Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection in people living with HIV in Thailand

  • Angsana Phuphuakrat ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    angsana.phu@mahidol.ac.th

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Kanitin Khamnurak,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Sirawat Srichatrapimuk,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Univerisity, Samut Prakan, Thailand

  • Wittaya Wangsomboonsiri

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Sawanpracharak Hospital, Nakhon Sawan, Thailand

Abstract

HIV testing is the first step to making people living with HIV (PLHIV) aware of their status. Thailand is among the countries where antiretroviral therapy is initiated in PLHIV at the lowest CD4 cell counts. We aimed to quantify and characterize missed opportunity (MO) for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection in PLHIV in Thailand. The medical records of adults who were newly diagnosed with HIV between 2019 and 2020 at the two tertiary hospitals in Thailand were reviewed. A hospital visit due to an HIV clinical indicator disease but an HIV test was not performed was considered an MO for HIV testing. Of 422 newly diagnosed PLHIV, 60 persons (14.2%) presented with at least one MO, and 20 persons (33.3%) had more than one MO. In PLHIV with MO, the median (interquartile range) time between the first MO event and HIV diagnosis was 33.5 (7–166) days. The three most common clinical manifestations that were missed were skin manifestations (25.0%), unexplained weight loss (15.7%), and unexplained lymphadenopathy (14.3%). Anemia was a factor associated with MO for HIV diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–4.35; p = 0.018]. HIV screening reduced the risk of MO for HIV diagnosis (OR 0.53 95% CI 0.29–0.95; p = 0.032). In conclusion, MOs for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection occurred in both participating hospitals in Thailand. Skin manifestations were the most common clinical indicator diseases that were missed. HIV testing should be offered for patients with unexplained anemia. Campaigns for HIV screening tests should be promoted.

Introduction

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PLHIV) and prevented the risk of onward transmission. HIV testing and diagnosis is the first step to making PLHIV aware of their status and entering the cascade of care. Despite the free HIV testing programs supported by the government and non-governmental organizations in Thailand, it was estimated that 50% of Thai PLHIV did not aware of their HIV status and 50% of Thai PLHIV started ART at CD4 counts below 100 cells/mm3 [1]. Late detection of HIV infection leads to delayed treatment and results in increased morbidity and mortality from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), healthcare costs [2], and treatment complexity.

Thailand has been scaling up ART. The national guidelines on HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention have recommended treating all PLHIV since 2014, irrespective of CD4 cell count. Access to HIV care and treatment is also free of charge in government hospitals. However, the proportion of PLHIV with late ART initiation was still significant. A previous study reported a global trend of increased median CD4 cell counts at the start of ART in PLHIV who started ART between 2002 and 2015 [3]. Notwithstanding this, Thailand was among the countries in which ART was commenced at the lowest CD4 spectrum [4], and approximately 75% of PLHIV started ART with CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm3 [3]. At Ramathibodi Hospital, the medians CD4 cell count at HIV diagnosis during 2011–2013, 2015–2017, and 2018 were 146 (45–298) [5], 159 (53–308) [6], and 116 (34–332) [7] cells/mm3, respectively.

There has been no study on the risk factors of late HIV diagnosis in Thailand. In this study, we quantified and characterized missed opportunity (MO) for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection in PLHIV in Thailand. We also studied the risk factors of the MO for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection.

Materials and methods

Study setting

This study was performed at Ramathibodi and Sawanpracharak hospitals in Thailand. Ramathibodi Hospital is a 1300-bed university hospital in Bangkok that serves a diverse population in central Thailand and is capable of super tertiary care. Sawanpracharak Hospital is a 700-bed tertiary hospital, which serves as a primary-level community hospital for Nakhon Sawan province and as a secondary and tertiary referral hospital for upper central Thailand. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of persons who were newly diagnosed with HIV infection between January 2019 and December 2020 by retrieving from the hospital databases. We included PLHIV whose age was at least 15 years old. PLHIV with previously known HIV-positive before 2019 were excluded. Sociodemographic data (e.g., gender, age at HIV diagnosis, HIV transmission route, and race) and clinical as well as laboratory data (e.g., CD4 cell counts, HIV viral load, clinical manifestations, and AIDS-defining illness at diagnosis) were included in the analyses.

