Figures
Abstract
Maternal morbidities present a major burden to the health and well-being of childbearing women. However, their impacts on women’s functional health are not well understood. This work aims to describe how maternal morbidities affect women’s quality of life (QoL) in pregnancy and the postpartum period . This qualitative study involved 118 pregnant and 135 postpartum women at six study sites in Kenya, Ghana, Zambia, Pakistan, and India. Data were collected between December 2023 and June 2024. Participants were selected via purposive sampling, with consideration of age, trimester, and time since delivery. A total of 23 focus group discussions with pregnant and late postpartum (≥6 months) participants and 48 in-depth interviews with early postpartum (≤6 weeks) participants were conducted using semi-structured guides. Data were analyzed using a collaborative, inductive, thematic approach. Four overarching themes were identified and were cross-cutting irrespective of continent or country : (1) physical and emotional challenges pose a barrier to daily activities; (2) lack of social support detracts from women’s QoL; (3) receipt of social support mitigates adverse impacts of maternal morbidities on QoL; and (4) economic challenges exacerbate declines in women’s QoL during pregnancy and postpartum. Physical and emotional morbidities related to childbearing severely limited women’s ability to complete daily tasks and adversely impacted their perceived QoL. Social and financial support from the baby’s father, family and/or in-laws, community members, and healthcare providers are important to mitigate the impacts of pregnancy and postpartum challenges on women’s health and well-being.
Citation: Ali Abdulai M, Adhikary P, Baumann SG, Ejaz M, Priya JO, Spelke MB, et al. (2025) How maternal morbidities impact women’s quality of life during pregnancy and postpartum in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: A qualitative study. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(9): e0004229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004229
Editor: Adriana Biney, University of Ghana, GHANA
Received: January 25, 2025; Accepted: August 11, 2025; Published: September 11, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Ali Abdulai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Transcript data will not be made publicly available given that it contains private and confidential information. However, all data collection tools and protocols will be made available on Open Science Foundation under the PRISMA Consortium (osf.io/qckyt).
Funding: This work was supported by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant number [INV-002220 and INV-037626 to KPA, CTA, and SN; INV-003601 to VA; INV-057217. to AGC; INV-057220 to ZH; INV-057218 to MPK; K01TW012426 NIH/FIC to MBS; INV-057222 to WM; INV-041999 and INV-031954 to ERS; and INV-057223 to SM]. The funder provided input on the design of the study but had no role in the decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Despite a 40% reduction in the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR) from 2000 to 2023, annual reductions in deaths have slowed and maternal mortality and morbidity remain serious public health concerns in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1,2]. In 2020, the estimated maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in Africa was 531 deaths per 100,000 live births, accounting for 69% of maternal deaths worldwide, and 117 per 100,000 live births in South-East Asia, accounting for 17% of maternal deaths worldwide [3,4]. Maternal deaths are often referred to as the ‘tip of the iceberg;’ whereas for every maternal death there are an estimated 50–100 cases of severe maternal morbidity, and there is a renewed global drive for interventions that go beyond averting death [5–7]. Recent evidence from the Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) cohort study in eight LMICs, found that one in three pregnant women experienced at least one direct maternal morbidity, with the burden twice as high for women in South Asia compared to sub-Saharan Africa [8]. Other studies, such as an observational study in Maharashtra, India, report maternal morbidity incidence rates exceeding 50%, with most complications occurring in the postpartum period [9].
Definitions of maternal morbidity are broad and most morbidity data comes from hospital-based studies, capturing only women who seek medical care for the morbidities they experience. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines maternal morbidity as “any health condition attributed to and/or complicating pregnancy and childbirth that has a negative impact on the woman’s well-being and/or functioning” [5]. Morbidities are further understood as direct (i.e., obstetric complications resulting from pregnancy or its management), indirect (i.e., existing conditions aggravated by pregnancy), and psychological (e.g., postpartum depression, attempted suicide) [10]. Complications contributing to morbidity vary in their duration and severity, ranging from life-threatening complications that may result in death or a maternal near-miss, to mild sequelae. Meanwhile, the relatively minor physical problems that commonly follow childbirth, such as backache, fatigue, vaginal pain, or hemorrhoids, are less studied, although they affect an estimated two-thirds of postpartum women and can incur severe functional limitations [11].
