Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Economic influences on population health in the United States: Toward policymaking driven by data and evidence

  • Atheendar S. Venkataramani ,

    Affiliations Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Rourke O’Brien,

    Affiliation Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Gregory L. Whitehorn,

    Affiliation Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Alexander C. Tsai

    Affiliations Center for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda

Summary points

  • The United States is in the midst of a 40-year-long population health crisis. Life expectancy has declined since 2014, an unprecedented event that has followed on the heels of a decades-long slowing in secular gains in longevity in the US relative to peer countries. These adverse population health trends appear to be primarily driven by worsening health among working-age individuals of lower socioeconomic status.
  • A growing body of research suggests that worsening economic outcomes—e.g., fading employment opportunities and increasing economic insecurity—may be a primary causal driver of adverse health trends among low-income and less-educated working-age US residents.
  • Evidence-based public policies to address widening gaps in economic and health outcomes include expanding early childhood health and educational investments, increasing the scope of programs that assist displaced workers in developing new skills and finding new jobs, reinforcing the social safety net, and improving the reach of public health efforts to help moderate the health consequences of adverse economic shocks.
  • Policymakers will also need to consider and rigorously evaluate new approaches, such as basic income grants, investments to direct automation toward complementing rather than replacing the work force, or job guarantee programs.
  • The size and scope of the population health challenges that have arisen with the changing economy highlight the importance of new data sources and evidence-based engagement by policymakers.


Over the last 40 years, the secular increase in longevity in the US has slowed relative to peer countries, a phenomenon capped in more recent years by an unprecedented decline in US life expectancy [1]. These broad trends mask widening disparities in health outcomes by socioeconomic status. Stagnant—and more recently, rising—mortality among working-age adults in lower income brackets who have less formal education, primarily driven by rising drug overdose and suicide death rates, appear to entirely account for the growing gap in health outcomes between the US and other high-income countries [14].

During this time, economic outcomes in the same population subgroups have worsened as well. Since the late 1970s, growth in wages and incomes stagnated for most US residents [5]. The ability of individuals from poor families to achieve upward socioeconomic mobility has fallen considerably [68], whereas insecurity in many aspects of life—such as earnings, work, and housing—has risen [8,9]. Consequently, income inequality has increased dramatically over this period, reaching levels not seen since the eve of the 1929–1939 Great Depression [10].

We argue that worsening economic outcomes among low-income and less-educated working-age adults may be a key driver of adverse population health trends in the US. We begin by describing trends in economic outcomes since the late 1970s and their underlying drivers. We then discuss the myriad ways in which these trends have affected population health, focusing primarily on working-age adults. We review existing and new interventions that may jointly improve economic outcomes and population health (or mitigate the adverse health consequences of negative economic shocks). We also highlight the importance of new and more accessible data to better inform policy and the role of political processes in realizing the full potential of evidence-based policymaking.

Worsening economic outcomes in the US

One of the most striking changes in the US economy has been the divergence, since 1980, in economic outcomes by level of education and relative position in the income distribution. Through the late 1970s, inflation-adjusted (i.e., real) wages grew at similar rates for US residents across the income distribution. Thereafter, however, real incomes stagnated for individuals in the bottom 50%, even as they continued to increase for those in the top 10% [5,11]. This divergence is even more stark when stratified by level of education. Over the same 40-year period, real earnings increased for those with a college education but decreased for those with only a high school education or less. At the same time, individuals growing up in poor families have found it increasingly difficult to exit poverty later in life. Economic opportunity—the ability to achieve upward socioeconomic mobility regardless of one’s background—has declined dramatically, particularly for those entering the US labor market in the early 1980s and thereafter [6,7].

Several forces may have contributed to these trends. The disappearance of employment opportunities that had previously provided to individuals without a college education a credible path to the middle class—e.g., manufacturing jobs—has played an outsized role [3,12,13]. These jobs have disappeared, in part, because of technological advances that have allowed firms to automate many tasks previously performed by workers [14] and also because of increases in foreign trade that have led to large declines in employment within industries and areas most exposed to competition with foreign firms [13,15]. The growth of low-wage healthcare industry jobs has buffered some areas against the loss of manufacturing employment opportunities but, overall, has done little to counter the worsening economic outcomes among low-income and less-educated workers that have been caused by automation and trade [16,17].

In addition to these market forces, shifts in public policy have also contributed to rising income inequality and falling social mobility in the US. Starting in the late 1970s, federal minimum wage increases have failed to keep up with inflation, and the inflation-adjusted minimum wage today is lower than it was in 1980. Recent studies have demonstrated the critical importance of minimum wage increases in sustaining incomes of low-wage workers, with attendant consequences for the shape of the overall income distribution [18,19]. Second, the deregulation of the financial industry has contributed to increasing “financialization” of the economy, which has both increased the relative importance of financial firms—and the wages of those employed within them—and exposed small businesses and individuals to greater financial risk [20]. The consequences of financialization are illustrated by the substantial declines in wealth among low- and middle-income households after the post-2007 Great Recession, compared with increasing wealth among higher-income households [21]. Third, emerging evidence suggests that deunionization has reduced the bargaining power of workers without college degrees, thereby undermining union-associated earnings premia and worsening income inequality [22,23].

Fourth, further entrenchment of structural racism has contributed to economic inequality by eroding economic outcomes among historically minoritized populations [24]. For example, after a period of narrowing, the gap in earnings between Black and White Americans has grown since the late 1970s [25]. Shifts in policing, criminal justice, and sentencing policies resulting in mass incarceration have contributed to this rise in economic inequality [26,27]. In addition, the persistence of racial segregation [2830]—and the inability of local, state, and federal governments to mount definitive policy responses to effectively eliminate it [31]—has undermined the resilience of Black Americans to negative economic shocks [32], while remaining a continuing driver of poverty among Black Americans and Black-White disparities in income and wealth [33].

Policy-driven erosion of the social safety net has compounded the adverse socioeconomic consequences of the changing economy on low-income and less-educated individuals [34]. For example, cuts to cash welfare programs under both Republican and Democratic presidential administrations have reduced the share of poor families receiving benefits during times of need, from 4 in 5 families accessing welfare in 1980 to 1 in 5 in the present day [35]. The combination of falling wages, fading economic opportunities, and a shrinking safety net has introduced increasing precarity in the lives of the poor, a state marked by income insecurity and unpredictability, disengagement from social and economic structures, decreasing resilience to compounding social and economic shocks, and the need to make hard choices around basic needs [34,3639].

