Figures
Abstract
The prevalence of multiple age-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is high among individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We described receipt of healthcare services for and management of hypertension and diabetes among individuals living with these conditions using individual-level data from 55 nationally representative population-based surveys (2009–2019) with measured blood pressure (BP) and diabetes biomarker. We restricted our analysis to non-pregnant individuals aged 40–69 years and defined three mutually exclusive groups (i.e., hypertension only, diabetes only, and both hypertension-diabetes) to compare individuals living with concurrent hypertension and diabetes to individuals with each condition separately. We included 90,086 individuals who lived with hypertension only, 11,975 with diabetes only, and 16,228 with hypertension-diabetes. We estimated the percentage of individuals who were aware of their diagnosis, used pharmacological therapy, or achieved appropriate hypertension and diabetes management. A greater percentage of individuals with hypertension-diabetes were fully diagnosed (64.1% [95% CI: 61.8–66.4]) than those with hypertension only (47.4% [45.3–49.6]) or diabetes only (46.7% [44.1–49.2]). Among the hypertension-diabetes group, pharmacological treatment was higher for individual conditions (38.3% [95% CI: 34.8–41.8] using antihypertensive and 42.3% [95% CI: 39.4–45.2] using glucose-lowering medications) than for both conditions jointly (24.6% [95% CI: 22.1–27.2]).The percentage of individuals achieving appropriate management was highest in the hypertension group (17.6% [16.4–18.8]), followed by diabetes (13.3% [10.7–15.8]) and hypertension-diabetes (6.6% [5.4–7.8]) groups. Although health systems in LMICs are reaching a larger share of individuals living with both hypertension and diabetes than those living with just one of these conditions, only seven percent achieved both BP and blood glucose treatment targets. Implementation of cost-effective population-level interventions that shift clinical care paradigm from disease-specific to comprehensive CVD care are urgently needed for all three groups, especially for those with multiple CVD risk factors.
Citation: Diallo AO, Marcus ME, Flood D, Theilmann M, Rahim NE, Kinlaw A, et al. (2024) Multiple cardiovascular risk factor care in 55 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of nationally-representative, individual-level data from 280,783 adults. PLOS Glob Public Health 4(3): e0003019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019
Editor: Ziyue Wang, McGill University, CANADA
Received: March 17, 2023; Accepted: February 20, 2024; Published: March 27, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Diallo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data included in this study are publicly available for 35 of the 56 countries. Microdata can be downloaded (upon free registration) for Bangladesh 2018, India 2015-2016, and Namibia 2013 at the following website: https://dhsprogram.com/. The country surveys included in this analysis that are publicly available through the STEPS Microdata repository (https://extranet.who.int/ncdsmicrodata/index.php/catalog/STEPS) are: Algeria 2016, Azerbaijan 2017, Belarus 2016, Benin 2015, Botswana 2014, Cambodia 2010, Eritrea 2010, Iraq 2015, Kiribati 2015, Kyrgyzstan 2013, Laos 2013, Lebanon 2017, Lesotho 2012, Marshall Islands 2017, Moldova 2013, Mongolia 2013, Morocco 2017, Myanmar 2014, Rwanda 2012, Samoa 2013, Sao Tome and Principe 2009, Solomon Islands 2015, Sri Lanka 2014, Sudan 2016, Tajikistan 2016, Tuvalu 2015, Vietnam 2015, Zambia 2017. The following five surveys can be accessed at their specific websites: Chile 2009-2010: http://epi.minsal.cl/encuesta-ens-anteriores/; China 2009: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china/data; Ecuador 2018: http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/salud-salud-reproductiva-y-nutricion/; Indonesia 2014: https://www.rand.org/labor/FLS/IFLS.html; Mexico 2009-2012: www.ennvih-mxfls.org/english/index.html. For the remaining countries, please contact ghp@hsph.harvard.edu. For Guyana and St. Vincent and the Grenadines, which are member countries of the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA): Data were originally shared through a Data Use Agreement signed with the Executive Director of CARPHA and the agreement of The Ministries of Health of St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Guyana. The Chief Medical Officer of the St. Vincent and the Grenadine’s Ministry of Health (Dr. Simone Keizer-Beache) can be contacted, if necessary.
Funding: Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health McLennan Fund: Dean's Challenge Grant Program and the EU's Research and Innovation programme Horizon 2020. There are no grant numbers. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including ischemic heart disease and stroke, are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have higher burdens of CVD [1–3], largely due to growing populations and increasing life expectancy putting more people at risk of developing multiple risk factors [4]. Coexisting CVD risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia) increase the complexity of symptom management needed to prevent further deterioration of quality of life and health [5, 6], contributing to increased morbidity and mortality [7, 8]. The rising prevalence of individuals with multiple CVD risk factors creates a growing urgency for health systems in LMICs to provide comprehensive CVD care [9–11], especially to those at highest risk, to prevent cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality [12, 13].
