This is an uncorrected proof.
Figures
Abstract
Scoliosis affects 2–3% of people, often developing during and after adolescence, and currently has a lifetime chance of surgical intervention of ~0.1% in high income countries. Understanding of causal genetic and environmental factors is improving, with mechanical feedback interactions between the neuromuscular and skeletal systems thought to be important. While examining mechanosignalling in the zebrafish musculoskeletal system, we observed transient expression of yap1 mRNA in precursor cells of muscle and notochord and wwtr1 mRNA accumulation in differentiated muscle. Yap1 and Wwtr1/Taz are transcriptional coactivators that mediate Hippo pathway signalling, often in response to mechanosignals. Loss of function mutation of either gene alone transiently altered early larval motility and reduced survival to adulthood, but mutation of yap1 specifically diminished overall growth without an obvious histological muscle defect. Yap1 mutants had a temperature-sensitive phenotype of oedema in cardiac and other tissues, which could be rescued by rearing at low temperature. Rescued yap1 mutants showed focal defects in hypochordal col8a1a mRNA expression at 1–2 days post-fertilisation (dpf), an early motility defect at 5 dpf and subsequently developed a fully penetrant vertebral dysmorphology, reflected by a decrease in posterior vertebral height. Thereafter, frank kyphoscoliosis accompanied by additional vertebral defects developed in around a third of the surviving yap1 mutants and was first detected at 11 dpf. Thus, the mild initial vertebral defect can, in a predisposing genetic or environmental background, gradually develop into full kyphoscoliosis through a positive feedback mechanism, analogous to the Hueter-Volkmann ‘Law’. Although the cell type/s of cell autonomous yap1 action remain unclear, we hypothesise that Yap1 mechanosensation mediates feedback between bone, muscle and tendon to restrain vertebral overgrowth and protect against the development of kyphoscoliosis.
Author summary
Scoliosis occurs in 2–3% of people, often arising during adolescence and more commonly in females. Scoliosis occasions surgical intervention in about 1 person in a thousand and is thought to develop through an imbalance of forces exerted on the skeleton by muscle contraction. However, initiating primary genetic and environmental cause(s) of scoliosis are largely unclear. During analysis of zebrafish lacking the Yap1 force sensor protein, we noticed the gradual development of scoliosis in about a third of yap1 mutant larvae. Larvae express the yap1 gene during development in both bone and muscle precursor cells. Early defects observed in mutants include altered col8a1a mRNA in the hypochord signalling centre, followed by reduced muscle function and swimming ability and growth rate. Fish lacking Wwtr1/Taz, a Yap1-like protein normally expressed in newly-formed muscle but not detected in bone precursor cells, show a similar early motility defect, but recover, grow normally and lack scoliosis. These findings suggest that correct Yap1-dependent force-sensing may be required during rapid musculoskeletal growth phases, together with other genetic and/or environmental factors, to ensure balanced and symmetrical spine development.
Citation: Williams-Ward VC, Wanders K, Hughes SM (2026) Yap1 regulates motility and vertebral development and prevents kyphoscoliosis in zebrafish. PLoS Genet 22(5): e1012172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172
Editor: Cecilia Moens, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Received: January 22, 2026; Accepted: May 18, 2026; Published: May 28, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Williams-Ward et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are in the manuscript and its supporting information files.
Funding: This work was funded by United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council (UKRI/MRC) grants (G1001029, MR/N021231/1 and MR/W001381/1 all to SMH) which provided salary for VCWW and KW. SMH is an MRC Scientist with Programme Grant support. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Familial genetics and genome wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated a number of genes involved in neuromusculoskeletal development and matrix biology in the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), which affects 2–3% of children and is more common in females [1,2]. However, the identified genes only account for a small fraction of AIS heritability, indicating heterogeneity of aetiology and pathogenesis [3]. Expanding genetic understanding of scoliosis with a view to illuminating environmental interactors that could mitigate the typically teenage onset is thus a priority.
Muscle-specific diseases such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy frequently lead to scoliosis [4]. Moreover, a recent murine study found that defective muscle development causes scoliosis and implicated the Yap1 mechanosensing system in its aetiology [5]. Within the musculoskeletal system, muscles generate force that is transmitted by tendons to cartilage and bone. During development, intercellular signals that pass between these tissues are required for the assembly of attachments [6–9]. Signals from muscle are required for skeletal development [10,11] and muscle contraction itself is required for normal muscle, tendon, cartilage, and bone growth [16–21,24]. Reciprocally, reduced force signals in osteoblasts lead to impaired muscle formation [22]. Even in the adult, high-force exercise is known to be a potent hypertrophic stimulus [16,23–27]. Conversely, osteoporosis and ageing-related muscle wasting (sarcopenia) are exacerbated by inactivity [28–33]. Moreover, clinical observations suggest that altered force can trigger pathological positive feedback that exacerbates kyphoscoliosis and other skeletal pathologies through inappropriate skeletal remodelling [34–39]. Given the heavy burden of musculoskeletal problems, particularly in the elderly, and the relative ease of modulating force through exercise, it is important to understand how force regulates the musculoskeletal system.
The Hippo pathway, which often mediates force-derived signals [40,41], is implicated in both muscular and skeletal response to force [42–44]. The canonical Hippo pathway integrates a variety of signals, including mechanical cues, through a protein kinase signalling cascade that focuses onto two proteins, Yap1 and Wwtr1/Taz [45]. Yap1 and Wwtr1 are transcriptional coactivators which, when activated by dephosphorylation, enter the cell nucleus and interact with a range of transcription factors to regulate (usually up-regulate) expression of their target genes [45,46]. Although Yap1 and Wwtr1 are widely expressed, the presence of distinct combinations of interacting transcription factors in each cell type allows exquisite tissue-specific tuning of the cellular response to mechanosignalling mediated by Yap1 and Wwtr1 [47–49]. Yap1/Wwtr1 activity can be regulated by cytoskeletal tension [50,51], ligand density [52] and ECM composition [53].
Both Yap1 and Wwtr1 have been implicated in musculoskeletal development, where it is suggested that they could mediate mechanosignals [54–59]. TEAD transcription factors, which strongly interact with Yap1 and Wwtr1, were originally described as the muscle-specific MCAT-binding transcription factor [60,61] (reviewed in [62]). In Drosophila, the single Yap1/Wwtr1 homologue, Yorkie, mediates Hippo signalling that restricts muscle size [63,64]. In vertebrates, murine Yap1 knockouts are embryonic lethal at E8.5, prior to musculoskeletal development [65]. In vitro, Yap1 knockdown reduces murine muscle stem cell proliferation, whereas Yap1 overexpression promotes proliferation and inhibits terminal differentiation [66]. In vivo, Yap1 activation in muscle fibres either triggers atrophic myopathy [67] or hypertrophy [68]. Yap1 and Wwtr1 within non-muscle cells in muscle tissue may also regulate muscle growth [69]. The 20% of Wwtr1 knockout mice that survive to weaning [54,70,71] have low body weight and smaller muscles [57]. Muscle-specific deletion of Yap1 or Wwtr1 leads to weakness with mild neuromuscular junction defects that are more marked in adult Wwtr1 mutants [72]. Muscle-specific deletion of both genes is lethal at birth due to severe muscle defects with sarcomere disorganisation [72]. Thus, Wwtr1 and Yap1 functions are required for normal muscle development.
Wwtr1 has also been implicated in bone formation based on knockdown experiments in cultured cells and zebrafish and a molecular interaction with the osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 [73]. However, no obvious defect in bone formation was reported in initial murine Wwtr1 knockouts [54,70,71]. The results of modulating Yap1 and Wwtr1 activities in developing bones in mice have been reported and yield a complex picture. Both gain and loss of function experiments have been performed specifically in chondrocytes, chiefly using a Collagen2a1 driver [58,74,75]. Removal of Yap1 from cartilage yielded slightly longer bones with a slight increase in mineralization [74]. The converse experiment of over-expressing Yap1 in cartilage using the same Col2a1 regulatory elements caused a dose-dependent shortening of long bones and vertebrae and reduction of growth plate size [74]. Similarly, dramatic shortening of bones and chondrodysplasia was observed when over-expressing constitutively nuclear (i.e., potentially active) Yap1 or by activating endogenous Yap1-family proteins through ablation of their upstream inhibitors in the Hippo pathway, Lats1 and Lats2 [58]. Another study reported Yap1 as essential for osteoclastogenesis through a TEAD-dependent mechanism [76]. In contrast, Li et al. [75] deleted Wwtr1, also using Col2a1:Cre, and observed a converse phenotype, with decreased long bone length, reduced growth plate length and less expression of chondrocyte marker genes. Vanyai et al. [58] ablated both Yap1 and Wwtr1 in chondrocytes, again using Col2a1:Cre, and detected various subtle bone malformations and an increase in long bone length with an enlarged growth plate but little change in overall bone formation at E17.5. Nevertheless, when chondrocyte proliferation was examined, little change was observed in the dual knockout [58], whereas the Yap1 and Wwtr1 single knockouts were each described as having reduced chondrocyte proliferation [74,75]. In another study, Wwtr1 was reported to regulate bone formation through a mechanosensing mechanism [77]. While clearly showing a role for Yap1 and Wwtr1 in cartilage/bone formation, these studies leave the precise role of each gene at various stages of skeletal differentiation unclear.
Here we report genetic analysis of the role/s of Yap1 and Wwtr1 in the zebrafish musculoskeletal system. We initially focus on early developmental stages, when myotomal muscle and its associated vertebral skeleton arise by well-characterised processes. In muscle, transient early yap1 expression is followed by later wwtr1 expression as muscle precursors undergo terminal differentiation into fibres. Initial myogenesis and notochord formation appeared normal in yap1, wwtr1, or double loss of function mutants, but hypochord and motility defects soon became apparent in yap1 mutants. Defects in musculoskeletal growth were observed in yap1 mutants, which grew more slowly than their non-mutant siblings. About a third of yap1 mutant individuals subsequently developed kyphoscoliosis. Although double mutant muscle could not be analysed due to early lethality [78], redundant function between the two proteins is suggested as heterozygosity of yap1 in wwtr1 mutants prevents larval survival. We conclude that Yap1 and Wwtr1 are required for full functional muscle in early larval growth, and that Yap1 plays a role in vertebral column development in interaction with other genetic or environmental determinants of kyphoscoliosis.
Results
Sequential yap1 and wwtr1 expression in the musculoskeletal system
Yap1 mRNA is expressed widely in early zebrafish development (Fig 1A–1K) and clearly as slow and fast myogenesis are initiated, respectively, in presomitic pre-adaxial cells and mediolateral stripes of the anterior border cells within each forming somite (Fig 1E and 1G; [79]). When adaxial and posterior somite cells become postmitotic en route to myogenesis, yap1 mRNA is downregulated (Fig 1E–1H), both as adaxial cells undergo terminal differentiation and as presomitic cells become somitic and upregulate myod1 mRNA (Fig 1E,1G, and 1H). By 24 hpf, yap1 mRNA has diminished in terminally-differentiated slow and fast muscle fibres, but remains present in the dermomyotomal cells located on the lateral surface of the myotome, which include precursor cells for later muscle growth (Fig 1J). As muscle precursors undergo terminal differentiation into fibres, yap1 is replaced by wwtr1 mRNA (Fig 1E’,1G’, and 1J’) in cells that have down-regulated myod1 mRNA (Fig 1H’ and 1I’). A similar pattern of yap1 mRNA in superficial precursors and wwtr1 mRNA in differentiated fibres is observed during pectoral fin myogenesis (Fig 1K and 1K’). Thus, yap1 and wwtr1 show sequential expression during early myogenesis.
(A,A’) Schematic indicating the location of antisense probe on each mRNA transcript. In situ mRNA hybridisation for yap1 mRNA (B-K) or wwtr1 mRNA (B’-K’) shown in lateral whole mount, anterior to top (B,B’-D,D’, F,F’, J,J’, K,K’), dorsal flat mount, anterior to top (E,E’, G,G’, H,H’) or transverse cryo-section (B,B’-D,D’, J, J’, K, K’). Maternal yap1 mRNA augmented by zygotic expression at high stage, contrasted with uniform wwtr1 mRNA zygotic expression (C,C’). (E) At 6ss, yap1 mRNA is widespread in forebrain (bracket), notochord (white arrowhead) and lateral somite stripes (black arrowheads), but less apparent in adaxial slow muscle precursors (black arrows). (E’) Wwtr1 mRNA appears more restricted to mid/hindbrain (bracket) and adaxial cells (black arrows), but is absent from notochord (white arrowhead). (F,G) At 10-12ss, notochord (white arrowhead), forebrain (bracket), tail bud (white asterisk) and lateral stripes in nascent somites (black arrowheads) contain yap1 mRNA, but expression appears diminished in more mature somites. (F’,G’) Accumulation of wwtr1 mRNA is observed in adaxial cells (black arrows), stripes in lateral somites (black arrowheads) and mid/hindbrain (bracket), but not in notochord (white arrowhead) or tail bud (white asterisk). (H) At 15ss, myod1 mRNA with yap1 mRNA localises in the anterior half of the somites, alternating with myod1 mRNA (black arrowheads) and notochord (white arrowhead). (H’) Conversely, wwtr1 mRNA co-localises with the myod1 mRNA in the posterior half of each somite (black arrowheads) and adaxial cells (black arrow). (I) Schematic indicating location of flat-mount (I) and 20 μm transverse cryosections (II and III) in J and J’. I’. Schematic indicating location of 15 μm transverse cryosections showing wwtr1 and myod1 mRNA in somitic regions at 32 hpf. (J, J’) At 24 hpf, low level yap1 mRNA was present in dorsal tip (yellow arrowhead) of somite (outlined in yellow dots), whereas wwtr1 mRNA was detected throughout the somitic myotome (yellow asterisks). Both yap1 and wwtr1 mRNAs were present in the eye (white asterisks) and head (brackets). Yap1 mRNA persisted in the tail bud (black asterisk). (K, K’) At 50 hpf, yap1 mRNA persisted at dorsal and ventral somite extremes and was present in heart (inset, black arrowhead) and pectoral fin (red arrowheads) whether viewed from anterior or in 20 μm transverse cryosection (red arrow). Yap1 and wwtr1 mRNAs persisted in the head (white asterisks), but both were reduced in the myotome (yellow asterisks). In pectoral fin, wwtr1 mRNA was detected in two regions consistent with the differentiating muscle masses (red arrows and arrowheads). Bars = 100 μm, except K and K’ 50 μm.
