Functional Crosstalk between the PP2A and SUMO Pathways Revealed by Analysis of STUbL Suppressor, razor 1-1

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) provide dynamic regulation of the cellular proteome, which is critical for both normal cell growth and for orchestrating rapid responses to environmental stresses, e.g. genotoxins. Key PTMs include ubiquitin, the Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier SUMO, and phosphorylation. Recently, SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) were found to integrate signaling through the SUMO and ubiquitin pathways. In general, STUbLs are recruited to target proteins decorated with poly-SUMO chains to ubiquitinate them and drive either their extraction from protein complexes, and/or their degradation at the proteasome. In fission yeast, reducing or preventing the formation of SUMO chains can circumvent the essential and DNA damage response functions of STUbL. This result indicates that whilst some STUbL "targets" have been identified, the crucial function of STUbL is to antagonize SUMO chain formation. Herein, by screening for additional STUbL suppressors, we reveal crosstalk between the serine/threonine phosphatase PP2A-Pab1B55 and the SUMO pathway. A hypomorphic Pab1B55 mutant not only suppresses STUbL dysfunction, but also mitigates the phenotypes associated with deletion of the SUMO protease Ulp2, or mutation of the STUbL cofactor Rad60. Together, our results reveal a novel role for PP2A-Pab1B55 in modulating SUMO pathway output, acting in parallel to known critical regulators of SUMOylation homeostasis. Given the broad evolutionary functional conservation of the PP2A and SUMO pathways, our results could be relevant to the ongoing attempts to therapeutically target these factors.


Introduction
Posttranslational modification (PTM) of the proteome drives most aspects of cell growth including cell cycle transitions, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Accordingly, deregulation of key PTMs such as phosphorylation, SUMOylation and ubiquitylation causes cell cycle defects, genome instability, and malignant transformation or cell death [1]. Crosstalk between PTMs in signal transduction is widespread [2], and has recently come to the fore in the SUMO and ubiquitin field. SUMO and ubiquitin are small protein PTMs that are covalently attached to target proteins via similar enzymatic cascades of E1 activating, E2 conjugating enzymes, and E3 ligases [3].
Both modifiers can form chains, with ubiquitin chains of different topologies supporting functions that range from proteolysis to protein recruitment [1,3]. In contrast, physiological role(s) of SUMO chains are poorly defined, and blocking their formation has no discernible impact on fission yeast viability or genotoxin resistance [4]. In budding yeast, SUMO chaindeficient mutants exhibit reduced sporulation following meiosis, and an apparently pleiotropic impact on chromatin organization, transcription and genotoxin sensitivity [5,6]. However, an earlier study on various SUMO chain mutants in budding yeast, with the exception of a drastic SUMO all K to R mutant, found no overt genotoxin sensitivities or growth defects [7]. Thus, any physiological requirement for SUMO chains is subtle.
In contrast to any positive roles, SUMO chains that accumulate in the absence of the desumoylating enzyme Ulp2 cause severe cell growth defects, genome instability, and genotoxin sensitivity [4,7]. Accordingly, a SUMO KtoR mutant that reduces SUMO chain formation rescues the phenotypes of ulp2Δ fission and budding yeast [4,7]. An accumulation of SUMO chains also causes the extreme genome instability and cell cycle phenotypes of fission yeast that lack the SUMO-targeted E3 ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) Slx8-Rfp1 [4,8].
STUbLs bind SUMO chains through their amino-terminal tandem SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) and ubiquitinate them using their carboxy-terminal RING domains [9][10][11][12]. Thereby, SUMO-ubiquitin hybrid chains are generated that can selectively recruit effector proteins with dual SUMO and ubiquitin binding domains. These effector proteins can either support further signaling e.g. Rap80 in the DNA damage response, or drive extraction of target proteins from complexes and/or their proteasomal degradation e.g. Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 [13]. Interestingly, inhibiting STUbL activity in both fission and budding yeast rescues ulp2Δ cell phenotypes to a similar extent as blocking SUMO chain formation, despite an overall increase in SUMO chains [14,15]. Therefore, unscheduled STUbL activity on SUMO-chain modified proteins, rather than the SUMO chains themselves, is toxic to ulp2Δ cells.