The 75th World Health Assembly (2022) ratified global coverage targets for diabetes to prevent diabetes-related complications as part of high-level efforts to reach global sustainable development goals (SDG) target 3.4, which calls for a reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) by a third by 2030 relative to 2015 levels, through diabetes prevention and management [14]. Global coverage targets were established for diabetes because it is a major obstacle to achieving SDG target 3.4 given that it is strongly associated with other CVD risk factors like hypertension and hyperlipidemia and is a leading cause of mortality [15–17]. The global diabetes coverage targets are that by 2030, 80% of people living with diabetes are clinically diagnosed; and among them, 80% have good control of glycemia (hemoglobin A1c <8%), and 80% have good control of blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg), and 60% of those with diabetes aged 40 years or older are taking a statin; 100% of those with type 1 diabetes have access to affordable insulin and blood glucose self-monitoring [14]. These targets highlight the increasing recognition that CVD risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia should be managed concurrently. Additionally, the Assembly agreed on recommendations to increase health systems’ capacity to deliver cost-effective population-wide interventions and monitor progress towards these targets.
Recent analyses of health system performance in LMICs have largely focused on a single CVD risk factor [18–24], and found that individuals’ awareness of their condition, medication use, and achievement of recommended treatment goals (i.e. improved management of their condition) are suboptimal—approximately 10% of people with hypertension and 23% of those with diabetes achieved treatment goals, respectively [18, 19, 25]. Few studies have examined the receipt of healthcare services (e.g., diagnosis and treatment) and the management of conditions for CVD risk reduction of among those with multiple CVD risk factors in LMICs [26, 27].
We examined whether individuals with both hypertension and diabetes were more likely to receive healthcare services and appropriately manage their conditions than those with just one of these conditions using individual-level data across multiple countries to provide a benchmark for the global coverage targets for diabetes by 2030 and the promotion of comprehensive CVD care. We also assessed appropriate management of hyperlipidemia with lipid-lowering medications (statins) as part of diabetes management according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidance [28, 29].
Methods
Study design and participants
We analyzed pooled, cross-sectional survey data identified through the Global Health and Population Project on Access to Care for Cardiometabolic Disease (HPACC)’s search methodology [30] that: (1) were conducted in 2009 or later in an LMIC as classified by the World Bank in the survey year; (2) were nationally representative; (3) had individual-level data available; (4) contained physiological measures of blood pressure (BP) and either blood glucose (BG) or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); and (6) had a response rate of ≥50%. This resulted in 55 eligible surveys conducted during 2009–2019, most of which (n = 47) used the WHO recommended Stepwise Approach to Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Risk Factor Surveillance (STEPS) instruments for population monitoring of NCD targets.
Our sample consisted of non-pregnant individuals 40–69 years to align with the STEPS surveys inclusion criteria, most of which set an age limit of 69, and CVD management recommendation by the WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable (PEN) Disease Interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings [28]. The PEN outlines instructions for the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and management of diabetes and hypertension, aligning with leading clinical guidelines and prevention recommendations [28, 31, 32].
Outcomes and procedures
We defined three mutually-exclusive study groups–namely hypertension only, diabetes only, and both hypertension and diabetes (henceforth referred to as hypertension-diabetes)–to compare individuals with concurrent hypertension and diabetes to individuals with each of these conditions separately. Hypertension was defined as either: systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg as per survey biomarker measurement, self-reported antihypertensive medication use, or self-reported diagnosis by a clinician [28]. Diabetes was defined as either: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL), random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) or HbA1c ≥6.5% as per survey biomarker measurement, self-reported glucose-lowering medication use, or self-reported diagnosis by a clinician [28]. S1–S4 Tables provides further details the hypertension and diabetes definitions as well as the BP and diabetes biomarker measurements.
For each of these study groups, we derived four main outcomes based on the PEN recommendation and the global diabetes coverage targets: awareness of diagnosis, receipt of lifestyle counseling, receipt of pharmacological therapy, and achievement of appropriate hypertension and diabetes management (see Table 1 and S5 Table).
Awareness of diagnosis was defined by respondents reporting having been told by a doctor or healthcare worker that they have elevated BP or BG.
