Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae (sensu lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968): An endoparasite of croakers (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) from Indonesia

  • Stefan Theisen ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany


  • Harry W. Palm,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany, Centre for Studies in Animal Diseases, Udayana University, Badung Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

  • Sarah H. Al-Jufaili,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Software

    Affiliations Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany, Laboratory of Microbiology Analysis, Fishery Quality Control Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Wealth, Al Bustan, Sultanate of Oman

  • Sonja Kleinertz

    Roles Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae (sensu lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968): An endoparasite of croakers (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) from Indonesia

  • Stefan Theisen, 
  • Harry W. Palm, 
  • Sarah H. Al-Jufaili, 
  • Sonja Kleinertz


An endoparasitic monogenean was identified for the first time from Indonesia. The oesophagus and anterior stomach of the croakers Nibea soldado (Lacépède) and Otolithes ruber (Bloch & Schneider) (n = 35 each) sampled from the South Java coast in May 2011 and Johnius amblycephalus (Bleeker) (n = 2) (all Sciaenidae) from Kedonganan fish market, South Bali coast, in November 2016, were infected with Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. Prevalences in the first two croakers were 63% and 46%, respectively, and the two J. amblycephalus harboured three and five individuals. All three croakers represent new hosts for this monogenean genus. We provide infection rates, light microscopical observations, 3D confocal microscopical illustrations, and a morphometric comparison with all congeners. The new species differs in body size, the position and shape of the ovary and testes, and especially in the composition of the dorsal anchor complex, with the dorsal bar being anteriorly concave rather than planar or convex as in its congeners. The dorsal and ventral anchors of this new species are the longest in the genus, whereas the male copulatory organ is the smallest. The first DNA sequences for a member of this genus demonstrate the greatest similarity with endoparasitic freshwater monogeneans from African cichlid fishes. This suggests a freshwater origin for these marine endoparasitic monogeneans.


The Monogenea are common ectoparasitic flatworms of fish, usually infecting gills, fins and scales, but also the eyes and nostrils. They feed on blood, mucus or epithelial cells of their host. The group is highly diverse, with an estimated 25,000, usually highly host specific, species. Besides the unique haptor (posterior attachment apparatus), the monoxenous life cycle is a typical feature which contrast to other platyhelmiths. The adults are hermaphroditic and reproduce sexually, with eggs releasing ciliated oncomiracidiae larvae; these seek a fish host, mainly photo- and chemotactically, and develop into adults. The combination of a direct life cycle, high host specificity and the adverse effects due to feeding on fish inducing possible secondary bacterial or viral infections often leads to mass infections in finfish aquaculture. They have resulted in disastrous financial losses worldwide (e.g. in commercially important grouper, barramundi, amberjack and salmon farms) [1,2].

Very few monogeneans are endoparasitic, i.e. found inside the host’s body. Occasionally species infect the digestive tract, heart musculature or blood vessels [3]. Species belonging to the genus Pseudempleurosoma Yamaguti, 1965 exhibit such a specialization in terms of their infection site that they have adapted to an endoparasitic life, showing different adaptation levels [4], especially in the anchor apparatus, to attach to the oesophageal folds [5]. This type of adaptation is known in only a few genera, such as in the `Diplectanotrema-group´, parasitizing the foregut–pharynx, oesophagus and stomach–and rectum of marine fishes, e.g. Diplectanotrema Johnson and Tiegs, 1922, Neodiplectanotrema Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987, Paradiplectanotrema Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987, Pseudodiplectanotrema Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987 and Metadiplectanotrema Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987 [5]. Additionally, this adaptation is present in monogeneans of the genus Enterogyrus Paperna, 1963, with species that inhabit the stomach of freshwater fishes [6,7], and in Montchadskyella Bychowsky, Korotajeva & Nagibina, 1970 (Montchadskyellidae, also marine, but pseudosegmented in contrast to the `Diplectanotrema-group´) [8]. This leads to the assumption that evolution to an endoparasitic lifestyle happened multiple times in monogenean history. Rarely the urinary bladder of fishes can be parasitized, and even freshwater amphibians and turtles are utilized as hosts (by the genera Polystoma (Frölich, 1791) and Kritskyia Kohn, 1990, respectively). One out of the thousands of species, namely Oculotrema hippopotami Stunkard, 1924 infects the eyes of the hippopotamus (the only known monogenean ectoparasite of mammals) [911].

