Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Factors associated with the ability of adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sexual unions to negotiate for safer sex. An analysis of data from the 2018 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS)

  • Teebeny Zulu ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    teebenyzulu@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Mwiche Musukuma,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Choolwe Jacobs,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Women in Global Health, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Patrick Musonda

    Roles Formal analysis, Software

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

The ability of AGYW to negotiate for safer sex is key in the fight against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). We determined the prevalence of safer sex negotiation among AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 and its associated factors in Zambia. Of 1879 respondents, 78.0% (1466) had the ability to negotiate for safer sex (ANSS). While adjusting for other variables in the model, condom use at last sex with the most recent partner (AOR 4.08, 95% CI 1.74–9.60, p = 0.001), experiencing any sexual violence by husband or partner (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17–2.59, p = 0.006), listening to the radio at least once a week (AOR 2.03, 95% CI 1.32–3.13, p = 0.001), secondary or higher education (AOR1.77, 95% CI 1.04–2.99, p = 0.034), being in the richest wealth quintile (AOR 2.70, 95% CI 1.30–5.60, p = 0.008), and living in Eastern Province (AOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.53–4.93 p = 0.001), Northwestern (AOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.15–4.65, p = 0.019) and Southern (AOR 3.11, 95% CI 1.58–6.09, p = 0.001) was associated with a significant increase in the odds of ANSS among AGYW aged 15–24 years in sexual unions. On the other hand, being in Muchinga province (AOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.81, p = 0.006) decreased the odds of ANSS. In conclusion, safer sex negotiation is crucial in combating HIV; hence, tailor-made interventions that promote condom use, frequency of listening to health programmes on the radio, education, and wealth acquisition should be implemented to build and sustain safer sex negotiation, particularly among AGYW in sexual unions.

1. Introduction

"Women submit while men love" is a prevalent narrative that has deprived women of their right to ask for condom use or deny sex even in their husband’s extramarital affairs. Such ideas, among others, have aided the spread of HIV, resulting in Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), which has remained a significant global health burden. Globally, around 39 million people were living with HIV in 2022, with 1.3 million becoming newly infected [1]. In most parts of the world, AGYW are more vulnerable to HIV infection than their male counterparts [2]. In 2022, around 1.9 million AGYW worldwide were HIV positive, compared to 1.2 million of their male counterparts [2]. In Sub-Saharan Africa in 2022, AGYW comprised over 77% of newly reported infections in individuals aged 15 to 24 [3]. Moreover, young women in Sub-Saharan Africa aged 15 to 24 had over three times higher chances of acquiring HIV in 2022 compared to young men [3]. Among other reasons, early marriage reduces AGYW’s ability to negotiate for safer sex which increase their risk of contracting HIV compared to their male peers [4]. To reduce the cases of HIV, efforts to improve safer sex negotiation in various populations, especially among AGYW in sexual unions and other sexually active populations, have intensified, but little has been achieved [5].

In Sub-Saharan African countries, such as Zambia, difficulties arise for AGYW in sexual relationships when it comes to safer sex negotiation, as men have more power and control in making sexual decisions, leading to higher HIV rates which is estimated at 5.7% compared to 1.8% among their male counterparts [6]. Given this information, SDG 5 emphasises the importance of gender equality in empowering AGYW to have more influence in reproductive matters, attitudes, and their capacity to negotiate for safer sex with their partners [7]. Literature has shown that safer sex negotiation is associated with comprehensive HIV/AIDS knowledge [810], maternal level of education [1113], wealth and occupational status [14, 15], maternal age [13], mass media exposure (radio, television, and newspapers) [8, 16], religious affiliation [12, 17], and intimate partner’s violence (IPV) and alcohol consumption [16, 18]. In Zambia, interventions such as comprehensive sexuality education, the promotion of condom use, and Determined, Resilience, Empowered, AIDS-Free, Mentored, and Safe (DREAMS), among others, aim to enhance AGYW’s ability to have knowledge and control over sexuality issues [19]. Adolescent girls and young women’s ANSS is crucial in reducing HIV incidence and prevalence as it reduces the likelihood of having unprotected sex.