The lifestyle counseling outcome was defined as respondents reporting to being advised to (1) start or increase physical activity, (2) reduce salt intake, or (3) maintain a healthy body weight or lose weight during any visit to a doctor or healthcare worker in the past 12 months. Physical activity and weight loss were assessed for all study groups and salt reduction was examined among those with hypertension only or hypertension-diabetes.
The pharmacological therapy outcome was defined as self-reported use of antihypertensive, glucose-lowering, or cholesterol-lowering (statin) medications in the past two weeks, individually or in combination. We described statin use among the diabetes only and hypertension-diabetes groups, since statins are recommended in individuals aged ≥40 years with diabetes, regardless of lipid values, for primary prevention of CVD [28].
To assess appropriate hypertension and diabetes management, we applied the WHO PEN recommended treatment goals to the BP and diabetes biomarker measurements [33]. The BP treatment goal was set at SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg. The diabetes treatment goal was based on HbA1c <7.0% or FPG <7.0 mmol/L (<126 mg/dl) if HbA1c was not available. We used the PEN HbA1c definition <7.0% rather than the global diabetes coverage target of <8.0% because we included adults aged 40–69 years; a higher target is often chosen as a blanket metric when older adults are part of the denominator. Among the diabetes only and hypertension-diabetes groups, we defined an additional control indicator that combined the diabetes treatment goal defined above and the self-reported use of statins.
Statistical analysis
For each group of interest, we estimated the percentage of individuals who received healthcare services and achieved condition management overall and stratified by survey implementation-year groups (2009–2014 and 2015–2019) and World Bank income group. We combined low-income (n = 11) and lower-middle-income (n = 26) countries because of data sparsity and reported stratified results as low/lower-income countries (L-MICs) and upper-middle-income countries (UMICs).
In all analyses, we accounted for the complex survey design by adjusting for stratification and clustering at the primary sampling unit (PSU) using the ‘srvyr’ R package [34]. Additionally, we used sampling weights adjusting for selection probability, nonresponse, and differences between the sample and target population. The main interest of our analysis is at the health system level; therefore, we rescaled survey weights to ensure equal contribution of each survey. If survey weights were missing but biomarker information was available, the country-average weight was assigned. For all other data, we did not replace or impute missing values. All models also include countries as indicator variables. We included only individuals with all relevant covariate and indicator data for each outcome analysis. Analyses were done in R version 4.1.2 [35].
Exploratory analysis
In addition to the risk factor approach (hypertension and diabetes), we also considered the total risk approach, the preferred strategy [36] to identify those at high risk of debilitating (e.g., heart attacks, strokes, etc.,) and fatal CVD outcomes. The total risk approach considers several risk factors including age, biological sex, body mass index (BMI), tobacco use, diabetes diagnosis, BP, and blood cholesterol to calculate a 10-year CVD risk score [37]. We estimated the percentage of individuals who received healthcare services and achieved appreciate management goals in the hypertension-diabetes group among those with 10-year CVD risk score <10% and ≥10%. We used the 2019 WHO office-based risk equations to estimate 10-year CVD risk [37].
Results
Of the 55 included countries, 37 were L-MICs and 19 UMICs (Table 2) and the average response rate was 86.7%. The pooled sample included 280,783 non-pregnant individuals. Of those, 90,086 (38.8% of the population-weighted sample) lived with hypertension only, 11,975 (4.9%) lived with diabetes only, and 16,228 (9.3%) lived with hypertension-diabetes (Table 3). The hypertension-diabetes group had the highest weighted percentage of individuals who were aged 60–69 years (30.1%), women (57.3%), and had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (47.3%); however, they also had the lowest weighted percentage of individuals who were current tobacco smokers (15.3%). The share of missing values for each characteristic and outcome are provided by country in S6 and S7 Tables, respectively.
In Fig 1 we show the percentage of individuals who received healthcare services and achieved appropriate management across the three study groups in the pooled country sample. Among the hypertension-diabetes group, 64.1% (95% CI: 61.8–66.4) were diagnosed with both conditions, which was more than sixteen percentage points higher than those diagnosed in the hypertension only (47.4% [95% CI: 45.3–49.6]) and diabetes only (46.7% [95% CI: 44.1–49.2]) groups (Fig 1A). Across the three lifestyle counseling indicators, the hypertension-diabetes group reported a higher uptake of lifestyle counseling than the hypertension only and diabetes only groups. For example, more than half of those in the hypertension-diabetes group (55.8% [95% CI: 52.1–59.5]) reported receiving exercise counseling compared to 39.7% (95% CI: 38.3–41.0]) and 42.3% (95% CI: 38.9–45.7) of those in the hypertension only and diabetes only groups, respectively (Fig 1B).