The genus Pseudempleurosoma Yamaguti, 1965 was first described for the type species, P. carangis Yamaguti, 1965, from the hosts Caranx lugubris Poey, 1861, Caranx sexfasciatus Quoy & Gaimard, 1825 (both Carangidae) and Myripristis berndti Jordan & Evermann, 1903 (Holocentridae) from Hawaiian waters (Pacific Ocean) [4]. While monogeneans in general are considered highly host specific, Pseudempleurosoma is not, infecting different host species, genera and families. After a re-examination of the holotypes and paratypes of the type species of the genus, which differs from Metadiplectanotrema by the presence of two rather than one ventral bars associated with each ventral anchor, and by the presence of an accessory piece around the male copulatory organ (MCO). Metadiplectanotrema was considered a junior synonym of Pseudempleurosoma [6]. So far, four further species (P. caranxi (Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987) Santos, Mourão & Cardenas, 2001, P. myripristi (Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987) Santos, Mourão & Cardenas, 2001, P. gibsoni Santos, Mourão & Cardenas, 2001 and P. guanabarensis Carvalho & Luque, 2012) have been described from the Atlantic Ocean, with the additional hosts Caranx ruber (Bloch, 1793), Myripristis jacobus Cuvier, 1829 (Carangidae resp. Holocentridae), Paralonchurus brasiliensis (Steindachner, 1875) (Sciaenidae), Rachycentron canadum (L., 1766) (Rachycentridae), Sphoeroides testudineus (L., 1758) (Tetraodontidae) and Trichiurus lepturus L., 1758 (Trichiuridae) between 1987 and 2012 [56,1213]. All recorded fish host species, except the tetraodontid pufferfish, have an economic value and show similarities in their ecology.

No DNA sequence for members if this group is known, but analyses of phylogenetic relations within the Dactylogyridae, including freshwater endoparasitic taxa, have been provided [14]. It has already been mentioned that endoparasitic monogeneans were dispersed from an origin in freshwater fish with their hosts potentially crossing to the marine environment, while the original ectoparasitic fauna was lost during this migration. It is thought that ectoparasites are not able to tolerate the variation in salinity and osmolarity [14]. For the first time, we now compare sequences of a new marine endoparasitic member of the `Diplectanotrema-group’, Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov., with a detailed phylogenetic analysis of most related dactylogyrid taxa, including Enterogyrus. We support the hypothesis that marine endoparasitism in monogeneans originates from African freshwater endoparasitic species, and we secure the phylogenetic position of these marine endoparasites. The monogenean species described herein represents a new member within the genus Pseudempleurosoma, and is the first species of this genus described from the Indian Ocean. A detailed description using 3D confocal microscopy and a morphometrical comparison between the valid species within this genus are provided.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and processing

The sciaenid croakers Nibea soldado and Otolithes ruber (n = 35 each) were sampled from Cilacap fish market, South Java coast, Indonesia (7°43´25.0´´S 109°01´22.7´´E) in May 2011, and an additional small sample of the sciaenid croaker Johnius amblycephalus (Bleeker, 1855) (n = 2) was obtained from Kedonganan fish market, South Bali coast, Indonesia (8°45´25.60´´S 115°10´05.94´´E) in November 2016. The fishes were transferred on ice to the Parasitological and Entomological Laboratory, Biological Faculty, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman (UNSOED University), Purwokerto, Java, and to the Marine and Fisheries Faculty Laboratory, Udayana University (UNUD), Kampus Bukit, Jimbaran, Bali, Indonesia, respectively.

Morphometrical data for each fish were taken (total and standard length (TL and SL) to the nearest 0.1 cm, total and gutted weight (TW and GW) to the nearest 0.1 g). The body cavity was opened and studied by naked eye. The internal organs were transferred to Petri dishes containing NaCl solution (0.9%), and studied for parasites under a Zeiss Stemi DV4 binocular microscope. The endoparasitic monogenean parasites were isolated from the oesophagus/proximal stomach, washed in saline solution and roughly identified under a Novel XSZ-107BN microscope. Some worms were compressed and directly transferred to 95% ethanol for confocal laser scanning microscopy, some worms from each of the three host fish species were directly transferred to 99.8% EtOH for DNA analyses. Most ancyrocephalids were fixed using AFA (Alcohol: Formalin: Acetic acid) or 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde, and then transferred and stored in 70% EtOH for further morphological analyses (light microscopy). Type-specimens are deposited in the Berlin Natural History Museum (ZMB, catalogue Entozoa, holotype: E.7602, paratypes E.7603a-h and E.7604a-i for specimens from additional host) and in the Bogor Zoological Museum, Bogor, Java, Indonesia (paratypes MZBTr 230 (from type host) and MZBTr 231 (from additional host)). The ecological parameters for fish infections with Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. (prevalence, intensity and abundance) were calculated according to standards [15].

Light microscopy, drawing and morphological investigation

Fixed specimens were cleared and mounted with glycerin following standard parasitological methods [16]. Some whole mounts were also prepared with compressed samples from 70% ethanol and stained with acetic carmine to study the sclerotized hard-parts. Measurements (in micrometres) are according to the initial generic description [4] (red arrow in Fig 1), and are given as the range followed by the mean in parentheses. Illustrations were prepared with the aid of a camera lucida drawing tube. Images were taken with a digital camera (Olympus UC30) attached to an Olympus BX53 light microscope, and measurements recorded with Olympus Cellsens Dimension software, Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH.

Fig 1. Drawings of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov.

