Weight Loss and Mortality

Weight cycling, that is, gaining and losing weight over time, has been linked to excess mortality. The studies reported in the supplement to this issue further evaluated the relation among weight loss, weight cycling, and health. The mortality rate was higher among persons who either lost weight or had weight cycling. The reasons for the weight loss or weight cycling were not determined. The association across varying levels of body mass index (BMI) and the findings that the negative effects of weight cycling are greatest in persons with the lowest BMIs suggest that the weight loss was not all voluntary. Attempts were made to adjust for comorbidity and cigarette smoking. The probability is strong that clinical or subclinical disease, other lifestyle changes, or psychosocial factors such as depression accounted for weight loss, weight cycling, and the increased mortality rate. Disease appears to be epidemic among persons who are at the lower end of the distribution of many biological variables or in whom levels decrease below a critical point. Treatment of hypertension may result in a reduction in blood pressure to below a critical level, the J point, resulting in an increase rather than a decrease in the risk for heart attack [1]. Lowering the blood cholesterol level has been reported to increase the risk for being murdered, committing suicide, and having a hemorrhagic stroke [2]. A low serum albumin level has been identified as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and probably cancer [3]. Low levels of antioxidant vitamins in the plasma may increase the risks for both heart attack [4] and cancer [5]. Short stature may be a risk factor for heart attack in men and probably in women as well [6, 7]. If a man loses his hair at a relatively early age, the risk for heart attack may increase [8]. We have even recently been told that the quality of sperm is decreasing and may be linked to testicular cancer [9]. Vasectomy may increase the risk for prostate cancer [10]. We are now confronted with studies that suggest that low body weight and weight loss or weight cycling may increase the risk for death, especially from cardiovascular disease [11, 12]. Studies reported in the supplement to this issue of Annals used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) follow-up, the Framingham Study, and the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) to evaluate weight loss, weight cycling, and the risk for cardiovascular, noncardiovascular, and total mortality [13-15]. These studies attempted to control for cigarette smoking and other important covariates. Several important observations were made in these studies. First, the effects of weight loss or weight cycling on cardiovascular and total mortality are not restricted to persons in the highest BMI category. In fact, the effects seem to be inversely related to BMI, which would suggest that the relation between weight loss or weight cycling and mortality may be due to involuntary, rather than voluntary, weight loss. The effects of weight loss also may be attenuated over time. The Framingham Study found a relation between weight loss and a higher prevalence of clinical disease and, possibly, of subclinical disease. None of the studies could explain why the persons lost weight or had weight cycling. Because some of the results were also found among lifetime nonsmokers, variations in weight loss are not associated only with smoking cessation. In fact, other lifestyle changes probably contributed to weight fluctuations. Are we to take these studies at face value and encourage corpulence, a lifestyle based on the bigger, the better? Should we require new warning labels on track shoes, fruits and vegetables, and low-calorie desserts because overconsumption may increase the likelihood of weight loss, morbidity, and mortality? Most of the articles in the supplement that relate the low end of a distribution to disease depended on statistical associations that were generated from data sets usually collected for other reasons. The biological plausibility for many, but not necessarily all, of the results has not been determined and, in many cases, variables necessary to evaluate the associations are missing from the analysis. The reasons for weight loss or weight cycling are probably numerous. The most important issue is whether voluntary weight loss increases the risk for disease. To test such a hypothesis, it is necessary to know the other reasons for weight loss, whether clinical or subclinical disease is present, the patient's other habits, his or her alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking status, whether depression is present, and whether hormonal changes are occurring. How then, should we interpret these studies? First, not one of the studies was a clinical trial designed specifically to test whether weight loss increased or decreased the risk for disease. Such a study would be needed to truly define the risks and benefits of voluntary weight loss. A strong relation exists between overweight or obesity and major risk factors such as blood pressure, cholesterol level, and blood sugar level, and it has been shown that voluntary weight loss reduces these major risk factors. It remains unclear what the mechanism could be whereby voluntary weight loss would improve risk factors for coronary heart disease and yet increase the risk for coronary heart disease. Second, no study successfully evaluated why