Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Antenatal magnesium sulphate and adverse neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Emily Shepherd ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    emily.shepherd@adelaide.edu.au

    Affiliations Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

  • Rehana A. Salam,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

  • Deepak Manhas,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Anne Synnes,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Philippa Middleton,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

  • Maria Makrides,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

  • Caroline A. Crowther

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Antenatal magnesium sulphate and adverse neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Emily Shepherd, 
  • Rehana A. Salam, 
  • Deepak Manhas, 
  • Anne Synnes, 
  • Philippa Middleton, 
  • Maria Makrides, 
  • Caroline A. Crowther
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

There is widespread, increasing use of magnesium sulphate in obstetric practice for pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and preterm fetal neuroprotection; benefit for preventing preterm labour and birth (tocolysis) is unproven. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether antenatal magnesium sulphate is associated with unintended adverse neonatal outcomes.

Methods and findings

CINAHL, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE, Embase, TOXLINE, and Web of Science, were searched (inceptions to 3 September 2019). Randomised, quasi-randomised, and non-randomised trials, cohort and case–control studies, and case reports assessing antenatal magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, fetal neuroprotection, or tocolysis, compared with placebo/no treatment or a different magnesium sulphate regimen, were included. The primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included pre-specified and non-pre-specified adverse neonatal outcomes. Two reviewers screened 5,890 articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias following Cochrane Handbook and RTI Item Bank guidance. For randomised trials, pooled risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis. Non-randomised data were tabulated and narratively summarised. We included 197 studies (40 randomised trials, 138 non-randomised studies, and 19 case reports), of mixed quality. The 40 trials (randomising 19,265 women and their babies) were conducted from 1987 to 2018 across high- (16 trials) and low/middle-income countries (23 trials) (1 mixed). Indications included pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (24 trials), fetal neuroprotection (7 trials), and tocolysis (9 trials); 18 trials compared magnesium sulphate with placebo/no treatment, and 22 compared different regimens. For perinatal death, no clear difference in randomised trials was observed between magnesium sulphate and placebo/no treatment (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10; 8 trials, 13,654 babies), nor between regimens. Eleven of 138 non-randomised studies reported on perinatal death. Only 1 cohort (127 babies; moderate to high risk of bias) observed an increased risk of perinatal death with >48 versus ≤48 grams magnesium sulphate exposure for tocolysis. No clear secondary adverse neonatal outcomes were observed in randomised trials, and a very limited number of possible adverse outcomes warranting further consideration were identified in non-randomised studies. Where non-randomised studies observed possible harms, often no or few confounders were controlled for (moderate to high risk of bias), samples were small (200 babies or fewer), and/or results were from subgroup analyses. Limitations include missing data for important outcomes across most studies, heterogeneity of included studies, and inclusion of published data only.

Conclusions

Our findings do not support clear associations between antenatal magnesium sulphate for beneficial indications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Further large, high-quality studies (prospective cohorts or individual participant data meta-analyses) assessing specific outcomes, or the impact of regimen, pregnancy, or birth characteristics on these outcomes, would further inform safety recommendations. PROSPERO: CRD42013004451.

Author summary

Why was this study done?

  • Magnesium sulphate is widely used in pregnancy, considered effective for maternal neuroprotection in pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and for fetal neuroprotection (cerebral palsy prevention) in women at risk of preterm birth, and ineffective for preventing preterm birth or labour (tocolysis).
  • It is important to understand whether this treatment, when given to women in pregnancy, is associated with any unintended adverse outcomes for babies.

What did the researchers do and find?

  • This systematic review incorporates the findings of 197 studies (including 40 randomised controlled trials) that reported on adverse outcomes for babies whose mothers were treated with magnesium sulphate in pregnancy.
  • Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials showed no clear difference in the risk of perinatal death between babies whose mothers were treated with magnesium sulphate and those whose mothers received placebo/no treatment, or between different magnesium sulphate regimens.
  • No clear adverse outcomes for babies were observed in randomised trials, and a very limited number of possible adverse outcomes warranting further consideration were identified in non-randomised studies.

What do these findings mean?

  • Magnesium sulphate in pregnancy, when given for the beneficial indications of maternal or fetal neuroprotection, is not associated with an increased risk of perinatal death or other adverse outcomes for babies.
  • Further investigation into specific adverse outcomes, and the impact of particular treatment regimen, pregnancy, and/or birth characteristics, would further inform safety recommendations.

Introduction

Antenatal magnesium sulphate is commonly used in obstetric practice. Systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines support its use when given for maternal neuroprotection in pre-eclampsia or eclampsia [13] and for neuroprotection of the fetus in women at risk of preterm birth (for cerebral palsy prevention) [47]. Despite continued use in some countries [8], available evidence does not support its role in preventing preterm birth in women with, or following, threatened preterm labour (for tocolysis) [7,9].

Concerns surrounding possible unintended adverse outcomes for fetuses or neonates following exposure to antenatal magnesium sulphate emerged over 50 years ago [10,11], and uncertainty persists today. While the clinical consequences of hypermagnesemia, related to increased serum concentrations, are well known and documented (such as lethargy, drowsiness, flushing, nausea, vomiting, muscle weakness, loss of deep tendon reflexes, hypotension, apnoea, coma, cardiac arrest, and, ultimately, death [12]), whether neonates are at risk of such adverse outcomes following exposure to antenatal magnesium sulphate is unclear.

We have systematically reviewed the maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens [13], and a further systematic review has summarised the effects specifically on fetal heart rate [14]. To our knowledge, a broad evaluation of evidence surrounding potential unintended neonatal adverse outcomes, informed by current guidance [1517], has not previously been conducted. Implementation of this treatment may be strengthened, and its safety improved, if guidelines and recommendations for practice can be based on such knowledge.

The aim of our study, therefore, was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to assess whether antenatal magnesium sulphate is associated with perinatal death and other unintended adverse neonatal outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline; the relevant checklist is provided in S1 PRISMA Checklist. Prior to conduct, this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42013004451) [18]. The Australian Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation–funded review protocol is available in S1 Text. Ethical approval was not required.

Search strategy

Comprehensive searches of the bibliographic databases CINAHL, Cochrane Library, LILACS, MEDLINE, Embase, TOXLINE, and Web of Science were undertaken from their respective inceptions to 3 September 2019, using combinations of MeSH and free text terms. The search strategies are available in S2 Text. No date or language restrictions were applied; however, because of logistical constraints, for non-English papers, only those with an available English abstract or full-text translation were retrieved. The reference lists of eligible articles were checked for additional reports.

Inclusion criteria

We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials as well as non-randomised controlled studies (non-randomised trials, cohort studies, and case–control studies), and case reports. We excluded cross-sectional studies and case series. We included studies available as abstracts only, along with full-text publications.

We included neonates who were exposed to antenatal magnesium sulphate, regardless of their gestational age at exposure or birth. We included studies where antenatal magnesium sulphate was given for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, for neuroprotection of the fetus, or for tocolysis. We excluded studies where magnesium sulphate was given as an adjuvant during obstetric anaesthesia. We included intervention studies in which magnesium sulphate was compared with no treatment, placebo, or a different magnesium sulphate regimen. We included observational studies where magnesium sulphate was assessed as an ‘exposure’. We excluded studies where magnesium sulphate was compared with another therapy (for example, diazepam for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, or nifedipine for tocolysis).

We included studies that reported on adverse outcomes for neonates, however defined. The primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes included pre-specified adverse outcomes (based on non-systematic literature review: stillbirth, neonatal death or death up to hospital discharge, low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, need for active resuscitation at birth, respiratory depression, spontaneous intestinal perforation, patent ductus arteriosus, hypotension, lethargy, hypotonia or hyporeflexia, osteopenia or bone fractures, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and duration of neonatal care unit admission), along with other non-pre-specified adverse neonatal outcomes.

Study selection

After screening all titles and abstracts, we obtained full-text articles for studies that appeared to meet the inclusion criteria. All full-text articles were assessed for inclusion. Each stage was carried out by 2 reviewers, and we resolved any discrepancies through discussion, or, if required, we consulted a third reviewer.

Data extraction and management

For included studies, data were extracted using a standardised form, including information regarding design, participants, the magnesium sulphate regimen(s), the control/comparison if applicable, neonatal adverse outcomes reported, results relevant to the review, and the risk of bias. For all randomised trials, all case reports, and 60% of non-randomised studies, extraction was carried out by 2 reviewers (for 40% of non-randomised studies, extractions were checked by a second reviewer), and we resolved discrepancies through discussion, or, if required, we consulted a third reviewer.

Assessment of risk of bias

Quality appraisal of intervention studies was undertaken utilising established guidelines provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [19]. The quality assessment of observational studies was guided by the RTI Item Bank [20].

Data synthesis and analysis

Data analyses were undertaken by study design. Statistical analyses for randomised trials were performed using Review Manager, version 5.3 [21]. We present quantitative data from individual studies as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For all outcomes, we carried out analyses as far as possible on an intention-to-treat basis. Pooled estimates were calculated using fixed-effects meta-analysis (Mantel-Haenszel method) where there was a sufficient quantity of data, with clinical homogeneity. Where there was substantial statistical heterogeneity (where I2 was greater than 30% and either T2 was greater than 0 or there was a low P value [less than 0.10] in the χ2 test), summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Where there were 10 or more trials in a meta-analysis, we investigated reporting biases (such as publication bias) using funnel plots, which we assessed visually.

Separate comparisons were performed for those studies assessing magnesium sulphate versus no treatment/placebo and those comparing different magnesium sulphate regimens. For our primary review outcome (perinatal death) and other mortality outcomes, we conducted subgroup analyses based on indication for use and characteristics of the magnesium sulphate loading and maintenance dose regimens, as these factors were considered likely to influence outcomes. It was not possible to conduct subgroup analyses based on other pregnancy or birth characteristics (gestational age at magnesium sulphate administration, birthweight, mode of birth, and concomitant maternal treatments) due to paucity of data. We assessed subgroup differences by interaction tests available within Review Manager, and, where applicable, we have quoted the χ2 statistic and P value, and the interaction test I2 value.

For observational studies (non-randomised trials, cohort studies, and case–control studies), we present effect estimates where possible as adjusted RRs or odds ratios if reported with 95% CIs, unadjusted RRs or odds ratios with 95% CIs, P values only, or percentages (rates), in tabular format; we used narrative synthesis to summarise the studies. Data from case reports were grouped according to common adverse outcomes, tabulated, and summarised narratively.

