Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Identification of 3′ UTR motifs required for mRNA localization to myelin sheaths in vivo

Identification of 3′ UTR motifs required for mRNA localization to myelin sheaths in vivo

  • Katie M. Yergert, 
  • Caleb A. Doll, 
  • Rebecca O’Rouke, 
  • Jacob H. Hines, 
  • Bruce Appel
PLOS
x

Abstract

Myelin is a specialized membrane produced by oligodendrocytes that insulates and supports axons. Oligodendrocytes extend numerous cellular processes, as projections of the plasma membrane, and simultaneously wrap multiple layers of myelin membrane around target axons. Notably, myelin sheaths originating from the same oligodendrocyte are variable in size, suggesting local mechanisms regulate myelin sheath growth. Purified myelin contains ribosomes and hundreds of mRNAs, supporting a model that mRNA localization and local protein synthesis regulate sheath growth and maturation. However, the mechanisms by which mRNAs are selectively enriched in myelin sheaths are unclear. To investigate how mRNAs are targeted to myelin sheaths, we tested the hypothesis that transcripts are selected for myelin enrichment through consensus sequences in the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR). Using methods to visualize mRNA in living zebrafish larvae, we identified candidate 3′ UTRs that were sufficient to localize mRNA to sheaths and enriched near growth zones of nascent membrane. We bioinformatically identified motifs common in 3′ UTRs from 3 myelin-enriched transcripts and determined that these motifs are required and sufficient in a context-dependent manner for mRNA transport to myelin sheaths. Finally, we show that 1 motif is highly enriched in the myelin transcriptome, suggesting that this sequence is a global regulator of mRNA localization during developmental myelination.

Introduction

In the central nervous system, myelin provides metabolic support and increases conduction velocity along axons. Myelin is produced by oligodendrocytes, glial cells that extend multiple long processes, and wrap layers of membrane around axons. Myelin sheaths originating from a single oligodendrocyte can vary considerably in length and thickness, suggesting that sheath growth is locally regulated [13]. In line with this model, the myelin transcriptome is distinct compared to the cell body [4]. For example, proteolipid protein (PLP) and myelin basic protein (MBP) are the most abundant proteins in myelin. Yet the underlying mechanisms driving their protein expression in the myelin are entirely different. Plp mRNA is retained in the cell body and translated at the endoplasmic reticulum and the protein is transported to myelin [5,6]. By contrast, Mbp mRNA is trafficked to nascent sheaths and locally translated [510]. This evidence supports the model that mRNAs are selectively targeted to nascent sheaths and locally translated during growth and maturation.

Transport and local translation of mRNAs are broadly utilized mechanisms for controlling subcellular gene expression. In neurons, mRNAs are subcellularly localized to axons [1113], dendrites [14], and growth cones [15], and local translation is required for axon growth and synaptogenesis [1619]. Frequently, mRNA localization in neurons is determined by elements within the 3′ UTR [20,21]. For instance, the 3′ UTR of β-actin contains a sequence that is recognized by the RNA binding protein ZBP1 for localization to cellular projections including growth cones, axons, and dendrites [2226]. Neurons localize hundreds of mRNAs to different subcellular compartments, but the underlying localization elements within the transcripts are largely unknown.

Similar to neurons, oligodendrocytes localize hundreds of mRNAs to distal myelin sheaths [27], but the localization signals necessary for myelin enrichment are limited to a few mRNAs. To date, the most extensively investigated transcript in oligodendrocytes is Mbp mRNA. The Mbp 3′ UTR is required for mRNA localization to myelin sheaths [28,29] and contains 2 minimal sequences including a 21-nt conserved sequence that is necessary for localization to processes in cultured mouse oligodendrocytes [30,31]. However, the minimal sequence is not required for localization in vivo, indicating that the Mbp 3′ UTR contains clandestine localization signals [29]. The investigations into Mbp mRNA localization have provided significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying mRNA localization in oligodendrocytes. However, we know very little about the mechanisms that promote localization of the other hundreds of myelin transcripts. How are mRNAs selected for localization to myelin sheaths? Do myelin-localized transcripts share similar cis-regulatory elements?

Here we bioinformatically identified myelin-enriched transcripts and investigated the ability of their 3′ UTR sequences to promote mRNA localization to nascent sheaths in living zebrafish. The 3′ UTRs that promote myelin localization contain shared cis-regulatory motifs necessary for mRNA localization. Moreover, we found that the motifs are sufficient to promote localization in some, but not all, contexts. Furthermore, we identified a sequence motif that is highly enriched in the myelin transcriptome, implicating the motif as a global regulator of mRNA localization in myelinating oligodendrocytes. Together, our data support a model whereby motifs in 3′ UTRs promote mRNA localization to nascent myelin sheaths.

Results

Quantification of mRNA within myelin sheaths of live zebrafish larvae

Although some transcripts, including Mbp and Mobp mRNA, are present in myelin [79,27,32], we lack information about the precise spatial distribution of myelin-enriched mRNAs in vivo. We therefore adapted the MS2 system [33] to visualize and quantify mRNA in myelinating oligodendrocytes of living zebrafish larvae. The MS2 system consists of a mRNA containing a 24xMBS (MS2 binding sites) sequence, which forms repetitive stem loops, and MCP-EGFP (MS2 coat protein), a reporter protein that specifically binds the 24xMBS stem loops for visualization of the mRNA via EGFP (Fig 1A). A nuclear localization signal is fused to the MCP-EGFP sequestering unbound MCP-EGFP in the nucleus thus reducing background fluorescence. To drive expression of MCP-EGFP in oligodendrocyte lineage cells, we created an expression plasmid, sox10:NLS-tdMCP-EGFP. Next we created mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-3′UTR to drive expression of mRNAs with various 3′ UTR elements in myelinating oligodendrocytes (Fig 1A). Additionally, this plasmid also encodes expression of mScarlet-Caax, which acts as a myelin membrane reporter.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The mbpa 3′ UTR is sufficient to localize mRNA to myelin sheaths in living zebrafish.

(A) Schematic of the MS2 system to visualize mRNA localization in oligodendrocytes. sox10 regulatory DNA drives expression of nuclear-localized MS2 coat protein, NLS-MCP-EGFP (orange crescent and green star). mbpa regulatory elements drive expression of mRNA encoding mScarlet-CAAX fluorescent protein with a repetitive sequence that creates 24 stem loops (24xMBS). When co-expressed, the mRNA–protein complex is exported from the nucleus and localized via the 3′ UTR. (B) Schematic of MS2 expression plasmids used for transient expression in oligodendrocytes with target sequences for Tol2 transposase to facilitate transgene integration. (C and D) Representative images of localization directed by the mbpa (C) or control sv40 3′ UTR (D). Asterisks mark cell bodies with high expression levels of the nuclear-localized MCP-EGFP. Boxed areas are enlarged to highlight sheath termini (arrows). (E) Average mRNA abundance per myelin sheath, measured by EGFP fluorescence intensity normalized to the average intensity of the sv40 control. sv40: n = 5 larvae, 35 sheaths. mbpa: n = 6 larvae, 38 sheaths. (F) Average mRNA abundance per soma, measured by EGFP fluorescence intensity normalized to the average intensity of the sv40 control. sv40: n = 11 larvae, 20 cell bodies. mbpa: n = 15 larvae, 21 cell bodies. (G and H) Representative images of 2 myelinating oligodendrocytes expressing mRNA lacking the 24xMBS. NLS-MCP-EGFP remains in the nucleus at 3 dpf (G) and 5 dpf (H). Scale bars, 10 μm. Statistical significance evaluated using Wilcoxon test. The underlying numerical data can be found in S1 and S2 Data. 3' UTR, 3' untranslated region; dpf, days post fertilization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g001

As proof of principle, we first tested the 3′ UTR of mbpa, a zebrafish ortholog of Mbp, which promotes mRNA localization in myelin (29). As a control, we used the sv40 polyadenylation signal, which lacks any known localization signals [34,35] (Fig 1B). To examine mRNA localization in individual oligodendrocytes, we transiently expressed sox10:NLS-tdMCP-EGFP with either mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-mbpa 3UTR or mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-sv40 3UTR by microinjection into 1-cell stage zebrafish embryos. This approach revealed mRNA, via EGFP fluorescence intensity, in the cytoplasm of nascent sheaths at 4 days post fertilization (dpf). Consistent with previous reports, we found that the mbpa 3′ UTR was sufficient to localize mRNA to nascent sheaths in vivo (Fig 1C and 1D). Furthermore, this approach demonstrated active translation of the mScarlet-Caax reporter mRNA. We also observed differences in the mScarlet-Caax fluorescence intensity, at the protein level, between the sv40 and mbpa 3′ UTR constructs, which could be explained by 3′ UTR-mediated difference in translation efficiency (Fig 1C and 1D).

To quantify mRNA abundance, we measured the average fluorescence intensity of EGFP in myelin sheaths. Due to high levels of fluorescent signal emitting from the cell body, we measured small regions (7 μm) of myelin sheaths far from the cell body. We found that the average fluorescence intensity of sheaths expressing the mbpa 3′ UTR were approximately 2-fold greater than the control (Fig 1E). Importantly, the difference in mRNA localization to myelin sheaths was not due to variability in expression levels of the MS2 reporter (Fig 1F). To verify that cytoplasmic fluorescence is mediated through the mRNA, we removed the 24xMBS and found that EGFP was retained in the nucleus throughout developmental myelination (Fig 1G and 1H). Together, these experiments confirm the ability to visualize and quantify mRNA localization during developmental myelination in vivo.

mbpa mRNA localizes to the leading edge of developing myelin sheaths

Previously, mbpa transcripts have been detected in sheaths throughout developmental myelination [29,36,37], but the proportion of mRNA that is transported to myelin sheaths is unknown. To quantify the distribution of endogenous mbpa mRNA localization in cell bodies and myelin sheaths, we performed single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) on Tg(mbpa:egfp-caax) larvae, which express membrane-tethered EGFP-CAAX in the myelin tracts of the larval hindbrain (Fig 2A). As a control, we also detected egfp mRNA encoded by the transgene, which does not contain any known mRNA localization signals (Fig 2B). To quantify mRNA abundance, we calculated the average integrated density of each transcript in both oligodendrocyte cell bodies and in comparable volumes of myelin in the hindbrain. mbpa mRNA abundance in myelin sheaths significantly increased between 3 and 4 dpf before reaching a plateau at 5 dpf (Fig 2C), indicating that the majority of mbpa mRNA is transported to myelin sheaths at 4 dpf. Specifically, we found that 37% of mbpa transcripts localized to myelin sheaths at 4 dpf, whereas only 4% of the egfp transcripts localized to the myelin (Fig 2D). We therefore performed all subsequent experiments at 4 dpf, during the peak of active mbpa mRNA transport. At 4 dpf, the density of mbpa mRNA and sheath length were positively correlated indicating that longer sheaths have more mbpa mRNA (Fig 2E). We interpret these data to mean that longer nascent sheaths have more cytoplasmic space and therefore have a greater capacity to accumulate macromolecules such as mRNA. In support of this interpretation, previous reports have found that longer myelin sheaths have increased mitochondrial densities [38].

thumbnail
Fig 2. Endogenous mbpa mRNA localizes to myelin sheaths between 3–5 dpf.

(A and B) Representative images of smFISH experiments using 4 dpf transgenic larva expressing EGFP-CAAX to mark oligodendrocytes. Images show sagittal sections of the hindbrain. DAPI stain labels nuclei. Sections were treated with smFISH probes designed to detect mbpa (A) or egfp (B) mRNA. Asterisks mark cell bodies and brackets mark myelin tracts. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C) Average mbpa mRNA density per cell body or equivalent volume of myelin from 3 to 5 dpf. Density was measured using the integrated density of fluorescence intensity in cell bodies and approximately equal volumes of myelin along the myelin tracts. A minimum (n) for each group was 3 larvae, 6 cell bodies, and 15 myelin regions. Statistical significance evaluated using Wilcoxon test. (D) Proportion of egfp or mbpa mRNA abundance in cell bodies compared to myelin tracts. A minimum (n) for each group was 3 larvae, 11 cell bodies, and 21 myelin regions. (E) Average mbpa mRNA density within individual sheaths plotted as a function of sheath length. Statistical significance evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Shaded area represents 95% confidence interval. n = 7 embryos, 26 sheaths. The underlying numerical data can be found in S5S7 Data. dpf, days post fertilization; smFISH, single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g002

The improved spatial resolution of our smFISH and MS2 approaches allowed us to examine subsheath localization of mRNA within nascent sheaths. We therefore examined the distribution of single mbpa transcripts from both longitudinal (Fig 3A and 3B) and transverse (Fig 3C) orientations using smFISH. This revealed transcripts as discrete puncta distributed along the length of individual sheaths (Fig 3A) and at sheath termini (Fig 3B), consistent with live-imaging observations using the MS2 system (Fig 1C). This distribution was reminiscent of filamentous actin (F-actin) at the leading edge of myelin sheaths [3941]. To determine if mRNA is localized at the leading edge of myelin membrane during wrapping, we co-expressed the MS2 system and Lifeact-mNeonGreen, an F-actin reporter. We found that transcripts containing the mbpa 3′ UTR colocalized with F-actin (Fig 3D), indicating that mRNA occupies the leading edge of myelin sheaths.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The mbpa 3′ UTR is sufficient to localize mRNA to the leading edge of myelin sheaths during wrapping.

