Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Glia-to-glia serotonin signaling directs MMP-dependent infiltration for experience-dependent synapse pruning

  • Vanessa Kay Miller,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee United States of America

  • Kendal Broadie

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    kendal.broadie@vanderbilt.edu

    Affiliations Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee United States of America, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America, Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America, Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University and Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Update

1 Oct 2024: Miller VK, Broadie K (2024) Experience-dependent serotonergic signaling in glia regulates targeted synapse elimination. PLOS Biology 22(10): e3002822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002822 View update

Abstract

Synapse connectivity is optimized in response to environmental input in critical periods, characterized by experience-dependent, temporally-restricted, and transiently-reversible synapse pruning by glial phagocytes. This precise, targeted synaptic elimination process requires glial serotonergic intercellular signaling. We discover glia-to-glia communication between different glial classes is essential for experience-dependent synaptic pruning in a well-defined Drosophila juvenile brain olfactory critical period. We find ensheathing glia infiltrate specific target synaptic glomeruli in response to guiding odorant experience via 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) signaling. Using cell-targeted tryptophan hydroxylase (Trhn) RNAi to block serotonin production, we discover serotonin signaling from ensheathing glia is required for experience-dependent synapse pruning. Using cell-targeted 5-HT2AR RNAi, we find the serotonin receptor is required exclusively in astrocyte-like glia (ALG). Using cell-targeted 5-HT2AR rescue in 5-HT2AR null mutants, we discover the serotonin receptor mediates experience-dependent synapse pruning. Thus, glia-to-glia serotonin signaling between different glial classes mediated by 5-HT2A receptors is necessary and sufficient for synapse elimination. We discover that ALG-targeted conditional 5-HT2AR in mature adults induces experience-dependent synapse pruning indistinguishable from the critical period mechanism. Thus, astrocyte 5-HT2AR signaling is sufficient to ‘re-open’ this characteristic critical period remodeling capability at maturity. We find astrocytic matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) induced by critical period odorant experience is required for experience-dependent synapse pruning downstream of 5HT2AR activation. We discover that ALG-targeted MMP-1 induction restores synapse pruning in the absence of 5HT2AR signaling. Taken together, we conclude that glia-to-glia serotonergic 5HT2AR signaling drives MMP-1 for experience-dependent infiltration phagocytosis synapse pruning, and can rekindle this remodeling capacity at adult maturity.

Introduction

Large-scale brain circuit remodeling driven by early-life sensory experience results from synapse connectivity refinement in transient critical periods of heightened plasticity in juveniles [1,2]. This mechanism optimizes all sensory input circuits, including visual, auditory, and olfactory modalities. Critical periods open with initial sensory experience, exhibit dynamically reversible synapse changes, and then undergo a permanent closure with consolidation of mature circuitry [2,3]. Critical period closure is presumed necessary for manifestation of mature circuit properties; however, closure prevents the correction of circuit impairments caused by trauma, injury, and disease [4,5]. This circuit connectivity remodeling occurs via opposing synapse formation and elimination mechanisms [6], with glia playing vital roles in both directions [1,7]. Overall, critical periods are characterized by net loss of synapses via experience-dependent glial phagocytosis [810]. In mammals, both astrocytes and microglia function as phagocytes for synapse elimination [1113]. In Drosophila, comparable astrocyte-like glia (ALG), ensheathing glia (EG), and cortex glia (CG) can all act as brain phagocytes [1,14]. Drosophila ALG associate very closely with synapses, while EG mediate experience-dependent synapse elimination during the early-life critical period [15,16]. There is very little known about glia-to-glia signaling mechanisms orchestrating distinct glial class functions. Our goal in this study was to investigate glial subclass interactions during the mechanism of critical period experience-dependent synapse pruning.

Intercellular signaling via the biogenic monoamine serotonin (5-HT) is integral to regulation of brain circuit plasticity across multiple timescales [17,18]. Serotoninergic cells are distinguished by expression of tryptophan hydroxylase (Trhn); a rate-limiting enzyme essential for serotonin biosynthesis [19,20]. In addition to neurons, glia also employ Trhn to produce serotonin, and require serotonergic signaling to enable experience-dependent synapse pruning in Drosophila [21]. The G-protein-coupled 5-HT2A receptor (5-HT2AR) is likewise present in both neurons and glia, playing a crucial role in regulating signaling essential for synaptic plasticity [22,23]. 5-HT2ARs have long been associated with learning and memory synaptic changes underlying long-term potentiation and depression [24,25]. Importantly, the 5-HT2A receptor functions in both astrocyte and microglia classes [25], and 5-HT2ARs are increasingly recognized for roles in regulating the maturation and remodeling of brain circuits [26,27] Drosophila glia employ 5-HT2AR signaling to drive experience-dependent synaptic pruning during the olfactory critical period [21]. Serotonin is also implicated in many neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders [2830], and there is a great push to use serotonergic signaling to re-open “critical period-like” remodeling as a treatment strategy [31]. Drosophila glia 5-HT2AR expression at maturity induces de novo experience-dependent synapse elimination [21]. Our goal here was to test glial class-specific 5-HT2AR signaling during critical period as well as induced adult experience-driven synapse pruning.

A primary obstacle to large-scale synapse pruning following closure of the critical period is brain circuit accessibility being blocked by extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition [32,33]. Central synapses are tightly ensheathed in ECM lattices that provide foundational connectivity support for synapse stability [34,35]. Modulation of synaptic dynamics by Ca2+-gated ion channels is also closely regulated by ECM interactions, demonstrating vital ECM roles in synaptic plasticity and remodeling [36]. Serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling regulates ECM turnover that controls synapse stability [37]. During synapse pruning, glial phagocytes must infiltrate the neuropil in a mechanism that requires remodeling of the surrounding ECM [38]. Serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling activates protein kinase C (PKC), which acts downstream to increase the production of matrix metalloprotease (MMP) extracellular proteolytic enzymes that function to remodel the ECM [39]. Different MMPs degrade ECM components such as collagen and fibronectin to enable accessibility for glial infiltration during synapse pruning [40]. Drosophila has only two MMPs, MMP-1 and MMP-2, which drive diverse mechanisms of cellular remodeling including multiple aspects of neuronal development [32]. In a Drosophila injury model, glial MMP-1 activation is required for the dynamic glia responses to axotomy, including glial engulfment and the clearance of damaged axons [41]. Our goal in this study was to test MMP-1 roles in critical period synapse pruning and glial 5-HT2AR MMP-1 activation within the mechanism of experience-dependent synapse pruning.

Serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling occurs between glia [21], but glia-to-glia class mechanisms are unknown. Here, we use a well-characterized Drosophila olfactory critical period [42,43] to test both serotonin production and 5-HT2AR function with glial class-specific transgenic drivers. We discover that EG have an essential role in serotonin synthesis for targeted synaptic neuropil infiltration and experience-dependent synapse pruning. We find an entirely distinct 5-HT2AR requirement in the ALG. During the juvenile critical period, we find 5-HT2ARs targeted only to ALG completely rescues 5-HT2AR global null mutant loss of synapse pruning, indicating ALG 5-HT2AR signaling fully explains the requirement in critical period experience-dependent synapse elimination. Moreover, we discover conditional 5-HT2AR expression in adult ALG only at maturity re-opens “critical period-like” experience-dependent synapse pruning that is indistinguishable from the juvenile brain mechanism. Downstream of 5-HT2AR signaling, we find that ALG MMP-1 expression is strongly induced by experience and completely required for experience-dependent synapse pruning. We discover here that MMP-1 induction targeted only to ALG completely restores synapse pruning in the absence of 5HT2AR signaling. Together, these results demonstrate that glia-to-glia class serotonergic 5HT2AR signaling activates astrocytic MMP-1 function to enable experience-dependent synapse pruning in juvenile brains, and can restore it in mature brains.

Results

Experience-dependent glial 5-HT2A receptor signaling targets synaptic neuropil infiltration

The Drosophila olfactory circuitry (Fig 1) has a very well-defined early-life critical period [44,45], with dose-dependent and temporally-restricted activation, characterized glial phagocytes [46,47], and a highly sophisticated transgenic toolkit for the cell-specific manipulation of serotonergic signaling [48]. The juvenile brain olfactory circuit synaptic neuropils in order are the antennal lobe (AL; Fig 1A, left, blue), which houses the first synaptic relay, then the mushroom body (MB; Fig 1A, left, orange), with the postsynaptic calyx second synaptic relay, and separable projections to the lateral horn (LH; Fig 1A, left, pink), for both learned or innate olfactory behaviors, respectively [49,50]. Odorant information is received by selective olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) classes, such as the ethyl butyrate (EB) responsive Or42a receptor neurons (Fig 1A, right, green), which innervate AL glomeruli. OSNs synapse on specific projection neurons (PNs; Fig 1A, right, pink), which then relay information to the MB and LH for learning and memory. Information processing is mediated by local interneurons (Fig 1A, right, cyan), which input and receive information from OSNs and PNs to integrate signaling. EB-responsive Or42a neurons selectively innervate only the defined ventral medial 7 (VM7) glomeruli (Fig 1B, left), with densely arrayed synapses. Or42a neurons are the sole OSN class innervating the VM7 synaptic glomeruli and make precisely mapped synapses directly onto defined PNs (Fig 1B, right). This circuit connectome serves as a reference for the experiments described below.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Or42a olfactory sensory neuron to projection neuron connectivity circuit.

A, The Drosophila brain olfactory system synaptic neuropils; antennal lobe (AL, blue), mushroom body and calyx (MB, orange), and lateral horn (LH, pink). Right: Connectivity of the Or42a olfactory sensory neurons (green), downstream projection neurons (pink), and interneurons (blue; https://flywire.ai). B, The ethyl butyrate (EB) responsive Or42a neurons send axonal projections to exclusively innervate antennal lobe VM7 glomeruli. Left: The different colors show the single Or42a neuron innervation patterns. Right: Or42a neurons (green) directly synapse onto projection neurons (pink). C, Confocal images at lower (left) and higher (right) magnification of the Or42a neuron innervated VM7 glomeruli in the antennal lobe. Left: VM7 innervation with a direct fusion Or42a::GFP membrane marker label based on intensity (heat-map) and co-labeled with anti-N-Cadherin (CadN; gray scale) for visualization of all AL synaptic glomeruli. Right: High magnification of the Or42a::GFP membrane marker (green) to show innervation of the paired VM7 glomeruli.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g001

Confocal microscopy is used to visualize Or42a neuron synaptic innervation in the AL VM7 glomeruli (Fig 1C). VM7 innervation can be visualized with a direct fusion of the Or42a promoter to green fluorescent protein (Or42a::GFP) or with Or42a-Gal4 driving the UAS-mCD8::GFP membrane marker. The Or42a OSN innervation is extremely dense, therefore, the use of heat-map visualization allows varying degrees of innervation to be separated (Fig 1C, left). These heat maps utilize fluorescence intensity of the GFP fluorophore to provide a value reflective of the degree of innervation within the neuropil. The AL is co-labeled with anti-N-Cadherin (CadN), a cell adhesion molecule, to demarcate all the synaptic glomeruli for circuit-localized studies (Fig 1C, left). Higher magnification allows for measurements of 3-dimensional innervation volumes in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli. The oval between the two brain hemisphere ALs is the esophagus opening that marks the center of the brain. The VM7 glomeruli on either side are connected with a cross-over connection (Fig 1B) on the medial aspect of the brain, which is typically not captured in our confocal imaging (Fig 1C). At higher magnification, the VM7 synaptic innervation can be visualized with a Z-stack projection (Fig 1C, right). Three-dimensional innervation volumes are measured by delineating the innervation area in each optical section, and then summing the total volume (see Methods). This approach allows for investigation of experience-dependent pruning via glial phagocytosis.

