https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-5951
Figures
Abstract
The present study was performed to evaluate the effects of seed priming. This was done by soaking the seeds of two rapeseed cultivars, namely, ZY15 (tolerant to low temperature and drought) and HY49 (sensitive to low temperature and drought), for 12 h in varying solutions: distilled water, 138 mg/L salicylic acid (SA), 300 mg/L gibberellic acid (GA), 89.4 mg/L sodium nitroprusside (SNP), 3000 mg/L calcium chloride (CaCl2), and 30 mg/L abscisic acid (ABA). Primed and non-primed seeds were left to germinate at 15°C and -0.15 MPa (T15W15) and at 25°C and 0 MPa (T25W0), respectively. The results showed that SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA significantly improved the germination potential (GP), germination rate (GR), germination index (GI), stem fresh weight (SFW), stem dry weight (SDW), root length (RL), stem length (SL), and seed vigor index (SVI) under T15W15. For ZY15 seeds under T25W0, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming reduced the average germination time (96% after 5 days) compared to that of the control (88% after 5 days). For ZY15 seeds under T15W15, SA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming, with respect to the control and water-treated groups, shortened the average germination time (92% after 5 days) compared to that of the control (80% after 5 days). For HY49 seeds under T25W0, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming reduced the average germination time (92% after 5 days) compared to that of the control (85% after 5 days). Similarly, for HY49 seeds under T15W15, GA priming shortened the average germination time (89% after 5 days) compared to that of the control (83% after 5 days). These priming agents increased the net photosynthesis, stomatal conductivity, and transpiration rate of rape seedlings under conditions of low temperature and drought stress, while also decreasing intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. Additionally, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA increased superoxide dismutase concentrations (SOD) and ascorbic peroxidase (APX) activities of rape seedlings under stress conditions, while decreasing catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) activities in ZY15 seedlings. In HY49, which is sensitive to low temperature and drought, all priming solutions, except for SNP, led to an increase in SOD activity levels and a decrease in CAT activity levels. Overall, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 increased the concentrations of indoleacetic acid (IAA), GA, ABA, and cytokinin (CTK) in seedlings under stress conditions. Moreover, compared to SA, CaCl2, and ABA, GA (300 mg/L) and SNP (300 mol/L) showed improved priming effects for ZY15 and HY49 under stress conditions.
Citation: Zhu ZH, Sami A, Xu QQ, Wu LL, Zheng WY, Chen ZP, et al. (2021) Effects of seed priming treatments on the germination and development of two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties under the co-influence of low temperature and drought. PLoS ONE 16(9): e0257236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257236
Editor: Saddam Hussain, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, PAKISTAN
Received: February 26, 2021; Accepted: August 26, 2021; Published: September 16, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: National Key R & D Program, Cultivation of New Mechanized Rapeseed Varieties with High Yield, Good Quality and Suitable Quality in the Lower Reaches of Yangtze River and Huang-Huai River (2018YFD0100600).
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that might be perceived to influence the results and discussion reported in this paper.
Introduction
In nature, plants are continuously subjected to multiple environmental stresses during their various developmental stages. Drought, extreme temperature, and salinity adversely affect plant growth and quality [1–4]. Drought stress is defined as a prolonged water supply shortage, whether atmospheric (below-average precipitation) or stemming from a lack of surface water or groundwater. In addition, drought stress has a complex effect on plant photosynthesis, reducing the photosynthetic rate and inhibiting photoperiod conversion. It also deregulates ion homeostasis and significantly increases the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative damage to electron transformation, photophosphorylation, and dark reaction processes of cellular components [3, 5–7]. At the morphological and molecular levels, the effects of drought are different. Drought significantly disrupts water-use efficiency, root differentiation, leaf dimensions, stomatal movements, shoot length, cell enlargement, the interaction of water and mineral nutrients, and plant yields [8–10]. For example, polyethylene glycol-induced water scarcity in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) decreases hypocotyl elongation, dry and fresh weights of shoots and roots, and ability to germinate. In contrast, polyethylene glycol also enhanced the root length [11].
Low temperature is an abiotic environmental factor that affects plant growth, geographical distribution, and crop yields. There are two types of low temperature stressors. One is the damage caused to plants by temperatures just above the freezing point, called chilling stress. The second is damage caused to plants by freezing stress below 0°C. A previous study found that low temperature stress had a significant effect on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. In wheat seedlings, low temperature stress significantly reduced leaf chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic and transpiration rates, and stomatal conductance; however, it dramatically increased intercellular carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations [6]. Photosynthesis is a source of dry plant matter accumulation and light-energy conversion. When plants suffer from chilling injury, chlorophyll is reduced, and damage to the chloroplast and thylakoid structures is also inflicted [12]. When plants suffer cold damage, the O2 (oxygen) utilization rate decreases, and ROS production increases. The plant body regulates the antioxidant enzyme defense system to remove excess ROS to prevent damage. The main protective plant antioxidant enzymes are superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbic peroxidase (APX) [13]. At an early stage of stress, excess hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be removed from the plant body to protect plant cells. However, later stages of stress can accelerate ROS production, reduce chlorophyll content, and promote membrane lipid peroxidation, which, to a certain extent, also occurs as the plant ages [14].
Drought and low temperatures are the most significant threats to global food production, climate change, and global population development. In modern crop production management, seed priming is a promising technique for biotic and abiotic management, which has been known for many years to improve seed germination and the efficacy of stress responses [15, 16]. This technique is a pre-sowing application that permits seeds to germinate more efficiently. It includes hormone priming, hydro priming, chemical priming, halo priming, nutrient priming, and osmo priming [17, 18]. In many horticultural and field crops, improved seed priming techniques are known to decrease emergence time, achieve uniform emergence, and provide better crop standing [19]. Seed priming boosts the synthesis of free radical-scavenging enzymes and increases SOD and CAT expression. Priming with pre-optimized concentrations of priming reagents, such as thiourea, ascorbic acid, salicylic acid, H2O2, gibberellic acid, and sodium chloride (NaCl), induced metabolic changes leading to improved germination and decreased germination time. There was also a regulatory effect on sunflower seedling growth [20–22].
In wheat under drought stress, CaCl2 priming improved seedling establishment, as well as the number of tillers, plant height, grain weight, and grain number [23]. Seed priming with KNO3 and urea improved root length, production of proline, germination quality, seedling growth, and protein content in maize hybrids subjected to drought and salinity stress [22, 24]. Hydro priming significantly increases the germination rate during unfavorable conditions of temperature and drought stress in plants [25]. In maize, chitosan, SA, and nitric oxide (NO) priming improved plant biomass, germination rate, and seedling growth under low temperature stress [26, 27]. In cotton and rapeseed, it was observed that a variety of priming agents, such as SA, ABA, GA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene, potassium nitrate (KNO3), monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4), polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000), mannitol, and NaCl, enhanced the tolerance to abiotic stresses (Pb, drought, and temperature) [28, 29].
Brassicaceae is a large family containing several species [30], which include crop hybrids and varieties. Rapeseed is an economically important crop in China and other temperate regions. However, low temperatures and drought stress drastically reduce crop yields. Therefore, reliable methods are required to mitigate the effects of abiotic stress and reduced crop productivity. The current study discusses how seed priming agents (SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA) induce resistance in rapeseed seedlings to low temperatures and drought stress. Among the five priming agents, which agents perform well? Furthermore, how do they affect the two different varieties of rapeseed? This study provides physiological, molecular, and biochemical parameters to further explore the regulatory mechanisms involved in the low temperature and drought tolerance of rapeseed, mediated by seed priming.
