Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

Reduced Insulin/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Mitigates Defective Dendrite Morphogenesis in Mutants of the ER Stress Sensor IRE-1


Neurons receive excitatory or sensory inputs through their dendrites, which often branch extensively to form unique neuron-specific structures. How neurons regulate the formation of their particular arbor is only partially understood. In genetic screens using the multidendritic arbor of PVD somatosensory neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, we identified a mutation in the ER stress sensor IRE-1/Ire1 (inositol requiring enzyme 1) as crucial for proper PVD dendrite arborization in vivo. We further found that regulation of dendrite growth in cultured rat hippocampal neurons depends on Ire1 function, showing an evolutionarily conserved role for IRE-1/Ire1 in dendrite patterning. PVD neurons of nematodes lacking ire-1 display reduced arbor complexity, whereas mutations in genes encoding other ER stress sensors displayed normal PVD dendrites, specifying IRE-1 as a selective ER stress sensor that is essential for PVD dendrite morphogenesis. Although structure function analyses indicated that IRE-1’s nuclease activity is necessary for its role in dendrite morphogenesis, mutations in xbp-1, the best-known target of non-canonical splicing by IRE-1/Ire1, do not exhibit PVD phenotypes. We further determined that secretion and distal localization to dendrites of the DMA-1/leucine rich transmembrane receptor (DMA-1/LRR-TM) is defective in ire-1 but not xbp-1 mutants, suggesting a block in the secretory pathway. Interestingly, reducing Insulin/IGF1 signaling can bypass the secretory block and restore normal targeting of DMA-1, and consequently normal PVD arborization even in the complete absence of functional IRE-1. This bypass of ire-1 requires the DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor. In sum, our work identifies a conserved role for ire-1 in neuronal branching, which is independent of xbp-1, and suggests that arborization defects associated with neuronal pathologies may be overcome by reducing Insulin/IGF signaling and improving ER homeostasis and function.

Author Summary

Sensory neurons sample their environment through highly branched structures termed dendritic arbors or trees. The precise patterning of dendritic arbors is important for the proper functioning of the nervous system, and evidence indicates an involvement of sensory neurons in neuropsychiatric disease such as autism spectrum disorders. The unfolded protein response is a cellular process that ensures and maintains a functional protein-folding environment in the cell’s endoplasmic reticulum, and is compromised in a number of neurodegenerative conditions. Recently, this process has also been implicated in dendrite patterning. We discovered that the function of the unfolded protein response in dendrite patterning is evolutionarily conserved from the roundworm C. elegans to mammals. Specifically, dendrites in both worms and mammals require the function of a conserved enzyme with both kinase and ribonuclease activity, which acts as a sensor for the unfolded protein response. Importantly, we find that loss of this enzyme can be bypassed by reducing the signaling through the insulin-like growth factor receptor. Our findings reveal a new way of bypassing defects in the unfolded protein response during dendrite development.


During their development neurons can form complex dendritic branching patterns. The specific arbor morphologies of different neuron types are thought to have evolved to mediate the acquisition and processing of distinct inputs [1]. Defective arbor morphologies in brain neurons are a common cellular symptom in many neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases [24].

Dendritic arbor growth requires the accurate orchestration of numerous cellular events that occur concomitantly at a distance from the neuronal cell body and integrate dramatic membrane extension, local protein translation and processing, vesicular transport, shifts in cytoskeleton dynamics and elevated metabolic activity. How neurons control these various processes at the genetic and molecular level remains only partially understood [57].

Our understanding of dendrite arbor morphogenesis has advanced significantly through the study of peripheral mechanosensory arbor development in the fly Drosophila melanogaster and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. In Drosophila, larval da (dendrite arborization) neurons are grouped into four classes according to the degree of arbor complexity [6, 8]. Screens for da dendrite defects have identified many genes that control arborization, such as transcription factors, membrane receptors and their ligands, integrins, vesicular transport factors and cell adhesion molecules [5, 6, 8]. Recently, the polymodal sensory neuron PVD in C. elegans with its characteristic multidendritic arbor has become a model neuron for the study of dendrite morphogenesis [9, 10]. Genetic work on the formation of the repetitive PVD menorah-shaped dendritic units has identified several genes not implicated before in dendrite morphogenesis, including roles for fusogens [11], the LRR-type receptor dma-1 [12], the fam151 family member mnr-1/menorin [13, 14], the secreted leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 lect-2/chondromodulin II [15, 16], and the furin-like protease kpc-1 [1719].

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the primary cellular site for secretory protein and lipid biosynthesis, both of which are essential for proper cellular function. In agreement, disruption of ER homeostasis is associated with pathologies such as neurodegenerative disorders [2022]. To prevent deleterious outcomes of perturbed ER homeostasis, a cellular program called the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) is triggered at times of increased load on the ER (i.e. ER stress) to ensure that ER homeostasis is retained regardless of the dynamic nature of cellular demand [23]. In mammalian cells (as well as in C. elegans), the UPR is composed of three pathways that are initiated by distinct ER stress sensors: inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK) and activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6). IRE1 is the most ancient of the UPR sensors, being conserved from yeast to humans, and bears both kinase and ribonuclease activities [24]. Upon its activation, IRE1 undergoes autophosphorylation and oligomerization into multimers [25, 26]. In its oligomeric state it removes an intron from xbp-1 (X-box binding protein-1) mRNA through unconventional splicing allowing the translation of an activated form of the XBP-1 transcription factor. This activated transcription factor induces the expression of chaperones, ERAD components and other ER auxiliary factors to rebalance ER capacity [27, 28]. The UPR, and specifically the ire-1/xbp-1 arm of the UPR, is important even under normal physiological conditions (i.e. in the absence of induced ER stress), as perturbations in this pathway impair secretory protein metabolism [29].

Additional xbp-1 independent functions of ire-1 are also known. These include activation of the cell death machinery [3032], induction of autophagosomes [33], induction of a cellular anti-oxidant response [34] and degradation of ER-localized mRNAs that encode secreted and membrane proteins through the RIDD (regulated Ire1-dependent decay) pathway [35]. Recent in vitro work using the yeast Ire1 has suggested that RIDD activity can be mediated by IRE1 even in its monomeric state [36].

