Hepatitis B e antigen induces the expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells to dampen T-cell function in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Feifei Yang; Xueping Yu; Chenliang Zhou; Richeng Mao; Mengqi Zhu; Haoxiang Zhu; Zhenxuan Ma; Bidisha Mitra; Gan Zhao; Yuxian Huang; Haitao Guo; Bin Wang; Jiming Zhang

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is associated with functionally impaired virus-specific T cell responses. Although the myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are known to play a critical role in impairing antiviral T cell responses, viral factors responsible for the expansion of MDSCs in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain obscure. In order to elucidate the mechanism of monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) expansion and T cell function suppression during persistent HBV infection, we analyzed the circulation frequency of mMDSCs in 164 CHB patients and 70 healthy donors, and found that the proportion of mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) CHB patients was significantly increased compared to that in HBeAg (-) patients, which positively correlated with the level of HBeAg. Furthermore, exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from healthy donors to HBeAg led to mMDSCs expansion and significant upregulation of IL-1β, IL-6 and indoleamine-2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO), and depletion of the cytokines abrogated HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion. Moreover, HBeAg-induced mMDSCs suppressed the autologous T-cell proliferation in vitro, and the purified mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) subjects markedly reduced the proliferation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and IFN-γ production, which could be efficiently restored by inhibiting IDO. In summary, HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion impairs T cell function through IDO pathway and favors the establishment of a persistent HBV infection, suggesting a mechanism behind the development of HBeAg-induced immune tolerance.

Author summary

HBeAg is not a structural component of HBV and is not essential for viral DNA replication, however, HBeAg positivity is associated with high levels of viremia in patients. HBeAg may represent a viral strategy to establish persistent infection, but the mechanism remains largely ambiguous. Growing evidence suggests that chronic HBV infection may be shaped by MDSCs-mediated T-cell exhaustion. Here, we report that the frequency of circulating mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) patients is higher than HBeAg (-) patients and positively correlates with serum HBeAg levels. The correlation is further demonstrated by in vitro HBeAg stimulation of PBMCs, which induced mMDSCs expansion. Furthermore, HBeAg-induced expansion of mMDSCs is dependent upon cytokine IL-6 and IL-1β, and the indoleamine-2, 3-dioxynase (IDO) plays a critical role in the suppression of T cell proliferation and IFN-γ production by HBeAg-activated mMDSCs. Therefore, our findings demonstrate a novel mechanism responsible for mMDSCs expansion in HBeAg (+) patients, and suggest that the HBeAg-mMDSC-IDO axis may serve as an immunotherapeutic target of chronic hepatitis B.

Citation: Yang F, Yu X, Zhou C, Mao R, Zhu M, Zhu H, et al. (2019) Hepatitis B e antigen induces the expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells to dampen T-cell function in chronic hepatitis B virus infection. PLoS Pathog 15(4): e1007690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690

Editor: Michael D. Robek, Albany Medical College, UNITED STATES

Received: November 16, 2018; Accepted: March 8, 2019; Published: April 18, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672009, 81471933 and 81400625 to JZ; 81670528 to RM; 30930068, 31430027 and 81672016 to BW), the Major Science and Technology Special Project of China (2017ZX10202202 and 2017ZX10202203-007 to JZ), the Shanghai Municipal Health Funds (201840024 to FY), and the US National Institutes of Health (R01AI110762, R01AI123271, and R01AI134818 to HG). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a blood borne pathogen that chronically infects approximately 350 million people worldwide, and more than 780,000 patients die annually due to HBV-related liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1, 2]. It is well acknowledged that the development of chronic hepatitis B is due to the failure of host immune system to clear the virus infection, and HBV encodes immunological decoys that cause a persistent infection [3].

HBV is a hepatotropic virus with a small DNA genome of about 3.2 kb. The HBV genome contains four open reading frames coding for precore/core, polymerase, surface, and X proteins. Among the circulating HBV antigens, HBeAg is derived from endoproteolysis of an intracellular precursor protein, namely precore, during ER-Golgi constitutive secretion [4]. HBeAg is not a structural component of HBV particle and is not required for viral DNA replication, however, HBeAg positivity is associated with high levels of viremia in patients [5]. HBeAg seroconversion is an indicator of partial immune control and an important prognosis in the treatment of CHB, suggesting a role of HBeAg in maintaining HBV persistence [6]. It has been reported that a vast majority of untreated infants born to HBeAg (+) mothers become infected, and the CD8⁺ T cells from these neonates are tolerant to HBV [7]. A recent study in HBV transgenic mice demonstrated that such impairment of T cell responses is mediated by hepatic macrophages, which are predisposed by maternal HBeAg to support HBV persistence through upregulation of inhibitory ligand PD-L1 [8]. Moreover, it has been shown that the circulating HBeAg in CHB patients may impact T-cell response, as evidenced by that the HBV core-specific T-cell response is significantly weaker in HBeAg (+) patients than that in HBeAg (-) patients [9]. Thus, HBeAg may represent a viral strategy to establish persistent infection in the host through inducing immune tolerance and/or exhaustion, but the mechanism remains largely ambiguous.

The myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is a heterogeneous cell population derived from myeloid progenitor cells, which can be divided into monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) and granulocytic MDSCs (gMDSCs) based on the presence or absence of CD14 marker on the cell surface, respectively [10]. MDSCs comprise of only ~0.5% of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in healthy individuals and are expanded during infection, inflammation, and cancer. MDSCs have a remarkable ability to suppress T-cell responses through direct cell-cell contact and secretion of soluble inhibitory molecules, including arginase, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [11]. Previous studies in animal models have demonstrated that HBV transgenic mice have higher number of intrahepatic MDSCs than normal mice [12], and the infiltration of γδT cells mobilized MDSCs to the livers of mice hydrodynamically injected with HBV plasmid in an IL-17-dependent manner, resulting in MDSC-mediated CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion [13]. Another study reported that gMDSCs are expanded during chronic HBV infection, particularly in the immunotolerance phase without immunopathology, which inhibit T cells in part by secreted arginase [14]. Furthermore, a higher frequency of MDSCs defined as CD14⁺HLADR^-/low, has been observed in the circulation of HBeAg (+) CHB subjects [15]. Thus, the above studies indicate that chronic HBV infection may be shaped by MDSCs-mediated T-cell exhaustion. However, the mechanisms involved in the expansion of MDSCs in HBeAg (+) patients remain unknown. We hypothesized that the HBV antigens in the peripheral blood, especially HBeAg, induce expansion of mMDSCs and result in the reduction of HBV-specific T cell responses.

We report herein that the frequency of circulating mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) patients is higher than that in HBeAg (-) patients and positively correlated with HBeAg levels. The correlation was further demonstrated by HBeAg-stimulated human PBMCs. Furthermore, HBeAg-induced expansion of mMDSCs is dependent on cytokines, IL-6 and IL-1β, and the indoleamine-2, 3-dioxynase (IDO) plays a critical role in the suppression of T cell proliferation and IFN-γ production by HBeAg-activated mMDSCs. Therefore, our findings elucidate a novel mechanism responsible for mMDSCs expansion in HBeAg (+) patients, and suggest that the HBeAg-mMDSC-IDO axis may serve as an immunotherapeutic target of chronic hepatitis B.

Results

High frequency of mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) CHB patients

We first compared the frequency and cell count of mMDSCs in the peripheral blood from CHB patients with those of healthy controls (HC). HBV is not cytopathic and the clinical outcome of infection is dependent on the complex interplay between HBV replication and host immune responses [16–18]. We therefore analyzed the circulating mMDSCs frequency and absolute numbers in CHB patients with different disease states. The clinical characteristics of enrolled CHB patients and healthy donors are summarized in Table 1.