Test materials and methods
Seed priming
The experiments were conducted at the laboratory of rapeseed cultivation, College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University in Hefei, China. The seeds of two rapeseed cultivars, Za You 15 (ZY15, registered in China in 2018) and Hui You 49 (HY49, registered in China in 2020), were obtained from Anhui Agricultural University. ZY15 is considered to have resistance to low temperature and drought conditions, whereas HY49 is susceptible to these stresses (unpublished data). Seeds were germinated under two levels of water potential (w): 0.0 MPa (control) and -0.15 MPa, as well as two temperatures, 25°C (control) and 15°C. The drought level was maintained using polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) [31], which was prepared by dissolving PEG in deionized water (135 g/L) at 15°C. Distilled water, SA (138 mg/L), GA (300 mg/L), SNP (89.4 mg/L), CaCl2 (3000 mg/L), and ABA (30 mg/L) were used as priming solutions (the concentrations of the priming agents were selected after a preliminary experiment) and were added to germination boxes along with four layers of filter paper (12 cm × 12 cm × 6 cm). Rape seeds were uniformly placed on the moistened filter paper, sealed within the boxes, and subjected to 25°C and 0 MPa, and to 15°C and -0.15 MPa, for 12 h in the dark. Subsequently, the residual priming solution on the surface of the seeds was immediately rinsed with pure water. The excess water was removed from the seeds with absorbent paper, and the seeds were air-dried to obtain the original weight of the seeds, under natural conditions [32, 33].
Seed germination and seedling development after priming
After priming, 100 seeds were uniformly placed in a germination box (12 cm × 12 cm × 6 cm) with four layers of filter paper. A germination box containing distilled water was placed at 25°C and 0 MPa (T25W0) in an artificial climate room, and a germination box containing PEG-6000 solution was placed at 15°C and -0.15 Mpa (T15W15) in another artificial climate room under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle. Each treatment was repeated three times and the number of germinated seeds was documented daily. After germination, the germination potential (GP), germination rate (GR), mean germination time (GT), germination index (GI), and seed vigor index (SVI) were determined to calculate root and bud length, and the dry weight and fresh weight of the stems (SDW and SFW). The seedlings were then transplanted into nutrient soil for single-cup and single-plant cultivation. The seedlings were grown either at -0.15 MPa, with PEG-6000 in pH 5.5 Hoagland nutrient solution at 15°C, or with only the nutrient solution at 25°C in artificial climate chambers. They received the same volume of water per day. At the end of the germination experiment, the above indices were calculated as follows:
Germination potential (GP) is calculated by the percentage of germinated seeds of the total number of seeds when the germinated seed per day reaches the peak [34].
, where n5d is the number of germinated seeds at day 5 after sowing and nT is the total number of seeds.
Germination rate (GR) is an estimate of the viability of a population of seeds, which is calculated by dividing the number of germinated seeds on the total number of seeds [35].
, where n is the number of germinated seeds and nT is the total number of seeds.
The mean germination time (GT) is calculated to assess the speed of germination [36].
, where n represents the number of seeds germinated at day i, d is the GT in days, and n is the total number of germinated seeds.
The seed germination Index (GI) is considered as the statistical data of the mean germination rate of seeds [37].
GI = ∑(Gt/Dt), which indicates the germination speed. In this equation Gt is the number of germinated seeds and Dt is the corresponding GT.
The seed vigor is the sum of the properties of the seed that determine the potential level of activity and performance of the seed during germination and seedling emergence [38]. The seed vigor index (SVI) is used to assess the seed vigor [37].
SVI = S × GI, where S is the average SFW during the germination period and GI is germination index.
Measurement of chlorophyll, photosynthetic index, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm)
Chlorophyll, photosynthetic index, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm) were evaluated as previously described [14, 33, 39]. A TYS-A portable chlorophyll meter (PP Systems, USA) was used for chlorophyll assessment. For the determination of photosynthetic indexes, the photosynthetic gas exchange parameters of the rape leaves (Ci, Pn, Gs, and Tr), with essentially identical growth potentials, were calculated outdoors from 8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. using a CIRAS-3 Portable photosynthetic apparatus (PP Systems, USA). The light intensity was set to 1200 mol m-2 s-1, and the indoor temperature was set to 20°C. Chlorophyll fluorescence was imaged using an IMAGING-PAM instrument (Maxi, Bay instruments, EASTON, MD, USA).
Measurement of relative electrical conductivity
The relative electrical conductivity (REC) was calculated as previously described [40]. Several rape leaves of the same size, and in the same section of each plant, were cut (without cutting the main vain). The surface was quickly cleaned with tap water, rinsed with pure water three times, and dried with filter paper. Strips of the same length were measured, and three fresh leaves (approximately 0.1 g) were placed in glass tubes containing 10 mL of deionized water before being stored in the refrigerator. After the leaves had soaked at 20°C for 12 h, the initial conductivity of the distilled solvent, referred to as R1, was measured using a conductivity meter (DDS-307A, Shanghai Yoke Instruments Co Ltd., Shanghai, China). The mixture was heated in a water bath for 30 min, placed on ice, and cooled to 20°C. After shaking, the conductivity of the extract was calculated again, referred to as R2. The formula for the estimation of REC is as follows:
Assessment of the relative water content in leaves
Several rape leaves of the same size were cut from the same section of each sample/treatment plant and placed into an aluminum box of known weight to determine the weight of the leaves. This is referred to as the fresh tissue weight (FW) [41, 42]. The plant tissue was soaked in a beaker of deionized water and stored in the dark. After 6–8 h, water was quickly removed from the leaf surface using filter paper. Thereafter, the samples were wrapped in aluminum foil and placed in an oven at 75°C. The leaves were dried at 75°C for 15 min and the dry weight of the tissue (Wd) was weighed using an electronic balance (AE224, Shanghai, China).
Assessment of antioxidant enzyme activity
Antioxidant enzymes (APX, POD, CAT, and SOD) were measured according to previous studies [13, 43]. Leaf samples were ground into powder with a mortar and pestle on ice in a homogenizing buffer, and then transferred to 5 mL tubes. Homogeneous samples were centrifuged (Shanghai Yoke Instruments Co Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 12,298 RCF (× g) at 4°C for 15 min and the supernatants were used for enzyme analysis. Peroxidase activity was tested using guaiacol (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) in 5 mL tubes. The reaction mixture was prepared with 48 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PPB; pH 6.1) (Aladdin, Shanghai, China), 5% guaiacol (w/v), 0.3% H2O2 (w/v), and enzyme extract. Moreover, the POD absorbance was measured at 470 nm. For CAT activity, 2.5 mL of 50 mM PPB (pH 7.2) and 1.2 mL of 0.3% H2O2 (w/v) were added to 1.5 mL of enzyme extract and continuously measured at 240 nm for 3 min. The nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) photochemical technique was used to analyze SOD activity [44]. Samples (0.1 g) were standardized in a 5 mL extractor buffer consisting of 50 mM PPB (pH 7.8). For the analysis, 3 mL of 50 mM PPB (pH 7.8), 30 mM methionine (Aladdin, Shanghai, China), 1 mM EDTA, 750 mM NBT (Aladdin, Shanghai, China), and 21 mM riboflavin were added to samples and analyzed at 560 nm (for the formation of purple formazan). A homogenization buffer containing 8 mM sodium ascorbate (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was used to detect APX. In the next step, 2 mL of 50 mM PPB (pH 7.2), 0.3 mL of 17 mM ASA (ascorbic acid), 1.5 mL of 0.5 mM H2O2, and 0.5 mL of extraction enzyme were added while taking continuous measurements on a spectrophotometer (Xevo TQD, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for 3 min at 290 nm.
Assessment of ABA, GA, IAA, and CTK
The ABA content was determined as previously described [13]. Leaf samples were crushed into powder with the addition of liquid nitrogen and then homogenized in methanol. Rivier et al. [45] first identified D6-ABA, which was used as an internal standard in this study. In the presence of the Oasis Max solid phase cartridge, methanol was added to formic acid (5% v/v) to purify the materials. Samples were then loaded onto the chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system, equipped with a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer, and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC; X8001S, Shanghai Yoke Instruments, Shanghai, China). The GA content was assessed as previously described [14]. Briefly, samples were crushed into powder with the addition of liquid nitrogen, and methanol (80% v/v, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), were used for the extraction. The resulting mixture was purified by ethyl-ether extraction, solid-phase extraction, and reverse-phase extraction. Samples were quantitatively analyzed using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS).
Samples were collected, wrapped in aluminum foil, and placed into the liquid nitrogen bottle at different times during blast inoculation. The CTK process was performed as described previously, using UPLC tandem mass spectrometry (ACQUITY UPLC System/Quattro Ultima Pt; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with an ODS column (ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) [46, 47].