Results

Study selection

The results of the search strategy, including the sources of the studies, their assessment, and final inclusion are shown in Fig 1. The database searching identified 5,890 records, and other searching identified a further 11 records. Review of the titles and abstracts and exclusion of irrelevant and duplicate records yielded 777. Of these, we excluded 572 for the documented reasons (see S3 Text for list of records excluded due to absence of an English translation). We included a total of 205 articles, relating to 197 studies. See S4 Text for references for all included studies. In the case of multiple publications from the same study, we included the report with the most relevant data as the primary reference, and only included further publications as secondary references if they provided additional relevant data.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flow diagram of included studies.

Flow diagram showing the flow of records through the different phases of the review, indicating the number of records identified, included and excluded, and the reasons for exclusions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.g001

Evidence from randomised controlled trials

Forty randomised trials were included, the characteristics of which are detailed in S1 Table, and the risk of bias assessments are summarised in Fig 2, S1 Fig, and S2 Table [2261]. The trials assessed a range of different magnesium sulphate regimens with varying control groups, and are therefore assessed under 8 different comparisons:

  1. Magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment (18 trials)
  2. Lower versus higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate (8 trials)
  3. Intramuscular (IM) versus intravenous (IV) maintenance dose of magnesium sulphate (5 trials)
  4. Loading versus loading and maintenance dose of magnesium sulphate (5 trials)
  5. Serial IV boluses versus continuous IV infusion of magnesium sulphate (1 trial)
  6. Short versus standard maintenance of magnesium sulphate (1 trial)
  7. Slower versus standard rate of loading dose infusion of magnesium sulphate (1 trial)
  8. Weaning versus no weaning of maintenance of magnesium sulphate (1 trial)
thumbnail
Fig 2. Risk of bias for randomised controlled trials.

Risk of bias graph showing judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across the 40 included randomised trials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.g002

The methodological quality of the 40 trials varied considerably. Considering selection bias, 18 trials were at low risk, reporting adequate methods for sequence generation and allocation concealment. Twelve and 8 trials received an unclear judgement for 1 and 2 of the selection bias domains, respectively. Two trials appeared to be quasi-randomised and thus were at high risk of selection bias. Twelve trials were at low risk of performance and detection bias (with blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors); 21 were at high risk of both performance and detection bias (all trials of different magnesium sulphate regimens, with no reported blinding), and the remaining 7 trials had an unclear judgement for 1 or 2 of the blinding domains. The majority of trials (31) were at low risk of attrition bias for neonatal outcome data, though for 9 trials, this was unclear. Only 5 trials were at low risk of reporting bias, 1 was at high risk of reporting bias, and for the remaining 34 trials, selective reporting was unclear.

Magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment

This comparison included 18 trials. The indication for use of magnesium sulphate in 6 trials was the prevention of eclampsia [30,32,39,43,48,61]; in 6 trials, fetal neuroprotection [28,36,45,47,51,54]; and in 6 trials, the prevention of preterm birth (tocolysis) [3335,38,40,46]. Magnesium sulphate regimens assessed varied considerably: 4-gram IV loading dose only (2 trials), 4-gram IV loading dose and 1-gram-per-hour IV maintenance dose (4 trials), 4-gram IV loading dose and 2-gram-per-hour IV maintenance (4 trials), 6-gram IV loading dose and 2-gram-per-hour IV maintenance dose (6 trials), and 4-gram IV and 10-gram IM loading dose and 5-gram IM maintenance dose every 4 hours (2 trials), with duration of treatment generally ranging from 12 to 24 hours. Fourteen trials compared magnesium sulphate with a placebo, while 4 trials had a no-treatment comparison (see Table 1 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates, forest plots, and funnel plots).

thumbnail
Table 1. Adverse outcome estimates from randomised controlled trials: Comparison 1—Magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t001

No clear difference was seen between magnesium sulphate and placebo/no treatment for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.10; 8 trials, 13,654 babies; analysis 1.1), nor for stillbirth, neonatal death (no obvious asymmetry observed on visual assessment of funnel plot), death later than 28 days but before discharge, early neonatal death, or late neonatal death (Table 1; S1 Appendix). When considering indication for use, the tocolysis subgroup showed an increase in perinatal death (RR 7.99; 95% CI 1.00 to 63.49; 2 trials, 257 babies; analysis 1.1.1) that was not observed in the pre-eclampsia or fetal neuroprotection subgroups. The subgroup interaction test, however, did not indicate a differential effect according to treatment indication (χ2 = 4.07, P = 0.13, I2 = 50.8%). For the remaining mortality outcomes, subgroup interaction tests did not indicate differential treatment effects according to indication for administration (see Tables 2 and 3 for effect estimates for individual subgroups and results from subgroup interaction tests).

thumbnail
Table 2. Subgroup analyses based on indication for use from randomised controlled trials: Comparison 1—Magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Subgroup analyses based on regimen characteristics from randomised controlled trials: Comparison 1—Magnesium sulphate versus placebo or no treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t003

Babies exposed to antenatal magnesium sulphate had a 67% relative increase in the risk of having an Apgar score less than 7 at 1 minute (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.73; 2 trials, 199 babies; analysis 1.7), and over 2 times the risk of need for volume expansion compared with babies not exposed (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 4.10; 1 trial, 87 babies; analysis 1.28). A subgroup of babies born less than 32 weeks gestation exposed to antenatal magnesium sulphate had a 62% relative reduction in the risk of intracerebral echodensity, compared with babies not exposed (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79; 1 trial, 1,613 babies; analysis 1.46). While a difference in intracerebral echolucency was not observed in all babies, a 39% relative reduction was seen for babies born less than 32 weeks exposed to antenatal magnesium sulphate (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.97; 1 trial, 1,613 babies; analysis 1.47.2) (Table 1; S1 Appendix).

There were no clear differences between magnesium sulphate and placebo/no treatment for all remaining secondary outcomes reported (Table 1; S1 Appendix).

Lower versus higher dose regimens

This comparison included 8 trials, with 6 assessing magnesium sulphate for treatment of eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia [22,23,44,52,56,59], and 2 for the prevention of preterm birth (tocolysis) [26,60]. Regimens assessed varied: lower dose regimens included a 4- to 10-gram loading dose with a 0.625- to 2-gram-per-hour maintenance dose; higher dose regimens assessed included a 4- to 14-gram loading dose with a 1.25- to 5-gram-per-hour maintenance dose (see Table 4 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates and forest plots).

thumbnail
Table 4. Adverse outcome estimates from randomised controlled trials: Comparison 2—Lower versus higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t004

No clear differences between the lower and higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate were seen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.36; 6 trials, 543 babies; analysis 2.1), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death (Table 4; S1 Appendix). For all mortality outcomes, subgroup interaction tests did not indicate differential treatment effects according to indication for administration of antenatal magnesium sulphate (see Table 5 for effect estimates for individual subgroups and results from subgroup interaction tests).

thumbnail
Table 5. Subgroup analyses based on indication for use from randomised controlled trials: Comparison 2—Lower versus higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t005

Babies exposed to the lower dose versus higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate had an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 1.75; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.88; 5 trials, 409 babies; analysis 2.17). On average, babies exposed to the lower dose regimen had a longer duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit compared with those exposed to the higher dose regimen (MD 3.10 days; 95% CI 0.78 to 5.42; 1 trial, 104 babies; analysis 2.18) (Table 4; S1 Appendix).

No clear differences were seen between the lower and higher dose regimens of magnesium sulphate for the remaining secondary outcomes reported (Table 4; S1 Appendix).

IM versus IV maintenance dose

This comparison included 5 trials, all assessing magnesium sulphate for the prevention or treatment of eclampsia [27,31,49,55,58]. Regimens assessed included Bhattacharjee’s regimen (4-gram IV loading dose; 6-gram IV maintenance dose every 8 hours), Dhaka regimen (4-gram IV and 6-gram IM loading dose; 2.5-gram IM maintenance dose every 4 hours), Pritchard’s regimen (4-gram IV and 10-gram IM loading dose; 5-gram IM maintenance dose every 4 hours), Zuspan’s regimen (4-gram IV loading dose; 1-gram IV maintenance dose every hour), and Sibai’s regimen (6-gram IV loading dose; 2-gram IV maintenance dose every hour) (all maintenance doses were for 24 hours after birth or last seizure) (see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates and forest plots).

thumbnail
Table 6. Adverse outcome estimates from randomised controlled trials: Comparisons 3–8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.t006

No clear differences were observed for

  • Pritchard’s versus Zuspan’s regimen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.32; 2 trials, 353 babies; analysis 3.1.1), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death;
  • Pritchard’s versus Sibai’s regimen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.53; 1 trial, 115 babies; analysis 3.1.2), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death;
  • Pritchard’s versus Bhattacharjee’s regimen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.61 to 2.65; 1 trial, 107 babies; analysis 3.1.3), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death;
  • Dhaka versus Zuspan’s regimen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.16 to 2.08; 1 trial, 41 babies; analysis 3.1.4), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

No clear differences were observed for Pritchard’s versus Zuspan’s regimen, Pritchard’s versus Sibai’s regimen, or Dhaka versus Zuspan’s regimen for the remaining secondary outcomes reported (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

Loading dose versus loading and maintenance doses

This comparison included 5 trials, all assessing magnesium sulphate for the prevention or treatment of eclampsia [25,41,50,53,57]. Trials compared a cumulative 8-, 10-, or 14-gram loading dose (4 grams IV and 4 to 10 grams IM) with Dhaka or Pritchard’s regimen (see descriptions above; and see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates and forest plots).

No clear differences for loading dose only versus loading and maintenance dose regimens were seen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (average RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.33 to 2.72; 3 trials, 632 babies; analysis 4.1), nor for stillbirth, neonatal death, or neonatal death at less than 7 days (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

No clear differences for loading dose only versus loading and maintenance dose regimens were seen for the remaining secondary outcomes reported (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

Serial IV boluses versus continuous IV maintenance dose

This comparison included 1 trial, assessing magnesium sulphate for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia, and compared a serial intravenous bolus regimen (6-gram IV loading dose, and 2-gram IV bolus over 10 minutes every 2 hours as maintenance) with a continuous infusion (4-gram IV loading dose, and 1-gram-per-hour continuous IV maintenance dose) [37] (see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates and forest plots).