Beyond treating symptoms and sequelae, little attention has been paid to assessing and managing the long-term impact of maternal morbidities on daily functioning. Maternal morbidities can affect physical, emotional, economic, and social aspects of women’s lives and influence the parent-child relationship. For example, certain complications in pregnancy increase the risk of preterm deliveries, and postpartum complications limit women’s ability to breastfeed, care for, or interact with their infants: all of which can hinder infant development [12,13]. Understanding the effects of maternal morbidities on women’s quality of life (QoL) is therefore essential for improving health, well-being, and productivity among childbearing women. The objective of this analysis was to investigate women’s experiences with maternal morbidities across five LMICs and understand the challenges they present to women’s QoL. Findings will inform the development of tailored interventions to improve the QoL of childbearing women in LMICs.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
This qualitative study was conducted at six research sites involved in the Pregnancy Risk, Infant Surveillance, and Measurement Alliance (PRISMA) Maternal and Newborn Health cohort study [14]. Sites were in Kintampo, Ghana; Kisumu, Kenya; Lusaka, Zambia; Karachi, Pakistan; Vellore, India (i.e., South India); and Hodal, India (i.e., North India). Data were collected between December 2023 and June 2024, during focus group discussions (FGDs) with pregnant and late postpartum women (6 months to 1 year postpartum) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with early postpartum women (≤6 weeks postpartum). Eligible participants were women who were either currently pregnant or had delivered in the past 12 months, lived in the catchment area, met the minimum required age (Ghana, Zambia, and Pakistan: 15 years; Kenya and India: 18 years) and provided written informed consent. Recruitment start and end dates (dd-mm-yyyy) by site as follows: 21-12-2023–07-03-2024 in Hodal, India; 13-02-2024–12-06-2024 in Pakistan; 14-12-2023–04-04-2024 in Zambia; 12-03-2024–08-04-2024 in Kenya; 17-01-2024–20-04-2024 in Vellore, India; and 07-12-2023–23-02-2024 in Ghana.
Purposive sampling was used to identify potential participants. Recruitment leveraged existing household demographic surveillance systems and antenatal and postnatal care clinics. Sampling was largely conducted within the ongoing PRISMA study and therefore was not necessarily representative of the broader community makeup at a given site. Efforts were made to recruit evenly across age groups, trimesters, local languages (if multiple), and time since childbirth (“early postpartum” ≤ 6 weeks and “late postpartum” 6 months to 1 year). Pregnant and late postpartum women participated in FGDs at a healthcare facility or community location; early postpartum women completed an IDI at their home. It was not possible to conduct FGDs with early postpartum women because of cultural practices that discourage women from leaving the home in the early weeks following childbirth. FGDs were stratified by perinatal status (i.e., pregnant or late postpartum) and age group (conducted separately with women <25 years and ≥25 years of age); each FGD contained 8–10 women across all three trimesters (if pregnant). Recruitment continued until the target sample size was reached (determined a priori based on budgetary constraints).
Three or four FGDs and eight IDIs were conducted in Twi (Ghana), Swahili and Dholuo (Kenya), Bemba and Nyanja (Zambia), Tamil (South India), Hindi (North India), and Urdu (Pakistan). FGDs and IDIs were led by a female trained moderator/interviewer with postgraduate education and experience with qualitative research. The moderator/interviewer was assisted by a research assistant, also female, from the site country, and fluent in the local language and English. In most cases, either the moderator/interviewer and/or the assistant were involved with the PRISMA study and therefore may have been familiar to some participants. During the consent process, the following was stated: “The purpose of this study is to understand mothers’ experience during pregnancy and after childbirth”. Before starting the FGD or IDI, participants were asked to complete a brief sociodemographic and obstetric history questionnaire, which was administered verbally by a member of the research team.
Semi-structured guides for the FGDs and IDIs were developed collaboratively by the research team, with input from investigators at all six study sites and the coordinating site at the George Washington University (S1 File). The development of the guides was informed by existing conceptual frameworks of maternal morbidities [15,16]. The guides included questions about how women in the community care for themselves during pregnancy or postpartum, the main challenges that affect pregnant and/or postpartum women, how these challenges are viewed by family and community members, and how women could be better supported during pregnancy or postpartum. Postpartum women were also asked about their delivery and any challenges or complications experienced during the birth. If a participant indicated experiencing a complication, the interviewer asked an additional set of questions to obtain further details.
The FGD and IDI guides were forward translated and back translated by two translators fluent in both English and the local language. Back translations were reviewed by the study team and adjustments were made, as needed, to ensure conceptual equivalency. Minor revisions to some questions were made and additional probes (i.e., follow-up questions intended to encourage participants to elaborate on a prior response) were added after beginning data collection to enhance clarity and elicit meaningful responses. Specifically, the FGD guide was updated to include probes based on feedback from the sites about how family and community view physical, emotional, social, and economic challenges during pregnancy and how women seek healthcare while pregnant. The IDI guide was updated to include probes about women’s expectations regarding the birth of their child and how women care for their health postpartum.
FGDs were 60–90 minutes in duration and IDIs were 30–45 minutes. All FGDs and IDIs were recorded and the recordings were transcribed verbatim in the local language. Transcripts were subsequently translated into English by translators fluent in both languages and reviewed by the interviewer/moderator to ensure that the essence was intact. All transcripts were reviewed for completeness, anonymity, and clarity prior to coding and analysis.
Data analysis
A collaborative, multi-step approach was used for data analysis. After reviewing the transcripts for familiarization with the data and confirming that saturation had been reached, a subset (2–3 FGDs and 1–2 IDIs) of transcripts from each site was coded independently by two coders (one from the local site and one from the coordinating site) using an inductive approach, to develop a site-specific codebook. The site-specific codebooks were then merged into a shared cross-site codebook and discussed with all site investigators. All transcripts were then coded independently by two coders in Dedoose using the shared cross-site codebook, which was iteratively refined by adding, merging, and reorganizing codes throughout the coding process [17]. After finalizing the shared cross-site codebook, all transcripts were independently reviewed and re-coded by the two coders to ensure alignment with a final shared cross-site codebook. Initial themes and subthemes were identified and subsequently discussed with investigators at all local sites. Participant input into the themes and subthemes identified was not solicited. The themes and subthemes were refined iteratively and collaboratively through discussion with investigators at all research sites, after which, representative quotations were selected.
