The key molecular event that marks entry into the cell cycle is transcription of G1 cyclins, which bind and activate cyclin-dependent kinases. In yeast cells, initiation of G1 cyclin transcription is linked to achievement of a critical cell size, which contributes to cell-size homeostasis. The critical cell size is modulated by nutrients, such that cells growing in poor nutrients are smaller than cells growing in rich nutrients. Nutrient modulation of cell size does not work through known critical regulators of G1 cyclin transcription and is therefore thought to work through a distinct pathway. Here, we report that Rts1, a highly conserved regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), is required for normal control of G1 cyclin transcription. Loss of Rts1 caused delayed initiation of bud growth and delayed and reduced accumulation of G1 cyclins. Expression of the G1 cyclin CLN2 from an inducible promoter rescued the delayed bud growth in rts1Δ cells, indicating that Rts1 acts at the level of transcription. Moreover, loss of Rts1 caused altered regulation of Swi6, a key component of the SBF transcription factor that controls G1 cyclin transcription. Epistasis analysis revealed that Rts1 does not work solely through several known critical upstream regulators of G1 cyclin transcription. Cells lacking Rts1 failed to undergo nutrient modulation of cell size. Together, these observations demonstrate that Rts1 is a key player in pathways that link nutrient availability, cell size, and G1 cyclin transcription. Since Rts1 is highly conserved, it may function in similar pathways in vertebrates.
A critical point in the cell cycle occurs in G1 phase, when cells must decide whether to enter a new round of cell division. At this time, cells assess nutrient availability to ensure that they have sufficient resources to complete cell growth and division. Vertebrate cells also assess growth factors that control cell growth and determine when and where cell division occurs in the context of a multi-cellular organism. A cell-size checkpoint acts during G1 to delay entry into the cell cycle if the cell is below a critical size. When the appropriate signals have been received, cells commit to entry into the cell cycle by initiating transcription of G1 cyclins. The mechanisms that integrate external signals, cell growth, cell size, and entry into the cell cycle are poorly understood and represent a fundamental unsolved problem in cell biology. We discovered that a specific form of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2ARts1) functions in the pathways that integrate nutrient availability, cell size, and entry into the cell cycle. PP2ARts1 is highly conserved and may therefore carry out similar functions in all eukaryotic cells.
Citation: Artiles K, Anastasia S, McCusker D, Kellogg DR (2009) The Rts1 Regulatory Subunit of Protein Phosphatase 2A Is Required for Control of G1 Cyclin Transcription and Nutrient Modulation of Cell Size. PLoS Genet 5(11): e1000727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000727
Editor: Orna Cohen-Fix, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, United States of America
Received: December 23, 2008; Accepted: October 16, 2009; Published: November 13, 2009
Copyright: © 2009 Artiles et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by NIH R01 GM063657. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Entry into the cell cycle is initiated by G1 cyclins, which bind and activate cyclin-dependent kinases . There are two cyclin-dependent kinases in budding yeast that function during G1, called Cdk1 and Pho85, which are activated by numerous different G1 cyclins . Cdk1 is activated by the cyclins Cln1, Cln2, and Cln3, while Pho85 is activated by Pcl1 and Pcl2, as well as by additional cyclins that do not appear to directly regulate G1 events. The G1 cyclins are redundant: cells lacking any two of the cyclins Cln1, Cln2 or Cln3 are viable, but loss of all three cyclins is lethal ,. Similarly, cells lacking Cln1 and Cln2 or Pcl1 and Pcl2 are viable, but loss of all four cyclins is lethal ,. The cyclin Cln3 plays a role in triggering transcription of a suite of genes required for initiation of G1 events, including the genes for Cln1, Cln2, and Pcl1, which are often referred to as late G1 cyclins –. Transcription of the late G1 cyclins is generally considered to be the key molecular event that marks entry into the cell cycle ,. The late G1 cyclins initiate growth of a new daughter bud and are also required for polar growth after bud emergence ,.
Production of late G1 cyclins is tightly regulated. Cyclin mRNA and protein undergo rapid turnover, so mechanisms that act at the level of transcription play an important role –. Transcription of G1-specific genes, including the late G1 cyclin genes, is dependent upon the SBF and MBF transcription factors. SBF and MBF each include a distinct DNA binding subunit, called Swi4 and Mbp1, respectively, and a shared subunit called Swi6. SBF and MBF are kept inactive early in the cell cycle by a repressor called Whi5 ,. Loss of Whi5 causes transcription of late G1 cyclins to occur before the mother cell has completed growth, leading to premature bud emergence and a reduced cell size. Cdk1/Cln3 triggers transcription of late G1 cyclins by phosphorylating and inactivating Whi5. Transcription of late G1 cyclins can also be triggered by a redundant Cln3-independent pathway that is dependent upon the Bck2 protein –. The late G1 cyclin Cln2 promotes its own transcription via a positive feedback loop, which ensures that initiation of G1 events occurs in a coordinated, switch-like manner ,,.
Mechanisms that control G1 cyclin transcription play an important role in control of cell size. A cell size checkpoint links initiation of G1 cyclin transcription to cell size. Thus, transcription of late G1 cyclins is only initiated when the mother cell has reached a critical size, which contributes to cell size homeostasis. An interesting property of cell size control in yeast is that the critical cell size is modulated by external nutrients, such that cells growing in poor nutrients are significantly smaller than cells growing in rich nutrients ,. It is thought that nutrients modulate cell size by rapidly changing the critical cell size for initiation of G1 cyclin transcription .
The mechanisms that link initiation of G1 cyclin transcription to cell size and nutrient availability are unknown. Interestingly, cln3Δ bck2Δ whi5Δ triple mutants, which lack all upstream regulators known to play an important role in the control of G1 cyclin transcription, undergo normal nutrient modulation of cell size . Thus, the signals that control cell size by linking G1 cyclin transcription to nutrient availability must act by a different mechanism. The mechanisms that link G1 cyclin transcription to cell size and nutrient availability are likely to be a key to understanding cell size control.
Here, we report that a specific form of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is required for control of G1 cyclin transcription and nutrient modulation of cell size. PP2A is a trimeric complex that consists of a catalytic “C” subunit, a scaffolding “A” subunit, and a regulatory “B” subunit . Binding of different B-type regulatory subunits is thought to direct PP2A activity toward different substrates. Thus, the key to understanding PP2A is to understand the function and regulation of specific regulatory subunits. In budding yeast, two B subunits called Cdc55 and Rts1 bind to PP2A in a mutually exclusive manner, forming two distinct PP2A complexes: PP2ACdc55 and PP2ARts1 ,.
We discovered a role for Rts1 in controlling G1 cyclin levels while characterizing a genetic interaction between RTS1 and the septin CDC12. The septins are a conserved family of proteins that localize to the site of bud emergence in early G1 and to the bud neck during bud growth and cytokinesis . The septins have been proposed to form a diffusion barrier between the mother and daughter cell, to serve as a signaling scaffold for activation of kinases, or to carry out functions in the secretory pathway. Temperature sensitive alleles of the septins cause cells to undergo a prolonged delay at G2/M while undergoing continuous polarized growth, leading to the formation of highly elongated cells . The G2/M arrest is mediated by Swe1, the budding yeast Wee1 homolog, which phosphorylates and inhibits Cdk1 to delay entry into mitosis . The G2/M delay and the elongated cell phenotype are eliminated by swe1Δ. A number of kinases have been identified that regulate septin function and localization, and may in turn be regulated by the septins –. These kinases include Elm1, Gin4, Cla4, and Hsl1. Loss of these kinases can cause a Swe1-dependent G2/M delay and an elongated cell phenotype similar to septin mutants.
Previous work found that rts1Δ increased the restrictive temperature of the cdc12-6 allele . Loss of RTS1 also caused altered septin ring dynamics; however, it remained unclear whether the observed changes in septin ring dynamics were sufficient to explain the rescue of the cdc12-6 temperature sensitive phenotype. For example, it was possible that in addition to regulating septin ring dynamics, Rts1 played additional roles in pathways that promote polar growth or Swe1-dependent G2/M delays. We therefore further investigated the role of Rts1 in polar cell growth and cell cycle progression.
