http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-8545
Figures
Abstract
Swarm-founding wasps are endemic and common representatives of neotropical fauna and compose an interesting social tribe of vespids, presenting both complex social characteristics and uncommon traits for a eusocial group, such as the absence of castes with distinct morphology. The paper wasp Protonectarina sylveirae (Saussure) presents a broad distribution from Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay, occurring widespread in the Atlantic rainforest and arboreal Caatinga, being absent in the Amazon region. Given the peculiar distribution among swarm-founding wasps, an integrative approach to reconstruct the evolutionary history of P. sylveirae in a spatial-temporal framework was performed to investigate: the presence of genetic structure and its relationship with the geography, the evolution of distinct morphologic lineages and the possible historical event(s) in Neotropical region, which could explain the observed phylogeographic pattern. Individuals of P. sylveirae were obtained from populations of 16 areas throughout its distribution for DNA extraction and amplification of mitochondrial genes 12S, 16S and COI. Analysis of genetic diversity, construction of haplotype net, analysis of population structure and dating analysis of divergence time were performed. A morphometric analysis was also performed using 8 measures of the body of the adult (workers) to test if there are morphological distinction among populations. Thirty-five haplotypes were identified, most of them exclusively of a group and a high population structure was found. The possibility of genetic divergence because of isolation by distance was rejected. Morphological analysis pointed to a great uniformity in phenotypes, with only a small degree of differentiation between populations of south and the remaining. Divergence time analysis showed a Middle/Late Miocene origin, a period where an extensive marine ingression occurred in South America. Divergence of haplogroups began from the Plio/Pleistocene boundary and the last glacial maximum most likely modeled the current distribution of species, even though it was not the cause of genetic breaks.
Citation: da Silva M, Noll FB, e Castro ACM-C (2018) Phylogeographic analysis reveals high genetic structure with uniform phenotypes in the paper wasp Protonectarina sylveirae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). PLoS ONE 13(3): e0194424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424
Editor: Tzen-Yuh Chiang, National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN
Received: November 9, 2017; Accepted: March 3, 2018; Published: March 14, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 da Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors are grateful for financial support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq - 472403/2013-3). MS is thankful to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for the scholarship (2012/13886-4). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Comprehension of the evolutionary processes that generate and maintain the biological diversity of tropical fauna has been challenging biologists for centuries and should be the underpinning of conservation strategies [1]. Current distributions result from the interaction between environmental requirements of species and geographical variation of environmental features [2]. Investigating the evolutionary history of species can increase understanding of the interactions between past climatic events and the evolutionary processes that contributed to current patterns of diversity [3–5].
Phylogeography focuses on the processes governing the distribution of genealogical lineages within species across the geographical landscape [6, 7]. Phylogeographic approaches facilitate an increased understanding of the role that historical events play in the geographical patterns of genetic variability within and among species [5, 8, 9]. One of the strengths of this discipline is the approach of micro evolutionary processes (within populations) and macro evolutionary patterns at larger spatial and temporal scales, in an integrated way, by linking heredity (processes at the level of individual pedigrees), divergence at the population level, and phylogenetic relationships among species [6, 10]. Demographic processes—drift, expansion and changes in effective population size—are consequence of biotic and abiotic conditions which a species was submitted during its evolutionary history and are reflected in genetic structure of neutral genes. The variable environmental conditions also act selecting phenotypes, once the morphological features affect the performance of individuals, impacting processes such as dispersal, colonization, and persistence [10]. Moreover, phenotypes provide information on local selective pressures and indicate a gene flow rupture history of the various populations due to a partial or total isolation between them [10, 11]. Thus, analysis of phenotypic variation within a phylogeographic approach can promote great advances in understanding how genetic and morphological divergence arises and how they behave in the face of ecological / evolutionary changes [10].
A single model of vicariance or recent climate changes cannot explainthe origin of Neotropical biota [12]. This region, which includes the south of Mexico, Central and South Americas and the Caribbean islands, is known for remarkable biodiversity [13] and is perhaps the richest terrestrial biogeographical region in terms of species [14]. Understanding the spatial patterns integrated with the molecular diversity, phenotypic variation, reproductive isolation and history of areas can provide information about speciation, clarify the historical biogeography and allow hypothesis regarding the diversification mechanisms. Thereafter, incorporating such aspects can contribute significantly to the development of strategies for conservation of ecosystems [1, 15].
Swarm-founding wasps of the Epiponini compose an interesting social tribe of vespids, presenting both complex social characteristics (intricate nest building, polygyny and swarm reproduction) and uncommon traits for a eusocial group, such as castes with the same or with a very similar morphology [16, 17]. As the name suggests, these wasps initiate their colonies by swarms, with one or more queens accompanied by a group of workers [17, 18]. As a social insect, the effective population size of P. sylveirae is very low, once there is only one or a few reproductives in the colony. The swarm strategy plus the polygyny (presence of more than one queen) greatly reduced the risk of loss of the reproductives, increasing the survive of the colony [19, 20, 21]. In these colonies, females are philopatric and the dispersion is male-biased, mostly in polygynous populations [22, 23].
Common representatives of Neotropical fauna, 19 genera and approximately 234 described species compose the Epiponini tribe [17]. Protonectarina sylveirae (Saussure) is the only species of the genus Protonectarina Ducke, and these aggressive wasps form colonies of large populations that build very large and perennial arboreal nests, usually suspended from a twig [16, 24, 25]. The colonies store a considerable amount of nectar, an unusual feature among wasps [16, 24, 25] (Fig 1). The species has a broad distribution from Brazil to Argentina, specifically along the central (Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso do Sul and Goiás) and eastern regions of Brazil (Ceará, Bahia, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul), the eastern end of Argentina and eastern Paraguay [16, 26] (Fig 2). Among the genera of Epiponini, Protonectarina is the only one that is not found in the Amazon region, occurring widespread in the Atlantic rainforest and arboreal Caatinga (a type of desert vegetation found exclusively in the interior northeastern of Brazil composed of a mosaic of spiny shrubs and seasonally dry forests [27].
A. Nest in a tree from Mossoró, RN, Brazil. B. Detail of the same nest showing many wasps outside, a common behavior of this species. Frontal (C), lateral (D) and dorsal (E) views of a worker.
Map of South America showing the distribution of P. silveirae and sample locations used for analysis. Circles represent the points sampled, and the dashed line indicates the limit of species distribution according to literature data and collection records. Acronyms and colors will be matched for the haplotype network and chronogram. Areas of Atlantic Forest (dark gray) and Caatinga (light gray) are represented, as are the geographic groups of Northeast (yellow), Central (blue) and South (pink). The map was generated using the software QGIS v2.18 (http://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html).
The Brazilian Atlantic Forest is the second largest tropical forest in South America, covering an area of > 1,000,000 km2 along the Brazilian coast, eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina [28–30]. Complex factors including strong seasonality, sharp environmental gradients and orographically driven rainfall result in a diverse landscape in this ecoregion [28, 31], which includes coastal Atlantic rainforests, semi-deciduous forests, subtropical Araucaria (Jussieu) forests and brejo forests [32]. For this biome, much of the research identifies recurrent phylogeographical discontinuities for different groups of organisms; for example, bees [33], amphibians [34, 35], reptiles [36, 37], birds [38,39], bats [40] and plants [41]. Moreover, some authors infer historical connections between Atlantic rainforest and Amazonian rainforest [12, 42].
