Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on adipose tissues in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  • Fupeng Liu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Qing Yang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Hongli Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Yanhong Zhang,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Guangzhi Yang,

    Roles Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Bo Ban,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Yanying Li ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    liyanying510@126.com (YL); zhangmeijn@163.com (MZ)

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯
  • Mei Zhang

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    liyanying510@126.com (YL); zhangmeijn@163.com (MZ)

    Affiliations Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Jining, China, Chinese Research Center for Behavior Medicine in Growth and Development, Jining, China

    ⨯

Abstract

Aims

Glucagon‑like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment can improve adipose distribution. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate whether GLP-1RAs preferentially reduce visceral adipose tissue (VAT) over subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods

We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials explicitly reporting changes in VAT and SAT. A random-effects model was performed to estimate the weighted mean difference (MD) for VAT and SAT. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using I2 statistics, and publication bias was assessed using Egger’s tests. Meta-regression was performed to identify the correlation between changes in adipose tissues and changes in body weight and glycated haemoglobin level.

Results

Ten trials with 924 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. GLP-1RA treatment led to similar absolute area (cm2) reductions in VAT (MD -21.13 cm2, 95% CI [-29.82, -12.44]) and SAT (MD -22.89 cm2, 95% CI [-29.83, -15.95]). No significant publication bias was detected, and this result was stable in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Moreover, GLP-1RA treatment resulted in a greater reduction in VAT and SAT in the subgroup with a greater reduction in body weight. The absolute area reduction in VAT was significantly correlated with the reduction in body weight (r = 6.324, p = 0.035).

Conclusions

GLP-1RA treatment leads to significant and similar absolute reductions in VAT and SAT, and the reduction in adipose tissues may be correlated with the reduction in body weight.

Citation: Liu F, Yang Q, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Yang G, Ban B, et al. (2022) The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on adipose tissues in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE 17(7): e0270899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899

Editor: Stephen L. Atkin, Weill Cornell Medical College Qatar, QATAR

Received: February 23, 2022; Accepted: June 19, 2022; Published: July 7, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: Fupeng Liu received the funding of The Key Research and Development Project of Jining City (2021YXNS073). The funding sources did not participate in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction

Compared with individuals without diabetes mellitus, patients with diabetes have a 2-fold increased risk of vascular diseases and a 2.32-fold increased risk of death from vascular causes [1, 2]. Studies have shown that a high percentage of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is consistently associated with type 2 diabetes, and obese patients with type 2 diabetes show a greater propensity for ectopic and visceral fat deposition [3, 4]. Compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), excessive VAT is more pathogenic and increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, including insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and systemic chronic low-grade inflammation [5, 6]. Consequently, VAT reduction leads to greater improvement in insulin sensitivity and lower cardiometabolic risk than SAT reduction [7].

Glucagon‑like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes. GLP-1RA treatment is associated with improvements in glucose control and reduced cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes [8, 9]. Although the exact mechanism is not fully elucidated, GLP-1RAs may exert their cardiovascular protective effects by improving cardiovascular risk factors; for example, GLP-1RA treatment can lead to weight loss, blood pressure reduction, improved lipid profiles and direct effects on the heart and vascular endothelium [10]. Recently, several clinical trials have indicated that GLP-1RA treatment can improve adipose distribution and has advantages in VAT reduction. In addition, immunofluorescence results have confirmed that the GLP-1R protein is present and more abundant in VAT than in SAT in individuals with type 2 diabetes [11]. Therefore, GLP-1RA effects may be specific to VAT. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate whether GLP-1RAs preferentially reduce VAT over SAT in patients with type 2 diabetes.

2. Methods

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (S1 Table) [12]. The primary protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021264743). Two authors independently performed literature searches, study data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessments. In the case of disagreement between the two reviewers, consensus was reached through a re-evaluation of the article and consultation with a third author. All analyses in this research were based on previously published studies; thus, no ethical approval or patient consent was needed.