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Clearance Committee on Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human Subjects of the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (MURA2021/64) and the Research and Journal Division of Sawanpracharak Hospital (23/2564). As the study was retrospective, the ethics committees waived the requirement for informed consent.

Definitions

An MO was defined as a healthcare encounter due to a clinical manifestation that may be caused by HIV infection or as a healthcare encounter due to an AIDS-defining illness (clinical indicator disease) but HIV was not tested [8]. AIDS-defining illnesses were defined following Thailand National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention 2017 [1]. Clinical indicator diseases for adult HIV infection were recorded following the UK National Guidelines for HIV testing 2008 [9] and Australian National HIV Testing Policy 2011 [10]. Late presenters were defined as PLHIV whose CD4 cell count at HIV diagnosis was less than 350 cells/mm3 [11]. HIV screening included an HIV test performed in a check-up program, preoperative screening, during antenatal care, before entry to inpatient care, before entry to prison, following the positive result of the partner, and according to the patient’s request. Anemia was defined following World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for anemia (hemoglobin <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women) [12].

Statistical methods

All data were retrieved from patients’ medical records and were compiled in a tabular manner, using an Excel datasheet (see S1 Data). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata statistical software version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range; IQR) were used to describe continuous variables. Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were used for the comparisons, as appropriate, with the level of significance set at a p-value of <0.05. A logistic regression model was performed to determine factors associated with MO of earlier diagnosis of HIV infection. Variables that presented a p-value of <0.2 from univariable logistic regression, or those that may affect missing opportunities despite their p-values of more than 0.2 were considered in a multivariable logistic regression model. Odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated.

Results

Patient characteristics

During the study period, we identified 422 persons newly diagnosed with HIV infection (231 and 191 persons at Ramathibodi and Sawanpracharak hospitals, respectively). The mean age at the diagnosis was 39.3±13.4 years, and 290 persons (68.7%) were men. Nearly all (98.6%) were Thai. Of these, 340 persons (80.6%) had available CD4 cell count data. The median CD4 at HIV diagnosis was 160 (44–313) cells/mm3. At the diagnosis, 275 persons (80.9%) were late presenters and 196 persons (57.7%) had CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/mm3. The most common HIV transmission routes were heterosexual (61.1%) followed by homosexual (23.3%). The most common reason for testing was physician request (181 persons; 42.9%) and patients were mostly diagnosed in an outpatient care setting (253 persons; 60.0%). Nearly half of the PLHIV (205 persons, 48.6%) had clinical indicator diseases at an HIV diagnosis.

Sixty patients (14.2%) had presented at least one MO. Table 1 shows characteristics of PLHIV at HIV diagnosis stratified by history of MO. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or body mass index (BMI) among PLHIV with or without MOs. There was a higher proportion of PLHIV with MO in persons whose risk was heterosexual, but the difference was not statistical significance (p = 0.424).

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of newly diagnosed PLHIV at HIV diagnosis categorized by a history of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000842.t001

The presence of clinical indicator diseases was different in PLHIV who had or did not have MO (Table 1). A higher proportion of PLHIV with at least one MO had clinical indicator diseases at HIV diagnosis (p = 0.003). In PLHIV with clinical indicator diseases, HIV testing was requested by a physician in 167 persons (81.5%). In total, HIV testing was requested by physicians in 181 persons (42.9%). Other reasons for testing were due to screening purposes. Of note, Sawanpracharak Hospital, but not Ramathibodi Hospital, has a mandatory HIV screening test on entry to inpatient care. This was able to detect 91 (21.6%) new cases during the study period. In PLHIV without clinical indicator diseases, HIV screening tests detected a significant proportion of this population, compared to those detected by physician request (93.6% vs. 0.5%; p <0.001).

Only 19 PLHIV (4.5%) in this study had prior HIV testing, and there was no significant difference in the proportion between the two groups. Sites of testing and physicians who requested anti-HIV tests at HIV diagnosis were not significantly different between the two groups.

