Alteration of urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin as a predictor of tacrolimus-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in tacrolimus dose adjustments following kidney transplantation

Wiwat Chancharoenthana; Asada Leelahavanichkul; Salin Wattanatorn; Yingyos Avihingsanon; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Natavudh Townamchai

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209708

Abstract

Despite tacrolimus (TAC) drug-level monitoring, TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis remains an important problem. This study investigated the potential of urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin (uNGAL) as a chronic renal allograft fibrosis biomarker in a two-phase study (proof of concept and cohort). In the proof of concept stage of the study, increased TAC-doses at 3 days after dose adjustment compared with the baseline were associated with elevated uNGAL (+ΔuNGAL) and urinary interleukin 18 (IL-18), but normal serum creatinine (SCr), despite the therapeutic trough levels of TAC. In the cohort study, the patients with elevated uNGAL post-recruitment in comparison with the baseline (+ΔuNGAL) was associated with the more severe renal allograft fibrosis from renal pathology of the protocol biopsy at 12 months post kidney transplantation (post-KT). A cut-off value of uNGAL ≥ 125.2 ng/mL during a 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-KT was associated with a higher fibrosis score, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.88, p < 0.0001) and a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.54 (95% CI 1.45 to 9.33; p < 0.001). We conclude that uNGAL is a sensitive biomarker of TAC induced subtle renal injury and TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis. We propose that uNGAL measurements, in addition to trough levels of TAC, should be used to predict TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in the recipients of KT.

Citation: Chancharoenthana W, Leelahavanichkul A, Wattanatorn S, Avihingsanon Y, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-Ong S, et al. (2018) Alteration of urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin as a predictor of tacrolimus-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in tacrolimus dose adjustments following kidney transplantation. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0209708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708

Editor: Stanislaw Stepkowski, University of Toledo, UNITED STATES

Received: September 22, 2018; Accepted: December 10, 2018; Published: December 21, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Chancharoenthana et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: All of the funding supports during study period including the Development of New Faculty Staff fund and Ratchadapiseksomphot fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA: P-13-00505) – Dr. Asada Leelahavanichkul. A.L. is under Center of Excellence in Immunology and Immune Mediated Diseases group. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; AKI, acute kidney injury; AUC, area under the curve; ci_x, chronic interstitium grade x; ct_x, chronic tubule grade x; cv_x, chronic vascular grade x; CAMR, chronic antibody-mediated rejection; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HR, hazard ratio; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-18, interleukin 18; KT, kidney transplantation; NRI, net reclassification improvement; ROC, receiver operator characteristic; SD, standard deviation; SCr, serum creatinine; TAC, tacrolimus; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor α; uCr, urinary creatinine; uNGAL, urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin

Introduction

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppressive therapy predisposes kidney transplantation (KT) recipients to chronic renal allograft fibrosis in renal allografts [1]. Studies have reported CNI-induced nephrotoxicity in 40–50% and 100% of KT recipients 2 and 10 years post-KT, respectively, based on surveillance (protocol) renal allograft biopsies [2–4]. CNI-induced nephrotoxicity finally leads to chronic renal allograft fibrosis, with irreversible allograft loss [5]. Although tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor, is an effective immunosuppressive drug, it is associated with a reduction of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and chronic renal allograft fibrosis, even within the achieved TAC therapeutic range [6]. The latter may be due to variations in the optimal TAC dose (TAC_dose) in each recipient [7, 8]. Hence, CNI dose adjustment is necessary to balance CNI toxicity/fibrosis versus rejection [9]. To delay the progression of chronic renal allograft fibrosis, early detection and rapid interventions are mandatory. Unfortunately, the optimal CNI dose for individual recipients remains uncertain [10]. Thus, chronic renal allograft fibrosis may occur in KT recipients with TAC trough levels within the therapeutic range at all stages of follow-up. It is possible that recommended TAC trough levels are relatively high, especially for the Asian population, due to the high prevalence of CYP3A5 expressors polymorphisms [11, 12]. A histopathology assessment from a renal biopsy is currently the only gold standard method for the detection of CNI-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis [13]. At present, a biopsy is conducted 1, 6 and 12 months post-KT to detect CNI-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis. If recommended therapeutic levels are achieved, the TAC doses given in the period shortly after post-KT are usually continued. In contrast, recipients who receive increased TAC doses in this period show a tendency towards continuation of higher TAC doses.

Non-invasive chronic renal allograft fibrosis-detection would allow more frequent evaluations and earlier interventions. Neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a more sensitive biomarker of acute kidney injury (AKI) than serum creatinine (SCr), a conventional AKI biomarker [14, 15]. NGAL is also a sensitive biomarker of CNI-induced nephrotoxicity in nephrotic syndrome [16] and liver transplantation [17]. Previous research demonstrated reduced plasma and urinary NGAL (uNGAL) in heart transplant recipients receiving CNI-free immunosuppressive therapy [18]. Although serum NGAL and uNGAL show similar diagnostic value for AKI-detection [15], uNGAL might be a more appropriate biomarker to determine subtle kidney injury, considering that urine is a direct renal excretory product and that NGAL is produced mainly by the distal tubule of the kidney [19].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of uNGAL as a chronic renal allograft fibrosis biomarker in a two-phase study (the proof of concept and the cohort). The following hypotheses were tested: i) uNGAL would be associated with subtle kidney injury after TAC dose adjustment in the proof of concept study (cross-sectional analysis), and ii) uNGAL would have potential as a predictor of TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in the 12 month-cohort study.