Economic outcomes and population health

Theoretical mechanisms linking economic conditions and population health

Worsening economic outcomes for less-educated and low-income individuals can influence health through several channels [2,40,41] (Fig 1). Falling incomes can reduce access to basic material resources (e.g., stable housing, food, health insurance, and healthcare) needed to ensure good health [41,42]. Worsening economic outcomes may also increase exposure to stressors such as poor environmental conditions (e.g., worse air pollution) [43,44]. Increasing economic insecurity and precarity may directly harm health through increasing biological and psychosocial stress [40,45,46].

Fig 1. Drivers of economic outcomes and consequences for population health.

Figure summarizes the key relationships between economic outcomes—and their underlying drivers—and health. To ensure better clarity, the figure only focuses on drivers and pathways discussed in this review. In doing so, we do not directly specify some relationships that are likely important for population health, e.g., direct effects of public policy (e.g., Medicaid expansions) and structural racism on health outcomes.

The diverging fortunes between the “haves” and “have-nots” may change or constrain the way individuals think and plan for the future, leading to underinvestment in behaviors that may improve health and economic outcomes. For example, worsening economic outcomes can diminish one’s expectations for a better future, which can undermine individuals’ motivations to engage in health-promoting behaviors [4750]. In addition, economic insecurity may reduce the mental bandwidth needed to make productive, future-oriented economic decisions, reducing individuals’ ability to exit their current economic circumstances and thereby contributing to their worsening health [51,52].

Empirical evidence linking worsening economic outcomes to population health

Descriptive evidence on trends in life expectancy and mortality by socioeconomic status implicate changing economic conditions as a key driver of worsening population health in the US. Most starkly, worsening health outcomes in the past 40 years have been concentrated among working-age adults in the bottom of the income distribution and among those with relatively low levels of formal education (i.e., high school or less). These are the very groups that have increasingly fallen behind in economic outcomes since the 1980s [1,3]. For example, a recent study using data from 1.4 billion individual-level tax records linked to administrative data on mortality found widening income-based mortality gaps from 1999 to 2014 [4]. Life expectancy increased by approximately 2–3 years over the 15-year study period for men and women with pre-tax incomes in the top 5% nationally. By contrast, life expectancies for men and women with incomes in the bottom 5% remained virtually unchanged. The growth in the mortality gap by level of education has been even more striking, with several studies demonstrating increases in mortality (or decreases in life expectancy) for adults in the bottom of the US education distribution [3, 5356]. Growing mortality gaps by education remain [57], even after accounting for bias from growing selection into lower levels of education over time [58].

Differential experiences across geographic areas are also consistent with economic factors playing a critical role in driving population health outcomes. This phenomenon can be revealed by even cursory inspection: for example, age-adjusted mortality rates in counties in different income and education deciles tracked closely with each other until the 1980s, after which the richest and more highly educated counties experienced much larger declines in death rates (Fig 2). Excess all-cause and drug overdose mortality relative to historical trends has increased in states where employment opportunities for less-educated workers have fallen the most in recent decades [1]. Areas with lower economic opportunity (operationalized as county-level differences in rates of upward mobility for individuals born into poorer families) tend to have higher mortality and morbidity [49,59,60]. Similarly, an extensive literature has demonstrated associations between rising income inequality and worsening health [61,62] (although other studies have challenged these findings [63]). Socioeconomic gaps in longevity even vary within geographic areas, with gaps growing markedly in some areas (e.g., the South and industrial Midwest) relative to others [4,54]. Metropolitan areas with higher proportions of college-educated individuals, lower unemployment, richer tax bases, and higher social mobility also tend to have narrower income-based gaps in health outcomes [4,64].

Fig 2. Age-adjusted mortality rates for working-age adults (ages 25–64 years) by county of residence per capital income and educational deciles, 1970–2016.

County-level age-adjusted, all-cause mortality rates for adults ages 25–64 years were obtained from the US Centers for Disease Control WONDER database. Data on county-level per-capita incomes and share of individuals with some college education or greater were obtained from US Decennial Census and ACS data made available through Social Explorer. We assigned counties into deciles of the per-capita income and education variations by each census-ACS year (so a given county could be grouped into different deciles in different years). This operationalization is particularly important for level of education, as focusing on fixed educated groups (e.g., high school or less) may result in selection bias [58]. Population-weighted average mortality rates were then calculated for each socioeconomic decile-year. We then plotted these average mortality rates for the bottom (1st), middle (5th), and top (10th) decile of each socioeconomic variable. After the 1980s, the beginning of which is marked by the vertical red lines, income and education disparities began widening. ACS, American Community Survey; WONDER, Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research.

Studies examining the health consequences of specific economic insecurities among low-income and less-educated adults provide still more supporting evidence. Many of these studies have the important advantage of leveraging “natural experiments,” which are research designs that use sudden unanticipated events or shifts in policy to account for unmeasured factors that may bias estimates of the associations between economic outcomes and health [65], allowing researchers to gain more purchase in assessing causal relationships [66] and disentangling age versus period versus cohort-based explanations [67,68]. Recent studies have used policy-driven increases in local exposure to foreign trade to investigate the effects of fading economic opportunities in sectors such as manufacturing, finding large impacts on drug overdose mortality [69,70]. Other studies have demonstrated worsening mental health and increases in overall and drug overdose mortality after manufacturing plant closures [7173]. Falling participation in labor unions has been linked to rising mortality rates from suicide and drug overdose [74]. Structural racism—as manifest by racial gaps in economic opportunity, racial gaps in wealth, racial segregation, and risk of incarceration—have also been negatively associated with a range of health outcomes, particularly for Black Americans [60,7577].

