Preschool environment and preschool teacher’s physical activity and their association with children’s activity levels at preschool

Chu Chen; Viktor H. Ahlqvist; Pontus Henriksson; Cecilia Magnusson; Daniel Berglind

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239838

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between preschool playground size, formalized physical activity (PA) policies, time spent outdoors and preschool teacher’s levels of PA and children’s objectively assessed levels of PA and sedentary time (ST) during preschool hours.

Methods

In total, 369 children and 84 preschool teachers from 27 preschools in Södermalm municipally, Stockholm Sweden wore an Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer during 7 consecutive days. Preschool environmental and structural characteristics were measured via the Environment and Policy Evaluation Self-Report (EPAO-SR) instrument and time in- and outdoors was recorded by preschool teachers during the PA measurements. Weight and height of children were measured via validated scales and parents filled out a questionnaire on demographical and descriptive variables. Linear mixed models, nested on preschool level, were used to assess the association between predictors and outcomes.

Results

The mean child age was 4.7 years (SD 0.8) and 45% were girls. We found that children were more active in preschools with a formalized PA policy, compared to preschools without such a policy, but not less sedentary. The association between policy and activity seemed to be more pronounced when accounting for other environmental factors. Similar associations were found in children spent most time outdoors (uppermost quartile) compared with children spent least time outdoors (Lowermost quartile). Preschool teachers’ light PA (LPA) (ß = 0.25, P = 0.004) and steps (ß = 0.52, P<0.001) were associated with children’s LPA and steps while the preschool playground size showed no association with PA in children, when accounting for other environmental factors.

Conclusion

The current study showed that preschool structural characteristics such as formalized PA policies and more time spent outdoors were positively associated with children’s PA. These findings suggest that formalized PA policies and time outdoors may be of importance for promoting children’s PA during preschool hours.

Citation: Chen C, Ahlqvist VH, Henriksson P, Magnusson C, Berglind D (2020) Preschool environment and preschool teacher’s physical activity and their association with children’s activity levels at preschool. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0239838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838

Editor: David Paul, University of Idaho, UNITED STATES

Received: January 20, 2020; Accepted: September 14, 2020; Published: October 15, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Data cannot be shared publicly because health data are considered sensitive data in Sweden which can be utilized only after permission from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm. Data are available from the Regional Ethical Review Board (contact via https://etikprovningsmyndigheten.se/) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding: DB received the funding for this study. This study was partly funded by Lindhés Advokatbyrå and by Södermalm municipally. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: Lindhés Advokatbyrå has no competing interest in terms of its ownership of stocks, employment or consultancy, board membership, patent applications (pending or actual), research grants, travel grants or gifts. Receiving funding from Lindhés Advokatbyrå does not alter our adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Total physical activity (PA), moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) [1] and steps per day [2] are positively associated with multiple health indicators in young children, while more conflicting findings have been reported for sedentary time (ST) [3]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that physically active children tend to remain more physically active across their lifespan [4]. Despite the many known benefits of PA, children are in general physically inactive [5]. A review on preschoolers’ physical activity level based on objective measure has shown highly variable results that preschool children spend 2%–41% of their day in MVPA, 4%–33% in light PA (LPA), and 34%–94% sedentary [6]. Moreover, Swedish data with objectively measured PA and ST, show that preschoolers’ levels of PA are low [7, 8]. Hence, effective strategies informed by objective data are urgently required to promote child PA.

A theory base is suggested to be beneficial for the effectiveness of PA promoting strategies [9], therefore the social ecological model was employed as framework to understand systematically what factors may enable effective PA promotion in preschool children [10]. According to the social ecological model, there are different levels of determinants of health behaviors such as physical activity namely individual level, interpersonal level, organizational level and physical environment level [10]. Environmental intervention in preschool which lay emphasize on non-individual level determinants of PA, can potentially be an effective PA promotion strategy also addressing sustainability and equity but the evidence-base is scarce [11]. In Sweden, approximately 92% of all children 1–5 years of age are attending preschools, regardless of their parents’ socioeconomic status [12]. Furthermore, approximately 50% of children’s daily MVPA is accumulated during preschool hours [8]. Therefore, the preschool environment presents an ideal arena to promote early development of healthy PA and ST behaviors [13].

Potential modifiable characteristics for preschool includes physical environment, policy, time spent outdoors on the organizational level and teachers’ PA on the interpersonal level, but the evidence supporting effectiveness is preliminary. In terms of interventions to modify physical environment, studies have shown that structural environmental factors such as playground size, play equipment accessibility and design of the preschool playground may be of importance for children’s PA during preschool hours [14, 15]. However, consensus on playground size is hampered by the lack of evidence, application of objective measure on PA, and the difficulty in studying this issue with randomized experimental design [16]. Although physical environment level interventions address all children in the environment with potentially promising sustainability, they are seldom practical due to the requirement on resources especially on large scale [17].

Modifying organizational factors, such as policy and time spent outdoors, is less resource-dependent but may be effective provided adequate evidence base. Having a PA policy in preschool is suggested to be beneficial for preschooler’s PA but objective measure on PA is lacking [14, 18, 19]. Conflicting results have been demonstrated by the few existing studies with accelerometer data. While Dowda et al found more MVPA in PA promoting preschools where policy is one of the components [20], Erinosho et al showed a negative association between PA policy and accelerometer measured PA level in preschool children [21]. More research with objective PA data is needed to determine the association between policy and PA levels in preschool children. Similarly, studies investigating associations between time spent outdoors at preschool and children’s levels of PA using objective measures on PA are also scarce. Only a few existing studies indicate that the amount of time preschool children spend outdoors is positively associated with their levels of PA and negatively associated with ST [22, 23]. A recent randomized controlled trial showed that scheduling both shorter more frequent and longer outdoor sessions during preschool hours significantly increased preschool children’s MVPA [24]. Thus, increasing time spent outdoors during preschool hours may, in addition to policies and environmental factors, be an effective strategy to promote healthy PA among preschool children. However, more studies are warranted to further explore the potential of organizational level factors.

