http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4357-7008
Figures
Abstract
Leaf morphology is one of the most important agronomic traits in rice breeding because of its contribution to crop yield. The drooping leaf (dr) mutant was developed from the Ilpum rice cultivar by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis. Compared with the wild type, dr plants exhibited drooping leaves accompanied by a small midrib, short panicle, and reduced plant height. The phenotype of the dr plant was caused by a mutation within a single recessive gene on chromosome 2, dr (LOC_Os02g15230), which encodes a GDSL esterase. Analysis of wild-type and dr sequences revealed that the dr allele carried a single nucleotide substitution, glycine to aspartic acid. RNAi targeted to LOC_Os02g15230 produced same phenotypes to the dr mutation, confirming LOC_Os02g15230 as the dr gene. Microscopic observations and plant nutrient analysis of SiO2 revealed that silica was less abundant in dr leaves than in wild-type leaves. This study suggests that the dr gene is involved in the regulation of silica deposition and that disruption of silica processes lead to drooping leaf phenotypes.
Citation: Yu Y, Woo M-O, Rihua P, Koh H-J (2020) The DROOPING LEAF (DR) gene encoding GDSL esterase is involved in silica deposition in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238887
Editor: Jong-Seong Jeon, Kyung Hee Univeristy, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Received: May 25, 2020; Accepted: August 25, 2020; Published: September 10, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ013165) of the Rural Development Administration, Korea.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Plant architecture has substantial impacts on growth and yield as a consequence of its direct influence on photosynthesis. Erect or excessively curved leaves increase plant self-shading, thereby decreasing light interception and decreasing photosynthetic capacity. Optimal leaf shape is therefore a critical characteristic that impacts a range of physiological functions. Enhancing leaf morphology, such as by reducing leaf drooping, is a key aim of plant breeding programs [1].
Many factors contribute to drooping leaf morphology, such as lack of midribs, abnormal arrangement of bulliform cells, modulated wax synthesis, lignin content, and silica presence. Midribs, which keep leaves upright, are thickened by cell proliferation, and promotion of cell proliferation impacts leaf phenotype [2]. Bulliform cells are found between two vascular bundles in parallel on the adaxial side of leaves. In a previous study, Xu et al. [3] reported that increased numbers and abnormal arrangements of bulliform cells increased leaf distortion and contributed to leaf drooping. Leaf surfaces are covered by a dense layer of wax crystals and loosening of layers leads to reduced wax deposition and distortion of leaf shape [4]. Lignin and silica can form tight crystal complexes with cellulose in secondary cell walls, generating layers of up to 2.5 μm in thickness. Reductions in lignin and silica accumulation decrease cell wall robustness and thereby influence leaf phenotype [5, 6].
Several genes related to the drooping leaf phenotype have been cloned and analyzed in rice. The DL and dl2 genes, which are involved in midrib formation, are located on chromosomes 3 and 1, respectively, and encode YABBY domains [7, 8]. Abnormal bulliform cell arrangement is regulated by the OsZHD1 and OsZHD2 genes, which are located on chromosomes 9 and 8, respectively. OsZHD1 and OsZHD2 encode zinc finger homeodomain class homeobox transcription factors [3]. The OsWR1 gene on chromosome 2 encodes ERF proteins and controls wax synthesis through alteration of long chain fatty acids and alkanes [9]. Secondary cell wall and lignin formation are regulated by the OsSWN1 gene, which is located on chromosome 6 and encodes a NAC transcription factor [10, 11]. Several silica transporter genes, Lsi1, Lsi2, and Lsi6, located on chromosomes 2, 3, and 6, respectively, encode aquaporin-like proteins [12–14].
In this study, whole genome sequencing and MutMap analysis was used to investigate a novel rice mutant gene, drooping leaf (dr). The dr gene was cloned and validated using RNAi. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM and SEM) and silica content analyses were used to further understand the cause underlying leaf shape determination.
Material and methods
Plant materials
Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) treatment was used to induce the dr mutation in a Korean japonica rice cultivar, Ilpum. Seeds of the mutant line used in this study were taken from the M13 generation. An F2 population derived from a cross between the mutant and the wild-type was used for genetic analysis and whole genome sequencing. For genetic mapping, Milyang 23, a Korean Tongil-type rice cultivar, was crossed with the mutant to obtain the mapping population. All plant materials were grown at the Experimental Farm of Seoul National University (Suwon, Korea) using conventional cultural practices.