The most well-known hypothesis on the origin of diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest is based on the classical Pleistocene Refugia Model [43, 44], which was postulated to explain the diversity in the Amazon forest. In the last decade, interest in clarifying the origin of this biodiversity has increased [32]. The refugia hypothesis has been fully proposed and tested [34, 45], and other recent studies on the history of the Neotropical biota in general, searching for both temporal and spatial biogeographic patterns, also propose the uplift of the Andes, rise of land bridges between North and South American marine incursions, and Pleistocene climate changes [46–50] as events of diversification for Neotropical biota. All hypotheses are based on some provisional reductions in gene flow among populations, which promoted divergence in allopatry, leading to different populations because they were somehow geographically isolated [51]. Phylogeographic studies of widespread species in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest occupying more than one phytogeographical region, as P. sylveirae, may reveal useful information regarding how such species responded to past climatic changes and how these events may have driven the evolutionary history of populations [52].
Given the widespread (east and central regions of Brazil) and the peculiar distribution among Epiponini wasps (absent in the Amazon region), in the present study, we used an integrative approach to reconstruct the evolutionary history of P. sylveirae in a spatial-temporal framework. The aim of this study was to answer the following questions to investigate the phylogeographic and demographic history of this species: (1) Do populations of P. sylveirae present genetic structure? (2) If yes, is this structure related to geography? (3) Does the genetic structure also lead to the evolution of distinct morphologic lineages? (4) Is the genetic diversity of this species a result of past habitat fragmentation or recent range expansion? (5) Is there some historical event(s) in the Neotropical region that can be related to the observed phylogeographic pattern?
Materials and methods
Sampling and laboratory procedures
Wasps were actively collected along the distributional area of the species with entomological nets in the vegetation or directly from nests and preserved in ethanol (96–100%). Only worker wasps were collected to avoid bias in morphometric analysis due to the dimorphism among castes [26]. One sample was also obtained from a collection of the American Museum of Natural History (Table 1, Fig 2). All the samples were collected with the permission of IBAMA (permit n°10739–1). The collection of specimens in private areas was carried out with the knowledge and permission of the owner. The field study did not involve endangered or protected species.
DNA was extracted from legs, antennae and mesosomal muscles of wasps using DNeasy Blood & Tissue (Qiagen) and Illustra tissue & cells genomic Prep mini spin (GE) kits. The extracted DNA was used to amplify part of the mitochondrial genes cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and 16S and 12S ribosomal RNA. PCR was performed using a PCR Ready-To-Go Beads (Amersham Biosciences) kit. Primers used to amplify sequences of COI and 16S were developed by Schulmeister et al. [53], whereas for the 12S gene, primers were constructed (S1 Table). PCR products were purified with a “GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification” (Amersham Biosciences) kit. Sequencing was performed by the Centro de Recursos Biológicos e Biologia Genômica (CREBIO) using an automatic sequencer ABI3730 XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequences were inspected and assembled in Geneious Pro 5.6.4 [54] and aligned in Mafft server [55] (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/).
Genetic diversity
To quantify the variation in DNA sequences and characterize populations, the following parameters were estimated in DnaSP v. 5.101 [56]: number of polymorphic sites (S), nucleotide diversity(π), average number of nucleotide differences (k), total number of mutations (η), number of haplotypes (h) and the haplotype diversity (Hd). To test whether genetic divergence could be explained by isolation by distance, the Mantel test [57] was applied in IBDWS 3.23 [58], with (1000) replications.
Haplotype relationship and population structure
To determine the relationships among the haplotypes, a network was constructed in PopART (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees; http://popart.otago.ac.nz) version 1.7 [59] using the median-joining [60] algorithm to describe graphically the relationship between the distribution of haplotypes and the geographic distribution of the populations of P. sylveirae. An Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was performed to test the presence of populational genetic structure. This analysis is based on F-statistics and assumes the hypothesis that the genetic diversity within two populations is not significantly different from that resulting from the joining of the two populations [61, 62]. Three approaches were used: a global analysis, without any a priori population group; grouping populations according to the geography; and grouping populations in groups that resulted from the arrangement obtained in the haplotype network. AMOVA was also performed in PopART.
Demographic events
To detect signs of recent population expansion or bottlenecks in populations of P. sylveirae, the neutrality tests of Tajima’s D [63, 64], Fu’s Fs [65] and the population size change test R2 [66] were performed using DnaSP v. 5.101 [56]. Significance of tests was obtained based on 1000 coalescent simulations. A value of D = 0 implies in neutrality, whereas a significant value of D can indicate population expansion, bottleneck or heterogeneity in mutation rates [67]. A high negative value of FS indicates population expansion [65], and small values of R2 are expected under a scenario of population expansion [66]. The performance of the R2 test is superior for a small sample size [66, 68].
The distribution of genetic differences between pairs of haplotypes (Mismatch distribution) was performed considering the premise of panmictic populations using the program DnaSP v. 5.101 [56]. In general, multimodal distributions are consistent with demographic stability or multiple expansion events; whereas unimodal distributions commonly indicate that the population underwent a recent population and spatial expansion [69]. The Mismatch distribution was performed using all populations together and by geographic distribution and haplotype groups.
Divergence time
The time since the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) was estimated under a Bayesian approach using BEAST 1.8.3 [70]. Analyses were conducted using sequences of all mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S and COI) for populations of P. sylveirae plus sequences of 3 other species of Epiponini (Agelaia testacea, Synoeca surinama and Brachygastra augusti) as out-groups under the GTR nucleotide substitution model, which was identified as the best model for the data in MEGA 7.0.7 [71]. An uncorrelated relaxed clock under a lognormal relaxed distribution was used. The coalescent tree prior used was the constant size, which is most suitable for trees describing the relationships among individuals in the same population/species. The age of the fossil Agelaia electra (20.43 to 13.65 mya) [72] was used for calibration under a normal distribution considering a mean of 17.04 ± 0.5mya. Analyses were conducted using default parameters for the MCMC, setting 10 million generations with 10% of the initial runs excluded. The resulting trees were combined using TreeAnnotator v1.8.0, and the consensus tree with the divergence times was visualized in FigTree v1.4.0 [73].
Phenotypic analysis
Digital images of the bodies of 128 individual P. sylveirae from the 13 populations sampled (Table 1; populations from Catimbau, Guarapuava and Lavras were not measured because of the few individuals in the samples) were taken witha stereomicroscope coupled with a digital camera (Leica PDF295) before the DNA extraction. The following adult body parts (Fig 3) were measured based on the work of Garcia et al. [74]: head length (HL), head width (HW), mesoscutum width (MW); mesosoma length (MeL), mesosoma height (MeH), hind femur length (HFL); 2° metasomal terga length (T2L) and 2° metasomal terga width (T2W). ImageJ software [75] (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html) was used to derive the measures in the images. Comparisons between populations within the species were performed. To determine the degree of discrimination and identify which measures best explained the data, a multivariate discriminant analysis with a posterior canonical discriminant analysis was performed [76]. The tests were performed with the program STATISTICA 7 [77].
The red lines represent the body size measures for morphological analysis of populations of Protonectarina sylveirae: A. Head length (HL) and head width (HW); B. Mesoscutum width (MW); C. Mesosoma length (MeL) and mesosoma height (MeH); D. 2° metasomal terga length (T2L) and 2° metasomal terga width (T2W); and E. Hind femur length (HFL). Pictures are of a worker from Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Results
Characterization and genetic diversity
The final alignment containing the concatenated data of 12S, 16S and COI resulted in a matrix with 117 sequences and 2320 base pairs. Sequences were submitted to GenBank (S2 Table). A total of 35 haplotypes were identified with a high diversity (0.921 ± 0.015) (Tables 2 and 3). By contrast, nucleotide diversity was low (0.0144 ± 0.00078) across all populations, and the average difference in the number of nucleotides among sequences was 33,496 (Table 3).
Samples of BON, BOD and IND shared the same haplotype (Hap 6), which was the most widespread haplotype geographically. Additionally, samples of SGRA and VIC shared haplotype 1 (Table 2). All the other samples presented an exclusive group of haplotypes that were not shared among other samples. The high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity values indicated only small differences between haplotypes; therefore, each population carried a different part of the total amount of diversity of the species.
