Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Reduction of mRNA export unmasks different tissue sensitivities to low mRNA levels during Caenorhabditis elegans development


Animal development requires the execution of specific transcriptional programs in different sets of cells to build tissues and functional organs. Transcripts are exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm where they are translated into proteins that, ultimately, carry out the cellular functions. Here we show that in Caenorhabditis elegans, reduction of mRNA export strongly affects epithelial morphogenesis and germline proliferation while other tissues remain relatively unaffected. Epithelialization and gamete formation demand a large number of transcripts in the cytoplasm for the duration of these processes. In addition, our findings highlight the existence of a regulatory feedback mechanism that activates gene expression in response to low levels of cytoplasmic mRNA. We expand the genetic characterization of nuclear export factor NXF-1 to other members of the mRNA export pathway to model mRNA export and recycling of NXF-1 back to the nucleus. Our model explains how mutations in genes involved in general processes, such as mRNA export, may result in tissue-specific developmental phenotypes.

Author summary

The Central Dogma of Biology schematically highlights the transmission of genetic information stored in DNA, through RNA, to the formation of proteins. This general flow implicates RNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and proper protein localization within the eukaryotic cell. Ultimately, proteins are the cell’s structural and catalytic functional units. As a result, cells differentiate into one cell type or another (such as epithelial, muscle, neuron…) and exhibit specific shape and functionality. Here we describe, in a C. elegans model, how mutations in genes involved in a general and ubiquitous mechanism, such as mRNA export, may result in tissue-specific developmental phenotypes that show up in processes that are highly demanding of cytoplasmic transcripts like epithelialization and gamete formation. A deep understanding of the mechanisms underlying the "connectors" shown in the Central Dogma of Biology is key both to unravel the general genetic control of an organism’s development and, at the same time, contribute to a better understanding of tissue-specific diseases.


Cell differentiation and morphogenesis rely on the expression of specific genes that are translated into proteins in specific sets of cells to ensure the correct formation of the organs and body plan. The physical separation between genomic DNA and the cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells makes it necessary to export RNA through the nuclear envelope (NE) [1,2,3,4,5]. This nucleo-cytoplasmic transport is highly conserved [6] and our understanding of its mechanism comes from a variety of model organisms including yeast, nematodes, fruit flies and vertebrates [4,5,7,8].

mRNA biogenesis and export are tightly coordinated by sequential assembly of appropriate ribonucleoprotein complexes named the THO complex (named after the yeast tho2 subunit was identified as a suppressor of the Transcriptional defect of Hpr1 by Overexpression), the TREX (TRanscription EXport) complex and the THSC/TREX-2 (Transport/export complex 2) complex [4,5,9,10,11]. Briefly, during transcription, a group of proteins called the THO complex is recruited to chromatin. This complex is needed for transcription elongation, mRNA export and genome integrity [12,13]. The metazoan THO complex contains THOC1/2/3/5/6/7 (THO complex in yeast: Hpr1, Tho2, Mtf1 and Thp2) [14]. Next, additional proteins UAP65, Aly/REF and CIP29 (Sub2p, Yra1p and Nab2 in yeast) bind the THO subunits to build the transcription-export complex (TREX complex) which couples transcription with mRNA export [15].

After the messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) has been generated, the conserved nuclear RNA export factor 1 (NXF1/TAP) is recruited through direct interaction with several TREX components [2,16]. NXF1 family export factors are composed of multiple domains. At the N terminus is the RNA recognition motif (RRM) [17]. Next, a leucine-rich repeat domain (LRR) is required for NXF1-mediated export [18]. This domain is followed by a nuclear transport factor 2, NTF2-like domain, that heterodimerizes with a protein known as p15 or NXT [19,20,21,22]. Efficient mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm requires the formation of this complex. The remaining C-terminal domain, TAP, also known as the NXF1 ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA), permits translocation through the central channel of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) by interacting with FG-Nups (phenylalanine-glycine (FG) reach nucleoporins) [6,20,21,23,24]. Finally, the THSC/TREX-2 (transport/export complex 2), binds the mRNP to the nucleoplasmic side of the NPC. The transit of mRNP through the nuclear pore is mediated by direct interaction of NXF1-p15 with the nucleoporins that line the pore [25]. Once in the cytoplasm, mRNA can be stored in large ribonucleotide protein particles (RNP), as happens in the so-called germ granules (known as P granules in C. elegans) or it can be directly translated into proteins [26,27,28] (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Schematic overview of nuclear mRNA export.

The primary steps in mRNA export are shown. (1) Recruitment of the NXF-1–NXT-1 (NXF1-p15) heterodimer to mRNA (2) nascent mRNP-NXF-1 is docked to the nuclear pore, (3) followed by translocation (4) and cytoplasmic release (5) at the cytoplasmic filaments.

Over the last decades, C. elegans has emerged as a powerful model for studying cell differentiation and morphogenesis. C. elegans has a simple body plan. Schematically, it can be divided into two cylindrical layers of tissues and organs separated by a fluid-filled space (pseudocoelom). From outside to inside, the outer layer constitutes the body wall, which consists of the cuticle and an epithelium called the epidermis (also known as the hypodermis) [29], the excretory system, neurons and muscles. The inner system is comprised of the gonad and another epithelial tube composed of the pharynx and intestine [30]. The anterior portion of the pharynx and the external epidermis remain linked by nine cells called the arcade cells. Absence of this arcade cell epithelium leads to a Pun (pharynx unattached) phenotype where the pharynx detaches from the mouth during development and forms a confined cell cluster in the interior of the animal [30,31,32,33].

Several pathways contribute to cell fate specification and epithelialization of arcade cells. It occurs after the epidermis and pharynx have epithelialized. The process is very fast (less than 10 minutes), during mid-embryogenesis after the embryonic cell divisions are complete [33]. Recent studies show that PAR-6/PARD6A is required for polarizing the arcade cells to define typical apical and basolateral domains [34,35,36]. In C. elegans epithelial cells, both domains are separated by the adherens junctions (CeAJ). Thus, the CeAJ contains proteins that mediate adhesion such as HMR-1/cadherin, HMP-1/-catenin, HMP-2/-catenin, and VAB-9/claudin [37,38]. In addition, DLG-1/Discs large and the coiled-coil protein AJM-1, are also part of the CeAJ although they are located slightly more basally [39,40].

In this study we show that reducing mRNA export strongly affects epithelial formation and germline proliferation in C. elegans. Previous studies revealed that both processes require specific gene expression programs. Our findings indicate the existence of feedback mechanisms that activate expression of specific genes to compensate for the lack of mRNAs in the cytoplasm such as those involved in mRNA export or cytoskeletal rearrangements. Finally, we suggest a model to explain the mRNA export pathway and recycling of the export factor NXF-1 back to the nucleus in C. elegans to close the export cycle.


Identification of a C. elegans nxf-1 mutant with pharyngeal and morphogenetic embryonic defects

To discover genes involved in embryonic morphogenesis, we performed a genetic screen for embryonic lethal worms with the pharynxes unattached to the mouth (Pun phenotype). Thus, we identified a thermo-sensitive (ts) mutant allele, t2160, whose embryos arrested at late stages with a highly penetrant Pun phenotype (87.5% (n = 176)) and body elongation defects (81% (n = 60)) (Fig 2A and 2B, Table 1). Three experimental lines demonstrated that t2160ts is an allele of the C. elegans nuclear export factor 1 (nxf-1) [41]. First, using the whole genome sequencing approach (WGS) and CloudMap/Hawaiian Variant Mapping ([42], we identified a homozygous A-to-G transition at the 14414501 position of chromosome V, in the C15H11.3/nxf-1 gene that caused a VAL to ALA substitution. The t2160ts mutation was located in the RRM (RNA recognition motif) domain of NXF-1 (Fig 2C). Second, t2160ts failed to complement a knockout deletion of the nxf-1(ok1281) gene. Third, the t2160ts embryonic lethality was successfully rescued with a plasmid containing 1096 bp of the gene promoter, the nxf-1 genomic region and 1313 bp of the 3' UTR (S1 Fig). To determine whether the ts effect of the VAL to ALA substitution was likely due to synthesis or to folding [43] we performed a ts curve assay during embryo development (S2 Fig). In an up-shift curve, worms grown to adulthood at 15°C (permissive temperature) were allowed to lay eggs which were sequentially shifted to 25°C (restrictive temperature). In those embryos, the maternal product was therefore synthesized at the permissive temperature. However, 100% of those embryos died when shifted to 25°C at the two-cell stage, and the lethality did not fall under 50% until mid-embryogenesis when most cell divisions and epithelialization are completed. The maternal product is enough to complete the development of a maternally rescued homozygous embryo at 25°C from a heterozygous nxf-1(t2160ts)(+/-) hermaphrodite mother. Together with the down-shift curve, these results show the NXF-1 requirement during embryonic cell proliferation, differentiation and morphogenesis and strongly indicate that t2160ts mutation alters the protein conformation when exposed to 25°C.

Fig 2. nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant shows unattached Pun pharynx.

(A) Schematic overview of pharyngeal morphogenesis during WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) embryogenesis. (B) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of comma, 1.5-fold and 2-fold embryos showing WT embryo elongation with pharynx attached to the buccal cavity and similar images of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryos in which the pharynx failed to reach the buccal cavity (unattached phenotype, Pun). White arrows point to the basement membrane surrounding the developing pharynx. (C) Genomic organization of the nxf-1 gene and NXF-1 protein domains. Red arrowhead indicates the t2160ts mutation. (D) mRNA visualized by FISH with a poly-dT oligonucleotide conjugated with Cy3. Strong accumulation of poly(A)mRNA in the nxf-1(t2160ts) nucleus contrasts with the WT nucleus where no signal accumulation was distinguishable, and mRNA concentrates in the cytoplasm. mRNA accumulation is measured as relative fluorescent units (RFU) in the cellular nucleus and cytoplasm of FISH-stained embryos.

Table 1. Phenotypes observed in nxf-1 mutants and after RNAi of mRNA export factors and EJC core proteins.

Since the t2160ts mutation affects the nxf-1 gene, we decided to check intracellular mRNA distribution. To examine the polyadenylated RNA localization, we performed FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) analysis. Hybridization with an oligo-dT probe against poly(A) showed mRNA preferentially accumulated in the nucleus rather than the cytoplasm of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants. In contrast, the signal was mostly dispersed in the cytoplasm of wild-type (WT) embryo cells (Fig 2D). This indicates that t2160ts is a loss-of-function mutation in the nxf-1 gene that impairs mRNA export. A phenotypic analysis of the available alleles and nxf-1 RNAi reveals that the t2160ts mutation leads to reduced activity but is not a null allele of nxf-1. nxf-1 (ok1281) knockout maternally rescued or nxf-1 RNAi-fed L1 larvae led to larval arrest, whereas nxf-1 (t2160ts) or RNAi performed under mild conditions (RNAi diluted with L4440 bacterial RNAi empty vector at a 1:1 ratio) led both to the same embryonic Pun phenotype and body elongation defects in the F1 embryos. Heterozygous worms ok1281/ t2160ts exhibited an intermediate phenotype: they reached adulthood but were sterile (Table 1).

To check NXF-1 localization in vivo and throughout development, we created transgenic lines expressing NXF-1 fused to 3xFLAG and eGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) (S1B Fig). The transgene successfully rescued the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutation indicating that the construct was functional and did not change the function of NXF-1. eGFP expression was detected in all stages of the C. elegans life cycle. As expected for a nuclear export factor, NXF-1::3xFLAG::eGFP showed nuclear localization during embryogenesis, larval and adult stages. NXF-1 showed dynamic localization during cell division: it was detected as nuclear but diffused to the cytoplasm during mitosis (S1 Movie). In addition, NXF-1::3xFLAG::eGFP was detected in granules in the oocyte cytoplasm (Fig 3).

