Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

SCF Ubiquitin Ligase F-box Protein Fbx15 Controls Nuclear Co-repressor Localization, Stress Response and Virulence of the Human Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus

  • Bastian Jöhnk,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics and Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

  • Özgür Bayram,

    Affiliations Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics and Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany, Department of Biology, Maynooth University, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland

  • Anja Abelmann,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics and Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

  • Thorsten Heinekamp,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Applied Microbiology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

  • Derek J. Mattern,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Applied Microbiology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

  • Axel A. Brakhage,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Applied Microbiology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

  • Ilse D. Jacobsen,

    Affiliation Research Group Microbial Immunology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

  • Oliver Valerius,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics and Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

  • Gerhard H. Braus

    gbraus@gwdg.de

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics and Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

SCF Ubiquitin Ligase F-box Protein Fbx15 Controls Nuclear Co-repressor Localization, Stress Response and Virulence of the Human Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus

  • Bastian Jöhnk, 
  • Özgür Bayram, 
  • Anja Abelmann, 
  • Thorsten Heinekamp, 
  • Derek J. Mattern, 
  • Axel A. Brakhage, 
  • Ilse D. Jacobsen, 
  • Oliver Valerius, 
  • Gerhard H. Braus
PLOS
x

Abstract

F-box proteins share the F-box domain to connect substrates of E3 SCF ubiquitin RING ligases through the adaptor Skp1/A to Cul1/A scaffolds. F-box protein Fbx15 is part of the general stress response of the human pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. Oxidative stress induces a transient peak of fbx15 expression, resulting in 3x elevated Fbx15 protein levels. During non-stress conditions Fbx15 is phosphorylated and F-box mediated interaction with SkpA preferentially happens in smaller subpopulations in the cytoplasm. The F-box of Fbx15 is required for an appropriate oxidative stress response, which results in rapid dephosphorylation of Fbx15 and a shift of the cellular interaction with SkpA to the nucleus. Fbx15 binds SsnF/Ssn6 as part of the RcoA/Tup1-SsnF/Ssn6 co-repressor and is required for its correct nuclear localization. Dephosphorylated Fbx15 prevents SsnF/Ssn6 nuclear localization and results in the derepression of gliotoxin gene expression. fbx15 deletion mutants are unable to infect immunocompromised mice in a model for invasive aspergillosis. Fbx15 has a novel dual molecular function by controlling transcriptional repression and being part of SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases, which is essential for stress response, gliotoxin production and virulence in the opportunistic human pathogen A. fumigatus.

Author Summary

The opportunistic human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus is the most prevalent cause for severe fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts. A major virulence factor of A. fumigatus is its ability to rapidly adapt to host conditions during infection. The rapid response to environmental changes underlies a well-balanced system of production and degradation of proteins. The degradation of specific target proteins is mediated by ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3), which mark their target proteins with ubiquitin for proteasomal degradation. Multisubunit SCF Cullin1 Ring ligases (CRL) are E3 ligases where the F-box subunit functions as a substrate-specificity determining adaptor. A comprehensive control of protein production includes global co-repressors as the conserved Ssn6(SsnF)-Tup1(RcoA) complex, which reduces transcription on multiple levels. We have identified a novel connection between protein degradation and synthesis through an F-box protein. Fbx15 can be incorporated into SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases and controls upon stress the nuclear localization of the SsnF. Fbx15 plays a critical role for A. fumigatus adaptation and is essential for virulence in a murine infection model. Fbx15 is a fungal-specific protein and therefore a potential target for future drug development.

Introduction

The ubiquitin 26S proteasome system (UPS) controls the life span of specific regulatory proteins, which are required for coordinated development, signal transduction and DNA maintenance. Target proteins are linked to ubiquitin by the sequential action of E1, E2 and E3 enzymes. A crucial step during this enzymatic cascade is carried out by E3 ubiquitin ligases, which recognize their specific substrate and catalyze the transfer of ubiquitin. SCF-complexes are multi-subunit E3 enzymes consisting of three major subunits (Cul1, Skp1 and Rbx1), which form the core enzyme and an exchangeable set of substrate-specific adaptors called F-box proteins [1,2]. The F-box domain of these adaptors is an N-terminal binding site of approximately 45 amino acids. It binds to the Skp1 linker to connect to Cul1. The human genome encodes 69 F-box proteins and defects in F-box mediated ubiquitination are associated with various diseases like diabetes, Parkinson or cancer [35]. Only little is known about the role of F-box proteins in virulence of fungal pathogens, though fungal F-box proteins play important roles for cellular development, transcription, signal transduction and nutrient sensing [68].

Aspergillus fumigatus is a soil borne, ubiquitously distributed filamentous fungus, growing on organic matter [3,9]. Besides its saprophytic lifestyle A. fumigatus also acts as an opportunistic human pathogen and causes life-threatening invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in immunocompromised hosts. High mortality rates of up to 90% among infected patients are linked to azole resistance, the lack of new antifungals and increasing numbers of immunosuppressive therapies [912]. Great efforts have been conducted to identify virulence factors, which discriminate A. fumigatus from its closely related but significantly less pathogenic relative Aspergillus nidulans [1319]. Virulence of A. fumigatus is presumably the result of a complex multifactorial network, rather than unique and sophisticated virulence factors. A. fumigatus pathogenicity is based on small infectious conidia and its ability to rapidly adapt to constantly changing conditions including high temperature, nutritional changes, hypoxia or high pH [4,20]. This is further supported by the production of secondary metabolites (SM) such as melanins, which protect from UV radiation or the immunosuppressive mycotoxin gliotoxin [2123].

The rapid responses of A. fumigatus to environmental stressors are linked to distinct evolutionary conserved molecular mechanisms, which are often part of development regulating processes [1,2]. A recently identified important developmental regulator in A. nidulans is Fbx15, which is required for sexual and asexual development. Furthermore, Fbx15 accumulates in SCFFbx15 complexes in csn-deficient mutants of A. nidulans [35]. The COP9 signalosome (CSN) multi-subunit complex plays a crucial role in fruiting body formation, oxidative stress tolerance and SM production in A. nidulans [6,7,24,25]. CSN acts as deneddylase by removing the isopeptide bond of the ubiquitin-like protein Nedd8 from a lysine residue of cullin scaffolds of those E3 ligases, which are not interacting with substrate molecules for ubqituitination [3,9]. Repetitive cycles of cullin neddylation/deneddylation are especially important for development because they promote the exchange of F-box adaptors from SCF E3 ligases [912]. The genomes of A. nidulans or its pathogenic counterpart A. fumigatus comprise approximately 70 F-box protein encoding genes, of which three (fbx15, fbx23, grrA) have been reported to influence developmental steps in A. nidulans [4,1318,26].

In this study we characterized the molecular function of the Fbx15 counterpart of the pathogen A. fumigatus. We were originally interested whether F-box proteins, which play a crucial role for fungal development in A. nidulans are connected to A. fumigatus pathogenicity. We found a novel dual function for F-box proteins because Fbx15 is not only part of nuclear SCF complexes but also controls the nuclear localization of the SsnF/Ssn6 component of the highly conserved eukaryotic transcriptional co-repressor complex Ssn6/Tup1. Cellular Fbx15 function is controlled by posttranslational phosphorylation and dephosphorylation during stress. Fbx15 including the F-box domain is required for cellular stress responses, the control of gliotoxin production and for virulence in a mouse model. Fbx15 is fungal-specific and might therefore be an interesting novel target for new drugs to treat invasive aspergillosis.

Results

Fbx15 is essential for a general stress response in Aspergillus fumigatus

A. fumigatus fbx15 (Afu3g14150) corresponds to the gene of A. nidulans encoding F-box protein 15, which is required for development [4,20]. Several cDNAs of this gene locus were sequenced and revealed that the A. fumigatus fbx15 gene structure consists of two exons and one intron resulting in a deduced open reading frame of 655 codons for a protein with a predicted molecular mass of 75 kDa (Fig 1A). Alignments of the A. fumigatus Fbx15 primary sequence revealed that high similarities are restricted to the Aspergilli counterparts with similarities between 72.8% and 59.8%, whereas Fbx15-like proteins of other filamentous fungi like Penicillium chrysogenum or Neurospora crassa share significant lower similarities of 43.6% and 24.7% respectively (Fig 1B, S1 Table). Two signature motifs are located almost in the middle of Fbx15 and include motif 1, which is specific for the genus Aspergillus and motif 2 that is also present in other fungi as P. chrysogenum or N. crassa (Fig 1B, S2 Table). Bioinformatics analysis predicts two nuclear localization signals (NLS), which suggest that Fbx15 might exhibit its function in the nucleus (Fig 1B).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Aspergillus fumigatus F-box domain protein Fbx15 is indispensible for oxidative stress response.

(A) fbx15 genomic locus, structure and transcripts. (B) The primary sequence of A. fumigatus Fbx15 F-box domain was compared with fungal homologues by ClustalW alignment. Highly conserved amino acids are marked in white; an arrow indicates the characteristic proline residue at position seven of the F-box domain. (C) fbx deletion mutants Δfbx15 and to less extent Δfbx23 and ΔgrrA showed increased oxidative stress sensitivity, which could be complemented by reintroduction of the wild type fbx-genes. (D) Δfbx15 mutant showed hyphal defects at low H2O2 concentrations. (E) Expression levels of cat1 encoding a mycelial catalase were increased in the Δfbx15 mutant, whereas wild type and complemented strain showed only slightly elevated cat1 mRNA levels after H2O2 exposure. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test (**P<0.01; ***P<0.001). (F) fbx15 transcript expression in AfS35 (WT) showed a rapid increase in the first 20 min upon oxidative stress and with a short delay increased protein levels, which are detected by an Fbx15 specific antibody. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g001

The function of fbx15 in A. fumigatus was genetically addressed by creating an fbx15 deletion. The mutant strain formed normal colonies on minimal medium (MM), but oxidative stress caused by 3 mM H2O2 abolished growth, whereas the wild type could still grow (Fig 1C). 1 mM H2O2, which had no impact on wild type, resulted in hyperbranched, swollen hyphae in the Δfbx15 strain (Fig 1D). On media containing superoxides-producing menadione or thiol-oxidizing diamide the Δfbx15 mutant displayed defects in growth and sporulation, which implies a general Fbx15 mediated resistance mechanism against oxidative stress, upstream of distinct stress response pathways (S1B Fig). Severe growth and sporulation defects were also observed when the Δfbx15 mutant was exposed to other stress conditions including elevated temperature, amino acid starvation, microtubule stress, osmotic stress or mutagenic stresses (S1C Fig).

The importance of Fbx15 during stress was compared to other F-box proteins, which have been previously shown to be involved in fungal development. Fbx23 is important to initiate A. nidulans asexual development [4,2123], whereas GrrA is an F-box protein that is required for the maturation of sexual spores [2629]. These two F-box proteins are conserved from fungi to higher eukaryotes (S1 Table). Characterization of both deletion mutants in A. fumigatus showed more distinct and less prominent phenotypes compared to the Δfbx15 mutant strain. In contrast to the wild type, deletion of fbx23 led to a decreased colony size, whereas the colony size of the ΔgrrA mutant was not affected under normal growth conditions (Fig 1C).