Material and methods

The study protocol was approved by Chulalongkorn University Institutional Review Board, and all the participants provided written informed consent. The clinical and research activities were consistent with the Principles of the Declaration of Istanbul, as outlined in the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism.

Study design and recipient selection

Samples from all KT recipients at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand during January 2011 through December 2016 were used. The exclusion criteria were second KT, positive pre-transplant donor specific antibodies, combined extra-renal transplantation and ABO-incompatible KT. Furthermore, KT recipients with allograft impairment by some other causes including infection, antibiotics and recipients with any renal replacement therapy were also excluded. All of the participants received induction with basiliximab and maintenance with TAC, mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day) and corticosteroids. TAC at 0.1 mg/kg/day was started at the time of the operation. Target TAC trough levels were 8–10 ng/mL for the first 6 months and reduced to 5–8 ng/mL thereafter. Surveillance renal biopsies were scheduled for 3, 6 and 12 months post-KT.

The study was conducted in two stages: a proof of concept and cohort phase (Fig 1). The aim of the proof of concept phase of the study was to explore whether the alteration in absolute urinary NGAL (ΔuNGAL) was associated with kidney injury in a cross-sectional analysis of 50 recipients. In this phase, new KT recipients with less than 5% fibrosis on 3-month surveillance (protocol) renal biopsies were included within 120 days post-KT. Based on a comparison of TAC doses before and 3 days after TAC dose adjustment, these recipients were categorized as Day 0 and Day +3, respectively. They were then divided into two groups: those who received a decreased TAC_dose (-ΔTAC_dose, n = 16) and those who received an increased TAC_dose (+ΔTAC_dose, n = 34) and analysed with baseline ΔuNGAL values.

Download:

Fig 1. Characteristics of the recipients.

CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; TAC, tacrolimus; uNGAL, urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin; Δ, change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.g001

The aim of the cohort phase (n = 212) of the study was to determine whether the alteration in ΔuNGAL was associated with chronic renal allograft fibrosis at a 1-year follow-up. The inclusion criteria were all recipients with less than 5% fibrosis on surveillance renal biopsies who had no TAC dose adjustment for at least 12 months during the study. Samples were obtained for uNGAL and TAC trough levels within 4 weeks from the time of study enrolment and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. One hundred thirty-two of 212 recipients were excluded for various reasons (Fig 1). Eighty recipients were divided into -ΔTAC_dose (n = 35) and +ΔTAC_dose groups (n = 45) based on the total dose adjustment (increased or decreased), TAC trough levels and uNGAL at baseline and after TAC dose adjustment.

Transplant renal biopsies were performed because of a protocol biopsy or clinical indications with 18-gauge core biopsy needles (BARD MAX-CORE, C. R. Bard, Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA). The adequacy of renal allograft samples was defined as biopsies containing at least seven glomeruli [20]. The renal allograft fibrosis data was semi-quantitatively scored by a pathologist blinded to the study based on Masson trichrome staining in accordance with the 2007 Banff classification [20]. Fibrosis relative to the total area was scaled as 0 to 3 (up to 5%, 6–25%, 26–50% and greater than 50%, respectively) in the renal interstitium (ci), tubules (ct) and vessels (cv) [20]. The primary study endpoint was fibrosis severity in allografts 12 months post-KT. The secondary endpoints were renal allograft survival, acute rejection rates (both antibody-mediated and cellular rejection) and systemic infections 24 months post-KT.

Laboratory measurements

Urine samples were centrifuged at 3000x g for 10 min and kept at -70°C until used. uNGAL and urinary IL-18, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Raybiotech, Norcross, GA, USA for urinary IL-18 and R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA for the others). Serum creatinine (SCr), urinary creatinine (uCr), and 24-h urinary total protein were measured using an enzymatic-based biochemical analyser (Vitros 4600 Chemistry System, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY, USA). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from SCr using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation [21].

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics of the recipients are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Other data are presented as median ± interquartile ranges. The student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test and chi-squared or Fischer’s exact test were conducted to compare continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively. The associations between uNGAL, eGFR and other study endpoints were assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression analysis and performed an intention to treat analysis. An area under the curve (AUC) and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, with C-statistic-calculation (for discrimination accuracy) was performed [22]. STATA version 13.1 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) was used for all analyses. A p-value < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

Results

Kidney injury after TAC dose adjustment detected by uNGAL: a cross-sectional analysis