Glia are phagocytes that prune the synaptic glomeruli innervation [1,15]. In the Drosophila brain olfactory circuit, the ALG, EG, and CG have all been implicated as active phagocytes [51]. During critical period OSN synaptic pruning, EB experience specifically targets glial projections into the VM7 synaptic glomeruli neuropil [15]. Using glial class-specific Gal4 drivers (S1 Fig), we first investigated the experience-dependent infiltration from all of these glial classes (Fig 2). Newly eclosed juveniles at 0–1 days post-eclosion (dpe) were placed in vacuum-sealed odorant exposure chambers containing either the mineral oil vehicle alone (control) or EB odorant dissolved in the oil (experience). Critical period EB exposure drives experience-dependent glial infiltration VM7 synaptic innervation pruning via phagocytosis [1]. The glial projection infiltration can best be visualized as a 3-dimensional projection of the VM7 synaptic glomerulus (Fig 2). Different glial classes were labeled with a membrane-bound RFP driven by the class-specific Gal4 drivers (for example, EG::RFP) with the depth shown by color-coding at 0.75 μm intervals within the Z-stack confocal image (Fig 2). This 3-dimensional AL representation shows the relative position of glial cells in the control condition and following critical period EB experience. The EB-responsive target VM7 synaptic glomerulus is independently labeled via a direct fusion of the membrane-bound GFP directly to the Or42a promoter (Or42a-mCD8::GFP), with VM7 indicated as white dotted circles (Fig 2). For all quantified comparisons, glial projection infiltration into the VM7 synaptic glomeruli is normalized to the oil vehicle control condition.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Disrupting glial 5-HT signaling prevents experience-dependent infiltration.

A, Ensheathing glia GMR56F03-Gal4 driven UAS-MCD8::RFP displayed in 3D projection of the central brain antennal lobe in a color-coded Z-stack (scale bottom right in C), with 24-hour exposure to the mineral oil vehicle control (left) and EB odorant experience (right) from 0 to 1 days post-eclosion (dpe) in the critical period. The glia specifically infiltrate target VM7 glomeruli (dotted circles) with critical period experience. Right: Quantification of glial infiltration into VM7 normalized to the mineral oil control shows a significant increase of ensheathing glia with EB experience (n = 10/condition, p = 1.72 × 10−7). B, Testing the role of glial 5-HT2AR signaling in experience-dependent synaptic infiltration. Transgenic controls (top: w1118; UAS-mCD8::RFP/+; repo-Gal4/mCD8-Or42a::GFP) and glia-specific 5-HT2AR RNAi (bottom: w1118; UAS-mCD8::RFP/Or42a-mCD8::GFP; UAS-5-HT2ARNAi/repo-Gal4) under the same conditions as above, at higher magnification. The control glial infiltration into target VM7 glomeruli (dotted circles) is completely blocked with glial 5-HT2AR RNAi. C, Quantification of glial VM7 infiltration normalized to oil vehicle shows highly significant experience-dependent infiltration in controls (top: n = 12/condition, p = 7.00 × 10−9), but none with glial 5-HT2AR RNAi (bottom: n = 11/condition, p = 0.370). Individual data points shown with mean ± SEM. Significance indicated as p < 0.0001 (****), p > 0.05 (not significant, ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g002

With all 3 glial class-specific RFP membrane markers, glial infiltration into the VM7 synaptic glomerulus was assayed in the oil control and with EB experience. No detectable change in the distribution or number of ALG or CG occurs with EB exposure (S2 Fig), but there is a striking infiltration of the EG (Fig 2A). In oil vehicle controls, EG surround the AL neuropil with few or no detectable projections into synaptic glomeruli, specifically including VM7 (Fig 2A, left image; white dotted circle). Three-dimensional depiction of EG in the oil control indicates that glia remain associated with the AL boundary. In response to critical period EB experience, EG are the only class that infiltrate into the AL neuropil, and this movement is predominatly targeted to the EB-responsive VM7 synaptic glomerulus (Fig 2A, right image; white dotted circle). Other EG movements presumably reflect the presence of other EB-responsive glomeruli elsewhere in the AL. Quantification shows a very highly significant nearly 3-fold increase in EG VM7 infiltration following critical period EB experience compared to the oil vehicle control (Fig 2A, right). These results are consistent with the fact that EG mediate experience-dependent synaptic innervation pruning during the critical period [15]. We next turned to investigating the guidance signaling that specifically targets EG into the EB-responsive VM7 synaptic glomerulus in this critical period mechanism.

Serotonin (5-HT) intercellular signaling is well established to shape olfactory circuit connectivity [52,53], and our previous work found glial 5-HT2A receptors upregulated in VM7 glomeruli in response to critical period EB experience [21]. To test this mechanism in EG infiltration, we used a glial driver (repo-Gal4) to express 5-HT2AR RNAi while simultaneously labeling glia with an RFP membrane marker. In the transgenic driver controls with the oil vehicle, there is again a complete absence of any glia within the VM7 synaptic glomerulus (Fig 2B, top left image; white dotted circle). With critical period EB experience, glial projections again strongly and specifically infiltrate the VM7 glomerulus (Fig 2B, top right image; white dotted circle). Quantification shows a >3-fold increase in glial infiltration in response to the EB experience compared to oil vehicle control (Fig 2C, top). With glial 5-HT2AR RNAi, there is a total loss of infiltration targeted by EB experience. In the oil vehicle control, there is no glial infiltration and, in sharp contrast to the above genetic control, EB experience results in no VM7 infiltration, making it indistinguishable from the control condition (Fig 2B, bottom row). Quantification shows there is absolutely no change in VM7 glial infiltration between the oil vehicle control and EB experience conditions (Fig 2C, bottom). Additional controls confirm blocked infiltration is a direct result of 5HT2AR loss and not the presence of a second UAS genetic construct (S3 Fig). Thus, glial 5-HT2AR RNAi blocks experience-dependent glial infiltration into VM7 synaptic glomeruli. We next tested glial class-specific roles in experience-dependent synaptic pruning during this juvenile critical period.

Ensheathing glia serotonin signaling drives experience-dependent synapse pruning

Tryptophan hydroxylase (Trhn) is an essential enzyme for serotonin synthesis from the tryptophan precursor, and cell-targeted Trhn RNAi can be used to test serotonergic signaling requirements [54]. Our previous work discovered that Trhn is required in glia, and not at all in neurons, for critical period EB experience-dependent synapse pruning [21]. We hypothesized that ALG, which are not mediating synaptic pruning but are implicated in serotonergic mediation during circuit remodeling [26,55], likely use serotonin as a core regulatory signal in response to experience during the critical period. To test glial class-specific requirements, we used an EG-specific driver (GMR56F03-Gal4), an ALG-specific driver (GMR86E01-Gal4), and a CG-specific driver (GMR54H02-Gal4) to express UAS-Trhn RNAi in each class. Each Gal4 demonstrates specificity to each of the glial class (S1 Fig) and similar expression strength without genetic dilution effects (S3 and S4 Figs). In the UAS-Trhn RNAi control (no Gal4 driver present) and all 3 glial class knockdowns, we paired 24-hour critical period exposure (0–1 dpe) of the oil vehicle (control) to EB odorant dissolved in oil (experience). We then tested experience-dependent pruning of Or42a OSN innervation in the VM7 glomerulus, with all synaptic glomeruli labeled with an N-Cadherin antibody (CadN; gray scale), and VM7 innervation labeled by Or42a receptor-direct fusion to the membrane mCD8::GFP (Or42a::GFP; shown in an intensity heat-map, see color scale). Representative images and quantification of the 3-dimensional Or42a neuron innervation volume in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli are shown in Fig 3.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Ensheathing glia produce serotonin for critical period synapse pruning.

A, Or42a neuron innervation of VM7 synaptic glomeruli shown with Or42a::GFP labeling (colored heat-map,16 LU scale; bottom right), co-labeled with anti-N-Cadherin (CadN) for visualization of all synaptic glomeruli (gray scale). The top row shows transgenic control of UAS-Trhn RNAi alone (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; UAS-Trhn RNAi/+) with oil vehicle (left) or EB odorant experience (right) for 24 hours from 0 to 1 dpe in the critical period. The bottom row shows ensheathing glia GMR56F03-Gal4 driven Trhn RNAi (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; UAS-Trhn RNAi/GMR56F03-Gal4) with experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning completely blocked. B, Quantification of Or42a OSN innervation volume in the Trhn RNAi control (green, left), and driven in ensheathing glia (EG, red, second), astrocyte-like glia (ALG, blue, third; w1118; GMR86E01-Gal4; UAS-Trhn RNAi), and cortex glia (CG, orange, right; w1118; GMR54H02-Gal4; UAS-Trhn RNAi). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison shows glial pruning of Or42a OSN innervation in the Trhn RNAi control (n = 10/condition, p < 1.00 × 10−15), as well as with astrocyte-like glia and cortex glia Trhn RNAi (ALG: n = 10/condition, p < 1.0 × 10−15; CG: n = 10/condition, p < 1.0 × 10−15), but no significant pruning with ensheathing glia Trhn RNAi (EG: n = 8, p = 0.379). All data points shown with mean ± SEM. Significance: p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g003

In the UAS-Trhn RNAi/+ control, 24-hour EB experience from 0 to 1 dpe in the critical period causes strong VM7 synaptic glomeruli pruning compared to the oil vehicle control (Fig 3A, top row). The heat-map label shows the pruned Or42a OSN innervation (color) with all synaptic glomeruli marked by anti-CadN (gray scale). In sharp contrast, blocking serotonin synthesis in only EG fully prevents experience-dependent pruning, with the EB experience indistinguishable from oil vehicle controls (Fig 3A, bottom row). UAS-Trhn RNAi driven in either ALG or CG allows pruning identical to control, with both conditions showing the same VM7 innervation loss in response to EB experience. Quantification of the innervation volumes reveals highly significant pruning in transgenic controls (green), and with ALG (blue) and CG (orange) Trhn RNAi from EB experience compared to the oil vehicle (Fig 3B). The control (green) is a 6.3-fold volumetric decrease, ALG (blue) is a 7.2-fold volumetric decrease, and CG (orange) is a 6.0-fold volumetric decrease in the VM7 innervation. In contrast, EG Trhn RNAi results in no experience-dependent pruning (Fig 3B, red). Quantification reveals no significant innervation volume change. These findings reveal that only the EG require serotonin synthesis via tryptophan hydroxylase for serotonergic signaling to drive critical period experience-dependent synapse pruning, an acute requirement that is independent of Trhn loss during earlier development (S5 Fig). We next tested glial class(es) requiring the 5-HT2A receptor for this signaling mechanism during the early-life pruning mechanism in the juvenile brain.

Astrocyte-like 5-HT2A receptor function is essential for critical period synaptic pruning

To test specific requirements across different glial classes for serotonin signaling, we moved forward to the reception side of this serotonergic communication. The 5-HT2A G-protein-coupled receptor is well established to be a central regulator of brain circuit plasticity [23,24], and our previous work discovered a glial 5-HT2A receptor requirement in olfactory critical period experience-dependent synaptic pruning [21]. Based on the above discovery of the serotonin signaling role in EG, we hypothesized that a distinct glial class should be required for the signaling reception, with 5-HT2A receptors mediating a novel mechanism of glial-to-glia class signaling. 5-HT2A receptors are present in different glia subclasses and have distinct roles in circuit maintenance and synaptic regulation, including roles in mammalian astrocytes and microglia [5658]. The different glia classes performing separable tasks in experience-dependent synaptic remodeling suggests communication not only with neurons, but also between different glial classes. We therefore hypothesized glia-to-glia class signaling via the 5-HT2A receptor is required for olfactory experience-dependent synaptic pruning. To test this hypothesis, we again used EG-specific driver (GMR56F03-Gal4), ALG-specific driver (GMR86E01-Gal4), and CG-specific driver (GMR54H02-Gal4) to express UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi and then assayed Or42a neuron innervation pruning in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli in response to EB experience compared to the oil vehicle during the 0–1 dpe critical period.

