Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Activating PAX gene family paralogs to complement PAX5 leukemia driver mutations

  • Matthew R. Hart,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Allen Discovery Center and Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Donovan J. Anderson,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Allen Discovery Center and Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Christopher C. Porter,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Emory University School of Medicine & Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

    Affiliation University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America

  • Tobias Neff,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Spring House, Pennsylvania, United States of America

    Affiliation University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America

  • Michael Levin,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Allen Discovery Center and Biology Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Marshall S. Horwitz

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Allen Discovery Center and Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America


PAX5, one of nine members of the mammalian paired box (PAX) family of transcription factors, plays an important role in B cell development. Approximately one-third of individuals with pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) acquire heterozygous inactivating mutations of PAX5 in malignant cells, and heterozygous germline loss-of-function PAX5 mutations cause autosomal dominant predisposition to ALL. At least in mice, Pax5 is required for pre-B cell maturation, and leukemic remission occurs when Pax5 expression is restored in a Pax5-deficient mouse model of ALL. Together, these observations indicate that PAX5 deficiency reversibly drives leukemogenesis. PAX5 and its two most closely related paralogs, PAX2 and PAX8, which are not mutated in ALL, exhibit overlapping expression and function redundantly during embryonic development. However, PAX5 alone is expressed in lymphocytes, while PAX2 and PAX8 are predominantly specific to kidney and thyroid, respectively. We show that forced expression of PAX2 or PAX8 complements PAX5 loss-of-function mutation in ALL cells as determined by modulation of PAX5 target genes, restoration of immunophenotypic and morphological differentiation, and, ultimately, reduction of replicative potential. Activation of PAX5 paralogs, PAX2 or PAX8, ordinarily silenced in lymphocytes, may therefore represent a novel approach for treating PAX5-deficient ALL. In pursuit of this strategy, we took advantage of the fact that, in kidney, PAX2 is upregulated by extracellular hyperosmolarity. We found that hyperosmolarity, at potentially clinically achievable levels, transcriptionally activates endogenous PAX2 in ALL cells via a mechanism dependent on NFAT5, a transcription factor coordinating response to hyperosmolarity. We also found that hyperosmolarity upregulates residual wild type PAX5 expression in ALL cells and modulates gene expression, including in PAX5-mutant primary ALL cells. These findings specifically demonstrate that osmosensing pathways may represent a new therapeutic target for ALL and more broadly point toward the possibility of using gene paralogs to rescue mutations driving cancer and other diseases.

Author summary

Mutations inactivating PAX5 disrupt B cell differentiation and occur frequently in ALL. Others have previously shown that restoring PAX5 expression normalizes B cell differentiation and leads to disease remission in a mouse model of ALL. We found that exogenous expression of PAX5’s intact and closely related gene family members, PAX2 or PAX8, which are ordinarily silent in lymphocytes but expressed in kidney and other tissues, can substitute for PAX5 and restore differentiation in ALL cells. A new approach for treating ALL might therefore be to discover ways to activate expression of PAX2 or PAX8 in leukemic cells. In the kidney, PAX2 expression is activated by changes in extracellular osmolarity. We found that PAX2 retains the capacity for osmotic activation in ALL cells and that wild type PAX5 expression also increases when ALL cells are osmotically stressed. Adjustment of serum osmolarity—or treatment with drugs targeting pathways responding to osmotic stress—may offer a potential new avenue for ALL therapy by elevating expression of PAX gene family members. More generally, our studies point toward a novel strategy of recruiting paralogs to complement mutations in genes responsible for cancer and other diseases.


Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a common pediatric malignancy often successfully treated with chemotherapy [1]. Unfortunately, chemotherapy is not without side effects, including risk for secondary malignancies and other long-term complications [2]. Additionally, adolescents and adults fare less well, requiring greater reliance on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant [3]. While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for ALL [4] continues to advance, patients may benefit from additional therapeutic options.

As with other types of leukemia, pre-B ALL exhibits stage-specific hematopoietic developmental arrest, in this case, corresponding to hyperproliferation of immature B cell progenitors [5]. Treatment aimed at restoring differentiation capacity to leukemic cells has long been sought, but has proven elusive [6]. The only widely used form of differentiation therapy employs all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), which has achieved remarkable success for the specific treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia [7].

The transcription factor PAX5 plays a central role in the origin of pre-B ALL as the single most common somatically mutated gene observed in the disease [810]. About one-third of patients acquire heterozygous PAX5 mutations, with complete loss of both alleles rarely seen [9,11]. Deletions or other loss-of-function mutations are typical, but, less frequently, PAX5 rearranges to form fusion genes with ETV6 or other partners, generating dominant negative proteins [12]. Heterozygous germline PAX5 loss-of-function mutation is also a cause of inherited predisposition to ALL [13,14]. In ALL cases defined by wild type PAX5, some acquire mutations in EBF or E2A (TCF3) [9], both of which are upstream activators of PAX5 [5]. Functionally, PAX5 activates B lymphoid-specific gene expression while repressing genes specifying alternative lineages, including T lymphocyte-promoting, NOTCH1 [15]. As such, B lymphoid development in the bone marrow of Pax5-null mice arrests at the pre-B stage [16]. Pax5 loss-of-function in conjunction with Stat5 activation results in developmental blockage of the B cell transcriptional program and leukemic transformation in mice [17]. Importantly, forced re-expression of PAX5 in PAX5-deficient ALL was recently shown to normalize growth and differentiation of leukemic cells in culture and clear circulating leukemic cells in a Pax5-deficient/Stat5-activated mouse model of ALL [18,19]. While cooperating mutations in additional genes arise during leukemogenesis [20], these findings, taken together, indicate that reduced PAX5 activity reversibly drives the formation of pre-B ALL and represents an intriguing therapeutic target.

Nevertheless, modulating PAX5 activity is likely to prove challenging. Transcription factors are generally regarded as “undruggable” [21]. Gene replacement therapy or genome editing [22] may ultimately prove too inefficient when dealing with large numbers of malignant cells. Moreover, targeting or even defining ALL leukemic stem cells for correction may be problematic, if not impossible [23]. However, in the case of genes that are members of paralogous gene families, such as PAX5, genetic redundancy may offer a feasible alternative.

The mammalian PAX gene family consists of nine paralogs [24]. Divergence among its four subfamilies is largely non-coding, within cis regulatory regions, allowing for tissue specific expression among family members [25]. In particular, members of the PAX2/5/8 subfamily (Fig 1, S1 Fig) contain largely identical functional domains, share DNA binding specificity, and exhibit functional redundancy [26,27]. For example, mouse gene targeting experiments, in which PAX2 is replaced by PAX5 under control of endogenous PAX2 regulatory elements, show complementation of developmental abnormalities otherwise resulting from PAX2 deletion [28]. While there is spatiotemporal overlap of PAX2/5/8 expression, for instance in parts of the developing nervous system, less overlap occurs in adult tissues [29]. PAX8 is expressed predominantly in the adult thyroid and PAX2 in the adult kidney, where PAX2 plays a protective role in response to hyperosmolarity encountered by inner medullary cells of nephrons [30]. Only PAX5 is expressed in lymphocytes.

Fig 1. PAX2/5/8 domains share high levels of homology.

Schematic of full-length PAX5 protein. Equivalent domains of PAX2 and PAX8, indicated in key, are shown above. Distance from PAX5 represents level of homology to PAX5, scale at right. See also S1 Fig.

As neither PAX2 nor PAX8 are expressed in lymphocytes, they are unlikely to be subjected to the same selective pressures favoring PAX5 mutation during leukemogenesis, and, not surprisingly, mutations are not detected in ALL [9]. Therefore, it is not hard to imagine that PAX2 and PAX8 could represent intact yet latent functional substitutes for PAX5 in pre-B ALL. Here we demonstrate the ability of both PAX2 and PAX8 to substitute for PAX5 loss-of-function and reverse the developmental blockade in pre-B ALL cells. We show that restoration of differentiation is similar using all three PAX family members and consists of changes to downstream gene expression, cell surface marker expression, cell size, and ultimately cell growth and survival. Additionally, as the translational utility of this strategy is predicated on the ability to activate the endogenous expression of these paralogs in the B cell lineage, we evaluate the aforementioned pathway of response to hyperosmolarity, which plays a prominent role in the kidney. We show that PAX2 and PAX5 exhibit transcriptional upregulation in response to hyperosmolarity in pre-B ALL cells, that PAX2 activation in lymphocytes, as in the kidney, is mediated by the tonicity response enhancer binding protein (TonEBP/NFAT5), and, finally, that hyperosmolarity-driven PAX2/5 activation correlates with changes in B cell developmental gene expression similar to those seen with exogenous PAX2/5/8 re-expression.


PAX2 and PAX8 compensate for PAX5 loss-of-function by modulating developmental gene expression in pre-B ALL cells

PAX5 loss-of-function results in B cell developmental blockade and contributes to leukemic transformation [16,17]. As an important early B cell transcription factor, PAX5 is responsible for both positively and negatively regulating developmental genes, driving differentiation towards a B lymphoid specific fate. Transcriptional targets of PAX5 are numerous and include B cell receptor (BCR) complex protein CD79a, the B cell specific transcriptional regulator BACH2, and the canonical B cell specific surface antigen CD19.

We began by confirming recent findings that re-expression of exogenous PAX5 rescues PAX5-deficient pre-B ALL cells [18] and assessing whether exogenous expression of PAX5 paralogs, PAX2 or PAX8, could function in a similar capacity. We initially evaluated the ability of PAX5, PAX2 or PAX8 to regulate a subset of PAX5 transcriptional targets, including CD79a, BACH2, and CD19. We also included CD10, which is a marker of B cell differentiation exhibiting a bell-shaped pattern of developmental expression levels that peak at the pro to pre-B cell transition [18,31]. We tested PAX factors in Reh cells, which were derived from a primary clonal culture isolated from pre-B ALL peripheral blood [32] and contain a heterozygous p.A322fs PAX5 null mutation [33]. As a PAX5 wild type control, we compared 697 cells, which are derived from a primary clonal culture of ALL bone marrow [34] and contain an E2A(TCF3)/PBX1 fusion gene arising from a t(1;19) chromosomal translocation [35]. Cells were stably transduced with lentivirus expressing either full length human PAX5, PAX2, or PAX8, along with a fluorescent marker, ZsGreen, driven from an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). As a functionally negative control, we used a vector expressing the clinically observed pre-B ALL PAX5 null mutation, PAX5p.V26fs [36]. At day 4 following transduction, 2×105 ZsGreen-positive cells of each transduction type were sorted by FACS (see S2 Fig for gating strategy). Using quantitative real time PCR, we found that transgene expression of PAX5, PAX2, or PAX8 in both Reh and 697 cells led to significant upregulation of PAX5 target gene expression, relative to empty vector or the negative control PAX5p.V26fs. With the exception of CD10, which is not a known PAX5 transcriptional target, this upregulation was more pronounced in PAX5-mutant Reh cells compared to PAX5-wild type 697 cells (Fig 2A and 2B, respectively).

Fig 2. PAX2 and PAX8 compensate for PAX5 loss-of-function by modulating developmental gene expression in pre-B ALL.

A) qRT-PCR of RNA/cDNA preparation from FACS of ZsGreen-positive Reh cells transduced with lentivirus containing transgenes indicated in key. B) 697 cells treated/harvested similarly. PAX2 and PAX8 levels are presented relative to baseline PAX5 due to the lack of detectable endogenous PAX2 or PAX8 (see Methods). Both A and B are representative of 3 separate experimental replicates. Error bars = standard deviation. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. empty vector, assuming unequal variation (EV = 1), p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005.

