http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-6988
Figures
Abstract
Bactrocera cucurbitae (melon flies) are prominent invasive pests in southern China. To screen for a stable reference gene in melon flies suitable for comparing tissue samples subjected to different conditions in four categories (temperature, insect stage, days of age and gender), the expression of 12 candidate reference genes under different treatment conditions was analyzed by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. The results obtained from a comprehensive analysis with geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and RefFinder software showed that the most stable reference gene was RPL60, and the least stable reference gene was actin-5. We used a heat shock protein gene (HSP-90) to verify the results, and the conclusion was consistent. When the reference gene RPL60 was used as the reference gene, the relative expression of HSP-90 was essentially constant with the prolongation of treatment time. When actin-5 was used, HSP-90 expression changed markedly with treatment time. The results of this study can be used for further research on gene expression inBactrocera cucurbitae.
Citation: Zhang Y, Gong Z, Li L, Niu L, Fu Y (2018) Evaluation of endogenous reference genes in Bactrocera cucurbitae by qPCR under different conditions. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0202829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202829
Editor: Xiaoping Pan, East Carolina University, UNITED STATES
Received: January 17, 2018; Accepted: August 9, 2018; Published: December 17, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Our experiment was funded by two funds: National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China (2015BAD08B03); Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (No. 1630042017014).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera, Tephritidae), or melon flies, are important invasive pests widely distributed in temperate, tropical, and sub-tropical regions of the world[1–2]. Melon flies damage a variety of fruits and vegetables[3], including bitter gourd, cucumber, pumpkin, muskmelon, watermelon, and papaya[4]; and they have caused huge economic losses in the south of China[5]. Melon flies are world quarantine pests[6–8]; with the increasing globalization of trade, melon flies are becoming of more quarantine concern than ever before. It is a long-term and arduous task to study the development, occurrence, damage, genetic differentiation and control of melon flies. Molecular technology has begun to be widely used in studying the melon fly. With the determination of melon fly transcriptome data, we can explore the expression of different genes in these insects, such as differences in the expression of odorant binding proteins, the expression of genes due to stress. Gene expression data, which can be obtained by quantitative real-time PCR, can also help explain the behavioral mechanisms of melon flies.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is an established technique for quantifying mRNA in biological samples[9]. It has been widely used in gene expression analysis because it is sensitive, accurate, reproducible and quantitative[10–14]. However, qRT-PCR still has some limitations in gene expression analysis, data analysis and subsequent interpretation due to variations in transcription and amplification efficiencies among different samples[12, 15–17]. Thus, when qRT-PCR is performed, it is necessary to normalize gene expression analysis data by measuring expression of reliable reference genes in the same samples in parallel[10–20]. To make sure expression of a candidate reference gene occurs at a constant level, each candidate reference gene should be evaluated under specific experimental conditions [15].
In recent years, there have been several studies on reference genes in insects such as Bactrocera dorsalis[21], Drosophila melanogaster[22], Bactrocera minax[23–24], and Anastrepha oblique[25]. Previously, reference genes in Bactrocera cucurbitae have seldom been reported. We evaluated the stability of 12 reference genes—a tubulin gene (β-tubulin); actin genes (β-actin, actin-5); ribosomal protein genes (RPL60, RPL40); extension factor genes (EF1-α, EF1-β); succinate dehydrogenase genes (SD-1,SD-2); ribosomal RNA genes (5S rRNA, 28S rRNA)[26]; and a ubiquitin-like protein gene (UBQ-5)—at different developmental stages and under different temperature conditions. The aim of this study was to identify appropriate reference genes for studying melon fly gene expression profiles under different experimental conditions.
1 Materials and methods
1.1 Insects
Melon fly populations were reared in an environmental chamber at 25±1°C with a 14:10 (light:dark) photoperiod and 65–75% relative humidity. To make the results more accurate, the ages of the melon fly larvae were synchronized before the experiment.
1.2 Candidate reference genes
Selected candidate reference genes included genes for tubulin (β-tubulin); actin (β-actin, actin-5), ribosomal RNA (5S rRNA, 28S rRNA); ribosomal proteins (RPL60, RPL40); extension factors (EF1-α, EF1-β); succinate dehydrogenase (SD-1, SD-2); and a ubiquitin-like protein (UBQ-5). The melon fly transcriptome was screened for the sequence information of candidate reference genes, and we used a heat shock protein gene, HSP-90, as a validation gene. Genious 10.0 was used to design primers for real-time PCR analysis. The PCR primer sequences used for quantitative expression are shown in Table 1.