Interpersonal level factor such as preschool teacher’s attitude, initiative, and participation in physical activities along with children, may play an important role in promoting preschool children’s PA [25]. However, there is a lack of studies among the preschool population. Only one Norwegian study has used objectively measured PA in both preschool teachers’ and children and found a small, but statistically significant association, between preschool teachers’ and preschool children’s levels of PA during preschool hours [26]. More studies with objective measure on both preschool teachers and children are imperative to confirm the potential association between preschooler’s PA and preschool teachers’ PA.

To address these knowledge gaps, the aim of the current study is to assess to what extent the physical preschool environment, formalized PA policies, time spent outdoors and preschool teachers’ levels of PA were associated with children’s objectively assessed PA, steps and ST during preschool hours to deepen knowledge in informing strategy development for child PA promotion.

Materials and methods

Study design, setting and study population

In this cross-sectional observational study, 30 out of the total 51 municipal preschools within the Södermalm district of Stockholm Sweden, were invited to participate. Preschools were chosen to reflect a representative sample of the different environmental characteristics (outdoor operation and different size of the playground) within the Södermalm district. In Sweden, all children from the age of 1 to 5 are eligible to go to preschool. However, children aged 1–2 years are often separated in physical activity daily routines from children aged 3–5 years because of the difference in their development stage [27]. Further, WHO have formulated different physical activity guidelines due to this variation in growth between 1–2 years old toddlers and 3–5 years old preschool children [28]. As such, preschool children of 3–5 years old were chosen as the study population of this research and children between 3–5 years of age, at the participating preschools, were invited to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating children’s parents and preschool teachers and the study has been approved by the Stockholm Ethical Review Board (EPN), Dnr: 2018/890-31/2. The fieldwork measurements, comprising questionnaires for preschool teachers and parents, body measures of children and 7 days of accelerometer measures of PA in children and preschool teachers, were carried out at the participating preschools from September to November 2018.

Preschool environmental characteristics, policies and time outdoors

The Environment and Policy Evaluation Self-Report (EPAO-SR) Instrument, showing good to excellent validity and reliability [29], was administered to preschool teachers. The EPAO-SR instrument includes both questions about nutrition and physical activity and only questions regarding physical activity were distributed in this study. Subscales of the EPAO-SR were used to measure environmental characteristics and formalized PA policies in the participating preschools. The specific questions asked were “How large is your preschool playground?” and “Does your preschool has written policy or any other written document about physical activity? Answers about playground size were categorized and modified to include the Swedish outdoor activity practice; (1) ≤200m², (2) around 900m², (3) >2700m² and (4) outdoors activity (all time at the preschool is spent outdoors). Formalized PA policy was analyzed as a dichotomous variable (Yes/No), depending on if the preschool had any written policy concerning PA or not. Time in-and outdoors was aggregated from in-out report, in which preschool teachers recorded time spent “indoors” or “outdoors” in 30-minute periods for every child on all weekdays during the PA measurements. Time outdoors was thereafter converted into quartiles (Q1 <138min, Q2 138min≤ to <187.5min, Q3 187.5min≤ to <234min and Q4 ≥234min), where Q1 comprises those 25% of preschool children who spent the least time outdoors and Q4 comprises those 25% who spent the most time outdoors.

Body measures

Weight and height of participating children were measured via validated scales and stadiometers, respectively (calibrated scale: VB2-200-EC, Vetek AB, Väddö, Sweden; portable stadiometer: Seca 213, Seca, Chino, CA, USA). Body mass index (BMI) was classified as normal, overweight or obese according to an international classification by Cole et al., correcting for age and sex [30].

Physical activity and sedentary time

PA and ST were measured via the triaxial Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer, which has been tested extensively for reliability and validity and is widely used in epidemiological pediatric research [31]. Wear protocol and analyzing techniques followed best practices and used the latest recommendations to increase accuracy [31]: children and preschool teachers were instructed to wear the accelerometer, at the right hip, all waking hours for 7 consecutive days. A sampling rate of 60 Hz was used and vector magnitude (V_m) activity counts (V_m = √ (X² + Y² + Z²)) was analyzed. Accelerometer data were considered valid if the child wore the accelerometer for at least 3 days, 10 hours/day. Non-wear time was defined as 60 or more consecutive minutes with zero counts, allowing up to 2 min of interruptions with non-zero counts [31]. Steps were determined using the manufacturer’s step algorithm, using the normal filter. MVPA, LPA and ST were calculated based on cut-offs and epochs developed specifically for the GT3X+ accelerometer, using V_m activity counts, in 4-year-old children [32]. A 60-s epoch length was used in analysis according to the epoch setting in the validation study that developed these cut-offs [32]. ST was calculated as any minute of less than 820 counts per minute (cpm), LPA as 820–3907 cpm and MVPA as ≥3908 cpm. For preschool teachers, MVPA, LPA and ST were calculated based on cut-offs and epochs developed by Santos-Lozano et al. for the GT3X+ accelerometer, using V_m activity counts [33]. ST was calculated as any minute of less than 150 cpm, LPA as 150–3207 cpm and MVPA as ≥3208 cpm [33]. After the validation and classification of PA level for whole day PA accelerometer measure, the time-stamped accelerometer data was further matched with preschool time information to extract PA during preschool time due to the focus of the preschool factors in this study. In Sweden, preschool hours vary to fit parents’ working schedule, but most preschools are open from 7:00 to 19:00. The preschool arrival and departure time information for each child was documented by preschool teachers daily in the same in/out report that recorded children’s activity indoor or outdoor in 30 minutes periods from 7:00 to 19:00.