Most of the KTs in the cross-sectional analysis were living-related donor transplantation recipients (n = 37, 74%) (Fig 1). At the time of enrolment, the median time since the KT was 6.5 months (1.5–11 months). The baseline eGFR was 93.4 (79.4–110.9) mL/min/1.73m². According to prescribed TAC doses on Day +3 versus Day 0, 16 and 34 recipients were classified as -ΔTAC_dose (decreased dose) and +ΔTAC_dose (increased dose), respectively. The mean difference in TAC trough levels between Day +3 and Day 0 was –2.40 ± 0.8 (-0.3 to -8.4) and 2.37 ± 0.6 (0.01 to 17.4) ng/mL in the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose group, respectively. Interestingly, SCr, uNGAL and uNGAL/uCr on Day +3 were not different as compared with those on Day 0 of TAC dose adjustment (Fig 2A, 2C and 2E). Furthermore, SCr values alteration was unchanged in the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose groups on Day +3 versus Day 0 (Fig 2B). However, the alteration in ΔuNGAL and uNGAL/uCr values were higher in the +ΔTAC_dose group than -ΔTAC_dose group (Fig 2D and 2F). In addition, urinary IL-18 and IL-6 but not urinary TNF-α were increased on Day +3 as compared with Day 0 in the +ΔTAC_dose group (Fig 3), pointing to renal injury after TAC dose adjustment.

Download:

Fig 2. Comparison of renal injury markers before (D 0) and 3 days after (D +3) TAC dose adjustment in the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose groups.

SCr and the alteration in SCr from the baseline were comparable between recipients in the decreased TAC dose (-ΔTAC_dose) and increased TAC dose (+ΔTAC_dose) groups (A and B). There were no differences in uNGAL and uNGAL/uCr between the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose groups (C, E) but the alteration in absolute uNGAL (ΔuNGAL) and uNGAL/uCr from the baseline were higher in the +ΔTAC_dose group (D, F).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.g002

Download:

Fig 3. Comparison of urinary cytokines between the day before (D 0) and 3 days after (D +3) TAC dose adjustment in the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose groups.

Both urinary IL-18 (A) and IL-6 (B) but not TNF-α were higher in recipients with increased TAC doses after dose adjustment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.g003

Renal allograft fibrosis and renal allograft function in recipients with increased uNGAL (+ΔuNGAL) in a longitudinal 1-year follow-up

The demographic data are presented in Table 1. The recipients were divided into different groups according to the ΔTAC_dose (increased/decreased) and ΔuNGAL values (Fig 4A). Mean TAC trough levels showed no statistically significant difference between -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose group in every 3-month follow-up with also no difference at 12-month (6.8 ± 0.9 vs. 7.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, respectively) (S1 Table). Unadjusted eGFR at the time of enrolment was 80.9 ± 14.1, 83.5 ± 12.9, 78.5 ± 15.1 and 80.9 ±1 4.7 mL/min/1.73m² in the -ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL, -ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL, +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL and +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL groups, respectively (Fig 4A). At the 12-month observation, only the eGFR in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group was lower than the base-line (80.9 ± 14.7 vs. 73.3 ± 8.8 mL/min/1.73 m²). Despite the reduced TAC_dose in the -ΔTAC_dose group, the eGFR progressively declined in cases where the uNGAL increased from baseline (-ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL vs. -ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL; p < 0.001), as shown in Fig 4A. Increased uNGAL predicted worsening renal function in the -ΔTAC_dose group. The annual slope of eGFR decline was 0.2 and 0.5 mL/min/1.73m² per year in the -ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL and +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group, respectively. On the other hand, the annual slope of eGFR increase was 0.7 and 0.2 mL/min/1.73m² per year in the -ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL and +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL groups, respectively (Fig 4B). A repeated measures analysis showed a least squares mean change in the eGFR (mL/min/1.73m²⁾ (95% confidence interval; CI) from the baseline in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL, -ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL, -ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL and +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL groups of -3.3 (-0.2 to -4.2), 3.8 (2.7 to 5.5), -0.7 (–0.1 to –2.4) and 0.5 (0.1 to 3.2), respectively (Fig 4B). Nevertheless, 24-h urinary protein remained stable in all the groups, with a trend towards an increase in the +ΔuNGAL group (Fig 4C). The distribution of the relative change in the Banff score was highest in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group, followed by the -ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL, +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL and -ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL groups. Of note, in the -ΔTAC_dose group, recipients who had +ΔuNGAL had more increased chronic characteristics of Banff score at 12 months compared with those had -ΔuNGAL, particularly in arteriolar hyalinosis (Table 2). Moreover, recipients in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group demonstrated an earlier presentation of chronic characteristics Banff score (at 6 months) compared with recipients in the +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL group. These findings point to a role for ΔuNGAL as a predictor of chronic renal allograft fibrosis.

Download:

Fig 4. Renal allograft histology, change in eGFR and percentage change in 24-h proteinuria during the study period.

A scatter plot showing eGFR and the percentage alteration in mean values of eGFR in the -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose groups at enrolment versus the values observed 12 months post-enrolment (A). The time course of changes in eGFR in all four subgroups (B, left side) (B, right side), in addition to the percentage change in 24-h urinary protein, in each group (C) *(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.g004

Download:

Table 1. Baseline demographics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.t001

Download:

Table 2. Changes in chronic biopsy scores in kidney allografts with time post-KT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.t002

As the optimal cut-point of uNGAL in the cohort was 125.2 ng/mL, this value was used for the graft survival analysis. Graft survival 2 years post-enrolment of recipients with uNGAL < 125.2 and ≥ 125.2 ng/mL was 94.9% and 89.5%, respectively (p = 0.38), as shown in Fig 5A. The most common causes of graft loss were chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) (67%) and recurrent glomerular diseases (33%). There was a zero incidence of acute cellular rejection and BK infection. It is to be noted that both events developed after 1-year follow-up which supports an evidence of chronic renal allograft fibrosis resulting from TAC rather than other specific etiologies. The AUC ROC of uNGAL for chronic renal allograft fibrosis was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.88, p < 0.0001) (Fig 5B) with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 88%. In a multivariate model, including donor and recipient age, baseline SCr, and uNGAL levels, the association of uNGAL ≥ 125.2 ng/mL with chronic renal allograft fibrosis in the 12-month biopsy remained (Table 3). In addition, long-term chronic renal allograft fibrosis was associated with high baseline SCr (over 1.5 mg/dL, p = 0.01) and an increased TAC_dose (p = 0.02) but not with donor and recipient age.