Growth defects of Δfbx23 and ΔgrrA in comparison to wild type were observed under amino acid starvation or microtubule stress. Both deletion strains were sensitive to topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT, whereas DNA-methylating MMS had a similar impact on wild type and mutant growth (S1C Fig). These results indicated that Fbx23 as well as GrrA are involved in the DNA replication process, whereas Fbx15 is additionally required for the repair of DNA-damage caused by methylation. Growth under increased temperature or oxidative stress conditions are important virulence factors of A. fumigatus [30]. The deletion of fbx23 led to a reduced colony size under high temperature (42°C) or oxidative stress, when compared to the wild type, whereas the ΔgrrA strain was only slightly affected by H2O2 (Fig 1C, S1C Fig).

These data suggest that the three F-box proteins Fbx23, GrrA and Fbx15 are part of a general stress response in A. fumigatus caused by multiple environmental stressors. The impact of the strain lacking Fbx15 suggests that this protein plays a key role in the fungal stress response.

Oxidative stress transiently induces fbx15 expression

Oxidative stress caused drastic effects on the Δfbx15 mutant, whereas fbx15 overexpression resulted in a wild type like phenotype (S1A Fig). Oxidative stress, in particular by peroxides like H2O2, leads to an elevated expression of catalases, which function as potent ROS scavenger [31,32]. A. fumigatus produces one conidial and two mycelial catalases. The expression of cat1, which encodes one of the mycelial catalases, was regulated in an Fbx15 dependent manner. The lack of fbx15 led to an approximately 2.5x derepressed basal cat1 expression, compared to wild type or a complemented strain during non-stress conditions (Fig 1E). After exposure to H2O2, the expression of cat1 in the Δfbx15 mutant was further increased, whereas wild type or complemented strain displayed only slight upregulation. Increased cat1 levels were not sufficient to protect the Δfbx15 mutant from oxidative stress. Fbx15 presumably is involved in additional molecular mechanisms, which protect against oxidative stress. The exposure to oxidative stress was analyzed as a possible external signal, which triggers changes in fbx15 expression in A. fumigatus. Fungal cultures were exposed to H2O2 and harvested at different time points within a 120 min period. fbx15 transcript levels were determined with real-time PCR (RT-PCR). A rapid increase of fbx15 expression was observed in the first 20 min reaching its maximum peak at 40 min with a 14-fold increased gene expression. Afterwards the expression decreased to a basal level, which is approximately 4-fold increased compared to the non-induced expression. Proteins from the same samples were extracted to test whether the changes in fbx15 transcript levels are also reflected on protein level. Fbx15 was visualized after immunoblotting by incubation with a polyclonal Fbx15 specific antibody. The general abundance of Fbx15 was very low. A three-fold increase of Fbx15 protein amounts was measured, starting after 40 min of H2O2 exposure, which was similar in the complemented strain and absent in the Δfbx15 mutant, mirroring the increased gene expression on the protein level with a delay of 20 min (Fig 1F, S1D Fig). These data suggest that the Fbx15 protein levels are increased as part of a stress adaption response towards H2O2 mediated ROS.

Fbx15 is predominantly localized in the nucleus

Two putative nuclear localization sites of Fbx15 suggest a nuclear function. A similar situation is found for the conserved A. fumigatus F-box protein SconB, which also possesses two nuclear localization signals, and was used as control (S1 Table). Similar to sconB of A. nidulans, sconB is essential for A. fumigatus as we could show with heterokaryon rescue assay (S2A and S2B Fig). Constitutively expressed GFP fusions of Fbx15 and SconB were compared for their subcellular localizations. Both F-box GFP fusions were functional during normal and oxidative stress growth conditions (S2C Fig). Fbx15 and SconB are primarily co-localized in fluorescence microscopy with DAPI stained nuclei, though small subpopulations of both proteins remain in the cytoplasm (S2D Fig). These data suggest a predominant nuclear function for both A. fumigatus F-box proteins.

Fbx15 is phosphorylated during vegetative growth under non-stress conditions

Fbx15 is primarily nuclear but has a significant cytoplasmic subpopulation. Different localizations of Fbx15 could be a result of controlled posttranslational phosphorylation. A bioinformatic analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of Fbx15 with NetPhos 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos) [3335] predicts in total 15 serine, 11 threonine and 4 tyrosine residues as putative phosphorylation sites (score value between 0 and 1; cutoff value >0.5: S3A Fig). An Fbx15 phosphopeptide with a single phosphorylation was identified with mass-spectrometry of purified functional Fbx15-TAP fusions from non-stressed cultures. Analysis of the MS2-spectra of this phosphopeptide with the phosphoRS software [36] revealed serine residues 468 and 469 as potential phosphorylation sites with probabilities of 45.5% each, whereas Ser473 only showed a low probability of 8.9% (Fig 2A). Theoretical analysis for Fbx15 phosphosites showed a high score value of 0.988 for Ser469, whereas Ser468 had a low score value of 0.029 and therefore is unlikely to be phosphorylated (S3A Fig). In contrast no phosphopeptides were identified for purified Fbx15-GFP fusions when the cells were grown under oxidative stress. Fbx15 is presumably phosphorylated during vegetative growth under non-stress conditions at Ser468 or Ser469 (Ser468/469), whereas it is unphosphorylated when H2O2-mediated oxidative stress is applied.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Fbx15 phosphorylation decreases during oxidative stress treatment and shifts the cellular interaction site with SkpA to the nucleus.

(A) Phosphorylated peptide of Fbx15 identified by LC-MS/MS after TAP-purification. Phosphorylation probabilities are based on NetPhos 2.0. (B) Immunoblotting of purified Fbx15-GFP before and after 3 mM H2O2 treatment with an S/T-phospho-specific antibody revealed rapid dephosphorylation of Fbx15. The graph represents mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments, with S/T-phospho-specific signal intensities normalized to total Fbx15 amount detected by GFP-specific antibody. Normalized Signal intensities were analyzed using two-sample t-test (**P<0.01; ***P<0.001). (C) Peptides of purified Fbx15-GFP before and after incubation with 3 mM H2O2 were differentially labeled with TMT isobaric mass labeling reagent. LC-MS/MS determined ratios of the TMT reporter-ion intensities for the MS2-spectra of the phosphopeptide are given. The graph on the right represents the reciprocal values, which confirmed specific dephosphorylation of S468/469 upon oxidative stress. Ratios of the TMT reporter-ion intensities from normalized phosphopeptides of N = 2 independent experiments were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (**P<0.01). (D) BiFC signals of Fbx15 and SkpA occurred mostly in the cytoplasm, whereas unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] interacted with SkpA primarily in the nucleus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g002

Phosphorylated Fbx15 interacts with the GlcA/BimG phosphatase and is dephosphorylated during oxidative stress

Phosphorylation of Fbx15 under normal growth conditions and dephosphorylation during H2O2-mediated oxidative stress suggests the presence of a phosphatase that might be specifically activated. GFP-traps with Fbx15-GFP recruited GlcA as the only phosphatase that interacts in cultures with or without stress (S3B Fig). A direct interaction of Fbx15 with GlcA could be observed using bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC), which was primarily visible after induction with H2O2 (S3C Fig). The A. nidulans GlcA homolog BimG has been characterized as essential major protein phosphatase 1, which is associated with thermo tolerance and hyphal morphology, features that were impaired in the Δfbx15 mutant [37,38]. Heterokaryon rescue experiments with a glcA deletion cassette and accompanying Southern-hybridizations verified that the situation is similar and glcA is essential for A. fumigatus as well (S3C and S3D Fig).

The dephosphorylation rate of Fbx15 in response to H2O2 was quantified. Fbx15-GFP expressing strains were grown in liquid cultures and subjected to oxidative stress by adding 3 mM H2O2. Fbx15-GFP from these cultures was purified and treated with an antibody against phosphorylated Ser/Thr residues. The rate of dephosphorylation was quantified against the overall amount of Fbx15-GFP, determined by an anti-GFP antibody (Fig 2B). 40% dephosphorylation upon H2O2-treatment indicated that Fbx15 becomes dephosphorylated in an oxidative stress-dependent manner. The Fbx15 dephosphorylation sites were localized by TMT isobaric mass tag labeling and LC-MS/MS [39]. Fbx15-GFP was enrichment from cultures before and after H2O2 treatment and separated on a coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE. After tryptic digestion, peptides from the untreated culture were labeled with TMT127 (heavy) whereas TMT126 (light) was used for all time points of the H2O2 treated cultures. The sample of time point zero was individually mixed with all other time points and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The parameters for fragmentation during mass spectrometry were set to identify only the phosphorylated peptide of Fbx15. Specific ratios of the heavy labeled phosphopeptide were obtained from time point zero against the light labeled phosphopeptides from the other conditions. These values were quantified against the ratios of two unmodified reference peptides of Fbx15, which represented the overall amount of purified Fbx15. The reciprocal values of these ratios are decreasing, thus reflecting a specific dephosphorylation on Ser468/469 (Fig 2C). Fbx15, which becomes phosphorylated at Ser468/469 under non-stress conditions, is presumably dephosphorylated when cells encounter H2O2-mediated oxidative stress by the Fbx15 interacting phosphatase GlcA/BimG.

Fbx15 dephosphorylation shifts the interaction with SkpA from the cytoplasm into the nucleus

The canonical function of F-box proteins is their ability to form ubiquitinating SCF ligase complexes by binding to the SkpA adaptor. A. fumigatus Fbx15 and SconB interactions to the SkpA SCF adaptor were compared by using BiFC. Both Fbx15 and SconB protein fusions produced an YFP-signal, indicating F-box protein-SkpA interactions. SconB interacted with SkpA almost exclusively in the nucleus (>90%), whereas 74% of the Fbx15-SkpA interaction was cytoplasmic (Fig 2D and S4A Fig). The Fbx15 serine codons of wild type positions S468 and S469 were replaced to alanine residues to mimic a constantly dephosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] to analyze whether Fbx15 phosphorylation is relevant for the location of the Fbx15-SkpA interaction. Interaction of Fbx15[S468|9A] variant with SkpA resulted in a nuclear signal (Fig 2D). Dephosphorylated Fbx15 primarily interacts with SkpA in the nucleus to form SCF-complexes. Growth without stress rather results in phosphorylated Fbx15 with presumably only limited amounts of dephosphorylated Fbx15 in the nucleus.

