Oral bleeding after dental extraction in patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is a frequent problem. We investigated whether 10% tranexamic acid (TXA) mouthwash decreases post-extraction bleeding in patients treated with NOACs.
Methods and findings
The EXTRACT-NOAC study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 10% TXA or placebo mouthwash and were instructed to use the mouthwash once prior to dental extraction, and thereafter for 3 times a day for 3 days. The primary outcome was the number of patients with any post-extraction oral bleeding up to day 7. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural, early, and delayed bleeding, and the safety outcomes included all thrombotic events. The first patient was randomized on February 9, 2018 and the last patient on March 12, 2020. Of 222 randomized patients, 218 patients were included in the full analysis set, of which 106 patients were assigned to TXA (74.8 (±8.8) years; 81 men) and 112 to placebo (72.7 (±10.7) years; 64 men). Post-extraction bleeding occurred in 28 (26.4%) patients in the TXA group and in 32 (28.6%) patients in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.42; P = 0.72). There were 46 bleeds in the TXA group and 85 bleeds in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.05; P = 0.07). TXA did not reduce the rate of periprocedural bleeding (bleeding score 4 ± 1.78 versus 4 ± 1.82, P = 0.80) and early bleeding (rate ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.37). Delayed bleeding (rate ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.89) and bleeding after multiple extractions (rate ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78) were lower in the TXA group. One patient in the placebo group had a transient ischemic attack while interrupting the NOAC therapy in preparation for the dental extraction. Two of the study limitations were the premature interruption of the trial following a futility analysis and the assessment of the patients’ compliance that was based on self-reported information during follow-up.
In patients on NOACs undergoing dental extraction, TXA does not seem to reduce the rate of periprocedural or early postoperative oral bleeding compared to placebo. TXA appears to reduce delayed bleeds and postoperative oral bleeding if multiple teeth are extracted.
Why was this study done?
- Oral bleeding after dental extraction in patients on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is a frequent problem and may occur in up to 25% of the patients.
- Because of bleeding, patients often reconsult a dentist or surgeon and might need a reintervention to stop the bleeding. Patients might also interrupt their anticoagulant treatment, which could lead to subsequent life-threatening thrombotic events.
- There is no consensus about the best hemostatic management to reduce bleeding after dental extraction in these patients.
- Tranexamic acid (TXA) was proven to reduce bleeding in other surgical settings and is a cheap and widely available hemostatic agent.
What did the researchers do and find?
- We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, clinical trial to evaluate if the use of a TXA mouthwash reduces bleeding.
- TXA did not seem to affect the rate of periprocedural or early postoperative oral bleeding compared to placebo.
- TXA appeared to reduce delayed bleeding and postoperative bleeding if multiple teeth were extracted.
- The use of TXA might also reduce the number of patients reconsulting a dentist or surgeon after dental extraction.
What do these findings mean?
- Our results confirm the high event rate of oral bleeds in patients treated with NOACs undergoing dental extraction, with more than 1 out of 4 patients reporting any bleeding.
- TXA might help to reduce delayed post-extraction bleeding and bleeding after multiple dental extractions in patients on NOACs and lead to less patients reconsulting healthcare services.
Citation: Ockerman A, Miclotte I, Vanhaverbeke M, Vanassche T, Belmans A, Vanhove J, et al. (2021) Tranexamic acid and bleeding in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants undergoing dental extraction: The EXTRACT-NOAC randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med 18(5): e1003601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003601
Received: February 4, 2021; Accepted: April 1, 2021; Published: May 3, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Ockerman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The deidentified study data are available from the Zenodo database (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4621031).
Funding: This work has been supported by two grants: 1) Grant T002117N, Research Foundation Flanders, Applied Biomedical Research Grant with a Primary Social finality (PV).(https://www.fwo.be/en/fellowships-funding/research-projects/tbm-projects/); 2) Grant ERISTA, European Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program, Bristol Myers-Squibb/Pfizer (PV). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: PV received grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Leo Pharma, and Portola and Medtronic outside the submitted work. Other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; DOAC, direct K oral anticoagulant; EHRA, European Hearth Rhythm Association; NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; TXA, tranexamic acid
Oral bleeding is a frequent complication after dental extraction in anticoagulated patients and might occur in up to 25% of these patients [1,2]. A meta-analysis on the risk of post-extraction bleeding pointed out that these patients have a 3 times higher risk of bleeding than patients not taking anticoagulant drugs . Bleeding often results in patients reconsulting a dentist or oral and maxillofacial surgeon and may require a reintervention. These unplanned visits to the dental practice or hospital increase healthcare costs. In addition, if the anticoagulant therapy is interrupted, bleeding may turn into a risk factor for thrombotic events.