Yap1 mRNA also accumulates in the nascent notochord before being down-regulated throughout its length by 24 hpf (Fig 1E,1F,1G and 1J). Wwtr1 mRNA, however, was not detected in the notochord or in nascent fin cartilage (Fig 1E’,1F’,1G’ and 1K’).
Myod is required to suppress yap1 and induce wwtr1 mRNA in somites
Skeletal myogenesis in zebrafish is driven by the myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) Myf5, Myod, Myogenin and Mrf4/Myf6 [11,80–82]. Whereas yap1 mRNA precedes expression of the myogenic transcription factor myod1, wwtr1 mRNA is expressed after myod1 mRNA in differentiated muscle deep within the myotome (Fig 1H,1I and 1H’,1I’). The time course of wwtr1 mRNA accumulation matches that of myog and myf6 [82]. To test the relationship between myogenesis and yap1/wwtr1 expression, embryos lacking each MRF gene were subjected to in situ mRNA hybridisation for yap1 and wwtr1 and compared to their non-mutant siblings. Loss of myod1 function delays differentiation of fast muscle [11,83]. Congruently, myod1 mutants show reduced wwtr1 expression and persistence of yap1 mRNA in the lateral somite (S1A and S1B Fig). As expected, expression of yap1 and wwtr1 was unaltered in other regions of myod1 mutant embryos (S1A and S1B Fig). Mutation of myog does not prevent muscle terminal differentiation, but reduces fusion into multinucleate fibres [80]. Yap1 mRNA appeared unaltered in myog mutants, whereas wwtr1 mRNA was somewhat reduced in muscle tissue (S1C and S1D Fig). Loss of function of either myf5 or myf6 had no discernible effect on yap1 or wwtr1 mRNA accumulation (S1E-S1H Fig). These observations support the view that a switch from expression of Yap1 to Wwtr1 accompanies zebrafish skeletal muscle terminal differentiation.
Mildly impaired larval movement in wwtr1 mutant
To test the role of Yap1 and Wwtr1 in the musculoskeletal system, each gene was mutated using TALEN-mediated genome editing in the coding region of the first coding exon (S2A and S2B Fig). Among various nonsense alleles obtained of each gene, a trend in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) was observed depending on nonsense tail length. One class of mutants had long nonsense tails and showed strong NMD (S2C- S2E Fig). Mutants shifting to the other nonsense reading frame resulted in a short nonsense tail and much less NMD (S2F and S2G Fig). Yap1 mRNA was not detectably upregulated in wwtr1 mutant larvae (S2H Fig). Wwtr1 mutants, when crossed onto a membrane-EGFP reporter to permit confocal analysis [84], did not show an obvious morphological defect before 5 dpf and muscle growth appeared to be normal (Figs 2A and S3A). However, fewer wwtr1kg169/kg169 mutants (we use the form wwtr1kg169 for such homozygote mutants hereafter) survived to adulthood than their co-habiting siblings (S3E Fig, n = 165, Χ2 p = 0.017). To ask if the lack of Wwtr1 affected muscle function, we used two movement assays. At 4 dpf, larvae from a wwtr1kg169/+ in-cross were anaesthetised and tested for their response to electrical stimulation by measuring the maximum angle of evoked trunk movement. Wwtr1kg169 mutants moved less than their siblings (p = 0.02; Fig 2B). However, wwtr1kg169 mutants did not show a slower swim speed response to touch at either 5 or 11 dpf (Fig 2C and 2D) and grew normally at later stages (see below, Fig 4B). Whereas electrically-evoked tail movement likely reflects a high force regime in which movement may be limited by altered trunk structure or extracellular matrix deposition, swimming speed may represent a lower force regime under which a motility defect is not apparent. These results show that Wwtr1 is not essential for muscle growth but is required transiently for optimal muscle function during early larval stages.
(A) Muscle growth analysed in sibling wild type (wt), heterozygote and wwtr1kg133 mutant bred on the ß-Actin:membEGFP background and reared at 28.5ºC until 5 dpf and then at 26.5ºC to the indicated age. Wwtr1kg133 mutants and their siblings have similar muscle growth. Note that apparent gaps (asterisks) between fibres reflect reporter mosaicism, not absence of fibres. Bar = 50 μm. (B) Fish movement in response to electrical stimulation under anaesthetic was reduced in wwtr1kg169 mutants compared to siblings. Bar = 500 μm. (C,D). Swim velocity in response to touch stimulation at 5 dpf (C) and 11 dpf (D). Number of fish analysed is indicated on columns. Significant statistical results are shown (A-D) for Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons, with the exception of the highly significant main effect of age is in A.
Muscle properties analysed in yap1 mutants and their non-mutant siblings on the ß-Actin:membEGFP background reared at the indicated temperature from 70% epiboly until prim 10 (B, see schematic) or 5 dpf-equivalent (A,C-E) and 26.5ºC thereafter (E). (A) MZyap1kg137 or MZyap1kg137/kg152 mutants and their heterozygote siblings grown at non-permissive temperature have similar muscle growth. Lack of signal in occasional fibres due to mosaic transgene expression (asterisks) is distinguished from broad loss of fluorescence (#) in oedematous MZ mutants at 5 dpf. Bar = 50 μm. (B) Yap1kg151 mutants grown as schematised had myotome volume indistinguishable from their heterozygous and wt siblings. (C-E) Yap1kg151/+ in-cross grown at permissive temperature from 70% epiboly. Symbol shape indicates lay. Bar = 500 μm. (C) Yap1kg151 mutants at 6 days (equivalent to ~4.25 dpf) swim away from touch stimulation slower than their siblings (upper panel), even when corrected for shorter total length (lower panel). (D) When stimulated by electrical pulses, yap1kg151 mutants at 7 days (equivalent to 5 dpf) move their trunk through a smaller angle in comparison to their siblings. (E) Swimming velocity of yap1kg151 mutants at 13 days (equivalent to 11 dpf) is variable between lays. Symbol shapes represent different lays/experiments (3 lays C, 2 lays D,E). Number of fish analysed is indicated on columns. Significant statistical results are shown (A-E) for Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons.
Yap1 mutant fish are defective in movement
We next assessed the phenotype of homozygous yap1 mutants observing, as previously reported, temperature-dependent variability [25,85]; S3B and S3C Fig). At the normal rearing temperature of 28.5 ºC, some yap1 mutants had reduced eyes, pericardial oedema and shortened or curled bodies (S3B and S3C Fig). When two lays were reared to adulthood at 28.5 ºC, no mutants were found among 97 surviving siblings (Χ2, p = 1 x 10-8). Reared at a higher, restrictive temperature of 32 ºC, eye, body, oedema and lethality phenotypes were fully penetrant in mutants by the equivalent of 5 dpf, whereas their siblings were unaffected (S3C Fig). Conversely, rearing at the lower permissive temperature of 20.5 ºC supressed these gross morphological phenotypes and mutants survived beyond 5 dpf-equivalent (7 days). When such surviving mutants were subsequently reared through the nursery at 26.5 ºC in tanks with their non-mutant siblings, approximately half survived to 3 months of age (S3D Fig; n = 423 survivors, Χ2 p =6 x 10-6). Husbandry and legal considerations prevented rearing at 20.5 ºC beyond 5 dpf-equivalent. Surviving mutant females bred poorly. Nevertheless, some maternal-zygotic (MZ) yap1 mutant larvae obtained, when reared at the permissive temperature until 7 days, were motile and survived to adulthood. Thus, yap1 is dispensable for early myogenesis.
Failure to thrive in the nursery and breed might reflect poor muscle function leading to low food intake. So we investigated muscle at pre-feeding stages by analysing muscle growth in MZyap1kg137 mutants or MZyap1kg137/kg152 trans-heterozygotes on a plasma membrane-EGFP reporter background (Fig 3). Analysis of myotome volume and muscle fibre number revealed no defect in maternal-zygotic (MZ) yap1 mutants compared to their heterozygous siblings (Fig 3A). Even mutants showing oedema grew muscle normally, despite becoming sick and necrotic at 5 dpf (Fig 3A). To avoid the problem of the early oedema and other phenotypes, yap1kg151 mutant embryos were grown at the permissive low temperature from 70% epiboly to the prim 10 stage (3 days of incubation; see Materials and Methods for explanation of rearing and staging at low temperatures) and then shifted to the restrictive higher temperature during early larval muscle growth. At 5 days of incubation, the equivalent of 4 dpf stage, no difference in myotome growth was detected between yap1kg151 mutants and their siblings (Fig 3B). At 7 days of incubation, 5 dpf-equivalent, no defects in sarcomere structure were observed either in live larvae or after immunodetection of α-actinin (S4 Fig). Wwtr1 mRNA was not detectably upregulated in yap1kg151 mutants, either in larvae or in adult muscle (S2H Fig). Thus, Yap1 is not required for muscle growth at pre-feeding stages.
To ask if the lack of Yap1 affects muscle function, we next looked at yap1kg151 mutants using the two movement assays. Siblings from yap1kg151/+ in-crosses were reared at the permissive temperature until 6 days (4 dpf-equivalent) and measurement of swim velocity in response to touch revealed that yap1kg151 mutant swam slower than their siblings (p ≤ 0.04; Fig 3C; hereafter fish grown at 20.5ºC from 70% epiboly to 5 dpf-equivalent and then transferred to 26.5ºC are staged in days, not dpf). At 7 days, maximal evoked trunk movement in yap1kg151 mutant fish was also reduced compared to siblings (p ≤ 0.003; Fig 3D). Neither defect could be accounted for by altered size of mutants (S5A and S5B Fig). When yap1kg151 mutants were assayed for swim speed at 13 days the defect was less apparent (Fig 3E). One lay of yap1 mutants suggested persistence of a movement defect, whereas another lay did not (Fig 3E). We conclude that yap1 mutants have significant motility defects in early larval stages that appear more severe than those in wwtr1 mutants.
Cooperativity between Yap1 and Wwtr1
Given the transient nature of the motility defects in yap1 and wwtr1 single mutants, we asked if these paralogous genes have redundant function. As reported previously with other alleles, yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169 double mutants were not viable, showing a failure of tailbud outgrowth with misshapen somites (S6A Fig), and death at around 1 dpf, which is suggested to arise from a periderm defect [78]. Analysis of muscle development in double mutants did not reveal any defect in myogenesis, either when analysing expression of MRF genes at the 16 somite stage (16ss; S6B Fig), or in terminal differentiation and morphogenesis of slow and fast muscle at 18ss (S6C Fig). At the 24ss, shortly before their death, fast muscle tissue was well differentiated although of aberrant morphology in yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169 double mutants (S6D Fig). Thus, despite their early and sequential expression within the myogenic lineage, neither Yap1 nor Wwrt1 is required for early myogenesis.
We next asked if loss of one allele of wwtr1 or yap1 on a null mutant background of the other gene would affect the muscle growth at later stages. Even when reared at the restrictive temperature, at 2 dpf no difference in myotome size was apparent in yapkg151/+;wwtr1kg169, yapkg151;wwtr1kg169/+ or its MZ yapkg151;wwtr1kg169/+ counterpart (S6E and S6F Fig). MZ analysis could not be performed on wwtr1 mutants because eggs from wwtr1 mutant females could not be fertilised, as previously suggested [86]. Despite their good initial myogenesis, yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169/+ fish showed more severe and earlier defects than their yap1kg151 siblings elsewhere in the body (S3A Fig), and yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169 larvae developed mild cardiac oedema and failed to survive to adulthood (S3A and S3F Fig). Thus, yap1 and wwtr1 show partial genetic redundancy.
Yap1 mutant fish develop kyphoscoliosis
To investigate the role/s yap1 and wwtr1 play in later development, surviving single mutants were assessed further (Fig 4). Adult yap1kg151 mutants were significantly shorter and lighter than their siblings, although Fulton’s condition factor (k = Weight/Length3; [87] was not reduced in mutants (Figs 4A and S6C). A similar size reduction was observed in yap1kg137 and yap1kg152 mutants (S7B and S7D Fig). In contrast, the length, weight and k factor of wwtr1kg169 mutants were similar to their siblings (Figs 4B and S7A). Microtomographic (CT) examination of yap1kg151 siblings raised at the permissive temperature for 7 days (5 dpf-equivalent) revealed severe kyphoscoliosis in some surviving adult yap1kg151 mutants (Fig 4C). Histological analysis revealed no obvious muscle defect in yap1 mutants, whether kyphoscoliotic or not (Fig 4D).