Although the link between ANSS and decreasing rates of HIV and unwanted pregnancy is well known, there has been limited research on this phenomenon in Zambia. This study is therefore aimed at determining the prevalence and the factors associated with ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 years by analysing data from the 2018 ZDHS.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Study area and setting

The study analyzed data from all 10 provinces of Zambia, a southern African country that is part of the SSA. As of 2023, Zambia’s population was 21 million, expected to grow at a rate of 2.8% per year [20]. Adolescents and young people aged 10–24 comprise 34.3% of the population [21]. Additionally, about 56% of the population lives in rural areas and depends mainly on subsistence agriculture [20].

2.2 Study design, data source and study population

This study was a cross-sectional study which constitutes a secondary analysis of microdata utilizing national-level data sourced from the ZDHS program. The ZDHS is a comprehensive, nationally representative household survey conducted by the Zambia Statistics Agency in collaboration with global partners, including ICF International and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The survey employs a two-stage sampling process, initially selecting enumeration areas (EAs) and subsequently households. All women in the 15–49 years age group who consented to take part in the survey and were usual members of the selected households or spent the night before the survey in the selected households were interviewed. A sample of 13,683 women aged 15–49 and 12,132 men aged 15–59 in 12831 households were successfully interviewed [22]. For this specific study, we extracted all pertinent variables from the AGYW in sexual unions aged 15 to 24 years data files (individual recode) 2018 ZDHS datasets. Data was accessed 29th of April 2024. The authors in this study did not have access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection.

2.3 Study variables

The dependent variable was ’Ability to Negotiate for Safer Sex’ (ANSS), characterised by two possible outcomes. This variable was created by composing two questions: ’Can you refuse sex with your partner?’ and ’Can you ask your partner to use a condom during sex?’ Those who responded ’yes’ to one of the two questions were classified as having ANSS and given a ’1 = yes’ code; otherwise, ’0 = no’ [8]. A total of fifteen explanatory variables were analysed and categorised into socio-demographic and Behavioural characteristics. The socio-demographic variables comprised age, occupation, education level, wealth index, province, residence, and religious affiliation. Behavioural traits included comprehensive knowledge of HIV, frequency of exposure to newspapers, radio, and television, their partner’s alcohol consumption, experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), using condoms during their last sexual intercourse with their most recent partner, and the total number of current sexual partners. Comprehensive knowledge on HIV/AIDS was a composite variable’. It was defined as correctly knowing two ways to prevent HIV transmission and rejection of the three most common misconceptions about HIV. This variable was measured by asking each woman whether or not she agreed with the following five statements: (1) Consistent use of condoms during sexual intercourse can prevent HIV transmission; (2) Limiting sex to just one uninfected faithful partner can prevent HIV transmission; (3) A healthy-looking person can have HIV; (4) A person can get HIV through mosquito bites; (5) A person can get HIV by sharing food with an HIV-infected person. A respondent was considered to have comprehensive HIV/AIDS knowledge if he/she correctly responding to all the five questions and a code ‘Yes’ = 1 was assigned, otherwise a ‘No’ = 0 was given. The variables were not predetermined a priori but were chosen based on theoretical importance and practical significance for negotiating safer sex [8].

2.4 Operational definitions

In this study, ANSS was defined as being able to ask for condom use or refuse sex. Sexual union refers to being married or living with a partner in other words cohabiting. We further defined adolescent as a female in the age range of 10–19 while a young woman as a female in the age range from 20–30.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Frequencies and percentages were presented for descriptive statistics to measure the proportion of safer sex negotiation among respondents. Associations between ANSS and categorical predictors were explored using the chi-squared test if the assumptions were satisfied; otherwise, Fisher’s exact test was used. To examine the association between quantitative predictors and the outcome, the Mann-Whitney test was used. Analytical analysis was performed using generalised linear models with a logit link. An investigator-led stepwise modelling approach was used at a 5% level of significance. Odds ratios have been presented as a measure of the association between a predictor and the outcome. Data was analysed in STATA version 16.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

2.6 Ethical considerations

The ICF Institutional Review Board approved the 2018 ZDHS data survey protocols with the ICF Project Number: 132989.0.000.ZM. DHS.02. Permission to use the dataset was acquired from ICF Macro, and the dataset named ZMIR71DTA is available for download at https://www.dhsprogram.com/data. The user carefully adhered to the given guidelines, highlighting the sensitive nature of the information and the significance of not trying to uncover the identity of any household or individual surveyed for the study (maintaining anonymity). Approval was requested from the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (UNZABREC) (Ref. Number 3459/2022 (Reference). Approval was also requested from the National Health Research Authority (NHRA) (Ref. Negative. NHRA008/03/07/2023)—(NHRA008 March 7, 2023).