Download:

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.t001

The percentage of mMDSCs in patient blood was analyzed by flow cytometry. A distinct population of HLA-DR^-/low CD33⁺CD11b⁺ cells in the samples were CD14⁺ rather than CD15⁺CD14^- (Fig 1A). The representative flow cytometry of mMDSCs frequency in patients with different disease phases is shown in Fig 1B. Statistically, the frequency of mMDSCs in both total PBMCs and monocytes was higher in CHB patients compared to the healthy controls (HC) (Fig 1C and 1D). Consistent with the increased frequency, the numbers of mMDSCs was also significantly increased in CHB patients compared to the HC (Fig 1E). Interestingly, HBeAg (+) groups (IT and IA⁺) have an increased percentage of mMDSCs in PBMCs and in monocytes compared to HBeAg (-) CHB group (IA^-) (Fig 1F and 1G). Cross-section data showed that the frequency of mMDSCs in PBMCs from the IT group (1.66±0.12%) was the highest compared to IA⁺ group (0.86±0.058%; p <0.0001) and IA^- group (0.59±0.041%; p < 0.0001) (Fig 1F). A similar trend has been observed in monocytes from CHB patients (Fig 1G). The expansion of mMDSCs was associated with the increased numbers of mMDSCs (Fig 1H). The above finding was reproduced in a separately sampled cohort (57 CHB patients with different disease phase and 20 healthy controls) by evaluating the frequency of mMDSCs in freshly collected whole blood samples from CHB patients (S1 Table) (S1 Fig). The percentage of mMDSCs in HC between different ages had no statistical significance (S2 Fig), indicating that the level of mMDSCs in CHB patients is not age-dependent. Collectively, the results demonstrated that the mMDSCs are expanded in HBeAg (+) patients, especially in IT patients.

Download:

Fig 1. Frequency of circulating mMDSCs in CHB patients.

(A) Sequential gating strategy for mMDSC identification (HLA-DR^-/low CD33⁺CD11b⁺CD14⁺) from PBMCs. (B) Representative data plots of mMDSCs from CHB patients in different disease phase including IT, IA⁺, IC and IA^-. The boxed areas represent the mMDSCs in PBMCs. (C) Statistical analysis of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs and (D) in CD14⁺ monocytes from CHB patients and healthy controls. (E) The numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs from CHB patients and healthy controls. (F) Comparison of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs and (G) in CD14⁺ monocytes from CHB patients in different disease phase. (H) The numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs from CHB patients. Horizontal lines and error bars represent mean ± SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g001

Correlations between mMDSCs frequency and clinical parameters

Next, the correlations between mMDSCs frequencies and serum HBV markers in CHB patients were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. The frequency of mMDSCs in monocytes was found to be positively correlated with the levels of HBsAg (R = 0.52; p < 0.0001; Fig 2A), HBV DNA (R = 0.29; p = 0.006; Fig 2B) and HBeAg (R = 0.57, p < 0.0001, Fig 2C) in HBeAg (+) patients. However, there was no statistical correlation between the mMDSCs frequency and HBsAg or HBV DNA in HBeAg (-) patients (Fig 2A and 2B). The mMDSCs percentage in PBMCs had the similar correlation with the levels of serum HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA (S3 Fig). These findings in HBeAg (+) patients were concisely displayed via hierarchical clustering by Euclidean distance (Fig 2D). Unsupervised clustering as seen with HBsAg, HBeAg, and mMDSCs frequencies showed that a high frequency of mMDSCs was concordant with high levels of serum HBsAg and HBeAg, but not serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. It has been recently reported that HBsAg induces mMDSCs expansion in CHB patients [19]. However, the levels of HBsAg do not significantly correlate with mMDSCs frequencies in HBeAg (-) patients (Fig 2A, S3 Fig). Our results infer that HBeAg may play a more important role in mMDSCs expansion than HBsAg in HBeAg (+) patients.

Download:

Fig 2. Correlation analysis between the frequency of circulating mMDSCs and clinical parameters.

The correlation between mMDSCs percentage in monocytes and the levels of HBsAg (A) or HBV DNA (B) from HBeAg (+) patients (red) and HBeAg (-) patients (blue) were analyzed by Spearman correlation. (C) Correlation analysis between the frequency of mMDSCs and HBeAg level in HBeAg (+) patients. (D) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using Euclidean distance; dendrogram displaying similarity between clusters. Clinically assigned disease phase shown adjacent to plot (not used for analysis). Increasing color intensity (blue→ red) corresponds to increasing mMDSC frequency, serum HBsAg (IU/ml), HBeAg (S/CO), or ALT (U/l).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g002

HBeAg induces mMDSCs expansion in vitro

We investigated whether HBeAg induces mMDSCs expansion by using PBMCs isolated from healthy donors. PBMCs were left untreated, or treated with serial concentrations recombinant HBeAg (rHBeAg), recombinant HBsAg (rHBsAg), recombinant HBcAg (rHBcAg) for 5 days. We found that rHBeAg and rHBsAg, but not rHBcAg, markedly induced mMDSCs expansion in a dose-dependent manner (S4A Fig), and 0.5 μg/ml of rHBeAg and rHBsAg exhibited a comparable effect on mMDSCs expansion (S4B Fig). The marginal induction of mMDSCs expansion by rHBcAg suggests an antigen-specific effect, though HBcAg and HBeAg share large homology at amino acid sequence level. In addition, rHBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion increased from day 3 to day 5, and started to decline afterwards (S5 Fig).

To further verify the observed effect of rHBeAg on mMDSCs expansion, PBMCs were untreated or treated with rHBeAg or a non-viral model antigen ovalbumin (OVA) for 5 days. The result showed that rHBeAg treatment significantly increased the frequency of mMDSCs in PBMCs and in monocytes compared to OVA treatment and untreated control (Fig 3A–3C). The mMDSCs expansion, as expected, was due to the increased numbers of mMDSCs (Fig 3D). Moreover, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inhibitor polymyxin B (PXB) did not attenuate rHBeAg-mediated mMDSCs expansion, ruling out a possibility of any LPS from the bacterially expressed rHBeAg inducing the mMDSCs (S6 Fig).

Download:

Fig 3. HBeAg induces mMDSCs expansion in vitro.

PBMCs from healthy donors were treated with rHBeAg (0.5 μg/ml) or OVA (0.5 μg/ml) and compared to untreated controls. For the serum experiments, PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in complete media with 20% serum from healthy subjects, HBeAg (+) CHB patients or HBeAg (-) CHB patients. After 5 days, the percentage of mMDSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) The plot of one representative experiment is shown. (B)The percentage of mMDSCs in PBMCs, (C) in monocytes, (D) and the numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs after treatment with rHBeAg was determined (mean ± SEM, n = 9). (E) The percentage and (F) the numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs after treatment with serum from healthy donors (normal), entecavir-treated HBeAg (-) and HBeAg (+) patients with undetectable HBV DNA and similar level of HBsAg (S2 Table) (mean±SEM, n = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g003

After demonstrating that rHBeAg induced mMDSCs expansion in vitro, we next assessed whether the serum HBeAg from HBV-infected individuals could induce mMDSCs expansion. PBMCs from healthy donor were treated with serum from HBeAg (+), HBeAg (-) or healthy individuals. To ensure an HBeAg-specific condition, the serum samples were collected from nucleoside entecavir-treated HBeAg (+) and HBeAg (-) CHB patients with undetectable HBV DNA and similar level of HBsAg (S2 Table). The result demonstrated a significantly increased frequency and number of mMDSCs in PBMCs following exposure to HBeAg (+) serum compared to serum from HBeAg (-) or healthy controls (Fig 3E and 3F). In addition, such effect could be reduced by incubating with anti-HBeAg antibodies, suggesting that HBeAg (+) patient serum induces mMDSCs expansion in an HBeAg-dependent manner (S7A and S7B Fig). Collectively, these findings suggested that the HBeAg is able to induce mMDSCs expansion.

HBeAg-mediated mMDSCs expansion is dependent on IL-6/IL-1β

It has been reported that the tumor-derived factors and inflammatory cytokines play a role in the differentiation and expansion of mMDSCs [20]. To evaluate whether HBeAg-induced cytokines lead to mMDSCs expansion, we measured a panel of cytokines in the supernatant of rHBeAg-treated PBMCs. A significant elevation of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 levels was detected in the supernatants of rHBeAg-treated PBMCs compared to untreated controls (Fig 4A). It is known that IL-10 is an effector molecule of MDSCs function without effect on the expansion of mMDSCs [15], we therefore focused on investigating the role of IL-1β and IL-6 in the rHBeAg-induced expansion of mMDSCs. To this end, PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured with various concentrations of recombinant human IL-1β (rhIL-1β) or IL-6 (rhIL-6) for 5 days. Both rhIL-1β and rhIL-6 significantly increased the frequency of mMDSCs in PBMCs and in monocytes (Fig 4B and 4C). Furthermore, blockage of IL-1β or IL-6 by cytokine-specific antibodies significantly decreased the rHBeAg-mediated expansion of mMDSCs in PBMCs and monocytes, and anti-IL1β treatment in combination with anti-IL-6 more effectively abrogated mMDSCs expansion (Fig 4D and 4E). In addition, IL-6 and IL-1β neutralizing antibodies abrogated the HBeAg (+) serum-mediated expansion of mMDSCs, which further validated the role of IL-6 and IL-1β in HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion (S7C and S7D Fig). To determine whether the above findings recapitulate the in vivo scenario, we examined the levels of IL-6 and IL-1β in the plasma of CHB patients. The results demonstrated that the levels of IL-6 and IL-1β in HBeAg (+) CHB patients were significantly higher than HBeAg (-) CHB patients (Fig 4F).