To assess further the kyphoscoliotic phenotype in yap1kg151 mutants, a lay was raised to 5.5 months and kyphoscoliosis was again observed in some mutants (Fig 4E). From 86 genotyped fish, all 17 surviving yap1kg151 mutants and 17 wildtype siblings were closely analysed by alizarin red staining; 3/17 mutant fish had a severe kyphoscoliotic phenotype and 4/17 fish were less severely curved (Fig 4E). Ten mutant fish were straight and similar to their wildtype siblings, although in general shorter in length (Fig 4E). About a third of mutants died before adulthood (Figs 4E,4F and S3D; n = 128 surviving mutants out of 763 fish of 3 to 5.5 months of age, Χ2 p = 4 x 10-6) and about a third of these surviving yap1 mutants exhibited kyphoscoliosis (n = 21/66 mutants, Χ2 p = 1 x 10-12; Fig 4E and 4F). Commensurately, whole spine length and vertebral length measured in the caudal region was shorter in the straight yap1kg151 mutants (Fig 4G and 4H). The dorsoventral height of the posterior end of the vertebral centrum was reduced in mutants (Fig 4H). Thus, loss of Yap1 function leads to a variety of vertebral phenotypes including smaller vertebrae which, in some individuals, develops into a strong kyphoscoliosis and failure to thrive.
To ask if kyphoscoliosis was more penetrant in MZ mutants, a lay from a yap1kg151 mutant female with a heterozygous yap1kg151/+ male were reared at the permissive temperature until 5 dpf-equivalent and then at 26.5ºC until 27 days. Kyphoscoliosis occurred at a similar rate to zygotic mutants, with 3/10 MZyap1kg151 mutants exhibiting a bent spine (Fig 5A), suggesting that maternal Yap1 does not protect zygotic yap1 mutants from kyphoscoliosis.
When the forming spine of larval fish raised at the permissive temperature was analysed with the live bone stain calcein [88], kyphoscoliosis was apparent in 5/12 mutants at 18 days (Fig 5B), developing from a more mild kyphoscoliosis that was already visible in some larvae at 13 days (Fig 5C). We conclude that about a third of yap1kg151 mutants develop kyphoscoliosis from as early as 13 days (11 dpf-equivalent).
Investigating the cause of kyphoscoliosis
Three reported causes of kyphoscoliosis in zebrafish are defective notochord development, alterations of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the neural canal and perturbation of the Reissner’s fibre. We investigated each but failed to find evidence of defects in yap1 mutants (S8–S10 Figs).
Multiple mutant zebrafish lines that have disorganised notochord cells develop kyphoscoliosis [89–91]. Yap1 mRNA is present early within the notochord (Fig 1E–1G). We therefore examined yap1kg151 mutants reared at the permissive temperature until 3 days (48 hpf-equivalent). No defects were noted in notochords of six mutants examined by compound microscopy for size and vacuolation at 3 dpf (S8 Fig), nor in >200 embryos resulting from four separate yap1kg151/+ in-crosses. Vertebral centrum defects frequently arise in mutants with notochord defects [92]. Our observations at 13 days failed to reveal defects in vertebral centrum formation (Fig 5C), further arguing against an early notochordal origin for the kyphoscoliosis.
Murine Yap1 deficiency causes hydrocephalus [93]. Defective cilia in cerebral ventricles lead to abnormal flow of cerebrospinal fluid that, in turn, has been suggested to cause both hydrocephalus and kyphoscoliosis [94,95]. Scanning electron microscopy of the rhombencephalic ventricle of kyphoscoliotic and non-kyphoscoliotic yap1kg151 mutants and their wild type siblings, failed to reveal either hydrocephalus or ciliary defects (S9 Fig). We conclude that Yap1-dependent kyphoscoliosis is not accompanied by a visible defect in ventricular ciliary morphology.
We did not examine ciliary function in the spinal canal, which is required for proper Reissner’s fibre formation. Kyphoscoliosis can arise in zebrafish with defects in the Reissner’s fibre, located within the spinal canal [96,97]. However, immunodetection of the Reissner’s fibre revealed its presence at the 5 dpf-equivalent stage in yap1 mutants grown at the permissive temperature (S10 Fig).
Another cause of kyphoscoliosis in zebrafish is loss of Dstyk activity, which also reduces notochordal collagen expression and shortens the body axis by 2 dpf [98]. We did not observe either a shortening of the body axis or reduction in notochordal col9a1b or col8a1a mRNA in yap1kg151 mutants (Fig 6A and 6B). However, yap1kg151 mutants did display focal losses of strong col8a1a mRNA accumulation in the hypochord in all seven mutants genotyped (Figs 6B and S11). Other genes, such as fast myosin heavy chain genes fmyhc1.2 and fmyhc2.1, which are regionally expressed along the body axis, showed no defects (Fig 6C and 6D). We conclude that Yap1 is essential for normal patterning of hypochord development but how this early phenotype relates to later growth defects and kyphoscoliosis is unclear.
Larval growth requires Yap1
Growth of yap1 mutants was studied in more detail. Fish from a yap1kg151/+ in-cross were reared at the low permissive temperature until 7 days to allow early survival and their growth under optimal husbandry conditions followed at 26.5ºC in our professional aquarium. Yap1kg151 mutant fish analysed at 13 days were already smaller in total fish length, spine length, head size and tail fin calcified area (Fig 7A-7E). Although fish with bent spines were not particularly short at 13 days (Fig 7B), by 18 days scoliotic fish were amongst the shortest in the lay (Figs 5B and 7F). At 13 days, spine and total fish lengths were reduced similarly (Fig 7G). Thus, Yap1 is required for normal growth of the larval skeleton.
Heterozygous in-crosses of yap1kg151/+ reared at the permissive 20.5ºC temperature (A,C-H) or wwtr1kg169/+ reared to 28.5ºC (B) until 5 dpf-equivalent and then at 26.5ºC to the indicated age, points plotted with jitter to avoid overlap. (A) Reduced growth of yap1kg151 mutants. Some yap1kg151 mutant individuals showed a dramatic tail truncation not observed in non-mutant (inset). (B) At 3 months, adult wwtr1kg169 mutants have similar weight and length to their wild type and heterozygous siblings but survive poorly (Χ2, n = 165, p = 0.02). (C) Computerised Tomography (CT) scans of adult fish at 4.5 months viewed from lateral and dorsal. (D) NADH tetrazolium reductase stain showing comparable oxidative/slow (arrows), intermediate (arrowheads) and glycolytic/fast fibres (asterisks) between wild type and yap1kg151 mutant muscle in superficial (left) and medial (right) myotome transverse cryosections taken at 6 months. (E) Lateral view of wholemount alcian red stained 5.5 month old skeletons. (F) Frequency of curved spine within sibling 4.5-5.5 month adult fish is greater in surviving mutants from four separate yap1kg151/+ in-crosses compared to their siblings (Χ2, n = 340, p = 1 x 10-11). (G) Spine length of 5.5 month sibling wt and yap1kg151 fish. (H) Caudal vertebrae length, height and posterior height of 5.5 month straight and curved yap1kg151 fish. Statistics show significant results of Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons (G,H). Bars: A,C and E = 5 mm; D = 100 μm. Number of fish analysed is indicated on columns.
(A) Larval fish at 27 days deriving from a female yap1kg151 x male yap1kg151/+ cross reared at 20.5 ºC until 7 days (5 dpf-equivalent) and then at 26.5 ºC. Wholemount fish before (upper) and after (lower) skeletal stain for bone (red) and cartilage (blue). Note reduced dorsoventral extent in severely kyphoscoliotic mutant (right). (B,C) Several examples of larval fish deriving from a yap1kg151/+ in-cross reared at 20.5 ºC until 7 days and then at 26.5 ºC stained live with calcein. Lateral views of 18 days (B) and 13 days (C). Numbers indicate fraction of fish of each genotype with morphology shown. Bars = 1 mm.
In situ mRNA hybridisation for collagen genes implicated in kyphoscoliosis and fast myosin heavy chain genes involved in axial patterning in sibling embryos reared from a yap1kg151/+ in-cross at non-permissive temperature (28.5ºC) that were photographed and subsequently PCR genotyped. (A,B) Collagen extracellular matrix genes col9a1b (A) and col8a1a (B) are unchanged in 36 hpf notochord (arrows) of mutants compared to their siblings. Col8a1a mRNA is abundant in sibling hypochord throughout the axis (B, arrowheads, shown magnified in insets), but lacking in several segments in mutants (B, brackets). Additional col8a1a-stained embryos of each genotype are shown in S11 Fig. (C,D) In contrast, the axially-patterned localisation of fast myosin heavy chains fmyhc1.2 (D, trunk) and fmyhc2.1 (E; tail) is unaltered at 48 hpf. Numbers of (individuals with the pattern shown)/ (total genotyped individuals) are displayed on each panel. Bars = 100 μm.
Yap1kg151/+ in-crosses were reared at 20.5°C from 70% epiboly to 7 days (5 dpf-equivalent) and then at 26.5°C until 13 days (11 dpf-equivalent) or 18 days (16 dpf-equivalent). Larvae were stained with calcein. (A) Schematics of measurements made (white). (B-G,H,M,N) Total fish length (B,F,N), head area (C), spine length (D), tail fin calcified area (E), Spine length divided by fish length ratio (G), number of calcified vertebrae (H) and myotome 17 volume/total fish length cubed (M). (I,J,K) After segregation into groups containing 28 or 29 calcified vertebrae, total fish length (I) and head area (J), but not tail calcified area (K), were reduced in yap1 mutants compared to wt siblings. (L) Volume of myotome 17 in 13-14 day fish reared in group nursery environment (clear bars) or individually with unlimited food (striped bars). (N) Length of fish at 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, 15, 17 and 18 days reared individually with unlimited food (striped bars) or in group nursery environment (clear bars). Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s post hoc comparisons. Green bars wt siblings, blue bars yap1kg151/+ siblings red bars yap1kg151. Red circle symbols represent curved spine fish (B-F,H-K). Symbol shape represents different lays/experiments (L,N). Number of fish analysed is indicated on columns.
Yap1kg151 mutant fish appeared slightly delayed in development, as mutants had on average one fewer calcified vertebrae than their siblings (p = 0.0005 Mann-Whitney; Fig 7H). When larvae were stage-matched according to their number of calcified vertebrae, yap1kg151 mutants still had a growth defect compared to their siblings, with shorter total length and head area (p ≤ 0.02 Mann-Whitney; Fig 7I and 7J). These reductions were not more pronounced in bent compared to straight mutants (Fig 7I and 7J compare circle and triangle symbols). In contrast, tail fin calcification appeared unchanged after stage-matching mutants and siblings (Fig 7K), suggesting this feature is indirectly dependent on Yap1. These findings suggest that yap1 mutants have a gross skeletal growth defect independent of a subtle developmental delay.
The skeletal reduction in yap1kg151 mutants was accompanied by defects in muscle growth. The myotome volume measured between 13 and 14 days was reduced in mutants housed with their siblings (p = 0.01 Mann-Whitney; Fig 7L). Fish housed alone grew more slowly despite ad libitum feeding and had yet to show a muscle defect at the same age (Fig 7L). Although the yap1kg151 mutant fish reared in groups had smaller myotome volumes, this size difference was removed if we divided it by body length cubed, to measure their overall condition [99,100], an analogue of Fulton’s k; Fig 7M). Therefore, despite a clear skeletal defect in yap1 mutants, there is little indication of a disproportionate muscle defect that might account of the skeletal changes.
To ask when the growth defect arose, fish reared under the permissive low temperature regime until 5 dpf-equivalent (7 days) were measured at 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 days. Under standard husbandry conditions, zebrafish get nutrients entirely from their yolk for the first 5 dpf, at which point they start to feed but yolk is not fully consumed until at least 10 dpf. After the first length measurement, the fish were raised in a light cycling incubator at 28.5°C in individual 35 mm wells in 6 well plates to enable longitudinal study of each fish. Fish were fed rotifers as they would be in the aquarium from 7 days. Surprisingly, these fish remained small and yap1kg151 mutants showed no difference in length or muscle volume from their siblings even at 13 days, nor did any have kyphoscoliosis (Fig 7L and 7N). However, when the experiment was repeated and fish raised individually through 15 and 17 days, yap1kg151 mutants began to show a growth defect (Fig 7N). We conclude that Yap1 is required for normal larval growth during the mid-larval period.
Discussion
The current study reports three novel findings. Firstly, that yap1 loss of function mutation causes a variably penetrant kyphoscoliosis arising in early larval life. Secondly, that yap1 mutation leads to a generalised growth defect that becomes apparent even in morphologically normal individuals at the mid-larval stage. Thirdly, that wwtr1 function is required for optimal survival to adulthood even in a protected aquarium environment. Our study also confirms several observations made with distinct yap1 and wwtr1 mutant alleles in zebrafish, including a striking temperature sensitivity of the yap1 loss of function phenotype.