3. Results

3.1 Characteristics of the study population

Results for the characteristics of the study population are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Out of 1879 AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 years interviewed in the 2018 ZDHS, 78.0% had ANSS. The majority (73.3%) lived in rural areas, and 64.0% were not working. Majority (93.3%) did not use condoms during their last sex with their most recent sexual partner, 86.8% did not experience any sexual violence from their partner; and 71.3% of their partners did not drink alcohol. The highest percentage (31.9%) belonged to the poorest wealth quintile, with only 7.2% in the richest wealth quintile. More than half (52.4%) attained primary education, and the majority (82.0%) were Protestants, with only 0.4% being Muslims. The majority (87.8%) did not read newspapers or magazines at all, compared to 1.4% who read almost every day and 60.9% who did not listen to the radio either.

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of AGYW aged 15–24 in Zambia stratified by ability to negotiate for safer sex and their associations five years preceding the 2018 ZDHS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003614.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Behavioural characteristics of AGYW aged 15–24 in Zambia stratified by ability to negotiate for safer sex and their associations five years preceding the 2018 ZDHS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003614.t002

3.2 Socio-demographic characteristics by ANSS

Table 1 also presents sample socio-demographic characteristics by ANSS. There was an association between the participant’s age and ANSS (p = 0.0015). The highest prevalence (84.0%) of ANSS was observed in participants residing in urban areas (p<0.0001), suggesting a strong association. There was a strong positive association between the highest level of education acquired and ANSS (p<0.0001). The highest prevalence of ANSS (82.1%) was observed among those who attained secondary or higher education. Respondents who were in the richest wealth quintile had the highest prevalence (91.1%) of ANSS (p<0.0001). A strong association (p<0.0001) was also observed between the province in which a participant resided and ANSS. The highest prevalence (90.2%) of ANSS was observed in AGYW in the eastern province.

3.3 Behavioural characteristics by ANSS

Sample sexual behavioural characteristics by ANSS are presented in Table 2. From the results, 92.0% of AGYW who used condoms at last sex with their most recent partner had ANSS, (p<0.0001). Roughly, an increase in the frequency of listening to the radio was associated with an increase in the prevalence of ANSS among participants (p = 0.001). The frequency of watching television was strongly associated with ANSS (p<0.0001). The highest prevalence of ANSS (86.7%) was observed in participants who watched television almost every day.

3.4 Factors associated with ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 years

In bivariate logistic regression analysis as shown in Table 3, the following variables had a statistically significant effect on ANSS; condom use during last sex with the most recent partner increased the odds of ANSS by a factor of 3.42 (COR 3.2, 95% CI 1.76–6.55, p<0.0001), compared to no education, primary as well as secondary or higher education increased the odds of ANSS (COR 1.57, 95% CI 1.04–2.37, p = 0.030) and (COR 2.27, 95% CI 1.48–3.47, p<0.0001) respectively, being in the richer wealth quintile compared to being in the poorest, increased the odds of ANSS by 35% (COR 1.64, 95% CI 1.16–2.32, p = 0.005), compared to being in the poorest wealth quintile, being in the richest increased the odds of ANSS by 3.60 times (COR 3.60, 95% CI 1.93–6.68, p<0.0001), the odds of ANSS among those who listened to the radio at least once a week were 2.04 times the odds of those who did not listen at all (COR 2.04, 95% CI 1.39–2.98, p<0.0001), compared to not listening to the radio at all, listening to the radio almost every day increased the odds of ANSS by 41% (COR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.96, p = 0.042), as compared to being in central province, being in eastern province increased the odds of ANSS by 2.75 times (COR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.53–4.93, p = 0.001), this was the case with those in Northwestern and Southern province (COR 2.31, 95% CI 1.15–4.65, p = 0.019) and (COR 3.11, 95% CI 1.58–6.09, p = 0.001). Being in Muchinga province decreased the odds of ANSS by 52% (COR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.81, p = 0.006).