The IAA analysis was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (DW-LC1620A, Shanghai Yoke Instruments, Shanghai, China) [48]. For loading onto the water, we used a Symmetry column C18 (140 mm × 4 mm, 5 μm), and 15 μL samples were placed into a set 15 μL loop. Acetonitrile was used as the solution of mobile phase: methanol: 0.9% acetic acid (5:45:40, v:v:v). Samples were then eluted from the column at 25°C, with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1, using the Waters Series 515 pump. A photodiode array detector (Waters 2998 Separations Module, Milford, MA, USA), with an absorbance of 218 nm, was used to measure hormonal peaks.
Results
Effects of priming on germination characteristics under low temperature and drought conditions
Compared with the control group, under T25W0 (temperature = 25°C and water potential = 0 MPa) no priming agents were able to increase the GP of ZY15 seeds (Table 1). There was no difference between the control and the treated groups (GA, SNP, and ABA). In contrast, SA treatment decreased the GP of ZY15 seeds by 5.3% compared to that of the control. H2O, SA, GA, SNP, and ABA priming under T25W0 increased the GP of HY49 seeds by 4.0%, 2.0%, 4.2%, 4.1%, and 4.4%, respectively, whereas CaCl2 priming reduced the GP of HY49 seeds by 1% compared to that of the control. In contrast, H2O, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA treatments increased the GP of ZY15 seeds by 29.0%, 8.5%, 30.0%, 41.0%, 36.8%, and 38.1%, respectively, under T15W15 (temperature = 15°C and water potential = -0.15 MPa). The priming solutions SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, increased the GP of HY49 seeds by 57.0%, 142.1%, 321.0%, 225.1%, 221.0%, and 244.1%, respectively, compared to that of the control group (Table 1).
Under T25W0, the GR of ZY15 seeds after priming treatment did not differ from that of the untreated seeds. However, compared with the untreated group, the priming agents, water, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, increased the GR of ZY15 seeds by 3.8%, 9.0%, 9.0%, 13.9%, 10.4%, and 13.9%, respectively, under T15W15 (Table 1).
For the control under T25W0, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming shortened the average GT of the ZY15 seeds by 1.7%, 2.0%, 2.0%, and 2%, respectively. GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming under T25W0 induced 96% germination after 5 days of treatment, whereas the control treatment showed 88% germination. SA priming and control treatments exhibited the same results. However, no noteworthy change was recorded in comparison to the water priming under T25W0. Compared to the control, which showed 85% germination after 5 days, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming reduced the average GT (92% after 5 days) of HY49 seeds. However, there was no significant difference with water priming under T25W0 (Table 1).
Under T15W15, SA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming, with respect to the control and water-treated groups, shortened the average GT of ZY15 seeds (92% after 5 days), among which SA priming was the best treatment. The control group showed 80% germination after 5 days, while the GA and control groups showed the same results under T15W15. Under T15W15, the average GT of HY49 seeds with SA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming increased compared to that of the control. Only GA priming (89% germination after 5 days), compared to the control (83% after 5 days), presented a shortened average GT for HY49 seeds under T15W15. In relation to the water treatment, all priming agents (except ABA) decreased the average GT of HY49 seeds under T15W15.
The GI is an estimate of the time, in days, that it takes to arrive at a certain germination percentage [49]. Compared to the control, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA improved the ZY15 seed GI by 7.9%, 9.8%, 10.0%, and 10.3%, respectively, under T25W0. SA treatment also showed a slight increasing trend; however, water treatment was better than SA and GA priming under T25W0. In relation to the control group, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA increased the GI of HY49 seeds by 2.4%, 10.7%, 9.4%, 8.7%, and 9.5%, respectively. Notably, the GI of HY49 seeds were increased by 100% using the GA priming under T25W0. Water priming also increased the GI compared to that for the control group. Under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming enhanced the GI of ZY15 seeds by 3.6%, 17.0%, 16.2%, 12.8%, and 14.9%, respectively. There was no change noted between water priming and GA; however, other priming agents decreased the GI of ZY15 seeds. For the HY49 seeds, in comparison to the control under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA increased the GI by 63.3%, 135.3%, 54.3%, 47.4%, and 5.5%, respectively. Moreover, compared to the water priming treatment, GA priming showed an improved effect (Table 1).
The SVI is the sum of the properties of the seed that determine the potential level of its activity and performance during germination, and seedling emergence [49]. Under T25W0, the SVI of ZY15 seeds, in relation to the control, increased with the use of SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, water, and ABA priming by 22.7%, 52.5%, 30.9%, 72.9%, and 27.6%, respectively. Compared to water, CaCl2 resulted in a higher SVI. In relation to the control, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA increased the SVI by 3.4%, 25.7%, 12.8%, 4.7%, and 18.2%, respectively, for HY49 seeds. No significant change was recorded in comparison to water priming under T25W0. Compared to the untreated group, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA under T15W15 significantly improved the SVI of ZY15 seeds by 40.3%, 48.4%, 56.5%, 33.9%, and 53.4%, respectively. Simultaneously, no major difference was noted in comparison to water priming. Compared to the control, the SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA treatments boosted the SVI of HY49 seeds by 84.8%, 184.8%, 54.5%, 39.4%, and 12.1%, respectively, under T15W15 (Table 1).
Effects of priming on the biomass of rape seedlings under low temperature and drought conditions
Under T25W0, all five priming solutions, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, increased the SFW of ZY15 seedlings by 25%, 40%, 20%, 60%, and 15% respectively, compared to that of the control group (Table 2). Moreover, priming with GA and CaCl2 significantly increased the SFW, in comparison to water priming, with CaCl2 priming producing the best results under T25W0. The SFW of HY49 seedlings under T25W0 increased slightly with GA and ABA priming agents, but it was not significantly different when compared to that of the control group. No differences were observed with SA, SNP, and CaCl2 priming when compared to that of the control. SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA (under T15W15) increased the SFW of ZY15 seedlings by 35.7%, 28.6%, 35.7%, 21.4%, and 35.7%, respectively, compared to that of the control group. In addition, they all also increased the SFW when compared to that of the water priming treatment. In contrast, only GA priming increased the SFW of HY49 seedlings (19.23%), while the results of other priming agents and that of the control were the same under T15W15.
Regarding the control, under T25W0, SA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA slightly increased the SDW of ZY15 seedlings, whereas GA priming decreased the SDW with respect to water priming. In comparison with the untreated group, the five priming solutions, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, increased the SDW of ZY15 seedlings by 50.1%, 50.5%, 50.4%, 50.5%, and 50.8%, respectively, under T15W15. No major difference was noted when comparing the water priming group (Table 2). After priming with SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, the SDW of HY49 seedlings were not considerably different from that of the control, under both T25W0 and T15W15.
In comparison to the untreated group under the T25W0 condition, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming considerably increased the root length (RL) of ZY15 seedlings by 12.6%, 23.1%, 11.7%, 6.9%, and 19.5%, respectively. Additionally, compared with water priming under T25W0, all other priming agents, except for CaCl2, showed an increasing trend. The four priming solutions, SA, GA, SNP, and ABA, improved the RL in HY49 seedlings under T25W0 by 9.1%, 6.0%, 7.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. Compared to the control, under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming significantly increased the RL of ZY15 seedlings by 32.8%, 10.9%, 10.6%, 14.8%, and 31.1%, respectively. Furthermore, compared to water priming under T15W15, all other priming agents showed an increasing trend, except for GA. Similarly, under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA enhanced the RL of HY49 seedlings by 142.9%, 178.2%, 150.0%, 172.9%, and 140.6%, respectively, compared to that of the control (Table 2).
With regard to the control group under T25W0 and T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming significantly increased the stem length (SL) of ZY15 seedlings; however, the GA treatment showed the best results. SA and GA also considerably improved the SL when compared to water priming under T25W0 and T15W15. Under T25W0, the SL of HY49 seedlings was increased by all five priming agents (SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA) by 37%, 90%, 37%, 53%, and 43%, respectively, compared to that of the control group. In comparison to the untreated group (under T15W15), SA, GA, CaCl2, SNP, and ABA improved the SL of HY49 seedlings by 65.1%, 80.7%, 28.9%, 36.1%, and 65.1%, respectively, among which SNP had the best effect (Table 2).
