposures and cognitive outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s005
(DOCX)
S6 Table. Sex-stratified linear regression modelling of dietary exposures and cognitive outcomes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s006
(DOCX)
S7 Table. Correlation coefficients between the Western dietary pattern scores for maternal blood metabolomes and child blood metabolomes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s007
(DOCX)
S8 Table. Western dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy and head circumference growth: latent class and linear mixed model results.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s008
(DOCX)
S9 Table. ANOVA table for the multivariable linear mixed model of Western dietary pattern metabolite score during pregnancy and breastfeeding duration.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s009
(DOCX)
S1 Fig. Principal component loadings for the Western and varied dietary patterns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s010
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. Three-dimensional scatterplot illustrating the associations between maternal diet, cognition, and head circumference growth.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s011
(DOCX)
S3 Fig. Heatmap of correlations between dietary exposures, outcomes, and model covariates.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s012
(DOCX)
S4 Fig. modulating effects of genetics scores for head circumference and intelligence on the association between head circumference and cognition at 10 years.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s013
(DOCX)
S5 Fig. Independent and mutual interaction term effects of dietary exposures.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s014
(DOCX)
S6 Fig. Sex Stratified effects of a pregnancy Western dietary pattern and breastfeeding duration on longitudinal measures of head circumference in a multivariable linear mixed model.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s015
(DOCX)
S7 Fig. Independent effects of the Western and Varied dietary metabolite scores for mothers 1-week postpartum and children’s metabolome at various time points on head circumference.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s016
(DOCX)
S8 Fig. Effect of child intelligence and head circumference polygenic risk score on longitudinal measures of head circumference.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s017
(DOCX)
S1 STROBE Checklist. Checklist outlining the items that should be included in reports of cohort studies, following the STROBE reporting guidelines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004454.s018
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Gottfredson LS. Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence. 1997;24(1):13–23.
- 2. Calvin C, Batty G, Der G, Brett C, Taylor A, Pattie A. Childhood intelligence in relation to major causes of death in 68 year follow-up: prospective population study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2708.
- 3.
Mackintosh N. IQ and human intelligence. Oxford university press. 2011:458.
- 4. Schmidt FL, Hunter J. General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(1):162–73. pmid:14717634
- 5. Bouchard TJ. The Wilson Effect: the increase in heritability of IQ with age. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16(5):923–30. pmid:23919982
- 6. Plomin R, Deary IJ. Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20(1):98–108. pmid:25224258
- 7. Sauce B, Matzel LD. The paradox of intelligence: heritability and malleability coexist in hidden gene-environment interplay. Psychol Bull. 2018;144(1):26–47. pmid:29083200
- 8. Tucker-Drob EM, Briley DA, Harden KP. Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22(5):349–55. pmid:24799770
- 9. Cooke RW, Lucas A, Yudkin PL, Pryse-Davies J. Head circumference as an index of brain weight in the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev. 1977;1(2):145–9. pmid:617306
- 10. Bartholomeusz HH, Courchesne E, Karns CM. Relationship between head circumference and brain volume in healthy normal toddlers, children, and adults. Neuropediatrics. 2002;33(5):239–41. pmid:12536365
- 11. Gale CR, O’Callaghan FJ, Bredow M, Martyn CN, Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Study Team. The influence of head growth in fetal life, infancy, and childhood on intelligence at the ages of 4 and 8 years. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1486–92. pmid:17015539
- 12. Jaekel J, Sorg C, Baeuml J, Bartmann P, Wolke D. Head growth and intelligence from birth to adulthood in very preterm and term born individuals. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019;25(1):48–56. pmid:30426909
- 13. Flensborg-Madsen T, Falgreen Eriksen H-L, Mortensen EL. Early life predictors of intelligence in young adulthood and middle age. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0228144. pmid:31990952
- 14. Sammallahti S, Pyhälä R, Lahti M, Lahti J, Pesonen AK, Heinonen K. Infant growth after preterm birth and neurocognitive abilities in young adulthood. J Pediatr. 2014;165(6):1109–15.
