Non-monotonic Temporal-Weighting Indicates a Dynamically Modulated Evidence-Integration Mechanism
Fig 2
Simulation of typical temporal weighting profiles predicted by the drift-diffusion model (DDM) and leaky-competing accumulators model (LCA).
A) DDM simulations with absorbing bound (red line; parameters: noise = 1; boundary = 2) and reflecting bound (blue line; parameters: noise = 1; boundary = 3) as compared to ideal integration (black line; parameters: noise = 1; response was determined by comparing the value of the accumulator to 0). Both models predict weighs that are flat, monotonically decreasing (a primacy bias; bounded diffusion) or monotonically increasing (a recency bias; reflecting boundaries) temporal weights; B) LCA simulations of temporal weights with inhibition dominance (red line; parameters: noise = 1; inhibition = 0.2; leak = 0) and leak dominance (blue line; parameters: noise = 1; inhibition = 0; leak = 0.1) as compared to ideal integration (black line). Y-axis depicts normalized regression coefficients. Inputs to the models were taken from the experiments; responses of each model were simulated for all trials and were subjected to a logistic regression analysis using the inputs as predictors. We iterated this analysis 1000 times per each model and show here average values of the regression coefficients across these 1000 simulations.