From the above, it is clear that SUMO pathway homeostasis is critical to multiple processes that impact genome stability and cell growth. Moreover, the SUMO pathway and associated factors, like STUbL, are important therapeutic targets in cancer and other diseases (e.g. [16][17][18]). Therefore, the identification of activities that modulate SUMO pathway outputs is of fundamental importance. To this end, we exploited the lethality of the STUbL mutant slx8-29 to screen for spontaneous suppressors, which resulted in the identification of a number of what we called "razors" due to their STUbL suppression. Here, we report the identification and characterization of one such razor, rzr1-1, which reveals novel functional crosstalk between the protein phosphatase PP2A and the SUMO pathway.
Here we present the identification and characterization of one such slx8-29 suppressor, rzr1-1.
Backcrossing the slx8-29 rzr1-1 strain to wild-type confirmed that rzr1-1 is an extragenic suppressor of slx8-29. Testing the strains derived from the backcross for sensitivity to hydroxyurea (HU) and camptothecin (CPT) revealed potent suppression of the HU and temperature sensitivity of slx8-29 by rzr1-1 (Fig 1A). Interestingly however, rzr1-1 cells are more sensitive to CPT than slx8-29, so do not afford a growth benefit in this condition.
Classical genetic approaches to identify rzr1-1 were unsuccessful, so we re-sequenced the genomes of the backcrossed slx8-29 rzr1-1, slx8-29, and rzr1-1 strains. This analysis revealed that rzr1-1 is a duplicated sequence in the gene encoding Pab1 (Fig 1C), the PR55 (Cdc55) regulatory B subunit of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A, [23]). The insertion occurs in the highly conserved beta-propeller or WD40 domain of Pab1, which makes contact with the catalytic subunit of the PP2A holoenzyme, and is thought to contribute to substrate selection (Fig 1C, [24]). The duplication retains the reading frame of Pab1, and so generates a hypomorphic allele, which we will refer to as pab1-1 from here on, rather than a null. Indeed, whereas pab1-1 (rzr1-1) strongly suppresses slx8-29, a full deletion of Pab1 (pab1Δ) causes poor growth with morphogenesis defects [23,25] and provides only a marginal rescue of the temperature and HU sensitivity of slx8-29 ( Fig 1D).

Pab1 Dosage Is Inversely Correlated with Growth of slx8-29 Cells
The pab1-1 mutation lies in the beta-propeller region of Pab1 that is highly conserved within the B55 family, and could thus affect its association with the PP2A holoenzyme and/or substrates ( Fig 1C, [24]). We therefore tested if slx8-29 cells were sensitive to the dosage of wildtype Pab1. We replaced the endogenous promoter of Pab1 with a tetracycline-regulated promoter in cells that also express or not the TetR repressor [26], and assayed the effect on slx8-29 cells. As for pab1-1, we found that reduced expression of wild-type Pab1 also rescued the HU A and D, dilution series of the indicated strains were spotted onto YES plates, with or without drugs (HU: hydroxyurea; CPT: camptothecin) at the indicated concentrations and temperatures. B, three representative tetrad dissections are shown from a genetic cross between rfp1Δ and rfp2Δ rzr1-1 cells. C, a schematic representation of the insertion mutation of rzr1-1 in the conserved WD40 domain in the pab1 locus. The indicated amino acids of the Bα subunits of PP2A in fission yeast (Pab1), human (B55) and budding yeast (Cdc55) are aligned, highlighting the high degree of sequence conservation across species. The "TEVI" insertion occurs at the end of a loop region between β3D and β4A in the seven-bladed β-propeller domain of Bα [24]. PP2A Regulates SUMO Pathway Output sensitivity of slx8-29 cells, especially in the presence of the TetR repressor (Fig 2A). In addition, overexpression of Pab1 from an attenuated nmt promoter (nmt41, [25,27]) strongly impaired the growth of slx8-29 but not wild-type cells (Fig 2B).