A growing literature has also investigated the mechanisms that plausibly may link worsening economic outcomes to health. Demonstrating that key hypothesized mediators influence health provides even greater confidence that economic changes in the past 40 years have adversely affected health. Several studies have examined the health consequences of increasing precarity: food, housing, and economic insecurity, for example, have been robustly linked to a range of health outcomes, including mortality [7880]. A number of studies have demonstrated negative effects of large economic shocks (e.g., financial hardship during the Great Recession or sudden, unexpected loss of wealth) on physiological stress as measured by cortisol, blood pressure, and blood glucose [46,81], and on premature death [82].

Our review of the evidence thus far has focused primarily on short- and medium-run impacts of economic shifts on the working-age individuals who are directly affected. However, worsening economic conditions may also negatively affect the health of those exposed to these changes early in life, prior to entering the labor market. Young adults entering the US job market during economic downturns are more likely to earn lower lifetime wages, engage in health risk behaviors such as smoking and excessive alcohol use, and, by their late 30s, have higher mortality risk, compared with their counterparts entering the labor market during better times [83,84]. Similarly, income inequality and fading economic opportunities have been linked to risky health behaviors and lower educational investments among adolescents, both of which influence health later in adulthood [85,86]. A large, robust literature has found strong links between exposure to economic insecurity in early childhood and a range of adult health outcomes [8789].

Social and economic policies to address population health challenges

Evidence to date

Existing research highlights a number of social and economic policies that may jointly improve economic and health outcomes. Intervening in infancy and childhood appears to be most effective in achieving these objectives, and consequently, such interventions tend to have the highest social returns on investment [90]. The collective impacts of early investments made to date may explain why socioeconomic gaps in mortality rates for children, adolescents, and young adults have actually narrowed over the same period during which they have widened for working-age adults [91].

Evidence from randomized and natural experiments demonstrates that investments made before the age of 5 can lead to improved economic and health outcomes in adulthood [9294]. Policies that provide early-life access to high-quality preschool and healthcare (e.g., through expansions of the Medicaid program) and reduce early exposure to pollution have also been shown to improve educational attainment, income, and health in adulthood [95100]. Investments made later in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood can also have large impacts on economic and health outcomes. Policies that enable children to grow up in better neighborhoods may be particularly transformative: children under the age of 13 whose families were randomly assigned to receive vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods as part of the US Housing and Urban Development’s Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment in the late 1990s were more likely to attend and complete college and achieve incomes that were over 30% higher, compared with children whose families did not receive vouchers [101]. Researchers strongly agree on the value of increasing access to high-quality education, with reinforcing investments made throughout the K–12 years appearing to have the greatest impact in reducing economic inequality [102]. In an economy where a 4-year college education increasingly demarcates economic success from economic failure, it will be important to ensure access to high-quality colleges and universities [93,94]. The positive long-run health consequences from investing in education—particularly, college education—have been noted in a number of studies [53,84,92,103]. It will also be important to bolster opportunities for those for whom a 4-year college degree may not be a good fit, for example, through increasing access to high-return vocational education [104].

There is comparatively less evidence to inform the deployment of policy interventions aimed at working-age adults to address worsening economic outcomes and population health. Whatever evidence exists, however, suggests that the right approach will likely involve bundling multiple strategies. There is emerging evidence that minimum wage increases and the Earned Income Tax Credit result in fewer deaths from suicide among individuals with lower levels of education [105107]. Policies and programs that assist workers displaced by automation and trade to acquire new skills may also play an important role. More generous unemployment insurance benefits have been found to mitigate the impact of economic downturns on suicide mortality [108] and overall self-reported health [109]. A recent study of the US Trade Adjustment Assistance Program, which aims to retrain workers who lose their jobs in industries affected by foreign trade, demonstrates large positive effects on employment and income [110]. Studies examining the consequences of similar policies in Europe also find important positive health impacts [111]. Recent evidence also suggests that adults moving to better neighborhoods as part of the MTO experiment achieved better health outcomes, despite little change in their economic outcomes [112]. At present, programs that foster geographic mobility and financial support to obtain new skills after job displacement remain relatively small in scope. This early evidence suggests value in scale-up and further testing.

For historically marginalized population groups such as Black Americans, improving health outcomes may additionally require supplementing universal economic and social policies with specific interventions to reduce long-standing, historically patterned barriers to social mobility. Longevity gaps between Black and White Americans persist and closely track with similar gaps in economic opportunity [60]. The positive impacts of Civil Rights–era policies on short- and long-run labor market outcomes and health [113,114] should motivate investment in a broad set of next-generation policies that include reforming law enforcement, the judicial system, and corrections; enhancing access to and affordability of high-quality education; implementing interventions aimed at narrowing the racial wealth gap; and reducing discrimination in labor markets [115118].

It will also be important to invest in social policies that break the link between worsening economic outcomes and worsening health. A growing body of research demonstrates that expansions of state Medicaid programs have both reduced debt-driven economy insecurity among low-income adults and improved health outcomes [119121]. Bolstering other safety net programs—e.g., Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program—and expanding access to federal housing programs can help reduce food and housing insecurity during hard times [122]. These efforts should explicitly address administrative features that may introduce inconveniences and stigma that may discourage participation even in generous social programs [123]. Additionally, there is growing evidence that eviction and foreclosure prevention policies may have an important role to play in severing the link between adverse economic shocks and semipermanent declines in health and well-being [80,124,125].

Future policy frontiers

The size and scope of population health declines among low-income and less-educated working-age adults also call for identifying, developing, and testing new intervention approaches. The threat of continued job displacement from automation has sparked interest in Universal Basic Income (UBI) cash-transfer programs. Early evidence from universal income programs (including ongoing programs in Alaska and the Eastern Cherokee nation) suggest positive impacts on health and educational attainment (without any evidence of the program inducing exit from the labor force) [126]. These findings reinforce earlier work showing how income supplements can improve health and developmental outcomes among children [127,128]. Large experimental evaluations of newly instituted UBI programs across the world are currently underway. Researchers and policymakers have also proposed a number of other novel transfer programs, such as automatic stabilizers to help decouple business cycle fluctuations from one’s economic circumstances [129] and reparation policies to close structurally mediated racial gaps in wealth [130]. It will also be important to consider new labor market interventions. For example, ongoing threats to economic opportunities due to automation could motivate policies that direct investment toward artificial intelligence that complements, rather than replaces, workers [131]. Job guarantee programs, which seek to provide voluntary public-sector work opportunities to those in need, have also been suggested as a potential policy option [132], particularly given positive early evidence from India [133].