Phenotype analysis
Agronomic traits including plant height (PH), stem length (SL), panicle length (PL), tillers per panicle (TP), panicles per plant (PP), spikelets per panicle (SP), spikelets per plant (SPP), and spikelet fertility (SF) were assessed in a single panicle from the main stem, with panicles assessed from 3–5 independent plants. Five replicates of thousand grain weights (TGW) were measured using an electronic balance (CAS, USA).
Chlorophyll (Chl) contents were measured in leaf sheaths from 70-day-old wild-type and mutant plants, using a Minolta SPAD-502 Meter (Minolta Camera Co., Ltd, Japan). Measurements were taken from five biological replicates.
For silica analysis, leaves were decolorized using 70% ethanol for 2 days at room temperature and then stained in phenol containing 0.001% safranin [15]. Photographs were taken under optical microscopy.
Determination of SiO2, N, P, and K
Leaves, stems, and roots were harvested at the maximum tiller number stage. Three replicate samples were collected. Samples were dried at 105°C for 16 hours and then ground to a powder. Approximately 0.5 g powdered sample was mixed with 1 ml concentrated sulphuric acid (reagent grade) and 10 ml 50% perchloric acid in a Kjeldahl flask. The mixture was heated to 400°C for 3 hours, cooled, and then filtered into a 100 ml mass flask through No. 6 quantitative filter papers. Filtration residues were used for SiO2 analysis, and filtrates were diluted with distilled water for determination of N, P, and K.
Histological analysis
Specimens for TEM and SEM were prepared from the maximum tillering stage leaves. For SEM, harvested leaves were fixed overnight at 4°C with slightly modified Karnovsky’s fixative consisting of 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer at pH 7.2, and then washed three times with 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer. Samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer and then washed three times with distilled water. Samples were treated with 0.5% uranyl acetate, washed with an ethanol gradient series, and then treated with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS). Samples were mounted on platinum stubs, coated with gold, and examined by a Field-Emission Scanning electron microscope (Sigma, Carl Zeiss).
TEM samples were fixed, post-fixed, and dehydrated as described in SEM, and then embedded in propylene oxide and Spurr’s resin overnight at 70°C. Embedded samples were sliced to 60 mm with an ultramicrotome (MT–X, RMC), and then stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 5 min and Reynold’s lead citrate for 2 min at 25°C. Processed samples were examined using a JEM-1010 EX electron microscope (JEOL, https://www.jeol.co.jp/en/).
Genetic analysis and fine mapping of the dr gene
A total of 250 F2 progeny from a cross between the mutant and Milyang 23 was used for segregation analysis and gene mapping. Genomic DNA samples were extracted from rice leaves using the CTAB method [16]. A bulked segregant analysis (BSA) strategy was used for genetic mapping as described by Michelmore et al. [17]. Equal amounts of DNA from each of ten mutant and ten wild-type plants were pooled into single bulked samples. Sixty-five sequence-tagged site (STS) markers designed at the Crop Molecular Breeding Laboratory, Seoul National University, were used to analyze bulk samples. The STS markers were distributed throughout the rice genome at known chromosomal locations. After BSA, fine mapping was performed using seven additional STS markers designed against rice databases (http://www.gramene.org; https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp) [18]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed as described by Piao et al. with slight modifications [19]. Primer sequences are shown in S1 Table.
Whole genome sequencing and MutMap analysis
DNA from 17 F2 plants displaying the dr phenotype were combined into a bulked sample for sequencing. Sequencing libraries were constructed from 5 μg bulked sample DNA using a TruseqNano DNA LT sample preparation kit (FC-121-4001). Libraries were used for cluster generation and were sequenced for 250 cycles on an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. To generate the Ilpum reference sequence, 20.12 Gb of wild-type Ilpum sequence reads from KOBIC (www.kobic.re.kr, No. 2013-10000-3) was aligned to the Nipponbare reference genome (build five genome sequence; http://rapdblegacy.dna.affrc.go.jp/download/index.html) using BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner) software. Alignment files were converted to SAM/BAM files using SAM tools, and the aligned short reads were filtered using Coval to improve SNP calling accuracy. The SNP index was calculated as described by Abe et al. [20]. Sliding window analysis was applied with a 4 Mb window size and a 10 kb increment following the improved MutMap methods [21, 22]. In the sliding window analysis, the average SNP index and average p-Value (Fisher’s exact test) were calculated for the SNPs located in the window.