Phosphorylated and unphosphorylated Fbx15-SkpA heterodimers can interact with CulA

Dephosphorylation of Fbx15 is triggered by H2O2-mediated ROS. The impact of the phosphorylation state of Fbx15 on its ability to interact with SCF-complexes was analyzed by replacing the serine residue S469 in Fbx15 with aspartate to mimic a constant phosphorylation Fbx15[S469D] or S468 and S469 with alanine to mimic unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A]. Both constructs and the wild type gene were expressed under the native promoter as Fbx15-RFP fusions. Immunoblotting confirmed that all Fbx15 versions were more abundant after H2O2 exposure (Fig 3A).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phosphorylated or unphosphorylated Fbx15 can interact with SkpA and CulA.

(A) Immunohybridization of Fbx15-RFP and phosphomutant versions of Fbx15, which mimic either an unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A]-RFP or a constant phosphorylation Fbx15[S469D]-RFP before and after H2O2-mediated oxidative stress. (B) Scheme of an active SCF-complex. (C) Heatmap of co-purified SCF subunits for RFP-tagged Fbx15 and phosphomutant versions after oxidative stress.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g003

RFP-trap co-purifications followed by LC-MS/MS with wild type Fbx15 or phosphomutant variants after oxidative stress induction with H2O2 were performed to identify which subunits of the SCF-ligase machinery interact with Fbx15. Further analysis included MaxQuant quantitative proteomic software in conjunction with Perseus software for statistical analysis, with a focus on the subunits of the SCF-ligase machinery. SCFs are activated by the RING protein RbxA-mediated interaction with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and covalent cullin modification by ubiquitin like NeddH (Fig 3B). SCF core components SkpA or CulA interacted with Fbx15, independently of the phosphorylation-state. Native Fbx15, which is presumably dephosphorylated at S468/S469 after oxidative stress or unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] could co-purify NeddH, but not RbxA or an E2 enzyme. In contrast the Fbx15, mimicking a constant phosphorylation, co-purified all subunits for an active SCF complex. NeddH was more abundant in co-purifications of the constantly phosphorylated Fbx15[S469D] than of unphosphorylated versions of Fbx15. RbxA and the E2 enzyme UbcM were only purified with negatively charged Fbx15[S469D], indicating an improved assembly of functional SCF-ligase complexes when Fbx15 is phosphorylated at Ser469 (Fig 3C). Active SCFFbx15 complexes contain therefore more likely phosphorylated than unphosphorylated Fbx15.

Since Fbx15 interacted within SCF complexes the cellular ubiquitination pattern of the Δfbx15 mutant, wild type and the fbx15 overexpression strain were compared before and after induction with H2O2. Neither the ubiquitination-pattern nor the general protein composition of the Δfbx15-strain was significantly altered in comparison to the wild type or the fbx15 overexpression strain, suggesting that the ubiquitination targets of SCFFbx15 complexes are limited (S4B and S4C Fig).

Fbx15 recruits 38 putative interacting proteins during TAP-enrichment

Additional potential interacting proteins for Fbx15 were identified by tandem-affinity-purification (TAP) and compared to co-purifications of SconB-TAP fusions. Variants of fbx15 and sconB were created where the conserved proline of the F-box domain was exchanged to a serine. This should weaken the F-box-SkpA binding and enable recruitment of SCF-independent interaction partners. The exchanged proline in SconB led to significantly increased protein stability, whereas stability of Fbx15 was not altered (S5 Fig). This reflects a possible autocatalytic mechanism for SCFSconB, where SconB is ubiquitinated within its own SCF ligase and eventually degraded [40,41], whereas Fbx15 stability seems to be independent of SCFFbx15. SconB-TAP recruited less proteins (22) than Fbx15 (38). SconB interactors include transcriptional activator MetR as known SCFSconB target [1] and 11 proteins that were identified for both F-box proteins including SCF subunits CulA and SkpA. Only Fbx15 was able to co-purify three subunits of the CSN deneddylase, which acts on neddylated cullin complexes, which do not interact with substrates [3]. This might reflect a highly dynamic assembly/disassembly of SCFFbx15 complexes (S3 Table).

The predominant nuclear localization of Fbx15 and SconB is consistent with nuclear interaction partners, which were identified during TAP co-purifications. These included two transcriptional regulators (RcoA/Tup1 and a putative APSES transcription factor), a DNA repair enzyme (AFUA_2G06140) and a single-stranded DNA binding protein (AFUA_5G07890/Rim1p) (Fig 4A). The fact that Fbx15 and SconB recruited these proteins might reflect a tight stability control by more than one F-box protein. In addition Fbx15 recruited specifically three transcriptional regulators (OefC, SrbB and SsnF/Ssn6), a nuclear GTPase (AFUA_4G8930/Nog2p) and the nuclear pore protein Nic96. (Fig 4A). A potential candidate, responsible for Fbx15 phosphorylation is the interacting cyclin-dependent serine/threonine kinase NimX/Cdc28p, which is required for cell cycle control and conidiophore morphology in A. nidulans [6]. A direct interaction of Fbx15 and NimX could be verified by BiFC assay, where the interaction signal from the reconstituted YFP was observed predominantly in the cytoplasm (S6A Fig). However, the NimX homolog in A. fumigatus is presumably encoded by an essential gene as we could show by heterokaryon assay and Southern hybridization (S6B and S6C Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Fbx15 interacts with the transcriptional repressor subunit SsnF without affecting its stability.

(A) Scheme of a subset of interacting proteins of Fbx15 and SconB based on LC-MS/MS identifications. Shown are presumably nuclear proteins, which are either exclusively found for each F-box protein or which were found for both. Further Fbx15-TAP co-purified proteins included three CSN subunits and the cyclin-dependent kinase NimX. (B) BiFC of Fbx15 and SsnF showed a predominantly cytoplasmic YFP-signal, whereas unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] interacted with SsnF primarily in the nucleus. (C) Protein stability assays of SsnF-GFP in wild type, Δfbx15 or fbx15 overexpression backgrounds with cultures exposed to cycloheximide (CHX) showed no Fbx15-dependent SsnF stability changes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g004

Fbx15 and SconB interaction partners include possible targets for SCF mediated ubiquitination. Three Fbx15 interacting CSN subunits suggest a more dynamic assembly/disassembly of SCFFbx15 in comparison to SCFSconB. An interesting finding is that both F-box proteins co-purified RcoA/Tup1 as part of the conserved transcriptional co-repressor complex RcoA/Tup1-SsnF/Ssn6, but only Fbx15 recruited the SsnF/Ssn6 subunit of this complex.

Fbx15 interaction with SsnF does not change the stability of the co-repressor subunit

The yeast Ssn6-Tup1 co-repressor complex affects the expression of 7% of all genes with emphasis on stress responses [9]. A homo-tetramer of RcoA/Tup1 repressor subunits is connected to one SsnF/Ssn6 adaptor protein, which binds to a DNA-binding protein, escorting the repressor complex to the target genes. The corresponding SsnF encoding gene of the model A. nidulans is essential for growth, whereas the yeast counterpart Ssn6 is dispensable [9,42]. With heterokaryon rescue and subsequent Southern analysis we could show that ssnF is not only essential for A. nidulans but also for A. fumigatus (S6D and S6E Fig). A BiFC signal verified the direct interaction of Fbx15 and SsnF in A. fumigatus under non-stress conditions in the cytoplasm, often located close to nuclei. Unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] which reflected H2O2-mediated oxidative stress conditions interacted with SsnF predominantly in the nucleus, similar to the Fbx15-SkpA interaction (Fig 4B). Fbx15 levels in different strain backgrounds did not influence SsnF stability in cycloheximide (CHX) protein-stability assays (Fig 4C). The amount of SsnF-GFP in wild type or fbx15 deletion mutant did not change in the absence or presence of 3 mM H2O2 nor did SsnF exhibit an Fbx15 dependent ubiquitination pattern (S6F and S6G Fig). This suggests that SsnF is not a significant substrate of an active SCFFbx15 E3 complex but acts as additional physical Fbx15 interaction partner.

Fbx15 is required for correct nuclear localization of SsnF

SsnF-GFP is localized in the nucleus in the presence of Fbx15, but accumulates at the nuclear envelope presumably enriched at nuclear pore complexes in the absence of Fbx15. This suggests that SsnF import is impaired without Fbx15 (Fig 5A). It was analyzed whether dephosphorylation of Fbx15 is involved in SsnF nuclear localization. In fbx15 wild type as well as in the fbx15 variant strain (Fbx15[S469D]), that mimics constant phosphorylation, SsnF-GFP was localized in the nucleus. In the fbx15 codon replacement mutant expressing the Fbx15[S468|9A] variant, which cannot be phosphorylated, SsnF accumulated at the nuclear envelope similar to the Δfbx15 strain. Correct nuclear SsnF-GFP localization could be either abolished after Fbx15 wild type dephosphorylation due to H2O2 or in the presence of the Fbx15[S468|9A] variant, which cannot be phosphorylated. In contrast, oxidative stress did not interfere with SsnF-GFP nuclear localization, when only the negatively charged Fbx15[S469D] was present, which mimics constant phosphorylation (Fig 5B).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Fbx15 is required for nuclear localization of SsnF.

(A) Fluorescence microscopy of SsnF-GFP in wild type or Δfbx15 background revealed that SsnF-GFP was localized to the periphery of the nuclei in Δfbx15, whereas it was inside the nuclei in wild type. (B) SsnF-GFP localization in wild type Fbx15-RFP, unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A]-RFP or phosphorylated Fbx15[S469D]-RFP in backgrounds before and after H2O2-treatment. Under normal growth conditions SsnF is nuclear in the presence of either the wild type or the phosphate mimicking Fbx15[S469D] variant, whereas SsnF-GFP accumulates at the nuclear envelope in presence of the non-phosphorylatable Fbx15[S468|9A]. Upon oxidative stress, the dephosphorylation of wild type Fbx15 leads to similar subpopulations of SsnF like the unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A]. In phosphorylated Fbx15[S469D] SsnF enters the nucleus even after H2O2-treatment. (C) Growth tests of A. fumigatus strains expressing either wild type fbx15::rfp (AfGB98), rfp tagged phosphovariants of fbx15 (AfGB101 and AfGB102) or corresponding rfp-tagged versions of fbx15 that lack the F-box domain (AfGB125, AfGB126 and AfGB127). 5 x 103 conidia were spotted on minimal medium (MM) plate, supplemented with 2 mM H2O2 for providing oxidative stress, and grown for four days at 37°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g005

These data support that phosphorylation of Fbx15 under non-stress conditions favors nuclear localization of SsnF, whereas Fbx15 dephosphorylation during H2O2-mediated oxidative stress leads to an accumulation of SsnF at the nuclear envelope.

The F-box of Fbx15 is essential and the phosphorylation status, which controls SsnF nuclear localization, contributes to the fungal stress response

The contribution of the Fbx15[S468|9A] variant, which cannot be phosphorylated and interferes with nuclear SsnF, to the fungal oxidative stress response was analyzed. Growth tests on different oxidative stress providing media showed that mutant strains expressing the non-phosphorylable Fbx15[S468|9A] as well as the phosphate mimicking Fbx15[S469D] showed mild colony growth reductions in comparison to the wild type version of Fbx15 (Fig 5C). Similar effects where observed on medium containing superoxide-producing menadione, where the phosphomutant strains showed a slight growth reduction compared to the RFP-tagged wild type Fbx15. Growth on thiol oxidizing media was not affected (S7 Fig). These data support that Fbx15 phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and the control of cellular SsnF localization contribute to an appropriate oxidative stress response.