(A) The percentage of individuals who were aware of their condition (diagnosed), (B) received lifestyle counseling, (C) used pharmacological therapy and (D) achieved treatment control targets for cardiovascular disease risk reduction among those with hypertension only, diabetes only, and hypertension-diabetes in 55 low- and middle-income countries. Abbreviations: BG, blood glucose; BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; meds, medications.
Medication use was low in all three groups with 20–30% taking treatment, and this was no different across groups (Fig 1C). When disaggregating the combined pharmacological therapy indicator in the hypertension-diabetes group, no individual condition was more likely to be treated (38.3% [95% CI: 34.8–41.8] using antihypertensive and 42.3% [95% CI: 39.4–45.2] using glucose-lowering medications); however, the treatment usage was higher for each of the individual conditions than both conditions (24.6% [95% CI: 22.1–27.2]). Statin use was 9.5% (95% CI: 8.3–10.7) in the hypertension-diabetes group, which was more than double that of the statin use in the diabetes only group (4.6% [95% CI: 3.5–5.6]).
The percentage of individuals who achieved appropriate management targets was lower among the hypertension-diabetes group (6.6% [95% CI: 5.4–7.8]) than the hypertension only (17.6% [95% CI: 16.4–18.8]) and diabetes only (13.3% [95% CI: 10.7–15.8]) groups (Fig 1D). When accounting for statin use as part of appropriate management in the 34 countries where these data were available, a substantially smaller share of the hypertension-diabetes (1.6% [95% CI: 1.1–2.0]) and diabetes only (1.4% ([95% CI: 0.8–1.9]) groups achieved targets (Fig 1D).
When stratified by World Bank income group, the percentage of individuals who received healthcare services and achieved appropriate management targets was higher in upper-middle-income than low- or lower-middle-income countries for all three groups (Fig 2). We did not observe statistically significant differences in outcomes (diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate management) between surveys conducted during 2009–2014 and 2015–2019 (S9 Table).
(A) The percentage of individuals who were aware of their condition (diagnosed), (B) received lifestyle counseling, (C) used pharmacological therapy, and (D) achieved treatment control targets for cardiovascular disease risk reduction among those with hypertension only, diabetes only, and hypertension-diabetes in 55 low- and middle-income countries, by World Bank income group. Abbreviations: BG, blood glucose; BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; meds, medications; L-MIC, low/lower middle-income countries; UMIC, upper-middle-income countries.
In our exploratory analysis conducted among the hypertension-diabetes group, most (71.5% [95% CI: 69.5, 73.4]) had an estimated predicted CVD risk score ≥10% (S8 Table). There were no differences in diagnosis awareness and receipt of lifestyle counseling outcomes between those with a CVD risk score <10% versus ≥10% (Fig 3). Those with CVD risk score ≥10% (24.4% [95% CI: 21.7–27.1]) were slightly more likely to report using antihypertensive and glucose-lowering medications than those with CVD risk score <10% (18.4% [95% CI: 15.1–21.6]). However, those with CVD risk score ≥10% (4.7% [95% CI: 3.4–5.9]) were less likely to achieve the appropriate hypertension and diabetes management targets than those with CVD risk score <10% (13.8% [95% CI: 9.1–18.5]).
(A) The percentage of individuals who were aware of their condition (diagnosed), (B) received lifestyle counseling, (C) used pharmacological therapy, and (D) achieved treatment control targets for cardiovascular disease risk reduction among those with hypertension-diabetes 10-year predicted CVD risk score <10% versus ≥10% in 55 low- and middle-income countriesa. Abbreviations: BG, blood glucose; BP, blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; meds, medications. aWe used 2019 WHO office-based risk equations to estimate 10-year CVD risk [37].
Discussion
Our study of nationally representative, individual-level data from 55 LMICs shows that health systems in LMICs are reaching a larger share of people living with both hypertension and diabetes—those with highest risk of poor CVD-related health outcomes—compared to those with either hypertension or diabetes alone. However, we also found substantial unmet need for all forms of clinical care in people with both risk factors. Only one in four people with both conditions used medications to address these risk factors. Additionally, less than 10% achieved both BP and BG management targets, and this figure dropped to 1.6% after accounting for statin use, which was low overall (5% in the diabetes-only and 10% in the hypertension-diabetes group). Finally, fewer than one in five people in each of the three study groups achieved appropriate risk factor management targets. Findings suggest an urgent need to implement cost-effective population-level interventions that shift the clinical care paradigm from disease-specific care to comprehensive CVD care for all three groups, especially for those with multiple CVD risk factors [38].