In the UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/+ controls, 24-hour EB experience causes the expected VM7 synaptic glomeruli pruning compared to the oil vehicle control (Fig 4A, top row). The heat-map shows Or42a OSN innervation pruning (color) with synaptic glomeruli labeled by anti-CadN (gray scale). Blocking 5-HT2A receptor signaling in only ALG prevents experience-dependent pruning (Fig 4A, bottom row). Conversely, 5-HT2AR RNAi in either EG or CG has no effect, with both showing the same loss of VM7 innervation in response to critical period EB experience. Quantification of innervation volume reveals highly significant experience-dependent pruning in the RNAi control (green) and with 5-HT2AR RNAi driven in EG (blue) or CG (orange; Fig 4B). The control (green) shows a 6-fold decrease, EG (blue) a nearly 5-fold decrease, and CG (orange) a >7-fold decrease in VM7 innervation volume. In contrast, the ALG 5-HT2AR RNAi results in a complete block of synaptic glomerulus pruning (Fig 4B, red). Quantification reveals no significant experience-dependent innervation volume change. These findings indicate the 5-HT2A receptor is required only in ALG for critical period synaptic pruning. In combination with the above Trhn results showing EG serotonin signaling, we suggest that a communication mechanism from EG to ALG is essential for experience-dependent synaptic pruning. We next tested if 5-HT2ARs in ALG only drives this critical period signaling mechanism.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Astrocyte-like glia 5-HT2AR is required for experience-dependent pruning.

A, Or42a OSN innervation of VM7 glomeruli (Or42a::GFP) shown as a colored heat-map (16 LU scale, bottom right) with anti-CadN labeling of all synaptic glomeruli (gray scale). Top row: 5-HT2AR RNAi alone transgenic control (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/+) with oil vehicle (left) or EB experience (right) for 24 hours from 0 to 1 dpe. Bottom row: astrocyte-like glia (ALG) GMR86E01-Gal4 5-HT2AR RNAi (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/GMR86E01-Gal4) showing experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning completely blocked. B, Quantification of VM7 innervation volume in the 5-HT2AR RNAi alone control (green, left), and driven in ALG (red, second), ensheathing glia (EG, blue; w1118; Or42a-Gal4/+; UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/GMR56F03-Gal4), and cortex glia (CG, orange; w1118; Or42a-Gal4/+; UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/GMR54H02-Gal4). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison shows significant glial pruning in the 5-HT2AR RNAi control (n = 24/condition, p = 5.00 × 10−14), as well as ensheathing and cortex glia 5-HT2AR RNAi conditions (EG: n = 10/ condition, p = 2.55 × 10−11; CG: n = 10/condition, p = 1.58 × 10−13), but no significant pruning with astrocyte-like glia 5-HT2AR RNAi (ALG: n = 10, p = 0.980). All individual data points are shown with the mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (not significant, ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g004

Restoring 5-HT2AR function only in astrocytes rescues 5-HT2AR null synapse pruning

One of the best compliments to test cell-type-specific signaling is targeted genetic rescue of a global null mutant [59]. This approach tests the sufficiency of the signaling mechanism. The Drosophila genetic toolkit provides a robust system to pursue rescue experiments for cellular signaling requirements [60]. To understand the requirements of the 5-HT2A receptor in the ALG, we needed to test if this glial class alone requires the receptor to mediate experience-dependent synapse pruning during the juvenile critical period. Our previous work discovered a rate-limiting requirement of glial 5-HT2A receptors using both targeted knockdown and overexpression [21]. We also found above that the 5-HT2AR requirement is within only the ALG, and that 5-HT2A receptor knockdown in EG and CG does not affect experience-dependent synapse pruning. We therefore hypothesized that the 5-HT2A receptor in the ALG is sufficient to enable this critical period mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we performed cell-targeted rescue in ALG in a global 5-HT2A receptor null mutant generated via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing [61]. We employed the ALG GMR86E01-Gal4 to drive wildtype UAS-5-HT2AR in this 5-HT2AR null background. We used the same oil vehicle and EB experience conditions as above to analyze experience-dependent pruning within the defined critical period. Representative images and quantification of 3-dimensional Or42a neuron innervation volume in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli are shown in Fig 5.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Restoring astrocyte-like glia 5-HT2AR rescues pruning in a 5-HT2AR null.

A, Or42a OSN innervation of VM7 glomeruli (Or42a::GFP) shown as a colored heat-map (16 LU scale, bottom right). Top row: oil vehicle treatment of the transgenic control (left; w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/+), the 5-HT2AR null mutant (center, w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; 5-HT2ARnull/5-HT2ARnull), and ALG-targeted rescue condition (right, w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/UAS-5-HT2AR; 5-HT2AR/5-HT2AR, GMR86E01-Gal4/5-HT2AR). Bottom row: The critical period (0−1 dpe) EB exposure to the same genotypes. Restoring 5-HT2A receptor in astrocyte-like glia (bottom right) rescues the blocked pruning in the null (bottom center). B, Quantification of Or42a OSN synaptic glomeruli innervation volumes for the control (blue, left), 5-HT2AR null (red, center), and ALG-targeted rescue condition (green, right) with oil vehicle and EB experience treatments. Compared to experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning in the controls (n = 16/condition, p = 4.36 × 10−10), the 5-HT2AR null blocks pruning (n = 16/condition, p = 0.053), which is restored by ALG-targeted 5-HT2AR rescue (n = 16/condition, p = 4.35 × 10−10). All individual data points are shown with mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (not significant, ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g005

In the transgenic controls, we find the expected levels of experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning compared to the oil vehicle control (Fig 5A, left) and a block of pruning in the 5-HT2A receptor global null mutants (Fig 5A, center). The Or42a::GFP fusion heat-map visualization shows the VM7 innervation with and without glial pruning. In the ALG 5-HT2A receptor rescue condition, we find that expression of the 5-HT2AR in only this single glial class is sufficient to induce experience-dependent pruning in otherwise 5-HT2AR null mutants (Fig 5A, right). Innervation quantification of transgenic controls shows highly significant experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning, with a 4-fold volume loss compared to the oil vehicle (Fig 5B, blue). In contrast, the 5-HT2AR global null (Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; 5-HT2ARnull) shows no significant change in innervation volume in response to critical period EB experience (Fig 5B, red). In the ALG-targeted rescue (UAS-5-HT2AR/Or42a-mCD8::GFP; GMR86E01-Gal4, 5-HT2ARnull/5-HT2ARnull), a highly significant degree of EB experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning is indistinguishable from control, with again a 4-fold volume loss compared to the oil vehicle (Fig 5B, green). This result shows that 5-HT2A receptors in the ALG is necessary and sufficient for synaptic pruning in response to olfactory experience in the juvenile critical period. We next explored the scope of ALG 5-HT2A receptor signaling requirement by testing if conditional adult expression is sufficient to re-open “critical period-like” plasticity at maturity.

Adult astrocyte 5-HT2AR expression re-opens experience-dependent synapse remodeling

The objective of “re-opening” the critical period to harness remodeling capacities is the aspiration for a wide spectrum of serotonergic therapeutic strategies [28,62], given connectivity defects causing life-long and debilitating impairments [63]. Our previous work discovered glial-targeted 5-HT2A receptor expression in mature adults enables de novo experience-dependent synaptic pruning [21]. We hypothesized ALG 5-HT2A receptor function mediates this mechanism. To test this idea, we employed a conditional, temperature-sensitive Gal80 (Gal80ts) transcriptional repressor to express the 5-HT2A receptor in only adult astrocytes. Gal80ts blocks Gal4-driven transcription at permissive temperature (18°C), but inactivates at restrictive temperature (28°C) to permit Gal4 transcription [64]. Control adults at permissive and restrictive temperatures show no EB experience-dependent pruning of VM7 synaptic innervation (Fig 6A, top). At permissive temperature (18°C), when Gal80ts represses 5-HT2A receptor expression in the ALG, there is likewise no detectable experience-dependent pruning (Fig 6A, bottom). Similarly, at restrictive temperature (28°C) when Gal4 is no longer repressed by Gal80ts, the controls show no synaptic glomeruli pruning with EB experience compared to controls with no 5-HT2A receptor expression (Fig 6A, top right). Quantified innervation volumes in all 3 control groups confirm that there is no significant pruning of the VM7 synaptic innervation in mature adults at either temperature (18°C, 28°C) with the absence of the 5-HT2A R expression in ALG (Fig 6B, green and red).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Conditional adult astrocyte 5-HT2AR expression induces synaptic pruning.

A, Mature adults exhibit no experience-dependent pruning of the Or42a OSN innervation. Left (18°C, blue, Gal80ts permissive temperature): Genetic background control (top: w1118; tubulin-Gal80ts/UAS-5-HT2AR; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+) and with ALG-specific Gal4 driver (bottom: w1118; tubulin-Gal80ts/UAS-5-HT2AR; Or42a-mCD8:GFP/ALG; GMR86E01-Gal4) with 24-hour oil vehicle (left) or EB experience (right). There is no experience-dependent pruning with Gal80ts active. Right (28°C, red, Gal80ts restrictive temperature): The same genotypes and conditions with Gal80ts repressed in the lower row to enable ALG-specific Gal4 driver conditional 5-HT2AR expression in the control oil vehicle (lower left) and with EB experience (lower right). Experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning induced in mature adults. B, Quantification of Or42a OSN innervation volumes at permissive 18°C (white circles) and restrictive 28°C (black circles) for genetic background controls (green), ALG-specific 5-HT2AR (red), and ensheathing glia (EG) 5-HT2AR (blue; w1118; tubulin-Gal80ts/UAS-5-HT2AR; Or42a-mCD8:GFP/GMR56F03-Gal4). Tests by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests show no significant change in innervation volumes in background controls (green, left; n = 10/condition, 18°C p = 0.626, 28°C p = 0.999), EG conditions (blue, right; n = 10/condition, 18°C p = 0.999, 28°C p = 0.2673), or ALG at 18°C (red, left; n = 10/condition, 18°C p = 0.999). Only ALG-specific 5-HT2AR at 28°C causes pruning with EB experience at maturity (red, right; n = 10/condition, 28°C p = 1.0 × 10−15). All data points are shown with the mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as p < 0.0001 (****). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g006

Conditional ALG 5-HT2A receptor expression only in mature adults induces experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning, which appears identical to the juvenile critical period mechanism (Fig 6A, bottom right). At the restrictive temperature (28°C), controls that lack the Gal4 driver have densely innervated VM7 synaptic glomeruli in both the oil vehicle and EB odorant experience conditions, showing a complete lack of experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning (Fig 6A, right top row). In these exact same conditions, but with Gal4 now driving 5-HT2A receptor expression only in the adult ALG, there is strong experience-driven synaptic glomeruli pruning consistent with the juvenile critical period mechanisms (Fig 6A, right bottom row). Quantification of the VM7 innervation volumes for all conditions are shown in Fig 6B. At the permissive temperature (18°C, open circles), when functional Gal80ts is actively repressing 5-HT2A receptor expression, there is a complete lack of experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning in comparison to the oil vehicle controls (Fig 6B). At the restrictive temperature (28°C, black circles), when the Gal80ts is inactive, the ALG 5-HT2A receptor expression drives very highly significant experience-dependent pruning in mature adults (Fig 6B, red). Quantification shows >4-fold innervation volume loss in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli at the restrictive 28°C at adult maturity in response to experience. In contrast, EG 5-HT2AR expression causes no detectable experience-dependent innervation pruning in the VM7 synaptic glomeruli (Fig 6B, blue). Thus, ALG 5-HT2AR expression alone re-opens “critical period-like” capabilities. We next turned to exploring the mechanism of the 5-HT2AR signaling requirement.