1.3 Treatment conditions
Mature larvae(7-day larvae), 4-day pupae, and 1-, 7-, 15-, and 30-day female and male adults were sampled to test the expression of candidate reference genes. These flies were raised at 25°C. Mature larvae, 4-day pupae, and 7-day female and male adults were the control groups. The two treatments were as follows:
For the high temperature treatment, whole developmental stages of melon flies were carried out in a 33°C artificial climatic incubator. Mature larvae, 4-day pupae, and 7-day adults were sampled during development.
The low temperature treatment was similar to the high temperature treatment, except that the treatment temperature was 19°C.
1.4 RNA extraction and reverse transcription
Total RNA was extracted using a TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sample purity was analyzed by means of the A260/A280 absorbance ratio with a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific), and RNA integrity was confirmed using 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis to test for a specific expected band. RNA was treated with DNase I (GIBCO-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), and cDNA template was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA using a First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc) with 1 μl of oligo (dT) as the primer (10 μM).
1.5 Quantitative real-time PCR
The qRT-PCR reactions were performed on a QuantStudio 6 Flex system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for TransStart Tip Green SuperMix (Beijing TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd.). Reaction volumes were 20 µl and included 1 μl of cDNA, 0.4 μl of each primer (10 μM), 10 μl of 2× TransStart Tip Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.4 μl of passive reference dye (50×), and 8 μl of ddH2O. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: step 1, 95°C for 3 min; step 2, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 30 sec; and step 3, 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 sec. Information was collected at stage 2 of step 2. A standard curve was created with a 4-fold dilution series of cDNA, and PCR efficiency (E) values between 94% and 119% were determined for all primer pairs, with typical correlation coefficients (R2) greater than or equal to 0.98.
To evaluate the stability of melon fly reference genes under different treatments, the expression of three target genes under varying durations of heat stress was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The most stable gene, RPL60, and the gene with the lowest stability, actin-5, were used as reference genes to analyze the expression stability of the heat shock protein.
1.6 Statistical methods
Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS package (version 19). Prior to all statistical analyses, data were examined for violations of normality assumptions using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The effects of different development stages and different stress conditions on reference gene expression were analyzed by the least significant difference (LSD) test after one-way ANOVA[27]. The results were expressed as the means ± standard errors (mean ± SEM). The differences were considered significant when P values were ≤ 0.05.
1.7 Expression stability analysis of candidate reference genes
Expression stability of the candidate reference genes was analyzed using the delta Ct method, BestKeeper[28], geNorm version 3.5 [29], NormFinder version 0.953[30], and RefFinder (http://150.216.56.64/referencegene.php). All the analysis procedures followed the manuals of each method.
1.8 Validation of the recommended reference genes
To validate the stability of the identified reference genes, the expression levels of two target genes were analyzed under different experimental conditions. We used the heat shock protein gene HSP-90 to validate the expression levels of the most stable and least stable reference genes for melon fly during high-temperature (33°C) conditions. Adults were sampled after 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours of heat treatment. RNA was extracted, and cDNA was reverse transcribed for each sample. After fluorescence quantitative PCR experiments, relative quantification of these three genes in different samples was performed using the 2(-ΔΔCT) method.
2 Results
2.1 Total RNA quality testing
Total RNA was extracted from 20 melon fly samples. The concentration and quality of the RNA were determined with a micro-UV spectrophotometer and electrophoresis. The results showed that the A260/280 ratios of all samples were between 1.8 and 2.0, and the bands were clear (Fig 1).
2.2 Primer optimization and qRT-PCR amplification efficiency
An RT-qPCR assay based on SYBR Green dye detection was carried out to examine the stability of the expression of the 12 candidate genes. Each sample was measured in triplicate within each run, and three independent technical replicates were performed for each experiment. A single peak in each melting curve in the RT-qPCR experiments indicated good specificity of the primers[31]. The RT-qPCR amplification efficiency (E) and correlation coefficient (R2) were calculated based on the slope of the calibration curves (Table 2). For the twelve candidate reference genes and three target genes, the E values ranged from 94% to 108%, between 90–110%. Correlation coefficient(R2) ranged from 0.9844 to 0.9988 which all above 0.98. The results showed that all 12 pairs of primers met the requirements of qRT-PCR experiments.
2.3 Reference gene RT-PCR analysis
Fluorescent quantitative PCR analysis of the melon fly cDNA template showed that there was only a single main peak in each of the melting curves for the 12 candidate internal reference genes under different experimental conditions (Fig 2); no other miscellaneous peaks appeared, and the reproducibility of the amplification curve between replicates was high.