The function for oxidative stress resistance of the F-box domain of Fbx15 as link to E3 ubiquitin ligases was examined. A gene for an RFP-tagged Fbx15 variant, that lacks the N-terminal F-box domain, and the two additional combinations with the alternative phosphovariants were constructed and the resistance against oxidative stress was tested. Loss of the F-box in all three strains completely abolished growth on media containing H2O2, similar to the Δfbx15 mutant (Fig 5C, S7 Fig).

These results indicate that the F-box, which is required to assemble Fbx15 into SCF ubiquitin ligases, is essential for the fungal oxidative stress response. The function of the oxidative stress controlled phosphorylation status of Fbx15, which channels SsnF nuclear localization, is presumably part of an additional fine-tuning of the appropriate cellular oxidative stress response.

Fbx15 is required for the repression of gliotoxin biosynthesis

A group of genes, which are usually repressed during normal fungal growth, are secondary metabolite genes. Defects in the CSN-regulated ubiquitination machinery result in a drastic misregulation of secondary metabolite formation, such as mycotoxins [13]. A potent immunosuppressive mycotoxin in A. fumigatus is gliotoxin, which is considered as one of multiple virulence factors [20].

It was analyzed, whether Fbx15 is part of the transcriptional repression of gliotoxin synthesis genes, because SsnF, which represents a part of a general conserved transcriptional repression mechanism, is accumulated at the nuclear periphery in the Δfbx15 mutant. We analyzed the expression of gliZ, which encodes a transcriptional activator that has been shown to drive the expression of gli-genes encoded in the gliotoxin gene cluster and gliP, encoding the non-ribosomal peptide synthetase GliP with a key role in gliotoxin biosynthesis [21,23]. The expression of gliZ and gliP in the Δfbx15 mutant increased by almost thirteen and five times respectively in comparison to wild type or complemented strain. Gliotoxin is a toxic metabolite for A. fumigatus itself. Expression patterns of gli genes, which are important for detoxification mechanisms, were examined. These include gliK, which is required for gliotoxin biosynthesis and secretion or gliT encoding a oxidoreductase with the ability to reversibly form the toxic disulphide bond of gliotoxin [2729]. Compared to wild type the gliK and gliT mRNA levels increased significantly in the Δfbx15 mutant by three and twelve times, respectively (Fig 6A).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Deletion of fbx15 results in elevated gliotoxin levels but a loss of virulence in a murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

(A) The Δfbx15 mutant showed an increased gli gene expression compared to wild type and complemented strain. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test (**P<0.01; ***P<0.001). (B) Gliotoxin levels in the Δfbx15 strain were 3x increased compared to wild type and complemented strain. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test (**P<0.01). (C) The RFP-tagged, constantly unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] version caused increased gli gene expression similar to the Δfbx15 mutant and in contrast to the RFP-tagged wild type or Fbx15[S469D] mimicking constant phosphorylation. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test (*P<0.05; **P<0.01). (D) Increased transcription of the gene encoding dephosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] is independent of gliotoxin production levels, which is similar in Fbx15 wild type and both phosphomutant variants of Fbx15. Mean values ± s.d. of N = 3 independent experiments are shown. P-values were calculated using two-sample t-test and showed no significant difference (P>0.1). (E) Survival rates of immunosuppressed mice (n = 10) infected with conidia of the respective Δfbx strains in comparison to mock-infected control group with PBS. Δfbx15-infected mice did not show any symptoms compared to wild type and complemented strain (P<0.0001). The Δfbx23 displayed slightly increased virulence (P = 0.0338), whereas ΔgrrA mutants did not show significant difference to wild type (P>0.05). P-values were determined by the Mantel-Cox log-rank test with pairwise comparison. (F) Histopathology of lung tissue from mice infected with AfS35 (WT), Δfbx15, Δfbx15::fbx15+ and PBS-control using PAS staining. Black arrows indicate infection sites. The infection site of Δfbx15 was already cleared; the lung tissue of AfS35 (WT) and Δfbx15::fbx15+ infected mice displayed normal fungal persistence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g006

Gliotoxin production of the Δfbx15 mutant was determined to analyze whether increased transcription of genes involved in gliotoxin production and detoxification correlates to a change in secondary metabolism. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) revealed that the gliotoxin production of Δfbx15 was increased by 3-fold compared to wild type (Fig 6B).

The phosphomutant versions of Fbx15, which mediate different localization of SsnF in or outside the nucleus, were included into the analysis of the transcription of gliotoxin biosynthetic and protecting genes. The fbx15 variant that produces the non-phosphorylatable Fbx15[S468|9A], which leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of SsnF, showed similarly increased gli gene transcript levels as the Δfbx15 deletion strain for gliZ and gliP and a moderately increased expression of gliK and gliT. In contrast, the Fbx15[S469D] variant mimicking constantly phosphorylation of Fbx15 and supporting nuclear localization of SsnF, resulted in a significantly lower expression of gli gene transcript levels as the non-phosphorylatable Fbx15[S468|9A] (Fig 6C).

Gliotoxin production levels of strains expressing either variant of unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] or phosphorylation mimicking Fbx15[S469D] were in a similar range as wild type and significantly lower than the Δfbx15 deletion strain (Fig 6D).

These results suggest that Fbx15 is required for repression of gli gene expression. The transcription of gli genes is derepressed and in addition the gliotoxin production is increased in the absence of Fbx15, when SsnF accumulates at the nuclear periphery. The transcription of gli genes is also increased in the presence of an unphosphorylatable Fbx15, which excludes SsnF from the nucleus, but gliotoxin production is not increased. This suggests an additional function of Fbx15 at a posttranscriptional layer of control for gliotoxin synthesis, which is independent of its phosphorylation status.

Fbx15 is essential for virulence in a mouse model of aspergillosis

An established murine model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was used to analyze whether Fbx15 mediated stress response and gliotoxin production control affect fungal virulence in comparison to wild type, Δfbx23 and ΔgrrA strains. Immunosuppressed mice infected with wild type, Δfbx23, ΔgrrA or complemented strains displayed normal mortality rates within 14 days, although the Δfbx23 strain displayed a slightly increased virulence (p = 0.03) in direct comparison to the wild type. In contrast, the Δfbx15 mutant completely lost its virulence (Fig 6E). The Δfbx15-infected mice did not show any symptoms and had the same clinical appearance as the mock infected control group, treated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Histopathology analyses of infected lung tissue were consistent with survival rates. Mice infected with either wild type or complemented strains showed fungal hyphae surrounded by tissue necrosis and extensive immune cell infiltration (Fig 6F). Moderate immune cell infiltrates were found in the lungs of mice infected with the Δfbx15 mutant, but no fungal hyphae could be detected. The fungus was cleared at an early stage of infection, probably by innate immune responses and increased temperature and elevated oxidative stress. Our data suggests that Fbx15, which is not required for growth without stress, plays a crucial role during infection because it enables A. fumigatus to adapt to innate immune response conditions of the host including limiting nutrition, fever or oxidative stress.

Discussion

Aspergillus fumigatus is the most prevalent cause for pulmonary infections in immunocompromised patients. High thermo- and oxidative stress tolerance, toxic metabolites and a versatile metabolism allow A. fumigatus to colonize host tissue [30]. We identified the fungal-specific F-box protein Fbx15, which is not required for vegetative growth in the absence of stress, as key determinant for stress response, controlled gliotoxin production and virulence. A novel dual molecular function was discovered for Fbx15. Fbx15 can be part of an SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and in addition controls nuclear localization of SsnF as transcriptional repressor subunit. Fbx15 levels are transcriptionally regulated and Fbx15 location in either the nucleus or the cytoplasm is determined by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, respectively. Fbx15 is a potential target for antifungal drugs, because it is essential for A. fumigatus virulence.

Our data demonstrate that Fbx15 plays a crucial role for adaptive responses to environmental changes and general stress response mechanisms in A. fumigatus whereas during non-stress conditions fbx15 is dispensable for normal growth. This correlates with the expression patterns of fbx15 gene transcription and translation, which demonstrated that Fbx15 becomes only abundant during oxidative stress induction. Whether this behavior is similar for different stressors remains to be shown. The low expression levels of fbx15 during non-stress conditions are is required for the nuclear localization of the transcriptional co-repressor subunit SsnF (Fig 7). The best known example of this repressor complex, conserved in eukaryotes, is yeast Ssn6(Cyc8)-Tup1. It affects expression of at least 334 genes during normal growth conditions, which include developmental, metabolic or stress response pathways [31]. Ssn6 acts as an adaptor between a tetramer of Tup1 and additional DNA-binding proteins which mediate sequence specificity [33,35]. Tup1 alone is able to promote transcriptional repression in yeast, which might explain the ability of the A. fumigatus Δfbx15 mutant to grow under normal conditions, where nuclear SsnF is compromised.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Model for Fbx15 function and localization during vegetative growth and stress response in A. fumigatus.

During vegetative growth a significant part of Fbx15 is phosphorylated, potentially by cyclin-dependent kinase NimX. Phosphorylated Fbx15 is transported together with the transcriptional repressor adaptor SsnF into the nucleus. Nuclear SsnF forms a functional co-repressor complex with RcoA tetramer and interacts with DNA binding proteins for the repression of stress or secondary metabolite target genes. The small cytoplasmic and the larger nuclear fraction of phosphorylated Fbx15 can be integrated into active SCFFbx15 E3 ubiquitin ligases (black arrows). Fbx15 is produced in higher levels and interacts with the phosphatase GlcA during stress conditions, resulting in dephosphorylated Fbx15 (red arrows). Dephosphorylated Fbx15 can be integrated into less active nuclear SCF complexes and leads to less nuclear SsnF. This can be caused by a reduced nuclear import/enhanced export of the co-repressor and/or a change in SsnF stability. Reduced nuclear SsnF results in derepression of stress response and secondary metabolite genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.g007

The oxidative stress response gene cat1, which encodes a mycelial catalase, represents a target gene, which is repressed in a Fbx15-dependent way [32,43]. Expression of cat1 is increased in the absence Fbx15, but this derepression is not sufficient for an appropriate oxidative stress response [5,44,45]. Oxidative stress results in Aspergillus nidulans in genome-wide transcriptional changes, rather than a specific response of distinct gene groups [7,8,46]. Derepression of cat1 as well as of several gliotoxin biosynthetic genes correlates with the mislocalization of the nuclear repressor subunit SsnF in the cytoplasm in the absence of Fbx15. The control of nuclear SsnF localization by the phosphorylation status of Fbx15 contributes but is not the only cause of an appropriate oxidative stress response.