Derived CAPS (dCAPS) maker analysis
To test the co-segregation between SNP genotype of the mutation locus and mutant phenotype, dCAPS analysis was performed [18]. PCR amplification with the primer set Os02g15230-Tsp45I-F (5’- ACGCCTGTTATCCAGTTCA-3’) and Os02g15230-Tsp45I-R (5’- CATCACACGCGGTTGCACCAGCGT-3’) were performed. Primers were designed using the CAPS finder 2.0 program (http://helix.wustl.edu/dcaps/dcaps.html). Each product was digested with Tsp45I in a total volume of 15μl at 37°C for 3 hours. After digestion, 5μl of each digest was visualized by ethidium bromide staining on TBE gel.
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from the mutant and wild-type leaves using RNAiso plus (Takara Bio, Japan). Extracted RNA was treated with RNase-free Recombinant DNase Ι (Takara Bio, Japan) to eliminate gDNA contamination. Reverse transcription was performed using an M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). For the amplification of full-length cDNA of the target gene, we designed a pair of primers based on the cDNA sequence of LOC_Os02g15230 from the rice database (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp), Os02g15230.1-full cDNA-F (5’-GGCGGCGATGGGGGCAGTTC-3’) which contains the 5’UTR sequence with start code and Os02g15230.1-full cDNA-R (5’-AAGTGACTTTCTCATGAAGA-3’) which was derived from 3’UTR sequences.
Vector construction and rice transformation
The RNAi construct for DR gene suppression was amplified using the primers, Os02g15230-1-F (5’-AAAAAGCAGGCTACAAGCAGCTACCTAGGGCA-3’) and Os02g15230-1-R (5’-AGAAAGCTGGGTATACCCAACCTCTGGCAATG-3’), then the PCR products were cloned into pDONR201 (Invitrogen). Subsequently, entry clones with DR gene were inserted into pH7GWIWG2(II) and pHGWFS7, using Gateway® BP and LR Clonase™ II enzyme mixes (Invitrogen, USA). The resultant constructs were introduced into Dongjin, a japonica rice cultivar, via Agrobacterium transformation using bacterial strain LBA4404. Transformation was performed as previously described with slight modifications [23].
Multiple sequence alignment
The amino acid sequences of DR and other crops proteins were downloaded from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org) website. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted using Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo) and background color shading was applied with Jalview using the perentage identity scheme. The conserved domain prediction was performed using NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/structure/cdd).
Results
Characterization of the dr mutant lines
General agronomic traits were assessed to identify differences between wild-type and the dr mutant lines. Overall, the mutant exhibited significant stunting compared with the wild-type (Table 1). During the reproductive stage, the dr mutant exhibited short stem lengths that produced a substantial height reduction (Fig 1A) of approximately 50% compared with the wild-type. Numbers of lateral and adventitious roots were lower in the mutant (Fig 1B) compared with the wild-type, and primary roots were shorter. Panicle length, spikelet numbers per panicle, and spikelet numbers per plant were also lower in the mutant than in the wild-type (Fig 1C). Grains produced by the mutant were smaller than those from the wild-type (Fig 1D), having reduced width and thickness and, consequently, lower 1000-grain weights. Despite differences in spikelet numbers between the mutant and wild-type plants, no difference in SF was observed (Table 1). Many drooping leaf mutant genes encode members of the YABBY protein family and exhibit abnormal spikelets [24]. Unlike drooping leaf mutants previously reported, dr has normal spikelets.
(A) Overall shape of plants on 60-day-old (left) and 90-day-old(right). (B) The roots development in the wild-type (left) and the dr mutant (right). (C) Panicle shape of the wild-type (left) and the dr mutant (right). (D) Spikelets and seeds phenotypes of the wild-type (upper) and the dr mutant (down). (E) Morphology of 60-day-old leaves. (F) The degree of drooping leaves in the wild-type (upper) and the dr mutant (down). (G) Spikelets of wild-type (left) and the dr mutant (right) before flowering. (H) Physically opened spikelets of wild-type (left) and the dr mutant (right), before flowering. (I) Cross-section of the dr mutant (upper) and the wild-type (lower).