Loss of the PP2A regulatory subunit Rts1 reduces polar growth caused by loss of septin function
Since rts1Δ suppressed the temperature sensitivity of cdc12-6, we tested whether rts1Δ also suppressed the elongated cell phenotype of these cells. We found that rts1Δ cdc12-6 cells showed reduced elongation compared with cdc12-6 cells when shifted to 30°C (Figure 1A). In addition, rts1Δ significantly reduced the elongated cell phenotype caused by loss of GIN4, ELM1, and CLA4 (Figure 1B).
(A) rts1Δ reduces the polar growth caused by inactivation of septins. Cells of the indicated genotypes were grown overnight to log phase at room temperature and then shifted to 30°C for 4 hours. (B) rts1Δ reduces the polar growth caused by inactivation of kinases that regulate the septins. Cells of the indicated genotypes were grown to log phase. The gin4Δ and gin4Δ rts1Δ cells were grown at room temperature, while the others were grown at 30°C. (C) rts1Δ does not eliminate the G2/M delay caused by elm1Δ. Wild type, elm1Δ, and elm1Δ rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest at 30°C. Samples were collected at 10 minute intervals and levels of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 were detected by Western blotting.
We next considered the possibility that rts1Δ rescued the elongated cell phenotype of these mutants by eliminating the Swe1-dependent G2/M delay. To test this, levels of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 were assayed by Western blotting during a synchronized cell cycle in wild type, elm1Δ, and elm1Δ rts1Δ cells (Figure 1C). As previously shown, elm1Δ cells underwent a prolonged G2/M delay with elevated Clb2 levels when compared to wild type cells . The prolonged G2/M delay was not eliminated by rts1Δ. Thus, although rts1Δ reduced the elongated cell phenotype caused by loss of CDC12, GIN4, CLA4, and ELM1, it did not appear to do so by reducing the Swe1-dependent G2/M delay.
Rts1 is required for the timely initiation and normal rate of polar cell growth
Since rts1Δ did not rescue the G2/M delay in elm1Δ cells, we considered the possibility that Rts1 plays a direct role in promoting polar growth. To test this, we utilized cells that over express SWE1 from the GAL1 promoter, which arrest at G2/M with high levels of G1 cyclins and undergo constitutive polar growth ,. Wild type or rts1Δ cells carrying GAL1-SWE1 were released from a G1 arrest in the presence of galactose to induce expression of SWE1. We then measured bud lengths at time intervals after induction of GAL1-SWE1 to determine the rate of polar bud growth. We found that polar bud growth in GAL1-SWE1 rts1Δ cells occurred at a slower rate than GAL1-SWE1 control cells (Figure 2A and 2B). Controls showed that wild type and rts1Δ cells expressed similar levels of Swe1 protein (Figure 2C). Similar results were also obtained by measuring rates of bud elongation after induction of GAL1-SWE1 in log phase populations of cells (not shown).
(A) rts1Δ reduces polar growth induced by expression of SWE1 from the GAL1 promoter. Cells were grown to log phase in YEP media containing 2% glycerol/ethanol and then arrested in G1 with α factor. The synchronized cells were released into galactose-containing media at 30°C to induce SWE1 expression, and images of cells were obtained at 30 minute intervals. The time indicates the number of hours after release of α factor-arrested cells into galactose. (B) rts1Δ reduces the rate of polar growth in cells that over express SWE1. Polar growth was measured and plotted as a function of time for the experiment shown in (A). The extent of polar bud growth was measured as the ratio of the length of the bud to the width of the bud measured at the widest point. The average ratio and standard deviation were plotted for each time point. (C) Western blots showing equal expression of Swe1 protein in wild type and rts1Δ cells from the experiment shown in (A). A Nap1 Western blot was included as a loading control. (D) rts1Δ causes a delay in bud emergence. Wild-type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest at 30°C and the percentage of budded cells was determined at 10 minute intervals. Error bars indicate standard deviation for 3 independent experiments.
We next determined whether Rts1 plays a role in initiation of polar bud growth. To do this, we assayed initiation of bud growth in synchronized populations of wild type and rts1Δ cells. Cells were released from an early G1 arrest and the timing of bud emergence was determined (Figure 2D). Cells lacking Rts1 showed a delay in bud emergence of 22 minutes ± 0.15 minutes compared with wild type cells. Together, these results demonstrate that Rts1 is required for both the timely initiation and the normal rate of polar bud growth.
Cells lacking Rts1 are sensitive to the dosage of G1 cyclins
Since G1 cyclins are required for initiation and maintenance of polar bud growth, it seemed likely that Rts1 is required for functions mediated by G1 cyclins. To test this, we determined whether rts1Δ showed genetic interactions with the G1 cyclins. We found that cln2Δ significantly reduced the rate of proliferation of rts1Δ cells (Figure 3A). Moreover, we failed to recover rts1Δ cln1Δ cln2Δ spores when rts1Δ was crossed to a cln1Δ cln2Δ strain, which suggested that rts1Δ is synthetically lethal with cln1Δ cln2Δ. To further test this, we created a GAL1-CLN2 cln1Δ rts1Δ strain, in which the expression of CLN2 could be repressed by switching from galactose-containing media to dextrose-containing media. This strain grew well on galactose, but was inviable on dextrose, which confirmed that rts1Δ is lethal in cln1Δ cln2Δ cells (Figure 3B). To characterize the defects caused by loss of Rts1, Cln1, and Cln2, we turned off CLN2 expression in the GAL1-CLN2 cln1Δ rts1Δ cells by shifting the cells to media containing dextrose for 8 hours (Figure 3C). The GAL1-CLN2 cln1Δ rts1Δ cells arrested primarily as large, unbudded cells with a small percentage of budded cells (6.5%). Control cells carrying rts1Δ or cln1Δ GAL1-CLN2 had 35% and 15% budded cells respectively. The GAL1-CLN2 cln1Δ rts1Δ cells also became abnormally large, which is commonly observed in cells that fail to undergo bud emergence (Figure 3C) ,.
(A) cln2Δ causes slow growth in rts1Δ cells. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 30°C, 34°C, and 37°C. (B) Loss of CLN1 and CLN2 is lethal in rts1Δ cells. Cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at room temperature for three days at 25°C on YEP media containing galactose or dextrose. (C) Loss of CLN1 and CLN2 in rts1Δ cells causes increased cell size and an arrest with predominantly unbudded cells. Images of cells of the indicated genotypes were taken 8 hours after expression of CLN2 was repressed by washing cells out of galactose-containing media into dextrose-containing media at 30°C.
We next tested whether rts1Δ showed a genetic interaction with cln3Δ. When rts1Δ cells were crossed to cln3Δ cells, a small proportion of the expected progeny was recovered (2/80 spores were recovered rather than the predicted 20/80), while the other progeny segregated according to the expected Mendelian ratios (rts1Δ: 21/80, cln3Δ: 20/80, wild type: 18/80). The few recovered rts1Δ cln3Δ cells formed colonies at the same rate as rts1Δ cells, but their low rate of recovery from the cross suggested that they could contain suppressor mutations. To analyze the viability of cells lacking RTS1 and CLN3 in a context unlikely to select for suppression, we utilized a GAL1-CLN3 rts1Δ strain. When switched to dextrose-containing medium we found that GAL1-CLN3 rts1Δ cells were viable, although they formed colonies at a slightly slower rate than rts1Δ cells (not shown).
It was previously reported that rts1Δ is synthetically lethal with the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85 in the S288C strain background . We were able to isolate a few rts1Δ pho85Δ spores in the W303 strain background, although they were poorly viable and grew significantly slower than either rts1Δ or pho85Δ cells (Figure 4A). We were also able to recover pcl1Δ pcl2Δ rts1Δ cells from crosses. These grew more slowly than rts1Δ cells but were more robust than pho85Δ rts1Δ cells (Figure 4B). Thus, the poor viability of pho85Δ rts1Δ cells is not strictly due to lack of Pho85 activity associated with the Pcl1/2 cyclins, and may indicate that additional Pho85/Pcl complexes are important for normal growth in rts1Δ strains. In contrast to cells lacking CLN1, CLN2 and RTS1, the pcl1Δ pcl2Δ rts1Δ cells did not show severe defects in bud formation, although they did become larger than the rts1Δ or pcl1Δ pcl2Δ cells. (Figure 4C).