The F-box domain of Fbx15 is essential for an appropriate oxidative stress response. This domain serves as binding site for the assembly into SCF ubiquitin ligases. This indicates additional SCF-dependent functions for Fbx15 during oxidative stress. Disassembly of those E3 SCF ubiquitin ligases, which are not binding target substrates for ubiquitination, requires their inactivation by the COP9 signalosome CSN [3,47]. The csn-deficient mutant strains of A. nidulans are impaired in this control of cellular ubiquitin ligase activities and show a severe growth phenotype in the presence of oxidative stress [11,25,48,49]. Impaired CSN activity in csn-deficient mutant strains resulted in the enrichment, isolation and identification of SCF-Fbx15 complexes in A. nidulans [17]. This suggests that the F-box mediated assembly of SCF-Fbx15 as well as the disassembly by CSN are crucial for the function of Fbx15 during oxidative stress.

Yeast Tup1 corresponds to Aspergillus RcoA and to Groucho/TLE of higher eukaryotes. Multiple repression mechanisms are associated to these complexes such as histone deacetylation, chromatin rearrangements, modification of RNA polymerase II activity and competition with transcriptional activators [1419,5052]. Repression can even be changed to activation as shown for the transcriptional repressor Sko1, which inhibits hyperosmotic stress response genes in conjunction with Ssn6-Tup1. Osmotic stress leads to the phosphorylation of Sko1, which turns it into a transcriptional activator that in conjunction with Tup1 recruits chromatin-remodeling complexes such as SAGA and SWI/SNF to the respective promoter sites. ATP-driven chromatin remodeling mediated by the SWI/SNF complex is further required for cell cycle progression and activation of DNA damage repair pathways [5355]. The lack of appropriate molecular derepression or activation of stress response genes during stress contributes to the observed serious defects in fungal growth in the A. fumigatus Δfbx15 mutant. There seems to be an additional posttranscriptional layer of control, which does not depend on the phosphorylation status of Fbx15. A block of nuclear SsnF in the presence of unphosphorylated Fbx15[S468|9A] results in increased transcription of gli genes but not increased gliotoxin production and has only a partial contribution for the resistance towards oxidative stress.

Rapid Fbx15 dephosphorylation during oxidative stress could be triggered by the essential protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit GlcA/BimG (Fig 7). GlcA belongs to the serine/threonine phosphatases and shares homology with the yeast protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) catalytic subunit Glc7. GLC7 is essential for yeast as well, but conditional mutant alleles of GLC7 could be connected to defects in adaptive functions like temperature tolerance, glucose repression, amino acid starvation, cell morphology and DNA damage repair, which are reminiscent to the growth defects of the Δfbx15 mutant on the respective conditions [4,22,5659]. Dephosphorylation of Fbx15 results in nuclear clearance of SsnF. This could be due to nuclear export combined with reduced import of SsnF and/or ubiquitin dependent or even independent degradation of SsnF. Nuclear trafficking control is supported by the observation that SsnF is blocked at NPCs in an Fbx15-dependent manner upon stress. In this context a potential ubiquitinating function of Fbx15 towards the nuclear pore complex (NPC) subunit Nic96, which was co-purified during our TAP-tag pull-downs, was a reasonable function for SCFFbx15-ligase complexes to promote nuclear transport control. And although the localization of SsnF-GFP in Δfbx15 background and the localization of Nic96-GFP shared some similarities, we could not observe an Fbx15-specific or oxidative stress-dependent ubiquitination pattern for Nic96 (Fig 5A, S8 Fig). However, the nuclear pore complex is a massive multi-protein complex composed of 30 different NPC-proteins, which are arranged in multiples and finally reach a molecular mass between 66 and 125 MDa [2,60]. In 2012 Hayakawa et al. showed that approximately half of the NPC-proteins in yeasts are ubiquitinated, but not necessarily targeted for proteasomal degradation [4,61]. It might be possible that Fbx15 plays a role in NPC-protein ubiquitination, which targets NPC-proteins in close proximity to Npc96 and thereby promotes a more general nuclear transport control.

Nuclear clearance of SsnF may also be triggered by selective ubiquitin-independent degradation of nuclear SsnF populations. Previous studies have shown that some E3-ubiquitin ligases directly interact with the regulatory particle of the proteasome and thus are able to transfer target proteins to the proteasome for degradation [24,25,62]. A similar scenario could be responsible for selective nuclear degradation of SsnF, where dephosphorylated Fbx15 incorporates into inactive SCF-core complexes, which have the potential to carry specific target substrates such as SsnF directly to the proteasome.

Phosphorylated or dephosphorylated Fbx15 interacts with SsnF at different cellular localizations. However, Fbx15 and SsnF are not present in stoichiometric amounts, which argues against stable Fbx15-SsnF complexes. Phosphorylated Fbx15 interacts with SsnF under non-stress conditions predominantly in the cytoplasm, suggesting a cargo function for Fbx15, which facilitates the nuclear import of Fbx15-SsnF heterodimers. Fbx15 protein levels are increased during stress and Fbx15 is dephosphorylated. Unmodified Fbx15 interacts with SsnF primarily in the nucleus and might compete with Tup1 interaction. In addition, Fbx15 possibly exhibits a nuclear export function by acting as a cargo receptor for SsnF export.

Similar to the interaction with SsnF, Fbx15 interaction with the adaptor protein SkpA, which bridges Fbx15 into SCF complexes was not disturbed due to the dephosphorylation of Fbx15. However, the interaction was shifted from cytoplasm to the nucleus. The Fbx15 phosphorylation site Ser468/469 is located between two NLSs. Therefore phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events on Fbx15 Ser468/469 might determine nuclear Fbx15 import or export by rearranging the NLS availability.

Fbx15 phosphorylation affects SsnF location. Disturbed localization patterns of SsnF in constantly unphosphorylated fbx15 mutants resulted in moderate phenotypes, whereas the additional deletion of the F-box domain of Fbx15 led to impaired oxidative stress resistance similar to the complete fbx15 deletion mutant. This suggests that Fbx15 as subunit of the SCFFbx15 complex is an important player in the stress tolerance mechanism of A. fumigatus. This additional SCF-dependent function for Fbx15, apart from SsnF localization control, is also supported by the fact that only complete fbx15 deletions led to increased gliotoxin levels in the mutant, whereas constantly unphosphorylated fbx15 mutants showed increased gli-gene expression, which did not lead to increased gliotoxin levels. The formation of active SCFFbx15 complexes was especially promoted in fbx15 mutants, which mimic a constant phosphorylation, indicating an ubiquitinating function of phosphorylated Fbx15-carrying SCF ligases during non-stress conditions. Fbx15 abundance under non-stress conditions is very low and overall ubiquitin-patterns of the cellular pool of proteins were not significantly changed between wild type and Δfbx15 mutants. This suggests that putative target(s) of SCFFbx15 are highly specific.

The role of F-box proteins in virulence might vary in different pathogenic fungi. A. nidulans ΔgrrA mutants are unable to produce mature ascospores due to a block in meiosis [3,26]. We showed here that the deletion of grrA in A. fumigatus did not affect virulence. GrrA shares structural similarity to Fbp1 of the opportunistic human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans and deletion of fbp1 led to a loss of virulence [10,12,63]. In contrast to Fbx15, Fbp1 is not involved in a broad range of stress responses but plays a more specific role in cell membrane integrity where the loss of fbp1 results in a block in meiosis, which finally leads to an impaired sexual sporulation, similar as GrrA in A. nidulans.

Fbx15 is a developmental regulator in the model organism A. nidulans, where the deletion of fbx15 results in a complete block in sexual and asexual development [4,26]. The deletion of the Tup1 homolog rcoA in A. nidulans leads to a phenotype very similar to A. nidulans Δfbx15 mutant strains, which are blocked in developmental pathways and secondary metabolism [4,64]. Thus Fbx15 mediated localization control of SsnF might be a conserved mechanism in filamentous fungi. However, fbx15 deletion mutants in the opportunistic pathogen A. fumigatus did not display a developmental defect, but Fbx15 emerges as key regulator for stress response and virulence. Several virulence factors of A. fumigatus, like mycotoxin production, oxidative stress resistance and nutritional versatility are linked to developmental control mechanisms, which were identified in the apathogenic model organism A. nidulans. This example of a connection between developmental regulators of non-pathogenic fungi and their role for virulence in fungal pathogens might be an interesting paradigm for future approaches to identify novel so far unknown virulence determinants.

A. fumigatus Fbx15 is specific to filamentous fungi, which provide the opportunity for drug design. The treatment of invasive aspergillosis is still primarily based on aggressive and toxic antifungal drugs. This disadvantage is aggravated by increasing numbers of A. fumigatus species, with resistances against commonly used medical triazoles [4,6567]. Fbx15 might be a potential drug target, excluding the risk of cross-reactions with human proteins. In contrast to novel drugs, which target the general ubiquitin proteasomal machinery by inhibiting their core components, such as Nedd8-activating enzymes, the SCF-adaptor Skp1 or the proteasome, and thus providing therapeutic chances for cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and immune deficiencies, a drug against Fbx15 would not affect the ubiquitin-proteasome system itself, but instead offer a highly specific inhibitor for fungal dissemination during life threatening aspergillosis [5,26,68,69]. So far promising drugs, targeting specific F-box proteins have been identified for human F-box proteins, which are connected to a diverse set of cancers [70]. The possibility to treat fungal diseases with F-box specific inhibitors is supported by Lobo et al., who discovered the plant defensin Psd1 from Pisum sativum that interacts with the nuclear F-box protein cyclin F of N. crassa and exhibits antifungal activity against several Aspergillus species [71]. A putative drug against Fbx15 might have a highly specific fungal target spectrum, because the function of Fbx15 varies between a stress response regulator in A. fumigatus and a developmental regulator in A. nidulans. Fbx15 might bear the potential to identify new virulence determining factors, which can be used for advanced drug design. Our identification of further Fbx15 interaction partners provides a promising base for the characterization of other novel virulence traits in A. fumigatus.

Taken together, Fbx15 is a crucial regulator for stress response and virulence in A. fumigatus, which provides the known function of an F-box protein, interacting with the ubiquitin SCF E3 ligase machinery. As a second function it controls the nuclear localization of the transcriptional co-repressor SsnF, which is part of a broad transcriptional network, including histone modifications. The broad impact of Fbx15 on stress responses and the fact that it is specific for the fungal kingdom makes this protein an interesting target for drug development.

Materials and Methods

Strains, media and general DNA manipulations

The generation of deletion-, complementation- and tagged strains was carried out in the ΔakuA-strain AfS35 a derivative of WT-strain D141, which provides high levels of homologous recombination [30,72,73]. BiFC was done in pyrG1-strain Af293.1 (FGSC#1137), obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center [32,74]. A. fumigatus strains were cultivated in minimal media (MM) with appropriate supplements. For cloning techniques E. coli strains DH5α and MACH-1 (Invitrogen) were applied. Fungal and bacterial transformations were carried out as described [34,75]. Plasmids and A. fumigatus strains are given in Tables S4/S6 and S1 Text.