2.4 Reference gene expression analysis
The stability of reference gene Ct values in different samples is an important criterion for selection. Through data analysis, we found that there were differences in the expression of each reference gene in different samples. The smaller the Ct value of the gene is, the higher the gene expression, and vice versa. The average Ct value of candidate reference genes was 12.97–30.03 in all melon fly samples. The average Ct value of RPL60, which was 17.02, was the lowest. Compared with other reference genes, RPL60 had the highest expression in all treatments. The average Ct value of SD-1 was the highest (25.75), reflecting the lowest expression of all reference genes. The standard deviations of the Ct values for 5S rRNA, EF1-β and RPL60 were relatively small, and the expression was relatively stable. Actin-5 had the largest standard deviation of Ct values and the poorest expression stability.
2.5 Evaluation of reference gene expression stability
2.5.1 GeNorm.
GeNorm analyzes the expression stability value (M) of reference genes in different samples and sorts them to determine the most stable internal control gene. The smaller the value of M is, the higher the stability. If M <1.5, the internal reference gene expression is stable. In this study, geNorm analysis showed that the M values of all 12 reference genes were less than 1.5, indicating that these genes were stable. As seen from Table 3, Figs 3 and S1, the 28S rRNA, RPL60 and EF1-β genes were most stably expressed in different samples, with M values of 0.150, 0.152 and 0.144, respectively, while β-actin was the least stably expressed, with an M value of 0.431.
2.5.2 NormFinder.
The NormFinder software evaluates the stability of the candidate reference gene by combining the variance within the group and the variance between groups. A lower stability value indicates a higher stability in the expression of the reference gene[32]. We used NormFinder to further confirm the results obtained with the geNorm program. The stability ranking of the reference genes by NormFinder was slightly different from the one determined by geNorm. As shown in Table 3 and Fig 4, under the different treatments, the most stable reference gene was RPL60, followed by SD-2, SD-1, and EF1-β. The most unstable reference gene was actin-5.
2.5.3 BestKeeper.
BestKeeper screens for the most stable reference genes by calculating the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV), where a smaller standard deviation and coefficient of variation indicate better stability. As shown in Table 3 and S2 Fig, under the different treatments, the most stable reference gene was 5S rRNA, followed by EF1-β, RPL60, and β-tubulin. The most unstable reference gene was actin-5.
2.5.4 RefFinder.
RefFinder integrates the currently available major computational programs (geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and the comparative Ct method) to compare and rank the tested candidate reference genes[33]. Based on the rankings from each program, it assigns an appropriate weight to an individual gene and calculates the geometric mean of the weights for the overall final ranking. The smaller the index is, the more stable the expression of the reference gene. Table 4 and Fig 5 show that the most stable reference gene was RPL60, and the most unstable reference gene was actin-5.
2.6 Reference gene stability verification
We analyzed the stability in expression of a heat shock protein using the most stable candidate reference gene, RPL60, and least stable candidate reference gene, actin-5, as internal reference genes. As seen from Fig 6, when RPL60 was used as a reference gene, the relative expression level of the target gene was consistent with the prolongation of treatment time, indicating that the gene expression was very stable. When actin-5 was used as an internal control gene, the target gene relative expression changed significantly with treatment time; thus, the expression stability was poor, and the relative expression of the target gene could not be accurately calculated.
Note: X-axis: time; Y-axis: relative quantification.
3 Discussion
A stable reference gene is a prerequisite for improving the reliability of RT-qPCR. The selection of early reference genes was mainly based on their function; actin and TUB genes are the basic components of organelle skeletons, while RPL, EF and UBQ are involved in the basic biological and metabolic processes of organisms, suggesting that these genes should be stably expressed in all cellular and physiological states. The choice of the correct reference gene depends largely on the tissue being studied, the conditions of the experiment, the stages of growth and development, and the biotic or abiotic stresses and hormones present, all of which can affect the specific expression of the reference gene. Due to the influence of the internal and external environment, an ideal reference gene among all different tissues may not exist [34–35]. The expression of the ideal reference gene in different tissues, cells and different experimental conditions is only relatively stable[36]. It is also an extremely important step to select the appropriate reference gene.
We used the most commonly referenced stability evaluation software: geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper. NormFinder takes all candidate genes into account and ranks the candidate genes with minimal estimated intra- and inter-group variation. In contrast, geNorm sequentially excludes the least stable genes, ending up with two genes, and ranks genes by the degree of similarity of expression profile[18]. BestKeeper screens for the most stable reference genes by calculating the standard deviation and coefficient of variation[37]. The three kinds of software use different algorithms, but their results were essentially the same. Then, we used RefFinder to integrate software packages like geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper to produce a final composite ranking result that would make our results more robust.
