http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-8417
Figures
Abstract
Myxobacteria are one of the most promising secondary metabolites producers. However, they are difficult to isolate and cultivate. To obtain more myxobacteria and know the effects of environmental factors on myxobacterial community, we characterized myxobacterial communities in Dinghushan acidic forest soils of pH 3.6–4.5 with culture-dependent and -independent techniques, and analyzed environmental factors shaping myxobacterial communities. A total of 21 myxobacteria were isolated using standard cultivation methods, including eleven isolates of Corallococcus, nine isolates of Myxococcus and one isolate of Archangium, and contained three potential novel species. In addition, a total of 67 unknown myxobacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained using high-throughput sequencing method. The abundance of Myxococcales account for 0.9–2.2% of bacterial communities, and Sorangium is the most abundant genus (60.1%) in Myxococcales. Correlation analysis demonstrated that bacterial diversity and soil pH are the key factors shaping myxobacterial community. These results revealed an abundant myxobacterial community which is shaped by other bacteria and pH in Dinghushan acidic forest soils.
Citation: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Feng G, Zhu H (2020) Culture-dependent and -independent methods revealed an abundant myxobacterial community shaped by other bacteria and pH in Dinghushan acidic soils. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238769
Editor: Paula V. Morais, Universidade de Coimbra, PORTUGAL
Received: July 27, 2019; Accepted: August 24, 2020; Published: September 14, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China 31800003 (LYY) (http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/), the GDAS' Special Project of Science and Technology Development 2020GDASYL-20200103032 (WCL) (http://www.gdas.gd.cn/), the Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund 2018B020205003 (FGD) (http://gdstc.gd.gov.cn/tzgg/), the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong 2019B030316009 (LAZ) (http://pro.gdstc.gd.gov.cn/egrantweb/) and the Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou 201704020088 (LAZ) (http://sop.gzsi.gov.cn/).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Myxobacteria are ubiquitous gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria which are distributed all over the world, even including extreme environments [1, 2]. Because of their unique social lifestyle, myxobacteria are of particular interest in the study of multicellular behaviors of bacteria [3, 4]. During vegetative growth, myxobacterial rod-shaped cells move by gliding motility and feed on a broad range of bacteria and fungi [2]. Upon starvation, vegetative cells aggregate into fruiting bodies forming resistant myxospores which can be dormant for several years [5]. Myxobacteria are able to produce prospective novel secondary metabolites for pharmaceutical research. More than 100 basic core metabolites originating from myxobacteria have been identified, most of which have antibiotic, anti-malarial, immunosuppressive, antiviral or insecticidal activities [6]. However, myxobacteria are difficult to isolate and cultivate, with only 74 described species to date [2, 7, 8]. According to Mohr [2], more than 99% myxobacteria are uncultured and uncharacterized due to the lack of optimum isolation methods.
The deep insights into the myxobacterial communities in different habitats and the environmental factors shaping the communities maybe contribute to obtain these hidden groups. Previous studies demonstrated that myxobacteria accounted for 0.4–4.5% of all bacterial communities in different soil niches by analyzing 103 high-throughput sequencing data sets obtained from public databases and their abundance were correlated with site temperature, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and pH values [9]. Myxobacteria preferred to survive in neutral or alkalescent habitats [2]. However, alkaline or acidic environments also seem to be suitable for myxobacteria [1]. Zhang et al. [10] isolated 58 salt-tolerant myxobacteria from saline-alkaline soils collected from Xinjiang, China and all these strains grew better with 1% NaCl. Mohr et al. [11] found an astonishing myxobacterial diversity in high moor and fen with pH between 4.0 and 7.0 with cultivation-based and cultivation-independent methods. Moreover, Mohr et al. [12] also investigated diversity of myxobacteria in two ecological habitats from Kiritmati Island and German compost. The results showed an overrepresentation of the genera Myxococcus spp. and Corallococcus spp. with standard cultivation and revealed a great potential of undescribed myxobacteria in both sampling sites.
Additionally, as social predators, myxobacteria exhibited a wide range of predation activities against both bacteria and fungi [13, 14], changing the structure and diversity of microbial community [15, 16]. Moreover, Wang et al. [17] latest reported that predatory Myxococcales are widely distributed in and closely correlated with the bacterial community structure of agricultural land. These pointed to the possibility that myxobacteria influence the communities of bacteria and fungi. Yet few studies analyze the importance of bacteria and fungi to myxobacterial community.