Given that Pab1 dosage is inversely correlated with the growth of slx8-29, we tested if the pab1-1 mutation affects Pab1 protein levels. Western analysis indicates that the pab1-1 mutation indeed destabilizes Pab1 and furthermore, appears to weaken its association with the PP2A catalytic subunit Ppa2 (Fig 2C). Together, these data suggest that pab1-1 suppresses slx8-29 phenotypes through a general reduction of PP2A-Pab1 activity. Consistent with this interpretation, deleting the catalytic subunit Ppa2 or the phosphotyrosyl phosphatase PP2A activator Ypa2 [28], also strongly suppresses the temperature and HU sensitivity of slx8-29 cells (Fig 2D). Overall, our data reveal that PP2A-Pab1 activity drives the pathological effects of slx8-29, and that pab1-1 likely provides an optimum general reduction in PP2A-Pab1 activity that allows cells to tolerate compromised STUbL function.

Pab1-1 Is Not a General Suppressor of DNA Repair and Replication Stress Defects
As PP2A is involved in a plethora of cellular functions, we next tested if pab1-1 is a general suppressor of HU-induced replication stress and/or temperature sensitivity. Initially, we generated double mutants of pab1-1 with either chk1Δ, which lacks the G2 DNA damage checkpoint [29], or rhp51Δ that compromises homologous recombination (HR) repair [30]. In contrast to the robust rescue of slx8-29, chk1Δ pab1-1 double mutant cells showed additive sensitivity to HU ( Fig 3A). Moreover, rhp51Δ pab1-1 double mutant cells were synthetically sick in the absence of drug, and exhibited synergistic sensitivity to HU ( Fig 3A). Next we tested if pab1-1 can rescue cds1Δ cells, which lack the replication checkpoint [31][32][33], or rqh1Δ and mus81Δ cells that exhibit severe HR defects under replication stress [34,35]. Again, the double mutant strains were either synergistically sensitive to HU (e.g. cds1Δ pab1-1), or pab1-1 provided no discernable growth benefit ( Fig 3A). In addition, pab1-1 does not rescue the temperature or HU sensitivity of an allele of the Cdc48/p97 cofactor Ufd1 (ufd1-1, Fig 3B [ 8]). Together, these data demonstrate that the rescue of slx8-29 by pab1-1 is not the result of a general increase in cellular resistance to genotoxins.

Impact of CDK Activity and the Cell Cycle Checkpoints on the slx8-29 Phenotype
In fission yeast, Xenopus and mammalian cells, PP2A-Pab1 B55 antagonizes CDK activity by regulating its activating phosphatase Cdc25 and inhibitory kinase Wee1 (see [36][37][38] & refs. therein). Consistent with this, pab1-1 cells and those expressing lower than wild-type levels of Pab1 enter mitosis precociously at a reduced cell length (Figs 4A and S1A [38]). Therefore, we asked if elevated CDK activity per se mediates the rescue of slx8-29 by pab1-1. To this end, we determined the genetic interactions between slx8-29 and mutations that render CDK hyperactive or ablate the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint.