(A) pho85Δ causes slow growth in rts1Δ cells. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 30°C, 34°C, and 37°C. (B) pcl1Δ pcl2Δ causes slow growth in rts1Δ cells. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 30°C, 34°C, and 37°C. (C) rts1Δ pcl1Δ pcl2Δ cells are abnormally large. Cells of the indicated genotypes were grown overnight to log phase at 25°C.
In summary, rts1Δ showed genetic interactions with multiple G1 cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Because the late G1 cyclins show extensive redundancy, mutations that cause reduced function of G1 cyclins should show synthetic interactions with mutations that cause a further reduction in cyclin levels. The fact that rts1Δ showed lethality when combined with cln1Δ cln2Δ, and reduced viability when combined with pcl1Δ pcl2Δ, suggests that Rts1 is required for the normal function of both pairs of cyclins, rather than mediating the functions of specific cyclins. The fact that rts1Δ also showed genetic interactions with cln3Δ, which is upstream of the late G1 cyclins, indicates that Rts1 does not act solely in a Cln3-dependent pathway that promotes transcription of the late G1 cyclins.
Rts1 is required for normal accumulation of the G1 cyclins
We next determined whether accumulation of the G1 cyclin Cln2 occurred normally in synchronized rts1Δ cells. For these experiments, we utilized a 3XHA-tagged version of CLN2 expressed from the CLN2 promoter and quantitative Western blotting to assay Cln2 protein levels. These experiments revealed that the peak of Cln2 accumulation was delayed by 10–15 minutes in rts1Δ cells and that Cln2 failed to reach normal levels (Figure 5A and 5C). The effects of rts1Δ on Cln2 accumulation were more severe at 34°C and 37°C (Figure 5D). Accumulation of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 was correspondingly delayed and cells appeared to delay in G2/M, as revealed by sustained levels of Clb2 relative to the wild type control (Figure 5A).
(A) Wild-type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C. Levels of Cln2-3XHA and Clb2 were monitored by Western blotting. (B) GAL1-CDC20 and GAL1-CDC20 rts1Δ cells were arrested in metaphase by depletion of Cdc20 in raffinose media for 4 hours. Cells were released by addition of galactose. Levels of Cln2-3XHA were monitored by Western blotting. (C) Accumulation of Cln2 protein is delayed and reduced during a synchronized cell cycle in rts1Δ cells. Cln2-3XHA protein levels were quantified during a synchronized cell cycle at 30°C. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments. (D) Accumulation of Cln2 protein is delayed and reduced during a synchronized cell cycle in rts1Δ cells. Cln2-3XHA protein levels were quantified during a synchronized cell cycle at 34°C. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments. (E,F) Accumulation of the CLN2 mRNA is reduced and delayed during a synchronized cell cycle in rts1Δ cells. Wild-type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C and samples were collected at 10 minute intervals during the cell cycle. (E) shows levels of CLN2 mRNA detected by Northern blotting. (F) shows quantification of CLN2 mRNA normalized to an ACT1 loading control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments. (G,H) Accumulation of the RNR1 mRNA is reduced and delayed during a synchronized cell cycle in rts1Δ cells. Wild type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C and samples were collected at 10 minute intervals during the cell cycle. (G) shows levels of RNR1 mRNA detected by Northern blotting. (H) shows quantification of RNR1 mRNA normalized to an ACT1 loading control. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments.
Since the cells used in these experiments were synchronized with mating pheromone, it was possible that the delayed accumulation of Cln2 was due to delayed release from mating pheromone arrest. To determine whether rts1Δ cells underwent normal release from mating pheromone arrest, we assayed the phosphorylation state of Cdc24, which is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42 . In previous work, it was found that Cdc24 becomes hyperphosphorylated during mating pheromone arrest and undergoes dephosphorylation upon release from the arrest ,. Cdc24 then undergoes hyperphosphorylation during G1 that is dependent upon the Cla4 kinase and Cdk1 ,,. We found that Cdc24 underwent normal dephosphorylation in rts1Δ cells after release from mating pheromone arrest, which suggested that rts1Δ does not cause delayed release from mating pheromone arrest (Figure S1A). Cdc24 showed delayed phosphorylation in rts1Δ cells, consistent with delayed initiation of G1 events.
To further rule out the possibility that the G1 delay was due to mating pheromone-induced arrest, we used an alternative method for cell synchronization. Cells can be arrested in mitosis by depletion of Cdc20, which is required for proteolytic destruction of the mitotic cyclins –. CDC20 was placed under the control of the GAL1 promoter in wild type and rts1Δ cells. Synchronization in metaphase was achieved by shifting cells to media lacking galactose for 4 hours, followed by releasing cells into galactose-containing media to initiate synchronous exit from mitosis. Cells lacking Rts1 showed a 30–40 minute delay in Cln2 accumulation and reduced Cln2 levels under these conditions (Figure 5B).
We also tested whether the effects of rts1Δ on Cln2 accumulation were dependent upon the strain background. Several commonly used laboratory yeast strains contain different alleles of the SSD1 gene, which can cause significant differences in phenotypes . However, we found that rts1Δ caused similar defects in Cln2 accumulation in both the W303 (ssd1-d2) strain background and the S288C (SSD1-v1) strain background (Figure 5 and Figure S1B, respectively).
Our finding that Cln2 accumulation was delayed and reduced in rts1Δ cells suggested an explanation for the reduced polar growth caused by rts1Δ in mutants that undergo excessive polar growth (Figure 1A and 1B and Figure 2A). We hypothesized that rts1Δ leads to reduced and delayed Cln2 accumulation in these cells, thereby causing reduced polar growth. We tested this directly by assaying Cln2 accumulation in synchronized gin4Δ and rts1Δ gin4Δ cells. As expected, rts1Δ caused reduced and delayed accumulation of Cln2, and a corresponding delay in Clb2 accumulation (Figure S2).
We next tested whether rts1Δ affected levels of CLN2 mRNA or mRNAs encoding additional G1 cyclins. Northern blotting revealed that accumulation of CLN2, CLN1 and PCL1 mRNA was reduced and delayed in rts1Δ cells (Figure 5E and 5F and Figure S1C). Transcription of the late G1 cyclins is controlled by the SBF transcription factor. To test whether rts1Δ caused delayed transcription of MBF targets as well, we assayed RNR1 mRNA expression. RNR1 mRNA accumulation was reduced and delayed to a similar extent as CLN2 mRNA in rts1Δ cells (Figure 5G and 5H). Together these results show rts1Δ causes reduced and delayed accumulation of both SBF and MBF-regulated transcripts.
Expression of CLN2 from a heterologous promoter rescues the delayed bud emergence of rts1Δ cells
Since rts1Δ caused reduced and delayed transcription of G1 cyclins, the delayed bud emergence observed in rts1Δ cells could be due solely to a role for Rts1 in promoting G1 cyclin transcription. Alternatively, Rts1 could play diverse roles in regulating events required for bud emergence. To distinguish these possibilities, we tested whether expression of CLN2 from the GAL1 promoter could rescue the delayed bud emergence of rts1Δ cells. Wild type and rts1Δ cells carrying GAL1-CLN2 or an empty vector were released from a G1 arrest under conditions that induce expression of CLN2, and the timing of bud emergence was assayed. We found that expression of CLN2 from the GAL1 promoter dramatically advanced the timing of bud emergence in rts1Δ cells, providing nearly complete rescue of the delay in bud emergence (Figure 6). This observation, combined with our previous observations, established that Rts1 functions in mechanisms directly involved in controlling transcription of the G1 cyclins. Expression of GAL1-CLN2 did not rescue the temperature sensitivity of rts1Δ cells, which indicated that the temperature sensitivity of rts1Δ cells must be due, at least in part, to additional functions of Rts1 (not shown).
Wild-type and rts1Δ cells carrying GAL1-CLN2 or an empty vector were released from an α factor arrest at 30°C and the percentage of budded cells was determined at 10 minute intervals. Over 200 cells were counted for each time point. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments.
Rts1 does not regulate the turnover of Cln2 protein
Recent work found that Cln2 acts in a positive feedback loop to stimulate its own transcription . Thus, the delay in accumulation of CLN2 mRNA could be due to a failure in mechanisms required for normal accumulation of the Cln2 protein, which would disrupt the feedback loop. Overexpression of CLN2 from the GAL1 promoter might be expected to rescue this kind of defect. Therefore, we tested whether Rts1 functions in several mechanisms known to regulate accumulation of CLN2 protein.