The predominant characteristic of the dr mutant was the drooping leaf phenotype. The thick central midrib vein observed in wild-type leaf blades was diminished in the mutant leaves, being only half-formed and small in size (Fig 1E). Wild-type leaves were also darker green than mutant leaves (Fig 1F and 1I). Correspondingly, SPAD analysis revealed that chlorophyll content was almost 30% higher in wild-type than in the mutant leaves (Table 1). Leaves were then further characterized to establish the underlying cause of the drooping leaf phenotype in the dr mutant.
Analysis of SiO2 abundance and its impact on the drooping leaf phenotype
Silica, which is deposited in leaves as the amorphous silica gel (SiO2) form, can act as a structural component to help maintain erect leaf morphology [25]. SiO2 abundance was assessed in wild-type and dr mutant to determine whether silica deposition contributed to the drooping leaf phenotype. As major plant nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) play significant roles in plant growth and development, N, P, and K were also assessed in wild-type and mutant leaves, stems, and roots at the maximum tillering stage.
As shown in Fig 2, N, P, and K levels did not differ in leaves, but a significant difference was observed between wild-type and mutant stems and roots. By contrast, SiO2 levels were lower in mutant leaves than in wild-type leaves, but differences were not observed in other plant parts. Of the components assessed, only SiO2 exhibited reduced abundance in dr mutant leaves compared with the wild-type. This confirmed that SiO2 accumulation was lower in the mutant than in wild-type leaves, suggesting that lower SiO2 abundance might be responsible for the drooping leaf phenotype (S2 Table).
Asterisks indicate the significance of differences between the wild-type and the dr mutant as determined by F-test (*, P<0.05; **, p<0.01; ns, not significant).
Histological analysis of the dr mutant leaves
In rice leaves, silica is primarily deposited in epidermal cell walls beneath the thin cuticle layer: this is termed the cuticle-silica double layer [26–29]. Two types of silicified cells are found in rice leaf blades: dumbbell-like shaped silica cells and silica bodies derived from motor cells [30, 31].
SEM was used to examine surface cells from leaves at the maximum tillering stage. Silica composition differed significantly between wild-type and the mutant leaves. On the adaxial side, wild-type leaves exhibited staunched silicified dumbbell-shaped cells along the vein, but mutant leaves had disordered and undeveloped cells (Fig 3A and 3B). Uniform silicified dumbbell-shaped cells were also found at the abaxial surface of wild-type leaves, whereas mutant leaves displayed degraded silica cells (Fig 3C and 3D).
(A, B) The adaxial surface in the wild-type and the dr mutant (C, D). The adaxial surface in the wild-type and the dr mutant. sb; silica body, sc; silicified dumbbell-shaped cells, sg; stomatal guard, pr; protuberances, tc; trichome, wp; wart-like protuberance. Arrow heads indicate undeveloped or degraded silica cells. Bars = 50 μm.
TEM was used to examine leaf cuticle membranes. Wild-type epidermis cells exhibited wart-like protuberances with electron-dense silica regions, but these structures were ambiguous in the mutant cells (Fig 4A and 4B). Wild-type epidermis cells without wart-like protuberances also had electron-dense silica layers, but these were not observed in dr mutant cells (Fig 4C and 4D). Cell walls, cuticles, and silica layers, were much thicker in wild-type than in mutant leaves, confirming that the dr mutant accumulated less silica than wild-type plants.
(A) Epidermal cell wall of the wild-type in the wp region. (B) Epidermal cell wall of the dr mutant in the wp region. (C) Epidermal cell wall of the wild-type without the wp region. (D) Epidermal cell wall of the dr mutant without the wp region. Cy; cytoplasm, cw; cell wall, sl; silicon layer, wp; wart-like protuberances, ct; cuticle layer. Bars = 0.5 μm.
Silica deposition pattern of the leaves in the secondary cell wall was examined using optical microscopy with a phenol-safranin staining method. In wild-type leaves, silicified dumbbell-shaped cells were arranged in a uniform manner along the vein and were opaque with silica (Fig 5A). By contrast, dumbbell-shaped cells in RNAi and dr leaves were transparent and had irregular leaf shapes (Fig 5B and 5C). Motor cell size and density was also reduced in RNAi and dr leaves (Fig 5E and 5F) compared with wild-type leaves (Fig 5D).
(A, D) wild-type. (B, E) RNAi plant. (C, F) dr mutant. Bars = 50 μm.