(A) smFISH images of a single optical section of a myelin sheath in a 3-dpf larva spinal cord. mbpa transcripts line the myelin sheath. Arrows highlight clusters of mbpa mRNA transcripts. (B) smFISH images of a single optical section of myelin tracts in the hindbrain of a 5-dpf larva. Boxed area magnified to highlight sheath termini (arrows). (C) smFISH images of a single optical section in transverse plane of myelin sheaths in a 5-dpf larva midbrain. Scale bars (A, B, and D), 5 μm; (C, boxed enlargements), 1 μm. (D) Representative images from MS2 system showing colocalization of mRNA containing mbpa 3′ UTR and F-actin in a myelinating oligodendrocyte. Asterisk marks the cell body, and boxes are magnified to highlight sheath termini. Arrows highlight sheaths with mRNA, and arrowheads highlight sheaths lacking mRNA. (E) Proportion of sheaths with mRNA enriched in sheath termini at 4 dpf using the MS2 system. Proportion measured as (sheaths with enrichment / number of sheaths) = 10/35 sv40, 18/38 mbpa. (F) Average fluorescence intensity of MS2 mRNA reporter containing the sv40 or mbpa 3′ UTRs across a 7-μm distance, at 0.2-μm intervals, from myelin sheath termini at 4 dpf. Each line scan was normalized to the average fluorescent intensity per sheath. All normalized values for each distance were then averaged. Shaded area represents 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance was evaluated every 0.2 μm using Wilcoxon test, and the distance between 0.8–1.0 μm was statistically significant (blue line). sv40 3′ UTR n = 5 larvae, 35 sheaths. mbpa 3′ UTR n = 6 larvae, 38 sheaths. The underlying numerical data can be found in S1 and S2 Data. 3' UTR, 3' untranslated region; dpf, days post fertilization; F-actin, filamentous actin; smFISH, single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g003

To determine the frequency at which mRNA localizes to the leading edge, we used the MS2 system to quantify the number of sheath termini that are enriched with mRNA. We found that 47% of sheath termini have mbpa 3′ UTR-containing mRNA in comparison to 27% of the sv40 3′ UTR control (Fig 3E). To precisely define the spatial organization of mRNA at sheath termini, we measured the fluorescence intensity of the MS2 mRNA reporter system across a 7-μm distance at the ends of each sheath. We found that mRNA containing the mbpa 3′ UTR was significantly enriched within 2 μm of the terminal end (Fig 3F). However, mRNA containing the sv40 3′ UTR was uniformly distributed along the length of the sheath and lacked enrichment at the leading edge (Figs 1D and 3F). Our data support the conclusion that the mbpa 3′ UTR is sufficient to localize mRNA to the leading edge of nascent sheaths during developmental myelination.

mRNA localization to myelin sheaths is determined by unique 3′ UTR motifs

Our data corroborate previous work demonstrating the sufficiency of the Mbp 3′ UTR in mRNA localization to myelin. Do other myelin-localized transcripts utilize 3′ UTR-dependent mechanisms for localization? To investigate this question, we bioinformatically identified 6 candidate 3′ UTRs from myelin-localized transcripts (Fig 4A). Specifically, we selected candidate 3′ UTRs by filtering RNA sequencing data obtained from purified myelin isolated from P18 mouse brain [27] for the gene ontology (GO) terms oligodendrocyte, myelin, translation, and synapse. We used the latter 2 terms because we are interested in the possibility that features of myelin plasticity are similar to synaptic plasticity [42]. We narrowed the candidate genes by expression levels in oligodendrocyte lineage cells from published RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) datasets [43,44], descriptions of gene functions from literature searches, and identification of zebrafish orthologs. This pipeline identified 6 candidate genes for which we cloned the 3′ UTR sequences: cadm1b, cyfip1, dlg1, eif4ebp2, fmr1, and lrrtm1 (Fig 4C).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Different 3′ UTRs have distinct effects on mRNA localization to myelin sheaths.

(A) Work flow to identify 3′ UTR candidates from RNA-seq data [27,43,44]. (B) Representative images from MS2 system showing localization of mRNAs containing different 3′ UTR sequences in oligodendrocytes. Asterisks mark cell bodies. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C) Table listing candidate 3′ UTRs incorporated into the MS2 system, 3′ UTR length, and the percentage of sequence that was cloned based on the annotated genome (GRCz11). (D) Average mRNA abundance, measured by average EGFP fluorescent intensity, per myelin sheath for each 3′ UTR. Normalized to sv40 control, statistical significance evaluated using Wilcoxon test. A minimum (n) of 5 larvae and 18 sheaths were used in each condition at 4 dpf. The underlying numerical data can be found in S1 and S2 Data. 3' UTR, 3' untranslated region; dpf, days post fertilization; RNA-seq, RNA sequencing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g004

Using the MS2 system, we found that inclusion of 3′ UTRs from our candidate genes led to a wide variation in mRNA localization to nascent sheaths. Strikingly, the 3′ UTRs from eif4ebp2, fmr1, and lrrtm1 produced significantly greater levels of fluorescence intensities in myelin sheaths than the sv40 control, whereas the remainder, cadm1b, cyfip1, and dlg1 were similar to the sv40 control (Fig 4B–4D). Given that all 6 candidate transcripts are found in purified myelin, our data suggest that only a subset of myelin transcripts are localized by their 3′ UTRs and that other transcripts likely utilize cis-regulatory elements not present in the 3′ UTR or, alternatively, are passively localized to myelin. Nonetheless, these data expand the repertoire of 3′ UTR-dependent mRNA localization to myelin sheaths in vivo.

To validate the MS2 findings, we confirmed that endogenous transcripts of eif4ebp2 and fmr1 are expressed by oligodendrocytes and are localized to myelin. We chose these transcripts because the 3′ UTRs are highly enriched in nascent sheaths (Fig 4D), and they encode translational regulators that are necessary for proper myelination [45] and cognition [4648]. To investigate the spatiotemporal expression of endogenous fmr1 and eif4ebp2 transcripts, we used smFISH on Tg(mbpa:egfp-caax) larvae to label oligodendrocyte cell bodies and myelin tracts during developmental myelination. In line with the MS2 data, we observed endogenous fmr1 expression in the cell bodies and myelin sheaths between 4 and 5 dpf (Fig 5A–5D). In contrast, eif4ebp2 had minimal expression in oligodendrocytes at 4 dpf (Fig 5A) but was prominent in both cell bodies and myelin sheaths by 5 dpf (Fig 5C and 5D). Together, our data show that fmr1 and eif4ebp2 transcripts are localized to myelin sheaths, at least in part, by their 3′ UTRs.

thumbnail
Fig 5. eif4ebp2 and fmr1 mRNA are localized to sheaths during developmental myelination.

Representative images of smFISH experiments to visualize egfp, eif4ebp2, or fmr1 mRNA localization at 4 dpf (A and B) and 5 dpf (C and D) in sagittal sections of hindbrain (A, C) or transverse sections of the Mauthner axon in the spinal cord (B, D). Dashed lines outline cell bodies marked by EGFP-CAAX. Scale bars, 5 μm (A, C) or 1 μm (B, D). dpf, days post fertilization; smFISH, single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g005

Localized 3′ UTRs share sequence motifs that are required for mRNA localization

3′ UTRs frequently contain regulatory elements necessary for posttranscriptional regulation including subcellular localization [20,21]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the candidate 3′ UTRs share cis-regulatory elements that promote localization to myelin. To test this hypothesis, we used Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) suite bioinformatics software [49,50] to identify shared motifs among the mbpa, eif4ebp2, and fmr1 3′ UTRs from the annotated zebrafish genome. We identified 3 motifs shared between the candidate 3′ UTRs (Fig 6A), which correspond to unique primary sequences in each 3′ UTR. However, the mbpa 3′ UTR we isolated from zebrafish cDNA is truncated by 118 nucleotides at the 3′ end and does not contain motif 1. Additionally, the mbpa 3′ UTR contains a previously identified, conserved RNA transport signal (RTS) [29,51]. However, motifs 2 and 3 do not overlap with the RTS element, suggesting these motifs are novel localization elements (Fig 6B). Importantly, the identified motifs were absent from the nonenriched 3′ UTRs (cadm1b, cyfip1, and dlg1) and the lrrtm1 3′ UTR. To test requirements for these motifs, we deleted all the sequences corresponding to the identified motifs from each 3′ UTR and examined mRNA localization using the MS2 system. We found that deletion of all motifs restricted mRNA to the cell bodies (Fig 6C and 6D). To narrow down which of the motifs are required for localization, we individually deleted each sequence and found that removal of any sequence reduced mRNA localization in myelin (Fig 6E). Moreover, deletion of motif 1 from the eif4ebp2 3′ UTR reduced mRNA localization further than the control. Together, these data show that each motif is required for mRNA localization to nascent sheaths.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Common motifs in candidate 3′ UTRs are required for myelin localization.

(A) Schematic representation of the 3 motifs identified in the 3′ UTRs of mbpa-201, eif4ebp2-201, and fmr1-201 from the annotated zebrafish genome (GRCz11) using MEME suite bioinformatics software. (B) Schematic representation showing the relative position of the motifs within the 3′ UTRs. Green box is motif 1, blue box is motif 2, and red box is motif 3. Gray box is the conserved RTS previously identified as a minimal localization element necessary for Mbp mRNA transport in cultured oligodendrocytes [28,29,51]. Motif 1 in the mbpa 3′ UTR is not present in 3′ UTR isolated from zebrafish cDNA utilized in experimental procedures (3′ end of the dashed line). (C) Representative images of MS2 system after sequential deletions of all motifs from mbpa, eif4ebp2, and fmr1 3′ UTRs. Asterisks mark cell bodies. (D) Quantification of mRNA abundance in myelin sheaths from sequential deletions in (C). (E) Quantification of mRNA abundance in myelin sheaths from full length 3′ UTR, mbpa 3′ UTR variant 3–1177, or individual motif deletions. Statistical analysis evaluated with Wilcoxon test. Scale bars, 10 μm. A minimum (n) of 6 embryos and 35 sheaths were used in each condition (D and E). The underlying numerical data can be found in S1 and S4 Data. 3' UTR, 3' untranslated region; MEME, Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation; RTS, RNA transport signal.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g006

We next tested whether the shared motifs are sufficient to localize mRNA to myelin sheaths. We cloned the unique sequences from each candidate 3′ UTR upstream of the sv40 polyadenylation signal (Fig 7A and 7B) and examined mRNA expression in oligodendrocytes using the MS2 system. We found that insertion of mbpa-derived sequence motifs were sufficient to localize mRNA to myelin sheaths (Fig 7C and 7D). However, insertion of the sequences isolated from fmr1 or eif4ebp2 were not sufficient to localize mRNA to myelin (Fig 7C and 7D).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Sequence motifs derived from the mbpa 3′ UTR are sufficient for mRNA localization to myelin.