Although the number of patients treated with direct or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs or NOACs) is increasing, data on how to prevent and manage bleeding in patients undergoing dental extractions are limited . Moreover, evidence from clinical trials shows a potential increased risk of mucosal bleeding in certain NOAC regimens . Guidelines advise performing dental extraction at trough level of a NOAC, which can be implemented by skipping a NOAC dose on the morning of the day of the dental extraction . This strategy appeared to be safe in a recent prospective pilot study, although there was a signal toward excess delayed bleeding compared to non-anticoagulated patients . Based on these preliminary findings, the current clinical trial was designed.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an attractive hemostatic agent for oral surgery as it can be applied locally, resulting in low systemic absorption [7,8]. Previous research has shown that the use of TXA mouthwash is effective in decreasing bleeding after dental extraction in patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, but its use in NOAC-treated patients has not yet been studied [9,10].
The current interventional EXTRACT-NOAC study was designed to assess whether a 10% TXA mouthwash reduces bleeding after dental extraction in patients on NOACs.
The EXTRACT-NOAC study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, investigator-initiated, clinical trial. The study obtained written consent by the Medical Ethics Committee of University Hospitals Leuven in July 2017 (S60131). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03413891). The full and detailed rationale and design of the study have been extensively described previously . This study is reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines (S1 CONSORT Checklist).
Patients older than 18 years were eligible if they were treated with a NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran), were scheduled for a dental extraction, and provided written informed consent. Patients who were pregnant or lactating were excluded . Patients visiting the oral and maxillofacial departments of the following Belgian hospitals were screened for eligibility: University Hospitals Leuven, Regional Hospital Heilig Hart Leuven, General Hospital St-Jan Genk, and AZ Monica Antwerp.
Randomization and study procedures
All patients were instructed to skip the morning dose of their NOAC on the day of the dental extraction, in agreement with the European Hearth Rhythm Association (EHRA) guidelines  and as previously validated by our group . No other precoagulation screening was performed, in agreement with the EHRA guidelines . If the procedure was planned early in the day, it was also allowed to skip the anticoagulant dose the evening before, aiming for an 18 to 24 hours window before the last dose. Patients were randomized through an interactive web recognition system to a 1g/10 mL (10%) TXA mouthwash or a taste and color-matching placebo, both manufactured by the Leuven Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. A computer-generated block randomization list was generated by an independent person (Leuven Clinical Coordinating Centre, University of Leuven, Belgium) for treatment allocation. The randomization was not stratified. Patients were enrolled in the study and assigned to the study interventions by clinicians. Patients, clinicians, and treating surgeons were blinded to the allocated intervention.
Patients were instructed to use the mouthwash immediately before the dental extraction and subsequently 3 times a day for 3 days starting the day after the extraction. They were asked to use the mouthwash for 1 minute and to spit it out afterwards. Extraction wound management was left at the discretion of the physician. Patients were instructed to resume the NOAC the day after dental extraction unless there were hemostasis issues. Investigators blinded to the allocated treatment contacted the patients by phone on day 2 and day 7 after dental extraction to assess compliance with the study protocol, the occurrence of any bleeding, and other secondary and safety outcomes .
The primary outcome was the number of patients with any oral bleeding, defined as overt bleeding within the oral cavity. Secondary outcomes were the number of bleeding events in the different bleeding categories, periprocedural bleeding (defined as a bleeding score measured on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10), unplanned medical contacts, reinterventions following oral bleeding, and unplanned NOAC interruptions. Oral bleeding events were categorized as minor, clinically relevant, or major, as previously published , and as early (on the day of the extraction or the day after) or delayed (on day 2 or later) . Facial hematomas were recorded as well. A blinded adjudicator adjudicated all suspected bleeding events and reinterventions. Safety outcomes were thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, and venous thromboembolism, any allergic reactions to the mouthwash, and non-oral bleeding events (such as epistaxis, eye bleeding, or bruises), up to the end of the study follow-up .