Genetic analysis and fine mapping of the dr mutation
F1 and F2 populations from crosses between the dr mutant and Ilpum lines were used to determine the inheritance of the dr trait. All F1 plants exhibited the wild-type phenotype, indicating that the dr trait was recessive. The F2 segregating population divided into two groups: dr-type and wild-type. Of the 250 F2 plants examined, 201 exhibited the wild-type phenotype and 49 exhibited the dr phenotype, consistent with the expected 3:1 Mendelian segregation ratio (Table 2). These results suggest that the dr trait was controlled by a single recessive gene.
To determine the physical location of the dr gene, F2 plants derived from cross between Milyang23 and dr mutant were used for mapping. BSA using 98 STS markers revealed that two markers, S02036 and S02039, located on the short arm of chromosome 2, showed significant polymorphisms between the wild-type and dr bulk samples (Fig 6A). Additional STS markers adjacent to the flanking markers were used to further refine the region to 340 kb between the S02-8309 and S02-8649 markers. Forty-five candidate genes within this region were identified using the RAP-DB database (version IRGSP 1.0; Fig 6B).
(A) Genetic mapping of the dr locus with STS markers. (B) Fine-mapping of the dr locus with additional STS markers. The candidate gene was mapped to a 340kb region on chromosome 2.
Analysis of the candidate gene
To locate the mutation and the gene responsible for the drooping leaf trait, a bulk population (25 plants) of DNA from F2 plants derived from a cross between dr mutant and Ilpum were used for whole genome sequencing and MutMap analysis. The sequence reads were aligned to the reference, Ilpum sequence. The SNP index of each SNP position was calculated, and SNP index plots were generated. According to the average SNP index peak, the most probable candidate region was detected in the 7–9 Mb region of chromosome 2 (Fig 7A) and it means that site is the most probable candidate region.
(A) SNP index plot of chr. 2 for identification of genomic regions harboring the causal mutation of dr gene. Gray shaded area is the region of the casual mutation. Blue dots represent SNP index values at a SNP position. Red line represents the sliding window average of SNP index values of the 4Mb interval with 10kb increments. Green line indicates the sliding window average of 95% confidence interval. Orange line indicates the sliding window average of 99% confidence interval. (B) Schematic diagram of the dr gene. Black rectangles represent exons and the red star represents the mutation site. (C) Co-segregation analysis of F2 plants using dCAPs markers. I; Ilpum, dr; dr, He; Heterozygous, Ho; Homozygous.
Thirty-four SNPs with an SNP index of 1 were found in the 340 kb candidate region between markers S02-8309 and S02-8649. Five of these SNPs were located in genic regions. DNA sequencing of each of the candidate genes was conducted to identify the gene associated with the dr phenotype. Comparisons between the dr mutant and wild-type sequences revealed a single point mutation in the LOC_Os02g15230 gene, which encodes GDSL esterase. The point mutation occurred in the fifth exon, at Open reading frame (ORF) nucleotide 2,677. The mutation substituted guanine with adenine, resulting in an amino acid change from glycine (Gly) to aspartic acid (Asp) in the dr mutant (Fig 7B). Co-segregation analysis of this SNP was performed using derived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (dCAPs) marker, and complete co-segregation of genotypes and phenotypes was observed in the F2 population (Fig 7C).
Validation of the mutation causing the dr phenotype
To verify whether the LOC_Os02g15230 gene was responsible for the drooping leaf phenotype, dsRNA-mediated interference (RNAi) transgenic plants targeting the candidate gene were developed. RNAi expression partially induced the drooping leaf phenotype (Fig 8A and 8B). RNAi plants also exhibited similar silica distribution to the dr mutant. SEM visualization revealed that both RNAi plants and the dr mutant had several undeveloped and degraded silicified dumbbell-shaped cells at the adaxial and abaxial sides of the leaf, unlike wild-type leaves (Fig 8C–8H). Silica development and degradation in RNAi plants was at intermediate levels between wild-type and the dr mutant, consistent with the leaf shape observations. These results demonstrated that the mutant phenotype resulted from loss-of-function of the dr gene.