(A) Schematic representation of the MS2 mRNA reporter with motifs inserted upstream of the sv40 3′ UTR. Green box is motif 1, blue box is motif 2, and red box is motif 3. (B) Schematic representation of the primary sequences used to test the sufficiency of the motifs in (A). Green underline is motif 1, blue underline is motif 2, and red underline is motif 3. Top to bottom correspond to fmr1, eif4ebp2, and mbpa sequences. (C) Representative images of MS2 system after motifs from the mbpa, eif4ebp2, or fmr1 3′ UTRs were inserted into the MS2 mRNA reporter. Asterisks mark cell bodies. (D) Quantification of mRNA abundance in myelin sheaths from (A–C). (E) Quantification of mRNA abundance in myelin sheaths from individual insertions of each motif. Statistical analysis evaluated with Wilcoxon test. Scale bars, 10 μm. A minimum (n) of 6 embryos and 35 sheaths were used in each condition (D and E). The underlying numerical data can be found in S1 and S4 Data. 3' UTR, 3' untranslated region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g007

To test the sufficiency of individual sequences, we inserted each sequence flanked by 6 to 10 nucleotides on each side upstream of the sv40 3′ UTR. We found that 4 out of the 8 sequences, including mbpa motif 3, fmr1 motif 3, eif4ebp2 motif 1, and eif4ebp2 motif 2, were sufficient to localize the reporter mRNA to nascent sheaths. Together the variability in our data indicates the motifs are sensitive to contextual features intrinsic to the cis-elements. For instance, primary sequences [52] and secondary structures [53] frequently modulate RNA regulatory mechanisms [54,55]. Here, we find that the sufficiency of each motif to drive mRNA localization to myelin is context-dependent. For instance, eif4ebp2 motifs 1 and 2 are sufficient for mRNA localization independently (Fig 7E); however, in the context of motif 3, mRNA localization is repressed (Fig 7D). Furthermore, when mbpa motifs 2 and 3 are coupled, they are sufficient for localization (Fig 7D). However, when tested independently, we found that motif 3 accounts for the majority of the mRNA localization (Fig 7E), indicating that motif 2 does not repress mRNA localization (Fig 7D). Overall, these data highlight the complexities of mRNA localization and add to the growing body of evidence that interactions between cis-regulatory elements and trans-acting factor are context-dependent [5257].

Localization motifs are enriched in the myelin transcriptome

Our analyses revealed motifs shared between localized transcripts. Are these motifs commonly found in the myelin transcriptome? We cross-referenced myelin-localized transcripts with those from oligodendrocytes using 2 independent RNA-seq datasets to exclude nonoligodendrocyte transcripts [44,58]. We identified 1,855 transcripts localized to myelin (S1 Table) of which 1,771 had significantly higher expression in the myelin transcriptome and were fully annotated in the genome browser. We found that motifs 1 and 3 were not enriched in these transcripts compared to randomized, length-matched control sequences. However, motif 2 was significantly enriched in the 1,771 transcripts of the myelin transcriptome (Fig 8A). Specifically, 42.4% (751 mRNAs) of myelin-localized transcripts contain one or more copies of motif 2 (Fig 8B, S2 Table). By comparison, we found that motif 2 is present at least once in only 28.7% of the mouse transcriptome (Fig 8C, S3 Table). Localization motifs are frequently positioned in the 3′ UTRs of mRNA. We found that 63.8% of the motif 2 sites are positioned in the 3′ UTRs of myelin-localized transcripts (Fig 8D, S4S6 Tables). Together, these data suggest that motif 2 is a localization signal utilized by many transcripts for 3′ UTR-mediated localization to myelin.

thumbnail
Fig 8. Motif 2 is enriched in the mouse myelin transcriptome.

(A) Schematic representation of motifs 1, 2, or 3 enrichment in the myelin transcriptome in comparison to length-matched, randomized sequences using MEME suite Analysis of Motif Enrichment (version 5.1.1) [59]. (B) FIMO (version 5.1.1) was used to determine the frequency at which motif 2 is present in the myelin transcriptome [60]. cDNA sequences from the myelin transcriptome were analyzed for the presence of motif 2. One or more copies of motif 2 were present in 42.4% of myelin cDNAs. (C) FIMO was used to determine the frequency at which motif 2 is present in the mouse transcriptome. cDNA sequences from the mouse annotated genome (mm10) were analyzed for the presence of motif 2. One or more copies of motif 2 were present in 28.7% of mouse cDNAs. (D) Percentage of motif 2 occurrences in 5′ UTR, coding sequences, 3′ UTR or other positions in myelin transcriptome. Motifs in the “other” category represent motifs overlapping 2 regions. (E) Top 20 GO terms identified in the myelin transcriptome. (F) Top 20 GO terms identified in myelin transcripts containing motif 2. Terms are ordered from most to least significant based on -log2 of the false discovery rates. Counts represent number of genes identified with the GO term. The underlying numerical data can be found in S8S10 Data. FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences; GO, gene ontology; MEME, Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation; UTR, untranslated region.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.g008

To determine if motif 2 is represented in particular subset of mRNAs within the myelin transcriptome, we performed GO analysis on all myelin-localized transcripts as well as the subset of myelin-localized transcripts containing motif 2. Previous reports investigating the myelin transcriptome show enrichment of biological processes such as nervous system development, cellular respiration, and neurogenesis (27). Assessment of our 1,771 myelin-localized genes was consistent with previous reports in that we also identified biological processes and cellular component terms pertaining to mitochondria, electron transport chain, and oxidative reduction. Importantly, we also identified GO terms associated with myelination such as myelin sheath, membrane, and protein transport (Fig 8E, S7 Table). Next, we narrowed our gene list to the subset of myelin-localized transcripts that contain motif 2 (751 genes) to determine if these genes are functionally distinct. We identified biological mechanisms associated with synaptic signaling, nervous system development, and regulation of cellular projections. Interestingly, many of the genes are associated with cellular functions in distal projections such as postsynaptic density, synaptic vesicles, axon, dendrite, and terminal bouton (Fig 8F, S8 Table). Many of the biological functions are neuronal in nature with a remarkable lack of terms associated with myelination. These observations raise the possibility that nascent myelin sheaths engage in molecular mechanisms during axon wrapping that are similar to synaptogenic mechanisms. Overall, these findings implicate motif 2 as a regulatory element for a distinct cohort of transcripts within myelin sheaths.

Discussion

The molecular mechanisms underlying myelin sheath growth are not well understood. Purified myelin contains hundreds of mRNAs [27], lending the possibility that mRNA localization and local translation promote sheath growth and maturation. How are mRNAs selectively targeted to myelin sheaths? Here we show that cis-regulatory elements found in candidate 3′ UTRs are required for mRNA localization to myelin during ensheathment of target axons in vivo. In particular, 1 sequence is enriched in the myelin transcriptome implicating the motif as a potential regulator of mRNA localization in oligodendrocytes.

With high-resolution microscopy, we found mbpa mRNA concentrated near the growth zones of nascent myelin membrane. What accounts for enrichment near growth zones? For the last several decades, the mechanisms underlying MBP mRNA localization have been heavily investigated and revealed that transcripts are actively transported through oligodendrocyte processes to myelin sheaths in kinesin and dynein-dependent manners [36,61,62]. Consistent with these data, recent work showed that microtubules are present in nascent sheaths in vivo [63]. Nascent membrane also contains F-actin, which is specifically present in the leading edge [40,41]. Importantly, actin-based transport can localize mRNA, mediated by myosin motor proteins [33,64,65], but this has yet to be tested in myelinating oligodendrocytes in vivo. Here, we show that mRNA containing the mbpa 3′ UTR is colocalized with F-actin in myelin sheaths. These observations raise the possibility that Mbp mRNA is handed off from microtubule-based transport to actin-based transport within growing sheaths.

Hundreds of mRNAs are localized to myelin, but it is unclear if these transcripts utilize 3′ UTR-dependent localization mechanisms. Of the candidates we tested, 4 out of seven 3′ UTRs were sufficient to drive mRNA into nascent sheaths. Thus, for some mRNAs, cis-regulatory elements important for mRNA localization might be embedded in 5′ UTRs, coding regions, or retained introns of the transcripts [6668]. Alternatively, transcripts might occupy myelin by diffusion. Notably, we identified 2 transcripts that utilize their 3′ UTRs for localization to myelin, eif4ebp2, and fmr1, which encode translational regulators. Importantly, fmr1 mRNA and the encoded protein, FMRP, have precedence for being localized to subcellular compartments, such as dendritic spines and myelin sheaths, far from the cell body [45,69]. By finding mRNAs encoding translation regulators in myelin, our data support the possibility that transcripts encoding translational proteins are themselves locally translated within individual sheaths. In support of this model, purified myelin contains a free and polyribosome ribosome fraction [5], electron micrographs revealed ribosomes in the distal ends of oligodendrocyte processes [70], and newly synthesized MBP reporter proteins were visualized in cultured oligodendrocyte precursor cells [10]. Furthermore, our own work indicates that Fmrp [45] protein is localized to nascent sheaths. This evidence raises the possibility that local protein synthesis of translational regulators may modulate localized protein expression within myelin sheaths. Testing this model directly will require methods for visualization of de novo translation in vivo [7175].

The candidate 3′ UTRs we selected were isolated from genes encoding cytosolic and transmembrane proteins. Canonically, transmembrane proteins are translated in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, processed by the Golgi apparatus, and transported via the secretory pathway. Identifying mRNAs encoding transmembrane proteins in the myelin transcriptome suggests that noncanonical pathways regulate protein synthesis of transmembrane proteins in nascent sheaths. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that the 3′ UTR of lrrtm1, a transcript encoding a transmembrane protein, is sufficient to localize mRNA to nascent sheaths. In contrast, we found that the cadm1b 3′ UTR is not sufficient to localize mRNA to myelin, although we have previously shown that the Cadm1b protein is present in myelin and regulates sheath length and number [42]. Together, these observations raise the possibility that some transmembrane proteins are locally synthesized similar to dendrites [14,76]. In support of this hypothesis, distal oligodendrocyte processes contain satellite structures of rough endoplasmic reticulum [77]. Future work will need to test the hypothesis that some transmembrane proteins undergo noncanonical synthesis near sites of sheath growth.

We identified cis-regulatory elements in the 3′ UTRs of myelin-localized mRNAs. To begin, we bioinformatically identified 3 motifs common to the mbpa, eif4ebp2, and fmr1 3′ UTRs. Each motif was necessary for localization, but only 4 sequences were sufficient to drive mRNA to nascent sheaths. However, we are not able to exclude the possibility the motif 1 in the mbpa 3′ UTR contributes to mRNA localization. We interpret these data to mean that mbpa motif 3, eif4ebp2 motif 1, eif4ebp2 motif 3, and fmr1 motif 3 are minimal cis-elements that regulate mRNA localization to nascent sheaths in vivo. The 4 other primary sequences isolated from the candidate 3′ UTRs, while necessary for localization, were not sufficient and thus require additional localization signals present in the 3′ UTR, which are currently unknown.

The capacity for motifs to promote mRNA localization when isolated from specific 3′ UTRs can be explained by several alternative possibilities. First, the primary sequences in the motifs are important for interacting with key trans-acting factors, such as RNA binding proteins, that are only able to interact with that primary sequence. Second, primary sequences may form a secondary structure that is sufficient for myelin localization. Third, RNA modifications to the sequences may contribute to the variability in mRNA localization. Importantly, these alternative explanations may not be mutually exclusive and together demonstrate the complexities underlying mRNA sorting.

We found that motif 2 is enriched in the myelin transcriptome and approximately two-thirds of these motifs are positioned in the 3′ UTRs, suggesting that motif 2 significantly contributes to mRNA localization in oligodendrocyte. To the best of our knowledge, motif 2 does not correspond to any known mRNA localization signals in oligodendrocytes. GO analysis of myelin-localized transcripts containing motif 2 indicates that many of these transcripts encode proteins with biological functions important in cellular and neural projections. Specifically, we identified genes associated with neuronal cellular compartments such as axon, dendrites, synapse, postsynaptic density, neuron projection, cell projection, synaptic vesicle membrane, and terminal bouton. These data support the model that myelin sheath growth utilizes molecular mechanisms similar to synaptogenesis [42]. Together, these data raise the possibility that motif 2 mediates localization of a cohort of mRNAs that encode proteins that function in distal ends of cellular projections, implicating the motif as a mRNA regulon. RNA regulons are primary sequences or secondary structures that are co-regulated at the posttranscriptional level to coordinate cellular functions [7881]. Identification of the trans-acting factors that interact with the motifs we identified will provide future insights into the molecular functions of myelin sheath growth, which will lead to a more complete understanding of the mechanisms guiding developmental myelination.

Materials and methods

Contact for reagent and resource sharing

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Bruce Appel (bruce.appel@ucdenver.edu).

Ethics statement

All procedures were approved by the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and performed to their standards.

Experimental model and subject details

Zebrafish lines and husbandry

All nontransgenic embryos were obtained from pairwise crosses of male and females from the AB strain. Embryos were raised at 28.5°C in E3 media (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl, 0.33 mM MgSO4 (pH 7.4), with sodium bicarbonate) and sorted for good health and normal developmental patterns. Developmental stages are described in the results section for individual experiments.