First we tested if a temperature sensitive Wee1 allele, wee1-50, was able to suppress slx8-29. Wee1-50 cells, like pab1-1, enter mitosis at a reduced cell size due to hyperactive CDK [39]. However, wee1-50 was unable to rescue the temperature and HU sensitivity of slx8-29 ( Fig  4B). As Wee1 could have functions beyond antagonizing CDK that obscure any rescue of slx8-29, we also tested if a hyperactive allele of CDK, cdc2-1w [40], was able to rescue slx8-29. Again, cdc2-1w could not restore growth to slx8-29 at its restrictive temperature in the presence of HU, conditions in which pab1-1 affords a near complete rescue ( Fig 4C). Finally, we tested if ablating the G2 DNA damage checkpoint, which normally inhibits CDK and the cell cycle following DNA damage, could rescue slx8-29. In the presence of HU at 35°C, conditions in which both pab1-1 and chk1Δ cells are fully viable, only pab1-1 was able to rescue of slx8-29 ( Fig 4D). Moreover, pab1-1 was able to rescue slx8-29 cell growth in the presence of MMS, in addition to rescuing their temperature and HU sensitivity ( Fig 4D).  Taken together, these data demonstrate that although advanced mitosis is one phenotypic consequence of pab1-1, as it is for mutants of the PP2A catalytic subunit Ppa2 [36], it is not the mechanism for slx8-29 rescue.

Impact of pab1-1 on SUMO Pathway Activity
In fission yeast, reducing SUMO chain formation renders STUbL activity largely redundant [4]. For example, the SUMO K14,30R or SUMO D81R chain deficient mutants allow slx8-29 cells to grow at high temperature, and in the presence of HU [4]. Therefore, we considered the possibility that the pab1-1 mutation affects SUMO pathway activity and reduces SUMO chain production.
We compared SUMO conjugate levels in slx8-29 single mutant cells versus double mutants of slx8-29 with pab1-1 and the controls wee1-50 and chk1Δ. The characteristic accumulation of high molecular weight (HMW) SUMO conjugates was observed in slx8-29 single and slx8-29 wee1-50 or slx8-29 chk1Δ double mutants ( Fig 5A). Although difficult to quantify due to their "smeary" nature, in contrast to slx8-29 and the double mutant controls, HMW SUMO conjugates are reduced in slx8-29 pab1-1 cells (Fig 5A). Because each of the slx8-29 pab1-1, slx8-29 wee1-50 and slx8-29 chk1Δ double mutants continue cycling, whereas slx8-29 cells accumulate in G2, cell cycle position does not contribute significantly to the observed SUMO levels. Moreover, the observed HMW SUMO conjugate levels correlate well with the growth of each strain in the presence of HU i.e. reduced levels support slx8-29 growth (Fig 4). Interestingly, ectopic expression of Pab1 in wild-type or slx8-29 cells leads to a dose-dependent increase in HMW SUMO conjugates, which is more pronounced in slx8-29 cells (Fig 5B). Because increased Pab1 dosage is toxic in slx8-29 cells (Fig 2), there is again a good correlation between HMW SUMO conjugates and slx8-29 cell viability.
As slx8-29 is a temperature sensitive and not a null allele, pab1-1 could conceivably "reactivate" it, leading to the observed reduction in HMW SUMO conjugates. We tested this possibility using a specific STUbL substrate we recently identified. In Nup132 mutant cells, the SUMO E3 ligase Pli1 is degraded in an Slx8-dependent manner [21]. Consistent with this, Pli1 is stabilized in Nup132 mutant cells by the slx8-29 mutation (Fig 5C, [21]). Importantly, Pli1 stabilization by slx8-29 is not reversed by pab1-1 (nup132Δ slx8-29 pab1-1, Fig 5C). This result indicates that pab1-1 does not reactivate the slx8-29 mutant, but instead affects the accumulation of HMW SUMO conjugates either through the regulation of SUMO pathway factors, or activities that act in parallel to STUbL.

Impact of pab1-1 on SUMO Pathway Mutants Functionally Related to STUbL
Our data thus far indicate that pab1-1 reduces the burden of SUMO chains in STUbL mutant cells, making them less dependent on this normally essential activity. We therefore tested the effect of pab1-1 on other SUMO pathway mutants that experience SUMO chain-mediated toxicity.