2.1 Data sources and searches

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library for RCTs or clinical trials from inception to May 1, 2021, using terms including “(‘glucagon-like peptide 1’ OR ‘GLP-1’) AND (‘adipose’ OR ‘fat’)” AND ‘type 2 diabetes’. Additionally, relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses were searched using these keywords. We consulted content experts and manually screened the references from identified systematic reviews to identify studies missed by our search strategy.

2.2 Study selection

We included RCTs that compared GLP-1RAs (with treatment dose included; e.g., liraglutide ≥ 0.9 mg/day) with placebo or standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes. Requirements were a follow-up duration of at least 6 months or 24 weeks and explicit reporting of the absolute changes in VAT and SAT in units of square centimetres. This is an appropriate duration for GLP-1RAs to achieve the majority reduction in body weight and therefore may also reduce adipose tissues the most [13, 14].

2.3 Data extraction

The following information from each eligible trial was collected: (1) general study characteristics, including the name of the first author, year of publication, study design, interventions, and duration of follow-up; (2) patient characteristics, including the number of patients randomised, body mass index (BMI), body weight, and the level of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); and (3) the absolute changes in VAT and SAT in units of square centimetres. The changes in body weight and the HbA1c level served as a reference.

2.4 Risk-of-bias and evidence-quality assessment

Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool based on the following criteria: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, the blinding of participants and personnel, the blinding of outcome assessment, the completeness of outcome data, the selectivity of reporting, and other bias [15]. Judgements were expressed as “low risk,” “high risk,” or “unclear risk.”

2.5 Data synthesis and analysis

Considering the heterogeneity among the enrolled studies, such as the background of patients, the instrument of measurement, and the type of GLP-1RAs, we employed the inverse-variance method and a random-effects model to pool the outcome data. The pooled results are reported as the weighted mean difference (MD) with the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) using the standard DerSimonian–Laird method. The pooled standard deviation (SD) for the change in all outcomes was imputed (when not available) assuming the correlation coefficient with a conservative value of 0.50 between the baseline and final measurements. We examined heterogeneity among the studies using I2 statistics with the associated 95% CI [16]. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed according to the time of publication, whether the SD for the change in adipose tissue was available, the types of GLP-1RAs, the baseline BMI and HbA1c level, and the MD in body weight and HbA1c level. We assessed funnel plot asymmetry using Egger’s tests and defined significant publication bias as p < 0.1. The trim-and-fill computation method was used to estimate the effect of publication bias on the interpretation of the results when publication bias was significant [17]. We also performed meta-regression to identify the correlation between the mean change in adipose tissue and the mean change in body weight and HbA1c level. We performed all analyses using RevMan software (version 5.1, Nordic Cochrane Centre; Copenhagen, Denmark) and Stata (version 11, Stata-Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1 Study selection

Fig 1 shows the study selection process. A total of 219 studies were identified through the search strategy, and 9 trials were included in this analysis [18–26]. One additional trial meeting the inclusion criteria was identified through manual searching [27].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Study flow diagram.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.g001

3.2 Characteristics of the included studies

The characteristics of the included trials are shown in Table 1. A total of 625 patients were enrolled in the results synthesis. The GLP-1RAs evaluated in the studies included liraglutide (7 trials) and exenatide (3 trials). The follow-up time of most trials was approximately 6 months. The mean BMI was 29.4 kg/m2, and the mean HbA1c level was 8.1%. VAT and SAT were measured by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR). Nine trials reported the baseline values of VAT and SAT, with mean values of 188.1 cm2 for VAT and 274.5 cm2 for SAT [18–25, 27].

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.t001

3.3 Risk of bias

Two trials did not provide the detailed process of random sequence generation (unclear risk) or the method of allocation concealment (unclear risk). Four trials did not mention whether the outcome assessment was blinded (unclear risk), and three trials were double-blind trials (low risk). Seven trials were supported financially by pharmaceutical manufacturers, and in accordance with the guidance provided by Cochrane, we assigned high risk to the item of “other bias” for these trials [28]. S1 Fig provides the quality assessment details.