PAX2 and PAX8 rescue immunophenotypic advancement of B cell differentiation in pre-B ALL cells

To further evaluate the ability of PAX2 and PAX8 to rescue PAX5 loss-of-function in pre-B ALL cells, we assessed whether their transcriptional redundancy resulted in enhanced immunophenotypic progression by comparing their ability to modulate a subset of surface markers of B cell differentiation. CD10 (CALLA) and CD19 are surface markers found on normal, as well as leukemic, pre-B cells. Increases in both markers are expect to accompany B cell differentiation, whereas CD38 and CD43 are both downregulated during the large-to-small pre-B cell transition [18,37]. Reh and 697 pre-B ALL cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing PAX-IRES-ZsGreen, as before. At day 4 post-transduction, cells were stained with antibodies for cell surface markers, followed by analysis of ZsGreen-positive cells using flow cytometry. Cells expressing PAX5, PAX2, or PAX8 constructs showed significantly upregulated levels of CD10 and CD19 with downregulated levels of CD38 and CD43, relative to cells transduced with either empty vector or PAX5p.V26fs (Fig 3A and 3B). These results demonstrate a level of functional phenotypic rescue beyond simple transcriptional activation and show a shared ability within the PAX2/5/8 subfamily to promote immunophenotypic changes associated with advanced differentiation in pre-B ALL. Interestingly, PAX5-wild type 697 cells again exhibited similar results (Fig 3C, note scale of intensity).

Fig 3. PAX2 and PAX8 rescue immunophenotypic advancement of B cell differentiation in PAX5 loss-of-function pre-B ALL cells.

A) Representative histogram comparisons of developmental marker antibody staining intensity for ZsGreen-positive Reh cells transduced with lentivirus containing either empty vector (black outlines) or indicated PAX mutant or wild type transgenes (red-dotted outlines). Antibodies used for flow cytometry denoted beneath each panel. B) Relative mean fluorescence intensity for each antibody, from A, average of 3 separate experimental replicates each for Reh cells, and C) for 697 cells. Values relative to empty vector transduced cells. Error bars = standard deviation. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. empty vector (EV = 100%), p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005.

Exogenous PAX2 and PAX8 reduce replicative potential and promote physical changes characteristic of the large-to-small B cell transition

The large-to-small pre-B cell transition occurs just prior to the emergence of the immature B cell and marks the end of the heavily proliferative large pre-B cell state, resulting instead in a population of pre-B cells which are not only smaller, as the name suggests, but also less proliferative [38]. As noted, we observed that transduction of Reh and 697 cells with PAX paralogs led to decreases in expression of CD38 and CD43, which are both downregulated during this transition [18,37]. This observation suggested that, consistent with prior observations related to PAX5 re-expression in Reh cells [18], PAX2 and PAX8 could advance differentiation in these cells, driving them through the large-to-small transition and ultimately to a normal, more quiescent state. To address this possibility, we analyzed changes in cell size as well as effects on replicative potential following transduction with PAX factors.

The flow cytometry parameter of forward scatter area (FSC-A) is a widely accepted proxy for estimating cell size [39]. Similar to PAX5, exogenous expression of PAX2 and PAX8 led to a reduction in Reh cell FSC-A ranging from 7–10.1%, relative to either empty vector or PAX5p.V26fs negative control (Fig 4A and 4B). Again, 697 cells displayed similar results (Fig 4B). However, as a negative control, the human embryonic kidney cell line, HEK293T, transduced with PAX2/5/8 or controls, did not exhibit a shift in cell size (S3C Fig).

Fig 4. PAX2 and PAX8 promote developmentally characteristic large-to-small B cell transition and exit from the cell cycle in PAX5-deficient pre-B ALL cells.

A) Representative histogram of FSC-A intensity for empty vector (black outlines) vs. PAX transduced (red-dotted outlines) Reh cells. B) Percent deviation from empty vector (set to 0) of mean FSC-A values for cells expressing indicated PAX mutant or wild type transgenes (see key) for an averaged 6 and 3 experimental replicates for Reh and 697 cells, respectively. C) Reh (3 experimental replicates) and D) 697 (2 experimental replicates) cell culture density vs. time, following sorting (day 4 post transduction) for ZsGreen-positive cells expressing indicated transgenes. Data points for all replicates are shown, along with lines fitting the mean values for each treatment. (-) ZsGreen cells represent unsuccessfully transduced cells sorted from the PAX5 lentivirus exposed cell suspension. E) Percentage of ZsGreen positive vs. negative cells at 11–14 days post sort for ZsGreen for 2 experimental replicates for per cell line. Error bars = standard deviation. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. empty vector, p-values * < .05, ** < .005, *** < .0005. See also S3, S4 and S5 Figs.

We next evaluated the effect of exogenous PAX paralog expression on the long-term replicative potential of Reh and 697 cells. Cells were transduced with PAX5, PAX2, PAX8, empty vector, or PAX5p.V26fs negative control. At day 4 post-transduction, 2×105 cells of each group were FACS-sorted for ZsGreen (at ~98% purity, see S2 Fig for gating strategy) and returned to culture. For the following 6 days, daily measurement of culture density, performed in duplicate using a hemocytometer, allowed us to compile growth curves for all groups. While control cultures expanded normally, PAX paralog expression resulted in a complete inhibition of culture expansion in Reh cells (Fig 4C, S4A Fig). Growth inhibition was also present, but less complete, in 697 cells (Fig 4D, S4B Fig) and largely absent in HEK293T control cells (S3B Fig). From this point, it became necessary to periodically passage cultures in order to maintain viable cell densities (i.e., 2×105–2×106 cells/mL). At days 11–14, we again used flow cytometry to measure ZsGreen-expressing cell populations. Cultures transduced with PAX paralogs exhibited dramatically reduced ZsGreen expression as a percentage of total cells, ranging from 28–54% in Reh cells and 6–13% in 697 cells, whereas both the empty vector and PAX5p.V26fs control groups maintained expression in ~90% of cells (Fig 4E and S4C Fig). Growth inhibition and the reduced proportion of ZsGreen-positive cells together suggest that these cells reduce their rate of growth and are outgrown by the ~2% of ZsGreen negative cells initially harvested by mis-sorting and/or that PAX/ZsGreen-positive cells die out so that only ZsGreen-negative cells remain and continue to grow. In support of the latter interpretation, PAX gene expression led to an apparent delay in cell cycle progression and conferred a modest increase in apoptosis, as measured by flow cytometry analysis of DNA content (with DAPI staining) and Annexin V staining, respectively (S5 Fig).

We have therefore confirmed previously published literature showing that restoration of PAX5 levels rescues deficiency of PAX5 activity in pre-B ALL cells [18] and have shown for the first time that its paralogs, PAX2 and PAX8, demonstrate a high level of functional redundancy in downstream activation of B cell specific gene expression, promoting differentiation similar to that seen with PAX5.

Extracellular hyperosmolarity induces endogenous PAX2 and upregulates PAX5 in Reh cells

The observation that PAX2 and PAX8 can rescue the PAX5 loss-of-function differentiation blockade in pre-B ALL cells suggests their activation in vivo could represent a potential therapeutic strategy. In such a context, the use of small molecules to induce their endogenous expression would be useful.

In attempting to identify drugs capable of activating endogenous PAX2 or PAX8 we initially surveyed a variety of agents targeting epigenetic repressive marks or that have been reported to promote lymphocyte differentiation; however, none induced detectable PAX2 or PAX8 expression. We then evaluated compounds known to induce PAX family gene expression in other model systems. Manipulation of transmembrane voltage potential in Xenopus laevis activates transcription factors, including PAX6, resulting in ectopic eye formation [40]. Based on this observation, we tested a variety of hyper- and hypo-polarizing compounds for their ability to induce PAX2 and/or PAX8 expression in Reh cells. We found that 24 hour exposure to membrane depolarizing concentrations (80mM) of C6H11KO7 (K-gluconate) in cell media led to induction of PAX2 expression to as much as 0.3 fold of baseline PAX5, as measured by qRT-PCR. Interestingly, significant upregulation of PAX5 expression was also observed (Fig 5A and S6A, S6B and S6C Fig).

Fig 5. Extracellular hyperosmolarity induces endogenous PAX2 and PAX5 expression in pre-B ALL cells.

A) Fold-expression of PAX2, PAX8 (none detected), and PAX5 mRNA in response to 24 hour exposure to 80mM treatments of indicated compounds in Reh cells. B) Fold-expression of downstream markers in response to treatments in A. C) Dose-response curve in Reh cells showing PAX2 and D) PAX5 mRNA expression in response to varying K-gluconate and CaCl2 concentrations. E) Relative PAX2, F) relative PAX5, and G) relative downstream gene levels following pulse chase, where x-axis represents the incubation time in normal media following 24 hours incubation in 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2 and flow sorting for live cells via FSC-A/SSC-A. PAX2 values shown are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to vehicle-treated PAX5 levels (as there is no detectable baseline PAX2 expression). All other gene expression values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to corresponding vehicle expression values. Error bars = standard deviation. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. vehicle treated, assuming unequal variation (vehicle = 1), p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005. A and B are each 3 averaged experimental replicates while C-G are each 2. All values shown are relative to ACTB as endogenous reference gene. See also S6A–S6C Fig for PAX amplification curves, S7A and S7B Fig for GAPDH normalized dose-response curves, and S7C and S7D Fig for 697 dose response to K-gluconate.

While such concentrations of K-gluconate are known to induce membrane depolarization [41], treatment with monensin and other compounds that are also known to promote membrane hypopolarization did not influence expression of PAX genes. As both potassium and gluconate ions are potentially capable of independent interaction with membrane channels or other cellular machinery that could influence downstream gene expression [42], we tested a variety of salts containing these and other ions, for their ability to influence PAX expression. Surprisingly, 80mM concentrations of NaC6H11O7 (Na-gluconate), KCl, CaCl2, and NaCl all promoted detectable induction of both PAX2 at 0.08–0.5 fold and PAX5 at 3.8–6.1 fold, relative to baseline PAX5 (Fig 5A). Evaluation of downstream PAX5 target and developmental marker genes, CD19, BACH2, and CD10, demonstrated concurrent upregulation at levels similar to those seen with transgene-driven exogenous PAX expression (Fig 5B). While the ionic composition of these agents differs, a commonality is that they all increase the osmolarity of cell growth media.

We observed quantitative differences in the ability of these osmolytes to induce PAX2/5, perhaps due to their variable ability to penetrate the cell membrane, utilizing channels specific for their uptake or efflux. As such, based on their greater relative ability to upregulate both PAX2 and PAX5 in Reh cells, we selected K-gluconate and CaCl2 for further evaluation. Dose-response curves revealed that 80-100mM concentrations (corresponding to ~400-540mOsmol/kg H2O in RPMI media) were optimal for either salts’ ability to upregulate PAX2 and PAX5, with little activity occurring at lower concentrations (Fig 5C and 5D, and S7A and S7B Fig). Similar results were seen with 697 cells; however, the magnitude of induction was less than that observed in Reh cells (S7C and S7D Fig).