Temperature sensitivity of yap1 putative null alleles
Four separate yap1 early-truncating mutant alleles occurring in distinct exons and isolated in different laboratories, yap1sa25458, yap1mw48, yap1zf2210 and yap1kg151, have now shown temperature sensitivity, with higher temperatures being non-permissive [25,85,101]; the current study). Although none of these alleles is a deletion, they are likely to reveal the null phenotype. Yap1kg151 causes translational termination early in the first coding exon, shows nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, and lacks evidence of genetic compensation. Moreover, as previously reported with other yap1 alleles that lack Yap1 immunoreactivity, at the non-permissive temperature yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169 dual loss of function is embryonic lethal during late somitogenesis stages, whereas loss of yap1 function alone leads to cardiac and yolk sac oedema, small eyes and death in the early larval stage in both zygotic and MZ mutants [25,78]. At the permissive temperature, almost all yap1kg151 mutants appear wild type at 5 dpf. Loss of wwtr1 function, on the other hand, leads to viable adults despite the reported cardiac and other defects [25,48,78,86,102–104].
Temperature sensitivity of null mutants has been reported in bacteria and yeast [105–107]. In animals, however, ts alleles are generally missense single amino acid substitutions affecting protein folding [108]. Interestingly, a truncating loss of function mutation (possibly not null) in scrib, which interacts genetically with yap1, is also temperature sensitive [85]. We suggest that temperature-sensitivity of unknown modifier gene/s or physiological processes account for variable penetrance of yap1 mutant alleles. The role of Yap1 in the response to environmental temperature merits further investigation.
Yap1 is required for larval motility and growth
Normal Yap1 function is essential to avoid early developmental defects, including oedema and eye defects. When yap1kg151 mutant fish are grown at non-permissive temperatures, the larvae do not survive. Pericardial oedema is frequently attributed to cardiovascular defects and Yap1 has been extensively implicated in cardiac development [109–113]. Pericardial and yolk-sac oedema has also been attributed to kidney or liver defects [114,115] and yap1 has been reported to play roles in both kidney and liver development [116–118]. Interestingly, the earliest defect observed in yap1kg151 mutants is an uneven axial distribution of col8a1a mRNA in the hypochord, an axial midline structure underlying the notochord. Hypochord signals, such as Vegfc, have been implicated in lymphangiogenic and vascular patterning [119], defects in which might contribute to the cardiovascular phenotype of mutants. However, gross vascular flow or morphology defects were not observed at 36 hpf; further study is warranted. Thus, the data are consistent with roles of Yap1 in early development of a variety of organs.
When grown at the low permissive temperature until the 5 dpf-equivalent stage, fish lacking zygotic Yap1 have a motility defect but normal body and muscle size and, even when shifted to non-permissive conditions at 5 dpf-equivalent, some go on to survive to adulthood. Nevertheless, following Yap1 inactivation from 5 dpf-equivalent, yap1kg151 mutants show an early growth deficit, which amounts to about a 10% reduction in length, head and tail size. A subset of such yap1 mutants show no morphological or obvious behavioural defects, but have a slight delay in vertebral calcification and growth. These ossification defects correlate with the reduction in body length. Various murine Yap1/Wwtr1 mutant combinations show reduced overall growth [54], as we observe in yap1 mutants. The findings suggest that the growth defect in yap1kg151 mutants arises as early as 13 days and persists into adulthood, accompanied by poor survival.
The mechanism underlying the motility defect is unclear because Yap1 protein is expressed in multiple tissues. Histological and size analysis of the yap1 mutants at early larval stages show myotome size and cellularity are similar to wild type siblings, even though early motility is required for muscle growth [18]. Although the function of larval muscle is poor, adult muscle appears histologically normal except for the reduced size of the fish. TEAD transcription factors can mediate Yap1 effects on transcription and a recently isolated tead1a mutant appeared ‘slimmer’ than wild type; however scoliosis was not reported [120]. Resolution of the cell autonomy and mechanism of Yap1 action will await tissue-specific genetic manipulation.
Yap1 helps maintain vertebral column symmetry
Yap1 is required to ensure symmetrical vertebral column morphogenesis. A kyphoscoliotic spinal phenotype of variable severity arises when mutant larvae are grown at the permissive temperature until 5 dpf-equivalent stage and the non-permissive temperature thereafter. Whereas the only early cartilage or bone defect in the backbone of larvae was a slight delay in calcification, some individual mutants showed a mildly curved spine at 13 days and by 1 month of age kyphoscoliosis was apparent in around a third of zygotic yap1 mutants. Similar defects were not observed in wwtr1kg169 mutants, yap1kg151/+ heterozygotes or yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ dual heterozygotes even if grown at the non-permissive temperature throughout their development. Analysis of yap1 MZ mutants revealed a similar phenotype to the zygotic mutants; about a third of MZyap1kg151 mutants showed kyphoscoliosis, suggesting that the maternal contribution does not affect the penetrance of the zygotic phenotype.
Yap1 has been extensively implicated in mechanosignalling [50,121,122]. A correlation between mechanical influences and kyphoscoliosis has long been proposed [34,35,37–39,123]. Once an initial defect in the spine occurs, generally from an unknown cause, worsening of the defect often occurs during adolescent growth spurts. In the 1880s, this observation engendered a hypothesis, the Hueter-Volkmann ‘Law’, which stated that vertebral growth is retarded by mechanical compression of the growth plate and stimulated by reduction of compression [34,39] thereby explaining the exacerbation of scoliosis during growth under asymmetric gravitational load. Studies on rat tails show that mechanical force can modulate or correct vertebral growth [35]. The kyphoscoliosis observed in the yap1kg151 mutants is first observed from 13 days and gradually worsens in some individuals, during zebrafish adolescence [124]. However, this process cannot be attributed to gravitational positive feedback effects because larvae are neutrally buoyant. Perhaps, in the absence of yap1, mechanical force is not transmitted or sensed correctly along the spine, causing a curve that, once present, progresses to kyphoscoliosis in about a third of the mutant fish.
About a third of yap1kg151 mutants also die during rearing. We note, however, that the frequency of kyphoscoliotic mutants did not obviously decrease with age, suggesting either that mutants die for reasons unrelated to kyphoscolioisis or that, as kyphoscoliotic mutants perish, additional mutants develop kyphoscoliosis during their adolescence.
As with humans, the heterogeneous genetic background in zebrafish yap1 mutants may explain the variable penetrance and time of onset of kyphoscoliosis. Alternatively, subtle epigenetic or environmental variables may affect the expression of the yap1 mutant phenotype. Such effects may account for the variable survival rate between different lays.
Poor larval survival without Wwtr1
Zebrafish wwtr1kg169 mutants, like those previously reported [25,86,118,125–127] do not recapitulate the failure to undergo skeletal calcification reported in wwtr1 morphants [73]. This is in contrast to murine manipulations in which Wwtr1 mutant mice are born significantly smaller than siblings with minor defects in ossification [54].
Despite the viability and unaltered size of zebrafish wwtr1kg169 mutants, they survive less well than their siblings, even in the protected environment of an aquarium. The wwtr1bns35 mutant allele has been shown to cause defects in cardiac trabeculation [126], which might enhance larval death. Mice lacking Wwtr1 die between birth and weaning, possibly from kidney defects [54,70]. As we confirm that yap1;wwtr1 double mutants show lethally severe early defects, it seems that balance of functional requirement for Yap1 and/or Wwtr1 in individual tissues has varied during vertebrate evolution. We also note that yap1kg151/+ heterozygosity may prevent survival of wwtr1kg169 mutants. Clearly, some Wwtr1 function(s) may be essential for effective survival in the wild.
Cell autonomy of Yap1 action in kyphoscoliosis unresolved
As we have analysed putative null yap1 and wwtr1 mutations, the cellular origin of the observed defects remains unknown. All components of the neuromusculoskeletal system, nerve, muscle, tendon, cartilage, bone and associated vessels, or a combination of them, are candidates for the site(s) of action of Yap1. Despite their early poor motility, the earliest putative precursor to kyphoscoliosis that we could discern in yap1kg151 mutants was at 11–13 days in spinal bone itself, where a delay in calcification was accompanied by mild spinal curvature in some individuals. Vertebrae arise from cells of the notochord sheath, somitic sclerotome and neural crest, but no defects in these tissues were observed at earlier stages. An osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) bone phenotype correlating with the extent of reduction of Yap1 and Wwtr1 in bone precursors has been reported in murine conditional mutants [55]. Murine cartilage-specific deletion of Yap1 and Wwtr1 has also shown subtle morphological bone defects [58]. Moreover, Yap1 and Wwtr1 have opposing effects at different stages of limb osteoblast differentiation [59]. Thus, vertebral precursor cells remain prime candidates for a cell autonomous origin of the defect.
The striking segmental interruptions of the hypochord observed in 36 hpf yap1 mutants suggest a possible vascular or lymphatic origin for kyphoscoliosis. We note, however, that the hypochord defect did not cause any obvious vessel defects and was fully penetrant at the non-permissive temperature. Further studies are required to determine whether and how similar defects in a subset of embryos reared at the permissive temperature might contribute to either the motility defect or the later vertebral anomalies and kyphoscoliosis.
Many zebrafish scoliotic phenotypes arise from defects in early notochord vacuolation, elongation and extracellular matrix deposition that lead to subsequent defective of ossification [98,128]. Yap1 mutants lack the poor notochord vacuolation and body length reduction at embryonic stages and calcein vertebral centrum defects at 15–20 dpf observed in dstyk and MZptk7a mutants and vangl2 knockdowns. Thus, the yap1 vertebral column phenotype arises at the mid larval stage after apparently normal early notochord formation.
The early motility defect is also a possible cause of kyphoscoliosis. Defects arising in the central nervous system are poor candidate kyphoscoliosis triggers because yap1 mutants showed early motility defects in response to direct electrical stimulation, which is thought to act peripherally [129]. So altered muscle-derived force was a prime trigger candidate, particularly because severe craniofacial cartilage and bone defects can arise from early muscle defects caused by mutation of genes acting cell autonomously in muscle [11]. Given the strong and sequential expression of yap1 and wwtr1 during myotomal myogenesis and evidence that Yap1 can affect murine myogenesis [57,66,130,131], we hypothesised that early muscle defects in yap1 mutants might cause force asymmetry leading to kyphoscoliosis. However, an extensive analysis of early muscle failed to reveal a morphological or histological defect in mutants, despite their poor motility. Moreover, yap1kg151 mutants show normal early muscle growth even when shifted to the non-permissive temperature during the early growth phase. Yap1 has also been shown to affect tendons [132–134], but given that tendons are small in 5 dpf zebrafish, we have not analysed this tissue.
Recessive variants in MYH3, the gene encoding the skeletal muscle-specific embryonic myosin heavy chain, cause spondylocarpotarsal synostosis (SCTS), characterised by vertebral fusions and scoliosis [135]. Ablation of the murine Myh3 gene similarly causes severe muscle defects with altered muscle Yap1 signalling and leads to scoliosis in surviving mice [5]. Our finding that loss of yap1 function can cause kyphoscoliosis strengthens the evidence for the involvement of Yap1 signalling in the aetiology of MYH3-associated SCTS and possibly other scolioses. Bharadwaj et al. further suggested that Myh3 ablation caused muscle defects and scoliosis through Yap1 activation because both phenotypes were mitigated by CA3, a drug that can block Yap1 action [5]. These observations raise the hypothesis that inhibition of Yap1 function cell autonomously within muscle mitigates scoliosis by its clear beneficial effects on muscle development. However, yap1 mutant fish do not show a severe muscle defect, yet have scoliosis. Although zebrafish do not contain an Myh3 orthologue, we observed no alteration in expression of regionally-expressed fmyhc1.2 and fmyhc2.1 fast myosin genes that might have contributed to kyphoscoliosis. Moreover, in fish, it is loss of yap1 function rather than gain, that promotes scoliosis. Thus, defining the cellular site and mechanism of Yap1 action required to prevent kyphoscoliosis is a priority.
Familial Kyphoscoliotic Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome arises from rare mutations in genes implicated in collagen matrix formation (PLOD1 and FKBP14; [136]). GWAS studies of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have yielded hits near genes involved in neuromuscular (EPHA4/PAX3, LBX1, SOX6 and GPR126) and skeletal (PAX1, SOX9, TBX1, MEOX2) development and in matrix biology (BNC2, FBN1), but to date account for a small fraction of heritability [3,137]. A YAP1-BNC2 interaction is implicated in matrix remodelling in response to mechanosignals [138]. We speculate that Yap1 function mediates mechanosignalling to regulate cell-matrix interactions in one or more tissues of the developing neuromusculoskeletal system and may contribute to some forms of AIS.
Lastly, a number of mutations affecting sensorimotor function have yielded kyphoscoliotic phenotypes in zebrafish, including some affecting cilia and the Reissner’s fibre [95,97]. While the cell types requiring this ciliary function are unclear, it has been suggested that defects in fluid circulation in the neural ventricles can underlie both Reissner’s fibre defects and scoliosis [94,96]. Although Yap1 has not been implicated in ciliary function, we investigated this possibility by analysing cilia in the ventricle and the Reissner’s fibre but failed to observe any morphological defect. Whether other neural system defects deriving from loss of Yap1 function, but acting through altered muscle or hypochord functionality, underlie kyphoscoliosis remains to be determined. While the mechanism leading to kyphoscoliosis in some individual yap1 mutants remains unclear, we hypothesise that Yap1 may act to suppress positive mechanofeedback leading to asymmetric bone growth.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All experiments were performed in accordance with licences held under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and later modifications after approval by King’s College London Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board and the UK Home Office and conforming to all relevant guidelines and regulations.