The Mantel test showed performed for all the samples, no correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance, indicating that the genetic divergence among populations could not be attributed to isolation by distance (S1 Fig).
Haplotype relationship and populational structure
Fig 4 shows the relationships among haplotypes of P. sylveirae, with the peculiar haplotype composition for each sample and the presence of “hypothetical haplotypes” (black circles), indicating some haplotypes were already lost, clearly demonstrated. Nevertheless, a lack of samples cannot be discarded.
A. Haplotype network inferred for haplotypes (H_1 to H_35) of the 12S, 16S and COI genes of Protonectarina sylveirae, estimated by the median-joining algorithm. Circles are proportional to the frequency of haplotypes, and colors represent each area sampled. The red numbers on the branches indicate mutational steps between haplotypes. Black circles are median vectors or hypothetical haplotypes (lost or unsampled). Size and positions of some branches were changed for better visualization. The haplotype groups are delimited by full lines, and the geographical ones by dashed lines. Acronyms shown in Table 1. B. The same network with the haplotypes superimposed on their approximate geographical location. Areas of Atlantic Forest (dark gray) and Caatinga (light gray) are represented, as well as the geographic groups (dotted lines) of Northeast (NE), Central (CE) and South (SO). The map was generated using the software QGIS v2.18 (http://www.qgis.org/en/site/forusers/download.html).
From the topology of the haplotype network, three groups were delimited according to geography, composed by haplotypes from Northeast (NE), South (SO) and Central (CE) regions of Brazil. Notably, although geographically close to the cities of BON and BOD, haplotypes from DOU were closely related to those from the South (haplogroup C). Some haplotypes were separated by many mutations, including within these geographical groups (e.g., within the NE group). At least six distinct haplogroups, A to G, were delimited (Table 3; Fig 4A). Further analyses were performed based on the network results, considering the division in haplogroups and the grouping by geography (Fig 4B).
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) considering all populations as a single group resulted in a high value of FST (0.948). The source of variation was 94.81% among populations and only 5.19% within populations (Table 4). This result suggested a strong genetic structuration and supported a scenario of low gene flow. When the analysis was repeated grouping the populations according to geography (NE, SW and CE), the F-statistic value was even higher (0.96592), and the percentage of variation was 76% among groups, 20.57% among populations within groups and only 3.41% within populations (Table 4). Analysis performed with samples in the six haplotypes groups based on the topology of the network resulted in an increase in the value of FCT (0.90299) compared with that in the analysis with groups defined by geography (0.76017), andninety percent of the variation was found among the groups (Table 4).
Demographic events
The Mismatch distribution for overall samples resulted in a multimodal distribution, which suggested populational stability. The same pattern was found for the three groups according to geography. A multimodal pattern was also found for haplogroups C and E, in contrast to groups A, B and F that exhibited a unimodal pattern, suggesting a recent demographic expansion [69, 78] or a range expansion with high levels of migration among neighborhoods [79, 80] (Fig 5). Of note, the South region contained A and B groups. For haplogroup D, the observed pattern was similar to that expected.
Graphics of pairwise distribution referent to geographic (NE, SO and CE) and haplotype groups (A-F) of Protonectarina sylveirae. Observed frequencies of pairwise differences (dotted line) are compared against expected frequencies under a scenario of expanding population sizes (full line).
Values of Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were not significant for any of the groups, indicating that the null hypothesis of population neutrality could not be rejected (Table 3). However, the low values of R2 suggested recent expansion (Table 3).
Divergence time
The divergence dating analysis revealed a middle Miocene origin for Protonectarina at approximately 11 mya. Divergence among the analyzed samples began at approximately 2 mya, with the oldest divergence occurring between lineages of the Northeast (CANO, CAT and MOS) and the others (at 1.83 mya), followed by the separation between lineages from the South (GUA, MIS, TRI, LON and DOU) and the others (at approximately 1.35 mya). More recently, at 0.36 mya, the Central lineages became separated in two primary groups: SACA, SJRP and LAV and BON, BOD, IND, SGRA and VIC (Fig 6).
Colors of the clades correspond to those of the haplotype network. Numbers annotated on each node represent the divergence times between clades, and the standard deviations (95% of high posterior density) are represented by the blue bars (divergence times less than 100 kaand intervals shorter than 500 ka are not represented). Acronyms shown in Table 1.
Morphological differences
Discriminant analysis showed variation among different populations. Populations of DOU and CANO presented a classification percentage of 100%, which according to the model, indicated these populations were not similar to any other population. By contrast, populations of VIC, LON, MIS and MOS presented a classification percentage lower than 60%. Despite the classification of 37.5%, individuals of the VIC population were morphologically similar to those from IND, BOD and SACA, populations in the same geographical group and haplogroup in which VIC was inserted. Populations of LON and MIS, in the SO group, were classified with a percentage of 30% and 50%, respectively. These populations shared similarities with populations of different groups but were classified more often as more similar to one another. Lastly, the MOS population was similar to populations of BON, BOD, SGRA, VIC, SJRP and SACA (S3 Table).
Contributions of each variable (measure) in functions generated by the value of Wilks’ λ were determined to identify those that were important to discrimination among groups (populations), and only the measures MeL and MeH were not significant (Table 5). Analysis of standardized coefficients identified MW as the most relevant in delimitation of the groups with the highest contribution in the share of discrimination (approximately 80%) represented by two functions discriminating between groups (Root 1 and Root 2) (S4 Table).
The ordination plots (Fig 7) show the geographical variation, explained primarily by the shape. A remarkable difference between populations of DOU and those of CANO, although not as conspicuous, can be observed. For the remaining populations, the plots showed no discrete clusters of individuals, with some degree of overlap among them. However, populations of the SO group (LON, MIS and TRI) were distributed from 0 to positive values on root 2 axes, while most populations of CS and NE groups were below 0 (except VIC, SJRP and SACA) (Fig 7B), which indicated that some morphological distinction was evident between the SO group and the other populations.
A. Divergence pattern per sample (represented by the colored shapes). B. Divergence pattern per group showing the upper position of populations of SO (South group, except population of DOU) compared with the other groups. BOD, Bodoquena; BON, Bonito; CANO, Casa Nova; DOU, Dourados; IND, Indiaporã; LON, Londrina; MIS, Misiones; MOS, Mossoró; SACA, São Carlos; SGRA, São Gonçalo do Rio Abaixo; SJRP, São José do Rio Preto; TRI, Triunfo; and VIC, Viçosa.
Discussion
Distribution, demography, and genetic and spatial structure
The evolutionary history and the pattern of genetic variability for the species Protonectarina sylveirae were clarified in this study. Across the distribution range, populations were genetically highly structured, as confirmed by AMOVA, presumably reflecting long lasting isolation in the past. Populations within the same geographical region were genetically more similar, such as populations of BON and BOD, or presented a low degree of genetic divergence, suggesting restricted gene flow between geographically separated groups of populations. However, the haplotype composition for most populations inside the same geographical region implied a condition of restricted gene flow not related to isolation by distance but most likely caused by a barrier. A unique haplotype composition was found for populations of P. sylveirae, in which exclusive alleles were found across most of the populations. A similar pattern was found for Eugenia uniflora from the south of the Atlantic Forest, which became geographicaly isolated during glacial cycles in fragments with appropriate environmental conditions, resulting in lineage divergence [5]. In the same way, the pattern found for P. sylveirae suggests a long-term persistence of these populations, rather than recent migrations. Moreover, the founding-nest behavior of reproductive females most likely reinforced the highly structured pattern of P. sylveirae. Indeed, individuals sampled in geographically close nests shared very similar haplotypes with low nucleotide diversity, which is also found within some species of ants with restricted female dispersion [81–84].