Here, we demonstrate that IRE1’s role in dendrite arborization is conserved during evolution from C. elegans to mammals. We show that in C. elegans ire-1 deficiency elicits a secretory block in the PVD neuron that interferes with the targeting of the DMA-1 receptor to the plasma membrane, strengthening similar results by Wei et al. [37]. We further reveal that this trafficking block, which does not occur in xbp-1 mutants, can be bypassed by reducing insulin/IGF1 signaling to restore normal arbor architecture. Altogether, this work assigns a conserved role for IRE-1 function in neuronal development and demonstrates that activation of alternative ER homeostasis-promoting pathways can counteract and prevent the deleterious consequences of compromised ER homeostasis on neuronal development.

Results and Discussion

The UPR sensor ire-1/IRE1 is required for dendrite morphogenesis in C. elegans and in mammals

The dendrites of the polymodal somatosensory PVD neurons are stereotypically patterned, by the consecutive branching of secondary, tertiary, and quaternary branches from primary dendrites that exit the PVD cell body on either side both in an anterior and in a posterior direction (Fig 1A). In concordance with a recent report [37], we isolated a mutant allele of ire-1, which encodes the C. elegans homolog of the inositol requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) in a screen for genes required for PVD morphogenesis [13]. The ire-1(dz176) allele changes Glycine 708, a residue that is located in an alpha helix of the kinase domain and conserved from yeast to humans (Fig 1A and 1B). The PVD phenotypes were shared with another missense allele (zc14), which also changed a perfectly conserved G723 in the kinase domain, as well as the deletion allele ok799 (Fig 1A–1C). Mutant phenotypes were transgenically rescued by both a wild-type copy of ire-1 (S1A–S1C Fig) and expression of a cDNA pan-neuronally or in PVD neurons, but not in the intestine or hypodermis (skin) (S1D Fig). These findings complement previous mosaic studies [37], and together strongly argue for a cell-autonomous function of ire-1.

Fig 1. The inositol requiring enzyme 1 (IRE-1) is required in PVD neurons to shape sensory dendrites.

A. Fluorescent micrographs with tracings (right panels) of PVD in the genotypes indicated (PVD visualized by the wdIs52 transgene (Is[F49H12.9::GFP]). Arrowheads indicate cell bodies and arrows areas with defects in self-avoidance. Anterior is to the left in all panels and ventral down; scale bars indicate 20 μm. B. Schematic of the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE-1) with a multiple sequence alignment of part of the kinase domain (accession numbers: C. elegans (Ce): Q09499.2, D. melanogaster (Dm): ABW08704.1, H. sapiens (Hs): HGNC: 3449, X. laevis (Xl): AAH73092.1, S. cerevisiae (Sc); NP_011946.1). Location of missense alleles and amino acid position (right) is indicated. C. Quantification of defects in the genotypes indicated. Defects are defined as absence of complete menorah-like dendrites between the vulva and the anterior end of the animals. D–E. Quantification of secondary, tertiary, and quaternary branch numbers (D.) and aggregate length (E.). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey correction. Statistical significance is indicated (*p = 0.05, **p = 0.01, ****p = 0.0001). n = 20 wild-type control animals (1295 dendritic branches), and n = 20 ire-1(ok799) mutant animals (489 dendritic branches). F. Maximum-intensity projection of an ire-1(dz176) mutant animal in which each individual optical section is labeled in a different color (7 sections of 0.6 μm each). Warmer and colder colors indicate more medial and lateral sections of the animal, respectively. Overlapping tertiary dendrites (within boxes and shown in magnification) appear in the same focal plane (based on the same color). The width of dendritic branches is approximately 200 nm [9], suggesting that tertiary dendrites in ire-1(dz176) mutants are closely apposed (within 0.6 μm) or directly touching.

As reported previously, ire-1 mutants formed dendrites with quaternary branches only in the area proximal to the PVD cell body, and gradually became less developed as their distance from the cell body increased both anteriorly and posteriorly (Fig 1A) [37]. We extended these observations in morphometric analyses, which showed a reduction both in the number and aggregate length of secondary, tertiary and quaternary branches in the presumptive ire-1(ok799) null mutant (Fig 1D and 1E; S1E Fig). In addition, we discovered a self-avoidance defect in ire-1 mutants, where adjacent tertiary dendrites failed to retract upon mutual contact, thereby eliminating the characteristic gaps between them (Fig 1F).

Since the role of IRE1 in dendrite patterning in mammals had never been addressed before, we investigated whether IRE1 serves an evolutionarily conserved function during dendrite patterning in mammals. We studied dendrite morphogenesis in dissociated rat hippocampal cultures and measured changes in dendrite length and complexity after 8 and 12 days in vitro (DIV), a time period during which dendrites undergo dynamic growth (Fig 2A). During this time window, neurons in culture were either treated with vehicle or the IRE1-specific inhibitor 4μ8C [38]. Vehicle-treated neurons showed the expected developmental increase in total dendritic branch length from 8 to 12DIV (Fig 2B; 8DIV, 897 +/- 50 μm, n = 42 vs. 12DIV+veh, 1308 +/- 75 μm, n = 42; p<0.0001). In contrast, neurons treated from 8DIV onwards with 50 μM of the specific IRE1 RNAse inhibitor 4μ8C did not show this developmental increase in total dendritic branch length (Fig 2B, 8DIV vs. 12DIV+4μ8C, 893 +/- 66 μm, n = 41; p = 0.99). In neurons treated with the IRE1 inhibitor, there was a trend towards fewer dendrite tips as compared with vehicle treated neurons (Fig 2C; 12DIV+veh, 22 +/- 1.1 tips vs. 12DIV+4μ8C, 18 +/- 1.6 tips; p = 0.078), consistent with the correlation of shorter total dendritic branch length with fewer dendritic tips [39]. IRE1 inhibition did not restrict the developmental increase in average dendritic branch length, supporting the notion that this aspect of dendrite differentiation was not impaired (Fig 2D; 8DIV, 26 +/- 1.1 μm vs. 12DIV+veh, 36 +/- 1.6 μm; p<0.0001; 8DIV vs. 12DIV+4μ8C, 33 +/- 2.3 μm, p<0.001). Importantly, the effect of IRE1 inhibition was specific to higher order branches and did not alter the number of primary branches (Fig 2E), similar to the effects observed in PVD dendrites of ire-1 mutants in C. elegans (Fig 1D and 1E). We conclude that IRE-1 serves a conserved role in dendritic dendrite morphogenesis under normal physiological conditions, and in the absence of external induction of ER stress. Thus, our studies in rats and C. elegans provide the first example for a conserved developmental function of the ire1 stress sensor in neural development. This adds to a growing body of literature, based on knockout approaches in mice, that show functions for the unfolded protein response during liver development [4042], as well as in the development of antibody-producing B cells [43] and secretory cells of the pancreas [44].

