Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Typo in SNP rs#?

Posted by PLOS_Genetics on 26 Feb 2008 at 14:06 GMT

Greg Lennon, 7 February 2008:

Is it possible that the mentions (in both the Abstract and within the text) of "rs1041296" are a typographical error, and instead, the intended SNP designation in all such cases is "rs1401296"?