Effects of priming agents on the photosynthetic characteristics of rape seedlings under low temperature and drought conditions
Under T25W0, GA, SNP, and ABA reduced the intercellular carbon dioxide (Ci) concentration in ZY15 seedling leaves by 19.1%, 20.0%, and 12.9%, respectively, compared to that of the control group (Fig 1A). In comparison, SA priming increased the Ci concentration of ZY15 leaves by 11.6%. Furthermore, with respect to water treatment, GA reduced intercellular carbon by 44.7%. In comparison to the control and water priming treatments, SA priming under T25W0 improved the Ci concentration of HY49 seedling leaves by 14.7%. Under T15W15, GA, SNP, and ABA treatments reduced the Ci concentration of ZY15 seedling leaves by 14.1%, 15.3%, and 31.6%, respectively, compared to that of the control and water priming groups. In comparison to the control group, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming, reduced the Ci concentration (by 13.3%, 23.8%, 9.3%, and 14.2%, respectively) of HY49 seedling leaves under T15W15 (Fig 1A).
The effects of low temperature and drought stresses (25°C and 0 MPa, 15°C and -0.15 MPa) on the photosynthetic characteristics: (A) intercellular carbon dioxide (Ci), (B) net photosynthesis (Pn), (C) stomatal conductance (Gs), and (D) transpiration rate (Tr) of Brassica napus seedlings (varieties ZY15 and HY49). Seven different treatments (a) control (Ck), (b) water (H2O), (c) salicylic acid (SA), (d) gibberellic acid (GA), (e) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), (f) calcium chloride (CaCl2), and (g) abscisic acid (ABA) were evaluated. Each point represents the mean of three replicates. The values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among treatments were determined using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests).
Compared to the control and water priming treatments, GA and SNP priming under T25W0 significantly enhanced the net photosynthesis (Pn) of ZY15 seedling leaves by 33.4% and 38.0%, respectively (Fig 1B). In contrast, CaCl2 and ABA slightly improved the Pn of ZY15 leaves. Compared to the control, SA, GA, and CaCl2 increased the Pn of HY49 seedling leaves, under T25W0, by 29.1%, 26.2%, and 29.3%, respectively, and significantly improved the Pn when compared to that of water priming. In relation to the untreated and water priming groups, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 significantly increased the Pn of ZY15 seedling leaves under T15W15 by 48.0%, 61.5%, 67.7%, and 82.6%, respectively. Compared to the control group, under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 increased the Pn of HY49 seedling leaves by 7.4%, 12.6%, 7.6%, and 12.1%, respectively (Fig 1B).
In comparison to the control group, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA, enhanced the stomatal conductance (Gs) of ZY15 seedling leaves by 41.4%, 51.3%, 83.6%, 49.3%, and 25.7%, respectively, under T25W0 (Fig 1C). GA, SNP, and CaCl2 also improved the Gs when compared to that of water priming. Furthermore, compared to the control group, under T25W0, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 enhanced the Gs of HY49 seedling leaves by 31.9%, 43.5%, and 27.5%, respectively, whereas no significant difference was recorded with water priming. In relation to the control and water priming groups, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA enhanced the Gs of ZY15 seedling leaves under T15W15 by 73.9%, 153.3%, 33.7%, 89.1%, and 30.4%, respectively. Compared to the control under T15W15, SA, GA, and SNP increased the Gs of the HY49 seedling leaves by 37.6%, 89.0%, and 63.4%, respectively (Fig 1C).
SA, GA, SNP, and ABA increased the transpiration rate (Tr) of ZY15 seedling leaves by 21.2%, 81.8%, 118.2%, and 78.7%, respectively, under T25W0, compared to that of the control (Fig 1D). Additionally, the Tr was improved by 41.3% and 60.5% with SNP and CaCl2 treatments, respectively, in the HY49 seedling leaves under T25W0, compared to that of the control. Under T15W15, GA increased the transpiration rate of ZY15 seedling leaves up to 120.0%, compared to that of the control and water priming treatments. With respect to the control and water priming treatments under T15W15, SNP and CaCl2 increased the transpiration rate of HY49 seedling leaves by 132.9% and 164.3%, respectively.
Effects of priming on the relative electrical conductivity and relative water content
Under T25W0, SA, GA, SNP, and ABA decreased the REC of ZY15 seedling leaves by 27.7%, 17.2%, 17.2%, and 24.7%, respectively, compared to that of the control group (Fig 2). Moreover, the RECs under water and CaCl2 priming were the same. Compared to the control group, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming (under T25W0) decreased the REC of HY49 seedling leaves by 17.6%, 13.7%, 14.3%, 12.9%, and 18.5%, respectively. Under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA considerably reduced the REC of ZY15 seedling leaves by 20.1%, 23.8%, 20.7%, and 16.0%, respectively, compared to that of the control group (Fig 2). With respect to the control group, SA, GA, CaCl2, and ABA priming reduced the REC of HY49 seedling leaves by 17.6%, 12.7%, 10.5%, and 9.9%, respectively.
Seven different treatments (a) control (Ck), (b) water (H2O), (c) salicylic acid (SA), (d) gibberellic acid (GA), (e) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), (f) calcium chloride (CaCl2), and (g) abscisic acid (ABA) were evaluated. Each point represents the mean of three replicates. The values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among treatments were determined by a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests).
The relative water content of ZY15 and HY49 seedling leaves induced by the five priming agents showed no remarkable difference when compared to that of the control under T25W0 (Fig 3). However, under T15W15, the ABA treatment reduced the relative water content of ZY15 leaves at the seedling stage. SA, SNP, and CaCl2 slightly increased the relative water content of HY49 seedling leaves under T15W15 by 7.7%, 7.6%, and 7.1%, respectively, compared to that of the control.
Seven different treatments (a) control (Ck), (b) water (H2O), (c) salicylic acid (SA), (d) gibberellic acid (GA), (e) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), (f) calcium chloride (CaCl2), and (g) abscisic acid (ABA) were evaluated. Each point represents the mean of three replicates. The values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among treatments were determined by a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests).
Effects of priming on antioxidant enzyme activities
Compared to the control group, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA reduced SOD activity levels in ZY15 seedling leaves under T25W0 by 20.0%, 32.2%, 26.9%, 23.0%, and 23.6%, respectively (Fig 4A). Compared to the control group, SA, GA, CaCl2, and ABA priming under T25W0 increased SOD activity levels by 40.9%, 49.6%, 51.8%, and 24.0%, respectively, in HY49 seedling leaves. SA, CaCl2, and ABA also increased SOD activity level in HY49 seedling leaves, when compared to that of the water treatment, under T25W0. Notably, SA priming was significantly different from the water treatment for SOD. GA, SNP, and CaCl2 under T15W15 improved SOD activity levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 2.6%, 3.8%, and 5.4%, respectively, compared to that of the untreated group, while CaCl2 priming significantly improved SOD activity levels when compared to those of the control and water priming groups. Similarly, SA, CaCl2, and ABA priming under T15W15 increased SOD activity levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 36.6%, 31.8%, and 28.0%, respectively, compared to that of the control.
Effects of low temperature and drought stressed (25°C and 0 MPa, 15°C and -0.15 MPa) on antioxidant enzyme activity with (A) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (B) catalase (CAT), (C) peroxidase (POD), and (D) ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in Brassica napus seedlings (varieties ZY15 and HY49). Seven different treatments were evaluated: (a) control (Ck), (b) water (H2O), (c) salicylic acid (SA), (d) gibberellic acid (GA), (e) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), (f) calcium chloride (CaCl2), and (g) abscisic acid (ABA). Each point represents the mean of three replicates. The values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among treatments were determined by a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests).