The transgenic line Tg(mbpa:EGFP-CAAX-polyA-CG2)co34 was created by Dr. Jacob Hines. The transgenic construct was created using Gateway tol2 kit (Kwan and colleagues, 2007). Specifically, p5E-mbpa contains 2.6-kb genomic fragment of zebrafish mbpa (Hines and colleagues, 2015). pME-EGFP-CAAX, p3E-polyA, and pDEST-tol2-CG2 were created by Dr. Jacob Hines. All entry vectors and destination were combined using LR clonase and transformed into DH5α cells. Colonies were screened by enzymatic digestion using BamHI, KpnI, and XhoI. Plasmid DNA was injected into AB embryos which were screened for transgenesis and outcrossed to create transgenic lines. All Tg(mbpa:EGFP-CAAX-polyA-CG2)co34 used in this manuscript were from F3 or later generations.

Method details

Candidate 3′ UTR selection

To select 3′ UTR candidates for cloning into the MS2 system, we utilized published transcriptomics data [27]. We downloaded S1 Table containing transcript abundance in 4 stages of myelin development identified by RNA-seq. We selected the 3 biological replicates from P18 for analysis because this developmental time point was the most similar to our model. We filtered these data for transcripts with normalized read counts greater than 20 for all 3 biological replicates (representing 21,937 genes). We put all gene names into a GO analysis (geneontology.org) and analyzed the genes for biological processes in Mus musculus. From these biological processes, we copied all genes into an Excel document that fit the term “synap,” “translation,” “myelin,” and “oligodend.” Biological terms identified in GO analysis are listed in Table 1.

After removing duplicate genes with a GO term, the “Synap” list contained 855 genes, the “Translation” list contained 534 genes, the “myelin” list contained 128 genes, and the “oligodend” list contained 28 genes. To further narrow our search, we cross-referenced these lists with one another to find genes that were common to more than 1 list, which resulted in 55 genes. To further narrow this list, we cross-referenced these genes with the Brain RNA Seq online database [44] to identify those with evidence of oligodendrocyte lineage cell expression. We next referenced these genes with the zebrafish genome browser (GRCz11) and searched for annotated 3′ UTRs for each. Finally, we performed literature searches for published data that were relevant to our model. This resulted in a final list of 10 candidate 3′ UTRs: dlg1, cyfip1, eif4ebp2, fmr1, cadm1, lrrtm1, eif4g1, eif4a3, mtmr2, and nfasc.

3′ UTR cloning

To clone the mbpa 3′ UTR, 5-dpf cDNA from zebrafish larvae was used for PCR amplification using primers to target the flanking regions of the mbpa 3′ UTR. The PCR fragment was cloned into pCR2.1 TOPO using the TOPO cloning kit. Colonies were screened by colony PCR. Using Gateway cloning, the mbpa 3′ UTR was amplified and inserted into pDONR-P2R-P3 using BP clonase. p3E-mbpa 3′ UTR was confirmed by sequencing. All cloning steps were performed by Dr. Jacob Hines.

To clone the additional full-length 3′ UTRs, cDNA was created from pooled 6-dpf AB larvae treated with 1 mL of Trizol and snap frozen. All RNA isolation steps were performed on ice and in a 4° centrifuge at 18,078 × g. Larvae were thawed on ice and homogenized with a 23-g needle. A volume of 200 μL of chloroform was added and shaken for 15 s followed by centrifugation for 10 min. The aqueous layer was transferred to a new tube, and an equal volume of 100% cold isopropanol and 2 μL of glycogen blue was added to the sample. The tube was incubated at −20° for 20 min and centrifuged for 10 min. The supernatant was removed and transferred to a new tube, and 200 μL of cold 70% ethanol was added to wash the pellet followed by 5-min centrifugation. This step was repeated. After the pellet dried, the RNA was resuspended in 20 μL of molecular grade water. RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop. To synthesize cDNA, we followed manufacturer instructions from the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR, which uses random hexamer primers to synthesize cDNA.

To amplify the 3′ UTRs from cDNA, we designed primers that flanked the annotated 3′ UTR as predicted by Danio rerio GRCz11 annotated genome. Primers were flanked with attB sequences (Table 2) for cloning into the pDONR-P2R-P3 vector of the Tol2 Gateway kit (Kwan and colleagues, 2007). cDNA was used as a PCR template to amplify the 3′ UTRs. Of the ten 3′ UTRs we attempted to amplify, we were successful with the 6 listed below. Following amplification, bands were gel extracted using a Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit and cloned into pDONR-P2R-P3 using BP clonase. Clones were verified by sequencing using M13 forward and M13 reverse primers. The p3E-dlg1 3′ UTR was not fully sequenced due to highly repetitive sequences. We sequenced approximately 51% of the construct from 1 to 54 and 775 to 1,552 base pairs. We therefore confirmed p3E-dlg1 3′ UTR identity using restriction enzyme mapping.

The sv40 3′ UTR is a transcription termination and polyadenylation signal sequence isolated from Simian virus 40. We obtained this sequence from the Tol2 Gateway-compatible kit where it is referred to as “pA.” This sequence was cloned with Gateway BP clonase into pDONR-P2R-P3. The p3E-sv40 3′ UTR was confirmed by sequencing.

MS2 plasmid construction

All MS2 constructs were created using Gateway cloning. pME-HA-NLS-tdMCP-EGFP and pME-24xMBS were generous gifts from Dr. Florence Marlow.

To create pME-mScarlet-CAAX-24xMBS, we obtained plasmid pmScarlet_C1 from Addgene. In-Fusion cloning was used to assemble mScarlet-CAAX in puc19. Next, we amplified mScarlet-CAAX sequence using primers 5′-ggggacaagtttgtacaaaaaagcaggcttaatggtgagcaagggcgag-3′ and 5′-ggggaccactttgtacaagaaagctgggtttcaggagagcacacacttgcag-3′ and cloned it in plasmid pDONR-221 using BP clonase to create pME-mScarlet-CAAX. Next, we designed primers flanked with BamHI cut sites (5′ -tccggatccatggtgagcaagggcgaggcag-3′ and (5′-cgactctagaggatcgaaagctgggtcgaattcgcc-3′), and PCR amplified the mScarlet-CAAX sequence. We purified the amplified product using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit and digested it with BamHI-HF. pME-24xMBS was linearized with BamHI-HF and treated with Antarctic phosphatase to prevent religation. We performed the ligation with 2X Quick Ligase, and the ligation reaction was transformed into DH5α competent cells. Clones were screened using restriction mapping, then sequenced for confirmation.

For expression plasmids containing full-length 3′ UTRs, we used Gateway multisite LR clonase to combine entry vectors with pDEST-tol2. The resulting expression plasmids included: pEXPR-mbp:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-mbpa 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-lrrtm1 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-fmr1 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-eif4ebp2 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-dlg1 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-cyfip1 3′UTR-tol2, pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-sv40 3′UTR-tol2, and pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-24xMBS-cadm1b 3′UTR-tol2. LR clonase reactions were transformed into Stellar Competent Cells (Takara cat # 636763). Clones were screened using restriction mapping.

To delete motifs, we used New England Biolabs Q5 Site Directed mutagenesis kit. Specifically, we designed primers flanking the motifs to omit the localization sequences from p3E-full length templates. We followed instructions outline in the kit to generate specific deletions. This step was repeated sequentially to delete all motifs from the previous template (Table 3).

To insert motifs into a Gateway entry vector, we provided Genscript with Gateway entry vector pDONR-P2R-P3 and the sequences for each gene to be synthesized. Genscript synthesized the sequences and cloned them into the Gateway entry vector between the attR2 and attL3 sites. Motifs (underlined) were separated by 3 to 4 random nucleotides.

The sequences synthesized from fmr1 motifs were 5′- ggagctctagtctcccactcagctcgcacaccagtcgataaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacctttgaagtgattc-3′, from eif4ebp2 motifs were 5′- ggagctctagatcaaaggtaggaaagcactgaagtggcactccagtcgattctcacagtgatctcattc-3′, from mbpa motifs were 5′-ggagctctagcaccagtcgctcaaaaaaaggaaggaaaacctgaaagtggatattc-3′.

For control experiments to determine the specificity of mRNA detection by MCP-EGFP, we created an expression plasmid that lacks the 24xMBS stem loops (pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-Caax-mbpa 3′UTR-tol2).

Lifeact cloning for F-actin reporter

The F-actin reporter was created using Gateway cloning. Alexandria Hughes created pME-lifeact-mNeonGreen by PCR amplification using primers 5′- ggggacaagtttgtacaaaaaagcaggctaccatgggcgtggccgacttga-3′ and 5′- ggggaccactttgtacaagaaagctgggttcttgtacagctcgtccatgccca-3′ from mNeonGreen-Lifeact-7. We then combined entry vectors and pDEST-tol2 using LR clonase to create pEXPR-mbpa:lifeact-mNeonGreen-polyA-tol2.

3′ UTR sequences used for MS2 RNA localization experiments

Underlined sequences indicate the sequence motifs deleted or inserted in motif experiments.

sv40 3′ UTR

5′-gatccagacatgataagatacattgatgagtttggacaaaccacaactagaatgcagtgaaaaaaatgctttatttgtgaaatttgtgatgctattgctttatttgtaaccattataagctgcaataaacaagttaacaacaacaattgcattcattttatgtttcaggttcagggggaggtgtgggaggtttttt-3′

mbpa 3′ UTR

5′-cttctccaagcaggaaaacactgagatggaagagagtgaaatggacggaaagcaaaaacttgagagggaggatgtctgccctacagactcaccagtcgcagcgagtttaacagactaacattggccatcttcgcttcctagatagagatacaatccaagtatctgttgctacatgcctgcagggttacagaagcacgtgttgactgtatgtgtgcaaacttgctgtaataattgtcaatggtcaggtgatgcgatacatcttgtaagtctccctttaaaatttagctgaagtgatcaatttcaatatatacaaagagcaaaaactcatacaaaaggtttgaaacaattagacagagtatttctctttttttaaaatccctgaaccaaccagatgaatcatttgatcattctgaattggtcttatatgtgtttcacaaaatggattgcttatatgctctccagcatttgatgtgtggcatttattctatgttatactgcctctccatggttttcttgagatccatgttcaacctcatgtgatgtgcatttctgtatgtttgtgttcactgtggtctttgtgttgcattctatattggttatttactttataccaggaatttgtatataggaatctttattgagttttaattaatgcaaaaaaaaatatgatgaccagttaactacattaaatttgattcattttgagaaatgatttagctcttaatcaggaccatgccttaaaatgattaaaaacagactaaaaacacaattttgtggactagggaatagattctaagcatgtatgtggcttggattgtatgccctcagatgttgcactgcagtatgtgtgttaaaaccacctgtaaatgttgtctgcgtcattacatgtgcaattttggtgttattttagaaaggtctcgtaattaccaggggtaggattaatatttaaataacaaacatgcagaaatctaggacaaagagtcagtgggagcataaaggaaagggtatgaaaaaaaggaaggaaaacctgaaagtgcaagatggataatgtgggaaatgctaaatgaggacttctgaaagagtaaggtggagtttattcagctgattttttttttctttttctgtgttgtatctcatgtgtcttaatatcgttcattgttctgtgtctcatatactctgcc-3′