In both fission and budding yeast Ulp2 SUMO protease mutants, SUMO chains accumulate and cause genome instability [4,7]. This is evidenced by the suppression of ulp2Δ phenotypes in the presence of a SUMO chain blocking mutant e.g. SUMO K14,30R [4,7]. Strikingly, as for slx8-29, we found that pab1-1 strongly suppressed the HU sensitivity of ulp2Δ cells (Fig 6A). Moreover, western analysis of SUMO again revealed a small but detectable reduction in HMW species in ulp2Δ pab1-1 double mutant versus ulp2Δ single mutant cells (Fig 6B).
The SLD2:Ubc9 complex exists in competition with the SUMO:Ubc9 complex, as both use the same interface on Ubc9 [4,43]. Because the SUMO:Ubc9 complex promotes SUMO chain formation in vivo, SUMO chains likely form in a rad60 E380R mutant that is unable to interact with Ubc9, due to an excess of the SUMO:Ubc9 complex [4]. Consistent with this, SUMO K14,30R partially suppresses rad60 E380R HU sensitivity [4]. Interestingly, pab1-1 also partially suppresses rad60 E380R sensitivity to HU and UV irradiation, and the HU sensitivity of another Rad60 mutant, rad60-4 ( Fig 6C). Together, these data indicate that pab1-1 may mitigate SUMO-chain mediated toxicity in Ulp2 and Rad60 mutant cells, as it does in slx8-29 cells. Moreover, as for slx8-29, the phenotypes of rad60-4 and ulp2Δ cells are not rescued by the hyperactive CDK allele cdc2-1w.
Given that Rad60 is phosphorylated during replication stress, and that it both physically and functionally associates with STUbL [20,22,41,43,44], we asked if it or other SUMO pathway factors were potential targets of PP2A-Pab1. To this end, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of Rad60, Slx8, Ubc9, and Pli1 in wild-type or pab1-1 cells by comparing their migration on regular or phos-tag PAGE gels [45]. Amongst these proteins, only Rad60 phosphorylation was detectably enhanced by the pab1-1 mutation (Fig 6D). Strikingly, this Rad60 hyper-phosphorylation was abolished when putative casein kinase sites in Rad60, serine S32 and S34, were mutated to alanine (Fig 6D, [44]). As Rad60 controls SUMO pathway output [4,43], this result raised the possibility that Rad60 phosphorylation might mediate the suppressive effects of pab1-1 on slx8-29, ulp2Δ and rad60 mutants. However, pab1-1 also rescues the HU sensitivity of rad60 S32,34A , which is refractory to pab1-1 induced phosphorylation (Fig 6D and 6E). Therefore, although pab1-1 impacts Rad60 phosphorylation, it is not the critical or sole target of PP2A-Pab1.

Discussion
Sumoylation and phosphorylation are master regulators of cell growth and genome stability, with defects in the homeostasis of these key PTMs driving human disease. Accordingly, deregulation of PP2A, an abundant heterotrimeric serine/threonine phosphatase, is observed in many cancers [47]. Cancer associated mutations are found in each of the PP2A subunits: A (scaffold), B (regulatory/substrate targeting), and C (catalytic). Given its hub role in cell growth and tumorigenesis, PP2A is a therapeutic target of interest [47].
Likewise, the SUMO pathway and its regulators such as SENPs ULPs and STUbL are therapeutically valuable in a number of cancers, including leukemia and those overexpressing the MYC oncogene [17,18]. The widespread interest in PP2A and the SUMO pathway as therapeutic drug targets makes it important to identify potential compensatory mechanisms that could allow cells to escape such interventions.
Here, we reveal that a hypomorphic allele of a B subunit of fission yeast PP2A, Pab1 B55 , is a potent suppressor of the phenotypes of STUbL, Ulp2 and Rad60 mutants. Strikingly, in a separate screen for spontaneous suppressors of the HU sensitivity of rad60 E380R (to be reported elsewhere), we noted that some had a short cell phenotype, similar to that of pab1-1. Sequencing revealed these suppressors to be truncating mutations in the gene encoding Ypa2, an activator of fission yeast PP2A [28]. Together with the fact that ypa2Δ also suppresses slx8-29 phenotypes (Fig 2D), this result underscores the intriguing functional relationship between STUbL, Ulp2, Rad60 and PP2A. Evolutionary conservation of these factors suggests that such compensation could occur in human cells, undermining targeted therapies.