The CAT levels under T25W0 in ZY15 seedling leaves were reduced by 21.4%, 24.4%, 15.2%, and 21.9%, after SA, GA, SNP, and ABA treatments, respectively, compared to that of the control group (Fig 4B). Furthermore, compared to the control group, SA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA reduced CAT activity levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 29.1%, 16.6%, 16.7%, and 33.1%, respectively; of which, SA and ABA priming showed significantly different results from the water treatment under T25W0. GA and ABA treatment under T15W15 decreased CAT activity levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 29.6% and 27.9%, respectively. In HY49 seedling leaves, SA and ABA treatment under T15W15 reduced CAT activity levels by 30.1% and 18.4%, respectively, compared to that of the control. Additionally, the SA treatment yielded significantly different levels from that of the water treatment.
Under T25W0, SA, GA, CaCl2, and ABA, reduced POD activity levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 15.9%, 20.3%, 15.3%, and 20.4%, respectively, compared to that of the control (Fig 4C). Meanwhile, under T25W0, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 reduced POD activity levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 15.4%, 28.3%, 23.4%, and 17.4%, respectively, compared to that of the control. Compared to the control, under T15W15, SA, GA, and SNP decreased POD activity levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 10.3%, 20.2%, and 22.5%, respectively. SA, GA, and CaCl2 reduced POD activity levels under T15W15 by 23.4%, 22.9%, and 13.8%, respectively, in HY49 seedling leaves. In comparison, SA and ABA increased POD activity levels when compared to that of the water priming treatment.
Under T25W0, the ABA treatment increased APX activity levels by 25.6% in ZY15 seedling leaves compared to those of the control and water priming groups (Fig 4D). SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming, under T25W0, considerably increased the APX activity levels of HY49 seedling leaves by 21.3%, 48.1%, and 23.0%, respectively, compared to that of the control. Moreover, compared to the control and water priming treatments, SA priming under T15W15 improved the APX activity levels of ZY15 seedling leaves by 17.14%. In contrast, none of the other priming agents increased APX activity levels under T15W15. Compared to the control, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA priming reduced the APX activity levels of HY49 seedling leaves under T15W15 by 35.0%, 19.3%, 24.3%, 29.0%, and 29.0%, respectively.
Effects of priming on hormones
The ABA treatment reduced the IAA level of ZY15 seedling leaves by 56.4% under T25W0, compared to that of the control and water priming treatments (Fig 5A). In contrast, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 increased the IAA levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 30.2%, 30.3%, 28.2%, and 30.1%, respectively, under T25W0. In HY49 seedling leaves, under T25W0, SA, GA, SNP, CaCl2, and ABA improved the IAA level by 115.2%, 91.3%, 74.7%, and 102.1%, respectively, compared to that of the control. This study also showed significant differences among the SA, GA, SNP, and water priming treatments. The ABA treatment reduced the IAA level of ZY15 seedling leaves by 34.0% compared to that of the control and water treatments, while the other priming agents increased the IAA level under T15W15. In contrast, IAA content in leaves primed with SA showed the highest increase compared to that of the control. Under T15W15, CaCl2 improved the IAA content in HY49 seedling leaves by 59.7% compared to that of the control.
Effects of low temperature and drought stresses (25°C and 0 MPa, 15°C and -0.15 MPa) on the hormones: (A) indoleacetic acid (IAA), (B) gibberellic acid (GA), (C) cytokinin (CTK), and (D) abscisic acid (ABA) of Brassica napus seedlings (varieties ZY15 and HY49). Seven different treatments, namely, (a) control (Ck), (b) water (H2O), (c) salicylic acid (SA), (d) gibberellic acid (GA), (e) sodium nitroprusside (SNP), (f) calcium chloride (CaCl2), and (g) abscisic acid (ABA), were evaluated. Each point represents the mean of three replicates. The values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences among treatments were determined by a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range tests).
Under T25W0, SA, GA, and SNP priming enhanced the GA levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 44.3%, 65.8%, and 59.1%, respectively, compared to that of the control (Fig 5B). The ABA treatment significantly reduced the GA levels of ZY15 seedling leaves, under T25W0, by 52.6% and 59.4%, respectively, compared to those of the control and water treatment groups. In HY49 seedling leaves, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2, under T25W0, improved the GA content by 129.3%, 145.4%, 146.0%, and 131.6%, respectively, compared to that of the control. CaCl2 priming significantly enhanced the GA content of ZY15 seedling leaves by 63.9% and 54.6%, respectively, compared to those of the untreated and water priming groups under T15W15. Moreover, under T15W15, the ABA treatment considerably decreased the GA content of ZY15 seedling leaves relative to the control and water priming treatments by 55.4% and 56.8%, respectively. Under T15W15, CaCl2 priming enhanced the GA content of HY49 seedling leaves by 63.9% compared to that of the control.
SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 significantly increased the CTK level under T25W0 in ZY15 seedling leaves by 27.1%, 22.4%, 32.5%, and 37.5%, respectively, compared to that of the control (Fig 5C). The ABA treatment under T25W0 considerably reduced the CTK levels of ZY15 seedling leaves by 26.4% and 35.8%, respectively, compared to those of the control and water treatments. Under T25W0, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 improved the CTK levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 70.8%, 65.9%, 81.8%, and 63.2%, respectively. Under T15W15, the ABA treatment reduced the CTK level of ZY15 seedling leaves by 31.4% compared to that of the control. Meanwhile, also under T15W15, CaCl2 increased the CTK level by 33.6%, compared to those of the control and water treatments.
Under T25W0, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 decreased ABA levels in ZY15 seedling leaves by 26.3%, 23.0%, 21.3%, and 44.8%, respectively, compared to that of the control (Fig 5D). However, the ABA level of ZY15 seedling leaves was enhanced by 32.4% compared to that of the control. Similarly, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 (under T25W0) reduced ABA levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 28.2%, 35.9%, 32.2%, and 26.1%, respectively. Under T25W0, ABA priming increased ABA levels in HY49 seedling leaves by 23.2% and 59.8%, respectively, compared to those of the control and water priming treatments. Furthermore, under T15W15, SA, GA, SNP, and CaCl2 reduced the ABA content in ZY15 leaves by 28.3%, 39.4%, 33.1%, and 23.6%, respectively. SA and GA significantly decreased the ABA level in HY49 seedling leaves by 28.2% and 35.3%, respectively, under T15W15, compared to that of the control.
Discussion
Abiotic stresses, such as low or high temperature, insufficient or excessive water, high salinity, heavy metals, and ultraviolet radiation, are harmful for plant growth and development. These stresses result in a considerable amount of agricultural production losses globally [8, 50, 51]. Drought/low temperature stress disrupts the plant’s defense system by altering gene expression, knocking out resistant genes, and disrupting protein/enzyme activities, causing cell injury, cell division, and osmotic stress [51–53]. This type of stress also disrupts stomatal density, causes protein denature, disrupts signaling molecules (such as ABA, H2O2, and NO), aggravates fatty acids, affects transcriptional control, and disrupts antioxidant enzymes and hormones [8, 53, 54]. The present study suggests priming agents as a means to improve plant defense mechanisms by increasing the expression of stress resistance genes; balancing ionic homeostasis, membrane functions, and transcriptional control by transcription factors; balancing antioxidant activities; inducing the activation of osmoprotectants; and cellular homeostasis. Further studies at molecular level will prove it.
Low temperature stress considerably reduced the GP, GR, and SVI of rapeseed and extended the average GT in different crops [35–37]. In the present study, water priming significantly improved the ability of the two cultivars to germinate and significantly shortened the GT. It has been found that seeds placed under conditions of insufficient water do not retain the minimum amount of water and are, therefore, unable to initiate germination [54, 55]. For example, under the conditions of insufficient water, Kaya et al. [56] found a decrease in final seed germination rate of the conventional sunflower and pepper seeds. These results are consistent with those of the present study [22, 57]. In the present study, five priming solutions significantly increased the germination capability of ZY15 and HY49, promoted stem and root length, and increased the fresh and dry weights of the stems (Tables 1 and 2). However, they had different effects on shortening the GT and improving the GI and SVI (Tables 1 and 2). In the present study, the germination percentage decreased dramatically with declining water potential, due to decreased water uptake [54, 58]. ZY15 showed better performance than HY49 when treated with all five priming agents. As ZY15 already has resistance to low temperature and drought, present study suspect that these priming agents increased its ability to germinate and its resistance to stress. According to Jisha et al. [17], primed seeds can quickly imbibe and restore seed metabolism, thereby increasing the rate of germination. In several crops, seed germination and early seedling growth are the most vulnerable stages for water limitation. Water stress can decrease the amount and uniformity of germination, contributing to poor yield and poor yield efficiency [59, 60]. Notably, a substantial reduction in germination was observed as an effect of CaCl2 priming. CaCl2 priming improves root development more efficiently under optimal sowing conditions [61, 62].