eif4ebp2 3′ UTR

5′-aagaagaggaacctacgtgaacaacgattaattacctggtacctgtgtgccagtggcttggcttgtagataccaatgttgtgagccctctcctttagctctctctagctgctgggtgctgtttaatcatggggataaatgactaaagtttgcccagtggtgttgctggagccctgaaagttaacctgtgagccctgttgagctcttcttttttgttgtttaggtttcagggctgccatcagcagtacttgcttgagtcacagagcaagggaaaaattctctattgcaagtgcccggatatattaccaatttaccataatagactcataaacggatcagccattagagattcactgctgatagatcaaagtacactgttccagttgatgcccttaatgcagtctatttcgttcacacataaactgatttgcaggacatgcggttatcattatctccctatattttcgattgtttttcccccagttaattttaaaagggacaacaggattatattcatattttttgattcaaaaagtgaaaaaattccaatcattcctgctcttttatatcatttttttttttcacctcaatacatttttcaggtgttcaaaagaatagttttatattgttgtccaaaaatgcataattaaaccattgaccttaatcattcatttgaactgacacatgatttcaatgccaaatgtgcacagaatttctcattttatttaggactaccccaaaataagcatttcaggtcatattagtttaatttcccagttttttcactgttaattttaagaaaagaaacacctaatcacattcgtgaaagaccaaactgttactttagattaaagagaatgtttctgttcagatttattttgctaacagtaaggtttgtttctttgtttgtctttgagagatgaagcgtcaacatagcctagttaaaagttaataacaccaagtaatgtttgattggataaagggtttaatataccttataagatgttgacaaagaaagctggtctcaggaagcacttgctttatgcacctaacaattacgcatcttacggctcctgttacgggagaaaaagcacggtgaatatttaacattaatatcagctgtgacatctgctgttactttccgaaatactacaatcctcacgaaccttgataatcaaatcaaaggtaggaaagcactgaagtgttgttttggtcatcgtaccatcggtctgtctcataagcgcacacaatgtgaacgagttttgtcgcgagcagacattcattttgattcagatcaaacgtctcgaaaacttgaattgaatctttccaatgctcttctatgcatgttctttcggtctgcttcttaagctttagttcacatgtcagatcattttaacgttgttgtttttggggggggacgccaaatcgtgtggaagacgagaattattattgtaagagaattaagcaaagagattattcaaacaaagtgacttaaagaggataagacttattctcatgactttaattgtctttttctgtgctccagtctttgtctgaggcacagaatgatttattttttcctctcacagtgatctcttgtgcttagcctccgtatccatgccttactttactaagctgagcagctgtgtcaaatacagtaccctttcataccttaaaacgggatcagttcctttctttcgtttctttcaagtggagaacaagatcaagatattgctgttttactagaaaacatttatatttttggagacatgtttgttatcatttactttcttacagaaatgggacgatttggaaatgcagaggtgtaatatttgtaatagtaatggattggttaaaagcaaatacagaatttaggtttgactttgaggtcacagttaagtttctattcaattttgagaacttgtagaatccttggagtatgttttcatgtccggtttgcgcaaaagtcacattcaagttctaatgatttacagtgaagggaaattggtgtatactgtccttctgtaatggatatgaatggtcaaattccagcttgtttcaactctaaaattatgaaatgttaaatttttttatttaaaaaaaaataatgcttactattgctttatgctttccccacgcatcaaactatcagaaatgcatttagttctgtgtgaggggatttaagatggacgtgttttatctaatatggcaaaaaacattggaaactgtattttctttcttctttgaccctgttaattttaatgaaatgccaatgccagtggacac-3′

lrrtm1 3′ UTR

5′-tccacccatgtcagtttttacaaatcaatgtacgggtggatatggaacatacgttaacttggcacccaattttgctgctctcaaagggagctacagttctggagtgtgagtggactacaaacatggatttagagctgatttcaacagcctcatggggaaatctgactgtgagacccgtgcacttgatgcaaaagatgtggaatgattatgctgaccagtcctggcttctcttgtgaaaagtggatatttgagctttaacgtgtctttctacttcaggatattctaggactctctaaagctaccgaggacatcaagtacaccatggtaacaaacatacgaacagacacaattgaagtggaaaacaacaa-3’

fmr1 3′ UTR

5′-ccttcccctcattctcccactcagctccaccaatccagatgcttcttcattagagacacattaggccaaagagaaccaggtcagtagggctgtcgcaagacatgacataaagcacactttgtaattgttagcggggttaaaagacaaggtctcttggtgtacggtgtgttgaatttggtagtcttcacggattagagagaccggtctctaaatctcaactgaagctacaggttttctaattgactttctaaataactacctaaagaagctgtggataaaatgtctctcataaatggaataaaaacaaaaaaaagagcttttccaagaaattggtttttaaagtttgttttccacaatgtccaaaaaaaagggaaagaaacgcatcggaggatgaactcaagctctcgacgcccaagtttatgccacatctcatggcatacattgtttttacacgctttggtgtccatggtttctcgagcccattctgatgtgagatcttaaccacatcattagcaaaaaaatacaaaaaaaatttaaaaaacgaagagaaaaaataagtaaaaaataaaaaaaatgctcctgtctggatctgtgcctttaactagtgtggatagtatcataatttggatgtttaaatcagggaagaaggcgtgaacaacacctgtcacctgagcagagtttgttgcaatctcagccgacaactttaaaaacaaacaaaaaaaggtgtttctttttttttctctgtgctgcatgtatttcacaaacattttgtatgtctgaaaagcaggattggaaatctattttgccatagctgagttgtgagtagtaaaggtattagcctaactaaactagtcaactgtggaagtcattgattgtaactaaccacccgagttgaatatcaatgctaattcaacaatgaaagcattaatgaagattaatttgatgtaaagcatatctttgcattttagaacaattgttttttgttttcaatagaggtagcaaagcagtttcctttaaacaaaatgtcttttgttttttacttgttttacctccatcatgatataaaggtgaatttgctcagatgttttctcacaaacagggtggaaatgctctattttgtttcattttttttttttgttcatgctggccacagtaaactgccatctttcctgctgtatttttcagcatcaggtgtgaagcacttatatcagattatatctgtaacattgtctttgtcctaacaatggctcatcatagactgaaaatgttgaactgtgggattgcatactgtatattattacatcatccgttaagagattgttgctgttctttttagattgaactttaaatgtgcacttatcatgtttgtgttactctgcaagtactttataatctataaacctataataaactagaatgtgataagacttcttcagcaggtgaatcacatgtatgctgtcaacataactaaactgaagtttagatctcttcgctaattttgagtctactgtacttttgcagcttcgagagggacgagatttgggggaaacacaacgttaactttgatatgaggagaacaaaatgtctatcttatccgattagtgcttgtgcattaaactttagtttacaattttgagaagacgcaaagctgttctaaacccacgattcttttgaaacctactgtgacggtaaacatggtagtttttttgactgtacagcaagaaagccagtcagttgtatcctctttgctcctttttcttaacaactctttttcattttatgctcgctagtcaaatatccagctctacctgtaaagcttacaccagtttcaaagtgattttgccttgatcagtgtcctgtgaaaaccaaacggaaggggttacgtttcacgcgaaatgcaaaaaaaacctgtgactggcagaggatttgcagctctgtgggatgggaatgataaaccactcgaacggggcgtcctggctgcatccggcccccttttaaaatttagcctttatttggaagtaaggtgttaaaatggtttactcccagtatttttaaaaaaacttgcacatctacggtgtgcagtaaactggcaagatggcagagttcaccagtctgttaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacctttgaagtgttgccaaacagactgttttctagttatttattttttggaatgtatatgaaaaatgacaaattgtaaaaccatctcttgcacacatcgttaggctattgtgatttgaataaagagctgaaaaggaataaaaacaaacaaaaaacatgaaatactgtagatactgaaccgaggtagactgaccttgtatgttactgcactttgggtgataatttctttgtacataatagcagaacagactgggttttatgttgacattgtttggttatagtgcaatatattttgtatgcaagcagtttcaataaataaaggttgatcttcctctgcaa-3′

dlg1 3′ UTR

Note: dlg1 3′ UTR contains a region of thymidine repeats that inhibited sequencing a 35 bp region (nucleotides 7 to 41). Within the 35 bp region, 5 nucleotides were not able to be confirmed and are underlined in the sequence below. Together, we confirmed 99.7% of the dlg1 3′ UTR sequence used in experimental procedures.

5′-ggggccgaagacaaataaaccttacacttcttttaactttttgtatttttttttaatcttttcgtttcctttttttaatattaacatggcctgcagcttgcattggctttccaactcctgagcataagaaatgcgttttctttgaatgggtttggggtttttcctctttctctcatgcctctctttgaaactactgtctagaactcgcatcccaatctccgcatgtggtcctccactgggaggagacgtgcttgaccagcgacttactggacagattatacggtacagattccttaatgtttaagggaggtgactttctcgaaggaaaaccaataagttaatgcattatacacattttggtttgttcttcattttttacccccccagtatatgatcagaagctttcatgtctgtctctggaaagacataaagcaaaactttgcacgtttttttgcatgtttggattattctgtttcagttaacatattgttcttacgtttttatgtcagacagatttaaaccatgtgactttcagccaccatatgactttagttttcttctaaaatcaagcaacccgttcactttatgcagctgatctgtttttgtcgccagtacacaaagaggatgataaaaaatttaatatttggcacaaaagttcttctttttatattaaatgtctatttgtcttaacgatctgtgtacattttaattaaggtgcatctgggagtagcttttagcagaggaacgggcttacgattatatttcaaacccagggtgacgacatattcttacttcaaaaaaacagcaatgcaaataagagagtataaattgtaatgtatattcaaccctcagtatactgcctattttgttataatgaaagtcctatattgagctttaattaaactctacacctatgggaattattttctttataatgtcaagcatacactcgaatgactatgcgtgtatgtatataaaataaatataaatagatatatatttttttcctttacttttaccaccatcacttttgttgtttctggtttgtctttatgcaaaaacactgacacacacacgcacactaggctggatggtggatttccatttgcatctgctccaacaatatgaaaacaaaactcaagttggcagtttgtagtattcagctctctctttgtctctctctcctgtgtaattctgtcatattttctttctcatgtgacgtgcatgatttcttaaagcaatagtcttcatcagcaaggagcggaggagagggatttggcataaactgtaaacctgaaaggctgtatgggaattgttgaatgcccgtagctgaagagagatttgctttgcctttaactgtccaccagggggtgctgacggcatccccgctattttgttttctttcgttttttaactcggagatgattgttttctaaaagattgcttctctaacttgtcatcatggctttctaacacattttgactagataatgtacataatctgccaacttgattcattccat-3′

cyfip1 3′ UTR

5′-gcaccagtttgaagtggaagagatgggaaaagagagggaaatatttagcaacgtgtttaggaccagtttcactgtcacattctacttaatgatgcctttcttatgccaccctgtagtttctgcagagccagtaagttgccttgtgattggtcgagtgatttgatttgcaccaattactgcaccctactcaggctttggttaatcaggccaagatatgtttatgatgtacacaaacatggctcagttttactagcgtatttcaggttgattttttttgtacacataaacacacacatacacacacactcgtgccttattatagataaattgactataatcttttatatgttaatgatagcacagcactactcatgttttatacttgggaacagcagtggggtatggttccaaaatggccaagtgggttttatcaaagggttatttaagcttttgctgtagtgcgagtccagcggtattttttctatgtggtgttgaatgattgcatgcaagtttttttttcttctattatacttaataaaactttaagcgtagccaagttcttactcctcataaacgtgccttttt-3′

cadm1b 3′ UTR

5′-actggaactagacctgttagcttccagtgctgaacagcaaactgtggactgctgggtttgggaggaaggggttgtgggattcaatcaggctggattcacacctgcgcagctgaagagacgctgctgccatcgagacggacggggtgtgggatggcagagcactaggagagctcaattttagaccgcttcaccatccaacacctcctgctggggccggttttgttccgtttaaacatttgctaagaattttgtgccttgttctgttcttactgaagttcccactttcatcaggacacccacaagctactgtctctccaatggtctgaatccacgttttttttttctctcctttcatttcatttttttaattgctagcacatcttaaagctctctctcatgctgttctgtctgcaggtctgaaagaaagccgcgcaccaagtttcgatgtaagattcagtcacagaatgatcgcttgggttgttttcacggattgattccaagtaatttatttggcaaattgcctgttgctctccttagtcccccagagaacgagttagagatgatagaaacctttttttctctctcttttttgtgaccaacaacattcagcagcagtattgcattgttgcaatatttattggatatactgtatgcgattatgatcagcttgtgttgatattagggctgtcaatcgaacacattactactattatttcgtttattaaatcattaaaatattacccaaatttggcaatgacatgacaaaatttatattattattattattatatacagctatggaaaaaatattaagactaattatgacatttcttactaaattaaaatgaaaaagttattatttagagcattgtttttttttttgcttgtttgttttttctttaaaaaaaaaggtgctaaattttcagacatgttgctagccaaattcatttatatagaacatttcataaacagtaataattccaagtgctttacataaacaggaataaaagaaacaagtataagaaaataaaaaacaaattataacagtgaataaaagcagtttaaaatg-3′

mbpa motif 2/3 insertions

5′-ggagctctagcaccagtcgctcaaaaaaaggaaggaaaacctgaaagtggatattc-3’

mbpa motif 2 insertion

5′-ggagctctaggctcaaaaaaaggaaggaaaacctgaaagtggatattc-3’

mbpa motif 3 insertion

5′-ggagctctagcaccagtcgctcagatattc-3′

eif4ebp2 motif 1/2/3 insertions

5′-ggagctctagatcaaaggtaggaaagcactgaagtggcactccagtcgattctcacagtgatctcattc-3′

eif4ebp2 motif 1 insertion

5′-ggagctctaggattctcacagtgatctcattc-3′

eif4ebp2 motif 2 insertion

5′-ggagctctagatcaaaggtaggaaagcactgaagtggcaattc-3′

eif4ebp2 motif 3 insertion

5′-ggagctctaggcactccagtcgatattc-3′

fmr1 motif 1/2/3 insertions

5′-ggagctctagtctcccactcagctcgcacaccagtcgataaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacctttgaagtgattc-3′

fmr1 motif 1 insertion

5′-ggagctctagtctcccactcagctcgcaattc-3′

fmr1 motif 2 insertion

5′-ggagctctaggataaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacctttgaagtgattc-3′

fmr1 motif 3 insertion

5′-ggagctctaggcacaccagtcgatattc-3′

smFISH probe design

The EGFP smFISH probes were purchased from Stellaris LGC Biosearch Technologies. Probes consist of a set of pooled oligos with CAL Fluor Red 610 Dye. smFISH probes were designed using the Stellaris RNA FISH Probe Designer tool by entering the zebrafish mbpa, eif4ebp2, or fmr1 cDNA sequences obtained from Ensemble Genome Browser from transcript mbpa-206, eif4ebp2-201, and fmr1-201 (GRCz11) (Tables 46). Probes with highly repetitive sequences were removed. Each probe was entered into BLAST to search for off targets and were removed if they were predicted to bind annotated genes with relatively high specificity. The probes were ordered with a CAL Fluor Red 610 Dye. Probes were resuspended in Tris-EDTA (pH 8.0) and stored at a stock concentration of 12.5 μM at −20°C.