Fig 2. IRE-1 is required for dendrite growth in dissociated hippocampal neurons.

A. Images of dissociated hippocampal neurons at indicated days in vitro (DIV) and either DMSO-vehicle control treated (Veh) or treated with an inhibitor of IRE-1 (4μ8C). Scale bars indicate 50 μm. B. Total dendritic branch length increases from 8 to 12 DIV in control neurons and this increase is blocked in 4μ8C-treated cultures. C. Dendrite tip number did not increase with development, however 4μ8C-treated cultures exhibited a non-significant trend towards reduced tip number reflecting decreased dendrite complexity. D. Average dendritic branch length increased from 8 to 12 DIV, and this was not affected by 4μ8C treatment. E. Primary dendrite number was stable from 8 to 12 DIV and was not affected by 4μ8C treatment. 8 DIV, 42 neurons; 12 DIV + Veh, 42 neurons; 12 DIV + 4μ8C, 41 neurons. All data are from three independent experiments. **p < .01; ***p < .001; ****p < .0001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05).

The nuclease activity of IRE-1 is required for PVD dendritic branching

The IRE-1 protein is composed of a luminal unfolded protein sensor domain and a cytosolic bifunctional active site, comprising a kinase and a ribonuclease domain. Our mutants in the kinase domain, as well as mutants identified by Wei et al. [37] suggested that both domains may be important for ire-1 function. To further investigate this notion, we generated mutant versions of IRE-1, defective in each of these domains, and conducted rescue experiments in ire-1 mutants. We found that expression of a mutant where the ER luminal domain, thought to serve as an unfolded protein receptor [45], had been replaced by red fluorescent protein (mCherry), rescued PVD morphology in ire-1 mutant animals, although not as efficiently as the full length transgene (Fig 3D). In contrast, expression of the ribonuclease-deficient mutant version IRE-1K853A, affecting a highly conserved residue in the putative nuclease active site [46] and completely devoid of any detectable xbp-1 splicing activity (Fig 3E), failed to rescue PVD arbor morphology in ire-1 mutant animals (Fig 3D). This implies that IRE-1 nuclease activity is necessary for dendrite morphogenesis. In addition, we expressed IRE-1L589G, an IRE-1 transgene harboring a mutation analogous to the yeast ire1p mutation L745G, which alters the specificity of the ATP binding site in the kinase domain of the protein [47]. In contrast to the yeast studies, the ribonuclease activity of IRE-1L589G appeared intact in an xbp-1 splicing assay (Fig 3E). We found that expression of IRE-1L589G also rescued the arborization defects in PVD sensory dendrites (Fig 3D). Collectively, our rescue studies show that PVD development requires the ribonuclease activity of IRE-1. This conclusion is consistent with the defective PVD arborization phenotype previously observed in ire-1(wy762) mutants, in which a conserved residue in the endoribonuclease domain of the protein has been altered [37]. In addition, kinase activity is likely required, because three mutant alleles of ire-1 (dz176, zc14, this study; wy782, [37]) that result in substitutions of distinct conserved residues in the kinase domain of the protein, display a defective PVD arborization phenotype.

Fig 3. IRE-1 requires its nuclease activity independently of canonical UPR pathways.

A–B. Fluorescent micrographs of mutant animals with tracings (right panels) of the genotypes indicated. Anterior is to the left and ventral down in all images. Arrowheads indicate the PVD axons and scale bars 20 μm. C. Quantification of animals with PVD defects in animals of the indicated genotypes. D. Structure function analyses of ire-1(ok799) mutant animals with the constructs as indicated. All constructs were transgenically expressed under control of the heterologous pan-neuronal Prgef-1 promoter. Transgenic (T) and non-transgenic siblings (NT) were analyzed in parallel in different transgenic lines (L1, L2, etc.). tm: transmembrane domain. E. xbp-1 splicing assay using RNA from the genotypes indicated (see Materials and Methods for details). Successful splicing is evidenced by the presence of a band that is slightly smaller (237 nt) than the unspliced band (260 nt), both indicated by black arrowheads. The size of selected bands in a molecular marker is shown. F. Quantification of animals with PVD defects in animals of the indicated genotypes.

PVD dendritic branching is independent of xbp-1

In addition to IRE-1, metazoans have at least two distinct additional sensors of ER stress, the pek-1/PERK kinase and the atf-6/ATF6 transcription factor [48]. Interestingly, PVD development proceeds normally in pek-1/PERK and atf-6/ATF6 mutants, demonstrating that they do not individually serve a critical role in PVD dendrite morphogenesis, and pointing at a unique function of IRE-1 (Fig 3A and 3C)[37].

To gain insight in the downstream effectors of IRE-1 signaling, we focused on the processing of xbp-1 mRNA through unconventional splicing by IRE-1, the best known activity of IRE-1 [27, 28]. Interestingly, two different xbp-1 mutant alleles, zc12 and tm2457 displayed a PVD arbor that was indistinguishable from wild type animals (Fig 3B and 3C), suggesting that IRE-1 can function through xbp-1-independent activities in patterning PVD dendrites.