Holotype in ventral view from Nibea soldado (A), male copulatory organs (MCO) drawings of different Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. individuals from the fish hosts Otolithes ruber (upper row of five MCOs) and Nibea soldado (6×), partially shown with position of muscular genital atrium/disc (mga), egg and prostatic reservoir (pr) (B) and of the opisthaptor with anchors, bars and seven pairs of hooks (the red arrow defines measuring) (C); scale bars A: 50 μm; B & C: 10 μm.

Confocal microscopy

Several 95% ethanol-fixed specimens were processed for confocal laser scanning microscopy following standard procedures [1718], using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope equipped with an inverted Leica DMIRE2 microscope and a PL APO 363 oil immersion objective (numerical aperture 5 1.4, z section setting minimum 200) at the Live Cell Imaging Center, Department of Biology, University of Rostock.

DNA analysis

For molecular analysis, genomic DNA was extracted from several adult worms of all three fish host species fixed in 99.8% ethanol following a recent useful protocol [18], i.e. grinding whole worms and using the suspension as a template directly without DNA extraction. Amplification of D1-D3 fragments of the large subunit region (LSU) was achieved using the following primers: C1 (forward; 5’-ACCCGCTGAATTTAAGCAT-3’) and D2 (reverse; 5’-TGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGAC-3’) [14]. The reaction was performed using illustra™ puReTaq Ready-To-Go PCR beads (0.2 ml tubes, 96 reactions), containing 5 pmol of each primer, 5 μl of DNA suspension and nuclease free water to a total volume of 30 μl. Obtained PCR products (1 μl) were viewed on a 0.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Contiguous sequences were aligned and assembled using BioEdit v.7.0.9 [19]. The generated sequences (GenBank accession numbers (GBAN) MF115714-MF115717) were aligned with their closest matches in GenBank (23 ingroup and Actinocleidus recurvatus (GBAN AJ969951) as an outgroup taxa). Phylogenetic analyses were performed in MEGA version 7 [20] based on the best scoring model (Bayesian Information Criterion, see supporting information S1 Calculation,, maximum likelihood was used for the best fitting tree according the General Time Reversible Model, rates among sites were gamma distributed with invariant sites (G + I), the number of discrete gamma categories was 5, and using complete deletion of gaps as gaps missing data treatment. The robustness of the inferred phylogeny was assessed using a bootstrap procedure with 1,000 replications [21].

Ethic statement

In this study, experiments were not performed on live vertebrates. Instead, freshly caught dead fish was used and therefore no ethics statement is required. Samples were taken within the Indonesian German joint research cooperation “SPICE” (Science for the Protection of Indonesian Marine Coastal Ecosystems), a German Indonesian initiative in earth system research, with research permit from RISTEK, the Indonesian State Ministry of Research and Technology, and in cooperation with Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali. The fishes were obtained from official fish markets (see Material and Methods section), national laws regulate captures and fishermen/salesmen are licensed, sampled fish species are common in Indonesia, not protected, and the number of 35 individuals per species was sampled because it is a good estimate to analyze the entire parasite community of a given fish species at a given location, and 35 is a minimum number for statistical tests.

Nomenclatural acts

The description of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. (LSID species identifier number: complies with the requirements of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “”. The LSID for this publication is: The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS and ResearchGate. DNA sequences are available in GenBank under the GBAN MF115714-MF115717.


Taxonomy and description

Family Ancyrocephalidae (sensu lato) Bychowsky & Nagibina, 1968

Pseudempleurosoma Yamaguti, 1965

Syn. Metadiplectanotrema Gerasev, Gaevskaja & Kovaleva, 1987 ([6])

Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov.

Type-host: soldier croaker, Nibea soldado (Lacépède, 1802) (Sciaenidae)

Additional hosts: tigertooth croaker, Otolithes ruber (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (from type-locality) and bearded croaker, Johnius amblycephalus (Bleeker, 1855) (from additional locality) (both Sciaenidae)

Type-locality: Cilacap, South Java coast, Indonesia (7°43´25.0´´S 109°01´22.7´´E)

Additional locality: Kedonganan, South Bali coast, Indonesia (8°45´25.60´´S 115°10´05.94´´E)

Habitat: oesophagus/proximal stomach

Type-material: holotype E.7602; paratypes E7603a-h (and additional specimens from additional host E7604a-I), and additional paratypes MZBTr 230 and MZBTr 231 (latter from additional host).

Deposition of specimens: Berlin Natural History Museum, Germany (“Museum für Naturkunde”) (holotype E.7602; paratypes E7603a-h and additional specimens from additional host E7604a-I), and Bogor Zoological Museum (“Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense”), Indonesia (paratypes MZBTr 230 and specimens from additional host MZBTr 231).

Infection: 22 of 35 fish (N. soldado) harboured 65 specimens and 16 of 35 fish (O. ruber) examined harboured 32 specimens. Prevalence 63% (N. soldado) and 46% (O. ruber), mean intensity 3 (N. soldado) and 2 (O. ruber), intensity 1–7 (N. soldado) and 1–6 (O. ruber), mean abundance 2 (N. soldado) and 1 (O. ruber). The two J. amblycephalus from Bali were infected with three and five individuals respectively.