Zebrafish lines and maintenance
Genetically-altered Danio rerio myf5hu2022 [82], myf6 kg126 (new, 3 bp deletion creating STOP (UAG) at position aa34: predicted null), myod1fh261 [11,139], myogkg125 [80], wwtr1kg133 (new, TALEN: 1 bp deletion T83, creating 4 aa nonsense tail then STOP; predicted null), wwtr1kg169 (new, TALEN: 8 bp deletion 82–89 CTTTTTAA, 105 aa nonsense tail; predicted null), yap1kg137 (new, TALEN: 19 bp deletion 106–124 AAAAACACCATCGTCCCCC, 4 aa nonsense tail; predicted null), yap1kg151 (TALEN: 5 bp deletion 111–115 CACCA, 84 aa nonsense tail; predicted null), yap1kg152 (TALEN: 11 bp deletion 110–120 ACACCATCGTC, 82 aa nonsense tail; predicted null), Tg(Ola.Actb:Hsa.HRAS-EGFP)vu119 (ßActin:membEGFP; [140]), Tg(actc1b:mCherryCAAX)pc22 and Tg(actc1b:LIFEACT-EGFP)pc21 [141] were kept on AB background, reared at King’s College London on a 14/10h light/dark cycle [142]. Adults were kept at 26.5°C and embryos/larvae were kept at 28.5°C (or 20.5°C or 32.0°C where stated) in the dark until 5 dpf-equivalent stage. To avoid developmental problems, including increased death rates [143], caused by rearing fish at non-standard temperatures during early embryonic stages, all fish were reared at 28.5ºC until 70% epiboly (~8 hpf) and then shifted to alternate temperatures as described. For clarity, the age of fish reared at non-standard temperatures are described by their absolute age in days, rather than by standard dpf stages at 28.5ºC (S1 Table). Pilot experiments showed equivalent development of length, pigmentation and yolk consumption at 5 dpf @ 28.5ºC and 7 days @ 20.5ºC. Fish raised past 5 dpf-equivalent developmental stage (7 days if raised at 20.5°C) in the incubator were kept separately in 12 or 24 well plates on a 12/12h light/dark cycle fed with fresh rotifer food daily.
Genotyping
Adult fish fin-clips or whole anaesthetised embryos/larva were dissolved in 50 μl 25 mM NaOH, 0.2 mM EDTA for 1 hour at 95°C and neutralized with 50 μl of 55 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0. Myf5hu202 was genotyped by PCR using primers CATTGTCTCCAATGGGCCTGCAAAGCTCG and GGATCTCTACCTTGGGGAGGCGTTG annealed at 60°C, followed by restriction digest with TaqI (NEB, R0149S) at 65°C for 4 hours to over-night, yielding uncut wt band (175 bp) and cut mutant bands (145 and 30 bp). Myf6 kg126 was genotyped by PCR using primers GGGCACCAGAAGGCCTATTG and GGTTGTATGTGTAAGGGTCAGT GTC annealed at 59°C, digested with RsaI (NEB, R0167) at 37°C for 4 hours to over-night yielding cut wild-type bands (250 and 396 bp), uncut mutant band (646 bp). Myodfh261 was genotyped by PCR using primers GGACCCCAGGCTTGTTC and GTTGGATCTCGGACTGGA annealed at 56°C, digested with BsaXI (NEB, R0609) at 37°C for 4 hours to over-night, yielding uncut wild-type band (397 bp) and cut mutant bands (260, 119 and 18 bp). Myogkg125 was genotyped by PCR using primers TCAGAAACACCCACAAACGCTCAC and GCAGGCCCAGGGGAGACACT annealed at 54°C, digested with EcoRV-HF (NEB, R3195) at 37°C for 4 hours to over-night, yielding cut wild-type bands (197 and 164 bp) and uncut mutant band (361 bp). Wwtr1kg133 and wwtr1kg169 were genotyped by PCR using primers CGGCCATTTTAATCGAAGTTTGTT and CTGTAGGGACGCCGGAGATGAGC annealed at 57°C followed by sequencing (Genewiz) with the latter primer. Yap1kg137, yap1kg151 and yap1kg152 were genotyped by PCR using primers TCTTTTTGGGTTGTTTTGGATTA and GGCTCTGGCGGCGTGAA annealed at 57°C, followed by sequencing with the former primer. An alternative High Resolution Melting (HRM) method was also used to genotype yap1kg151 using the primers ACCGATCTGGAGGCTCTTTT and GTCTGGCAGCTTTCTCAACC and wwtr1kg169 using primers GTGATCCATGTCGCCAAAGACT and GCGGCATATCCTTGTTC. Both HRM methods used the standard 60°C annealing temperature with Melt Dr (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 4415450) reagent in an Applied Biosystems ViiA 7 with the HRM set-up in duplicate 10 μl reaction volumes.
Generation and characterisation of yap1 and wwtr1 mutants
Yap1 and Wwtr1 mutants were generated by TALEN (Transcription activator-like effector nuclease) genome editing. Two RNA guide TALEN arms were designed to target within the first exon of each gene, 5′-TAACGCTGTGATGAACCC-3’ and 5’-CCCCTTCCGTGCCGATG-3’ (exon 1 of yap1) and 5′-TGGACACGGATCTGGAGG-3’ and 5’-CATGAACCCGAAACCGA-3’ (exon 1 of wwtr1) using Zifit software [144, 145]. TALEN arms were constructed using cloning by the REAL Assembly Plasmid Method [145]. Capped TALEN mRNAs were injected into single cell embryos to induce FokI cuts at the target site. Alleles were selected at F1 that carried mutations causing premature stop codons after a nonsense tail. All the alleles described for each gene have a similar phenotype, but yap1kg151 and wwtr1kg169 were eventually favoured due to their high levels of nonsense mediated decay. Repeated outcrossing to ‘wildtype’ AB did not reveal changes in phenotype to F4.
Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed on RNA extracted from four sibling individual 7–8 dpf-equivalent larval trunk/tails of each genotype (heads were used for genotyping) or from dissected adult muscle of the indicated number of genotyped sibling individuals. Larvae were sonicated on ice in 100 μL TRI Reagent (Sigma T9424) and left at room temperature for 5 minutes before 1-Bromo-3-chloropropane (50 μL, Sigma B9673 was added, incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature, microfuged at 4°C for 10 minutes and RNA purified from the aqueous upper phase by phenol/chloroform extraction. Adult muscle (~50 mg) was processed in 500 μL of TRI Reagent using a Tissue Ruptor (Qiagen 9002755) and purified using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen 74106). The cDNA synthesis and qPCR were performed as described [146], using primers listed in S2A Table.
In situ mRNA hybridization (ISH), immunodetection, histology and imaging
ISH was performed as described [147]. Digoxigenin-labelled probe for yap1 was made by PCR from 24 hpf cDNA with the primers TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAACGCCGCCAGAGCCAAAGTCC and GGATCCATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGGAAGTGCCGCCATCCTGCTCCAT. Probes for wwtr1 were made from Image Clone 9037619 (Sourcebioscience). Primers used to make probes for col8a1a, col9a1b, fmyhc1.2 and fmyhc2.1 are listed in S2B Table. Embryos were immersed in glycerol and imaged on a Leica MZ16F with LED light attachment, Olympus DP70 camera and DP Controller software.
Immunodetection was performed as previously described [148] with antibodies Rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, Torrey Pines, ABIN110592), A4.1025/sarcomeric myosin heavy chain (MyHC; 1:10, Abcam, ab37484), F59/slow MyHC (1:5, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-32732), F310/fast myosin light chain (1:5 DSHB), Mouse anti-alpha-actinin (1:500 Sigma A7811), GαMIgG(H + L)Alexa Fluor488 (1:1000 Invitrogen A-11001), GαMIgA-FITC (1:1000 Serotec 5104-3104F), GαMIgG1AlexaFluor555 (1:1000 Invitrogen A-21127), GantiR IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor488 (1:1000 Invitrogen A-11008) and Hoechst 33342 (1:2000 New England Biolabs 4082S). Larvae older than 2 dpf were lightly fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Embryos/larvae were mounted in low melting point agarose and imaged on a Zeiss LSM Exciter confocal microscope using Zeiss 20 × /1.0 NA dipping objective, analysed using Fiji (NIH, ImageJ2 2.9.0/1.53t) or ZEN 2009 (Zeiss) software. Myotome volume and fibre number measurements followed [84]. NADH tetrazolium reductase staining was performed as described [80].
Immunodetection of the Reissner’s fibre was performed as described in [97] on bleached larvae at 5 dpf-equivalent using 3 day incubation for the AFRU rabbit primary antibody (a generous gift of Dr. M. Monserrat Guerra, Universidad Austral de Chile) and 3 days for the secondary antibody. Some larvae were transected to improve access. Individuals were countrerstained with Hoechst 33342 in the secondary step.
Skeletal assays
Alizarin Red and Alcian Blue staining was performed as previously described [149]. Measurements of spine and caudal vertebrae were performed using Image J version 1.53. Measurements on caudal vertebrae C15-C20 were averaged for each fish. Calcein staining of live fish was as described [150]. Micro Computerized Tomography (CT) scans of 4.5 month frozen fish supported by gauze were made in the Centre for Craniofacial Regenerative Biology (KCL) using a Scanco MicroCT 50 (300–350 ms exposure, 70 kV, 114 μA, 10 μm resolution).
Scanning electron microscopy
Skulls were opened with forceps, the brain removed and bisected with a sapphire knife, fixed in 2% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) overnight at 4°C, and processed by the KCL Centre for Ultrastructural Imaging.
Movement assays
The larval tail movement assay was carried out as previously described [146], and tail angle of movement was measured in Fiji (NIH) software. Velocity swim assay conducted as previously described [151], recorded at early larval stages on Leica MZ16F with LED light attachment, Olympus DP70 camera and DP Controller software or with an iPhone 13. Fish velocity was measured using Tracker (http://physlets.org/tracker) software, by averaging the second and third time intervals at the early (4–5 dpf) larval stage, but the second to fourth time intervals at the later (11 dpf) larval stage because motility persisted longer than in younger larvae. The first interval was omitted as it was unknown when within it the fish began to move.
Statistics
Unless otherwise stated, parametric and non-parametric tests appropriate to the data were performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.6.1. Χ2 tests were performed in Excel for Mac 16.101.3. Raw count data underlying the current work is available in S1 Data.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Yap1 and wwtr1 mRNA accumulation is altered in myod1 mutants.
In situ mRNA hybridisation for yap1 mRNA (A,C,E,G) and wwtr1 mRNA (B,D,F,H) in genotyped mutant and wild type (wt) sibling embryos from single lays from heterozygote in-crosses of MRF mutants myod1fh261, myogkg125, myf5hu2022 and myf6 kg126. Lateral whole mounts, anterior to left, dorsal to top are magnified at right. At lower right, transverse cryosections in the yolk-extension region have dorsal to top and show somitic muscle tissue (yellow dots). (A) Yap1 mRNA is up-regulated in superficial somitic regions (arrowheads) of myod1fh261 mutants (myod1fh261 vs wt sib p = 0.01, myod1fh261 vs myod1fh261/+ p = 0.012, wt sib vs myod1fh261/+ p = 0.877, Kruskal-Wallis, adjusted with Bonferroni-Holm). (B) Myodfh261 mutants have similar intensity but lesser extent of somitic wwtr1 mRNA signal in comparison to wt siblings. (C-H) Yap1 mRNA in myogkg125, myf5hu2022 and myf6 kg126 mutants appears comparable to wt siblings (C,E,G). Wwtr1 mRNA accumulated less in myogkg125 mutant somites in comparison to wt sibling (D). Wwtr1 mRNA in myf5hu2022 and myf6 kg126 was indistinguishable from wt (F,H). Fractions represent number of embryos with phenotype shown/numbers genotyped, in all cases heterozygotes appeared wt. Bars = 100 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s002
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Genome edited yap1 and wwtr1 loss-of-function mutants.
(A,B) Schematics of yap1 (A) and wwtr1 (B) protein, mRNA and gene showing location of TALEN binding sites in exon 1 and primers used to identify and genotype mutants. (C-G) Mutant alleles showing schematic of protein truncation (top left, red indicates length of predicted nonsense C-terminal peptide), sequencing traces of heterozygote (top right) and in situ mRNA hybridisation showing nonsense-mediated decay in yap1kg151 (C), yap1kg152 (D) and wwtr1kg169 (E), but not yap1kg137 (F) or wwtr1kg133 (G). Fractions show number of each genotype among unsorted embryos and how blind sorting of the three ISH phenotypes was confirmed with 100% genotype accuracy in kg151, kg152 and kg169, but genotypes could not be distinguished by ISH in kg137 or kg133. Bars = 100 μm. (H) qRT-PCR for yap1 or wwtr1 mRNA in wwtr1kg169 and yap1kg151, respectively, in 5 dpf-equivalent larval trunk/tail (left and centre) or adult myotomal muscle (right). Symbol shapes indicate siblings. Mean ± SEM, t-test statistics.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s003
(PDF)
S3 Fig. Variable penetrance of severe Yap1 and mild Wwtr1 mutant phenotypes.