Evidence from LMICs suggests that individuals with multiple conditions, including hypertension and diabetes, have more interactions with the health system [13, 39]. The coexistence of these conditions exacerbates poorer health status, requiring individuals to seek both primary and secondary preventative care, while simultaneously providing the health system with more opportunities to diagnose and deliver care [6]. Previous studies in LMICs have quantified the number of interactions and cost of healthcare utilization among those with multiple CVD risk factors [13, 38, 40]. Our study expands upon this literature by showing that the share of people achieving appropriate BP and BG management targets is low in individuals with hypertension only, diabetes only, and hypertension-diabetes, despite greater receipt of healthcare services among those with both conditions.
Among the hypertension-diabetes group, a greater proportion reported receiving lifestyle counseling than pharmacological therapies (e.g., increase exercise: 56% versus concurrent antihypertensive and glucose-lowering medication use: 25%). This may be because of reduced access to pharmacological therapies or low health literacy. Additionally, those reporting receipt of lifestyle counseling may be a younger, leaner population in whom HbA1c (or equivalent FPG) is <8% or BP <150/95 mmHg and their clinicians are willing to counsel on lifestyle change as recommended by country-specific and leading international guidelines [28, 33] for risk factor management [41]. Translating this evidence into health policies and clinical practice to achieve health gains is particularly challenging in LMICs because of resource constraints, prioritization, and complex societal factors such as the increasing availability and consumption of inexpensive processed foods [42–44].
Reduced availability and affordability of pharmacological therapies for CVD risk management and care in LMICs, especially when multiple treatments are required, are key contributors to the low proportion of medication use among those with multiple CVD risk factors [45, 46]. Given the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies including antihypertensive, glucose-lowering, and statin medications on CVD-related outcomes, this lack of access is consequential and associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including stroke and mortality in LMICs. Among individuals with hypertension-diabetes, medication use for one condition was higher than for both conditions. This could be driven by differential availability and affordability of antihypertensive and glucose-lowering medications [45, 46] or clinical prioritization due to symptomatic severity of one condition over the other [47] when resources are limited. Here, we found greater use of pharmacological therapy for one condition in individuals with hypertension-diabetes compared to those who had either condition alone, which suggests that people with both conditions are interacting with the health system and provided more opportunities to receive needed care. Approaches to improve access to and use of pharmacological therapies among those with multiple CVD risk factors in LMICs, including the procurement of quality-assured medications that are affordable to the greater public, should be considered and implemented [45].
Our finding that less than 10% of individuals with hypertension-diabetes achieved BP and BG management targets reflects the reality that the coexistence of these CVD risk factors dramatically increases the complexity of managing individuals’ symptoms to prevent further deterioration of health and quality of life [5, 6]. However, we found that more individuals in the hypertension-diabetes group achieved control of at least one target than those in either the hypertension only or diabetes only groups. When comparing the achievement of the two targets, we noted that achieving the BG target (diabetes only: 13% and hypertension-diabetes: 20%) was less common than achieving the BP target (hypertension only: 18% and hypertension-diabetes: 25%). A recent study conducted in the UK concurs with our finding that the coexistence of multiple CVD risk factors was associated with a higher probability of achieving appropriate management [48] while others have found that individuals with hypertension-diabetes were less likely to achieve BP control [49, 50]. Nevertheless, the levels of risk factor management in all three groups in our study were lackluster, suggesting an urgent need for improvements in CVD care in LMICs.
Our study has limitations. First, our definitions of hypertension and diabetes were limited to a single time point or measurement which might have resulted in the misclassification of our three study groups. In clinical practice, hypertension management is based on BP measured during multiple consecutive healthcare visits. However, we used three BP measurements from a single occasion to diagnose hypertension [51–53], and higher thresholds for hypertension definition compared to current guidelines that use a BP >130/80 mmHg. For diabetes, most surveys collected a single capillary glucose measurement, which other studies have found to under- or over-diagnose diabetes [54]. However, biological measurements captured on a single time point are commonly used in high-quality population-based surveys to estimate disease prevalence and evaluate health system performance [55]. Additionally, we included reported diagnosis awareness and medication use in our definition to identify individuals with BP and diabetes biomarker measurements below the diagnostic thresholds who may have benefited from lifestyle counseling and pharmacological therapies and, therefore, would not be detected based on biological measurements alone. Second, we used self-reported information to define our diagnosis awareness, lifestyle counseling, and pharmacological therapy outcomes which might lead to differential misclassification of our outcomes due to recall bias. It should be noted that prior studies have found high accuracy of self-reported CVD histories and medications [56, 57]. Third, we used data collected from surveys conducted in different countries over ten years. Although most surveys (84%) used the WHO STEPS questionnaire and similar approaches to measure BP and diabetes biomarkers, differences in the translation and phrasing of questionnaires and implementation of biological measurement procedures might have contributed to variations in our estimates. Finally, the 55 LMICs included in this study may not represent all LMICs globally and encompass a heterogeneous group of countries with different health systems. However, including them together in analyses allows us to better understand the state of CVD care for individuals at the highest risk of developing CVD-related disability and mortality in low-resource settings.
