Skip to main content
  • Loading metrics

VIB1, a Link between Glucose Signaling and Carbon Catabolite Repression, Is Essential for Plant Cell Wall Degradation by Neurospora crassa

  • Yi Xiong,

    Affiliation Plant and Microbial Biology Department and The Energy Biosciences Institute, The University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

  • Jianping Sun,

    Affiliation Plant and Microbial Biology Department and The Energy Biosciences Institute, The University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America

  • N. Louise Glass

    Affiliation Plant and Microbial Biology Department and The Energy Biosciences Institute, The University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America


Filamentous fungi that thrive on plant biomass are the major producers of hydrolytic enzymes used to decompose lignocellulose for biofuel production. Although induction of cellulases is regulated at the transcriptional level, how filamentous fungi sense and signal carbon-limited conditions to coordinate cell metabolism and regulate cellulolytic enzyme production is not well characterized. By screening a transcription factor deletion set in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa for mutants unable to grow on cellulosic materials, we identified a role for the transcription factor, VIB1, as essential for cellulose utilization. VIB1 does not directly regulate hydrolytic enzyme gene expression or function in cellulosic inducer signaling/processing, but affects the expression level of an essential regulator of hydrolytic enzyme genes, CLR2. Transcriptional profiling of a Δvib-1 mutant suggests that it has an improper expression of genes functioning in metabolism and energy and a deregulation of carbon catabolite repression (CCR). By characterizing new genes, we demonstrate that the transcription factor, COL26, is critical for intracellular glucose sensing/metabolism and plays a role in CCR by negatively regulating cre-1 expression. Deletion of the major player in CCR, cre-1, or a deletion of col-26, did not rescue the growth of Δvib-1 on cellulose. However, the synergistic effect of the Δcre-1; Δcol-26 mutations circumvented the requirement of VIB1 for cellulase gene expression, enzyme secretion and cellulose deconstruction. Our findings support a function of VIB1 in repressing both glucose signaling and CCR under carbon-limited conditions, thus enabling a proper cellular response for plant biomass deconstruction and utilization.

Author Summary

Many filamentous fungi that grow on plant biomass are capable of producing lignocellulase enzymes to break down plant cell walls into utilizable sugars, thus holding great potential in reducing the cost of the next-generation biofuels. Cellulase production is subject to induction by the presence of plant biomass components and to repression by the availability of easily metabolized sugars, such as glucose. Genes required for repression of cellulase gene expression when preferred carbon sources are present (carbon catabolite repression) and those that play a role in mediating glucose sensing/metabolism have been identified in filamentous fungi, but the mechanisms involved in crosstalk between repression versus induction of cellulase gene expression is poorly understood. Here, we report the identification and functional characterization of VIB1, a transcription factor essential for plant cell wall deconstruction in Neurospora crassa and COL26, a transcription factor that functions in glucose sensing/metabolism and regulation of CCR. We show that disabling CRE1 repression and modulating the glucose response by deletion of col-26 restored growth of the Δvib-1 mutant on cellulose. Our findings are particularly important in understanding the molecular basis of enzyme production that could allow a further strain improvement for plant biomass deconstruction.


Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to simple sugars holds great promise in next-generation biofuel production and relies on a complex repertoire of proteins for enzymatic deconstruction of plant cell walls [1]. Many filamentous fungi have evolved to utilize cellulosic materials and are capable of producing a wide spectrum of enzymes, but only a few species have been harnessed for industrial usage [2]. Further improvement in fungal cellulolytic enzyme production is desired to make biofuel production cost-competitive, but this relies on a better understanding of the molecular basis of networks involved in carbon sensing and regulatory aspects associated with induction of gene expression of hydrolytic enzymes [3].

Cellulolytic enzyme production and secretion is a unique attribute of filamentous fungi, and efforts to identify important factors in enzyme production led to the discovery of a number of transcriptional activators and repressors. For example, the transcription factor XlnR/XYR1 positively regulates expression of cellulase and hemicellulase genes in Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma reesei, respectively [4][7]. In Neurospora crassa, the transcription factors CLR1 and CLR2 are essential for growth on cellulose and are required for expression of a ∼212 gene regulon that is induced in response to cellodextrins, such as cellobiose [8], [9] (Figure 1). In Aspergillus nidulans and A. oryzae, a clr-2 homolog, called clrB/manR, respectively, is also essential for cellulase gene expression and activity [8], [10], [11]. Additional transcriptional regulators that promote expression of some genes encoding hydrolytic enzymes have also been identified, including mcmA in A. nidulans [12], clbR in A. aculeatus [13], and aceII and bglR in T. reesei [14], [15].

Figure 1. Cellulase production in N. crassa is regulated by cellobiose induction and CCR.

CCR is decreased in absence of glucose, allowing scouting enzymes to liberate cellobiose from cellulose. Cellobiose (or a derivative) results in activation of the transcription factor CLR1, which induces expression of transporters for cellodextrins, β-glucosidases, and clr-2. Production of the transcription factor CLR2 drives cellulase gene expression. Both intracellular and extracellular β-glucosidase enzymes catalyze conversion of cellobiose to glucose, which can trigger carbon catabolite repression via glucose sensing mechanisms and transcriptional repression by CRE1.

In addition to induction, cellulase gene expression is also subject to carbon catabolite repression (CCR), which functions when a favorable carbon source, such as glucose, is present [3], [16], [17]. The most well-characterized transcription factor involved in CCR in filamentous fungi is CreA/CRE1. Deletion of creA/cre-1 alleviates some aspects of CCR for cellulolytic enzyme expression in Aspergilli [18][22], T. reesei [23][25], Penicillium decumbens [2] and N. crassa [26], [27]. In A. nidulans, repression by CreA occurs both by binding to promoters of hemicellulase genes as well as repressing expression of transcriptional activators [28]. Other factors including creB/cre2, creC, creD, lim1, and aceI were also reported to promote CCR in different fungal species via unknown mechanisms [29][37]. The strength of CCR is tuned by glucose sensing and signaling, although crosstalk between these two regulatory systems is not well understood. In N. crassa, RCO3, a predicted sugar transporter was proposed to function as a glucose sensor [38], [39]. In A. nidulans, phosphorylation of glucose triggers CreA repression [29], [40]. In Magnaporthe oryzae, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (Tps1) promotes glucose metabolism and CCR through inhibition of Nmr (nitrogen metabolite repression) proteins (Nmr1, Nmr2, Nmr3) [41]. Downstream, a multidrug and toxin extrusion pump, Mdt1, promotes citrate efflux to relieve CCR. To what extent these mechanisms are shared among cellulolytic fungi and whether they all converge to regulate CreA/CRE1-mediated CCR is currently unclear.

N. crassa is an early colonizer of burnt vegetation [42], [43], grows robustly on plant biomass and secretes a broad spectrum of enzymes to degrade plant cell walls [44], [45]. By screening the N. crassa near-full genome deletion strain set [46] for growth on Avicel (crystalline cellulose), we identified a transcription factor, vib-1, that is essential for cellulose utilization. VIB1 (vegetative incompatibility blocked) is a p53-like transcription factor that is conserved among filamentous ascomycete fungi. Characterized as a mediator of nonself recognition and cell death in N. crassa [47], [48], VIB1 is also required for extracellular protease secretion in response to both carbon and nitrogen starvation [48]. Here, we demonstrated that vib-1 functions upstream of cellulolytic gene induction and its absence leads to a weak induction of clr-2 and cellulase genes but increased expression of genes predicted to function in CCR. Functional analysis of one such predicted transcription factor gene, col-26, an N. crassa bglR homolog, showed that COL26 regulates glucose sensing/metabolism and which is separate from CRE1-mediated CCR. Deletion of both col-26 and cre-1 leads to a synergistic effect in rescuing Δvib-1 utilization of cellulose and cellulolytic activity. Our data support a function for VIB1 in repression of glucose signaling and CCR and which is critical for fungal utilization of plant biomass.