No clear differences between the serial bolus and continuous infusion regimens were seen for the primary review outcome perinatal death (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.08 to 2.34; 1 trial, 197 babies; analysis 5.1), nor for stillbirth or neonatal death (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

No clear differences between the serial bolus and continuous infusion regimens were seen for the remaining secondary outcomes reported (Table 6; S1 Appendix).

Short versus standard maintenance course

This comparison included 1 trial, assessing magnesium sulphate for the treatment of eclampsia. Both groups received a 4-gram IV and 10-gram IM loading dose, followed by either a short maintenance course (2 doses of 5 grams IM 4 hours apart after birth or last seizure) or a standard maintenance course (5 grams IM every 4 hours for 24 hours after birth or last seizure) [29].

No clear difference between the short and standard maintenance course regimens was seen for stillbirth. No clear difference between the short and standard maintenance course regimens was seen for the only other secondary outcome reported, birth asphyxia (see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimates and forest plots).

Slower versus standard rate of loading dose

This comparison included 1 trial, assessing magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection, and compared a slower (over 60 minutes) versus standard (over 20 minutes) rate of administering a 4-gram IV loading dose of magnesium sulphate (all women received a 1-gram-per-hour maintenance dose for 24 hours or until birth) [24].

No clear difference between a slower and standard rate of loading dose administration was seen for stillbirth (see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimate and forest plot).

Weaning versus no weaning

This comparison included 1 trial, assessing magnesium sulphate for the prevention of preterm birth (tocolysis), and compared weaning (by 1 gram IV per 4 hours) versus not weaning magnesium sulphate (all women received a 6-gram IV loading dose, and 2- to 3.5-gram IV maintenance dose per hour until tocolysis was achieved) [42].

No clear difference between weaning and no weaning was seen for Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes (see Table 6 and S1 Appendix for effect estimate and forest plot).

Evidence from non-randomised comparative studies

One hundred thirty-eight non-randomised studies were included: 5 non-randomised trials, 35 prospective cohort studies (7 with nested case–control analyses), 82 retrospective cohort studies (16 with nested case–control analyses), 8 non-concurrent cohort studies, and 8 case–control studies [62199]. The characteristics of the studies and risk of bias assessments are detailed in S1 and S2 Tables.

There was substantial variation in the characteristics of these studies regarding participants, indications for use of magnesium sulphate (prevention or treatment of eclampsia: 30 studies; prevention of preterm birth (tocolysis): 28 studies; fetal neuroprotection: 25 studies; combination of aforementioned indications: 38 studies; unclear: 17 studies), comparison groups, outcomes assessed (and their definitions), and analysis methods employed. Methodological quality (specifically in relation to the risk of bias for reported review outcomes of interest) also differed across the studies, with overall judgements of unclear (specifically when only abstracts were available), high, moderate to high, and moderate risk of bias assigned to 43 studies, 49 studies, 35 studies, and 11 studies, respectively. The most common concerns across studies related to the potential for confounding (with no attempt to balance allocation between groups or match groups, and/or important confounding variables not taken into account in relevant outcome analyses), detection bias (with the consistent implementation of valid and reliable measures being unclear, and/or the absence of blinding of exposure or outcome assessors), and performance bias (with protocols not available to assess important variations).

The primary review outcome, perinatal death, was reported by 11 of the 138 non-randomised studies, 10 of which showed either a possible reduction (or lower rate) or no clear difference (or similar rate) in perinatal death among babies exposed to magnesium sulphate compared with no magnesium sulphate or a different magnesium sulphate regimen. A possible increase in perinatal death, specifically among babies exposed to >48 versus ≤48 grams of magnesium sulphate for tocolysis was shown in in the 11th study (retrospective cohort of 127 babies, moderate to high risk of bias) [183]. See Table 7 and S3 Table for summaries of individual study results.

For the majority of secondary pre-specified and non-pre-specified adverse neonatal outcomes reported, the results from non-randomised studies were consistent with those observed in randomised controlled trials, with no clear differences (and in some cases, possible benefits of magnesium sulphate) observed. The direction of the findings (no clear difference, possible benefit, possible harm, or mixed) from the non-randomised studies are summarised in Table 8, with the detailed individual study results provided in S3 Table.

Seventeen of the 138 non-randomised studies (14 at moderate or moderate to high risk of bias, and 3 at unclear risk of bias [abstracts only]) observed a possible increase in the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes with antenatal magnesium sulphate, with some consideration of important confounding variables in relevant outcome analyses [68,73,84,90,106,108,109,129,132,134,140,152,153,173,180,184,191]. Potential increased risks with antenatal magnesium sulphate of 4 outcomes (discussed below) were observed by more than 1 study. For the remaining outcomes (nosocomial infection [184], enteral feeding intolerance [68], respiratory disease composite [153], pulmonary interstitial emphysema [191], early germinal matrix/intraventricular haemorrhage [180], thalamostriate or mineralising vasculopathy [152], and a composite neonatal adverse outcome [73]), single studies reported possible harms.

Potential increased risk of neonatal death before intensive care unit discharge, and of a composite outcome of neonatal death before intensive care unit discharge and/or necrotising enterocolitis, was shown among a subgroup of babies born less than 26 weeks gestation with the use of antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection (293 babies, in a retrospective cohort of 697 babies born less than 28 weeks gestation) [129]. A possible increased risk of the composite outcome spontaneous intestinal perforation or neonatal death was also shown among a subgroup of babies born less than 25 weeks gestation with higher cumulative antenatal magnesium sulphate doses for fetal neuroprotection (non-concurrent cohort of 155 babies born less than 1,000 grams) [173].

A possible increased risk of patent ductus arteriosus was observed with magnesium sulphate given for pre-eclampsia (retrospective cohort of 81 ‘very low birthweight’ babies; abstract only) [140] or for pre-eclampsia or tocolysis (retrospective cohort of 941 babies born 500 to 1,000 grams) [90]. Further, a possible increased risk of patent ductus arteriosus in babies born 26 weeks gestation or later was shown with cumulative antenatal magnesium sulphate doses for pre-eclampsia or tocolysis of at least 50 grams (retrospective cohort of 941 babies born 500 to 1,000 grams) [90]. Potential increased risk of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus, and of failure of early closure of the ductus arteriosus, was also observed with the use of antenatal magnesium sulphate for tocolysis (retrospective cohort of 160 babies born less than 28 weeks gestation, who all received indomethacin prophylaxis) [132].

A potential increased risk of intraventricular haemorrhage grade 3 or 4 was observed with antenatal magnesium sulphate for tocolysis (case–control study of 121 babies born less than 1,500 grams) [134], and with a higher dose regimen of antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection (6-gram IV loading dose and 2-gram-per-hour IV maintenance dose for 12 hours versus 4-gram IV loading dose only) (retrospective cohort, including 54 babies exposed to magnesium sulphate within 12 hours of birth) [84].

A possible increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission with the use of antenatal magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia was observed (retrospective cohorts of 264 babies and 2,166 babies born at 37 weeks gestation or later) [106,109]. Further increased risks of neonatal intensive care unit and special care unit admission were observed with higher total hours, higher total doses, more than 12 hours, and more than 30 grams of antenatal magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia (retrospective cohort of 242 babies born at 35 weeks gestation or later) [108].

Evidence from case reports

Nineteen reports describing a total of 134 babies exposed to antenatal magnesium sulphate with adverse outcomes were included [200218] (see Table 9; the detailed characteristics of cases are presented in S4 Table).

Clinical features of neonatal hypermagnesemia, magnesium ‘toxicity’, or magnesium ‘intoxication’ at birth were the focus of 5 reports (35 neonates), in which antenatal magnesium sulphate was given for pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (with exposure durations and doses ranging from 3.5 to 46 hours and 11 to 60.4 grams prior to birth, respectively) [202,205,206,213,218], and were variably described throughout the remaining reports. These included low Apgar scores, apnoea, cyanosis, hypotonia, and/or hyporeflexia, with or without the need for active resuscitation and calcium gluconate administration.

Two reports described neonatal death following antenatal magnesium sulphate exposure. In the first report, death was considered to be related to ‘the toxic effects of magnesium on the myocardium’ when given for tocolysis (4-gram IV loading dose followed by 2.5-gram-per-hour IV maintenance dose for approximately 1 day: 51.4 grams total) [204], and in the second, 1 death (of 7) was attributed to ‘overdose’ (unclear dose/regimen) of magnesium sulphate when given for pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [210].

In the context of hypermagnesemia at birth (following exposure to a total of 24 to 28 grams of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia), neonatal gentamicin administration for suspected sepsis was associated with respiratory arrest and cardiac arrest in 2 reports [211,215]. Other specific adverse outcomes attributed to antenatal magnesium sulphate exposure included

  • Microcolon or meconium-plug syndrome (3 reports, 14 neonates, when given for pre-eclampsia/eclampsia: 25 to 41 grams in the day prior to birth in 1 report; regimen not described in 2 reports) [201,209,216];
  • Nonoliguric hyperkalaemia (1 report, 1 neonate, when given for pre-eclampsia: 0.1 gram to 2 grams per hour IV for 12 days) [217];
  • Bone abnormalities (commonly metaphyseal osteopenia, in some cases leading to fracture) (6 reports, 35 neonates, when given for tocolysis: ranging from 1 to 4 grams per hour for between 8 and 13 weeks) [200,203,207,208,212,214].

Discussion

Overall, no clear difference in our primary review outcome, perinatal death, was shown in the randomised trials comparing antenatal magnesium sulphate with placebo/no treatment, nor in regimen comparisons in randomised trials. While 11 of the 138 non-randomised studies reported on perinatal death, only 1 cohort study (at moderate to high risk of bias) observed a possible increased risk of perinatal death, with high-dose (more than 48 grams) antenatal magnesium sulphate exposure for tocolysis [183].