Real-time-PCR

Total RNAs were extracted with “RNeasy plant mini kit” (Qiagen). 0.8 μg RNA was transcribed into cDNA using “QuantiTect reverse transcription kit” (Qiagen). Gene expressions were measured with quantitative real-time PCR using either a Light Cycler 2.0 System (Roche) with “RealMasterMix SYBR ROX 2.5x” (5Prime) or a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) with “MESA GREEN qPCR MasterMix Plus for SYBR Assay” (Eurogentec). Histone (h2A) and Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gpdA) expression were used as reference for relative quantification. Details about used cDNA concentrations and primer pairs are given in S5 Table and S1 Text.

Immunoblotting

For Immunoblotting experiments 100–150 μg crude protein extract was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by electro blotting as described previously [36,76]. Antibodies used for detection of fusion proteins are described in S1 Text. Signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence technique with either an Amersham Hyperfilm-P (GE Healthcare Limited) or with the Fusion SL7 system (Peqlab). For signal quantification Bio 1D imaging software (Peqlab) was used. Protein stability was measured by the addition of 25 μg/ml cycloheximide prior to protein extraction.

Tandem affinity purification (TAP)

Co-purification with TAP-tagged Fbx15, Fbx15(P12S), SconB and SconB(P200S) was performed with a modified version of the Tandem Affinity Purification protocol as described in S1 Text.

GFP-/ RFP-trap

Immunoprecipitation of GFP- or RFP-tagged proteins were performed with “GFP-trap_A and “RFP-trap_A (chromotek). Proteins were extracted from 5 ml frozen pulverized mycelium. 5 ml of protein crude extracts were incubated with 40 μl of GFP-Trap_A or RFP-Trap_A agarose, which was previously equilibrated to the B300-buffer. After two hours of incubation agarose was washed twice with B300 buffer. The agarose was boiled in 100 μl 3x SDS-sample buffer to elute the bound proteins. The extracted proteins were used directly for SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting or coomassie-staining and tryptic digestion for LC-MS/MS analysis.

TMT-labeling

Fbx15-GFP was purified from cultures before and after treatment with 3 mM H2O2 and run on an SDS-PAGE. After coomassie-staining the proteins were in-gel digested with trypsin. The purified peptides were labeled with an isobaric mass tag using the “TMTduplex Isobaric Mass Tagging Kit” (Thermo Scientific), where Fbx15-GFP before H2O2 treatment was labeled with heavy TMT-127 and all time points after H2O2 induction were labeled with TMT-126 (for details see S1 Text).

LC-MS/MS Protein Identification

Proteins were digested with “Sequencing Grade Modified Trypsin” (Promega). Digested peptides were extracted from polyacrylamide gel and separated using reversed-phase liquid chromatography with an RSLCnano Ultimate 3000 system (Thermo Scientific) followed by mass identification with a Orbitrap Velos Pro mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Details about mass spectrometry and data analysis are given in S1 Text.

Murine virulence tests

The virulence of A. fumigatus Δfbx mutants and the corresponding complemented strains was tested in an established murine model for IPA [37,38,77]. In brief, female CD-1 mice were immunosuppressed with cortisone acetate (25 mg/mouse intraperitoneally; Sigma-Aldrich) on days -3 and 0. Mice were anesthetized and intranasally infected with 20 μl of a fresh suspension containing 106 conidia. A control group was mock infected with PBS to monitor the influence of the immunosuppression. The health status was monitored at least twice daily for 14 days and moribund animals (defined by severe dyspnoea and/or severe lethargy) were sacrificed. Infections were performed with a group of 10 mice for each tested strain. Lungs from euthanized animals were removed, and fixed in formalin and paraffin-embedded for histopathological analyses according to standard protocols [39,78].

Ethics statement

Mice were cared for in accordance with the principles outlined by the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (European Treaty Series, no. 123; http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/123). All animal experiments were in compliance with the German animal protection law and were approved by the responsible Federal State authority “Thüringer Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz” and ethics committee “Beratende Komission nach § 15 Abs. 1 Tierschutzgesetz” with the permit Reg.-Nr. 03-001/12.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Growth tests of A. fumigatus Δfbx deletion strains under various stress conditions.

(A) Overexpression of fbx15 does not affect oxidative stress response. (B) Growth tests of the Δfbx15 mutant in comparison to AfS35 wild type and complemented strains on thiol oxidizing diamide or superoxide producing menadione. 5 x 103 conidia of AfS35 wild type, the Δfbx15-strain and the corresponding reconstructed strain were spotted on minimal medium (MM) plate, supplemented with 1 mM diamide or 7 μM Menadione sodium bisulfite as indicated and grown for four days at 37°C. (C) Δfbx-strains were tested for their viability under different stress conditions. 5 x 103 conidia of AfS35 wild type, the Δfbx-strain and the corresponding reconstructed strain were spotted on minimal medium (MM) plate, supplemented with different stresses as indicated and grown for three days at 37°C. To investigate the effect of the particular F-box proteins on heat response plates were incubated at 42°C. (D) An increased Fbx15 protein level was observed after 40–60 min of H2O2 exposure for the complemented strain, whereas no Fbx15 could be detected in the Δfbx15 mutant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Both F-box proteins Fbx15 and the essential SconB are primarily localized to the nucleus.

(A) Heterokaryon rescue assay for primary ΔsconB transformants. Conidia of slow growing primary transformants were plated equally on non-selective MM and selective MM containing pyrithiamine. AfS35 (WT) and all transformants except for ΔsconB-1 did not grow on selective plates indicating a spontaneously generated heterokaryon. (B) The Southern hybridization for ΔsconB-1 mutant. On the left, a scheme for AfS35 (WT) and ΔsconB genomic loci with restriction enzyme sites NsiI and BspEI used for Southern hybridization is given. On the right Southern-hybridization autoradiography for AfS35 (WT) and ΔsconB-1 is shown. The ΔsconB-1 mutant strain showed two bands, confirming an ectopic integration of the ΔsconB-cassette. (C) Phenotypical comparison of AfS35 (WT) with strains, which constitutively express GFP-fusion proteins of F-box proteins Fbx15 (AfGB32) and SconB (AfGB34), under normal and oxidative stress conditions. The expression of GFP-fusion proteins showed no altered colony morphology compared to wild type, thus confirming their functionality. (D) Fluorescence microscopy of strains expressing GFP-fusions of either Fbx15 or SconB under constitutive promoter revealed a predominantly nuclear localization for both F-box proteins. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Deletion of the phosphatase encoding gene glcA is lethal for A. fumigatus.

(A) Putative phosphorylation sites inside the primary amino acid sequence of Fbx15. Phosphorylation sites on serine, threonine and tyrosine residues were determined with NetPhos 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos) [34,40,41]. Phosphorylation probability was provided with score-values from 0–1, whereas the cutoff value for potential phosphosites was set to 0.5. The experimental verified phosphosites at Ser469 and Ser468 with their respective score values are indicated. (B) Coomassie-stained SDS-gel of purified Fbx15-GFP before and after oxidative stress. The phosphatase GlcA was identified with LC-MS/MS for all stages of oxidative stress induction. Identified peptides for GlcA are shown in the table corresponding to the respective rectangles in the Coomassie-gel. (C) BiFC of cYFP-Fbx15 and nYFP-GlcA fusion proteins in strain AfGB123. A reconstituted YFP signal could only be observed in hyphae after treatment with H2O2. (D) Heterokaryon rescue assay for primary transformants of ΔglcA. From 12 primary transformants only one was able to propagate on selective medium containing hygromycin G. (E) Southern hybridization of ΔglcA-7 mutant. In addition to the WT band for glcA, which complies with the restriction map shown at the left, the ΔglcA-7 mutant showed an additional band confirming an ectopic integration of the marker cassette (indicated by an arrow).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Fbx15 interacts with SkpA primarily in the cytoplasm but is not required for overall cellular protein stability or ubiquitination.

(A) BiFC of nYFP-SconB fusion proteins with cYFP-SkpA in strain AfGB45. Nuclear SconB-SkpA interaction is dominant, whereas Fbx15 and SkpA interacted more in cytoplasm than in the nucleus, which was shown by quantification of YFP-intensities according to their subcellular localization in 10 hyphae for each F-box protein. Whereas almost all interaction between SconB and SkpA took place in the nucleus (>90%), the interaction site of Fbx15 with SkpA was observed primarily in the cytoplasm (74%) with smaller fractions in the nucleus (26%). (B) 50 μg protein crude extract from AfS35 (WT), Δfbx15 and Δfbx15::fbx15+ before and after incubation with 3 mM H2O2, blotted to a Ponceau S-stained nitrocellulose-membrane showed no major differences in the cellular protein pattern. (C) Immunoblot of 50 µg protein crude extract from AfS35 (WT), Δfbx15 and Δfbx15::fbx15+ before and after induction with 3 mM H2O2 incubated with anti-ubiquitin antibody. The cellular ubiquitination-pattern was not significantly altered in the Δfbx15 mutant compared to AfS35 (WT) or complemented strain. Anti-tubulin antibody was used as loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Fbx15 is a stable F-box protein compared to SconB.

(A) Protein stability assays of GFP-tagged Fbx15 and SconB. Structure of the GFP-fusion proteins of Fbx15 and SconB are shown with their respective domains and their predicted molecular weight of 102.4 and 105 kDa. The 48 amino acid sequences of their respective F-box domains with the characteristic proline residue at position seven are highlighted. Respective strains AfGB32 and AfGB34 were incubated in MM for 18 hours and then shifted to 25 μg/ml cycloheximide containing MM for two hours. Crude protein extracts were prepared from cultures every 20 min. Immunoblottings were prepared using GFP and tubulin antibody as control. Protein stability was determined by signal quantification relatively to the tubulin-signal. Fbx15-GFP showed a higher stability compared to SconB-GFP. (B) Protein stability assay for GFP-fusions of Fbx15 (AfGB40) and SconB (AfGB42) after replacement of the conserved proline residues at position 7 of the respective F-box domains by serines. The protein stability of Fbx15 was not affected by the exchange of the conserved proline residue inside the F-box domain. In contrast, the protein stability of SconB[P200S] was drastically increased compared to wild type SconB. (C) Quantifications of protein levels from Fbx15-GFP and SconB-GFP in comparison to their proline mutant versions. Fbx15 showed high protein stability with a half-life of 90 min, which was independent of the presence or absence of the proline-residue in the F-box domain. In contrast SconB is a short-lived protein with a half-life of approximately 40 min. SconB stability was substantially increased after exchange of its conserved proline residue at position 200, leading to a half-life of more than two hours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Fbx15 interacting proteins NimX and SsnF are essential for A. fumigatus.