Dinghushan forest ecosystem contains a large number of microbial novel species and represents a hot spot area for studying the biodiversity of tropical and subtropical forest ecosystems [18, 19]. To obtain more myxobacterial sources, the intensive examination of neglected/extreme habitats and grasping the influence factors on myxobacterial community are necessary strategies. In this study, we investigated the communities of myxobacteia in Dinghushan forest soils, which is a neglected and extreme habitat, using culture-dependent and -independent (high-throughput Illumina sequencing) techniques. Additionally, the effects of biotic (bacterial diversity) and abiotic factors shaping myxobacterial community were analyzed and compared. We aimed to know the myxobacterial diversity and key factors to determine myxobacterial communities in Dinghushan acidic forest soils. These studies can add new information about myxobacterial diversity in subtropical acidic forest soils and guide to obtain more myxobacteria.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
No specific permissions were required for the study, as it did not involve human or animals. Moreover, the sample sampling did not involve endangered or protected species.
Soil samples collection
The soil samples were collected in September of 2017 from Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (112°30′~112°33′E; 23°09′~23°11′N), which locates at Zhaoqing city in Guangdong province of China. It has a typical monsoonal climate with the annual average temperature of 22.3°C and rainfall of 1678 mm [18]. A total of 30 soil samples were collected from topsoil (5–15 cm) of 3 forest types (coniferous forest, coniferous-broadleaf mixed forest and monsoon evergreen broadleaf forest, 10 samples from each kind of forest) and immediately transported to laboratory in an ice box. Counterparts of 9 representative samples were drawn and stored at -80°C. Then, all 30 soil samples were air-dried and stored at 4°C.
Isolation of myxobacteria with cultivation
Myxobacteria were isolated using the standard techniques from the 30 air-dried samples: soil samples were soaked in actinomycin for 12 h to avoid fungal contamination, and then plated on WCX solid medium (CaCl2·2H2O 0.1%, cycloheximide 50 μg/mL, agar 1.5%, pH 7.2) with E. coli (Fig 1A) and filter papers as food sources (Fig 1B) [20]. Plates were incubated for 3–5 weeks at 30°C. Fruiting bodies were observed every three days using a stereoscope (Leica, M165C) and then transferred into VY/2 (Baker’s yeast 0.5%, CaCl2·2H2O 0.1%, Cyanocobalamin 0.5 mg/mL, agar 1.5%, pH 7.2) and MD1 agar (Casitone 0.3%, CaCl2·2H2O 0.07%, MgSO4·7H2O 0.2%, Cyanocobalamin 0.5 mg/mL, agar 1.5%, pH 7.2), respectively. Pure culture was obtained by continuous transfer of colony edge onto VY/2 or MD1 agar, and stored in 20% glycerol solution under -80°C.
Isolation of myxobacteria using E. coil (A) and filter papers (B); Sectional fruiting bodies observed on filter papers (C-G) and on soil samples using E. coli as baits (H-I). Phase-contrast photographs of M. stipitatus K13C18031201, M. stipitatus 25S18041902, M. stipitatus Z6C18031901, M. xanthus K38C18041901, Corallococcus sp. K15C18031902, Corallococcus sp. K2CV092601 and Corallococcus sp. H22C18031201. Bars, C-E, G-I: 0.5 mm; F: 0.25 mm.
Phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequences of myxobacteria
The genomic DNA of pure culture was extracted using the improved Cetyltrimethylammonium Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method [21] and 16S rRNA gene was sequenced by the universal primers 27F and 1492R [22]. Sequences obtained were compared with other 16S rDNA in Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). A neighbor-joining tree [23] was constructed using MEGA 7.0 software based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences applying bootstrap values with 1000 replications. Evolutionary distance was calculated using Kimura’s two-parameter model [24]. The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained had been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the accession numbers MK968786-MK968806.
Genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis
According to the phylogenetic analysis, 11 isolates in Corallococcus were divided into two groups, which represented different strains of two potential novel species. Because of the close 16S rRNA gene similarities of different strains, we selected strains H22C18031201 and Z5C101001 as two representative species, and their draft genomes were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq platform using a 2×150 bp paired-end reads at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Personalbio, Shanghai). Sequencing reads were assembled into contigs and scaffolds by using A5-miseq v20150522 [25]. The genome sequences of H22C18031201 and Z5C101001 had been submitted to NCBI database under the accession number QNUN00000000 and VKLU00000000, respectively.