Download:

Fig 5. Urinary NGAL was predictive of chronic renal allograft fibrosis at 12 months post-enrolment.

Kaplan–Meier curve for the association of chronic renal allograft fibrosis with uNGAL (A) and ROC curve for the association between uNGAL at enrolment and chronic renal allograft fibrosis (B) were demonstrated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.g005

Download:

Table 3. Determinants of renal allograft interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy at the time of enrolment using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.t003

To test the potential of uNGAL as a chronic renal allograft fibrosis biomarker, uNGAL was added to a model with follow-up period and conventional risk factors (i.e. age [donors and recipients], sex [donors], numbers of anti-hypertensive medications at baseline and ΔTAC_dose). The addition of uNGAL increased the c statistic to 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90).

Discussion

The present study demonstrated a benefit of uNGAL measurements, in combination with TAC trough level monitoring, in KT. An increase in uNGAL from the baseline was associated with renal allograft injury following TAC dose adjustment, despite achievement of target TAC trough levels. KT recipients who had a trend of the higher uNGAL as compared with the baseline at 1-year follow-up showed the more severe fibrosis than the recipients with the lower uNGAL. In addition, the present study demonstrated that a decreased TAC_dose improved the eGFR and decreased renal allograft fibrosis. In the cross-sectional arm of the study, we demonstrated an uncertain correlation between TAC dose adjustment and TAC trough level, suggesting that variability in TAC responses in individual recipients might enhance renal allograft fibrosis progression [23]. Interestingly, the increased doses of TAC resulted in the elevation of uNGAL, uNGAL/uCr (from the baseline) and urinary cytokines but not enhanced SCr. This finding implies that alterations in uNGAL and the absolute values urinary cytokine are very sensitive markers of a subtle TAC-induced kidney injury. Previous studies showed that uNGAL was elevated in KT recipients with renal allograft injury, delayed graft function and long-term renal allograft function, as well as in liver-transplant recipients with CNI toxicity [16, 24, 25]. In the present study, the absence of any difference in chronic renal allograft fibrosis discrimination between uNGAL and uNGAL/uCr implies that uNGAL could serve as a marker of chronic renal allograft fibrosis, independent of urinary concentration level [26, 27]. Hence, we used the alteration in absolute uNGAL (ΔuNGAL) as the main determinant biomarker of subtle renal injury in the cohort study.

In the cohort study, there were no differences among the groups at the time of enrolment in SCr, fibrosis score and the established renal allograft fibrosis risk factors [28–30] (reno-protective renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocking agents [31, 32]). At the 12-month post-recruitment, the prevalence of chronic renal allograft fibrosis was higher in recipients whose TAC doses were increased in the early phase of post-KT, and such doses were continued because of the achieving of the TAC trough levels. Although this practice complies with current guidelines [9], the aforementioned finding implies that i) the current recommended TAC trough level might be too high, especially in an Asian population and ii) a non-invasive biomarker of chronic renal allograft fibrosis, together with TAC level monitoring, is needed. Interestingly, the renal biopsy 6 months post-KT did not show CNI toxicity or chronic renal allograft fibrosis in both recipients with increased and decreased TAC doses from the baseline. However, the renal biopsy 12 months post-recruitment revealed more chronic renal allograft fibrosis in recipients with increased TAC doses. These findings suggest that the diagnosis of CNI toxicity by a renal biopsy may not be sensitive enough and that other biomarkers are needed.

Interestingly, both ΔuNGAL (compared with the baseline) and the fibrosis score were higher at the 12-month follow-up in those with increased TAC doses as compared with the baseline at the time of enrolment (+ΔTAC_dose), indicating that a trend of ΔuNGAL may be a good predictive biomarker for TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis rather than a single time measurement. This postulation is also supported by the unchanged or decreased uNGAL between Day 0 and Day +3 despite reduced TAC dose in the proof of concept part of our study (Fig 2C and 2D). Likewise, in the cohort study, there is a group with increased uNGAL after the reduction of TAC dose. Indeed, uNGAL was also strongly associated with renal fibrosis in primary glomerulonephritis [33], acute rejection and immune-related renal allograft fibrosis [34]. Although the leading cause of graft loss in our cohort is due to CAMR and recurrent glomerulonephritis, the serial protocol biopsy could preclude an immune-related CNI toxicity. Moreover, ΔuNGAL was associated with renal allograft eGFR at 12 months post-KT but not 6 months post-KT. This suggests a cumulative effect of subclinical allograft injury that once an event has occurred, the interventions at the late post-KT shows a little effect [35]. In addition, the fibrosis score was less severe in recipients with a decreased TAC dose from the baseline (-ΔTAC_dose) compared with the +ΔTAC_dose group (p < 0.05). The increase in uNGAL levels of recipients, in the present study, in the -ΔTAC_dose group indicates possible renal allograft fibrosis progression.