Download:

Fig 4. HBeAg promotes expansion of mMDSCs in an IL-6 and IL-1β dependent manner.

(A) PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in the presence of HBeAg (0.5 μg/ml) for 5 days and the concentrations of cytokines in supernatant were measured. (B and C) PBMCs were treated with various concentrations of IL-6 or IL-1β for 5 days. The proportion of mMDSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative plots of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs are shown. The histograms show the statistical analysis of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs and in monocytes after cytokine stimulation (mean ± SEM, n = 3). (D and E) PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured with HBeAg (0.5μg/ml), and isotype control antibody, or anti-IL6, anti-IL1β or anti-IL6 in combination with anti-IL1β (15 μg/ml) were added to the cultures for 5 days, followed by flow cytometry analysis of mMDSCs. The representative dot plot is shown. Mean values (±SEM) are shown for three independent experiments. (F) The plasma concentrations of IL-6 and IL-1β in HBeAg (+) and HBeAg (-) patients were measured by ELISA, mean ± SEM values are shown for 42 HBeAg (+) patients and 33 HBeAg (-) patients. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g004

These results suggest that the HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion is predominantly mediated by cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β.

HBeAg-induced CD33⁺ cells suppress CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell activation in vitro

Previous studies have shown that the CD33⁺ MDSCs, generated from human PBMCs following exposure to immunosuppressive factors or immunomodulatory proteins, suppress T-cell responses [20–22]. To assess whether HBeAg-induced CD33⁺ MDSCs impairs T-cell functions, we incubated PBMCs from healthy donors with or without rHBeAg (control) for 5 days. CD33⁺ cells were then isolated, and HLA-DR, CD11b and CD14 were analyzed by flow cytometry. A significant decrease of surface expression of HLA-DR, low levels of CD11b, and equivalent levels of CD14 was observed on HBeAg-induced CD33 cells compared to control CD33 cells (S8 Fig). CD33 MDSCs were then co-cultured with autologous CFSE-labeled Pan T cells. As shown in Fig 5A and 5B, HBeAg-induced CD33⁺ MDSCs markedly decreased CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cell proliferation compared to control CD33⁺ cells, indicating an inhibitory effect of HBeAg-induced MDSCs on T cells.

Download:

Fig 5. HBeAg-induced CD33⁺ cells suppress T-cell activation.

(A) PBMCs from healthy donors were untreated (control) or treated with rHBeAg (0.5 μg/ml) for 5 days. CD33⁺ cells were then isolated and incubated with autologous Pan T cells in the presence of human T-activator CD3/CD28 beads for 3 days (middle and bottom panels). Pan T cells alone stimulated by CD3/CD28 beads for 3 days served as untreated control (top panel). CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation was determined by CFSE dilution. The plots are representative results. (B) The graph shows the results expressed as the mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. (C) Monocytes from healthy donors were treated with HBeAg (0.5 μg/ml) for 5 days, untreated served as controls. MDSC-related molecules were detected by qPCR (mean ± SEM, n = 9). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (D and E) The IDO expression in HBeAg-induced CD14⁺ cells and mMDSCs was analyzed by intracellular staining. A representative plot of IDO staining in HBeAg-induced mMDSCs is shown. The histograms show the MFI (median fluorescence intensity) of IDO in HBeAg-induced CD14⁺ cells and mMDSCs (mean ±SEM, n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g005

Next, we set out to identify the cellular factors responsible for HBeAg-mediated immunosuppression of T cells. Several factors including Arg1, iNOS, IL-10, PD-L1, p47^phox, gp91 and IDO have been implicated in mMDSCs-mediated immunosuppression [11, 15, 23]. We, therefore, measured the intracellular mRNA levels of these factors by real-time PCR. While PD-L1 and NOX components (p47^phoxand gp91) critical for ROS production were modestly upregulated by several folds in rHBeAg-treated monocytes compared to untreated monocytes, the transcription of IDO was significantly increased (mean ± SEM, 1,828±551 fold) in rHBeAg-treated monocytes (Fig 5C). We further analyzed IDO expression by intracellular staining and demonstrated that IDO expression increased significantly at protein level in HBeAg-induced CD14⁺ cells and mMDSCs (Fig 5D and 5E). However, the protein expression of PD-L1, Arg1, and IL-10, or ROS activity in HBeAg-induced mMDSCs did not show statistical differences compared to untreated controls (S9 Fig).These findings suggest that HBeAg-induced mMDSCs may functionally suppress T cells via expression of IDO.

mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients suppress T cells response via IDO

MDSCs are known to impair T cells immune responses under certain pathological conditions [24]. Therefore, we assessed whether HBeAg (+) CHB patients-derived mMDSCs can impair the proliferation and IFN-γ production of autologous T cells. CD33⁺CD11b⁺HLA-DR^-/low CD14⁺ MDSCs were purified from PBMCs of HBeAg (+) subjects and co-cultured with CFSE-labeled autologous Pan T cells at different ratios. As shown in Fig 6, mMDSCs significantly inhibited CD8⁺ T cell and CD4⁺ T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 6A and 6B), and markedly decreased the intracellular IFN-γ production in CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells when co-cultured with PBMCs in the presence of PMA (Fig 6C). Furthermore, mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) patients exhibited a stronger immunosuppression activity against T- cell proliferation than that from HBeAg (-) CHB patients or healthy donors (S10A Fig). The capacity of T cells to secrete IFN-γ was also markedly impaired by HBeAg (+) patient-derived mMDSCs in the presence of CD3/CD28 (S10B Fig).

Download:

Fig 6. mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) patients suppresses T-cell response through IDO.

(A) Purified mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) donors were cultured with autologous T cells at different ratios as indicated. Pan T cells without CD3/CD28 activation serves as unstimulated control. CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation was evaluated by CFSE dilution. Representative plots are shown. (B) The histograms show results form 6 individual patients. (C) Purified mMDSCs were co-incubated with PBMCs at a ratio of 1:2 for 6 hours in the presence of PMA/ionomycin, IFN-γ was measured by intracellular cytokine staining (mean ± SEM, n = 4). (D and E) Representative plot of IDO expression in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) patients (CHB, blue line), healthy donors (HC, red line), and isotype control (Ctrl, green line) determined by intracellular staining. Mean ± SEM values are shown for 13 HBeAg (+) patients and 9 healthy controls. (F) mMDSCs purified from HBeAg (+) donors were co-cultured with autologous CFSE-labeled T cells for 3 days with or without 500 μM IDO inhibitor 1-MT. CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation was evaluated by CFSE dilution (mean ± SEM, n = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g006

Furthermore, in order to assess whether the HBeAg-induced mMDSCs suppress the function of HBV antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells, PBMCs purified from HBeAg (+) patients were left unstimulated or stimulated with HBsAg (5 μg/ml), or stimulated with HBsAg after depletion of mMDSCs, or stimulated with HBsAg after the addition of mMDSCs (1:0.5 ratio), followed by intracellular IFN-γ staining. As shown in S10C and S10D Fig, while HBsAg stimulation slightly induced IFN-γ production in PBMCs, the HBsAg-stimulated PBMCs with mMDSCs depletion produced much higher level of IFN-γ, and co-culturing HBsAg-stimulated PBMCs with supplemental mMDSCs abolished IFN-γ production. These results suggest that HBeAg-induced mMDSCs are able to inhibit HBsAg-specific T cell responses.