Deletion of vib-1 causes a growth defect on cellulosic biomass

Screening of a transcription factor deletion set of N. crassa strains [46] for ability to deconstruct crystalline cellulose showed that a strain carrying a deletion of the vib-1 gene (FGSC11309) failed to grow on Avicel (Figure 2A). Since functional vib-1 is required for extracellular protease secretion in response to carbon and nitrogen starvation in N. crassa [48], [49], we hypothesized that the Δvib-1 mutant might be unable to respond to complex extracellular carbon sources. In support of this hypothesis, the Δvib-1 mutant also exhibited slow growth on xylan. Growth defects were accompanied by barely detectable extracellular enzyme activity towards crystalline cellulose and low extracellular xylanase activity (Figure 2B and S1A). In contrast, the Δvib-1 mutant accumulated a similar amount of mycelial biomass as the WT strain when inoculated into minimal media containing simple sugars (sucrose, cellobiose or xylose) (Figure S1B). The introduction of an ectopic copy of vib-1 (Pvib-1) completely restored the growth defects on Avicel of the Δvib-1 mutant, as well as the secretome and cellulolytic enzyme activity of culture supernatants (Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Deletion of vib-1 abolishes production of cellulases and utilization of cellulosic material.

(A) Growth of WT and Δvib-1 on Avicel after 4 days; growth of WT is indicated by formation of orange mycelia, versus no growth of the Δvib-1 mutant. (B) Cellulase activity from 4-day old culture supernatants from Avicel-grown cultures of WT, the Δvib-1 mutant, the Pvib-1 strain (constitutive expression of vib-1 in a Δvib-1 strain) and the PTrvib1 strain (constitutive expression of T. reesei vib1 in a Δvib-1 strain). Cellulase activity was measured using Avicel as a substrate and represented by the amount of glucose and cellobiose released. The equivalent of glucose from cellobiose was calculated and represented by the light gray bar. (C) The secretomes of strains analyzed in panel B are shown.

To test the hypothesis that the role of VIB1 in cellulose utilization is conserved in other filamentous fungi, especially in fungi used in industrial production of cellulolytic enzymes, we carried out complementation tests using the vib-1 ortholog from T. reesei (EGR52133; Trvib1); TrVIB1 and N. crassa VIB1 share 49% amino acid identity. Constitutive expression of Trvib1 in a N. crassa Δvib-1 mutant fully restored the growth and cellulolytic enzyme activity (Figure 2B). The Trvib1 strain also recapitulated most of the secretome of N. crassa WT and Pvib-1 strains on Avicel (Figure 2C). These results suggest that vib-1 is functionally conserved for the utilization of cellulose in filamentous ascomycete fungi.

The Δvib-1 mutant shows an inappropriate temporal and spatial conidiation pattern. These phenotypes are correlated with differential localization of VIB1-GFP in vegetative hyphae versus conidiophores [48]. As conidiation is regulated by glucose limitation [50], we assessed whether differential localization of VIB1 was also associated with cellulose utilization. We examined a strain in which we replaced the resident vib-1 gene with a functional vib-1-gfp construct. Nuclear localization of VIB1-GFP was observed in hyphae and localization was independent of carbon source, either following a shift to Avicel for 2 hrs (Figure S1C) or after prolonged growth.

Constitutive expression of clr-2 restores cellulose utilization in the Δvib-1 mutant

Previous comparative RNA-seq analysis of WT revealed that 212 genes are significantly differentially expressed under cellulose conditions, a gene set referred to as the “Avicel regulon” [8]. To determine whether the defect in cellulase secretion and activity in the Δvib-1 mutant was due to failure to induce cellulase gene expression versus a defect in cellulase secretion, we assessed genome wide expression differences via RNA-seq between the WT and Δvib-1 strains following a shift for 4 hrs from sucrose medium to either carbon-free or Avicel medium. Of the 212 genes in the Avicel regulon, 91 genes were expressed at a significantly lower level in the Δvib-1 mutant versus WT under Avicel conditions (cutoff: Padj <0.05 and fold change >2; Table S1). This gene set includes the essential cellulase transcription factor gene, clr-2 and 43 carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) from 27 different families (Carbohydrate Active Enzymes database: [51].

CLR1 and CLR2 are strictly required for full expression of 140 genes within the Avicel regulon [8], [10]; 62 of these genes were identified in the 91-gene set that showed low expression in the Δvib-1 mutant. Although expression of clr-1 was not significantly different from WT in the Δvib-1 mutant, the expression of clr-2 was significantly reduced (FPKM: 107±43 in WT; 66±27 in Δvib-1 for clr-1 versus 171±10 in WT; 39±14 in Δvib-1 for clr-2) (Table S1). Importantly, constitutive expression of clr-2 (Pc clr-2) in minimal medium without cellulosic inducers recapitulates the response of N. crassa to crystalline cellulose, including the secretion of active cellulolytic enzymes [10]. The reduced transcription of clr-2 in the Δvib-1 mutant (Table S1) suggested that constitutive expression of clr-2 might suppress the cellulose utilization defect in the Δvib-1 mutant. To test this hypothesis, we constructed a Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strain and evaluated its ability to secrete cellulases and utilize Avicel in comparison to the Pc clr-2, the Δvib-1 and WT strains. In support of our hypothesis, the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strain showed restoration of protein secretion and cellulolytic activity to near WT levels (Figure 3A). Although the clr-2 expression levels in the Pc clr-2 strain were at a similar level to a WT strain after a 4 hr shift to Avicel (Figure S4), the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 mutant showed a ∼3.5 fold increase in clr-2 expression level under the same conditions.

Figure 3. Constitutive expression of clr-2 rescued the cellulase production defect of the Δvib-1 mutant.

(A) Protein concentration and cellulase activity in a Δvib-1 mutant versus a Δvib-1 strain constitutively expressing clr-2 (Pc clr-2; Δvib-1) and WT and a Pc clr-2 strain under Avicel conditions. (B) Expression levels from RNA-seq data of genes encoding major classes of CAZy proteins from WT and Δvib-1 shifted to Avicel versus the Pc clr-2 and Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strains shifted to minimal media with no carbon source. FPKM (Fragment Per Kilobase per exon per Megabase mapped) for individual genes were averaged between three biological replicates and pooled by CAZy class. (C) Hierarchical clustering of FPKM for 91 Avicel-regulon genes in the Δvib-1 mutant and WT on Avicel (Av) and the Δvib-1, WT, Pc clr-2 and the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strains switched to no carbon conditions (Nc). Results are displayed as heat maps with log (FPKM) from minimum (bright blue) to maximum (bright yellow).

To evaluate the functions of VIB1 versus CLR2 in regulating the 91 genes in the Avicel-regulon, we generated RNA-seq data from the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 mutant that was shifted for 4 hrs from sucrose medium to carbon-free medium and compared it to previously obtained data for Pc clr-2 [10]. Analysis of genes encoding different CAZy family proteins revealed a similar pattern of expression between the Pc clr-2 and the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strains (Figure 3B), consistent with our hypothesis that VIB1 functions upstream of clr-2 in response to cellulose. To differentiate whether any Avicel-regulon genes that showed decreased expression levels in Δvib-1 mutant were due to the vib-1 deletion rather than a low level of clr-2 expression, we performed hierarchical clustering of expression patterns of the Avicel-regulon genes across 6 RNA-seq experiments (WT and Δvib-1 shifted to no carbon or Avicel and the Pc clr-2 and the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strains shifted to no carbon); 4 major expression groups were identified (Figure 3C and Table S1). Two groups (group 1 and 3) were CLR2-regulon genes that were vib-1 independent. Group 1 consisted of 54 genes whose expression was fully induced by constitutive expression of clr-2 regardless of the presence or absence of vib-1, including 33 of the 43 CAZy proteins (Table S1). Group 3 consisted of 8 genes whose expression was partially induced by clr-2, but still in a vib-1-independent manner. The fourth group of genes included 14 vib-1 modulated genes. These genes were partially induced in Δvib-1 on Avicel, but remained repressed in both the Pc clr-2 and the Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strains under no carbon conditions (Table S1). Expression of these genes is likely induced by the cellulolytic cascade pathways upstream of CLR2 or other components present in commercial Avicel preparations, such as a low concentration of hemicellulose [9]. The second group consisted of 15 genes that were induced by constitutive clr-2 expression under no carbon conditions but in vib-1-dependent manner. This gene set included a pectate lyase (NCU06326), a BNR/Asp-box repeat protein predicted to have exo-α-L-1,5-arabinanase activity (NCU09924), a β−xylosidase (NCU09923/gh3-7), an extracellular β−1,4-D-glucosidase (NCU04952/gh3-4), a β−1,3-glucosidase (NCU09904), a starch binding domain-containing protein (NCU08746), a LysM domain-containing protein (NCU05319), a putative methyltransferase (NCU05501), and 6 hypothetical proteins. Six genes in this set encode proteins predicted to enter the secretory pathway (Table S1).

