Advertisement

< Back to Article

Emergence of social inequality in the spatial harvesting of renewable public goods

Fig 8

Overview of harvesting and dispersal regimes and their ranges in equality-efficiency space.

The sedentary regime (labelled ‘S’) is equitable but inefficient, the mobile regime (labelled ‘M’) is equitable and efficient at high dispersal costs but inefficient at low dispersal costs, while the coexistence regime (labelled ‘S & M’) is neither equitable nor efficient.

Fig 8

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007483.g008