Etymology: the specific name is for Dr. Craig J. Hayward who recorded the first unidentified Pseudempleurosoma nearby Indonesian waters in 1997.

Description (all measurements in μm) (Figs 1 and 2): based on 12 specimens from the type host N. soldado (see also supporting information S1 and S2 Tables and S1 Fig for details,

Fig 2. Confocal photos of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov.

Confocal microscopy illustrations of male copulatory organ (MCO) of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. with accessory pieces (A-K), from different angles (A-C), at different levels (D-G) and from a second worm (H-K), and of the opisthaptor with its hooks, anchors and bars (dorsal bar concave anterior) (L) as well as from different levels of the dorsal anchor apparatus (outer root extension with chitin containing cap, inner root extension with saucer-type excrescence) (M-P); additional confocal photos are shown in the supporting information S1 Fig,

Body slender, unspined, 588–1295 (971) long; maximum width 181–361 (289) (at level of boarder ovary/testis). Single pair of head glands extends to pharyngeal region. Two pairs of eye-spots. Oral aperture ventral; pharynx globular, 40–67 × 40–63 (52 × 48) (length × width) (Fig 1A). Intestinal caeca overlaid posterior to testis, coexisting with vitelline follicles, with lateral diverticula lacking haematin pigment. Haptor, 53–84 × 101–142 (66 × 116) length × width), not distinctly set off from body, but laterally lobed; with 2 pairs of dissimilar anchors and 14 marginal hooks (Figs 1A, 1C and 2L). Dorsal anchors, measured according to genus original description [4] from tip of ventral root to height of curve of blade (with inner dorsal root being shorter than outer ventral root in this genus), comparatively long (longest in genus), 59–61 (60) in length, connected by single quadrangular dorsal bar with distinct concave anterior border, 12–21 (19) from end to end, with distance of 12–17 (15) from anterior to posterior border (Figs 1C and 2L–2P). Ventral anchors 14–16 (15) in length, each one with two bars: one attached of 8–18 (11) in length and one free irregular bar of 17–21 (19) in length (Figs 1C and 2L). Marginal hooks 13–16 (15) long (Figs 1C and 2L). Male copulatory organ (MCO) sclerotized, tubular, 29–51 (42) long, with seminal vesicle and prostatic reservoir at base; accessory piece sclerotized, irregular in shape, 14–23 (20) long (Figs 1B and 2A–2K). Testis post-ovarian, oval to almost triangular, widest at its anterior region, 39–95 × 26–57 (76 × 41) (length × width) (Fig 1A). Ovary turned back on itself, giving appearance of being oval, 44–101 × 32–74 (77 × 55) (length × width) (Fig 1A). Uterus sacciform, ends as muscular aperture of 21–39 × 20–31 (29 × 25) (length × width), in smooth genital atrium, almost round in shape (Fig 1A and 1B). Vagina simple, opens at level of muscular genital atrium, no sclerotization visible even in laser confocal microscopy. Vitelline follicles arranged longitudinally in lateral fields along body (Fig 1A). Vitelline ducts unite in a slender line half way between the base of MCO and ovary. Eggs oviform, 56–72 × 39–59 (67 × 50) (length × width), polar filament absent (Figs 1B and 2A).


Due to the presence of i) an accessory piece on the MCO and ii) two bars associated with each ventral anchor, as well as iii) one bar connecting the two dorsal anchors, the new species belongs to Pseudempleurosoma (see Table 1 and [6]). The specimens from all sampled fish species belong to the same species (Table 2 and in more detail in the additional supporting information S1 Table and S2 Table), and thus measurements of P. haywardi sp. nov. from both host species sampled in higher number (n = 35, see Material and Methods section,) are combined for the following comparison with its congeners (based on 12 specimens from the type host N. soldado and 11 specimens from the additional host O. ruber).

Table 1. Key characteristics of the genera within the “Diplectanotrema-group.”

The body length of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. is in the range of the body length of P. carangis and P. myripristi; P. gibsoni is slightly longer; P. caranxi is much longer; and P. guanabarensis has almost the double body length (see Table 2). The body width of P. haywardi sp. nov. is similar to the body width of P. carangis and P. gibsoni; the body of P. myripristi is–even though the length is similar to the new species–much wider. The two longer species P. caranxi and P. guanabarensis have wider bodies (Table 2). The detached bars of the ventral anchors have similar sizes compared to the congeners’, except P. guanabarensis, which has smaller detached bars than all other congeners (Table 2). The size of the marginal hooks is similar in all species of this genus (Table 2). Compared to P. haywardi sp. nov., the sizes of the eggs are larger in all congeners except in P. caranxi, which shows similar egg sizes (Table 2).