A swarm has a limited dispersion capacity once the queen is constrained by the dispersing ability of nestmates [85]. The low dispersal capacity of the queen can result in population genetic viscosity (in a continuous population, the closest colonies present greater genetic similarity than the colonies that are more distant from each other) and inbreeding depression (a decrease in the fitness of inbred individuals) [22, 86]. The latter condition is especially important in social insects because colonies present small effective population sizes [87]. However, because males can be efficient dispersers (they leave the home nest to find foreign colonies), the effects of low dispersion of queens, genetic viscosity, and inbreeding can be mitigated. This can be observed, for example, in biparentally inherited (nuclear) genes, which do not present genetic viscosity [85].
Lineages of P. sylveirae showed low haplotype sharing and long-term divergence. This divergence is not surprising when the distribution and the molecular markers of this species are considered. The use of only mitochondrial markers has some limitations, mainly because it represents the study of a single locus, showing only a small part of the history of populations and reflecting the matrilineal history, which may differ from the population's history when analyzing, for example, nuclear genes [88, 89]. Moreover, because the effective population size of mtDNA is a fourth of that of nuclear autosomal sequences, the process of lineage sorting (when a species splits, allelic lineages sort into the descendant populations) occurs much faster and the rate of allele loss is high for mtDNA lineages [88].
Although reciprocal monophyly of the alleles at a given locus in allopatrically or parapatrically distributed sets of populations is commonly interpreted as an indication of distinct species [90, 91], other conditions can lead to this pattern, as in the case of mitochondrial DNA. When the locus is maternally inherited, strong genetic structure can also result from low dispersal distances of females even when autosomal and paternally inherited genes are regularly exchanged between the same sets of populations [92]. Thereby, two or more species might be inferred although the populations in question form a single metapopulation lineage [93]. Decreasing population size also increases the chance of observing phylogeographic breaks. Maternally inherited markers have one-fourth the effective population size of nuclear genes and therefore are more likely to show phylogeographic structure in a continuously distributed species [92]. For social insects, the effective population size is even smaller, because among all the members of the colony, only a small percentage reproduces.
The type of social organization in vespids has generated profound effects in several aspects of the group [74]. Non-swarm-founding species can generate new colonies rapidly and their dispersion could be facilitated; however, the colony success is low given the low number of founding individuals [19]. By contrast, a swarm-founding species, such as P. sylveirae, reduces queen mortality risk and increases homeostatic control of the colony, but the dispersal process could be restricted with populations prone to local extinction because the swarm is vulnerable to harsh climatic conditions during the migration [19, 94]. Nests of P. sylveirae are not common and are not easily located in the field, with nests usually built in high trees and found only in areas with forested vegetation. Even samples collected in dry environments, such as those from CANO, CAT and MOS in the Caatinga biome, were found in high trees. These biological requirements likely shaped the distribution of populations and contributed to the low rates of gene flow among populations. Areas with open vegetation and/or dry conditions most likely were not a barrier for the expansion of populations but were for the establishment of colonies.
Sufficient gene flow between populations can slow down or prevent the process of geographic differentiation and leave a signature of little population structure over large areas. This signature is commonly observed in flying insect species, specifically in those species that migrate or are good dispersers [95]. Nevertheless, this pattern was not observed for P. sylveirae. The divergence among haplotypes and the genetic structuration suggested a deep divergence instead of ancestry based on coalescence, indicating low rates of gene flow and resulting in the high index of FST. Considering the predictions of the theory of coalescence, a direct relationship occurs between haplotype frequency and the age of haplotypes in which the most common haplotypes are the oldest [96]. Hence, most of new mutants are derivatives of common haplotypes; therefore, rare variants are the most recent mutations and most closely related to the common haplotypes than to the other rare variants [97]. In this study, the haplotype ancestry of groups of haplotypes could not be determined. The presence of hypothetical haplotypes (median vectors) can be biologically interpreted as possibly extant unsampled sequences or extinct ancestral sequences [60]. Nevertheless, a lack of samples cannot be discarded, primarily in the area close to the southeast coast, which was not sampled.
Rapid cycles of extinction and colonization can also affect the genetic structure of populations in which frequent founding events during colonization may increase the value of FST [98]. Nevertheless, this value depends on the settlement mode, more specifically the source of the origin of migrants [99]. The combination of high haplotype diversity (Hd) and low nucleotide diversity (π), as observed in our data, also can be a signature of a rapid demographic expansion from a small effective population size [100]. In eusocial species, such as P. sylveirae, only a few individuals of the colonies are reproductive. After a swarm, colonies start with several queens and workers, and as the colony develops, some queens disappear or adopt a worker role, and the number of queens reduces until one or a few queens remain [17]. Carvalho [101] also found a high value of Hd and a low π for Angiopolybia pallens and Synoeca surinama, two species of paper wasps in the same tribe as Protonectarina. The author found a lower genetic diversity for S. surinama than that for A. pallens, which was attributed to the differences in biology between the two species (e.g., vagility, body size and distinct colonization systems). In the same way, both genera diverge earlier than Protonectarina [102] and show differences in many aspects, such as in nest construction, number of individuals in the colony and behavior.
The multimodal Mismatch distribution suggested stability in populations [69, 79]. However, recent changes in the size of a population cannot be detected because of threshold effects, lapses of time or previous demographic events, which can mask the effects of recent events [103]. Multimodal distribution can also be generated for populations that experienced recent population expansion but are subject to higher migration rates and/or suffered historical population reduction [104–105].
Morphometric analysis indicated differences among populations, which were statistically significant, although morphologically imperceptible. Furthermore, according to the results, the selected measures were adequate for discrimination of groups. From the graphic of discriminant analysis (Fig 7), a difference in the distribution of plots between the SO group (except DOU) and the other populations could be observed. The size and shape of the DOU sample were highly divergent from those of the other populations. Phylogeographic structure with little or absence of phenotypic variation can occur when stabilizing selection is acting, which tends to keep the population constant over time, increasing the fitness of the members with average characteristics (more common) within the population compared with those with extreme characteristics [10, 106]. When strong stabilizing selection acts on traits that characterize the niche of a species, populations will track suitable habitat as it appears and disappears over time [107]. Furthermore, the presence of strong biogeographic barriers to gene flow between stable environments, which exhibit little variation in space and time, allow species to be subdivided into populations and accumulate genetic differences without any morphological differentiation [107]. This condition can generate “cryptic” lineages and later, species [10, 108].
Considering other morphological traits, such as cuticular punctuation and color, no different patterns were observed among populations. In fact, color showed intra-population differences. Several studies reveal deep intraspecific phylogeographical structure with multiple lineages (phylogroups) [52], which can be indicative of cryptic species, i.e., distinct species that are morphologically indistinguishable [108]. However, we believe that this type of affirmation requires a more accurate study.
Differences concerning patterns obtained from molecular and morphological data rely on the way in which selection acts to drive evolution [109]. Functional genes can be under strong stabilizing selection, decreasing the rate of evolution [110, 111], whereas the non-functional regions can rapidly evolve according to the neutral evolution model. By contrast, phenotypic evolution is mostly driven by natural selection, which can force morphological evolution away from the expected correlation with molecular data [109, 112]. The possible outcomes range from cryptic lineages resulting from stabilizing selection [113] to high rates of morphological divergence because of directional selection [114].
Time, diversification and historical aspects
The dating analysis showed a time of origin of the species in the Middle Miocene (approximately 13 mya). During the Miocene, one of the largest and most extensive humid environments in geological history was formed in the Amazon region. The evolution of this system was influenced primarily by the rise of the Andes in association with other factors such as global sea level change, subsidence and a seasonally humid climate [115]. In the Middle/Late Miocene (14–10 mya), in a relatively warm and humid phase of Earth [116], the system connected with the Atlantic Ocean, covering extensive areas between the Andean Cordillera and the Guiana and Brazilian shields [115, 117]. In the periphery of these areas, lands emerged in which tropical forest prevailed [115]. This event most likely isolated the ancestor of P. sylveirae in the eastern part of Brazil, explaining the absence in the Amazon region.