VIB1 functions upstream of the inducer signal

Our epistasis experiments indicated that vib-1 functions upstream of clr-2, suggesting that VIB1 could be involved in signal molecule processing that leads to CLR1 activation and thus clr-2 expression (Figure 1). In N. crassa, a strain carrying deletions of genes encoding two extracellular β-glucosidases and an intracellular β-glucosidase (Δ3βG), recapitulates the cellulolytic response when the Δ3βG strain is exposed to cellobiose [9]. These data indicate that cellobiose (or a derivative) functions as a cellulose signal that results in the induction of cellulolytic genes and subsequent secretion of cellulase enzymes. This cellobiose-induced cellulase gene expression and secretion is dependent upon functional clr-2 gene, as the Δ3βG; Δclr-2 mutant is unable to produce cellulolytic enzymes in response to Avicel or cellobiose (unpublished data). We therefore asked if VIB1 plays a role in induction via signal processing. To test this hypothesis, we created a Δ3βG; Δvib-1 quadruple mutant and asked whether the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 mutant could induce cellulase gene expression in response to cellobiose. Following a switch from sucrose to either no carbon, or 0.2% cellobiose, or 2% Avicel for 4 hrs, the induction of two major cellulase genes, cbh-1/NCU07340 and gh5-1/NCU00762 were significantly induced in the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 and the Δ3βG strains, but not in the Δvib-1 strain (p<0.05)(Figure 4A).

Figure 4. VIB1 is not required for cellobiose sensing or signaling.

(A) Expression levels of two cellulase genes (cbh-1 and gh5-1) were assessed in the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain versus WT, and the Δ3βG and Δvib-1 strains after a shift from sucrose VMM to 0.2% cellobiose versus 2% Avicel. Gene expression levels were measured by relative quantitative-PCR using actin as a control and normalized to expression level when cultures were shifted to VMM with no carbon source. (B) CMCase activity after 24 hrs of growth on 2% cellobiose of the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain relative to the WT, and the Δ3βG and Δvib-1 strains. Measured enzyme activity in arbitrary unit (AU) was normalized against to the mycelial biomass of each culture.

The restoration of cellulase gene expression in the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain when exposed to cellobiose was accompanied by enzyme production and activity. Similar to the Δ3βG mutant, the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain accumulated biomass more slowly on cellobiose than WT or the Δvib-1 mutant due to the slow conversion of cellobiose to glucose (0.51±0.11 g/L and 0.63±0.0 g/L for the Δ3βG and the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strains, respectively, versus 3.83±0.19 g/L and 3.62±0.11 g/L for WT and Δvib-1, respectively). However, despite less biomass accumulation, both the Δ3βG and the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strains showed significantly more enzyme activity than WT and the Δvib-1 strains on 2% cellobiose (Figure 4B). When grown on medium containing 2% Avicel as a sole carbon source, the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain showed significantly higher enzyme activity than Δvib-1 (Figure S2). These expression and activity data indicate VIB1 does not play a role in signal processing or signal transduction mechanisms that lead to activation of CLR1 and transcription of the cellulase activator, CLR2.

Comparative analysis of transcriptomes of WT and the Δvib-1 strain

In addition to induction, cellulolytic enzyme production requires proper nutrient sensing and relief from carbon catabolite repression (CCR) (reviewed in [17], [52]). We therefore hypothesized that the Δvib-1 mutant might be defective in either nutrient sensing and/or relieving CCR in response to Avicel. To test this hypothesis, we first compared RNA-seq data of the Δvib-1 mutant when shifted from sucrose to carbon-free media versus a shift from sucrose to Avicel media. This comparison revealed 770 differentially expressed genes (cutoff: Padj<0.01 and fold change >2) (Table S2). We then compared how these genes were expressed in WT under no carbon versus Avicel conditions using a previously published RNA-seq dataset [8]. Hierarchical clustering analysis of expression patterns of these 770 genes revealed three gene clusters (Figure 5) (Table S2).

Figure 5. Comparative analysis of gene expression between Δvib-1 and WT shifted to media lacking a carbon source (Nc) versus Avicel (Av) revealed potential CCR regulators.

Hierarchical clustering of FPKM for 770 genes that were differentially expressed in the Δvib-1 mutant when shifted to either carbon-free and Avicel conditions. Heat maps showing log (FPKM) from minimum (bright blue∶L) to maximum (bright yellow∶H) revealed three gene sets: A 273-gene set that has a similar expression pattern between the Δvib-1 mutant and WT, although the induction level on Avicel differed; a 173-gene set that displayed a similar expression pattern between the Δvib-1 mutant and WT that is high (H) on Nc and low (L) on Avicel; a 360-gene set consisting of genes that were generally expressed at higher levels in Δvib-1 on Avicel than in other samples/conditions.

The first cluster contained 237 genes whose expression pattern was similar between the Δvib-1 and WT strains. This gene set was expressed at low levels under no carbon conditions but induced to higher levels upon exposure to Avicel. This group contained 51 CAZy proteins, clr-1 and clr-2, all three cellodextrin transporters (cdt-1, cdt-2, and cbt-1) [44], [53], [54] and 102 hypothetical proteins. This gene set overlapped the WT Avicel-regulon for 143 genes, suggesting that cellulosic induction still occurred in the Δvib-1 mutant albeit at a low level.

The second cluster consisted of 173 genes whose expression pattern was also similar between WT and the Δvib-1 strain. However, in contrast to the first gene set, the expression level of these 173 genes was higher under carbon-free conditions. This set included 7 CAZy proteins, three conidiation-specific proteins (NCU08769/con-6, NCU07325/con-10, NCU09235/con-8), a high affinity glucose transporter/NCU08152, and 103 hypothetical proteins. Genes in this cluster may encode proteins that function in a general response to carbon starvation.

The third cluster consisted of 360 genes whose expression pattern between no carbon and Avicel conditions was different in the Δvib-1 mutant as compared to the WT strain. This gene set showed consistently higher expression in the Δvib-1 mutant on Avicel medium as compared to carbon-free medium (Figure 5). Only 7 genes encoding CAZy proteins were in this set and 169 genes were annotated as hypothetical. An enrichment in the categories of metabolism and energy, particularly, degradation of glycine (p = 2.37e-03), nitrogen, sulfur and selenium metabolism (p = 8.00e-03), purine nucleotide/nucleoside/nucleobase catabolism (p = 2.49e-05), isoprenoid metabolism (p = 8.63e-04), respiration (p = 3.34e-04), metal binding (p = 6.18e-04), and mitochondrial transport (p = 2.94e-03) was observed. These data suggested that the Δvib-1 mutant was improperly responding to carbon-limited conditions as compared to a WT strain.

Within the gene set that showed increased expression level in the Δvib-1 mutant on Avicel were genes involved in CCR. This gene set included cre-1/NCU08807, creD/NCU03887, creB/NCU08378 and bglR/NCU07788 (Table S2). Although the role of cre-1 in CCR and cellulose utilization is established in N. crassa [26], [27], the function of the creB and creD homologs in cellulolytic enzyme production were uncharacterized. In N. crassa, NCU07788/BglR was previously characterized in a transcription factor deletion screen and was named col-26 for its colonial phenotype on minimal sucrose medium [46].

The identification and characterization of new proteins involved in carbon sensing

To determine whether homologs of the CCR genes that showed increased expression in the Δvib-1 mutant play a role in cellulose deconstruction, we first measured protein concentration and cellulase enzyme activity in supernatants from the Δcol-26, ΔNCU08378/creB, and ΔNCU03887/creD mutants grown on Avicel for 7 days: none of the mutants showed significantly different cellulase activity than WT (Figure S3). To test if these genes are involved in CCR, we evaluated resistance of WT and the mutants to 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG). The compound 2-DG is an analogue of glucose that cannot be metabolized and is often used to select for, or evaluate, impairment of CCR and glucose repression in filamentous fungi [39], [55][57]. In strains with functional CCR, 2-DG is phosphorylated, thus activating CCR, resulting in the inability of the strain to grow on alternative carbon sources; strains with impaired CCR are insensitive to 2-DG exposure. When 2% cellobiose and 0.2% 2-DG were used as carbon sources, only the Δcre-1 and the Δcol-26 mutants showed 2-DG resistance, which was more obvious when Avicel instead of cellobiose was used as a carbon source (Figure 6A). These data implicated COL26 in CCR in N. crassa.

Figure 6. Screen for function of new proteins involved in CCR.