Ethical considerations
All participants provided written informed consent or assent prior to participating. Study procedures were reviewed and approved or exempted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Review Committee (ERC) at each participating institution, as follows: The George Washington University, United States (NCR235136); Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana (KHRCIEC/2023–32); Society for Applied Studies, India (SAS/ERC/MMS Study/2023); Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya (SERU 4882); Aga Khan University, Pakistan (2023-9286-26951); Christian Medical College Vellore, India (IRB Min. No. 15913); University of Zambia, Zambia (Ref No. 4442–2023); and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States (Z32301). Participants who expressed severe psychological distress or disclosed circumstances of abuse or violence were referred for additional care at a health facility, as appropriate.
Results
A total of 23 FGDs (4 FGDs per site except Kenya where we conducted 3 FGDs) and 48 IDIs (8 IDIs per site) were conducted. Across all sites, 62% of women who were invited to participate attended their scheduled session and provided informed consent (overall 253/411; by site: North India 39/82; South India 38/77; Ghana 43/58; Pakistan 47/56; Zambia 48/91; Kenya 38/47). Data from 1 postpartum IDI participant (South India) were excluded during the analysis as she had already participated in a FGD during pregnancy.
Participants’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Most participants were multipara (75%) and married or cohabitating (93%). The mean age of study participants was 26 years (range: 16–46 years), with 46% under 25 years. Among pregnant participants, gestational age distribution was skewed toward later pregnancy, with 10% in their first trimester, 32% in their second, and 58% in their third trimester. Occupational trends differed across sites: >85% of women reported being housewives or not employed in Pakistan and India, compared to 23% in Ghana, 45% in Kenya, and 71% in Zambia. Overall, the most common occupations were working for a small business or as a business owner (15%) or as a skilled laborer (6%). The reported heads of household also differed regionally, with most reporting husband/partner at the African sites, versus parent/parent-in-law among participants at the Asian sites.
Four overarching themes were identified using thematic analysis: (1) physical and emotional challenges pose a barrier to daily activities; (2) lack of social support detracts from women’s QoL; (3) receiving social support mitigates adverse impacts of pregnancy and postpartum challenges on QoL; and (4) economic challenges exacerbate declines in women’s QoL during pregnancy and postpartum. The overarching themes intersected pregnancy and postpartum and were cross-cutting, irrespective of continent or country. Some differences in minor themes and subthemes were observed across pregnancy and postpartum women and/or across regions or countries and are detailed below.
Theme 1. Pregnancy and postpartum challenges pose a barrier to daily activities
Physical morbidities, such as pain and fatigue, were a near-universal experience during pregnancy and postpartum and hindered women’s ability to carry out daily activities (Table 2). Pain associated with bending and lifting made it difficult for women to complete household work, particularly chores such as washing, sweeping, and fetching water. As one postpartum woman in Vellore, India said, “Because of my back pain, I can’t bend and do any work.” Feelings of weakness and fatigue were also commonly reported. For some, this made it impossible to complete tasks that involved heavy lifting, or any tasks at all without taking breaks. A pregnant woman in Lusaka, Zambia said, “I feel body weakness like I have just woken up. Sometimes I am very weak that I only manage to do laundry once in a week and just some light work. Most of the time I just want to sit and sleep.” Many women also indicated that they would have liked more help from family members to reduce their workload.
Emotional changes during pregnancy and postpartum also posed a challenge to daily functioning (Table 2). Women described a variety of emotional challenges, including mood swings, depression, anger, anxiety, brain fog, and feelings of helplessness. In some cases, this also manifested as physical morbidity. As one pregnant participant in Lusaka, Zambia said, “I have become very moody and high-tempered, sometimes I feel pain in my heart. I think this is not good for a pregnant woman.” Some women found it difficult to control their emotions, which made it hard for them to be productive and complete the tasks expected of them. For example, a postpartum woman in Karachi, Pakistan said, “When I get angry, then I just go outside. I start to lose consciousness from the anger.” The physical and emotional challenges women described experiencing during pregnancy and postpartum were similar across the different local contexts.
Theme 2. Lack of social support detracts from well-being during pregnancy and postpartum
Women described receiving inadequate support from the baby’s father, as well as from their families and communities (Table 3). With regard to the baby’s father, participants explained that they received a lack of support in several areas, which included practical support (e.g., household chores or childcare), emotional support, and financial support. While a lack of support from the baby’s father emerged as a theme in both sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, this was a particularly salient theme in the African countries. For example, a postpartum woman in Lusaka, Zambia said, “After delivery, every woman expects their husband to be happy and support them, but this doesn’t happen to everyone, so many women go into postnatal depression because of lack of care from their spouses.” Participants also expressed that the baby’s father did not recognize or acknowledge their feelings or need for rest when they were physically and or mentally exhausted, which contributed to feeling isolated. As explained by a pregnant woman in Kintampo, Ghana, “If I say I am tired and cannot work anymore, he will not understand and will not give me the needed attention.”