In studying the kinetics of this response to hyperosmolarity, 24 hour exposure to high salt concentrations, followed by sorting of live cells and return to normal media for extended incubation revealed that both PAX2 and PAX5 upregulation occurred quickly, but decreased within 24 hours post exposure to salt (Fig 5E and 5F). While CD10 followed a similar temporal pattern to PAX gene modulation, increases in direct PAX5 target genes CD19 and BACH2 were delayed and more persistent, supportive of their sequential response to PAX induction following hyperosmolarity, rather than to hyperosmolarity alone (Fig 5G). Interestingly, the RNA collection method affected the magnitude of induction for PAX2, which was as much as 10-fold greater in RNA extracted from cells immediately following treatment compared to RNA harvested from cells which were first treated, then sorted for viability (as assessed by FSC-A/SSC-A). In contrast, induction of PAX5 appeared to be similar regardless of the RNA collection method. (RNA collection methods are described in Figure Legends and Methods.) This observation suggests an interplay between cell viability and PAX2 expression (Fig 5A and 5C, compared to Fig 5E; see also S2 Fig for gating strategy).

Global gene expression reinforces PAX2/5/8 functional similarity with regard to B cell development and highlights overlapping effects from the response to hyperosmolarity

Using cell surface markers, morphological changes, and a subset of PAX5 transcriptional targets, we have demonstrated the ability of PAX2 and PAX8 to rescue PAX5 loss-of-function in pre-B ALL cell lines. To evaluate the full extent to which PAX2 and PAX8 can substitute for PAX5, as well as to compare PAX transgene expression with the response to hyperosmolarity, we evaluated global changes in gene expression by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) following PAX2, PAX5, or PAX8 transfection or treatment with 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2 in Reh cells.

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed common enrichment pathways based on biological process and transcription factor targets (Fig 6). Gene sets previously shown to be either direct transcriptional targets of PAX5 at the pro and mature stages of B cell development or whose regulation relies on PAX5 mediation of differentiation from the pro to mature B cell stages displayed enrichment as well [13,43]. We restricted analysis to gene sets with a false discovery rate less than 0.05.

Fig 6. RNA-seq data shows that PAX2, PAX8, K-gluconate, and CaCl2 affect pathways modulated by the restoration of PAX5.

A) Venn diagram of enriched gene sets in Reh samples transfected with PAX5, PAX2, or PAX8. B) Venn diagram of enriched gene sets in Reh cells transfected with PAX5 or exposed to either CaCl2 or K-gluconate (80mM). C) Venn diagram of common PAX2∩PAX5∩PAX8 and common PAX5∩CaCl2K-gluconate enriched gene sets. D) Gene set enrichment plots for the PAX5_PROB gene set adapted from [13]. E) Changes in expression of genes regulated by PAX5 in Reh cells and that are related to remission of B-ALL in mice. A black bar indicates the median gene log2 fold change for each sample. Liu et al. samples were first reported in [18]. See also S8S11 Figs.

We observed enrichment of 420 gene sets in Reh cells transfected with PAX5. 35% (149) or 26% (108) of these gene sets are also enriched in PAX2 or PAX8 transfected cells, respectively, with 14% (57) common to all three samples (Fig 6A). The majority of these gene sets involve genome accessibility and protein translation (e.g., methylation, peptidyl lysine modification, translational initiation, and cytoplasmic translation), but we also see negative enrichment of known cell cycle regulation transcription factor gene sets such as those involving MYC/MAX and E2F1 (MYCMAX_01 and E2F1_Q4, respectively, S1 Table). PAX2/5/8 transfected samples also show similar enrichment patterns in the PAX5 B cell developmental gene sets (Fig 7A and 7B, S2 Table and S1 Dataset), each factor promoting the upregulation of CD72, IRF4, BACH2, CD19, EGR1, IKZF3, KLF2, and SAMHD1 as well as the suppression of CYBB and FOS.

Fig 7. Increasing PAX expression or osmolarity changes expression of genes related to B cell development.

A) Fold change heatmap of PAX5 related pro-B cell genes with PAX5 binding sites in the promoter. B) Fold change heatmap of PAX5 related mature B cell genes with PAX5 binding sites in the promoter. C) Fold change heatmap of genes involved in the PAX5 dependent transition of pro-B cells to mature B cells. Average gene expression across samples is illustrated to the left of each heatmap. The pro-to-mature B cell heatmap has been cut in half and displayed side-by-side due limited space. See also S8S11 Figs.

Interestingly, K-gluconate and CaCl2 share a larger percentage of the PAX5 enriched gene sets, 66% (278) and 60% (254), respectively, than either PAX2 or PAX8 transfected samples (Fig 6B). 53% (221) of the PAX5 enriched gene sets are also enriched following both CaCl2 and K-gluconate exposure (S1 Table). In general, there is a larger, overlapping response when comparing the two salt treatments, presumably part of a general response to hyperosmolarity. Of note, gene sets related to the transport of calcium ions, chloride ions, potassium ions, and organic anions, as well as cytosolic calcium regulation, are positively enriched for all three treatments—an expected result for cells exposed to K-gluconate and CaCl2, but not for forced expression of PAX5. Again, the MYCMAX_01 and E2F1_Q4 gene sets are negatively enriched, linking increasing osmolarity with a pathway for reduced proliferation and a decrease in B cell size [44], although leading edge analysis of the gene sets suggests different genes responsible for enrichment when compared to PAX2/5/8 (S3 Table). Both CaCl2 and K-gluconate show their strongest PAX5 related response in the pro to mature B cell transition gene set (Fig 7C and S2 Table). Here overlapping clusters of upregulated genes similar to the individual pro and mature B cell gene sets (e.g., KLF2, EGR1, IKZF3, SAMHD1, and CD72) are highlighted. TNFRSF13C/BAFF-R, a regulator of peripheral B cell survival, is also upregulated, whereas downregulated genes include cell cycle initiation factors CDC6 and CDC45 and pre-replication complex components MCM3, MCM6, MCM7, and MCM10.

In total, 43 of the 57 gene sets common to PAX2/5/8 transfected samples are also enriched in the CaCl2 and K-gluconate treated samples, corresponding to 10% of the total enriched gene sets in PAX5 transfected Reh cells (Fig 6C, S1 Table). Most of the enriched sets common for both PAX2/5/8 transfectants and salt treatment again relate to genome structure and protein synthesis and also similarly include MYCMAX_01 and E2F1_Q4 transcription factor targets. Both the pro-B cell and pro to mature B cell gene sets are enriched in all samples, as well. The greatest similarity across treatment conditions is seen in the pro-B cell set of genes (Fig 6D), with the only difference being a lack of negative enrichment of genes in either CaCl2 or K-gluconate treated cells. Overall, these results suggest that B cell maturation is regulated by a set of genes and pathways commonly responsive to either PAX gene expression or hyperosmolarity.

Liu et al. [13] restored PAX5 expression in Reh cells and compared global changes in gene expression via RNA-seq to gene expression in a Pax5-deficient/Stat5-activated mouse model of ALL. They identified 31 genes in Reh cells, upregulated by greater than two-fold in response to exogenous PAX5, that are also commonly upregulated with restoration of Pax5 in the mouse model of ALL. Restoration of Pax5 in this model triggers durable disease remission. The log2 fold change values we observed for these 31 genes in PAX2/5/8 transfected and CaCl2 or K-gluconate treated cells appear in Fig 6E, charted alongside corresponding original data from Liu et al. Although treatment windows for our samples were somewhat brief compared to duration of Pax5 induction in mice, we found similar increases in relative expression across this set of 31 genes, albeit at levels roughly half of what Liu et al. reported. These data demonstrate that PAX paralog expression or hyperosmolar treatment both similarly modulate an important subset of genes associated with disease remission when PAX5 expression is restored to normal levels in cell and mouse models of PAX5-deficient ALL.

To confirm RNA-seq results, we used qRT-PCR to validate the responses of several genes where the heatmap clustering showed them to be upregulated by at least 4 of 5 treatment conditions, along with an additional gene, SNX12, which was slightly downregulated by 4 of 5 conditions. qRT-PCR analysis of all 7 of these genes accurately corroborated the trends seen in the RNA-seq data (S8A Fig). Notably, relative to RNA-seq, magnitudes of induction (if present) were almost always greater using qRT-PCR ΔΔCT values. This is likely due to the conservative estimates of differential expression from the DESeq2 normalization algorithm we employed to analyze RNA-seq data. Nevertheless, trends were consistent regardless of technique or genes referenced for comparison.

TonEBP/NFAT5 modulates PAX2 but not PAX5 upregulation in response to hyperosmolarity, revealing the NFAT5 pathway as a target for activating endogenous PAX2 expression in pre-B ALL

Cellular response to hypertonicity, as brought about by hyperosmolarity, is thought to be largely mediated by the tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein, TonEBP [45]. TonEBP, also called (and referred to here as) NFAT5 (nuclear factor of activated T cells 5), is a transcription factor predominantly associated with the kidney but which is also expressed in other tissues, including B cells and, as its name suggests, T cells. Initial response to hypertonicity by NFAT5 involves post-translational modification via phosphorylation, followed by transcriptional activity, including self-induction. Interestingly, NFAT5 mediated gene regulation in the high salt environment of nephrons has been shown to include elevated PAX2 expression, seemingly as part of a survival mechanism during osmotic stress [30]. Not surprisingly, our RNA-seq data showed that hyperosmolarity in Reh cells led to induction of NFAT5, as well as several of its downstream targets (S1 Dataset), consistent with the notion that hyperosmolar concentrations of K-gluconate and CaCl2 generate a canonical response to hypertonicity (i.e., an increase in osmotic pressure gradient across the cell membrane). Subsequent evaluation by qRT-PCR confirmed that NFAT5 mRNA levels, as well as a downstream target associated with B cell maturation, B cell activating factor (BAFF), along with its receptor, TNFRSF13C (BAFF-R) [46], were upregulated in Reh cells after 24 hour treatment with 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2 (Fig 8A). BAFF-R alone was also upregulated by PAX transgene expression.

Fig 8. NFAT5 plays a role in hypertonicity mediated PAX2 expression.

A) qRT-PCR validation of RNA-seq data for NFAT5, BAFF-R, and BAFF. Graphs represent the average of two separate experimental replicates. Fold change values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to each samples’ respective control (i.e., empty vector or untreated), with ACTB used as endogenous reference gene. B) Representative western blot of PAX5 and NFAT5 protein knockdown by siRNA. C) Fold expression of PAX2 (left scale), PAX5, NFAT5, and downstream genes (right scale) after treatment with (+/-) 80mM K-gluconate and (+/-) siRNA knockdown of PAX2, PAX5, PAX2/5, or NFAT5, for 3 experimental replicates. PAX2 values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to vehicle-treated PAX5 levels. All other gene expression values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to corresponding vehicle expression values. Protein lysates in part B were bulk harvested from treated cells while RNA in part C was isolated from live cells first flow sorted by FSC-A/SSC-A. Error bars = standard deviation. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. control treated, assuming unequal variance (i.e., vehicle = 1), p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005. See also S9 Fig for TonE elements at PAX2 and PAX5 loci, as well as S8 Fig for NFAT5 target solute channels in response to NFAT5 siRNA knockdown.

