Figures
Table 3 is incorrect. Please see the corrected Table 3 here.
Comparing the absolute and relative means of the three iSense scan measurements (N = 14) and means of the three EVA scan measurements (N = 14), limits of agreement, coefficient of repeatability within methods and uniformity of the data for each section of the lower limb going from 300mm below the mid-patella (0mm) to 180mm above the mid-patella.
Reference
- 1. Dessery Y, Pallari J (2018) Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190585 pmid:29320560
Citation: Dessery Y, Pallari J (2018) Correction: Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace. PLoS ONE 13(4): e0196183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196183
Published: April 17, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Dessery, Pallari. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.