The proportion of late presenters was significantly higher in PLHIV with a history of MO (83.3% vs. 62.2%; p <0.001). In PLHIV with and without MO, the median CD4 cell counts were 84 (40–161), and 187 (45–332) cells/mm3, respectively. CD4 cell counts were significantly higher in PLHIV without history of MO (p = 0.003). White blood cells were also significantly higher in PLHIV without history of MO (6,800 vs. 5,800 cells/mm3; p = 0.013). Hemoglobin levels were higher in PLHIV without history of MO (11.9 vs. 11.1; p = 0.011). There were no statistically significant differences in the numbers of platelets, levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (Table 1).

Missed opportunity events and clinical indicator diseases

Of the 60 PLHIV who had at least one MO, 20 persons (33.3%) had more than one MO (Fig 1). The median duration between the first MO event and HIV diagnosis was 33.5 (IQR 7–166, range 1–1,472) days. The median number of MO event was one event per person (IQR 1–2, range 1–22).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Numbers of missed opportunity events for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection in PLHIV at Ramathibodi and Sawanpracharak hospitals between 2019 and 2020.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000842.g001

There were 117 MO events and 140 clinical indicator diseases in PLHIV with a history of MO. Of the clinical indicator diseases, four diseases (2.9%) were AIDS-defining illnesses. Table 2 shows clinical indicator diseases that were missed in the study. The most common clinical indicator diseases that were missed included skin manifestations (25.0%), unexplained weight loss (15.7%), and unexplained lymphadenopathy (14.3%) respectively (Table 2). For the skin manifestations, dermatitis/seborrheic dermatitis was the most common skin manifestation that HIV testing should be offered but missed. In PLHIV who had unexplained weight loss, pulmonary tuberculosis was the most common final diagnosis. In those who had unexplained lymphadenopathy, pathological diagnosis revealed reactive lymphadenopathy and lymphoma as the most common final diagnosis.

thumbnail
Table 2. Numbers of clinical indicator diseases that were missed in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000842.t002

Risk factors of missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis

Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with an MO for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection were performed (Table 3). In univariable analysis, HIV screening and anemia were associated with MO. In multivariable analysis, anemia showed an increased risk of MOs (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.15–4.35; p = 0.018). HIV screening reduced the risk of MO for HIV diagnosis (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29–0.95; p = 0.032).

thumbnail
Table 3. Univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with missed opportunity for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000842.t003

Discussion

This study demonstrated 14.2% of MOs for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection occurred in our hospitals. In PLHIV who had at least one MO had lower CD4 count, and higher proportions of PLHIV with clinical indicator diseases at HIV diagnosis compared to those who did not have an MO. In this study, skin manifestations were the most common clinical indicator diseases that were missed. Anemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of MO, whereas HIV screening reduced the risk of MO.

A previous study showed that median CD4 cell counts at ART initiation increased over time in Asian PLHIV from 2007 to 2011 [13]. In our study, however, we revealed approximately 80% of newly diagnosed PLHIV in Thailand were presented late. The proportion of late presenters in Thailand was higher than in other countries in Asia and the Pacific [14]. Previous studies showed 43% of PLHIV in China [15] and 63% of those in Malaysia [16] had a late presentation. Older age, male gender, and persons who inject drugs were factors associated with a presentation into care at CD4 cell count <200 cells/mm3 in Asian countries [17].

Factors associated with MO were different in various settings. In Israel, a low prevalence setting, there were no national guidelines concerning HIV testing except for the guidelines regarding pregnant women. Approximately one-third of PLHIV in the Israel study were diagnosed late; old age and heterosexual were the risk factors. Hematological diseases were the most common clinical indicator diseases that were missed in the study [18]. A study from Europe in the setting of an HIV outpatient clinic in Switzerland showed that 59% of newly diagnosed PLHIV were late presenters, and 47% had presented with at least one MO [11]. In this setting, MO was associated with individuals from sub-Saharan Africa, men who have sex with men, and patients under follow-up for chronic disease. In the United Kingdom, the study of MO in newly diagnosed HIV infection in Africans revealed that nearly half of the participants were diagnosed with HIV infection when CD4 cell count was <200 cells/mm3 [19]. Approximately 75% of the participants attended general practitioner in the two years before HIV diagnosis. However, HIV testing was not offered for 82.4% of those who accessed the services in the year before HIV diagnosis. A study in Malaysia reported 57% of MOs for earlier HIV diagnosis [16]. Unexplained fever and/or fever lasting more than one month were the most common presenting symptom that was missed. Our study showed skin manifestations were the most common clinical indicator disease that were missed.

