• Loading metrics

Adapting to a new normal: Antiracism as a core public health principle

Adapting to a new normal: Antiracism as a core public health principle

  • Utibe R. Essien, 
  • Eloho O. Ufomata

“We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late…This may well be mankind’s last chance to choose between chaos and community.”–Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 1967

As COVID-19 vaccination slowly upticks around the world and we are faced with the new challenge of the Delta variant of the novel coronavirus, our global collective is once again reminded of the impacts of inequity in resource distribution and faced with a moment of critical reflection. An opportunity to examine the past 18 months, and ask ourselves, where do we go from here? Will we go back to “normal,” as so many have hoped for in the past year and a half? A normal that resulted in Black, Hispanic, and Native Americans suffering 2–2.5 times the rate of infection and death during the pandemic [1]. A normal that has resulted in 70% of individuals in the U.S. receiving at least one COVID-19 vaccine by August 2021, a time point when fewer than 1% of Africa’s 3 billion people were vaccinated [2]. In the United States, we saw Black and Hispanic people receive smaller shares of vaccines compared to the disproportionate impact of the disease on their communities and also compared to their nationally representative population [3]. A normal created by centuries of racism and a lack of acknowledgement of its impact as the driver of disparities in disease outcomes [4].

Over the past year, spurred by the grass-roots movement of Black people across the world demanding that our lives matter, we have experienced a growing fervor to acknowledge and abolish racism and disparities in care from our health care institutions. Antiracism trainings have been included in medical school curricula across North America and Europe, as students and educators have called out this critical gap in health professional training [5]. Health care advocates have sought to rid clinical care of the pervasive legacy of the biologic determinism of race and rather encouraged all care providers to understand that race is a sociopolitical construct [6]. Researchers have drawn attention to the sordid history of racism and discrimination in public health and medical research and have made a commitment to look beyond mistrust as the driver of underrepresentation of diverse communities within their scientific endeavors [7]. Yet, with all these steps, the question remains: can this work be sustainable? The answer, we maintain, must be a resounding yes, and we offer a number of strategies to achieve this goal.

First, the health system must commit to desegregation at every level. While black and white photographs of “Whites Only” clinic waiting rooms remind us of a chilling past in the U.S., the legacy of segregation and white supremacy persists in our health system today. Prior research has found that Black and Latinx patients are more likely to be cared for by a resident physician in training than white patients [8]. Another study observed that Black patients with heart failure were less likely than White patients to be admitted to specialized cardiology units in the hospital, despite similar levels of care needs [9]. These examples are pervasive across the globe, with Black and brown communities consistently being relegated to the lowest levels of medical care, either by insurance status in the U.S.; or by lack of access to lifesaving resources in economically developing countries, such as has been seen in several nations in the Global South with the latest COVID-19 surge [1012]. In addition, there has been growing concern for how the requirement of proof of vaccination to access resources in certain communities might disproportionately impact communities of color who have not had equal access to vaccinations. To sustain antiracism in medicine, we must ensure that regardless of race, or economic status, all patients can have access to the highest quality of care.

Second, we must divest from racist practice and policy. The health system, like any other institution, functions according to design. And so, we must consider how access to medical care disadvantages segments of our population. The potentially triggering effect experienced by patients of color, when no one on the medical team looks like them, or speaks their language. Or the impossibility of showing up on time for a 9AM-5PM outpatient clinic appointment for individuals with limited job security, financial assets, and social support. Or on a global scale, encouraging capitalism as the driver for scientific discovery. These seemingly colorblind policies, including the physical accessibility of certain health care settings due to centuries of discriminatory U.S. housing and public transportation policy, are just some of the areas we can intervene upon to ensure an antiracist public health system [13].

Third, we must diversify the health professions workforce. For example, in the U.S, the rates of racial and ethnic minorities in medicine are dismal, with recent data reporting 4.9% of all medical school matriculants identified as Black and Hispanic with even fewer identifying as Native American [14]. Myriad data demonstrate the importance of patient-provider racial, including higher likelihood of influenza vaccination or acceptance of an invasive cardiovascular procedure [15]. The COVID-19 pandemic has especially brought the lack of diversity of the public health workforce to the forefront, highlighting the need for trusted messengers that not only look like the community, but can speak their language and empathize with their lived experience. Sustaining antiracism in public health will require that we no longer center traditional health care voices but rather amplify those who can boldly speak to the pervasive role racism has on all aspects of our health.