Family characteristics

At baseline, parents filled out a questionnaire on demographical and descriptive variables on anthropometry (height and weight) and highest education level, categorized into elementary school, upper secondary school and university education.

Teacher PA

Teachers’ PA outcomes were aggregated at preschool level by calculating the means of the respective PA outcomes of all teachers in each preschool. Every outcome was then categorized into high and low by the median. Cut-offs for teacher PA outcomes aggregated at preschool level were defined as: MVPA_low<24.5 min, LPA_low<310.4 min, Steps_low<6656 steps, ST_low≤184.5 min.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive analyses included the distribution (mean and standard deviation (SD)) of various background characteristics and PA outcomes by preschool policy, playground size, time outdoors and teacher PA.

Next, we used Linear Mixed Models (LMM), nested on preschool level, to examine associations between existence of formalized PA policy, playground size, time spent outdoors and preschool teachers aggregated levels of MVPA, LPA, steps and ST with child levels of MVPA, LPA, steps and ST. We analyzed each association between the exposures and outcomes independently and all predictors jointly in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Adjustments, in all models presented, were made for age of the child, sex and BMI [34] that has been selected based on causal diagram [35]. There are no defined classrooms in Swedish preschools where all teachers take care and interact will all children in principle [36]. Although children can be divided into groups, these groups are not fixed, and most children participate in different group constellations [27]. Therefore, a 2-level nesting, children/teachers nested in preschools, was adopted in the LMM. In addition, we estimated the intra class correlation for each mixed model to determine the preschool-level cluster effect.

All statistical analysis was performed in software STATA version 16.0.

Results

Fig 1 demonstrates the derivation of the analytical dataset. In total, 404 children and 92 preschool teachers from 27 preschools participated in the current study. First, 10 children and 6 teachers were excluded because they had less than 3 days or 10 hours/day of accelerometer data. Second, 25 children and 2 teachers were excluded due to missing recorded preschool hours, as such information were required to determine PA during preschool time. Thus, the final analytical sample comprised 369 children and 84 preschool teachers. The mean child age was 4.7 years (SD 0.1) and 45% were girls. On average, a child spent 475 minutes (7.9h) in preschool per day, of which 269 (SD 97.5) and 206 (SD 107.7) minutes were spent in- and outdoors, respectively.

Download:

Fig 1. Flowchart of participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g001

Table 1 provides an overview of the preschool characteristics by preschool policy, playground size and time spent outdoors (exposures) and child’s daily average levels of PA, steps and ST (outcomes) during preschool hours. The overview of teacher’s PA, steps and ST aggregated on preschool level and child’s daily average of PA during preschool time, steps and ST respectively is presented in S1 Table. In total, girls spent 19% less minutes in MVPA, 5% less minutes in LPA and spend 14% more minutes in ST compared with boys during preschool hours.

Download:

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics in relation to preschool level features.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.t001

Associations between formalized preschool policy and children’s PA, steps and ST

When formalized preschool policy was analyzed as the only predictor in the independent models, the effect of formalized preschool PA policy was hardly manifested (Figs 2–5, independent model). However, when all predictors were analyzed simultaneously (Figs 2–5, joint model), i.e. the direct association between each predictor and outcome, assuming all other predictors constant, children spent 10.2 (95% CI: 2.8, 17.6) minutes more in MVPA (Fig 2, joint model), 15.6 (95% CI: 1, 30.2) minutes more in LPA (Fig 3, joint model) and acquired 997 (95% CI: 181, 1813) more steps (Fig 4, joint model) in preschools with formalized PA policies compared with preschools with no such policies.

Download:

Fig 2. Association between predictors and children’s MVPA during preschool time.

Both models are adjusted for age, sex and BMI category. Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4, BMI = body mass index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Association between predictors and children’s LPA during preschool time.

Both models are adjusted for age, sex and BMI category. Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4, BMI = body mass index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Association between predictors and children’s steps during preschool time.

Both models are adjusted for age, sex and BMI category. Abbreviations: Q1-4 = quartile 1–4, BMI = body mass index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g004

Download:

Fig 5. Association between predictors and children’s ST during preschool time.

Both models are adjusted for age, sex and BMI category. Abbreviations: ST = sedentary time, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4, BMI = body mass index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g005

Associations between preschool playground area and children’s PA, steps and ST

As is shown in Figs 2–4, the independent model shows dose-response association between preschool playground area and children’s PA and steps. However, this dose-response association is not displayed when the preschool playground area is analyzed with other predictors simultaneously.

Associations between time spent outdoors and children’s PA, steps and ST

In the independent model where time spent outdoors was analyzed as the only predictor for the association with children’s PA outcomes, children in the uppermost quartile of time spent outdoors (Q4) spend 11.1 (95% CI: 3.5, 18.7) minutes more in MVPA (Fig 2, independent model), 59.8 (95% CI: 45.5, 74.1) minutes more in LPA (Fig 3, independent model) and acquired 2685 (95% CI: 2037, 3333) more steps compared with children in the lowermost quartile of time spent outdoors (Q1) (Fig 4, independent model). Moreover, when analyzed with all predictors and confounders simultaneously, children in the uppermost quartile of time spent outdoors (Q4) spend 11.5 (95% CI: 3.0, 20.0) minutes more in MVPA (Fig 2, joint model), 59.1 (95% CI: 43.1, 75.2) minutes more in LPA (Fig 3, joint model) and acquired 2092 (95% CI: 1399, 2785) more steps (Fig 4, joint model) compared with children in the lowermost quartile of time spent outdoors (Q1).