Results for secondary adverse neonatal outcomes were reassuring, with very few clear differences observed between antenatal magnesium sulphate and placebo/no treatment or between different magnesium sulphate regimens. Where possible harms of magnesium sulphate were seen, commonly no confounders were taken into account (and studies were judged to be at high risk of bias), study samples were small (less than 200 babies), and/or differences were observed in (non-formal) subgroup analyses only. Non-randomised studies identified a limited number of outcomes justifying further evaluation, such as from large, high-quality studies (prospective cohorts, individual participant data meta-analyses, or randomised trials of regimen comparisons). These included neonatal death and intestinal morbidity in very preterm neonates with exposure for fetal neuroprotection, patent ductus arteriosus in very preterm or very low birthweight neonates with exposure for pre-eclampsia or tocolysis, and intensive care unit admission in term neonates with exposure for pre-eclampsia. Case reports suggested an association between neonatal bone abnormalities and long-term, high-dose exposure to antenatal magnesium sulphate for tocolysis.

We are not aware of any other published systematic reviews with a focus on potential adverse outcomes for neonates following antenatal magnesium sulphate exposure, though we identified 3 review registrations focused specifically on magnesium sulphate for tocolysis and the outcomes neonatal respiratory depression (CRD42017058912), patent ductus arteriosus (CRD42017060049), and bone abnormalities (CRD42017062550) [18]. Three previous systematic reviews have assessed ‘adverse events’ [13], ‘side effects’ [219], and ‘safety’ [220] for women, and a further systematic review has assessed the effects of antenatal magnesium sulphate specifically on fetal heart rate parameters, finding a small negative effect on rate, variability, and accelerative pattern, ‘not sufficient clinically to warrant medical intervention’ [14].

Our review findings are consistent with those from the relevant Cochrane reviews comparing antenatal magnesium sulphate with placebo/no treatment, or different magnesium sulphate regimens [1,2,4,9,221], though our review includes a wider range of outcomes. As was observed in our review’s tocolysis subgroup for perinatal death, the Cochrane review assessing magnesium sulphate for tocolysis demonstrated a borderline increased risk of fetal, neonatal, or infant death with antenatal magnesium sulphate [9].

A recent non-systematic narrative review evaluated ‘whether antenatal MgSO4 is beneficial or harmful’ in extremely and very preterm neonates [222]. Relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, and observational studies were retrieved, with a broad search strategy focused on neuroprotection and cerebral palsy, necrotising enterocolitis, and spontaneous intestinal perforation. The narrative review suggested that current evidence supports the neuroprotective role of antenatal magnesium sulphate for preterm neonates, and that, while the effects are ‘controversial’ and ‘not well established’, a ‘high index of suspicion of gastrointestinal complications in extremely preterms, particularly < 26 weeks of gestation’ is recommended [222]. While our review similarly identified a possibility of harm, the relevant studies were of questionable methodological quality, and our systematic review included additional reports (of higher quality, and involving much larger cohorts) that indicated no increased risk of intestinal morbidity.

The findings of this review are reassuring and can be considered in conjunction with those from relevant reviews demonstrating a clear benefit of antenatal magnesium sulphate [1,2,4], and current international clinical practice guideline recommendations [3,7]. Our review findings of possible adverse outcomes with long-term, high-dose use for tocolysis have implications for settings with continued use for this indication [8] in spite of the absence of benefit shown in systematic reviews and international guidance [79].

Strengths and limitations

The main limitations of our review relate to missing data for important outcomes across most studies, the inclusion of published data only, and the heterogeneity of included studies.

Of the 40 randomised trials included in this review, our primary outcome (perinatal death) was reported by 22 (55%); it was reported by only 11 (8%) of the 138 included non-randomised studies. Aside from related mortality outcomes (stillbirth and neonatal death), all other adverse outcomes were reported sparsely, by less than a third of trials, with many outcomes reported by single trials only. While a broader range of adverse neonatal outcomes were reported by the non-randomised studies, apart from neonatal death (50 studies), intraventricular haemorrhage (39 studies), and necrotising enterocolitis (36 studies), all other outcomes were reported by less than a fifth of studies, again, with many reported by single studies only.

In addition to missing data for important outcomes across most studies, a further limitation includes the number of studies with relatively small sample sizes comparing different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens. Moreover, many studies assessing antenatal magnesium sulphate for relevant indications were not included due to lack of reporting of adverse neonatal outcomes.

We searched extensively across multiple databases and reviewed reference lists for additional reports; however, we did not seek unpublished data. Recent evidence has suggested that while much adverse event information remains unpublished, inclusion of such data generally does not change the direction or statistical significance of pooled risk estimates [223]. While we were not able to fully evaluate non-English publications without available translations for inclusion, we have provided a list of these for readers to consider (S3 Text).

As the aim of the review was to provide a comprehensive, general view of potential unintended adverse outcomes, we designed this review with broad scope [15,16]. This presented challenges, including the number of diverse outcomes, inconsistent reporting, and the vast quantities of heterogeneous data. The study characteristics (including designs, settings, participating women and neonates, and antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens) varied greatly, and reporting was commonly incomplete. The ability to conduct subgroup analyses for the randomised trials was limited, and we did not inappropriately pool data from non-randomised studies. We conducted this review in accordance with recommendations for systematic reviews of adverse events [1517], and of randomised and non-randomised studies more generally [224]. Our evaluation thus provides a firm basis for any further, narrowly focused studies of specific outcomes and characteristics.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings do not support any clear associations between perinatal death or other adverse neonatal outcomes and antenatal magnesium sulphate exposure when given for the beneficial indications of maternal neuroprotection in pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and fetal neuroprotection in cerebral palsy prevention. To further inform safety recommendations of this widely used treatment in pregnancy, future research should be directed towards identified research gaps surrounding specific adverse neonatal outcomes and the impact of particular regimen, pregnancy, and/or birth characteristics.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Forest plots and funnel plots for comparisons 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Risk of bias for randomised controlled trials.

Risk of bias summary showing judgements about each risk of bias item for the 40 included randomised trials. Green represents ‘low risk of bias’; yellow, ‘unclear risk of bias’; red, ‘high risk of bias’.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s002

(TIF)

S1 PRISMA Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Characteristics of included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Risk of bias of included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s005

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Adverse outcomes from non-randomised studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s006

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Adverse outcomes from case reports.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s007

(DOCX)

S3 Text. Articles excluded at full-text screening due to absence of English translation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s010

(DOCX)

S4 Text. References for included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002988.s011