(A) Growth assays of the WT, Δvib-1, Δcre-1, Δcol-26, ΔcreB, and ΔcreD strains on 2-deoxy-glucose (2-DG) when grown on 2% cellobiose VMM for 2 days or on 2% Avicel VMM for 4 days. (B) Effects of col-26 and cre-1 deletions on sensitivity to 2-DG and allyl alcohol. Strains were inoculated and grown in 2% cellobiose VMM with 100 mM allyl alcohol for 40 hrs. For 2-DG sensitivity tests, the strains were inoculated and grown in 2% Avicel with either 0.2% 2-DG or 0.5% 2-DG for 5 days.

To confirm the role of COL26 in CCR, we tested CCR functionality using allyl alcohol (AA). As reported for M. oryzae [41], when CCR is impaired, alcohol dehydrogenase is expressed and will convert AA into toxic acrylaldehyde. Thus, strains with impaired CCR exhibit AA sensitivity, while strains with functional CCR are insensitive. As predicted, the Δcre-1 mutant was sensitive to AA, but the Δcol-26 mutant, similar to WT, was insensitive (Figure 6B). These data indicated that CCR was still functional in the Δcol-26 mutant. To reconcile the different results for the Δcol-26 mutant with respect to CCR, we analyzed growth of the Δcre-1 and the Δcol-26 mutants on different simple carbon sources. When grown on MM media with 2% glucose, fructose, sucrose, or cellobiose as the sole carbon source, the Δcre-1 mutant accumulated a similar amount of biomass to the WT strain (Figure 7A). However, the Δcol-26 mutant exhibited a severe growth defect on glucose, fructose and sucrose, consistent with its colonial designation [46], but only a moderate growth defect on cellobiose (Figure 7A).

Figure 7. Deletion of col-26 causes defects in glucose sensing/metabolism.

(A) Mycelial biomass of the Δcol-26 mutant relative to WT and the Δcre-1 strains on glucose, fructose, sucrose, or cellobiose. Mycelial biomass was measured at 24 hrs after inoculation. (B) Glucose uptake of WT, Δvib-1, Δcre-1, Δcol-26; Δvib-1 and the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutants was assayed by monitoring glucose remaining in the medium at 5 min, 20 min, and 60 min from cultures of identical biomass.

The fact that the Δcol-26 mutant grew much better on cellobiose as compared to glucose, fructose, and sucrose and was insensitive to 2-DG suggested that the Δcol-26 mutant might have defects in sugar transport and/or metabolism. To test this hypothesis, we measured glucose uptake rates in WT, the Δcre-1, and the Δcol-26 mutants. Within the first 5 minutes, extracellular glucose was reduced to a similar level in all strains (Figure 7B), suggesting similar glucose transporting capacity. However, over the remaining 55 minutes, glucose uptake rates decreased dramatically in the Δcol-26 mutant (Figure 7B). These data indicate that the Δcol-26 mutant has defects in glucose sensing/metabolism, rather than in glucose transport.

Simultaneous inhibition of glucose sensing/metabolism and impairment of CRE1-mediated CCR rescues Δvib-1 growth on Avicel

Our data supported a role for CRE1 in CCR and a role for COL26 in the regulation of glucose utilization. We therefore tested sensitivity of the Δcre-1; Δvib-1 and the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutants to AA. The Δcre-1; Δvib-1 and the Δcre-1 mutants were both sensitive to AA (Figure 6B), indicating the Δcre-1 mutation is epistatic for CCR to Δvib-1, while the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant was insensitive to AA, consistent with the active CCR phenotype of the col-26 and the Δvib-1 mutants. However, although CCR was impaired in the Δcre-1; Δvib-1 mutant, the double mutant was still unable to produce cellulolytic enzymes and grow on Avicel (Figure 8A). Similar to the Δcol-26 mutant, the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant also showed defects in glucose consumption (Figure 7B). Although the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant was unable to utilize Avicel, it showed slightly higher enzyme levels than that of the Δvib-1 mutant (Figure 8A). We therefore hypothesized that simultaneously preventing CRE1-mediated CCR and reducing glucose sensing/metabolism via inactivation of col-26 would restore cellulase gene expression and enzyme activity in a Δvib-1 mutant. As predicted, a Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 triple mutant utilized Avicel, produced significant cellulase activity and displayed a secretome similar to WT after 5 days of growth on Avicel (Figure 8A and S5). RT-PCR experiments from the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 Avicel cultures showed that expression levels of clr-2 and cbh-1 were restored in the triple mutant (Figure 8B).

Figure 8. Simultaneous deletion of cre-1 and col-26 rescues the phenotype of Δvib-1 on cellulose.

(A) Cellulase activity of culture supernatants after 4-days of growth on Avicel from WT versus Δvib-1, Δcre-1, Δcol-26, Δcre-1; Δvib-1, Δcol-26; Δvib-1 and Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 strains. (B) RT-PCR measurements of clr-2 and cbh-1 expression in the WT versus the Δcol-26, Δcre-1, and the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 cultures after 5-days of growth on Avicel. Expression levels were normalized to WT. (C) The CMCase activity of Avicel cultures of WT versus Δcol-26, Δcre-1, and the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutants during a time course of growth on Avicel.

Although simultaneous deletion of cre-1 and col-26 restored utilization of cellulose in the Δvib-1 mutant, a significant lag in growth and enzyme activity in the triple mutant was observed as compared to the WT, Δcre-1, or Δcol-26 mutants (Figure 8C). To assess whether the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant was also delayed in transcriptional response upon exposure to cellulose, we measured expression levels of clr-2, cbh-1, cre-1, vib-1 and col-26 in the Δvib-1, Δcol-26, Δcre-1, Δcre-1; Δvib-1, Δcol-26; Δvib-1, and Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutants as compared to the WT strain at 4 hrs and 24 hrs after cultures were shifted to Avicel conditions. Consistent with the enzyme activity assay and growth phenotype (Figure 8C), induction of clr-2 and cbh-1 was delayed in the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant (Figure 9). However, in the Δcol-26 mutant at the 4 hr time point, expression levels of cre-1 were significantly higher than in the Δvib-1 mutant, with the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant showing an additive phenotype of significantly increased cre-1 expression levels. At the 24 hr time point, expression levels of cre-1 were only maintained in the Δvib-1 and Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutants, but not in the Δcol-26 mutant. These data suggest that COL26 may function to repress cre-1 transcription to promote relief of CCR during the initial response to cellulolytic induction. Surprisingly, although the Δcre-1; Δvib-1 mutant was unable to utilize cellulose, induction of both clr-2 and cbh-1 were near WT levels at the 4 hr time point, unlike the Δvib-1 mutant (Figure 9A). However, at the 24 hr time point, expression levels of clr-2 were low and cbh-1 was undetectable in Δcre-1; Δvib-1 mutant (Figure 9B). These data suggest that although the Δcre-1; Δvib-1 can respond to cellulolytic induction by increasing clr-2 and thus cbh-1 expression levels, induction signaling cannot be maintained, perhaps due to repression by COL26 or by other factors present/absent in a Δvib-1 mutant background. The fact that the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant does not show WT restoration of initial cellulolytic induction (Figure 8C; Figure 9A) supports the hypothesis that additional unknown factors remain to be identified that play a role in nutrient sensing/signaling and the regulation of cellulose utilization in N. crassa.

Figure 9. Suppression of cre-1 and col-26 expression by VIB1 plays a role in early inductive and utilization phase during growth on cellulose.

The transcriptional expression of cre-1, vib-1, col-26, clr-2, and cbh-1 were measured by RT-PCR at 4 hrs (A) and 24 hrs (B) after 16 hr sucrose growth cultures were transferred to Avicel conditions. Expression levels were normalized to WT.


In this study, we showed that a Δvib-1 mutant displayed severe growth defects on cellulose, which was correlated with a lack of cellulolytic enzyme activity. By using RNA-seq data, we showed that expression of the Avicel regulon was significantly decreased in the Δvib-1 mutant, a phenotype that was rescued by constitutive expression of clr-2. Induction of clr-2 is dependent upon a signal cascade from cellobiose or derivative and functional CLR1 (Figure 1) [8]. Here we showed that VIB1 is not involved in inducer signal processing or perception because the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 mutant produced cellulolytic enzymes in response to cellobiose. These data indicated that VIB1 functions upstream of regulators that mediate inducer-dependent signal transduction and cellulase gene expression and activity.