Association between preschool teachers’ PA and children’s PA

Fig 6 illustrates the association between preschool teacher’s aggregated levels of MVPA, LPA, steps and ST with children’s levels of MVPA, LPA, steps and ST on an individual level. Both preschool teacher’s aggregated levels of LPA and steps were statistically significant associated with children’s individual levels of LPA (ß = 0.25, P = 0.004) and steps (ß = 0.52, P<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant association between preschool teachers aggregated levels of MVPA and ST and children’s levels of MVPA (ß = -0.01, P = 0.93) and ST (ß = 0.20, P = 0.14).

Download:

Fig 6. Association between preschool teachers’ and children’s PA and ST during preschool time.

Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.g006

Sensitivity analyses

In sensitivity analyses, we estimated the intra class correlation of each model shown in S2 Table. We observed small to modest ICC for all models (and all outcomes); there was a small ICC for MVPA, and somewhat higher for Steps, LPA and ST (S3 Table). In addition, we ran all models included in S2 Table with additional adjustment made for parental education in a subset population of children (n = 337) (S4 Table). S4 Table shows that none of the estimates are affected, to any substantial extent, by the introduction of parental education as a covariate. Finally, we ran descriptive analyses comparing children in the analytical sample (n = 369) with children with incomplete accelerometer data or missing data on anthropometrics and or missing data on time spent in- and outdoors (n = 35) (S5 Table). As shown in S5 Table, children excluded from analyses, due to missing data, had a higher prevalence of obesity (33% vs. 2%) and lower PA level. The excluded sample were generally distributed across the preschools except for that one preschool contributed to 11 (31.4%) exclusions due to loss of sub-report document for in/out report with information on preschool time and time spent outdoors. This preschool had the smallest preschool playground and did not have a formalized policy.

Discussion

The current study examined associations between preschool playground size, formalized PA policies, time spent outdoors and preschool teacher’s levels of PA with children’s levels of PA and ST at preschool. Our findings showed that preschool characteristics such as formalized PA policies and more time spent outdoors were positively associated with children’s levels of PA. Moreover, preschool teachers aggregated levels of LPA and steps were statistically significant associated with children’s individual levels of LPA and steps. However, preschool playground size showed no significant association with children’s levels of PA. These findings may be of importance for promoting children’s PA during preschool hours and intervention development.

Comparison with previous research

Our finding that time spent outdoors was positively associated with children’s levels of PA is supported by previous systematic reviews on positive associations between time outdoors with PA [37] and negative associations with ST [38]. However, most previous studies have relied on potentially biased self-reported levels of PA or retrospective information on time spent in- and outdoors during preschool hours. One small (n = 46) observational study with objectively measured PA and GPS-assessed time spent outdoors showed that children were approximately twice as active and less sedentary when comparing outdoor verses indoor time in a preschool setting [39]. The association in the aforementioned study is somewhat stronger than the 68% more MVPA and 37% less ST accumulated during time spent outdoors compared to indoors we observed in the current study. However, the study by Tandon et al. had a more precise measure of the exposure, i.e. time spend in- and outdoors (GPS vs. preschool teacher reports), which to some extent may explain the observed differences between the two studies.

There is limited evidence that PA policies alone positively stimulate PA and reduce ST in preschool children [40]. In general, PA interventions in preschool settings generate small to moderate effect on children’s MVPA, where multicomponent interventions including structured outdoor activity are most effective [13]. However, a review on the promotion of PA in preschool children [41] highlights the importance of implementing policies concerning PA in preschools to promote children’s levels of PA during preschool hours. Findings in the current study that children spent 10.2 minutes more in MVPA during preschool hours in preschools having formalized PA policies compared with preschools with no such policies, further supports the importance of implementing formalized PA policies.

Systematic review data indicate that preschool playground size and playground software characteristics e.g. play equipment are associated with levels of PA in preschool children [42]. Hence, having enough space to play and having favorable playground conditions may be sufficient for preschool children to be physically active. However, these observational associations have not been reinforced in the few existing interventions studies. In the current study, we found a dose-response association between playground size and children’s levels of PA during preschool hours. However, this association was deteriorated when the association between playground size and PA was evaluated together with PA policy and time outdoors. Thus, the association between playground size and children’s PA may partly be explained by PA policy and time spent outdoors. Nevertheless, more complex relationships may exist. For example, it is possible that these correlating factors interact, and such interactions may be of relevance for PA. However, the potential complex interplay was not explored due to the limited sample size and the cross-sectional design of this study, future studies that perform such detailed investigations are warranted.

Preschool teachers’ individual attitudes and behaviors may play an important role in promoting preschool children’s PA [43]. However, most previous research on the topic are based on qualitative approaches. Thus far, only one Norwegian study has explored accelerometer assessed associations between preschool teachers’ and children’s levels of MVPA during preschool hours [44]. This study demonstrated that there was a statistically significant association between preschool teacher’s aggregated levels of MVPA and preschool children’s individual levels of MVPA. In contrast, we were unable to detect any such association in the current study. However, we observed a statistically significant association between preschool teachers aggregated levels of LPA and steps and children’s individual levels of LPA and steps. The discrepancy between these studies may to some extent be explained by differences in approaches used to classify MVPA intensity in both preschool children and preschool teachers.

Strengths and limitations

The current study possesses several strengths. First, PA in both preschool children and teachers were assessed objectively with accelerometers during all preschool hours. Thus, limiting certain biases associated with self-reported measures, e.g. social desirability and recall difficulties. Second, the detailed in- and outdoor reports enabled us to match accelerometer data with children’s in- and outdoor time with high resolution (in 30-minute intervals). Third, the study included a large number of participants in preschools with different environmental characteristics (e.g. playground size). Finally, we used a validated instrument (EPAO-SR) to assess preschool characteristics, e.g. PA policies.