The study was designed to test the hypothesis that TXA mouthwash would be superior to placebo with respect to the number of patients with any oral bleeding. Based on a pilot study, the sample size was set at 236 patients, which would allow to detect a treatment difference of 15% between the TXA and placebo group using a chi-squared test with an expected proportion of patients with any bleeding of 30% in the control group . The statistical power was set at 80% and the 2-sided significance level at 5%. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 and SAS/STAT version 15.1 for Windows.
The primary analysis was conducted in the full analysis set, which included all randomized patients, but excluded 3 patients for whom no follow-up data could be obtained and 1 control patient who used off-trial TXA . A sensitivity analysis was performed whereby the primary endpoint for these patients was imputed according to a worst-case scenario (i.e., occurrence of oral bleeding), but yielded similar results. A further sensitivity analysis was performed on the per-protocol set, additionally excluding patients who had not complied with the assigned treatment for at least 80%.
The primary outcome (i.e., number of patients with any oral bleeding) was analyzed using a chi-squared test. The effect of treatment was estimated by the risk ratio and presented along with its 95% confidence interval (CI).
The secondary outcomes were analyzed, and a prespecified subgroup analysis was performed, by means of a logistic regression (for the number of patients with bleeds) and negative binomial regression model (for the number of bleeds). The CIs from the negative binomial regression were calculated using the normal approximation. The treatment effect was estimated as a rate ratio (the number of bleeds per patient during the first 7 days after dental extraction). The subgroup analysis included a risk analysis for bleeding events accounting for patient demographics and procedural characteristics, stratified per treatment group. Additionally, a post hoc exploratory analysis was performed, analyzing all oral bleeds plus facial hematomas by means of a logistic regression (for the primary endpoint) and negative binomial regression model (for the number of bleeds).
Importantly, an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board performed an unplanned interim analysis on the number of patients with oral bleeding in May 2020 with the aim of assessing futility or reassessing the sample size. At that time, the trial was suspended because of the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and 222 of the 236 planned patients had been randomized. The Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended not to reinitiate the study based on the number of patients with bleeding. The study team remained blinded to all study results. The full details of the methodology of the interim and full analysis are outlined in S1 SAP Interim and S2 SAP Final, respectively.
Recruitment, baseline characteristics, and follow-up
The study flowchart is shown in Fig 1. The first patient was enrolled in February 2018, and the trial was closed in May 2020. Of 293 patients referred for dental extraction, 222 eligible patients were randomized: 108 patients were assigned to TXA mouthwash and 114 to placebo. Three patients were lost to follow-up, and 1 patient took off-trial TXA, so that 106 TXA-treated patients and 112 placebo-treated patients were included in the full analysis set.
The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The 2 groups were well balanced, except for a difference in sex. The mean age was 74.8 (±8.8) years in the TXA group and 72.7 (±10.7) years in the placebo group. Details of the dental extractions are presented in S1 Table.
Primary and secondary bleeding outcomes
The primary and secondary bleeding outcomes are summarized in Table 2. There was no difference in the number of patients with any oral post-extraction bleeding in the TXA group (28 patients, 26.4%) versus the placebo group (32 patients, 28.6%) (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.42; P = 0.72). When assessing all oral bleeding events, there were 46 oral bleeds in the TXA group versus 85 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.04, P = 0.07). The procedural bleeding score was similar between both groups: 4 ± 1.78 on a VAS scale (0 to 10) for TXA-treated patients and 4 ± 1.82 for placebo-treated patients (P = 0.80).
Patients in the TXA group had less delayed oral bleeds than patients in the placebo group (11 versus 36 delayed bleeds, rate ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.89). TXA-treated patients had fewer bleeds related to the dental extraction, which were oral bleeds and facial hematomas, compared to patients assigned to placebo (52 versus 99 bleeds, rate ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.96).
All oral bleeds in this trial were managed with local hemostatic measures, except for one major oral bleeding in a patient in the placebo arm who needed a blood transfusion and who was hospitalized for 2 days.