Cln2 is a highly unstable protein and proteolysis plays an important role in regulation of Cln2 protein levels. Proteolysis of Cln2 is controlled by the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex, which recognizes phosphorylated sites at the C-terminus of Cln2 and targets Cln2 for destruction ,. Cdc34 is the E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme component of the SCF complex. We hypothesized that the reduced Cln2 protein levels observed in rts1Δ cells could be caused by increased SCF-dependent proteolysis of Cln2 protein. Reduced protein levels, in turn, would disrupt the positive feedback loop that promotes CLN2 transcription, thereby causing reduced and delayed transcription of CLN2 mRNA. To test this possibility, we created an rts1Δ strain that also contained a temperature sensitive allele of CDC34 (cdc34-2). Cells were released from a synchronized G1 arrest into 37°C media, and Cln2 protein expression was followed by Western blotting (Figure 7A). As previously reported, inactivation of Cdc34 in the control cells caused stabilization of Cln2 and a dramatic increase in Cln2 protein levels . In the cdc34-2 rts1Δ cells, Cln2 protein levels were still reduced and did not accumulate to the high levels observed in cdc34-2 cells. This showed that the failure of rts1Δ cells to accumulate normal levels of Cln2 is due to a failure to produce Cln2, rather than to increased SCF-dependent destruction of Cln2.
(A) Inactivation of the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase does not cause increased Cln2 protein levels in rts1Δ cells. Cells of the indicated genotypes were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 37°C. Levels of Cln2-3XHA protein were monitored by Western blotting. (B) rts1Δ does not decrease the half-life of the Cln2 protein. GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 and GAL1-3XHA-CLN2 rts1Δ cells were grown overnight at room temperature in YEP media containing 2% glycerol/ethanol. A burst of CLN2 transcription was triggered by washing the cells into YEP +2% galactose for 1 hour. At time = 0, CLN2 transcription was turned off by washing cells into YEPD media. Samples were collected at t = 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 120 minutes, and quantitative Western blotting was used to determine Cln2 levels. The half-life of Cln2 protein was calculated using a standard curve fitted for one phase exponential decay. The half-life of Cln2 was 9.6±2.0 minutes in wild type cells and 10.8±2.4 minutes in rts1Δ cells (n = 3).
We also considered the possibility that Rts1 regulates Cln2 stability via SCF-independent mechanisms. The Cln2 protein has a short half-life of 8–10 minutes ,. To determine whether rts1Δ decreased the half-life of the Cln2 protein, we expressed a burst of CLN2 from the GAL1 promoter and then measured the rate of destruction of Cln2 protein after shutting off the promoter. In wild type control cells, the half-life of Cln2 was 9.6±2.0 minutes, similar to previous reports. In rts1Δ cells, the half-life of Cln2 was 10.8±2.4 minutes, which showed that there is not a significant decrease in the stability of Cln2 protein (Figure 7B).
Rts1 does not act in a Whi5-dependent pathway
To further define the function of Rts1, we tested whether it acts in pathways known to control G1 cyclin transcription. The Whi5 transcriptional repressor delays G1 progression by inhibiting transcription of G1 cyclins. Whi5 acts by binding and inhibiting the SBF and MBF transcription factors, which are required for transcription of the G1 cyclins ,. The Cdk1/Cln3 complex relieves this inhibition by phosphorylating Whi5, which triggers export of Whi5 from the nucleus. Thus, it was possible that Rts1 played a role in the inactivation of Whi5. If this were true, whi5Δ should rescue the delayed expression of Cln2 observed in rts1Δ cells. However, we found that bud emergence and accumulation of Cln2 protein were still delayed in rts1Δ whi5Δ cells compared to whi5Δ cells (Figure 8A, and data not shown). In addition, whi5Δ did not rescue the temperature sensitivity of rts1Δ cells (Figure 8B). Loss of Whi5 advanced the production of Cln2 protein in rts1Δ cells, although not to the same extent observed in whi5Δ cells, which indicated that Whi5-dependent regulation of transcription occurs normally in rts1Δ cells. Thus, the delayed Cln2 expression in rts1Δ cells is not due to a failure to inactivate Whi5.
(A) rts1Δ causes a G1 delay in whi5Δ cells. Cells of the indicated genotypes were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 34°C and samples were collected at 10 minute intervals. Levels of Cln2-3XHA were assayed by Western blotting. (B) whi5Δ does not rescue the temperature sensitivity of rts1Δ. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 30°C and 37°C.
Rts1 does not function solely in a Bck2-dependent pathway
Bck2 acts in a redundant pathway that works in parallel to Cln3 to promote transcription of G1 cyclins –. To test whether Rts1 acts in this Bck2-dependent pathway, we crossed rts1Δ to bck2Δ to create rts1Δ bck2Δ cells. If Rts1 functioned solely in the Bck2-dependent pathway, we expected to see no additive phenotypic effects in the double mutant.
All of the expected rts1Δ bck2Δ progeny were recovered from the cross. We found that bck2Δ increased the temperature sensitivity of rts1Δ (Figure 9A). To test whether deletion of Bck2 altered the timing of G1 events in rts1Δ cells, we compared the timing of bud emergence and Cln2 accumulation in wild type, rts1Δ, bck2Δ, and rts1Δ bck2Δ cells. Cells lacking BCK2 delayed bud emergence to a similar extent as rts1Δ cells. Bud emergence was severely delayed in rts1Δ bck2Δ cells when compared to either single mutant, and a subset of cells failed to bud by 2 hours after release from G1 arrest (Figure 9B). Cln2 accumulation peaked later in rts1Δ bck2Δ cells than in rts1Δ or bck2Δ cells, and accumulated to lower levels (not shown). These observations are consistent with previous reports that CLN2 mRNA is reduced in bck2Δ cells ,. When tested at 34°C, we saw results that were similar, although more severe (not shown). We examined the phenotype of rts1Δ bck2Δ cells in log phase cultures that were grown at room temperature, and found that rts1Δ bck2Δ cells appeared much larger than either rts1Δ or bck2Δ cells (Figure 9C). The strong additive effects of rts1Δ and bck2Δ rule out the possibility that Rts1 functions solely in the Bck2-dependent pathway that controls G1 cyclin transcription, although it remains possible that Rts1 contributes to both Bck2-dependent and independent pathways.
(A) rts1Δ causes slow growth in bck2Δ cells. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 30°C, 34°C, and 37°C. (B) rts1Δ causes a prolonged delay in bud emergence in bck2Δ cells. Cells were released from an α factor arrest at 30°C and the percentage of cells with buds was determined at 10 minute intervals. A minimum of 200 cells was counted for each time point. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for 3 independent experiments. (C) rts1Δ causes increased cell size in bck2Δ cells. Images of cells from rapidly growing cultures of cells of the indicated genotypes. Cells were grown at 25°C.
Rts1 may regulate the Swi6 component of SBF and MBF
We next determined whether we could detect a role for Rts1 in regulating SBF or MBF. The components of SBF and MBF are Swi6, Swi4 and Mbp1. The Stb1 protein also associates with SBF and MBF and regulates their activity . We therefore generated 3XHA-tagged versions of these proteins and determined whether they showed Rts1-dependent changes in modification state or protein levels. Stb1-3XHA and Swi6-3XHA showed multiple forms on Western blots due to phosphorylation, as previously reported –. Loss of Rts1 caused no detectable changes in the levels of Stb1 modification during a synchronized cell cycle (not shown). In contrast, Swi6-3XHA showed reduced phosphorylation in rts1Δ cells at 20 to 30 minutes after release from a mating pheromone arrest (Figure 10A). Notably, the defect in Swi6 phosphorylation occurred at the time that cells would normally be initiating G1 cyclin transcription. We detected no changes in the protein levels of Swi4 or Mbp1 in rts1Δ cells during the cell cycle. Swi4 and Mbp1 both migrated as a single band, so electrophoretic mobility shifts could not be used to assay their modification states.
(A) Swi6 is dephosphorylated in rts1Δ cells at the time of initiation of G1 cyclin transcription. Wild type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C. Swi6-3XHA modification was monitored by Western blotting. (B,C) mbp1Δ but not swi4Δ causes a reduced growth rate in rts1Δ cells. A series of 10-fold dilutions of cells of the indicated genotypes were grown at 25°C, 30°C, 34°C, and 37°C.