Nevertheless, the current study has several limitations that need consideration. First, both preschool characteristics, assessed via the EPAO-SR, and the in- and outdoor reporting relied on preschool teacher’s self-reporting, which have several inherited biases. In addition, formalized PA policy was dichotomized into yes/no which may have disregarded the influence of policy’s specific content on PA outcomes [19, 21]. Investigation further into content of formalized policy was hindered by the limited number of preschools that had formalized policy and unavailability of implementation information. Second, the geographical distribution of preschools was limited to a small area in Stockholm with a homogenous socioeconomic distribution. Furthermore, our sensitivity analysis showed that children with incomplete data had a higher prevalence of obesity and lower PA level compared with those included in the main analyses. However, it is important to note that few observations (25 observations for obesity status and 8 observations for PA level) in the excluded sample due to missing value may limit the representativeness of this result in the excluded sample. Further, one preschool, with no formalized policy and a playground ≤ 200m², contributed to 31.4% of the excluded participants due to loss of sub-document of in/out report with information on preschool time and time spent outdoors. This is of importance in relation to the center-level influence on missing data. Nevertheless, the constricted socioeconomic and body size distribution limit the generalizability of findings in the current study. Third, although accelerometry is considered as a preferable measurement of PA among preschool children in free-living conditions, it is unable to detect all PA when attached to the hip, e.g. cycling or upper-body movements [45]. Thus, some of preschoolers PA during preschool hours may not be captured, which may impact or estimates of PA and ST. Forth, information regarding child and preschool teacher associations in PA may have been diminished due to aggregating preschool teacher levels of PA within the preschools. Moreover, with the cross-sectional nature of data, it is not possible to conclude if preschool teachers PA affect children’s PA or vice versa. Finally, by using the normal filter to process accelerometer data we may have underestimated the number of steps taken during preschool hours [46]. In addition, a 60s epoch was adopted in accelerometer data analysis while a shorter epoch length has been suggested to suit the young children’s sporadic moving nature [31]. However, studies also suggest that scaling the cut-offs to suit a different epoch may be problematic [47]. The accuracy of cut-offs to classify PA level may be optimal when they are applied under the same epoch setting as the calibration setting that developed these cut-offs [47, 48]. Therefore, accelerometer data was analyzed in 60 s epoch strictly following the epoch length used in the validation study [32].

Conclusions

The current study showed that modifiable preschool characteristics such as formalized PA policies and more time spent outdoors were positively associated with children’s objectively measured levels of PA during preschool hours. For promoting children’s PA during preschool hours, preschools should consider incorporating formalized PA policies and aim to increase the daily amount of time spent outdoors. However, given the cross-sectional nature of the current study, these findings need further examination, preferably using experimental research designs.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Cross tabulation of teachers' PA and children' s PA.

High and low are classified by the median of the respective teacher PA variable Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Associations between predictors and physical activity indicators during preschool time (n = 369).

Model 1 = crude model each predictor independently, Model 2 = Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, BMI category Model 3 = all predictors jointly, Model4 = Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, BMI category Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, BMI = body mass index, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4 Reference level: Formalized PA policy = No, Playground area = ≤200 m², Time spend outdoors = Q1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Preschool-level cluster effect (intra class correlation) in each linear mixed model.

Model 1 = crude model each predictor independently, Model 2 = Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, BMI category Model 3 = all predictors jointly, Model 4 = Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, age, BMI category Abbreviations: MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time Reference level: Formalized PA policy = No, Playground area = ≤200 m², Time spend outdoors = Q1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Associations between predictors and physical activity indicators during preschool time (n = 337).

Model 1 = crude model each predictor independently, Model 2 = Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, BMI category and parental education Model 3 = all predictors jointly, Model4 = Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, age, BMI category and parental education Abbreviations: PA = physical activity, BMI = body mass index, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4 Reference level: Formalized PA policy = No, Playground area = ≤200 m2, Time spend outdoors = Q1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s004

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Comparison of descriptive characteristics between analytical dataset and excluded observations.

PA = physical activity, BMI = body mass index, MVPA = moderate to vigorous physical activity, LPA = light physical activity, ST = sedentary time, Q1-4 = quartile 1–4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s005

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Policy content in seven preschool reported formalized policy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239838.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank participating children, their families, preschool teachers and personnel at Södermalm municipally.