Besides these differences, P. haywardi sp. nov. differs from all congeners by having longer dorsal anchors. With a length of 58–64 (60), they are the by far longest in the genus. The other five valid species have dorsal anchor length range of 38–58, and mean values of 46–52. Thus, the dorsal anchor length alone is a strong characteristic to distinguish P. haywardi sp. nov. from its congeners. A second unique characteristic of the new species is the shape of the dorsal bar being anteriorly concave, while all so far described dorsal bars of the congeners are either planar [5] or convex [4,6,12]. Thus, the two structures of the dorsal anchor complex, namely the dorsal anchors and the dorsal bar of P. haywardi sp. nov., are unique. Also the ventral anchor is the longest in this new species. With sizes of 14–18 (16), it differs from its congeners with only 10–15 (mean around 12). The range of the length of the attached ventral bar of the congeners is similar to the sizes of our material, however, with up to 18, the attached ventral bars of P. haywardi sp. nov. are also the largest within the genus. In contrast, the male copulatory organ (MCO) is the smallest in the new species, with a mean value of 44, while the other species have mean values of MCO length of 50–59.

Confocal microscopy made it possible to position structures for measuring, providing a range of viewing angles for exact images and measurements, for example a dorsal view on the dorsal bar, as well as focusing through the layers of the dorsal bar from a dorsal view, showing its length and shape accurately.

Other differences from the congeners are the host species, even though a sciaenid host of Pseudempleurosoma was already published from the Atlantic (and for a misidentified taxa from Vietnam, probably representing Pseudempleurosoma, see Discussion), and the geographic range in Indonesia, South-East Asia.

DNA analysis

Following a recent protocol [18], we could not amplify the DNA of the worms sampled in 2011, however, analysis of three adult worms collected in 2016 from the bearded croaker Johnius amblycephalus led to sequences. The partial LSU rDNA sequences were 840bp long (with primers). A NCBI Genbank blast showed closest similarity to freshwater endoparasitic monogeneans, namely Enterogyrus coronatus, Enterogyrus "sp. 1 AS-2010" and Enterogyrus sp. "2 AS-2010" (GBAN: HQ010032, HQ010031, HQ010030). The new sequence is available under the GBAN MF115714-MF115717. The obtained sequence of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. formed a well supported clade with the freshwater endoparasitic Monogenea from cichlid teleosts with a strong bootstrap value of 93% (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from the analysis of LSU rDNA.

The generated sequences were aligned with their closest matches in GenBank (23 ingroup and Actinocleidus recurvatus as an outgroup taxa). Phylogenetic analysis based on General Time Reversible Model with complete deletion used as gaps missing data treatment. The robustness was assessed using a bootstrap procedure with 1,000 replications [2021]. For sequence details, see S1 Calculation (calculation of best scoring model for phylogeny studies) and S2 Fig (alignment of sequences),


Zoogeography and host range

A summary of the zoogeographical distribution of Pseudempleurosoma, ranging from the Gulf of Mexico (P. carangis [13]) and the Caribbean Sea (P. caranxi and P. myripristi [5]) to the South East coast of Brazil (P. gibsoni and P. guanabarensis [6,12]), waters off Mozambique [23], the eastern Malaysian Peninsula (unidentified Pseudempleurosoma spp. [22,23]), the South Java coast, Indonesia (P. haywardi sp. nov.), Coral Sea [24] and Vietnam (misidentified Pseudempleurosoma sp. [25]) to Hawaii (P. carangis [4]) is given in Fig 4. The record from the Chesterfield Islands, Coral Sea (unidentified Pseudempleurosoma sp. from a hoplichthyid fish [24]), is doubtful (see Fig 4 and Discussion below).

Fig 4. Biogeography of Pseudempleurosoma spp.

All records of the genus are shown together with the reference, based on English, Russian, Vietnamese and German literature. The record from the Coral Sea [24] is doubtful (see Discussion below) and the record from Vietnam [25] is considered as Pseudempleurosoma (see Discussion). Reprinted with permission from Esri Inc. (Environmental System Research Institute) under a CC BY license, original copyright 2017 (see supporting information S1 Permission to use Fig 4),

Monogeneans are known being host specific, site selecting and well adapted to their hosts [2,6], but so far members of Pseudempleurosoma seem to have a wide host range. The genus has been reported from the Carangidae, Chlorophthalmidae, Holocentridae, Hoplichthyidae, Rachycentridae, Sciaenidae, Sillaginidae and Tetraodontidae [46,1213,2324] (Tables 2 and 3, Fig 4). Besides the single specimen of Pseudempleurosoma sp. from the sillaginid bay whiting Sillago ingenuua McKay, 1985 in Malaysia [22], and misidentified worms from the sciaenid croakers Argyrosomus japonicus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1843) and Johnius carouna (Cuvier, 1830) in Vietnam [25], this is the third record of an endoparasitic marine monogenean from South East Asia. So far the only other record of Pseudempleurosoma from a sciaenid, the banded croaker P. brasiliensis, is from the Atlantic, i.e. the southeastern coast of Brazil [6] (see Tables 2 and 3 and Fig 4). In 2011, an endoparasitic Monogenea was isolated from the stomach of sciaenid croakers A. japonicus and J. carouna in Vietnam [25], close to our area of investigation. The geographic area and the closely related host fish species (all Sciaenidae) as well as the provided drawings of the dorsal bar and the anchors and hooks suggest that the worms identified as Paradiplectanotrema trachuri belong to Pseudempleurosoma with some similarities to P. haywardi sp. nov.. We herewith establish three new host records for Pseudempleurosoma.