In conclusion, we found that individuals with concurrent hypertension and diabetes were more likely to have been diagnosed and treated for CVD risk factors than individuals with only one of these conditions. However, using the recently adopted global coverage targets for diabetes by 2030 as a benchmark [58], there remains a substantial gap in appropriate CVD risk factor management as less than one in ten people with concurrent risk factors achieved both BP and BG targets, and even fewer achieved these metrics along with statin use. To achieve these targets, policy efforts and investments should increase health systems’ capacity to deliver cost-effective population-level interventions and shift the clinical care paradigm from disease-specific care to comprehensive care.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Detailed definitions the blood pressure and diabetes biomarker measurements.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Blood pressure measurement details.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Diabetes biomarker measurement details.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Lipid biomarker measurement details.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Select questions from generic STEPS surveys.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s005
(DOCX)
S6 Table. Number and percent of participants with missing predictor variables by country.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s006
(DOCX)
S7 Table. Number and percent of participants with missing outcome indicator variables by country.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s007
(DOCX)
S8 Table. Distribution of 10-year predicted cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score among individuals with hypertension only, diabetes only and hypertension and diabetes (hypertension-diabetes).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s008
(DOCX)
S9 Table. The proportion of individuals who were aware of their condition (diagnosed), had received lifestyle counseling, used pharmacological therapy, and achieved appropriate management for cardiovascular disease risk reduction among those with hypertension (HTN) only, diabetes (DM) only, and hypertension and diabetes (HTN-DM) in 55 low- and middle-income countries overall and by world bank income group and survey year groups (2009–2014 and 2015–2019).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003019.s009
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the survey teams and survey participants for taking part in this research. Funding to support this analysis was provided by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health McLennan Fund: Dean’s Challenge Grant Program.
References
- 1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76: 2982–3021. pmid:33309175
- 2. Jagannathan R, Patel SA, Ali MK, Narayan KMV. Global updates on cardiovascular disease mortality trends and attribution of traditional risk factors. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19: 44. pmid:31222515
- 3. Gaziano TA, Bitton A, Anand S, Abrahams-Gessel S, Murphy A. Growing epidemic of coronary heart disease in low- and middle-income countries. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35: 72–115. pmid:20109979
- 4. Garin N, Koyanagi A, Chatterji S, Tyrovolas S, Olaya B, Leonardi M, et al. Global Multimorbidity Patterns: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based, Multi-Country Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71: 205–214. pmid:26419978
- 5. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10: 430–439. pmid:21402176
- 6. Forman DE, Maurer MS, Boyd C, Brindis R, Salive ME, Horne FM, et al. Multimorbidity in older adults with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71: 2149–2161. pmid:29747836
- 7. Zhang D, Tang X, Shen P, Si Y, Liu X, Xu Z, et al. Multimorbidity of cardiometabolic diseases: prevalence and risk for mortality from one million Chinese adults in a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e024476. pmid:30833320
- 8. Bazalar-Palacios J, Jaime Miranda J, Carrillo-Larco RM, Gilman RH, Smeeth L, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Aggregation and combination of cardiovascular risk factors and their association with 10-year all-cause mortality: the PERU MIGRANT Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21: 582. pmid:34876013
- 9. Thienemann F, Ntusi NAB, Battegay E, Mueller BU, Cheetham M. Multimorbidity and cardiovascular disease: a perspective on low- and middle-income countries. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10: 376–385. pmid:32420119
- 10. BeLue R, Okoror TA, Iwelunmor J, Taylor KD, Degboe AN, Agyemang C, et al. An overview of cardiovascular risk factor burden in sub-Saharan African countries: a socio-cultural perspective. Global Health. 2009;5: 10. pmid:19772644