Insufficient financial support was also widely identified as a key challenge, with the baby’s father sometimes unable or unwilling to contribute to expenses for food, medical care, or basic supplies. As a participant in Kisumu, Kenya said, “Sometimes when you get pregnant and realize, as a woman, you will go to your husband and tell him that you should start saving and buy the baby’s necessities; but he won’t be even interested in even giving out the support that you would need.” Women explained that the absence of financial assistance from the baby’s father forced women to return to work earlier than expected after childbirth, which exacerbated physical challenges such as back pain and delayed or precluded their recovery.
Some participants described mistreatment from the baby’s father, including being subjected to physical violence, psychological abuse, and withholding of necessities, such as food. While mistreatment from the baby’s father was described in both sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, this was particularly salient in Zambia. As a postpartum woman in Lusaka, Zambia said, “I was being beaten by my husband, claiming that I didn’t have respect for him. He would torture me by not providing me with food, and I would just drink water.” Participants’ also described experiences of infidelity and rejection from their baby’s father, which was also particularly salient at the Zambia site.
Outside of the home, some women described feeling judged by their community as being lazy when they were weak or unwell, as well as being compared to other pregnant women who did not suffer such symptoms. One pregnant woman in Kintampo, Ghana said, “I am currently not feeling well but another pregnant woman might be okay so if I show any signs of weakness, people might say I am being lazy.” Participants expressed a desire for more empathy and/or assistance from their community. As a pregnant woman in Vellore, India explained “There’s no one to offer help or even ask if [pregnant women] are tired. No one is there to inquire if they need assistance. Even if there are many people around them, no one cares enough to ask how they feel personally.”
A subtheme specific to India and Pakistan, was that participants perceived the medical care they received as inadequate. Women reported that hospital staff were not attentive to their physical and emotional needs during pregnancy or during labor and delivery. In some cases, participants spoke of broader systemic challenges, including lack of nearby clinics and insufficient health care professionals. However, lack of support from the medical system and healthcare providers was not commonly described among women at the sites in sub-Saharan Africa.
A lack of support from family members further detracted from participants’ well-being. For example, participants explained that their family members did not offer to help with household chores. One pregnant woman in Hodal, India said “We have no choice but to do all the work. Like living alone with my husband, father-in-law, and one and a half-year-old daughter, I have to take care of all of them, clean my house, and make food and I have no one for help. Even if I am on a ventilator, I will be the only one who will do all the work [joked and smiled].” Participants shared that their family members had unreasonable expectations and pressured them to complete tasks they were unable to do. Specifically in India and Pakistan, this criticism and pressure was described as being commonly inflicted by the mother-in-law. As a postpartum woman in Karachi, Pakistan said “I have to complete my tasks before resting otherwise the family...I can’t just tell them I’m resting now and will serve food later, can I? If I say that, my mother-in-law would take it badly, thinking I’m being lazy or neglectful.”
A specific source of stress described by women in both sub-Saharan African and South Asian countries stemmed from societal pressure to have a male child (Table 3). Participants described being looked down upon and resented for having a female child and feeling upset as a result. This was especially present in India, where it is illegal to determine the sex of the fetus and female feticide remains a major concern. As one woman in Hodal, India said, “Her husband drinks and beats her up because she gave birth to 5 girls.”
Theme 3. Receipt of social support mitigates pregnancy and postpartum challenges
Participants, across all study contexts, shared that receiving support from their families and communities made managing pregnancy and postpartum challenges easier (Table 4). For example, women were able to rest and recover when family members helped with household chores and were appreciative of emotional support such as extra care, attention, and pampering. One postpartum woman in Kintampo, Ghana said, “I live peacefully with the people in my house so I get people to bathe the baby and even if I want, they will want to bathe and massage me. For the baby, they will take very good care of him. They will cook and bathe the baby until you ask them to stop.” Some family members also provided financial assistance for expenses such as medical costs during pregnancy and buying food and supplies for her recovery after childbirth, which alleviated economic pressures.
Community support further mitigated challenges during pregnancy and postpartum across all study contexts, and in some cases, was described as eliciting feelings of belonging. For example, participants explained that their neighbors helped with physical tasks during pregnancy, such as fetching water, and assisted with transportation to the hospital at the time of delivery. As a postpartum woman in Karachi, Pakistan said, “In my case, my neighbor, although she is not closely related, took care of me just as my sisters would have. She didn’t leave anything lacking.” Friends also provided support by preparing meals and washing clothes, especially when women did not have that support from their families. One woman in Kintampo, Ghana said, “When you give birth in the community your loved ones and friends can come and help with cooking, washing clothing, and fetching water for you.” Women explained that they felt valued by their community when their needs were recognized and prioritized. For example, receiving priority seating on public transportation or at community gatherings provided participants with a sense of comfort and belonging within the community.