Our transcriptional profiling revealed that, under Avicel conditions, a deletion of vib-1 led to an increase in transcription of genes in metabolism and energy as well as genes reported to mediate CCR. These results suggested that cellulolytic induction was mis-regulated in the Δvib-1 mutant. In the presence of glucose, N. crassa adjusts its metabolism for a high rate of glycolysis and directs carbon flux to respiration and fermentation for biosynthesis and energy production [58], while genes involved in utilization of alternative carbon sources are repressed in a CRE1-dependent manner [26], [27]. When lignocellulose is the only carbon source, CCR is relieved to allow the synthesis of “scouting” enzymes that liberate inducer molecules, such as cellobiose [9], [44], [59]. In S. cerevisiae, glucose is sensed through a multifaceted mechanism including direct detection of glucose by glucose receptors/transporters on the plasma membrane and by the sensing of glucose-6-P and other metabolites by metabolic enzymes. The glucose signals are transmitted to CCR mainly through the Snf1 complex and the Mig1 (CreA/Cre1 homolog) transcriptional repressor complex [60], [61]. In A. nidulans, mutations in two hexose kinase genes (hxkA/glkA4) results in inappropriate de-repression of genes under glucose growth conditions, although to a lesser extent than a creA mutant strain [29]. Here we show that simply eliminating CRE1-mediated CCR did not rescue the growth defect of Δvib-1 mutant on Avicel, but that a deletion of col-26 was also required.

The Δcol-26 mutant exhibited a growth defect on glucose, fructose and sucrose, which was not associated with a deficiency in glucose transport (Figure 7B). In T. reesei, a strain carrying a mutation in bglR shows reduced expression of β-glucosidase genes, suggesting the BglR plays a positive role in CCR by increasing glucose release from cellobiose [15]. However, our analyses of cellulolytic activity of secreted enzymes in the Δcol-26 mutant showed no difference in glucose versus cellobiose release (Figure 8A), a result that is in contrast to the strongly reduced glucose release from culture supernatants in the Δ3βG mutant (which lacks extracellular β-glucosidase activity) (Figure S2). Although we have not determined how glucose metabolism is changed in the Δcol-26 mutant, the resistance of Δcol-26 to 2-DG inhibition suggests a defect in glucose sensing/metabolism; CRE1-mediated CCR was still functional (as shown by insensitivity to AA). The fact that a deletion of col-26 and cre-1 restored growth of Δvib-1 on Avicel suggests a synergistic effect between glucose sensing/metabolism mediated by COL26 and CRE1-regulated CCR in repressing cellulolytic induction (Figure 10). However, other unknown factors in addition to CRE1 and COL26 play a role in the Δvib-1 mutant, because the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant showed a significant lag in gene induction and enzyme secretion under cellulolytic conditions (Figure 8C). Future experiments to identify additional mutations that fully suppress the Δvib-1 cellulolytic phenotype and the identification of direct targets of VIB1 will be most informative for further dissection of glucose sensing and CCR in filamentous fungi.

Figure 10. Model for role of VIB1 in regulating glucose sensing/metabolism and CCR under cellulolytic conditions.

In an early encounter of N. crassa to cellulose, “scouting” enzymes induced by carbon starvation act on cellulose to liberate cellulolytic inducers that activate signaling cascades that include activation of CLR1, and subsequent expression of CLR2 and induction of genes encoding cellulases. Efficient cellulolytic induction also requires de-repression of carbon catabolite repression (CCR), as many cellulase genes are not expressed even in the presence of an inducer if a preferred carbon source is available. In the early cellulolytic induction, VIB1 functions to repress CRE1-mediated CCR and glucose sensing/metabolism by COL26, which results in CCR de-repression and productive cellulolytic responses. COL26 also plays a role in repressing cre-1 expression and thus alleviating CCR. As cellulases are produced, glucose is liberated from cellulose and N. crassa transits into the utilization phase, which is associated with reduced transcription of cellulases [44]. Repressive function of VIB1 on col-26 expression may be important for tuning cellular responses for the need to produce sufficient enzymes to liberate simple sugars from cellulose, but without over-activating CCR. VIB1 also likely regulates other factors important for cellulolytic induction.

Our data supports the model that the regulatory function of VIB1 on CRE1-mediated CCR and COL26-mediated glucose sensing/metabolism functions during different stages of the cellulolytic response (Figure 10). At induction stage, both VIB1 and COL26 negatively regulate CRE1-mediated CCR (Figure 9), thus allowing a relief of CCR and efficient induction of cellulolytic genes in response to cellulose. During the utilization phase, glucose is released from cellulose, and glucose sensing/signaling via COL26 may repress cellulolytic responses, with VIB1 functioning to dampen this inhibition. As many cellulolytic genes are subject to carbon catabolite repression and a requirement for CLR2 for induction, the cellular response to plant biomass may depend on the relative strength of these two antagonizing forces (Figure 10). Mechanistically, how VIB1 exerts its function on glucose sensing/metabolism via COL26 and CCR via CRE1 remain to be elucidated.

In the hyper-secreting T. reesei strain, RUT-C30, disruption of phosphoglucose isomerase gene (pgi1) blocks formation of fructose-6-P from glucose-6-P and increased cellulase production on glucose. This increase relies on a genetic interaction between the Δpgi1 mutation and the cre1-1-1 mutation in the RUT-C30 background [62]. Interestingly, both the hyper-secreting T. reesei RUT-C30 and PC-3-7 strains have mutations in cre1 and bglR/col-26 [15], [63], [64], but whether a synergy exists between Δcre1 and ΔbglR in T. reesei, as in N. crassa, and its relationship to T. reesei vib1 is unclear. Many cellulolytic enzyme hyper-producers such as T. reesei RUT-C30 and PC-3-7, and P. decumbens JU-A10-T show relief from CCR, but contain a large number of mutations in additional genes that contribute to the hyper-production phenotype [2], [15], [63][65]. Identifying and characterizing possible synergistic effects of the different mutations on hyper-production of lignocellulose enzymes, as shown in this study, will be a challenge.

The function of VIB1 in regulating glucose sensing/metabolism and CCR plays a role in the utilization of other complex substrates. VIB1 is required for extracellular protease production in response to carbon and nitrogen starvation, a function shared by its homolog in A. nidulans, xprG [66][70]. The Δvib-1 mutant also exhibits inappropriate temporal and spatial conidiation and has defects in protoperithecia formation [48], [70], two developmental events that are regulated by nitrogen and glucose limitation and signaling [71]. A shotgun proteomic analysis of culture supernatant of the Pvib-1 strains under carbon source depletion showed a higher amount of intracellular proteins relative to WT (Table S3). These data are in consistent with a role of VIB1 in promoting cell death [47], [48], [72], and in autolysis in A. nidulans [73], perhaps via perturbed nutritional signaling. Autolysis is frequently observed in submerged batch cultures in industrial bioprocessing, and promotes cryptic growth for survival and protein production under nutrient-depleted conditions [74]. Further manipulations of vib-1 and its homologs in filamentous fungi may yield economic benefits via the regulation of autolysis under industrial settings.

In summary, our data show that VIB1 is an essential regulator for cellulase production under inductive conditions and identifies COL26 as an important player in glucose sensing/metabolism. As VIB1 mediates metabolic changes as well as programmed death, two properties shared by mammalian tumor suppressor p53 [75], [76], the molecular mechanism in linking the two could be conserved, and further investigation of vib-1 function and its homologs in filamentous fungi may also shed light on cancer research.

Materials and Methods


FGSC 2489 was used as the WT reference strain and background for mutant strains [46]. FGSC 11308 (Δvib-1; mat a), FGSC 11309 (Δvib-1; mat A), FGSC 11030 (Δcol-26; mat a), FGSC 11031 (Δcol-26; mat A) were obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center ( [50]. The vib-1 mis-expression strain Pvib-1 (Pvib-1; Δvib-1) was constructed by transforming FGSC 11308 with a DNA fragment containing the promoter of the clock controlled gene 1 (ccg-1) and the open reading frame and 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of vib-1 and homologous and flanking regions from the coding sequence of the his-3 gene. Transformants were selected for histidine prototrophy [77] and backcrossed to FGSC 2489 to obtain a his-3::pccg-1-vib-1; Δvib-1 homokaryotic strain. The Tr vib1 mis-expression strain PTr-vib1 (PTr vib1; Δvib-1) was created in the same way except that the open reading frame and 3′UTR of Tr vib1 was used. The Pc clr-2, the Δcre-1, the Δ3βG and the Δ3βG Δcre-1 strains were from previous studies [9], [10], [26]. The Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 strain, the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 strain, the Δcol-26; Δvib-1 strain, the Δcre-1; Δcol-26 strain, and the Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 strain were created through crosses.