Fig 3. NXF-1 is concentrated in the nucleus.

(A) (top panel) NXF-1::GFP expression in the early two-cell stage embryos (A1, A1') during cell division of the AB blastomere (A2, A2'), and in the four-cell stage (A3, A3'). Bottom panel shows quantification of the NXF-1 diffused into the cytoplasm during cell division. (B) NXF-1 expression in C. elegans adult somatic cells. Pictures show details of the head (B1, B1'), tail (B2, B2'), gonad (B3, B3') and oocytes (B4, B4'). White arrows indicate cellular nuclei. Black arrowheads indicate cytoplasmic granules. A detail of the localization of NXF-1 in the nuclear envelope of gonadal nuclei is shown in B3, B3' inset. Scale bar: 10μm.

To assess the developmental defects of nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos, we performed 4D microscopy and compared it to that of WT N2 embryos (S2 Movie). Since the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant is temperature sensitive, worms (WT and mutant) were grown at 15°C. Then, the worms where transferred to 25°C degrees and allowed to grow overnight (O/N) prior to selecting the embryos. The Pun pharynxes of the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryos displayed several characteristics that are consistent with normal tissue differentiation, such as the presence of a distinct pharyngeal lumen and sustained rhythmic pumping. In further support of these results, we observed strong expression of several GFP markers indicating the presence of differentiated muscle (Pmyo-2::GFP) [44], and neurons (Pric-19::GFP) [45] in the Pun pharynxes (Fig 4A and 4B).

Fig 4. nxf-1(t2160ts) Pun pharynxes show normal tissue differentiation but failed arcade polarization.

(A) Representative three-fold WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos expressing pMYO-2::GFP reporter in pharyngeal muscle and (B) RIC-19::GFP expression in M1 and M2 neurons in three-fold embryos. (C) WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos expressing PHA-4::GFP and (D) CDH-3::GFP reporter in the arcade cells, lateral epidermal cells and the seam cells. (E) Representative images of Ppha-4::membrane–GFP reporter expression and (F) PAR-6::GFP shows a clear cell polarization in WT but a mislocalized expression in nxf-1(t2160ts) embryonic epithelia. Corresponding DIC (left) and fluorescence images (right) are paired for each embryo. Anterior is left, dorsal is up.

In addition to these transgenes, we tested the expression of the pha-4 gene. The pha-4 transcription factor is the central selector regulator gene for the C. elegans pharynx and its activity is essential for all pharyngeal development [46]. PHA-4 determines the identity and morphogenetic program of all the pharyngeal precursors by directly regulating many genes expressed in the pharynx and arcade cells at different time intervals [36,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. pha-4 expression was detected in the nuclei of the intestine, pharynx and arcade cells, both in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant and WT. All nine arcade nuclei could be identified and were located approximately between the pharyngeal and epidermal cells (Fig 4C), indicating that developmental programs properly differentiate pharyngeal cells in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant. Furthermore, normally expressed CDH-3::GFP [55] in the developing arcade cells, lateral epidermal cells and seam cells suggested proper differentiation of epithelial cells (Fig 4D).

In contrast, expression of the pxIs10 [Ppha-4::GFP::CAAX + (pRF4) rol-6(su1006)] transgene that generates a GFP fused to the isoprenylation sequence (CAAX) of mig-2 [56], under control of the pha-4 promoter to drive GFP to the plasma membrane of the same cells [30,53], revealed that although the intestinal and pharyngeal cell membranes glowed in both WT and mutant embryos, fluorescence was not detected in the arcade cell membrane of the mutant (Fig 4E). This indicated the existence of membrane or cortex defects specifically in the arcade cells of the nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutant.

To further assess whether epithelialization defects in arcade cells caused the Pun phenotype in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants, we monitored the localization of the fluorescent reporter for the C. elegans apical surface polarization protein PAR-6/Par-6 and the expression and localization of C. elegans apical junction (CeAJ) components (Fig 4F, S3A Fig): the classical cadherin-catenin complex (HMR-1/E-cadherin, JAC-1/p120-catenin, HMP-1/alpha-catenin) and the more basal AJM-1, DLG-1/disk large complex and SAX-7/L1CAM that has been proposed to function as a transmembrane component of this complex (S3 and S4 Figs) [57]. Partial loss of NXF-1 activity affected normal expression of CeAJ proteins. We detected a strong increase in DLG-1::dsRed expression and a moderate decrease of AJM-1::GFP, SAX-7::GFP and HMR-1::GFP expression in both the epidermis and the gut, that may be a direct consequence of the less efficient export of transgenic mRNA in the nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutant. However, the more dramatic change in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants was the absence of apical junctions in the arcade cells and the mislocalization of the PAR-6 polarity protein that shows an ectopic and non-polarized localization in arcade cells and also, to a lesser degree, in pharyngeal and intestinal cells as occurs in WT (Fig 4F, S5 Fig), indicating that NXF-1 is essential for arcade cells to form a polarized epithelium. In addition, proper epidermal morphogenesis was disrupted, and some cells failed to adopt their normal elongated form (Fig 4, S3 Fig, S4 Fig).

Finally, to determine whether other epithelia, such as intestine, could also be affected to a lesser extent, we analyzed WT and nxf-1 (t2160ts) L1 larvae intestinal morphology. Although the mutants showed a fully developed intestine, their morphology was not completely normal and showed a wider lumen than in the WT, all along the gut duct. This defect was already detectable during embryogenesis (S6 Fig), indicating that although less sensitive than arcade and hypodermal cells, intestinal epithelia is also affected by limited mRNA export.

In summary, a partial loss of activity in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant predominantly affects epithelial tissues (mainly arcade cells) causing pharynx attachment defects and body elongation arrest by affecting cell-cell membrane contacts but not cell differentiation.

mRNA export machinery is essential for pharyngeal and epidermal morphogenesis

To discern whether the unattached pharynx and body elongation defects observed in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants were due to a specific function in morphogenesis or to impaired mRNA export in tissues with a high demand of mRNA, we knocked down other mRNA export machinery components and evaluated both phenotypes. Thus, we depleted NXT-1/p15 and the DEAD-box helicase, HEL-1/UAP56 by RNAi. NXT-1/p15 is an ortholog of the Ran-GDP-binding nuclear transport factors NXT1 and NXT2, that heterodimerize with NXF-1 to bind to nucleoporins and facilitate export of poly(A) RNA [2,58,59]. HEL-1/UAP56 is a DEAD-box helicase, essential for mRNA export in C. elegans [59,60] (Fig 5).

Fig 5. mRNA export components NXF-1/NXF1, NXT-1/NXT1 and HEL-1/UAP56 are required for C. elegans foregut tubulogenesis and epidermal morphogenesis where EJC core components RNP-4/Y14 and MAG-1/Mago-nashi are essential for C. elegans epidermal morphogenesis but dispensable for pharyngeal morphogenesis.

Worms expressing AJM::GFP reporter in the L4 stage were fed with RNAi clones of hel-1, nxf-1, nxt-1, mag-1 and rnp-4. RNAi clones of nxf-1 and nxt-1 were diluted with L4440 at a 1:1 concentration for a “milder” RNAi effect. Worms were grown at 15°C and images were taken the next day. Embryos depleted of nxf-1, nxt-1 and hel-1 show pharyngeal and hypodermal defects (asterisks). WT, rnp-1(RNAi) and mag-1(RNAi) arcade cells (between white lines) expressed AJM::GFP, illustrating that they are epithelialized.

L1 larvae of the strain ST65 (ncIs13[ajm-1::GFP]) [61], expressing AJM-1::GFP, fed with RNAi clones of the nxf-1 and hel-1 genes, arrested at the L2 stage. L1 animals depleted of NXT-1 reached adulthood but were sterile and 50% of them showed protruding vulva (S7 Fig). When the RNAi experiment started at the L4 stage, all the worms progressed to adulthood and laid eggs that arrested at early embryonic stages [41,59]. To obtain a partial reduction of the mRNA export activity, we performed RNAi experiments by feeding L4 stage worms with bacterial nxf-1 and nxt-1 RNAi diluted with L4440 (bacterial RNAi empty vector) at a 1:1 ratio for a “milder” RNAi effect. F1 embryos developed further and died at later stages. 71% (n = 28) of the nxf-1 RNAi embryos, 62% (n = 29) of the nxt-1 RNAi embryos and 27% of the hel-1 RNAi (L4 normal conditions) embryos showed unattached pharynxes with missing expression of AJM-1::GFP in arcade cells and body elongation defects (Fig 5, Table 1).

Thus, we concluded that inhibition of the mRNA export machinery by RNAi depletion of its individual components leads to a catastrophic arrest during development. In contrast, a partial reduction in mRNA export predominantly affects epithelial tissues, mainly arcade cells, causing pharynx attachment defects and body elongation arrest.

To assess whether other proteins involved in mRNA biogenesis and processing also affect embryonic morphogenesis in C. elegans, we knocked down components of the exon junction complex (EJC) and scored the unattached pharynx and body elongation defects. The EJC complex remains stably bound within mRNPs and serves as a binding platform for factors involved in mRNA packaging, export, translation and nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Depletion of C. elegans EJC has a partial effect on mRNA splicing fidelity [62]. This complex provides a link between several steps of the mRNA life cycle [reviewed in: 63,64,65].

L1 larvae of the transgenic strain ST65 (ncIs13[ajm-1::GFP]) [61], expressing AJM-1::GFP, were fed with RNAi clones of the genes mag-1/Mago-nashi and its binding partner rnp-4/Y14 (components of the C. elegans EJC) [66]. Depletion of these two genes caused lethality of the F1 embryos which arrested with elongation defects [this study,59,66]. Depletion of RNP-4/Y14 did not cause nuclear accumulation of poly(A) RNAs, suggesting that C. elegans Y14 orthologue plays an essential role in C. elegans development, but is not directly associated with mRNA export [59]. The AJM::GFP reporter showed that the hypodermis was disorganized in these embryos. In contrast, pharyngeal and intestinal tissues were evident in those arrested embryos. The CeAJ in the foregut was properly formed and the pharynx was completely elongated (Fig 5).

Our results indicate that whereas the epidermis is highly sensitive to different processes affecting mRNA metabolism, such as biogenesis, processing or export, arcade cells are specifically more sensitive to mRNA export defects. This suggests the existence of different mechanisms for epithelialization or different levels of mRNA requirements for the different types of epithelia during morphogenesis.

Mutation of nxf-1 affects cell proliferation and DNA damage response in the C. elegans germline

To further explore the consequences of reducing the activity of nxf-1 in other tissues, we expanded the analysis to the C. elegans germline. Oocyte production requires high levels of transcription and translation to accumulate enough maternal product for embryonic development [67,68]. DAPI staining of gonads at the one-day adult stage shows that the number of mitotic germ cells was strongly reduced in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant (Fig 6). N2 and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms were grown at 15°C until the L4 larval stage and then moved overnight to 25°C before scoring the gonad nuclei. The mitotic region of nxf-1(t2160ts) gonads had 105.9±3.4 nuclei (mean±standard error/SE) (n = 20), which is half the number of nuclei in the mitotic region of WT worms 205.36±2.9 (mean±SE) (n = 11) grown under the same conditions. In C. elegans, germline proliferation is governed by GLP-1/Notch-receptor and other effectors that mediate the transition from mitosis to meiosis [69,70]. Although, we did not find significant differences between gene expression of those factors in nxf-1(t2160ts) vs WT nematodes (S8 Fig), the inefficient transport of their mRNAs to the cytoplasm could affect the extension of the mitotic region. The number of nuclei in mitosis was determined by counting phosphorylated histone H3 (pH3)-positive nuclei in dissected gonads. Immunostaining with an anti-pH3 antibody marks cells in the late M phase [71]. This reduction in phosphorylated histone H3 is not caused by a lower level of histone expression (S9 Fig) but likely reflects the less proliferative state of the nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutant gonad. The reduction of the average number of mitotic cells observed in nxf-1(t2160ts) (3.58±0.36 (mean±SE) (n = 29)) versus the WT (8.88±0.69 (mean±SE) (n = 18)) further confirmed the diminished germline proliferation in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant (Fig 6).