Innovations in public health and healthcare systems—specifically those that help buffer population health against threats from adverse economic shocks—should also be explored. For example, there is growing interest in addressing social determinants of health among state Medicaid programs and hospital systems. Specific pilot programs (such as providing housing, community health worker programs, or interventions to increase access to other social programs) have been shown to be effective in this regard [134137], though the evidence base as a whole remains sparse. In addition, heightened screening and surveillance in areas facing economic downturns, empowering healthcare practitioners to identify social drivers of health and refer patients to local resources, and fostering partnerships between community-based organizations and health systems may represent a comprehensive and cohesive action plan to mitigate the negative consequences of worsening economic outcomes [138141]. Implementation and scale-up of these interventions may require redesigning financial incentives in healthcare in ways that direct investment toward addressing socioeconomic determinants of health, e.g., alternative payment models or financial partnerships between healthcare and social sector organizations to address key social issues affecting health and economic outcomes within communities [141,142]. It will also be important to ensure programs implemented by healthcare organizations do not crowd out or replace similar, but higher-return, efforts by other organizations (e.g., public health or housing departments).

Investing in new data and enhancing data access to inform policy

A detailed understanding of how the changing economy has affected population health has been made possible by newly available large administrative databases and innovations in statistical techniques. New insights on the changing relationship between income and health have come from combining data from tax databases with mortality data from Social Security death records [4]. Evidence on the impacts of the US Trade Adjustment Assistance program on the incomes of workers comes from unprecedented linkages between US Census data and program administrative data [110]. Landmark contributions on the impacts of environmental policies on health and economic outcomes result from combining individual- and firm-level employment and wage data collected by states with detailed local-area data on air pollution [98]. Researchers studying the impacts of specific social and economic policies on a range of health outcomes have creatively combined hand-collected information on the timing of policy adoption with data on health outcomes from publicly available data from long-standing surveys, such as the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study and National Health Interview Survey, or vital statistics data [72,86,106,143].

Although many of these novel datasets have been gathered or built by individual research groups, there is an increasing trend toward data sharing, further catalyzing research on the economic determinants of health. For example, researchers releasing deidentified, aggregate versions of their tax-record data have enabled other scholars to identify new insights on the relationship between economic opportunity and health [50,64,144,145]. The growth of federally and privately funded “data aggregators” (e.g., the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series [IPUMS] or Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [ICPSR]) has also been important for researchers studying the economy and health. Data aggregators serve a variety of functions, including enabling easy access to cleaned and harmonized census, health, and economic survey data; collating and disseminating data used in other academic papers; and collecting vetted information on policy implementation across a variety of domains. State and federal government databases are becoming increasingly more complete and easier to access through public-facing web portals, with prime examples being the US Centers for Disease Control Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database for vital statistics and the US Bureau of Labor Statistics databases for unemployment and income data.

Despite these encouraging trends, researchers and policymakers still face significant challenges obtaining the data needed to best inform policymaking. Large, annual sample surveys primarily collect detailed information on health outcomes or economic outcomes, but not both, making it difficult to study the nuances of how economic trends shape various dimensions of health in different populations. Linking large-scale, individual-level federal economic datasets to health datasets such as death records or medical claims remains a costly, time-consuming process for most researchers. As a result, researchers studying the health consequences of adverse economic trends have had to rely on aggregate data, which are prone to their own biases (e.g., researchers cannot reliably account for nonrandom migration) and make it difficult to study heterogeneity across population groups. Moreover, most of these data are released from 1–2 years after collection, making it difficult to provide real-time information on key questions of interest.

The increasing availability of proprietary private data sources and high-frequency, crowd-sourced data has helped address some, but unfortunately not all, of these constraints. Consequently, new policies to increase access to existing large-scale administrative and survey data are needed to maximize our understanding of what policies are most effective in addressing the twin challenges of worsening economic outcomes and population health in the US. Steps to reduce administrative and financial barriers to accessing and linking state and federal data resources will be critical. In this respect, state and federal agencies could follow the lead of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), who recently made data linkages with the death registration system free for NIH-supported researchers, streamlined the process to apply for these data and increased the frequency at which these data were updated. Insights from the development and management of wide-ranging linked registries, such as those in Sweden or Denmark, could also provide a useful model. Agencies can also consider making some currently restricted-access data (e.g., vital statistics for counties with small numbers of births or deaths) public by adopting newly developed techniques to add noise to these measures in a manner that reduces loss of privacy while maintaining statistical fidelity [146].

Evidence-based policy and politics

The full potential of data-driven policymaking to improve economic and health outcomes cannot be realized without buy-in from policymakers. There needs to be consensus and political will among policymakers around investing in data and acting on evidence. Translating evidence into policy will require a detailed understanding of the political considerations, policymaker values, and decision-making processes that influence policy adoption [147,148]. Evidence may be valued differently by different actors and in different circumstances [149151]. Wherever it is possible to do so, collaboration between researchers and policymakers to incorporate data collection efforts and rigorous evaluation designs as part of the policy implementation process [151,152] will be important to help build consensus around the value of data and evidence-based policymaking.

In addition, it will be important to elucidate the complex feedback loops between health, economic outcomes, and voting patterns that will ultimately dictate which policies are adopted [147]. Exposure to international trade, which has been tied to worse economic outcomes and deteriorating health among working class individuals [15,70], has led to increased support for presidential candidates whose policy agendas have often run counter to emerging evidence on how to improve economic well-being and population health [153]. These dynamics were particularly salient in the 2016 presidential election, in which areas with worsening health outcomes saw increased support for Donald Trump [154,155], a candidate who campaigned, for example, on deconstructing the Affordable Care Act and reducing environmental regulation. On the other hand, expansion of the Medicaid program, which has shown to improve both health and economic outcomes among low-income US residents [99,119,120], was associated with increased support for the program [156] and greater voter turnout [157]. Incorporating the study of such “political feedback loops” into analyses of the effects of social and economic policies will thus be important to fully elucidate their long-run economic and health consequences.