thumbnail
Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of the ability to negotiate for safer sex among AGYW aged 15–24 in Zambia five years preceding the 2018 ZDHS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003614.t003

Adjusted multiple logistic regression results are also presented in Table 3. While controlling for other variables in the model; the odds of ANSS among AGYW who used condoms during their last sex with the most recent partner were 4.08 times the odds of those who did not use condoms (AOR 4.08, 95% CI 1.74–9.60, p = 0.001), as compared to AGYW in sexual unions who did not experience IPV, the odds of ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions who experienced IPV, increased by 74% (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.17–2.59, p = 0.006). The odds of ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions whose highest level of education was secondary or higher were 1.77 times the odds of their counterparts with no education (AOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04–2.99, p = 0.034), listening to the radio at least once a week as compared to not listening to the radio at all, increased the odds of ANSS among AGYW by a factor of 2.03 (AOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.32–3.13, p<0.0001), being in the richest wealth quintile as compared to being in the poorest among AGYW increased the odds of ANSS by 2.70 times (AOR 2.70, 95% CI 1.30–5.60, p = 0.008), the odds of ANSS among AGYW in Eastern province were 2.75 times the odds of AGYW in sexual unions in central province of Zambia (AOR 2.75, 95% CI 1.53–4.90, p<0.0001), compared to AGYW in central province, being in Northwestern province increased the odds of ANSS by a factor of 2.31 (AOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.15–4.65, p = 0.019), being in southern province as compared to being in the central province increased the odds of ANSS among AGYW by a factor of 3.11 (AOR 3.11, 95% CI 1.58–6.09, p = 0.001).

4. Discussion

In this study, we explored the prevalence and factors associated with ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 years. The study revealed that the prevalence of ANSS among AGYW was high in Zambia five years before the 2018 ZDHS. Condom use during last sex with the most recent partner, experiencing any form of IPV, the highest level of education attained, frequency of listening to the radio, wealth index, and province were factors associated with ANSS among AGYW in sexual unions aged 15–24 years in Zambia.

The study found a high prevalence of safer sex negotiation in Zambia, which aligns with findings from previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [11] and SSA [8]. The reason for this may be the educational background of most participants in this study, as the majority had finished elementary school. Educated young women are more likely than their uneducated counterparts to negotiate for safer sex [11]. Formal education gives women correct information about STIs and HIV/AIDS, which likely improves their attitudes towards practising safe sex [23]. This finding implies that the government and other appropriate parties should introduce measures like covering tuition fees, exam fees, and uniforms to enhance education access, thereby building and sustaining AGYW’s ANSS in Zambia [24].

Findings have indicated that AGYW in sexual unions who used condoms during their last sex with the most recent partner were more likely to negotiate for safer sex compared to those who did not use condoms. A prior study in SSA across 30 countries showed that most AGYW in sexual relationships who used condoms in their last sexual encounter were successful in negotiating for safer sex [8]. One possible explanation for this is that AGYW who consistently use condoms may be more familiar with them and are thus more inclined to dispel misconceptions about their use. Despite knowing that condoms offer protection against HIV/AIDS and early pregnancy, most men choose not to use them due to the belief that condoms diminish sexual pleasure and signify a lack of trust in a committed relationship [25]. Hence, by consistently using condoms, AGYW can dispel myths about condom use within sexual relationships and effectively advocate for safer sex. Therefore, it is important to continue encouraging the use of condoms among AGYW in sexual relationships through various platforms, including social media and sports, as they are heavily involved in these activities.

Similar to Melenedz and his team [26], our study found that AGYW who had experienced any form of IPV were more likely to participate in discussions about safer sex compared to those who had not. Many AGYW in sexual unions where sexual abuse occurs typically create ways to avoid being abused by their partners again. These women are more likely to insist on using condoms or reject sex if their partner wants to have unprotected sex. Another potential reason could be that when AGYW attempted to talk about practising safe sex, their partners may have perceived it as disrespectful and resorted to IPV. Previous studies have shown that women who have autonomy over their sexuality are more likely to face different forms of violence [16, 18]. This suggests that these women might be capable of standing up for their rights, a situation their husbands see as a challenge to their authority, causing them to act aggressively towards their wives. Many African communities, especially in rural areas that prioritize traditional practices, prohibit women from refusing sexual advances from their partners unless they are menstruating, pregnant, breastfeeding, or engaged [16]. Our findings show that creating and improving a support system, such as 360 Women, is crucial for both IPV survivors and non-survivors to share ideas and offer each other support [16].