Analysis of the 5’ enhancer/promoter regions of both PAX2 and PAX5, along with their intronic and exonic DNA, indicated numerous iterations of the consensus (TGGAAANNYNY) TonE binding site (S9A and S9B Fig) [47]. To determine whether NFAT5 was involved in hyperosmolarity-induced expression of PAX2 and PAX5 and to concurrently assess whether such PAX upregulation directly affected downstream gene modulation, we performed siRNA knockdown of these three genes (Fig 8B and 8C). We found that siRNA knockdown of NFAT5 was sufficient to abrogate PAX2 upregulation in response to 80mM K-gluconate in Reh cells (Fig 8C). Similarly, knockdown of NFAT5 quenched hyperosmolarity mediated increases in the solute carriers, SLC5A3 and SLC6A6, both of which are known targets of NFAT5 (S8B Fig) [48]. Interestingly, neither PAX5 nor PAX5 downstream genes upregulated in response to hyperosmolarity were affected by NFAT5 knockdown (Fig 8C), consistent with a separate, NFAT5 independent mechanism for induction of PAX5 or, at least, reduced sensitivity of PAX5 to changes in NFAT5 levels. Importantly, knockdown of PAX5 itself led to reductions in expression of the downstream genes we assessed, while siRNA directed against PAX2 had little effect (Fig 8C), suggesting that hypertonic induction of residual wild type PAX5 expression outweighs PAX2 with respect to regulation of their common targets. We note that PAX2 expression is detectable as a transcript, but insufficient to measure at the protein level by western blot.

Hyperosmolarity stimulates expression of both wild type and mutant PAX5

The PAX5 mutation in Reh cells creates a frameshift leading to premature termination and is thus expected to be subject to nonsense-mediated decay. However, western blot indicates that, in addition to a full-length PAX5 protein corresponding to the wild type allele, a truncated polypeptide that is likely non-functional is apparently generated from the mutant allele, albeit at reduced abundance, suggesting that nonsense-mediated decay is incomplete (as evident in Fig 8B, where both products are specifically targeted by siRNA directed against PAX5). Reh cells should therefore contain mRNA from both the wild type and mutant PAX5 alleles. To determine if either salt treatment differentially activates the wild type as opposed to the mutant PAX5 allele in Reh cells, we analyzed RNA-seq data and compared the total number of reads obtained from each allele (and that also include the distinguishing mutation). In untreated cells, 27 of 105 total, non-normalized reads (26%) corresponded to transcripts from the mutant allele. In K-gluconate or CaCl2 treated cells, the equivalent proportions of mutant transcripts were 54/261 (21%) and 36/135 (27%), respectively. (Using a two-tailed test to compare two population proportions, for untreated versus K-gluconate treated cells, the Z-score is 1.05 and p-value is 0.29. The same comparison for CaCl2 treated cells yields a Z-score of -0.17 and p-value of 0.87). These differences are not significant. We conclude that neither salt treatment discriminates between wild type and mutant allele when activating PAX5 expression, as reflected in proportionately increased total read counts.

Primary cell response to K-gluconate and efficacy of near clinically achievable mannitol dosage in Reh cells supports the therapeutic potential of targeting hypertonicity response pathways in pre-B ALL

As numerous studies have shown, long term, in vitro, cell culture inherently selects for gene expression profiles differing from those seen for primary tissue samples [49,50]. To further evaluate whether the PAX2/5 response to hyperosmolarity is one that is intrinsic to ALL cells both in vitro and in vivo, we screened 10 primary pre-B ALL samples for PAX5 mutations, using Sanger DNA sequencing. Of those samples, one, from a 19 year-old male with trisomy 21 Down syndrome, possessed a heterozygous p.(K198Qfs*44) mutation, resulting in frameshift leading to early stop and protein truncation (see Methods). Pre-B ALL occurs more commonly in Down syndrome individuals and is felt to be biologically distinct from disease occurring in non-Down syndrome patients [51]; nevertheless, inactivating mutations of PAX5 are detected at similar frequency in Down syndrome-associated pre-B ALL [52]. Due to limited sample availability from this patient, we performed a single test employing primary cells alongside multiple replicates using primary cells expanded through passage in mice (see Methods). Whether direct from the patient or passaged through mice, 24 hour exposure to 80mM K-gluconate resulted in increased expression of PAX5, as well as several but not all downstream targets seen previously with Reh and 697 cells (Fig 9A and S10A Fig). PAX2 expression was not detected in this assay; however, this may be due in part to low RNA input levels, which were constrained by sample quantity.

Fig 9. PAX5 upregulation and downstream gene modulation in response to 80mM K-gluconate in a PAX5 mutant primary ALL sample, and cellular response to near clinical dosing of mannitol, support the potential of targeting hypertonicity response pathways in vivo.

A) qRT-PCR analysis of PAX2, PAX5, and several downstream genes for NSGS mouse passaged aliquots of primary patient sample in response to 24 hour treatment with 80mM K-gluconate. Shown are two experimental replicates from separately thawed aliquots. Cells were sorted by FSC-A/SSC-A for live cells prior to isolation/harvest of RNA. B and C) qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression in Reh cells in response to 24 hour treatment with 80 or 160mM mannitol, compared with 80mM K-gluconate. Shown are 3 experimental replicates. Values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to vehicle-treated. Statistical significance derived using one sample t-test vs. vehicle treated, assuming unequal variance (vehicle = 1), p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005. See also S14A Fig for a single replicate of a non-NSG passaged primary cell sample and S14B Fig for Reh viability in response to 80mM and 160mM mannitol vs. 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2.

The osmotic concentrations of K-gluconate or CaCl2 we evaluated in vitro would prove lethal if administered clinically. However, mannitol is also known to activate NFAT5 [53] and is used to adjust serum hyperosmolar concentrations to high levels in certain clinical settings [54]. To test whether mannitol could be employed to upregulate PAX2 or PAX5 in pre-B ALL, we treated Reh cells with 80mM or 160mM mannitol for 24 hours, prior to FACS sorting for live cells and harvesting of RNA. qRT-PCR demonstrated dose-dependent increases both for PAX2 and especially for PAX5, along with similar changes in downstream gene expression, albeit not to the level seen with K-gluconate (Fig 9B and 9C). Importantly, 160mM is near the range of clinically achievable therapeutic concentrations for mannitol [54]. Comparison of 160mM mannitol with 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2, followed by FSC-A/SSC-A sorting of live cells and subsequent measurement of culture expansion demonstrated slightly reduced growth potential for K-gluconate and CaCl2 treated cells as compared to cells grown in 160mM mannitol or normal media (S10B Fig). Interpretation of long term viability in response to hyperosmolarity was complicated due to the noticeably brief induction of PAX2/5 (Fig 5E), coupled with the generally harsh nature of such treatment, even with only 24 hour exposure. The growth delay observed with K-gluconate in this case may largely be due to cell cycle arrest or other adverse effects of elevated hyperosmolarity [55], rather than the PAX dependent, developmentally programed exit from the cell cycle we appeared to observe with continuous PAX re-expression. However, even in vitro, mannitol appears to be better tolerated, and thus it or related organic osmolytes may present options for modulating tonicity that could prove tolerable in vivo.


Liu et al. recently demonstrated that restoration of PAX5 expression can reverse the developmental blockade holding PAX5-mutated pre-B ALL cells in a continuously replicating, developmentally immature state [18]. We have confirmed that result and extended it further by showing that PAX5’s closely related paralogs, PAX2 or PAX8, neither of which is mutated in ALL nor ordinarily expressed in lymphocytes, can function equivalently to normalize differentiation and growth of pre-B ALL cells. Moreover, we have shown that endogenous PAX2 expression, and unexpectedly also PAX5 itself, can be upregulated to promote similar effects on differentiation of pre-B ALL cells under hypertonic conditions.

While germline loss-of-function mutations are a cause of familial pre-B ALL [13,14], demonstrating that PAX5 deficiency can ultimately initiate leukemogenesis, loss of PAX5 activity is not by itself sufficient, and development of leukemia requires additional cooperating mutations. Cancer genome sequencing has identified a wide diversity of mutations [8,9], such that no two ALL patients are likely to share identical mutational profiles. Reh and 697 cells, tested here as well as by Liu et al. [18], are quite dissimilar, with 697 cells having only a few coding sequence alterations while Reh cells have considerably more, with very little overlap (S11 Fig). In particular, Reh cells contain a heterozygous loss-of-function PAX5 mutation [33], whereas in 697 cells, PAX5 is intact (per our sequencing, S13 Fig). However, an upstream regulator of PAX5, E2A (TCF3), is at least partially inactivated via a translocation involving PBX1 [35], suggesting that there may be similarly reduced expression of PAX5 in 697 cells. Regardless, targeting PAX2/5/8 activity may prove beneficial even in those patients lacking PAX5 mutations. Liu et al. also demonstrated that PAX5 replenishment succeeded in curing a transgenic mouse model of ALL, driven by PAX5 knockdown combined with Stat5 activation [18]. The fact that PAX5 re-expression normalizes growth and differentiation in pre-B ALL with divergent genetic backgrounds and mutational signatures, including with Down syndrome associated ALL as tested in primary cells, suggests that even after cooperating mutations have arisen, loss of PAX5 activity continues to support the leukemic state. Consistent with the concept of oncogene addiction, in which secondary mutations are dependent upon driver mutations for maintaining the cancer phenotype [56], acquisition of additional mutations may therefore possibly render ALL cells even more vulnerable following replacement of PAX5 activity.

Current approaches for treatment of pre-B ALL continue to rely on chemotherapy and, more recently, immunotherapy. Chemotherapy is often successful in pediatric settings [1] but is associated with considerable toxicity, long-term side effects [2], and substantially reduced efficacy in older children and adults, where allogenic stem cell transplant is more heavily relied upon [3]. Recent breakthroughs in CAR T cell therapy have shown great promise in treating certain disease presentations, specifically those which are highly CD19 positive [57]. However, hurdles remain, including clonal selection for PAX5 deletion with consequent downregulation of the CD19 target antigen, leading to disease resistance [58]. Since CD19 is a direct target of PAX5 and, as we have shown, can be activated equally well by PAX2 or PAX8, the therapeutic approach contemplated here may work in conjunction with CAR T cell therapy by increasing levels of the targeted CD19 B cell antigen, even after loss of PAX5. CD19 can also be targeted through other forms of therapy, such as with antibody-drug conjugates [59].

Our observations demonstrate the use of gene paralogs to resolve a human disease phenotype. A remaining challenge, however, involves approaches for activating developmentally silenced genes in vivo. We tested a variety of compounds based upon previously described properties as either generally reversing repressive chromatin modifications (zebularine, hydralazine, valproic acid, azacitidine, and vorinostat) or as mechanistically undefined inducers of lymphocyte differentiation (ATRA, methotrexate, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)). None consistently activated PAX2 or PAX8 expression or otherwise promoted pre-B ALL cell differentiation under conditions we evaluated.

Another class of compounds we tested affect cell membrane potential, the modulation of which has been shown in model systems to induce a variety of developmental transcription factors, including, for example, PAX6 [40]. We observed induction of PAX2, but not PAX8, as well as increases in downstream differentiation markers in response to K-gluconate. After testing a variety of other salts as well as several non-ionic modulators of cell membrane potential, we concluded that our observation was likely a cellular response to hypertonicity. During water diuresis, physiological concentrations of salts, mainly NaCl, in the renal inter-medullary interstitial fluid reach concentrations ranging from 600 to more than 1000mOsmol/kg H2O. Interestingly, survival mechanisms for cells in these conditions include the anti-apoptotic upregulation of PAX2, which has been shown to peak in mouse intermedullary collecting duct cells at ~500mOsmol/kg H2O [30], similar to what we observed in Reh cells (~400-540mOsmol/kg H2O in RPMI media). Unexpectedly, we observed that hypertonicity also induced expression of PAX5 in pre-B ALL.