Multivariable analysis in our study demonstrated unexplained and/or unaware anemia was associated with MOs for earlier HIV diagnosis. Anemia was identified as a factor related to MOs for earlier HIV diagnosis in Canada [20]. In the study, 21%, 19%, and 18% of anemia was related to iron deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiencies, and unspecified causes, respectively. We identified an HIV screening test as a factor that reduced the risk of MOs, this factor agreed with the earlier study [21]. Of note, HIV screening on entry to inpatient care could detect many new cases in this study.

Thailand National Guidelines recommend HIV testing in persons who had signs and symptoms compatible with HIV infection or AIDS [1], but the clinical indicators of HIV infection were not described in detail. Adding the description of clinical indicator diseases to the guidelines might help remind clinicians when HIV testing should be offered. Unexplained anemia should be added to the conditions that anti-HIV should be tested. Thailand National Guidelines recommend HIV testing following the WHO guidelines on HIV testing services [22], in which counseling and consent are needed before HIV testing. In 2006, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised the HIV testing guidelines. The current CDC guidelines recommend an opt-out HIV screening in health-care settings [23]. This strategy does not require neither specific signed consent for HIV testing nor prevention counseling. HIV screening is included in the standard screening tests in all health-care settings unless the patient declines. The randomized clinical trial performed at the emergency department of a teaching hospital and regional trauma center showed that this opt-out approach significantly increased HIV testing acceptance [24]. In Thailand, the opt-out screening was previously studied in the setting of women undergoing treatment for cervical neoplasia with 100% patient acceptance [25]. This suggested the feasibility of the opt-out approach implementation in health-care settings, e.g., screening before entry to inpatient care, in Thailand.

The strength of this study is that we compiled the newly diagnosed PLHIV in two hospitals located in different regions and had different screening programs. This study had some limitations. We were able to review the medical records only in these hospitals, and the patients might visit outside hospitals or services before presenting to the participating hospitals. Moreover, some data were incomplete, as with any retrospective study.

In conclusion, MOs for earlier diagnosis of HIV infection occur in both hospitals in Thailand and a large proportion of PLHIV presented late. Skin manifestations were the most common clinical indicator diseases that were missed. Unexplained and/or unaware anemia was associated with MOs for earlier HIV diagnosis, whereas HIV screening tests decreased the risk. HIV screening programs should be promoted, and the national guidelines should provide the details on unexplained anemia and clinical indicator diseases that HIV testing should be offered.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Excel file with raw data that was used for all analysis shown in the paper.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000842.s001