Table 3. Pseudempleurosoma spp. fish host species ecology and economic value.

Note that almost all host species are aggregating or schooling, reef-associated or associated to muddy bottoms, and of commercial importance (fish ecology and economy data from [26]).

Morphological characterization

We compare Diplectanotrema, Neodiplectanotrema, Paradiplectanotrema, Pseudodiplectanotrema and Pseudempleurosoma (Syn.: Metadiplectanotrema) in Table 1. The record from the Pacific (Coral Sea, see above) [24] was described as follows: “a sclerotized copulatory organ without an accessory piece, ventral and dorsal anchor/bar complexes, …and slender shaft”. It was also stated that the genera of the “Diplectanotrema-group” are probably synonyms [24]. However, Yamaguti's type specimens of P. carangis were re-examined and accessory pieces were found [6]. Consequently, these specimens [24] most likely belong to Neodiplectanotrema and not Pseudempleurosoma, which is considered to have an accessory piece and a ventral anchor/bar complex. The only other genus in the group lacking an accessory piece is Pseudodiplectanotrema, but this taxon lacks a ventral bar. In addition, the description of “a dorsal bar formed as two bilateral sclerotized rudiments” [24] does not fit to the so-far described genera of the “Diplectanotrema-group”.

The record of Pseudempleurosoma sp. [23] from Mozambique did not provide morphometric information, leaving species identification insecure. Measurements were provided for a single specimen from Malaysia [22], revealing similarities to P. carangis, based on its general morphology, internal anatomy and hooks [22]. However, the morphology of the haptoral complex was misinterpreted [6,22]. According to our confocal images and illustrations, Pseudempleurosoma has two dorsal anchors connected by a single bar, combined with two ventral anchors associated with two bars each, one pair connected and one pair disconnected. The original genus description lacked one pair of ventral bars [4], though, re-examination of the type specimens already documented its presence [6], and “three dorsal bars between the large dorsal anchors” (instead of one) combined with no ventral bar were misinterpreted for the Malaysian specimen [22]. However, figure 12 in that publication [22] shows that two of those dorsal bars are saucer-type excrescence root extensions of the dorsal anchors, that were described in more detail for the Ancyrocephalinae [5] as follows: “outer root extension with chitin containing cap, inner root extension with saucer-type excrescence” (in Russian). Comparing the anchor apparatus of P. haywardi sp. nov. (present study, see Figs 1C & 2L–2P) with the drawings of the generic description with P. carangis [4], characterizing this saucer-type excrescence as “dorsal root …turned medially to form a dorsal swelling”, and with the drawings of the unidentified specimen [22], it is evident that there is just one dorsal bar in the latter worm as well, as known for Pseudempleurosoma spp.. Consequently, this specimen can be affiliated with Pseudempleurosoma. This structure was also realized for further species [6], stating: “In P. carangis and P. gibsoni …the roots of each dorsal hamulus [= anchor (authors)] are concave, giving the appearance of bars, but in reality there is only one dorsal bar between hamulus.” These saucer-type excrescences, used for distinguishing between species of the Ancyrocephalinae [5] were thus misinterpreted as roots [6] or bars [22]. The description of the Malaysian specimen [22] demonstrates closer similarity to our newly described species compared with P. carangis. It had an equal length of the dorsal anchors (61 μm), which are largest in P. haywardi sp. nov. compared to its congeners (mean around 50 μm), and a very long ventral anchor (24 μm). However, this large size results from misinterpretation of the attached ventral bars as belonging to the ventral anchors, while only two (= one pair) of ventral bars, the attached ventral bar of each ventral anchor, were mentioned and drawn in the generic description [4]. The detached, free irregular bars were misinterpreted as “anterior medial hooklets [= hooks (authors)] abnormally large”. In summary, according to the illustration and measurements provided [22] and the explanation given above, this single worm should be affiliated with Pseudempleurosoma, is similar to our new species, and their conspecificity so far cannot be excluded.