MMP-1 is induced by experience and required for experience-dependent synaptic pruning

5-HT2AR signaling regulates ECM turnover controlling synapse stability [37], which suggests the mechanistic role in ALG during critical period synapse pruning. Specifically, 5-HT2AR signaling activates MMP production for ECM remodeling [39]. Compared to the ~25 MMPs within mammals, Drosophila has a reduced complement of only two MMPs; MMP-1 and MMP-2. These MMPs are implicated in diverse neuronal cellular remodeling mechanisms [32], but MMP-1 activation in glia has been specifically shown to mediate glial pruning of neuronal axons [41]. We therefore focused on MMP-1 as the likely candidate for experience-dependent 5-HT2AR signaling. We hypothesized that glial MMP-1 would be upregulated in response to critical period EB experience, and that this MMP-1 induction would be required for experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning. To test this hypothesis, we first exposed juveniles during the early-life critical period (0–1 dpe) to either the mineral oil vehicle control or EB odorant and employed MMP-1 immunocytochemical labeling to visualize protein dynamics during experience-dependent innervation pruning. The oil vehicle controls show very low basal levels of MMP-1 in the VM7 glomeruli (Fig 7A, left). In sharp contrast, EB experience dramatically elevates MMP-1 expression (Fig 7A, right). Quantifications of MMP-1 levels within the VM7 synaptic glomerulus show critical period experience causes a highly significant increase (>25-fold) compared to matched controls (Fig 7C). Thus, MMP-1 is induced in glia by EB experience during the critical period.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Experience-induced MMP-1 required for experience-dependent pruning.

A, Anti-MMP1 labeling shown as a color-coded Z-stack (scale, top left) in VM7 glomeruli (white ovals), with 24-hour exposure from 0 to 1 dpe to the mineral oil vehicle control (left) or 25% EB odorant (right). B, Astrocyte-like glia control (top: w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/+) and MMP-1 RNAi targeted to the astrocyte-like glia (bottom: w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal-4 RNAi/UAS-Dicer-2) in color-coded Z-stack of Or42a::GFP labeling of the VM7 innervation (scale, bottom left) with 24-hour exposure from 0 to 1 dpe to the mineral oil vehicle control (left) or 25% EB odorant (right). C, Quantification of the anti- MMP-1 fluorescence intensity (n = 12/condition, p-value ≤ 1.0 × 10−15). The individual data points are shown with the mean ± SEM. Significance indicated as p < 0.0001 (****). D, Quantification of the Or42a OSN innervation volume in the ALG-Gal4 transgenic driver control (green) and with ALG-targeted MMP-1 RNAi (red). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison shows significant experience-dependent pruning of VM7 innervation in the control (green, n = 22/condition, p-value = 2.0 × 10−11), whereas pruning is completely blocked by ALG-targeted MMP-1 RNAi (red, n = 10/condition, p-value = 0.950). Individual data points shown with mean ± SEM. Significance: p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g007

We hypothesized MMP-1 would be required in astrocyte glia specifically to enable experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning. To investigate this requirement, we employed ALG-Gal4 MMP-1 RNAi together with Or42a::GFP visualization of the VM7 innervation (Fig 7B). We exposed the transgenic ALG-Gal4 driver control and targeted MMP-1 knockdown to either mineral oil vehicle control or EB odorant for 24 hours from 0 to 1 dpe during the critical period. The controls show the characteristic innervation in the oil vehicle and the robust synaptic glomerulus pruning in response to EB experience, as expected (Fig 7B, top). ALG-Gal4 MMP-1 RNAi show a block of experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning, with no indication of decreased VM7 innervation (Fig 7B, bottom). Thus, MMP-1 knockdown specifically in the ALG strongly prevents glial pruning in response to critical period experience. Specificity was further confirmed by MMP-1 knockdown in EG, which failed to effect experience-dependent glial infiltration or VM7 innervation pruning (S6 Fig). Quantification of VM7 innervation volume reveals the expected EB experience-dependent extensive pruning and loss of innervation in transgenic driver controls (>3-fold innervation volume decrease compared to the vehicle; Fig 7D, left, green). In sharp contrast, critical period EB experience results in no detectable pruning with ALG MMP-1 knockdown, with no significant VM7 innervation volume change compared to the vehicle (p = 0.950; Fig 7D, right, red). Comparable experiments investigating MMP-2 reveal no role in this mechanism. MMP-2 knockdown in glia permits pruning indistinguishable from control (S7A Fig), with MMP-1 loss alone specifically disrupting critical period synaptic glomerulus pruning (S7B Fig). Thus, critical period experience induces MMP-1 expression in VM7-infiltrating ALG that is required for experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning.

5-HT2AR knockdown with MMP-1 overexpression restores experience-dependent pruning

Our final objective was to test whether ALG 5-HT2AR signaling acts via MMP-1 induction as the mechanism for experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning. We hypothesized this signaling cascade would enable glial infiltration into the VM7 synaptic neuropil, since it is known that this mechanism MMP remodeling of the synaptic ECM [38]. Serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling triggers MMP extracellular proteolytic enzyme functions in other context [39], so we hypothesized the same mechanism here. To test the direct connection of experience-driven glial 5-HT2AR signaling to activating MMP-1 function, we employed MMP-1 overexpression with 5-HT2AR RNAi knockdown in the same ALG. This test determines whether MMP-1 overexpression in the absence of 5-HT2AR signaling is sufficient for experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning. Experience was tested with 24-hour (0–1 dpe) exposure to EB odorant compared to oil vehicle control in 3 matched genetic groups: (1) the transgenic driver control (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4 (ALG)/+), (2) the ALG-targeted 5-HT2AR RNAi knockdown (w1118; Or42a- mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi), and (3) ALG-targeted MMP-1 overexpression together with 5-HT2AR RNAi knockdown (w1118; Or42a- mCD8::GFP/UAS-MMP-1; GMR86E01-Gal4/UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi). The VM7 innervation was visualized with Or42a::GFP labeling in 3D intensity images and the VM7 innervation volume quantified to measure the extent of pruning in all 6 genotypes and treatment conditions (Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 8. MMP-1 OE restores 5HT2AR-deficient experience-dependent pruning.

A, Or42a OSN innervation of VM7 glomeruli shown as a color-coded Z-stack (scale, top right) with 24-hour exposure from 0 to 1 dpe to the mineral oil vehicle control (left) and EB odorant (right) in astrocyte-like glia control (top: w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/+), the astrocyte-like glia 5-HT2AR RNAi alone (middle: w1118;Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi), and with MMP-1 overexpression (bottom: w1118;Or42a-mCD8::GFP/UAS-MMP1; GMR86E01-Gal4/UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi). B, Quantified Or42a OSN innervation volume in the transgenic control (green), 5-HT2AR RNAi (red), and together with MMP-1 overexpression (OE, blue). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison shows consistent significant innervation pruning in the transgenic control (green, n = 10/condition, p-value = 4.38 × 10−13). Targeted 5-HT2AR RNAi results in no significant difference between oil control and EB experience conditions (red, n = 10/condition, p-value = 0.990). MMP-1 OE restores synaptic pruning with a significant decrease of innervation volume in response to the EB odorant experience (blue, n = 10/condition, p-value = 4.43 × 10−13), which is nearly identical to the control. Individual data points are shown with mean ± SEM. Significance: p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.g008

Controls show the expected pruning of the VM7 innervation with EB experience compared to the vehicle control (Fig 8A, top). As previous results above, 5-HT2AR RNAi targeted only to ALG completely blocks this experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning (Fig 8A, middle). The important new finding is that ALG-targeted MMP-1 overexpression in combination with 5-HT2AR RNAi (designated + MMP-1 OE) effectively restores the pruning (Fig 8A, bottom). The extent of experience-dependent pruning is indistinguishable between the MMP-1 OE condition and transgenic controls. Quantification of the VM7 innervation volume comparing oil vehicle and EB experience conditions shows a significant decrease in controls (2.6-fold; Fig 8B, left, green) and a similar significant decrease with MMP-1 OE (3.3-fold; Fig 8B, blue). There remains no significant change in innervation volume between vehicle and EB experience conditions with ALG 5-HT2AR RNAi (Fig 8B, red). There is a significant lost innervation volume (3.12-fold decrease) between EB conditions of 5-HT2AR RNAi and MMP-1 OE, but no significant difference between the MMP-1 OE condition and the transgenic control, demonstrating a full restoration of experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning. We conclude that ALG MMP-1 overexpression restores pruning prevented by knockdown of 5-HT2AR signaling. This mechanism suggests glia-to-glia serotonergic communication with 5-HT2A receptor activation upstream of MMP-1 induction is essential for experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning.

Discussion

We discover a serotonergic signaling mechanism between two glial classes needed for experience-dependent synapse pruning: EG (serotonin production) and ALG (5-HT2A reception). New Drosophila connectome FlyWire mapping [65] reveals complete synaptic partner connectivity for this brain circuit remodeling (Fig 1). Neuron-to-glia signals orchestrating such synaptic pruning are relatively well known [66,67], but glia-to-glia signaling is a largely unexplored frontier [1]. Mammalian glial studies have revealed intra-class signaling that mediates synapse pruning [68], but inter-class signaling is much less known. Synapse elimination is the end result of hierarchical activation signaling that ultimately results in synaptic destabilization and/or direct synapse phagocytosis by glia [69,70]. Intercellular “find me” signals guide glial infiltration [47,71,72], and subsequent “eat me” signals target precise phagocytosis [1,15]. Unlike neuron-to-glia signals, there is an underemphasis on glial-to-glia signaling and pruning coordination across different glia classes. Serotonergic signaling is well-known to regulate circuit formation and juvenile brain circuit remodeling in mammals [73,74]. Glial serotonin signaling is required for olfactory experience-dependent synaptic pruning in the juvenile Drosophila brain [21]. We here discover separable requirements for serotonin signaling and 5-HT2A receptor function in two interacting glial classes, demonstrating a glia-to-glia class serotonergic signaling mechanism essential for highly precise synapse pruning in a temporally-restricted critical period and for re-opening this capacity at maturity.

We find glia infiltration into target synaptic neuropil is entirely by EG, revealing a novel glial class-restricted, experience-dependent mechanism (Fig 2A). During glial activation, glial membrane projections extend into the synaptic neuropil, but glial somata remain at the outer bounds of the AL, as shown with glia nucleus staining. Glia send their projections into input experience-targeted synaptic glomeruli for precise pruning via activation of input-specific signaling cascades [75]. For example, critical period experience induces odorant dose-dependent ERK activation in glia, with glial-targeted ERK loss impairing circuit-localized synaptic neuropill infiltration [76]. Glia also employ Draper (mammalian MEGF10) receptor activation, Basket (mammalian JNK) phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, and transcriptional upregulation of Cheerio (mammalian FLNA), to guide glial F-actin cytoskeleton dynamics for glial infiltration [15]. Consistent with this study, the Draper receptor requirement is solely in EG. The mechanism is conserved with injury responses, where a soma phagosome mediates degradation and recycling of the engulfed material, while projection infiltration acts as the mechanism of targeted engulfment and directed phagocytosis [77]. For synaptic pruning, this separable process means experience-dependent infiltration into EB-responsive VM7 synaptic glomeruli (Fig 2A), with synapses eliminated in a class-specific mechanism. Future studies will investigate integration of signaling cascades directing glial infiltration to targeted synapses for removal and degradation in separate cellular locations.

We discover glial 5-HT2A receptors are required for experience-driven targeting, with glial 5-HT2AR RNAi completely blocking projection infiltration into the EB-responsive synaptic glomeruli (Fig 2B and 2C). In mammalian cultures, neuronal 5-HT receptors trigger cytoskeleton remodeling for growth guidance during synaptogenesis and plasticity [78]. However, nothing is known about 5-HT receptors in glial projection guidance. Mammalian glia fractalkine (CX3CR1) signaling mediates infiltration in response to neuronal activation by injury or pathogens [79]. The signaling cascades regulated by cytokines are a potential link to glial serotonergic requirements [80]. Although these mechanisms are a response to neuronal injury or pathogenesis, the glial synaptic pruning process is thought to be conserved with these pathways [15]. In Drosophila, glial ephrin/Eph receptor signaling is also reportedly implicated in glial infiltration [81]. This independent mechanism for glial infiltration mirrors the requirement for 5-HT/5-HT2AR signaling in experience-dependent critical period synaptic pruning. We find glial 5-HT2AR RNAi blocks glial infiltration entirely (Fig 2B and 2C), whereas EphA receptors provide spatial cues that appear to only modulate neuronal plasticity [81]. Nevertheless, together these findings suggest glial signals can orchestrate glial projection infiltration in mechanisms required for neuronal remodeling. Future studies are needed to further dissect glial class-specific requirements of 5-HT2AR signaling in the directional glial infiltration for experience-dependent synaptic pruning and provide insights into precise synapse elimination in sculpting juvenile brain circuitry.