participants gained or lost weight or had weight cycling. These studies did not distinguish between voluntary and involuntary weight loss, and no study assessed the specific determinants of weight loss or weight cycling. Changes in lifestyle, especially changes in eating behavior, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical exercise are important determinants of weight change. These lifestyle changes may be due to disease or social behavioral factors and may independently affect morbidity and mortality. Third, the degree of weight change may be a measure of the activity of a disease or of the specific treatments for disease. Inflammation may be important in the pathogenesis of both atherosclerosis and thrombosis [16]. Cytokine changes associated with disease or inflammation may contribute to weight cycling. Psychiatric disorders such as depression may also be related to weight change and to death from coronary heart disease, especially among women [17]. Fourth, weight changes could be related to metabolic changes that increase the risk for disease. Only a few attempts have been made to test this hypothesis, and the results have been negative [11]. Wing [12] recently concluded that there was no consistent evidence that weight cycling affected total body fat, body fat distribution, or resting energy expenditure. Fifth, there are problems with the measurement of weight change and weight cycling in these studies. Self-reported weights have been used in some studies (for example, NHANES); that is, participants were asked to recall their maximum weight or the number of weight cycles over their lifetime. Weight variability was assessed during a 6- to 7-year period in the MRFIT study and during a 10-year period in the Framingham Study; in neither study were the weight changes occurring during the rest of a person's life considered. Mortality was assessed 5 to 8 years after these measures of weight change, but there was no discussion of what happened to body weight during this 5- to 8-year period. Given these limitations, what are the implications of these findings to the practice of medicine? As noted above, these studies do not test the efficacy of voluntary weight loss, especially for overweight persons. Only a few studies have analyzed the data on weight cycling or weight change separately for persons who were thin, of normal weight, or heavy. These studies suggest that the negative effect of weight loss is seen primarily in the lowest tertile of body weight. In MRFIT, for example, the association between weight cycling and mortality was in the lowest tertile of BMI, and in NHANES weight losses of 5% to 14% were protective, not detrimental, in the heaviest men (BMI g 29). These studies on weight loss clearly reinforce the obviousthat weight loss may be a warning sign of disease and increased risk for death. Involuntary weight loss or decreases in such variables as cholesterol level, blood pressure, hemoglobin concentration, and albumin level are not healthy signs, even when previously high levels return to normal. Unintentional weight loss and gain or weight cycling could be a warning sign to a physician of changes in other habits, especially smoking, alcohol use, and drug abuse; preclinical cyclical disease status; or psychiatric disease, especially depression. These studies have raised interesting new questions, but they lack the in-depth analysis of data to determine a causal pathway between weight cycling, weight loss, low BMI, and disease. It is unlikely that secondary analysis of similar large data sets will provide any further new insights. Future studies need to focus on a much better interpretation of the determinants of weight loss and weight cycling, especially the reasons for the weight loss and cycling, and then on metabolic and health consequences. Such studies clearly need to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary weight loss. It will be possible, for example, to evaluate the reasons for weight loss in some longitudinal studies by directly questioning persons who have lost weight, as well as to carry out a careful clinical assessment of persons who have lost weight, had weight cycling, or have had a stable weight over time. Many clinical trials of weight loss in the prevention of such disorders as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are either in progress or have been planned. The effects of weight loss and regain, as metabolic variables, need to be evaluated in these studies. The effects of voluntary weight loss


Open access, freely available online
June 2005 | Volume 2 | Issue 6 | e195 | e198 As mothers get older and assisted conception becomes more common in developed countries, the incidence of multiple births-primarily of nonidentical siblings, but also of identical ones-has dramatically increased. Multiple pregnancies are high-risk pregnancies, with preterm delivery and monochorionicity (shared placenta) the major problems. Consequently, efforts are underway to optimize the management of these pregnancies.
While identical (monozygotic) twins are much less common than dizygotic ones, monozygotic twinning events are increased after induced ovulation and in vitro fertilization. Monozygotic twins can be diamniotic dichorionic (two amniotic sacs, two placentas), monoamniotic monochorionic (one amniotic sac, one placenta), or diamniotic monochorionic (two amniotic sacs, one placenta). The last type accounts for approximately twothirds of all monozygotic twins.