(A) BiFC of cYFP-Fbx15 and nYFP-NimX fusion proteins in strain AfGB124. A reconstituted YFP signal could be observed primarily in the cytoplasm. (B) Heterokaryon rescue assay for 12 primary ΔnimX transformants. Conidia of primary transformants were plated equally on non-selective MM and selective minimal medium containing hygromycin B. Only ΔnimX mutant 2 was able to grow on the selective medium, indicating that nimX is essential for A. fumigatus. (C) The Southern hybridization for ΔnimX-2 mutant in comparison with the wild type verified an ectopic integration of the hygromycin B resistance cassette in addition to the wild type locus of nimX (indicated with an arrow). (D) Heterokaryon rescue assay for primary transformants of ΔssnF. Primary transformants were equally plated on MM and selective medium containing pyrithiamin. Transformants ΔssnF 4–6 were still growing on selective medium and further analyzed by Southern hybridization. (E) Restriction map of AfS35 (WT) and ΔssnF genomic loci with cutting sites for EcoRI used for Southern hybridization. Southern hybridization of ΔssnF mutants 4–6 showed in addition to the wild type band at 11.5 kb a band at 5.3 kb indicating an ectopic integration of the ΔssnF deletion cassette (indicated with an arrow). (F) Immunoblotting of SsnF-GFP in either wild type or Δfbx15 background before and after incubation with 3 mM H2O2. SsnF amount was not influenced by either treatment with H2O2 or in an Fbx15 dependent manner. (G) SsnF-GFP was purified from cultures with GFP-trap from either wild type or Δfbx15 background before and after H2O2-stress induction. Immunoblotting of the purified SsnF-GFP with anti ubiquitin antibody showed no Fbx15 specific ubiquitination of SsnF.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Growth tests of A. fumigatus fbx15 phosphomutant strains with and without F-box domain under oxidative stress conditions.

Growth tests of A. fumigatus strains expressing either wild type fbx15::rfp (AfGB98), rfp tagged phosphomutant versions of fbx15 (AfGB101 and AfGB102) or corresponding rfp-tagged versions of fbx15 that lack the F-box domain (AfGB125, AfGB126 and AfGB127) under oxidative stress mediated by menadione or diamide. 5 x 103 conidia of the corresponding strains were spotted on minimal medium (MM) plate, supplemented with either 7 μM menadione sodium bisulfite or 1 mM diamide and grown for four days at 37°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Nuclear pore protein Nic96 is not influenced by Fbx15.

(A) Fluorescence microscopy of Nic96-GFP in either WT or Δfbx15 background. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Nic96-GFP could be detected at periphery of the nuclei independent of the presence or absence of Fbx15. (B) GFP-trap pull-down of Nic96-GFP in either WT or Δfbx15 background before and after H2O2-treatment followed by immunoblotting. Purified Nic96-GFP of respective conditions was incubated with anti-ubiquitin antibody, but no Fbx15 dependent ubiquitination pattern could be detected. Blotted membranes were subsequently incubated with anti-GFP antibody indicating equal amounts of purified Nic96-GFP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s008

(TIF)

S1 Table. NCBI-accession numbers for A. fumigatus Fbx-proteins and their homologues in other species identified by NCBI-BLAST.

Query coverage describes the percentage of the alignment, which covers the primary amino acid sequence of A. fumigatus F-box proteins. Identity shows the degree of similarity between the identified F-box protein compared to the respective F-box protein of A. fumigatus, which was calculated with ClustalW alignment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s009

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Fbx15 motifs determined by comparison of A. fumigatus Fbx15 homologs.

Primary amino acid sequences were compared with multiple EM for motif elicitation (MEME). Most conserved amino-acids are marked bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s010

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Putative interacting proteins for Fbx15 and SconB.

Putative interaction partners of A. fumigatus Fbx15 and SconB, which were co-purified with TAP-tagged versions of Fbx15 and SconB in either wild type or mutated form Fbx15[P12S]/SconB[P200S]. Criteria for interacting proteins was that they had to appear at least twice in two independent purifications for each F-box protein. An exception is CulA which was found only once for SconB, indicated with an asterisk. Amount of independent co-purifications are given. Proteins, which were identified for both F-box proteins are bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s011

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Aspergillus fumigatus strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s012

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Oligonucleotides used during this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s013

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Plasmids constructed and used during this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s014

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Additional Material and Methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005899.s015

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Rebekka Harting for critical comments and Christoph Sasse for providing an RFP-expressing control strain. We also thank Karl Thieme for providing us with the primer pair for gpdA during our qPCR measurements.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: BJ GHB ÖB.
  2. Formal analysis: BJ OV GHB.
  3. Funding acquisition: GHB.
  4. Investigation: BJ AA TH DJM IDJ.
  5. Methodology: BJ ÖB OV AA.
  6. Project administration: GHB.
  7. Resources: GHB ÖB AAB TH IDJ.
  8. Supervision: GHB ÖB.
  9. Validation: BJ ÖB OV AA TH DJM AAB GHB.
  10. Visualization: BJ GHB.
  11. Writing – original draft: BJ GHB ÖB OV TH.
  12. Writing – review & editing: BJ GHB ÖB OV TH AA.