Theme 4. Economic challenges detract from health/well-being in pregnancy and postpartum
Economic hardship was described by participants across all study sites (Table 5). Participants explained that they struggled to afford prenatal and postnatal care, including the transportation costs to travel to and from the healthcare facility. A woman in Lusaka, Zambia said, “…a pregnant woman is required to carry out some tests, but they don’t have money.” In some cases, participants explained that the baby’s father or their family had to spend more than they could afford to cover the prenatal and delivery expenses, which compromised their financial situation. Food insecurity was also a widespread concern. Participants spoke about not having food at home and relying on the baby’s father to bring them something to eat, with some women forced to resort to begging. The subtheme lack of food was particularly salient in sub-Saharan African countries. As a participant in Lusaka, Zambia described, “I have seen some women who have not fully recovered from childbirth, going round in the community begging for food with a very small baby, because they had no food at home.”
While financially necessary, returning to work or seeking employment after childbirth was complicated by physical challenges and lack of childcare. Many women described being physically exhausted and not having the strength to work. One woman in Vellore, India said, “I wanted to return to the office and thought I could work, but since I can’t sit for more than a few hours, I don’t know how I would manage in the office.” Even among mothers who were physically capable, a lack of caretakers or financial ability to pay for childcare precluded them from seeking employment. Those who did return to work often did so prematurely, compromising their health to support themselves and their baby, and often against the wishes of their families. As described by a woman in Hodal, India: “After having a baby, women often leave their job. Their family tells them that they are incapable of taking care of the baby. Therefore, they tell women to choose one between their home and career. I have seen many cases in our village like this.”
Discussion
This study aimed to understand how the experience of maternal morbidities impacted women’s QoL in five countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Across all local contexts, participants described a range of physical and emotional challenges that prevented them from carrying out daily activities, such as completing household chores, obtaining food and necessities, and/or maintaining self-care. Consistent with existing literature, participants reported avoiding or modifying strenuous tasks, like fetching water, due to severe backaches and musculoskeletal strain [18,19]. Fatigue also emerged as a major barrier, which aligns with the findings of previous studies that link fatigue to pregnancy-related hormonal changes, postpartum sleep disruption and depression, and underlying undernutrition and infection in LMIC settings [20,21]. Financial barriers, inadequate social support and sociocultural expectations were reported to exacerbate these morbidities and intensify the burden placed on women to overcome them.
When received, family and community support emerged as critical mitigating factors, underscoring the importance of informal networks in maternal well-being. The importance of social support during the perinatal period has been described previously [22,23]. Poor social support during pregnancy and postpartum is associated with perinatal depression, fatigue, post-traumatic stress, and other mental health concerns [20,24]. A systematic review of women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy found that pregnant women lacking emotional connection and reassurance from their partners were more likely to experience anxiety and depression [22]. Previous research in India and Pakistan showed that women with perinatal depression had lower scores on QoL domains [25]. Postpartum depression has also been linked to poor physical health and insomnia, further exacerbating the functional impacts of maternal morbidities [11,26,27]. Conversely, several prior studies demonstrate that social support is positively associated with QoL [28,29] and receiving emotional support from family improves maternal mental health outcomes [22,30,31].
Community and family pressures, such as the stigmatization of single mothers and societal expectations regarding the sex of the baby, worsened women’s feelings of social isolation and exacerbated emotional challenges. This is consistent with previous research [32–34]. The positive and/or negative influence of a woman’s mother-in-law, in particular, was a recurring concept, especially among South Asian participants; this is consistent with findings in other Asian countries and suggests that enhancing social support from the mother-in-law may improve women’s health and wellbeing [35,36].
The extent to which women, especially in sub-Saharan African countries, negatively described interactions with the baby’s father was notable. The cultural acceptance of infidelity further fosters feelings of abandonment and neglect and heightens the risk of postpartum depression [37]. Mistreatment from partners, including intimate-partner violence, rejection, and infidelity, has been shown to worsen maternal physical and mental health outcomes [34,38,39]. Intimate-partner violence is also associated with adverse birth outcomes including preterm birth and low birth weight [40]. In sub-Saharan Africa, male involvement in caregiving roles is often discouraged [30,41–43] and similar trends have been observed in parts of Asia, where patriarchal norms restrict male engagement in maternal care [36,37]. Importantly, as research by Cumber and colleagues (2024) reveals, fathers’ motivations to be more supportive may also be hindered by cultural stigma, financial barriers, or exclusion from maternity services [44]. This calls for intentional involvement of fathers in antenatal and postnatal care to foster their participation, which has been shown to have widespread positive effects [45,46].
