Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Search for viral agents in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with multiple sclerosis using real-time PCR and metagenomics

  • Karol Perlejewski ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

    kperlejewski@wum.edu.pl

    Affiliation Department of Immunopathology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Iwona Bukowska-Ośko,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Immunopathology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Małgorzata Rydzanicz,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Department of the Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Tomasz Dzieciątkowski,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Beata Zakrzewska-Pniewska,

    Roles Data curation, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Aleksandra Podlecka-Piętowska,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Agata Filipiak,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation University Clinical Center of Medical University of Warsaw, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Krzysztof Barć,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation University Clinical Center of Medical University of Warsaw, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Kamila Caraballo Cortés,

    Roles Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Department of Immunopathology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Agnieszka Pawełczyk,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunopathology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Marek Radkowski,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Immunopathology of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Tomasz Laskus

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Adult Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system of unclear etiology, but there is some evidence that viral infections could be responsible for triggering autoimmune mechanisms against myelin. We searched for viral RNA and DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 34 MS patients and 13 controls using RT-PCR/PCR against common neurotropic viruses. In addition, shotgun DNA- and RNA-based metagenomics were done in 13 MS patients and 4 controls. Specific quantitative real-time RT-PCR/PCR testing revealed the presence of viral nucleic acid in seven (20.59%) MS patients and in one (7.69%) control patient. In MS patients the most frequently detected was human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6; 3 cases; 8.82%); followed by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV; 2 cases; 5.88%), varicella zoster virus (VZV; 1 case; 2.94%) and Enterovirus (EV; 1 case; 2.94%). The single identified virus among controls was EBV (7.69%). DNA and RNA metagenomic assays did not identify any known eukaryotic viruses even though three of the analyzed samples were low-level positive by specific quantitative real-time PCR. In conclusion, we detected the presence of Herpesviridae and occasionally Enteroviridae in CSF from patients with MS but their prevalence was not significantly higher than among controls. Metagenomic analysis seems to be less sensitive than real-time RT-PCR/PCR and it did not detect any potential viral pathogens.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS); [1]. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study estimated that the number of patients worldwide is close to 2.2 million which poses a major health and economic burden on the society [2]. In the US it is estimated that the advanced stages of the disease result in healthcare costs ranging from $8,528 to $54,244 per patient per year [3]. Unfortunately, despite intensive research the pathogenesis of the disease remains unknown [4].

A number of patient factors have been suspected to play some role in MS development, including genetic susceptibility [5], high estrogen levels [6], smoking [7] and vitamin D deficiency [8], but there is also evidence for environmental influence since there is an increase in disease risk for all individuals moving from low to high MS prevalence areas [9].

A number of epidemiological studies have linked various viruses including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6), human cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex viruses (HSV), human endogenous retrovirus (HERV), Measles virus (MeV) and even transfusion transmitted virus (TTV) with MS but the strongest overall seems to be the association with EBV and HHV-6 [7, 911]. However, previous studies used routine diagnostic methods thus limiting the detection to the most common pathogens [12]. Next generation sequencing (NGS) metagenomics offers an alternate approach to the identification of pathogens as it allows for characterization of whole microbial communities [13].

Only a few metagenomic studies were conducted so far on viral populations in MS patients which resulted in finding of GB virus-C (GBV-C) in the brain of one MS patient [14] and a very limited number of NGS reads mapping to EBV, CMV, and parvovirus in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [15]. In our previous small study shotgun metagenomic analysis of CSF detected VZV-DNA in a patient with Central Nervous System Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Disorder (IIDD); [16]. This finding encouraged us to conduct a more comprehensive search for viral agents in CSF of MS patients using both RT-PCR/PCR testing for the most common neurotropic viruses and shotgun DNA/RNA-based metagenomics.