Fig 6. nxf-1(t2160ts) gonads show a reduced mitotic region with fewer cells in the M phase.

(A) Representative pictures of the α-pH3 immunostained gonads. N2 (WT) and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms were synchronized. Gonads were dissected, fixed, immunostained with α-pH3 and counterstained with DAPI. (B) Mitotic cell quantification in the gonadal mitotic region of WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) background. (C) pH3 positive cell quantification in the gonadal mitotic region of WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) background. The number of pH3 positive cells and mitotic cells was manually counted in Z-Stack. Student’s t-test; ***P<0.0001. n = 20 gonads. Scale bar: 10μm.

As a canonical cell cycle progression mechanism, CDC25 dephosphorylates CDK1 to allow entry into mitosis. In C. elegans, CDK-1 is phosphorylated at the Tyr15 inhibitory residue upon DNA damage [72,73]. Phosphorylation of tyrosine (Tyr15) and threonine (Thr14) in the ATP-binding loop of CDK-1 prevents activation of the CDK/cyclin complex hindering entry into mitosis. To understand how loss of function of nxf-1 disrupts the mitotic cell cycle, we performed immunostaining of adult gonads with antibodies against phosphorylated Tyr15 CDK-1. Our results showed an increase in Tyr15 phosphorylation of CDK-1 in the nuclei of the gonadal proliferative region of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant animals (S10 Fig). This increase was higher than that caused by irradiation with ionizing radiation (IR) in WT animals. The absence of significant changes in the expression of cdc-25 or cdk-1 (S9 Fig) in nxf-1 (t2160ts) vs WT and immunostaining with antibodies specific to phosphorylated proteins suggests that the reduction in germline proliferation is achieved by control of the cell cycle machinery by phosphorylation. To further check whether cell cycle impairment was an nxf-1(t2160ts)-specific phenotype or a consequence of reduced RNA export, we assayed other genes involved in RNA export. RNAi depletion of the DEAD-box helicase HEL-1/UAP56 also increased Tyr15 phosphorylation of CDK-1 in the gonadal proliferative region (S10 Fig). We next extended the analysis of cell proliferation to the cell cycle progression in the developing embryo. Consistent with the results observed in the gonad, 4D microscopic analysis shows that embryonic cell division is significantly slower in nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutants compared to WT embryos under the same conditions (Fig 7). Taken together, these results suggest that RNA export reduction impairs mitotic cell cycle progression in C. elegans.

Fig 7. Analysis of the embryonic cell cycle progression in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant compared to a WT embryo under the same conditions.

(A) Representative examples of cell lineages within the AB blastomere descendants from a WT embryo and the same cells from an nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryo. (B) Cell division takes significantly longer in the mutant than in the WT. As a consequence, nxf-1(t2160ts) develops slower than a WT embryo recorded under the same conditions. (C) Duration of each cellular generation for WT and nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutant embryos (n = 12 cells from 3 different WT and nxf-1 (t2160ts) embryos).

Since the germline mitotic rate was reduced upon RNA export impairment, we further investigated its role in maintenance of meiosis. The RAD-51 protein is involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination and it is a marker of double-strand breaks (DSBs) undergoing processing [74,75]. Although the expression of rad-51 was not affected by nxf-1(t2160ts) mutation (S9 Fig), we observed a massive accumulation of RAD-51 in the pachytene/diplotene region of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant gonads (S11 Fig). However, depletion of hel-1 by RNAi did not produce similar RAD-51 foci (S11 Fig). This result suggests that this phenotype is not directly caused by the reduction of RNA export, but instead may reveal an additional function of nxf-1 in genome stability. Once nuclei enter the meiotic pathway and complete the premeiotic S-phase, physiological double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generated through the action of a specialized topoisomerase enzyme SPO-11 [76]. Chromosomes align and synapse, and recombination is largely completed by late pachytene. This mechanism for initiation of meiotic recombination is conserved throughout eukaryotes. As a consequence, RAD-51 foci fail to form in spo-11 mutants, indicative of an absence of DSBs [76]. To assay whether the increased levels of RAD-51 in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants were due to a deregulation of SPO-11 activity, we knocked down spo-11 by RNAi in an nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant background. Depletion of spo-11 did not suppress the formation of RAD-51 foci in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant, indicating that they are independent of SPO- 11 activity (S11 Fig).

A feed-back mechanism alters the gene expression pattern in response to low mRNA export

To gain insight into the transcriptional consequences of reducing mRNA export, we performed RNA-seq analysis of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant worms and compared the gene expression profile to that of N2 WT worms. Since nxf-1(t2160ts) is a temperature sensitive mutant, synchronized one-day old adult-stage WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms grown at 15°C were shifted to 25°C for 12–16 hours before RNA extraction. Three biological replicas of each analysis were performed. RNA extraction, deep sequencing and quantitative differential expression analysis were performed as described in Material and Methods. Raw sequence data generated in this study are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data repository (Accession number GSE116737). Statistical analysis with the DeSeq and Edger bioinformatics algorithms showed 1117 statistically significant downregulated genes and 834 statistically significant upregulated genes in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants vs WT (S12 Fig).

Our KEGG pathway analysis [77] of these sets of genes revealed that mRNA export reduction in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant led to activation of RNA transport and mRNA surveillance pathways. nxf-1 expression itself, its binding partner nxt-1/p15 and other genes involved in RNA transport are significantly upregulated when nxf-1(t2160ts) is mutated. This result likely suggests the existence of a transcriptional feedback mechanism that activates mRNA export in response to low levels of cytoplasmic RNA. Similar transcription-translation feedback loops (TTFL) in which genes are transcribed until their protein products accumulate and are transported into the nucleus, thus inhibiting positive elements from the promoter region of the gene so that transcription is halted, have been described from yeast to mammals [78, 79, 80, 81, 82]. Consistently, genes involved in other aspects of the RNA life cycle such as ribosome biogenesis pathways appear as significantly downregulated, which again suggests a regulatory transcriptional response to adapt the number of ribosomes to the few transcripts available in the cytoplasm (Table 2, S1 Table, S2 Table, S12 Fig).

Table 2. Up- and down-regulated pathways determined by KEGG enrichment analysis.

Significant pathways have been selected according to their q-value. Genes, within each category, showing significantly altered expression are shown in the right-hand column.

In addition, a Gene Ontology analysis [77] of the same sets of differentially expressed genes revealed that they do not randomly fall within different molecular function categories. Instead, the significantly upregulated set in the nxf-1 mutant is highly enriched for GTPase binding, RasGTPase binding, small GTPase binding, actin binding and cytoskeleton protein binding genes. On the other hand, the set of significantly downregulated genes is enriched in genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial ATP synthesis (Table 2, S12 Fig). These results suggest that reduction of mRNA export has a deep impact on cytoskeletal dynamics that could underlie the nxf-1(t2160ts) epidermal and mitochondrial defects. These results prompted us to specifically study the cytoskeleton and mitochondrial network in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant.

Cytoskeletal growth and rearrangement require the translation of specific mRNAs that code for structural components and regulatory proteins connected to the cytoskeleton [83]. To examine the actin filament network in WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos, we used phalloidin staining. Whereas WT embryos accumulated actin at the nascent apical surface at the onset of epithelialization, we observed a decrease in filamentous actin (F-actin) staining in the mutant. In addition, actin remained dispersed in the arcade cells of nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos compared to WT (Fig 8). Next, we evaluated the mitochondrial network morphology by discriminating between four types of mitochondrial shapes: connected, intermediate, fragmented and very fragmented [84]. C. elegans WT embryonic cells show a connected mitochondrial network in their cytoplasm (S13 Fig). In contrast, nxf-1 (t2160ts) embryos grown at 25°C showed a general dotted pattern of Mitotracker staining in their cytoplasm, indicating the additional presence of fragmented-type mitochondria (S13 Fig). To further validate this observation, we analyzed mitochondrial morphology in adult muscle cells, a tissue where mitochondria are highly abundant and evident. To do so, animals were grown for 8 days at 25°C and scored at day 1 post L4, day 4 and day 8. 64% (n = 47) of the nxf-1(t2160ts) body wall muscle cells already showed a fragmented pattern of mitochondrial network at day 1 (S14 Fig). A higher percentage (76%) (n = 46) of nxf-1(t2160ts) muscle cells still had the fragmented phenotype at day 8, whereas in WT worms, only 14% (n = 21) of muscle cells showed this mitochondrial morphology (S14 Fig). This fragmented mitochondrial network observed in nxf-1(t2160ts) is detectable in different types of embryonic cells and not restricted to epithelia. Therefore, it does not seem to be the cause of morphogenetic defects but rather a result of cytoskeletal defects [85].

Fig 8. F-actin visualized by Phalloidin-iFluor 488 staining.

(A) F-actin is apically enriched in arcade cells in WT worms. White squares indicate the anterior end and arcade cells. (B) Images of phalloidin stained embryos were taken at different focal planes. Epidermal fluorescence was measured at the upper levels of the embryo whereas pharyngeal and intestinal fluorescence were measured at the center of the embryo. The histogram shows the decrease in F-actin staining in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant compared to the WT (n = 14) on different regions of the embryo (pharynx, intestine and epidermis). F-actin is significantly reduced throughout the nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos. Student’s t-test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01. n = 20. Scale bar: 10μm.

These data, as a whole, point to a model in which the decrease in cytoplasmic mRNA available for actin rearrangement could explain the reduction and disorganization of the actin cytoskeletal network in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryos, leading to cell attachment and elongation defects [86,87]. The transcriptional activation of genes coding for small GTPase, actin and cytoskeleton binding proteins further supports the existence of a transcriptional feedback mechanism that activates the expression of those genes in response to the cellular requirements of cytoskeletal rearrangements.

Proteomic analysis defines a molecular model of RNA transport and recycling of RNA transporters

To get deeper insight into the molecular mechanism by which NXF-1 acts in the cell, we identified C. elegans NXF-1 co-immunoprecipitated protein partners using LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry). We expressed NXF-1::3xFLAG::eGFP to immunoprecipitate NXF-1 along with its protein partners and used the N2 WT strain as the negative control. Immunoprecipitations (IPs) from three replicate JCP519 and N2 worm extracts were eluted from the beads by competitive elution with the 3xFLAG peptide. Next, immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue. Proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS (Table 3). Co-immunoprecipitated proteins fall into the following two main categories:

Table 3. NXF-1 and its protein partners co-immunoprecipitated by LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry).

Factors involved in mRNA metabolism.