References

1. Carson V, Lee EY, Hewitt L, Jennings C, Hunter S, Kuzik N, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between physical activity and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC public health. 2017;17(Suppl 5):854. pmid:29219090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW, Belton S, Cardon GM, Duncan S, et al. How Many Steps/Day are Enough? for Children and Adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2011;8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Cliff DP, Hesketh KD, Vella SA, Hinkley T, Tsiros MD, Ridgers ND, et al. Objectively measured sedentary behaviour and health and development in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(4):330–44. pmid:26914664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Jones RA, Hinkley T, Okely AD, Salmon J. Tracking Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Childhood: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;44(6):651–8. pmid:23683983
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Bornstein DB, Beets MW, Byun W, McIver K. Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: a meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011;14(6):504–11. pmid:21684809
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Hnatiuk JA, Salmon J, Hinkley T, Okely AD, Trost S. A review of preschool children's physical activity and sedentary time using objective measures. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):487–97. pmid:25084681
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Berglind D, Hansson L, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Levels and Patterns of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Four-Year-Old Swedish Children. Journal of physical activity & health. 2016:1–23.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Berglind D, Tynelius P. Objectively measured physical activity patterns, sedentary time and parent-reported screen-time across the day in four-year-old Swedish children. BMC public health. 2017;18(1):69. pmid:28764730
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Finch M, Jones J, Yoong S, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L. Effectiveness of centre-based childcare interventions in increasing child physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis for policymakers and practitioners. Obes Rev. 2016;17(5):412–28. pmid:27005942
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Harvard university press; 1979.
11. Mehtälä MAK, Sääkslahti AK, Inkinen ME, Poskiparta MEH. A socio-ecological approach to physical activity interventions in childcare: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11(1):22.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Pearce M, Page AS, Griffin TP, Cooper AR. Who children spend time with after school: associations with objectively recorded indoor and outdoor physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):45. pmid:24679149
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Gordon ES, Tucker P, Burke SM, Carron AV. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for preschoolers: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(3):287–94. pmid:24261007
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Hinkley T, Carson V, Hesketh KD. Physical environments, policies and practices for physical activity and screen-based sedentary behaviour among preschoolers within child care centres in Melbourne, Australia and Kingston, Canada. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2015;41(1):132–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Villarreal-Calderon A, Acuna H, Villarreal-Calderon J, Garduno M, Henriquez-Roldan CF, Calderon-Garciduenas L, et al. Assessment of physical education time and after-school outdoor time in elementary and middle school students in south Mexico City: the dilemma between physical fitness and the adverse health effects of outdoor pollutant exposure. Archives of environmental health. 2002;57(5):450–60. pmid:12641189
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Broekhuizen K, Scholten A-M, de Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children’s physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11(1):59.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Swerissen H, Crisp BR. The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organization. Health promotion international. 2004;19(1):123–30. pmid:14976180
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Byrd-Williams CE, Dooley EE, Thi CA, Browning C, Hoelscher DM. Physical activity, screen time, and outdoor learning environment practices and policy implementation: a cross sectional study of Texas child care centers. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):274. pmid:30845946
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Dooley EE, Thi CA, Browning C, Hoelscher DM, Byrd-Williams CE. Examining physical activity policies to practice implementation: Results from the Texas Early Childhood Physical Activity Survey in non-Head Start childcare centers. Preventive medicine reports. 2020;17:101019. pmid:32021757
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Dowda M, Brown WH, McIver KL, Pfeiffer KA, O'Neill JR, Addy CL, et al. Policies and characteristics of the preschool environment and physical activity of young children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e261–6. pmid:19171578
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Erinosho T, Hales D, Vaughn A, Mazzucca S, Ward DS. Impact of Policies on Physical Activity and Screen Time Practices in 50 Child-Care Centers in North Carolina. Journal of physical activity & health. 2016;13(1):59–66.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Boldemann C, Blennow M, Dal H, Martensson F, Raustorp A, Yuen K, et al. Impact of preschool environment upon children's physical activity and sun exposure. Prev Med. 2006;42(4):301–8. pmid:16448688
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Tandon PS, Saelens BE, Zhou C, Christakis DA. A Comparison of Preschoolers' Physical Activity Indoors versus Outdoors at Child Care. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(11).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Razak LA, Yoong SL, Wiggers J, Morgan PJ, Jones J, Finch M, et al. Impact of scheduling multiple outdoor free-play periods in childcare on child moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: a cluster randomised trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2018;15.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Mikkelsen BE. Associations between pedagogues attitudes, praxis and policy in relation to physical activity of children in kindergarten—results from a cross sectional study of health behaviour amongst Danish pre-school children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:12–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Fossdal TS, Kippe K, Handegard BH, Lagestad P. "Oh oobe doo, I wanna be like you" associations between physical activity of preschool staff and preschool children. PloS one. 2018;13(11).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Sheridan S, Williams P, Pramling Samuelsson I. Group size and organisational conditions for children’s learning in preschool: a teacher perspective. Educational Research. 2014;56(4):379–97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. WHO. WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. In: WHO, editor. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311664/9789241550536-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y: WHO; 2019.
29. Ward D, Mazzucca S, McWilliams C, Hales D. Use of the Environment and Policy Evaluation and Observation as a Self-Report Instrument (EPAO-SR) to measure nutrition and physical activity environments in child care settings: validity and reliability evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2015;12(1):124.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240–3. pmid:10797032
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Delisle Nystrom C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Lof M, et al. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports medicine. 2017.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Butte NF, Wong WW, Lee JS, Adolph AL, Puyau MR, Zakeri IF. Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1216–26. pmid:24195866
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailon R, Bergmeir C, et al. Actigraph GT3X: Validation and Determination of Physical Activity Intensity Cut Points. Int J Sports Med. 2013.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Dolinsky DH, Brouwer RJN, Evenson KR, Siega-Riz AM, Østbye T. Correlates of sedentary time and physical activity among preschool-aged children. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(6):A131–A. pmid:22005624
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Williamson EJ, Aitken Z, Lawrie J, Dharmage SC, Burgess JA, Forbes AB. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection. Respirology. 2014;19(3):303–11. pmid:24447391
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Skolverket. Curriculum for the Preschool Lpfö 18 https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.6bfaca41169863e6a65d897/1553968298535/pdf4049.pdf2019
37. Ferreira I, van der Horst K, Wendel-Vos W, Kremers S, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J. Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth—a review and update. Obes Rev. 2007;8(2):129–54. pmid:17300279
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Hinkley T, Salmon J, Okely AD, Trost SG. Correlates of sedentary behaviours in preschool children: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:66. pmid:20825682
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Tandon PS, Saelens BE, Zhou C, Christakis DA. A Comparison of Preschoolers' Physical Activity Indoors versus Outdoors at Child Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Bower JK, Hales DP, Tate DF, Rubin DA, Benjamin SE, Ward DS. The childcare environment and children's physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(1):23–9. pmid:18083447
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Tremblay L, Boudreau-Lariviere C, Cimon-Lambert K. Promoting Physical Activity in Preschoolers: A Review of the Guidelines, Barriers, and Facilitators for Implementation of Policies and Practices. Can Psychol. 2012;53(4):280–90.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Broekhuizen K, Scholten AM, de Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children's physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:59. pmid:24885611
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Mikkelsen BE. Associations between pedagogues attitudes, praxis and policy in relation to physical activity of children in kindergarten—results from a cross sectional study of health behaviour amongst Danish pre-school children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6 Suppl 2:12–5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Fossdal TS, Kippe K, Handegard BH, Lagestad P. "Oh oobe doo, I wanna be like you" associations between physical activity of preschool staff and preschool children. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0208001. pmid:30496229
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, Okely AD. Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0–5 years. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(5):557–67. pmid:19147404
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM. Comparison of Step Outputs for Waist and Wrist Accelerometer Attachment Sites. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2015;47(4):839–42.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Hibbing PR, Bassett DR, Crouter SE. Modifying Accelerometer Cut-Points Affects Criterion Validity in Simulated Free-Living for Adolescents and Adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020:1–11.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Marissa Hope M, Ruth C, Shannon M, Laura AF-L. Accelerometry Analysis Options Produce Large Differences in Lifestyle Physical Activity Measurement. Physiological Measurement. 2020.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Carson V, Lee EY, Hewitt L, Jennings C, Hunter S, Kuzik N, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between physical activity and health indicators in the early years (0–4 years). BMC public health. 2017;17(Suppl 5):854. pmid:29219090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Beets MW, Belton S, Cardon GM, Duncan S, et al. How Many Steps/Day are Enough? for Children and Adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2011;8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Cliff DP, Hesketh KD, Vella SA, Hinkley T, Tsiros MD, Ridgers ND, et al. Objectively measured sedentary behaviour and health and development in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(4):330–44. pmid:26914664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] PubMed/NCBI