Methods and methods

Patients

Forty-seven patients (30 women, 17 men) aged from 17 to 71 years (median 30 years), who were admitted to the Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw in the years 2012–2016 with suspicion of MS were subjects of the study. MS was eventually confirmed in 34 patients and excluded in the remaining 13 patients, who were considered controls. Patient and control demographical, clinical and laboratory data are shown in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Clinical data and RT-PCR/PCR results of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240601.t001

Four control patients were diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy, three had peripheral vertigo and two suffered from retinopathy, while the remaining four patients remained undiagnosed. MS was diagnosed according to the revised (2010) McDonald criteria [17], which were in use at the time of the study, but all our patients met the revised McDonald criteria introduced in 2017 [18]. All MS patients had Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) and CSF was collected within 1–4 weeks from the onset of symptoms. After the initial hospitalization for 7–10 days during which the SM diagnosis was made, patients were followed up at the outpatient clinic for at least 2 years.

All patients gave a written informed consent and all research was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Medical University of Warsaw (approval number: KB/8/2015).

Nucleic acids extraction

CSF samples were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, aliquoted and kept frozen at -80°C until analysis. For RT-PCR/PCR assays total RNA and DNA were extracted from 200μl of CSF using TRIzol LS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and NucleoSpin Plasma XS (Macherey-Nagel, Germany), respectively, whereas for metagenomic analysis nucleic acids were extracted from 500μl of CSF. Extracted RNA/DNA were suspended in 20μl of water.

Virus-specific RT-PCR/PCR

CSF samples were analyzed using in-house quantitative real-time RT-PCR/PCR described previously [1922]. These assays detected the following viruses: herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively), varicella zoster virus (VZV), EBV, CMV, HHV-6, human herpes virus type 7 (HHV-7), human adenoviruses (HAdVs) and enteroviruses (EV; Coxsackie A9, A16, B2, B3, B4, B5; ECHO 5, 6, 9, 11, 18, 30 and enterovirus 71). Limits of detection (LOD) for quantitative PCRs were as follows: for HSV-1–253 viral copies/ml, HSV-2–369 viral copies/ml, VZV—150 viral copies/ml, CMV– 403 viral copies/ml, EBV—226 viral copies/ml, HHV-6–111 viral copies/ml, HHV-7–153 viral copies/ml, HAdV—102 viral copies/ml and EV—240 viral copies/ml.

DNA/RNA preamplification and NGS library preparation

Due to the expected low amounts of DNA/RNA in CSF a preamplification step was introduced to enable the construction of NGS libraries for sequencing [23]. RNA was reversely transcribed by single-primer isothermal amplification (Ribo-SPIA), using Ovation RNA-Seq V2 system (NuGEN, San Carlos, USA) following manufacturer’s recommendation. DNA was preamplified using SeqPlex Enhanced DNA Amplification protocol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Preamplified cDNA and DNA were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA) at a ratio of 0.8 (cDNA/DNA mixture volume to beads).

Libraries for NGS were prepared from one ng of cDNA/DNA using Nextera XT Kit (Illumina, USA) following manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and average length of NGS library was assessed using Bioanalyzer and DNA HS kit (Agilent Technologies, USA). Samples were double indexed, pooled equimolarly and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq (150nt, paired-end reads) or Illumina HiSeq (101nt, paired-end reads).

NGS data analysis

Raw reads were trimmed in a process including adaptor and artifact removal and discarding reads with bases below quality score of Q20 (phred quality score) using Trimmomatic [24]. Reads shorter than 50 bp were excluded and the remaining reads were mapped to human reference sequence (hg19) with Stampy software [25]. Next, all unmapped sequences were compared to NCBI genomic viral reference database (viral RefSeq release 96) using Bowtie2 [26]. Reads were sorted, indexed with SAMtools [27], counted and statistically analyzed with standard R packages. Non-human sequences were uploaded into Sequence Read Archive (SRA); (BioProject ID PRJNA656949).

The criteria for positive virus detection were as follows: i) at least three reads specific for a particular viral species, ii) reads had to be distributed over the whole genome, iii) no presence of any of these viral reads in the control samples. Similar criteria for metagenomic virus detection were previously applied by others [28].

Results

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR/PCR

Specific quantitative real-time PCR testing revealed the presence of viral nucleic acid in seven (20.59%) out of 34 MS patients and in one (7.69%) out of 13 control patients (not significant by Fisher's exact test). The most frequently detected virus in MS patients was HHV-6 (3 cases; 8.82%); followed by EBV (2 cases; 5.88%), VZV (1 case; 2.94%) and EV (1 case; 2.94%). The single identified virus among controls was EBV (7.69%). CSF viral loads ranged from 550 to 1750 copies/ml (Table 1).

