Metacognitive efficiency in learned value-based choice
Fig 5
Relationship between MetaRL.Ratio and empirical choice parameters.
A) The MetaRL.Ratio, our measure of metacognitive efficiency, was independent of empirical performance (the proportion of trials on which participants chose the best option). B) The correlation between MetaRL.Ratio and confidence bias decreased after applying the confidence scaling method. C & D) The MetaRL.Ratio was not significantly correlated with the inverse temperature (C) or the learning-rate (D) of the Forward model. The dots in the plots show the estimates for each subject in the low variance condition of the task.