In the present study, we observed the greatest decline of adjusted eGFR at 12 months post-enrolment in the recipients with an increased-TAC dose plus increased-uNGAL from the baseline (+ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL). Indeed, renal allograft function in recipients with a decreased TAC dose (-ΔTAC_dose) was better than that of recipients with increased doses (+ΔTAC_dose). Recipients with a decreased-TAC dose from the baseline and decreased-uNGAL (-ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL) showed the lowest kidney injury progression. In addition, there was a trend towards higher 24-h proteinuria in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group as compared with the +ΔTAC_dose/-ΔuNGAL groups at the 12-month post-enrolment, supporting an association between i) increased uNGAL (+ΔuNGAL) and chronic renal allograft fibrosis and ii) high proteinuria and chronic renal allograft fibrosis [36]. In the present study, proteinuria among KT recipients was a predictive marker of long-term renal allograft survival [36, 37]. Increased 24-h urinary protein in the early stages after transplantation not only indicated enhanced renal allograft fibrosis progression but also rapid deterioration of allograft function, particularly in the +ΔTAC_dose/+ΔuNGAL group (Fig 4B and 4C). This finding implies that ΔuNGAL might be a more sensitive, or at least non-inferior, biomarker than proteinuria as a predictor of renal allograft fibrosis progression. And uNGAL ≥ 125.2 ng/mL (AUC ROC at 0.80) was an additional predictor of chronic renal allograft fibrosis in our cohort. The increased C statistic (AUC ROC of 0.84) implies that the addition of uNGAL measurements to TAC monitoring (trough levels and dosing trends) improved the concordance between predicted and observed chronic renal allograft fibrosis. Some studies have demonstrated an elevated ΔuNGAL in recipients with various settings [38, 39]; therefore, we subsequently evaluated ΔuNGAL from those with acute antibody mediated rejection, acute cellular rejection, chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), and normal allograft function as the control groups (Table 4). Although ΔuNGAL in among recipients with kidney injury were higher than those with normal allograft function, recipients with either CAMR or TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis showed robust ΔuNGAL compared with those with acute rejection. This attributed to uNGAL an interesting predictive value of renal allograft fibrosis; however, the numbers in among groups are small. Accordingly, in our opinion, uNGAL measurement should be performed and interpreted with a fair tentative diagnosis by taking a careful history, utilizing and combining available immunological diagnostic testing.

Download:

Table 4. Median urinary NGAL levels stratified by status of renal allograft function.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.t004

There were several limitations in our study. First, this was a retrospective cohort study and therefore cannot accurately demonstrate causal-inference relationships, despite the use of matched-pair renal allograft biopsies. Second, for minimizing the potential intervening cause of immune-related renal allograft fibrosis, the current study excluded high immunological risk KT recipients as described in the Material and Methods section. Therefore, the results cannot be extrapolated to all KT recipients. Third, most of the recipients were in the first year post-KT and had early-stage renal allograft fibrosis. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are needed.

In conclusion, based on the findings of the present study, we propose that uNGAL measurements, together with TAC trough level monitoring, may predict TAC-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in KT recipients. In the present study, chronic renal allograft fibrosis was detected in renal allografts, despite recipients achieving TAC therapeutic levels. Thus, a non-invasive fibrosis biomarker should be helpful for early renal preservation procedures. In addition to TAC trough levels, uNGAL should be frequently evaluated in routine KT follow-up. Further studies are warranted.

Supporting information

S1 File. Data_average change of uNGAL–uCr.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.s001

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Comparison of mean TAC trough levels between -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose group during follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209708.s002

(DOCX)