DNA/RNA metagenomics

Metagenomic analysis was conducted on CSF samples from 13 MS patients and 4 controls. In the remaining cases either not enough CSF sample was left for analysis, or the required amount of cDNA/DNA to generate libraries for sequencing could not be obtained. Three of these patients were positive by real-time PCR. All 17 CSF samples underwent RNA-based metagenomic, while DNA workflow was limited to 16 since in one sample the amount of DNA generated was insufficient for NGS library construction.

After quality control DNA sequencing provided 211,440,331 reads (average 13,215,021 reads per sample) while the RNA approach provided 451,782,975 reads (mean 26,575,469 reads per sample). Detailed metagenomic data are shown in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) metagenomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid samples from 13 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 4 controls.

Reads were compared to the NCBI genomic viral RefSeq database (release 96).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240601.t002

Regardless of the applied metagenomic workflow, the vast majority of NGS reads mapped to human genome (mean: 96.21%). DNA sequencing protocol provided from 42 to 10,174 (0.0003–0.0886%, mean: 0.0132%) viral reads, whereas RNA metagenomics provided from 2,609 to 69,061 (0.0075–0.2443%; mean: 0.0491%) reads mapping to viral database. The vast majority of identified viruses were bacteriophages, whereas the remaining viral reads either did not fulfil the criteria for positivity or were contaminants and artifacts (not shown). Applying the initially established criteria, no eukaryotic viruses were detected in MS patients or controls.

Discussion

Viral infections are likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis and exacerbation of MS as evidenced by epidemiological studies and a number of reports on the potential of viruses to trigger autoimmune responses to such mechanisms as myelin by molecular mimicry, epitope spreading and bystander effect [10, 12, 29, 30]. Virus caused demyelination is a known phenomenon and has been previously described for Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in which JC virus infects and ultimately kills myelin-producing oligodendrocytes [31]. A similar mechanism could be operational for canine distemper virus (CDV) infection in the white matter of dogs [32]. However, as Herpesviridae cause chronic infection it cannot be excluded that their presence in CSF from MS patients is the result of their reactivation [33, 34].

In the current study we identified four different viral species in CSF from patients with MS and the most frequently detected was HHV-6 as it was found in 3 patients (8.82%). Several earlier studies reported on the increased prevalence of HHV-6-DNA and anti-HHV-6 IgG/IgM in CSF of MS patients [3538]. It has been proposed that HHV-6 might trigger demyelination by molecular mimicry of the virus-encoded U24 protein to myelin basic protein (MBP), which is a putative MS-associated autoantigen [39]. However, it should be noted that correlation between HHV-6 infection and MS was not confirmed in some other studies but the numbers of patients and controls were small [4042].

A number of studies showed positive correlation between mononucleosis and MS [4345] and thus detection of EBV DNA in two of our patients was not unexpected. It was calculated that mononucleosis increases the risk of MS development 2.3 times and in case of HLA-DR2-positive patients the risk is even 7 times higher [44].

VZV, another Herpesviridae was detected in one MS patient. VZV DNA was reported to be commonly present in CSF during MS relapses [46] and in our previous study we detected it in a patient with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) which is considered to represent the earliest stage of MS demyelination [16, 47].

Enteroviral RNA was detected in one out of 34 MS patients. While Enteroviruses are typically associated with encephalitis, some enteroviral infections result in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and hallmark of this syndrome is the presence of demyelination lesions in the brain and spinal cord [48, 49]. The patient was a 20 years-old male hospitalized because of sensory symptoms, but he admitted to having a short episode of diplopia 4 months earlier. A month after the current hospitalization the patient was readmitted because of retrobulbar optic neuritis. His symptoms were not preceded by any infection, he did not have fever, encephalopathy or headache. His MRI showed a symmetric pattern of T2-weighted hyperintense lesions in brain and spine including periventricular location. His CSF showed the presence of unique oligoclonal bands while pleocytosis and protein concentration were normal. The relapsing-remitting course, presence of unique oligoclonal bands in CSF and character of MRI changes strongly suggest that the patient had SM and not ADEM. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that the presence of enteroviral RNA in this case was coincidental and did not have any relationship to MS.