Population health in the US stands at a critical juncture. Growing evidence suggests that fading economic opportunities and rising economic insecurity have played an important role in the deteriorating health outcomes and rising mortality rates experienced by working-age individuals. These trends may be further exacerbated by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, whose adverse economic consequences—and wide-ranging direct and indirect negative effects on a variety of health outcomes—are expected to most heavily affect low-income individuals. Despite these troubling trends, there are reasons for optimism. New data have enabled researchers and policymakers to better delineate emerging population health challenges and identify policies that can reduce growing health and economic inequality. Further investments in new data and ensuring better access to, and linkages between, existing databases will be necessary to fully realize the potential of evidence-based social and economic policy. However, data alone will not be sufficient. Policymaker consensus around the value of data—and the political will to act on it—will be critical for translating evidence into improvements in population health.


  1. 1. Woolf SH, Schoomaker H. Life expectancy and mortality in the United States, 1959–2017. JAMA. 2019;322(20):1996–2016. pmid:31769830
  2. 2. Bor J, Cohen G, Galea S. Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1475–940. pmid:28402829
  3. 3. Case A, Deaton A. Mortality and morbidity in the 21st Century. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2017;Spring:397–443.
  4. 4. Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, Lin S, Scuderi B, Turner N, et al. The association between income and life expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. JAMA. 2016;315(16):1750–66. pmid:27063997
  5. 5. Donovan SA, Bradley DH. Real Wage Trends, 1979–2018. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service; 2019.
  6. 6. Davis J, Mazumdar B. The decline in intergenerational mobility after 1980. Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality; 2020.
  7. 7. Aaronson D, Mazumdar B. Intergenerational economic mobility in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Human Resources. 2008;43(1):139–72.
  8. 8. Chetty R, Grusky D, Hell M, Hendren N, Manduca R, Narang J. The fading American dream: trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science. 2017. pmid:28438988
  9. 9. Western B, Bloome D, Sosnaud B, Tach L. Economic insecurity and social stratification. Annual Review of Sociology. 2012;38:341–59.
  10. 10. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press; 2014.
  11. 11. Autor D, Katz LF, Kearney MS. Trends in U.S. wage inequality: revising the revisionists. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2008;90(2):300–23.
  12. 12. Autor D, Dorn D. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review. 2013;103(5):1553–397.
  13. 13. Pierce JR, Schott PK. The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. American Economic Review. 2016;106(7):1632–62.
  14. 14. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy. 2020;120(6):2188–244.
  15. 15. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G. The China shock: learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics. 2016;8:205–40.
  16. 16. Dill J, Hodges MJ. Is healthcare the new manufacturing?: industry, gender, and “good jobs” for low- and middle-skill workers. Social Science Research. 2019;84:e102350.
  17. 17. Himmelstein KEW, Venkataramani AS. Economic vulnerability among US female health care workers: potential impact of a $15-per-hour minimum wage. American Journal of Public Health. 2019;109(2):198–205. pmid:30571300
  18. 18. Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, Zipperer B. The effect of minimum wage on low-wage jobs. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2019;134(3):1405–54.
  19. 19. Dube A. Minimum wages and the distribution of family incomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2019;11(4):268–304.
  20. 20. Davis GF, Kim S. Financialization of the economy. Annual Review of Sociology. 2015;41:203–21.
  21. 21. Wolff EN. Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962 to 2016: has middle class wealth recovered? NBER Working Paper No 24085. 2017.
  22. 22. Western B, Rosenfeld J. Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. American Sociological Review. 2011;76(4):513–37.
  23. 23. Farber HS, Herbst D, Kuziemko I, Naidu S. Unions and inequality over the twentieth century: new evidence from survey data. NBER Working paper No 24587. 2018.
  24. 24. Small ML, Pager D. Sociological perspectives on racial discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020;34(2):49–67.
  25. 25. Bayer P, Charles KK. Divergent paths: a new perspective on earnings differences between Black and White men since 1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2018;133(3):1459–501.
  26. 26. Western B, Pettit B. Incarceration and social inequality. Daedalus. 2010;(Summer):8–19. pmid:21032946
  27. 27. Wilson WJ. When Work Disappears: The New World of the Urban Poor. Alfred A Knopf; 1996.
  28. 28. Boustan L. Was postwar suburbanization “White flight”? Evidence from the Black migration. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2010;125(1):417–43.
  29. 29. Cutler D, Glaeser E, Vigdor J. The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy. 1999;107(3):455–506.
  30. 30. Aaronson D, Hartley D, Mazumdar B. The effects of the 1930s HOLC “redlining” maps. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper. 2019 [cited 2020 May 15]. Available from:
  31. 31. Boustan L. Racial residential segregation in American cities. In: Brooks N, Donaghy K, Knapp G-J, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Economics and Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 318–39.
  32. 32. Rugh JS, Massey DS. Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. American Sociological Review. 2010;75(5):629–51. pmid:25308973
  33. 33. Ananat EO. The wrong side(s) of the tracks: the causal effects of racial segregation on urban poverty and inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2011;3(2):34–66.
  34. 34. Edin K, Shaefer HL. $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America. New York: Houghton Miffin Harcourt; 2015.
  35. 35. Floyd I. Cash Assistance Should Reach Millions More Families. Washington, D.C.: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities; 2020.
  36. 36. Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2014;35:229–53. pmid:24641559
  37. 37. Whittle H, Leddy AM, Shieh J, TIen PC, Ofotokun I, Adimora AA, et al. Precarity and health: theorizing the intersection of multiple material-need insecurities, stigma, and illness among women in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2020;245:e112683.
  38. 38. Bhattacharya J, DeLeire T, Haider S, Currie J. Heat or eat? Cold-weather shocks and nutrition in poor American families. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(7):1149–54. pmid:12835201