The genome sequences of C. coralloides DSM 2259T (CP003389), M. fulvus DSM 16525T (FOIB00000000), M. xanthus DSM 16526T (FNOH00000000), M. virescens DSM 2260T (FNAJ00000000), M. stipitatus DSM14675T (CP004025), M. macrosporus DSM 14697T (CP022203), Archangium gephyra (CP011509) and Archangium sp. Cb G35 (MPOI01000017) were downloaded from NCBI database for the comparative study. The digital estimates for DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were calculated between the genome dataset pairs by using website at https://ggdc.dsmz.de/ provided on the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator GGDC [26]. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculator was performed by using the OrthANIu algorithm (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) [27].
Soil physicochemical properties
The 9 counterparts of soil samples for high-throughput sequencing were used to measure physicochemical properties. Soil pH was measured with deionized water (2.5:1, w/v) using a glass electrode (Sartorius PB-10). The contents of organic matter (OM) were determined by titration after wet oxidation with H2SO4 and K2Cr2O7 [28]. Available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available potassium (AK) contents were analyzed with alkali-hydrolyzed reduction diffusing method [29], colorimetric method (UV754N, YOKE INSTRUMENT) [30] and flame photometer method (FP6410, SH1717 China) [31], respectively. Ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) contents were analyzed according to the described method by Liu et al. using UV spectrophotometry and Nessler’s reagent colorimetry, respectively [32]. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) were determined using the ferric ammonium EDTA method (KDN-103A) [33].
DNA extraction and the high-throughput sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from the 9 soil samples stored at -80°C using the PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA quality was tested with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and DNA concentration was determined with a Nanodrop 2000C Spectrophotometer.
Sequencing was performed on the Illumina PE300 platform at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. The V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA was amplified with the universal primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) as previously described [34] that contained the Illumina adapter overhang nucleotide sequences. The raw sequence reads were de-multiplexed, quality-filtered, processed and analyzed using QIIME [35]. The raw sequence data had been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive at NCBI dababase (accession number SRP9637593-SRP9637601).
Bioinformatics data analysis
Sequences with ≥97% similarity were assigned to the same operational taxonomic unit (OTU) by UCLUST clustering [36]. OTU tables from all bacteria and myxobacteria were output for further analysis. The Chao index was calculated with QIIME to estimate the richness of bacterial communities. The Shannon index was calculated diversity of bacterial communities in QIIME. The correlations between environmental factors and myxobacterial alpha-diversity were revealed by Spearman analysis. The relationships between environmental factors and myxobacterial community structure were calculated with Mantel test based on pairwise Bray-Curtis distance matrix. Histograms of myxobacterial communities based on the high-throughput sequencing were constructed using Graphpad prism 7.0 software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The network analysis was performed with a random matrix theory (RMT)-as default setup on an online pipeline (http://ieg4.rccc.ou.edu/MENA) and visualized using Cytoscape software [37].
Results
Cultivation of myxobacteria from Dinghushan forest soils
A total of 66 myxobacterial strains from 30 soil samples were isolated. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and morphological characteristics, potential duplicates were excluded from further analyses. Finally, a total of 21 isolates were further analysed. Sectional fruiting body pictures were shown in Fig 1C–1I. Most of these fruiting bodies were spherical or ellipsoid in shape, and white, yellow, orange red or pale pink. In addition, during the myxobacterial isolation, 4 novel strains of Chitinophaga varians 10-7W-9003T [38], Chitinophaga flava K3CV102501T [39], Chitinophaga sp. K2CV101002 (unpublished) and Chitinophaga silvisoli K20C18050901T [40], and 1 strain of Deminuibacter soli K23C18032701T [41], belonging to the family Chitinophagaceae, were isolated as myxobacteria.
A neighbor-joining tree was constructed based on the isolates’ 16S rRNA gene sequences, showing the strains grouped into 3 clusters with strong bootstrap support (Fig 2). Among these strains, 9 strains belong to Myxococcus and 11 strains belong to Corallococcus, exhibiting 97.7–99.8% homologies with known culture myxobacteria; 1 strain belongs to the genus Archangium in the family Cystobacteriaceae, showing 99.1% similarity to Archangium gephyra. Identities of myxobacteria obtained by 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis were listed in S1 Table.