(A) Dual heterozygote yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ in-cross larvae reared at 28.5ºC in lateral view, dorsal to top, anterior to left. Yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169 fish have oedema (asterisks) from 2 dpf. In comparison to yap1kg151 single mutant, yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169/+ fish have more severe eye defects including coloboma starting at 2 dpf (arrowheads). Bar = 500 μm. (B) Wholemounts of genotypically-identified yap1kg151 mutant larvae reared at 28.5°C until 70% epiboly then at 32.0°C until 3 dpf. Compared to wild type and heterozygote siblings (wt, larva 1) (top), the severity of yap1kg151 phenotype varies, with oedema (larvae 2–6, red arrows), small eye pigment area (larvae 2–6) and bent (larvae 2–4) or curled (larvae 5,6, asterisks) bodies. Bottom: pericardial oedema (left) and eye pigmentation (right, outlined in yellow dots). Bars = 100 μm. (C) Penetrance of the small eye pigmentation/oedema/bent tail phenotype in fry from three yap1kg151/+ in-cross experiments (Exp 1–3) reared at different temperatures to the equivalent of the 5 dpf developmental stage, as indicated in schematic (top). Number of larvae on bars. Difference from 25% mutant phenotype: Χ2; 20.5°C p = 2 x 10-10, 28.5°C p = 3 x 10-5, 32.0°C p = 0.1. (D) Survival beyond 5 dpf-equivalent of yap1kg151 compared to siblings when raised at 28.5°C until 70% epiboly then 20.5°C until 7 days (5 dpf-equivalent) and 28.5°C thereafter. Data pooled from seven yap1kg151/+ in-crosses totalling 576 viable larvae at 7 days (no deaths occurred before 7 days), of which 423 survived to genotyping at 3 months (73%). (E) Poor survival beyond 5 dpf-equivalent of wwtr1kg169 pooled from three separate lays. * p-values of Χ2 tests performed comparing numbers of genotypes obtained against the numbers expected at 1:2:1. (F) Survival from 5 dpf to 3 months from a yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ in-cross raised at 28.5°C. Note the lack of surviving yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/kg169 larvae (p = 0.008; Χ2 on survival versus non-yap1 mutant siblings). Number of fish analysed is indicated on columns.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s004
(PDF)
S4 Fig. Sarcomere organisation appears unaffected in yap1kg151 mutant.
Heterozygote yap1kg151/+ carriers were crossed and reared at permissive temperature from 70% epiboly and analysed live (A) or after fixation (B) and are shown in lateral view, dorsal to top, anterior to left. (A) Dual heterozygote yap1kg151/+;Tg(actc1b:mCherryCAAX)pc22/+ and yap1kg151/+; Tg(actc1b:LIFEACT-EGFP)pc21/+ crossed and larvae reared to 6 dpf-equivalent had normal structure and average sarcomere length (brackets; 1.94 μm) in mutants and siblings. (B) α-actinin at 5 dpf-equivalent in larvae from an in-cross of heterozygote yap1kg151/+ parents. Bar = 5 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s005
(PDF)
S5 Fig. Yap1 mutant movement defects are not due to shorter fish length.
(A) Swimming velocity in mutants is not correlated with their length. (B) Maximum trunk angle shows no correlation with total fish length.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s006
(PDF)
S6 Fig. Double mutants have normal myogenesis prior to developmental arrest.
(A) Time course of development of embryos from a dual heterozygote yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ in-cross. Lateral view, dorsal to top, anterior to left. Red brackets highlight reduced height of myotome, at 14ss and further reduction at 16ss. By 21ss, yolk elongation fails. Yellow dots marking somite borders highlight shorter length of somites in double mutants compared to siblings. (B) In situ mRNA hybridisation for MRF mRNAs in 16ss double mutant (right) and sibling (left). Dorsal flatmount, anterior to top. (C) Confocal stacks of flatmounted 18ss yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169 and sibling embryos stained for fast myosin (F310, red), slow myosin (F59, green), and nuclei (Hoechst 33342, blue). Fractions indicate number of genotyped flatmounts showing the phenotype. (D) Lateral view confocal stacks of 24ss yap1kg151;wwtr1kg169 and sibling larvae stained for fast myosin (F310, green). (E,F) Volume of myotome 17 at 2 dpf in progeny from a dual heterozygote yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ in-cross (E) or a yap1kg151 mutant female crossed with a yap1kg151/+;wwtr1kg169/+ male (F), each grown at the non-permissive temperature. Numbers of fish analysed are indicated on columns. Bars: A = 200 μm; B = 100 μm; C and D = 50 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s007
(PDF)
S7 Fig. Adult yap1kg137/151 and yap1kg137/152 mutants are smaller than their siblings.
(A-C). Weight, standard length and Fulton’s condition factor (k) of wwtr1kg169 (A), yap1kg137, yap1kg151 and yap1kg152 (B) and yap1kg151 (C). (D) Adult yap1kg137/151 and yap1kg137/152 mutants reared at the permissive 20.5ºC temperature until 5 dpf-equivalent and then at 26.5ºC are smaller than their wt or heterozygote siblings, points plotted with jitter to avoid overlap. Statistically significant results of Kruskal-Wallis tests are shown (B,C).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s008
(PDF)
S8 Fig. Apparently normal notochord cells in yap1kg151 mutant.
Notochord cells of yap1kg151 mutants grown at 20.5°C until 3 day (equivalent to ~2 dpf) were indistinguishable from those of their wild type siblings. Box indicates location of magnified images, showing variability between individuals unrelated to genotype. Bars = 100 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s009
(PDF)
S9 Fig. Zebrafish yap1kg151 mutants lack a morphological ciliary defect in cerebral ventricle.
(A) Schematic dorsal view (left) of adult zebrafish brain showing the sagittal dissection (red line), and lateral view (right) of the dissected brain with the position of imagining in the rhombencephalic ventricle marked (red box). (B-D) Scanning electron micrographs of the internal surface of the rhombencephalic ventricle in sibling wildtype (B) and yapkg151 mutants without (C) or with (D) spinal curvature phenotype at two magnifications. OB; olfactory bulb, Tel; telencephalon, TeO; optic tectum, CCe; corpus cerebelli, CC; crista cerebralis, V; ventricle. Bars = 10 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s010
(PDF)
S10 Fig. Reissner’s fibre is present in yap1kg151 mutant.
Immunofluorescent detection of AFRU Reissner’s fibre antigen (green, arrowheads) and nuclei (blue) in the posterior spinal canal at the 5 dpf-equivalent stage in single optical slices (top) or maximum intensity projection in a genotyped yapkg151 mutant. Single channels are shown beneath in grayscale. Note the intense AFRU signal at the posterior tip of the spinal cord (arrows). Bar = 50 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s011
(PDF)
S11 Fig. Defective distribution of col8a1a mRNA in hypochord of yap1kg151 mutants.
In situ mRNA hybridisation for col8a1a mRNA in additional sibling 36 hpf embryos to those shown in Fig 6B. (A) Mutants show patchy axial distribution in hypochord (arrowheads), but more even signal in notochord (arrows). Hypochord signal is absent for one or more whole somite lengths in mutants. (B,C) In contrast, heterozygous (B) and wild type (C) siblings show continuous hypochord signal throughout the axis at higher level than that in notochord. Bar = 100 μm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s012
(PDF)
S1 Table. Staging of fish reared at 28.5ºC until 70% epiboly and at 20.5ºC thereafter.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s013
(PDF)
S2 Table. Primers used in qRT-PCR and to make probes for in situ mRNA hybridisation.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1012172.s014
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Bruno Correia de Silva and his staff for fish care, to Gaia Gestri and Hughes lab members for advice.
References
- 1. Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(12):758–70. pmid:28951564
- 2. Wise CA, Sepich D, Ushiki A, Khanshour AM, Kidane YH, Makki N, et al. The cartilage matrisome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Res. 2020;8:13. pmid:32195011
- 3. Kou I, Otomo N, Takeda K, Momozawa Y, Lu H-F, Kubo M, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 14 previously unreported susceptibility loci for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Japanese. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3685. pmid:31417091
- 4. Conway KM, Gedlinske A, Mathews KD, Perlman S, Johnson N, Butterfield R, et al. A population-based study of scoliosis among males diagnosed with a dystrophinopathy identified by the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking, and Research Network (MD STARnet). Muscle Nerve. 2022;65(2):193–202. pmid:34787322
- 5. Bharadwaj A, Sharma J, Singh J, Kumari M, Dargar T, Kalita B, et al. Musculoskeletal defects associated with myosin heavy chain-embryonic loss of function are mediated by the YAP signaling pathway. EMBO Mol Med. 2023;15(9):e17187. pmid:37492882
- 6. Bourgeois A, Esteves de Lima J, Charvet B, Kawakami K, Stricker S, Duprez D. Stable and bicistronic expression of two genes in somite- and lateral plate-derived tissues to study chick limb development. BMC Dev Biol. 2015;15:39. pmid:26518454
- 7. Dong Y, Yuan H, Ma G, Cao H. Bone-muscle crosstalk under physiological and pathological conditions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):310. pmid:39066929
- 8. Gaut L, Duprez D. Tendon development and diseases. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016;5(1):5–23. pmid:26256998
- 9. Usami Y, Iijima H, Kokubun T. Exploring the role of mechanical forces on tendon development using in vivo model: a scoping review. Dev Dyn. 2024;253(6):550–65. pmid:37947268
- 10. Braun T, Rudnicki MA, Arnold HH, Jaenisch R. Targeted inactivation of the muscle regulatory gene Myf-5 results in abnormal rib development and perinatal death. Cell. 1992;71(3):369–82. pmid:1423602
- 11. Hinits Y, Williams VC, Sweetman D, Donn TM, Ma TP, Moens CB, et al. Defective cranial skeletal development, larval lethality and haploinsufficiency in Myod mutant zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2011;358(1):102–12. pmid:21798255
- 12. Ashby PR, Pinçon-Raymond M, Harris AJ. Regulation of myogenesis in paralyzed muscles in the mouse mutants peroneal muscular atrophy and muscular dysgenesis. Dev Biol. 1993;156(2):529–36. pmid:8462749
- 13. Hall BK, Herring SW. Paralysis and growth of the musculoskeletal system in the embryonic chick. J Morphol. 1990;206(1):45–56. pmid:2246789
- 14. Hosseini A, Hogg DA. The effects of paralysis on skeletal development in the chick embryo. I. General effects. J Anat. 1991;177:159–68. pmid:1769890
- 15. Hosseini A, Hogg DA. The effects of paralysis on skeletal development in the chick embryo. II. Effects on histogenesis of the tibia. J Anat. 1991;177:169–78. pmid:1769891
- 16. Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral density in athletes during and after career: a comparison between loaded and unloaded skeletal regions. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;59(4):245–8. pmid:8781046
- 17. Karlsson MK, Johnell O, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral density in professional ballet dancers. Bone Miner. 1993;21(3):163–9. pmid:8400916
- 18. Kelu JJ, Pipalia TG, Hughes SM. Circadian regulation of muscle growth independent of locomotor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(49):31208–18. pmid:33229575
- 19. Skerry TM. The response of bone to mechanical loading and disuse: fundamental principles and influences on osteoblast/osteocyte homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;473(2):117–23. pmid:18334226
- 20. Subramanian A, Kanzaki LF, Galloway JL, Schilling TF. Mechanical force regulates tendon extracellular matrix organization and tenocyte morphogenesis through TGFbeta signaling. Elife. 2018;7:e38069. pmid:30475205
- 21. Suominen H. Bone Mineral Density and Long Term Exercise. Sports Medicine. 1993;16(5):316–30.
- 22. Shen H, Grimston S, Civitelli R, Thomopoulos S. Deletion of connexin43 in osteoblasts/osteocytes leads to impaired muscle formation in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(4):596–605. pmid:25348938
- 23. Attwaters M, Hughes SM. Cellular and molecular pathways controlling muscle size in response to exercise. FEBS J. 2022;289(6):1428–56. pmid:33755332
- 24. Karlsson MK, Johnell O, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral density in weight lifters. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;52(3):212–5. pmid:8481835
- 25. Miesfeld JB, Gestri G, Clark BS, Flinn MA, Poole RJ, Bader JR, et al. Yap and Taz regulate retinal pigment epithelial cell fate. Development. 2015;142(17):3021–32. pmid:26209646
- 26. Nikander R, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Kannus P. Femoral neck structure in adult female athletes subjected to different loading modalities. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(3):520–8. pmid:15746998
- 27. Roberts MD, McCarthy JJ, Hornberger TA, Phillips SM, Mackey AL, Nader GA, et al. Mechanisms of mechanical overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy: current understanding and future directions. Physiol Rev. 2023;103(4):2679–757. pmid:37382939
- 28. Dirks ML, Wall BT, van de Valk B, Holloway TM, Holloway GP, Chabowski A, et al. One Week of Bed Rest Leads to Substantial Muscle Atrophy and Induces Whole-Body Insulin Resistance in the Absence of Skeletal Muscle Lipid Accumulation. Diabetes. 2016;65(10):2862–75. pmid:27358494
- 29. Dos Santos VR, de Silva BSA, Agostinete RR, Batista VC, Gobbo LA. Older adults physically inactive in occupational and commuting domains have a higher risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis: A 12-month prospective study. Arch Osteoporos. 2023;18(1):80. pmid:37280379
- 30. Nicks DK, Beneke WM, Key RM, Timson BF. Muscle fibre size and number following immobilisation atrophy. J Anat. 1989;163:1–5. pmid:2558097
- 31. Sánchez-Sánchez JL, He L, Morales JS, de Souto Barreto P, Jiménez-Pavón D, Carbonell-Baeza A, et al. Association of physical behaviours with sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024;5(2):e108–19. pmid:38310891
- 32. Schoutens A, Laurent E, Poortmans JR. Effects of inactivity and exercise on bone. Sports Med. 1989;7(2):71–81. pmid:2646672
- 33. Tournadre A, Vial G, Capel F, Soubrier M, Boirie Y. Sarcopenia. Joint Bone Spine. 2019;86:309–14.