We further investigated the underlying mechanism by which mMDSCs suppress T cells responses. Although the mRNA levels of p47^phox, gp91 and PD-L1 were up-regulated in rHBeAg-treated monocytes (Fig 5C), however, the expression of these factors in mMDSCs had no obvious difference between HBeAg (+) CHB patients and healthy controls (S11 Fig). Consistent with the remarkable upregulation of IDO in rHBeAg-treated mMDSCs, a significantly higher IDO protein level was found in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB subjects compared to healthy controls (Fig 6D and 6E). To investigate whether mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients suppressed T cells responses via IDO, we treated the purified mMDSCs with 1-methyl-tryptophan (1-MT), a competitive inhibitor of IDO, while co-culturing the mMDSCs with autologous T cells. The result showed that 1-MT treatment efficiently restored T cell proliferation (Fig 6F), suggesting that the mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) CHB patients dampen T cell functions in an IDO-dependent manner.

Discussion

Since the discovery of HBeAg in HBV patients almost a half century ago, its biological functions in HBV persistence remain elusive [25]. In this study, we demonstrate that the frequency of circulating CD33⁺CD11b⁺HLA-DR^-/lowCD14⁺ MDSCs is elevated in immune tolerant CHB patients compared to immune active and HBeAg (-) CHB patients (Fig 1). Moreover, the percentage of such cell population positively correlated with the levels of serum HBeAg, suggesting a role of HBeAg in mMDSCs expansion (Fig 2). We further demonstrate that treatment of PBMCs from healthy donors with rHBeAg or HBeAg (+) patient serum significantly induces the proliferation of mMDSCs in vitro (Fig 3).

A previous study by Pallet et al reported that the granulocytic MDSCs, rather than mMDSCs, are significantly expanded in CHB patients [14]. Such discrepancy may be attributed to several different factors between these two studies. First, the numbers of enrolled total CHB patients and HBeAg (+) patients in our study are higher than these in Pallett’s study (Table 1) [14], which might result in a corresponding higher percentage of mMDSCs in CHB patients compared to health controls than that of Pallett’s study; second, while the mMDSCs population in Pallett’s study was calculated as a percentage of myeloid cells (CD11b^highCD33⁺), it is presented as a percentage of PBMCs or monocyte cells in this study; lastly, it is also possible that the mMDSC frequency might be influenced by the potential different genetic background of enrolled patients and/or HBV genotypes in these two studies. Nonetheless, two other previous studies demonstrated higher frequencies of mMDSCs in CHB patients than healthy controls [15, 19], which is consistent with our study.

MDSCs have been recognized as a subset of innate immune cells that can alter adaptive immunity and cause immunosuppression [26], which led to the hypothesis that HBeAg may suppress T cell functions to support HBV persistent infection through promoting the expansion of mMDSCs. In line with this notion, it has been reported that HBV core-specific T-cell response in HBeAg (+) patients is significantly weaker than in HBeAg (-) patients, suggesting that HBeAg may impact T-cell response [9]. It is worth noting that the proportion of circulating mMDSCs was also found to be positively correlated with HBsAg in HBeAg (+) patients (Fig 2), which is consistent with a previous study [19], suggesting that HBsAg may also contribute to the MDSC-mediated immunosuppression, especially when HBeAg becomes negative due to seroconversion or precore-deficiency mutations [27, 28]. Nonetheless, the correlation between HBsAg and mMDSCs expansion is weaker in HBeAg (-) patients (Fig 2A and S3A Fig). In addition, while both the recombinant HBsAg and HBeAg could induce mMDSCs expansion in PBMCs in vitro (S4B Fig), HBeAg (+) patient serum significantly induced expansion of mMDSCs in PBMCs compared to HBeAg (-) patient serum, though their HBsAg levels were similar (Fig 3E and 3F, S2 Table), and the mMDSCs expansion induced by HBeAg (+) patient serum could be blocked by anti-HBeAg antibodies (S7A and S7B Fig). Therefore, we concluded that the HBeAg plays a more important role in the expansion of mMDSCs than HBsAg.

Previous studies suggest that PBMCs can serve as precursors for mMDSCs under certain conditions, including virus infections. For example, exposure of PBMCs to HIV gp120 protein induces expansion of mMDSCs; and HCV core protein, when co-cultured with PBMCs, enhances the production of mMDSCs from PBMCs in vitro [21, 29]. Our study has demonstrated that HBeAg could induce the expansion of mMDSCs from healthy donors’ PBMCs, and explored the mechanism underlying HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion. The expansion of MDSCs has been shown to be associated with chronic inflammation and the production of cytokine IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, GM-SCF, and IL-12 in human and animal models [20, 30, 31]. In HBV mouse model, IL-17 produced by γδT cells is essential for the expansion of MDSCs [13]. In this study, we speculated that the pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by HBeAg could result in expansion of mMDSCs, and observed significantly higher levels of IL-6 and IL-1β in the supernatants of HBeAg-induced mMDSCs (Fig 4A). Consequently, the exogenous IL-6 and IL-1β induced the expansion of mMDSCs from healthy donors’ PBMCs, and the neutralization of cytokines abrogated the HBeAg-mediated mMDSCs expansion (Fig 4, S7C and S7D Fig).

Limited information is available regarding the specific signals required for the generation of MDSCs, but the list of regulatory factors involved in this process is growing. IL-6, G-CSF and GM-CSF have been used in in vitro generation of MDSCs [32]. HIV gp120 and HBsAg can induce expansion of mMDSCs via IL-6/STAT3 feedback signaling [19, 21]. It has been reported that tumor-derived IL-1β induces MDSCs accumulation and suppressive activity via NF-κB pathway, suggesting a relationship between inflammation, cancer, and immune suppression. Mice bearing 4T1 tumor cells that ectopically express functional IL-1β or lack the IL-1 receptor antagonist exhibit increased MDSCs accumulation and their immune suppressive activity [31, 33]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the transfected 4T1 tumor cells constitutively expressing IL-6 induced expansion of MDSCs and restored MDSCs accumulation in tumor-bearing IL-1 receptor knockout mouse, suggesting that IL-6 is likely to be a relevant IL-1β downstream mediator [31]. Consistently, we show herein that IL-6, in collaboration with IL-1β, is crucial for HBeAg-mediated mMDSCs expansion in vitro (Fig 4E and 4F, S7C and S7D Fig). Nonetheless, the underlying mechanism of IL-1β and IL-6 induction by HBeAg awaits further investigation.

Furthermore, we found that HBeAg significantly enhances the immunosuppressive activity of mMDSCs in vitro, as the HBeAg-induced mMDSCs reduced the proliferation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (Fig 5A and 5B). Consistent with our in vitro data on mMDSCs-mediated immunosuppression of T cells (Fig 6A), the purified mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients markedly decreased the proliferation and IFN-γ secretion of autologous T cells (Fig 6B and 6C). It is well acknowledged that MDSCs impair T cell functions by multiple suppressive mechanisms, including PD-L1 expression, production of ROS and NO, and induction and secretion of IDO [34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the CD14⁺HLA-DR^-/low MDSCs suppress T-cell activation through their PD-L1 molecule, and the granulocytic subset gMDSCs develop their suppressive function via Arg1 expression in persistent HBV infection [14, 15]. In this study, we found that IDO was significantly upregulated in HBeAg-induced mMDSCs in vitro (Fig 5C–5E) and in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients (Fig 6D and 6E), however, the protein expression of PD-L1 in mMDSCs had no obvious difference between HBeAg-treated and untreated PBMCs (S9 Fig), or between CHB patients and healthy controls (S11B Fig). Additionally, we confirmed the role of IDO in mMDSCs-mediated T cell suppression, as evidenced by the restoration of T cell proliferation upon administration of an IDO inhibitor (Fig 6F). IDO is a rate-limiting enzyme catalyzing tryptophan into kynurenine. Both, the depletion of tryptophan and the accumulation of kynurenine, cause T-cell suppression and apoptosis [23, 35]. IL-6 has been found to stimulate STAT3 in breast cancer-derived MDSCs, and the unregulated expression of IDO was through the activation of STAT3 and NF-κB pathway [36]. In our study, since the levels of IL-6 was upregulated in HBeAg-stimulated mMDSCs (Fig 4A), it will be interesting to examine whether the upregulation of IDO by HBeAg requires the IL-6-mediated STAT3 activation in mMDSCs.

In CHB patients, HBeAg positivity and high antigenemia mark a high level of HBV replication and immune tolerance [37]. In this study, we report that HBeAg induces the expansion of mMDSCs and the upregulation of immune suppressor molecules IDO in mMDSCs, which in turn inhibits T cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion, suggesting that HBeAg may induce immune tolerance or suppression through activation of mMDSCs (Fig 7). Taken together, the HBeAg-mMDSCs-IDO nexus may play an important role in the establishment and maintenance of chronic hepatitis B, and potentially serve as a novel therapeutic target for developing therapies to break the virus-induced immune tolerance and reset the immune system to clear HBV infection.