An overt phenotype of pab1-1 cells, as for mutations in certain other PP2A subunits, is their entry into mitosis at a reduced cell size due to elevated CDK activity (Figs 4A and S1A; [36][37][38] & refs. therein)). Defects in the SUMO pathway have previously been linked to a failure of cells to reenter the cell cycle after completion of DNA repair e.g. [48,49]. Therefore, we initially speculated that the suppressive effects of pab1-1 were due to elevated CDK activity, and eventual bypass of the checkpoint induced cell cycle arrest. Indeed, the sickness of pab1-1 when combined with DNA repair mutants such as rhp51Δ and rqh1Δ is consistent with an attenuated G2/M cell cycle checkpoint, as in chk1Δ cells [50]. Moreover, the synthetic sickness of pab1-1 and cds1Δ in the presence of HU mirrors that of cds1Δ chk1Δ double mutants, which fail to delay the cell cycle in response to replication inhibition (Fig 3A, [31]).
However, neither hyperactive CDK (e.g. cdc2-1w, wee1-50), nor ablating the damage checkpoint (chk1Δ) suppresses STUbL dysfunction. This specificity is all the more surprising given that cdc2-1w shares several phenotypes with pab1-1, including small cell size and sensitivity to CPT [51]. Therefore, pab1-1 likely affects the phosphorylation status of another kinase target, which in turn reduces cellular dependency on STUbL activity.
Others and we have shown that reducing SUMO chain formation bypasses the need for the SUMO protease Ulp2 [4,7]. Moreover, the functions of STUbL can be bypassed by blocking SUMO chain formation in fission yeast [4,13]. Western analysis of STUbL and Ulp2 mutants revealed that the pab1-1 allele reduces the abundance of HMW SUMO conjugates in both backgrounds, whereas overproducing Pab1 causes an increase. This effect is not due to cell cycle position, indicating that PP2A-Pab1 B55 either directly or indirectly modulates SUMO pathway homeostasis.
SUMO and its E3 ligases are subject to phosphorylation-dependent regulation, providing a potential avenue for direct PP2A-dependent regulation [52][53][54]. However, we were unable to detect PP2A-Pab1 regulated phosphorylation of any SUMO pathway factors, other than Rad60. In addition, Rad60 hyper-phosphorylation was excluded as a contributor to the suppression of slx8-29, ulp2Δ or rad60 mutants by pab1-1. This illustrates the difficulty in identifying one amongst a plethora of cellular targets of PP2A-Pab1 that mediates the effects of pab1-1 on the SUMO pathway. This is certainly a goal for the future, and may be assisted by more global approaches such as phosphoproteome analysis of wild-type and pab1-1 cells. In this regard, a recent study compared global protein phosphorylation levels between wild-type and pab1Δ cells [55]. Unfortunately, amongst the numerous phosphoproteins identified, none were obvious candidates for mediators of the pab1-1 phenotypes revealed here. This study also highlighted a limitation with such proteome-wide analyses, wherein the data are "swamped" by the most abundant PP2A-Pab1 targets such as metabolic enzymes. These may mask low abundance factors that are critical for the pab1-1 SUMO-related phenotypes.