As expected, we co-immunoprecipitated the NXF-1 binding partner, NXT-1 [58] and the NCP cytoplasmic fibril component NPP9/RanBP2/NUP358 that is involved in disassembly of the export complex [88] (S15 Fig, Table 3). RanBP2 provides a major binding site for NXF1/TAP at the NPC cytoplasmic filaments, thereby restricting its diffusion into the cytoplasm after NPC translocation. NPP-9 could then act as a physical link between NPCs and P granules for NXF-1-dependent transport [89,90]. In further support of this function, we co-immunoprecipitated the P-granule DEAD box RNA helicase GLH-1. GLH-1 could facilitate the passage of NXF-1 and its cargo from NPCs into perinuclear P-granules before releasing mRNA into the general cytoplasm (S15 Fig, Table 3) [28]. Once in the cytoplasm, mRNA is within large ribo-protein complexes that may locate at the nuclear envelope (germline P granules) or remain isolated within the cytoplasm (processing P bodies; stress granules) [28,91,92,93].

In consonance, we also co-immunoprecipitated P body components: poly(A) binding protein PAB-1/PABP, decapping factor CGH-1/DDX6, CAR-1/Rap55/Trailer hitch and Y-box protein CEY-2 (S15 Fig, Table 3). Interaction between these proteins within the P bodies has been described in C. elegans, although this interaction seems to be RNA-mediated [94,95,96]. Co-Immunoprecipitation of these proteins, together with detection of NXF-1 in cytoplasmic granules of mature oocytes (Fig 3B, S15 Fig, Table 3), suggests the involvement of NXF-1 in mRNA metabolism after transport, such as storage of maternal product within P bodies or as sites for mRNA degradation.

Our mass spectrometry analysis detected other proteins involved in different aspects of mRNA metabolism, such as alternative splicing factor HRP-2 [97]. However, the low spectral count of these proteins suggests that these interactions might not be direct but rather mediated through the RNA molecules to which they are bound.

Proteins involved in other types of transport.

We detected importin IMB-3/karyopherin-β3 and GTP-binding proteins RAN-1/Ran GTPase, RAN-2/RanGAP in our IP/Mass spectrometry analysis. IMB-3 is an importin-beta-like protein orthologous to Drosophila, vertebrate, and yeast importin/karyopherin-β3. The N-terminal tail of NXF-1/NXF1 contains an NLS (nuclear localization signal), which is recognized by karyopherins at the cytoplasmic site of the NPC favoring its import. Detection of IMB-3 and RAN-1 together with the cellular localization of C. elegans NXF-1 (Fig 3, Table 3), strongly suggests that after exporting mRNA to the cytoplasm, RNA-free NXF-1 could be recycled back to the nucleus by IMB-3 importin in a Ran-dependent pathway (S15 Fig).

In C. elegans, asymmetric distribution of the GTP- and GDP-bound conformations of the small GTPase RAN-1 across the nuclear envelope (NE) serves as a gradient in many transport processes [7,90,98]. RAN-2/RanGAP stimulates GTPase activity of RAN-1 which causes cytoplasmic release of the cargo from the exportin complex. Therefore, co-immunoprecipitation of RAN-2 suggests that NXF-1 could export cargo molecules in a RAN-1 GTPase-dependent cycle (S15 Fig, Table 3). Interestingly, in human HeLa cells, NXF1 and karyopherin β2B collaborate in the export of a proportion of mRNAs in RanGTP dependent cycle [99].


The formation and maintenance of specialized organs depend on developmental signaling pathways that regulate cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as establishment of the correct architecture by regulating cell-cell adhesion, cytoskeletal organization and apical-basal polarity within the constituent cells. For this to happen, gene expression has to be tightly regulated in all the steps; from transcription to mRNA export and translation [1,3]. Three levels of regulation control formation of the arcade cell epithelium: first, the transcriptional level; second, the level of protein expression; and third, the protein localization to nascent adherens junctions [36].

Nuclear export factor 1 (NXF-1), but not its ortholog, NXF-2, has been shown to play an essential role in mRNA export in C. elegans [41,59,60]. However, the consequence of NXF-1 partial loss-of-function was not examined previously. Isolation of the nxf-1(t2160ts) thermo-sensitive mutant provides an invaluable tool for analyzing the spatial and temporal in vivo role of mRNA transport during development. nxf-1(t2160ts) mutation results in mRNA accumulation in all cell nuclei. This inability to export mRNA primarily disrupts epidermal and pharyngeal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Mutant embryos do not elongate properly and show problems with epidermal cell organization. In addition, although the pharynx was evident and the pharyngeal lumen was visible, in most of the cases (87.5%, n = 176) it was unattached to the mouth.

Our genetic analysis revealed that the observed phenotypes were not the result of cell fate mis-specification, but rather cell morphogenetic defects. Expression of pha-4, a transcription factor that regulates pharyngeal development [46,100]; myo-2/Myosin-3, pharyngeal muscle myosin [44] and ric-19/ICA1, which is expressed in nervous system [45], revealed that the fate of major pharyngeal components was properly specified. In contrast, expression of membrane-tagged GFP [32,56] and the apical junction markers: PAR-6/PARD6A; DLG-1/Discs large [101,102]; AJM-1 [62] and HMR-1/E-cadherin [103] indicated that Pun pharynxes of nxf-1(t2160ts) animals are possibly a result of lost cell polarity and failed epithelialization of arcade cells. Similar expression patterns of apical markers have been observed in pha-1 mutants [104].

These developmental defects do not reflect a specific function of NXF-1, but rather the consequence of the reduction of mRNA export. Disruption of other nuclear export factors such as NXT-1/p15 and HEL-1/UAP56 also led to similar embryonic lethality, epidermal defects and the Pun phenotype. Thus, although it affects all cells, hypodermal and especially pharyngeal development seem to be particularly sensitive to a reduction in the efficiency of mRNA export. The arcade cell epithelium forms extremely rapidly, in less than 10 min, while epidermal epithelialization takes over 30 min [32,33]. Therefore, pharyngeal morphogenesis probably requires extremely tight temporal control over the differentiation process.

As a consequence of the low amount of cytoplasmic mRNA, nxf-1 mutation causes upregulation of genes involved in mRNA export and downregulation of ribosomal RNAs. aly-1/ALYREF, eef-1A.2/EEF1A1, npp-14/NUP214, npp-21/TPR, nxt-1/p15 and nxf-1 itself, among others, appear significantly upregulated in nxf-1(t2160ts) worms compared to WT N2 animals (S1 Table, S2 Table). Such a feedback mechanism has also been described in Drosophila Schneider cells (S2 cells) in which blocking the NXF1-mediated mRNA export pathway results in upregulation of export factors [105].

A similar feedback regulatory mechanism also seems to operate for genes involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement. nxf-1 loss of function causes the lack of an apical junction in arcade cells (Fig 5, S3 Fig, S4 Fig) and a dramatic reduction in filamentous actin in nxf-1 mutant embryos (Fig 8). Our transcriptomic analysis shows a significant upregulation of genes involved in cytoskeletal maintenance: GTPase binding, Ras GTPase binding, small GTPase binding, Rho GTPase binding, actin binding, and cytoskeletal binding proteins. This overexpression likely occurs as a feedback mechanism due to an insufficiency of cytoplasmic mRNAs necessary for cytoskeletal maintenance and rearrangement. Transcriptional activation of these genes is indeed a critical step during epithelial polarization and cytoskeletal reorganization [87].

Studies in Drosophila suggest a functional connection between SBR/NXF1 and the cytoskeleton [106]. In early D. melanogaster embryos, SBR/NXF1 marks the spindles of dividing nuclei [107]. We found the HCP-1/CAGE1 protein among the NXF-1 interactors in the immuno-precipitation experiments. HCP-1 is a centromere-associated protein involved in the fidelity of chromosome segregation [108]. The key role of HCP-1 is to target CLS-2/CLASP to kinetochores which promote the polymerization of kinetochore-bound microtubules [109]. Detection of HCP-1 suggests that NXF-1 may play a role in mitotic spindle assembly independently of mRNA transport. This functional connection between NXF1 and the embryonic mitotic spindle may underlie the slow cell division rate and the DNA breaks observed in C. elegans nxf-1 (t2160ts) mutants. D. melanogaster sbr10 and sbr5 mutants have morphological spindle defects in their first meiotic division [110]. Moreover, the sterile males of sbr12 mutant flies display immobile spermatozoa which exhibit disturbances in mitochondrial morphology and cytokinesis similar to those described here [106,107].

In addition to the defects in epidermal and pharyngeal morphogenesis, nxf-1 loss of function reduces the gonadal mitotic regions in C. elegans. The reduced number of mitotic germ cells in nxf-1(t2160ts) animals and the small number of cells in M-phase could be explained by mitotic delay of cells entering into the M-phase, which leads to mitotic defects and increased CDK-1 phosphorylation levels (Fig 6, S10 Fig). C. elegans germline proliferation is governed by GLP-1/Notch-receptor and other regulators [69, 70]. Our results suggest that efficient mRNA export of those and/or other factors is key to proper mitotic progression in the C. elegans gonad. Thus, knockdown of HEL-1/UAP56 also leads to increased CDK-1 phosphorylation levels (S10 Fig). Interestingly, UAP56/HEL-1 associates with the mitotic apparatus in HeLa cells. When UAP56/HEL-1 was knocked down, chromosome misalignment and mitotic delay at prometaphase were frequently observed in mitotic cells. Chromosome misalignment causes activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) which arrests mitotic progression at prometaphase [111].

Interestingly, not only mitosis but also meiosis is affected in nxf-1(t2160ts) animals. The massive accumulation of RAD-51 foci in the meiotic region suggests the existence of multiple DNA breaks. Importantly, knockdown of other mRNA export factors such as HEL-1/UAP56 does not lead to the same accumulation of RAD-51 foci, suggesting that they are not caused by the lack of mRNA export (S11 Fig). These breaks could form as a consequence of the impaired cytoskeleton dynamics during chromosome pairing or could reflect the existence of torsional stress at the DNA fiber level upon NXF-1 downregulation. This mechanical stress activates ATR which seems to modulate nuclear envelope plasticity and to promote chromatin detachment from the nuclear envelope [112,113]. Unexpectedly, high levels of mRNA from a transgene containing the hsp-16.2 promoter, GFP, and the unc-54 3’UTR (hsp-16.2::gfp::unc-54 (3’UTR)), has been detected in the so-called “expression zone” [26] that overlaps with the region where we see the meiotic RAD-51 accumulation in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant. Additional studies in C. elegans show that the heat shock hsp-16.2 gene promoter relocates to the nuclear periphery after heat shock [114]. These findings suggest the existence of a yet unknown stress response mechanism in the late pachytene/diplotene germ cells.

In summary, mRNA export is required in all tissues and organs. However epithelial cells that undergo a rapid morphogenetic transformation during development (such as arcade cells and epidermis) and the germline (the only proliferative tissue in adult nematodes) appear to be highly sensitive to reductions in the mRNA export rate in C. elegans. Many proteins involved in mRNA export have been implicated in cancer, developmental and neural diseases [1,115,116,117,118,119]. It has been shown that NPC can be reprogrammed as part of the oncogenic transformation process, the result of a viral infection or during oxidative and metabolic stress [1,8]. Interestingly, bioinformatic research predicts NXF1 to be a probable tumor suppressor gene (TSG) [120]. A deeper understanding of the processes involved in mRNA export from nucleus to cytoplasm is required. Basic aspects of their relationship to stress and DNA damage response remain an open question. This knowledge will shed light on many aspects of biology ranging from cell differentiation to morphogenesis and disease.

Materials and methods

C. elegans strains and maintenance

Standard methods were used to culture and manipulate C. elegans strains [121]. Worms were grown on NGM (nematode growth media) agar plates. Plates were previously seeded with an LB (Luria-Bertani) liquid culture of the Escherichia coli strain OP50 (Uracil auxotroph, E. coli B., ampicillin resistant from CGC) overnight at 37°C (ampicillin (100 mg/ml) and nystatin (0.004%)), and air-dried.