Download:

Fig 7. Mode of action of HBeAg-induced expansion of mMDSCs in CHB patients.

The frequency of circulating mMDSCs is increased in CHB patients in the immune tolerant state. HBeAg induces the expansion of mMDSCs in an IL-6 and IL-1β dependent manner. HBeAg-induced upregulation of IDO expression in mMDSCs dampen T cell functions to promote HBV persistence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.g007

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Huashan hospital, Fudan University (IRB# 2016–123), and the IRB Committee of Indiana University (IRB# 1808003516). All the study participants were enrolled in Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, and provided written informed consent.

Study participants

Fresh blood samples were obtained from 164 Chinese CHB patients infected with genotype B or C HBV, including 44 HBeAg (+) immune tolerant (IT), 56 HBeAg (+) immune active (IA⁺), 33 inactive carriers (IC) and 31 HBeAg (-) CHB (IA^-), serological assays and HBV DNA quantitation were performed as previously described [38]. The lowest detection limit for HBV DNA is 500 IU/ml. The normal range for serum ALT level is 0–50 U/l. All patients were diagnosed according to previously described criteria [39]. Briefly, the IT group is defined as patients with HBeAg-positive, high levels of HBV replication (HBV DNA > 10⁷ IU/ml), normal ALT (< 50 U/l), and no liver inflammation or fibrosis. The IA⁺ group includes patients with positive HBeAg, relatively low level of replication compared to the immune tolerant phase (HBV DNA >2,000 IU/ml), increased or fluctuating ALT levels (> 50 U/l), moderate or severe liver necroinflammation. The IC group was characterized by negative HBeAg, anti-HBe positive, HBV DNA <2,000 IU/ml, and normal ALT. The IA^- group was characterized by negative HBeAg, HBV DNA >2,000 IU/ml, ALT > 50 U/l, moderate or severe liver necroinflammation. None of the above-mentioned patients had received antiviral therapy or immunosuppressive drugs within 6 months before sampling. The subjects with coinfections of hepatitis A virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, hepatitis E virus, or human immunodeficiency virus, and patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune diseases, or HCC, were excluded. For comparison, 70 healthy controls were age and gender matched to the enrolled patients. Characteristics of enrolled CHB patients and healthy controls for whole blood staining are summarized in S1 Table. For serum treatment experiments, the enrolled HBeAg (+) and HBeAg (-) CHB patients had received entecavir treatment with HBV DNA<500 IU/ml, HBeAg levels>1,000 S/CO, and similar level of HBsAg in HBeAg (+) CHB patients (S2 Table).

Cell isolation and sorting

PBMCs were isolated from EDTA-anticoagulant venous blood by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (Cedarlane Laboratories). CD14⁺ monocytes, CD33⁺ cells and Pan T cells were purified using magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) at a purity level of ≥90%. CD33⁺CD11b⁺CD14⁺HLA-DR^-/low cells were sorted by using a MoFlo XDP cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) with purity >95%.

Flow cytometric analysis

For surface marker staining, PBMCs were labeled with the following mAbs: anti-human CD14 PE-Cy7, anti-human CD33 PE, anti-human CD11b FITC, anti-human PD-L1 PerCp-eFluor (eBioscience), anti-human HLA-DR APC, anti-human CD8 PE-Cy7, anti-human CD4 PE (BD Biosciences), anti-human CD3 PB, anti-human CD15 BV421 (Biolegend). After incubation for 20 min at RT, the cells were analyzed using flow cytometer. For whole blood staining, 100 μl of fresh whole blood was labeled with above-mentioned antibodies for 20 min at RT, then lysed with red blood cell (RBC) lysis buffer (BD Biosciences), and subjected to flow cytometry.

For intracellular staining, the cells were fixed and permeabilized using Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus kit (BD Biosciences), and stained with the corresponding intracellular Ab, anti-human IFN-γ APC (BD Biosciences), anti-human IDO PerCp-eFluor (eBioscience), anti-human IL-10 BV421 and anti-human Arg1 PE (Biolegend). Data acquisition and analysis were performed by flow cytometer. Controls for each experiment included cells that were single stained for surface markers or intracellular proteins, unstained cells, and isotype-matched antibodies.

ROS assay

Cells were treated with or without HBeAg for 5days, then stained with 2.5 μM 2’, 7’-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) (Beyotime Biotechnology) for 30 min in the presence of 30 ng/mL PMA, followed by flow cytometry analysis.

Induction of mMDSCs in vitro

PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in complete media (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies)) at a concentration of 1×10⁶ cells/ml for 5 days with rHBeAg, rHBsAg, rHBcAg (ProSpec) or OVA(Sigma-Aldrich). For the serum experiments, PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in complete media with 20% serum from healthy subjects, HBeAg (+) CHB patients or HBeAg (-) CHB patients. 3 μg/ml anti-HBeAg antibody (Abcam) was added into the cultures to assess its effect on HBeAg (+) patient serum-induced mMDSCs expansion, with isotype-matched control antibody serving as control. The supernatant was collected on day 5 and stored at -80°C. The levels of mMDSCs were analyzed by flow cytometry. Polymyxin B (PXB, Sigma-Aldrich), an inhibitor of LPS [40], was used to assess potential effect of LPS contamination in rHBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion.

PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured at a concentration of 1×10⁶ cells/ml in complete media with various concentrations (10~50 ng/ml) of rhIL-6 or rhIL-1β (eBioscience) for 5 days. PBMCs cultured in medium alone were run in parallel as a control. The medium and cytokines were refreshed every other day. Various concentrations of IL-6-neutralizing antibody and/or IL-1β-neutralizing antibody was added to rHBeAg-treated or HBeAg (+) patient serum–treated cultures to determine the effect of blocking IL-6 and/or IL-1β on mMDSCs expansion.

Cytokine detection

The supernatant from the cultured cells were tested for cytokines (IL-10, IL-6, IL-1β, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-13, IL-2 and TNF-α) by using Luminex 200 multiplexing instrument (EMD Millipore). IL-6 and IL-1β in patient’s plasma were measured using commercial ELISA Kit (Anogen).

T cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion assays

CD33⁺CD11b⁺CD14⁺HLA-DR^-/low cells purified from HBeAg (+) CHB patients, HBeAg (-) CHB patients and healthy donors or CD33⁺ cells purified from HBeAg-treated PBMCs were co-cultured with autologous CFSE-labeled (Invitrogen) T cells in various ratios. The T cells were stimulated with human T-activator CD3/CD28 dynabeads (Gibco) for 3 days according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then washed and stained with anti-human CD8 PE-Cy7, anti-human CD4 PE, and anti-human CD3 PB. T cell proliferation was analyzed by MoFlo XDP.

For intracellular IFN-γ detection, the co-cultured cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml PMA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 6 h or 5 μg/ml HBsAg for 12h. For intracellular IFN-γ staining, 0.4 mM monensin (BD Biosciences) was concurrently added during the course of T-cell activation for 5 h to trap IFN-γ secretion. After incubation, the cells were permeabilized and stained with APC anti-human IFN-γ. The IFN-γ in culture supernatant was detected by ELISA (Anogen).

To assess the role of IDO in mMDSCs-mediated T cell suppression, mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) patients were co-cultured with autologous CFSE-labeled T cells for 72 hours in the presence or absence of 500 μM of IDO inhibitor 1-MT (Sigma-Aldrich) [41].

Real-time PCR

A total of 5×10⁵ CD14⁺ monocytes were treated with or without 0.5 μg/ml rHBeAg for 5 days, total RNA was extracted by Trizol (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a PrimerScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara). mRNA levels were quantified by real-time PCR (SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit, Takara). Relative expressions of Arg1, iNOS, IL-10, PD-L1, p47^phox, gp91 and IDO were determined by normalizing the expression of each target gene to β-actin. Gene-specific primers for RT-qPCR are listed in S3 Table.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism6 and expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM) unless otherwise specified. The mMDSCs frequency, number and the levels of cytokines between different groups were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Wilcoxon or paired Student t test were used to determine the statistical significance for in vitro experiments. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman rank correlation tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The frequency of mMDSCs is elevated in whole blood of CHB patients.