We also considered the possibility that the PP2A-Pab1 B55 enzyme is a target of STUbL, Ulp2 and Rad60, and that pab1-1 bypasses the requirement for such regulation (see below). Indeed, in budding yeast, STUbL activity prevents the kinetochore proximal accumulation of a distinct PP2A complex, PP2A-Rts1 B56 [56]. How STUbL antagonizes PP2A-Rts1 B56 accumulation was not determined, but it was suggested to be through an indirect mechanism involving activation of the tension-sensing pathway, leading to increased Rts1 B56 recruitment via Sgo1 [56]. Nevertheless, the positive genetic interaction between STUbL and PP2A-Rts1 B56 raises interesting questions about the crosstalk between the SUMO and PP2A pathways across species. For example, does Rts1 B56 mutation suppress budding yeast Ulp2 and Esc2 (Rad60 orthologue) mutants? If so, this could indicate that the SUMO-related functions of PP2A rely on distinct complexes in different organisms i.e. PP2A-Rts1 B56 in budding yeast or PP2A--Pab1 B55 in fission yeast.
To test PP2A-Pab1 B55 as a target of the SUMO pathway, we analyzed Pab1 protein levels, potential SUMOylation state, and subcellular localization in slx8-29 and ulp2Δ cells, but observed no significant differences (S1B and S1C Fig). In addition, two recent proteomic analyses of protein SUMOylation in fission yeast failed to detect modification of any of the abundant PP2A complex proteins, even in cells with compromised STUbL activity [57,58]. Although we cannot completely exclude direct or indirect regulation of PP2A-Pab1 B55 by the SUMO pathway, we favor a model in which the hyper-phosphorylation of PP2A-Pab1 B55 targets in pab1-1 cells mitigates the phenotypes of the tested SUMO pathway mutants.
For example, in pab1-1 cells, a pathway parallel to STUbL that degrades HMW SUMO species could be engaged e.g. through a phosphodegron in key SUMO conjugates. However, because pab1-1 suppresses slx8-29, ulp2Δ and rad60 phenotypes, this would imply the existence of a single or an overlapping set of SUMO conjugates that cause the phenotypes of each mutant. Although possible, it seems more likely that PP2A-Pab1 B55 reduces the SUMO chain output of the SUMO pathway, thus providing pan-suppression of STUbL, Ulp2 and Rad60 mutants.
Replication stress induces lethal HR-dependent chromosome missegregation in STUbL, Rad60 and Ulp2 mutant cells [20,22,42,46]. We found that in keeping with the ability of pab1-1 to improve the growth of each mutant in the chronic presence of HU, pab1-1 reduces HU-induced mitotic chromosome missegregation in the mutants. As SUMO chains drive the increased mitotic recombination and chromosome missegregation in ulp2Δ budding yeast [46], our chromosome segregation analyses of slx8-29, rad60-4 and ulp2Δ are again consistent with a role for PP2A-Pab1 B55 in controlling SUMO pathway homeostasis.
Overall, we have identified critical functional crosstalk between the SUMO pathway and the major serine/threonine phosphatase PP2A-Pab1 B55 . Interplay between these master regulators of cell growth and genome stability is intrinsically important, and in the future will likely provide a basis for mechanistically defining phosphorylation-dependent regulation of SUMO pathway output.

General Yeast Techniques
Standard methods for S. pombe were performed as described previously [59]. All strains (Table 1) are of genotype ura4-D18 leu1-32 unless otherwise stated.

Spot Assays
Cells were grown at 25°C to logarithmic phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD 600 ] of 0.6 to 0.8), spotted in 5-fold dilutions from a starting OD 600 of 0.5 on plates supplemented with the relevant drug. The plates were then incubated at 25 to 35°C for 3 to 5 days.