Culture conditions

N. crassa cultures were grown on Vogel's minimal medium (VMM) [78]. Unless noted, 2% (w/v) sucrose was used as a carbon source. Strains were pre-grown on 3 mL VMM slants at 30°C in dark for 24 hrs, then at 25°C in constant light for 4–10 days to stimulate conidia production. For flask cultures, conidia were inoculated into 100 mL of liquid media at 106 conidia/mL and grown at 25°C in constant light and shaking (200 rpm). To test 2-DG and allyl alcohol sensitivity, 3 mL of liquid media containing either 0.2% (w/v) 2-DG (Sigma Aldrich, MO) or 100 mM allyl alcohol were inoculated with 106 conidia/mL and grown in 24-well plates at 25°C in constant light and shaking (200 rpm).

For crosses, one parental strain was grown on synthetic crossing medium [79] as the female for 2 weeks at room temperature for protoperithecial development. The other parental strain was used as the male to fertilize the protoperithecia. Crosses were kept for 3 weeks at room temperature. Ascospores were collected and activated as described [80], plated on 1% VMM, and incubated at room temperature for 18 hrs. Germinated ascospores were selected and transferred to selective slants for further screen and confirmation.

Media shift experiments

Cultures were grown on sucrose for 16 hrs, centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min and washed in VMM or MM without a carbon source, followed by 4 hrs growth in 100 mL VMM or MM with 2% carbon source (sucrose, cellobiose, Avicel PH-101 (Sigma Aldrich, MO)) or with no carbon source added.

RNA preparation and qRT-PCR analysis

Mycelia were harvested by filtration and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using the Trizol method (Invitrogen) and further purified using RNeasy kits (QIAGEN). Four ng of RNA was used as template in each quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) reaction. qRT-PCR was carried out using EXPRESS One-Step SYBR GreenER kit (Invitrogen) and Applied Biosystems Step One Plus Real Time PCR system. qRT-PCR were done in biological duplicates or triplicates with actin as the endogenous control. Relative expression levels were normalized to actin, and fold changes in RNA level were the ratios of the relative expression level on inducing conditions to no carbon conditions.

RNA sequencing and transcription expression analysis

Libraries were prepared according to standard protocols from Illumina Inc (San Diego, CA) and sequenced on the HiSeq 2000 platforms at QB3 Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory (CA). Sequenced reads were mapped against predicted transcripts from the N. crassa OR74A genome [81](Neurospora crassa Sequencing Project, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT with Tophat v2.0.4 [82]. Transcript abundance (FPKM) was estimated with Cufflinks v2.0.2 mapping against reference isoforms and differential gene expression were analyzed with Cuffdiff v2.0.2 [83]. Biological replicates used for RNA-seq showed high reproducibility. The Pearson correlation of FPKM on log basis (p-value<2.2e-16): rp≥0.96 between WT (Nc) replicates, rp≥0.91 between WT (Av) replicates, rp≥0.99 between Δvib-1 (Nc) replicates, and rp≥0.96 between Δvib-1 (Av) replicates.

For hierarchical clustering analysis, FPKM were log transformed, normalized and centered on a per gene basis with Cluster 3.0 [84] so that values from each gene ranged from −1 (minimum) to 1 (maximum). Average linkage clustering was performed with Euclidean distance as the similarity metric. Functional category analysis was done as described in [8]. Lists of genes were matched against the MIPS Functional Category Database [85], and significance of enrichment was calculated.

Enzyme activity assays

For CMCase and xylanase activity assays, Azo-CM-Cellulose and Azo-xylan (Beechwood) from Megazyme (Wicklow, Ireland) were used as substrates. Protein concentration was measured with the Bradford assay (BioRad). Cellulase assays were conducted by mixing 500 µL of culture supernatant with 500 µL 0.5% (w/v) Avicel in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, and incubated with shaking at 37°C for 5 hrs. Reactions were stopped by centrifugation at 2000 g for 5 min and by addition of 9 volumes of 0.1 M NaOH to the reaction supernatants. Released glucose and cellobiose were separated on a PA-200 HPAEC column and analyzed on Dionex ICS-3000 as described in [45].

Glucose uptake assays

Strains were grown in 3 mL VMM with 2% cellobiose as the carbon source in the well of 24-well plates at 25°C in constant light with shaking (200 rpm) for 40 hrs to reach the same mycelial biomass, then glucose was added into each culture such that the culture was grown in MM with 1% (w/v) glucose for 1 hr. The cultures were thoroughly washed with MES buffer (10 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid, 100 mM NaCl), and each washed culture was transferred into 4 ml of MES buffer supplemented with 10 mM glucose and grown at room temperature for 1 hr with shaking at 550 rpm. Culture supernatants were sampled at 5, 20, and 60 min, and diluted in 50 volumes of 0.1 M NaOH. Glucose levels were measured using Dionex ICS-3000 HPAEC-PA 200 and MES buffer instead of VMM was used to avoid precipitation that interferes with downstream analysis.

Protein gel electrophoresis

Culture supernatants were mixed with 4× SDS loading buffer and boiled for 10 min before loading onto Criterion 4–15% Tris-HCl Precast Gel (Bio-Rad). GelCode Blue Stain Reagent (Thermo Scientific) was used for gel staining.

Microscopy and imaging

Strains were inoculated in 2% sucrose VMM and grown at 25°C for 12 hrs in eight-chamber Lab-Tek chambered cover glass (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL). Localization of VIB1-GFP was observed using a 100×1.4 NA oil immersion objective on a Leica SD6000 spinning disk confocal with 488 nm laser and controlled by Metamorph software. Z-series stacks were collected and maximum intensity projections were created using ImageJ. For medium shift experiment, the cultures in the chamber were washed with VMM without carbon sources and VMM with 0.5% Avicel was added, followed by immediate time-lapse recordings with an interval of 15 min.

Proteomic analysis

Equal volume of culture supernatants of WT and Pvib-1 strains was subjected to SDS-PAGE and secretome proteins identified as described in [86]. In-gel trypsin-digestion was performed according to manufacture protocol (Promega, Trypsin Gold). Digested peptides were separated using ProtID-Chip-43 (II) and analyzed using the Agilent 6510 Q-TOF LC/MS as in [9].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

VIB1 functions in xylanase production and localizes to nuclei in both sucrose and cellulose media. (A) The Δvib-1 mutant grew slowly on xylan and showed reduced xylanase activity. (B) Mycelial biomass accumulation after 24 hrs of growth in the Δvib-1 mutant as compared to WT in VMM containing 2% (w/v) of glucose, cellobiose, or xylose as the sole carbon source. (C) Fluorescence microscopy showing localization of VIB1-GFP to nuclei under both sucrose and Avicel conditions.


Figure S2.

Mutations in Δ3βG genes rescue the cellulase-deficient phenotype of the Δvib-1 mutant on Avicel. Cellulase activity in the Δ3βG; Δvib-1 mutant compared to the WT, Δvib-1 and the Δ3βG strains after 4 days of growth on 2% Avicel. Cellulase activity was measured using Avicel as substrate (see Materials and Methods).


Figure S3.

Secreted protein levels and cellulase activity in the Δcre-1, ΔcreB, ΔcreD, and Δcol-26 mutants relative to WT and the Δvib-1 mutant. (A) The Δcre-1, ΔcreB, ΔcreD and Δcol-26 mutants in comparison to WT and the Δvib-1 mutant were screened for secreted protein levels after 7 days of growth on 2% Avicel. (B) CMCase activity of the Δcre-1, ΔcreB, ΔcreD and Δcol-26 mutants in comparison to WT and the Δvib-1 mutant after 7 days of growth on 2% Avicel.


Figure S4.

clr-2 expression levels in the Pc clr-2 strains as compared to WT and the Δvib-1 mutant. clr-2 expression levels at 4 hrs after a shift of 16 hr old sucrose-grown cultures to Avicel were measured in WT, Δvib-1, Pc clr-2, and Pc clr-2; Δvib-1 by RT-PCR and normalized to the WT level.


Figure S5.

The Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 mutant displays a cellulose secretome similar to WT. WT, Δvib-1, Δcre-1, Δcol-26, Δcre-1; Δvib-1, Δcol-26; Δvib-1, and Δcre-1; Δcol-26; Δvib-1 strains were inoculated with 106 conidia/ml and grown on Avicel for 5 days. The culture supernatants were subsequently separated by SDS-PAGE.