3.4 Meta-analysis of outcomes by construct

Overall, compared to patients in the control groups, patients treated with GLP-1RAs showed significant reductions in VAT (MD -21.13 cm2, 95% CI [-29.82, -12.44]) and SAT (MD -22.89 cm2, 95% CI [-29.83, -15.95]) (Fig 2) [18–27]. We found substantial heterogeneity among studies for VAT (I2 = 52%, 95% CI [2%, 77%]) and less heterogeneity for SAT (I2 = 0%, 95% CI [0%, 62%]). No publication bias was found in the analysis of VAT (p = 0.910) and SAT (p = 0.211) by Egger’s test with funnel plots, as shown in Fig 3. As references, patients treated with GLP-1RAs also showed significant reductions in both body weight (MD -3.83 kg, 95% CI [-4.76, -2.89]) and HbA1c level (MD -0.38%, 95% CI [-0.66, -0.09]) compared with patients in the control groups (S2 Fig) [18–27].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Random-effects pooled MD for VAT and SAT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Begg’s funnel plots for publication bias of VAT and SAT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.g003

Considering the wide confidence intervals for heterogeneity, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were further performed (Table 2). In the sensitivity analyses, GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a significant reduction in both VAT and SAT when only the studies that were published in 2019 and 2020 or the studies that directly provided SDs for the changes in adipose tissues were enrolled. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the type of GLP-1RAs, the baseline BMI and HbA1c level, and the MD in body weight and HbA1c level. GLP-1RA treatment was again associated with significant reductions in both VAT and SAT in all these subgroup analyses. Moreover, compared to the subgroup of MD in body weight < 3 kg, in the subgroup of MD in body weight ≥ 3 kg, GLP-1RA treatment resulted in more reductions in both VAT (MD -25.20 cm2, 95% CI [-36.38, -14.02] vs. MD -13.06 cm2, 95% CI [-22.27, -3.85]) and SAT (MD -23.95 cm2, 95% CI [-32.36, -15.53] vs. MD -17.63 cm2, 95% CI [-34.75, -0.50]).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.t002

Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the correlation between the MD in adipose tissue and the MD in body weight and HbA1c level. The MD in VAT showed a significant correlation with the MD in body weight (r = 6.324, p = 0.035) but no significant correlation with the MD in HbA1c level. The MD in SAT showed a significant correlation with neither the MD in body weight nor the MD in HbA1c level. The details of the meta-regression are shown in S3 Fig.

4. Discussion

This systematic review of 10 trials and 625 participants provided the first evidence that GLP-1RA treatment can significantly reduce VAT and SAT in patients with type 2 diabetes. When VAT and SAT baseline values were taken into consideration, GLP-1RA treatment seemed to be associated with the preferential reduction in VAT (11.23%) over SAT (8.34%). Moreover, GLP-1RA treatment resulted in a greater reduction in VAT and SAT in the subgroup with a greater reduction in body weight. In addition, the reduction in VAT was significantly correlated with the reduction in body weight.

Although both SAT and VAT are correlated with metabolic risk factors, VAT is more pathogenic than SAT [5, 29–31]. In the study of Karlsson et al with 325,153 patients, VAT was associated with an increased risk of hypertension, heart attack/angina, type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidaemia, and Mendelian randomisation analysis showed VAT to be a causal risk factor for all of the above four diseases [30]. VAT accumulation has also been linked with heart failure and cardiovascular death [32–35]. In early type 2 diabetes mellitus, VAT volume is associated with premature atherosclerosis independent of traditional risk factors [36]. A high ratio of VAT-to-SAT is a determinant of atherosclerosis and predicts cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes [37, 38]. Therefore, there is no doubt that VAT is an emerging risk factor for type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease [39].

The recognition of increased VAT as a cardiac risk factor has increased interest in strategies that target these adipose tissues. Several systematic reviews have confirmed that strategies including exercise, calorie restriction and pharmaceutical interventions can reduce both VAT and SAT [40–42]. Notably, the absolute reduction in the VAT area has been shown to be similar to that in the SAT area with exercise (-26.3 cm2 vs. -31.5 cm2), whereas the reduction in the VAT area has been shown to be approximately half that of the SAT area with calorie restriction (-33.6 cm2 vs. -65.1 cm2) [40]. Moreover, exercise interventions have been shown to result in a greater reduction in VAT relative to weight loss than pharmacological interventions [41].