Microscopy
For live imaging, cells were grown in liquid EMM medium supplemented with leucine, uracil, arginine, and histidine (LUAH) and sterilized by filtration to logarithmic phase. Wide-field images of live cells were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse microscope with a 100x Plan Apochromat DIC H oil immersion objective and a Photometrics Quantix charge-coupled device camera. Images were analyzed with NIH ImageJ software. For staining with 4',6-diamidino-

FLAG-IP and Western Blotting
To immunoprecipitate N-terminally FLAG-tagged wild type or mutant Pab1, cell pellets were resuspended in 0.4 ml of Sp-lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) [8], supplemented with 2 mM PMSF, and Complete protease inhibitor tablet, EDTA-free (Roche Applied Science), and lysed by beating with silica-zirconia beads three times at 5.0 m/s for 20 s in a FastPrep-24. After 10 min clarification by centrifugation at 16,000 x g in a microfuge at 4°C, supernatant was quantified for protein concentration based on OD reading at 280 nm. A total of 1 mg of proteins were incubated with 20 μl of Protein G MagBeads (GenScript) that have been preequilibrated with 10 μg of mouse-anti-FLAG antibodies (M2, Sigma). After 1 h of binding at 4°C, the beads were washed extensively with Sp-lysis buffer, and eluted with 2x LDS Sample Loading buffer (Life Technologies). One fifth of the eluted proteins, along with 10 μg (1%) of the input, were separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was carried out as previously described [8,58]. The membrane was blocked in 1% w/v non-fat milk in phosphate buffer saline solution with 0.1% v/v Tween-20, probed with primary antibodies, followed by HRP or IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies, and detected either using an ECL Dura system (Pierce) on film; or scanning on an ODYSSEY scanner (Li-Cor). TAP-tagged proteins were probed with Peroxidase-Antiperoxidase (PAP), then directly detected using ECL. Protein phosphorylation was identified by comparing the migration of a protein species on 10% Tris-Glycine gel (Life Technologies) to that on 10% SuperSep Phos-tag (50 μmol/L, Wako) [45].

Genome Sequencing Using Next Generation Sequencing
To extract genomic DNA, 10 ml of saturated cultures were collected by centrifugation and washed with 0.5 ml of H 2 O. The cell pellet was resuspended in 0.2 ml of extraction buffer (0.2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and transferred to a screw cap 1.5 ml tube in which 0.2 ml of PCIA (phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol at a ratio of 25:24:1) has been added. The cells were lysed by bead-beating as described above. Afterward, the lysate was centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 x g in a microfuge, and the upper layer was transferred to a fresh tube and extracted twice with chloroform. The aqueous layer was digested with 50 μg of RNase A for 30 min at 37°C, then extracted again with PCIA, followed with two chloroform extractions. The genomic DNA was precipitated with 3 M sodium acetate and 100% ethanol. The DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried and dissolved in 80 μl of TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA).
For Next Generation Sequencing, 1 μg of genomic DNA was sheared on an S2 Covaris set at 10% duty cycle, intensity of 5, 200 cycles per burst for 120 seconds, to obtain fragments of 200-300 bp in sizes. The fragments were then end-repaired, A-tailed with Taq Polymerase, kinased, and ligated to standard TruSeq (Illumina) barcoded adapters following manufacturer recommended protocols. The library was then amplified by PCR for 6 cycles. The amplified libraries were gel purified to select for DNA products of between 200-250 bp for single read 1x100 sequencing. The 100bp reads were generated by the HISeq 2000 Analyzer (Illumina) located at the Scripps DNA Sequencing Facility. The Genome Analyzer Pipeline Software (currently Casava v1.8.2) was used to perform the early data analysis of a sequencing run, using tools including image analysis, base calling, and demultiplexing. The reads were aligned to the genome with Bowtie 0.12.9 software using parameter to keep only the best scoring singleton.
Supporting Information S1 Fig. A, The percentage of septated cells was monitored following a block at 35.5°C for 4 hrs and release to 25°C of cdc2-33 and cdc2-33 pab1-1 cells. The data shows that the pab1-1 mutation promotes cell cycle progression, as anticipated. B, Western analysis of HA-tagged Pab1 shows similar expression of Pab1 in cells overexpressing His6-SUMO (-B1), deleted of ulp2, or with the slx8-29 mutation. C, GFP-Pab1 shows similar nuclear/cytoplasmic distribution in wild type and slx8-29 cells. (TIF)