Divergence times estimated for the primary genetic breaks were placed within the Plio–Pleistocene periods (approximately 2 mya), a period in which the average temperature of the earth began to decrease rapidly and for which extensive records document changes in forest distribution associated with climatic cycles [45, 116, 118–126]. The first break occurred between NE and SO+CE groups, with the northeast lineages of P. sylveirae the oldest ones. Analysis of palynological records for areas of the Caatinga in the states of Bahia and Pernambuco showed hot and wet weather [127–129] until approximately 4000 years ago, when the modern Caatinga expanded. Moreover, in the Pliocene/Holocene boundary, a dense arboreal vegetation of the ombrophilous forest type predominated under a humid tropical climate [127]. For Catimbau National Park in Pernambuco, the humid condition continued until approximately 1000 years ago, and a constant humidity persists today [128, 129]. These environmental conditions were certainly suitable for the occurrence of P. sylveirae populations.
From the current vegetation, the Caatinga is clearly inhospitable to most rainforest species and even more stressful to arboreal ones [130]. Living in areas of arboreal Caatinga, populations in this biome undergo sudden changes in the environment throughout the year. In lineages in other locations in which wasps are confined to areas that are more humid, such adaptability does not occur. A notable characteristic of this species, related to survival in periods of scarce resources, is the production and storage of a large amount of honey, unusual for paper wasps [16]. Climatic changes during Quaternary period, which caused isolation of forested areas, most likely contributed to the increase in genetic divergence among populations of this region. A vast fossil record of mammals provides strong evidence of a past (Pleistocene) mosaic of vegetation of open fields, savannas and forests in the Caatinga [128, 131]. Furthermore, the called “Brejos de Altitude” montane forests that currently exist within the semi-arid region are relicts of an ancient and wider forest cover and were forest refuges during the Plio-Pleistocene [42, 132].
Climatic fluctuations and the effect of Pleistocene arid phases were greater in the southern portion of the biome than in the northern region [34, 133], which acted as a refuge because of the environmental stability [34]. Thus, populations from the south should present less genetic diversity than populations from north and central regions [34], which was not observed for P. sylveirae. The Atlantic Forest may have been able to maintain a reasonable degree of continuity during such climatic events because of the complex topography of the region and the potential for vertical migration [133]. The geographic distribution for most lineages of P. sylveirae included altitudes from 400 to more than 1000 m, which can be explained by vertical migration. Based on the mountain refuge hypothesis [134, 135], during dry periods, forest formations were more likely to occur in high altitude areas because of increased rainfall resulting from the orographic effect [136]. Moreover, the Last Glacial Maximum (~20,000Ka) is a period too recent to explain the major genetic breaks that occurred among lineages of P. sylveirae.
The DOU population was in the SO group, and these populations share the Paraná watershed and a common climate region. However, the DOU population was morphologically different from the other populations, including those of the same group. A possible cause is the Paraná River between DOU and the other SW populations, which could have hindered gene flow, reinforcing the differences among populations. Another notable result was that, despite the spatial proximity, the population of DOU was not in the same haplogroup of populations of BON and BOD. However, BON and BOD are in a different watershed (basin of Paraguay). Moreover, DOU is in the plateau zone of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, whereas BON and BOD are in Serra da Bodoquena, which are two different geological formations.
Previous studies with other genera of Epiponini also found a recent time of divergence. A phylogeographic analysis of Angiopolybia pallens and Synoeca surinama [101] found early origins for the species, approximately 3 and 2 mya, respectively. Menezes et al. [137] found a middle/late Miocene origin for Synoeca, with subsequent diversification of extant species occurring in the Plio-Pleistocene. The calibration used was different for both works and also differed in this study. The inference of lineage divergence time from molecular data has been criticized, primarily because dating is prone to many types of error (particularly for those taxa lacking an available fossil record for calibration) [52], one of which is related to the high influence of the calibration scheme [138]. Hence, the patterns reported here must be evaluated carefully.
Conclusions
The genetic diversity of Protonectarina sylveirae presented a strong structuration, suggesting the presence of barriers, which restricted or even interrupted the genetic flow among populations. Moreover, deep phylogeographical divisions within taxa also suggested extensive periods of isolation among populations of the species. The possibility of genetic divergence because of isolation by distance was rejected. From the haplotype network, three primary groups were delimited based on geography: Northeast, South and Central. However, at least six haplogroups were delimited genetically. Demographic analysis showed stability for most populations, indicating that the populations had remained constant throughout their evolutionary history. However, signs of recent expansion were found for populations of the south region and Catimbaú. Importantly, note that the eusociality of P. sylveirae also strongly influenced genetic and geographic patterns. Despite the uniformity in phenotypes, a small degree of morphological differentiation was also found for populations in morphometric analysis, revealing a distinction between populations of SO and the others and a particular morphology for the sample of DOU. No differences in other morphological features such as color or punctuation were observed for different patterns among populations.
The dating analysis indicated the origin of Protonectarina in the limit of Middle/Late Miocene, approximately 11 mya. In this period, an extensive marine ingression acted as a barrier, which could explain the absence of the species in the Amazon region. Divergence of haplogroups began from the Plio/Pleistocene boundary. No clear overall pattern indicated the origin of most of the South American species during the Pleistocene, as predicted by the refuge theory. However, the last glacial maximum (LGM) most likely modeled the current distribution of species, as observed for P. sylveirae. Nevertheless, the climatic changes that occurred in the LGM could not be the cause of genetic breaks among lineages because that event occurred more recently than the divergence found in our analysis. The divergence times obtained might provide a crude estimate of the relative order of events isolating the major haplotype lineages of P. sylveirae in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
Our results provide insights on the phylogeography of Protonectarina sylveirae and increase understanding of the complex pattern of diversification for the enormous biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Further studies using a multiple loci approach and increasing the range of geographical sampling of the species will provide a more complete picture of the evolution and diversification of paper wasps and contribute more pieces to solve the jigsaw of historical diversification of biota in South America.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Graphics of Mantel test to identify isolation by distance.
Lines represents RMA regression. The values of p were not significant for any of the analyzes. Z, Pearson's correlation coefficient between matrix; r, Pearson’s statistics.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424.s001
(TIF)
S1 Table. Sequence of primers and used PCR conditions for amplify fragments of genes.
F, forward; R, reverse; bp, base pair; *approximate size of the amplicon. COI, cytochrome oxidase subunit I; 12S ribosomal RNA, 16S ribosomal RNA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. GenBank accession numbers.
Accession numbers provided after submission of obtained gene sequences.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424.s003
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Classification matrix according the discriminant model.
The matrix shows, for each population, the number of cases classified correctly and incorrectly according the discriminant model. Rows: observed classification; columns: predicted classification.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424.s004
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Standardized coefficients for the canonical variables.
Numbers in bold show the contribution of the two functions that best explained the discrimination found among populations. HL, head length; HW, head width; MW, mesoscutum width; MeL, mesosoma; MeH, mesossoma height; HFL, hind femur lenght; T2L, 2° metasomal terga length and T2W, 2° metasomal terga width.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194424.s005
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Claúdia Márcia Aparecida Carareto and her team for their support in obtaining the molecular data and to Sc.M. Nara Cristina Chiarini Pena Barbosa for the help during the analysis. We are also thankfull to Ph.D. Marco Antônio Del Lama for cooperation throughout the development of the project and all the team of Laboratório de Aculeata for the help with the fieldwork.
References
- 1. Moritz C, Patton JL, Schneider CJ, Smith TB. Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2000; 31: 533–563.