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Department of Disease Control, Mininstry of Public Heatlh. Thailand National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention 2017. [cited 24 March 2022]. Available from: http://www.thaiaidssociety.org/images/PDF/hiv_thai_guideline_2560.pdf.
  2. 2. Fleishman JA, Yehia BR, Moore RD, Gebo KA, HIV Research Network. The economic burden of late entry into medical care for patients with HIV infection. Med Care. 2010; 48(12):1071–9. pmid:21063228.
  3. 3. The IeDea and COHERE Cohort Collaborations. Global trends in CD4 cell count at the start of antiretroviral therapy: Collaborative study of treatment programs. Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 66(6):893–903. pmid:29373672.
  4. 4. Phuphuakrat A, Kiertiburanakul S, Sungkanuparph S. Current status of HIV treatment in Asia and the Pacific region. Sex Health. 2014; 11(2):119–25. pmid:24433878.
  5. 5. Pradubthai Y, Muennuch S, Aumkhyan S, Setthaudom C, Phuphuakrat A, Kiertiburanakul S. Clinical characteristics and trends of CD4 cell counts of newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients at a university hospital in Thailand. J Infect Dis Antimicrob Agents. 2019; 36(1):13–22.
  6. 6. Eamsakulrat P, Kiertiburanakul S. The impact of timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation on retention in care, viral load suppression and mortality in people living with HIV: A study in a university hospital in Thailand. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2022; 21:23259582221082607. pmid:35229678.
  7. 7. Boonyawairote R, Setthaudom C, Kiertiburanakul S. Clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed individuals with HIV infection in a university hospital. Abstract 3.13. 45th annual meeting of the Infectious Disease Association of Thailand; October 11–14, 2019; Chonburi, Thailand.
  8. 8. Hopkins C, Reid M, Gilmour J, Werder S, Briggs S. Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus infection among adults presenting to Auckland District Health Board hospital services. Intern Med J. 2019; 49(4):495–501. pmid:30091194.
  9. 9. British HIV Association, British Association of Sexual Health and HIV, and British Infection Society. UK National Guidelines for HIV Testing 2008. [cited 24 March 2022]. Available from: https://www.bhiva.org/file/RHNUJgIseDaML/GlinesHIVTest08.pdf.
  10. 10. Australian Government, Department of Health. National HIV Testing Policy 2011. [cited 24 March 2022]. Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ohp-bbvs-hiv-testing-policy.
  11. 11. Lhopitallier L, Moulin E, Hugli O, Cavassini M, Darling KEA. Missed opportunities for HIV testing among patients newly presenting for HIV care at a Swiss university hospital: A retrospective analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(6):e019806. pmid:29895647.
  12. 12. World Health Organization. Nutritional anaemias: Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1968; 405:5–37. pmid:4975372.
  13. 13. Kiertiburanakul S, Boettiger D, Lee MP, Omar SF, Tanuma J, Ng OT, et al. Trends of CD4 cell count levels at the initiation of antiretroviral therapy over time and factors associated with late initiation of antiretroviral therapy among Asian HIV-positive patients. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014; 17:18804. pmid:24598459.
  14. 14. UNAIDS. AIDSinfo 2020. [cited 30 March 2022]. Available from: https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/.
  15. 15. Sun C, Li J, Liu X, Zhang Z, Qiu T, Hu H, et al. HIV/AIDS late presentation and its associated factors in China from 2010 to 2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Res Ther. 2021; 18(1):96. pmid:34895254.
  16. 16. Koh KC, Islam M, Chan WK, Lee WY, Ho YW, Alsagoff SAH, et al. Missed opportunities for earlier HIV-testing in patients with HIV infection referred to a tertiary hospital, a cross-sectional study. Med J Malaysia. 2017; 72(4):209–14. pmid:28889131.
  17. 17. Jeong SJ, Italiano C, Chaiwarith R, Ng OT, Vanar S, Jiamsakul A, et al. Late presentation into care of HIV disease and its associated factors in Asia: Results of TAHOD. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2016; 32(3):255–61. pmid:26414065.
  18. 18. Levy I, Maor Y, Mahroum N, Olmer L, Wieder A, Litchevski V, et al. Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV in patients who presented with advanced HIV disease: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(11):e012721. pmid:28186940.
  19. 19. Burns FM, Johnson AM, Nazroo J, Ainsworth J, Anderson J, Fakoya A, et al. Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis within primary and secondary healthcare settings in the UK. AIDS. 2008; 22(1):115–22. pmid:18090399.
  20. 20. Nanditha NGA, St-Jean M, Tafessu H, Guillemi SA, Hull MW, Lu M, et al. Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV in British Columbia, Canada: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(3):e0214012. pmid:30897143.
  21. 21. Hu X, Liang B, Zhou C, Jiang J, Huang J, Ning C, et al. HIV late presentation and advanced HIV disease among patients with newly diagnosed HIV/AIDS in Southwestern China: A large-scale cross-sectional study. AIDS Res Ther. 2019; 16(1):6. pmid:30876476.
  22. 22. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services, 2019. [cited 21 June 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-155058-1.
  23. 23. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, Janssen RS, Taylor AW, Lyss SB, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006; 55(RR-14):1–17. pmid:16988643.
  24. 24. Montoy JC, Dow WH, Kaplan BC. Patient choice in opt-in, active choice, and opt-out HIV screening: randomized clinical trial. BMJ. 2016; 532:h6895. pmid:26786744.
  25. 25. Kietpeerakool C. Human immunodeficiency virus infection in women undergoing treatment for cervical neoplasia: prevalence and the feasibility of routine screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008; 9(1):36–8. pmid:18439069.