smFISH experimental procedure

The smFISH protocol was adapted from 3 published protocols: Hauptmann and Gerster (2000), Lyubimova and colleagues (2013), and Oka and colleagues (2015). First, larvae were sorted for EGFP expression and fixed O/N in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C. Larvae were embedded laterally in 1.5% agar and 5% sucrose blocks and transferred to a 30% sucrose solution O/N at 4°C. Blocks were frozen on dry ice and sectioned with a Leica cryostat into 20-μm thick sections and placed on microscope slides. Slides were not allowed to dry more than 5 min before adding 4% paraformaldehyde to fix the tissue at RT for 10 to 20 min. The slides were quickly rinsed with 1X PBS twice. The tissue was permeabilized with 70% cold ethanol at −20°C for 2 h. Parafilm was placed over tissue to prevent evaporation at all incubation steps. The tissue was rehydrated with wash buffer (10% DI formamide, 2X SSC in molecular grade water) for 5 min at RT. From this point on, care was taken to protect the tissue and probes from light as much as possible. Hybridization Buffer was made: 2x SSC, 10% DI formamide, 25 mg/mL tRNA, 50 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 200 mM ribonucleoside vanadyl complex in DEPC water. Aliquots were made and stored at −20°C. Final probe concentrations for egfp and mbpa was 125 nM. Final probe concentrations for eif4ebp2 and fmr1 was 250 nM. Slides were incubated at 37°C overnight in probe. Slides were quickly rinsed with fresh wash buffer followed by 2 wash steps at 37°C for 30 min. DAPI was added at 1:1,000 concentration in wash buffer to the tissue for 5 to 7 min at RT. Slides were quickly rinsed twice with wash buffer. Finally, slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting media and a No. 1 coverslip and sealed with nail polish. All slides were stored and protected from light at 4°C.

Microscopy

To image RNA localization in living animals, plasmids were injected with mRNA encoding Tol2 transposase into newly fertilized eggs. Injection solutions contained 5 μL 0.4 M KCl, 250 ng Tol2 mRNA, and 125 ng pEXPR-sox10:NLS-tdMCP-EGFP-sv40 3′ UTR-tol2 plasmid and 125 ng pEXPR-mbpa:mScarlet-CAAX-various 3′ UTR-polyA-tol2. Larvae were grown to 4 dpf and selected for good health and normal developmental patterns. Larvae were immobilized in 0.6% low-melt agarose with 0.06% tricaine. Images of single time point data were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 880 laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with a 40×, 1.3 NA oil immersion objective. Imaging was performed using Zeiss Zen Black software with the following parameters: 1024 × 1024 frame size, 1.03 μs pixel dwell time, 16-bit depth, 10% 488 laser power, 14% 561 laser power, 700 digital gain, 488 filter range 481 to 571, mScarlet filter range 605 to 695, and z intervals of 0.5 μm. All images of single cells were taken in the spinal cord of living zebrafish above the yolk extension. Cells were selected for imaging based on dual expression of EGFP and mScarlet-CAAX.

Images of smFISH experiments were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 880 with Airyscan confocal microscope and a Plan-Apochromat 63×, 1.4 NA oil immersion objective. The acquisition light path used Diode 405, Argon 488, HeNe 594 lasers, 405 beam splitter and 488/594 beam splitters, and Airyscan super resolution detector. Imaging was performed using Zeiss Zen Black software and parameters included: 1024 × 1024 frame size, 1.03 μs pixel dwell time, 16-bit depth, 3× zoom. Line averaging was set to 2, 2% to 5% 488 laser power, 2% 594 laser power, 0.5% to 3% 405 laser power, 750 gain, and z intervals of 0.3 μm. All images of single cells were taken in the hindbrain of zebrafish larvae. Cells were selected for imaging based on expression of EGFP-CAAX and Quasar-610 fluorescence. Post-image processing was performed using Airyscan Processing set to 6.8 for images that were quantified. For representative images of fmr1 and eif4ebp2 smFISH, post-acquisition processing was performed using auto Airyscan Processing.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Quantification of MS2 RNA localization

All images were processed and analyzed using ImageJ Fiji software. To analyze mRNA fluorescent intensity in sheath termini, we imaged single cells co-expressing NLS-MCP-EGFP and mScarlet-CAAX. Individual myelin sheaths were optically isolated by performing a maximum z projection of images collected at 0.5 μm intervals. Fluorescence intensity was measured by performing line scans across a 7-μm (± 0.3 μm) distance beginning at the terminal end of each sheath. Specifically, we drew each line in the mScarlet-CAAX channel to ensure we encompassed the edge of the myelin membrane. Gray values along each line (at 0.2 μm intervals) were measured in both channels. All measurements were combined into a Microsoft Excel file and imported into RStudio for further processing and analysis. In RStudio, we used tidyverse and ggplot2 libraries to manipulate data and generate plots. To normalize fluorescence intensities in each sheath, we divided the raw gray value at each distance by the average gray values of all distances per sheath. To calculate the average mRNA fluorescence intensity among all myelin sheaths, we plotted the average normalized fluorescence intensity by distance. To calculate mRNA fluorescence intensities in myelin sheaths, we plotted the average fluorescent intensity of EGFP (raw gray values) for each sheath using the line scan measurements described above.

To measure mRNA fluorescent intensity in cell bodies, we imaged single cells co-expressing NLS-MCP-EGFP and mScarlet-CAAX. Due to the high expression levels of EGFP in the nucleus, the 488 laser power was lowered to 0.3 to ensure we captured the full dynamic range of EGFP intensities. Cells containing saturated pixels were not utilized. During post-acquisition analysis, cell bodies were optically isolated by performing maximum z projection of images collected at 0.5 μm intervals. Fluorescence intensity was measured by drawing 3 regions of interest (ROIs) at the cell periphery, cell center, and between the periphery and center. Each ROI was 3 pixels by 3 pixels. All data points were combined in Microsoft Excel and imported into RStudio for analysis. To calculate the average fluorescence intensity per cell, we averaged the 3 ROIs per cell. We normalized the intensity from each cell body to the average of all cell bodies in the sv40 3′ UTR control.

smFISH quantification

All quantification was performed in ImageJ Fiji using a custom script created by Karlie Fedder (available upon request). First, z intervals were selected for individual cells or myelin tracts using the “Make Substack” feature in Fiji. Substacks for cell bodies included all z intervals for each soma. Substacks of myelin tracts in the hindbrain included 100 pixels × 100 pixels and 13 steps with an interval of 0.3 μm (4.39 μm × 4.39 μm × 3.9 μm). This volume was chosen because it was approximately the same volume as cell bodies. Each substack was maximum z-projected. Background was subtracted using a 2.5 rolling ball. The image was then thresholded by taking 3 standard deviations above the mean fluorescence intensity. Puncta were analyzed using the “Analyze Particles” feature with a size of 0.01 to Infinity and circularity of 0.00 to 1.00. Using the maximum projection of the EGFP-CAAX channel, an ROI was drawn around each cell body using the freehand tool. Alternatively, for myelin ROIs, the rectangle tool was used to draw a square 100 × 100 pixels (4.39 μm × 4.39 μm). All thresholded puncta were inspected to ensure single molecules were selected. Occasionally, threshold puncta fell on the border of the ROI, and these were excluded from measurements. mbpa transcripts are highly expressed, and counting individual puncta was not consistently reliable. Therefore, to measure each puncta, we overlaid the binary image on the maximum z-projected image and calculated the density (area × average fluorescence intensity) using the “IntDen” measurement.

To obtain the average mRNA abundance per subcellular compartment, we calculated the average density for all puncta in each ROI (cell bodies or myelin). All ROIs for each subcellular compartment were then averaged to calculate the average density per subcellular compartment.

To measure mRNA abundance and sheath length, we calculated the total density using the “IntDen” measurement in Fiji for each nascent sheath. Additionally, we measured the sheath length. All data were imported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed for statistical correlation in RStudio using Spearman’s correlation coefficient.

Statistics

All statistics were performed in RStudio (version 1.1.456) using devtools (version 2.2.1) and ggplot2(Wickham, 2009) packages. Additionally, several packages and libraries were installed including tidyverse (Wickham and colleagues, 2019), readxl (version 1.3.1), RColorBrewer (version 1.1–2), ggsignif (version 0.6.0), and ggpubr (version 0.2.4). All statistical analyses were performed with ggpubr. Wilcoxon rank sum was performed for unpaired comparisons of 2 groups.

Bioinformatic analysis

Identifying transcripts in the myelin transcriptome

To identify cDNA sequences in the myelin transcriptome associated with S1 Table in the main text, we started with the myelin transcriptome obtained from [27]. Specifically, we used the data from the 3 biological replicates from P18 mice, and these biological replicates were called “Treatment.” As a control group, we used 6 RNA-seq datasets from 2 independent studies using cultured oligodendrocytes to eliminate any axonal-derived mRNAs [44,58]. Specifically, we used P7B2 and P7B3 datasets from [58] and the 2 NFO and 2 MO datasets from [44]. These datasets were called “Control” in S1 Table. We calculated the average abundance (FPKM) in the treatment group and control group and determined the fold change. Next, we filtered the data for transcripts that have a q-value less than 0.05. Finally, to eliminate any genes with low mRNA abundance (FPKM), we filtered the data to only include genes that have FPKM greater than 5 in the control or treatment groups.

MEME analysis

To identify motifs shared between the mbpa-201, eif4ebp2-201, and fmr1-201 3′ UTRs, we used MEME (version 5.1.1) part of the MEME suite software. We used the default settings: Classic mode, RNA sequences, Zero or One Occurrence Per Sequence, and set the maximum motif to identify at 20 motifs. We selected the top 3 motifs for experimental procedures.

AME analysis

To identify if motifs enriched in the myelin transcriptome, we used Analysis of Motif Enrichment (AME) (version 5.1.1) part of MEME suite software. Specifically, we downloaded cDNA sequences in fasta formats for transcripts present in the myelin transcriptome (1,771 cDNA fasta sequences associated with the 1,855 genes in S1 Table). Some genes had multiple cDNA sequences that correlate to splice variants, and we selected the longest variant for our analysis. We uploaded these sequences into AME software and used the default settings to determine if motifs 1, 2, or 3 were enriched in the myelin transcriptome. As a control sequence, we used shuffled input sequences.

FIMO analysis

To determine the frequency of motif 2 occurrences in the various datasets, we used Find Individual Motif Occurrences (FIMO) (version 5.1.1) part of the MEME suite software. Specifically, we downloaded cDNA sequences from the entire mouse transcriptome (mm10), cDNA sequences from the myelin transcriptome, 5′ UTR sequences from the myelin transcriptome, 3′ UTR sequences from the myelin transcriptome, or coding sequences from the myelin transcriptome. We uploaded the sequences in to FIMO software and used the default settings to determine the number of occurrences for motif 2. Table 7 indicates the number of input sequences for each condition, number of occurrences motif 2 was identified, and the number of unique genes with one or more copies of motif 2. The results from each of these analyses can be found in the supporting information tables.