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Jones RA, Hinkley T, Okely AD, Salmon J. Tracking Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Childhood: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;44(6):651–8. pmid:23683983
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Bornstein DB, Beets MW, Byun W, McIver K. Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: a meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011;14(6):504–11. pmid:21684809
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hnatiuk JA, Salmon J, Hinkley T, Okely AD, Trost S. A review of preschool children's physical activity and sedentary time using objective measures. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47(4):487–97. pmid:25084681
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Berglind D, Hansson L, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Levels and Patterns of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Four-Year-Old Swedish Children. Journal of physical activity & health. 2016:1–23.
View Article
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Berglind D, Tynelius P. Objectively measured physical activity patterns, sedentary time and parent-reported screen-time across the day in four-year-old Swedish children. BMC public health. 2017;18(1):69. pmid:28764730
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[28] View Article

[29] PubMed/NCBI

[30] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Finch M, Jones J, Yoong S, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L. Effectiveness of centre-based childcare interventions in increasing child physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis for policymakers and practitioners. Obes Rev. 2016;17(5):412–28. pmid:27005942
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Harvard university press; 1979.

[ref11] 11. Mehtälä MAK, Sääkslahti AK, Inkinen ME, Poskiparta MEH. A socio-ecological approach to physical activity interventions in childcare: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11(1):22.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Pearce M, Page AS, Griffin TP, Cooper AR. Who children spend time with after school: associations with objectively recorded indoor and outdoor physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):45. pmid:24679149
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Gordon ES, Tucker P, Burke SM, Carron AV. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for preschoolers: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(3):287–94. pmid:24261007
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Hinkley T, Carson V, Hesketh KD. Physical environments, policies and practices for physical activity and screen-based sedentary behaviour among preschoolers within child care centres in Melbourne, Australia and Kingston, Canada. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2015;41(1):132–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Villarreal-Calderon A, Acuna H, Villarreal-Calderon J, Garduno M, Henriquez-Roldan CF, Calderon-Garciduenas L, et al. Assessment of physical education time and after-school outdoor time in elementary and middle school students in south Mexico City: the dilemma between physical fitness and the adverse health effects of outdoor pollutant exposure. Archives of environmental health. 2002;57(5):450–60. pmid:12641189
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Broekhuizen K, Scholten A-M, de Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children’s physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2014;11(1):59.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Swerissen H, Crisp BR. The sustainability of health promotion interventions for different levels of social organization. Health promotion international. 2004;19(1):123–30. pmid:14976180
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Byrd-Williams CE, Dooley EE, Thi CA, Browning C, Hoelscher DM. Physical activity, screen time, and outdoor learning environment practices and policy implementation: a cross sectional study of Texas child care centers. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):274. pmid:30845946
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Dooley EE, Thi CA, Browning C, Hoelscher DM, Byrd-Williams CE. Examining physical activity policies to practice implementation: Results from the Texas Early Childhood Physical Activity Survey in non-Head Start childcare centers. Preventive medicine reports. 2020;17:101019. pmid:32021757
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Dowda M, Brown WH, McIver KL, Pfeiffer KA, O'Neill JR, Addy CL, et al. Policies and characteristics of the preschool environment and physical activity of young children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e261–6. pmid:19171578
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Erinosho T, Hales D, Vaughn A, Mazzucca S, Ward DS. Impact of Policies on Physical Activity and Screen Time Practices in 50 Child-Care Centers in North Carolina. Journal of physical activity & health. 2016;13(1):59–66.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Boldemann C, Blennow M, Dal H, Martensson F, Raustorp A, Yuen K, et al. Impact of preschool environment upon children's physical activity and sun exposure. Prev Med. 2006;42(4):301–8. pmid:16448688
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Tandon PS, Saelens BE, Zhou C, Christakis DA. A Comparison of Preschoolers' Physical Activity Indoors versus Outdoors at Child Care. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(11).
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Razak LA, Yoong SL, Wiggers J, Morgan PJ, Jones J, Finch M, et al. Impact of scheduling multiple outdoor free-play periods in childcare on child moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: a cluster randomised trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2018;15.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Mikkelsen BE. Associations between pedagogues attitudes, praxis and policy in relation to physical activity of children in kindergarten—results from a cross sectional study of health behaviour amongst Danish pre-school children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:12–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Fossdal TS, Kippe K, Handegard BH, Lagestad P. "Oh oobe doo, I wanna be like you" associations between physical activity of preschool staff and preschool children. PloS one. 2018;13(11).
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Sheridan S, Williams P, Pramling Samuelsson I. Group size and organisational conditions for children’s learning in preschool: a teacher perspective. Educational Research. 2014;56(4):379–97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. WHO. WHO guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. In: WHO, editor. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311664/9789241550536-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y: WHO; 2019.