(A) Overall shape of plants on 60-day-old in the wild-type (left) and the RNAi (right). (B) Comparison leaf shape in the wild-type, RNAi and the dr mutant. (C, D, E) The adaxial surface in the wild-type, RNAi and the dr mutant. (F, G, H) The adaxial surface in the wild-type, RNAi and the dr mutant. sb; silica body, sc; silicified dumbbell-shaped cells, sg; stomatal guard, pr; protuberances, tc; trichome, wp; wart-like protuberance. Arrow heads indicate undeveloped or degraded silica cells. Bars = 20 μm.
DR gene encoding a GDSL esterase/lipase
Database analysis suggested that the DR gene is a member of the GDSL esterase/lipase family, which is containing a SGNH hydrolase domain. The GDSL esterase/lipase has four important catalytic residues Ser-Gly-Asn-His in the conserved blocks I, II, III and V [32]. The DR gene also has these residues and it indicates that the DR gene may have esterase/lipase activity. GDSL esterase/lipases are involved in the regulation of plant development, morphogenesis, and synthesis of secondary metabolites [33, 34].
Multiple sequence alignment showed that the DR gene has highly conserved domain and motif within its amino acid sequences. Orthologs of the rice DR gene were found in several cereal crops, including Brachypodium distachyon (XP_003572041; 88% amino acid indentity), Sorghum bicolor (XP_002451875; 83% amino acid indentity), Zea mays (PWZ25920; 83% amino acid indentity), Triticum aestivum (CDM83832; 88% amino acid indentity), Setaria italica (XP_004965532; 73% amino acid indentity) (Fig 9).
The backgournd color (dark blue and light blue) boxes represent identical or similar amino acids. Block I to V indicate the conserved domains. N-terminal signal peptides and SGNH hydrolase domains are underlined with green and yellow line. GDSL motif is surrounded by red box. Red asterisks indicate amino acid residue which is changed by missense mutation in dr gene. The black arrowheads mark indicate the catalytic residues. XP_003572041; Brachypodium distachyon, XP_002451875; Sorghum bicolor, PWZ25920; Zea mays, CDM83832; Triticum aestivum, XP_004965532; Setaria italica.
Discussion
During photosynthesis, plants trap light energy with their leaves. Properly curved leaves receive optimum light and increase yield [35]. Although leaf architecture-related genes have been studied for several decades, the mechanisms regulating leaf architecture remain poorly understood [36]. In this study, we isolated the dr gene and determined the cause of the drooping leaf phenotype.
Map-based approach and resequencing data from MutMap-assisted SNP genotyping revealed that the DR gene was LOC_Os02g15230 on chromosome 2, and the causative SNP for the mutant was located in the 5th exon of the gene (Fig 6). RNAi-transgenic plants exhibited the same phenotypes as the dr mutant, confirming that DR gene was LOC_Os02g15230 (Fig 8).
Previously, another mutant in LOC_Os02g15230, namely, brittle leaf sheath1 (bs1), was identified [37]. This is a natural mutant from Nipponbare in which a single base at the second exon-intron junction caused an unspliced intron and premature stop codon and consequently resulted in brittle leaf sheath phenotype. In fact, although Zhang et al. [37] didn’t mention about the drooping leaf phenotype and didn’t observe abnormal silica deposition in leaves as well in the bs1 mutant, its appearance looks similar to the dr mutant. On the other hand, the dr mutant in this study didn’t exhibit brittle stem phenotypes. This indicates that dr and bs1 are different alleles of LOC_Os02g15230 showing a little different phenotypes, which yet to be tested for allelism with functional studies.
In general, silica deposition enhances strength and rigidity by reinforcing plant cell walls, and erect leaf blade structure is compromised when silica levels are reduced [38, 39]. Previous studies revealed that the leaves without silica showed droopy and less rigid surface [40–42]. SEM and TEM analysis indicated that dr leaves contained fewer silicified dumbbell-shaped cells and had a thinner silica layer than wild-type leaves (Figs 3 and 4). Plant nutrient analysis confirmed that silica accumulation was significantly reduced in dr leaves compared with the wild-type (Fig 2), suggesting that insufficient silica accumulation resulted in the drooping leaf phenotype. The mechanism of abnormal Si deposition in the mutant leaves is yet to be studied in relation to the report by Zhang et al. [37] that a natural mutation of the LOC_Os02g15230 showed impaired secondary wall pattern and abnormal pleotropic phenotypes such as brittle leaf sheath, abnormal xylem, and reduced growth, although phenotypes of bs1 and dr mutants are controlled by different alleles and different genetic backgrounds as well.