Known xbp-1-independent functions of ire-1 include activation of the TRAF2 and JNK kinase signaling cascade [30, 49], and degradation of ER-localized mRNAs that encode secreted and membrane proteins through the RIDD (regulated Ire1-dependent decay) pathway [35]. We found that PVD arborization remained normal upon depletion of the C. elegans TRAF2 homolog trf-1 or concomitant depletion of all three C. elegans jnk-1-related kinases (Fig 3F) suggesting that neither pathway plays non-redundant roles in PVD morphogenesis. To directly explore whether RIDD is the mechanism by which IRE-1 controls PVD arborization, we sought another way to maintain RIDD activity in ire-1 mutants while compromising xbp-1 splicing activity. A mutation in the yeast yIre1 protein, R1087D, uncouples the two nuclease activities of ire1p in yeast by impairing xbp-1 splicing while leaving RIDD activity intact [36]. The analogous mutation in worms, IRE-1R882D, failed to rescue PVD architecture (Fig 3D). Since xbp-1 function is not required for PVD morphogenesis, we suggest that C. elegans IRE-1R882D mutant protein may not discriminate between xbp-1-related and unrelated nuclease activities. Thus, among the known xbp-1 independent activities of IRE-1, RIDD remains the most likely to mediate PVD dendrite arborization. This conclusion supports experiments where mosaic knock out of an essential xrn-1 RNA endonuclease, believed to be part of the RIDD pathway, produced low penetrance defects in PVD neurons [37].

The neuronal receptor DMA-1 mislocalizes to the PVD cell body in ire-1 mutants

Recently, it was shown that even under normal growth conditions (i.e. without artificially-induced ER stress) ire-1 mutants display defects in the metabolism of secretory proteins [29]. One central protein located on the cell membrane of PVD and essential for proper dendrite branching is the DMA-1 leucine rich repeat transmembrane receptor [12]. In concordance with a recent report [37] we found that a DMA-1::GFP reporter primarily localized to the cell body of ire-1 mutant animals (Fig 4B and 4E). In contrast, in wild-type animals, the DMA-1::GFP reporter localized both to the cell body as well as to the entire PVD arbor, throughout the primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary branches (Fig 4A and 4E). Importantly, although the primary branch of the PVD dendrite is always present and extends along the body of ire-1-deficient animals (Fig 1A), DMA-1::GFP expression was restricted to the cell body and was not detected on the plasma membrane of the primary branch of PVD (Fig 4B). This suggests that DMA-1 is specifically required for patterning of the secondary, tertiary and quaternary branches in ire-1-deficient animals. This further suggests that the DMA-1::GFP localization defect in ire-1 mutants precedes the PVD patterning defect. Collectively, these observations suggest that DMA-1 fails to shuttle properly through the secretory pathway, resulting in patterning defects of higher order branches of the PVD dendrite.

Fig 4. Reducing DAF-2/IIS signaling mitigates the secretory block in ire-1 mutant animals.

A–D. Fluorescent micrographs of animals transgenically expressing a translational DMA-1::GFP fusion [12] in the genotypes indicated. Anterior is to the left in all panels and ventral down. Arrowheads indicate the PVD cell body and scale bars 20 μm. E. Quantification of mean fluorescent intensity of the PVD cell body in different genetic backgrounds. F. Quantification of defects in PVD in animals in the indicated genotypes. G. Quantification of branch number in daf-2(e1370), ire-1(ok799), dma-1(tm5159) single-, double- and triple-mutant animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey correction, and statistical significance is indicated (*p = 0.05, **p = 0.01, ***p = 0.001, ****p = 0.0001; ns, not significant [p > 0.05]). n = 20 wild-type controls (1295 dendritic branches), n = 20 daf-2(e1370)mutant animals (1046 dendritic branches), n = 20 ire-1(ok799) mutant animals (489 dendritic branches), n = 20 dma-1(tm5159) mutant animals (381 dendritic branches), n = 20 ire-1(ok799); daf-2(e1370) mutant animals (1100 dendritic branches), n = 19 dma-1(tm5159); ire-1(ok799); daf-2(e1370) mutant animals (470 dendritic branches). Data for wild-type control and ire-1(ok799) animals are identical to those in Fig 1 and are shown for comparison only.

Intriguingly, xbp-1 mutants displayed completely normal DMA-1::GFP staining of the entire PVD dendrite similar to wild-type animals (Fig 4C), and did not accumulate DMA-1::GFP in the soma like ire-1 mutants (Fig 4E). The proper localization of DMA-1::GFP in xbp-1 mutants contrasts with its mislocalization in ire-1 mutants (Fig 4A–4C and 4E), but is consistent with the PVD arborization architecture seen in the respective mutants (Fig 3A–3C). This finding was surprising, given that loss of xbp-1 has been shown to perturb ER homeostasis and interfere with secretory protein metabolism [29]. Based on the trafficking defects in ire-1 mutant animals, and the finding that the basal activity of the UPR in PVD itself is largely dependent on DMA-1 expression, it has been suggested that the failure of DMA-1::GFP to reach the plasma membrane is a consequence of a folding challenge of DMA-1 itself [37]. However, we point out that although in many cases functional xbp-1 is also required for the trafficking and maturation of other secreted and transmembrane proteins [29, 50], it was not required for DMA-1 trafficking to the plasma membrane, and PVD morphogenesis is normal in xbp-1 mutants. Thus, DMA-1 can traffic to the plasma membrane and support PVD dendrite morphogenesis even under the unfavorable proteostatic conditions in the ER of xbp-1-deficient animals. This suggests that DMA-1 may not have an intrinsic tendency to fold improperly and that the DMA-1 trafficking defect is more likely a reflection of a general overload and perturbed function of the ER in the PVD neuron that lacks ire-1. A possible explanation for the differences between ire-1 mutants and xbp-1 mutants is that ER homeostasis and function is less compromised in xbp-1-deficient animals compared to ire-1-deficient animals [29]. Thus, the DMA-1-dependent activation of the UPR in PVD suggested by Wei et al. [37] may be an indirect consequence of DMA-1 promoting dendrite morphogenesis and expansion, both of which require the synthesis of membranes proteins and lipids and impose a significant biosynthetic load on the ER. This ‘capacity model’ is also consistent with the observation that overexpression of spliced xbp-1 or its target, the ER-localized heat shock protein HSP-4/BiP/grp78 can bypass the requirement for ire-1 and rescue the morphological defects and the DMA-1::GFP secretion defects in ire-1 mutants [37]. Altogether, our report adds to a growing number of recent works delineating an xbp-1-independent branch of the ire-1 pathway [29, 35, 40, 51, 52].