- 2. Espíndola A, Pellissier L, Maiorano L, Hordijk W, Guisan A, Alvarez N. Predicting present and future intra-specific genetic structure through niche hindcasting across 24 millennia. Ecol Lett. 2012; 15: 649–657. pmid:22515791
- 3. Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature. 2000; 405: 907–913. pmid:10879524
- 4. Duminil J, Heuertz M, Doucet JL, Bourland N, Cruaud C, Gavory F, et al.CpDNA-based species identification and phylogeography: application to African tropical tree species. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19: 5469–5483. pmid:21091558
- 5. Turchetto-Zolet AC, Salgueiro F, Turchetto C, Cruz F, Veto NM, Barros MJF, et al. Phylogeography and ecological niche modelling in Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae) suggest distinct vegetational responses to climate change between the southern and the northern Atlantic Forest. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016; 182: 670–688.
- 6. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, Neigel JE, et al. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1987; 18:489–522.
- 7. Arbogast BS, Kenagy GJ. Comparative phylogeography as anintegrativeapproach to historical biogeography. J Biogeogr. 2001; 28: 819–825.
- 8. Knowles LL, Maddison WP. Statistical Phylogeography. Mol Ecol. 2002; 11: 2623–2635. pmid:12453245
- 9. Avise JC. Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. J Biogeogr. 2009; 36: 3–15.
- 10. Zamudio KR, Bell RC, Mason NA. Phenotypes in phylogeography: species' traits, environmental variation, and vertebrate diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016; 113: 8041–8048. pmid:27432983
- 11. Habel JC, Husemann M, Schmitt T, Dapporto L, Rödder D, Vandewoestijne S.A forest butterfly in Sahara Desert oases: isolation does not matter. J Hered. 2013; 104: 234–247. pmid:23132908
- 12. Costa PL. The historical bridge between Amazon and Atlantic forest of Brazil: a study of molecular phylogeography with small mammals. J Biogeogr. 2003; 30: 71–86.
- 13. Morrone JJ. Cladistics biogeography of the Neotropical region: identifying the main events in the diversification of the terrestrial biota. Cladistics. 2013; 29: 1–13.
- 14. Condamine FL, Silva-Brandão KL, Kergoat GJ, Sperling FAH. Biogeographic and diversification patterns of Neotropical Troidini butterflies (Papilionidae) support a museum model of diversity dynamics for Amazonia. BMC Evol Biol. 2012; 12: 2–16.
- 15. Knowles LL. Statistical Phylogeography. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40: 593–612.
- 16.
Richards OW. The social wasps of the Americas, excluding Vespinae. London: British Museum of Natural History; 1978.
- 17. Noll FB. “Marimbondos”: a review on the neotropical swarm-founding polistines. Sociobiology. 2013; 60: 347–354.
- 18. Bouwma AM. Founding swarms in a tropical social wasp: adult mortality, emigration distance, and swarm size. J Insect Behav. 2003; 16: 439–452.
- 19.
Jeanne RL. The swarm-founding Polistinae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW, editors. The social biology of wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991. pp. 191–231.
- 20.
Carpenter JM. Phylogenetic relationships and the origin of social behavior. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW, editors. The social biology of wasps. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991. pp. 7–32.
- 21.
Mateus S. Análise dos comportamentos envolvidos na organização social e no processo de enxameio de Parachartergus fraternus (Hymenoptera, Polistinae, Epiponini). Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo. 2005. Avaiable from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/59/59131/tde-10072007-114228/pt-br.php.
- 22. Seppä P, Gyllenstrand N, Corander J, Pamilo P. Coexistence of the social types: genetic population structure in the ant Formica exsecta. Evolution (NY). 2004; 58: 2462–2471.
- 23. Johnstone RA, Cant MA, Field J. Sex-biased dispersal, haplodiploidy and the evolution of helping in social insects. Proc R Soc B. 2012; 279: 787–793. pmid:21795270
- 24. Wenzel JW. A generic key to the nests of hornets, yellowjackets, and paper wasps worldwide (Vespidae: Vespinae, Polistinae). Am Mus Novit. 1998; 3224: 1–39.
- 25. Shima SN, Noll FB, Zucchi R. Influence of the colony cycle on physiological and morphological caste variation in the perennial neotropical swarm-founding social wasp, Protonectarina sylveirae (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Epiponini). Sociobiology. 2003; 42: 449–466.
- 26. Tanaka GM Jr., Soleman RA, Noll FB. Morphological and physiological variation between queens and workers of Protonectarina sylveirae (de Saussure) (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Epiponini). Rev Bras Entomol. 2010; 54: 104–109.
- 27. Leal IR, da Silva JMC, Tabarelli M, Lacher TE Jr.. Mudando o curso da conservação da biodiversidade na Caatinga do Nordeste do Brasil. Megadiversidade. 2005; 1: 139–146.
- 28. Joly CA, Aidar MPM, Klink CA, McGrath DG, Moreira AG, Moutinho P, et al. Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. Cienc Cult. 1999; 51: 331–348.
- 29. Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes MAL. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica. 2000; 32, 793–810.
- 30. Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. The Brazilian Atlantic forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2009; 142: 1141–1153.
- 31. Martins FM. Historical biogeography of the Brazilian Atlantic forest and the Carnaval-Moritz model of Pleistocene refugia: what do phylogeographical studies tell us? Biol J Linn Soc. 2011; 104: 499–509.
- 32. Silva SM, Moraes-Barros N, Ribas CC, Ferrand N, Morgante JS. Divide to conquer: a complex pattern of biodiversity depicted by vertebrate components in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biol J Linn Soc Lon. 2012; 107: 39–55.
- 33. Batalha-Filho H, Waldschmidt AM, Campos LAO, Tavares MG, Fernandes-Salomão TM. Phylogeography and historical demography of the neotropical stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera, Apidae): incongruence between morphology and mitochondrial DNA. Apidologie, 2010; 41: 534–547.
- 34. Carnaval AC, Hickerson MJ, Haddad CFB, Rodrigues MT, Moritz C. Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot. Science.2009; 323: 785–789. pmid:19197066
- 35. Thomé MTC, Zamudio KR, Giovanelli JGR, Haddad CFB, Baldissera FA, Alexandrino J. Phylogeography of endemic toads and post-Pliocene persistence of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010; 55: 1018–1031. pmid:20139019
- 36. Pellegrino KCM, Rodrigues MT, Waite AN, Morando M, Yassuda YY, Sites JW Jr.. Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biol J Linn Soc Lon. 2005; 85: 13–26.
- 37. Grazziotin FG, Monzel M, Echeverrigaray S, Bonatto SL. Phylogeography of the Bothrops jararaca complex (Serpentes: Viperidae): past fragmentation and island colonization in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Ecol, 2006; 15: 3969–3982. pmid:17054497
- 38. Cabanne GS, Santos FR, Miyaki CY. Phylogeography of Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Passeriformes, Dendrocolaptidae): vicariance and recent demographic expansion in southern Atlantic forest. Biol J Linn Soc Lon. 2007; 91: 73–84.
- 39. Cabanne GS, D’Horta FM, Sari EHR, Santos FR, Miyaki CY. Nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeography of the Atlantic forest endemic Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae): biogeography and systematics implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008; 49: 760–773. pmid:18849002
- 40. Martins FM, Templeton AR, Pavan ACO, Kohlbach BC, Morgante JS. Phylogeography of the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus): marked population structure, Neotropical Pleistocene vicariance and incongruence between nuclear and mtDNA markers. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9: 1–13.
- 41. Ribeiro RA, Lemos-Filho JP, Ramos ACS, Lovato MB. Phylogeography of the endangered rosewood Dalbergianigra (Fabaceae): insights into the evolutionary history and conservation of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Heredity. 2011; 106: 46–57. pmid:20517347
- 42. Batalha-Filho H, Fjeldsä J, Fabre PH, Miyaki CY. Connections between the Atlantic and the Amazonian forest avifaunas represent distinct historical events. J Ornithol. 2013; 154: 41–50.