When larger amounts of worms were needed (for IP experiments), egg-seeded plates were used. Egg plates were prepared as described [122]. Normal NGM plates were seeded with 5ml egg mix and air-dried.

In this study, worms were grown at 15°C and 25°C. The nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant is temperature sensitive so it was maintained at 15°C. Before all experiments, worms were shifted to the non-permissive temperature of 25°C. The C. elegans strains used in this study are listed in S3 Table. Their genotypes, characteristics and sources are shown.

3D Fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH)

3D FISH protocol [123] was followed. Embryos were fixed on slides using the freeze-crack procedure. For hybridization, the probe against the poly-A sequence of mRNA (40T) labeled with Cy3 fluorochrome (Sigma) was added to the hybridization buffer and slides were incubated for 2–3 days at 37°C.


Phalloidin staining [124] was performed. Embryos were fixed on slides using the freeze-crack procedure. After cracking, eggs were fixed for 20 minutes in fix/permeabilization solution (4% PFA; 0.2% Triton X-100; 50mM PIPES pH 6.8; 25mM HEPES pH 6.8; 10.2mM EGTA; 2mM MgCl2), then slides were rehydrated/permeabilized by three 5-minute washes in 1X PBS in a Coplin jar, followed by 90 minutes of incubation with CytoPainter Phallooidin-iFluor 488 solution (Abcam). Slides were washed 2 times in 1X PBS and mounted by adding a drop of ProLongTM Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen).

Young adult worms were dissected in dissection buffer (1X egg buffer, 0.02% Tween-20, 0.2mM Levamisole and Milli-Q H2O). Dissected gonads on slides were fixed in fixation buffer (1X egg buffer, 0.02% Tween-20, 4% formaldehyde and Milli-Q H2O) covered with a coverslip (24x24 mm), incubated for 5 minutes and dipped in liquid nitrogen. Coverslips were flipped away and slides were incubated in Coplin jars in precooled (-20°C) 1:1 acetone: methanol solution for 10 minutes. Next, slides were washed three times (10 minutes each) in 1% Triton PBS buffer followed by another 5-minute wash with 0.1% Tween-20 PBS. Samples were blocked for 20–30 minutes in a Coplin jar with 10% fetal bovine serum diluted in 0.1% Tween PBS. Slides were pre-blocked for 20–30 minutes using Image- iT FX Signal Enhancer (Invitrogen). Slides were incubated with the desired first antibody, washed three times (10 minutes each) in 1% Triton PBS buffer, stained with the appropriate secondary antibody, and mounted by adding a drop of ProLongTM Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen). The following antibodies were used: anti-RAD-51 (1:10000, SDIX 2948.00.02); anti-pH3 (detects pSer 10 H3, 1:400, Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-8656R); anti-pTyr15 CDK-1 (1:10000, CALBIOCHEM 213940); goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 555 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific); goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Immunoprecipitation from C. elegans extracts

In order to immunoprecipitate NXF-1 and Co-IP their interactors, protein extracts from JCP519 (nxf-1(t2160ts) V; jcpEx6[pAZ09(Pnxf-1::nxf-1::3xFLAG::eGFP::nxf-1UTR)]), were used. Extracts from WT worms were used as the negative control. A large amount of protein extract was needed, and thus 8 to 10 NGM egg plates were used. Protein extracts were measured using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IP/Co-IPs were performed with Anti-FLAG M2 Magnetic Beads (Sigma) composed of the murine derived ANTI-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibodies attached to superparamagnetic iron impregnated 4% agarose beads. The eluted IPs were run on Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and proteins were separated according to their molecular weights [125]. Next, the gels were stained with Coomassie Blue and bands were excised. Proteomic analysis was performed at the CIC Biogune proteomics platform (

Worm transformations

C. elegans biolistic bombardment was performed as described [121], with few modifications. We used the Biolistic PDS-1000/He Particle Delivery System (Bio-Rad). This system uses high-pressure helium, released by a rupture disk and a partial vacuum, to propel a macrocarrier sheet with millions of microscopic DNA-coated gold particles toward target worms at a high velocity. In this work, JCP495 (nxf-1(t2160ts) V) was successfully rescued by bombardment with plasmids pAZ07 (Pnxf-1::nxf-1::nxf-1UTR) and pAZ09 (Pnxf-1::nxf-1::3xFLAG::eGFP::nxf-1UTR) (S1 Fig). The JCP519 (nxf-1(t2160ts) V; jcpEx6[pAZ09(Pnxf-1::nxf-1::3xFLAG::eGFP::nxf-1UTR)]) strain expressing NXF-1::3XFLAG::eGFP was generated by gene bombardment using the plasmid pAZ09.

RNA interference

In this study, RNAi was achieved by feeding worms with the bacteria that produced the desired dsRNA. RNAi clones of nxf-1, hel-1 and rnp-4 (our lab), as well as nxt-1 and mag-1 [126] were used in this study. The empty L4440 vector in HT115 cells was used as a control. For a “mild” RNAi effect, bacterial RNAi clones of nxf-1 and nxt-1 were diluted with L4440 at a 1:1 concentration.


For microscope preparations, worms were monitored on NGM plates under a Leica Stereo microscope (MZ16FA). DIC was performed on a fluorescent Leica microscope (DM600B) equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca-ER C10600 camera fitted with DIC optics. C. elegans embryos, larvae and adults were mounted on 4.5% agar pads and observed under DIC optics [127]. Images were captured with Micro-manager software ( and processed with XnView software and ImajeJ or Fiji software.

Confocal microscopy imaging was performed with a Zeiss 780 confocal microscope (immunofluorescence and phalloidin staining experiments). Images were acquired and processed using ZEN lite open software from Zeiss and ImageJ/Fiji.

Relative fluorescence image data obtained from ImageJ/Fiji was statistically analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistic 21, and the representative graphs were created with GraphPad Prism 6 software.

Next generation sequencing and Whole-genome sequencing (WGS)

In this study, the nxf-1(t2160ts) strain was backcrossed with the Hawaiian (CB4856) strain. Around 3000 F2 recombinants (t2160ts)/(Hawaiian-CB4856) were singled out. 560 thermo-sensitive F2 t2160ts/Hawaiian recombinants were obtained. Total DNA extraction of 560 C. elegans worms (560 recombinants (t2160ts)/(Hawaiian-CB4856)) was performed using the Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp.) following the manufacturer’s instructions. This kit enabled us to isolate total DNA from a small number of worms.

Using the Hawaiian single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mapping method, we backcrossed the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant with the polymorphic Hawaiian strain [128]. Next, we isolated the newly generated F2 recombinants homozygous for the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutation, (Hawaiian-CB4856)/nxf-1(t2160ts). Using 205 ng genomic DNA obtained as described, sequencing libraries were constructed using the NEXTflex Rapid DNA-Seq Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bioo Scientific). DNA quality and integrity were evaluated by Experion Automated Electrophoresis System (Bio-Rad) and the concentration was calculated using qPCR. Libraries were prepared at the genomic platform of the CIBIR ( and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 15000. The quality of DNAseq results was assessed using FastQC( Paired-end 100-bp sequencing yielded a theoretical mean coverage of 245X of the C. elegans genome. The FastQ files were analyzed using a Cloud-Based Pipeline for Analysis of Mutant Genome Sequences (Cloudmap tool, with standard parameters following Cloudmap workflow [42].

RNA deep sequencing

Total RNA extraction from C. elegans worms was performed using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Four 99x16.2 mm worm plates of nxf-1(t2160ts) and WT worms were used.

RNA deep sequencing was performed at the genomic platform of the CIBIR ( Expression analysis was performed by DESeq2 [129] and edgeR [130] as described [131, 132].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Schematic drawings of trangenes used in this study.

(A) plasmid pAZ07 (used to rescue JCP495) and (B) plasmid pAZ09 (used to generate transgenic strain JCP519) are shown.


S2 Fig. Temperature sensitive curve of nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant.

X axis shows the different developmental stages at which the embryos were temperature-shifted. Y axis shows the percentage of embryonic lethality measured as non-hatched embryos.

Blue line shows the lethality of embryos that underwent an upshift from 15°C to 25°C at the two-cell stage (100% lethality), four-cell stage (73% lethality), twelve-cell stage (73% lethality), 100-cell stage (63% lethality), 200-cell stage (58% lethality), 1.5-fold stage (13% lethality) and 2-fold stage (0% lethality). The lethality does not fall under 50% until mid-embryogenesis, when most cell divisions and epithelialization are completed. Orange line shows the lethality of embryos that underwent a downshift from 25°C to 15°C at the same stages.

Together, the results indicate that mRNA transport is required throughout development but is has to function very efficiently during the morphogenetic events that happen between the 200-cell stage and the 1.5-fold stage.


S3 Fig. NXF-1 is essential for arcade cells to form a polarized epithelium.

(A) Schematic representation of an epithelial cell of C. elegans. The epithelial cell contains a single junction, the C. elegans apical junction (CeAJ) with a bipartite organization. The basal region is associated with an electron dense structure, where DLG-1/Disc large and AJM-1 co-localize while the more apical region is not associated with any structure and harbors the HMR-1/E-cadherin and HMP-1/alpha-catenin molecules. (B-D) Representative DIC and fluorescence images of 1.5-fold embryos and quantification of expression changes in the nxf-1(t2160ts) and WT background of the AJM-1::GFP (B) and cadherin-catenin complex components HMR-1::GFP (C) and HMP-1::GFP (D) in pharynx and epidermis. Anterior is to the left. n > 20 embryos for each strain. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.


S4 Fig. Apical junction components expression in pharynx and epidermis.

(A-C) Representative DIC and fluorescence images of 1.5-fold embryos and quantification of expression changes in the nxf-1(t2160ts) and WT background of the DLG-1::dsRed (A) SAX-7::GFP (B) and JAC-1::GFP (C) in pharynx and epidermis. Anterior is to the left. n > 20 embryos for each strain. Student’s t-test; ***P<0.0001.


S5 Fig. Quantification of total levels of PAR-6 in nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryos versus WT embryos.

PAR-6 protein is measured as relative fluorescent units (RFU) in nxf-1(t2160ts) and WT embryos expressing a PAR-6::mCherry transgene (as shown in Fig 4F). The slight increase of PAR-6 protein in the nxf-1(t2160ts) background suggests that polarization defects in arcade cells are mainly due to mislocalization of PAR-6 and failure in apical localization.


S6 Fig. nxf-1(t2160ts) mutants display a wider intestinal lumen than WT.

(A) Comparison of WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) embryonic intestines visualized with DIC and AJM-1::GFP. (B) Hatched nxf-1(t2160ts) L1 larvae show a wider intestinal lumen than WT L1 larvae. (C) Quantification of the lumen width of different intestinal sections in WT and nxf-1(t2160ts) animals. Statistical analysis performed using Student’s t-test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01.


S7 Fig. Knockdown of C. elegans mRNA export machinery members NXF-1/TAP, NXT-1/p15, HEL-1/UAP56.

ST65 (ncIs13[ajm-1::GFP]) worms in L1 stage were fed bacterial L4440 vector control (a) and RNAi clones of nxf-1 (b), hel-1 (c) and nxt-1 (d). Worms were grown at 15°C and images were taken at the sixth day (adult stage). The worms fed bacterial RNAi clones of nxf-1 (b) and hel-1 (c) arrested at the L1-L2 stage whereas worms fed the bacterial RNAi clone of nxt-1(d) reached the adult stage and as zoomed in (e), 50% of scored animals show a protruding vulva phenotype (arrows) (n = 260).