Bootstrap values ˃70% are shown at branch points. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Eleven strains of the genus Corallococcus showed 97.7–98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with their most related species, which were lower than the threshold of 98.7% for species delineation [42], Strains H22C18031201, K2CV092601, K2CV101002, H9CV101001, H5C101703 and H9CV102501 revealed 99.3% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities which possibly represent different strains of one potential novel species, and strains Z5C101001, K15C18031902, H17C18032101, K23C18031201-2 and Z5CV092601 showed 99.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities which possibly represent different strains of the other potential novel species. We selected strains H22C18031201 and Z5C101001 as represent species for further analysis. According to comparative genome analysis, the ANI and dDDH values among strains H22C18031201, Z5C101001 and their closely relatives, showed 77.8–88.4% similarities and 20.9–34.7% similarities, respectively (Table 1). These values were much lower than the threshold of 95–96% and 70% for species delineation [42], supporting that strains H22C1803120 and Z5C101001 represent two potential novel species. In addition, strain 12S042801 showed one nucleotide difference of 16S rRNA gene sequence with Archangium sp. Cb G35. The ANI and dDDH values between Archangium sp. Cb G35 and A. gephyra were 92.3% and 45.9%, respectively. These values were also lower than the threshold of 95–96% and 70% for species delineation, indirect supporting strain 12S042801 may represent a potential novel species.
Soil physicochemical properties
The pH of 9 soil samples was 3.6–4.5. The organic matter (OM) contents were 26.6–143.4 g/kg. Sample K30 had the lowest available nitrogen (AN) content of 88.7 mg/kg with the high available potassium (AK) content of 134 mg/kg. The available phosphorus (AP), ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-) and cation exchange capacity (CEC) contents did not differ significantly among 9 samples (S2 Table).
Uncultured myxobacteria in Dinghushan forest soils with high-throughput sequencing method
We analyzed myxobacterial communities of 9 samples with high-throughput sequencing technique using the universal primers 338F and 806R. After merging, filtering and chimera removal, 46083–71424 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences were finally recruited (S3 Table). The numbers of myxobacterial sequences ranged from 378 to 1091 in different soil samples. Myxococcales accounted for 0.9–2.2% of the total bacterial communities. Sorangium was the most dominant genus, accounting for 60.1% in Myxococcales, followed by the genus of Haliangium, accounting for 18.8%. Anaeromyxobacter was the fourth most dominant genus, accounting for 4.1%. In addition, Sorangium accounted for 94.7% in sample K30. All myxobacterial sequences grouped into 67 OTUs and the numbers ranged from 29 to 56 in different samples. The diversity and abundance of myxobacteria in soil samples exhibited significantly differences (Fig 3). The genera of g1_unclassified_Sandaracinaceae and g3_unclassified_BIrii41 were only present in samples Z2 and Z10 (Fig 3). These results showed an abundant myxobacterial community in Dinghushan acidic forest soils and the niche specificity of myxobacterial taxa. Confusingly, sequences of Myxococcus and Corallococcus that were isolated with culture-dependent technique were not obtained with culture-independent method in the same forest soil samples.
Community compositions in soil samples were measured by relative abundance of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences.
Biotic and abiotic factors shaping myxobacterial community
To investigate the effects of environmental factors on myxobacterial community, we performed Spearman analysis of environmental factors and myxobacterial alpha-diversity and Mantel test of environmental factors and myxobacterial community structure. The results indicated that soil pH showed strong positive relationship with myxobacterial alpha-diversity (r = 0.817, p<0.01) and community structure (r = 0.5941, p<0.05). AK showed positive relationship with myxobacterial community structure (r = 0.4868, p<0.05), whereas AN, AP, OM, NH4+, NO3- and CEC showed no relationship (Table 2). The alpha-diversity of bacteria (Chao and Shannon index) was significant positive correlated with alpha-diversity and community structure of myxobacteria (Table 2). These results all indicated that bacterial diversity and abiotic factors collaboratively shape myxobacterial community.