- 11. Oni T, McGrath N, BeLue R, Roderick P, Colagiuri S, May CR, et al. Chronic diseases and multi-morbidity—a conceptual modification to the WHO ICCC model for countries in health transition. BMC Public Health. 2014;14: 575. pmid:24912531
- 12. Singh K, Patel SA, Biswas S, Shivashankar R, Kondal D, Ajay VS, et al. Multimorbidity in South Asian adults: prevalence, risk factors and mortality. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019;41: 80–89. pmid:29425313
- 13. Lee JT, Hamid F, Pati S, Atun R, Millett C. Impact of Noncommunicable Disease Multimorbidity on Healthcare Utilisation and Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures in Middle-Income Countries: Cross Sectional Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0127199. pmid:26154083
- 14. Gregg EW, Buckley J, Ali MK, Davies J, Flood D, Mehta R, et al. Improving health outcomes of people with diabetes: target setting for the WHO Global Diabetes Compact. Lancet. 2023;401: 1302–1312. pmid:36931289
- 15. NCD Countdown 2030 collaborators. NCD Countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2018;392: 1072–1088. pmid:30264707
- 16. NCD Countdown 2030 collaborators. NCD Countdown 2030: pathways to achieving Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2020;396: 918–934. pmid:32891217
- 17. Dal Canto E, Ceriello A, Rydén L, Ferrini M, Hansen TB, Schnell O, et al. Diabetes as a cardiovascular risk factor: An overview of global trends of macro and micro vascular complications. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26: 25–32. pmid:31722562
- 18. Manne-Goehler J, Geldsetzer P, Agoudavi K, Andall-Brereton G, Aryal KK, Bicaba BW, et al. Health system performance for people with diabetes in 28 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys. PLoS Med. 2019;16: e1002751. pmid:30822339
- 19. Geldsetzer P, Manne-Goehler J, Marcus M-E, Ebert C, Zhumadilov Z, Wesseh CS, et al. The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data from 1·1 million adults. Lancet. 2019;394: 652–662. pmid:31327566
- 20. Flood D, Seiglie JA, Dunn M, Tschida S, Theilmann M, Marcus ME, et al. The state of diabetes treatment coverage in 55 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative, individual-level data in 680 102 adults. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2: e340–e351. pmid:35211689
- 21. Odland ML, Bockarie T, Wurie H, Ansumana R, Lamin J, Nugent R, et al. Prevalence and access to care for cardiovascular risk factors in older people in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10: e038520. pmid:32907906
- 22. Jorgensen JMA, Hedt KH, Omar OM, Davies JI. Hypertension and diabetes in Zanzibar—prevalence and access to care. BMC Public Health. 2020;20: 1352. pmid:32887593
- 23. Price AJ, Crampin AC, Amberbir A, Kayuni-Chihana N, Musicha C, Tafatatha T, et al. Prevalence of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, and cascade of care in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural and urban Malawi. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6: 208–222. pmid:29371076
- 24. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017;390: 2627–2642. pmid:29029897
- 25. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet. 2017;389: 37–55. pmid:27863813
- 26. Geldsetzer P, De Neve J-W, Mohan V, Prabhakaran D, Roy A, Tandon N, et al. Health System Performance for Multimorbid Cardiometabolic Disease in India: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Glob Heart. 2022;17: 7. pmid:35174048
- 27. Wong EB, Olivier S, Gunda R, Koole O, Surujdeen A, Gareta D, et al. Convergence of infectious and non-communicable disease epidemics in rural South Africa: a cross-sectional, population-based multimorbidity study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9: e967–e976. pmid:34143995
- 28.
World Health Organization. WHO package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions for primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
- 29.
World Health Organization. Diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes (HEARTS-D). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
- 30. Manne-Goehler J, Theilmann M, Flood D, Marcus ME, Andall-Brereton G, Agoudavi K, et al. Data resource profile: the global health and population project on access to care for cardiometabolic diseases (HPACC). Int J Epidemiol. 2022. pmid:35762972
- 31.
World Health Organization. Hearts: Technical package for cardiovascular disease management in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
- 32. Prabhakaran D, Anand S, Watkins D, Gaziano T, Wu Y, Mbanya JC, et al. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2018;391: 1224–1236. pmid:29108723
- 33. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 international society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2020;75: 1334–1357. pmid:32370572
- 34.
Ellis GF, Schneider B. srvyr: ‘dplyr’-Like Syntax for Summary Statistics of Survey Data. CRAN; 2021.
- 35.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.
