Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeError in "Why most published research findings are false"
Posted by plosmedicine on 30 Mar 2009 at 23:46 GMT
Author: Art Owen
Position: Professor of Statistics
Institution: Stanford University
E-mail: owen@stat.stanford.edu
Submitted Date: September 27, 2005
Published Date: October 6, 2005
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.
There is an error in the Table 2 entry for the row with research finding = yes and the column with true relationship = no. Plugging in u=0 should make Table 2 equal to Table 1 but it does not. There should be parentheses starting at c alpha and ending just before the division by R+1.
The PPV formula given for Table 2 is unaffected by this error.
Despite the irony of there being an error in an article with such a title, I found the article useful. It provides a good reminder of the need to think about issues of bias and power and the ratio R.