Studying the relationships between myxobacteria and bacteria using co-occurrence network analysis
Co-occurrence networks were generated based on the OTU table to investigate the relationships between myxobacterial and other bacterial OTUs. Significant interactions were determined using a random matrix theory (RMT)-based on an online pipeline (http://ieg4.rccc.ou.edu/MENA). After filtering, a total of 20 OTUs from Myxococcales (yellow nodes) and 77 OTUs from other bacteria (other colors nodes) were contained, and most links were positive correlations (blue lines) among them (Fig 4). Myxobacteria have many links with other bacteria, especially Proteobacteria, probably indicating a broad range of bacteria as potential prey of myxobacteria. In particular, myxobacterial OTU1350, OTU463 and OTU1704 possessed 13, 8 and 8 links with other bacterial OTUs. Interestingly, in co-occurrence network, OTU457 representing strain Dinghuibacter silviterrae in the family of Chitinophagaceae isolated from Dinghushan forest soils [43] showed positive relationship with OTU417 representing uncultured Haliangium in the family of Haliangiaceae. In addition, OTU1664 representing unclassified Chitinophagaceae had also positive impact on OTU1350 representing P3OB-42 of myxobacteria.
Node represents individual OTU. The different colors signify the different phyla of bacteria. The yellow color represents Myxococcales. The blue solid line represents a positive correlation, and the red solid line signifies a negative correlation.
Discussion
Myxobacteria are one of the important sources for secondary metabolites aside from actinomycetes and fungi [44, 45]. To obtain these potential sources, there is a pressing need to screen the myxobacteria from different environment especially extreme and/or neglected habitats [46]. In this study, we investigated myxobacterial communities in Dinghushan acidic forest soils with pH 3.6–4.5 by using culture-dependent and -independent techniques, and analyzed the effect of biotic and abiotic factors on soil myxobacteria.
A total of 21 strains were isolated using standard cultivation methods. Almost all culturable strains were identified as the genera Myxococcus and Corallococcus (Fig 1). However, members of the two genera were not detected in the high-throughput sequencing analysis. This phenomenon has also been found in the study by Mohr et al. (2017). Combined with these analyses, we inferred that Corallococcus-strains were only present in forms of myxospores in-situ environments or that the vegetative cells/myxospores were strongly under-represented and therefore resisted the total genomic DNA extraction [11]. Similar to this study, Myxococcus and Corallococcus were frequently isolated from different habitats [11, 15], probably suggesting that they grow faster and easily form fruiting bodies. Intriguingly, three potential novel species were detected in all 21 culturable strains, indicating the high possibility to isolate new myxobacterial taxa from subtropical acidic forest soils. These potential novel species merit further identification in the future.
High-throughput sequencing revealed that the relative abundance of 16S rRNA amplicons of Myxococcales accounted for 0.9–2.2% of bacterial communities in Dinghushan acidic forest soils with pH of 3.6–4.5, in consistent with the result of Zhou et al [9], who revealed that the abundance of Myxococcales were among 0.4–4.5% in 103 various soil niches. Further, a total of 67 myxobacterial OTUs obtained from 9 soil samples exhibited an abundant myxobacterial community. Different soil samples exhibited significantly differences in the abundance and diversity of myxobacteria (Fig 3), which may relate to environmental factors. Correlation analysis revealed that soil pH was key positive correlated with myxobacterial community (Table 2), which were in accordance with previously studies [9, 11, 17]. Moreover, the sequences of Myxococcus and Corallococcus were detected in neutral environments and were not found in acidic habitats [9, 11, 47]. These may be due to the pH range for growth of the majority of myxobacteria is rather narrow. However, Sorangium in Myxococcales accounted for 60.1% in total samples and 94.7% in sample K30 (Fig 3). We inferred that pH range for growth of Sorangium is rather broad and acidic forest soils are potential habitats to obtain the genus of Sorangium which is frequently described as a rich source for new, biologically active natural products [20, 48]. Various myxobacterial species tolerant to different pH range, which will guide to isolate different myxobacterial taxa.
Bacterial diversity also showed a significantly positive relationship with myxobacterial community (Table 2). The network analysis further demonstrated that a large number of bacteria including two Chitinophagaceae OTUs were positive relationship with myxobacteria OTUs (Fig 4). Besides, four novel strains of the genus Chitinophaga [38–40] and one novel strain of the family Chitinophagaceae [41] were obtained during the isolation of myxobacteria. Our predation assays also indicated that myxobacteria could prey some strains of the genus Chitinophaga. Based on the above results, we speculated that some strains of the family Chitinophagaceae are the potential food sources of myxobacteria.
Taken together, subtropical acidic forest soils contain abundance myxobacterial community, especially the genera of Sorangium and Haliangium. Moreover, soil pH and bacterial diversity have significantly positive relationship with myxobacterial community. Therefore, trying different pH media and various bacteria such as Chitinophagaceae as preys to isolate myxobacteria maybe contribute to obtain more novel groups.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Identities of myxobacteria obtained by 16S rRNA gene sequence blast.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238769.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Soil chemical characteristics of Dinghushan forest soil.