- 15. Neubauer V, Fuchs T, Griesmaier E, Kager K, Pupp-Peglow U, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U. Poor postdischarge head growth is related to a 10% lower intelligence quotient in very preterm infants at the chronological age of five years. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(5):501–7. pmid:26792418
- 16. Ferrer M, García-Esteban R, Iñiguez C, Costa O, Fernández-Somoano A, Rodríguez-Delhi C, et al. Head circumference and child ADHD symptoms and cognitive functioning: results from a large population-based cohort study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;28(3):377–88. pmid:30027417
- 17. Klevebro S, Juul SE, Wood TR. A more comprehensive approach to the neuroprotective potential of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in preterm infants is needed-should we consider maternal diet and the n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio?. Front Pediatr. 2020;7:533. pmid:31998669
- 18. Fujimura M, Seryu JI. Velocity of head growth during the perinatal period. Arch Dis Child. 1977;52(2):105–12. pmid:836060
- 19. Tarry-Adkins JL, Ozanne SE. Nutrition in early life and age-associated diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:96–105. pmid:27594376
- 20. Deary IJ, Johnson W, Houlihan LM. Genetic foundations of human intelligence. Hum Genet. 2009;126(1):215–32. pmid:19294424
- 21. Vogelezang S, Bradfield JP, Early Growth Genetics Consortium, Grant SFA, Felix JF, Jaddoe VWV. Genetics of early-life head circumference and genetic correlations with neurological, psychiatric and cognitive outcomes. BMC Med Genomics. 2022;15(1):124. pmid:35659227
- 22. Anjos T, Altmäe S, Emmett P, Tiemeier H, Closa-Monasterolo R, Luque V, et al. Nutrition and neurodevelopment in children: focus on NUTRIMENTHE project. Eur J Nutr. 2013;52(8):1825–42. pmid:23884402
- 23. Starling P, Charlton K, McMahon AT, Lucas C. Fish intake during pregnancy and foetal neurodevelopment—a systematic review of the evidence. Nutrients. 2015;7(3):2001–14. pmid:25793632
- 24. Lee H, Park H, Ha E, Hong Y, Ha M, Park H. Effect of breastfeeding duration on cognitive development in infants: 3-year follow-up study. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(4):579–84.
- 25. Schwarzenberg SJ, Georgieff MK, COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION. Advocacy for improving nutrition in the first 1000 days to support childhood development and adult health. Pediatrics. 2018;141(2):e20173716. pmid:29358479
- 26. Georgieff MK, Ramel SE, Cusick SE. Nutritional influences on brain development. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(8):1310–21. pmid:29468731
- 27. Mun JG, Legette LL, Ikonte CJ, Mitmesser SH. Choline and DHA in maternal and infant nutrition: synergistic implications in brain and eye health. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1125. pmid:31117180
- 28. Farshchi HR, Macdonald I, Madjd A, Taylor MA. Benefits and limitations of traditional self-report instruments. Adv Assess Dietary Intake. 2017:1–17.
- 29. Horner D, Jepsen JRM, Chawes B, Aagaard K, Rosenberg JB, Mohammadzadeh P, et al. A western dietary pattern during pregnancy is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and adolescence. Nat Metab. 2025. pmid:40033007
- 30. Bisgaard H, Vissing NH, Carson CG, Bischoff AL, Følsgaard NV, Kreiner-Møller E, et al. Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(12):1384–94. pmid:24118234
- 31. Mohammadzadeh P, Rosenberg JB, Vinding R, Møllegaard Jepsen JR, Lindberg U, Følsgaard N, et al. Effects of prenatal nutrient supplementation and early life exposures on neurodevelopment at age 10: a randomised controlled trial—the COPSYCH study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e047706. pmid:35105560
- 32. Mikkelsen TB, Olsen SF, Rasmussen SE, Osler M. Relative validity of fruit and vegetable intake estimated by the food frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):172–9. pmid:17454921
- 33. Mikkelsen TB, Osler M, Olsen SF. Validity of protein, retinol, folic acid and n-3 fatty acid intakes estimated from the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):771–8. pmid:16925883
- 34. Bjarnadóttir E, Stokholm J, Chawes B, Thorsen J, Mora-Jensen A-RC, Deleuran M, et al. Determinants of neurodevelopment in early childhood—results from the Copenhagen prospective studies on asthma in childhood (COPSAC2010 ) mother-child cohort. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(9):1632–41. pmid:30748036
- 35. Krogh MT, Vaever MS. Bayley-III: cultural differences and language scale validity in a Danish sample. Scand J Psychol. 2016;57(6):501–8. pmid:27716932
- 36. Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development, third edition. PsycTESTS Dataset. 2012.
- 37. Lynne Beal A. Test review: Wechsler, D. (2003, 2004). Wechsler intelligence scale for children, fourth edition (WISC-IVCDN). Toronto, ON: The Psychological Corporation. Can J School Psychol. 2004;19(1–2):221–34.
- 38. Nishijima M, Yoshida T, Matsumura K, Inomata S, Nagaoka M, Tamura K, et al. Correlation between the Bayley-III at 3 years and the Wechsler intelligence scale for children, fourth edition, at 6 years. Pediatr Int. 2022;64(1):e14872. pmid:34081822
- 39. Ekelund CK, Petersen OB, Jørgensen FS, Kjaergaard S, Larsen T, Olesen AW, et al. The Danish Fetal Medicine Database: establishment, organization and quality assessment of the first trimester screening program for trisomy 21 in Denmark 2008-2012. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(6):577–83. pmid:25597330
- 40. Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Liquet B. Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: the R Package lcmm. J Stat Soft. 2017;78(2).
- 41. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models Usinglme4. J Stat Soft. 2015;67(1).