Other material, probably Pseudempleurosoma sp., misidentified as Paradiplectanotrema trachuri [25] (Vietnam, see above), differs from the herein described new species. The body length of this Pseudempleurosoma sp. (1.7–2.6 mm with a body width up to 824 μm) and the pharynx size are much bigger than of P. haywardi sp. nov. and in the range of the largest congener, P. guanabarensis. On the other hand, the MCO of the worms (max. 48 μm) is smaller than in P. haywardi sp. nov. (max. 52 μm), which was so far considered to have the smallest MCO. The sizes of the dorsal bar, in shape similar to the one of P. haywardi sp. nov., are in the range of the largest congener, displaying the largest dorsal bar, namely P. guanabarensis. Dorsal anchors are smaller in this material compared with P. haywardi sp. nov. and in the congeners range. Detached ventral bars of the Vietnamese specimens are in the same range as in the congeners, except of the largest species, P. guanabarensis, which displays the smallest detached ventral bars. Attached ventral bars were misinterpreted (thus the worms were misidentified as Paradiplectanotrema), and thus measurements are not presented, consequently measurements for the ventral (attached) anchor were misinterpreted as well (however, ventral anchors and attached bars as well as detached bars are visible in the drawing of this worm [25]). The worm still has some similarities with P. haywardi sp. nov., but differs in several morphological measurements. Again, conspecificity of P. haywardi sp. nov. and the Vietnamese worm so far cannot be excluded.

Confocal microscopy made it possible to position structures, providing angle of views for illustrating and comparison as well as accurate measurements, for example the saucer-type excrescences, the exact length of the curved MCO, the irregular shape of its accessory piece, the connection of the hooks and bars or the dorsal bar, showing its length, width and shape accurately (Fig 2). This methodology is found to be suitable to detect minor, often difficult to describe differences in the haptoral structures of these small monogeneans.

Phylogeny and evolution

Without DNA sequence data of diplectanotrems, it was assumed that the evolutionary specialization towards an endoparasitic lifestyle must have happened multiple times separately, for freshwater and marine taxa [5]. With adaptation to the oesophageal folds instead of the gill filaments for attachment, host specificity seems to reduce. This might either be explained by the probably common morphology of oesophageal epithel cells within various fish species compared to the specialized and differentiated gill rakers and especially filaments. Another factor for decreasing host specificity might be the environmental change from living outside the fish (marine; changing abiotical factors such as temperature, salinity, current, oxygen, light) to inside the fish with a constant physiology. We suggest that adaptation from a highly differentiated site (gill filaments) towards a more general site (stomach) can go along with decreasing host specificity. In the case of diplectanotrem monogeneans, the site change has three benefits. Firstly, the newly explored oesophageal folds are neither utilized by other parasitic worms nor by fish parasitic crustaceans, thus they represent a niche only for diplectanotrems, and resource competition is minimized. Secondly, with exploration of the new habitat, many more fish species and families become potential hosts with empty niches, thus spreading of the diplectanotrems can be maximized. Thirdly, because the host species of Pseudempleurosoma spp. appear coastal, often reef-associated, and close to cleaning stations where cleaner fish or shrimp feed on ectoparasites, the new habitat minimizes possible predation.

According to our phylogenetic analysis, P. haywardi sp. nov. is a close relative of endoparasitic freshwater monogeneans of Enterogyrus, distributed in continental Africa and South East Asia. Cichlid fishes originate from Madagascar, and Enterogyrus has been associated with cichlid hosts before the colonization of these two continents [14]. If these genera go back to the same origin, diplectanotrem monogeneans might have developed either already from the very basal freshwater cichlids within historical geographically isolated Madagascar, or from the already advanced African cichlids parasitizing monogeneans, subsequently spreading from Africa into the Indo-Pacific region, with the freshwater forms Enterogyrus and the marine diplectanotrems. Most interestingly, while the freshwater endoparasitic monogeneans have been reported to be specific to their cichlid hosts, development into the marine forms reduced the host specificity and allowed subsequent worldwide distribution (see Fig 4).


A new species of endoparasitic monogenean on marine fishes (Johnius amblycephalus, Nibea soldado, Otolithes ruber) from Indonesian waters is described as Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov., based on various unique morphological characteristics as well as on the zoogeographic distribution and hosts. We document different infection rates of the investigated sciaenids, with a prevalence of 46% to 63% (and both J. amblycephalus investigated were infected), and up the seven worms in the oesophagus of a single fish. We demonstrate that like the other congeners, P. haywardi sp. nov. is less host specific, and might be found in further of the 39 marine sciaenid species occurring in Indonesia (for list of species, see [26]), or possibly in other fish families, for example sillaginids (compare [22]).

It is noteworthy that the so far recorded host fish species (Tables 2 and 3) are of economic interest, most species have fisheries and/or aquaculture importance, and Trichiurus lepturus is of high commercial interest for fisheries [26]. Most of the recorded fish species share similarities concerning their ecology (Table 3), either being reef-associated or benthic over muddy bottoms (except the pufferfish which inhabits (brackish) bays); however, all species are schooling or aggregating. Thus it can be concluded that the genus Pseudempleurosoma is somewhat associated to aggregations of fish host species over reefs or muddy bottoms (Table 3).

The phylogeny of marine diplectanotrems is decrypted for the first time, securing the position of these endoparasites and supporting an African freshwater origin. Further phylogenetic analysis of other diplectanotrem genera and of Montchadskyella, marine endoparasitic Monogenea of armorheads (Histiopterinae) in Southern Australia, will shed more light on their evolution.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Comparative linear measures for Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. from the type host Nibea soldado (Sciaenidae).