S8 Fig. DESeq2 normalized expression values and standard deviation for ego-1, ego-2, glp-1, lag-1, lgx-1, teg-1 and teg-4 genes.

No significant differences between nxf-1(t2160ts) samples and WT controls, calculated both by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey’s HSD) and pairwise.t.test (FDR ≤ 0.05), are detected.


S9 Fig. DESeq2 normalized expression values and standard deviation for cdc-25, cdk-, histone (his-) and rad-51 genes.

Significant differences between nxf-1(t2160ts) samples and WT controls, calculated both by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey’s HSD) and pairwise.t.test (FDR ≤ 0.05), are shown with asterisks. Analyzed genes: cdc-25.1, cdc-25.2, cdc-25.3, cdc-25.4, cdk-1, his-1, his-2, his-3, his-4, his-5, his-6, his-7, his-8, his-11, his-16, his-17, his-18, his-24, his-25, his-31, his-32, his-35, his-37, his-38, his-39, his-40, his-41, his-42, his-45, his-47, his-48, his-55, his-57, his-58, his-59, his-60, his-61, his-62, his-63, his-64, his-65, his-66, his-67, his-68, his-69, his-70, his-71, his-72, his-73, his-74, rad-51.

Other histone coding genes such as: his-9, -10, -12, -13, -14, -15, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -26, -27, -28, -29, -30, -33, -34, -36, -43, -44, -46, -49, -50, -51, -52, -53, -54, -56 showed no-expression in lab growth conditions.


S10 Fig. NXF-1 and HEL-1 are necessary for normal cell proliferation.

Mitotic cells in nxf-1(t2160ts) failed to proceed into mitosis and arrested at G2 phase (g, h and i), similar to gonads after IR (d, e and f) and depletion of hel-1 (m, n and o). N2 (WT) was used as the negative control (a, b and c). N2 (WT) and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms were synchronized. At the L4 stage, part of the N2 worms were fed the hel-1 bacterial RNAi and the bacterial RNAi clone of the empty L4440 vector was used as a control and fed to the rest of the worms (j, k and l). Another batch of L4 stage N2 worms were irradiated (90Gy). After 24 hours, gonads of nxf-1(t2160ts), N2 irradiated and non-irradiated worms, along with worms fed hel-1 and L4440, were dissected, fixed, immunostained with α-pTyr-15 CDK-1 and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 10 μm.


S11 Fig. Accumulation of RAD-51 in the late pachytene/diplotene region of nxf-1(t2160ts).

N2 (WT) and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms were synchronized. At the L4 stage, N2 (WT) worms were irradiated (90Gy). After 24 hours, gonads of N2 non-irradiated (a, b and c), N2 irradiated (d, e and f) and nxf-1(t2160ts) (g, h and i) worms were dissected, fixed, immunostained with α-RAD-51 and counterstained with DAPI. In another set of experiments, N2 (WT) and nxf-1(t2160ts) worms were synchronized and from the L1 stage, they were fed the spo-11 bacterial RNAi (p, q, r, v, w and x) and the empty L4440 vector (j, k, I, s, t and u) that was used as a control. At the L4 stage, a fraction of N2 (WT) worms were fed the hel-1 bacterial RNAi clones (m, n and o). One-day-old worms were dissected, and their gonads were fixed, immunostained with α-RAD-51 and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 20μm.


S12 Fig. Transcriptomic analysis.

Statistical analysis with DeSeq and Edger shows 1117 downregulated (A) and 834 upregulated genes (B) in nxf-1(t2160ts) vs WT. Gene ontology (GO) analysis, cellular component (CC) analysis, and molecular function (MF) of differentially expressed downregulated and upregulated genes in nxf-1(t2160ts) vs. WT (C, D, E and F). The number of genes within each category is represented in color bars, one bar per GO term. Bar length indicates the number of genes belonging to the different GO categories and color indicates the statistical significance, from those with highly significant expression differences (red) to those with low expression differences (blue).


S13 Fig. nxf-1(t2160ts) embryos show a general pattern of fragmented mitochondrial morphology.

(A) WT embryos at different developmental stages (1–3) show a connected mitochondrial network in the cytoplasm of their cells visualized with Mitotracker staining (1'-3'). (B) nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant embryos at the same developmental stages (4–6) show a general dotted pattern of Mitotracker staining in the cytoplasm of their cells (4’-6’), indicating the additional presence of fragmented-type mitochondria. (C) shows a non-stained embryo as a control for autofluorescence (7–7’).


S14 Fig. Age-dependent mitochondrial changes occur faster in the nxf-1(t2160ts) mutant compared to WT.

(A) Representative images of the different mitochondrial morphologies scored. (B) Transgenic animals expressing mitoGFP (ccIs4251 [(pSAK2) Pmyo-3::GFP::LacZ::NLS + (pSAK4) Pmyo-3::mitochondrial GFP + dpy-20(+)]) in body wall muscle cells (DAY 1, DAY 4 and DAY 8) were analyzed at different days after the L4 larval stage, respectively (DAY 1 WT n = 41 and nxf-1(t2160ts) n = 47; DAY 4 WT n = 61 and nxf-1(t2160ts) n = 73; DAY 8 WT n = 21 and nxf-1(t2160ts) n = 46). Because nxf-1(t2160ts) are ts, worms were grown at 15°C and then moved to 25°C at the L4 larval stage. Scale bar: 10μm.


S15 Fig. Working model for mRNA export and a new proposed model for the collaboration of NXF-1-RAN-1 in the export of unknown cargo.

On the left-hand side, the main steps of mRNA export are shown: NXF-1/NXT-1 recruitment to the mRNP; mRNP export through the NPC where cytoplasmic fibril NPP-9 probably mediates the translocation step of mRNA across the NPC. GLH-1 probably mediates the release of mRNA from P granules into the cytoplasm; mRNAs are stored in P body particles. P body poly(A) binding protein PAB-1, decapping factor CGH-1, CAR-1/Rap55/Trailer hitch and Y-box protein CEY-2 are shown. Finally, import of NXF-1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus via the IMB-3 transport in the RanGTPase-dependent pathway. On the right-hand side of the proposed model, NXF-1 exports unknown cargo using the RAN-1-dependent pathway. Once in the cytoplasm, RAN-2 associates with the cargo complex and this leads to its dissociation.


S2 Table. Genes involved in the RNA transport and mRNA surveillance pathways, upregulated in nxf-1(t2160ts) compared to WT.


S3 Table. C. elegans mutant and transgenic strains used in this study and some of their characteristics.


S1 Movie. NXF-1::GFP localization throughout the cell cycle during early C. elegans development.


S2 Movie.

Development of a WT embryo (left) compared to an nxf-1 (t2160ts) embryo (right).



JC, AMV and HN are members of the European network Genie. We thank Consejería de Innovación del Gobierno de La Rioja for a Ph.D. fellowship to AZ, CIC bioGUNE proteomics platform for the service, Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC) for strains, Knudra for transgenes, and Christy Esmahan for comments.