Reduced insulin/IGF-1 signaling suppresses the PVD defects of ire-1 mutants

If the failure to form menorahs in ire-1 mutants is a result of a block in the secretory pathway in the PVD neuron then conditions that release the secretory block in ire-1 mutants should restore PVD arborization. One way to overcome the secretory block in ire-1 mutants is by activating the FOXO transcription factor DAF-16, which is inhibited by the insulin/IGF-1 signaling (IIS) pathway [52]. Indeed, reducing IIS in animals through a mutation in their daf-2 gene, the only insulin-like growth factor receptor in C. elegans, resulted in reduced accumulation of DMA-1::GFP in the cell body and redistribution to the plasma membrane of PVD in ire-1 mutants (Fig 4D and 4E). Consistent with the restored localization of DMA-1::GFP expression pattern in the PVD neuron, we found that PVD dendrite morphogenesis defects in ire-1; daf-2 double mutants were completely reversed and PVD arbors of double mutants were indistinguishable from wild type animals (Fig 4F). This finding was further corroborated by morphometric analyses. We found that the reduced length of secondary, tertiary and quaternary branches in ire-1 mutants was suppressed upon reduced DAF-2/IIS signaling (Fig 4G). Moreover, this suppression was largely (although not completely) dma-1-dependent, because dma-1 appeared epistatic in a dma-1; ire-1; daf-2 triple mutant (Fig 4G).

The physiological consequence of reduced DAF-2/IIS signaling, including improving ER homeostasis in ire-1-deficient animals [52], in many cases depends on the activation of the transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO. We found that daf-16; ire-1; daf-2 triple mutant animals showed the same frequency of PVD defects as ire-1 single mutants, indicating that the suppression of defects in ire-1 mutants by loss of daf-2 insulin signaling was entirely dependent on daf-16 activation (Fig 4F). In other words, the defects in dendrite morphogenesis of ire-1 mutants can be rescued by compromising DAF-2/IIS signaling in a daf-16/FOXO-dependent manner.

Our finding that trafficking of a DMA-1::GFP reporter is restored in daf-2/IIS mutants suggests that (1) different approaches can be used to relieve the secretory block in ire-1 mutants, and (2) are consistent with previous observations that attenuation of IIS can result in favorable effects on proteostasis, ER homeostasis, organismal health and survival in C. elegans, as well as other organisms [53, 54]. Similarly, activation of the IIS regulated transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO3A in ire-1-deficient cells can bypass the requirement of the canonical ire-1/xbp-1 pathway for the maintenance of ER homeostasis, and improve both ER homeostasis and restoration of normal secretory protein trafficking in worms and mammalian cells [52]. Thus, our findings may provide a mechanistic explanation for observations in several studies showing that neurons grow and function better under reduced IIS conditions [5557], and expands this notion to include dendritic arbor morphogenesis. Since the improvement on DMA-1::GFP trafficking and dendrite morphology were dependent on activation of the DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor, the activation of this pathway by alternative cues including starvation as well as a variety of cytotoxic stresses (e.g. heat-shock and oxidative stresses), which directly or indirectly activate DAF-16, hold the potential to recover PVD dendrite morphogenesis in the absence of a properly functioning UPR.

In summary, our results establish that the function of the IRE-1 UPR sensor in neuronal patterning is conserved from invertebrates to mammals. Our findings demonstrate that promoting ER homeostasis, e.g. by reducing IIS, can overcome morphological defects in neuronal patterning. This underscores the importance of discovering and investigating new approaches that can bypass excessive ER stress. Given the conservation of the role of the UPR in dendrite branching and morphogenesis from C. elegans to mammals, as well as the conservation of the proteostasis-promoting effects of the IIS pathway, these findings may offer novel approaches for treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.

Materials and Methods

Strains and genetics

Worms were grown on OP50 Escherichia coli-seeded nematode growth medium plates at 20°C. Strains used in this work include: N2 (wild type reference), ire-1(dz176), ire-1(ok799), ire-1(zc14), xbp-1(tm2457), xbp-1(zc12), pek-1(ok275), atf-6(ok551), daf-2(e1370), daf-16(mu86), trf-1(nr2014), kgb-1(um3) kgb-2(gk361) jnk-1(gk7). PVD neurons were visualized by the integrated transgene wdIs52 (Is[F49H12.4::GFP]). Transgenic strains for cell-specific rescue were established by injecting the respective plasmids at 5–10 ng/μl together with rol-6(su1006) or Pttx-3::mCherry (labeling the interneuron AIY) at 50 ng/μl as an injection marker into ire-1(ok799); wdIs52. The PVD::DMA-1::GFP translational fusion was a kind gift of K. Shen (Stanford U, California). For a complete strain list see Supporting Information.

Molecular cloning

The ire-1 cDNA was amplified with gene specific primers from a N2 mixed stage cDNA sample and cloned KpnI/SphI downstream of the Pttx-3promB regulatory element [58]. For the cell specific heterologous rescue the ire-1 cDNA was placed under control of the Pdpy-7 (hypodermis-specific), Pmyo-3 (muscle), Pges-1 (intestine), Prgef-1 (pan-neuronal) or Pser-2prom3 promoter (PVD/OLL specific). For further details see Supporting Information.

xbp-1 splicing

On day 1 of adulthood, animals were collected for RNA extraction, purification and reverse transcription, using random 9-mers and standard protocol. A primers set encompassing the noncanonical intron of the xbp-1 transcript was used, giving rise to two PCR products of amplified spliced and unspliced xbp-1 transcript (primers: 5’- TCCGCTTGGGCTCTTGAGATGTTC-3’ and 5’-TGTCGTCGTCGGAGGAGAGGATCG- 3’). PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

Fluorescence microscopy and quantification

Images of immobilized animals (1–5 mM levamisol, Sigma) were captured using either a Zeiss Axioimager Z1 Apotome at 40X, where Z stacks were collected and maximum projections were used for imaging of dendrites, or with a CCD digital camera using a Nikon 90i fluorescence microscope at 20X magnification. For DMA-1::GFP signal quantification the NIS element software was used to quantify sum and mean fluorescence intensity as measured by intensity of each pixel in the selected area.