Of the 60 patients who reported oral bleeding, 28 experienced more than 1 bleeding (Fig 2). No patient had 4 or more oral bleeds in the TXA group, whereas 10 patients in the placebo group had. Fig 3 shows the number of oral bleeds per day after dental extraction. TXA had no influence on early post-extraction oral bleeding (day 0 and day 1) (see also Table 2). In contrast, the number of oral bleeds was lower on days 2, 3, and 4 after extraction for patients in the TXA group compared to the placebo group (see also Table 2).
Other secondary outcomes
Fewer patients treated with TXA (6.6%) had an unplanned medical contact after dental extraction compared to patients using placebo (16.1%) (relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.94) (Table 3). The most frequent reasons for unplanned medical contact were bleeding and infection (S2 Table). The number of patients requiring a reintervention for oral bleeding or that interrupted their NOAC was comparable between both groups (Table 3). The majority of unplanned NOAC interruptions was because of bleeding complications (S2 Table).
Only 1 patient included in the placebo group suffered from a thrombotic event in preparation for dental extraction (Table 3). The participant had stopped NOAC treatment 2 days before dental extraction and had a transient ischemic attack. There were no thrombotic events in the TXA group. Allergic reactions were rare. Two patients in both treatment groups reported a tingling feeling in their mouth after using the mouthwash (Table 3).
The exploratory subgroup analysis is shown in Fig 4. A significant treatment interaction was identified in patients requiring extraction of 2 or more teeth. In this subgroup, there were 33 bleeds in 19/61 (31.2%) patients assigned to TXA and 77 bleeds in 24/57 (42.2%) of patients assigned to placebo (rate ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78). In patients who were 75 years or older, there were 24 bleeds in 13/59 (22.0%) patients assigned to TXA and 55 bleeds in 16/51 (31.4%) patients assigned to placebo (rate ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.79), although this interaction did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07).
no./No. = the number of patients with oral bleeds divided by the total number of patients in the subgroup; no. = number of oral bleeding events. The rate ratios are given for the number of oral bleeding events and are obtained by means of a negative binomial regression. CI, confidence interval; NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant; TXA, tranexamic acid.
To our knowledge, this is the first randomized double-blind clinical trial assessing the efficacy of TXA to reduce post-extraction bleeding in patients treated with NOACs. The results of the current trial provide new clinical data in the debate of the optimal anticoagulant and hemostatic management of patients on NOACs undergoing dental extractions . We observed no reduction in the number of patients with oral bleeding when comparing TXA mouthwash with placebo. TXA did not reduce the rate of periprocedural bleeding or early bleeding after extraction, but reduced delayed bleeding and bleeding after multiple dental extractions. Patients using TXA also had fewer unscheduled medical contacts after dental extraction (59% reduction), predominantly related to bleeding.
Our results confirm the high event rate of oral bleeds in patients treated with NOACs undergoing tooth extraction, with more than 1 out of 4 patients reporting any bleeding. Moreover, half of the patients with a bleeding reported multiple oral bleeding events. In the TXA group, no patients had 4 or more bleedings, compared to 10 patients in the placebo group. Fewer patients in the TXA group thus suffered recurrent bleeding.
Two patients in each group experienced allergic reactions after the use of the assigned mouthwash, and no patients had thrombotic complications after the use of TXA, highlighting that TXA is well tolerated and safe to use. The intervention with TXA mouthwash is also affordable, readily available on the market, and therefore easy to implement in clinical practice.
In our study, 6 patients in the TXA group and 9 patients in the placebo group interrupted their NOAC (without it being planned in preparation for surgery). Unplanned interruption of anticoagulants is a concern in clinical practice, since it is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events . Patient adherence and compliance with the doctor’s advice remain important.
An exploratory subgroup analysis showed that patients who underwent extraction of 2 or more teeth and elderly patients and patients who restarted their NOAC within 24 hours after the dental extraction might benefit more from treatment with TXA. However, the latter finding was not statistically significant. These findings support the hypothesis that the potential benefit of a hemostatic agent is likely to be the largest in patients with friable mucosa and more extensive tissue damage. An immature coagulum combined with reinitiation of the anticoagulant may then result in bleeding. Future studies may focus on this high-risk population.