  39. 39. McKee M, Reeves A, Clair A, Stuckler D. Living on the edge: precariousness and why it matters for public health. Archives of Public Health. 2017;75(1):13.
  40. 40. Adler NE, Rehkoph DH. U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annual Review of Public Health. 2008;29:235–52. pmid:18031225
  41. 41. Khullar D, Chokshi DA. Health, income, and poverty: where we are and what could help? Health Affairs Health Policy Brief [Internet]. 2018.
  42. 42. Marmot M. The Health Gap. London: Bloomsbury; 2015.
  43. 43. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts JT. Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2009;34:405–30.
  44. 44. Banzhaf S, Ma L, Timmins C. Environmental justice: the economics of race, place, and pollution. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2019;33(1):185–208. pmid:30707005
  45. 45. Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Affairs. 2002;21(2):60–76. pmid:11900187
  46. 46. Boen C, Yang YC. The physiological impacts of wealth shocks in late life: evidence from the Great Recession. Social Science and Medicine. 2016;150:221–30. pmid:26773705
  47. 47. Browman AS, Destin M, Kearney M, Levine P. How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behavior in disadvantaged youth. Nature Human Behavior. 2019;3(3):214–20.
  48. 48. Browman AS, Destin M, Carswell K, Svoboda RC. Perceptions of social mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2017;72:45–52.
  49. 49. Venkataramani AS, Brigell R, O'Brien R, Chatterjee P, Kawachi I, Tsai AC. Economic opportunity, health behaviours, and health outcomes in the USA: a population-based cross-sectional study. The Lancet Public Health. 2016;1(1):e18–e25. pmid:29253376
  50. 50. Venkataramani AS, Chatterjee P, Kawachi I, Tsai AC. Economic opportunity, health behaviors, and mortality in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 2016;106(3):478–84. pmid:26691108
  51. 51. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. Scarcity: The New Science of Having Less and How it Defines Our Lives. New York, NY: Henry Holt; 2013.
  52. 52. Schilbach F, Schofield H, Mullainathan S. The psychological lives of the poor. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. 2016;106(5):435–40.
  53. 53. Hummer RA, Hernandez EM. The effect fo educational attainment on adult mortality in the United States. Population Bulletin. 2013;68(1):1–16. pmid:25995521
  54. 54. Karas Montez J, Zajacova A, Hayward M, Woolf SH, Chapman D, Beckfield J. Educational disparities in adult mortality across US states: how do they differ, and have they changed since the mid-1980s? Demography. 2019;56(2):621–44. pmid:30607779
  55. 55. Meara ER, Richards S, Cutler DM. The gaps gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000. Health Affairs. 2008;27(2):350–60. pmid:18332489
  56. 56. Montez JK, Hummer RA, Hayward MD. Educational attainment and adult mortality in the United States: a systematic analysis of functional form. 49. 2012;1(315–336). pmid:22246797
  57. 57. Novosad P, Rafkin C. Mortality change among less educated Americans. Mimeo, Dartmouth University; 2018.
  58. 58. Dowd JB, Hamoudi A. Is life expectancy really falling for groups of low-socioeconomic status? Lagged selection bias and artefactual trends in mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;43(4):2014.
  59. 59. O'Brien R, Venkataramani AS, Tsai AC. Economic opportunity and mortality among U.S. middle aged Whites. Epidemiology. 2017;28(2):e12–e3. pmid:27787290
  60. 60. O’Brien R, Neman T, Seltzer N, Evans L, Venkataramani AS. Structural racism, economic opportunity, and racial health disparities: evidence from U.S. counties. SSM—Population Health. 2020;11:e100564.
  61. 61. Wilkinson RG, Pickett K. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane; 2009.
  62. 62. Kawachi I, Subramanian S. Income inequality. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, Glymour M, editors. Social Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 126–52. pmid:24240651
  63. 63. Lynch J. Income inequality and health: expanding the debate. Social science & medicine. 2000;51(7):1001–5; discussion 9–10. Epub 2000/09/27. pmid:11005387.
  64. 64. Venkataramani AS, Daza S, Emanuel E. Association of social mobility with the income-related longevity gap in the United States: a cross-sectional, county-level study. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020.
  65. 65. Fuchs VR. Social determinants of health: caveats and nuances. JAMA. 2017;317(1):25–6. pmid:28030707
  66. 66. Angrist J, Pischke J-S. Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2015.
  67. 67. Reynolds N. The broad decline in health and human capital of Americans born after 1947. Mimeo, Brown University; 2019.
  68. 68. Huang X, Keyes K, Li G. Increasing prescription opioid and heroin overdose mortality in the United States, 1999–2014: an age-period-cohort analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 2017;108(1):131–6. pmid:29161066
  69. 69. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G. When work disappears: manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of men. American Economic Review: Insights. 2019;1(2):161–78.
  70. 70. Pierce JR, Schott PK. Trade liberalization and mortality: evidence from U.S. counties. American Economic Review: Insights. 2020;2(1):47–64.
  71. 71. Sullivan D, von Wachter TM. Job displacement and mortality: an analysis using administrative data. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2009;124(3):1265–306.
  72. 72. Venkataramani AS, Bair EF, O’Brien R, Tsai AC. Association between automotive assembly plant closures and opioid overdose mortality in the United States: a difference-in-differences analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020;180(2):1–9.
  73. 73. Elser H, Ben-Michael E, Rehkoph DH, Modrek S, Eisen EA, Cullen MR. Layoffs and the mental health and safety of remaining workers: a difference-in-differences analysis of the US aluminum industry. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2019;73:1094–100. pmid:31533963
  74. 74. Eisenberg-Guyot J, Mooney SJ, Hagopian A, Barrington WE, Hajat A. Solidarity and disparity: Declining labor union density and changing racial and educational mortality inequities in the United States. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2019 [cited 2020 June 6]. Available from:
  75. 75. Bailey Z, Krieger N, Agenor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequity in the USA: evidence and interventions. The Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–63.
  76. 76. Wildeman C, Wang E. Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA. The Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1464–74.
  77. 77. Boen C, Keister L, Aronson B. Beyond net worth: racial differences in wealth portfolios and Black-White health inequality across the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2020;6(2):153–69.
  78. 78. Bradford A, Bradford W. The effect of evictions on accidental drug and alcohol mortality. Health Services Research. 2020;55:9–17.