Table S1.

Gene list of the 91 Avicel-regulon genes differentially expressed in Δvib-1 as compared to WT on Avicel.


Table S2.

Gene list of the 770 genes differentially expressed between no carbon and Avicel conditions in Δvib-1.


Table S3.

Intracellular N. crassa proteins enriched in the supernatant of Pvib-1 cultures relative to WT after carbon depletion.



We thank Trevor Starr for providing the strain in which the resident vib-1 gene was replaced with vib-1-gfp construct. We are pleased to acknowledge use of deletion strains generated by NIH Program Project Grant P01GM068087, Functional analysis of a model filamentous fungus.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YX JS NLG. Performed the experiments: YX JS. Analyzed the data: YX JS NLG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NLG. Wrote the paper: YX NLG.


  1. 1. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, et al. (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804–807.
  2. 2. Liu G, Zhang L, Qin Y, Zou G, Li Z, et al. (2013) Long-term strain improvements accumulate mutations in regulatory elements responsible for hyper-production of cellulolytic enzymes. Sci Rep 3: 1569.
  3. 3. Kubicek CP, Mikus M, Schuster A, Schmoll M, Seiboth B (2009) Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina. Biotechnol Biofuels 2: 19.
  4. 4. van Peij NN, Gielkens MM, de Vries RP, Visser J, de Graaff LH (1998) The transcriptional activator XlnR regulates both xylanolytic and endoglucanase gene expression in Aspergillus niger. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3615–3619.
  5. 5. Gielkens MM, Dekkers E, Visser J, de Graaff LH (1999) Two cellobiohydrolase-encoding genes from Aspergillus niger require D-xylose and the xylanolytic transcriptional activator XlnR for their expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 4340–4345.
  6. 6. Stricker AR, Grosstessner-Hain K, Wurleitner E, Mach RL (2006) Xyr1 (xylanase regulator 1) regulates both the hydrolytic enzyme system and D-xylose metabolism in Hypocrea jecorina. Eukaryot Cell 5: 2128–2137.
  7. 7. Stricker AR, Mach RL, de Graaff LH (2008) Regulation of transcription of cellulases- and hemicellulases-encoding genes in Aspergillus niger and Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78: 211–220.
  8. 8. Coradetti ST, Craig JP, Xiong Y, Shock T, Tian C, et al. (2012) Conserved and essential transcription factors for cellulase gene expression in ascomycete fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 7397–7402.
  9. 9. Znameroski EA, Coradetti ST, Roche CM, Tsai JC, Iavarone AT, et al. (2012) Induction of lignocellulose-degrading enzymes in Neurospora crassa by cellodextrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 6012–6017.
  10. 10. Coradetti ST, Xiong Y, Glass NL (2013) Analysis of a conserved cellulase transcriptional regulator reveals inducer-independent production of cellulolytic enzymes in Neurospora crassa. Microbiologyopen 2: 595–609.
  11. 11. Ogawa M, Kobayashi T, Koyama Y (2013) ManR, a transcriptional regulator of the beta-mannan utilization system, controls the cellulose utilization system in Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77: 426–429.
  12. 12. Yamakawa Y, Endo Y, Li N, Yoshizawa M, Aoyama M, et al. (2013) Regulation of cellulolytic genes by McmA, the SRF-MADS box protein in Aspergillus nidulans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 431: 777–782.
  13. 13. Kunitake E, Tani S, Sumitani J, Kawaguchi T (2013) A novel transcriptional regulator, ClbR, controls the cellobiose- and cellulose-responsive induction of cellulase and xylanase genes regulated by two distinct signaling pathways in Aspergillus aculeatus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97: 2017–2028.
  14. 14. Aro N, Saloheimo A, Ilmen M, Penttila M (2001) ACEII, a novel transcriptional activator involved in regulation of cellulase and xylanase genes of Trichoderma reesei. J Biol Chem 276: 24309–24314.
  15. 15. Nitta M, Furukawa T, Shida Y, Mori K, Kuhara S, et al. (2012) A new Zn(II)(2)Cys(6)-type transcription factor BglR regulates beta-glucosidase expression in Trichoderma reesei. Fungal Genet Biol 49: 388–397.
  16. 16. Ilmen M, Saloheimo A, Onnela ML, Penttila ME (1997) Regulation of cellulase gene expression in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 1298–1306.
  17. 17. Aro N, Pakula T, Penttila M (2005) Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 719–739.
  18. 18. de Vries RP, Visser J, de Graaff LH (1999) CreA modulates the XlnR-induced expression on xylose of Aspergillus niger genes involved in xylan degradation. Res Microbiol 150: 281–285.
  19. 19. Orejas M, MacCabe AP, Perez Gonzalez JA, Kumar S, Ramon D (1999) Carbon catabolite repression of the Aspergillus nidulans xlnA gene. Mol Microbiol 31: 177–184.
  20. 20. Orejas M, MacCabe AP, Perez-Gonzalez JA, Kumar S, Ramon D (2001) The wide-domain carbon catabolite repressor CreA indirectly controls expression of the Aspergillus nidulans xlnB gene, encoding the acidic endo-beta-(1,4)-xylanase X(24). J Bacteriol 183: 1517–1523.
  21. 21. Bailey C, Arst HN Jr (1975) Carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillos nidulans. Eur J Biochem 51: 573–577.
  22. 22. Shroff RA, O'Connor SM, Hynes MJ, Lockington RA, Kelly JM (1997) Null alleles of creA, the regulator of carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol 22: 28–38.
  23. 23. Strauss J, Mach RL, Zeilinger S, Hartler G, Stoffler G, et al. (1995) Cre1, the carbon catabolite repressor protein from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Lett 376: 103–107.
  24. 24. Takashima S, Iikura H, Nakamura A, Masaki H, Uozumi T (1996) Analysis of Cre1 binding sites in the Trichoderma reesei cbh1 upstream region. FEMS Microbiol Lett 145: 361–366.
  25. 25. Ilmen M, Thrane C, Penttila M (1996) The glucose repressor gene cre1 of Trichoderma: isolation and expression of a full-length and a truncated mutant form. Mol Gen Genet 251: 451–460.
  26. 26. Sun J, Glass NL (2011) Identification of the CRE-1 cellulolytic regulon in Neurospora crassa. PLoS One 6: e25654.
  27. 27. Ziv C, Gorovits R, Yarden O (2008) Carbon source affects PKA-dependent polarity of Neurospora crassa in a CRE-1-dependent and independent manner. Fungal Genet Biol 45: 103–116.
  28. 28. Tamayo EN, Villanueva A, Hasper AA, de Graaff LH, Ramon D, et al. (2008) CreA mediates repression of the regulatory gene xlnR which controls the production of xylanolytic enzymes in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet Biol 45: 984–993.
  29. 29. Flipphi M, van de Vondervoort PJ, Ruijter GJ, Visser J, Arst HN Jr, et al. (2003) Onset of carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Parallel involvement of hexokinase and glucokinase in sugar signaling. J Biol Chem 278: 11849–11857.
  30. 30. Todd RB, Lockington RA, Kelly JM (2000) The Aspergillus nidulans creC gene involved in carbon catabolite repression encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Mol Gen Genet 263: 561–570.
  31. 31. Lockington RA, Kelly JM (2001) Carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans involves deubiquitination. Mol Microbiol 40: 1311–1321.
  32. 32. Lockington RA, Kelly JM (2002) The WD40-repeat protein CreC interacts with and stabilizes the deubiquitinating enzyme CreB in vivo in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol 43: 1173–1182.
  33. 33. Boase NA, Kelly JM (2004) A role for creD, a carbon catabolite repression gene from Aspergillus nidulans, in ubiquitination. Mol Microbiol 53: 929–940.
  34. 34. Denton JA, Kelly JM (2011) Disruption of Trichoderma reesei cre2, encoding an ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase, results in increased cellulase activity. BMC Biotechnol 11: 103.
  35. 35. Zhou G, Lu J, Li Z, Li J, Wang M, et al. (2012) Enhanced cellulase production of Penicillium decumbens by knocking out CreB encoding a deubiquitination enzyme [Chinese]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 28: 959–972.
  36. 36. Gremel G, Dorrer M, Schmoll M (2008) Sulphur metabolism and cellulase gene expression are connected processes in the filamentous fungus Hypocrea jecorina (anamorph Trichoderma reesei). BMC Microbiol 8: 174.
  37. 37. Aro N, Ilmen M, Saloheimo A, Penttila M (2003) ACEI of Trichoderma reesei is a repressor of cellulase and xylanase expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 56–65.
  38. 38. Ebbole DJ (1998) Carbon catabolite repression of gene expression and conidiation in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genetics and Biology 25: 15–21.