Women in the present study cited economic challenges as an obstacle to accessing care and purchasing necessities, such as transportation, food, and clothing for themselves and/or their baby. Existing literature emphasizes how financial insecurity (particularly a lack of financial contributions from the baby’s father) can severely restrict access to prenatal care and nutritious food [22,47,48]. A lack of prenatal care worsens maternal morbidities [48,49], whereas timely prenatal care reduces pregnancy-related complications and adverse fetal outcomes [50–53]. Maternal malnutrition during pregnancy is further tied to maternal morbidities [54–56] and nutritional deficiencies postpartum increase women’s vulnerability to illness, reducing their capacity to care for themselves and their newborns [57]. Economic hardships also presented women with stressful decisions; for example, postpartum participants described needing to choose between earning money and caring for their child, which further restricted their financial independence [58–61]. This is particularly relevant in patriarchal societies where traditional gender roles place the burden of childcare on women. As such, cash transfer approaches may be an applicable intervention in study contexts. Indirect or conditional schemes, like the Maternal Health Voucher Scheme in Bangladesh or Janani Suraksha Yojana in India, have been found to increase maternity care uptake and facility deliveries [62,63]. Direct cash transfer programs, while gaining popularity, have produced more heterogeneous results evidencing their ability to increase antenatal and postnatal visit attendance [64,65]. However, beyond service utilization, both models show promising effects for reducing preterm birth and low birth weight, and improving child nutritional outcomes and quality of life [66,67].
Key strengths of the study include data collection across five LMICs on two continents, which allowed us to capture and compare women’s experiences during pregnancy and postpartum in different cultural contexts. Another strength of the study was the enrollment of women across trimesters and at varying time points postpartum, which allowed us to more comprehensively assess women’s experiences of maternal morbidities and their impacts on QoL. Several limitations also warrant consideration. Considering the hierarchical nature of study contexts, participants may have responded in a socially desirable manner. The added group dynamic of the FGDs or lack of privacy of IDIs, given they occurred within the participants’ homes, may have further discouraged women from engaging in open dialogue.
Conclusions
These results demonstrate that maternal morbidities have wide-reaching impacts on women’s quality of life during pregnancy and postpartum, particularly in carrying out household chores, obtaining food and other necessities, and maintaining self-care. The adverse impacts of maternal morbidities on women’s QoL were overall consistent across different country settings. Social support was a vital factor in mitigating declines in health and well-being associated with childbearing. Our findings suggest that incentivizing father-inclusive maternity care and integrating routine QoL assessments into antenatal and postnatal care could increase awareness of the functional limitations women face due to childbearing. Moreover, targeted strategies to promote economic empowerment and provide financial support during the perinatal period, such as cash transfer programs, may be critical to support the health and well-being of women and their children.
Supporting information
S1 File. Focus group discussion and in-depth interview guides.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004229.s001
(PDF)
S1 Checklist. PLOS inclusivity in research questionnaire.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004229.s004
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This study would not be possible without the support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, specifically from Drs. Laura Lamberti and Sun-Eun Lee. The authors would also like to acknowledge the community members, especially pregnant and postpartum women, whose generous participation helped to answer our research questions.
References
- 1. Geller SE, Koch AR, Garland CE, MacDonald EJ, Storey F, Lawton B. A global view of severe maternal morbidity: moving beyond maternal mortality. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):98. pmid:29945657
- 2.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020. World Health Organization; 2023. Report No.: ISBN 978-92-4-006875-9. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366225/9789240068759-eng.pdf?sequence=1
- 3.
World Health Organization. Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births). In: The Global Health Observatory [Internet]. [cited 11 Nov 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/maternal-mortality-ratio-(per-100-000-live-births)
- 4. Ekwuazi EK, Chigbu CO, Ngene NC. Reducing maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Case Rep Womens Health. 2023;39:e00542. pmid:37954228
- 5. Vanderkruik RC, Tunçalp Ö, Chou D, Say L. Framing maternal morbidity: WHO scoping exercise. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:213. pmid:24252359
- 6. Knaul FM, Langer A, Atun R, Rodin D, Frenk J, Bonita R. Rethinking maternal health. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(4):e227-8. pmid:26953968
- 7.
The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030). World Health Organization; 5 Dec 2018 [cited 11 Nov 2024]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/A71-19
- 8. Aftab F, Ahmed I, Ahmed S, Ali SM, Amenga-Etego S, Ariff S, et al. Direct maternal morbidity and the risk of pregnancy-related deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: A population-based prospective cohort study in 8 countries. PLoS Med. 2021;18(6):e1003644. pmid:34181649
- 9. Bang RA, Bang AT, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Filippi V. Maternal morbidity during labour and the puerperium in rural homes and the need for medical attention: A prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. BJOG. 2004;111(3):231–8. pmid:14961884
- 10.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Population, Reed HE, Koblinsky MA, Henry Mosley W. The Consequences of Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Mortality: Report of a Workshop. National Academies Press (US); 2000.
- 11. Webb DA, Bloch JR, Coyne JC, Chung EK, Bennett IM, Culhane JF. Postpartum physical symptoms in new mothers: their relationship to functional limitations and emotional well-being. Birth. 2008;35(3):179–87. pmid:18844643
- 12. Bauserman M, Thorsten VR, Nolen TL, Patterson J, Lokangaka A, Tshefu A, et al. Maternal mortality in six low and lower-middle income countries from 2010 to 2018: risk factors and trends. Reprod Health. 2020;17(Suppl 3):173. pmid:33334343
- 13. Say L, Barreix M, Chou D, Tunçalp Ö, Cottler S, McCaw-Binns A, et al. Maternal morbidity measurement tool pilot: study protocol. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):69. pmid:27277959
- 14.