Our results indicate that AGYW who had completed secondary school or higher are more inclined to engage in safer sex negotiations compared to those with no education. The correlation identified in this research aligns with previous studies [12, 27]. Formal education boosts women’s independence and ability to make decisions about their reproductive health and overall well-being [27]. Another possible reason for this finding may be that women who receive formal education acquire reliable information about STIs and HIV/AIDS, which likely enhances their willingness to discuss safer sex [23]. Studies indicate that women who are educated or have higher levels of education are more capable and empowered to alter their sexual behaviour and embrace safer sexual practices [28, 29]. Evidence shows that educated women or individuals with higher levels of education are better empowered to change their sexual behaviour and adopt safer sexual practices [27]. We recommend prioritizing the promotion of access and equity in education as a crucial element for effectively responding to HIV prevention among AGYW in sexual partnerships [24, 30].

Additionally, our research revealed that AGYW who tuned in to the radio at least once per week were more likely to negotiate for safer sex than those who never listened to the radio. Our results align with another study’s results [16], which found a higher likelihood of safer sex negotiation among AGYW exposed to the mass media however, this study did not specify the genre of mass media. Research has indicated that AGYW exposed to the media acquire knowledge about HIV and are more likely to negotiate for safer sex, however, this was not a significant factor in our study [8]. Extensive information about HIV is frequently cited as a factor that impacts individuals’ sexual practices and control over their own sexual experiences [31, 32]. There is a need to think about using radio to spread health messages to the public, promoting awareness and encouraging safe sex conversations.

In addition, we observed a higher chance of AGYW in the richest wealth quintile engaging in safer sex negotiations compared to those in the poorest wealth quintile. Previous studies also found a higher likelihood of safer sex negotiation among women who belonged to the middle class and richer wealth status [33, 34]. This is because AGYW from wealthier families have more financial security, which lowers the likelihood of them participating in transactional sex or suffering from abusive sexual relationships. Furthermore, these teenagers have access to good education and media in urban areas where working-class women serve as role models, motivating them to decrease their reliance on husbands. Many women who are financially reliant on men find it challenging to prioritise safe sexual practices, despite having a good understanding of HIV/AIDS [35]. This highlights the importance of implementing interventions aimed at enhancing the capacity of AGYW in sexual unions to negotiate for safer sex, specifically focusing on poverty alleviation initiatives in low-income households.

It has been shown in this study that AGYW in sexual unions who resided in Eastern, Northwestern, or southern provinces were more likely to negotiate for safer sex as compared to their counterparts in Central Province. On the other hand, AGYW in Muchinga province had a reduced ability to negotiate for safer sex. This could be explained by differences in programmes and levels of sensitization to safer sex practices in different provinces [22]. Qualitative studies are needed to understand why the Eastern, Northwestern, and Southern provinces are doing better concerning safer sex negotiation.

4.1 Study strengths and limitations

The main strength of this study lies in its utilisation of a sample that is representative of the entire nation, with collection techniques and methodology that adhere to the highest standards. Therefore, the results of the research can apply to all AGYW aged 15 to 24 in sexual unions in Zambia. Among the limitations of this study is the use of a cross-sectional design, preventing the determination of causality. Furthermore, the connections between the independent and dependent variables may change with time, indicating the necessity for research on this subject utilising the most recent ZDHS. Additionally, it is important to investigate the impact of social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok on the negotiation of safer sex.

4.2 Conclusion

We determined the prevalence and factors influencing the ability to negotiate for safer sex among AGYW aged 15–24 in Zambia. A significant number of AGYW had the ability to negotiate for safer sex five years before the 2018 ZDHS. Factors such as condom use, IPV, frequency of listening to the radio, having a secondary education or higher, richest wealth quintile, and residing in the Eastern, Northwestern, and Southern provinces were all linked to a higher chance of negotiating safer sex. Conversely, living in Muchinga Province was linked to a decreased likelihood of engaging in safer sex negotiations. As a result, it is necessary to introduce measures to improve access to education, wealth, condom usage, and mass media to build and sustain safer sex negotiations among AGYW in Zambia. Additional research, such as qualitative research, may be required to understand why AGYW in sexual relationships in the Eastern, Northwestern, and Southern provinces are successful in negotiating safer sex.