Dissociated hippocampal cultures

Hippocampal neurons were prepared from rats at E18 as previously described [59] with modifications. In brief, dissected hippocampi were incubated in 0.05% trypsin at 37°C for 20 minutes (Invitrogen 25300054) and plated at a density of 60,000 cells per 12 mm coverslip coated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma P1274). Cells were incubated in a cell culture incubator maintained at 37°C with 5.0% CO2. Cytosine arabinoside (ara-c, Sigma C1768) was added at a final concentration of 2 μM at 2 days in vitro (DIV) to prevent glia cell overgrowth before being replaced with Neurobasal without ara-c at 4DIV. Neurons were transfected at 5-6DIV using Lipofectamine LTX and Plus Reagent (ThermoFisher). For cytoplasmic labeling of neurons to visualize dendrites, 60,000 cells were transfected with 0.25 μg pCAGGS-mCherry [60]. Neurons were treated at 8DIV with IRE-1 RNAse inhibitor 4μ8C (EMD Millipore 412512). 4μ8C was first dissolved in DMSO (Invitrogen) and diluted in supplemented Neurobasal. Diluted 4μ8C at 100 μM was added to cultures at 1:1 with conditioned neural media with final concentrations of 50 μM 4μ8C and 0.5% DMSO. Additional 4μ8C was added to neurons at 10DIV resulting in a final concentrations of 37.5 μM 4μ8C and 0.5% DMSO. Vehicle neurons were treated in identical ways using media containing DMSO only.

Immunostaining, imaging, and analysis of dissociated hippocampal cultures

At 8 or 12 DIV coverslips with neurons were quickly washed two times with PBS, followed by fixation for 15 min with 4% PFA / 4% sucrose in PBS at RT. Cells were blocked and permeabilized with 3% horse serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h at RT. Cells were incubated with antibodies against mCherry (Rockland 600-401-379) at 4°C overnight. The next day cells were washed three times with PBS and labeled with AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen; 1:500) for 1 hr at RT. Cells were washed three times with PBS, stained with DAPI, and mounted on slides Aqua-Mount mounting media (Thermo Scientific). Tiled images of dendritic arbors were acquired using a Keyence BZ-X710 Fluorescence Microscope equipped with a Nikon 60X oil-immersion 1.40 NA objective. Merged composite images of the individually acquired tiled images were generated using Keyence software. Dendritic arbors were traced using the NeuronJ plugin for ImageJ [61]. Total dendritic branch length was calculated as the sum of the length of all dendrites. Average dendrite branch length is average length of each dendritic branch excluding primary dendrites, as primary dendrite lengths are highly variable across neurons. All images were acquired and all analysis was performed with the experimenter blind to conditions. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.

Statistical analysis

Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least 3 independent experiments. P values were calculated using the unpaired Student's t test, or one-way ANOVA with the Tukey correction for multiple comparisons (GraphPad Prism 6).

Supporting Information

S1 Supporting Information. This contains a complete strain list, as well as additional details with regard to the construction DNA constructs and transgenic strains.


S1 Fig. IRE-1 functions cell-autonomously to pattern sensory dendrites.

  1. A.–B. Fluorescent micrographs of PVD in non-transgenic ire-1(dz176) mutants (A) and in ire-1(dz176) mutants harboring a transgene with a fosmid that contains the wild type ire-1 locus. PVD visualized by the wdIs52 transgene (Is[F49H12.9::GFP]. Arrowheads indicate cell bodies. Anterior is to the left in all panels and ventral down; scale bars indicate 20 μm.
  2. C. Quantification of defects in the genotypes indicated. Defects are defined as absence of complete menorah-like dendrites between the vulva and the anterior end of the animals.
  3. D. Quantification of PVD defects in mutant ire-1(ok799) animals using transgenic rescue of ire-1 driven by tissue specific heterologous promoters (Prgef-1: pan neuronal expression, Pges-1: intestinal expression, Pdpy-7: hypodermal expression and Pser-2prom3 short: expression in the PVD and OLL neurons). Transgenic animals (T) and non-transgenic animals (NT) are shown side by side.
  4. E. Quantification of secondary, tertiary, and quaternary branch aggregate length. Data are represented as mean ± SEM.



We thank members of the Henis-Korenblit and Bülow laboratories for comments on the manuscript and for discussions during the course of this work; S. Mitani (National Bioresource Project for the nematode, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Japan) and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC) and K. Shen for strains.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: YS SHK HEB.
  2. Formal analysis: YS SHK HEB AJC TB.
  3. Funding acquisition: TB SHK HEB.
  4. Investigation: YS AJC KC MCB.
  5. Methodology: YS SHK HEB AJC TB.
  6. Project administration: TB SHK HEB.
  7. Supervision: TB SHK HEB.
  8. Validation: YS AJC KC MCB.
  9. Visualization: YS SHK HEB AJC.
  10. Writing – original draft: YS SHK HEB.
  11. Writing – review & editing: YS SHK HEB AJC TB.