(A) Sequential gating strategy for mMDSC identification from whole blood. (B) Representative data plots of mMDSCs from CHB patients in different disease phase including IT, IA⁺, IC and IA^-. The boxed areas represent the mMDSCs population. (C) Statistical analysis of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs and in monocytes from CHB patients and healthy controls. (D) The numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs from CHB patients and healthy controls. (E) Comparison of mMDSCs frequency in PBMCs and in monocytes from CHB patients in different disease phases. (F) The numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs from CHB patients in different disease phases. Horizontal lines and error bars represent mean ± SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The percentage of mMDSCs in healthy controls with different age.

Statistical analysis of mMDSCs frequency in (A) PBMCs and (B) monocytes from healthy controls with different age. Horizontal lines and error bars represent mean ± SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Correlation analysis between the percentage of mMDSCs in PBMCs and virological parameters.

(A) The correlation between mMDSCs percentage in PBMCs and the levels of HBsAg in HBeAg (+) patients (red) and HBeAg (-) patients (blue). (B) The correlation between mMDSCs percentage in PBMCs and the levels of HBeAg in IT and IA⁺ patients. (C) The correlation between the frequency of mMDSCs in PBMCs and HBV DNA level in HBeAg (+) and HBeAg (-) patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Assessment of effect of recombinant HBV antigens on mMDSCs expansion.

PBMCs from healthy donors were treated with indicated concentrations of rHBeAg, rHBsAg or rHBcAg for 5 days, followed by counting of mMDSCs using flow cytometry. (A) The percentage of mMDSCs in PBMCs induced by different recombinant HBV antigens at indicated concentrations. (B) Percentage and the numbers of mMDSCs in PBMCs induced by 0.5 μg/ml recombinant HBV antigens (mean ± SEM, n = 5, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. The time course analysis of rHBeAg-mediated mMDSC induction.

PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured with or without 0.5 μg/ml rHBeAg for the indicated durations, and the proportion of mMDSCs were quantified by flow cytometric analysis (mean ± SEM, n = 3; *p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. rHBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion is not due to possible LPS contamination.

PBMCs isolated from healthy donors were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS or 0.5 μg/ml rHBeAg with or without 10 μg/ml Polymyxin B (PXB) for 5 days. The percentage of mMDSCs was determined by flow cytometric analysis (mean ± SEM, n = 3; *p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. HBeAg (+) patient serum induces mMDSCs expansion in an IL-6 and IL-1β dependent manner.

(A and B) Anti-HBeAg antibody inhibited HBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion. Purified PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in the presence of HBeAg (+) serum with anti-HBeAg antibody or isotype-matched control antibody for 5 day, the proportion of mMDSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry. The representative plots are shown in panel A and the mean values (±SEM) from three independent experiments are plotted in panel B. (C and D) PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured with HBeAg (+) serum for 5 days in the presence of 10 μg/ml of IL-6 and IL-1β neutralizing antibodies or isotype control antibody. Frequency of mMDSCs was analyzed by flow cytometry. The plots of one representative experiment are shown in panel C and the mean values (±SEM) from four independent experiments are plotted in panel D.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. The expression levels of surface marker CD14, CD11b and HLA-DR in CD33⁺ cells treated with HBeAg.

PBMCs from healthy controls were left untreated or treated with rHBeAg (0.5 μg/ml) for 5 days. The surface expression of CD14, CD11b and HLA-DR were analyzed by flow cytometer. The rHBeAg-treated cells are represented by blue line, the untreated control samples are indicated by red line, and the untreated controls stained with isotype control antibody are indicated by green line.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig. FCS analyses of PD-L1, Arg1 and IL-10 expression and ROS activity in rHBeAg-treated PBMCs.

PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured with or without rHBeAg (0.5 μg/ml). The expression levels of PD-L1, Arg1 and IL-10 were determined by flow cytometry. ROS activity was measured by staining cells with DCFDA, followed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative plots of DCFDA staining, and PD-L1, Arg1, and IL-10 expression following exposure to HBeAg. (B) The histograms show the MFI of DCFDA, PD-L1, Arg1, and IL-10 in rHBeAg-induced mMDSCs (mean ±SEM, n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. HBeAg (+) patient-derived mMDSCs suppress T-cell responses.

(A) The inhibition of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell proliferation by mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients, HBeAg (-) CHB patients and healthy donors was evaluated by FCS. T-cell proliferation without mMDSCs was set as 100% to calculate the relative inhibition of T-cell proliferation by mMDSCs from different sources (mean ± SEM, n = 3). (B) Pan-T cells were cultured alone, or co-cultured with purified mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) patients at 1:0.5 ratio, followed by CD3/CD28 activation. IFN-γ in supernatant was measured by ELISA (mean ± SEM, n = 5). (C and D). PBMCs purified from HBeAg (+) patients were untreated or treated with rHBsAg (5 μg/ml), or treated with rHBsAg after depletion of mMDSCs, or treated with rHBsAg after addition of mMDSCs (1:0.5 ratio), for 12h, followed by intracellular IFN-γ staining. Panel C shows the representative flow cytometry plots of IFN-γ-positive CD8+ and CD4+ cell staining under the indicated conditions. The percentage of HBsAg-induced IFN-γ-positive CD8+ and CD4+ cells in HBeAg (+) patient-derived PBMCs with and without mMDSCs depletion is plotted in panel D, respectively (Mean ± SEM, n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s010

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Comparison of expression levels of p47^phox, gp91 and PD-L1 in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients and healthy controls.

(A) mRNA levels of p47^phox and gp91 in mMDSCs of healthy controls (HC) and HBeAg (+) CHB patients (n = 8) were detected by qPCR and plotted as fold change (CHB/HC) (mean ± SEM). (B) PD-L1 protein expression in mMDSCs of HC and HBeAg (+) CHB patients (n = 8) was measured by flow cytometry and the median values of fluorescent intensity (MFI) were plotted (Y-axis).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s011

(TIF)

S1 Table. Clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects for analyzing frequency of mMDSCs in whole blood.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s012

(PDF)

S2 Table. Clinical parameters of serum samples from enrolled healthy controls and Nuc-treated CHB patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s013

(PDF)

S3 Table. Gene-specific primers for RT-qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007690.s014

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Min-Hui Dong, Xin-Yan Li, Jin-Yu Wang, Si-Si Yang and Zhong-Liang Shen for technical assistance and Drs. Jie Yu, Yan-Li Qing, Yong-Mei Zhang, and Fa-Hong Li for help with patient recruitment.