- 34. Hueter C. XXIII. Anatomische Studien an den Extremitätengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener. Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin Band 26. De Gruyter. 1863. p. 484–519.
- 35. Mente PL, Aronsson DD, Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Mechanical modulation of growth for the correction of vertebral wedge deformities. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(4):518–24. pmid:10459757
- 36. Roaf R. Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1960;42-B:40–59. pmid:13854527
- 37. Stokes IAF. Mechanical effects on skeletal growth. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2002;2(3):277–80. pmid:15758453
- 38. Stokes IA, Spence H, Aronsson DD, Kilmer N. Mechanical modulation of vertebral body growth. Implications for scoliosis progression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(10):1162–7. pmid:8727190
- 39.
von Volkmann R. Veilletzungen und Krankheiten der Bewegungsorgane. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke. 1882.
- 40. Li Z, Lin J, Wu J, Suo J, Wang Z. The Hippo signalling pathway in bone homeostasis: Under the regulation of mechanics and aging. Cell Prolif. 2024;57(10):e13652. pmid:38700015
- 41. Zhang C, Wang F, Gao Z, Zhang P, Gao J, Wu X. Regulation of Hippo Signaling by Mechanical Signals and the Cytoskeleton. DNA Cell Biol. 2020;39(2):159–66. pmid:31821009
- 42. Han J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Luo W, Liu L, Zhu Y, et al. Emerging role and function of Hippo-YAP/TAZ signaling pathway in musculoskeletal disorders. Stem Cell Res Therapy. 2024;15:386.
- 43. Wackerhage H, Del Re DP, Judson RN, Sudol M, Sadoshima J. The Hippo signal transduction network in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Sci Signal. 2014;7(337):re4. pmid:25097035
- 44. Watt KI, Goodman CA, Hornberger TA, Gregorevic P. The Hippo Signaling Pathway in the Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018;46(2):92–6. pmid:29346163
- 45. Zhong Z, Jiao Z, Yu F-X. The Hippo signaling pathway in development and regeneration. Cell Rep. 2024;43(3):113926. pmid:38457338
- 46. Pocaterra A, Romani P, Dupont S. YAP/TAZ functions and their regulation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(2):jcs230425. pmid:31996398
- 47. Mosaddad SA, Salari Y, Amookhteh S, Soufdoost RS, Seifalian A, Bonakdar S, et al. Response to Mechanical Cues by Interplay of YAP/TAZ Transcription Factors and Key Mechanical Checkpoints of the Cell: A Comprehensive Review. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2021;55(1):33–60. pmid:33474906
- 48. Nakajima H, Yamamoto K, Agarwala S, Terai K, Fukui H, Fukuhara S, et al. Flow-Dependent Endothelial YAP Regulation Contributes to Vessel Maintenance. Dev Cell. 2017;40(6):523-536.e6. pmid:28350986
- 49. Vassilev A, Kaneko KJ, Shu H, Zhao Y, DePamphilis ML. TEAD/TEF transcription factors utilize the activation domain of YAP65, a Src/Yes-associated protein localized in the cytoplasm. Genes Dev. 2001;15(10):1229–41. pmid:11358867
- 50. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474(7350):179–83. pmid:21654799
- 51. Mason DE, Camacho P, Goeckel ME, Tobin BR, Vega SL, Wu PH, et al. Mechanotransductive feedback control of endothelial cell motility and vascular morphogenesis. eLife. 2023;12:RP86668.
- 52. Stanton AE, Tong X, Lee S, Yang F. Biochemical Ligand Density Regulates Yes-Associated Protein Translocation in Stem Cells through Cytoskeletal Tension and Integrins. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(9):8849–57. pmid:30789697
- 53. Stanton AE, Tong X, Yang F. Extracellular matrix type modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:310–20. pmid:31255664
- 54. Hossain Z, Ali SM, Ko HL, Xu J, Ng CP, Guo K, et al. Glomerulocystic kidney disease in mice with a targeted inactivation of Wwtr1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(5):1631–6. pmid:17251353
- 55. Kegelman CD, Mason DE, Dawahare JH, Horan DJ, Vigil GD, Howard SS, et al. Skeletal cell YAP and TAZ combinatorially promote bone development. FASEB J. 2018;32(5):2706–21. pmid:29401582
- 56. Piccolo S, Sladitschek-Martens HL, Cordenonsi M. Mechanosignaling in vertebrate development. Dev Biol. 2022;488:54–67. pmid:35580730
- 57. Sun C, De Mello V, Mohamed A, Ortuste Quiroga HP, Garcia-Munoz A, Al Bloshi A, et al. Common and Distinctive Functions of the Hippo Effectors Taz and Yap in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Function. Stem Cells. 2017;35(8):1958–72. pmid:28589555
- 58. Vanyai HK, Prin F, Guillermin O, Marzook B, Boeing S, Howson A, et al. Control of skeletal morphogenesis by the Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway. Development. 2020;147(21):dev187187. pmid:32994166
- 59. Xiong J, Almeida M, O’Brien CA. The YAP/TAZ transcriptional co-activators have opposing effects at different stages of osteoblast differentiation. Bone. 2018;112:1–9. pmid:29626544
- 60. Mar JH, Ordahl CP. A conserved CATTCCT motif is required for skeletal muscle-specific activity of the cardiac troponin T gene promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(17):6404–8. pmid:3413104
- 61. Yoshida T. MCAT elements and the TEF-1 family of transcription factors in muscle development and disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(1):8–17. pmid:17962623
- 62. Qin S, Li C, Lu H, Feng Y, Guo T, Han Y, et al. Biology of Hippo signaling pathway: Skeletal muscle development and beyond. J Integr Agric. 2024;23:1825–38.
- 63. Kaya-Çopur A, Marchiano F, Hein MY, Alpern D, Russeil J, Luis NM, et al. The Hippo pathway controls myofibril assembly and muscle fiber growth by regulating sarcomeric gene expression. Elife. 2021;10:e63726. pmid:33404503
- 64. Weitkunat M, Kaya-Çopur A, Grill SW, Schnorrer F. Tension and force-resistant attachment are essential for myofibrillogenesis in Drosophila flight muscle. Curr Biol. 2014;24(7):705–16. pmid:24631244
- 65. Morin-Kensicki EM, Boone BN, Howell M, Stonebraker JR, Teed J, Alb JG, et al. Defects in yolk sac vasculogenesis, chorioallantoic fusion, and embryonic axis elongation in mice with targeted disruption of Yap65. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(1):77–87. pmid:16354681
- 66. Judson RN, Tremblay AM, Knopp P, White RB, Urcia R, De Bari C, et al. The Hippo pathway member Yap plays a key role in influencing fate decisions in muscle satellite cells. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 24):6009–19. pmid:23038772
- 67. Judson RN, Gray SR, Walker C, Carroll AM, Itzstein C, Lionikas A, et al. Constitutive expression of Yes-associated protein (Yap) in adult skeletal muscle fibres induces muscle atrophy and myopathy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59622. pmid:23544078
- 68. Goodman CA, Dietz JM, Jacobs BL, McNally RM, You J-S, Hornberger TA. Yes-Associated Protein is up-regulated by mechanical overload and is sufficient to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(13):1491–7. pmid:25959868
- 69. Kaneshige A, Kaji T, Zhang L, Saito H, Nakamura A, Kurosawa T, et al. Relayed signaling between mesenchymal progenitors and muscle stem cells ensures adaptive stem cell response to increased mechanical load. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(2):265-280.e6. pmid:34856120
- 70. Makita R, Uchijima Y, Nishiyama K, Amano T, Chen Q, Takeuchi T, et al. Multiple renal cysts, urinary concentration defects, and pulmonary emphysematous changes in mice lacking TAZ. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294(3):F542-53. pmid:18172001
- 71. Tian Y, Kolb R, Hong J-H, Carroll J, Li D, You J, et al. TAZ promotes PC2 degradation through a SCFbeta-Trcp E3 ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(18):6383–95. pmid:17636028
- 72. Gessler L, Huraskin D, Jian Y, Eiber N, Hu Z, Prószyński TJ, et al. The YAP1/TAZ-TEAD transcriptional network regulates gene expression at neuromuscular junctions in skeletal muscle fibers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(2):600–24. pmid:38048326
- 73. Hong J-H, Hwang ES, McManus MT, Amsterdam A, Tian Y, Kalmukova R, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309(5737):1074–8. pmid:16099986
- 74. Deng Y, Wu A, Li P, Li G, Qin L, Song H, et al. Yap1 Regulates Multiple Steps of Chondrocyte Differentiation during Skeletal Development and Bone Repair. Cell Rep. 2016;14(9):2224–37. pmid:26923596
- 75. Li Y, Yang S, Qin L, Yang S. TAZ is required for chondrogenesis and skeletal development. Cell Discov. 2021;7(1):26. pmid:33879790
- 76. Zhao L, Guan H, Song C, Wang Y, Liu C, Cai C, et al. YAP1 is essential for osteoclastogenesis through a TEADs-dependent mechanism. Bone. 2018;110:177–86. pmid:29432919
- 77. Xiao Z, Cao L, Smith MD, Li H, Li W, Smith JC, et al. Genetic interactions between polycystin-1 and Wwtr1 in osteoblasts define a novel mechanosensing mechanism regulating bone formation in mice. Bone Res. 2023;11(1):57. pmid:37884491
- 78. Kimelman D, Smith NL, Lai JKH, Stainier DY. Regulation of posterior body and epidermal morphogenesis in zebrafish by localized Yap1 and Wwtr1. Elife. 2017;6:e31065. pmid:29283341
- 79. Groves JA, Hammond CL, Hughes SM. Fgf8 drives myogenic progression of a novel lateral fast muscle fibre population in zebrafish. Development. 2005;132(19):4211–22. pmid:16120642
- 80. Ganassi M, Badodi S, Ortuste Quiroga HP, Zammit PS, Hinits Y, Hughes SM. Myogenin promotes myocyte fusion to balance fibre number and size. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4232. pmid:30315160
- 81. Ganassi M, Badodi S, Wanders K, Zammit PS, Hughes SM. Myogenin is an essential regulator of adult myofibre growth and muscle stem cell homeostasis. Elife. 2020;9:e60445. pmid:33001028
- 82. Hinits Y, Osborn DPS, Hughes SM. Differential requirements for myogenic regulatory factors distinguish medial and lateral somitic, cranial and fin muscle fibre populations. Development. 2009;136(3):403–14. pmid:19141670
- 83. Roy SD, Williams VC, Pipalia TG, Li K, Hammond CL, Knappe S, et al. Myotome adaptability confers developmental robustness to somitic myogenesis in response to fibre number alteration. Dev Biol. 2017;431(2):321–35. pmid:28887016
- 84. Attwaters M, Kelu JJ, Pipalia TG, Hughes SM. Real Time and Repeated Measurement of Skeletal Muscle Growth in Individual Live Zebrafish Subjected to Altered Electrical Activity. J Vis Exp. 2022;(184):10.3791/64063. pmid:35781279
- 85. Xu D, Lv J, He L, Fu L, Hu R, Cao Y, et al. Scribble influences cyst formation in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease by regulating Hippo signaling pathway. FASEB J. 2018;32(8):4394–407. pmid:29529391
- 86. Dingare C, Niedzwetzki A, Klemmt PA, Godbersen S, Fuentes R, Mullins MC, et al. The Hippo pathway effector Taz is required for cell morphogenesis and fertilization in zebrafish. Development. 2018;145(22):dev167023. pmid:30327325
- 87. Ricker WE. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish Res Board Can Bull. 1975;191:1–382.