We find that serotonin synthesis via tryptophan hydroxylase is also required only in EG, with cell-targeted RNAi blocking critical period experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning (Fig 3). Glia phagocytosis is the primary means of neuronal pruning in both sensory experience-dependent and injury-induced mechanisms [1,66,67]. The different glial classes perform distinct pruning jobs [82,83]. In the juvenile Drosophila olfactory critical period, EG are the sole phagocytes responding to odorant experience [15]. The finding that this terminal endpoint glial phagocyte class is the source of serotonin signaling is surprising, with the circuit-localized serotonergic response driven solely by Or42a OSN activation [21]. In mammals, serotonergic signaling is also linked to glial functions, with activated glia triggering alternative tryptophan metabolism to reduce serotonin availability within the brain [84]. However, studies of serotonergic disease dysfunction often fail to consider possible glial signaling. For example, juvenile mice show reduced serotonin-mediated calcium signaling within astrocytes, which results in aberrant synaptic plasticity [26]. Nevertheless, glial functions and glia class interactions remain understudied. We find that EG Trhn RNAi completely blocks critical period synaptic glomerulus pruning (Fig 3). Future studies could test if experience-dependent serotonin signaling is solely from EG, with brain 5-HT levels quantified for EG-targeted Trhn RNAi. To further understand the requirement of glia-to-glia serotonergic signaling, we next tested glia class-specific 5-HT receptor roles.

We find astrocytic 5-HT2A receptors alone are required for experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning in the critical period (Fig 4). Importantly, EG are the sole synaptic phagocytes responding to early experience [15]. These paired class-specific requirements suggest a model in which ALG and EG are differentially required for the directional precise pruning of targeted synapses. This in turn suggests cooperative glial interactions and demonstrates a novel requirement for communication between different glial classes. Glia-to-glia signaling is a newer finding; however, precedents do exist. Mammalian glia produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1β, and interferon-γ, to drive glial phagocytosis in response to injury or infection [85,86]. Moreover, mammalian astrocytes release CCL2/CXCL10 chemokines to signal glial attraction to sites of inflammation [87]. In Alzheimer’s disease models, a positive feedback signaling loop between microglia and astrocytes drives the inflammatory response, suggesting glia-to-glia communication for cooperative neuronal clearance [82]. Similarly, serotonin may signal from phagocytic glia (EG) to ALG to coordinate a cooperative phagocytosis mechanism. While the above examples are from injury or disease contexts, they provide a comparison for considering phagocytic glia producing a signal that works in a feedback mechanism in astrocytes during synaptic pruning in response to critical period experience. We propose serotonin signaling removes a protective glial block to guide pruning specificity.

We discover that astrocytic 5-HT2A receptors are not only necessary for synaptic pruning, but are sufficient to rescue critical period experience-dependent synapse pruning in an otherwise global 5-HT2AR null mutant (Fig 5). In neurons, the 5-HT2A receptor is known to drive formation of serotonergic circuits via autoregulation [17,24], both during brain development and in adult learning/memory cascades [88,89]. The 5-HT2A receptor distribution predicts plasticity capacities in adult mammalian brain [90], which suggests a connection between the receptor availability and synaptic signaling. In the Drosophila juvenile brain olfactory critical period, glial 5-HT2A receptors have a rate-limiting role in the extent of experience-dependent synapse pruning [21]. The requirement of ALG activation for this synaptic pruning is entirely novel. Glial 5-HT2A receptor upregulation occurs in the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury [91], linked to serotonergic cognitive impairments [92], suggesting 5-HT2ARs may drive localized synaptic changes. Our results here indicate that 5-HT2ARs required only in astrocytes allows precise local synapse pruning in response to critical period experience. Thus, restoring this 5-HT2A receptor signaling only in ALG is sufficient to rescue experience-dependent synaptic glomeruli pruning (Fig 5). Isolating this 5-HT2AR requirement to a single glial class may help answer the broad-spectrum question of how glial cells enact high-level specificity to a broad and diverse range of environmental sensory input, while enabling correct synaptic connectivity remodeling to optimize juvenile brain circuits.

We find astrocytic 5-HT2A receptors are not only necessary and sufficient for critical period pruning, but that conditional 5-HT2A receptor expression in adult astrocytes acts to re-open “critical period-like” experience-dependent synapse pruning at maturity (Fig 6). Synaptic plasticity in adults allows learning and memory formation; however, large-scale connectivity changes are largely prohibited at maturity [93]. Both long-term potentiation and depression can involve synapse formation and elimination [94,95], but operate on a smaller scale. Extensive remodeling is presumed to be blocked following critical period closure to insulate mature circuit properties [96,97], which are believed vital for higher-order cognition, but this poses an obstacle in treating trauma, injury, and disease. It is therefore a priority to find ways to re-open the heightened state of “critical period-like” remodeling to provide treatments for many circuit dysfunction conditions, such as autism spectrum disorder [98], schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease [99,62]. While serotonergic psychoactive drugs (e.g., LSD and ketamine) have shown promise in elevating such synaptic remodeling capacities, specificity is a substantial concern [100]. Critical period closure is thought to protect against large-scale connectivity changes, so re-opening this ability without sufficient specificity protections is likely quite detrimental. Such specificity could possibly be derived from 5-HT2AR activation within specific glial classes to activate experience-dependent synapse pruning (Fig 6). Thus, we propose astrocyte-targeted serotonergic signaling as a potential new intervention strategy.

We discover that critical period sensory experience induces MMP-1 expression within ALG (Fig 7). Since serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling activates MMP extracellular proteolytic enzymes [39], this provided a potential mechanism to explain the glia-to-glia serotonin signaling role in experience-dependent synaptic pruning. A primary restriction to large-scale connectivity remodeling is ECM synapse stabilization [101,102], with glial-mediated ECM changes implicated in both the projection infiltration and subsequent phagocytosis modulating this synapse stability [103,104]. In Drosophila, the glial Draper engulfment receptor (mammalian MEGF-10) initiates ECM remodeling to enable glial phagocytosis function [41]. In injury models, Draper receptor activation triggers the upregulation of glial MMP-1, however the mechanistic requirement for MMP-1 in other forms of glial infiltration remains unknown. Here, we show MMP-1 is induced in ALG for juvenile brain infiltration. We find MMP-1 is absolutely required in the ALG for experience-dependent synaptic pruning (Fig 7). In mammals, MMPs are long associated with responses to stroke-induced inflammation, as well as juvenile brain experience-dependent primary visual cortex remodeling plasticity [105]. Importantly, secreted MMP-9 overexpression in mice has been shown to re-open ‘critical period-like’ synaptic remodeling at maturity [106,107]. Here, we show secreted MMP-1 is an essential component of Drosophila experience-dependent synaptic pruning, indicating a well-conserved mechanism enabling brain circuit plasticity.

We discover a direct connection between glial 5-HT2AR and MMP-1 roles, with MMP-1 overexpression compensating for 5-HT2AR loss to restore experience-dependent synaptic pruning (Fig 8). 5-HT2AR signaling is well known to activate ECM-digesting MMP extracellular endopeptidases via ERK1/2 signaling [39], and we have also recently discovered that experience-dependent ERK signaling is required for synapse pruning [39,76]. In injury models, 5-HT2AR activation upregulates MMPs for ECM remodeling [37]. We postulate that glial 5-HT2AR signaling in critical period experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning similarly upregulates glial secreted MMP-1 to enable circuit-localized ECM remodeling for targeted glial infiltration. Our data support the hypothesis that MMP-dependent ECM remodeling allows large-scale synaptic connectivity alterations [35,108]. We add the novel dimension that temporally-restricted glial 5-HT2AR signaling delineates the critical period window of MMP function in experience-dependent synapse elimination. We find glial infiltration is blocked by loss of glial 5-HT2AR signaling (Fig 2), and further testing MMP-1 requirements in this mechanism is an important future goal. Future studies will examine experience-dependent glial infiltration with targeted MMP-1 knockdown, and MMP-1 roles during 5-HT2AR signaling deficient loss of glial infiltration. In conclusion, the work reported here reveals novel glia-to-glia class serotonergic 5-HT2AR signaling that induces MMP-1 upregulation as an important and overlooked control mechanism driving experience-dependent, circuit-localized synapse pruning in brain circuits.

Methods

Drosophila genetics

Animals were maintained at 25°C in a 12:12-hour light/dark incubator on standard food. The Gal4 driver lines were: pan-glial repo-Gal4 (RRID: BDSC 7415) [109], ALG GMR86E01-Gal4 (RRID: BDSC: 45914) [110], EG GMR56F03-Gal4 (RRID: 39157) [111], and CG GMR54H02-Gal4 (RRID: 45784) [112]. The UAS responder lines were: membrane markers UAS-mCD8::GFP (RRID: BDSC 5137) [113] UAS-mCD8::RFP (RRID: BDSC 32219) [114], and UAS-Luciferase (RRID: BDSC 35789) [115]; the serotonergic UAS-Trhn RNAi (RRID: BDSC 25842) [111], UAS-5HT2AR RNAi (RRID: BDSC 31882) [116], and UAS-5-HT2AR OE (RRID: BDSC 24504) [117]; the MMP pathway UAS-MMP1 RNAi [32,118], UAS-MMP1 OE (RRID: BDSC:58700) [32,118,119], UAS-MMP-2 RNAi (RRID: BDSC:31371) [32,118], and also UAS-Dicer-2 (RRID: BDSC 24651) [119]. The temperature-sensitive (ts) Gal80 repressor was α-tubulin-Gal80ts (RRID: BDSC 86328) [64]. Direct promoter fusion line was Or42a-mCD8::GFP [44,120]. The 5-HT2A receptor null mutant line was w1118; 5-HT2ARnull (RRID: BDSC 84444) [121]. The genetic background control was w1118 (RRID: BDSC 3605), and multiple transgenic controls used were: (1) w1118; UAS-mCD8::RFP/+; repo-Gal4/mCD8-Or42a::GFP, (2) w1118; Or42a-mCD8:GFP/+; repo-Gal4/+, (3) w1118; Or42a-mCD8:GFP/+; UAS-Trhn RNAi/+, (4) w1118; Or42a-mCD8:GFP/+; UAS-5-HT2AR RNAi/+, (5) w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4/+, (6) w1118; UAS-5-HT2A/α-tubulin-Gal80ts; Or42a-mCD8::GFP, (7) w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4 (ALG)/+, (8) (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4 (ALG)/+, and (9) w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/UAS-Dicer-2; UAS-MMP-2 RNAi/+. Animals of both sexes were used in all studies.

Odorant exposure

Odor experience treatments were done as previously described [122]. Briefly; animals were developmentally staged, and then sorted as late-stage pupae into separate vials based on sex and genotype. A fine wire stainless steel mesh was secured with taped Parafilm over the top of the vials. The vials were placed in an airtight 3,700 ml Glasslock container with 1 ml mineral oil vehicle (100%; Sigma-Aldrich) or 25% EB odorant (Sigma-Aldrich; % v/v EB in mineral oil) in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube centered in the odorant exposure chamber. The odorant chambers were placed into temperature-controlled incubators (25°C) on a 12-hour light/dark cycle for all the non-temperature-sensitive animals. Newly eclosed flies were rapidly transferred to new vials in exposure chambers with freshly made odorants (as above), 4–6 hours after placing the vials into the chambers. The animals were then maintained in the odorant exposure chambers in incubators for a further 18–20 hours (24 hours total), and then immediately processed for brain immunocytochemistry [122].

