Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Figure 1.

Static pointing task performed with a hand-held tool.

The tool is grasped at a fixed position , at distance from the tool tip . The pose of the hand-held tool, with respect to a fixed frame , can be specified as the position and orientation of a moving frame attached to the tool at the gripping point.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Figure 2.

Example of configuration manifold.

More »

Figure 2 Expand

Figure 3.

Components of the 3D position, in spatial frame coordinates, of the stylus tip () for one representative trial.

The ‘ * ’ marking the minima correspond to the positions furthest away from the target. The thick solid lines are the data of interest, within 5 seconds before and after the midpoint between two minima.

More »

Figure 3 Expand

Figure 4.

Variance per dof in the nullspace () and its orthogonal complement () for all 20 trials of a representative subject.

More »

Figure 4 Expand

Figure 5.

Power spectral density for each velocity component of a representative subject.

More »

Figure 5 Expand

Figure 6.

Average UCM components for each subject in Exp I (left, supported arm) and Exp II (right, unsupported arm).

For both experimental conditions, each subject shows a statistically significant difference () between the UCM components. Vertical lines represent the standard errors.

More »

Figure 6 Expand

Figure 7.

UCM ratio for seven subjects for the two experimental conditions, Exp I and Exp II (top).

Bottom figures show the ratio between Exp II and Exp I (left) and similarly for (right). The horizontal line marks the unitary ratio (i.e. no difference in the variance in position between Exp II and Exp I). Vertical lines represent the standard errors. Statistically significant differences are highlighted for (*), for (**), and for (***).

More »

Figure 7 Expand

Figure 8.

Variance at and in Exp I (left) and Exp II (right).

Vertical lines represent the standard errors. Statistically significant differences are highlighted for (*), for (**), and for (***).

More »

Figure 8 Expand

Figure 9.

Ratio of position variance ratio () for each subject in both experimental conditions (Exp I and Exp II) (top).

Bottom figures show the ratio between Exp II and Exp I (left) and similarly for (right). The horizontal line marks the unitary ratio (i.e. no difference in the variance in position between Exp II and Exp I). Vertical lines represent the standard errors. Statistically significant differences are highighted for (*), for (**), and for (***).

More »

Figure 9 Expand