RNA-seq performed in conjunction with GSEA highlighted similarities and differences resulting from expression of PAX2 or PAX8, compared to PAX5, in PAX5-deficient ALL cells. In a pairwise comparison of any of the three PAX factors, slightly fewer than half of all gene sets exhibiting significant expression changes were common to both, and only 13% of all gene sets (57/440, Fig 6A) enriched by PAX5 were commonly modulated by all three PAX genes. Importantly, however, the group of gene sets commonly regulated by all three PAX factors includes PAX5 targets most relevant to B cell maturation (Fig 6D), consistent with our findings that all three PAX factors similarly promote differentiation of PAX5-deficient ALL cells. We speculate that PAX5 target genes likely reside in accessible chromatin configurations in pre-B cells, such that even imperfect PAX activity from a paralog may readily induce their expression. In contrast, gene sets exhibiting significant enrichment following treatment with CaCl2 or K-gluconate exhibited much greater overlap with PAX5, and a majority of gene sets showing enrichment with PAX5 (221/420, Fig 6B) or that were commonly enriched by all three PAX factors (43/57, Fig 6C) were also enriched after treatment with CaCl2 or K-gluconate. This may not be surprising given that treatment with either salt induced expression of PAX2 and, especially, PAX5 itself. Finally, it is worth emphasizing from a translationally relevant standpoint, that a set of 31 genes found by Liu et al. to undergo significant regulation during ALL remission, as induced by Pax5 restoration in a mouse model of Pax5-deficient ALL, were similarly modulated by all tested conditions in our studies, whether it be PAX5, PAX2, PAX8, K-gluconate, or CaCl2 (Fig 6C).

We found that components of the NFAT5 pathway, including NFAT5 and TNFS13B (BAFF), along with its receptor, TNFRSF13C (BAFF-R), are upregulated in response to many or all of our treatments (i.e., PAX2/5/8 or salt treatment, Fig 8A and S1 Dataset). Named “nuclear factor of activated T cells 5,” for its role as a transcriptional coordinator of T cell immune response [60], NFAT5 is the only known osmosensing mammalian transcription factor and is active in a variety of cell types, including B cells [45,46]. Indeed, siRNA mediated knockdown of NFAT5 in Reh cells led to a reduction in PAX2 expression in response to hyperosmolarity (Fig 8B and 8C). However, the added observation that PAX5 expression was not affected by NFAT5 knockdown suggests either the presence of a separate, non NFAT5 related, osmosensing pathway upstream of PAX5, or alternatively, a substantially lower threshold for NFAT5 abundance to achieve upregulation of PAX5 under these conditions. In support of the latter, PAX5 appears to contain more potential NFAT5 binding sites than PAX2 (S9 Fig). Separately, these siRNA experiments showed that PAX5 upregulation had a greater effect on downstream gene regulation, and presumably B cell maturation, than did PAX2 (Fig 8B and 8C). Based on our observations from earlier experiments (Figs 24), where PAX2 effectively functionally mimicked PAX5, and the substantially lower level of PAX2 expression present relative to the induced levels of PAX5 in response to hyperosmolarity (~20 fold), we believe this most likely reflects relative levels of expression, rather than differences in functionality.

Given that components of the hypertonicity response pathway are highly conserved from single cell organisms to mammals [61], it seems reasonable to speculate that PAX genes, including PAX2 and PAX5, may play a role in osmotic adaptation across various tissue types. In fact, similar to our observations, upregulation of PAX2 occurs in mouse embryonic fibroblasts in response to hypertonicity [48]. Secondary lymphoid organs, including spleen and thymus, maintain a remarkably high osmolar environment compared to serum and other tissue [62]. It should not be overlooked that a decrease in cell size, which we observed upon expression of PAX2/5/8, normally accompanies the large-to-small pre-B cell transition as cells begin their migration from the bone marrow to secondary lymphoid organs. It is possible that exposure to differences in local osmolarity across these compartments could play a role in normal lymphocyte development. Whether upregulation of PAX2 and/or PAX5 is a normal physiologic response to osmotic stress in lymphocytes or a vestigial pathway more heavily relied on in other tissues such as the kidney, but which is capable of artefactual activation under extreme circumstances, we show here that osmotic stress exposes a potential therapeutic target for activating elements of the normal B cell differentiation program.

The osmolar concentration required for peak induction of PAX2 and PAX5 is, just barely, outside the clinically achievable range for serum based on maximum recommended dosing for mannitol [54]. It is possible that specialized delivery methods, manipulation of dosage levels, and/or exposure time may bridge this gap. It is also worth noting that serum osmolar concentrations within this range are sometimes encountered in acutely ill diabetes mellitus patients with hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome [63]. However, even if the highly hyperosmolar conditions we subjected ALL cells to in vitro are not therapeutically tenable in vivo, they do suggest that the complexity of kinases and other components of the signaling pathway responding to hypertonicity, including those regulating NFAT5, at least in the case of PAX2 [64], may be ripe for investigation as drug targets.

An additional limitation relates to duration of therapy, as the replacement of PAX5 activity may only have a temporary effect on differentiation of ALL cells, though this may still be beneficial either as a form of induction therapy or as an adjuvant when combined with CAR T cell, other therapies targeting CD19, or conventional chemotherapy. Intriguingly, a relevant recent in vitro study demonstrated that hyperosmotic stress achieved with salt or mannitol treatment synergized with chemotherapeutic drugs to kill ALL cells via an NFAT5 dependent mechanism, although activation of PAX genes was not investigated [53]. It should also be emphasized that remissions achieved with differentiation therapy employing ATRA for promyelocytic leukemia can actually be enduring [7]. Finally, if differentiation of pre-B ALL cells could be pushed as far as to the plasma cell stage, where PAX5 expression is normally extinguished [65], then mutations inactivating PAX5 could become inconsequential, anyway.

Finding the right balance of PAX gene expression is another issue. PAX2, when activated, can behave as an oncogene in solid tumors [66], and PAX5 is normally down-regulated during plasma cell differentiation [65]. However, our RNA-seq data suggest that there may be an auto-regulatory ceiling for PAX gene expression, particularly for PAX5. Specifically, by examining total PAX5 transcripts and comparing differences in the read ratios of SNPs discriminating between native and exogenous PAX5, we observed an apparent suppression of endogenous PAX5 transcript by PAX5 transgene expression, and to a lesser extent, by the expression of PAX2 or PAX8 transgenes (S12 Fig). Of course, unless PAX gene activation is confined only to the leukemic population of cells, there may be undesirable effects in other tissues, although compared to oncogenic mutations, PAX gene activation by osmoresponsive mechanisms is unlikely to be permanent. Moreover, some current cancer therapies employ treatment with epigenetic modifier drugs, such as azacitidine, capable of producing genome-wide and persistent activation of many genes across multiple tissues [67].

The strategy implemented here, to activate expression of intact and functionally similar paralogs of mutated cancer-driver genes to therapeutically restore cellular differentiation, could potentially be extended to other types of cancer. For example, inactivating RUNX1 mutations frequently occur in acute myeloid leukemia, where upregulation of RUNX2 or RUNX3 exhibits anti-leukemic effects [68]. More generally, a wide variety of non-cancer illnesses possess etiologies for which complementation of inactivating mutations by activating gene paralogs may prove useful, extending the potential therapeutic application of this concept. For example, in spinal muscular atrophy, causative loss-of-function mutations in SMN1 can be rescued by a recently approved therapy which uses an antisense compound to promote exon retention in an alternatively spliced yet otherwise identical paralog, SMN2 [69]. Finally, hypertonic activation of PAX gene expression offers an example of emerging “electroceutical” approaches based on manipulation of biophysical phenomena [41].


Ethics statement

Leukemia cells were collected, after informed consent, through the Cell Bank of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders at Children’s Hospital Colorado. The Cell Bank protocol is approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB #00–206).

Animal use was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Colorado Denver (Protocol 66912(12)1E).

Contact for reagent and resource sharing

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Marshall Horwitz (

Experimental model and subject details

Cell lines and culture methods.

Reh cells (female [32]) and HEK293T cells (female [70]) were obtained from ATCC. 697 cells (male [34]) were obtained from DSMZ. As suggested by their supplier, Reh and 697 cells were grown in 10% FBS/RPMI 1640 (Gibco, 11875–093), and HEK293T cells were grown in 10% FBS/DMEM (Gibco, 11995–065). All cells were grown at 37°C, under 5% CO2 and were passaged every 3–4 days at confluencies suggested by their suppliers. Cell aliquots were cultured for no more than ~20 passages. Based on hybrid capture exome sequencing, 697 cells are reported in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) [71] as being heterozygous for the PAX5 null mutation p.R225fs; however, we could not confirm this mutation upon Sanger DNA sequencing (S13 Fig), and review of the CCLE primary data shows that both read depth and variant allele count at this position are minimal, consistent with artifact. To verify the identity of the 697 cell line in our possession, we performed Sanger DNA sequencing and confirmed the existence of two separate and uncommon CCLE-reported gene mutations, intrinsic to this cell line; heterozygous NRAS p.G12D and hemizygous GPR112 p.D2657del (S13 Fig). While not identified in the CCLE, Reh cells have been previously reported to contain a heterozygous p.A322fs mutation [33], which we confirmed by Sanger sequencing (S13 Fig). For further verification of cell line identity, low passage samples of both Reh and 697 cells were submitted to ATCC for short tandem repeat profiling and validation by comparison with known profiles for Reh and 697 cell lines. The samples were profiled using the PowerPlex 18D system (Promega), which provides a signature encompassing 17 short tandem repeat loci plus Amelogenin (S14 and S15 Figs).

Primary patient samples

Ten B ALL samples were screened for mutation in PAX5 by Sanger DNA sequencing. One sample, CHCO-7657, was found to contain a heterozygous PAX5 mutation resulting in p.K198fs (S16 Fig). A subset of primary cells were stored in liquid nitrogen and additional leukemia cells were passaged through NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice once and amplified in NOD scid gamma Il3-GM-SF (NSGS) mice (both purchased from Jackson Labs), prior to storage in liquid nitrogen. Recipient mice were irradiated with 200cGy via X-irradiator prior to leukemia injection. Prior to experimentation, cells were thawed and resuspended in 20%FBS/MEM-alpha (Gibco,12561–056) which had been preconditioned with OP9 feeder cells (ATCC) seeded the day prior at 3×105 cells/T75 flask, in 10mL media. Primary cells were overlaid onto and co-cultured with these OP9 feeder cells for 24 hours, followed by treatment with 80mM K-gluconate for an additional 24 hours before sorting for live cells and isolation of RNA.

Method detail

Lentiviral plasmids cloning, virus preparation, and transduction.