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Duley L, Gülmezoglu AM, Henderson‐Smart DJ, Chou D. Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre‐eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(11):CD000025. pmid:21069663
  2. 2. Duley L, Matar HE, Almerie MQ, Hall DR. Alternative magnesium sulphate regimens for women with pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(8):CD007388. pmid:20687086
  3. 3. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  4. 4. Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S, Rouse D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD004661. pmid:19160238
  5. 5. Jayaram PM, Mohan MK, Farid I, Lindow S. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection: a critical appraisal and systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. J Perinat Med. 2019;47(3):262–9. pmid:30352042
  6. 6. Medley N, Poljak B, Mammarella S, Alfirevic Z. Clinical guidelines for prevention and management of preterm birth: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(11):1361–9.
  7. 7. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
  8. 8. Elliott JP, Morrison JC, Bofill JA. Risks and benefits of magnesium sulfate tocolysis in preterm labor (PTL). AIMS Public Health. 2016;3(2):348–56. pmid:29546168
  9. 9. Crowther CA, Brown J, McKinlay CJD, Middleton P. Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(8):CD001060. pmid:25126773
  10. 10. Hutchinson HT, Nichols MM, Kuhn CR, Vasicka A. Effects of magnesium sulfate on uterine contractility, intrauterine fetus, and infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;88:747–58. pmid:14130338
  11. 11. Tsang RC. Neonatal magnesium disturbances. Am J Dis Child. 1972;124(2):282–93. pmid:4559534
  12. 12. Van Laecke S. Hypomagnesemia and hypermagnesemia. Acta Clin Belg. 2019;74(1):41–7. pmid:30220246
  13. 13. Bain ES, Middleton PF, Crowther CA. Maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens for improving maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:195. pmid:24139447
  14. 14. Nensi A, De Silva DA, von Dadelszen P, Sawchuck D, Synnes AR, Crane J, et al. Effect of magnesium sulphate on fetal heart rate parameters: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(12):1055–64. pmid:25668040
  15. 15. Loke YK, Golder SP, Vandenbroucke JP. Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2011;2(2):59–68. pmid:25083202
  16. 16. Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. pmid:17615054
  17. 17. Zorzela L, Loke YK, Ioannidis JP, Golder S, Santaguida P, Altman DG, et al. PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2016;352:i157. pmid:26830668
  18. 18. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: international prospective register of systematic reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2019 [cited 2019 May 3]. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
  19. 19. Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 2019 Nov 11]. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.
  20. 20. Viswanathan M, Berkman ND, Dryden DM, Hartling L. Assessing risk of bias and confounding in observational studies of interventions or exposures: further development of the RTI Item Bank. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013 Aug.
  21. 21. Nordic Cochrane Centre. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2014.
  22. 22. Abdul M, Nasir U, Khan N, Yusuf M. Low-dose magnesium sulphate in the control of eclamptic fits: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(1):43–6. pmid:22930148
  23. 23. Agrawal S, Das V, Verma V, Agarwal A, Pandey A, Jain V. Evaluation of medium dose versus standard Pritchard regime of magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia in developing nation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 5):E183.
  24. 24. Bain E, Middleton P, Yelland L, Ashwood P, Crowther C. Maternal adverse effects with different loading infusion rates of antenatal magnesium sulphate for preterm fetal neuroprotection: the IRIS randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(5):595–603.
  25. 25. Begum M, Begum A, Quardir E. Loading dose versus standard regime of magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia: a randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2002;28(3):154–9. pmid:12214831
  26. 26. Behrad B, Moossavifar N, Motahedzadeh M, Esmaili H, Moghtadeii P. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of high and low doses of magnesium sulfate for acute tocolysis. Acta Med Iran. 2003;41(2):126–31.
  27. 27. Bhattacharjee N, Saha S, Ganguly R, Patra K, Shali B, Das N, et al. A randomised comparative study between low-dose intravenous magnesium sulphate and standard intramuscular regimen for the treatment of eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(4):298–303. pmid:21534749
  28. 28. Blackwell S, Hallak M, Hassan S, Berry S, Russell E, Sorokin Y. The effects of intrapartum magnesium sulfate therapy on fetal serum interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α at delivery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1320–4. pmid:11408847
  29. 29. Chama C, Geidam A, Bako B, Mairiga A, Atterwahmie A. A shortened versus standard matched postpartum magnesium sulphate regimen in the treatment of eclampsia: a randomised controlled trial. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013; 17(3):131–6. pmid:24069775
  30. 30. Chen F-P, Chang S-D, Chu K-K. Expectant management in severe preeclampsia: does magnesium sulfate prevent the development of eclampsia? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74(3):182–5.
  31. 31. Chissell S, Botha J, Moodley J, McFadyen L. Intravenous and intramuscular magnesium sulphate regimens in severe pre-eclampsia. S Afr Med J. 1994;84(9):607–10. pmid:7839282
  32. 32. Coetzee E, Dommisse J, Anthony J. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(3):300–3. pmid:9532990
  33. 33. Colon I, Berletti M, Garabedian M, Wilcox N, Williams K, Chueh J, et al. Randomized, double-blinded trial of magnesium sulfate tocolysis vs intravenous normal saline for nonsevere placental abruption. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1 Suppl):S388–9.
  34. 34. Cotton D, Strassner H, Hill L, Schifrin B, Paul R. Comparison of magnesium sulfate, terbutaline and a placebo for inhibition of preterm labor. A randomized study. J Reprod Med. 1984;29(2):92–7. pmid:6708033
  35. 35. Cox S, Sherman L, Leveno K. Randomized investigation of magnesium sulfate for prevention of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):767–72. pmid:2206069
  36. 36. Crowther C, Hiller J, Doyle L, Haslam R, Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium Sulphate (ACTOMgSO4) Collaborative Group. Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2669–76. pmid:14645308
  37. 37. Easterling T, Hebert M, Bracken H, Darwish E, Ramadan MC, Shaarawy S, et al. A randomized trial comparing the pharmacology of magnesium sulfate when used to treat severe preeclampsia with serial intravenous boluses versus a continuous intravenous infusion. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):290. pmid:29976161
  38. 38. Fox M, Allbert J, McCaul J, Martin R, McLaughlin B, Morrison J. Neonatal morbidity between 34 and 37 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1993;49(4):242–3.
  39. 39. Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359(1):1877–90.
  40. 40. How HY C C, Cook VD, Miles DE, Spinnato JA. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: aggressive tocolysis versus expectant management. J Matern Fetal Med. 1998;7(1):8–12. pmid:9502662
  41. 41. Keepanasseril A, Maurya DK, Manikandan K, Suriya YJ, Habeebullah S, Raghavan SS. Prophylactic magnesium sulphate in prevention of eclampsia in women with severe preeclampsia: randomised controlled trial (PIPES trial). J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):305–9. pmid:28974124
  42. 42. Lewis DF, Bergstedt S, Edwards MS, Burlison S, Gallaspy JW, Brooks GG, Adair CD. Successful magnesium sulfate tocolysis: is “weaning” the drug necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(4):742–5. pmid:9369812
  43. 43. Livingston J, Livingston L, Ramsey R, Mabie B, Sibai B. Magnesium sulfate in women with mild preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(2):217–20. pmid:12576241
  44. 44. Malapaka S, Ballal P. Low-dose magnesium sulfate versus Pritchard regimen for the treatment of eclampsia and imminent eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115(1):70–2. pmid:21798536
  45. 45. Marret S, Marpeau L, Zupan-Simunek V, Eurin D, Leveque C, Hellot M-F, et al. Magnesium sulphate given before very-preterm birth to protect infant brain: the randomised controlled PREMAG trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114(3):310–8.
  46. 46. Mirzamoradi M, Behnam M, Jahed T, Saleh-Gargari S. Does magnesium sulfate delay the active phase of labor in women with premature rupture of membranes? A randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(3):309–12. pmid:25286782
  47. 47. Mittendorf R, Dambrosia J, Pryde P, Lee K-S, Gianopoulois J, Besinger R, et al. Association between the use of antenatal magnesium sulfate in preterm labor and adverse health outcomes in infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1111–8. pmid:12066082
  48. 48. Moodley J, Moodley V. Prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy in hypertensive crises of pregnancy—the need for a large, randomized trial. Hypertens Pregnancy. 1994;13(3):245–52.
  49. 49. Mundle S, Regi A, Easterling T, Biswas B, Bracken H, Khedekar V, et al. Treatment approaches for preeclampsia in low-resource settings: a randomized trial of the Springfusor pump for delivery of magnesium sulfate. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012;2(1):32–8. pmid:26104987
  50. 50. Orji E, Ogoke G, Fasubaa O. Efficacy of a single loading dose of magnesium sulphate versus the standard Pritchard regimen in the management of severe preeclampsia in an African population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(S3):S447.
  51. 51. Parashi S, Bordbar A, Mahmoodi Y, Jafari M. The survey of magnesium sulfate in prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage in premature infants: a randomized clinical trial. Shiraz E Med J. 2017;18(11):e55094.
  52. 52. Pascoal ACF, Katz L, Pinto MH, Santos CA, Braga LCO, Maia SB, et al. Serum magnesium levels during magnesium sulfate infusion at 1 gram/hour versus 2 grams/hour as a maintenance dose to prevent eclampsia in women with severe preeclampsia: a randomized clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(32):e16779.
  53. 53. Rimal S, Rijal P, Bhatt R, Thapa K. Loading dose only versus standard dose magnesium sulfate seizure prophylaxis in severe pre-eclamptic women. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2017;56(208):388–94.
  54. 54. Rouse D, Hirtz D, Thom E, Varner M, Spong C, Mercer B, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):895–905. pmid:18753646
  55. 55. Saha P, Kaur J, Goel P, Kataria S, Tandon R, Saha L. Safety and efficacy of low dose intramuscular magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) compared to intravenous regimen for treatment of eclampsia J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;4(10):1543–9.
  56. 56. Shilva, Saha S, Kalra J, Prasad R. Safety and efficacy of low-dose MgSO4 in the treatment of eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(2):150–1. pmid:17368649
  57. 57. Shreya M, Krishna L, Shailaja N, Bhat B. Evaluation of single dose magnesium sulphate and Pritchard regimen in the treatment of eclampsia—a comparative study. Biomedicine. 2014;34(2):252–6.
  58. 58. Singh S, Behera A. Eclampsia in Eastern India: incidence, demographic profile and response to three different anticonvulsant regimes of magnesium sulphate. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;15(2):1–7.
  59. 59. Tangmanowutthikul S, Champawong R, Songthamwat S, Songthamwat M. Comparison of magnesium sulphate protocols by weight-adjusted versus two grams per hour for preventing convulsion in preeclampsia: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(2):QC01–4.