Smith ER, Baumann SG, Mores C, Tawiah C, Asante KP, Mazumder S. PRISMA Maternal & Newborn Health Study. Open Science Foundation. OSF. 2024.
- 15. Filippi V, Chou D, Barreix M, Say L, the WHO Maternal Morbidity Working Group (MMWG). A new conceptual framework for maternal morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141:4–9.
- 16.
National Quality Forum. Maternal morbidity and mortality measurement recommendations report. National Quality Forum. 2021.
- 17.
Salmona M, Lieber E, Kaczynski D. Qualitative and Mixed Methods Data Analysis Using Dedoose. In: SAGE Publications Ltd [Internet]. 4 Apr 2025 [cited 5 Jun 2025]. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-and-mixed-methods-data-analysis-using-dedoose/book258543
- 18. Salari N, Mohammadi A, Hemmati M, Hasheminezhad R, Kani S, Shohaimi S, et al. The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):830. pmid:38042815
- 19. Manyozo SD, Nesto T, Bonongwe P, Muula AS. Low back pain during pregnancy: Prevalence, risk factors and association with daily activities among pregnant women in urban Blantyre, Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2019;31(1):71–6. pmid:31143400
- 20. Mortazavi F, Borzoee F. Fatigue in Pregnancy: The validity and reliability of the Farsi Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue scale. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019;19(1):e44–50. pmid:31198595
- 21. Smartt C, Medhin G, Alem A, Patel V, Dewey M, Prince M, et al. Fatigue as a manifestation of psychosocial distress in a low-income country: a population-based panel study. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(3):365–72. pmid:26683692
- 22. Al-Mutawtah M, Campbell E, Kubis H-P, Erjavec M. Women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):782. pmid:37950165
- 23. Lagadec N, Steinecker M, Kapassi A, Magnier AM, Chastang J, Robert S, et al. Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):455. pmid:30470200
- 24. Kay TL, Moulson MC, Vigod SN, Schoueri-Mychasiw N, Singla DR. The Role of Social Support in Perinatal Mental Health and Psychosocial Stimulation. Yale J Biol Med. 2024;97(1):3–16. pmid:38559463
- 25. Shriyan P, Babu GR, Pattanshetty S, Nair S. Depression and quality of life among antenatal women in Southern Karnataka. RGUHS National Journal of Public Health. 2019;4. Available from: https://journalgrid.com/view/article/rnjph/652
- 26. Howell EA, Mora P, Leventhal H. Correlates of early postpartum depressive symptoms. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(2):149–57. pmid:16341910
- 27. Mori E, Iwata H, Sakajo A, Maehara K, Tamakoshi K. Association between physical and depressive symptoms during the first 6 months postpartum. Int J Nurs Pract. 2017;23:e12545.
- 28. Jamshaid S, Malik NI, Ullah I, Saboor S, Arain F, De Berardis D. Postpartum Depression and Health: Role of Perceived Social Support among Pakistani Women. Diseases. 2023;11(2):53. pmid:37092435
- 29. Gul B, Riaz MA, Batool N, Yasmin H, Riaz MN. Social support and health related quality of life among pregnant women. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(6):872–5. pmid:30325903
- 30. Nesane KV, Mulaudzi FM. Cultural barriers to male partners’ involvement in antenatal care in Limpopo province. Health SA. 2024;29:2322. pmid:38322365
- 31. Eddy BP, Fife ST. Active husband involvement during pregnancy: A grounded theory. Fam Relat. 2021;70:1222–37.
- 32. Ye Z, Wang L, Yang T, Chen L-Z, Wang T, Chen L, et al. Gender of infant and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis based on cohort and case-control studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(13):2581–90. pmid:32635787
- 33. Sheela CN, Venkatesh S. Screening for Postnatal Depression in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):72–6. pmid:27651581
- 34. Insan N, Weke A, Rankin J, Forrest S. Perceptions and attitudes around perinatal mental health in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: a systematic review of qualitative data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):293. pmid:35387619
- 35. Qi W, Liu Y, Lv H, Ge J, Meng Y, Zhao N, et al. Effects of family relationship and social support on the mental health of Chinese postpartum women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):65. pmid:35078423
- 36. Ekpenyong MS, Munshitha M. The impact of social support on postpartum depression in Asia: A systematic literature review. Mental Health & Prevention. 2023;30:200262.