Lentiviral plasmids pRRL-CMV-IRES-hrGFPII and pLVX-EF1α-IRES-ZsGreen, were obtained from the University of Washington Diabetes Research Core and Clontech, respectively. PAX5 isoform 1 cDNA [13] was utilized for these studies. PAX2b (catalog # SC300041) and PAX8a cDNA (SC122658) were obtained from OriGene. The PAX2b isoform was chosen due to its relatively abundant expression in human tissues and close resemblance to full length PAX5 (S1 Fig). PAX8a is the most commonly expressed isoform [72] but includes an extra serine-rich ~60 amino acid region between the partial homeodomain and transactivation domain that is absent from PAX2 or PAX5. EcoR1 sites were added to both ends of cDNA upon amplification with primers (PAX2F: 5’ACAGTAGAATTCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGATGGATATGCACTGCAAAGCAGACC, PAX2R: 5’CTAGTGGCGGTCATAGGCAG, PAX8F: 5’ACAGTAGAATTCGCCACCATGGATTACAAGGATGACGACGATAAGATGCCTCACAACTCCATCAG, PAX8R: 5’CTACAGATGGTCAAAGGCCG) and were employed for ligation into plasmids. PAX5p.V26fs was created via primer directed mutagenesis (Forward primer: 5’[Phos]GGGGTTTTTGTGAATGGACGG, Reverse primer: 5’[Phos]CCCCAAGCTGATTCACTCCTCC). Directionality and integrity were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Expected protein size/expression was verified by western blot in HEK293T cells (visible in S3 Fig). Lentivirus production was performed by Allele Biotech and the University of Washington Diabetes Research Core Facility.

Cells were transduced using “spinoculation.” Briefly, cells were washed twice in serum-free RPMI and distributed at 2×105 cells/well in a 96-well plate. Lentivirus (MOI 10–20) was added, along with 4.5 μg/mL polybrene for a total of ~100 μL volume/well. Cells were centrifuged at 1200×g at 30°C, for 2 hours. Supernatant was then removed and cells resuspended in a total of 1 mL growth media, then analyzed at day 4 post-transduction unless otherwise noted.

Lysate preparation, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer with complete protease inhibitor (Roche), 1mM Na3VO4 and 1mM PMSF. Lysates were quantified with the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher) and electrophoresed on MINI-protein TGX gels (BioRad) and transferred onto PVDF membrane (BioRad). Membranes were immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. All primary antibodies were diluted in 1% milk or BSA in TBST and were incubated overnight at 4°C. Blots were incubated in secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, also in 1% milk or BSA.

Flow cytometry and FACS

Flow cytometry for cell surface markers was performed on a BD LSR II flow cytometer using indicated antibodies. For antibody staining, cells were washed twice in sorting buffer (1%FBS/PBS), prior to incubation in antibody (diluted in sorting buffer) on ice and in the dark, for 30 minutes. Cells were then again washed twice in sorting buffer, and resuspended in 300–500μL sorting buffer prior to analysis. All staining and washing was done in 96 well, flat bottom plates. In between washes, cells were spun down for 3’ at 300×g. Plates were overturned and shaken to remove buffer. FACS was performed on a BD Aria II cell sorter. All raw data files were processed using FlowJo software. For experiments where RNA was harvested, cells were sorted directly into 500μL of Qiagen Buffer RLT+, prior to RNA isolation (see below). For further propagation of live cells, cells were sorted directly into complete growth media. Experiments were performed in triplicate (at minimum) unless otherwise noted in figure legends.

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

RNA was harvested from cells using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), following the supplied protocol, and converted to cDNA using random oligomers and either Superscript III or Superscript IV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR was performed on cDNA using the indicated TaqMan probes and analyzed on an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System. Relative quantification of mRNA abundance was performed using the 2-ΔΔCT method and ACTB or GAPDH as reference genes, where ΔCT = (CTtarget-CTreference) and 2-ΔΔCT = 2-(ΔCTsample-ΔCTcontrol). Note, in the cases of PAX2 and PAX8, for which no endogenous baseline expression was detected in ALL cells, baseline PAX5 (empty vector or vehicle) expression was used in calculating ΔCTcontrol. Experiments were performed in triplicate unless otherwise noted in figure legends.

Cellular proliferation assays

At day 4 post-lentiviral transduction, 2×104 ZsGreen-positive cells of each PAX gene or control vector type were isolated by FACS and distributed into individual single wells of a 96-well plate. Beginning with normalized concentrations of 2×105 cells/mL (i.e., 100 μL total volume/well), these cells were further propagated in culture for a time course of 15–17 days. Culture density was assessed manually every 1–2 days during this time, using a hemocytometer. Additional media was added as needed prior to each counting in order to account for evaporation and to maintain ~100 μL volume in each well. For HEK293T cells, cell viability was assessed using an MTS assay (Cell Titer 96 One Solution, Promega), which produces a formazan product in the presence of phenazine methosulfate, which is present in metabolically active cells. Soluble formazan product is detectable at a 490nm absorbance maximum in PBS. Experiments were performed in triplicate (at minimum) unless otherwise noted in figure legends.

Exposure to hypertonicity

Cells were passaged one day prior to plating at a density of 2×105 cells/mL in 5 or 10mL of regular growth media with an added 80mM K-gluconate (Sigma, P1847) or CaCl2 (Sigma, C-3306) (unless otherwise noted). After indicated incubation times and depending on the experiment, RNA was either bulk harvested from treated cells or was harvested from live cells that were first sorted and collected by flow cytometry based on FSC-A and SCC-A measurements (indicated in figure legends). For pulse/chase in Fig 5E, 5F and 5G, cells were treated as indicated for 24 hours. 3×105 live cells were then sorted and returned to culture followed by removal of aliquots at indicated time points for harvesting of RNA (0h = 24 hour pulse, 0 hour chase). Experiments for all figures were performed in triplicate (at minimum) unless otherwise noted in figure legends.


4×106 Reh cells were electroporated with SMARTpool siRNA (i.e., 3 separate target siRNAs each) for PAX2, PAX5, NFAT5, or a non-targeting control pool (Dharmacon) using a BioRad GenePulser Xcell (Square wave, 210V, 15ms, 2x pulse, 0.1sec gap). Cells were suspended in 400μL Opti-MEM buffer containing 500nM siRNA that had been previously prepared and frozen at 20μM stock concentration in siRNA resuspension buffer (GE Healthcare). Cells were allowed to recover for 24 hours prior to harvest of protein lysates or treatment with hypertonic media (80mM K-Gluconate in RPMI with 10% FBS).


Transfection of PAX family members.

Two separate transfections of PAX2, PAX5, PAX8, or empty vector (pRRL-CMV-IRES-hrGFPII) control were performed via electroporation in 400μL OPTI-MEM on 1.5×106 Reh cells per treatment condition (BioRad GenePulser Xcell, Square wave, 210V, 15ms, 2x pulse, 0.1sec gap). The transfected cells were incubated for 24 hours post transfection in normal growth media (see above). Cells were washed twice in PBS plus 1% FBS, and 4–6×105 GFP (+) cells per treatment condition were harvested via FACS for RNA. Total RNA was isolated from sorted cells using the Qiagen RNeasy Plus kit.

Salt treatment.

1×106 Reh cells, cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, were exposed to either K-gluconate or CaCl2 (80mM concentration added to media) for 24 hours. The cells were then washed twice with PBS, and total RNA was isolated using the Qiagen RNeasy Plus kit. Each condition, along with a no treatment control, was repeated for a total of 3 samples.


mRNA libraries were prepared from total RNA (~1 μg per sample) using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep kit. Individual RNA samples were created by pooling equal amounts of total RNA from multiple experiments (see above). Prepared libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument (1×75 bp read). Reads were aligned against GRCh38 using the HISAT2 aligner. Reads mapped to exons defined by GRCh38.88 were counted, and transcripts per million (TPM) values for each gene were calculated using StringTie software (Johns Hopkins Center for Computational Biology). An average of 53 million reads were aligned per sample.

Quantification and statistical analysis


Bar graphs represent combined mean values of 2-ΔΔCT for included experimental replicates, relative to controls indicated in the figure legend and graph axis labels. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significance was determined using one-way t-test method for deviation from a fixed value (i.e., value of control sample). p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005.

Flow cytometry

Bar graphs for antibodies and cell size (FSC-A) represent mean fluorescence intensity. Values are averaged across several experimental replicates, as indicated, above. Error bars represent standard deviation. Significance was determined using one-way t-test method for deviation from a fixed value (i.e., normalized value of control sample). p-values * <0.05, ** <0.005, *** <0.0005. Bar graphs for cell cycle phase (S5 Fig) were determined from percentages of cells in G1, S, and G2 phase, based on DAPI staining, and assessed by the “Cell cycle” function in FlowJo, vX.


Normalization and differential expression calculations were performed using the R package DESeq2 [73] based on TPM data. Clustering and heatmap creation were performed using the heatmap.2 package (dist = Euclidean and method = complete).

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)

Expressed genes in each sample were ranked based on their log2 fold change in mRNA levels when compared to the appropriate control. GSEA was conducted using GSEA Desktop 3.0 software (Broad Institute). Gene sets analyzed (Molecular Signatures Database v6.1) include the biological process group from Gene Ontology (GO:BP), the transcription factor targets (TFT) group, and a custom PAX5 related group of human genes based on genes differentially expressed at various stages of B cell development in mice that have either normal levels of PAX5 or are deficient [13,43]. Briefly, the pro and mature B cell sets are comprised of genes that are differentially expressed compared to the appropriate controls and have predicted PAX5 binding sites in their promoter region while the pro-to-mature B cell sets contain all genes differentially expressed when comparing mature B cells to pro-B cells in the presence or absence of PAX5. Analysis was conducted using the GSEAPreranked tool to calculate a classic enrichment score for each set. Gene sets with a false discovery q-value (FDR) of <0.05 were selected for further analysis.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. PAX2/5/8 domains share high levels of homology.

Aligned amino acid sequences of functional domains for human PAX2, PAX5, and PAX8 are shown. Homology to PAX5 is illustrated at right, with percent identity as well as percent similarity listed for each domain.


S2 Fig. Gating strategy for isolating single and/or ZsGreen positive cells.

Sequential gating using FSC-A vs. SSC-A along with FSC-W vs. FSC-H and SSC-W vs. SSC-H allows for the isolation of single, largely viable cells. Further gating by presence or absence of GFP allows for isolation of lentivirally transduced cells, if applicable.


S3 Fig. PAX2/5/8 modulated cell viability and size changes are B cell specific.

A) 293T cells were transfected with PAX lentiviral vectors using Lipofectamine 3000 following manufacturer suggestions. Protein lysates were taken at 24 hours, quantified by BCA protein assay, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by western blot with anti-Flag antibody (BioLegend). Predicted size of PAX5p.V26fs is roughly 8.7kDa (80aa), but was not detected by western blot, presumably due to complete nonsense-mediated decay. B) 6×104 cells of each group were sorted by FACS for ZsGreen at day 4 post transduction with lentivirus expressing either PAX genes or PAX5p.V26fs or empty vector (ZsGreen only) controls. Cells of the (-) ZsGreen sample are unsuccessfully transduced cells of the PAX5 sample, as in Fig 4. Post sorting, the cells of each group were divided equally into 9 separate wells in a 96 well plate (~6.6×103 cells/well). At 0, 4 and 6 days post sorting, 3 wells of each group were used to assess viability with an MTS colorimetric assay as described in the Methods. C) Histogram comparisons of cell size by FSC-A for 293T cells transduced with either PAX2/5/8, empty vector, or PAX5p.V26fs.


S4 Fig. PAX2 and PAX8 promote exit from the cell cycle in PAX5-deficient pre-B ALL cells, additional data related to Fig 4.

A) Reh (3 experimental replicates) and B) 697 (2 experimental replicates) cell culture density vs. time, following sorting (day 4 post transduction) for ZsGreen-positive cells expressing indicated transgenes. Data points for all replicates are shown, along with lines fitting the mean values for each treatment. Numbers for mean and standard deviation for all time points and treatments are shown below. (-) ZsGreen cells represent unsuccessfully transduced cells sorted from the PAX5 lentivirus exposed cell suspension. C) Numerical representation of percentage of ZsGreen positive vs. negative cells at 11–14 days post sort for ZsGreen for 2 experimental replicates for per cell line.