GO analysis

To identify GO terms associated with the myelin transcriptome and motif 2-containing myelin transcriptome, we used DAVID software (version 6.8). Specifically, we submitted Ensemble Gene IDs from the myelin transcriptome (2,821 genes) or the 751 genes containing motif 2. We selected GO term categories for biological processes, cellular compartment, and up_keywords. We filtered the results for false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05. We identified 60 terms in the myelin transcriptome and 34 terms in the motif 2-containing myelin transcriptome. We sorted the GO terms from lowest to highest FDR, removed any duplicate GO terms, and selected the top 20 terms.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Genes localized to myelin.

Control_mean is the average mRNA expression in oligodendrocytes across individual experimental runs. Treatment_mean is the average mRNA expression in purified myelin across individual experimental runs. GEO accession numbers are provided for individual experimental runs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s001

(XLS)

S2 Table. Genes localized to myelin that contain one or more copies of motif 2.

FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Genes in mouse transcriptome that contain one or more copies of motif 2.

FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Genes localized to myelin and contain one or more copies of motif 2 in the 3′ UTR.

FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s004

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Genes localized to myelin and contain one or more copies of motif 2 in the 5′ UTR.

FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s005

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Genes localized to myelin and contain one or more copies of motif 2 in the coding region.

FIMO, Find Individual Motif Occurrences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s006

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Gene ontology terms significantly enriched in the myelin-localized transcripts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s007

(XLSX)

S8 Table. Gene ontology terms significantly enriched in the myelin-localized transcripts that contain one or more copies of motif 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001053.s008

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Florence Marlow for her generous gift of the MS2 plasmids. We thank Karlie Fedder and Douglas Shepherd for their guidance during smFISH quantification.