  60. 60. Terrone D, Rinehart B, Kimmel E, May W, Larmon J, Morrison J. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of high and low maintenance doses of magnesium sulfate for acute tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(6):1477–82. pmid:10871468
  61. 61. Wiltlin A, Friedman S, Sibai B. The effect of magnesium sulfate therapy on the duration of labor in women with mild preeclampsia at term: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(3):623–7. pmid:9077617
  62. 62. Adama-Hondegla AB, Lawson-Evi K, Bassowa A, Modji S, Egbla KF, Akpadza K. Perinatal mortality risk factors of infants bom from eclamptic mothers at Tokoin Teaching Hospital of Lome. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;13(5):391–5.
  63. 63. Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. Selective magnesium sulfate prophylaxis for the prevention of eclampsia in women with gestational hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(4):826–32. pmid:17012442
  64. 64. Alston MJ, Alexandrovic K, Stiglich N, Metz TD. Discontinuation of tocolytics for preterm labor in an academic safety net hospital: impact on the duration of betamethasone exposure. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(2):109–13.
  65. 65. Ambadkar A, Prasad M, Chauhan AR. Neonatal effects of maternal magnesium sulphate in late preterm and term pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(1):25–30. pmid:30814806
  66. 66. Bajaj M, Natarajan G, Shankaran S, Wyckoff M, Laptook AR, Bell EF, et al. Delivery room resuscitation and short-term outcomes in moderately preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2018;195:33–8e2. pmid:29306493
  67. 67. Basu SK, Chickajajur V, Lopez V, Bhutada A, Pagala M, Rastogi S. Immediate clinical outcomes in preterm neonates receiving antenatal magnesium for neuroprotection. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(2):185–9.
  68. 68. Belden MK, Gnadt S, Ebert A. Effects of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on neonatal feeding tolerance. J Pediatri Pharmacol Ther. 2017;22(2):112–7.
  69. 69. Bertello Grecco M, Barrón B, Rigo D, McCormick Cook A, Pajón Scocco J, Novoa P, et al. Maternal and neonatal safety with the use of magnesium sulfate in preeclampsia. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;4(7):S146.
  70. 70. Black B, Holditch-Davis D, Schwartz T, Scher MS. Effects of antenatal magnesium sulfate and corticosteroid therapy on sleep states of preterm infants. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(4):269–80. pmid:16847907
  71. 71. Blackwell SC, Redman ME, Whitty JE, Refuerzo JS, Berry SM, Sorokin Y, et al. The effect of intrapartum magnesium sulfate therapy on fetal cardiac troponin I levels at delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12(5):327–31. pmid:12607765
  72. 72. Bonta BW, Chin TK, DeVoe WM. Maternal intravenous MgSO4 administration and its effects on neonatal respiratory function and risk of development of hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus shunts during the initial 72 hours of life. J Investig Med. 2000;48(1):107A.
  73. 73. Boyle A, Greer K, Caballero A, Norton T, Kate P, Ferguson J, et al. Neonatal outcomes in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery for fetal heart rate tracing abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):S335.
  74. 74. Bozkurt O, Eras Z, Canpolat FE, Oguz SS, Uras N, Dilmen U. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants born to preeclamptic mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(7):1101–4. pmid:25893546
  75. 75. Brazy JE, Grimm JK, Little VA. Neonatal manifestations of severe maternal hypertension occurring before the thirty-sixth week of pregnancy. J Pediatr. 1982;100(2):265–71. pmid:7057337
  76. 76. Brookfield K, Su F, Drover D, Adelus M, Lyell D, Carvalho B. Umbilical cord magnesium levels and neonatal resuscitation in infants exposed to magnesium sulfate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1 Suppl):S395–6.
  77. 77. Brookfield K, O’Malley K, Yeaton-Massey A, Butwick A. Does magnesium sulfate exposure attenuate the effete of steroids administered for fetal lung maturation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;1(Suppl):S89.
  78. 78. Brown BE, Vincer M, Acott P, El-Naggar W, O’Connell C, Kajetanowicz A. Systemic hypertension in preterm infants—a population-based study. Paediatr Child Health. 2019;24(Suppl 2):e47–8.
  79. 79. Canterino JC, Verma UL, Visintainer PF, Figueroa R, Klein SA, Tejani NA. Maternal magnesium sulfate and the development of neonatal periventricular leucomalacia and intraventricular hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(3):396–402. pmid:10074987
  80. 80. Cawyer CR. The association of magnesium sulfate with maternal morbidity when used for preeclampsia without severe features. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):S292–3.
  81. 81. Cho GJ, Lee JE, Hong HR, Hong SC, Hong YS, Kim HJ, et al. Maternal magnesium sulfate treatment is not associated with serum calcium levels of preterm neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1 Suppl):S356.
  82. 82. Chowdhury JR, Chaudhuri S, Bhattacharyya N, Biswas PK, Panpalia M. Comparison of intramuscular magnesium sulfate with low dose intravenous magnesium sulfate regimen for treatment of eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(1):119–25. pmid:19215558
  83. 83. Chun E-H, Do S-H, Shin H-J, Na H-S, Hwang J-W. Effects of magnesium sulfate on the labor duration and neonatal outcome in parturients with preeclampsia. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;9(2):128–33.
  84. 84. Cuff RD, Sullivan SA, Chang EY. Impact of dosing schedule on uptake of neuroprotective magnesium sulfate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep 19. pmid:30122071
  85. 85. Das M, Chaudhuri PR, Mondal BC, Mitra S, Bandyopadhyay D, Pramanik S. Assessment of serum magnesium levels and its outcome in neonates of eclamptic mothers treated with low-dose magnesium sulfate regimen. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(5):502–8. pmid:26600638
  86. 86. De Jesus L, Sood B, Shankaran S, Kendrick D, Das A, Bell E, et al. Antenatal magnesium sulfate exposure and acute cardiorespiratory events in preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1):94.e1–7.
  87. 87. De Silva D, Synnes A, von Dadelszen P, Lee T, Bone J, Mag-CP, et al. MAGnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection to prevent Cerebral Palsy (MAG-CP)—implementation of a national guideline in Canada. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):8. pmid:29325592
  88. 88. de Veciana M, Porto M, Major CA, Barke JI. Tocolysis in advanced preterm labor: impact on neonatal outcome. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(4):294–8. pmid:7575840
  89. 89. Deering SH, Stagg AR, Spong CY, Abubakar K, Pezzullo JC, Ghidini A. Antenatal magnesium treatment and neonatal illness severity as measured by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17(2):151–5. pmid:16076625
  90. 90. del Moral T, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Claure N, Vanbuskirk S, Bancalari E. Antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate and the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2007;27(3):154–7. pmid:17314984
  91. 91. delValle GM, Bister GL, Lynch LA, Cummings JJ. Prenatal magnesium sulfate exposure and the incidence of cerebral palsy in very low birth weight infants. J Investig Med. 1998;46(1):175A.
  92. 92. Derks JB, Sol CM, Van Leeuwen J, Keunen K, Mulder EJ, De Vries LS, et al. Antenatal magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection reduces punctate white matter lesions at 30 weeks MRI in the human neonate. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(Suppl 1):273A.
  93. 93. Downey LC, Cotten CM, Hornik CP, Laughon MM, Tolia VN, Clark RH, et al. Association of in utero magnesium exposure and spontaneous intestinal perforations in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2017;37(6):641–4. pmid:28125094
  94. 94. Drassinower D, Obican S, Levin H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Immediate neonatal outcomes in infants exposed to magnesium sulfate at the time of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1 Suppl):S90.
  95. 95. Duffy CR, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Effect of magnesium sulfate on fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1129–36. pmid:22617576
  96. 96. Edwards J, Edwards L, Swamy G, Grotegut C. Magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection in the setting of chorioamnionitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(9):1156–60. pmid:28395549
  97. 97. Elimian A, Verma R, Ogburn P, Wiencek V, Spitzer A, Quirk JG. Magnesium sulfate and neonatal outcomes of preterm neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12(2):118–22. pmid:12420842
  98. 98. Elliott J, Garite T, Clark R, Combs A. Perinatal effect of magnesium sulfate administered for tocolysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6 Suppl):S63.
  99. 99. Farkouh LJ, Thorp JA, Jones PG, Clark RH, Knox GE. Antenatal magnesium exposure and neonatal demise. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(4):869–72. pmid:11641668
  100. 100. FineSmith RB, Roche K, Yellin PB, Walsh KK, Shen C, Zeglis M, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate on the development of cystic periventricular leukomalacia in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 1997;14(5):303–7. pmid:9259949
  101. 101. Gano D, Ho ML, Partridge JC, Glass HC, Xu D, Barkovich AJ, et al. Antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate is associated with reduced cerebellar hemorrhage in preterm newborns. J Pediatr. 2016;178:68–74. pmid:27453378
  102. 102. Garcia Alonso L, Pumarada Priet M, Gonzalez Colmenero E, Concheiro Guisan A, Suarez Albo M, Duran Fernandez-Feijoo C, et al. Prenatal therapy with magnesium sulfate and its correlation with neonatal serum magnesium concentration. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(2):170–6. pmid:28854447
  103. 103. Gasparyan A. [Neurosonographical characteristics of dysmature infants depending on conducted neuroprotection.] Georgian Med News. 2017;(268–9):72–5.
  104. 104. Ghidini A, Espada RA, Spong CY. Does exposure to magnesium sulfate in utero decrease the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(2):126–9. pmid:11167206
  105. 105. Gibbins KJ, Browning KR, Lopes VV, Anderson BL, Rouse DJ. Evaluation of the clinical use of magnesium sulfate for cerebral palsy prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):235–40. pmid:23344271
  106. 106. Girsen AI, Greenberg MB, El-Sayed YY, Lee H, Carvalho B, Lyell DJ. Magnesium sulfate exposure and neonatal intensive care unit admission at term. J Perinatol. 2015;35(3):181–5. pmid:25321647
  107. 107. Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Tolaymat L, Claure N, Vanbuskirk S, Siman D, del Moral T, et al. Survival rate in neonates exposed to magnesium sulfate. J Perinat Med. 2001;29(Suppl 1):20.
  108. 108. Greenberg MB, Penn AA, Thomas LJ, El-Sayed YY, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ. Neonatal medical admission in a term and late-preterm cohort exposed to magnesium sulfate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):515.e1–7.
  109. 109. Greenberg MB, Penn AA, Whitaker KR, Kogut EA, El-Sayed YY, Caughey AB, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate exposure on term neonates. J Perinatol. 2013;33(3):188–93. pmid:22836873
  110. 110. Grether JK, Hoogstrate J, Selvin S, Nelson KB. Magnesium sulfate tocolysis and risk of neonatal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(1 Pt 1):1–6. pmid:9465794
  111. 111. Grimbly C, Rosolowsky E, Aziz K, O’Reilly M, Cheung PY, Schmolzer G. New baby jitters: novel characterization of the incidence and risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia in the premature infant <33 weeks. Paediatr Child Health. 2015;20(5):e86.
  112. 112. Gulcan H, Gungor S, Tiker F, Kilicdag H. Effect of perinatal factors on time of first stool passage in preterm newborns: an open, prospective study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2006;67(3):214–25. pmid:24678097