References

1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. pmid:23245604.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Trepo C, Chan HL, Lok A. Hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2053–63. pmid:24954675.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Chisari FV, Isogawa M, Wieland SF. Pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus infection. Pathologie-biologie. 2010;58(4):258–66. pmid:20116937; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2888709.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Milich D, Liang TJ. Exploring the biological basis of hepatitis B e antigen in hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2003;38(5):1075–86. pmid:14578844.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Ou JH. Molecular biology of hepatitis B virus e antigen. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 1997;12(9–10):S178–87. pmid:9407336.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Block TM, Guo H, Guo JT. Molecular virology of hepatitis B virus for clinicians. Clinics in liver disease. 2007;11(4):685–706, vii. pmid:17981225; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2144742.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Milich DR, Jones JE, Hughes JL, Price J, Raney AK, McLachlan A. Is a function of the secreted hepatitis B e antigen to induce immunologic tolerance in utero? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1990;87(17):6599–603. pmid:2395863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC54584.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Tian Y, Kuo CF, Akbari O, Ou JH. Maternal-Derived Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen Alters Macrophage Function in Offspring to Drive Viral Persistence after Vertical Transmission. Immunity. 2016;44(5):1204–14. pmid:27156385; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4871724.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Park JJ, Wong DK, Wahed AS, Lee WM, Feld JJ, Terrault N, et al. Hepatitis B Virus-Specific and Global T-Cell Dysfunction in Chronic Hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(3):684–95 e5. pmid:26684441; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4766024.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Peranzoni E, Zilio S, Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Zanovello P, Mandruzzato S, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell heterogeneity and subset definition. Current opinion in immunology. 2010;22(2):238–44. pmid:20171075.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nature reviews Immunology. 2009;9(3):162–74. pmid:19197294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828349.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Chen S, Akbar SM, Abe M, Hiasa Y, Onji M. Immunosuppressive functions of hepatic myeloid-derived suppressor cells of normal mice and in a murine model of chronic hepatitis B virus. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2011;166(1):134–42. pmid:21762128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3193928.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Kong X, Sun R, Chen Y, Wei H, Tian Z. gammadeltaT cells drive myeloid-derived suppressor cell-mediated CD8+ T cell exhaustion in hepatitis B virus-induced immunotolerance. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(4):1645–53. pmid:25015833.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Pallett LJ, Gill US, Quaglia A, Sinclair LV, Jover-Cobos M, Schurich A, et al. Metabolic regulation of hepatitis B immunopathology by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nature medicine. 2015;21(6):591–600. pmid:25962123; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4458139.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Huang A, Zhang B, Yan W, Wang B, Wei H, Zhang F, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells regulate immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection through PD-1-induced IL-10. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(11):5461–9. pmid:25344470.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Bertoletti A, Ferrari C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut. 2012;61(12):1754–64. pmid:22157327.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Bertoletti A, Maini MK, Ferrari C. The host-pathogen interaction during HBV infection: immunological controversies. Antiviral therapy. 2010;15 Suppl 3:15–24. pmid:21041900.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Dandri M, Locarnini S. New insight in the pathobiology of hepatitis B virus infection. Gut. 2012;61(Suppl 1):i6.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Fang Z, Li J, Yu X, Zhang D, Ren G, Shi B, et al. Polarization of Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells by Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Is Mediated via ERK/IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Feedback and Restrains the Activation of T Cells in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Journal of immunology. 2015;195(10):4873–83. pmid:26416274.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Lechner MG, Liebertz DJ, Epstein AL. Characterization of cytokine-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells from normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of immunology. 2010;185(4):2273–84. pmid:20644162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2923483.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Garg A, Spector SA. HIV type 1 gp120-induced expansion of myeloid derived suppressor cells is dependent on interleukin 6 and suppresses immunity. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014;209(3):441–51. pmid:23999600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3883171.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Tacke RS, Lee HC, Goh C, Courtney J, Polyak SJ, Rosen HR, et al. Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2012;55(2):343–53. WOS:000299632900003. pmid:21953144
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Jitschin R, Braun M, Buttner M, Dettmer-Wilde K, Bricks J, Berger J, et al. CLL-cells induce IDOhi CD14+HLA-DRlo myeloid-derived suppressor cells that inhibit T-cell responses and promote TRegs. Blood. 2014;124(5):750–60. Epub 2014/05/23. pmid:24850760.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Condamine T, Gabrilovich DI. Molecular mechanisms regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell differentiation and function. Trends in immunology. 2011;32(1):19–25. pmid:21067974; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3053028.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Magnius LO, Espmark JA. New specificities in Australia antigen positive sera distinct from the Le Bouvier determinants. Journal of immunology. 1972;109(5):1017–21. pmid:4116763.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Stewart TJ, Smyth MJ. Improving cancer immunotherapy by targeting tumor-induced immune suppression. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2011;30(1):125–40. pmid:21249424.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Alexopoulou A, Karayiannis P. HBeAg negative variants and their role in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(24):7644–52. pmid:24976702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4069293.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Tong S, Li J, Wands JR, Wen YM. Hepatitis B virus genetic variants: biological properties and clinical implications. Emerging microbes & infections. 2013;2(3):e10. pmid:26038454; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3636426.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Pang X, Song H, Zhang Q, Tu Z, Niu J. Hepatitis C virus regulates the production of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells through PI3K pathway and autocrine signaling. Clinical immunology. 2016;164:57–64. Epub 2016/01/29. pmid:26821305.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Tu S, Bhagat G, Cui G, Takaishi S, Kurt-Jones EA, Rickman B, et al. Overexpression of interleukin-1beta induces gastric inflammation and cancer and mobilizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice. Cancer cell. 2008;14(5):408–19. pmid:18977329; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2586894.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Bunt SK, Yang L, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Reduced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment delays the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and limits tumor progression. Cancer research. 2007;67(20):10019–26. pmid:17942936; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4402704.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Dolcetti L, Peranzoni E, Ugel S, Marigo I, Fernandez Gomez A, Mesa C, et al. Hierarchy of immunosuppressive strength among myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets is determined by GM-CSF. European journal of immunology. 2010;40(1):22–35. Epub 2009/11/27. pmid:19941314.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Bunt SK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Inflammation induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that facilitate tumor progression. Journal of immunology. 2006;176(1):284–90. Epub 2005/12/21. pmid:16365420.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Parker KH, Beury DW, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Critical Cells Driving Immune Suppression in the Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in cancer research. 2015;128:95–139. pmid:26216631; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4662416.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Lob S, Konigsrainer A, Rammensee HG, Opelz G, Terness P. Inhibitors of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase for cancer therapy: can we see the wood for the trees? Nature reviews Cancer. 2009;9(6):445–52. Epub 2009/05/23. pmid:19461669.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Yu J, Wang Y, Yan F, Zhang P, Li H, Zhao H, et al. Noncanonical NF-kappaB activation mediates STAT3-stimulated IDO upregulation in myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(5):2574–86. pmid:25063873; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4719564.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of hepatology. 2012;57(1):167–85. Epub 2012/03/23. pmid:22436845.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Zhou P, Yang F, Wang J, Mao R, Qi X, Huang Y, et al. Improved Efficacy of a pegylated interferon-alpha-2a stepwise optimization treatment strategy in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. Medicine. 2015;94(17):e730. pmid:25929904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4603052.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. European Association For The Study Of The L. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of hepatology. 2012;57(1):167–85. pmid:22436845.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Silswal N, Singh AK, Aruna B, Mukhopadhyay S, Ghosh S, Ehtesham NZ. Human resistin stimulates the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-12 in macrophages by NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005;334(4):1092–101. pmid:16039994.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Mao R, Zhang J, Jiang D, Cai D, Levy JM, Cuconati A, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase mediates the antiviral effect of gamma interferon against hepatitis B virus in human hepatocyte-derived cells. Journal of virology. 2011;85(2):1048–57. pmid:21084489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3019998.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. pmid:23245604.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Trepo C, Chan HL, Lok A. Hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2053–63. pmid:24954675.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Chisari FV, Isogawa M, Wieland SF. Pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus infection. Pathologie-biologie. 2010;58(4):258–66. pmid:20116937; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2888709.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Milich D, Liang TJ. Exploring the biological basis of hepatitis B e antigen in hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2003;38(5):1075–86. pmid:14578844.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Ou JH. Molecular biology of hepatitis B virus e antigen. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 1997;12(9–10):S178–87. pmid:9407336.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Block TM, Guo H, Guo JT. Molecular virology of hepatitis B virus for clinicians. Clinics in liver disease. 2007;11(4):685–706, vii. pmid:17981225; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2144742.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Milich DR, Jones JE, Hughes JL, Price J, Raney AK, McLachlan A. Is a function of the secreted hepatitis B e antigen to induce immunologic tolerance in utero? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1990;87(17):6599–603. pmid:2395863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC54584.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Tian Y, Kuo CF, Akbari O, Ou JH. Maternal-Derived Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen Alters Macrophage Function in Offspring to Drive Viral Persistence after Vertical Transmission. Immunity. 2016;44(5):1204–14. pmid:27156385; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4871724.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Park JJ, Wong DK, Wahed AS, Lee WM, Feld JJ, Terrault N, et al. Hepatitis B Virus-Specific and Global T-Cell Dysfunction in Chronic Hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(3):684–95 e5. pmid:26684441; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4766024.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Peranzoni E, Zilio S, Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Zanovello P, Mandruzzato S, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell heterogeneity and subset definition. Current opinion in immunology. 2010;22(2):238–44. pmid:20171075.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nature reviews Immunology. 2009;9(3):162–74. pmid:19197294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828349.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Chen S, Akbar SM, Abe M, Hiasa Y, Onji M. Immunosuppressive functions of hepatic myeloid-derived suppressor cells of normal mice and in a murine model of chronic hepatitis B virus. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2011;166(1):134–42. pmid:21762128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3193928.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Kong X, Sun R, Chen Y, Wei H, Tian Z. gammadeltaT cells drive myeloid-derived suppressor cell-mediated CD8+ T cell exhaustion in hepatitis B virus-induced immunotolerance. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(4):1645–53. pmid:25015833.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Pallett LJ, Gill US, Quaglia A, Sinclair LV, Jover-Cobos M, Schurich A, et al. Metabolic regulation of hepatitis B immunopathology by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Nature medicine. 2015;21(6):591–600. pmid:25962123; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4458139.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Huang A, Zhang B, Yan W, Wang B, Wei H, Zhang F, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells regulate immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection through PD-1-induced IL-10. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(11):5461–9. pmid:25344470.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Bertoletti A, Ferrari C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut. 2012;61(12):1754–64. pmid:22157327.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Bertoletti A, Maini MK, Ferrari C. The host-pathogen interaction during HBV infection: immunological controversies. Antiviral therapy. 2010;15 Suppl 3:15–24. pmid:21041900.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Dandri M, Locarnini S. New insight in the pathobiology of hepatitis B virus infection. Gut. 2012;61(Suppl 1):i6.
View Article
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Fang Z, Li J, Yu X, Zhang D, Ren G, Shi B, et al. Polarization of Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells by Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Is Mediated via ERK/IL-6/STAT3 Signaling Feedback and Restrains the Activation of T Cells in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Journal of immunology. 2015;195(10):4873–83. pmid:26416274.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Lechner MG, Liebertz DJ, Epstein AL. Characterization of cytokine-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells from normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of immunology. 2010;185(4):2273–84. pmid:20644162; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2923483.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Garg A, Spector SA. HIV type 1 gp120-induced expansion of myeloid derived suppressor cells is dependent on interleukin 6 and suppresses immunity. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2014;209(3):441–51. pmid:23999600; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3883171.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Tacke RS, Lee HC, Goh C, Courtney J, Polyak SJ, Rosen HR, et al. Myeloid suppressor cells induced by hepatitis C virus suppress T-cell responses through the production of reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2012;55(2):343–53. WOS:000299632900003. pmid:21953144
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Jitschin R, Braun M, Buttner M, Dettmer-Wilde K, Bricks J, Berger J, et al. CLL-cells induce IDOhi CD14+HLA-DRlo myeloid-derived suppressor cells that inhibit T-cell responses and promote TRegs. Blood. 2014;124(5):750–60. Epub 2014/05/23. pmid:24850760.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Condamine T, Gabrilovich DI. Molecular mechanisms regulating myeloid-derived suppressor cell differentiation and function. Trends in immunology. 2011;32(1):19–25. pmid:21067974; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3053028.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Magnius LO, Espmark JA. New specificities in Australia antigen positive sera distinct from the Le Bouvier determinants. Journal of immunology. 1972;109(5):1017–21. pmid:4116763.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Stewart TJ, Smyth MJ. Improving cancer immunotherapy by targeting tumor-induced immune suppression. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2011;30(1):125–40. pmid:21249424.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Alexopoulou A, Karayiannis P. HBeAg negative variants and their role in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(24):7644–52. pmid:24976702; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4069293.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Tong S, Li J, Wands JR, Wen YM. Hepatitis B virus genetic variants: biological properties and clinical implications. Emerging microbes & infections. 2013;2(3):e10. pmid:26038454; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3636426.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] PubMed/NCBI