Monochorionic twins are at higher risk because they share a common placenta; they are primarily at risk from circulation abnormalities like twin-twin transfusion syndrome (the smaller twin [donor] does not get enough blood while the larger twin [recipient] becomes volume overloaded) and intrauterine growth restriction. However, the majority of diamniotic monochorionic twin pregnancies do not develop such complications.
Nicholas Fisk and colleagues have studied records of 151 seemingly uncomplicated diamniotic monochorionic pregnancies and found a surprisingly high rate of fetal death: ten unexpected intrauterine deaths occurred in seven of the 151 pregnancies with no prior signs of complications. All deaths occurred within two weeks of a normal scan, at a median gestational age of 34 weeks and 1 day.
The authors conclude that "despite intensive fetal surveillance, structurally normal monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies without twin-twin transfusion syndrome and intrauterine growth restriction are complicated by a high rate of intrauterine death." As the deaths occurred predominantly after 32 weeks' gestation, the authors suggest that the prospective risk for fetal death in these pregnancies might be eliminated by elective preterm delivery after 32 weeks.
In an accompanying Perspective (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020180), Jane Cleary-Goldman and Mary D'Alton agree that, despite the limitations of the study (its retrospective nature, small numbers, and lack of dichorionic controls), it highlights a critical question for obstetricians, namely, "when is the ideal gestational age to deliver apparently uncomplicated monochorionic twins?" As Cleary-Goldman and D'Alton discuss, at 32 weeks of gestation many of the risks associated with prematurity have abated, but the remaining ones are not negligible. Until larger prospective observational studies have been conducted, balancing these risks remains challenging. Assessing the Risks of Twin Pregnancies DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020195 Smoking is the single largest preventable cause of disease and premature death, according to the World Health Organization.
Smoking-related diseases kill one in ten adults globally, i.e., 4 million deaths annually; by 2030, if current trends continue, smoking will kill one in six people. Smoking is a prime factor in heart disease, stroke, and chronic lung disease, which cost the United States more than $150 billion a year. The relationship between smoking and cardiovascular disease is well documented, as is the association of smoking with increased levels of infl ammatory markers and accelerated atherosclerosis. It is also well known that when smokers quit, their risk of mortality and future cardiac events declines, but there is little data quantifying the rate of this risk reduction.
Smoking triggers an immunologic response to vascular injury, which is associated with increased levels of infl ammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein and white blood cell count. Several studies have shown that such markers predict future cardiovascular events. Markers such as C-reactive protein are also increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. There are, however, still some gaps in our knowledge of cardiovascular disease, smoking, and the predictive use of such markers. For example, few studies have examined the impact of smoking cessation on levels of infl ammatory markers or on cardiovascular risk reduction; the level and rate at which the infl ammatory response subsides following smoking cessation

Short-and long-term health-care savings may be realized if smoking cessation is made a priority
If you are overweight, then losing weight is good for your health, surely? Unfortunately, the evidence on which an answer to this seemingly simple question might be based is at best equivocal, and at worst very controversial. Previous work has shown that weight loss in obese people improves risk factors associated with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, but studies are confl icting on the long-term effects of weight loss on mortality. A study in this month's PLoS Medicine by Jaakko Kaprio and colleagues on a Finnish dataset adds more evidence to this debate, but experts are divided on what can be concluded from it.
The major diffi culty in getting clear results on this question is that it is virtually impossible to do a controlled trial to answer it. Hence, the evidence accumulated has come mostly from epidemiological studies, but it is notoriously diffi cult to remove all confounding factors from these studies. Kaprio and colleagues' study is another epidemiological study, but we should not simply dismiss the data as unreliable just because of the problems inherent to such a study design. Instead, we should consider their study in the light of all the other evidence available.
Starting from a group of 19,993 twins from Finland who have been studied since 1975, the authors gathered data from the 2,957 overweight participants who remained after they had excluded people with pre-existing disease, and those with missing data. These twins had been asked in 1975 if they intended to lose weight, and then had information on weight collected in 1981. Information on mortality was then collected over the next 18 years; the authors then analyzed mortality in relation to intention to lose weight and actual weight change.
In total, 268 people died. When the results were analyzed, the surprising fi nding was that people who intended to lose weight, and who did so, had a somewhat higher mortality than those who intended to lose weight but whose weight remained stable, or went up. People who intended to lose weight, and who did so, also had a slightly higher mortality than those who did not intend to lose weight and whose weight was stable.