References

  1. 1. Murtie JC, Macklin WB, Corfas G. Morphometric analysis of oligodendrocytes in the adult mouse frontal cortex. J Neurosci Res [Internet]. 2007 Aug 1 [cited 2019 Apr 2];85:2080–6. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/jnr.21339 pmid:17492793
  2. 2. Almeida RG, Czopka T. ffrench-Constant C, Lyons DA. Individual axons regulate the myelinating potential of single oligodendrocytes in vivo. Development. 2011 Oct 15;138 (20):4443–50. pmid:21880787
  3. 3. Chong SYC, Rosenberg SS, Fancy SPJ, Zhao C, Shen Y-AA, Hahn AT, et al. Neurite outgrowth inhibitor Nogo-A establishes spatial segregation and extent of oligodendrocyte myelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A [Internet]. 2012 Jan 24 [cited 2019 Apr 18];109(4):1299–304. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22160722 pmid:22160722
  4. 4. de Vries H, Schrage C, Hoekstra D. An Apical-Type Trafficking Pathway Is Present in Cultured Oligodendrocytes but the Sphingolipid-enriched Myelin Membrane Is the Target of a Basolateral-Type Pathway. Mol Biol Cell [Internet]. 1998 Mar [cited 2019 Dec 19];9(3):599–609. Available from: https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.9.3.599 pmid:9487129
  5. 5. Colman DR. Synthesis and incorporation of myelin polypeptides into CNS myelin. J Cell Biol [Internet]. 1982 Nov 1;95(2):598–608. Available from: http://www.jcb.org/cgi/doi/10.1083/jcb.95.2.598 pmid:6183276
  6. 6. Schwob VS, Clark HB, Agrawal D, Agrawal HC. Electron Microscopic Immunocytochemical Localization of Myelin Proteolipid Protein and Myelin Basic Protein to Oligodendrocytes in Rat Brain During Myelination. J Neurochem [Internet]. 1985 Aug 1 [cited 2020 Feb 24];45(2):559–71. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1985.tb04024.x pmid:2409233
  7. 7. Ainger K, Avossa D, Morgan F, Hill SJ, Barry C, Barbarese E, et al. Transport and localization of exogenous myelin basic protein mRNA microinjected into oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biol. 1993;123 (2):431–41. pmid:7691830
  8. 8. Kristensson K, Zeller NK, Dubois-dalcq ME, Lazzarini RA. The Journal of Histochemistry Expression of Myelin Basic Protein Gene in the Developing Rat Brain as Revealed by in Situ Hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem [Internet]. 1986 [cited 2019 Apr 2];34(4):467–73. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/34.4.2419396 pmid:2419396
  9. 9. Trapp BD, Moench T, Pulley M, Barbosa E, Tennekoon G, Griffin J. Spatial segregation of mRNA encoding myelin-specific proteins (oligodendrocytes/Schwann cells/in situ hybridization/immunocytochemistry). Neurobiology [Internet]. 1987 [cited 2018 Dec 26];84:7773–7. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/84/21/7773.full.pdf
  10. 10. Wake H, Lee PR, Fields RD. Control of Local Protein Synthesis and Initial Events in Myelination by Action Potentials. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2011;333(6049):1647–51. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1206998 pmid:21817014
  11. 11. Minis A, Dahary D, Manor O, Leshkowitz D, Pilpel Y, Yaron A. Subcellular transcriptomics-Dissection of the mRNA composition in the axonal compartment of sensory neurons. Dev Neurobiol [Internet]. 2014 Mar 1 [cited 2019 Mar 18];74(3):365–81. Available from: pmid:24127433
  12. 12. Briese M, Saal L, Appenzeller S, Moradi M, Baluapuri A, Sendtner M. Whole transcriptome profiling reveals the RNA content of motor axons. Nucleic Acids Res [Internet]. 2016 Feb 29 [cited 2019 Mar 18];44(4):e33. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkv1027 pmid:26464439
  13. 13. Taylor AM, Berchtold NC, Perreau VM, Tu CH, Li Jeon N, Cotman CW. Axonal mRNA in uninjured and regenerating cortical mammalian axons. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2009 Apr 15 [cited 2019 May 6];29(15):4697–707. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19369540 pmid:19369540
  14. 14. Cajigas IJ, Tushev G, Will TJ, Tom Dieck S, Fuerst N, Schuman EM. The Local Transcriptome in the Synaptic Neuropil Revealed by Deep Sequencing and High-Resolution Imaging. Neuron [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Sep 20];74(3):453–66. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3627340/pdf/emss-52755.pdf pmid:22578497
  15. 15. Zivraj KH, Chun Y, Tung L, Piper M, Gumy L, Fawcett JW, et al. Cellular/Molecular Subcellular Profiling Reveals Distinct and Developmentally Regulated Repertoire of Growth Cone mRNAs. 2010 [cited 2018 Sep 17]; Available from: www.jneurosci.org
  16. 16. Huber KM, Kayser MS, Bear MF. Role for rapid dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 May 19 [cited 2018 Dec 14];288(5469):1254–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10818003 pmid:10818003
  17. 17. Zhang X hui, Poo M. Localized synaptic potentiation by BDNF requires local protein synthesis in the developing axon. Neuron [Internet]. 2002 Nov 14 [cited 2019 Mar 18];36(4):675–88. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12441056 pmid:12441056
  18. 18. Kang H, Schuman EM. A Requirement for Local Protein Synthesis in Neurotrophin-Induced Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity. Science (80-). 1996;273(5280):1402–6. pmid:8703078
  19. 19. Leung K-M, Holt CE. Live visualization of protein synthesis in axonal growth cones by microinjection of photoconvertible Kaede into Xenopus embryos. Nat Protoc [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2017 Oct 3];3(8):1318–27. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714300 pmid:18714300
  20. 20. Taliaferro JM, Vidaki M, Oliveira R, Gertler FB, Swanson MS, Burge Correspondence CB, et al. Distal Alternative Last Exons Localize mRNAs to Neural Projections. Mol Cell [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 May 3];61:821–33. Available from: pmid:26907613
  21. 21. Tushev G, Glock C, Heumüller M, Biever A, Jovanovic M, Schuman EM. Alternative 3’ UTRs Modify the Localization, Regulatory Potential, Stability, and Plasticity of mRNAs in Neuronal Compartments. Neuron. 2018;98(3):495–511.e6. pmid:29656876
  22. 22. Zhang HL, Eom T, Oleynikov Y, Shenoy SM, Liebelt DA, Dictenberg JB, et al. Neurotrophin-Induced Transport of a β-Actin mRNP Complex Increases β-Actin Levels and Stimulates Growth Cone Motility. Neuron [Internet]. 2001 Aug 2 [cited 2019 Apr 3];31(2):261–75. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627301003579?via%3Dihub pmid:11502257
  23. 23. Kislauskis EH, Zhu X, Singer RH. Sequences responsible for intracellular localization of β-actin messenger RNA also affect cell phenotype. J Cell Biol. 1994;127 (2):441–51. pmid:7929587
  24. 24. Bassell GJ, Zhang H, Byrd AL, Femino AM, Singer RH, Taneja KL, et al. Sorting of β-actin mRNA and protein to neurites and growth cones in culture. J Neurosci 1998;18 (1):251–65. pmid:9412505
  25. 25. Welshhans K, Bassell GJ. Netrin-1-induced local β-actin synthesis and growth cone guidance requires zipcode binding protein 1. J Neurosci. 2011;31 (27):9800–13. pmid:21734271
  26. 26. Donnelly CJ, Willis DE, Xu M, Tep C, Jiang C, Yoo S, et al. Limited availability of ZBP1 restricts axonal mRNA localization and nerve regeneration capacity. EMBO J [Internet]. 2011 Nov 16 [cited 2020 Apr 30];30(22):4665–77. Available from: http://emboj.embopress.org/cgi/doi/10.1038/emboj.2011.347 pmid:21964071
  27. 27. Thakurela S, Garding A, Jung RB, Müller C, Goebbels S, White R, et al. The transcriptome of mouse central nervous system myelin. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016;6(1):25828. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep25828 pmid:27173133
  28. 28. Ainger K, Avossa D, Diana AS, Barry C, Barbarese E, Carson JH. Transport and localization elements in myelin basic protein mRNA. J Cell Biol. 1997;138 (5):1077–87. pmid:9281585
  29. 29. Torvund-Jensen J, Steengaard J, Askebjerg LB, Kjaer-Sorensen K, Laursen LS. The 3’UTRs of Myelin Basic Protein mRNAs Regulate Transport, Local Translation and Sensitivity to Neuronal Activity in Zebrafish. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:185. pmid:29946237
  30. 30. Munro TP, Magee RJ, Kidd GJ, Carson JH, Barbarese E, Smith LM, et al. Mutational analysis of a heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2 response element for RNA trafficking. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 1999 Nov 26 [cited 2019 Apr 18];274(48):34389–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10567417 pmid:10567417
  31. 31. Hoek KS, Kidd GJ, Carson JH, Smith R. hnRNP A2 Selectively Binds the Cytoplasmic Transport Sequence of Myelin Basic Protein mRNA † [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2019 Apr 18]. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines
  32. 32. Holz A, Schaeren-Wiemers N, Schaefer C, Pott U, Colello RJ, Schwab ME. Molecular and developmental characterization of novel cDNAs of the myelin-associated/oligodendrocytic basic protein. J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16 (2):467–77. pmid:8551331
  33. 33. Bertrand E, Chartrand P, Schaefer M, Shenoy SM, Singer RH, Long RM. Localization of ASH1 mRNA Particles in Living Yeast. Mol Cell [Internet]. 1998 Oct 1 [cited 2019 May 6];2(4):437–45. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276500801434?via%3Dihub pmid:9809065
  34. 34. Fitzgerald M, Shenk T. THE SITE AT WHICH LATE mRNAs ARE POLYADENYLATED IS ALTERED IN SV40 MUTANT dl882. Ann N Y Acad Sci [Internet]. 1980 Nov 1 [cited 2019 May 24];354(1 Genetic Varia):53–9. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb27957.x pmid:6164330
  35. 35. Buj R, Iglesias N, Planas AM, Santalucía T. A plasmid toolkit for cloning chimeric cDNAs encoding customized fusion proteins into any Gateway destination expression vector. BMC Mol Biol [Internet]. 2013 Aug 20 [cited 2019 Apr 6];14(18):1–16. Available from: http://bmcmolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2199-14-18 pmid:23957834
  36. 36. Lyons D, Naylor SG, Scholze A, Talbot WS. Kif1b is essential for mRNA localization in oligodendrocytes and development of myelinated axons. Nat Genet [Internet]. 2009;41(7):854–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.376%5Cnhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19503091%5Cnhttp://www.nature.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/ng/journal/v41/n7/full/ng.376.html pmid:19503091
  37. 37. Herbert AL, Fu M, Drerup CM, Gray RS, Harty BL, Ackerman SD, et al. Dynein/dynactin is necessary for anterograde transport ofMbpmRNA in oligodendrocytes and for myelination in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114 (43):E9153–62. pmid:29073112
  38. 38. Rinholm JE, Vervaeke K, Tadross MR, Tkachuk AN, Kopek BG, Brown TA, et al. Movement and structure of mitochondria in oligodendrocytes and their myelin sheaths. Glia [Internet]. 2016 May 1 [cited 2020 Apr 29];64(5):810–25. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/glia.22965 pmid:26775288
  39. 39. Snaidero N, Möbius W, Czopka T, Hekking LHP, Mathisen C, Verkleij D, et al. Myelin Membrane Wrapping of CNS Axons by PI(3,4,5)P3-Dependent Polarized Growth at the Inner Tongue. Cell [Internet]. 2014 Jan;156(1–2):277–90. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867413015304 pmid:24439382
  40. 40. Nawaz S, Sánchez P, Schmitt S, Snaidero N, Mitkovski M, Velte C, et al. Actin Filament Turnover Drives Leading Edge Growth during Myelin Sheath Formation in the Central Nervous System. Dev Cell [Internet]. 2015 Jul 27 [cited 2018 May 16];34(2):139–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26166299 pmid:26166299
  41. 41. Zuchero JB, Fu M-M, Sloan SA, Ibrahim A, Olson A, Zaremba A, et al. CNS myelin wrapping is driven by actin disassembly-supplement. Dev Cell [Internet]. 2015 Jul 27 [cited 2018 May 31];34(2):152–67. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26166300 pmid:26166300
  42. 42. Hughes AN, Appel B. Oligodendrocytes express synaptic proteins that modulate myelin sheath formation. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2019 Dec 11 [cited 2019 Sep 16];10(1):4125. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12059-y pmid:31511515
  43. 43. Ravanelli AM, Kearns CA, Powers RK, Wang Y, Hines JH, Donaldson MJ, et al. Sequential specification of oligodendrocyte lineage cells by distinct levels of Hedgehog and Notch signaling. Dev Biol [Internet]. 2018 Dec 15 [cited 2019 Jan 18];444(2):93–106. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160618304755?via%3Dihub pmid:30347186
  44. 44. Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, Bennett ML, Scholze AR, O’Keeffe S, et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2014 Sep 3;34(36):11929–47. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014 pmid:25186741
  45. 45. Doll CACA Yergert KMKM, Appel BHBH. The RNA binding protein fragile X mental retardation protein promotes myelin sheath growth. Glia [Internet]. 2020 Mar 18 [cited 2020 Jan 19];68(3):495–508. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/glia.23731 pmid:31626382
  46. 46. D’Hooge R, Nagels G, Franck F, Bakker CE, Reyniers E, Storm K, et al. Mildly impaired water maze performance in male Fmr1 knockout mice. Neuroscience. 1997 Jan;76 (2):367–76. pmid:9015322
  47. 47. Banko JL, Poulin F, Hou L, DeMaria CT, Sonenberg N, Klann E. The translation repressor 4E-BP2 is critical for eIF4F complex formation, synaptic plasticity, and memory in the hippocampus. J Neurosci [Internet]. 2005 Oct 19 [cited 2019 May 15];25(42):9581–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16237163 pmid:16237163
  48. 48. Van Dam D, D’Hooge R, Hauben E, Reyniers E, Gantois I, Bakker CE, et al. Spatial learning, contextual fear conditioning and conditioned emotional response in Fmr1 knockout mice. Behav Brain Res. 2000 Dec 20;117 (1–2):127–36. pmid:11099766
  49. 49. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res [Internet]. 2009 Jul 1 [cited 2020 Jan 28];37(Web Server):W202–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkp335 pmid:19458158
  50. 50. Bailey T, Elkan C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. AAAI Press; 1994. p. 28–36.
  51. 51. Brosamle C, Halpern ME. Characterization of Myelination in the Developing Zebrafish. Glia [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2020 May 14];39:47–57. Available from: http://workbench.sdsc.edu/ pmid:12112375
  52. 52. Buckanovich RJ, Darnell RB. The Neuronal RNA Binding Protein Nova-1 Recognizes Specific RNA Targets In Vitro and In Vivo [Internet]. Vol. 17, Mol Cell Biol. 1997 [cited 2020 Oct 9]. Available from: http://mcb.asm.org/ pmid:9154818
  53. 53. Li X, Quon G, Lipshitz HD, Morris Q. Predicting in vivo binding sites of RNA-binding proteins using mRNA secondary structure. RNA [Internet]. 2010 Jun 1 [cited 2020 Oct 9];16(6):1096–107. Available from: http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.2017210. pmid:20418358
  54. 54. Van Nostrand EL, Freese P, Pratt GA, Wang X, Wei X, Xiao R, et al. A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Jul 30;583(7818):711–9. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2077-3 pmid:32728246
  55. 55. Taliaferro JM, Lambert NJ, Sudmant PH, Dominguez D, Merkin JJ, Alexis MS, et al. RNA Sequence Context Effects Measured In Vitro Predict In Vivo Protein Binding and Regulation. Mol Cell [Internet]. 2016 Oct;64(2):294–306. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1097276516305147 pmid:27720642
  56. 56. Liu L, Ouyang M, Rao JN, Zou T, Xiao L, Chung HK, et al. Competition between RNA-binding proteins CELF1 and HuR modulates MYC translation and intestinal epithelium renewal. Magin TM, editor. Mol Biol Cell [Internet]. 2015 May 15 [cited 2020 Oct 9];26(10):1797–810. Available from: https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.E14-11-1500 pmid:25808495
  57. 57. Motta-Mena LB, Heyd F, Lynch KW. Context-Dependent Regulatory Mechanism of the Splicing Factor hnRNP L. Mol Cell [Internet]. 2010 Jan 29 [cited 2020 Oct 9];37(2):223–34. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC2818868/?report = abstract pmid:20122404
  58. 58. Marques S, Zeisel A, Codeluppi S, van Bruggen D, Mendanha Falcão A, Xiao L, et al. Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun 10 [cited 2017 Nov 1];352(6291):1326–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27284195 pmid:27284195
  59. 59. McLeay RC, Bailey TL. Motif Enrichment Analysis: a unified framework and an evaluation on ChIP data. BMC Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2010 Dec 1 [cited 2020 Feb 11];11(1):165. Available from: https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2105-11-165 pmid:20356413
  60. 60. Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2011 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Feb 11];27(7):1017–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 pmid:21330290
  61. 61. Carson JH, Worboys K, Ainger K, Barbarese E. Translocation of myelin basic protein mRNA in oligodendrocytes requires microtubules and kinesin. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1997;38 (4):318–28. pmid:9415374
  62. 62. Herbert AL, Fu M-M, Drerup CM, Gray RS, Harty BL, Ackerman SD, et al. Dynein/dynactin is necessary for anterograde transport of Mbp mRNA in oligodendrocytes and for myelination in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114 (43):E9153–62. pmid:29073112
  63. 63. Fu M, McAlear TS, Nguyen H, Oses-Prieto JA, Valenzuela A, Shi RD, et al. The Golgi Outpost Protein TPPP Nucleates Microtubules and Is Critical for Myelination. Cell [Internet]. 2019 Sep;179(1):132–146.e14. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867419309134 pmid:31522887
  64. 64. Yoshimura A, Fujii R, Watanabe Y, Okabe S, Fukui K, Takumi T. Myosin-Va facilitates the accumulation of mRNA/protein complex in dendritic spines. Curr Biol [Internet]. 2006 Dec 5 [cited 2018 Oct 31];16(23):2345–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17141617 pmid:17141617
  65. 65. Krauss J, López de Quinto S, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Ephrussi A. Myosin-V Regulates oskar mRNA Localization in the Drosophila Oocyte. Curr Biol [Internet]. 2009 Jun 23 [cited 2019 May 8];19(12):1058–63. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982209011178?via%3Dihub pmid:19481457
  66. 66. Buckley PT, Lee MT, Sul JY, Miyashiro KY, Bell TJ, Fisher SA, et al. Cytoplasmic Intron Sequence-Retaining Transcripts Can Be Dendritically Targeted via ID Element Retrotransposons. Neuron. 2011 Mar 10;69 (5):877–84. pmid:21382548
  67. 67. Hachet O, Ephrussi A. Splicing of oskar RNA in the nucleus is coupled to its cytoplasmic localization. Nature [Internet]. 2004 Apr 29 [cited 2020 Feb 20];428(6986):959–63. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/nature02521 pmid:15118729
  68. 68. Meer EJ, Wang DO, Kim S, Barr I, Guo F, Martin KC. Identification of a cis-acting element that localizes mRNA to synapses. [cited 2020 Feb 20]; Available from: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1116269109
  69. 69. Antar LN, Afroz R, Dictenberg JB, Carroll RC, Bassell GJ. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation Regulates Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein and Fmr1 mRNA Localization Differentially in Dendrites and at Synapses. J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 17;24 (11):2648–55. pmid:15028757
  70. 70. Lunn KF, Baas PW, Duncan ID. Microtubule Organization and Stability in the Oligodendrocyte. J Neurosci [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2017 Apr 27];17(13):4921–32. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/17/13/4921.full.pdf pmid:9185530
  71. 71. Halstead JM, Lionnet T, Wilbertz JH, Wippich F, Ephrussi A, Singer RH, et al. An RNA biosensor for imaging the first round of translation from single cells to living animals. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Mar 20 [cited 2017 Oct 3];347(6228):1367–671. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25792328 pmid:25792328
  72. 72. Yan X, Hoek TA, Vale RD, Tanenbaum ME. Dynamics of Translation of Single mRNA Molecules In Vivo. Cell [Internet]. 2016 May 5 [cited 2019 May 8];165(4):976–89. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867416304779?via%3Dihub pmid:27153498
  73. 73. Morisaki T, Lyon K, DeLuca KF, DeLuca JG, English BP, Zhang Z, et al. Real-time quantification of single RNA translation dynamics in living cells. Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun 17 [cited 2019 May 8];352(6292):1425–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27313040 pmid:27313040
  74. 74. Wang C, Han B, Zhou R, Zhuang X. Real-Time Imaging of Translation on Single mRNA Transcripts in Live Cells. Cell [Internet]. 2016 May 5 [cited 2019 May 8];165(4):990–1001. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867416304834 pmid:27153499
  75. 75. Pichon X, Bastide A, Safieddine A, Chouaib R, Samacoits A, Basyuk E, et al. Visualization of single endogenous polysomes reveals the dynamics of translation in live human cells. J Cell Biol [Internet]. 2016 Sep 12 [cited 2019 May 8];214(6):769–81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597760 pmid:27597760
  76. 76. Hanus C, Geptin H, Tushev G, Garg S, Alvarez-Castelao B, Sambandan S, et al. Unconventional secretory processing diversifies neuronal ion channel properties. Elife. 2016 Sep 28;5(September2016). pmid:27677849
  77. 77. Waxman SG, Sims TJ. Specificity in central myelination: evidence for local regulation of myelin thickness. Brain Res [Internet]. 1984 Jan 30 [cited 2018 Jun 14];292(1):179–85. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006899384909053?via%3Dihub pmid:6697207
  78. 78. Tenenbaum SA, Carson CC, Lager PJ, Keene JD. Identifying mRNA subsets in messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes by using cDNA arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97 (26):14085–90. pmid:11121017
  79. 79. Hogan DJ, Riordan DP, Gerber AP, Herschlag D, Brown PO. Diverse RNA-Binding Proteins Interact with Functionally Related Sets of RNAs, Suggesting an Extensive Regulatory System. Sean R. Eddy, editor. PLoS Biol [Internet]. 2008 Oct 28 [cited 2020 Feb 5];6(10):e255. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060255 pmid:18959479
  80. 80. Narla A, Ebert BL. Ribosomopathies: human disorders of ribosome dysfunction. Blood [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Jul 20];115(16). Available from: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/115/16/3196?sso-checked=true pmid:20194897
  81. 81. Culjkovic-Kraljacic B, Borden KLB. The Impact of Post-transcriptional Control: Better Living Through RNA Regulons. Front Genet. 2018 Nov;5:9. pmid:30455716