References

1. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O’Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(24): 2326–2333. pmid:14668458
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Dimeny E, Wahlberg J, Larsson E, Fellstrom B. Can histopathological findings in early renal allograft biopsies identify patients at risk for chronic vascular rejection? Clin Transplant. 1995;9(2):79–84. pmid:7599406
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Serón D, Moreso F, Fulladosa X, Hueso M, Carrera M, Grinyó J. Reliability of chronic allograft nephropathy diagnosis in sequential protocol biopsies. Kidney Int. 2002; 61(2): 727–733. pmid:11849416
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O’Connell PJ, Chapman JR, Allen RD. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: longitudinal assessment by protocol histology. Transplantation. 2004; 78(4): 557–565. pmid:15446315
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Pascual M, Theruvath T, Kawai T, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Cosimi AB. Strategies to improve long-term outcomes after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(8): 580–590. pmid:11856798
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Tsuchiya T, Ishida H, Tanabe T, Shimizu T, Honda K, Omoto K, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pathology for low-dose tacrolimus once-daily and twice-daily in living kidney transplantation: prospective trial in once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2013; 96(2): 198–204. pmid:23792649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Charpentier B, Rostaing L, Berthoux F, Lang P, Civati G, Touraine JL, et al. A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003; 75(6):844–851. pmid:12660513
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Hardinger KL, Bohl DL, Schnitzler MA, Lockwood M, Storch GA, Brennan DC. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2005; 80(1): 41–46. pmid:16003231
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9 Suppl3: S1–155.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Zaza G, Granata S, Tomei P, Dalla Gassa A, Lupo A. Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in “omics” medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(2): 4281–4305. pmid:25690039
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002; 54: 1271–1294. pmid:12406645
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Townamchai N, Chancharoenthana W, Vadcharavivad S, Chariyavilaskul P, Pongpirul K, Leelahavanichkul A, et al. A simple novel technique to estimate tacrolimus dosages during the early post kidney transplantation period. Transplant Proc. 2015; 47(8): 2433–2438. pmid:26518946
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Williams WW, Taheri D, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Colvin RB. Clinical role of the renal transplant biopsy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012; 8(2): 110–121. pmid:22231130
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, Mitsnefes M, Zahedi K, Yang J, et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel urinary biomarker for ischemic injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14(10): 2534–2543. pmid:14514731
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Wasilewska A, Zoch-Zwierz W, Taranta-Janusz K, Michaluk-Skutnik J. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL): a new marker of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity? Pediatr Nephrol. 2010; 25(5): 889–897. pmid:20072790
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Tsuchimoto A, Shinke H, Uesugi M, Kikuchi M, Hashimoto M, Sato T, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a useful biomarker for tacrolimus-induced acute kidney injury in liver transplant patients. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(10): e110527.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110527 pmid:25329716
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Haase M, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, Schlattmann P, Haase-fielitz A; NGAL Meta-analysis Investigator Group. Accuracy of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in diagnosis and prognosis in acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 54(6): 1012–1024. pmid:19850388
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Stypmann J, Fobker M, Rosing K, Engelen M, Gunia S, Dell’Aquila AM, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in heart transplant recipients after conversion to everolimus therapy. J Cardiol. 2015;66(4):347–352. pmid:25583090
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Kuwabara T, Mori K, Mukoyama M, Kasahara M, Yokoi H, Saito Y, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels reflect damage to glomeruli, proximal tubules, and distal nephrons. Kidney Int. 2009;75(3):285–294. pmid:19148153
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Praditpornsilpa K, Townamchai N, Chaiwatanarat T, Tiranathanagul K, Katawatin P, Susantitaphong P, et al. The need for robust validation for MDRD-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in various CKD populations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26(9): 2780–2785. pmid:21357214
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8(4): 753–760. pmid:18294345
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Cook NR. Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007;115(7):928–935. pmid:17309939
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Vanhove T, Vermeulen T, Annaert P, Lerut E, Kuypers DRJ. High intrapatient variability of tacrolimus concentrations predicts accelerated progression of chronic histologic lesions in renal recipients. Am J Transplant. 2016;1:2954–2963.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Hall IE, Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Wang Z, Doshi M, Devarajan P, et al. IL–18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(1):189–197. pmid:19762491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Hollmen ME, KyllÖnen LE, Inkinen KA, Lalla ML, Salmela KT. Urine neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin is a marker of graft recovery after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2011;79(1):89–98. pmid:20861824
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Helmersson-Karlqvist J, ArnlÖv J, Larsson A. Day-to-day variation of urinary NGAL and rational for creatinine correction. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(1–2):70–72. pmid:23041245
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Schinstock CA, Semret MH, Wagner SJ, Borland TM, Bryant SC, Kashani KB, et al. Urinalysis is more specific and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is more sensitive for early detection of acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(5):1175–1185. pmid:22529161
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Schwarz A, Mengel M, Gwinner W, Radermacher J, Hiss M, Kreipe H, et al. Risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation: a protocol biopsy study. Kidney Int. 2005;67:341–348. pmid:15610260
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Heilman RL, Devarapalli Y, Chakkera HA, Mekeel KL, Moss AA, Mulligan DC, et al. Impact of subclinical inflammation on the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation recipients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:563–570. pmid:20121731
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Heylen L, Naesens M, Jochmans I, Monbaliu D, Lerut E, Claes K, et al. The effect of anastomosis time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after brain death: a cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:2900–2907. pmid:26484837
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Xie X, Liu Y, Perkovic V, Li X, Ninomiya T, Hou W, et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(5):728–741. pmid:26597926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Hiremath S, Fergusson DA, Fergusson N, Bennett A, Knoll GA. Renin-angiotensin system blockade and long-term clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):78–86. pmid:27712852
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Lertrit A, Worawichawong S, Vanavanan S, Chittamma A, Muntham D, Radinahamed P, et al. Independent associations of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and serum uric acid with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in primary glomerulonephritis. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2016;9:111–118. pmid:27143950
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Szeto C-C, Kwan BC-H, Lai K-B, Lai F-M, Chow K-M, Wang G, et al. Urinary expression of kidney injury markers in renal transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(12):2329–2337. pmid:20671224
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Loupy A, Vernerey D, Tinel C, Aubert O, Duong van Huyen JP, Rabant M, et al. Subclinical Rejection Phenotypes at 1 Year Post-Transplant and Outcome of Kidney Allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(7): 1721–1731. pmid:25556173
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Amer H, Fidler ME, Myslak M, Morales P, Kremers WK, Larson TS, et al. Proteinuria after kidney transplantation, relationship to allograft histology and survival. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(12):2748–2756. pmid:17941956
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Naesens M, Lerut E, Emonds MP, Herelixka A, Evenepoel P, Claes K, et al. Proteinuria as a noninvasive marker for renal allograft histology and failure: an observational cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27(1):281–292. pmid:26152270
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Heyne N, Kemmner S, Schneider C, Nadalin S, KÖnigsrainer A, Häring HU. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin accurately detects acute allograft rejection among other causes of acute kidney injury in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2012;93(12):1252–1257. pmid:22513480
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Hollmen ME, Kyllönen LE, Inkinen KA, Lalla ML, Salmela KT. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a marker of graft recovery after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2011;79(1):89–98. pmid:20861824
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O’Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(24): 2326–2333. pmid:14668458
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Dimeny E, Wahlberg J, Larsson E, Fellstrom B. Can histopathological findings in early renal allograft biopsies identify patients at risk for chronic vascular rejection? Clin Transplant. 1995;9(2):79–84. pmid:7599406
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Serón D, Moreso F, Fulladosa X, Hueso M, Carrera M, Grinyó J. Reliability of chronic allograft nephropathy diagnosis in sequential protocol biopsies. Kidney Int. 2002; 61(2): 727–733. pmid:11849416
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O’Connell PJ, Chapman JR, Allen RD. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: longitudinal assessment by protocol histology. Transplantation. 2004; 78(4): 557–565. pmid:15446315
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Pascual M, Theruvath T, Kawai T, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Cosimi AB. Strategies to improve long-term outcomes after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(8): 580–590. pmid:11856798
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Tsuchiya T, Ishida H, Tanabe T, Shimizu T, Honda K, Omoto K, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pathology for low-dose tacrolimus once-daily and twice-daily in living kidney transplantation: prospective trial in once-daily versus twice-daily tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2013; 96(2): 198–204. pmid:23792649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Charpentier B, Rostaing L, Berthoux F, Lang P, Civati G, Touraine JL, et al. A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2003; 75(6):844–851. pmid:12660513
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Hardinger KL, Bohl DL, Schnitzler MA, Lockwood M, Storch GA, Brennan DC. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2005; 80(1): 41–46. pmid:16003231
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9 Suppl3: S1–155.
View Article
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Zaza G, Granata S, Tomei P, Dalla Gassa A, Lupo A. Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in “omics” medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(2): 4281–4305. pmid:25690039
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Lamba JK, Lin YS, Schuetz EG, Thummel KE. Genetic contribution to variable human CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002; 54: 1271–1294. pmid:12406645
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Townamchai N, Chancharoenthana W, Vadcharavivad S, Chariyavilaskul P, Pongpirul K, Leelahavanichkul A, et al. A simple novel technique to estimate tacrolimus dosages during the early post kidney transplantation period. Transplant Proc. 2015; 47(8): 2433–2438. pmid:26518946
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Williams WW, Taheri D, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Colvin RB. Clinical role of the renal transplant biopsy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012; 8(2): 110–121. pmid:22231130
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] PubMed/NCBI

