Peer Review History
Original SubmissionSeptember 26, 2023 |
---|
PGPH-D-23-01919 Experiences of transgender persons in accessing routine healthcare services in India: findings from a participatory qualitative study PLOS Global Public Health Dear authors, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. It is a very interesting topic, however, some items could be improved (see reviewers comments). Some items should be more detailed and explained. For instance, why the intersectional approach was chosen and what it is. It is also recommended to explain how it is a participatory methodology. The only information is that you use interviews and focus groups. Is the manuscript part of a bigger project? How impacted to data collection the merge of face-to-face interviews, zoom interviews, and telephone interviews? Please submit your revised manuscript by 25th of November If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Maria del Mar Pastor Bravo, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS Global Public Health Journal Requirements: 1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. 2. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format only and remove any figures embedded in your manuscript file. Please also ensure all files are under our size limit of 10MB. For more information about figure files please see our guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirement 3. In the online submission form, you indicated that "The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because they were collected from a marginalised community. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author". All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons by return email and your exemption request will be escalated to the editor for approval. Your exemption request will be handled independently and will not hold up the peer review process, but will need to be resolved should your manuscript be accepted for publication. One of the Editorial team will then be in touch if there are any issues. Additional Editor Comments (if provided): Dear author, Congratulation on your work. It is a very interesting topic. Some items should be more detailed and explained. For instance, why the intersectional approach was chosen and what it is. It is also recommended to explain how it is a participatory methodology. The only information is that you use interviews and focus groups. Is the manuscript part of a bigger project? How impacted to data collection the merge of face-to-face interviews, zoom interviews, and telephone interviews? [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A Reviewer #2: N/A ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This is a well articulated article on a very timely issue. I suggest a minor revision on the following 1. Although published in other article from the same study, I suggest the authors to write more on intersectionality and community based participatory approach in the methods section, so that readers get adequate idea about these approaches from this article. 2. What is AS? please elaborate when first used 3. in page 10, line 200 in quote, give an explanation in parenthesis what was the 'they' in their language, I mean what exact word they used. 3. intersectionality is an important concept used in this paper. However, data and analysis on intersectionality in not adequate. I suggest to consider intersectionality in presenting and explaining each experiences in finding section 1, rather than making a small section of findings on 'intersectionality'. 4. this article is overloaded with quotes. However, overall the explanations of quotes should be more in-depth and detail. In these cases, the authors may like to remove some quotes and give more explanations and analysis of the quotes. 5. the authors can also draw a diagram/framework on challenges transpeople face in accessing heath care from an intersectional lens. This will help theorise the findings. Reviewer #2: I would like to congratulate the authors on this study that fills an important gap in the literature. I strongly feel that the study makes significant contribution to the field by bringing alive the lived experiences of transgender community, and the direction it provides for the training of medical professionals in particular. I would like to make few minor but important points that I think would enhance the readability as swell as potential impact of the research work. 1. Authors should provide a brief narration with respect to the status the third gender and their rights in India and its potential implications. This background is important in light of the wide international readership of the journal. 2. Authors are requested to provide more details on the sampling. While authors mention that the participants are mostly urban, yet there seems to be heterogeneity in geographical and socio-economic background (including age groups) that would lead to varied experiences as in the last 5-6 years there has been few monumental developments in the country with respect to LGBTQIA+ community. 3. Authors make a very important point that multiple identities other than gender too shaped the experiences both positively and negatively. However, this seems inadequate based on evidence provided. Authors are requested to elaborate this section with more evidence. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Sanzida Akhter Reviewer #2: No ********** [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step. |
Revision 1 |
Experiences of transgender persons in accessing routine healthcare services in India: findings from a participatory qualitative study PGPH-D-23-01919R1 Dear Dr. Raghuram, We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Experiences of transgender persons in accessing routine healthcare services in India: findings from a participatory qualitative study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health. Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests. Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated. IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org. Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health. Best regards, Julia Robinson Executive Editor PLOS Global Public Health *********************************************************** Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference): Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: N/A ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: No ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: It was a pleasure reading your work and heartening to see an important issue like this being addressed through your research. I sincerely congratulate the authors for their valuable contribution to health sciences in this direction. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: Yes: Sandip K. Agarwal, IISER Bhopal ********** |
Open letter on the publication of peer review reports
PLOS recognizes the benefits of transparency in the peer review process. Therefore, we enable the publication of all of the content of peer review and author responses alongside final, published articles. Reviewers remain anonymous, unless they choose to reveal their names.
We encourage other journals to join us in this initiative. We hope that our action inspires the community, including researchers, research funders, and research institutions, to recognize the benefits of published peer review reports for all parts of the research system.
Learn more at ASAPbio .