NGS-based metagenomic analysis offers a universal pathogen detection and has already been used to identify viruses in neuroinfections [50, 51]. However, despite our two-pronged RNA and DNA approach with a preamplication step no eukaryotic viruses were detected even though three of the analyzed samples were positive for Herpesviruses by specific real-time PCR. This discrepancy could be due to the fact that metagenomic workflows are less sensitive than specific real time RT-PCR/PCR assays and thus may fail in analysis of low viral-copy CSF samples [52]. Using serial dilutions of HIV and HSV positive sera in negative CSF, we have previously found that the limit of detection was 102 and 103 copies per reaction, respectively, while in the current study viral load in metagenomics-negative real-time PCR-positive samples ranged from 550 to 1650 copies/ml [53].

Although CSF is considered to be free of microbial DNA, we detected numerous reads mapping to various viral reference genomes but not fulfilling the initially established criteria of positivity. These mostly represented phage species and artifact sequences, which are particularly common for samples with a low DNA and RNA loads [54, 55]. Moreover, the reagents themselves could be the source of contaminating foreign sequences and may affect the interpretation of metagenomic results [53, 56].

Conclusions

In conclusion, we detected the presence of Herpesviridae and occasionally Enteroviridae in CSF from MS patients but their prevalence was not significantly higher than among controls. Metagenomic analysis seems to be less sensitive than real-time RT-PCR/PCR and it did not detect any additional potential viral pathogens.