The problems with such a study are outlined in an accompanying Perspective (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.002018) by Meir Stampfer from Harvard School of Public Health, and there is no doubt that these results seem counterintuitive. Some readers may take away the idea from this paper that overweight people should not be advised to lose weight, but Stampfer cautions against that interpretation. Perhaps the safest interpretation of these results is that by the time adults are overweight, the health benefi ts of losing weight are not clear-cut. If there is one message therefore that should be taken from the paper it is this: in order to prevent the associated health effects of obesity, preventing obesity, especially in childhood, should be an overriding public health priority.
The study leaves us with the question of how intentional weight loss could lead to excess mortality. The authors suggest that this could be due to the unavoidable loss of lean body mass, which according to several other studies may increase mortality, and which may outweigh the benefi cial effects of losing fat mass in healthy individuals. The authors therefore conclude that "the long-term effects of weight loss are complex, and they may be composed of oppositely operating effects with net results refl ecting the balance between these effects." is also uncertain. Furthermore, whether traditional risk factors can explain the decline in cardiovascular risk following smoking cessation is also unclear.
In this month's PLoS Medicine, Arvind Bakhru and Thomas Erlinger investigate the association between smoking and smoking cessation and levels of infl ammatory markers and cardiovascular risk factors. Data were gathered on 15,489 US adults between 1988 and 1994 in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Of these, 7,665 were classifi ed as never smokers, 3,459 were former smokers, and 4,365 were current smokers.
The investigators focused on changes in C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, albumin, and fi brinogen, and the traditional risk factors-total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and diabetes-that occurred with decreased smoking intensity and increased time since smoking cessation. They found that infl ammatory markers had a dose-dependent and temporal relationship to smoking and smoking cessation. They noted that both infl ammatory and traditional risk factors improved with less smoking, but as the time since smokers quit increased, infl ammatory markers resolved more slowly than traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Still, the smoking-associated infl ammatory response returned to normal within fi ve years after smokers quit, suggesting that the vascular effects were reversible and that cardiovascular risk subsides gradually with reduced exposure.
The authors conclude that these fi ndings support the hypothesis that cardiovascular risk falls as infl ammatory response falls, and that infl ammatory markers are good indicators of this risk reduction. Despite limitations of the study, including possible errors from self-reporting and lack of data on second-hand smoke and newer measures such as interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, the infl ammatory markers studied here demonstrated a much clearer trend and longerlasting effect after smoking cessation than traditional risk factors, and hence were more useful and accurate markers of disease.
As with related studies, these results suggest that smoking cessation should be a more prominent goal of public policy, and the authors conclude that policymakers must pursue smoking cessation plans as an opportunity to make savings on health care through cardiovascular risk reduction. Further research should explore the acute phase response in the months after smoking cessation, which this and other studies have not been able to study adequately. Lassa fever, a viral hemorrhagic fever caused by the Lassa virus and commonly transmitted by its rodent host, is endemic in certain areas of West Africa, where several hundred thousand people are estimated to be infected each year. The disease is asymptomatic or mild in approximately 80% of infected patients, but the remaining 20% have severe multisystem disease. Estimated overall mortality is 1%-2%.
Death rates are particularly high for women in the third trimester of pregnancy, and for fetuses, about 95% of which die in the uterus of infected pregnant mothers. The most common complication of Lassa fever is deafness. Various degrees of deafness occur in approximately one-third of cases, and in many cases hearing loss is permanent. Disease severity does not seem to affect this complication: deafness may develop in mild as well as in severe cases.
Lassa fever remains a serious challenge to public health in West Africa, threatening both local residents in rural areas and those who serve them, particularly medical care providers. Ribavirin, an antiviral drug, has been used successfully in Lassa fever patients, but it needs to be given early and is not readily available in the infected areas. Given the ecology of the rodent host and conditions in the endemic area, a vaccine is mandatory for control. Lassa vaccine initiatives have suffered from a lack of funding in the past, but bioterrorism and recent importation of the disease to the United States and Europe have brought new resources to Lassa virus science.