Conditional transgenics

For all temperature-sensitive Gal80 (Gal80ts) trials, developmentally staged animals were sorted as dark pupae into separate vials based on age, sex, and genotype. All animals used were raised at 18°C restrictive temperature with 12-hour light/dark cycle to either a juvenile critical period age (2–4 days, S5 Fig) or to mature adult age (14–16 days, Fig 6) and then transferred to experimental temperature (18°C restrictive or 28°C permissive temperature) for odorant exposure. As above, animals were exposed in vials with a fine wire stainless steel mesh top in airtight Glass- lock containers with either the 1 ml vehicle control only (100% mineral oil; Sigma-Aldrich) or the 25% EB odorant (Sigma-Aldrich; % v/v EB in mineral oil). The animals were maintained in the odorant exposure chambers in temperature-controlled incubators for 24 hours before immediately being processed for brain immunocytochemistry [122].

Immunocytochemistry imaging

Post-exposure animals were anesthetized in 70% ethanol for 1–2 min. Brains were dissected using sharpened forceps (Dumont #5, C shape) in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Invitrogen). Brains were fixed for 30 min at room temperature (RT) in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; EMS 15714) in 4% sucrose PBS. Fixed brains were washed 3× with PBS and then blocked for 1.5–2 hours at RT or overnight (12–16 hours in 4°C) with 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBS-T; Fisher Chemical). The brains were incubated with all primary antibodies diluted in 0.2% BSA in PBS-T at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies used were: chicken anti-GFP (Abcam, 13970; 1:1,000), rat anti-RFP (Chromotek, 5F8; 1:1,000), and rat anti-DNEX-8 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB); 1:50), mouse anti-MMP1 (DSHB, 5H7B11; 1:50), mouse anti-MMP1 (DSHB, 3A6B4; 1:50), and mouse anti-MMP1 (DSHB, 3B8D12; 1:50). All three anti-MMP1 antibodies were used together in a 1/1/1 mixture, as previously described [123]. The brains were washed 3× for 20 min each with PBS-T and then incubated overnight with fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies. The secondary antibodies used were: AlexFluor-488 goat anti-chicken, AlexFluor-488 goat anti-mouse, AlexaFluor-546 goat anti-rat, and AlexaFluor-546 donkey anti-rat (all used at 1:250). The brains were washed in PBS-T 3× for 20 min each, followed by PBS 1× for 20 min. Brains were mounted onto glass slides (75 × 25 mm, 0.9–1.06 mm; Corning) with a glass coverslip (No. 1.5H, Carl Zeiss) in Fluoromount-G (EMS 17984–25). Double-sided adhesive tape (Scotch) was used to raise coverslips over the brains, and clear nail polish (Sally Hansen) was used to seal coverslips. Images were collected on a 510 META laser-scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) with a 63× oil-immersion objective. Images were collected at 1,024 × 1,024 resolution with a Z-slice thickness of 0.75 μm. The microscope and imaging settings were kept constant within every experiment (exact settings can be found in Protocol Exchange).

Quantification measurements

All measurements were done blind to both genotype and experience conditions using the ImageJ Blind Analysis Tool plug-in. To quantify EG and pan-glial repo-Gal4 driving UAS-mCD8::RFP membrane innervation values, the weighted sum of all pixels was used, which adds together all the pixels in each slice at each position. Brightness values <50 were dropped to account for imaging background. These values were then normalized to the mineral oil control in each analysis. For glial-specific infiltration, a defined ROI was made from the borders of the VM7 glomerulus and innervation volume was quantified by lasso perimeter measurements from the sum slices Z-projection using the following equation: [volume (μm3) = area (μm2) × slice thickness × total number of slices]. For Or42a innervation volumes, an ROI was defined for the VM7 glomerulus quantified by lasso perimeter measurements from the sum slices Z-projection using the following equation: [volume (μm3) = area (μm2) × slice thickness × total number of slices]. To quantify MMP-1 intensity values, the weighted sum of all pixels was used, which adds together all the pixels in each slice at each position. Brightness values <50 were dropped to account for imaging background. Data from all the combined biological replicates were maintained as a raw measurement point spread, with blinded quantification to ensure normality across all trials [122].

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with Prism software (GraphPad version 9). All analyses were done using n = number of synaptic glomeruli, unless otherwise stated. All groups that met the criteria for parametric statistics were analyzed with unpaired two-tailed t tests. For data comparing >2 genotypes, a two-way ANOVA was used with odorant exposure and genotype as independent variables, followed by the Sidak’s multiple-comparisons test to compare the oil odorant vehicle and EB-exposure conditions within each genotype. Comparisons between 2 or more genotypes were analyzed by two-way ANOVA tests with a 5% alpha significance level. Data are presented in the figures as all individual data points and mean ± SEM. Significance in figures is indicated as p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****), and p > 0.05 marked not significant (ns). The exact significance p-values for each comparison are given in the figure legends.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Different transgenic Gal4 drivers for the three antennal lobe glial classes.

Juvenile brain antennal lobe (AL) expression of the UAS-mCD8::GFP membrane marker (green) driven in three different glial classes: A, ensheathing glia (EG, R56F03-Gal4); B, astrocyte-like glia (ALG, R86E01-Gal4); and C, cortex glia (CG, R54H02-Gal4). Brains were dissected from animals 0 to 1 days post-eclosion (dpe). Scale bar: 10 μm. The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Astrocyte and cortex glia show no infiltration with odorant experience.

A, Astrocyte-like glia (top) GMR86E01-Gal4 and Cortex Glia (bottom) GMR54H02-Gal4 driven UAS-MCD8::RFP in antennal lobe 3D projection (depth color-coded scale, bottom right), with 24-hour (0–1 dpe) exposure to vehicle control (oil, left) or odorant experience (EB, right). VM7 synaptic glomeruli shown in white. B, Quantification of glial in VM7 shows no significant infiltration for astrocyte-like glia (blue, p = 0.525) or cortex glia (red, p = 0.829) with EB experience. All data points with mean ± SEM. Not significant; p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Glial repo-Gal4 driver effectiveness not diluted with dual UAS constructs.

Experience-dependent glial VM7 infiltration is indistinguishable with single UAS control (w1118; UAS-mCD8::RFP/+; repo-Gal4/mCD8-Or42a::GFP) and double UAS control (w1,118; UAS-mCD8::RFP/mCD8-Or42a::GFP; repo-Gal4/UAS-luciferase). Oil controls are not significantly different (p = 0.999) and EB treatments are not significantly different (p = 0.588). All data points with mean ± SEM. Not significant; p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s003

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Different glial transgenic Gal4 drivers express with comparable strength.

Glial florescence intensity measured in juvenile brains with a single UAS construct driven by glial class-specific Gal4 drivers (w1118; UAS-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR56F03-Gal4 (EG)/+ or w1118; UAS-mCD8::GFP/+; GMR86E01-Gal4(ALG)/+) or two UAS constructs driven by glial class-specific Gal4 drivers (w1118; UAS-mCD8::GFP/UAS-mCD8::RFP; GMR56F03-Gal4 (EG)/+ or w1118; UAS-mCD8::GFP/UAS-mCD8::RFP; GMR86E01-Gal4(ALG)/+). Quantification shows no change with ensheathing glia Gal4 (p = 0.948) or astrocyte-like glia Gal4 (p = 0.502) drivers. All data points with mean ± SEM. Not significant; p > 0.05 (ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s004

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Conditional adult serotonin loss blocks experience-dependent pruning.

A, Critical period experience-dependent synaptic glomerulus pruning with Gal80ts active (top; 18°C, blue, permissive temperature) in w1118; tubulin-Gal80ts/Or42a-mCD8::GFP; UAS-Trhn RNAi/ GMR56F03-Gal4. Pruning is blocked by EG-specific conditional adult Trhn RNAi expression with Gal80ts repressed (bottom; 28°C, red, restrictive temperature). 24-hour (0–1 dpe) vehicle control (oil, left) or odorant experience (EB, right). B, Or42a OSN innervation volume quantified at permissive 18°C (blue) and restrictive 28°C (red). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests show significant EB-induced pruning at permissive temperature (p = 8.830 × 10−13), but not when Trhn RNAi is driven in adult EG at restrictive temperature to cause no significant pruning (p = 0.9943). All data points with mean ± SEM. Significance: p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (not significant; ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s005

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. EG-specific MMP-1 RNAi does not block glial infiltration or pruning.

A, Ensheathing glia in VM7 glomeruli (EG-Gal4 driven UAS-mCD8::RFP; heat-map) with ensheathing glia MMP-1 knockdown (w1118; GMR56F03-Gal4/UAS-MMP-1 RNAi; UAS-mCD8::RFP/UAS-Dicer-2) after 24-hour (0–1 dpe) exposure to vehicle control (oil, left) or odorant experience (EB, right) from 0 to 1 days post-eclosion (dpe). B, Quantification of glial infiltration into VM7 shows a significant increase with critical period EB experience (p = 1.672 × 10−12). C, Quantification VM7 innervation volume shows a significant decrease with critical period EB experience (p = 1.934 × 10−10). All data points with mean ± SEM. Significance indicated as p < 0.0001 (****). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s006

(TIFF)

S7 Fig. MMP-2 plays no role in critical period experience-dependent pruning.

A, Or42a neuron innervation of VM7 synaptic glomeruli shown with Or42a::GFP labeling (colored heat-map,16 LU scale; bottom right), co-labeled with anti-N-Cadherin (CadN) for visualization of all synaptic glomeruli (gray scale). Top row shows transgenic control of UAS-MMP-2 RNAi only (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/UAS-Dicer-2; UAS-MMP-2 RNAi/+). Bottom row shows glial repo-Gal4 driven MMP-2 RNAi (w1118; Or42a-mCD8::GFP/UAS-Dicer-2; UAS-MMP-2 RNAi/ repo-Gal4). Vehicle control (oil, left) or odorant experience (EB, right) for 24 hours from 0 to 1 dpe. B, Quantification of Or42a OSN innervation volume in repo-Gal4 control (green, left), driving MMP-1 RNAi (red, middle), or MMP-2 RNAi (blue, right). Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison shows VM7 innervation pruning in repo-Gal4 control (p = 6.535 × 10−11) and driving MMP-2 RNAi (p = 6.551 × 10−11), but no significant pruning with MMP-1 RNAi (p = 0.523). All data points with mean ± SEM. Significance: p < 0.0001 (****) and p > 0.05 (not significant, ns). The data underlying this Figure can be found in S1 Data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003524.s007

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC; Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA) for essential genetic stocks, and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB; University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA) for essential antibodies. We thank Broadie Laboratory members for extensive and insightful input on this study.