The abnormal distribution of VAT and SAT is very common in patients with type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for age, sex, BMI and waist circumference, the patients with type 2 diabetes had a higher VAT area (163.79 ± 47.98 cm2) than the patients without diabetes (147.49 ± 39.09 cm2) [43]. Therefore, it is important to identify an antidiabetic drug that can reduce VAT while decreasing glucose.

The present study demonstrated that GLP-1RA treatment can significantly reduce VAT in patients with type 2 diabetes. Since the patients in the study of Nobarani et al had a BMI similar to that in our meta-analysis (30.7 kg/m2 vs. 30.0 kg/m2), we can take this study as a reference [43]. The absolute reduction in VAT by GLP-1RAs (21.13 cm2) in the present study was larger than the difference between patients with and without type 2 diabetes in the reference (16.3 cm2) [43]. Therefore, we believe that this extent of reduction in VAT by GLP-1RA treatment should have great clinical significance. Moreover, GLP-1RA treatment led to similar reductions in VAT and SAT, and this feature is similar to that of exercise but different from that of calorie restriction.

Whether the VAT reduction induced by GLP-1RA treatment is due to a specific modulation or is the result of overall weight loss is unknown. GLP-1RA treatment can decrease appetite and calorie intake, and a hypocaloric diet can lead to reductions in VAT [40–42]. The meta-regression of the present research also demonstrated that the mean reduction in VAT was significantly correlated with the mean reduction in body weight. Therefore, the contribution of weight loss to the reduction in VAT induced by GLP-1RAs cannot be ruled out.

However, some evidence indicates that GLP-1RA treatment may have distinct effects on VAT and SAT reduction. Real-time PCR and immunofluorescence results have shown that the GLP-1 receptor is present and more abundant in VAT and EAT than in SAT [11]. In an animal study, liraglutide redistributed body fat by decreasing VAT and relatively increasing SAT, which could partly be attributed to changes in the expression of the corresponding key enzymes for lipid metabolism. Lipogenesis is reduced in visceral white adipose tissue but is elevated in subcutaneous white adipose tissue [44]. In rodents, the activation of central GLP-1 receptors contributes substantially to an increase in sympathetic outflow, and the central action of GLP-1RAs might induce specific lipolysis in VAT compared to SAT [45, 46]. In the present meta-analysis, GLP-1RA treatment showed similar absolute and higher percentage reduction in VAT compared to SAT, suggesting that GLP-1Ras may activate additional pathways that calorie restriction does not.

There are some limitations in our research. First, although all these included studies were RCTs, more than half were not double blind, and the majority of trials were supported by pharmaceutical manufacturers, which leads to more favourable efficacy results and conclusions than sponsorship by other sources [28]. Second, the number of studies was relatively large, but the total number of patients was small. Third, significant heterogeneities were detected in the analyses of VAT, which may be due to differing demographic characteristics and large differences in the intervention type and design. Moreover, two studies did not directly provide the SD for the changes in adipose tissues [19, 21]. Therefore, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed, and GLP-1RA treatment still showed significant reductions in both VAT and SAT. Fourth, the number of studies included in the meta-regression was fairly small, which may lead to result instability. Finally, unlike previous meta-analyses that included patients who were overweight and/or obese, the present research focused on patients with type 2 diabetes, and these patients had high levels of VAT. Therefore, whether GLP-1RA treatment has similar effects as exercise in VAT reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes needs to be further confirmed by well-designed and directly comparable trials.

In conclusion, GLP-1RA treatment led to significant and similar absolute reductions in VAT and SAT. The reduction in adipose tissues with GLP-1RA treatment may be correlated with the reduction in body weight. In combination with the fact that excessive VAT is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality, the findings of the present study support the evidence for a protective role of GLP-1RAs in cardiovascular disease.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Cochrane risk of bias assessment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Random-effects pooled weight MD for HbA1c level and body weight.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The correlation between the MD in adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) and the MD in body weight and HbA1c level.