References

  1. 1. Multiple Sclerosis: Management of Multiple Sclerosis in Primary and Secondary Care. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. London2014.
  2. 2. Collaborators GBDMS. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3):269–85. pmid:30679040
  3. 3. Adelman G, Rane SG, Villa KF. The cost burden of multiple sclerosis in the United States: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of medical economics. 2013;16(5):639–47. pmid:23425293
  4. 4. Loma I, Heyman R. Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Current neuropharmacology. 2011;9(3):409–16. pmid:22379455
  5. 5. Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility. Science. 2019;365(6460):eaav7188. pmid:31604244
  6. 6. Ysrraelit MC, Correale J. Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development. Immunology. 2019;156(1):9–22. pmid:30222193
  7. 7. Wingerchuk DM. Smoking: effects on multiple sclerosis susceptibility and disease progression. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2012;5(1):13–22. pmid:22276073
  8. 8. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Souberbielle JC. Contribution of vitamin D insufficiency to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2013;6(2):81–116. pmid:23483715
  9. 9. Ascherio A, Munger KL. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: Noninfectious factors. Annals of neurology. 2007;61(6):504–13. pmid:17492755
  10. 10. Kakalacheva K, Munz C, Lunemann JD. Viral triggers of multiple sclerosis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1812(2):132–40. pmid:20600868
  11. 11. O'Gorman C, Lucas R, Taylor B. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis: a review with a focus on molecular mechanisms. International journal of molecular sciences. 2012;13(9):11718–52. pmid:23109880
  12. 12. Virtanen JO, Jacobson S. Viruses and multiple sclerosis. CNS & neurological disorders drug targets. 2012;11(5):528–44. pmid:22583435
  13. 13. Kim D, Hofstaedter CE, Zhao C, Mattei L, Tanes C, Clarke E, et al. Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):52. pmid:28476139
  14. 14. Kriesel JD, Hobbs MR, Jones BB, Milash B, Nagra RM, Fischer KF. Deep sequencing for the detection of virus-like sequences in the brains of patients with multiple sclerosis: detection of GBV-C in human brain. PloS one. 2012;7(3):e31886. pmid:22412845
  15. 15. Jovel J, O'keefe S, Patterson J, Bording-Jorgensen M, Wang W, Mason AL, et al. Cerebrospinal Fluid in a Small Cohort of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Was Generally Free of Microbial DNA. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2017;6.
  16. 16. Perlejewski K, Bukowska-Osko I, Nakamura S, Motooka D, Stokowy T, Ploski R, et al. Metagenomic Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2016;935:89–98. pmid:27311319
  17. 17. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of neurology. 2011;69(2):292–302. pmid:21387374
  18. 18. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–73. pmid:29275977
  19. 19. Kierat S, Les K, Przybylski M, Dzieciatkowski T, Mlynarczyk G. [TaqMan fluorescent probe-based real-time PCR assay for detection of varicella-zoster virus]. Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia. 2012;64(2):139–49. pmid:23072059
  20. 20. Les K, Przybylski M, Dzieciatkowski T, Mlynarczyk G. [Detection of human enteroviruses with real-time PCR assay using TaqMan fluorescent probe]. Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia. 2010;62(3):245–53. pmid:21114017
  21. 21. Dzieciatkowski T, Przybylski M, Gierynska M, Luczak M. [Real-time PCR as an efficient tool for investigating the presence of human herpesvirus 6 DNA]. Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia. 2008;60(3):259–65. pmid:19143180
  22. 22. Rynans S, Dzieciatkowski T, Przybylski M, Basak GW, Rusicka P, Tomaszewska A, et al. Incidence of adenoviral DNAemia in Polish adults undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis. 2015;63(1):79–84. pmid:25376263
  23. 23. Perlejewski K, Popiel M, Laskus T, Nakamura S, Motooka D, Stokowy T, et al. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the identification of encephalitis-causing viruses: Unexpected detection of human herpesvirus 1 while searching for RNA pathogens. J Virol Methods. 2015;226:1–6. pmid:26424618
  24. 24. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20. pmid:24695404
  25. 25. Lunter G, Goodson M. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 2011;21(6):936–9. pmid:20980556
  26. 26. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. pmid:22388286
  27. 27. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9. pmid:19505943
  28. 28. Kufner V, Plate A, Schmutz S, Braun DL, Gunthard HF, Capaul R, et al. Two Years of Viral Metagenomics in a Tertiary Diagnostics Unit: Evaluation of the First 105 Cases. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(9).
  29. 29. Stohlman SA, Hinton DR. Viral induced demyelination. Brain Pathol. 2001;11(1):92–106. pmid:11145206
  30. 30. Croxford JL, Olson JK, Miller SD. Epitope spreading and molecular mimicry as triggers of autoimmunity in the Theiler's virus-induced demyelinating disease model of multiple sclerosis. Autoimmunity reviews. 2002;1(5):251–60. pmid:12848977
  31. 31. Saribas AS, Ozdemir A, Lam C, Safak M. JC virus-induced Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Future virology. 2010;5(3):313–23. pmid:21731577
  32. 32. Mutinelli F, Vandevelde M, Griot C, Richard A. Astrocytic infection in canine distemper virus-induced demyelination. Acta neuropathologica. 1989;77(3):333–5. pmid:2922996