References

  1. 1. Nelson N, Miller V, Broadie K. Neuron-to-glia and glia-to-glia signaling directs critical period experience-dependent synapse pruning. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025;13:1540052. pmid:40040788
  2. 2. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol. 1970;206(2):419–36. pmid:5498493
  3. 3. Reh RK, Dias BG, Nelson CA 3rd, Kaufer D, Werker JF, Kolb B, et al. Critical period regulation across multiple timescales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(38):23242–51. pmid:32503914
  4. 4. Dehorter N, Del Pino I. Shifting developmental trajectories during critical periods of brain formation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:283. pmid:33132842
  5. 5. Starkey J, Horstick EJ, Ackerman SD. Glial regulation of critical period plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2023;17:1247335. pmid:38034592
  6. 6. Colón-Ramos DA. Synapse formation in developing neural circuits. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2009;87:53–79. pmid:19427516
  7. 7. Akinlaja YO, Nishiyama A. Glial modulation of synapse development and plasticity: oligodendrocyte precursor cells as a new player in the synaptic quintet. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1418100. pmid:39258226
  8. 8. Kelsch W, Lin C-W, Mosley CP, Lois C. A critical period for activity-dependent synaptic development during olfactory bulb adult neurogenesis. J Neurosci. 2009;29(38):11852–8. pmid:19776271
  9. 9. Doll CA, Broadie K. Impaired activity-dependent neural circuit assembly and refinement in autism spectrum disorder genetic models. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:30. pmid:24570656
  10. 10. Leier HC, Foden AJ, Jindal DA, Wilkov AJ, Costello PVdL, Vanderzalm PJ, et al. Glia control experience-dependent plasticity in an olfactory critical period. Elife. 2025;13.
  11. 11. Faust TE, Gunner G, Schafer DP. Mechanisms governing activity-dependent synaptic pruning in the developing mammalian CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(11):657–73. pmid:34545240
  12. 12. Luo T, Gao T-M. A novel phagocytic role of astrocytes in activity-dependent elimination of mature excitatory synapses. Neurosci Bull. 2021;37(8):1256–9. pmid:33890228
  13. 13. Chung W-S, Clarke LE, Wang GX, Stafford BK, Sher A, Chakraborty C, et al. Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways. Nature. 2013;504(7480):394–400. pmid:24270812
  14. 14. Hilu-Dadia R, Kurant E. Glial phagocytosis in developing and mature Drosophila CNS: tight regulation for a healthy brain. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;62:62–8.
  15. 15. Nelson N, Vita DJ, Broadie K. Experience-dependent glial pruning of synaptic glomeruli during the critical period. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):9110. pmid:38643298
  16. 16. Bittern J, Pogodalla N, Ohm H, Brüser L, Kottmeier R, Schirmeier S, et al. Neuron-glia interaction in the Drosophila nervous system. Dev Neurobiol. 2021;81(5):438–52. pmid:32096904
  17. 17. Ogelman R, Gomez Wulschner LE, Hoelscher VM, Hwang I-W, Chang VN, Oh WC. Serotonin modulates excitatory synapse maturation in the developing prefrontal cortex. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1368. pmid:38365905
  18. 18. Suri D, Teixeira CM, Cagliostro MKC, Mahadevia D, Ansorge MS. Monoamine-sensitive developmental periods impacting adult emotional and cognitive behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(1):88–112. pmid:25178408
  19. 19. Nakamura K, Hasegawa H. Developmental role of tryptophan hydroxylase in the nervous system. Mol Neurobiol. 2007;35(1):45–54. pmid:17519505
  20. 20. Kirby LG, Pernar L, Valentino RJ, Beck SG. Distinguishing characteristics of serotonin and non-serotonin-containing cells in the dorsal raphe nucleus: electrophysiological and immunohistochemical studies. Neuroscience. 2003;116(3):669–83. pmid:12573710
  21. 21. Miller VK, Broadie K. Experience-dependent serotonergic signaling in glia regulates targeted synapse elimination. PLoS Biol. 2024;22(10):e3002822. pmid:39352884
  22. 22. Higa GSV, Francis-Oliveira J, Carlos-Lima E, Tamais AM, Borges F da S, Kihara AH, et al. 5-HT-dependent synaptic plasticity of the prefrontal cortex in postnatal development. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21015. pmid:36470912
  23. 23. Kossatz E, Diez-Alarcia R, Gaitonde SA, Ramon-Duaso C, Stepniewski TM, Aranda-Garcia D, et al. G protein-specific mechanisms in the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor regulate psychosis-related effects and memory deficits. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4307. pmid:38811567
  24. 24. Berthoux C, Barre A, Bockaert J, Marin P, Bécamel C. Sustained activation of postsynaptic 5-HT2A receptors gates plasticity at prefrontal cortex synapses. Cereb Cortex. 2019;29(4):1659–69. pmid:29917056
  25. 25. Zhang G, Stackman RW Jr. The role of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in memory and cognition. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:225. pmid:26500553
  26. 26. González-Arias C, Sánchez-Ruiz A, Esparza J, Sánchez-Puelles C, Arancibia L, Ramírez-Franco J, et al. Dysfunctional serotonergic neuron-astrocyte signaling in depressive-like states. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(9):3856–73. pmid:37773446
  27. 27. Vargas MV, Dunlap LE, Dong C, Carter SJ, Tombari RJ, Jami SA, et al. Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors. Science. 2023;379(6633):700–6. pmid:36795823
  28. 28. Lepow L, Morishita H, Yehuda R. Critical period plasticity as a framework for psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:710004. pmid:34616272
  29. 29. Saeger HN, Olson DE. Psychedelic-inspired approaches for treating neurodegenerative disorders. J Neurochem. 2022;162(1):109–27. pmid:34816433
  30. 30. Inserra A, De Gregorio D, Gobbi G. Psychedelics in psychiatry: neuroplastic, immunomodulatory, and neurotransmitter mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73(1):202–77. pmid:33328244
  31. 31. Higa GSV, Viana FJC, Francis-Oliveira J, Cruvinel E, Franchin TS, Marcourakis T, et al. Serotonergic neuromodulation of synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology. 2024;257:110036. pmid:38876308
  32. 32. Dear ML, Dani N, Parkinson W, Zhou S, Broadie K. Two classes of matrix metalloproteinases reciprocally regulate synaptogenesis. Development. 2016;143(1):75–87. pmid:26603384
  33. 33. Sanchez B, Kraszewski P, Lee S, Cope EC. From molecules to behavior: implications for perineuronal net remodeling in learning and memory. J Neurochem. 2024;168(9):1854–76. pmid:38158878
  34. 34. Frischknecht R, Gundelfinger ED. The brain’s extracellular matrix and its role in synaptic plasticity. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;970:153–71. pmid:22351055
  35. 35. Dankovich TM, Rizzoli SO. Extracellular matrix recycling as a novel plasticity mechanism with a potential role in disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:854897. pmid:35431813
  36. 36. Dityatev A, Schachner M, Sonderegger P. The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(11):735–46. pmid:20944663
  37. 37. John Jayakumar JAK, Panicker MM, Basu B. Serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor affects cell-matrix adhesion and the formation and maintenance of stress fibers in HEK293 cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21675. pmid:33303826
  38. 38. Tewari BP, Chaunsali L, Prim CE, Sontheimer H. A glial perspective on the extracellular matrix and perineuronal net remodeling in the central nervous system. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:1022754. pmid:36339816
  39. 39. Shum JKS, Andres Melendez J, Jeffrey JJ, Sanchez JL, Jeffrey JJ, Dumin JA. Serotonin-induced MMP-13 production is mediated via phospholipase C, protein kinase C, and ERK1/2 in rat uterine smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(45):42830–40. pmid:12213812
  40. 40. Cabral-Pacheco GA, Garza-Veloz I, Castruita-De la Rosa C, Ramirez-Acuña JM, Perez-Romero BA, Guerrero-Rodriguez JF, et al. The roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24):9739. pmid:33419373
  41. 41. Purice MD, Ray A, Münzel EJ, Pope BJ, Park DJ, Speese SD, et al. A novel Drosophila injury model reveals severed axons are cleared through a Draper/MMP-1 signaling cascade. Elife. 2017;6:e23611. pmid:28825401
  42. 42. Devaud J-M, Acebes A, Ramaswami M, Ferrús A. Structural and functional changes in the olfactory pathway of adult Drosophila take place at a critical age. J Neurobiol. 2003;56(1):13–23. pmid:12767029
  43. 43. Coulson B, Hunter I, Doran S, Parkin J, Landgraf M, Baines RA. Critical periods in Drosophila neural network development: importance to network tuning and therapeutic potential. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1073307. pmid:36531164
  44. 44. Golovin RM, Vest J, Broadie K. Neuron-specific FMRP roles in experience-dependent remodeling of olfactory brain innervation during an early-life critical period. J Neurosci. 2021;41(6):1218–41. pmid:33402421
  45. 45. Golovin RM, Vest J, Vita DJ, Broadie K. Activity-dependent remodeling of Drosophila olfactory sensory neuron brain innervation during an early-life critical period. J Neurosci. 2019;39(16):2995–3012. pmid:30755492
  46. 46. Song C, Broadie K. Fragile X mental retardation protein coordinates neuron-to-glia communication for clearance of developmentally transient brain neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(12):e2216887120. pmid:36920921
  47. 47. Vita DJ, Meier CJ, Broadie K. Neuronal fragile X mental retardation protein activates glial insulin receptor mediated PDF-Tri neuron developmental clearance. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1160. pmid:33608547
  48. 48. Coates KE, Calle-Schuler SA, Helmick LM, Knotts VL, Martik BN, Salman F, et al. The wiring logic of an identified serotonergic neuron that spans sensory networks. J Neurosci. 2020;40(33):6309–27. pmid:32641403
  49. 49. Münch D, Galizia CG. DoOR 2.0--comprehensive mapping of Drosophila melanogaster odorant responses. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21841. pmid:26912260
  50. 50. Fishilevich E, Vosshall LB. Genetic and functional subdivision of the Drosophila antennal lobe. Curr Biol. 2005;15(17):1548–53. pmid:16139209
  51. 51. Castañeda-Sampedro A, Alcorta E, Gomez-Diaz C. Cell-specific genetic expression profile of antennal glia in Drosophila reveals candidate genes in neuron-glia interactions. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):5493. pmid:39953089
  52. 52. Zhang X, Gaudry Q. Functional integration of a serotonergic neuron in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Elife. 2016;5:e16836. pmid:27572257
  53. 53. Kaylynn X, Coates E, Majot AT, Zhang X, Michael CT, Spitzer SL, et al. Systems/circuits identified serotonergic modulatory neurons have heterogeneous synaptic connectivity within the olfactory system of Drosophila. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0192-17.2017
  54. 54. Chivite M, Leal E, Míguez JM, Cerdá-Reverter JM. Distribution of two isoforms of tryptophan hydroxylase in the brain of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). An in situ hybridization study. Brain Struct Funct. 2021;226(7):2265–78. pmid:34213591
  55. 55. Müller FE, Schade SK, Cherkas V, Stopper L, Breithausen B, Minge D, et al. Serotonin receptor 4 regulates hippocampal astrocyte morphology and function. Glia. 2021;69(4):872–89. pmid:33156956
  56. 56. Hasel P, Liddelow SA. Astrocytes. Curr Biol. 2021;31(7):R326–7. pmid:33848482
  57. 57. Colonna M, Butovsky O. Microglia function in the central nervous system during health and neurodegeneration. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35:441–68. pmid:28226226
  58. 58. Di Benedetto G, Burgaletto C, Bellanca CM, Munafò A, Bernardini R, Cantarella G. Role of microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease: from neuroinflammation to Ca2+ homeostasis dysregulation. Cells. 2022;11(17):2728. pmid:36078138
  59. 59. Ecovoiu AA, Ratiu AC, Micheu MM, Chifiriuc MC. Inter-species rescue of mutant phenotype-the standard for genetic analysis of human genetic disorders in Drosophila melanogaster model. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2613. pmid:35269756
  60. 60. Zirin J, Hu Y, Liu L, Yang-Zhou D, Colbeth R, Yan D, et al. Large-scale transgenic Drosophila resource collections for loss- and gain-of-function studies. Genetics. 2020;214(4):755–67. pmid:32071193
  61. 61. Deng B, Li Q, Liu X, Cao Y, Li B, Qian Y, et al. Chemoconnectomics: mapping chemical transmission in Drosophila. Neuron. 2019;101:876–93.e4.
  62. 62. Nardou R, Sawyer E, Song YJ, Wilkinson M, Padovan-Hernandez Y, de Deus JL, et al. Psychedelics reopen the social reward learning critical period. Nature. 2023;618(7966):790–8. pmid:37316665