VAT, visceral adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.s003

(TIF)

S1 Table. PRISMA checklist.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270899.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the linguistic assistance provided by AJE (www.aje.com) during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375(9733):2215–22. Epub 2010/07/09. pmid:20609967; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2904878.
  2. 2. Rao Kondapally Seshasai S, Kaptoge S, Thompson A, Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Sarwar N, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;364(9):829–41. Epub 2011/03/04. pmid:21366474; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4109980.
  3. 3. Gupta P, Lanca C, Gan ATL, Soh P, Thakur S, Tao Y, et al. The Association between Body Composition using Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Type-2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational studies. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):12634. Epub 2019/09/04. pmid:31477766; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6718404.
  4. 4. Levelt E, Pavlides M, Banerjee R, Mahmod M, Kelly C, Sellwood J, et al. Ectopic and Visceral Fat Deposition in Lean and Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016;68(1):53–63. Epub 2016/07/02. pmid:27364051; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4925621.
  5. 5. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):39–48. Epub 2007/06/20. pmid:17576866.
  6. 6. Neeland IJ, Ayers CR, Rohatgi AK, Turer AT, Berry JD, Das SR, et al. Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2013;21(9):E439–47. Epub 2013/05/21. pmid:23687099; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3751977.
  7. 7. Park HS, Lee K. Greater beneficial effects of visceral fat reduction compared with subcutaneous fat reduction on parameters of the metabolic syndrome: a study of weight reduction programmes in subjects with visceral and subcutaneous obesity. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2005;22(3):266–72. Epub 2005/02/19. pmid:15717873.
  8. 8. Bethel MA, Patel RA, Merrill P, Lokhnygina Y, Buse JB, Mentz RJ, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):105–13. Epub 2017/12/10. pmid:29221659.
  9. 9. Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, Docherty KF, Sattar N, Preiss D, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(10):776–85. Epub 2019/08/20. pmid:31422062.
  10. 10. Bertoccini L, Baroni MG. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: New Insights and Opportunities for Cardiovascular Protection. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2021;1307:193–212. Epub 2020/02/09. pmid:32034729.
  11. 11. Ejarque M, Guerrero-Pérez F, de la Morena N, Casajoana A, Virgili N, López-Urdiales R, et al. Role of adipose tissue GLP-1R expression in metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):6274. Epub 2019/04/20. pmid:31000783; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6472499.
  12. 12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2009;339:b2700. Epub 2009/07/23. pmid:19622552; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2714672.
  13. 13. le Roux CW, Astrup A, Fujioka K, Greenway F, Lau DCW, Van Gaal L, et al. 3 years of liraglutide versus placebo for type 2 diabetes risk reduction and weight management in individuals with prediabetes: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10077):1399–409. Epub 2017/02/27. pmid:28237263.
  14. 14. Davies MJ, Bergenstal R, Bode B, Kushner RF, Lewin A, Skjøth TV, et al. Efficacy of Liraglutide for Weight Loss Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The SCALE Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2015;314(7):687–99. Epub 2015/08/19. pmid:26284720.
  15. 15. Decker R, Albertsson-Wikland K, Kristrom B, Halldin M, Dahlgren J. Decreased GH dose after the catch-up growth period maintains metabolic outcome in short prepubertal children with and without classic GH deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;77(3):407–15. Epub 2012/03/16. [doi]. pmid:22417085.
  16. 16. Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2007;335(7626):914–6. Epub 2007/11/03. pmid:17974687; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2048840.
  17. 17. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63. Epub 2000/07/06. pmid:10877304.