In general, the fresh and dry stem weights and the root length of the two varieties of seedlings were improved to a certain extent by the five priming solutions, under both optimal and low temperature conditions. Previous studies have shown that, as maize seeds were subjected to cold stress, the dry weight of roots and shoots and the activities of defense enzymes in SA-treated seeds were higher than those in untreated grains [63]. Salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide have been reported to improve cold resistance and facilitate seed germination in maize. Few studies have focused on the combined impact of SA and H2O2 on the improvement of cold tolerance in maize; therefore, the process behind this combined effect is still unclear [63]. The present findings suggest that GA and ABA may have great potential as priming agents in rapeseed production, by improving the tolerance to low temperature and drought. Gibberellic acid and water priming greatly improved seedling weight by supplying hydrolyzing products. Research has shown that loss of dry weight by seedlings under drought stress is due to decreased hydrolyzed reserves and is not linked to the output of seed deposits [60, 64]. The key function of GA is to stimulate genes encoding for enzymes involved in seed germination, particularly alpha-amylase, by upregulating mRNA expression [65]. From the perspective of the improvement of all indexes, GA priming had the best effect on improving seed germination and seedling growth (Tables 1 and 2) [65].
The results of the present study are consistent with those of previous studies showing that seed priming solutions significantly increased the photosynthetic conversion rate of seedlings [65, 66]. Drought stress substantially lowers the photosynthetic rate, whereas seed priming agents regulate photosynthetic rate [67, 68]. Previous studies also supported the present results, which show that the physiological processes by which plants react to both salinity and drought are identical. This indicates that both stresses must be interpreted by the plant cell as water deficiency [3, 69]. The Ca2+ is an essential mineral nutrient for plant growth and development, and its main role is to maintain cell membrane stability and to regulate the transport of inorganic salt ions [32, 70]. While Ca2+ is crucial for controlling plant tolerance to both drought and salinity, the relationship between Ca2+ and salinity has been more intensively studied than drought [71]. When water availability is low, the diffusion of carbon dioxide through the stomata decreases. The present results indicate that CaCl2 treatment could cause this phenomenon [62, 67].
Seed priming can significantly improve the tolerance of cold and drought stress of different crop varieties in different environments [33, 67]. This study suggests that the treatment of seedlings with appropriate concentrations of priming solutions could improve stress resistance. In maize plants, SA priming increased the biosynthesis of antioxidant enzymes under low temperatures [29, 72, 73]. In addition, the levels of the antioxidant enzymes, SOD and CAT, as well as that of the hormones (except ABA), increased after GA treatment (Figs 4 and 5), which is consistent with the results of previously published results [33, 74]. This may be due to the direct or indirect activation of antioxidant enzymes by GA, which promotes the synthesis of various enzymes. The present study showed that low temperature and drought stress extensively disturbed the plant antioxidant mechanism and hormonal balance, while seed priming agents played a vital role in the repair of these systems. Previous studies have shown that the complex synthesis, and catabolic balance of ABA and GA is essential for seed germination [58, 75]. By depositing osmoprotectants, abscisic acid seed priming serves as a growth regulator in plant systems under restricted soil moisture conditions [76]. Further, crop priming with GA increases the germination of rye seeds and stimulates antioxidant production under drought stress [58, 77].
In addition, CaCl2 priming has a significant effect on endogenous hormones and significantly increases the levels of IAA, GA, and CTK [63, 70]. In low temperature and drought conditions, ABA can control bud dormancy in plants by upregulating hormone transcription factors, thereby maintaining normal plant growth [14]. Sodium nitroprusside is often used as a donor for NO, which is a bioactive molecule that plays a crucial role in signal transmission. Studies have shown that exogenous NO can significantly improve seedling quality, while increasing the activity levels of SOD, CAT, and other antioxidants, in addition to the levels of IAA, GA, and CTK hormones. In this way, it improves the resilience of plants [14, 22]. The GA enhances the enzymatic activity of isocitrate lyase in the glyoxylate cycle, and triggers the synthesis of soluble sugars and triacylglycerol degradation [27, 78]. Gibberellic acid priming improved the emergence of N. sativa under severe stress conditions [7, 78]. Further, CaCl2 osmo priming of seeds is useful for the development and growth of cereal crops, including rice [70, 79]. Drought and low temperatures disrupt the mineral-nutrient relationship in plants by disrupting the supply, transport, and partitioning of nutrients.
The priming phase contributes to the membrane repair system, by improving membrane stability, as the primed seed has a lower electrical conductivity level [80]. Related findings were obtained from sorghum seeds primed with PEG 6000 [4, 81]. Plants grown with SA priming exhibited enhanced levels of hydrogen peroxide, electrolyte leakage, superoxide anions, lipid peroxidation, and increased ROS enzyme production [62]. A previous study supports the results presented here, where unprimed control seeds recorded the highest value; whereas, the seeds primed with SA had the lowest recorded value in maize [31]. An increase in electrolyte leakage, which reflects a loss in the ability of biological membranes to regulate the transport of ions, has been reported in soybeans under drought stress [82]. Seeds primed with phenylalanine or calcium nitrate had the lowest electrical conductivity readings, suggesting lower degrees of cell injury [31]. However, the electrical conductivity of seed leachate in salicylic acid did not vary from that of mannitol (2% and 4%), gibberellic acid, and hydro priming.
Conclusion
Treatment with five priming agents (138 mg/L SA, 300 mg/L GA, 89.4 mg/L SNP, 3000 mg/L CaCl2, and 30 mg/L ABA) significantly improved the GP, GR, GI, biomass, antioxidant levels, photosynthetic activity levels, and SVI of the two rapeseed varieties. These priming agents also balanced IAA, GA, CTK, and ABA levels. It was concluded that 300 mg/L of GA and 89.4 mg/L of SNP showed the most significant effects against low temperature and drought conditions in rapeseed. Nevertheless, more studies are required to evaluate why GA and SNP priming were better than the other priming agents. The present study also revealed that among the two varieties, ZY15 showed a better performance than HY49; however, seed priming improved the performance of HY49 compared to that of the control. The performance of ZY15 was the best, perhaps because it was already considered to be a stress-tolerant variety. However, the challenges and opportunities associated with various other priming agents and methods need to be addressed, and a cost-efficient technique is required to overcome the challenges in food security.
References
- 1. Bohnert H. J., Nelson D. E., & Jensen R. G. (1995). Adaptations to environmental stresses. The plant cell, 7(7), 1099. pmid:12242400
- 2. Zhao T. J., Liu Y., Yan Y. B., Feng F., Liu W. Q., & Zhou H. M. (2007). Identification of the amino acids crucial for the activities of drought responsive element binding factors (DREBs) of Brassica napus. FEBS letters, 581(16), 3044–3050. pmid:17560577
- 3. Kosar F., Akram N. A., Ashraf M., Ahmad A., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Impact of exogenously applied trehalose on leaf biochemistry, achene yield and oil composition of sunflower under drought stress. Physiologia Plantarum.
- 4. Raja V., Qadir S. U., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Impact of drought and heat stress individually and in combination on physio-biochemical parameters, antioxidant responses, and gene expression in Solanum lycopersicum. 3 Biotech, 10(5), 1–18.
- 5. Nezhadahmadi A., Prodhan Z. H., & Faruq G. (2013). Drought tolerance in wheat. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. pmid:24319376
- 6. Korres N. E., Norsworthy J. K., Burgos N. R., & Oosterhuis D. M. (2017). Temperature and drought impacts on rice production: An agronomic perspective regarding short-and long-term adaptation measures. Water resources and rural development, 9, 12–27.
- 7. Jan S., Abbas N., Ashraf M., & Ahmad P. (2019). Roles of potential plant hormones and transcription factors in controlling leaf senescence and drought tolerance. Protoplasma, 256(2), 313–329. pmid:30311054
- 8. Fathi A., & Tari D. B. (2016). Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. International Journal of Life Sciences, 10(1), 1–6.