  79. 79. Seligman HK, Berkowitz SA. Aligning programs and policies to support food security and public health goals in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health. 2019;40:319–37. pmid:30444684
  80. 80. Tsai AC. Home foreclosure, health, and mental health: a systematic review of individual, aggregate, and contextual associations. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123182. pmid:25849962
  81. 81. Seeman T, Thomas D, Merkin SS, Moore K, Watson K, Karlamangla A. The Great Recession worsened blood pressure and blood glucose levels in American adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(13):3296–301.
  82. 82. Pool L, Burgard S, Needham B, Elliott M, Langa K, Mendes de Leon C. Association of a negative wealth shock with all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older adults in the United States. JAMA. 2018;319(13):1341–50. pmid:29614178
  83. 83. Schwandt H, von Wachter TM. Socioeconomic decline and health: midlife impacts of graduating in a recession. NBER Working Paper No 26638. 2020.
  84. 84. Cutler D, Huang W, Lleras-Muney A. When does education matter? The protective effect of education for cohorts graduating in bad times. Social Science and Medicine. 2015;127:63–73. pmid:25113567
  85. 85. Ananat EO, Gassman-Pines A, Francis DV, Gibson-Davis CM. Linking job loss, inequality, mental health, and education. Science. 2017;356(6343):1127–8. pmid:28619903
  86. 86. Venkataramani AS, Cook E, O’Brien R, Kawachi I, Jena AB, Tsai AC. College affirmative action bans and smoking and alcohol use among underrepresented minority adolescents in the United States: a difference-in-differences study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(6):e1002821. pmid:31211777
  87. 87. Almond D, Currie J, Duque V. Childhood circumstances and adult outcomes: act II. Journal of Economic Literature. 2018;56(4):1360–446.
  88. 88. Case A, Fertig A, Paxson C. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. Journal of Health Economics. 2005;24(2):365–89. pmid:15721050
  89. 89. Duncan GJ, Menestrel SL, editors. A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty: A Consensus Study Report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2019.
  90. 90. Hendren N, Sprung-Keyser B. A unified welfare analysis of government policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2020;135(3).
  91. 91. Currie J, Schwandt H. Mortality inequality: the good news from a county-level approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2016;30(2):29–52. pmid:27917023
  92. 92. Buckles K, Hageman A, Malamud O, Morrill M, Wozniak A. The effects of college education on mortality. Journal of Health Economics. 2016;50:99–114. pmid:27723470
  93. 93. Chetty R, Friedman JN, Saez E, Turner N, Yagan D. Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility. Mimeo, Stanford University; 2017.
  94. 94. Katz LF, Goldin C. The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2008.
  95. 95. Campbell F, Conti G, Heckman J, Moon S, Pinto R, Pungello E, et al. Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science. 2014;343(6178):1478–85. pmid:24675955
  96. 96. Almond D, Currie J, Duque V. Childhood circumstances and adult outcomes: act II. Journal of Economic Literature. 2019;56(4):1360–446.
  97. 97. Heckman J, Pinto R, Savelyev P. Understanding the Mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review. 2013;103(6):2052–86. pmid:24634518
  98. 98. Isen A, Rossin-Slater M, Walker WR. Every breath you take—every dollar you’ll make: the long-term consequences of the Clean Air Act of 1970. Journal of Political Economy. 2017;125(3):848–902.
  99. 99. Miller S, Wherry LR. The long-term effects of early life Medicaid coverage. Journal of Human Resources. Forthcoming 2018.
  100. 100. O’Brien R, Robertson CL. Early-life Medicaid coverage and intergenerational economic mobility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2018;59(2):300–15. pmid:29672187
  101. 101. Chetty R, Nathaniel H, Katz LF. The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Project. American Economic Review. 2016;106(4):855–902. pmid:29546974
  102. 102. Johnson RC, Jackson CK. Reducing inequality through dynamic complementarity: evidence from Head Start and public school spending. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2019;11(4):310–49.
  103. 103. Frisvold D, Golberstein E. School quality and the education-health relationship: evidence from blacks in segregated schools. Journal of Health Economics. 2011;30(6):1232–45. pmid:21893357
  104. 104. Aizenman J, Jinjarak Y, Ngo N, Noy I. Vocational, education, manufacturing, and income distribution: international evidence and case studies. Open Economics Review. 2018;29:641–64.
  105. 105. Kaufman JA, Salas-Hernandez L, Komro KA, Livingston MD. Effects of increased minimum wages by unemployment rate on suicide in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2020. pmid:31911542
  106. 106. Dow WH, Godoy A, Lowenstein CA, Reich M. Can economic policies reduce deaths of despair? NBER Working Paper No 25787. 2019.
  107. 107. Gertner AK, Rotter JS, Shafer PR. Association between state minimum wages and suicide rates in the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019;56(5):648–54. pmid:30905484
  108. 108. Cylus J, Glymour MM, Avendano M. Do generous unemployment benefit programs reduce suicide rates? A state-fixed effect analysis covering 1968–2008. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2014;180(1):45–52. pmid:24939978
  109. 109. Kuka E. Quantifying the benefits of social insurance: unemployment insurance and health. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2020;102(3):490–505.
  110. 110. Hyman B. Can displaced labor be retrained? Evidence from quasi-random assignment to trade adjustment assistance. Mimeo, University of Chicago; 2018.
  111. 111. Coutts AP, Stuckler D, Cann DJ. The health and wellbeing effects of active labor market programs. In: Huppert FA, Cooper CL, editors. Interventions and Policies to Enhance Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide. Vol VI. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  112. 112. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, et al. Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes—a randomized social experiment. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365:1509–19. pmid:22010917
  113. 113. Donohue JJ, Heckman J. Continuous versus episodic change: the impact of Civil Rights policy on the economic status of blacks. Journal of Economic Literature. 1991;29(4):1603–43.
  114. 114. Chay KY, Guryan J, Mazumdar B. Birth cohort and the Black-White achievement gap: The roles of health soon after birth. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago—Working Paper, No 2008–20. 2009.
  115. 115. Pager D. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration. Chigago: University of Chicago Press; 2007.
  116. 116. Pager D, Shepherd H. The sociology of discrimination: racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology. 2008;34:181–209. pmid:20689680