We also tested for genetic interactions between rts1Δ and swi6Δ, swi4Δ or mbp1Δ. Previous studies found that swi6Δ is recovered poorly from genetic crosses (27% of expected swi6Δ progeny are recovered) . We obtained similar results, and were unable to obtain swi6Δ rts1Δ progeny, suggesting that swi6Δ is synthetically lethal with rts1Δ. We found that mbp1Δ rts1Δ cells grew more poorly than either single mutant (Figure 10B). We detected no genetic interaction with swi4Δ (Figure 10C). The synthetic lethal interaction with swi6Δ must be treated with caution because swi6Δ shows synthetic lethality with a surprisingly broad range of genes, including genes that do not appear to have G1-specific functions (BioGRID database). Thus, the synthetic lethality may be due to functions of Rts1 that are not related to G1 functions.
Rts1 is required for nutrient modulation of cell size
Our analysis of the role of Rts1 in control of G1 cyclins suggested that Rts1 does not function solely in the known critical pathways for control of G1 cyclin transcription that work through Cln3, Whi5, or Bck2. This was an intriguing discovery, because previous work found that the mechanisms responsible for nutrient modulation of cell size do not control G1 cyclin transcription via Cln3, Whi5 or Bck2 ,. We therefore hypothesized that Rts1 controls G1 cyclin transcription in a distinct pathway that mediates nutrient modulation of cell size. To test this, we determined whether Rts1 is required for nutrient modulation of cell size. We grew wild type and rts1Δ cells in rich or poor carbon sources and measured cell size with a Coulter counter. We found that Rts1 is required for nutrient modulation of size (Figure 11A). The slight shift in size observed for rts1Δ cells shifted to poor carbon sources is similar to the slight shift observed for sch9Δ and sfp1Δ, which have also been found to be required for nutrient modulation of cell size . Since rts1Δ cells are abnormally large, we were concerned that they may already be above the critical size for initiation of G1 cyclin transcription, and therefore not subject to G1 size control. To test this, we used mih1Δ cells, which are abnormally large because they undergo extra growth during G2/M ,. The mih1Δ cells showed normal nutrient modulation of cell size control (Figure 11B). Furthermore, others have found that cln3Δ cells, which are also abnormally large, undergo normal nutrient modulation of cell size .
Wild-type, rts1Δ (A), and mih1Δ (B) cells were grown to log phase in media containing either 2% dextrose or 2% glycerol/ethanol as a carbon source. Cell size was measured with a Coulter counter and plotted as a distribution of number % of cells in each size bin. Each plot is the average of 4 independent experiments in which 3 independent samples were analyzed.
Rts1 is required for normal control of G1 cyclin transcription
Loss of Rts1 caused reduced and delayed expression of multiple G1 cyclins, and a corresponding delay in bud emergence. Overexpression of CLN2 from a heterologous promoter largely rescued the delayed bud emergence in rts1Δ cells. We found no evidence that Rts1 regulates Cln2 protein stability. Together, these observations demonstrate that Rts1 functions in a pathway that regulates G1 cyclins at the level of transcription.
The results of genetic analysis further supported the conclusion that Rts1 works in a pathway that controls G1 cyclin levels. The genetic interactions that we observed for rts1Δ are summarized in Table 1. In general, rts1Δ caused slow growth or lethality when combined with deletions of G1 cyclin genes or pho85Δ. Due to the redundancy of the G1 cyclins, a general reduction in levels of G1 cyclin expression caused by rts1Δ would be expected to cause additive effects when combined with gene deletions that further reduce levels of G1 cyclins.
The finding that Rts1 is required for normal levels of Cln2 protein provides an explanation for why rts1Δ caused reduced polar growth in mutants that fail to properly inactivate Swe1. Failure to inactivate Swe1 causes cells to arrest at G2/M with high levels of Cln2 protein . Since Cln2 promotes polar growth, a reduction in Cln2 levels would be expected to cause reduced polar growth. Accordingly, we found that rts1Δ caused reduced and delayed accumulation of Cln2 in gin4Δ cells, which fail to inactivate Swe1.
Previous work found that G1 cyclin transcription is regulated by another PP2A-like phosphatase called Sit4. Loss of Sit4 caused decreased transcription of late G1 cyclins and defects in bud emergence, similar to rts1Δ . However, there are a number of significant differences in the G1 phenotypes caused by sit4Δ and rts1Δ. First, in contrast to rts1Δ, defects in bud emergence caused by sit4Δ are not rescued by expression of CLN2 from a heterologous promoter, which demonstrates that Sit4 carries out functions required for bud emergence beyond controlling G1 cyclin transcription . Second, the phenotype of sit4Δ cells is strongly enhanced by the ssd1-d2 allele, whereas the phenotype of rts1Δ is not affected by the status of SSD1 . Finally, sit4Δ cln3Δ cells are barely viable, whereas loss of RTS1 caused relatively mild effects in cln3Δ cells . These phenotypic differences suggest that Rts1 and Sit4 may function in independent pathways that regulate late G1 cyclin levels in response to different signals, but do not rule out the possibility that they have overlapping functions.
Rts1 does not function solely in one of the pathways known to play a critical role in transcription of G1 cyclins
We used epistasis analysis to determine whether Rts1 regulates G1 cyclin transcription via known mechanisms. This analysis demonstrated that Rts1 does not function solely in a Bck2-dependent pathway, and ruled out a role for Rts1 in a pathway known to regulate G1 cyclin transcription via Cln3-dependent inactivation of the Whi5 transcriptional repressor. Cln3 may also promote G1 cyclin transcription in a Whi5-independent manner. Overexpression of CLN3-1 makes whi5Δ cells smaller, which suggests that Cln3 can drive G1 cyclin transcription by an alternative mechanism . In genetic crosses, we found that most cln3Δ rts1Δ spores failed to germinate, and cells lacking both Rts1 and Cln3 showed slow growth when compared to either single deletion. Thus, Rts1 does not appear to function solely in a Cln3-dependent pathway that promotes G1 cyclin transcription. Together, these observations suggest that Rts1 does not function solely in one of the known pathways that play an important role in promoting G1 cyclin transcription. Our results do not rule out the possibility that Rts1 contributes to multiple pathways.
Rts1 may regulate SBF and MBF via Swi6
We found that rts1Δ caused reduced and delayed expression of both SBF and MBF-dependent transcripts, which demonstrated that Rts1 acts in a pathway upstream of both transcription factors. We further found that rts1Δ caused a reduction in Swi6 phosphorylation at the time that cells initiate G1 cyclin transcription. Since Swi6 is the one shared component of SBF and MBF, this suggests that Rts1 regulates both transcription factors via Swi6. In support of this, the pattern of genetic interactions observed for rts1Δ is similar to the pattern previously reported for swi6Δ. Both swi6Δ and rts1Δ cause slow growth in cln2Δ cells, lethality in cln1Δ cln2Δ cells, and slow growth or lethality in bck2Δ cells ,. In addition, neither rts1Δ nor swi6Δ caused synthetic lethality in combination with cln3Δ cells . In contrast, loss of SWI4 is lethal in combination with cln3Δ . The fact that Swi6 undergoes reduced phosphorylation in rts1Δ cells, rather than hyperphosphorylation, indicates that it is unlikely to be a direct target of PP2ARts1.
Phosphorylation of Swi6 that can be detected by an electrophoretic mobility shift is dependent upon the MAP kinase Slt2, and activation of Slt2 coincides with initiation of polar growth ,. The Slt2 pathway is activated by Pkc1, and overexpression of Pkc1 suppresses swi4 mutants, which demonstrates a role in controlling G1 cyclin transcription . In previous work, slt2Δ was not found to cause reduction in the levels of CLN1 or CLN2 transcripts, but did cause a reduction in levels of PCL1 and PCL2 transcripts in cells grown at 37°C. These studies did not utilize synchronized cells and may therefore have missed effects of slt2Δ on levels of CLN1 and CLN2 transcripts. In addition, rts1Δ could lead to misregulation of Slt2 that causes effects on CLN1 and CLN2 transcripts that are more significant than the effects caused by slt2Δ. Further work will be necessary to test for possible roles of Rts1 in Slt2-dependent regulation of G1 cyclin transcription.