- 9. Afzal Z., Howton T. C., Sun Y., & Mukhtar M. S. (2016). The roles of aquaporins in plant stress responses. Journal of developmental biology, 4(1), 9. pmid:29615577
- 10. Begum N., Ahanger M. A., Su Y., Lei Y., Mustafa N. S. A., Ahmad P., et al. (2019). Improved drought tolerance by AMF inoculation in maize (Zea mays) involves physiological and biochemical implications. Plants, 8(12), 579. pmid:31817760
- 11. Anjum S. A., Ashraf U., Tanveer M., Khan I., Hussain S., Shahzad B., et al. (2017). Drought induced changes in growth, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant metabolism of three maize hybrids. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8.
- 12. Xue-Xuan X., Hong-Bo S., Yuan-Yuan M., Gang X., Jun-Na S., Dong-Gang , et al. (2010). Biotechnological implications from abscisic acid (ABA) roles in cold stress and leaf senescence as an important signal for improving plant sustainable survival under abiotic-stressed conditions. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 30(3), 222–230. pmid:20572794
- 13. Sami A., Riaz M. W., Zhou X., Zhu Z., & Zhou K. (2019). Alleviating dormancy in Brassica oleracea seeds using NO and KAR1 with ethylene biosynthetic pathway, ROS and antioxidant enzymes modifications. BMC plant biology, 19(1), 1–15. pmid:30606102
- 14. Sami A., Shah F. A., Abdullah M., Zhou X., Yan Y., Zhu Z., et al. (2020). Melatonin mitigates cadmium and aluminium toxicity through modulation of antioxidant potential in Brassica napus L. Plant Biology. pmid:32003103
- 15. Van Hulten M., Pelser M., Van Loon L. C., Pieterse C. M., & Ton J. (2006). Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(14), 5602–5607. pmid:16565218
- 16.
Lal S. K., Kumar S., Sheri V., Mehta S., Varakumar P., Ram B., et al. (2018). Seed priming: An emerging technology to impart abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. In Advances in Seed Priming (pp. 41–50). Springer, Singapore.
- 17. Jisha K. C., Vijayakumari K., & Puthur J. T. (2013). Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: an overview. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 35(5), 1381–1396.
- 18. Paparella S., Araújo S. S., Rossi G., Wijayasinghe M., Carbonera D., & Balestrazzi A. (2015). Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant cell reports, 34(8), 1281–1293. pmid:25812837
- 19. Ashraf M., & Foolad M. R. (2005). Pre‐sowing seed treatment—A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non‐saline conditions. Advances in agronomy, 88, 223–271.
- 20. Wahid A., Noreen A., Basra S. M., Gelani S., & Farooq M. (2008). Priming-induced metabolic changes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) achenes improve germination and seedling growth. Botanical Studies, 49(2), 343–350.
- 21. Kohli S. K., Handa N., Sharma A., Gautam V., Arora S., Bhardwaj , et al. (2018). Interaction of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid regulates pigment contents, antioxidative defense responses, and gene expression in Brassica juncea L. seedlings under Pb stress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(15), 15159–15173. pmid:29560590
- 22. Kaya C., Şenbayram M., Akram N. A., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Sulfur-enriched leonardite and humic acid soil amendments enhance tolerance to drought and phosphorus deficiency stress in maize (Zea mays L.). Scientific reports, 10(1), 1–13. pmid:31913322
- 23. Hussain S., Yin H., Peng S., Khan F. A., Khan F., Sameeullah M., et al. (2016). Comparative transcriptional profiling of primed and non-primed rice seedlings under submergence stress. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 1125. pmid:27516766
- 24. Anosheh H. P., Sadeghi H., & Emam Y. (2011). Chemical priming with urea and KNO 3 enhances maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) seed viability under abiotic stress. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 14(4), 289–295.
- 25. Cheng J., Wang L., Zeng P., He Y., Zhou R., Zhang , et al. (2017). Identification of genes involved in rice seed priming in the early imbibition stage. Plant Biology, 19(1), 61–69. pmid:26833720
- 26. Guan Y. J., Hu J., Wang X. J., & Shao C. X. (2009). Seed priming with chitosan improves maize germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under low temperature stress. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 10(6), 427–433. pmid:19489108
- 27. Kaya C., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., Corpas F. J., & Ahmad P. (2020). Salicylic acid-induced nitric oxide enhances arsenic toxicity tolerance in maize plants by upregulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle and glyoxalase system. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 399, 123020. pmid:32526442
- 28. Casenave E. C., & Toselli M. E. (2007). Hydropriming as a pre-treatment for cotton germination under thermal and water stress conditions. Seed Science and Technology, 35(1), 88–98.
- 29. Kohli S. K., Bali S., Tejpal R., Bhalla V., Verma V., Bhardwaj , et al. (2019). In-situ localization and biochemical analysis of bio-molecules reveals Pb-stress amelioration in Brassica juncea L. by co-application of 24-Epibrassinolide and Salicylic Acid. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1–15. pmid:30626917
- 30. Gall J. E., & Rajakaruna N. (2013). The physiology, functional genomics, and applied ecology of heavy metal-tolerant Brassicaceae. Brassicaceae: characterization, functional genomics and health benefits, 121–148.
- 31. Gouveia G. C. C., Binotti F. F. D. S., & Costa E. (2017). Priming effect on the physiological potential of maize seeds under abiotic stress1. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47(3), 328–335.
- 32. Kaczmarek M., Fedorowicz-Strońska O., Głowacka K., Waśkiewicz A., & Sadowski J. (2017). CaCl2 treatment improves drought stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 39(1), 41.
- 33. Li Z., Xu J., Gao Y., Wang C., Guo G., Luo Y., et al. (2017). The synergistic priming effect of exogenous salicylic acid and H2O2 on chilling tolerance enhancement during maize (Zea mays L.) seed germination. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 1153. pmid:28725229
- 34. Niu X., Mi L., Li Y., Wei A., Yang Z., Wu J.,… et al. (2013). Physiological and biochemical responses of rice seeds to phosphine exposure during germination. Chemosphere, 93(10), 2239–2244. pmid:23992639
- 35. Ren J., & Tao L. (2004). Effects of different pre-sowing seed treatments on germination of 10 Calligonum species. Forest Ecology and Management, 195(3), 291–300.
- 36. Refka Z., Mustapha K., & Ali F. (2013). Seed germination characteristics of Rhus tripartitum (Ucria) grande and Ziziphus lotus (L.): effects of water stress. International Journal of Ecology, 2013.
- 37. Li Z., Wang X., Liao T., Feng Q., & Zhang D. (2016). A self-developed system for visual detection of vegetable seed vigor index. Int. J. Agric. Biol, 18, 86–91.
- 38. Perry D. A. (1978). Report of the vigour test committee 1974–1977. Seed Science and Technology.
- 39. Ito S., Nozoye T., Sasaki E., Imai M., Shiwa Y., Shibata-Hatta, et al. (2015). Strigolactone regulates anthocyanin accumulation, acid phosphatases production and plant growth under low phosphate condition in Arabidopsis. PLoS One, 10(3), e0119724. pmid:25793732
- 40. Li G. W., Zhang M. H., Cai W. M., Sun W. N., & Su W. A. (2008). Characterization of OsPIP2; 7, a water channel protein in rice. Plant and cell physiology, 49(12), 1851–1858. pmid:18988636
- 41. Bewley J. D. (1997). Seed germination and dormancy. The plant cell, 9(7), 1055. pmid:12237375
- 42. Wellburn A. R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of plant physiology, 144(3), 307–313.
- 43. Marta B., Szafrańska K., & Posmyk M. M. (2016). Exogenous melatonin improves antioxidant defense in cucumber seeds (Cucumis sativus L.) germinated under chilling stress. Frontiers in plant science, 7, 575. pmid:27200048
- 44. Bates L. S., Waldren R. P., & Teare I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39(1), 205–207.