The appropriate reference gene must be selected according to the different test subjects, experimental purposes and experimental conditions. In this study, cDNA was reverse transcribed from RNA extracted from melon flies of different developmental stages (larvae, pupae and adult), different sexes (female, male), and different days of age (1-, 7-, 15-, 30 day), as well as those reared in different temperatures (31°C, 25°C, and 19°C). Twelve pairs of primers were designed for real-time quantitative PCR. The most suitable internal control gene was RPL60, which was stable under a variety of experimental conditions. Apart from the genes discussed above, another actin gene (β-actin), ribosomal RNA genes (5S rRNA, 28S rRNA) and extension factor genes (EF1-α, EF1-β), which are widely used in many research fields as reference genes, were not suitable reference genes in the melon fly. Actin as a reference gene was susceptible to treatment differences, resulting in greater error in the test results. Our study also showed that using rRNA (5S rRNA, 28S rRNA) as a single normalizer can overestimate the expression of the target gene, leading to false positive results.
With the successful sequencing of the melon fly transcriptome, real-time quantitative PCR will be more widely applicable to the functional study of melon fruit fly genes. A stable reference gene is a prerequisite for improving the reliability of RT-qPCR results. This study therefore lays the foundation for the expression analysis of functional genes in melon flies.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Expression stability of 12 candidate reference genes calculated by geNorm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202829.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Expression stability of 12 candidate reference genes calculated by BestKeeper.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202829.s002
(TIF)
References
- 1. Zhang YN, Gong Z, Niu LM, Li L, Zhang FP, Han DY, et al. Geographical Population Genetic Differentiation Analysis of Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucuribitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) Based on COI Gene Sequences. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops. 2017; 38(5): 926–931
- 2. Mir S. H., Dar S. A., Mir G. M. and Ahmad S. B. Biology of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Cucumber[J].Florida Entomologist.2014; 97(2): 753–758
- 3. Nishida T. and Bess H. A. Applied ecology in melon fly control. Journal of Economic Entomology.1950; 43(6): 877–883
- 4. Liang DT, Xun CJ,Yun H, Bu LF, Kui L Parasitism, Emergence, and Development of Spalangia endius (Hymenoptera:Pteromalidae) in Pupae of Different Ages of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae).Journal of Insect Science. 2015; 15(15):1–5
- 5. Ma XL, Li ZH, Hu XN, Wu JJ. The assessment of the economic losses caused by Bactrocera dorsalis, B. cucurbitae and B. tau to Guangdong province. PLANT QUARANTINE.2013; 3(1): 50–56
- 6. Yu BH and Hsin Chi.Age-stage,two-sex life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) with a discussion on the problem of applying female age-specific life tables to insect populations. Insect Science.2012; (19):263–273
- 7. Shivashankar S., Sumathi M., Krishnakumar N.K., Rao V.K. Role of phenolic acids and enzymes of phenylpropanoid pathway in resistance of chayote fruit (Sechium edule) against infestation by melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae. Annals of Applied Biology. 2015; 3(166):420–433
- 8. Wu H, Liu f, He YB, Li GP. Research Progress of Population Ecology and Molecular Ecology of Bactrocera cucurbitae. Journal of Anhui Agri. 2012;40(30): 14788–14836
- 9. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S and Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes and Immunity.2005; 6: 279–284 pmid:15815687
- 10. Hong S. Y., Seo P. J., Yang M. S., Xiang F. and Park C. M. Exploring valid reference genes for gene expression studies in Brachypodium distachyon by real-time PCR. BMC Plant Biol. 2008; 8(112):1–11
- 11. Ginzinger D. G. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp Hematol. 2002; 30(6): 503–512 pmid:12063017
- 12. Bustin S. A., Benes V., Nolan T. and Pfaffl M. W. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR—a perspective. Mol Endocrinol.2005; 34(3): 597–601
- 13. Kubista M., Andrade J. M., Bengtsson M., Forootan A., Jonak J., Lind K., Sindelka R., et al. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med.2006; 27(2–3): 95–125 pmid:16460794
- 14. VanGuilder H. D., Vrana K. E. and Freeman W. M. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques. 2008; 44(5): 619–626 pmid:18474036
- 15. Thellin O., Zorzi W., Lakaye B., De Borman B., Coumans B., Hennen G., et al. Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits. Biotechnol.1999; 75(2–3): 291–295.