This study clarifies the relationship between the dr phenotype and silica abundance and demonstrates that the dr gene plays an important role in determining the shape of rice leaves. These results advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying leaf morphology and provide important information for rice breeding programs.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Primer information used for mapping.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238887.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Abundance of SiO2 and other plant nutrients in leaf, stem, and root tissues of wild-type and dr mutant.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238887.s002
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Givnish TJ. Comparative studies of leaf form: assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New phytologist. 1987; 106:131–160
- 2. Yamaguchi T, Nagasawa N, Kawasaki S, Matsuoka M, Nagato Y, Hirano HY. The YABBY gene DROOPING LEAF regulates carpel specification and midrib development in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell. 2004; 16:500–509
- 3. Xu Y, Wang Y, Long Q, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhou K, et al. Overexpression of OsZHD1, a zinc finger homeodomain class homeobox transcription factor, induces abaxially curled and drooping leaf in rice. Planta. 2014; 239:803–816
- 4. Zhou L, Ni E, Yang J, Zhou H, Liang H, Li J, et al. Rice OsGL1-6 is involved in leaf cuticular wax accumulation and drought resistance. PloS One. 2013; 8:e65139
- 5. Hossain MT, Mori R, Soga K, Wakabayashi K, Kamisaka S, Fujii S, et al. Growth promotion and an increase in cell wall extensibility by silicon in rice and some other Poaceae seedlings. J Plant Res. 2002; 115:23–27
- 6. Sato H, Sakamoto S, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Takamizo T. Improvement of cell wall digestibility in tall fescue by Oryza sativa SECONDARY WALL NAC DOMAIN PROTEIN2 chimeric repressor. Mol Breeding. 2018; 38:1–11
- 7. Ohmori Y, Toriba T, Nakamura H, Ichikawa H, Hirano HY. Temporal and spatial regulation of DROOPING LEAF gene expression that promotes midrib formation in rice. Plant J. 2011; 65:77–86
- 8. Huang J, Che S, Jin L, Qin F, Wang G, Ma N. The physiological mechanism of a drooping leaf2 mutation in rice. Plant science. 2011; 180.6:757–765
- 9. Wang Y, Wan L, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Quan R, et al. An ethylene response factor OsWR1 responsive to drought stress transcriptionally activates wax synthesis related genes and increases wax production in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2012; 78:275–288
- 10. Chai M, Bellizzi M, Wan C, Cui Z, Li Y, Wang GL. The NAC transcription factor OsSWN1 regulates secondary cell wall development in Oryza sativa. J Plant Biol. 2015; 58:44–51
- 11. Yoshida K, Sakamoto S, Kawai T, Kobayashi Y, Sato K, Ichinose Y, et al. Engineering the Oryza sativa cell wall with rice NAC transcription factors regulating secondary wall formation. Front Plant Sci. 2013; 4:383
- 12. Zhao FJ, Ago Y, Mitani N, Li RY, Su YH, Yamaji N, et al. The role of the rice aquaporin Lsi1 in arsenite efflux from roots. New Phytol. 2010; 186:392–399
- 13. Yamaji N, Ma JF. Further characterization of a rice silicon efflux transporter, Lsi2. J Soil Sci. 2011; 57:259–264
- 14. Yamaji N, Ma JF. A transporter at the node responsible for intervascular transfer of silicon in rice. The Plant Cell. 2009; 21.9: 2878–2883
- 15. Yamaji N, Mitatni N, Ma JF. A transporter regulating silicon distribution in rice shoots. Plant Cell. 2008; 20:1381–1389
- 16. Causse MA, Fulton TM. Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on interspecific backcross population. Genetics. 1994; 138:1251–1274
- 17. Michelmore R, Paran I, Kesseli R. Identification of markers linked to disease resistance genes by BSA: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genome regions by using segregating populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991; 88:9828–9832