After enrolling 222 out of 236 planned patients, the trial was prematurely stopped during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic after a futility analysis by the Data Safety Monitoring Board based on the number of patients with oral bleeding. This was the main limitation of the study. Another limitation was that we relied on self-reported information gathered during a follow-up by phone to assess the patients’ compliance with the study protocol. However, the studied intervention was a simple intervention, and patients got both oral and written instructions on a schematic leaflet about the protocol. A last limitation was that there was no fixed time point on restarting the NOAC after dental extraction. Patients were instructed on when to restart their NOAC, but the exact timing of the NOAC re-intake was left at the patient’s decision. As a result, there was a spread in the timing of the NOAC restart among the studied patients, and the possible effect hereof on bleeding after dental extraction is unclear. The question on timing of NOAC restart needs further study.
In conclusion, a 10% TXA mouthwash did not reduce the number of patients with any oral bleeding after dental extraction, nor the periprocedural bleeding or early bleeding after extraction. TXA appears to reduce delayed bleeding and bleeding after multiple dental extractions. Follow-up studies may explore potential benefit in high-risk patient populations.
S1 CONSORT Checklist. The current manuscript follows the CONSORT reporting guidelines.
CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
S1 SAP Interim. The interim statistical analysis plan of the EXTRACT-NOAC study.
NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant.
S2 SAP Final. The final statistical analysis plan of the EXTRACT-NOAC study.
NOAC, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant.
S1 Table. Details of the dental extraction are given according to the treatment groups.
We thank study coordinator Barbara Debaveye, University Hospitals of Leuven; study recruiters Laura-Lien Poortmans and Jeroen Martens, both of the University of Leuven; and bioinformaticians Michiel Van der Haegen and Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo, University of Leuven. We also thank Peter Van Rompaey, University of Leuven, for managing any queries in the database. They did not receive compensation for their support of this study.
- 1. Miclotte I, Vanhaverbeke M, Agbaje JO, Legrand P, Vanassche T, Verhamme P, et al. Pragmatic approach to manage new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing dental extractions: a prospective case-control study. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2183–8. pmid:27891570
- 2. Patel JP, Woolcombe SA, Patel RK, Obisesan O, Roberts LN, Bryant C, et al. Managing direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing dentoalveolar surgery. Br Dent J. 2017;222(4):245–9. pmid:28232717
- 3. Bensi C, Belli S, Paradiso D, Lomurno G. Postoperative bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants after oral surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(7):923–32. pmid:29627150
- 4. Johnston S. An evidence summary of the management of patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) undergoing dental surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(5):618–30. pmid:26774397
- 5. Vanassche T, Hirsh J, Eikelboom JW, Ginsberg JS. Organ-specific bleeding patterns of anticoagulant therapy: Lessons from clinical trials. Thromb Haemost. 2014;112(5):918–23. pmid:25187203
- 6. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(16):1330–93. pmid:29562325
- 7. Tengborn L, Blombäck M, Berntorp E. Tranexamic acid—an old drug still going strong and making a revival. Thromb Res. 2015;135(2):231–42. pmid:25559460
- 8. Ker K, Beecher D, Roberts I. Topical application of tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD010562. pmid:23881695
- 9. Ockerman A, Miclotte I, Vanhaverbeke M, Verhamme P, Poortmans LL, Vanassche T, et al. Local haemostatic measures after tooth removal in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;21:2183–8. pmid:30155575
- 10. Ramström G, Sindet-Pedersen S, Hall G, Blombäck M, Alander U, Ramstrom G, et al. Prevention of postsurgical bleeding in oral surgery using tranexamic acid without dose modification of oral anticoagulants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Nov;51(11):1211–6. pmid:8229393
- 11. Ockerman A, Vanhaverbeke M, Miclotte I, Belmans A, Vanassche T. Tranexamic acid to reduce bleeding after dental extraction in patients treated with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: design and rationale of the EXTRACT-NOAC trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(10):1107–12. pmid:31669068
- 12. The European Medicines Agency’s (EMEA’s) guidelines on statistical principles for clinical trials: ICH Topic E9. Eur Med Agency. 2006.
- 13. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955–62. pmid:24315724