OM, organic matter; AP, available phosphorus; AN, available nitrogen; AK, available potassium; NH4+, ammonium; NO3-, nitrate; CEC, cation exchange capacity.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238769.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Observed valid sequences and myxobacterial OTUs at different samples.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238769.s003
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
Shimkets LJ, Dworkin M, Reichenbach H. The Myxobacteria. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E, editors. In the Prokaryotes. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 31–115.
- 2. Mohr KI. Diversity of myxobacteria-we only see the tip of the Iceberg. Microorganisms. 2018; 6: 1–23.
- 3. Kaiser D, Manoil C, Dworkin M. Myxobacteria-cell-interactions, genetics, and development. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1979; 33: 595–639.
- 4.
Whitworth DE. Myxobacteria: multicellularity and differentiation. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007.
- 5. Münoz Dorado J, Marcos Torres FJ, Garcia Bravo E, Moraleda Munoz A, Perez J. Myxobacteria: moving, killing, feeding, and surviving together. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 1–18.
- 6. Weissman KJ, Müller R. Myxobacterial secondary metabolites: bioactivities and modes-of-action. Nat Prod Rep. 2010; 27: 1276–1295.
- 7. Mohr KI, Wolf C, Nuebel U, Szafranska AK, Steglich M, Hennessen F, et al. A polyphasic approach leads to seven new species of the cellulose-decomposing genus Sorangium, Sorangium ambruticinum sp nov., Sorangium arenae sp nov., Sorangium bulgaricum sp nov., Sorangium dawidii sp nov., Sorangium kenyense sp nov., Sorangium orientale sp nov and Sorangium reichenbachii sp nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018b; 68: 3576–3586.
- 8. Livingstone PG, Ingleby O, Girdwood S, Cookson AR, Morphew RM, Whitworth DE. Predatory organisms with untapped biosynthetic potential: descriptions of novel Corallococcus Species C. aberystwythensis sp. nov., C. carmarthensis sp. nov., C. exercitus sp. nov., C. interemptor sp. nov., C. Ilansteffanensis sp. nov., C. praedator sp. nov., C. sicarius sp. nov., and C. terminator sp. nov. Appl Environ Microb. 2020; 86.
- 9. Zhou XW, Li SG, Li W, Jiang DM, Han K, Wu ZH, et al. Myxobacterial community is a predominant and highly diverse bacterial group in soil niches. Env Microbiol Rep. 2014; 6: 45–56.
- 10. Zhang XJ, Yao Q, Cai ZP, Xie XL, Zhu HH. Isolation and identification of myxobacteria from saline-alkaline soils in Xinjiang, China. Plos One. 2013; 8: 1–11.
- 11. Mohr KI, Zindler T, Wink J, Wilharm E, Stadler M. Myxobacteria in high moor and fen: an astonishing diversity in a neglected extreme habitat. Microbiologyopen. 2017; 6: 1–9.
- 12. Mohr KI, Stechling M, Wink J, Wilharm E, Stadler M. Comparison of myxobacterial diversity and evaluation of isolation success in two niches: Kiritimati Island and German compost. Microbiologyopen. 2016; 5: 268–278.
- 13. Berleman JE, Kirby JR. Multicellular development in Myxococcus xanthus is stimulated by predator-prey interactions. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189: 5675–5682.
- 14. Li ZK, Ye XF, Chen PL, Ji K, Zhou J, Wang F, et al. Antifungal potential of Corallococcus sp strain EGB against plant pathogenic fungi. Biol Control 2017; 110: 10–17.
- 15. Livingstone PG, Morphew RM, Whitworth DE. Myxobacteria are able to prey broadly upon clinically-relevant pathogens, exhibiting a prey range which cannot be explained by phylogeny. Front Microbiol. 2017; 8: 1593–1601.
- 16. Morgan AD, MacLean RC, Hillesland KL, Velicer GJ. Comparative analysis of Myxococcus predation on soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microb. 2010; 76: 6920–6927.
- 17. Wang WH, Luo X, Ye XF, Chen Y, Wang H, Wang L, et al. Predatory Myxococcales are widely distributed in and closely correlated with the bacterial community structure of agricultural land. Appl Soil Ecol 2020; 146: 1–10.