  18. 18. van Eyk HJ, Paiman EHM, Bizino MB, de Heer P, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, Kharagjitsingh AV, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial to assess the effect of liraglutide on ectopic fat accumulation in South Asian type 2 diabetes patients. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2019;18(1):87. Epub 2019/07/11. pmid:31288820; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6615254.
  19. 19. Tanaka K, Saisho Y, Manesso E, Tanaka M, Meguro S, Irie J, et al. Effects of Liraglutide Monotherapy on Beta Cell Function and Pancreatic Enzymes Compared with Metformin in Japanese Overweight/Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subpopulation Analysis of the KIND-LM Randomized Trial. Clinical drug investigation. 2015;35(10):675–84. Epub 2015/09/16. pmid:26369653.
  20. 20. Liu L, Yan H, Xia M, Zhao L, Lv M, Zhao N, et al. Efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2020;36(5):e3292. Epub 2020/01/20. pmid:31955491.
  21. 21. Dutour A, Abdesselam I, Ancel P, Kober F, Mrad G, Darmon P, et al. Exenatide decreases liver fat content and epicardial adipose tissue in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a prospective randomized clinical trial using magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2016;18(9):882–91. Epub 2016/04/24. pmid:27106272.
  22. 22. Guo W, Tian W, Lin L, Xu X. Liraglutide or insulin glargine treatments improves hepatic fat in obese patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in twenty-six weeks: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2020;170:108487. Epub 2020/10/10. pmid:33035599.
  23. 23. Yan J, Yao B, Kuang H, Yang X, Huang Q, Hong T, et al. Liraglutide, Sitagliptin, and Insulin Glargine Added to Metformin: The Effect on Body Weight and Intrahepatic Lipid in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2019;69(6):2414–26. Epub 2018/10/21. pmid:30341767; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6594101.
  24. 24. Bizino MB, Jazet IM, de Heer P, van Eyk HJ, Dekkers IA, Rensen PCN, et al. Placebo-controlled randomised trial with liraglutide on magnetic resonance endpoints in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a pre-specified secondary study on ectopic fat accumulation. Diabetologia. 2020;63(1):65–74. Epub 2019/11/07. pmid:31690988; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6890592.
  25. 25. Bouchi R, Nakano Y, Fukuda T, Takeuchi T, Murakami M, Minami I, et al. Reduction of visceral fat by liraglutide is associated with ameliorations of hepatic steatosis, albuminuria, and micro-inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients with insulin treatment: a randomized control trial. Endocrine journal. 2017;64(3):269–81. Epub 2016/12/06. pmid:27916783.
  26. 26. Jendle J, Nauck MA, Matthews DR, Frid A, Hermansen K, Düring M, et al. Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2009;11(12):1163–72. Epub 2009/11/26. pmid:19930006.
  27. 27. Wang X, Zhao X, Gu Y, Zhu X, Yin T, Tang Z, et al. Effects of Exenatide and Humalog Mix25 on Fat Distribution, Insulin Sensitivity, and β-Cell Function in Normal BMI Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Visceral Adiposity. Journal of diabetes research. 2020;2020:9783859. Epub 2020/06/23. pmid:32566685; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7273456.
  28. 28. Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;2(2):Mr000033. Epub 2017/02/17. pmid:28207928; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8132492 reviews and included studies.
  29. 29. Goldani H, Adami FS, Antunes MT, Rosa LH, Fassina P, Quevedo Grave MT, et al. Applicability of the visceral adiposity index (vai) in the prediction of the components of the metabolic syndrome in elderly. Nutricion hospitalaria. 2015;32(4):1609–15. Epub 2015/11/08. pmid:26545525.
  30. 30. Karlsson T, Rask-Andersen M, Pan G, Höglund J, Wadelius C, Ek WE, et al. Contribution of genetics to visceral adiposity and its relation to cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Nature medicine. 2019;25(9):1390–5. Epub 2019/09/11. pmid:31501611.
  31. 31. Hiuge-Shimizu A, Kishida K, Funahashi T, Ishizaka Y, Oka R, Okada M, et al. Absolute value of visceral fat area measured on computed tomography scans and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors in large-scale Japanese general population (the VACATION-J study). Annals of medicine. 2012;44(1):82–92. Epub 2010/10/23. pmid:20964583.
  32. 32. Nicklas BJ, Cesari M, Penninx BW, Kritchevsky SB, Ding J, Newman A, et al. Abdominal obesity is an independent risk factor for chronic heart failure in older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006;54(3):413–20. Epub 2006/03/23. pmid:16551307.