- 36. Lloyd-Jones DM, Braun LT, Ndumele CE, Smith SC, Sperling LS, Virani SS, et al. Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;139: e1162–e1177. pmid:30586766
- 37. WHO CVD Risk Chart Working Group. World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7: e1332–e1345. pmid:31488387
- 38. Basu S, Flood D, Geldsetzer P, Theilmann M, Marcus ME, Ebert C, et al. Estimated effect of increased diagnosis, treatment, and control of diabetes and its associated cardiovascular risk factors among low-income and middle-income countries: a microsimulation model. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9: e1539–e1552. pmid:34562369
- 39. Zhao Y, Zhao S, Zhang L, Haregu TN, Wang H. Impacts of multimorbidity on medication treatment, primary healthcare and hospitalization among middle-aged and older adults in China: evidence from a nationwide longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21: 1380. pmid:34253222
- 40. Zhao Y, Atun R, Oldenburg B, McPake B, Tang S, Mercer SW, et al. Physical multimorbidity, health service use, and catastrophic health expenditure by socioeconomic groups in China: an analysis of population-based panel data. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8: e840–e849. pmid:32446349
- 41. Sum G, Salisbury C, Koh GC-H, Atun R, Oldenburg B, McPake B, et al. Implications of multimorbidity patterns on health care utilisation and quality of life in middle-income countries: cross-sectional analysis. J Glob Health. 2019;9: 020413. pmid:31448114
- 42.
Ali MK, Siegel KR, Chandrasekar E, Tandon N, Montoya PA, Mbanya J-C, et al. Diabetes: an update on the pandemic and potential solutions. 3rd ed. In: Prabhakaran D, Anand S, Gaziano TA, Mbanya J-C, Wu Y, Nugent R, editors. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0518-9/ch12
- 43. Uthman OA, Hartley L, Rees K, Taylor F, Ebrahim S, Clarke A. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of CVD in LMIC: A cochrane review. Glob Heart. 2017;12: 199–208.e8. pmid:27452771
- 44. Popkin BM, Corvalan C, Grummer-Strawn LM. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet. 2020;395: 65–74. pmid:31852602
- 45. Wirtz VJ, Kaplan WA, Kwan GF, Laing RO. Access to Medications for Cardiovascular Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Circulation. 2016;133: 2076–2085. pmid:27217433
- 46. Chow CK, Nguyen TN, Marschner S, Diaz R, Rahman O, Avezum A, et al. Availability and affordability of medicines and cardiovascular outcomes in 21 high-income, middle-income and low-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5. pmid:33148540
- 47. Kaiser AH, Hehman L, Forsberg BC, Simangolwa WM, Sundewall J. Availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines for treatment of diabetes and hypertension in private pharmacies in Zambia. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0226169. pmid:31834889
- 48. Boyd CM, Fortin M. Future of multimorbidity research: how should understanding of multimorbidity inform health system design? Public Health Rev. 2010;32: 451–474.
- 49. Tapela N, Collister J, Clifton L, Turnbull I, Rahimi K, Hunter DJ. Prevalence and determinants of hypertension control among almost 100 000 treated adults in the UK. Open Heart. 2021;8. pmid:33707223
- 50. Majernick TG, Zacker C, Madden NA, Belletti DA, Arcona S. Correlates of hypertension control in a primary care setting. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17: 915–920. pmid:15485754
- 51. Wong MCS, Wang HHX, Cheung CSK, Tong ELH, Sek ACH, Cheung NT, et al. Factors associated with multimorbidity and its link with poor blood pressure control among 223,286 hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177: 202–208. pmid:25499379
- 52. Olivier S, Murray T, Matthews P, Mhlongo N, Gunda R, Baisley K, et al. Pitfalls of Single Measurement Screening for Diabetes and Hypertension in Community-Based Settings. Glob Heart. 2021;16: 79. pmid:34900570
- 53. Stauffer F, Viswanathan B, Jean M, Kinabo P, Bovet P. Comparison between capillary glucose measured with a Contour glucometer and plasma glucose in a population survey. LaboratoriumsMedizin. 2016;40.
- 54. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Gregg EW, Del Rio C. A cascade of care for diabetes in the United States: visualizing the gaps. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161: 681–689. pmid:25402511
- 55. Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Dagenais G, Diaz R, et al. Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet. 2011;378: 1231–1243. pmid:21872920
- 56. Richardson K, Kenny RA, Peklar J, Bennett K. Agreement between patient interview data on prescription medication use and pharmacy records in those aged older than 50 years varied by therapeutic group and reporting of indicated health conditions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66: 1308–1316. pmid:23968693
- 57. Hafferty JD, Campbell AI, Navrady LB, Adams MJ, MacIntyre D, Lawrie SM, et al. Self-reported medication use validated through record linkage to national prescribing data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;94: 132–142. pmid:29097340
- 58. Wilkinson E. World Health Assembly ratifies first global diabetes targets. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10: 560. pmid:35785797