Citation: Holtz TH (2007) XDR-TB in South Africa: Revised Definition. PLoS Med 4(4): e161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040161
Published: April 24, 2007
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
Funding: The author received no specific funding for this article.
Competing interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
The authors should be commended for a thoughtful and stimulating article . However, we wish to clarify the historical record about the use of the term XDR-TB. The concept of XDR-TB as a distinct nosological entity was first developed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in March 2005 and introduced into public use in October 2005 at the 36th World Conference on Lung Health in Paris [2,3]. At that meeting, data on second-line drug resistance from a global survey of supranational TB reference laboratories conducted by CDC and the World Health Organization, as well as treatment outcomes of XDR-TB patients in Latvia, were first presented. Shortly thereafter, the cluster of TB deaths with resistance to second-line drugs in HIV-infected persons in KwaZulu-Natal was presented at the 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Denver in February 2006 . The original definition for XDR-TB published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report in March 2006  that they have used, however, was revised in October 2006 at an emergency meeting of the Global XDR-TB Task Force. The revised definition was published on November 3, 2006 in an MMWR notice to readers . Currently, XDR-TB is defined as the occurrence of TB in persons whose Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates are resistant to isoniazid and rifampin plus any fluoroquinolone and at least one of the three injectable second-line drugs (amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin). The definition was revised because drug susceptibility testing to these drugs produces reliable and reproducible results, and is more accessible in resource-limited settings. In addition, patients meeting the revised definition have significantly poorer treatment outcomes. The new definition is important for those intending to conduct surveillance for XDR-TB in their setting.
- 1. Singh JA, Upshur R, Padayatchi N (2007) XDR-TB in South Africa: No time for denial or complacency. PLoS Med 4: e50.
- 2. Shah NS, Wright A, Drobniewski F, et al. (2005) Extreme drug resistance in tuberculosis (XDR-TB): Global survey of supranational reference laboratories for Mycobacterium tuberculosis with resistance to second-line drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9(Suppl 1): S77.
- 3. Holtz TH, Riektsina V, Zarovska E, Laserson KF, Wells CD, et al. (2005) XDR-TB: Extreme drug-resistance and treatment outcome under DOTS-Plus, Latvia, 2000–2002. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 9(Suppl 1): S258.
- 4. Moll A, Gandhi NR, Pawinski R, Andrews J, Zeller K, et al. (2006) Identification of a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis cluster as a cause of death among HIV coinfected patients in rural South Africa. 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 7 February 2006; Denver, Colorado, United States of America. Poster O-115.
- 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2006) Emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs—Worldwide, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55: 301–305.
- 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2006) Notice to readers: Revised definition of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55: 1176.