  63. 63. Chini M, Pöpplau JA, Lindemann C, Carol-Perdiguer L, Hnida M, Oberländer V, et al. Resolving and rescuing developmental miswiring in a mouse model of cognitive impairment. Neuron. 2020;105(1):60–74.e7. pmid:31733940
  64. 64. Niu X, Mao C-X, Wang S, Wang X, Zhang Y, Hu J, et al. α-Tubulin acetylation at lysine 40 regulates dendritic arborization and larval locomotion by promoting microtubule stability in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0280573. pmid:36827311
  65. 65. Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Schlegel P, Yu S-C, McKellar CE, et al. Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain. Nature. 2024;634(8032):124–38. pmid:39358518
  66. 66. Raiders S, Han T, Scott-Hewitt N, Kucenas S, Lew D, Logan MA, et al. Engulfed by glia: glial pruning in development, function, and injury across species. J Neurosci. 2021;41(5):823–33. pmid:33468571
  67. 67. Huo A, Wang J, Li Q, Li M, Qi Y, Yin Q, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying microglial sensing and phagocytosis in synaptic pruning. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19(6):1284–90. pmid:37905877
  68. 68. Vainchtein ID, Chin G, Cho FS, Kelley KW, Miller JG, Chien EC, et al. Astrocyte-derived interleukin-33 promotes microglial synapse engulfment and neural circuit development. Science. 2018;359(6381):1269–73. pmid:29420261
  69. 69. Yu X. Less is more: a critical role of synapse pruning in neural circuit wiring. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023;24(2):61. pmid:36477108
  70. 70. Dzyubenko E, Hermann DM. Role of glia and extracellular matrix in controlling neuroplasticity in the central nervous system. Semin Immunopathol. 2023;45(3):377–87. pmid:37052711
  71. 71. Musashe DT, Purice MD, Speese SD, Doherty J, Logan MA. Insulin-like signaling promotes glial phagocytic clearance of degenerating axons through regulation of draper. Cell Rep. 2016;16(7):1838–50. pmid:27498858
  72. 72. Luo J, Ting C-Y, Li Y, McQueen P, Lin T-Y, Hsu C-P, et al. Antagonistic regulation by insulin-like peptide and activin ensures the elaboration of appropriate dendritic field sizes of amacrine neurons. Elife. 2020;9:e50568. pmid:32175842
  73. 73. Teissier A, Soiza-Reilly M, Gaspar P. Refining the role of 5-HT in postnatal development of brain circuits. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:139. pmid:28588453
  74. 74. Gu Q, Singer W. Involvement of serotonin in developmental plasticity of kitten visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7(6):1146–53. pmid:7582087
  75. 75. Raiders S, Han T, Scott-Hewitt N, Kucenas S, Lew D, Logan MA, et al. Engulfed by glia: glial pruning in development, function, and injury across species. J Neurosci. 2021;41(5):823–33. pmid:33468571
  76. 76. Baumann NS, Sears JC, Broadie K. Experience-dependent MAPK/ERK signaling in glia regulates critical period remodeling of synaptic glomeruli. Cell Signal. 2024;120:111224. pmid:38740233
  77. 77. Hilu-Dadia R, Kurant E. Glial phagocytosis in developing and mature Drosophila CNS: tight regulation for a healthy brain. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;62:62–8. pmid:31862622
  78. 78. Gordon-Weeks PR, Fournier AE. Neuronal cytoskeleton in synaptic plasticity and regeneration. J Neurochem. 2014;129(2):206–12. pmid:24147810
  79. 79. Zhao D, Hu M, Liu S. Glial cells in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Front Cell Neurosci. 2024;18:1426094. pmid:39081666
  80. 80. O’Farrell K, Fagan E, Connor TJ, Harkin A. Inhibition of the kynurenine pathway protects against reactive microglial-associated reductions in the complexity of primary cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;810:163–73. pmid:28688912
  81. 81. Lee J-E, Lee H, Baek E, Choi B, Yun HS, Yoo YK, et al. The role of glial and neuronal Eph/ephrin signaling in Drosophila mushroom body development and sleep and circadian behavior. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2024;720:150072. pmid:38749187
  82. 82. Sun M, You H, Hu X, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Song Y, et al. Microglia-astrocyte interaction in neural development and neural pathogenesis. Cells. 2023;12(15):1942. pmid:37566021
  83. 83. Lopez-Ortiz AO, Eyo UB. Astrocytes and microglia in the coordination of CNS development and homeostasis. J Neurochem. 2024;168(10):3599–614. pmid:37985374
  84. 84. Watkins CC, Sawa A, Pomper MG. Glia and immune cell signaling in bipolar disorder: insights from neuropharmacology and molecular imaging to clinical application. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4(1):e350. pmid:24448212
  85. 85. Schmidt SI, Bogetofte H, Ritter L, Agergaard JB, Hammerich D, Kabiljagic AA, et al. Microglia-secreted factors enhance dopaminergic differentiation of tissue- and iPSC-derived human neural stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16(2):281–94. pmid:33482100
  86. 86. Gao C, Jiang J, Tan Y, Chen S. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):359. pmid:37735487
  87. 87. Lee H-G, Lee J-H, Flausino LE, Quintana FJ. Neuroinflammation: an astrocyte perspective. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(721):eadi7828. pmid:37939162
  88. 88. Nakao K, Singh M, Sapkota K, Fitzgerald A, Hablitz JJ, Nakazawa K. 5-HT2A receptor dysregulation in a schizophrenia relevant mouse model of NMDA receptor hypofunction. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):168. pmid:35459266
  89. 89. Salvan P, Fonseca M, Winkler AM, Beauchamp A, Lerch JP, Johansen-Berg H. Serotonin regulation of behavior via large-scale neuromodulation of serotonin receptor networks. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26(1):53–63. pmid:36522497
  90. 90. Meneses A, Antonietta De Luca M, Di Giovanni G, Zhang G, Stackman RW Jr. The role of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in memory and cognition. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:225.
  91. 91. Murnane KS. Serotonin 2A receptors are a stress response system: implications for post-traumatic stress disorder. Behav Pharmacol. 2019;30(2 and 3-Spec Issue):151–62. pmid:30632995
  92. 92. Collins SM, O’Connell CJ, Reeder EL, Norman SV, Lungani K, Gopalan P, et al. Altered serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor signaling underlies mild TBI-elicited deficits in social dominance. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:930346. pmid:35910378
  93. 93. Seng C, Luo W, Földy C. Circuit formation in the adult brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2022;56(3):4187–213. pmid:35724981
  94. 94. Ganguly A, Qi C, Bajaj J, Lee D. Serotonin receptor 5-HT7 in Drosophila mushroom body neurons mediates larval appetitive olfactory learning. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21267. pmid:33277559
  95. 95. Cai X, Kallarackal AJ, Kvarta MD, Goluskin S, Gaylor K, Bailey AM, et al. Local potentiation of excitatory synapses by serotonin and its alteration in rodent models of depression. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(4):464–72. pmid:23502536
  96. 96. Wong-Riley MTT. The critical period: neurochemical and synaptic mechanisms shared by the visual cortex and the brain stem respiratory system. Proc Biol Sci. 2021;288(1958):20211025. pmid:34493083
  97. 97. Larsen B, Sydnor VJ, Keller AS, Yeo BTT, Satterthwaite TD. A critical period plasticity framework for the sensorimotor-association axis of cortical neurodevelopment. Trends Neurosci. 2023;46(10):847–62. pmid:37643932
  98. 98. Gibson JM, Howland CP, Ren C, Howland C, Vernino A, Tsai PT. A critical period for development of cerebellar-mediated autism-relevant social behavior. J Neurosci. 2022;42(13):2804–23. pmid:35190469
  99. 99. Patton MH, Blundon JA, Zakharenko SS. Rejuvenation of plasticity in the brain: opening the critical period. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;54:83–9. pmid:30286407
  100. 100. Vargas MV, Dunlap LE, Dong C, Carter SJ, Tombari RJ, Jami SA, et al. Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors. Science. 2023;379(6633):700–6. pmid:36795823
  101. 101. Mohan V, Pantazopoulos H, Baroncelli L, Dankovich TM, Rizzoli SO. Extracellular matrix recycling as a novel plasticity mechanism with a potential role in disease. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16: 854897.
  102. 102. Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, Vainchtein ID, Han RT, Nakao-Inoue H, et al. Microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix promotes synapse plasticity. Cell. 2020;182(2):388–403.e15. pmid:32615087
  103. 103. Crapser JD, Arreola MA, Tsourmas KI, Green KN. Microglia as hackers of the matrix: sculpting synapses and the extracellular space. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(11):2472–88. pmid:34413489
  104. 104. Winkler B, Funke D, Klämbt C. Macrophage invasion into the Drosophila brain requires JAK/STAT-dependent MMP activation in the blood-brain barrier. PLoS Biol. 2025;23(2):e3003035. pmid:39977429
  105. 105. Pielecka-Fortuna J, Kalogeraki E, Fortuna MG, Löwel S. Optimal level activity of matrix metalloproteinases is critical for adult visual plasticity in the healthy and stroke-affected brain. Elife. 2015;5:e11290. pmid:26609811
  106. 106. Ribot J, Breton R, Calvo C-F, Moulard J, Ezan P, Zapata J, et al. Astrocytes close the mouse critical period for visual plasticity. Science. 2021;373(6550):77–81. pmid:34210880
  107. 107. Yin L-T, Feng R-R, Xie X-Y, Yang X-R, Yang Z-F, Hu J-J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression in the hippocampus reduces alcohol-induced conditioned-place preference by regulating synaptic plasticity in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2023;442:114330. pmid:36746309
  108. 108. Huntley GW. Synaptic circuit remodelling by matrix metalloproteinases in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(11):743–57. pmid:23047773
  109. 109. Halter DA, Urban J, Rickert C, Ner SS, Ito K, Travers AA, et al. The homeobox gene repo is required for the differentiation and maintenance of glia function in the embryonic nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1995;121(2):317–32. pmid:7768175
  110. 110. Kremer MC, Jung C, Batelli S, Rubin GM, Gaul U. The glia of the adult Drosophila nervous system. Glia. 2017;65(4):606–38. pmid:28133822
  111. 111. Alassaf M, Rajan A. Diet-induced glial insulin resistance impairs the clearance of neuronal debris in Drosophila brain. PLoS Biol. 2023;21(11):e3002359. pmid:37934726
  112. 112. Jenett A, Rubin GM, Ngo T-TB, Shepherd D, Murphy C, Dionne H, et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Rep. 2012;2(4):991–1001. pmid:23063364
  113. 113. Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 1999;22(3):451–61. pmid:10197526
  114. 114. Karuparti S, Yeung AT, Wang B, Guicardi PF, Han C. A toolkit for converting Gal4 into LexA and Flippase transgenes in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda). 2023;13(3):jkad003. pmid:36617215
  115. 115. Kuo S-Y, Tu C-H, Hsu Y-T, Wang H-D, Wen R-K, Lin C-T, et al. A hormone receptor-based transactivator bridges different binary systems to precisely control spatial-temporal gene expression in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50855. pmid:23239992
  116. 116. Bonanno SL, Sanfilippo P, Eamani A, Sampson MM, Kandagedon B, Li K, et al. Constitutive and conditional epitope tagging of endogenous G-protein-coupled receptors in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2024;44(33):e2377232024. pmid:38937100
  117. 117. Gasque G, Conway S, Huang J, Rao Y, Vosshall LB. Small molecule drug screening in Drosophila identifies the 5HT2A receptor as a feeding modulation target. Sci Rep. 2013;3:srep02120. pmid:23817146
  118. 118. Page-McCaw A, Serano J, Santé JM, Rubin GM. Drosophila matrix metalloproteinases are required for tissue remodeling, but not embryonic development. Dev Cell. 2003;4(1):95–106. pmid:12530966
  119. 119. Ochoa E, Ramirez P, Gonzalez E, De Mange J, Ray WJ, Bieniek KF. Pathogenic tau-induced transposable element–derived dsRNA drives neuroinflammation. Sci Adv. 2023;9.
  120. 120. Stephan D, Sánchez-Soriano N, Loschek LF, Gerhards R, Gutmann S, Storchova Z, et al. Drosophila Psidin regulates olfactory neuron number and axon targeting through two distinct molecular mechanisms. J Neurosci. 2012;32(46):16080–94. pmid:23152593
  121. 121. Gowda SBM, Banu A, Salim S, Peker KA, Mohammad F. Serotonin distinctly controls behavioral states in restrained and freely moving Drosophila. iScience. 2022;26(1):105886. pmid:36654863
  122. 122. Nelson N, Miller V, Baumann N, Broadie K. Experience-dependent remodeling of juvenile brain olfactory sensory neuron synaptic connectivity in an early-life critical period. J Vis Exp. 2024;(205):10.3791/66629. pmid:38497653
  123. 123. Dear ML, Shilts J, Broadie K. Neuronal activity drives FMRP- and HSPG-dependent matrix metalloproteinase function required for rapid synaptogenesis. Sci Signal. 2017;10(504):eaan3181. pmid:29114039