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Mishra J, Ma Q, Prada A, Mitsnefes M, Zahedi K, Yang J, et al. Identification of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a novel urinary biomarker for ischemic injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14(10): 2534–2543. pmid:14514731
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wasilewska A, Zoch-Zwierz W, Taranta-Janusz K, Michaluk-Skutnik J. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL): a new marker of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity? Pediatr Nephrol. 2010; 25(5): 889–897. pmid:20072790
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Tsuchimoto A, Shinke H, Uesugi M, Kikuchi M, Hashimoto M, Sato T, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a useful biomarker for tacrolimus-induced acute kidney injury in liver transplant patients. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(10): e110527.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110527 pmid:25329716
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Haase M, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, Schlattmann P, Haase-fielitz A; NGAL Meta-analysis Investigator Group. Accuracy of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in diagnosis and prognosis in acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 54(6): 1012–1024. pmid:19850388
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Stypmann J, Fobker M, Rosing K, Engelen M, Gunia S, Dell’Aquila AM, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in heart transplant recipients after conversion to everolimus therapy. J Cardiol. 2015;66(4):347–352. pmid:25583090
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Kuwabara T, Mori K, Mukoyama M, Kasahara M, Yokoi H, Saito Y, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin levels reflect damage to glomeruli, proximal tubules, and distal nephrons. Kidney Int. 2009;75(3):285–294. pmid:19148153
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Praditpornsilpa K, Townamchai N, Chaiwatanarat T, Tiranathanagul K, Katawatin P, Susantitaphong P, et al. The need for robust validation for MDRD-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in various CKD populations. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26(9): 2780–2785. pmid:21357214
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: Updates and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8(4): 753–760. pmid:18294345
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Cook NR. Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007;115(7):928–935. pmid:17309939
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Vanhove T, Vermeulen T, Annaert P, Lerut E, Kuypers DRJ. High intrapatient variability of tacrolimus concentrations predicts accelerated progression of chronic histologic lesions in renal recipients. Am J Transplant. 2016;1:2954–2963.
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Hall IE, Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Wang Z, Doshi M, Devarajan P, et al. IL–18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(1):189–197. pmid:19762491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] PubMed/NCBI