Early attempts to develop a Lassa fever vaccine in the 1980s focused on killed pathogens, which caused a strong humoral response but failed to protect nonhuman primate test animals. Subsequently, recombinant vaccines used vaccinia vectors carrying different combinations of structural Lassa proteins. Some of these protected 90% of nonhuman primates from a lethal challenge in the absence of a strong humoral response, suggesting that cellular responses are important for protection.
Use of vaccinia vectors in humans is problematic, especially in areas where HIV infection is common-immunesuppressed individuals can develop serious skin lesions-and several alternative vaccines based on other vectors as well as harmless vaccinia ones are under development. Thomas Geisbert and colleagues now report promising results with a replicationcompetent vaccine based on attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus vectors expressing the Lassa viral glycoprotein. A single intramuscular vaccination protected all four vaccinated cynomolgus macaques against a lethal challenge of a particular Lassa strain, while two control monkeys that had received empty vector died after injection with the same dose of virus.
These are encouraging results, but future larger studies will need to assess the duration of protection and demonstrate the safety of this replication-competent vaccine. Another crucial question is how quickly vaccinated individuals acquire protection, and thus whether the vaccine would be suitable for creating a ring of vaccination around an outbreak zone, the most likely early application of a promising candidate vaccine. In addition, there are at least four different strains of the Lassa virus, and an ideal vaccine should provide protection across all strains. Finally, conducting trials in endemic areas, many of which lack political stability, remains a serious challenge. A Promising Candidate for a Lassa Fever Vaccine DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020196 Exposure to short periods of very loud noise can cause tinnitus-a persistent ringing or buzzing in the ears that cannot be blocked out. Tinnitus may affect around 10%-15% of the population; severe tinnitus is very debilitating (1%-2% of the population). Previous work has shown that tinnitus has a neurophysiological basis, but precisely which parts of the brain and the auditory circuits are involved is not yet understood.
The human ear is essentially a very sensitive vibration sensor, one that is able to receive the minute longitudinal vibrations in air that make up sound waves. It can detect sounds from 20 Hertz (Hz) (very low pitch) to 20,000 Hz (very high pitch) but is particularly sensitive to sounds in the range of 500-5,000 Hz-the so-called speech frequencies. However, the ear, and in particular the cochlea, or inner ear, can be damaged by exposure to excess noise, leading to permanent damage to the ear, i.e., deafness.
Some studies in both animals and humans have suggested that tinnitus and hearing loss may be related. These studies have found that neurons in regions of the auditory cortex that have been deprived of stimuli because of hearing loss change their receptive fi eld and may develop enhanced spontaneous activity. Other studies, such as some involving neuroimaging using positron emission tomography, have suggested that parts of the brain involved in attention and emotional regulation might be involved in the production of tinnitus.
One of the key research targets in tinnitus has been investigation of cortical activity, especially in animal models of tinnitus, but studies in humans have been rare. Previous studies have identifi ed temporal and frontal temporal changes in individuals whose tinnitus is severely disabling; however, there have been no group studies comparing abnormalities of ongoing, spontaneous neuronal activity in people with and without tinnitus.
In this month's PLoS Medicine, Nathan Weisz and colleagues studied 17 patients with chronic tinnitus and hearing loss and 16

Color-enhanced transmission electron micrograph of Lassa virus particles
As cells specialize during development they pass through different levels of differentiation, from the earliest stem cells through to the highly specialized types that make up the body's organs. Hence, a number of different tissues may derive from common precursors. For example, muscle, fat, cartilage, and bone are all derived from a group of mesenchymal precursor cells that originate in the paraxial mesoderm. So pluripotent (i.e., able to differentiate into any cell type) human embryonic stems cells are potentially a starting point for the regeneration of all types of diseased or damaged organs (and already researchers have shown that it is possible to stimulate human embryonic stem cells to differentiate into specifi c cell types such as neural or hematopoietic cells). The isolation of intermediate multipotent stem cells (which can differentiate into a limited number of cell types) may also be valuable. For example, the production of an unlimited supply of mesenchymal precursors would be very useful, not only for the understanding of how cells differentiate, but also for eventual practical application.
In this month's PLoS Medicine, Lorenz Studer and colleagues from the Sloan-Kettering Institute in New York describe a protocol for deriving mesenchymal precursors, which they then show are capable of differentiating into specialized cell types.