- 42. Privé F, Aschard H, Carmi S, Folkersen L, Hoggart C, O’Reilly PF, et al. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109(2):373. pmid:35120604
- 43. Dupont C, Castellanos-Ryan N, Séguin J, Muckle G, Simard M, Shapiro G. The predictive value of head circumference growth during the first year of life on early child traits. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9828.
- 44. Brito NH, Noble KG. Socioeconomic status and structural brain development. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:276. pmid:25249931
- 45. Shiohama T, Hisada A, Yamamoto M, Sakurai K, Takatani R, Fujii K. Decreased head circumference at birth associated with maternal tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy on the Japanese prospective birth cohort study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18949.
- 46. Fitzgerald E, Hor K, Drake AJ. Maternal influences on fetal brain development: The role of nutrition, infection and stress, and the potential for intergenerational consequences. Early Hum Dev. 2020;150:105190.
- 47. Josse J, Husson F. missMDA: a package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J Stat Soft. 2016;70(1).
- 48. Freitas-Vilela AA, Pearson RM, Emmett P, Heron J, Smith ADAC, Emond A, et al. Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and intelligence quotients in the offspring at 8 years of age: findings from the ALSPAC cohort. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12431
- 49. Lv S, Qin R, Jiang Y, Lv H, Lu Q, Tao S, et al. Association of maternal dietary patterns during gestation and offspring neurodevelopment. Nutrients. 2022;14(4):730. pmid:35215380
- 50. Steenweg-de Graaff J, Roza SJ, Walstra AN, El Marroun H, Steegers EAP, Jaddoe VWV, et al. Associations of maternal folic acid supplementation and folate concentrations during pregnancy with foetal and child head growth: the Generation R Study. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56(1):65–75. pmid:26497537
- 51. Pongcharoen T, Ramakrishnan U, DiGirolamo AM, Winichagoon P, Flores R, Singkhornard J, et al. Influence of prenatal and postnatal growth on intellectual functioning in school-aged children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(5):411–6. pmid:22566539
- 52. Christian P, Murray-Kolb L, Tielsch J, Katz J, LeClerq S, Khatry S. Associations between preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and neonatal morbidity and cognitive function among school-age children in Nepal. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:58.
- 53. Bach C, Henriksen T, Larsen R, Aagaard K, Matthiesen N. Head circumference at birth and school performance: a nationwide cohort study of 536,921 children. Pediatr Res. 2020;87(6):1112–8.
- 54. Sato Y, Sakurai K, Tanabe H, Kato T, Nakanishi Y, Ohno H, et al. Maternal gut microbiota is associated with newborn anthropometrics in a sex-specific manner. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2019;10(6):659–66. pmid:31106719
- 55. Terrazzan Nutricionist AC, Procianoy RS, Roesch LFW, Corso AL, Dobbler PT, Silveira RC. Meconium microbiome and its relation to neonatal growth and head circumference catch-up in preterm infants. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238632. pmid:32956415
- 56. Maher SE, O’Brien EC, Moore RL, Byrne DF, Geraghty AA, Saldova R. The association between the maternal diet and the maternal and infant gut microbiome: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2020;1:1–29.
- 57. Vuong HE, Pronovost GN, Williams DW, Coley EJL, Siegler EL, Qiu A, et al. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature. 2020;586(7828):281–6. pmid:32968276
- 58. Newby PK, Tucker KL. Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev. 2004;62(5):177–203. pmid:15212319
- 59. Cuparencu C, Bulmuş-Tüccar T, Stanstrup J, La Barbera G, Roager HM, Dragsted LO. Towards nutrition with precision: unlocking biomarkers as dietary assessment tools. Nat Metab. 2024;6(8):1438–53. pmid:38956322
- 60. Smit DJA, Luciano M, Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Wright MJ, Hansell NK, et al. Heritability of head size in Dutch and Australian twin families at ages 0-50 years. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2010;13(4):370–80. pmid:20707707
- 61. Savard C, Lemieux S, Weisnagel SJ, Fontaine-Bisson B, Gagnon C, Robitaille J, et al. Trimester-specific dietary intakes in a sample of French-Canadian pregnant women in comparison with national nutritional guidelines. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):768. pmid:29899222
- 62. Ivanovic DM, Leiva BP, Pérez HT, Olivares MG, Díaz NS, Urrutia MSC, et al. Head size and intelligence, learning, nutritional status and brain development. Head, IQ, learning, nutrition and brain. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(8):1118–31. pmid:15093150
- 63. Kar BR, Rao SL, Chandramouli BA. Cognitive development in children with chronic protein energy malnutrition. Behav Brain Funct. 2008;4:31. pmid:18652660
- 64. Koshy B, Srinivasan M, Gopalakrishnan S, Mohan VR, Scharf R, Murray-Kolb L, et al. Are early childhood stunting and catch-up growth associated with school age cognition?—Evidence from an Indian birth cohort. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264010. pmid:35235588