  39. 39. Madi L, McBride SA, Bailey LA, Ebbole DJ (1997) rco-3, a gene involved in glucose transport and conidiation in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 146: 499–508.
  40. 40. Brown NA, de Gouvea PF, Krohn NG, Savoldi M, Goldman GH (2013) Functional characterisation of the non-essential protein kinases and phosphatases regulating Aspergillus nidulans hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6: 91.
  41. 41. Fernandez J, Wright JD, Hartline D, Quispe CF, Madayiputhiya N, et al. (2012) Principles of carbon catabolite repression in the rice blast fungus: Tps1, Nmr1-3, and a MATE-family pump regulate glucose metabolism during infection. PLoS Genet 8: e1002673.
  42. 42. Davis RH, Perkins DD (2002) Timeline: Neurospora: a model of model microbes. Nat Rev Genet 3: 397–403.
  43. 43. Turner BC, Perkins DD, Fairfield A (2001) Neurospora from natural populations: a global study. Fungal Genet Biol 32: 67–92.
  44. 44. Tian C, Beeson WT, Iavarone AT, Sun J, Marletta MA, et al. (2009) Systems analysis of plant cell wall degradation by the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 22157–22162.
  45. 45. Phillips CM, Iavarone AT, Marletta MA (2011) Quantitative proteomic approach for cellulose degradation by Neurospora crassa. J Proteome Res 10: 4177–4185.
  46. 46. Colot HV, Park G, Turner GE, Ringelberg C, Crew CM, et al. (2006) A high-throughput gene knockout procedure for Neurospora reveals functions for multiple transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10352–10357.
  47. 47. Xiang Q, Glass NL (2002) Identification of vib-1, a locus involved in vegetative incompatibility mediated by het-c in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 162: 89–101.
  48. 48. Dementhon K, Iyer G, Glass NL (2006) VIB-1 is required for expression of genes necessary for programmed cell death in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell 5: 2161–2173.
  49. 49. Hutchison EA, Bueche JA, Glass NL (2012) Diversification of a protein kinase cascade: IME-2 is involved in nonself recognition and programmed cell death in Neurospora crassa. Genetics 192: 467–482.
  50. 50. McCluskey K (2003) The Fungal Genetics Stock Center: from molds to molecules. Adv Appl Microbiol 52: 245–262.
  51. 51. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B (2013) The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D490–495.
  52. 52. Glass NL, Schmoll M, Cate JH, Coradetti S (2013) Plant cell wall deconstruction by ascomycete fungi. Annu Rev Microbiol 67: 477–498.
  53. 53. Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, et al. (2010) Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 330: 84–86.
  54. 54. Xiong Y, Coradetti ST, Li X, Gritsenko MA, Clauss T, et al. (2014) The proteome and phosphoproteome of Neurospora crassa in response to cellulose, sucrose and carbon starvation. Fungal Genet Biol (in press).
  55. 55. Eveleigh DE, Montenecourt BS (1979) Increasing yields of extracellular enzymes. Adv Appl Microbiol 25: 57–74.
  56. 56. Sheirneiss G, Montenecourt BS (1984) Characterization of the secreted cellulases of Trichoderma reesei wild type and mutants during controlled fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 20: 46–53.
  57. 57. Allen KE, McNally MT, Lowendorf HS, Slayman CW, Free SJ (1989) Deoxyglucose-resistant mutants of Neurospora crassa: isolation, mapping, and biochemical characterization. J Bacteriol 171: 53–58.
  58. 58. Xie X, Wilkinson HH, Correa A, Lewis ZA, Bell-Pedersen D, et al. (2004) Transcriptional response to glucose starvation and functional analysis of a glucose transporter of Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 1104–1119.
  59. 59. Delmas S, Pullan ST, Gaddipati S, Kokolski M, Malla S, et al. (2012) Uncovering the genome-wide transcriptional responses of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger to lignocellulose using RNA sequencing. PLoS Genet 8: e1002875.
  60. 60. Rolland F, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM (2002) Glucose-sensing and -signalling mechanisms in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2: 183–201.
  61. 61. Gancedo JM (1998) Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 334–361.
  62. 62. Limon MC, Pakula T, Saloheimo M, Penttila M (2011) The effects of disruption of phosphoglucose isomerase gene on carbon utilisation and cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30. Microbial Cell Factories 10: 40.
  63. 63. Porciuncula Jde O, Furukawa T, Mori K, Shida Y, Hirakawa H, et al. (2013) Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of a Trichoderma reesei hyper-cellulolytic mutant developed in Japan. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77: 534–543.
  64. 64. Le Crom S, Schackwitz W, Pennacchio L, Magnuson JK, Culley DE, et al. (2009) Tracking the roots of cellulase hyperproduction by the fungus Trichoderma reesei using massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16151–16156.
  65. 65. Vitikainen M, Arvas M, Pakula T, Oja M, Penttila M, et al. (2010) Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of Trichoderma reesei strains with enhanced cellulase production properties. BMC Genomics 11: 441.
  66. 66. Katz ME, Flynn PK, vanKuyk PA, Cheetham BF (1996) Mutations affecting extracellular protease production in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Gen Genet 250: 715–724.
  67. 67. Katz ME, Bernardo SM, Cheetham BF (2008) The interaction of induction, repression and starvation in the regulation of extracellular proteases in Aspergillus nidulans: evidence for a role for CreA in the response to carbon starvation. Curr Genet 54: 47–55.
  68. 68. Katz ME, Gray KA, Cheetham BF (2006) The Aspergillus nidulans xprG (phoG) gene encodes a putative transcriptional activator involved in the response to nutrient limitation. Fungal Genet Biol 43: 190–199.
  69. 69. Bernardo SM, Gray KA, Todd RB, Cheetham BF, Katz ME (2007) Characterization of regulatory non-catalytic hexokinases in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Genet Genomics 277: 519–532.
  70. 70. Hutchison EA, Glass NL (2010) Meiotic regulators Ndt80 and ime2 have different roles in Saccharomyces and Neurospora. Genetics 185: 1271–1282.
  71. 71. Ricci M, Krappmann D, Russo VEA (1991) Nitrogen and carbon starvation regulate conidia and protoperithecia formation in Neurospora crassa grown on solid media. Fungal Genet Newslett 38: 87–88.
  72. 72. Xiang Q, Glass NL (2004) The control of mating type heterokaryon incompatibility by vib-1, a locus involved in het-c heterokaryon incompatibility in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 1063–1076.
  73. 73. Katz ME, Braunberger K, Yi G, Cooper S, Nonhebel HM, et al. (2013) A p53-like transcription factor similar to Ndt80 controls the response to nutrient stress in the filamentous fungus, Aspergillus nidulans. F1000Res 2: 72.
  74. 74. White S, McIntyre M, Berry DR, McNeil B (2002) The autolysis of industrial filamentous fungi. Crit Rev Biotechnol 22: 1–14.
  75. 75. Puzio-Kuter AM (2011) The role of p53 in metabolic regulation. Genes Cancer 2: 385–391.
  76. 76. Maddocks OD, Vousden KH (2011) Metabolic regulation by p53. J Mol Med 89: 237–245.
  77. 77. Aramayo R, Metzenberg RL (1996) Gene replacements at the his-3 locus of Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Newsl 43: 9–13.
  78. 78. Vogel H (1956) A convenient growth medium for Neurospora. Microb Genet Bull 13: 2–43.
  79. 79. Westergaard M, Mitchell HK (1947) Neurospora V. A synthetic medium favoring sexual reproduction. Am J Botany 34: 573–577.
  80. 80. Davis RH, Serres FJd (1970) Genetic and microbiological research techniques for Neurospora crassa. Meth Enzymol 17: 79–143.
  81. 81. Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Borkovich KA, Selker EU, Read ND, et al. (2003) The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422: 859–868.
  82. 82. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25.
  83. 83. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, et al. (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7: 562–578.
  84. 84. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S (2004) Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20: 1453–1454.
  85. 85. Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, et al. (2004) The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 5539–5545.
  86. 86. Liu H, Osmani AH, Ukil L, Son S, Markossian S, et al. (2010) Single-step affinity purification for Fungal Proteomics. Eukayot Cell 9: 831–833.