They used two undifferentiated stem cell lines-from the 22 lines that were approved in 2001 by President Bush for use in federally funded research in the United States. The specifi cations for approval for these lines are clear-see the guidelines at http://stemcells.nih. gov/research/registry/eligibilityCriteria. asp. The number of human embryonic stem cell lines available for researchers are strictly limited, making it necessary to develop protocols that expand these cells along various lineages.
In order to differentiate the cells into mesenchymal precursors, the stem cell lines were cocultured with mouse feeder cells to produce fi ve different polyclonal lines. The authors then cultured these polyclonal precursors with appropriate tissue-specifi c stimulation in attempt to produce fat, bone, cartilage, or muscle cells. The evidence that the authors provide for these cells being differentiated includes analysis of gene expression, surface antigens, and immunocytochemistry typical of the mature tissues. For example, the authors were able to show the presence of fat granules in adipocytes, calcium in the matrix of osteogenic cells, and collagen in chondrocytes. It was harder to produce muscle cells, but even these types of cells could eventually be induced by specifi c culture conditions.
What are the possible concerns about these types of studies? One obvious one is the potential for residual undifferentiated cells to turn into tumors, but the authors tested the differentiated cell cultures for cell surface markers characteristic of undifferentiated cells and found no evidence of them. Another worry for

ES-derived mesenchymal precursors upon cocultures with C2C12 myoblasts
control individuals with normal hearing. Patients were asked to fi ll in a questionnaire about the impact of tinnitus on their lives and had their levels of tinnitus assessed.
The team's methods differed from previous work in that the team chose to examine the power spectrum of neuromagnetic oscillatory activity during rest, whereas previous studies had focused on measuring neurophysiological responses following sounds.
Normally in awake and healthy subjects a certain rhythm of brain activity at 8-12 Hz-the so-called alpha rhythm-is dominant. Finding enhanced slow-wave, or delta, activity (<4 Hz) in awake subjects is usually a sign of a dysfunctional neuronal network, as these waves can be observed in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. Weisz and colleagues' analysis of the frequency spectrum of recorded magnetic fi elds revealed that the energy in the alpha band was strongly reduced and that of the delta band enhanced in the group with tinnitus compared with the individuals with normal hearing. This pattern was particularly pronounced in the temporal regions, and overall the effects were stronger for the alpha than for the delta frequency band.
This is the fi rst study to show these changes in delta and alpha spontaneous cortical activity, say the authors. But they concede it is still unclear whether the enhancement of delta activity compared with alpha is the abnormal activity perceived as tinnitus. However, the fact that regions that show slow-wave activity during slow-wave sleep are also regions of low alpha activity supports the idea that changes in cortical activity might be mediated by sensory deprivation, in this case that partial hearing loss might be involved in producing tinnitus.
Tinnitus-related distress as assessed by the questionnaire was strongly associated with this abnormal spontaneous activity, especially in the right temporal and left frontal areas, thus pinpointing a possible tinnitus-related cortical network.
A limitation of this study was that the tinnitus group also had high-frequency hearing loss, whereas the control group did not; the ideal control group would have been patients with the same sort of hearing loss but no tinnitus.
In discussing their fi ndings, the authors suggest that their study supports previous work indicating that the prefrontal cortex is a candidate region for integration of the sensory and emotional aspects of tinnitus. Further studies should focus on frontal areas, which could allow identifi cation of interactions and modulating infl uences that higher-order psychological processes (e.g., emotions and thoughts) may have on the generation of tinnitus in the auditory cortex.

Weisz N, Moratti S, Meinzer M, Dohrmann K, Elbert T (2005)
Tinnitus perception and distress is related to abnormal spontaneous brain activity as measured by magnetoencephalography. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020153 the use of these cells directly in humans is the need, at least at the beginning, to culture the cells with mouse feeder cells-obviously no human treatment could contain cells contaminated with mouse cells. Further development of protocols will be needed to address this issue. However, as the authors comment, "the high purity, unlimited availability, and multipotentiality of hESMPCs [human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal precursor cells] will provide the basis for future therapeutic efforts using these cells in preclinical animal models of disease." In addition, the techniques described here will provide a very useful resource for studying mesenchymal cell development.