  33. 33. Djoussé L, Bartz TM, Ix JH, Zieman SJ, Delaney JA, Mukamal KJ, et al. Adiposity and incident heart failure in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2012;20(9):1936–41. Epub 2011/10/22. pmid:22016094; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3429627.
  34. 34. Abbasi SA, Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Jerosch-Herold M, Blankstein R, Petersen SE, et al. Visceral adiposity and left ventricular remodeling: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD. 2015;25(7):667–76. Epub 2015/06/03. pmid:26033394; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4468023.
  35. 35. Kammerlander AA, Lyass A, Mahoney TF, Massaro JM, Long MT, Vasan RS, et al. Sex Differences in the Associations of Visceral Adipose Tissue and Cardiometabolic and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: The Framingham Heart Study. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021;10(11):e019968. Epub 2021/05/18. pmid:33998254; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8483556.
  36. 36. Reijrink M, de Boer SA, Spoor DS, Lefrandt JD, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Boellaard R, et al. Visceral adipose tissue volume is associated with premature atherosclerosis in early type 2 diabetes mellitus independent of traditional risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290:87–93. Epub 2019/10/12. pmid:31604171.
  37. 37. Fukuda T, Bouchi R, Takeuchi T, Nakano Y, Murakami M, Minami I, et al. Ratio of visceral-to-subcutaneous fat area predicts cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of diabetes investigation. 2018;9(2):396–402. Epub 2017/07/08. pmid:28686352; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5835471.
  38. 38. Bouchi R, Takeuchi T, Akihisa M, Ohara N, Nakano Y, Nishitani R, et al. High visceral fat with low subcutaneous fat accumulation as a determinant of atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2015;14:136. Epub 2015/10/09. pmid:26445876; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4597374.
  39. 39. Neeland IJ, Ross R, Després JP, Matsuzawa Y, Yamashita S, Shai I, et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2019;7(9):715–25. Epub 2019/07/16. pmid:31301983.
  40. 40. Abe T, Song JS, Bell ZW, Wong V, Spitz RW, Yamada Y, et al. Comparisons of calorie restriction and structured exercise on reductions in visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue: a systematic review. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2021. Epub 2021/05/28. pmid:34040197
  41. 41. Rao S, Pandey A, Garg S, Park B, Mayo H, Després JP, et al. Effect of Exercise and Pharmacological Interventions on Visceral Adiposity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term Randomized Controlled Trials. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019;94(2):211–24. Epub 2019/02/04. pmid:30711119; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6410710.
  42. 42. Verheggen RJ, Maessen MF, Green DJ, Hermus AR, Hopman MT, Thijssen DH. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of exercise training versus hypocaloric diet: distinct effects on body weight and visceral adipose tissue. Obesity reviews: an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2016;17(8):664–90. Epub 2016/05/24. pmid:27213481.
  43. 43. Nobarani S, Alaei-Shahmiri F, Aghili R, Malek M, Poustchi H, Lahouti M, et al. Visceral Adipose Tissue and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2021. Epub 2021/04/01. pmid:33788095.
  44. 44. Zhao L, Zhu C, Lu M, Chen C, Nie X, Abudukerimu B, et al. The key role of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in body fat redistribution. The Journal of endocrinology. 2019;240(2):271–86. Epub 2018/12/12. pmid:30530905.
  45. 45. Kooijman S, Wang Y, Parlevliet ET, Boon MR, Edelschaap D, Snaterse G, et al. Central GLP-1 receptor signalling accelerates plasma clearance of triacylglycerol and glucose by activating brown adipose tissue in mice. Diabetologia. 2015;58(11):2637–46. Epub 2015/08/10. pmid:26254578; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4589565.
  46. 46. Nguyen NL, Randall J, Banfield BW, Bartness TJ. Central sympathetic innervations to visceral and subcutaneous white adipose tissue. American journal of physiology Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology. 2014;306(6):R375–86. Epub 2014/01/24. pmid:24452544; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3949107.