- 45. Rivier L., Milon H., & Pilet P. E. (1977). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometric determinations of abscisic acid levels in the cap and the apex of maize roots. Planta, 134(1), 23–27 pmid:24419574
- 46. Kojima M., Kamada-Nobusada T., Komatsu H., Takei K., Kuroha T., Mizutani M.,… et al. (2009). Highly sensitive and high-throughput analysis of plant hormones using MS-probe modification and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: an application for hormone profiling in Oryza sativa. Plant and Cell Physiology, 50(7), 1201–1214. pmid:19369275
- 47. Jiang C. J., Shimono M., Sugano S., Kojima M., Yazawa K., Yoshida R.,… et al. (2010). Abscisic acid interacts antagonistically with salicylic acid signaling pathway in rice–Magnaporthe grisea interaction. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 23(6), 791–798. pmid:20459318
- 48. Cai T., Meng X., Liu X., Liu T., Wang H., Jia, et al. (2018). Exogenous hormonal application regulates the occurrence of wheat tillers by changing endogenous hormones. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1886. pmid:30622548
- 49. Finch-Savage W. E., & Bassel G. W. (2016). Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. Journal of experimental botany, 67(3), 567–591. pmid:26585226
- 50. He M., He C. Q., & Ding N. Z. (2018). Abiotic stresses: general defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1771. pmid:30581446
- 51. Chourasia K. N. (2017). Resistance/Tolerance mechanism under water deficit (Drought) condition in plants. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 6(4), 66–78.
- 52. Ritonga F. N., & Chen S. (2020). Physiological and molecular mechanism involved in cold stress tolerance in plants. Plants, 9(5), 560. pmid:32353940
- 53. Yadav S. K. (2010). Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 30(3), 515–527.
- 54. Delachiave M. E. A., & De Pinho S. Z. (2003). Scarification, temperature and light in germination of Senna occidentalis seed (Caesalpinaceae). Seed science and technology, 31(2), 225–230.
- 55. Farooq A., Bukhari S. A., Akram N. A., Ashraf M., Wijaya L., Alyemeni M. N., et al. (2020). Exogenously applied ascorbic acid-mediated changes in osmoprotection and oxidative defense system enhanced water stress tolerance in different cultivars of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Plants, 9(1), 104.
- 56. Kaya M. D., Okçu G., Atak M., Cıkılı Y., & Kolsarıcı Ö. (2006). Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). European journal of agronomy, 24(4), 291–295.
- 57. Kaya C., Ashraf M., Wijaya L., & Ahmad P. (2019). The putative role of endogenous nitric oxide in brassinosteroid-induced antioxidant defence system in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants under water stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 143, 119–128. pmid:31493672
- 58. Kaya C., Sarıoğlu A., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Gibberellic acid-induced generation of hydrogen sulfide alleviates boron toxicity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 153, 53–63. pmid:32474386
- 59. Demir A. O., Göksoy A. T., Büyükcangaz H., Turan Z. M., & Köksal E. S. (2006). Deficit irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a sub-humid climate. Irrigation Science, 24(4), 279–289.
- 60. Kaya C., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Nitrate reductase rather than nitric oxide synthase activity is involved in 24-epibrassinolide-induced nitric oxide synthesis to improve tolerance to iron deficiency in strawberry (Fragaria× annassa) by up-regulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 151, 486–499. pmid:32302942
- 61. Kwon T. R., Shaheed Siddiqui Z., & Harris P. J. (2009). Effects of supplemental calcium on ion accumulation, transport and plant growth of salt sensitive Brassica rapa Landrace. Journal of plant nutrition, 32(4), 644–667.
- 62. Siddiqui M. H., Alamri S., Khan M. N., Corpas F. J., Al-Amri A. A., Alsubaie Q. D., et al. (2020). Melatonin and calcium function synergistically to promote the resilience through ROS metabolism under arsenic-induced stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 398, 122882. pmid:32516727
- 63. Guan Y., Li Z., He F., Huang Y., Song W., et al. (2015). “On-Off” Thermoresponsive Coating Agent Containing Salicylic Acid Applied to Maize Seeds for Chilling Tolerance. PloS one, 10(3), e0120695. pmid:25807522
- 64. Soltani A., Gholipoor M., & Zeinali E. (2006). Seed reserve utilization and seedling growth of wheat as affected by drought and salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 55(1–2), 195–200.
- 65. Fallah S., Malekzadeh S., & Pessarakli M. (2018). Seed priming improves seedling emergence and reduces oxidative stress in Nigella sativa under soil moisture stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(1), 29–40.
- 66. Ashrafi A., & Razmjou K. (2010). Evaluation of hydropriming effect on safflower physiological and biochemical characteristics under drought stress. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 1(1), 34–44.
- 67. Chaves M. M., Flexas J., & Pinheiro C. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of botany, 103(4), 551–560. pmid:18662937
- 68. Kaya C., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). The role of nitrate reductase in brassinosteroid-induced endogenous nitric oxide generation to improve cadmium stress tolerance of pepper plants by upregulating the ascorbate-glutathione cycle. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 196, 110483. pmid:32247238
- 69. Munns R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, cell & environment, 25(2), 239–250. pmid:11841667
- 70. Ahmad P., Abd_Allah, E. F., Alyemeni M. N., Wijaya L., Alam P., Bhardwaj R., et al. (2018). Exogenous application of calcium to 24-epibrassinosteroid pre-treated tomato seedlings mitigates NaCl toxicity by modifying ascorbate–glutathione cycle and secondary metabolites. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1–15. pmid:29311619
- 71. Hu Y., & Schmidhalter U. (2005). Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168(4), 541–549.
- 72. Wang Y., Wen T., Hu J., Han R., Zhu Y., Guan Y., et al. (2013). Relationship between endogenous salicylic acid and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize seedlings under chilling stress. Experimental Agriculture, 49(2), 295.
- 73. Kaya C., Akram N. A., Ashraf M., Alyemeni M. N., & Ahmad P. (2020). Exogenously supplied silicon (Si) improves cadmium tolerance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by up-regulating the synthesis of nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide. Journal of biotechnology, 316, 35–45. pmid:32315687
- 74. Abdel-Kader D. Z. (2001). Drought and gibberellic acid-dependent oxidative stress: effect on antioxidant defense system in two lettuce cultivars. Pak J Biol Sci, 4(9), 1138–1143.
- 75. Footitt S., Douterelo-Soler I., Clay H., & Finch-Savage W. E. (2011). Dormancy cycling in Arabidopsis seeds is controlled by seasonally distinct hormone-signaling pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20236–20241. pmid:22128331
- 76. Zheng M., Tao Y., Hussain S., Jiang Q., Peng S., Huang J., et al. (2016). Seed priming in dry direct-seeded rice: consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under drought stress. Plant Growth Regulation, 78(2), 167–178.
- 77. Ansari O., Azadi M. S., Sharif-Zadeh F., & Younesi E. (2013). Effect of hormone priming on germination characteristics and enzyme activity of mountain rye (Secale montanum) seeds under drought stress conditions. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 9(3).
- 78. Eastmond P. J., & Jones R. L. (2005). Hormonal regulation of gluconeogenesis in cereal aleurone is strongly cultivar‐dependent and gibberellin action involves SLENDER1 but not GAMYB. The Plant Journal, 44(3), 483–493. pmid:16236157
- 79. Farooq M. S. M. A., Basra S. M. A., & Hafeez K. (2006). Seed invigoration by osmohardening in coarse and fine rice. Seed Science and Technology, 34(1), 181–187.
- 80. Lamichaney A., Kudekallu S., Kamble U., Sarangapany N., Katiyar P. K., & Bohra A. (2016). Differences in seed vigour traits between desi (pigmented) and kabuli (non-pigmented) ecotypes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and its association with field emergence. J. Environ. Bio. 38, 735–742.
- 81. Oliveira A. B. D., & Gomes-Filho E. (2010). Efeito do condicionamento osmótico na germinação e vigor de sementes de sorgo com diferentes qualidades fisiológicas. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 32(3), 25–34.
- 82. Chowdhury J. A., Karim M. A., Khaliq Q. A., Ahmed A. U., & Mondol A. M. (2017). Effect of drought stress on water relation traits of four soybean genotypes. SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 15(2), 163–175.