- 43. Haffer J. Speciation in Amazonian forests birds. Science, 1969; 165: 131–137. pmid:17834730
- 44. Vanzolini PE, Williams EE. The vanishing refuge: a mechanism for ecogeographic speciation. Pap Avulsos Zool. 1981; 34: 251–256.
- 45. Carnaval AC, Moritz C. Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J Biogeogr. 2008; 35: 1187–1201.
- 46. Rull V. Speciation timing and Neotropical biodiversity: The Tertiary-Quaternary debate in the light of molecular phylogenetic evidence. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 2722–2729. pmid:18494610
- 47.
Hoorn CM, Wesselingh FP. Amazonia, landscape and species evolution: a look into the past. 1st ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
- 48. Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, terSteege H, Bermudez MA, Mora A, Stevink J, et al. Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science. 2010; 330: 927–931. pmid:21071659
- 49. Rull V. Neotropical biodiversity: timing and potential drivers. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26: 508–513. pmid:21703715
- 50. Silva M, Noll FB. Biogeography of the social wasp genus Brachygastra (Hymenoptera: Vespidade: Polistinae), J Biogeogr. 2015; 42: 833–842.
- 51. Dantas GPM, Cabanne GS, Santos FR. How past vicariant events can explain the Atlantic forest biodiversity? Ecosystems Biodiversity (ed. by Grillo O.). 2011; ISBN: 978-953-307-417-7. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/ecosystemsbiodiversity/how-past-vicariant-events-can-explain-the-atlantic-forest-biodiversity.
- 52. Turchetto-Zolet AC, Pinheiro F, Salgueiro F, Palma-Silva C. Phylogeographical patterns shed light on evolutionary process in South America. Mol Ecol. 2013; 22: 1193–1213. pmid:23279129
- 53. Schulmeister S, Wheeler WC, Carpenter JM. Simultaneous analysis of the basal lineages of Hymenoptera (Insecta) using sensitivity analysis. Cladistics. 2002; 18: 455–484.
- 54. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 1647–1649. pmid:22543367
- 55. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. pmid:28968734
- 56.
Rozas J, Librado P, Sánchez-Del Barrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP: Dna sequence polymorphism, version 5.10.1. Universitat de Barcelona. 2010.
- 57. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research. 1967; 27: 209–220. pmid:6018555
- 58. Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST. Isolation by distance, web service, version 3.23. BMC Genetics. 2005; 6: 13. Avaiable from: http://ibdws.sdsu.edu/. pmid:15760479
- 59. Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015; 6: 1110–1116.
- 60. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-Joining Networks for Inferring Intraspecific Phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999; 16: 37–48. pmid:10331250
- 61. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial-DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992; 131: 479–491. pmid:1644282
- 62. Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001; 26: 32–46.
- 63. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123: 585–595. pmid:2513255
- 64. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989; 123: 597–601. pmid:2599369
- 65. Fu Y. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997; 147: 915–925. pmid:9335623
- 66. Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol. 2002; 19: 2092–2100. pmid:12446801
- 67. Tajima F. The amount of DNA polymorphism maintained in a finite population when the neutral mutation rate varies among sites. Genetics. 1996; 143: 1457–1465. pmid:8807315
- 68. Ramírez-Soriano A, Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozaz J, Callafell F, Navarro A. Statistical power analysis of neutrality tests under demographic expansions, contractions and bottlenecks with recombination. Genetics. 2008; 179: 555–567. pmid:18493071
- 69. Rogers AR, Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992; 9: 552–569. pmid:1316531
- 70. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012; 29: 1969–1973. pmid:22367748
- 71. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 33: 1870–1874. pmid:27004904
- 72. Carpenter JM, Grimaldi DA. Social wasps in amber. Am Mus Novit. 1997; 3203: 1–7.
- 73.
Rambaut A. FigTree version 1.3.1. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author. 2009. Avaiable from: tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software.
- 74. Garcia Z, Sarmiento CE, Rojas R. Social organizational influences on the morphologic differentiation in Polistinae wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Sociobiology. 2008; 51: 473–489.
- 75.
Rasband WS. Image J: Image Processing and Analysis in Java. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 1997–2016. Avaiable from: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html.
- 76. Araujo EL, Nascimento FM, Zucchi FA. Utilização da análise discriminante em estudos taxonômicos de moscas-das-frutas do gênero Anastrepha Schiner, 1868 (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci Agric. 1998; 55: 105–110.
- 77.
StatSoft inc. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 7. 2004. Avaiable from: www.statsoft.com.
- 78. Slatkin M, Hudson RR. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991; 129: 555–562. pmid:1743491
- 79. Ray N, Currat M, Excoffier L. Intra-Deme molecular diversity in spatially expanding populations. Mol Biol Evol. 2003; 20: 76–86. pmid:12519909
- 80. Excoffier L. Patterns of DNA sequence diversity and genetic structure after a range expansion: lessons from the infinite-island model. Mol Ecol. 2004; 13: 853–864. pmid:15012760
- 81. Liautard C, Keller L. Restricted effective queen dispersal at a microgeographic scale in polygynous populations of the ant Formica exsecta. Evolution. 2001; 55, 2484–2492. pmid:11831664
- 82. Doums C, Cabrera H, Peeters C. Population genetic structure and male-biased dispersal in the queenless ant Diacamma cyaneiventre. Mol Ecol. 2002; 11, 2251–2264. pmid:12406237
- 83. Clémencet J, Viginier B, Doums C. Hierarchical analysis of population genetic structure in the monogynous ant Cataglyphis cursor using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol. 2005; 14, 3735–3744. pmid:16202092
- 84. Resende HC, Yotoko KSC, Delabie JHC, Costa MA, Campiolo S, Tavares MG, et al. Pliocene and Pleistocene events shaping the genetic diversity within the central corridor of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol J Linn Soc Lon. 2010; 101: 949–960.
- 85. Cronin AL, Molet M, Doums C, Monnin T, Peeters C. Recurrent evolution of dependent colony foundation across eusocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013; 58: 37–55. pmid:22934981
- 86. Rousset F. Genetic differentiation between individuals. J Evol Biol. 2000; 13: 58–62.
- 87. Chapman RE, Bourke AFG. The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecol Lett. 2001; 4: 650–662.
- 88. Zhang DX, Hewitt G. Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12: 563–584. pmid:12675814
- 89. Godinho R, Crespo EG, Ferrand N. The limits of mtDNA phylogeography: complex patterns of population history in a highly structured Iberian lizard are only revealed by the use of nuclear markers. Mol Ecol. 2008; 17: 4670–4683. pmid:18828782
- 90. Moritz C. Defining ‘evolutionarily significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994; 9: 373–375. pmid:21236896
- 91. Avise JC, Wollenberg K. Phylogenetics and the origin of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997; 94:7748–7755. pmid:9223259
- 92. Irwin DE. Phylogeographic breaks without geographic barriers to gene flow. Evolution (NY). 2002; 56: 2383–2394.
- 93. De Queiroz K. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst Biol. 2007; 56: 879–886. pmid:18027281
- 94. Bouwma AM, Bouwma PE, Nordheim EV, Jeanne RL. Adult mortality rates in young colonies of a swarm-founding (Polybia occidentalis). J Zool. 2003; 260: 11–16.
- 95. Jong MA, Wahlberg N, van Eijk M, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ. Mitochondrial DNA signature for range-wide populations of Bicyclus anynana suggests a rapid expansion from recent refugia. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e21385. pmid:21731725
- 96. Ferreri M, Qu W, Han BO. Phylogenetic networks: A tool to display character conflictand demographic history. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011; 10: 12799–12803.