  1. 1. Hall DH, Treinin M. How does morphology relate to function in sensory arbors? Trends Neurosci. 2011;34(9):443–51. Epub 2011/08/16. pmid:21840610
  2. 2. Dierssen M, Ramakers GJ. Dendritic pathology in mental retardation: from molecular genetics to neurobiology. Genes Brain Behav. 2006;5 Suppl 2:48–60.
  3. 3. Kulkarni VA, Firestein BL. The dendritic tree and brain disorders. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2012;50(1):10–20. pmid:22465229
  4. 4. Cochran JN, Hall AM, Roberson ED. The dendritic hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. Brain Res Bull. 2014;103:18–28. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3989444. pmid:24333192
  5. 5. Urbanska M, Blazejczyk M, Jaworski J. Molecular basis of dendritic arborization. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2008;68(2):264–88.
  6. 6. Jan YN, Jan LY. Branching out: mechanisms of dendritic arborization. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(5):316–28. Epub 2010/04/21. pmid:20404840
  7. 7. Dong X, Shen K, Bülow HE. Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of dendritic morphogenesis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2015;77:271–300. pmid:25386991
  8. 8. Singhania A, Grueber WB. Development of the embryonic and larval peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2014;3(3):193–210. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4318504. pmid:24896657
  9. 9. Albeg A, Smith CJ, Chatzigeorgiou M, Feitelson DG, Hall DH, Schafer WR, et al. C. elegans multi-dendritic sensory neurons: morphology and function. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2011;46(1):308–17. Epub 2010/10/26. pmid:20971193
  10. 10. Smith CJ, Watson JD, Spencer WC, O'Brien T, Cha B, Albeg A, et al. Time-lapse imaging and cell-specific expression profiling reveal dynamic branching and molecular determinants of a multi-dendritic nociceptor in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2010;345(1):18–33. Epub 2010/06/12. pmid:20537990
  11. 11. Oren-Suissa M, Hall DH, Treinin M, Shemer G, Podbilewicz B. The fusogen EFF-1 controls sculpting of mechanosensory dendrites. Science. 2010;328(5983):1285–8. Epub 2010/05/08. pmid:20448153
  12. 12. Liu OW, Shen K. The transmembrane LRR protein DMA-1 promotes dendrite branching and growth in C. elegans. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(1):57–63. Epub 2011/12/06.
  13. 13. Salzberg Y, Diaz-Balzac CA, Ramirez-Suarez NJ, Attreed M, Tecle E, Desbois M, et al. Skin-Derived Cues Control Arborization of Sensory Dendrites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. 2013;155(2):308–20. pmid:24120132
  14. 14. Dong X, Liu OW, Howell AS, Shen K. An extracellular adhesion molecule complex patterns dendritic branching and morphogenesis. Cell. 2013;155(2):296–307. pmid:24120131
  15. 15. Díaz-Balzac CA, Rahman M, Lázaro-Peña MI, Martin Hernandez LA, Salzberg Y, Aguirre-Chen C, et al. Muscle- and Skin-Derived Cues Jointly Orchestrate Patterning of Somatosensory Dendrites. Curr Biol. 2016.
  16. 16. Zou W, Shen A, Dong X, Tugizova M, Xiang YK, Shen K. A multi-protein receptor-ligand complex underlies combinatorial dendrite guidance choices in C. elegans. Elife. 2016;5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5079751.
  17. 17. Schroeder NE, Androwski RJ, Rashid A, Lee H, Lee J, Barr MM. Dauer-specific dendrite arborization in C. elegans is regulated by KPC-1/Furin. Curr Biol. 2013;23(16):1527–35. pmid:23932402
  18. 18. Salzberg Y, Ramirez-Suarez NJ, Bülow HE. The proprotein convertase KPC-1/furin controls branching and self-avoidance of sensory dendrites in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(9):e1004657. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4169376. pmid:25232734
  19. 19. Dong X, Chiu H, Park YJ, Zou W, Zou Y, Ozkan E, et al. Precise regulation of the guidance receptor DMA-1 by KPC-1/Furin instructs dendritic branching decisions. Elife. 2016;5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4811766.
  20. 20. Lin JH, Walter P, Yen TS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:399–425. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3653419. pmid:18039139
  21. 21. Lindholm D, Wootz H, Korhonen L. ER stress and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(3):385–92. pmid:16397584
  22. 22. Yoshida H. ER stress and diseases. FEBS J. 2007;274(3):630–58. pmid:17288551
  23. 23. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(7):519–29. pmid:17565364
  24. 24. Welihinda AA, Kaufman RJ. The unfolded protein response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Oligomerization and trans-phosphorylation of Ire1p (Ern1p) are required for kinase activation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(30):18181–7. pmid:8663458
  25. 25. Zhou J, Liu CY, Back SH, Clark RL, Peisach D, Xu Z, et al. The crystal structure of human IRE1 luminal domain reveals a conserved dimerization interface required for activation of the unfolded protein response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(39):14343–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1566190. pmid:16973740
  26. 26. Li H, Korennykh AV, Behrman SL, Walter P. Mammalian endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1 signals by dynamic clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(37):16113–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2941319. pmid:20798350
  27. 27. Shen X, Ellis RE, Lee K, Liu CY, Yang K, Solomon A, et al. Complementary signaling pathways regulate the unfolded protein response and are required for C. elegans development. Cell. 2001;107(7):893–903. pmid:11779465
  28. 28. Calfon M, Zeng H, Urano F, Till JH, Hubbard SR, Harding HP, et al. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature. 2002;415(6867):92–6. Epub 2002/01/10. pmid:11780124
  29. 29. Safra M, Ben-Hamo S, Kenyon C, Henis-Korenblit S. The ire-1 ER stress-response pathway is required for normal secretory-protein metabolism in C. elegans. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 18):4136–46. Epub 2013/07/12. pmid:23843615
  30. 30. Urano F, Wang X, Bertolotti A, Zhang Y, Chung P, Harding HP, et al. Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1. Science. 2000;287(5453):664–6. pmid:10650002
  31. 31. Yoneda T, Imaizumi K, Oono K, Yui D, Gomi F, Katayama T, et al. Activation of caspase-12, an endoplastic reticulum (ER) resident caspase, through tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2-dependent mechanism in response to the ER stress. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(17):13935–40. pmid:11278723
  32. 32. Levi-Ferber M, Salzberg Y, Safra M, Haviv-Chesner A, Bülow HE, Henis-Korenblit S. It's all in your mind: determining germ cell fate by neuronal IRE-1 in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(10):e1004747. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4207656. pmid:25340700