References

  1. 1. United Nations Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. UNAIDS data 2021. UNAIDS Joint United Nations Program HIV/AIDS [Internet]. 2021;1–38. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC3032_AIDS_Data_book_2021_En.pdf
  2. 2. United Nations Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome UNAIDS. HIV and adolescent girls and young women. 2023 GLOBAL AIDS UPDATE FACTSHEET. 2023. https://thepath.unaids.org/wpcontent/themes/unaids2023/assets/files/thematic_fs_hiv_girls_women.pdf
  3. 3. United Nations Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome UNAIDS. World Aids day 2023. Global statistics-fact sheet. 2023. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf
  4. 4. Mavhu W, Rowley E, Thior I, Kruse-Levy N, Mugurungi O, Ncube G et al. Sexual behaviour experiences and characteristics of male-female partnerships among HIV positive adolescent girls and young women: qualitative findings from Zimbabwe. PLoS One, (2018). 13(3), e0194732.
  5. 5. Badru T, Mwaisaka J, Khamofu H, Agbakwuru C, Adedokun O, Pandey SR, et al. HIV comprehensive knowledge and prevalence among young adolescents in Nigeria: evidence from Akwa Ibom AIDS indicator survey, 2017. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):45. pmid:31931760
  6. 6. Darteh EKM. Individual and contextual predictors of comprehensive HIV and AIDS knowledge among young females in Ghana. African J AIDS Res. 2020 Jul 2;19(3):222–30. pmid:32892711
  7. 7. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. 2015 Sep 25. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  8. 8. Frimpong J, Budu E, Adu C, Mohammed A, Tetteh J, Seidu A-A, et al. Comprehensive HIV/AIDS knowledge and safer sex negotiation among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa. J Biosoc Sci. 2021 Sep 24;54. pmid:34558397
  9. 9. Zgambo M, Kalembo FW, Mbakaya BC. Risky behaviours and their correlates among adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):180. pmid:30355344
  10. 10. Aboki H, Folayan MO, Daniel U, Ogunlayi M. Changes in Sexual Risk Behaviour of Adolescents in Nigeria African Journal of Reproductive Health. Afr J Reprod Heal. 2014;18(3):109–17. http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?rh14067
  11. 11. De Coninck Z, Feyissa IA, Ekström AM, Marrone G. Improved HIV Awareness and Perceived Empowerment to Negotiate Safe Sex among Married Women in Ethiopia between 2005 and 2011. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12): e115453. pmid:25506823
  12. 12. Seidu A-A, Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Agbemavi W, Akpeke M, Budu E, et al. Women’s autonomy in household decision-making and safer sex negotiation in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of data from 27 Demographic and Health Surveys. SSM—Popul Heal. 2021; 14:100773. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827321000483 pmid:33855160
  13. 13. Chapman J, Nascimento N, Mandal M. Role of Male Sex Partners in HIV Risk of Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Mozambique. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2019 Sep 23;7(3):435–446. http://www.ghspjournal.org/content/7/3/435.abstract pmid:31558599
  14. 14. Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Mutombo N, Chowdhuri RN, Ngo TD. Why don’t urban youth in Zambia use condoms? The influence of gender and marriage on non-use of male condoms among young adults. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3): e0172062. pmid:28333963
  15. 15. Austin K, Choi M, Berndt V. Trading sex for security: Unemployment and the unequal HIV burden among young women in developing nations. Int Sociol. 2017 Feb
  16. 16. Aboagye RG, Ahinkorah BO, Seidu A-A, Adu C, Hagan JE, Amu H, et al. Mass Media Exposure and Safer Sex Negotiation among Women in Sexual Unions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Analysis of Demographic and Health Survey Data. Vol. 11, Behav. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 63. pmid:33925022
  17. 17. Jesmin SS, Cready CM. Can a woman refuse sex if her husband has a sexually transmitted infection? Attitudes toward safer-sex negotiation among married women in Bangladesh. Cult Health Sex. 2014 Jul 3;16(6):666–82. pmid:24735199