  1. 1. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B and Borden KL. Aiding and abetting cancer: mRNA export and the nuclear pore. Trends Cell Biol. 2013; 23: 328–335. pmid:23582887
  2. 2. Katahira J. Nuclear export of messenger RNA. Genes (Basel). 2015; 6: 163–184.
  3. 3. Delaleau M and Borden KL. Multiple Export Mechanisms for mRNAs. Cells. 2015; 4: 452–473. pmid:26343730
  4. 4. Sloan KE, Gleizes PE and Bohnsack MT. Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of RNAs and RNA–Protein Complexes. J Mol Biol. 2016; 428: 2040–2059. pmid:26434509
  5. 5. Bjork P and Wieslander L. Integration of mRNP formation and export. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017; 74: 2875–2897. pmid:28314893
  6. 6. Izaurralde E. Friedrich Miescher Prize awardee lecture review. A conserved family of nuclear export receptors mediates the exit of messenger RNA to the cytoplasm. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001; 58: 1105–1112. pmid:11529502
  7. 7. Adam SA. The nuclear transport machinery in Caenorhabditis elegans: A central role in morphogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009; 20: 576–581. pmid:19577735
  8. 8. Bonnet A and Palancade B. Regulation of mRNA trafficking by nuclear pore complexes. Genes (Basel). 2014; 5: 767–791.
  9. 9. Piruat JI and Aguilera A. A novel yeast gene, THO2, is involved in RNA pol II transcription and provides new evidence for transcriptional elongation-associated recombination. EMBO J. 1998; 17:4859–4872 pmid:9707445
  10. 10. Castellano-Pozo M, Garcia-Muse T, Aguilera A. The Caenorhabditis elegans THO Complex Is Required for the Mitotic Cell Cycle and Development. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(12): e52447. pmid:23285047
  11. 11. Kurshakova MM, Georgieva SG and Kopytova DV. Protein complexes coordinating mRNA export from the nucleus into the cytoplasm. Mol Biol (Mosk). 2016; 50: 723–729.
  12. 12. Rondon AG, Jimeno S and Aguilera A. The interface between transcription and mRNP export: from THO to THSC/TREX-2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1799: 533–538. pmid:20601280
  13. 13. Luna R, Rondón AG and Aguilera A. New clues to understand the role of THO and other functionally related factors in mRNP biogenesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2012; 1819: 514–520.
  14. 14. Pena A, Gewartowski K, Mroczek S, Cuellar J, Szykowska A, Prokop A, Czarnocki-Cieciura M, Piwowarski J, Tous C, Aguilera A. et al. Architecture and nucleic acids recognition mechanism of the THO complex, an mRNP assembly factor. EMBO J. 2012; 31: 1605–1616. pmid:22314234
  15. 15. Heath CG, Viphakone N and Wilson SA. The role of TREX in gene expression and disease. Biochem J. 2016; 473: 2911–2935. pmid:27679854
  16. 16. Viphakone N, Hautbergue GM, Walsh M, Chang CT, Holland A, Folco EG, Reed R and Wilson SA. TREX exposes the RNA-binding domain of Nxf1 to enable mRNA export. Nat Commun. 2012; 3: 1006. pmid:22893130
  17. 17. Walsh MJ, Hautbergue GM and Wilson SA. Structure and function of mRNA export adaptors. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010; 38: 232–236. pmid:20074066
  18. 18. Braun IC, Herold A, Rode M, Conti E and Izaurralde E. Overexpression of TAP/p15 heterodimers bypasses nuclear retention and stimulates nuclear mRNA export. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 20536–20543. pmid:11259411
  19. 19. Santos-Rosa H, Moreno H, Simos G, Segref A, Fahrenkrog B, Pante N. and Hurt E. Nuclear mRNA export requires complex formation between Mex67p and Mtr2p at the nuclear pores. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 6826–6838. pmid:9774696
  20. 20. Herold A, Suyama M, Rodrigues JP, Braun IC, Kutay U, Carmo-Fonseca M, Bork P and Izaurralde E. TAP (NXF1) belongs to a multigene family of putative RNA export factors with a conserved modular architecture. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 8996–9008. pmid:11073998
  21. 21. Suyama M, Doerks T, Braun IC, Sattler M, Izaurralde E and Bork P. Prediction of structural domains of TAP reveals details of its interaction with p15 and nucleoporins. EMBO Rep. 2000; 1: 53–58. pmid:11256625
  22. 22. Senay C, Ferrari P, Rocher C, Rieger KJ, Winter J, Platel D and Bourne Y. The Mtr2-Mex67 NTF2-like domain complex. Structural insights into a dual role of Mtr2 for yeast nuclear export. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 48395–48403. pmid:14504280
  23. 23. Bachi A, Braun IC, Rodrigues JP, Pante N, Ribbeck K, von Kobbe C, Kutay U, Wilm M, Gorlich D, Carmo-Fonseca M et al. The C-terminal domain of TAP interacts with the nuclear pore complex and promotes export of specific CTE-bearing RNA substrates. RNA. 2000; 6: 136–158. pmid:10668806
  24. 24. Strasser K, Bassler J and Hurt E. Binding of the Mex67p/Mtr2p heterodimer to FXFG, GLFG, and FG repeat nucleoporins is essential for nuclear mRNA export. J Cell Biol. 2000; 150: 695–706. pmid:10952996
  25. 25. Fribourg S, Braun IC, Izaurralde E and Conti E. Structural Basis for the Recognition of a Nucleoporin FG Repeat by the NTF2-like Domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA Nuclear Export Factor. Mol Cell. 2001; 8: 645–656. pmid:11583626
  26. 26. Saffman EE and Lasko P. Germline development in vertebrates and invertebrates. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999; 55: 1141–1163. pmid:10442094
  27. 27. Strome S. Specification of the germ line. WormBook. 2005; 1–10.
  28. 28. Sheth U, Pitt J, Dennis S and Priess JR. Perinuclear P granules are the principal sites of mRNA export in adult C. elegans germ cells. Development. 2010; 137: 1305–1314. pmid:20223759
  29. 29. Quintin S, Michaux G, McMahon L, Gansmuller A and Labouesse M. The Caenorhabditis elegans Gene lin-26 Can Trigger Epithelial Differentiation without Conferring Tissue Specificity. Dev Biol. 2001; 235: 410–421. pmid:11437447
  30. 30. White J. The anatomy, The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1988; 81–122.
  31. 31. Albertson DG and Thomson JN. The pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976; 275: 299–325. pmid:8805
  32. 32. Portereiko MF and Mango SE. Early morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Dev Biol. 2001; 233: 482–494. pmid:11336509
  33. 33. Portereiko MF, Saam J and Mango SE. ZEN-4/MKLP1 is required to polarize the foregut epithelium. Curr Biol. 2004; 14: 932–941. pmid:15182666
  34. 34. Knust E and Bossinger O. Composition and formation of intercellular junctions in epithelial cells. Science. 2002; 298: 1955–1959. pmid:12471248
  35. 35. Von Stetina SE and Mango SE. PAR-6, but not E-cadherin and beta-integrin, is necessary for epithelial polarization in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2015; 403: 5–14. pmid:25773364
  36. 36. Von Stetina SE, Liang J, Marnellos G and Mango SE. Temporal regulation of epithelium formation mediated by FoxA, MKLP1, MgcRacGAP, and PAR-6. Mol Biol Cell. 2017; 28: 2042–2065. pmid:28539408
  37. 37. Costa M, Raich W, Agbunag C, Leung B, Hardin J and Priess JR. A putative catenin-cadherin system mediates morphogenesis of the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J Cell Biol. 1998; 141: 297–308. pmid:9531567
  38. 38. Simske JS, Koppen M, Sims P, Hodgkin J, Yonkof A and Hardin J. The cell junction protein VAB-9 regulates adhesion and epidermal morphology in C. elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 2003; 5: 619–625. pmid:12819787
  39. 39. Bossinger O, Klebes A, Segbert C, Theres C and Knust E. Zonula adherens formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires dlg-1, the homologue of the Drosophila gene discs large. Dev Biol. 2001; 230: 29–42. pmid:11161560
  40. 40. Koppen M, Simske JS, Sims PA, Firestein BL, Hall DH, Radice AD, Rongo C and Hardin JD. Cooperative regulation of AJM-1 controls junctional integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans epithelia. Nat Cell Biol. 2001; 3: 983–991. pmid:11715019
  41. 41. Tan W, Zolotukhin AS, Bear J, Patenaude DJ and Felber BK. The mRNA export in Caenorhabditis elegans is mediated by Ce-NXF-1, an ortholog of human TAP/NXF and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mex67p. RNA. 2000; 6: 1762–1772. pmid:11142376
  42. 42. Minevich G, Park DS, Blankenberg D, Poole RJ. and Hobert O. CloudMap: a cloud-based pipeline for analysis of mutant genome sequences. Genetics. 2012; 192: 1249–1269. pmid:23051646
  43. 43. Gordon CL, King J. Genetic properties of temperature-sensitive folding mutants of the coat protein of phage P22. Genetics. 1994; 136:427–438 pmid:8150274
  44. 44. Okkema PG, Harrison SW, Plunger V, Aryana A and Fire A. Sequence requirements for myosin gene expression and regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1993; 135: 385–404. pmid:8244003
  45. 45. Morck C, Axang C and Pilon M. A genetic analysis of axon guidance in the C elegans pharynx. Dev Biol. 2003; 260: 158–175. pmid:12885562
  46. 46. Mango SE, Lambie EJ and Kimble J. The pha-4 gene is required to generate the pharyngeal primordium of Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1994; 120: 3019–3031. pmid:7607089
  47. 47. Kalb JM, Lau KK, Goszczynski B, Fukushige T, Moons D, Okkema PG and McGhee JD. pha-4 is Ce-fkh-1, a fork head/HNF-3alpha,beta,gamma homolog that functions in organogenesis of the C. elegans pharynx. Development. 1998; 125: 2171–2180. pmid:9584117
  48. 48. Gaudet J and Mango SE. Regulation of organogenesis by the Caenorhabditis elegans FoxA protein PHA-4. Science. 2002; 295: 821–825. pmid:11823633
  49. 49. Gaudet J, Muttumu S, Horner M and Mango SE. Whole-Genome Analysis of Temporal Gene Expression during Foregut Development. PLoS Biol. 2004; 2(11): e352. pmid:15492775
  50. 50. Kuchenthal CA, Chen W and Okkema PG. Multiple enhancers contribute to expression of the NK-2 homeobox gene ceh-22 in C. elegans pharyngeal muscle. Genesis. 2001; 31: 156–166. pmid:11783006
  51. 51. Smith PA and Mango SE. Role of T-box gene tbx-2 for anterior foregut muscle development in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2007; 302: 25–39. pmid:17005176
  52. 52. Vilimas T, Abraham A and Okkema PG. An early pharyngeal muscle enhancer from the Caenorhabditis elegans ceh-22 gene is targeted by the Forkhead factor PHA-4. Dev Biol. 2004; 266: 388–398. pmid:14738885
  53. 53. Mango SE. The C. elegans pharynx: a model for organogenesis. WormBook. 2007; 1–26.
  54. 54. Mango SE. The molecular basis of organ formation: insights from the C. elegans foregut. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009; 25: 597–628. pmid:19575642
  55. 55. Pettitt J, Wood WB and Plasterk RH. cdh-3, a gene encoding a member of the cadherin superfamily, functions in epithelial cell morphogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1996; 122: 4149–4157. pmid:9012534
  56. 56. Zipkin ID, Kindt RM and Kenyon CJ. Role of a new Rho family member in cell migration and axon guidance in C. elegans. Cell. 1997; 90: 883–894. pmid:9298900
  57. 57. Chen L, Ong B and Bennett V. LAD-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans L1CAM homologue, participates in embryonic and gonadal morphogenesis and is a substrate for fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway-dependent phosphotyrosine-based signaling. J Cell Biol. 2001; 154: 841–855. pmid:11502758
  58. 58. Kerkow DE, Carmel AB, Menichelli E, Ambrus G, Hills RD Jr, Gerace L and Williamson JR. The structure of the NXF2/NXT1 heterodimeric complex reveals the combined specificity and versatility of the NTF2-like fold. J Mol Biol. 2012; 415: 649–665. pmid:22123199
  59. 59. Longman D, Johnstone IL and Caceres JF. The Ref/Aly proteins are dispensable for mRNA export and development in Caenorhabditis elegans. RNA. 2003; 9: 881–891. pmid:12810921
  60. 60. MacMorris M, Brocker C and Blumenthal T. UAP56 levels affect viability and mRNA export in Caenorhabditis elegans. RNA. 2003; 9: 847–857. pmid:12810918
  61. 61. Liu Z, Fujii T, Nukazuka A, Kurokawa R, Suzuki M, Fujisawa H and Takagi S. C. elegans PlexinA PLX-1 mediates a cell contact-dependent stop signal in vulval precursor cells. Dev Biol. 2005; 282: 138–151. pmid:15936335
  62. 62. Shiimori M, Inoue K and Sakamoto H. A specific set of exon junction complex subunits is required for the nuclear retention of unspliced RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Cell Biol. 2013; 33: 444–456. pmid:23149939
  63. 63. Hir HL, Sauliere J and Wang Z. The exon junction complex as a node of post-transcriptional networks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17: 41–54. pmid:26670016
  64. 64. Boehm V and Gehring NH. Exon Junction Complexes: Supervising the Gene Expression Assembly Line. Trends Genet. 2016; 32: 724–735. pmid:27667727
  65. 65. Woodward LA, Mabin JW, Gangras P and Singh G. The exon junction complex: a lifelong guardian of mRNA fate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2017; 8(3).
  66. 66. Kawano T, Kataoka N, Dreyfuss G and Sakamoto H. Ce-Y14 and MAG-1, components of the exon-exon junction complex, are required for embryogenesis and germline sexual switching in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Dev. 2004; 121: 27–35. pmid:14706697
  67. 67. Evans TC and Hunter CP. Translational control of maternal RNAs. WormBook. 2005; 1–11.
  68. 68. Robertson S and Lin R. The Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition in C. elegans. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015; 113: 1–42. pmid:26358869