Fourth, we have to ensure a systemic approach to antiracist public health training for health professionals, particularly clinicians. There is a notable paucity of published medical school curricula that teach antiracism [16]. As such, health professional students continue to train in an ahistorical environment, with limited understanding of how racism influences health care around the world. Such an environment results in dangerous false beliefs about biological differences between Black and White patients, for example, as well as critical gaps in the training of a future generation of health system leaders [17]. We must push forth an antiracist educational agenda, across all healthcare professional training across the globe, and urge all licensing institutions to adopt measurable competencies and targets that will sustain these efforts.

Finally, we must deepen our investments in the community. As the pandemic has revealed, the social determinants of health, and a focus on public health more specifically, are critical to the wellbeing of each member of our global society. Prior research in Massachusetts, U.S, found that a 10% increase in the Hispanic or Black population was associated with an increase of 250–315 COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population [18]. These higher rates were not associated with biologic differences between the races but rather differential pollution exposure, household size, and rates of essential workers. We must advance public health and policy efforts to improve care for traditionally underserved communities while encouraging health system leaders to embrace their role as anchor institutions that provide social supports such as food, housing, and employment assistance to those in need [19].

It is our great desire for a post pandemic world, one in which we can once again remove the mask and walk through the world as our full selves. However, we cannot fully experience a post COVID-19 world without correcting the deep fault lines within our health system that have been unmasked in the past year and a half. With the mask off, we can clearly envision a better future; one that understands that racism is a public health issue and one where we are all actively working together to be antiracist in pursuit of a just and equitable health system for all.


  1. 1. Gross CP, Essien UR, Pasha S, Gross JR, Wang S yi, Nunez-Smith M. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Population-Level Covid-19 Mortality. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Published online 2020. pmid:32754782
  2. 2. Dahir AL, Holder J. Africa’s Covid Crisis Deepens but Vaccines Are Still Far Off. New York Times. July 2021. Accessed September 14, 2021.
  3. 3. Kolbe A. Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Rates across Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in the United States. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. April 2021.
  4. 4. Medicine’s Privileged Gatekeepers: Producing Harmful Ignorance About Racism And Health | Health Affairs. Accessed May 23, 2021.
  5. 5. Ufomata E, Merriam S, Puri A, et al. A Policy Statement of the Society of General Internal Medicine on Tackling Racism in Medical Education: Reflections on the Past and a Call to Action for the Future. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2021;36(4):1077–1081. pmid:33483823
  6. 6. Cerdeña JP, Plaisime M v., Tsai J. From race-based to race-conscious medicine: how anti-racist uprisings call us to act. The Lancet. 2020;396(10257):1125–1128. pmid:33038972
  7. 7. Manning KD. More than medical mistrust. The Lancet. 2020;396(10261):1481–1482. pmid:33160559
  8. 8. Essien UR, He W, Ray A, et al. Disparities in Quality of Primary Care by Resident and Staff Physicians: Is There a Conflict Between Training and Equity? Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019;34(7). pmid:30963439
  9. 9. Eberly LA, Richterman A, Beckett AG, et al. Identification of racial inequities in access to specialized inpatient heart failure care at an academic medical center. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2019;12(11). pmid:31658831
  10. 10. Mehtar S, Preiser W, Aissatou Lakhe N, Bousso A, Muyembe TamFu JJ, Kalley O, et al. (2020) Limiting the spread of COVID-19 in Africa: one size mitigation strategies do not fit all countries. Lancet Global Health 8(7):e881–e883. pmid:32530422
  11. 11. Pramesh CS, Badwe RA (2020) Cancer management in India during Covid-19. New Engl J Med 382(20):e61. pmid:32343498
  12. 12. Jensen N., Kelly A.H. & Avendano M. The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 15 (2021).
  13. 13. Woolf SH, Braveman P. Where health disparities begin: The role of social and economic determinants-and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Affairs. 2011;30(10):1852–1859. pmid:21976326
  14. 14. 2020 FACTS: Applicants and Matriculants Data | AAMC. Accessed May 23, 2021.
  15. 15. Saha S, Beach MC. Impact of Physician Race on Patient Decision-Making and Ratings of Physicians: a Randomized Experiment Using Video Vignettes. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2020;35(4):1084–1091. pmid:31965527
  16. 16. MedEdPORTAL. Accessed May 23, 2021.
  17. 17. Hoffman KM, Trawalter S, Axt JR, Oliver MN. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online 2016. pmid:27044069
  18. 18. Figueroa JF, Wadhera RK, Lee D, Yeh RW, Sommers BD. Community-level factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in covid-19 rates in Massachusetts. Health Affairs. 2020;39(11):1984–1992. pmid:32853056
  19. 19. Essien UR, Corbie-Smith G. Opportunities for Improving Population Health in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Journal of hospital medicine. 2021;16(1):53–55. pmid:33357330