- 88. Schreiber AM. Asymmetric craniofacial remodeling and lateralized behavior in larval flatfish. J Exp Biol. 2006;209(Pt 4):610–21. pmid:16449556
- 89. Bagwell J, Norman J, Ellis K, Peskin B, Hwang J, Ge X, et al. Notochord vacuoles absorb compressive bone growth during zebrafish spine formation. Elife. 2020;9:e51221. pmid:31995030
- 90. Christiansen HE, Lang MR, Pace JM, Parichy DM. Critical early roles for col27a1a and col27a1b in zebrafish notochord morphogenesis, vertebral mineralization and post-embryonic axial growth. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8481. pmid:20041163
- 91. Wang M, Zhao S, Shi C, Guyot M-C, Liao M, Tauer JT, et al. Planar cell polarity zebrafish models of congenital scoliosis reveal underlying defects in notochord morphogenesis. Development. 2024;151(21):dev202829. pmid:39417583
- 92. Wopat S, Adhyapok P, Daga B, Crawford JM, Norman J, Bagwell J, et al. Notochord segmentation in zebrafish controlled by iterative mechanical signaling. Dev Cell. 2024;59(14):1860-1875.e5. pmid:38697108
- 93. Park R, Moon UY, Park JY, Hughes LJ, Johnson RL, Cho S-H, et al. Yap is required for ependymal integrity and is suppressed in LPA-induced hydrocephalus. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10329. pmid:26754915
- 94. Grimes DT, Boswell CW, Morante NFC, Henkelman RM, Burdine RD, Ciruna B. Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature. Science. 2016;352(6291):1341–4. pmid:27284198
- 95. Xie H, Li M, Kang Y, Zhang J, Zhao C. Zebrafish: an important model for understanding scoliosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79(9):506. pmid:36059018
- 96. Rose CD, Pompili D, Henke K, Van Gennip JLM, Meyer-Miner A, Rana R, et al. SCO-Spondin Defects and Neuroinflammation Are Conserved Mechanisms Driving Spinal Deformity across Genetic Models of Idiopathic Scoliosis. Curr Biol. 2020;30(12):2363-2373.e6. pmid:32386528
- 97. Troutwine BR, Gontarz P, Konjikusic MJ, Minowa R, Monstad-Rios A, Sepich DS, et al. The Reissner fiber is highly dynamic in vivo and controls morphogenesis of the spine. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:2353–62.e2353.
- 98. Sun X, Zhou Y, Zhang R, Wang Z, Xu M, Zhang D, et al. Dstyk mutation leads to congenital scoliosis-like vertebral malformations in zebrafish via dysregulated mTORC1/TFEB pathway. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):479. pmid:31980602
- 99. Froese R. Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: history, meta‐analysis and recommendations. J App Ichthyol. 2006;22:241–53.
- 100.
Fulton TW. The rate of growth of fishes. Fisheries Board of Scotland. 1904.
- 101. Dooley CM, Wali N, Sealy IM, White RJ, Stemple DL, Collins JE, et al. The gene regulatory basis of genetic compensation during neural crest induction. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(6):e1008213. pmid:31199790
- 102. Astone M, Lai JKH, Dupont S, Stainier DYR, Argenton F, Vettori A. Zebrafish mutants and TEAD reporters reveal essential functions for Yap and Taz in posterior cardinal vein development. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10189. pmid:29976931
- 103. Fillatre J, Fauny J-D, Fels JA, Li C, Goll M, Thisse C, et al. TEADs, Yap, Taz, Vgll4s transcription factors control the establishment of Left-Right asymmetry in zebrafish. Elife. 2019;8:e45241. pmid:31513014
- 104. Yi X, Yu J, Ma C, Li L, Luo L, Li H, et al. Yap1/Taz are essential for the liver development in zebrafish. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503(1):131–7. pmid:29859190
- 105. Burd CG, Mustol PA, Schu PV, Emr SD. A yeast protein related to a mammalian Ras-binding protein, Vps9p, is required for localization of vacuolar proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(5):2369–77. pmid:8628304
- 106. Onogi T, Yamazoe M, Ichinose C, Niki H, Hiraga S. Null mutation of the dam or seqA gene suppresses temperature-sensitive lethality but not hypersensitivity to novobiocin of muk null mutants. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(20):5898–901. pmid:11004192
- 107. Wente SR, Blobel G. A temperature-sensitive NUP116 null mutant forms a nuclear envelope seal over the yeast nuclear pore complex thereby blocking nucleocytoplasmic traffic. J Cell Biol. 1993;123(2):275–84. pmid:7691829
- 108. McMurray M. Lean forward: Genetic analysis of temperature-sensitive mutants unfolds the secrets of oligomeric protein complex assembly. Bioessays. 2014;36(9):836–46. pmid:25048147
- 109. Bornhorst D, Xia P, Nakajima H, Dingare C, Herzog W, Lecaudey V, et al. Biomechanical signaling within the developing zebrafish heart attunes endocardial growth to myocardial chamber dimensions. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4113. pmid:31511517
- 110. Duchemin A-L, Vignes H, Vermot J. Mechanically activated piezo channels modulate outflow tract valve development through the Yap1 and Klf2-Notch signaling axis. Elife. 2019;8:e44706. pmid:31524599
- 111. Flinn MA, Jeffery BE, O’Meara CC, Link BA. Yap is required for scar formation but not myocyte proliferation during heart regeneration in zebrafish. Cardiovasc Res. 2019;115(3):570–7. pmid:30295714
- 112. Fukui H, Terai K, Nakajima H, Chiba A, Fukuhara S, Mochizuki N. S1P-Yap1 signaling regulates endoderm formation required for cardiac precursor cell migration in zebrafish. Dev Cell. 2014;31(1):128–36. pmid:25313964
- 113. Miesfeld JB, Link BA. Establishment of transgenic lines to monitor and manipulate Yap/Taz-Tead activity in zebrafish reveals both evolutionarily conserved and divergent functions of the Hippo pathway. Mech Dev. 2014;133:177–88. pmid:24560909
- 114. Elmonem MA, Khalil R, Khodaparast L, Khodaparast L, Arcolino FO, Morgan J, et al. Cystinosis (ctns) zebrafish mutant shows pronephric glomerular and tubular dysfunction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42583. pmid:28198397
- 115. Hanke N, Staggs L, Schroder P, Litteral J, Fleig S, Kaufeld J, et al. “Zebrafishing” for novel genes relevant to the glomerular filtration barrier. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:658270. pmid:24106712
- 116. Molina L, Nejak-Bowen K, Monga SP. Role of YAP1 signaling in biliary development, repair, and disease. Seminars in Liver Disease. 2022;:017–33.
- 117. Oh S-H, Swiderska-Syn M, Jewell ML, Premont RT, Diehl AM. Liver regeneration requires Yap1-TGFβ-dependent epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):359–67. pmid:29758331
- 118. Ren Z, Zhang Z, Liu T-M, Ge W. Novel zebrafish polycystic kidney disease models reveal functions of the Hippo pathway in renal cystogenesis. Dis Model Mech. 2021;14(11):dmm049027. pmid:34545930
- 119. Le Guen L, Karpanen T, Schulte D, Harris NC, Koltowska K, Roukens G, et al. Ccbe1 regulates Vegfc-mediated induction of Vegfr3 signaling during embryonic lymphangiogenesis. Development. 2014;141(6):1239–49. pmid:24523457
- 120. Yiqin W, Ruimeng Y, Peihong W, Xiaohui L, Hao Y, Hongli H, et al. Tead1a Initiates Transcriptional Priming Through the TEAD1a/YAP-Notch1-Spi1/Cebpα Axis to Promote Neutrophil Fate. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025;12(41):e05441. pmid:40874937
- 121. Halder G, Dupont S, Piccolo S. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(9):591–600. pmid:22895435
- 122. Wada K-I, Itoga K, Okano T, Yonemura S, Sasaki H. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development. 2011;138(18):3907–14. pmid:21831922
- 123. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech. 1984;17(12):897–905. pmid:6520138
- 124. Singleman C, Holtzman NG. Growth and maturation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio: a staging tool for teaching and research. Zebrafish. 2014;11(4):396–406. pmid:24979389
- 125. Bornhorst D, Abdelilah-Seyfried S. Strong as a Hippo’s Heart: Biomechanical Hippo Signaling During Zebrafish Cardiac Development. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:731101. pmid:34422841
- 126. Lai JKH, Collins MM, Uribe V, Jiménez-Amilburu V, Günther S, Maischein H-M, et al. The Hippo pathway effector Wwtr1 regulates cardiac wall maturation in zebrafish. Development. 2018;145(10):dev159210. pmid:29773645
- 127. Pappalardo A, Porreca I, Caputi L, De Felice E, Schulte-Merker S, Zannini M, et al. Thyroid development in zebrafish lacking Taz. Mech Dev. 2015;138 Pt 3:268–78. pmid:26478012
- 128. Wang M, Zhao S, Shi C, Guyot M-C, Liao M, Tauer JT, et al. Planar cell polarity zebrafish models of congenital scoliosis reveal underlying defects in notochord morphogenesis. Development. 2024;151(21):dev202829. pmid:39417583
- 129. Attili S, Hughes SM. Anaesthetic tricaine acts preferentially on neural voltage-gated sodium channels and fails to block directly evoked muscle contraction. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103751. pmid:25090007
- 130. Fischer M, Rikeit P, Knaus P, Coirault C. YAP-Mediated Mechanotransduction in Skeletal Muscle. Front Physiol. 2016;7:41. pmid:26909043
- 131. Watt KI, Turner BJ, Hagg A, Zhang X, Davey JR, Qian H, et al. The Hippo pathway effector YAP is a critical regulator of skeletal muscle fibre size. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6048. pmid:25581281
- 132. Li Y, Xiao C, Li R, Zhong W, Xu G, Zhang W. Role of Yes-associated protein (YAP) in regulation of mesenchymal stem cell tenogenic differentiation. J Mol Histol. 2022;53(2):273–83. pmid:35048214
- 133. Lu J, Yang X, He C, Chen Y, Li C, Li S, et al. Rejuvenation of tendon stem/progenitor cells for functional tendon regeneration through platelet-derived exosomes loaded with recombinant Yap1. Acta Biomater. 2023;161:80–99. pmid:36804538
- 134. Tao S-C, Huang J-Y, Li Z-X, Zhan S, Guo S-C. Small extracellular vesicles with LncRNA H19 “overload”: YAP Regulation as a Tendon Repair Therapeutic Tactic. iScience. 2021;24(3):102200. pmid:33733065
- 135. Cameron-Christie SR, Wells CF, Simon M, Wessels M, Tang CZN, Wei W, et al. Recessive Spondylocarpotarsal Synostosis Syndrome Due to Compound Heterozygosity for Variants in MYH3. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;102(6):1115–25. pmid:29805041
- 136. Lim PJ, Lindert U, Opitz L, Hausser I, Rohrbach M, Giunta C. Transcriptome Profiling of Primary Skin Fibroblasts Reveal Distinct Molecular Features Between PLOD1- and FKBP14-Kyphoscoliotic Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(7):517. pmid:31288483
- 137. Khanshour AM, Kou I, Fan Y, Einarsdottir E, Makki N, Kidane YH, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis and replication studies in multiple ethnicities identify novel adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(22):3986–98. pmid:30395268
- 138. Bobowski-Gerard M, Boulet C, Zummo FP, Dubois-Chevalier J, Gheeraert C, Bou Saleh M, et al. Functional genomics uncovers the transcription factor BNC2 as required for myofibroblastic activation in fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5324. pmid:36088459
- 139. Draper BW, McCallum CM, Stout JL, Slade AJ, Moens CB. A high-throughput method for identifying N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced point mutations in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol. 2004;77:91–112. pmid:15602907
- 140. Cooper MS, Szeto DP, Sommers-Herivel G, Topczewski J, Solnica-Krezel L, Kang H-C, et al. Visualizing morphogenesis in transgenic zebrafish embryos using BODIPY TR methyl ester dye as a vital counterstain for GFP. Dev Dyn. 2005;232(2):359–68. pmid:15614774
- 141. Berger J, Tarakci H, Berger S, Li M, Hall TE, Arner A, et al. Loss of Tropomodulin4 in the zebrafish mutant träge causes cytoplasmic rod formation and muscle weakness reminiscent of nemaline myopathy. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(12):1407–15. pmid:25288681
- 142.
Westerfield, M, 2007. The Zebrafish Book; A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Univ. Oregon Press.
- 143. Urushibata H, Sasaki K, Takahashi E, Hanada T, Fujimoto T, Arai K, et al. Control of Developmental Speed in Zebrafish Embryos Using Different Incubation Temperatures. Zebrafish. 2021;18(5):316–25. pmid:34491109
- 144. Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, Xia DF, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(2):143–8. pmid:21179091
- 145. Sander JD, Cade L, Khayter C, Reyon D, Peterson RT, Joung JK, et al. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(8):697–8. pmid:21822241
- 146. Kelu JJ, Hughes SM. Muscle peripheral circadian clock drives nocturnal protein degradation via raised Ror/Rev-erb balance and prevents premature sarcopenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122(19):e2422446122. pmid:40324095
- 147. Hinits Y, Hughes SM. Mef2s are required for thick filament formation in nascent muscle fibres. Development. 2007;134(13):2511–9. pmid:17537787
- 148. Hinits Y, Pan L, Walker C, Dowd J, Moens CB, Hughes SM. Zebrafish Mef2ca and Mef2cb are essential for both first and second heart field cardiomyocyte differentiation. Dev Biol. 2012;369(2):199–210. pmid:22750409
- 149. Walker MB, Kimmel CB. A two-color acid-free cartilage and bone stain for zebrafish larvae. Biotech Histochem. 2007;82(1):23–8. pmid:17510811
- 150. Du SJ, Frenkel V, Kindschi G, Zohar Y. Visualizing normal and defective bone development in zebrafish embryos using the fluorescent chromophore calcein. Dev Biol. 2001;238(2):239–46. pmid:11784007
- 151. Hau H-TA, Kelu JJ, Ochala J, Hughes SM. Slow myosin heavy chain 1 is required for slow myofibril and muscle fibre growth but not for myofibril initiation. Dev Biol. 2023;499:47–58. pmid:37121308