  113. 113. Gursoy T, Imamoglu EY, Ovali F, Karatekin G. Effects of antenatal magnesium exposure on intestinal blood flow and outcome in preterm neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(11):1064–9. pmid:25825964
  114. 114. Havranek T, Ashmeade TL, Afanador M, Carver JD. Effects of maternal magnesium sulfate administration on intestinal blood flow velocity in preterm neonates. Neonatology. 2011;100(1):44–9. pmid:21212694
  115. 115. Hechtman J, Blackwell S, Moldenhauer J, Refuerzo J, Hassan S, Berry S, et al. Lack of association of neonatal mortality and exposure to tocolytic magnesium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6 Suppl 1):S124.
  116. 116. Holcomb WL, Shackelford GD, Petrie RH. Magnesium tocolysis and neonatal bone abnormalities: a controlled study. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(4):611–4. pmid:1923163
  117. 117. Hom K, Brar B, Kennel P, Jackson D. Magnesium for fetal neuroprotection: should it be started when delivery is not imminent in pprom? Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(Suppl 1):44S.
  118. 118. Hong JY, Kim Y-M, Hong JY, Seo M-r, Chae J, Sung J-H, et al. Does antenatal magnesium sulfate exposure increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):S327.
  119. 119. Igarashi H, Honma Y, Suwa K, Momoi M, Yanagisawa M. The clinical effects of hypermagnesemia on preterm infants of mothers treated with magnesium sulfate for tocolysis. Acta Neonatol Japon. 1995;31(2):388–93.
  120. 120. Imamoglu EY, Gursoy T, Karatekin G, Ovali F. Effects of antenatal magnesium sulfate treatment on cerebral blood flow velocities in preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2014;34(3):192–6. pmid:24480905
  121. 121. James AT, Corcoran JD, Hayes B, Franklin O, El-Khuffash A. The effect of antenatal magnesium sulfate on left ventricular afterload and myocardial function measured using deformation and rotational mechanics imaging. J Perinatol. 2015;35(11):913–8. pmid:26291779
  122. 122. Jazayeri A, Jazayeri MK, Sutkin G. Tocolysis does not improve neonatal outcome in patients with preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2003;20(4):189–93. pmid:12874729
  123. 123. Jeanneteau P, Bouet PE, Baisson AL, Courtay V, Gascoin-Lachambre G, Gillard P, et al. Evaluation of the clinical use of magnesium sulfate for cerebral palsy prevention. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(Suppl 1):377–8.
  124. 124. Jones CW, Petrashek K, Wenzlaff M, Simpson P, Pan AY. Prenatal magnesium sulfate and time to first stool in late preterm infants. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(Suppl 1):160S.
  125. 125. Jung EJ, Byun JM, Kim YN, Lee KB, Sung MS, Kim KT, et al. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for both tocolysis and fetal neuroprotection in premature rupture of the membranes before 32 weeks’ gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(11):1431–41. pmid:28391733
  126. 126. Kamilya G, Bharracharyya SK, Mukherji J. Changing trends in the management of eclampsia from a teaching hospital. J Indian Med Assoc. 2005;103(3):132,134–5.
  127. 127. Kamyar M, Bardsley T, Korgenski K, Clark E. Magnesium sulfate and the extremely low birth weight neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1 Suppl):S362–3.
  128. 128. Kamyar M, Bardsley T, Korgenski K, Clark EAS. Association of antenatal magnesium sulfate with neonatal morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(Suppl 1):144A.
  129. 129. Kamyar M, Clark EA, Yoder BA, Varner MW, Manuck TA. Antenatal magnesium sulfate, necrotizing enterocolitis, and death among neonates<28 weeks gestation. AJP Rep. 2016;6(1):e148–54. pmid:27054046
  130. 130. Kamyar M, Manuck TA, Stoddard GJ, Varner MW, Clark EAS. Magnesium sulfate, chorioamnionitis, and neurodevelopment after preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(7):1161–6.
  131. 131. Kamyar M, Varner M, Clark E. Magnesium sulfate neuroprophylaxis and the effect of infant sex. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(1 Suppl):S144.
  132. 132. Katayama Y, Minami H, Enomoto M, Takano T, Hayashi S, Lee YK. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and the postnatal response of the ductus arteriosus to indomethacin in extremely preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2011;31(1):21–4. pmid:20505743
  133. 133. Kelly MJ, Viscardi RM. Effects of maternal magnesium sulfate on preterm newborns. Pediatr Res. 1992;31(4 Pt 2):207A.
  134. 134. Khodapanahandeh F, Khosravi N, Larijani T. Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants in Tehran, Iran. Turk J Pediatr. 2008;50(3):247–52. pmid:18773670
  135. 135. Kimberlin DF, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Bottoms SF, Iams JD, Mercer B, et al. The effect of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on neonatal morbidity in < or = 1000-gram infants. Am J Perinatol. 1998;15(11):635–41. pmid:10064205
  136. 136. Koksal N, Baytan B, Bayram Y, Nacarkucuk E. Risk factors for intraventricular haemorrhage in very low birth weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69(7):561–4. pmid:12173693
  137. 137. Kuban KC, Leviton A, Pagano M, Fenton T, Strassfeld R, Wolff M. Maternal toxemia is associated with reduced incidence of germinal matrix hemorrhage in premature babies. J Child Neurol. 1992;7(1):70–6. pmid:1552156
  138. 138. Lai TC, Liao CY. Maternal magnesium sulfate treatment and infant outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(Suppl 1):56–7.
  139. 139. Lee B, Cho GJ, Jin HM, Chung SH, Oh MJ, Kim HJ. Maternal magnesium sulfate treatment is not associated with serum calcium levels of preterm neonate. J Perinat Med. 2015;43:667.
  140. 140. Lee NY, Cho SJ, Park EA. Influence of antenatal magnesium sulfate exposure on perinatal outcomes in VLBW infants with maternal preeclampsia. Neonatal Med. 2013;20(1):28–34.
  141. 141. Leung JC, Cifra CL, Agthe AG, Sun CC, Viscardi RM. Antenatal factors modulate hearing screen failure risk in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(1):F56–61. pmid:26195624
  142. 142. Leviton A, Paneth N, Susser M, Reuss ML, Allred EN, Kuban K, et al. Maternal receipt of magnesium sulfate does not seem to reduce the risk of neonatal white matter damage. Pediatrics. 1997;99(4):E2. pmid:9099777
  143. 143. Lipsitz PJ. The clinical and biochemical effects of excess magnesium in the newborn. Pediatrics. 1971;47(3):501–9. pmid:5547870
  144. 144. Lloreda-Garcia JM, Lorente-Nicolás A, Bermejo-Costa F, Martínez-Uriarte J, López-Pérez R. Necesidad de reanimación en prematuros menores de 32 semanas expuestos a sulfato de magnesio para neuroprotección fetal. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016;87(4):261–7.
  145. 145. Martin D, Gonzalez JL, Gardner MO, Izquierdo LA, Tobey K, Curet LB. Incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates under 32 weeks of gestation delivered to mothers with severe pre-eclampsia. Prenat Neonatal Med. 1998;3(2):250–4.
  146. 146. Matsuda Y, Maeda Y, Ito M, Sakamoto H, Masaoka N, Takada M, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate treatment on neonatal bone abnormalities. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;44(2):82–8. pmid:9286718
  147. 147. McGuinness GA, Weinstein MM, Cruikshank DP, Pitkin RM. Effects of magnesium sulfate treatment on perinatal calcium metabolism. II. Neonatal responses. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;56(5):595–600. pmid:7432730
  148. 148. McPherson JA, Rouse DJ, Grobman WA, Palatnik A, Stamilio DM. Association of duration of neuroprotective magnesium sulfate infusion with neonatal and maternal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):749–55. pmid:25198275
  149. 149. Mikhael M, Bronson C, Zhang L, Curran M, Rodriguez H, Bhakta KY. Lack of evidence for time or dose relationship between antenatal magnesium sulfate and intestinal injury in extremely preterm neonates. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):371–8. pmid:30965340
  150. 150. Mitani M, Matsuda Y, Shimada E. Short- and long-term outcomes in babies born after antenatal magnesium treatment. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(11):1609–14. pmid:21733038
  151. 151. Mittendorf R, Besinger R, Santillan M, Gianopoulos J. When used in the circumstance of preterm labor, is there a paradoxical effect of varying exposures to magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) on the developing human brain? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(6):S65.
  152. 152. Mittendorf R, Pryde P, Gianopoulos J, Besinger R, Lee K-S. Thalamostriate vasculopathy in the neonate is associated with antenatal exposures to tocolytic MgSO4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(6):S79.
  153. 153. Morag I, Okrent AL, Strauss T, Staretz-Chacham O, Kuint J, Simchen MJ, et al. Early neonatal morbidities and associated modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors in a cohort of infants born at 34–35 weeks of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(8):876–82. pmid:24962498
  154. 154. Morag I, Yakubovich D, Stern O, Siman-Tov M, Schushan-Eisen I, Strauss T, et al. Short-term morbidities and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants exposed to magnesium sulphate treatment. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016;52(4):397–401. pmid:27145502
  155. 155. Moschos E, Magee K. Does magnesium sulfate exposure decrease the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6 Suppl):S148.
  156. 156. Murata Y, Itakura A, Matsuzawa K, Okumura A, Wakai K, Mizutani S. Possible antenatal and perinatal related factors in development of cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Brain Dev. 2005;27(1):17–21. pmid:15626536
  157. 157. Nakamura Y, Ibara S, Ikenoue T. Effect of maternally administered magnesium sulfate on the neonate. J Perinat Med. 1991;19(Suppl 2):136.
  158. 158. Narasimhulu D, Brown A, Egbert NM, Rojas M, Haberman S, Bhutada A, et al. Maternal magnesium therapy, neonatal serum magnesium concentration and immediate neonatal outcomes. J Perinatol. 2017;37(12):1297–303. pmid:28981078
  159. 159. Nassar AH, Sakhel K, Maarouf H, Naassan GR, Usta IM. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcome of prolonged course of magnesium sulfate tocolysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(9):1099–103. pmid:16929415
  160. 160. Nelson KB, Grether JK. Can magnesium sulfate reduce the risk of cerebral palsy in very low birthweight infants? Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):263–9. pmid:7838646
  161. 161. Nunes RD, Schutz FD, Traebert JL. Association between the use of magnesium sulfate as neuroprotector in prematurity and the neonatal hemodynamic effects. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1900–5. pmid:28521581
  162. 162. O Reilly E, Rogers EL, Hayes B. Effects of magnesium sulphate on respiratory function in the preterm infants who received magnesium sulphate prophylaxis at delivery. Ir J Med Sci. 2016;185:S277–8.
  163. 163. Okusanya BO, Garba KK, Ibrahim HM. The efficacy of 10gram intramuscular loading dose of MgSO(4) in severe preeclampsia/ eclampsia at a tertiary referral centre in Northwest Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2012;19(3):143–8. pmid:23064169
  164. 164. Özlü F, Hacıoğlu C, Büyükkurt S, Yapıcıoğlu H, Satar M. Changes on preterm morbidities with antenatal magnesium. Cukurova Med J. 2019;44(2):502–8.
  165. 165. Palatnik A, Liu LY, Lee A, Yee LM. Predictors of early-onset neonatal sepsis or death among newborns born at <32 weeks of gestation. J Perinatol. 2019;39(7):949–55. pmid:31089257
  166. 166. Paneth N, Jetton J, Pinto-Martin J, Susser M. Magnesium sulfate in labor and risk of neonatal brain lesions and cerebral palsy in low birth weight infants. The Neonatal Brain Hemorrhage Study Analysis Group. Pediatrics. 1997;99(5):E1. pmid:9113958
  167. 167. Perlman J, Fernandez C, Gee J, Leveno K, Risser R. Magnesium sulphate (Mg) administered to mothers with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) is associated with a reduction in periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage (PV-IVH). Pediatr Res. 1995;37(4 Pt 2):231A.