  18. 18. Sunmola AM, Mayungbo OA, Fayehun OA, Opayemi RS, Morakinyo LA. Is Women’s Tendency to Negotiate Safer Sex Another Opportunity for Intimate Partner Violence in Nigeria?. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36(7–8):NP3624–45. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29911476 pmid:29911476
  19. 19. Saul J, Bachman G, Allen S, Toiv NF, Cooney C, Beamon T. The DREAMS core package of interventions: A comprehensive approach to preventing HIV among adolescent girls and young women. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12): e0208167. pmid:30532210
  20. 20. World meter. Elaboration of data by United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/zambia-population/
  21. 21. UNICEF. Evidence synthesis on adolescent health and HIV in Zambia. 2022; https://www.unicef.org/zambia/media/3406/file/Adolescent Health and HIV Synthesis Report.pdf
  22. 22. Siziya S, Mulenga D, Mazaba ML, Njunju EM, Kwangu M. Condom use at last sexual intercourse among female teenagers in Zambia: results from the Zambia Demographic and Health Survey, 2013–2014. 2017;1(3):2013–4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318929415_Condom_use_at_last_sexual_intercourse_among_female_teenagers_in_Zambia_results_from_the_Zambia_Demographic_and_Health_Survey_2013-2014
  23. 23. Putra IGNE, Dendup T, Januraga PP. The roles of women empowerment on attitude for safer sex negotiation among Indonesian married women. Women Health. 2021 Jan 2;61(1):95–108. pmid:33054693
  24. 24. Iritani BJ, Cho H, Rusakaniko S, Mapfumo J, Hartman S, Hallfors DD. Educational Outcomes for Orphan Girls in Rural Zimbabwe: Effects of a School Support Intervention. Health Care Women Int. 2016 Mar 3;37(3):303–24. pmid:25692731
  25. 25. Fiaveh D. Condom Myths and Misconceptions: The Male Perspective. J Med Res. 2012 Jun 10; 12:42–52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236360063_Condom_Myths_and_Misconceptions_The_Male_Perspective
  26. 26. Melendez RM, Hoffman S, Exner T, Leu C-S, Ehrhardt AA. Intimate Partner Violence and Safer Sex Negotiation: Effects of a Gender-Specific Intervention. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32(6):499–511. pmid:14574094
  27. 27. Acharya DR, Bell JS, Simkhada P, van Teijlingen ER, Regmi PR. Women’s autonomy in household decision-making: a demographic study in Nepal. Reprod Health. 2010;7(1):15. pmid:20630107
  28. 28. Mabaso M, Sokhela Z, Mohlabane N, Chibi B, Zuma K, Simbayi L. Determinants of HIV infection among adolescent girls and young women aged 15–24 years in South Africa: a 2012 population-based national household survey. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):183. pmid:29373958
  29. 29. Baker DP, Leon J, Collins JM. Facts, Attitudes, and Health Reasoning About HIV and AIDS: Explaining the Education Effect on Condom Use Among Adults in Sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(7):1319–27. pmid:20544383
  30. 30. Cho H, Mbai I, Luseno WK, Hobbs M, Halpern C, Hallfors DD. School Support as Structural HIV Prevention for Adolescent Orphans in Western Kenya. J Adolesc Heal Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2018 Jan;62(1):44–51. pmid:29107569
  31. 31. Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behaviour. Health education monographs. 1974; 2:324–473.
  32. 32. Iqbal S, Maqsood S, Zafar A, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Determinants of overall knowledge of and attitudes towards HIV/AIDS transmission among ever-married women in Pakistan: evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2012–13. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun;19(1):793. pmid:31226969
  33. 33. Ung M, Boateng GO, Armah FA, Amoyaw JA, Luginaah I, Kuuire V. Negotiation for safer sex among married women in Cambodia: the role of women’s autonomy. J Biosoc Sci. 2013/03/21. 2014;46(1):90–106. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1BC763D04121D972A209EE7DAC158FD7 pmid:23517629
  34. 34. Tenkorang EY. Negotiating Safer Sex Among Married Women in Ghana. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(6):1353–62. pmid:22552707
  35. 35. Rodrigo C and Rajapakse S. HIV, poverty and women. International Health. 2010 Mar 1;2(1):9–16. pmid:24037044