- 16. Suzuki T., Higgins P. J. and Crawford D. R. Control selection for RNA quantitation. Biotechniques. 2000; 29(2): 332–337. pmid:10948434
- 17. Pfaffl M. W., Tichopad A., Prgomet C. and Neuvians T. P. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6): 509–515. pmid:15127793
- 18. Shen GM, Jiang HB, Wang XN, Wang JJ. Evaluation of endogenous references for gene expression profiling in different tissues of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC molecular biology.2010; 11(76):1–10
- 19. Tunbridge E. M., Eastwood S. L. and Harrison P. J. Changed relative to what? Housekeeping genes and normalization strategies in human brain gene expression studies. Biol Psychiatry.2011; 69(2): 173–179 pmid:20673871
- 20. Li R, Xie W, Wang S, Wu Q, Yang N, Yang X, et al. Reference gene selection for qRT-PCR analysis in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). PLoS One.2013; 8(1): e53006 pmid:23308130
- 21. Shen GM, Huang Y, Jiang XZ, Dou W, Wang JJ. Effect of β-Cypermethrin Exposure on the Stability of Nine Housekeeping Genes in Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist.2013; 96(2): 442–450
- 22. Ponton F., Chapuis M. P., Pernice M., Sword G. A. and Simpson S. J. Evaluation of potential reference genes for reverse transcription-qPCR studies of physiological responses in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol.2011; 57(6): 840–850. pmid:21435341
- 23. Lü ZC, Wang LH, Dai RL, Zhang GF, Guo JY, Wan FH. Evaluation of Endogenous Reference Genes of Bactrocera (Tetradacus) minax by Gene Expression Profiling under Various Experimental Conditions.Florida Entomologist. 2014; 97(2): 597–604.
- 24. Wang J, Zhao J, Liu YH. Evaluation of endogenous reference genes in Bactrocera minax (Diptera:Tephritidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica. 2014; 12: 1375–1380.
- 25. Nakamura A. M., Chahad-Ehlers S., Lima A. L. A., Taniguti C. H., Sobrinho I. Jr, Torres F. R. and de Brito R. A. Reference genes for accessing differential expression among developmental stages and analysis of differential expression of OBP genes in Anastrepha obliqua. Scientific Reports.2016; 6:17480 pmid:26818909
- 26. Olsvik Pål A, Lie Kai K, Jordal Ann-Elise O, Nilsen Tom O, Hordvik Ivar. Evaluation of potential reference genes in real-time RT-PCR studies of Atlantic salmon. BMC Molecular Biology. 2005; 6(21): 1–9
- 27. Lu YH, Zheng XS, Liang Q, Xu HX, Yang YJ, Tian J, He XC, Lu ZX. Evaluation and validation of reference genes for SYBR Green qRT-PCR normalization in Sesamia inferens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2015; 18(8):669–675
- 28. Pfaffl M. W., Tichopad A., Prgomet C., Neuvians T. P. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004; 26(6): 509–515. pmid:15127793
- 29. Vandesompele J, De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol.2002; 3(7): 1–12
- 30. Andersen C. L., Jensen J. L., Orntoft T. F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(15): 5245–5250 pmid:15289330
- 31. Gao MM, Liu YP, Ma X, Qin S, Gai GY, Yan L. Evaluation of Reference Genes for Normalization of Gene Expression Using Quantitative RT-PCR under Aluminum, Cadmium, and Heat Stresses in Soybean. PLoS One. 2017; 3(1):1–15
- 32. Fan CJ, Ma JM, Guo QR, Li XT, Wang H, Lu MZ. Selection of Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time PCR in Bamboo(Phyllostachys edulis). PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e56573 pmid:23437174
- 33. Zhu XY, Li XP, Chen WX, Chen JY, Lu WJ, Chen L, Fu DW. Evaluation of New Reference Genes in Papaya for Accurate Transcript Normalization under Different Experimental Conditions. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e44405 pmid:22952972
- 34. Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol. 2002; 29(1): 23–39 pmid:12200227
- 35. Folkersen L, Kurtovic S, Razuvaev A, Agardh HE, Gabrielsen A, Paulsson-Berne G. Endogenous control genes in complex vascular tissue samples. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10(516): 1–8
- 36. Thorrez L, Van Deun K, Tranchevent LC, Van Lommel L, Engelen K, Marchal K, et al. Using ribosomal protein genes as reference: a tale of caution. PLoS One. 2008; 3(3):e1854 pmid:18365009
- 37. Pang QQ, Li ZL, Luo SB, Chen RY, Jin QM, Li ZX, et al. Selection and Stability Analysis of Reference Gene for q RT-PCR in Eggplant Under High Temperature Stress. Acta Horticulturae Sinica.2017; 44 (3): 475–486