  69. 69. Vought VE, Ohmachi M, Lee MH, Maine EM. EGO-1, a putative RNA-directed RNA polymerase, promotes germline proliferation in parallel with GLP-1/notch signaling and regulates the spatial organization of nuclear pore complexes and germline P granules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2005;170(3):1121–32. Epub 2005 May 23 pmid:15911573
  70. 70. Pepper AS, Lo TW, Killian DJ, Hall DH, Hubbard EJ. The establishment of Caenorhabditis elegans germline pattern is controlled by overlapping proximal and distal somatic gonad signals. Dev Biol. 2003; 259(2):336–50 pmid:12871705
  71. 71. Hendzel MJ, Wei Y, Mancini MA, Van Hooser A, Ranalli T, Brinkley BR, Bazett-Jones DP and Allis CD. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma. 1997; 106: 348–360. pmid:9362543
  72. 72. Moser SC, von Elsner S, Bussing I, Alpi A, Schnabel R and Gartner A. Functional dissection of Caenorhabditis elegans CLK-2/TEL2 cell cycle defects during embryogenesis and germline development. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5(4): e1000451. pmid:19360121
  73. 73. Bailly AP, Freeman A, Hall J, Declais AC, Alpi A, Lilley DM, Ahmed S and Gartner A. The Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of Gen1/Yen1 resolvases links DNA damage signaling to DNA double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(7): e1001025. pmid:20661466
  74. 74. Alpi A, Pasierbek P, Gartner A and Loidl J. Genetic and cytological characterization of the recombination protein RAD-51 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma. 2003; 112: 6–16. pmid:12684824
  75. 75. Ward JD, Barber LJ, Petalcorin MI, Yanowitz J and Boulton SJ. Replication blocking lesions present a unique substrate for homologous recombination. EMBO J. 2007; 26: 3384–3396. pmid:17611606
  76. 76. Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M and Villeneuve AM. Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell. 1998; 94: 387–398. pmid:9708740
  77. 77. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y and He QY. ClusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012; 16: 284–287. pmid:22455463
  78. 78. Hastings MH, Maywood ES, O'Neill JS. Cellular circadian pacemaking and the role of cytosolic rhythms. Current Biology. 2008; 18 (17): R805–R815 pmid:18786386
  79. 79. Sheredos B. Scientific Diagrams as Traces of Group-Dependent Cognition: A Brief Cognitive-Historical Analysis". Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 2013; 35 (35).
  80. 80. Andreani TS, Itoh TQ, Yildirim E, Hwangbo DS, Allada R. Genetics of Circadian Rhythms. Sleep Medicine Clinics 2015. 10 (4): 413–21 pmid:26568119
  81. 81. Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, Colot HV, Mehra A, Belden WJ, Shi M, Hong CI, Larrondo LF, Baker CL, Chen CH, Schwerdtfeger C, Collopy PD, Gamsby JJ, Lambreghts R. A circadian clock in Neurospora: how genes and proteins cooperate to produce a sustained, entrainable, and compensated biological oscillator with a period of about a day". Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 2007; 72: 57–68 pmid:18522516
  82. 82. Sanchez SE, Kay SA. The Plant Circadian Clock: From a Simple Timekeeper to a Complex Developmental Manager. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2016; 8 (12): a027748 pmid:27663772
  83. 83. Condeelis J and Singer RH. How and why does beta-actin mRNA target?. Biol Cell. 2005; 97: 97–110. pmid:15601261
  84. 84. Regmi SG, Rolland SG and Conradt B. Age-dependent changes in mitochondrial morphology and volume are not predictors of lifespan. Aging (Albany NY). 2014; 6: 118–130.
  85. 85. Boldogh IR, Pon LA. Interactions of mitochondria with the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006; 1763: 450–462 pmid:16624426
  86. 86. Chin-Sang ID and Chisholm AD. Form of the worm: genetics of epidermal morphogenesis in C. elegans. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 544–551. pmid:11102704
  87. 87. Saenz-Narciso B, Gomez-Orte E, Zheleva A, Gastaca I and Cabello J. Control of developmental networks by Rac/Rho small GTPases: How cytoskeletal changes during embryogenesis are orchestrated. Bioessays. 2016; 38: 1246–1254. pmid:27790724
  88. 88. Goldberg MW. Nuclear pore complex tethers to the cytoskeleton. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017; 68: 52–58. pmid:28676424
  89. 89. Forler D, Rabut G, Ciccarelli FD, Herold A, Kocher T, Niggeweg R, Bork P, Ellenberg J and Izaurralde E. RanBP2/Nup358 provides a major binding site for NXF1-p15 dimers at the nuclear pore complex and functions in nuclear mRNA export. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24: 1155–1167. pmid:14729961
  90. 90. Cohen-Fix O and Askjaer P. Cell Biology of the Caenorhabditis elegans Nucleus. Genetics. 2017; 205: 25–59. pmid:28049702
  91. 91. Anderson P and Kedersha N. RNA granules: post-transcriptional and epigenetic modulators of gene expression. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10: 430–436. pmid:19461665
  92. 92. Decker CJ and Parker R. P-bodies and stress granules: possible roles in the control of translation and mRNA degradation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012; 4(9): a012286. pmid:22763747
  93. 93. Luo Y, Na Z and Slavoff SA. P-Bodies: Composition, Properties, and Functions. Biochemistry. 2018; 57: 2424–2431. pmid:29381060
  94. 94. Boag PR, Nakamura A and Blackwell TK. A conserved RNA-protein complex component involved in physiological germline apoptosis regulation in C. elegans. Development. 2005; 132: 4975–4986. pmid:16221731
  95. 95. Boag PR, Atalay A, Robida S, Reinke V and Blackwell TK. Protection of specific maternal messenger RNAs by the P body protein CGH-1 (Dhh1/RCK) during Caenorhabditis elegans oogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2008; 182: 543–557. pmid:18695045
  96. 96. Audhya A, Hyndman F, McLeod IX, Maddox AS, Yates JR 3rd, Desai A and Oegema K. A complex containing the Sm protein CAR-1 and the RNA helicase CGH-1 is required for embryonic cytokinesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2005; 171: 267–279. pmid:16247027
  97. 97. Kabat JL, Barberan-Soler S and Zahler AM. HRP-2, the Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of mammalian heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins Q and R, is an alternative splicing factor that binds to UCUAUC splicing regulatory elements. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 28490–28497. pmid:19706616
  98. 98. Cautain B, Hill R, de Pedro N and Link W. Components and regulation of nuclear transport processes. FEBS J. 2015; 282: 445–462. pmid:25429850
  99. 99. Shamsher MK, Ploski J and Radu A. Karyopherin beta 2B participates in mRNA export from the nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 14195–14199. pmid:12384575
  100. 100. Horner MA, Quintin S, Domeier ME, Kimble J, Labouesse M and Mango SE. pha-4, an HNF-3 homolog, specifies pharyngeal organ identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 1947–1952. pmid:9649499
  101. 101. Zaidel-Bar R, Joyce MJ, Lynch AM, Witte K, Audhya A and Hardin J. The F-BAR domain of SRGP-1 facilitates cell-cell adhesion during C. elegans morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2010; 191: 761–769. pmid:21059849
  102. 102. Raich WB, Agbunag C and Hardin J. Rapid epithelial-sheet sealing in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo requires cadherin-dependent filopodial priming. Current Biology. 1999; 9: 1139–1146. pmid:10531027
  103. 103. Achilleos A, Wehman AM and Nance J. PAR-3 mediates the initial clustering and apical localization of junction and polarity proteins during C. elegans intestinal epithelial cell polarization. Development. 2010; 137: 1833–1842. pmid:20431121
  104. 104. Kuzmanov A, Yochem J and Fay DS. Analysis of PHA-1 reveals a limited role in pharyngeal development and novel functions in other tissues. Genetics. 2014; 198: 259–268. pmid:25009149
  105. 105. Herold A, Teixeira L and Izaurralde E. Genome-wide analysis of nuclear mRNA export pathways in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 2472–2483. pmid:12743041
  106. 106. Mamon LA, Ginanova VR, Kliver SF, Yakimova AO, Atsapkina AA and Golubkova EV. RNA-binding proteins of the NXF (nuclear export factor) family and their connection with the cytoskeleton. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2017; 74: 161–169.
  107. 107. Golubkova EV, Atsapkina AA and Mamon LA. The role of sbr/Dm nxf1 gene in syncytial development in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell and Tissue Biology. 2015; 9: 271–283.
  108. 108. Moore L.L., Morrison M., and Roth M.B. HCP-1, a protein involved in chromosome segregation, is localized to the centromere of mitotic chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. The Journal of cell biology. 1999; 147: 471–480 pmid:10545493
  109. 109. Cheeseman I.M., MacLeod I., Yates J.R. 3rd, Oegema K., and Desai A. (2005). The CENP-F-like proteins HCP-1 and HCP-2 target CLASP to kinetochores to mediate chromosome segregation. Current biology. 2005; 15: 771–777. pmid:15854912
  110. 110. Golubkova EV, Markova EG, Markov AV, Avanesyan EO, Nokkala S and Mamon LA. Dm nxf1/sbr gene affects the formation of meiotic spindle in female Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosome Res. 2009; 17: 833–845. pmid:19779841
  111. 111. Yamazaki T, Fujiwara N, Yukinaga H, Ebisuya M, Shiki T, Kurihara T, Kioka N, Kambe T, Nagao M, Nishida E et al. The closely related RNA helicases, UAP56 and URH49, preferentially form distinct mRNA export machineries and coordinately regulate mitotic progression. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21: 2953–2965. pmid:20573985
  112. 112. Bermejo R, Capra T, Jossen R, Colosio A, Frattini C, Carotenuto W, Cocito A, Doksani Y, Klein H, Gomez-Gonzalez B et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell. 2011; 146: 233–246. pmid:21784245
  113. 113. Kumar A, Mazzanti M, Mistrik M, Kosar M, Beznoussenko GV, Mironov AA, Garre M, Parazzoli D, Shivashankar GV, Scita G et al. ATR mediates a checkpoint at the nuclear envelope in response to mechanical stress. Cell. 2014; 158: 633–646. pmid:25083873
  114. 114. Rohner S, Kalck V, Wang X, Ikegami K, Lieb JD, Gasser SM and Meister P. Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 2013; 200: 589–604. pmid:23460676
  115. 115. Hurt JA and Silver PA. mRNA nuclear export and human disease. Dis Model Mech. 2008; 1: 103–108. pmid:19048072
  116. 116. Simon DN and Rout MP. Cancer and the nuclear pore complex. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 773: 285–307. pmid:24563353
  117. 117. Geuens T, Bouhy D and Timmerman V. The hnRNP family: insights into their role in health and disease. Hum Genet. 2016; 135: 851–867. pmid:27215579
  118. 118. Hautbergue GM. RNA Nuclear Export: From Neurological Disorders to Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017; 1007: 89–109. pmid:28840554
  119. 119. Wickramasinghe VO and Venkitaraman AR. RNA Processing and Genome Stability: Cause and Consequence. Mol Cell. 2016; 61: 496–505. pmid:26895423
  120. 120. Kumar RD, Searleman AC, Swamidass SJ, Griffith OL and Bose R. Statistically identifying tumor suppressors and oncogenes from pan-cancer genome-sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 3561–3568. pmid:26209800
  121. 121. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974; 77: 71–94. pmid:4366476
  122. 122. Hochbaum D, Ferguson AA and Fisher AL. Generation of transgenic C. elegans by biolistic transformation. J Vis Exp. 2010; 42.Pii2090.
  123. 123. Lanctot C and Meister P. Microscopic analysis of chromatin localization and dynamics in C. elegans. Methods Mol Biol. 2013; 1042: 153–172. pmid:23980006
  124. 124. Hardin J. Imaging embryonic morphogenesis in C. elegans. Methods Cell Biol. 2011; 106: 377–412. pmid:22118285
  125. 125. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227: 680–685. pmid:5432063
  126. 126. Rual JF, Ceron J, Koreth J, Hao T, Nicot AS, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Vandenhaute J, Orkin SH, Hill DE, van den Heuvel S, Vidal M. Toward improving Caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an ORFeome-based RNAi library. Genome Res. 2004;14: 2162–2168 pmid:15489339
  127. 127. Nieto C, Almendinger J, Gysi S, Gomez-Orte E, Kaech A, Hengartner MO, Schnabel R, Moreno S, Cabello J. ccz-1 mediates digestion of apoptotic corpses in C. elegans. J Cell Science. 2010; 123: 2001–2007. pmid:20519582
  128. 128. Doitsidou M, Poole RJ, Sarin S, Bigelow H and Hobert O. C. elegans mutant identification with a one-step whole-genome-sequencing and SNP mapping strategy. PLoS One. 2010; 5(11): e15435. pmid:21079745
  129. 129. Love MI, Huber W and Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: 550. pmid:25516281
  130. 130. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ and Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 139–140. pmid:19910308
  131. 131. Gomez-Orte E, Cornes E, Zheleva A, Saenz-Narciso B, de Toro M, Iniguez M, Lopez R, San-Juan JF, Ezcurra B, Sacristan B et al. Effect of the diet type and temperature on the C. elegans transcriptome. Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 9556–9571. pmid:29515753
  132. 132. Gomez-Orte E, Saenz-Narciso B, Zheleva A, Ezcurra B, de Toro M, Lopez R, Gastaca I, Nilsen H, Sacristán MP, Schnabel R, Cabello J. Disruption of the Caenorhabditis elegans Integrator complex triggers a non-conventional transcriptional mechanism beyond snRNA genes. PLOS Genetics, 2019; 15(2): e1007981. pmid:30807579