[ref29] 29. Ward D, Mazzucca S, McWilliams C, Hales D. Use of the Environment and Policy Evaluation and Observation as a Self-Report Instrument (EPAO-SR) to measure nutrition and physical activity environments in child care settings: validity and reliability evidence. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2015;12(1):124.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240–3. pmid:10797032
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Delisle Nystrom C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Lof M, et al. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports medicine. 2017.
View Article
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Butte NF, Wong WW, Lee JS, Adolph AL, Puyau MR, Zakeri IF. Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(6):1216–26. pmid:24195866
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[107] View Article

[108] PubMed/NCBI

[109] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailon R, Bergmeir C, et al. Actigraph GT3X: Validation and Determination of Physical Activity Intensity Cut Points. Int J Sports Med. 2013.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Dolinsky DH, Brouwer RJN, Evenson KR, Siega-Riz AM, Østbye T. Correlates of sedentary time and physical activity among preschool-aged children. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(6):A131–A. pmid:22005624
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Williamson EJ, Aitken Z, Lawrie J, Dharmage SC, Burgess JA, Forbes AB. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection. Respirology. 2014;19(3):303–11. pmid:24447391
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Skolverket. Curriculum for the Preschool Lpfö 18 https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.6bfaca41169863e6a65d897/1553968298535/pdf4049.pdf2019

[ref37] 37. Ferreira I, van der Horst K, Wendel-Vos W, Kremers S, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J. Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth—a review and update. Obes Rev. 2007;8(2):129–54. pmid:17300279
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] PubMed/NCBI

[125] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Hinkley T, Salmon J, Okely AD, Trost SG. Correlates of sedentary behaviours in preschool children: a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:66. pmid:20825682
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[127] View Article

[128] PubMed/NCBI

[129] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Tandon PS, Saelens BE, Zhou C, Christakis DA. A Comparison of Preschoolers' Physical Activity Indoors versus Outdoors at Child Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11).
View Article
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Bower JK, Hales DP, Tate DF, Rubin DA, Benjamin SE, Ward DS. The childcare environment and children's physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(1):23–9. pmid:18083447
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Tremblay L, Boudreau-Lariviere C, Cimon-Lambert K. Promoting Physical Activity in Preschoolers: A Review of the Guidelines, Barriers, and Facilitators for Implementation of Policies and Practices. Can Psychol. 2012;53(4):280–90.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Broekhuizen K, Scholten AM, de Vries SI. The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children's physical activity level: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:59. pmid:24885611
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] PubMed/NCBI

[143] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Mikkelsen BE. Associations between pedagogues attitudes, praxis and policy in relation to physical activity of children in kindergarten—results from a cross sectional study of health behaviour amongst Danish pre-school children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6 Suppl 2:12–5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Fossdal TS, Kippe K, Handegard BH, Lagestad P. "Oh oobe doo, I wanna be like you" associations between physical activity of preschool staff and preschool children. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0208001. pmid:30496229
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, Okely AD. Methodological considerations in using accelerometers to assess habitual physical activity in children aged 0–5 years. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(5):557–67. pmid:19147404
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM. Comparison of Step Outputs for Waist and Wrist Accelerometer Attachment Sites. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2015;47(4):839–42.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Hibbing PR, Bassett DR, Crouter SE. Modifying Accelerometer Cut-Points Affects Criterion Validity in Simulated Free-Living for Adolescents and Adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020:1–11.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Marissa Hope M, Ruth C, Shannon M, Laura AF-L. Accelerometry Analysis Options Produce Large Differences in Lifestyle Physical Activity Measurement. Physiological Measurement. 2020.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study design, setting and study population

Preschool environmental characteristics, policies and time outdoors

Body measures

Physical activity and sedentary time

Family characteristics

Teacher PA

Statistical analyses

Results

Associations between formalized preschool policy and children’s PA, steps and ST

Associations between preschool playground area and children’s PA, steps and ST

Associations between time spent outdoors and children’s PA, steps and ST

Association between preschool teachers’ PA and children’s PA

Sensitivity analyses

Discussion

Comparison with previous research

Strengths and limitations

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 Table. Cross tabulation of teachers' PA and children' s PA.

S2 Table. Associations between predictors and physical activity indicators during preschool time (n = 369).

S3 Table. Preschool-level cluster effect (intra class correlation) in each linear mixed model.

S4 Table. Associations between predictors and physical activity indicators during preschool time (n = 337).

S5 Table. Comparison of descriptive characteristics between analytical dataset and excluded observations.

S6 Table. Policy content in seven preschool reported formalized policy.

Acknowledgments

References