S5 Fig. PAX2/5/8 expression leads to cell cycle delays and a modest increase in apoptosis.

A) Cells were transduced with lentiviral PAX expression constructs as described (Methods) and sorted for ZsGreen at day 4 post transduction. Cells were immediately fixed and stained with DAPI, followed by flow analysis for staining intensity. Curves representing phases of the cell cycle were fitted using the “Cell Cycle” function of FlowJo software. Figure represents a single experimental replicate. B) Graphical representation of % cells per phase, based on the analysis in A. C) Reh cells were electroporated with either PAX5 or empty vector expression constructs. 24 hours later, cells were stained with Annexin V/DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry using the gating strategy shown.


S6 Fig. Exposure to hyperosmolarity causes expression of PAX2 and upregulation of PAX5 in Reh cells.

A-C) Cells were incubated for 24 hours with vehicle (normal growth media), media with added 80mM K-gluconate, or media with added 80mM CaCl2. RNA was then bulk harvested and cDNA prepared as described in the Methods. Representative PAX2 (red) as well as PAX5 (yellow) amplification curves are shown for all samples.


S7 Fig. qRT-PCR normalization using GAPDH is similar to ACTB in Reh cells and 697 cells also respond to hypertonicity.

A, B) Dose curve as in Fig 5C and 5D, except normalized to GAPDH rather than ACTB. C, D) Dose curve for K-gluconate treated 697 cells, normalized to ACTB. Note, both A and B represent an average of two experimental replicates.


S8 Fig. qRT-PCR validation of RNA-seq gene regulation trends and NFAT5 knockdown affects solute carrier upregulation in response to hyperosmolarity.

A) qRT-PCR validation of RNA-seq gene subset from Fig 8. Fold change values are 2-ΔΔCT, relative to each samples’ respective control (i.e., empty vector or untreated), with ACTB used as endogenous reference gene. Represents 2 experimental replicates. B) Fold expression of solute channels (+/-) 80mM K-gluconate and (+/-) siRNA knockdown of NFAT5 or GAPDH as a negative control. Represents 3 experimental replicates.


S9 Fig. PAX2 and PAX5 genomic loci contain multiple TonE binding elements.

A) Screen shot from UCSC Genome Browser image of the PAX5 locus, highlighting instances of the TonE consensus sequence (TGAAANNYNY) which are present in the genomic region shown. B) As in A, but for the PAX2.


S10 Fig. Exposure to hyperosmolarity results in PAX5 and downstream gene modulation in a non-NSG passaged, PAX5 mutant, primary patient pre-B ALL sample and has varied effects on cell viability in Reh cells.

A) qRT-PCR analysis of PAX2, PAX5, and several downstream genes for one aliquot of direct-from-patient, primary sample in response to 24 hour treatment with 80mM K-gluconate. Cells were sorted by FSC-A/SSC-A for live cells prior to isolation/harvest of RNA. B) Reh cells were treated with 80 or 160mM mannitol, 80mM K-gluconate, or vehicle control for 24 hours, followed by FSC-A/SSC-A sorting for 2×105 live cells per condition which were then return to culture. Culture density as shown, was evaluated manually at days 2, 3, and 5 post sort. Data points for 3 experimental replicates are shown, as are lines representing mean values of combined replicates.


S11 Fig. Reh and 697 cell lines show disparate mutational profiles.

Shown is a Venn diagram of all coding mutations listed in the CCLE for both 697 (black) and Reh cells (magenta). Note, while the CCLE shows a PAX5 mutation in 697 cells, it is not included here as we did not detect that mutation by Sanger sequencing (see S13 Fig). However, we did confirm 697 identity by verifying the presence of other mutations and by short tandem repeat profiling (S14 Fig). Additionally, the p.A322fs PAX5 mutation in Reh cells is not reported by the CCLE, but is shown here (bold), as it has been reported by other sources, and we have verified it by Sanger sequencing (see Methods, S13 Fig).


S12 Fig. Exogenous PAX paralog expression reduces endogenous PAX5 expression.

A) Normalized RNA-seq expression data of PAX2/5/8 in transfected Reh cells. rlog normalized TPM values shown in cells transfected with pRRL- empty vector, PAX2, PAX5, or PAX8. Dark purple box indicates proportion of reads from Reh p.A322fs allele. B) PAX5 variant sequences in Reh cells and pRLL-PAX5 cDNA. (+) strand genomic sequence is shown for exon 8 and 10 for both Reh alleles as well as pRLL-PAX5. Variants are shown in red. C) Proportion of PAX5 aligned reads attributable to either the Reh alleles or the pRLL-PAX5. For Exon 8: insG, the ratio of reads with an insertion to total reads in the empty vector sample from A was used to estimate the percentage of reads attributable to the Reh alleles. Black boxes indicate the range of Reh PAX5 expected based on samples in A. Average read depth (SD) for each condition; Empty Vector = 570(65), PAX5 = 11×103 (2.1×103). Exon 8: T>C = NC_000009.12:g.36,882,065T>C, Exon 8: insG = NC_000009.12:g.36,882,053insG, Exon 10: G>A = NC_000009.12:g.36,840,626G>A.


S13 Fig. Sanger DNA sequencing verification of Reh and 697 cell lines.

Arrows denote the locations of previously reported mutations for Reh and 697 cells. A) Electropherogram from Sanger DNA sequencing of exon 8, Reh cells, showing a heterozygous single nucleotide insertion resulting in the p.A322fs mutation [33]. B) Electropherogram trace from exon 6, 697 cells, at the location of the CCLE identified p.R225fs mutation [71]. C) Electropherogram traces showing the presence of GPR112 and NRAS mutations (p.D2657del and pG12D) as reported in the CCLE for the 697 cell line. Note that GPR112 resides on the X chromosome, and the cell source is male.


S14 Fig. Short tandem repeat profiling to validate identity of the Reh cell line.

A) Electropherogram results for the Reh sample. B) Profile comparisons for the submitted sample and ATCC CRL-8286 (Reh cell line) for a subset of 18 evaluated loci.


S15 Fig. Short tandem repeat profiling to validate identity of the 697 cell line.

A) Electropherogram results for the 697 sample. B) Profile comparisons for the submitted sample and DSMZ-42 (697 cell line) for a subset of 18 evaluated loci.


S16 Fig. Sanger DNA sequencing of primary patient sample.

Forward and reverse Sanger traces show position of the p.K198fs mutation in PAX5.


S3 Table. Leading edge genes for MYCMAX_01 and E2F1_Q4 gene sets.


S1 Dataset. Exogenous PAX2/5/8 expression or elevated hyperosmolarity modulate Reh gene expression.

Excel file including log2 gene expression changes from treatment with PAX2/5/8 vs. empty vector or treatment with 80mM K-gluconate or CaCl2 vs. untreated Reh cells (“Differential Expression” tab). Genes are listed by Ensembl ID. Treatment conditions used are outlined in the “Conditions Key” tab and described in the methods.


S2 Dataset. Numerical data underlying all graphical representations presented in main body and supplemental figures.

Tabs are labeled with corresponding figure numbers. Corresponding sub-figure labels within each tab are highlighted in yellow.



We thank members of the Horwitz and Miller labs and Dr. David Wu for their suggestions and support. We thank Dr. Karol Bomsztyk for suggesting use of mannitol. TN and MSH wish to dedicate this paper to the memory of Dr. George Stamatoyannopoulos.


