This article, on a topic existentially important for the future of our planet, was judged scientifically suitable for publication 2 months before it was actually published. Just sayin...
Competing interests declared:
I'm a co-author of this article. The two co--authors of this article co-founded PLOS, with the intention of making the results of scientific and medical research freely and rapidly accessible to scientific community and the world. I and my co-author experienced months of excruciating delays as we tried to share urgently important new scientific insights with the scientific community and the world. Did the months of delay meaningfully change the critical results or conclusions of the article? Read the review chronology and decide for yourself.