[111] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Pang X, Song H, Zhang Q, Tu Z, Niu J. Hepatitis C virus regulates the production of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells through PI3K pathway and autocrine signaling. Clinical immunology. 2016;164:57–64. Epub 2016/01/29. pmid:26821305.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[113] View Article

[114] PubMed/NCBI

[115] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Tu S, Bhagat G, Cui G, Takaishi S, Kurt-Jones EA, Rickman B, et al. Overexpression of interleukin-1beta induces gastric inflammation and cancer and mobilizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice. Cancer cell. 2008;14(5):408–19. pmid:18977329; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2586894.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] PubMed/NCBI

[119] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Bunt SK, Yang L, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Reduced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment delays the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and limits tumor progression. Cancer research. 2007;67(20):10019–26. pmid:17942936; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4402704.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[121] View Article

[122] PubMed/NCBI

[123] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Dolcetti L, Peranzoni E, Ugel S, Marigo I, Fernandez Gomez A, Mesa C, et al. Hierarchy of immunosuppressive strength among myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets is determined by GM-CSF. European journal of immunology. 2010;40(1):22–35. Epub 2009/11/27. pmid:19941314.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Bunt SK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Inflammation induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that facilitate tumor progression. Journal of immunology. 2006;176(1):284–90. Epub 2005/12/21. pmid:16365420.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] PubMed/NCBI

[131] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Parker KH, Beury DW, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Critical Cells Driving Immune Suppression in the Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in cancer research. 2015;128:95–139. pmid:26216631; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4662416.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] PubMed/NCBI

[135] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Lob S, Konigsrainer A, Rammensee HG, Opelz G, Terness P. Inhibitors of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase for cancer therapy: can we see the wood for the trees? Nature reviews Cancer. 2009;9(6):445–52. Epub 2009/05/23. pmid:19461669.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] PubMed/NCBI

[139] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Yu J, Wang Y, Yan F, Zhang P, Li H, Zhao H, et al. Noncanonical NF-kappaB activation mediates STAT3-stimulated IDO upregulation in myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer. Journal of immunology. 2014;193(5):2574–86. pmid:25063873; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4719564.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of hepatology. 2012;57(1):167–85. Epub 2012/03/23. pmid:22436845.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] PubMed/NCBI

[147] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Zhou P, Yang F, Wang J, Mao R, Qi X, Huang Y, et al. Improved Efficacy of a pegylated interferon-alpha-2a stepwise optimization treatment strategy in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. Medicine. 2015;94(17):e730. pmid:25929904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4603052.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. European Association For The Study Of The L. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Journal of hepatology. 2012;57(1):167–85. pmid:22436845.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] PubMed/NCBI

[155] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Silswal N, Singh AK, Aruna B, Mukhopadhyay S, Ghosh S, Ehtesham NZ. Human resistin stimulates the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-12 in macrophages by NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005;334(4):1092–101. pmid:16039994.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] PubMed/NCBI

[159] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Mao R, Zhang J, Jiang D, Cai D, Levy JM, Cuconati A, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase mediates the antiviral effect of gamma interferon against hepatitis B virus in human hepatocyte-derived cells. Journal of virology. 2011;85(2):1048–57. pmid:21084489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3019998.
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[161] View Article

[162] PubMed/NCBI

[163] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Results

High frequency of mMDSCs in HBeAg (+) CHB patients

Correlations between mMDSCs frequency and clinical parameters

HBeAg induces mMDSCs expansion in vitro

HBeAg-mediated mMDSCs expansion is dependent on IL-6/IL-1β

HBeAg-induced CD33+ cells suppress CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation in vitro

mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients suppress T cells response via IDO

Discussion

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Study participants

Cell isolation and sorting

Flow cytometric analysis

ROS assay

Induction of mMDSCs in vitro

Cytokine detection

T cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion assays

Real-time PCR

Statistical analysis

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The frequency of mMDSCs is elevated in whole blood of CHB patients.

S2 Fig. The percentage of mMDSCs in healthy controls with different age.

S3 Fig. Correlation analysis between the percentage of mMDSCs in PBMCs and virological parameters.

S4 Fig. Assessment of effect of recombinant HBV antigens on mMDSCs expansion.

S5 Fig. The time course analysis of rHBeAg-mediated mMDSC induction.

S6 Fig. rHBeAg-induced mMDSCs expansion is not due to possible LPS contamination.

S7 Fig. HBeAg (+) patient serum induces mMDSCs expansion in an IL-6 and IL-1β dependent manner.

S8 Fig. The expression levels of surface marker CD14, CD11b and HLA-DR in CD33+ cells treated with HBeAg.

S9 Fig. FCS analyses of PD-L1, Arg1 and IL-10 expression and ROS activity in rHBeAg-treated PBMCs.

S10 Fig. HBeAg (+) patient-derived mMDSCs suppress T-cell responses.

S11 Fig. Comparison of expression levels of p47phox, gp91 and PD-L1 in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients and healthy controls.

S1 Table. Clinical characteristics of enrolled subjects for analyzing frequency of mMDSCs in whole blood.

S2 Table. Clinical parameters of serum samples from enrolled healthy controls and Nuc-treated CHB patients.

S3 Table. Gene-specific primers for RT-qPCR.

Acknowledgments

References

HBeAg-induced CD33⁺ cells suppress CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell activation in vitro

S8 Fig. The expression levels of surface marker CD14, CD11b and HLA-DR in CD33⁺ cells treated with HBeAg.

S11 Fig. Comparison of expression levels of p47^phox, gp91 and PD-L1 in mMDSCs from HBeAg (+) CHB patients and healthy controls.