  1. 1. Hunger SP, Mullighan CG. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children. N Engl J Med. 2015;373: 1541–1552. pmid:26465987
  2. 2. Fulbright JM, Raman S, McClellan WS, August KJ. Late effects of childhood leukemia therapy. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2011;6: 195–205. pmid:21695425
  3. 3. Curran E, Stock W. How I treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia in older adolescents and young adults. Blood. 2015;125: 3702–3710. pmid:25805810
  4. 4. Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, Rheingold SR, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368: 1509–1518. pmid:23527958
  5. 5. Somasundaram R, Prasad MA, Ungerback J, Sigvardsson M. Transcription factor networks in B-cell differentiation link development to acute lymphoid leukemia. Blood. 2015;126: 144–152. pmid:25990863
  6. 6. Nowak D, Stewart D, Koeffler HP. Differentiation therapy of leukemia: 3 decades of development. Blood. 2009;113: 3655–3665. pmid:19221035
  7. 7. Wang ZY, Chen Z. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from highly fatal to highly curable. Blood. 2008;111: 2505–2515. pmid:18299451
  8. 8. Mullighan CG. Molecular genetics of B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2012;122: 3407–3415. pmid:23023711
  9. 9. Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2007;446: 758–764. pmid:17344859
  10. 10. Kuiper RP, Schoenmakers EF, van Reijmersdal SV, Hehir-Kwa JY, van Kessel AG, van Leeuwen FN, et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of childhood ALL reveals novel recurrent genetic lesions affecting pathways involved in lymphocyte differentiation and cell cycle progression. Leukemia. 2007;21: 1258–1266. pmid:17443227
  11. 11. O’Brien P, Morin P Jr., Ouellette RJ, Robichaud GA. The Pax-5 gene: a pluripotent regulator of B-cell differentiation and cancer disease. Cancer Res. 2011;71: 7345–7350. pmid:22127921
  12. 12. Kawamata N, Pennella MA, Woo JL, Berk AJ, Koeffler HP. Dominant-negative mechanism of leukemogenic PAX5 fusions. Oncogene. 2012;31: 966–977. pmid:21765475
  13. 13. Shah S, Schrader KA, Waanders E, Timms AE, Vijai J, Miething C, et al. A recurrent germline PAX5 mutation confers susceptibility to pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2013;45: 1226–1231. pmid:24013638
  14. 14. Auer F, Ruschendorf F, Gombert M, Husemann P, Ginzel S, Izraeli S, et al. Inherited susceptibility to pre B-ALL caused by germline transmission of PAX5 c.547G>A. Leukemia. 2014;28: 1136–1138. pmid:24287434
  15. 15. Pridans C, Holmes ML, Polli M, Wettenhall JM, Dakic A, Corcoran LM, et al. Identification of Pax5 target genes in early B cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2008;180: 1719–1728. pmid:18209069
  16. 16. Nutt SL, Urbánek P, Rolink A, Busslinger M. Essential functions of Pax5 (BSAP) in pro-B cell development: difference between fetal and adult B lymphopoiesis and reduced V-to-DJ recombination at the IgH locus. Genes Dev. 1997;11: 476–491. pmid:9042861
  17. 17. Heltemes-Harris LM, Willette MJ, Ramsey LB, Qiu YH, Neeley ES, Zhang N, et al. Ebf1 or Pax5 haploinsufficiency synergizes with STAT5 activation to initiate acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Exp Med. 2011;208: 1135–1149. pmid:21606506
  18. 18. Liu GJ, Cimmino L, Jude JG, Hu Y, Witkowski MT, McKenzie MD, et al. Pax5 loss imposes a reversible differentiation block in B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genes Dev. 2014;28: 1337–1350. pmid:24939936
  19. 19. Chan LN, Chen Z, Braas D, Lee JW, Xiao G, Geng H, et al. Metabolic gatekeeper function of B-lymphoid transcription factors. Nature. 2017;542: 479–483. pmid:28192788
  20. 20. Tijchon E, Havinga J, van Leeuwen FN, Scheijen B. B-lineage transcription factors and cooperating gene lesions required for leukemia development. Leukemia. 2013;27: 541–552. pmid:23047478
  21. 21. Fontaine F, Overman J, Francois M. Pharmacological manipulation of transcription factor protein-protein interactions: opportunities and obstacles. Cell Regen (Lond). 2015;4: 2.
  22. 22. Yin H, Kauffman KJ, Anderson DG. Delivery technologies for genome editing. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017.
  23. 23. Bernt KM, Armstrong SA. Leukemia stem cells and human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2009;46: 33–38. pmid:19100366
  24. 24. Miller DJ, Hayward DC, Reece-Hoyes JS, Scholten I, Catmull J, Gehring WJ, et al. Pax gene diversity in the basal cnidarian Acropora millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa): implications for the evolution of the Pax gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97: 4475–4480. pmid:10781047
  25. 25. Gruss P, Walther C. Pax in development. Cell. 1992;69: 719–722. pmid:1591773
  26. 26. Bouchard M, Souabni A, Mandler M, Neubüser A, Busslinger M. Nephric lineage specification by Pax2 and Pax8. Genes Dev. 2002;16: 2958–2970. pmid:12435636
  27. 27. Czerny T, Bouchard M, Kozmik Z, Busslinger M. The characterization of novel Pax genes of the sea urchin and Drosophila reveal an ancient evolutionary origin of the Pax2/5/8 subfamily. Mech Dev. 1997;67: 179–192. pmid:9392515
  28. 28. Bouchard M, Pfeffer P, Busslinger M. Functional equivalence of the transcription factors Pax2 and Pax5 in mouse development. Development. 2000;127: 3703–3713. pmid:10934015
  29. 29. Goode DK, Elgar G. The PAX258 gene subfamily: a comparative perspective. Dev Dyn. 2009;238: 2951–2974. pmid:19924770
  30. 30. Cai Q, Dmitrieva NI, Ferraris JD, Brooks HL, van Balkom BW, Burg M. Pax2 expression occurs in renal medullary epithelial cells in vivo and in cell culture, is osmoregulated, and promotes osmotic tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 503–508. pmid:15623552
  31. 31. Hystad ME, Myklebust JH, Bø TH, Sivertsen EA, Rian E, Forfang L, et al. Characterization of early stages of human B cell development by gene expression profiling. J Immunol. 2007;179: 3662–3671. pmid:17785802
  32. 32. Rosenfeld C, Goutner A, Venuat AM, Choquet C, Pico JL, Dore JF, et al. An effective human leukaemic cell line: Reh. Eur J Cancer. 1977;13: 377–379. pmid:194778
  33. 33. Dörfler P, Busslinger M. C-terminal activating and inhibitory domains determine the transactivation potential of BSAP (Pax-5), Pax-2 and Pax-8. EMBO J. 1996;15: 1971–1982. pmid:8617244
  34. 34. Findley HW Jr., Cooper MD, Kim TH, Alvarado C, Ragab AH. Two new acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines with early B-cell phenotypes. Blood. 1982;60: 1305–1309. pmid:6982733
  35. 35. Diakos C, Xiao Y, Zheng S, Kager L, Dworzak M, Wiemels JL. Direct and indirect targets of the E2A-PBX1 leukemia-specific fusion protein. PLoS One. 2014;9: e87602. pmid:24503810
  36. 36. Santoro A, Bica MG, Dagnino L, Agueli C, Salemi D, Cannella S, et al. Altered mRNA expression of PAX5 is a common event in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2009;146: 686–689. pmid:19604238
  37. 37. Jimi E, Phillips RJ, Rincon M, Voll R, Karasuyama H, Flavell R, et al. Activation of NF-kappaB promotes the transition of large, CD43+ pre-B cells to small, CD43- pre-B cells. Int Immunol. 2005;17: 815–825. pmid:15908447
  38. 38. Herzog S, Reth M, Jumaa H. Regulation of B-cell proliferation and differentiation by pre-B-cell receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9: 195–205. pmid:19240758
  39. 39. Tzur A, Moore JK, Jorgensen P, Shapiro HM, Kirschner MW. Optimizing optical flow cytometry for cell volume-based sorting and analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6: e16053. pmid:21283800
  40. 40. Pai VP, Aw S, Shomrat T, Lemire JM, Levin M. Transmembrane voltage potential controls embryonic eye patterning in Xenopus laevis. Development. 2012;139: 313–323. pmid:22159581
  41. 41. Pai VP, Martyniuk CJ, Echeverri K, Sundelacruz S, Kaplan DL, Levin M. Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved transcriptional responses downstream of resting potential change in Xenopus embryos, axolotl regeneration, and human mesenchymal cell differentiation. Regeneration (Oxf). 2016;3: 3–25.
  42. 42. Sakaguchi T, Kuno M, Kawasaki K. Protection of excitotoxic neuronal death by gluconate through blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Neuroscience. 1999;92: 677–684. pmid:10408615
  43. 43. Revilla-I-Domingo R, Bilic I, Vilagos B, Tagoh H, Ebert A, Tamir IM, et al. The B-cell identity factor Pax5 regulates distinct transcriptional programmes in early and late B lymphopoiesis. EMBO J. 2012;31: 3130–3146. pmid:22669466
  44. 44. Iritani BM, Eisenman RN. c-Myc enhances protein synthesis and cell size during B lymphocyte development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96: 13180–13185. pmid:10557294
  45. 45. Burg MB, Ferraris JD, Dmitrieva NI. Cellular response to hyperosmotic stresses. Physiol Rev. 2007;87: 1441–1474. pmid:17928589
  46. 46. Kino T, Takatori H, Manoli I, Wang Y, Tiulpakov A, Blackman MR, et al. Brx mediates the response of lymphocytes to osmotic stress through the activation of NFAT5. Sci Signal. 2009;2: ra5. pmid:19211510
  47. 47. Rim JS, Atta MG, Dahl SC, Berry GT, Handler JS, Kwon HM. Transcription of the sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter gene is regulated by multiple tonicity-responsive enhancers spread over 50 kilobase pairs in the 5'-flanking region. J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 20615–20621. pmid:9685419
  48. 48. Izumi Y, Yang W, Zhu J, Burg MB, Ferraris JD. RNA-Seq analysis of high NaCl-induced gene expression. Physiol Genomics. 2015;47: 500–513. pmid:26220925
  49. 49. Daniel VC, Marchionni L, Hierman JS, Rhodes JT, Devereux WL, Rudin CM, et al. A primary xenograft model of small-cell lung cancer reveals irreversible changes in gene expression imposed by culture in vitro. Cancer Res. 2009;69: 3364–3373. pmid:19351829
  50. 50. De Witt Hamer PC, Van Tilborg AA, Eijk PP, Sminia P, Troost D, Van Noorden CJ, et al. The genomic profile of human malignant glioma is altered early in primary cell culture and preserved in spheroids. Oncogene. 2008;27: 2091–2096. pmid:17934519
  51. 51. Porter CC. Germ line mutations associated with leukemias. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016: 302–308. pmid:27913495
  52. 52. Hanada I, Terui K, Ikeda F, Toki T, Kanezaki R, Sato T, et al. Gene alterations involving the CRLF2-JAK pathway and recurrent gene deletions in Down syndrome-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Japan. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014;53: 902–910. pmid:25044358
  53. 53. Bittner S, Knoll G, Ehrenschwender M. Hyperosmotic stress enhances cytotoxicity of SMAC mimetics. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8: e2967. pmid:28771230
  54. 54. Cloyd JC, Snyder BD, Cleeremans B, Bundlie SR, Blomquist CH, Lakatua DJ. Mannitol pharmacokinetics and serum osmolality in dogs and humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986;236: 301–306. pmid:3080582
  55. 55. Dmitrieva NI, Bulavin DV, Fornace AJ, Burg MB. Rapid activation of G2/M checkpoint after hypertonic stress in renal inner medullary epithelial (IME) cells is protective and requires p38 kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99: 184–189. pmid:11756692
  56. 56. Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes—the Achilles heal of cancer. Science. 2002;297: 63–64. pmid:12098689
  57. 57. Maude SL, Teachey DT, Porter DL, Grupp SA. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125: 4017–4023. pmid:25999455
  58. 58. Jacoby E, Nguyen SM, Fountaine TJ, Welp K, Gryder B, Qin H, et al. CD19 CAR immune pressure induces B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia lineage switch exposing inherent leukaemic plasticity. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12320. pmid:27460500
  59. 59. Hong EE, Erickson H, Lutz RJ, Whiteman KR, Jones G, Kovtun Y, et al. Design of Coltuximab Ravtansine, a CD19-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies: Structure-Activity Relationships and Preclinical Evaluation. Mol Pharm. 2015;12: 1703–1716. pmid:25856201
  60. 60. Trama J, Lu Q, Hawley RG, Ho SN. The NFAT-related protein NFATL1 (TonEBP/NFAT5) is induced upon T cell activation in a calcineurin-dependent manner. J Immunol. 2000;165: 4884–4894. pmid:11046013
  61. 61. Sheikh-Hamad D, Gustin MC. MAP kinases and the adaptive response to hypertonicity: functional preservation from yeast to mammals. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004;287: F1102–1110. pmid:15522988
  62. 62. Go WY, Liu X, Roti MA, Liu F, Ho SN. NFAT5/TonEBP mutant mice define osmotic stress as a critical feature of the lymphoid microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101: 10673–10678. pmid:15247420
  63. 63. Carchman RM, Dechert-Zeger M, Calikoglu AS, Harris BD. A new challenge in pediatric obesity: pediatric hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6: 20–24. pmid:15636654
  64. 64. Zhou X. How do kinases contribute to tonicity-dependent regulation of the transcription factor NFAT5? World J Nephrol. 2016;5: 20–32. pmid:26788461
  65. 65. Lin KI, Angelin-Duclos C, Kuo TC, Calame K. Blimp-1-dependent repression of Pax-5 is required for differentiation of B cells to immunoglobulin M-secreting plasma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22: 4771–4780. pmid:12052884
  66. 66. Al-Hujaily EM, Tang Y, Yao DS, Carmona E, Garson K, Vanderhyden BC. Divergent Roles of PAX2 in the Etiology and Progression of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8: 1163–1173.
  67. 67. Wolff F, Leisch M, Greil R, Risch A, Pleyer L. The double-edged sword of (re)expression of genes by hypomethylating agents: from viral mimicry to exploitation as priming agents for targeted immune checkpoint modulation. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15: 13. pmid:28359286
  68. 68. Morita K, Suzuki K, Maeda S, Matsuo A, Mitsuda Y, Tokushige C, et al. Genetic regulation of the RUNX transcription factor family has antitumor effects. J Clin Invest. 2017;127: 2815–2828. pmid:28530640
  69. 69. Corey DR. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide drug for spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20: 497–499. pmid:28192393
  70. 70. Lin YC, Boone M, Meuris L, Lemmens I, Van Roy N, Soete A, et al. Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat Commun. 2014;5: 4767. pmid:25182477
  71. 71. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483: 603–607. pmid:22460905
  72. 72. Pasca di Magliano M, Di Lauro R, Zannini M. Pax8 has a key role in thyroid cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97: 13144–13149. pmid:11069301
  73. 73. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15: 550. pmid:25516281