- 18. Chen BM, Li S, Liao HX, Peng SL. Do forest soil microbes have the potential to resist plant invasion? A case study in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (South China). Acta Oecol. 2017; 81: 1–9.
- 19. Li ZQ, Ke YL, Zeng WH, Zhang SJ, Wu WJ. Response of termite (Blattodea: Termitoidae) assemblages to lower subtropical forest succession: A case study in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve, China. Environ Entomol. 2016; 45: 39–45.
- 20. Ahn JW, Jang KH, Chung SC, Oh KB, Shin J. Sorangiadenosine, a new sesquiterpene adenoside from the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum. Organic Letters. 2008; 10: 1167–1169.
- 21. Chen DH, Ronald PC. A rapid DNA minipreparation method suitable for AFLP and other PCR applications. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1999; 17: 53–57.
- 22.
Lane DJ. 16S/23S rDNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Chichester: Wiley; 1991. p. 115–175.
- 23. Saitou N, Nei M. The Neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4: 406–425.
- 24. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparatives studies of nucleotide-sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16: 111–120.
- 25. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31: 587–589.
- 26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Goeker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2013; 14.
- 27. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017; 110: 1281–1286.
- 28. Heanes DL. Determination of total organic-C in soils by an improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 1984; 15: 1191–1213.
- 29. Lu RK. Soil analytical methods of agronomic chemical. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese). 2000.
- 30. Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS. Changes in inorganic and organic soil-phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1982; 46: 970–976.
- 31. Xiong Y, Xia H, Li Za, Cai Xa, Fu S. Impacts of litter and understory removal on soil properties in a subtropical Acacia mangium plantation in China. Plant Soil. 2008; 304: 179–188.
- 32. Zhou Y, Zhu H, Fu S, Yao Q. Metagenomic evidence of stronger effect of stylo (legume) than bahiagrass (grass) on taxonomic and functional profiles of the soil microbial community. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 10195.
- 33.
MoCotPRo C. Standard for Soil Test Methods (GB/T 50123–1999). China Planning Press, Beijing. 1999.
- 34. Xu N, Tan G, Wang H, Gai X. Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Eur J Soil Biol. 2016; 74: 1–8.
- 35. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012; 6: 1621–1624.
- 36. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 2460–2461.
- 37. Paul S, Andrew M, Owen O, Nitin SB, Jonathan TW, Daniel R, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13: 2498–2504.
- 38. Lv YY, Zhang XJ, Li AZ, Zou WL, Feng GD, Zhu HH. Chitinophaga varians sp nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018; 68: 2139–2144.
- 39. Lv YY, Wang CL, Feng GD, Yao Q, Su BL, Li AZ, et al. Chitinophaga flava sp. nov., isolated from monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019; 69: 625–630.
- 40. Wang CL, Lv YY, Li AZ, Feng GD, Bao GG, Zhu HH, et al. Chitinophaga silvisoli sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018; 69: 909–913.
- 41. Wang CL, Lv YY, Li AZ, Bao GG, Feng GD, Zhang J, et al. Deminuibacter soli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Filimonas aurantiibacter as Arvibacter aurantiibacter comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019; 69: 1650–1655.
- 42. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018; 68: 461–466.
- 43. Lv YY, Wang J, Chen MH, You J, Qiu LH. Dinghuibacter silviterrae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016; 66: 1785–1791.
- 44. Schaeberle TF, Lohr F, Schmitz A, Koenig GM. Antibiotics from myxobacteria. Nat Prod Rep. 2014; 31: 953–972.
- 45. Thiery S, Kaimer C. The predation strategy of Myxococcus xanthus. Front Microbiol. 2020; 11: 2.
- 46. Wrotniak-Drzewiecka W, Brzezinska AJ, Dahm H, Ingle AP, Rai M. Current trends in myxobacteria research. Annals of Microbiology. 2016; 66: 17–33.
- 47. Li SG, Zhou XW, Li PF, Han K, Li W, Li ZF, et al. The existence and diversity of myxobacteria in lake mud-a previously unexplored myxobacteria habitat. Env Microbiol Rep. 2012; 4: 587–595.
- 48. Jahns C, Hoffmann T, Muller S, Gerth K, Washausen P, Hofle G, et al. Pellasoren: structure elucidation, biosynthesis, and total synthesis of a cytotoxic secondary metabolite from Sorangium cellulosum. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012; 51: 5239–5243.