Rts1 is required for nutrient modulation of cell size
Previous work found that nutrient modulation of cell size does not require Cln3, Whi5, or Bck2, which suggests that it works via a distinct mechanism. The discovery that Rts1 does not function solely in one of the pathways known to play a critical role in controlling G1 cyclin transcription therefore prompted us to test whether Rts1 is required for nutrient modulation of cell size. We found that Rts1 is required for nutrient modulated control of cell size, which identifies Rts1 as a new component of the pathways that integrate nutrient availability, cell size, and entry into the cell cycle.
Little is known about the pathways responsible for nutrient modulation of cell size. Two conserved pathways play broad roles in controlling nutrient sensing, nutrient utilization, cell growth and cell cycle entry . In one pathway, the TOR kinases respond to the availability of nitrogen and trigger activation of pathways that control cell growth and nitrogen utilization. A second pathway responds to carbon source availability and regulates growth via activation of the Ras GTPase and protein kinase A (PKA) . The Ras/PKA pathway is required for control of cell size: increased activity of the pathway leads to increased cell size, while decreased activity leads to reduced cell size –. However, the mechanisms by which Ras/PKA control cell size are unknown.
A key target of both pathways is ribosome biogenesis. Two key regulators of ribosome biogenesis that are thought to regulate cell growth are Sch9 and Sfp1. Sch9 is a member of the AGC kinase family and is closely related to vertebrate Akt kinase, while Sfp1 is related to transcription factors . Sch9 and Sfp1 carry out overlapping functions in controlling transcription of genes required for ribosome biogenesis ,,. Loss of either protein causes reduced ribosome biogenesis, while loss of both is lethal. The TOR pathway appears to work through Sch9, but the mechanisms by which the Ras/PKA pathway controls ribosome biogenesis are unclear ,.
It is thought that nutrient modulation of cell size is achieved by changing the critical cell size required for initiation of G1 cyclin transcription . Thus far, only three proteins have been found to be required for nutrient modulation of cell size: Sch9, Sfp1 and PKA ,. Notably, all three converge on control of ribosome biogenesis. Moreover, mutants that cause reduced rates of ribosome biogenesis cause cells to enter the cell cycle at a reduced cell size, leading to an overall reduction in cell size . Together, these observations suggest a model in which the rate of ribosome biogenesis sets the critical cell size ,. According to this model, cells growing in rich nutrients have a high rate of ribosome biogenesis, which sends a signal that inhibits G1 cyclin transcription to allow the cell to reach a larger critical size.
The mechanisms that link initiation of G1 cyclin transcription to ribosome biogenesis and nutrient availability are unknown. The identification of Rts1 as a new upstream regulator of G1 cyclin transcription that is also required for nutrient modulation of cell size is therefore a significant step towards understanding these pathways. Rts1 could function between ribosome biogenesis and G1 cyclin transcription. Alternatively, Rts1 could promote ribosome biogenesis, in which case the effects of rts1Δ could be due to decreased rates of ribosome biogenesis. Inactivation of factors that promote ribosome biogenesis cause reduced cell size, whereas rts1Δ causes increased cell size. However, we do not yet know what causes rts1Δ cells to have an increased cell size, and it could be due to a G2/M delay that occurs later in the cell cycle .
Since Rts1 is highly conserved, it may also play a role in mechanisms that integrate external signals, cell size, and G1 cyclin transcription in vertebrate cells. The signaling pathways that control G1 cyclin transcription in vertebrate cells are of considerable interest, since deregulation of these pathways contributes to cancer .
Materials and Methods
Yeast strains, culture conditions, and plasmids
The strains used for this study are listed in Table 2. Cells were grown in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD) media supplemented with 40 mg/liter adenine, unless otherwise noted. Full length CLN2 was expressed from plasmid pSL201-5[GAL1-CLN2-3XHA URA3] . 3XHA-tagging of CLN2 was carried out by digesting plasmid pMT104 with PvuII and integrating at the Cln2 locus using standard yeast transformation techniques ,. 3XHA-tagging of other genes was carried out as previously described .
Cell cycle time courses
Cells were grown overnight at room temperature on a shaking platform. Cells at an OD600 of 0.6 were arrested in G1 by the addition of 0.5 µg/ml α factor for 3.5 hours. Cells were released into a synchronous cell cycle by washing 3× with fresh YEPD pre-warmed to 30°C, and time courses were carried out at 30°C unless otherwise noted. To prevent cells from entering a second cell cycle, α factor was added back at 65 minutes. For metaphase arrest, strains containing GAL1-CDC20 were first grown overnight in YEP +2% raffinose +2% galactose and then washed into media containing 2% raffinose and allowed to arrest for four hours. Cells were released from metaphase arrest by adding 2% galactose and were then shifted to 30°C. At each time interval, 1.6 ml samples were collected in screw-top tubes. The cells were pelleted, the supernatant was removed, and 250 µl of glass beads were added before flash freezing. To lyse cells, 100 µl of 1× sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 3% SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, bromophenol blue) was added. 2 mM PMSF was added to the sample buffer immediately before use from a 100 mM stock made in 100% isopropanol. Cells were lysed by shaking in a Biospec Multibeater-8 at top speed for 2 minutes. The tubes were immediately removed, centrifuged for 1 minute in a microfuge and placed in a boiling water bath for 5 minutes. After boiling, the tubes were again centrifuged for 1 minute and 10 µl was loaded on a gel (5 µl when probing for Nap1). For microscopy, 180 µl samples were collected and fixed by adding 20 µl of 37% formaldehyde for 1 hour. Cells were washed twice in 1× PBS, 0.05% Tween-20, 0.02% sodium azide and imaged by differential interference contrast microscopy. Bud emergence was quantified by counting the number of buds per 200 cells for each sample.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out as previously described . Gels were run at 20 mA on the constant current setting. Western blots were transferred for 1 hour at 1 Amp at 4°C in a Hoeffer transfer tank in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris base, 150 mM glycine, and 20% methanol. Blots were probed overnight at 4°C with affinity purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies raised against Clb2, Swe1, Cdc24, Nap1 or HA peptide. Blots were probed with an HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (GE Healthcare).
For quantitative western blotting, protein was transferred onto Millipore Immobilon-FL membrane. Before transfer, the membrane was first briefly wetted in 100% methanol. A Cy5-conjugated secondary antibody was used (Affinipure goat anti-rabbit, Jackson ImmunoResearch) and images were collected on a Typhoon 9410 variable mode imager. ImageQuant was used to quantify band intensity. Local background was subtracted from each band. An antibody that recognizes the Nap1 protein was used as a loading control. Since Nap1 migrates below Cln2, the western blots could be cut into two pieces to independently probe Cln2 and Nap1 in the same samples. For each lane, the ratio of Cln2/Nap1 signal was determined to normalize for differences in loading. Graphing was done with GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Mac .
Northern blot analysis
Probes that specifically recognized CLN1, CLN2, PCL1, RNR1 and ACT1 RNA were made using a gel-purified PCR product (CLN1 oligos: AGAATGGTCCTGTAAGAGAAAGT, AGAAACTGATGATGAAGAGGCAT; CLN2 oligos: TGAACCAATGATCAATGATTACGT, TCAAGTTGGATGCAATTTGCAG; PCL1 oligos: ACTAGATTGGTCAGATACACCAA, TGGTTACATCTTTTAGCCTTCTTAGA; RNR1 oligos: ACTTAGGTGTCATCAAGTCATCA, TCTACCACCATGCTTCATGATATCTT; ACT1 oligos: TCATACCTTCTACAACGAATTGAGA, ACACTTCATGATGGAGTTGTAAGT) and the Megaprime DNA labeling kit (GE Healthcare Amersham). Total yeast RNA was extracted as previously described  and blotting was carried out using standard methods . Blots were stripped and re-probed for ACT1 as a loading control. Images were collected on a Typhoon 9410 variable mode imager. ImageQuant was used to quantify band intensity. Local background was subtracted from each band. The amount of CLN1, CLN2, PCL1, and RNR1 RNA was normalized to the amount of ACT1 RNA for each lane and used to determine relative expression level. Data from three independent time course experiments was used to determine error bars (standard error of the mean).
Measurement of the rate of polar growth
Samples of synchronized GAL1-SWE1 or GAL1-SWE1 rts1Δ cells were collected at 30 minute intervals following release from a G1 arrest into galactose-containing media. Cells were imaged using differential interference contrast microscopy and ImageJ 1.37v software was used to measure bud length and bud width for 100 cells for each sample . The extent of polar growth was measured as the ratio of length/width, and was plotted for each time point.