  168. 168. Petrov V, Lupascu A, Etsco L, Pavlenco A. Maternal and new born hemodynamics after antenatal administration of magnesium sulfate (MGSO4), as a neuroprotective drug in preterm birth. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(Suppl 1):RU350.
  169. 169. Petrova A, Mehta R. Magnesium sulfate tocolysis and intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm infants. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79(1):43–7. pmid:21625843
  170. 170. Qasim A, Jain S, Dasgupta S. Does antenatal magnesium sulfate increase the likelihood of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus in neonates? J Investig Med. 2017;65(2):547–8.
  171. 171. Rantonen T, Kaapa P, Gronlund J, Ekblad U, Helenius H, Kero P, et al. Maternal magnesium sulfate treatment is associated with reduced brain-blood flow perfusion in preterm infants. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(7):1460–5. pmid:11445708
  172. 172. Rasch DK, Huber PA, Richardson CJ, L’Hommedieu CS, Nelson TE, Reddi R. Neurobehavioral effects of neonatal hypermagnesemia. J Pediatr. 1982;100(2):272–6. pmid:7199083
  173. 173. Rattray BN, Kraus DM, Drinker LR, Goldberg RN, Tanaka DT, Cotten CM. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and spontaneous intestinal perforation in infants less than 25 weeks gestation. J Perinatol. 2014;34(11):819–22. pmid:24901451
  174. 174. Rauf M, Sevil E, Ebru C, Yavuz S, Cemil C. Antenatal magnesium sulfate use for fetal neuroprotection: experience from a tertiary care hospital in Turkey. Biomed Res. 2017;28(4):1749–54.
  175. 175. Rhee E, Beiswenger T, Oguejiofor CE, James AH. The effects of magnesium sulfate on maternal and fetal platelet aggregation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(5):478–83. pmid:21762000
  176. 176. Riaz M, Porat R, Brodsky NL, Hurt H. The effects of maternal magnesium sulfate treatment on newborns: a prospective controlled study. J Perinatol. 1998;18(6 Pt 1):449–54. pmid:9848759
  177. 177. Rizzolo A, Shah PS, Boucorian I, Lemyre B, Bertelle V, Pelausa E, et al. Cumulative effect of evidence-based practices on outcomes of preterm infants born at <29 weeks gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sept 6. pmid:31499055
  178. 178. Sakae C, Sato Y, Kanbayashi S, Taga A, Emoto I, Maruyama S, et al. Introduction of management protocol for early-onset severe pre-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43(4):644–52. pmid:28150368
  179. 179. Sahin H, Akay AF, Bircan MK, Gocmen A, Bircan Z. The first micturition times of the newborns whose mothers were treated with magnesium sulfate. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;32(4):651–3. pmid:11989558
  180. 180. Salafia CM, Minior VK, Rosenkrantz TS, Pezzullo JC, Popek EJ, Cusick W, et al. Maternal, placental, and neonatal associations with early germinal matrix/intraventricular hemorrhage in infants born before 32 weeks’ gestation. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(6):429–36. pmid:8579656
  181. 181. Sarkar S, Bhagat I, Dechert R, Schumacher RE, Donn SM. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: comparison of risk factors and short-term neonatal morbidities between grade 3 and grade 4 intraventricular hemorrhage. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(6):419–24. pmid:19267317
  182. 182. Schanler RJ, Smith LG, Burns PA. Effects of long-term maternal intravenous magnesium sulfate therapy on neonatal calcium metabolism and bone mineral content. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;43(4):236–41. pmid:9194621
  183. 183. Scudiero R, Khoshnood B, Pryde PG, Lee KS, Wall S, Mittendorf R. Perinatal death and tocolytic magnesium sulfate. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(2):178–82. pmid:10908759
  184. 184. Shalabi M, Mohamed A, Lemyre B, Aziz K, Faucher D, Shah PS, et al. Antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate and spontaneous intestinal perforation and necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely preterm neonates. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(12):1227–33. pmid:28494498
  185. 185. Shamsuddin L, Nahar K, Nasrin B, Nahar S, Tamanna S, Kabir RM, et al. Use of parenteral magnesium sulphate in eclampsia and severe pre-eclampsia cases in a rural set up of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2005;31(2):75–82. pmid:16967813
  186. 186. Shokry M, Elsedfy GO, Bassiouny MM, Anmin M, Abozid H. Effects of antenatal magnesium sulfate therapy on cerebral and systemic hemodynamics in preterm newborns. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(6):801–6. pmid:20504082
  187. 187. Stetson BT, Buhimschi CS, Kellert BA, Hay K, Buhimschi IA, Maitre NL. Comparison of cerebral palsy severity between 2 eras of antenatal magnesium use. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(2):188–90. pmid:30508016
  188. 188. Stockley EL, Ting JY, Kingdom JC, McDonald SD, Barrett JF, Synnes AR, et al. Intrapartum magnesium sulfate is associated with neuroprotection in growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(6):606e1–8.
  189. 189. Suh B, Ko K, Bang J, Oh Y, Lee Y, Lee J, et al. Neonatal outcomes of premature infants who were delivered from mother with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and effects of antihypertensive drugs and MgSO4. Korean J Perinatol. 2015;26(3):190–9.
  190. 190. Teng RJ, Wu TJ, Sharma R, Garrison RD, Hudak ML. Early neonatal hypotension in premature infants born to preeclamptic mothers. J Perinatol. 2006;26(8):471–5. pmid:16775620
  191. 191. Verma RP, Chandra S, Niwas R, Komaroff E. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of pulmonary interstitial emphysema in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26(3):197–200. pmid:16493434
  192. 192. Weintraub Z, Solovechick M, Reichman B, Rotschild A, Waisman D, Davkin O, et al. Effect of maternal tocolysis on the incidence of severe periventricular/intraventricular haemorrhage in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;85(1):F13–7. pmid:11420315
  193. 193. Weisz D, Shivananda S, Asztalos E, Yee W, Synnes A, Lee S, et al. Intrapartum magnesium sulfate and need for intensive delivery room resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F59–65. pmid:25232002
  194. 194. Whitsel A, Insel A, Desilva H, Bernstein B. Association of maternal antepartum management with mortality and morbidity of the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(6 Suppl):S75.
  195. 195. Whitten A, Ogunyemi D, Betcher K, Nowakowski A, Qu S. What factors predict prolonged neonatal length of stay in term babies? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:E462–3.
  196. 196. Wiswell TE, Caddell JL, Graziani LJ, Kornhauser MS, Spitzer AR. Maternally-administered magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) decreases the incidence of severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants: a prospective study. Pediatr Res. 1996;39(4):1501.
  197. 197. Wutthigate P, Yangthara B, Siripattanapipong P, Kitsommart R. Correlation between maternal cumulative dose of intrapartum magnesium sulfate and cord blood magnesium level. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017;48(Suppl 2):256–63.
  198. 198. Yokoyama K, Takahashi N, Yada Y, Koike Y, Kawamata R, Uehara R, et al. Prolonged maternal magnesium administration and bone metabolism in neonates. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(3):187–91. pmid:20226604
  199. 199. Young BK, Weinstein HM. Effects of magnesium sulfate on toxemic patients in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49(6):681–5. pmid:865731
  200. 200. Ahmad S, Miller M, Slaughter S. Is there any evidence for fetal harm with prolonged used of magnesium sulfate in pregnant women? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(1):141.
  201. 201. Amodio J, Berdon W, Abramson S, Stolar C. Microcolon of prematurity: a form of functional obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;146(2):239–44. pmid:3484569
  202. 202. Cruz M, Doren A, Fernandez B, Antonio Salinas J, Urzua S, Lui Tapia J. Intoxicación neonatal por sulfato de magnesio: caso clínico. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2009;80(3):261–6.
  203. 203. Cumming W, Thomas V. Hypermagnesemia: a cause of abnormal metaphyses in the neonate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152(5):1071–2. pmid:2705341
  204. 204. Herschel M, Mittendorf R. Tocolytic magnesium sulfate toxicity and unexpected neonatal death. J Perinatol. 2001;21(4):261–2. pmid:11533846
  205. 205. Brady J. Magnesium intoxication in a premature infant. Pediatrics. 1967;40(1):100–3. pmid:6028888
  206. 206. Jashi R, Gorgadze N. Maternal medication part of infant mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:320–1.
  207. 207. Kaplan W, Haymond MW, McKay S, Karaviti LP. Osteopenic effects of MgSO4 in multiple pregnancies. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2006;19(10):1225–30. pmid:17172083
  208. 208. Kogan JM, Wedig KE, Whitsett JA, Schorry EK. Prolonged prenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate associated with bone abnormalities mimicking genetic bone disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(5 Suppl):590.
  209. 209. Krasna IH, Rosenfeld D, Salerno P. Is it necrotizing enterocolitis, microcolon of prematurity, or delayed meconium plug? A dilemma in the tiny premature infant. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(6):855–8. pmid:8783123
  210. 210. Kurtoglu S, Caksen H, Poyrazoglu MH. Neonatal poisonings in middle Anatolia of Turkey: an analysis of 72 cases. J Toxicol Sci. 2000;25(2):115–9. pmid:10845189
  211. 211. L’Hommedieu CS, Huber P, Rasch DK. Potentiation of magnesium-induced neuromuscular weakness by gentamicin. Crit Care Med. 1983;11(1):55–6. pmid:6848309
  212. 212. Lamm C, Norton K, Murphy R, Wilkins I, Rabinowitz J. Congenital rickets associated with magnesium sulfate infusion for tocolysis. J Pediatr. 1988;113(6):1078–82. pmid:3193315
  213. 213. Lipsitz P, English I. Hypermagnesemia in the newborn infant. Pediatrics. 1967;40(5):856–62. pmid:6075658
  214. 214. Malaeb S, Rassi A, Haddad M, Seoud M, Yunis K. Bone mineralization in newborns whose mothers received magnesium sulphate for tocolysis of preterm labour. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(384–6).
  215. 215. Rasch D, Richardson C. Effect of gentamicin on neuromuscular function (NMF) of a hypermagnesemic neonate. Pediatr Res. 1981;15(4):499.
  216. 216. Sokal M, Koenigsberger M, Rose J, Berdon W, Santulli T. Neonatal hypermagnesemia and the meconium-plug syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1972;286(1):823–5.
  217. 217. Tanaka K, Mori H, Sakamoto R, Matsumoto S, Mitsubuchi H, Nakamura K, et al. Early-onset neonatal hyperkalemia associated with maternal hypermagnesemia: a case report. BMC Pediatr. 2018;15(1):55.
  218. 218. Teng R, Liu H, Tsou Yau K. Neonatal hypermagnesemia: report of one case. Acta Paediatr Sin. 1989;30(5):333–6. pmid:2637615
  219. 219. Smith JM, Lowe RF, Fullerton J, Currie SM, Harris L, Felker-Kantor E. An integrative review of the side effects related to the use of magnesium sulfate for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia management. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:34. pmid:23383864
  220. 220. Duffy J, Hirsch M, Pealing L, Showell M, Khan KS, Ziebland S, et al. Inadequate safety reporting in pre-eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(7):795–803.
  221. 221. McNamara HC, Crowther CA, Brown J. Different treatment regimens of magnesium sulphate for tocolysis in women in preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD011200. pmid:26662716
  222. 222. Garg BD. Antenatal magnesium sulfate is beneficial or harmful in very preterm and extremely preterm neonates: a new insight. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(12):2084–90. pmid:29301419
  223. 223. Golder S, Loke YK, Wright K, Norman G. Reporting of adverse events in published and unpublished studies of health care interventions: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2016;13(9):e1002127. pmid:27649528
  224. 224. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. pmid:28935701