  33. 33. Ogata M, Hino S, Saito A, Morikawa K, Kondo S, Kanemoto S, et al. Autophagy is activated for cell survival after endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(24):9220–31. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1698520. pmid:17030611
  34. 34. Hourihan JM, Moronetti Mazzeo LE, Fernandez-Cardenas LP, Blackwell TK. Cysteine Sulfenylation Directs IRE-1 to Activate the SKN-1/Nrf2 Antioxidant Response. Mol Cell. 2016;63(4):553–66. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4996358. pmid:27540856
  35. 35. Hollien J, Weissman JS. Decay of endoplasmic reticulum-localized mRNAs during the unfolded protein response. Science. 2006;313(5783):104–7. pmid:16825573
  36. 36. Tam AB, Koong AC, Niwa M. Ire1 has distinct catalytic mechanisms for XBP1/HAC1 splicing and RIDD. Cell Rep. 2014;9(3):850–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4486022. pmid:25437541
  37. 37. Wei X, Howell AS, Dong X, Taylor CA, Cooper RC, Zhang J, et al. The unfolded protein response is required for dendrite morphogenesis. Elife. 2015;4:e06963. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4484204. pmid:26052671
  38. 38. Cross BC, Bond PJ, Sadowski PG, Jha BK, Zak J, Goodman JM, et al. The molecular basis for selective inhibition of unconventional mRNA splicing by an IRE1-binding small molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(15):E869–78. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3326519. pmid:22315414
  39. 39. Cheadle L, Biederer T. Activity-dependent regulation of dendritic complexity by semaphorin 3A through Farp1. J Neurosci. 2014;34(23):7999–8009. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4044256. pmid:24899721
  40. 40. Osorio F, Tavernier SJ, Hoffmann E, Saeys Y, Martens L, Vetters J, et al. The unfolded-protein-response sensor IRE-1alpha regulates the function of CD8alpha+ dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15(3):248–57. pmid:24441789
  41. 41. Iwawaki T, Akai R, Kohno K. IRE1alpha disruption causes histological abnormality of exocrine tissues, increase of blood glucose level, and decrease of serum immunoglobulin level. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):e13052. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2946364. pmid:20885949
  42. 42. Hur KY, So JS, Ruda V, Frank-Kamenetsky M, Fitzgerald K, Koteliansky V, et al. IRE1alpha activation protects mice against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. J Exp Med. 2012;209(2):307–18. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3280871. pmid:22291093
  43. 43. Reimold AM, Iwakoshi NN, Manis J, Vallabhajosyula P, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E, Gravallese EM, et al. Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP-1. Nature. 2001;412(6844):300–7. pmid:11460154
  44. 44. Lee AH, Chu GC, Iwakoshi NN, Glimcher LH. XBP-1 is required for biogenesis of cellular secretory machinery of exocrine glands. EMBO J. 2005;24(24):4368–80. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1356340. pmid:16362047
  45. 45. Gardner BM, Walter P. Unfolded proteins are Ire1-activating ligands that directly induce the unfolded protein response. Science. 2011;333(6051):1891–4. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3202989. pmid:21852455
  46. 46. Lee KP, Dey M, Neculai D, Cao C, Dever TE, Sicheri F. Structure of the dual enzyme Ire1 reveals the basis for catalysis and regulation in nonconventional RNA splicing. Cell. 2008;132(1):89–100. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2276645. pmid:18191223
  47. 47. Papa FR, Zhang C, Shokat K, Walter P. Bypassing a kinase activity with an ATP-competitive drug. Science. 2003;302(5650):1533–7. Epub 2003/10/18. pmid:14564015
  48. 48. Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011;334(6059):1081–6. pmid:22116877
  49. 49. Oh SW, Mukhopadhyay A, Svrzikapa N, Jiang F, Davis RJ, Tissenbaum HA. JNK regulates lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans by modulating nuclear translocation of forkhead transcription factor/DAF-16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(12):4494–9. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC555525. pmid:15767565
  50. 50. Shim J, Umemura T, Nothstein E, Rongo C. The unfolded protein response regulates glutamate receptor export from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(11):4818–28. Epub 2004/08/20. pmid:15317844
  51. 51. Coelho Dina S, Cairrão F, Zeng X, Pires E, Coelho Ana V, Ron D, et al. Xbp1-Independent Ire1 Signaling Is Required for Photoreceptor Differentiation and Rhabdomere Morphogenesis in Drosophila. Cell Reports. 2013;(0).
  52. 52. Safra M, Fickentscher R, Levi-Ferber M, Danino YM, Haviv-Chesner A, Hansen M, et al. The FOXO transcription factor DAF-16 bypasses ire-1 requirement to promote endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2014;20(5):870–81. pmid:25448701
  53. 53. Neri C. Role and Therapeutic Potential of the Pro-Longevity Factor FOXO and Its Regulators in Neurodegenerative Disease. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:15. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3281233. pmid:22363285
  54. 54. Henis-Korenblit S, Zhang P, Hansen M, McCormick M, Lee SJ, Cary M, et al. Insulin/IGF-1 signaling mutants reprogram ER stress response regulators to promote longevity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(21):9730–5. Epub 2010/05/13. pmid:20460307
  55. 55. Cohen E, Du D, Joyce D, Kapernick EA, Volovik Y, Kelly JW, et al. Temporal requirements of insulin/IGF-1 signaling for proteotoxicity protection. Aging Cell. 2010;9(2):126–34. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3026833. pmid:20003171
  56. 56. Scerbak C, Vayndorf EM, Parker JA, Neri C, Driscoll M, Taylor BE. Insulin signaling in the aging of healthy and proteotoxically stressed mechanosensory neurons. Front Genet. 2014;5:212. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4107846. pmid:25101108
  57. 57. Byrne AB, Walradt T, Gardner KE, Hubbert A, Reinke V, Hammarlund M. Insulin/IGF1 signaling inhibits age-dependent axon regeneration. Neuron. 2014;81(3):561–73. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3924874. pmid:24440228
  58. 58. Altun-Gultekin Z, Andachi Y, Tsalik EL, Pilgrim D, Kohara Y, Hobert O. A regulatory cascade of three homeobox genes, ceh-10, ttx-3 and ceh-23, controls cell fate specification of a defined interneuron class in C. elegans. Development. 2001;128(11):1951–69. pmid:11493519
  59. 59. Kaech S, Banker G. Culturing hippocampal neurons. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2406–15. pmid:17406484
  60. 60. Stagi M, Fogel AI, Biederer T. SynCAM 1 participates in axo-dendritic contact assembly and shapes neuronal growth cones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(16):7568–73. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2867738. pmid:20368431
  61. 61. Meijering E, Jacob M, Sarria JC, Steiner P, Hirling H, Unser M. Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry A. 2004;58(2):167–76. pmid:15057970