Determination of the half-life of the Cln2 protein
The half-life of the Cln2 protein was determined as previously described with the following modifications . Cells were grown overnight in YEP media containing 2% glycerol/ethanol. GAL1-CLN2 transcription was induced by washing cells into YEP media containing 2% galactose for 1 hour. Expression of CLN2 was then repressed by washing cells into YEPD media. Quantitative Western blotting was carried out to quantify Cln2 levels over time. Non-linear regression curve fitting for one phase exponential decay was carried out using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Mac .
Measurement of cell size
Cultures of cells were grown in triplicate overnight at 25°C in either YEP +2% dextrose or YEP +2% glycerol and 2% ethanol. A 1 ml sample of log phase (OD600 = 0.60) culture was fixed with 1/10 volume 37% formaldehyde for 1 hour, then washed twice with 1× PBS+0.04% sodium azide +0.02% Tween 20. Cell size was measured using a Channelizer Z2 Coulter counter as previously described . 150 µl of fixed culture were diluted in 20 ml of Isoton II and sonicated for 20 seconds prior to Coulter counter analysis. Each plot is the average of 4 independent experiments in which 3 independent samples were analyzed.
rts1Δ results in delayed G1 events. (A) The Cdc24 protein undergoes normal dephosphorylation during release from α factor arrest in rts1Δ cells. Western blotting was carried out with an anti-Cdc24 antibody. Changes in Cdc24 phosphorylation were detected as a shift in electrophoretic mobility. (B) Accumulation of the Cln2 protein is delayed during a synchronized cell cycle in rts1Δ cells in the S288C (SSD1-v1) strain background. Wild type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C. Levels of Cln2-3XHA were monitored by Western blotting. (C) CLN1 and PCL1 RNA accumulation were delayed and reduced in rts1Δ cells. Wild type and rts1Δ cells were released from an α factor arrest into pre-warmed media at 30°C and samples were collected at 10 minute intervals during the cell cycle. Levels of CLN1 and PCL1 mRNA were monitored by Northern blotting.
(0.94 MB TIF)
We thank Stacy Harvey, Laura Serbus, Jian Cao, Lee Hoang, and Rebecca Marlow for critical reading of the manuscript and Jan Skotheim, Bill Sullivan, and Manny Ares for thoughtful discussions. We thank Curt Wittenberg and Ray Deshaies for plasmids and strains and Thea Egelhofer for strain construction of DK778 and DK605. We thank Samir Patel for advice on quantitative Western blotting techniques.
Conceived and designed the experiments: KA DM DRK. Performed the experiments: KA SA. Analyzed the data: KA DRK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KA SA DM. Wrote the paper: KA DRK.
- 1. Andrews B, Measday V (1998) The cyclin family of budding yeast: abundant use of a good idea. Trends Genet 14: 66–72.
- 2. Richardson HE, Wittenberg CW, Cross F, Reed SI (1989) An essential G1 function for cyclin-like proteins in yeast. Cell 59: 1127–1133.
- 3. Cross F (1990) Cell cycle arrest caused by CLN gene deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae resembles START-I arrest and is independent of the mating-pheromone signalling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 10: 6482–6490.
- 4. Moffat J, Andrews B (2004) Late-G1 cyclin-CDK activity is essential for control of cell morphogenesis in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 6: 59–66.
- 5. Measday V, Moore L, Retnakaran R, Lee J, Donoviel M, et al. (1997) A family of cyclin-like proteins that interact with the Pho85 cyclin-dependent kinase. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1212–1223.
- 6. Cross FR, Tinkelenberg AH (1991) A potential positive feedback loop controlling CLN1 and CLN2 gene expression at the start of the yeast cell cycle. Cell 65: 875–883.
- 7. Dirick L, Nasmyth K (1991) Positive feedback in the activation of G1 cyclins in yeast. Nature 351: 754–757.
- 8. Measday V, Moore L, Ogas J, Tyers M, Andrews B (1994) The PCL2 (ORFD)-PHO85 cyclin-dependent kinase complex: a cell cycle regulator in yeast. Science 266: 1391–1395.
- 9. Tyers M, Tokiwa G, Futcher B (1993) Comparison of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins: Cln3 may be an upstream activator of Cln1, Cln2 and other cyclins. EMBO J 12: 1955–1968.
- 10. Futcher B (2002) Transcriptional regulatory networks and the yeast cell cycle. Curr Opin Cell Biol 14: 676–683.
- 11. Jorgensen P, Tyers M (2004) How cells coordinate growth and division. Curr Biol 14: R1014–1027.
- 12. McCusker D, Denison C, Anderson S, Egelhofer TA, Yates JR, 3rd, et al. (2007) Cdk1 coordinates cell-surface growth with the cell cycle. Nat Cell Biol 9: 506–515.
- 13. Deshaies RJ, Chau V, Kirschner M (1995) Ubiquitination of the G1 cyclin Cln2p by a Cdc34p-dependent pathway. EMBO J 14: 303–312.
- 14. Willems AR, Lanker S, Patton EE, Craig KL, Nason TF, et al. (1996) Cdc53 targets phosphorylated G1 cyclins for degradation by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway. Cell 86: 453–463.
- 15. Schneider BL, Zhang J, Markwardt J, Tokiwa G, Volpe T, et al. (2004) Growth rate and cell size modulate the synthesis of, and requirement for, G1-phase cyclins at start. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10802–10813.
- 16. Costanzo M, Nishikawa JL, Tang X, Millman JS, Schub O, et al. (2004) CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast. Cell 117: 899–913.
- 17. de Bruin RA, McDonald WH, Kalashnikova TI, Yates J, 3rd, Wittenberg C (2004) Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5. Cell 117: 887–898.
- 18. Di Como CJ, Chang H, Arndt KT (1995) Activation of CLN1 and CLN2 G1 cyclin gene expression by BCK2. Molec Cell Biol 15: 1835–1846.
- 19. Epstein CB, Cross F (1994) Genes that can bypass the CLN requirement for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 14: 2041–2047.
- 20. Wijnen H, Futcher B (1999) Genetic analysis of the shared role of CLN3 and BCK2 at the G(1)-S transition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 153: 1131–1143.
- 21. Manukyan A, Zhang J, Thippeswamy U, Yang J, Zavala N, et al. (2008) Ccr4 alters cell size in yeast by modulating the timing of CLN1 and CLN2 expression. Genetics 179: 345–357.
- 22. Skotheim JM, Di Talia S, Siggia ED, Cross FR (2008) Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 454: 291–296.
- 23. Johnston GC, Ehrhardt CW, Lorincz A, Carter BL (1979) Regulation of cell size in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 137: 1–5.
- 24. Fantes P, Nurse P (1977) Control of cell size in fission yeast by a growth modulated size control over nuclear division. Exp Cell Res 107: 377–386.
- 25. Jorgensen P, Rupes I, Sharom JR, Schneper L, Broach JR, et al. (2004) A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. Genes Dev 18: 2491–2505.
- 26. Janssens V, Goris J (2001) Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem J 353: 417–439.
- 27. Zhao Y, Boguslawski G, Zitomer RS, DePaoli-Roach AA (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologs of mammalian B and B′ subunits direct the enzyme to distinct cellular functions. J Biol Chem 272: 8256–8262.
- 28. Shu Y, Yang H, Hallberg E, Hallberg R (1997) Molecular genetic analysis of Rts1p, a B′ regulatory subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein phosphatase 2A. Mol Cell Biol 17: 3242–3253.
- 29. Spiliotis ET, Nelson WJ (2006) Here come the septins: novel polymers that coordinate intracellular functions and organization. J Cell Sci 119: 4–10.
- 30. Hartwell L (1971) Genetic control of the cell cycle in yeast. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exp Cell Res 69: 265–276.
- 31. Longtine MS, Theesfeld CL, McMillan JN, Weaver E, Pringle JR, et al. (2000) Septin-dependent assembly of a cell cycle-regulatory module in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4049–4061.
- 32. Barral Y, Parra M, Bidlingmaier S, Snyder M (1999) Nim1-related kinases coordinate cell cycle progression with the organization of the peripheral cytoskeleton in yeast. Genes Dev 13: 176–187.