  117. 117. Chetty R, Hendren N, Jones MR, Porter SR. Race and economic opportunity in the United States: an intergenerational perspective. NBER Working Paper No 24441. 2018.
  118. 118. Johnson RC. Long-run impacts of school desegregation and school quality on adult attainments. NBER Working Paper No 16664. 2015.
  119. 119. Miller S, Altekruse S, Johnson N, Wherry LR. Medicaid and mortality: new evidence from linked survey and administrative data. NBER Working Paper No 26081. 2019.
  120. 120. Hu L, Kaestner R, Mazumder B, Miller S, Wong A. The effect of Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansions on financial well-being. Journal of Public Economics. 2018;163:99–112. pmid:30393411
  121. 121. Sommers BD, Gawande AA, Baicker K. Health insurance coverage and health—what the recent evidence tells us. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:586–93. pmid:28636831
  122. 122. Bitler M, Hoynes H. The more things change, the more they stay they same? The safety net and poverty in the Great Recession. Journal of Labor Economics. 2016;34(S1):S403–S44.
  123. 123. Herd P, Moynihan DP. Adminstrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2019.
  124. 124. Bradford A, Bradford W. The Effect of Evictions on Accidental Drug and Alcohol Mortality. Health Services Research. 2020;55:9–17. pmid:31889303
  125. 125. Desmond M, Bell M. Housing, poverty, and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2015;11:15–35.
  126. 126. Marinescu I. No Strings Attached: The Behavioral Effects of U.S. Unconditonal Cash Transfer Programs. New York: Roosevelt Institute; 2017.
  127. 127. Akee RKQ, Copeland WE, Keeler G, Angold A, Costello EJ. Parents’ incomes and children’s outcomes: a quasi-experiment using transfer payments from casino profits. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010;2(1):86–115. pmid:20582231
  128. 128. Costello EJ, Compton S, Keeler G, Angold A. Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2023–9. pmid:14559956
  129. 129. Dolls M, Fuest C, Peichl A. Automatic stabilizers and the economic crisis: US vs. Europe. Journal of Public Economics. 2012;96(3–4):279–94.
  130. 130. Darity WA, Mullen K. From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2020.
  131. 131. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labor demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 6]. Available from:
  132. 132. Tcherneva P. The Case for a Job Guarantee. Cambridge, UK: Polity; 2020.
  133. 133. Imbert C, Papp J. Labor market effects of social programs: evidence from India’s employment guarantee. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2015;7(2):233–63.
  134. 134. Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, Huo H, Smith RA, Long JA. Community health worker support for disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic diseases: a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Public Health. 2017;107(10):1660–7. pmid:28817334
  135. 135. Black S, Sisco S, WIlliams T, Brathwaite M, Bhandarker K, Chokshi DA, et al. Return on investments from co-locating tax assistance for low-income persons at clinical sites. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1093–5. pmid:32181840
  136. 136. Sadowski LS, Kee RA, VanderWeele TJ, Buchanan D. Effect of a housing and case management program on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among chronically ill homeless adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301(17):1771–8. pmid:19417194
  137. 137. Berkowitz SA, Delahanty L, Terranova J, Steiner B, Ruazol M, Singh R, et al. Medically tailored meal delivery for diabetes patients with food insecurity: a randomized cross-over trial. 34. 2019;3(396–404).
  138. 138. Auerbach J, Miller B. Deaths of despair and building a national resilence strategy. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2018;24(4):297–300. pmid:29787503
  139. 139. Singh P. Dying and Living in the Neighborhood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.
  140. 140. Alley DE, Asomugha CN, Conway PH, Sanghavi DM. Accountable Health Communities—addressing social needs through Medicare and Medicaid. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374:8–11. pmid:26731305
  141. 141. Khullar D, Chokshi DA. Moving action on place-based health. JAMA Forum [Internet]. 2019 Dec 12 [cited 2020 Jun 6]. Available from:
  142. 142. Joynt Maddox K. Financial incentives and vulnerable populations—will alternative payment models help or hurt? New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(11):977–9. pmid:29539282
  143. 143. Bitler M, Hoynes H. Welfare reform and indirect impacts on health. In: Schoeni R, House J, Kaplan G, Pollack H, editors. Making Americans Healthier: Social and Economic Policy as Health Policy. New York: Russell Sage; 2008.
  144. 144. Chetty R, Hendren N, Kline P, Saez E. Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2014;129(4):1553–623.
  145. 145. Chetty R, Cutler D, Stepner M. Effects of local health interventions on inequality in life expectancy: new publicly available data. American Journal of Public Health. 2016;106(12):2154–5. pmid:27736211
  146. 146. Chetty R, Friedman JN. A practical method to reduce privacy loss when disclosing statistics based on small samples. NBER Working Paper No 25626. 2019.
  147. 147. Dawes DE. The Political Determinants of Health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2020.
  148. 148. Lynch J. Regimes of Inequality: The Political Economy of Health and Wealth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
  149. 149. Hjort J, Moreira D, Rao G, Santini JF. How research affects policy: experimental evidence from 2,150 municipalities. NBER working Paper No 25941. 2019.
  150. 150. Basu S, Carney MA, Kenworthy NJ. Ten years after the financial crisis: the long reach of austerity and its global impacts on health. Social Science and Medicine. 2017;187:203–7. pmid:28666546
  151. 151. Venkataramani AS, Underhill K, Volpp KG. Moving toward evidence-based policy: the value of randomization for program and policy implementation. JAMA. 2020;323(1):21–2.
  152. 152. Dulfo E. Field experiments and the practice of policy. American Economic Review. 2020;110(7):1952–73.
  153. 153. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. American Economic Review. Available from: [cited 2020 Jul 8].
  154. 154. Bor J. Diverging life expectancies and voting patterns in the 2016 US presidential election. American Journal of Public Health. 2017;107(10):1560–2. pmid:28817322
  155. 155. Monnat S, Brown DL. More than a rural revolt: landscapes of despair and the 2016 Presidential election. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017;55:227–36. pmid:29269990
  156. 156. Hopkins DJ, Parish K. The Medicaid expansion and attitudes towards the affordable care act: testing for a policy feedback on mass opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2019;83(1):123–34.
  157. 157. Baicker K, Finkelstein A. The impact of Medicaid expansion on voter participation: evidence from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 2019;44:383–400.