- 18. Woo MO, Ham TH, Ji HS, Choi MS, Jiang W, Chu SH, et al. Inactivation of the UGPase1 gene cause genic male sterility and endosperm chalkiness in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant J. 2008; 54:190–204
- 19. Piao R, Jiang W, Ham TH, Choi MS, Qiao Y, Chu SH, et al. Map-based cloning of the ERECT PANICLE 3 gene in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 119:1497–1506
- 20. Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol. 2012; 30:174–178
- 21. Fekih R, Takagi H, Tamiru M, Abe A, Natsume S, Yaegashi H, et al. MutMap+: genetic mapping and mutant identification without crossing in rice. PloS One. 2013; 8: e68529
- 22. Takagi H, Uemura A, Yaegashi H, Tamiru M, Abe A, Mitsuoka C, et al. MutMap-Gap: whole-genome resequencing of mutant F2 progeny bulk combined with de novo assembly of gap regions identifies the rice blast resistance gene Pii. New Phytol. 2013; 200:276–283
- 23. Nishimura A, Aichi I, Matsuoka M. A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1:2796–2802
- 24. Li H, Liang W, Hu Y, Zhu L, Yin C, Xu J, et al. Rice MADS6 interacts with the floral homeotic genes SUPERWOMAN1, MADS3, MADS58, MADS13, and DROOPING LEAF in specifying floral organ identities and meristem fate. The Plant Cell. 2011; 23(7), 2536–2552
- 25. Richmond KE, Sussman M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003; 6:268–272
- 26. Kim SG, Kim KW, Park EW, Choi D. Silicon-induced cell wall fortification of rice leaves: a possible cellular mechanism of enhanced host resistance to blast. Phytopathology. 2002; 92:1095–1103
- 27. Zhang C, Wang L, Zhang W, Zhang F. Do lignification and silicification of the cell wall precede silicon deposition in the silica cell of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf epidermis? Plant Soil. 2013; 372:137–149
- 28. Ma JF, Mitani N, Nagao S, Konishi S, Tamai K, Iwashita T, et al. Characterization of the silicon uptake system and molecular mapping of the silicon transporter gene in rice. Plant Physiol. 2004; 136:3284–3289
- 29. Ma JF, Yamaji N. Functions and transport of silicon in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008; 65:3049–3057
- 30. Whang SS, Kim K, Hess WM. Variation of silica bodies in leaf epidermal long cells within and among seventeen species of Oryza (Poaceae). AM J BOT. 1998; 85:461–466
- 31. Epstein E. Silicon. Annu. 1999; 50: 641–664
- 32. Chepyshko H, Lai CP, Huang LM, Liu JH, Shaw JF. Multifunctionality and diversity of GDSL esterase/lipase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica) genome: new insights from bioinformatics analysis. BMC genomics. 2012; 13:309
- 33. Akoh CC, Lee GC, Liaw YC, Huang TH, Shaw JF. GDSL family of serine esterases/lipases. Prog Lipid Res. 2004; 43:534–552
- 34. Oh IS, Park AR, Bae MS, Kwon SJ, Kim YS, Lee JE, et al. Secretome analysis reveals an Arabidopsis lipase involved in defense against Alternaria brassicicola. Plant Cell. 2005; 17:2832–2847
- 35. Lang Y, Zhang Z, Gu X, Yang J, Zhu Q. Physiological and ecological effects of crimpy leaf character in rice (Oryza sativa L.) II. Photosynthetic character, dry mass production and yield forming. Zuo wu μe bao. 2004; 30:883–887
- 36. Sharkey TD. Estimating the rate of photorespiration in leaves. Physiol Plant. 1988; 73:147–152
- 37. Zhang B, Zhang L, Li F, Zhang D, Liu X, Wang H, et al. Control of secondary cell wall patterning involves xylan deacetylation by a GDSL esterase. Nat Plants. 2017; 3:17017
- 38. Yamamoto T, Nakamura A, Iwai H, Ishii T, Ma JF, Yokoyama R, et al. Effect of silicon deficiency on secondary cell wall synthesis in rice leaf. J Plant Res. 2012; 125:771–779
- 39. Kido N, Yokoyama R, Yamamoto T, Furukawa J, Iwai H, Satoh S, et al. The matrix polysaccharide (1; 3, 1; 4)-β-D-glucan is involved in silicon-dependent strengthening of rice cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014; 56:268–276
- 40. Yoshida S, Navasero SA, Ramirez EA. Effects of silica and nitrogen supply on some leaf characters of the rice plant. Plant and soil. 1969; 31.1: 48–56
- 41. Epstein E. The anomaly of silicon in plant biology. PNAS. 1994; 91.1: 11–17
- 42. Ma JF, Yamaji N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006; 11.8: 392–397