- 37. Phoosuwan N, Manasatchakun P, Eriksson L, Lundberg PC. Life situation and support during pregnancy among Thai expectant mothers with depressive symptoms and their partners: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):207. pmid:32272908
- 38. Wessells MG, Kostelny K. The Psychosocial Impacts of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in LMIC Contexts: Toward a Holistic Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14488. pmid:36361364
- 39. Kathree T, Selohilwe OM, Bhana A, Petersen I. Perceptions of postnatal depression and health care needs in a South African sample: the “mental” in maternal health care. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:140. pmid:25389015
- 40. Lockington EP, Sherrell HC, Crawford K, Rae K, Kumar S. Intimate partner violence is a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023;3(4):100283. pmid:38077225
- 41. Craymah JP, Oppong RK, Tuoyire DA. Male Involvement in Maternal Health Care at Anomabo, Central Region, Ghana. Int J Reprod Med. 2017;2017:2929013. pmid:29362725
- 42. Dumbaugh M, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Manu A, ten Asbroek GH, Kirkwood B, Hill Z. Perceptions of, attitudes towards and barriers to male involvement in newborn care in rural Ghana, West Africa: a qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:269. pmid:25112497
- 43.
Kinanee JB, Ezekiel-Hart J. Men as partners in maternal health: Implications for. 2009. 044.
- 44. Nambile Cumber S, Williams A, Elden H, Bogren M. Fathers’ involvement in pregnancy and childbirth in Africa: an integrative systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2024;17(1):2372906. pmid:38993149
- 45. Palioura Z, Sarantaki A, Antoniou E, Iliadou M, Dagla M. Fathers’ Educational Needs Assessment in Relation to Their Participation in Perinatal Care: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(2):200. pmid:36673568
- 46. Jeong J, Sullivan EF, McCann JK. Effectiveness of father-inclusive interventions on maternal, paternal, couples, and early child outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2023;328:115971. pmid:37224703
- 47. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62–77. pmid:26650969
- 48. Amana IG, Tefera EG, Chaka EE, Bulto GA. Health-related quality of life of postpartum women and associated factors in Dendi district, West Shoa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):79. pmid:38297361
- 49. Sarkar M, Das T, Roy TB. Determinants or barriers associated with specific routine check-up in antenatal care in gestational period: A study from EAG states, India. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2021;11:100779.
- 50.
WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017.
- 51.
Bale JR, Stoll BJ, Lucas AO, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Improving Birth Outcomes. Improving Birth Outcomes: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World. National Academies Press (US). 2003.
- 52. Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):S2. pmid:25178042
- 53. Amponsah-Tabi S, Dassah ET, Asubonteng GO, Ankobea F, Annan JJK, Senu E, et al. An assessment of the quality of antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):e0275933. pmid:36223426
- 54. Ramakrishnan U, Grant F, Goldenberg T, Zongrone A, Martorell R. Effect of women’s nutrition before and during early pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review: Periconceptual nutrition and maternal and infant outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(Suppl 1):285–301.
- 55. Victora CG, Christian P, Vidaletti LP, Gatica-Domínguez G, Menon P, Black RE. Revisiting maternal and child undernutrition in low-income and middle-income countries: variable progress towards an unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2021;397(10282):1388–99. pmid:33691094
- 56. Figa Z, Temesgen T, Mahamed AA, Bekele E. The effect of maternal undernutrition on adverse obstetric outcomes among women who attend antenatal care in Gedeo zone public hospitals, cohort study design. BMC Nutr. 2024;10(1):64. pmid:38650046
- 57. Iqbal S, Ali I. Maternal food insecurity in low-income countries: Revisiting its causes and consequences for maternal and neonatal health. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2021;3:100091.
- 58. Torres AJC, Barbosa-Silva L, Oliveira-Silva LC, Miziara OPP, Guahy UCR, Fisher AN, et al. The Impact of Motherhood on Women’s Career Progression: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Interventions. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(4):275. pmid:38667071
- 59. Jayachandran S. Social Norms as a Barrier to Women’s Employment in Developing Countries. IMF Econ Rev. 2021;69(3):576–95.
- 60. Chauhan J, Mishra G, Bhakri S. Career success of women: Role of family responsibilities, mentoring, and perceived organizational support. Vis J Bus Perspect. 2022;26:105–17.
- 61. Irani L, Vemireddy V. Getting the measurement right! quantifying time poverty and multitasking from childcare among mothers with children across different age groups in rural north India. Asian Population Studies. 2020;17(1):94–116.
- 62. Nguyen HTH, Hatt L, Islam M, Sloan NL, Chowdhury J, Schmidt J-O, et al. Encouraging maternal health service utilization: an evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(7):989–96. pmid:22326107
- 63. Gupta SK, Pal DK, Tiwari R, Garg R, Shrivastava AK, Sarawagi R, et al. Impact of Janani Suraksha Yojana on institutional delivery rate and maternal morbidity and mortality: an observational study in India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30(4):464–71. pmid:23304913
- 64. Jacobs W, Downey LE. Impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on antenatal care service uptake in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2022;12(11):e064673. pmid:36428017
- 65. Hunter BM, Harrison S, Portela A, Bick D. The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173068. pmid:28328940
- 66. Ngamasana EL, Moxie J. Cash transfer, maternal and child health outcomes: a scoping review in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2024;17(1):2309726. pmid:38333923
- 67. Lisboa CS, Guimarães NS, Ferreira AJF, Silva KBB da, Alves FJO, Rocha ADS, et al. Impact of cash transfer programs on birth and child growth outcomes: systematic review. Cien Saude Colet. 2023;28(8):2417–32. pmid:37531548