[94] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Hollmen ME, KyllÖnen LE, Inkinen KA, Lalla ML, Salmela KT. Urine neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin is a marker of graft recovery after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2011;79(1):89–98. pmid:20861824
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] PubMed/NCBI

[98] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Helmersson-Karlqvist J, ArnlÖv J, Larsson A. Day-to-day variation of urinary NGAL and rational for creatinine correction. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(1–2):70–72. pmid:23041245
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] PubMed/NCBI

[102] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Schinstock CA, Semret MH, Wagner SJ, Borland TM, Bryant SC, Kashani KB, et al. Urinalysis is more specific and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is more sensitive for early detection of acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(5):1175–1185. pmid:22529161
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[104] View Article

[105] PubMed/NCBI

[106] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Schwarz A, Mengel M, Gwinner W, Radermacher J, Hiss M, Kreipe H, et al. Risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation: a protocol biopsy study. Kidney Int. 2005;67:341–348. pmid:15610260
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] PubMed/NCBI

[110] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Heilman RL, Devarapalli Y, Chakkera HA, Mekeel KL, Moss AA, Mulligan DC, et al. Impact of subclinical inflammation on the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in kidney transplantation recipients. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:563–570. pmid:20121731
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] PubMed/NCBI

[114] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Heylen L, Naesens M, Jochmans I, Monbaliu D, Lerut E, Claes K, et al. The effect of anastomosis time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after brain death: a cohort study. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:2900–2907. pmid:26484837
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] PubMed/NCBI

[118] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Xie X, Liu Y, Perkovic V, Li X, Ninomiya T, Hou W, et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(5):728–741. pmid:26597926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] PubMed/NCBI

[122] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Hiremath S, Fergusson DA, Fergusson N, Bennett A, Knoll GA. Renin-angiotensin system blockade and long-term clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(1):78–86. pmid:27712852
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Lertrit A, Worawichawong S, Vanavanan S, Chittamma A, Muntham D, Radinahamed P, et al. Independent associations of urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and serum uric acid with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in primary glomerulonephritis. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2016;9:111–118. pmid:27143950
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] PubMed/NCBI

[130] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Szeto C-C, Kwan BC-H, Lai K-B, Lai F-M, Chow K-M, Wang G, et al. Urinary expression of kidney injury markers in renal transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(12):2329–2337. pmid:20671224
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] PubMed/NCBI

[134] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Loupy A, Vernerey D, Tinel C, Aubert O, Duong van Huyen JP, Rabant M, et al. Subclinical Rejection Phenotypes at 1 Year Post-Transplant and Outcome of Kidney Allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(7): 1721–1731. pmid:25556173
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] PubMed/NCBI

[138] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Amer H, Fidler ME, Myslak M, Morales P, Kremers WK, Larson TS, et al. Proteinuria after kidney transplantation, relationship to allograft histology and survival. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(12):2748–2756. pmid:17941956
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] PubMed/NCBI

[142] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Naesens M, Lerut E, Emonds MP, Herelixka A, Evenepoel P, Claes K, et al. Proteinuria as a noninvasive marker for renal allograft histology and failure: an observational cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27(1):281–292. pmid:26152270
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] PubMed/NCBI

[146] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Heyne N, Kemmner S, Schneider C, Nadalin S, KÖnigsrainer A, Häring HU. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin accurately detects acute allograft rejection among other causes of acute kidney injury in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2012;93(12):1252–1257. pmid:22513480
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] PubMed/NCBI

[150] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Hollmen ME, Kyllönen LE, Inkinen KA, Lalla ML, Salmela KT. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a marker of graft recovery after kidney transplantation. Kidney Int. 2011;79(1):89–98. pmid:20861824
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[152] View Article

[153] PubMed/NCBI

[154] Google Scholar

Alteration of urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin as a predictor of tacrolimus-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in tacrolimus dose adjustments following kidney transplantation

Alteration of urinary neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin as a predictor of tacrolimus-induced chronic renal allograft fibrosis in tacrolimus dose adjustments following kidney transplantation

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Material and methods

Study design and recipient selection

Laboratory measurements

Statistical analysis

Results

Kidney injury after TAC dose adjustment detected by uNGAL: a cross-sectional analysis

Renal allograft fibrosis and renal allograft function in recipients with increased uNGAL (+ΔuNGAL) in a longitudinal 1-year follow-up

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 File. Data_average change of uNGAL–uCr.

S1 Table. Comparison of mean TAC trough levels between -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose group during follow-up.

References

Correction

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Material and methods

Study design and recipient selection

Laboratory measurements

Statistical analysis

Results

Kidney injury after TAC dose adjustment detected by uNGAL: a cross-sectional analysis

Renal allograft fibrosis and renal allograft function in recipients with increased uNGAL (+ΔuNGAL) in a longitudinal 1-year follow-up

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 File. Data_average change of uNGAL–uCr.

S1 Table. Comparison of mean TAC trough levels between -ΔTACdose and +ΔTACdose group during follow-up.

References

S1 Table. Comparison of mean TAC trough levels between -ΔTAC_dose and +ΔTAC_dose group during follow-up.