- 33. Longtine MS, Fares H, Pringle J (1998) Role of the yeast Gin4p protein kinase in septin assembly and the relationship between septin assembly and septin function. J Cell Biol 143: 719–736.
- 34. Carroll C, Altman R, Schieltz D, Yates J, Kellogg DR (1998) The septins are required for the mitosis-specific activation of the Gin4 kinase. J Cell Biol 143: 709–717.
- 35. Sreenivasan A, Kellogg D (1999) The Elm1 kinase functions in a mitotic signaling network in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 19: 7983–7994.
- 36. Mortensen E, McDonald H, Yates J, Kellogg DR (2002) Cell cycle-dependent assembly of a Gin4-septin complex. Molec Biol Cell 13: 2091–2105.
- 37. Dobbelaere J, Gentry M, Hallberg R, Barral Y (2003) Phosphorylation-dependent Regulation of Septin Dynamics During the Cell Cycle. Developmental Cell 4: 345–357.
- 38. Booher RN, Deshaies RJ, Kirschner MW (1993) Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. EMBO J 12: 3417–3426.
- 39. Hartwell LH, Culotti J, Pringle JR, Reid BJ (1974) Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. Science 183: 46–51.
- 40. Johnston GC, Pringle JR, Hartwell LH (1977) Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cervisiae. Exp Cell res 105: 79–98.
- 41. Huang D, Moffat J, Andrews B (2002) Dissection of a complex phenotype by functional genomics reveals roles for the yeast cyclin-dependent protein kinase Pho85 in stress adaptation and cell integrity. Mol Cell Biol 22: 5076–5088.
- 42. Sloat BF, Adams A, Pringle JR (1981) Roles of the CDC24 gene product in cellular morphogenesis during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol 89: 395–405.
- 43. Gulli MP, Jaquenoud M, Shimada Y, Niederhauser G, Wiget P, et al. (2000) Phosphorylation of the Cdc42 exchange factor Cdc24 by the PAK-like kinase Cla4 may regulate polarized growth in yeast. Mol Cell 6: 1155–1167.
- 44. Bose I, Irazoqui JE, Moskow JJ, Bardes ES, Zyla TR, et al. (2001) Assembly of scaffold-mediated complexes containing Cdc42p, the exchange factor Cdc24p, and the effector Cla4p required for cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of Cdc24p. J Biol Chem 276: 7176–7186.
- 45. Shirayama M, Zachariae W, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K (1998) The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J 17: 1336–1349.
- 46. Visintin R, Prinz S, Amon A (1997) CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278: 460–463.
- 47. Lim HH, Goh PY, Surana U (1998) Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast. Curr Biol 8: 231–234.
- 48. Sutton A, Immanuel D, Arndt KT (1991) The SIT4 protein phosphatase functions in late G1 for progression into S phase. Mol Cell Biol 11: 2133–2148.
- 49. Lanker S, Valdivieso MH, Wittenberg C (1996) Rapid degradation of the G1 cyclin Cln2 induced by CDK-dependent phosphorylation. Science 271: 1597–1601.
- 50. de Bruin RA, Kalashnikova TI, Wittenberg C (2008) Stb1 collaborates with other regulators to modulate the G1-specific transcriptional circuit. Mol Cell Biol 28: 6919–6928.
- 51. Madden K, Sheu YJ, Baetz K, Andrews B, Snyder M (1997) SBF cell cycle regulator as a target of the yeast PKC-MAP kinase pathway. Science 275: 1781–1784.
- 52. Costanzo M, Schub O, Andrews B (2003) G1 transcription factors are differentially regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the Swi6-binding protein Stb1. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5064–5077.
- 53. Leem SH, Chung CN, Sunwoo Y, Araki H (1998) Meiotic role of SWI6 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 3154–3158.
- 54. Pal G, Paraz MT, Kellogg DR (2008) Regulation of Mih1/Cdc25 by protein phosphatase 2A and casein kinase 1. J Cell Biol 180: 931–945.
- 55. Russell P, Moreno S, Reed SI (1989) Conservation of mitotic controls in fission and budding yeasts. Cell 57: 295–303.
- 56. Fernandez-Sarabia M, Sutton A, Zhong T, Arndt KT (1992) SIT4 protein phosphatase is required for the normal accumulation of SWI4, CLN1, CLN2, and HCS26 RNAs during late G1. Genes Dev 6: 2417–2428.
- 57. Di Como CJ, Chang H, Arndt KT (1995) Activation of CLN1 and CLN2 G1 cyclin gene expression by BCK2. Mol Cell Biol 15: 1835–1846.
- 58. Nasmyth K, Dirick L (1991) The role of SWI4 and SWI6 in the activity of G1 cyclins in yeast. Cell 66: 995–1013.
- 59. Zarzov P, Mazzoni C, Mann C (1996) The SLT2(MPK1) MAP kinase is activated during periods of polarized cell growth in yeast. EMBO J 15: 83–91.
- 60. Gray JV, Ogas JP, Kamada Y, Stone M, Levin DE, et al. (1997) A role for the Pkc1 MAP kinase pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bud emergence and identification of a putative upstream regulator. EMBO J 16: 4924–4937.
- 61. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR (2008) How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 42: 27–81.
- 62. Baroni MD, Martegani E, Monti P, Alberghina L (1989) Cell size modulation by CDC25 and RAS2 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 9: 2715–2723.
- 63. Baroni M, Monti P, Alberghina L (1994) Repression of growth-regulated G1 cyclin expression by cyclic AMP in budding yeast. Nature 371: 339–342.
- 64. Tokiwa G, Tyers M, Volpe T, Futcher B (1994) Inhibition of G1 cyclin activity by the Ras/cAMP pathway in yeast. Nature 371: 342–345.
- 65. Urban J, Soulard A, Huber A, Lippman S, Mukhopadhyay D, et al. (2007) Sch9 is a major target of TORC1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 26: 663–674.
- 66. Fingerman I, Nagaraj V, Norris D, Vershon AK (2003) Sfp1 plays a key role in yeast ribosome biogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 2: 1061–1068.
- 67. Jorgensen P, Nishikawa JL, Breitkreutz BJ, Tyers M (2002) Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and division in yeast. Science 297: 395–400.
- 68. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Schneper L, Slonim N, Broach JR (2009) Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways. Mol Syst Biol 5: 245.
- 69. Weinberg RA (2007) The Biology of Cancer. New York, , NY: Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
- 70. Guthrie C, Fink G (1991) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. 194: 273–372.
- 71. Longtine MS, McKenzie A, DeMarini D, Shah NG, Wach A, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953–961.
- 72. Harvey SL, Charlet A, Haas W, Gygi SP, Kellogg DR (2005) Cdk1-dependent regulation of the mitotic inhibitor Wee1. Cell 122: 407–420.
- 73. Nazarenko A, Purdenko A, Volovnenko S, Ursulenko A (2003) Prism for Macintosh. In: Radushev D, editor. 4.0 ed: GraphPad Software, Inc.
- 74. Kellogg DR, Murray AW (1995) NAP1 acts with Clb2 to perform mitotic functions and suppress polar bud growth in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 130: 675–685.
- 75. Terry Brown KM, Tingting Du (2004) Analysis of RNA by Northern and Slot Blot Hybridization. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology: John Wiley & Sons.
- 76. Rasband WS (1997–2008) ImageJ. Bethesda, , Maryland, , USA: U. S. National Institutes of Health.
- 77. Jorgensen P, Nishikawa JL, Breitkreutz BJ, Tyers M (2002) Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and cell division in yeast. Science 297: 395–400.
- 78. Altman R, Kellogg DR (1997) Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase. J Cell Biol 138: 119–130.
- 79. Sreenivasan A, Bishop A, Shokat K, Kellogg D (2003) Specific inhibition of Elm1 kinase activity reveals functions required for early G1 events. Mol Cell Biol 23: 6327–6337.
- 80. Zimmerman Z, Kellogg DR (2001) The Sda1 protein is required for passage through Start. Mol Biol Cell 12: 201–219.
- 81. Egelhofer TA, Villen J, McCusker D, Gygi SP, Kellogg DR (2008) The septins function in G1 pathways that influence the pattern of cell growth in budding yeast. PLoS ONE 3: e2022.
- 82. Harvey SL, Kellogg DR (2003) Conservation of mechanisms controlling entry into mitosis: budding yeast wee1 delays entry into mitosis and is required for cell size control. Curr Biol 13: 264–275.