- 97. Excoffier L, Langaney A. Origin and Differentiation of Human Mitochondrial DNA. Am J Hum Genet. 1989; 44: 73–85. pmid:2562823
- 98. Wright S. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am Nat. 1940; 74: 232–248.
- 99. Slatkin M. Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol. 1977; 12: 253–262. pmid:601717
- 100.
Avise JC. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. London: Harvard University Press; 2000.
- 101.
Carvalho AF. Sobre a Biogeografia dos polistíneos neotropicais: uma abordagem evolutiva. Ph.D. Disertation. Universidade Federal de São Carlos. 2014. Avaiable from: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/handle/ufscar/5425/6552.pdf?sequence=1.
- 102.
Wenzel JW, Carpenter JM. Comparing methods: adaptive traits and tests of adaptation. In: Eggleton P, Vane-Wright , editors. Phylogenetics and Ecology. London: Harcourt Brace; 1994. pp. 79–101.
- 103. Johnson JA, Dunn PO, Bouzat JL. Effects of recent population bottlenecks on reconstructing the demographic history of prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol. 2007; 16: 2203–2222, 2007. pmid:17561885
- 104. Castoe TA, Spencer CL, Parkinson CL. Phylogeographic structure and historical demography of the western diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox): a perspective on North American desert biogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002; 42: 193–212.
- 105. Nuñez JJ, Wood NK, Rabanal FE, Fontanella FM, Sites JW Jr.. Amphibian phylogeography in the Antipodes: refugia and postglacial colonization explains mitochondrial haplotype distribution in the Patagonian frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Cycloramphidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011; 58: 343–352. pmid:21145400
- 106.
Mark R. Evolução. 3a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006.
- 107. Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB, Cornell HV, et al. (2010) Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13: 1310–1324. pmid:20649638
- 108. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22: 148–155. pmid:17129636
- 109. Renauld S, Chevret P, Michaux J. Morphological vs. molecular evolution: ecology and phylogeny both shape the mandible of rodents. Zool Scr. 2007; 36: 525–535.
- 110. Gojobori T, Moriyama EN, Kimura M. Molecular clock of viral evolution, and the Neutral Theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87: 10015–10018. pmid:2263602
- 111. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natil Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 14338–14343.
- 112. Losos JB, Jackman TR, Larson A, de Queiroz K, Rodríguez-Schettino L. Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science. 1998; 279: 2115–2118. pmid:9516114
- 113. Rocha-Olivares A, Fleeger JW, Foltz DW. Decoupling of molecular and morphological evolution in deep lineages of a meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Mol Biol Evol. 2001; 18: 1088–1102. pmid:11371597
- 114. Benton MJ. Early origins of modern birds and mammals: molecules vs. morphology. Bioessays. 1999; 21: 1043–1051. pmid:10580989
- 115.
Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, Hovikoski J, Guerrero J. The development of the Amazonian mega-wetland (Miocene; Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia). In: Hoorn C, Wesseling FP editors. Amazonia: landscape and species evolution, a look into the past. New Jersey: Wiley-Blakcwell; 2010. pp. 123–142.
- 116.
Lavina EL, Fauth G. Evolução Geológica da America do Sul nos últimos 250 Milhões de Anos. In: Carvalho CJB, Almeida EAB, editors. Biogeografia da América do Sul: padrões & processos. São Paulo: Roca Ltda; 2011. pp. 3–13.
- 117. Ortiz-Jaureguizar E, Cladera GA. Paleoenvironmental evolution of southern South America during the Cenozoic. J Arid Environ. 2006; 66: 498–532.
- 118.
Riccomini C. O rift continental do sudeste do Brasil. Ph. D. Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo. 1989. Avaiable from: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/44/44136/tde-18032013-105507/pt-br.php.
- 119. Behling H. A high-resolution Holocene pollen record from Lago do Pires, SE Brazil: vegetation, climate and fire history. J Paleolimnol. 1995; 14: 253–268.
- 120. Behling H. Late Quaternary vegetation, climate and fire history of the Araucaria forest and campos region from Serra Campos Gerais, Paraná State (south Brazil). Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 1997; 97: 109–121.
- 121. Behling H. South and southeast Brazilian grasslands during late Quaternary times: a synthesis. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol. 2002; 177: 19–27.
- 122. Ledru MP, Braga PIS, Soubiès F, Fournier M, Martin L, Suguio K, et al. The last 50,000 years in the Neotropics (southern Brazil): evolution of vegetation and climate. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1996; 123: 239–257.
- 123. Ledru MP, Rousseau DD, Cruz FW, Riccomini C, Karmann I, Martin L. Paleoclimate changes during the last 100,000 yr from a record in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest region and inter hemispheric comparison. Quat Res. 2005; 64: 444–450.
- 124. Behling H, Lichte M. Evidence of dry and cold climatic conditions at glacial times in tropical southeastern Brazil. Quat Res. 1997; 48: 348–358.
- 125. Behling H, Negrelle RRB. Tropical rainforest and climate dynamics of the Atlantic lowland, southern Brazil, during the late Quaternary. Quat Res. 2001; 56: 383–389.
- 126. Cruz FW, Burns SJ, Karmann I, Sharp WD, Vuille M, Cardoso AO, et al. Insolation-driven changes in atmospheric circulation over the past 116,000 years in subtropical Brazil. Nature. 2005; 434: 63–66. pmid:15744298
- 127. De Oliveira PE, Barreto AMF, Suguio K. Late Pleistocene/Holocene climatic and vegetational history of the brazilian caatinga: the fossil dunes of the middle São Francisco river. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1999; 152: 319–337.
- 128.
De Oliveira PE, Pessenda LCR, Barreto AMF, Oliveira ES, Santos JC. Paleoclimas da Caatinga brasileira durante o Quaternário tardio. In: Carvalho IS, Garcia MJ, Lana CC, Strohschoen O Jr., editors. Paleontologia: cenários de vida? Paleoclimas, vol. 5. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência; 2014. pp. 501–516.
- 129. Nascimento SS, Alves JJA. Ecoclimatologia do Cariri Paraibano. Rev Geogr Acad. 2008; 2: 28–41.
- 130. Vivo M. Mammalian evidence of historical ecological change in the Caatinga semiarid vegetation of northeastern Brazil. J Comp Biol. 1970; 2, 65–73.
- 131. Bergqvist LP, Almeida EB de. Biodiversidade de mamíferos fósseis brasileiros. Rev Geociências. 2004; 9: 54–68.
- 132.
Bigarella JJ, Andrade-Lima D. Paleoenvironmental changes in Brazil. In: Prance GT, editor. Biological diversification in tropics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1982.
- 133.
Por FD. Sooretama, the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing; 1992.
- 134.
Moreau RE. The bird faunas of Africa and its islands. New York: Academic Press; 1966.
- 135.
Lara MC, Geise L, Schneider CJ. Diversification of small mammals in the Atlantic forest of Brazil: testing the alternatives. In: Lacey EA, Myers P, editors. Mammalian diversification: from chromosomes to phylogeography (a celebration of the career of James L. Patto); 2005. pp. 311–335.
- 136. D’Horta FM, Cabanne G, Meyer D, Miyaki CY. The genetic effects of Late Quaternary climatic changes over a tropical latitudinal gradient: diversification of an Atlantic Forest passerine. Mol Ecol. 2011; 20, 1923–1935. pmid:21410807
- 137. Menezes RST, Brady SG, Carvalho AF, Del Lama MA, Costa MA. Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the neotropical swarm-founding social wasp genus Synoeca (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0119151. pmid:25738705
- 138. Sauquet H, Ho SYW, Gandolfo MA, Jordan GJ, Wilf P, Cantrill DJ et al. Testing the impact of calibration of molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales). Syst Biol. 2012; 61: 289–313. pmid:22201158