  33. 33. Wandinger K, Jabs W, Siekhaus A, Bubel S, Trillenberg P, Wagner H, et al. Association between clinical disease activity and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in MS. Neurology. 2000;55(2):178–84. pmid:10908887
  34. 34. Farrell RA, Antony D, Wall GR, Clark DA, Fisniku L, Swanton J, et al. Humoral immune response to EBV in multiple sclerosis is associated with disease activity on MRI. Neurology. 2009;73(1):32–8. pmid:19458321
  35. 35. Alvarez-Lafuente R, Garcia-Montojo M, De Las Heras V, Dominguez-Mozo MI, Bartolome M, Benito-Martin MS, et al. Herpesviruses and human endogenous retroviral sequences in the cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple sclerosis. 2008;14(5):595–601. pmid:18566025
  36. 36. Ablashi DV, Lapps W, Kaplan M, Whitman JE, Richert JR, Pearson GR. Human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) infection in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary report. Multiple sclerosis. 1998;4(6):490–6. pmid:9987758
  37. 37. Tejada-Simon MV, Zang YC, Hong J, Rivera VM, Killian JM, Zhang JZ. Detection of viral DNA and immune responses to the human herpesvirus 6 101-kilodalton virion protein in patients with multiple sclerosis and in controls. Journal of virology. 2002;76(12):6147–54. pmid:12021348
  38. 38. Virtanen JO, Farkkila M, Multanen J, Uotila L, Jaaskelainen AJ, Vaheri A, et al. Evidence for human herpesvirus 6 variant A antibodies in multiple sclerosis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Journal of neurovirology. 2007;13(4):347–52. pmid:17849318
  39. 39. Tejada-Simon MV, Zang YC, Hong J, Rivera VM, Zhang JZ. Cross-reactivity with myelin basic protein and human herpesvirus-6 in multiple sclerosis. Annals of neurology. 2003;53(2):189–97. pmid:12557285
  40. 40. Kuusisto H, Hyoty H, Kares S, Kinnunen E, Elovaara I. Human herpes virus 6 and multiple sclerosis: a Finnish twin study. Multiple sclerosis. 2008;14(1):54–8. pmid:17893113
  41. 41. Gustafsson R, Reitsma R, Stralfors A, Lindholm A, Press R, Fogdell-Hahn A. Incidence of human herpesvirus 6 in clinical samples from Swedish patients with demyelinating diseases. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47(5):418–21. pmid:23731901
  42. 42. Leibovitch EC, Jacobson S. Evidence linking HHV-6 with multiple sclerosis: an update. Current opinion in virology. 2014;9:127–33. pmid:25462444
  43. 43. Thacker EL, Mirzaei F, Ascherio A. Infectious mononucleosis and risk for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Annals of neurology. 2006;59(3):499–503. pmid:16502434
  44. 44. Nielsen TR, Rostgaard K, Nielsen NM, Koch-Henriksen N, Haahr S, Sorensen PS, et al. Multiple sclerosis after infectious mononucleosis. Archives of neurology. 2007;64(1):72–5. pmid:17210811
  45. 45. Handel AE, Williamson AJ, Disanto G, Handunnetthi L, Giovannoni G, Ramagopalan SV. An updated meta-analysis of risk of multiple sclerosis following infectious mononucleosis. PloS one. 2010;5(9). pmid:20824132
  46. 46. Sotelo J, Ordonez G, Pineda B, Flores J. The participation of varicella zoster virus in relapses of multiple sclerosis. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2014;119:44–8. pmid:24635924
  47. 47. Fernández V, Postigo MJ, Gonzalez A, Urbaneja P, León A, Alonso A, et al. ID 94 –Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS): Measure of axonal status. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2016;127(3):e71.
  48. 48. Pillai S, Tantsis E, Prelog K, Ramanathan S, Webster R, Ouvrier RA, et al. Confirmed enterovirus encephalitis with associated steroid-responsive acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: an overlapping infection and inflammation syndrome. European journal of paediatric neurology: EJPN: official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society. 2015;19(2):266–70. pmid:25576193
  49. 49. Agin H, Apa H, Unalp A, Kayserili E. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis associated with enteroviral infection. Neurosciences. 2010;15(1):46–8. pmid:20677593
  50. 50. Lipowski D, Popiel M, Perlejewski K, Nakamura S, Bukowska-Osko I, Rzadkiewicz E, et al. A Cluster of Fatal Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus Infection in Organ Transplant Setting. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2017;215(6):896–901. pmid:28453842
  51. 51. Smits SL, Zijlstra EE, van Hellemond JJ, Schapendonk CME, Bodewes R, Schurch AC, et al. Novel Cyclovirus in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid, Malawi, 2010–2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(9):1511–3. pmid:23968557
  52. 52. Edridge AWD, Deijs M, van Zeggeren IE, Kinsella CM, Jebbink MF, Bakker M, et al. Viral Metagenomics on Cerebrospinal Fluid. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(5).
  53. 53. Bukowska-Osko I, Perlejewski K, Nakamura S, Motooka D, Stokowy T, Kosinska J, et al. Sensitivity of Next-Generation Sequencing Metagenomic Analysis for Detection of RNA and DNA Viruses in Cerebrospinal Fluid: The Confounding Effect of Background Contamination. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2016. pmid:27405447
  54. 54. Malboeuf CM, Yang X, Charlebois P, Qu J, Berlin AM, Casali M, et al. Complete viral RNA genome sequencing of ultra-low copy samples by sequence-independent amplification. Nucleic acids research. 2013;41(1):e13. pmid:22962364
  55. 55. Strong MJ, Xu G, Morici L, Splinter Bon-Durant S, Baddoo M, Lin Z, et al. Microbial contamination in next generation sequencing: implications for sequence-based analysis of clinical samples. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(11):e1004437. pmid:25412476
  56. 56. Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87. pmid:25387460