References

  1. 1. Brzywczy J, Kacprzak MM, Paszewski A. Novel mutations reveal two important regions in Aspergillus nidulans transcriptional activator MetR. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48: 104–112. pmid:20955810
  2. 2. Yu J-H. Regulation of Development in Aspergillus nidulans and Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycobiology. 2010;38: 229–237. pmid:23956662
  3. 3. Cavadini S, Fischer ES, Bunker RD, Potenza A, Lingaraju GM, Goldie KN, et al. Cullin-RING ubiquitin E3 ligase regulation by the COP9 signalosome. Nature. 2016;531: 598–603. pmid:27029275
  4. 4. Zeska Kress von MR, Harting R, Bayram Ö, Christmann M, Irmer H, Valerius O, et al. The COP9 signalosome counteracts the accumulation of cullin SCF ubiquitin E3 RING ligases during fungal development. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83: 1162–1177. pmid:22329854
  5. 5. Schwartz AL, Ciechanover A. Targeting Proteins for Destruction by the Ubiquitin System: Implications for Human Pathobiology. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;49: 73–96. pmid:18834306
  6. 6. Ye XS, Lee SL, Wolkow TD, McGuire SL, Hamer JE, Wood GC, et al. Interaction between developmental and cell cycle regulators is required for morphogenesis in Aspergillus nidulans. EMBO J. 1999;18: 6994–7001. pmid:10601021
  7. 7. Jonkers W, Rep M. Lessons From Fungal F-Box Proteins. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8: 677–695. pmid:19286981
  8. 8. Liu T-B, Xue C. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and F-box Proteins in Pathogenic Fungi. Mycobiology. 2011;39: 243–248. pmid:22783111
  9. 9. Smith RL, Johnson AD. Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25: 325–330. pmid:10871883
  10. 10. Braus GH, Irniger S, Bayram Ö. Fungal development and the COP9 signalosome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13: 672–676. pmid:20934903
  11. 11. Lin SJ, Schranz J, Teutsch SM. Aspergillosis Case-Fatality Rate: Systematic Review of the Literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32: 358–366. pmid:11170942
  12. 12. Schmidt MW, Mcquary PR, Wee S, Hofmann K, Wolf DA. F-Box-Directed CRL Complex Assembly and Regulation by the CSN and CAND1. Molecular Cell. 2009;35: 586–597. pmid:19748355
  13. 13. Gerke J, Braus GH. Manipulation of fungal development as source of novel secondary metabolites for biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98: 8443–8455. pmid:25142695
  14. 14. Perez-Nadales E, Nogueira MFA, Baldin C, Castanheira S, Ghalid El M, Grund E, et al. Fungal model systems and the elucidation of pathogenicity determinants. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;70: 42–67. pmid:25011008
  15. 15. Gibbons JG, Jacobsen ID, Rokas A, Grosse K, Slesiona S, Hube B, et al. The function and evolution of the Aspergillus genome. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21: 14–22. pmid:23084572
  16. 16. Horn F, Heinekamp T, Kniemeyer O, Pollmächer J, Valiante V, Brakhage AA. Systems biology of fungal infection. Front Microbiol. 2012;3: 108. pmid:22485108
  17. 17. Abad A, Fernández-Molina JV, Bikandi J, Ramírez A, Margareto J, Sendino J, et al. What makes Aspergillus fumigatus a successful pathogen? Genes and molecules involved in invasive aspergillosis. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2010;27: 155–182. pmid:20974273
  18. 18. Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma L-J, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, et al. Sequencing of Aspergillus nidulans and comparative analysis with A. fumigatus and A. oryzae. Nature. 2005;438: 1105–1115. pmid:16372000
  19. 19. Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Arroyo J, et al. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2005;438: 1151–1156. pmid:16372009
  20. 20. Scharf DH, Heinekamp T, Remme N, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. Biosynthesis and function of gliotoxin in Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93: 467–472. pmid:22094977
  21. 21. Bok JW, Chung D, Balajee SA, Marr KA, Andes D, Nielsen KF, et al. GliZ, a Transcriptional Regulator of Gliotoxin Biosynthesis, Contributes to Aspergillus fumigatus Virulence. Infect Immun. 2006;74: 6761–6768. pmid:17030582
  22. 22. Heinekamp T, Thywißen A, Macheleidt J, Keller S, Valiante V, Brakhage AA. Aspergillus fumigatus melanins: interference with the host endocytosis pathway and impact on virulence. Front Microbiol. 2012;3: 440. pmid:23346079
  23. 23. Kupfahl C, Heinekamp T, Geginat G, Ruppert T, Härtl A, Hof H, et al. Deletion of the gliP gene of Aspergillus fumigatus results in loss of gliotoxin production but has no effect on virulence of the fungus in a low-dose mouse infection model. Mol Microbiol. 2006;62: 292–302. pmid:16956378
  24. 24. Busch S, Schwier EU, Nahlik K, Bayram O, Helmstaedt K, Draht OW, et al. An eight-subunit COP9 signalosome with an intact JAMM motif is required for fungal fruit body formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104: 8089–8094. pmid:17470786
  25. 25. Nahlik K, Dumkow M, Bayram Ö, Helmstaedt K, Busch S, Valerius O, et al. The COP9 signalosome mediates transcriptional and metabolic response to hormones, oxidative stress protection and cell wall rearrangement during fungal development. Mol Microbiol. 2010;78: 964–979. pmid:21062371
  26. 26. Krappmann S, Jung N, Medic B, Busch S, Prade RA, Braus GH. The Aspergillus nidulans F-box protein GrrA links SCF activity to meiosis. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61: 76–88. pmid:16824096
  27. 27. Gallagher L, Owens RA, Dolan SK, O’Keeffe G, Schrettl M, Kavanagh K, et al. The Aspergillus fumigatus protein GliK protects against oxidative stress and is essential for gliotoxin biosynthesis. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11: 1226–1238. pmid:22903976
  28. 28. Scharf DH, Remme N, Heinekamp T, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. Transannular disulfide formation in gliotoxin biosynthesis and its role in self-resistance of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132: 10136–10141. pmid:20593880
  29. 29. Schrettl M, Carberry S, Kavanagh K, Haas H, Jones GW, O'brien J, et al. Self-Protection against Gliotoxin—A Component of the Gliotoxin Biosynthetic Cluster, GliT, Completely Protects Aspergillus fumigatus Against Exogenous Gliotoxin. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6: e1000952. pmid:20548963
  30. 30. McCormick A, Loeffler J, Ebel F. Aspergillus fumigatus: contours of an opportunistic human pathogen. Cell Microbiol. 2010;12: 1535–1543. pmid:20716206
  31. 31. Green SR, Johnson AD. Promoter-dependent Roles for the Srb10 Cyclin-dependent Kinase and the Hda1 Deacetylase in Tup1-mediated Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15: 4191–4202. pmid:15240822
  32. 32. Paris S, Wysong D, Debeaupuis J-P, Shibuya K, Philippe B, Diamond RD, et al. Catalases of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun. 2003;71: 3551–3562. pmid:12761140
  33. 33. Tzamarias D, Struhl K. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex. Nature. 1994;369: 758–761. pmid:8008070
  34. 34. Blom N, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S. Sequence and Structure-Based Prediction of Eukaryotic Protein Phosphorylation Sites. J Mol Biol. 1999;294: 1351–1362. pmid:10600390
  35. 35. Liu Z, Karmarkar V. Groucho/Tup1 family co-repressors in plant development. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13: 137–144. pmid:18314376
  36. 36. Taus T, Köcher T, Pichler P, Paschke C, Schmidt A, Henrich C, et al. Universal and Confident Phosphorylation Site Localization Using phosphoRS. J Proteome Res. 2011;10: 5354–5362. pmid:22073976
  37. 37. Fox H, Hickey PC, Fernández-Abalos JM, Lunness P, Read ND, Doonan JH. Dynamic distribution of BIMGPP1 in living hyphae of Aspergillus indicates a novel role in septum formation. Mol Microbiol. 2002;45: 1219–1230. pmid:12207691
  38. 38. Son S, Osmani SA. Analysis of All Protein Phosphatase Genes in Aspergillus nidulans Identifies a New Mitotic Regulator, Fcp1. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8: 573–585. pmid:19181872
  39. 39. Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J, Schmidt G, et al. Tandem Mass Tags: A Novel Quantification Strategy for Comparative Analysis of Complex Protein Mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003;75: 1895–1904. pmid:12713048
  40. 40. Pashkova N, Gakhar L, Winistorfer SC, Yu L, Ramaswamy S, Piper RC. WD40 Repeat Propellers Define a Ubiquitin-Binding Domain That Regulates Turnover of F Box Proteins. Molecular Cell. 2010;40: 433–443. pmid:21070969
  41. 41. Galan JM, Peter M. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of multiple F-box proteins by an autocatalytic mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96: 9124–9129. pmid:10430906
  42. 42. García I, Mathieu M, Nikolaev I, Felenbok B, Scazzocchio C. Roles of the Aspergillus nidulans homologues of Tup1 and Ssn6 in chromatin structure and cell viability. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;289: 146–154. pmid:19054105
  43. 43. Petroski MD, Deshaies RJ. Function and Regulation of Cullin-RING Ubiquitin Ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6: 9–20. pmid:15688063
  44. 44. Calera JA, Paris S, Monod M, Hamilton AJ, Debeaupuis JP, Diaquin M, et al. Cloning and Disruption of the Antigenic Catalase Gene of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun. 1997;65: 4718–4724. pmid:9353056
  45. 45. Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M. Mechanisms and function of substrate recruitment by F-box proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14: 369–381. pmid:23657496
  46. 46. Pócsi I, Miskei M, Karányi Z, Emri T, Ayoubi P, Pusztahelyi T, et al. Comparison of gene expression signatures of diamide, H2O2 and menadione exposed Aspergillus nidulans cultures—linking genome-wide transcriptional changes to cellular physiology. BMC Genomics. 2005;6: 182. pmid:16368011
  47. 47. Tekaia F, Latgé J-P. Aspergillus fumigatus: saprophyte or pathogen? Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8: 385–392. pmid:16019255
  48. 48. Beckmann EA, Köhler AM, Meister C, Christmann M, Draht OW, Rakebrandt N, et al. Integration of the catalytic subunit activates deneddylase activity in vivo as final step in fungal COP9 signalosome assembly. Mol Microbiol. 2015;97: 110–124. pmid:25846252
  49. 49. Dagenais TRT, Keller NP. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in Invasive Aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22: 447–465. pmid:19597008
  50. 50. Malavé TM, Dent SYR. Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84: 437–443. pmid:16936817
  51. 51. Sekiya T, Zaret KS. Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg Proteins: Genomic Site Recruitment Generates Compacted Chromatin In Vitro and Impairs Activator Binding in Vivo. Molecular Cell. 2007;28: 291–303. pmid:17964267
  52. 52. Agoston Z, Schulte D. Meis2 competes with the Groucho co-repressor Tle4 for binding to Otx2 and specifies tectal fate without induction of a secondary midbrain-hindbrain boundary organizer. Development. 2009;136: 3311–3322. pmid:19736326
  53. 53. Proft M, Struhl K. Hog1 Kinase Converts the Sko1-Cyc8-Tup1 Repressor Complex into an Activator that Recruits SAGA and SWI/SNF in Response to Osmotic Stress. Molecular Cell. 2002;9: 1307–1317. pmid:12086627
  54. 54. Ng CH, Akhter A, Yurko N, Burgener JM, Rosonina E, Manley JL. Sumoylation controls the timing of Tup1-mediated transcriptional deactivation. Nat Commun. 2015;6: 6610. pmid:25766875
  55. 55. Kapoor P, Bao Y, Xiao J, Luo J, Shen J, Persinger J, et al. Regulation of Mec1 kinase activity by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 2015;29: 591–602. pmid:25792597
  56. 56. Winkelströter LK, Bom VLP, de Castro PA, Ramalho LNZ, Goldman MHS, Brown NA, et al. High osmolarity glycerol response PtcB phosphatase is important for Aspergillus fumigatus virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2015;96: 42–54. pmid:25597841
  57. 57. Hu K, Li W, Wang H, Chen K, Wang Y, Sang J. Shp1, a regulator of protein phosphatase 1 Glc7, has important roles in cell morphogenesis, cell cycle progression and DNA damage response in Candida albicans. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49: 433–442. pmid:22542681
  58. 58. Andrews PD, Stark MJ. Type 1 protein phosphatase is required for maintenance of cell wall integrity, morphogenesis and cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2000;113 (Pt 3): 507–520. pmid:10639337
  59. 59. Stark MJ. Yeast Protein Serine/Threonine Phosphatases: Multiple Roles and Diverse Regulation. Yeast. 1996;12: 1647–1675. pmid:9123967
  60. 60. Grossman E, Grossman E, Medalia O, Medalia O, Zwerger M, Zwerger M. Functional Architecture of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Annu Rev Biophys. 2012;41: 557–584. pmid:22577827
  61. 61. Hayakawa A, Babour A, Sengmanivong L, Dargemont C. Ubiquitylation of the nuclear pore complex controls nuclear migration during mitosis in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2012;196: 19–27. pmid:22213798
  62. 62. Xie Y, Varshavsky A. UFD4 lacking the proteasome-binding region catalyses ubiquitination but is impaired in proteolysis. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4: 1003–1007. pmid:12447385
  63. 63. Liu T-B, Wang Y, Stukes S, Chen Q, Casadevall A, Xue C. The F-Box protein Fbp1 regulates sexual reproduction and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10: 791–802. pmid:21478432
  64. 64. Hicks J, Lockington RA, Strauss J, Dieringer D, Kubicek CP, Kelly J, et al. RcoA has pleiotropic effects on Aspergillus nidulans cellular development. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39: 1482–1493. pmid:11260466
  65. 65. Kuiper L, Ruijgrok EJ. A Review on the Clinical Use of Inhaled Amphotericin B. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2009;22: 213–227. pmid:19466905
  66. 66. Snelders E, Huis In t Veld RAG, Rijs AJMM, Kema GHJ, Melchers WJG, Verweij PE. Possible environmental origin of resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to medical triazoles. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75: 4053–4057. pmid:19376899
  67. 67. Smith JA, Kauffman CA. Pulmonary fungal infections. Respirology. 2012;17: 913–926. pmid:22335254
  68. 68. Mandel SA, Fishman-Jacob T, Youdim MBH. Targeting Skp1, an Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Component Found Decreased in Sporadic Parkinson's Disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;: 220–223. pmid:22205206
  69. 69. Soucy TA, Smith PG, Milhollen MA, Berger AJ, Gavin JM, Adhikari S, et al. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature. 2009;458: 732–736. pmid:19360080
  70. 70. Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M. SCF ubiquitin ligase targeted therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13: 889–903. pmid:25394868
  71. 71. Lobo DS, Pereira IB, Fragel-Madeira L, Medeiros LN, Cabral LM, Faria J, et al. Antifungal Pisum sativum Defensin 1 Interacts with Neurospora crassa Cyclin F Related to the Cell Cycle. Biochemistry. 2007;46: 987–996. pmid:17240982
  72. 72. Reichard U, Büttner S, Eiffert H, Staib F, Rüchel R. Purification and characterisation of an extracellular serine proteinase from Aspergillus fumigatus and its detection in tissue. J Med Microbiol. 1990;33: 243–251. pmid:2258912
  73. 73. Krappmann S, Sasse C, Braus GH. Gene Targeting in Aspergillus fumigatus by Homologous Recombination Is Facilitated in a Nonhomologous End- Joining-Deficient Genetic Background. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5: 212–215. pmid:16400185
  74. 74. McCluskey K, Wiest A, Plamann M. The Fungal Genetics Stock Center: a repository for 50 years of fungal genetics research. J Biosci. Springer; 2010;35: 119–126.
  75. 75. Bayram Ö, Krappmann S, Ni M, Bok JW, Helmstaedt K, Valerius O, et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA Complex Coordinates Light Signal with Fungal Development and Secondary Metabolism. Science. 2008;320: 1504–1506. pmid:18556559
  76. 76. Christmann M, Schmaler T, Gordon C, Huang X, Bayram Ö, Schinke J, et al. Control of Multicellular Development by the Physically Interacting Deneddylases DEN1/DenA and COP9 Signalosome. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003275. pmid:23408908
  77. 77. Liebmann B, Mühleisen TW, Müller M, Hecht M, Weidner G, Braun A, et al. Deletion of the Aspergillus fumigatus lysine biosynthesis gene lysF encoding homoaconitase leads to attenuated virulence in a low-dose mouse infection model of invasive aspergillosis. Arch Microbiol. 2004;181: 378–383. pmid:15052376
  78. 78. Schrettl M, Beckmann N, Varga J, Heinekamp T, Jacobsen ID, Jöchl C, et al. HapX-Mediated Adaption to Iron Starvation Is Crucial for Virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6: e1001124. pmid:20941352