All measurements in μm,


S2 Table. Comparative linear measures for Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov. from the additional host Otolithes ruber (Sciaenidae).

All measurements in μm,


S1 Fig. Confocal photos of the haptor of Pseudempleurosoma haywardi sp. nov.

Confocal microscopy illustrations of the opisthaptor with hooks, anchors and bars (dorsal bar concave anterior) (A), with focus on the inner two (of seven) pairs of hooks, partially overlaid by the ventral anchor with both its bars (B) and the same in detail (C),



We thank the Indonesian Ministry for Research and Technology (RISTEK) for permitting the research in Indonesia. We are also thankful to Endang Srimurni Kusmintarsih and Endang Ariyani Setyowati from the Indonesian Universitas Jenderal Soedirman and to Endang Wulandari Suryaningtyas, Pande Gde Sasmita Julyantoro and I Ketut Wija Negara from Udayana Universitas for their help with issuing authorities, sampling, transport, laboratory work and providing work space. This is publication no. 10 under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, and the Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Aquaculture and Sea-Ranching, University of Rostock, Germany, in order to promote fish parasite and biodiversity research in Indonesia. We thank the colleagues from Rostock University for providing the chance for confocal microscopy (PD Dr. Sergei A. Kuznetsov from the Live Cell Imaging Center (LMZ), Department of Biology), and our colleagues from our institute for providing and translating Russian and Vietnamese literature, namely Ekaterina Pikalov and Truong Van Thuong.


  1. 1. Cribb TH, Chisholm LA, Bray RA. Diversity in Monogenea and Digenea: does lifestyle matter? International Journal for Parasitology. 2002;32: 321–328. pmid:11835972
  2. 2. Palm HW, Bray RA. Marine Fish Parasitology in Hawaii. 1st ed. Hohenwarsleben: Westarp & Partner Digitaldruck; 2014.
  3. 3. Whittington ID, Chisholm LA. Diseases caused by Monogenea. In: Eiras J et al., editors. Fish Diseases. New Hampshire: Science Publishers Ltd; 2008. pp. 683–810.
  4. 4. Yamaguti S. New Monogenetic Trematodes from Hawaiian Fishes I. Pacific Science. 1965;19(1): 55–95.
  5. 5. Gerasev PI, Gaevskaya AV, Kovaleva AA. New genera of monogeneans of the group of diplectanotrems (Ancyrocephalinae). Parazitologicheskii Sbornik. 1987;34: 192–210. (In Russian, with english abstract).
  6. 6. Santos C, Mourão ED, Cárdenas MQ. Pseudempleurosoma gibsoni n. sp., a new ancyrocephalid monogenean from Paralonchurus brasiliensis (Sciaenidae) from off the southeastern coast of Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96(2): 215–219. pmid:11285499
  7. 7. Madanire-Moyo GN, Avenant-Oldewage A. The histopathology of Enterogyrus coronatus pariselle, Lambert & Euzet, 1991 (Monogenoidea) in the stomach of the southern mouthbrooder Pseudocrenilabrus philander (Weber, 1897) (Cichlidae). African Zoology. 2015;50(2): 175–180.
  8. 8. Bychowsky ВE, Korotajeva VD, Nagibina LF. Montchadskyella intestinale gen. et sp. n., a new member of endoparasitic monogeneans. Parazitologiya. 1970;4(5): 451–457. (In Russian, with english abstract).
  9. 9. Cepeda PB, Ceccarelli PS, Luque JL. A new species of Kritskyia (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) parasitic in urinary bladder of Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes) from the Pantana wetlands, Brazil. Acta Parasitologica. 2011;56(3): 270–273.
  10. 10. Vaucher C. Polystoma cuvieri n. sp. (Monogenea: Polystomatidae), a parasite of the urinary bladder of the leptodactylid frog Physalaemus cuvieri in Paraguay. Journal of Parasitology. 1990;76(4): 501–504. pmid:2380858
  11. 11. Stunkard HW. A new trematode, Oculotrema hippopotami n.g., n.sp., from the eye of the hippopotamus. Parasitology. 1924;16: 436–441.
  12. 12. De Carvalho AR, Luque RL. Three new species of monogeneans parasitic on Atlantic cuttlassfish Trichiurus lepturus (Perciformes: Trichiuridae) from Southeastern Brazil. Acta Scientiarium, Biological Sciences. 2012;34(3): 359–365.
  13. 13. Mendoza-Franco EF, Vidal-Martínez VM. First records of known endoparasitic species of Pseudempleurosoma Yamaguti, 1965 (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae) from tetraodontid and rachycentrid fish off the northern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology. 2011;97(6): 1020–1025. pmid:21612419
  14. 14. Mendlová M, Pariselle A, Vyskočilová M, Šimková A. Molecular phylogeny of monogeneans parasitizing African freshwater Cichlidae inferred from LSU rDNA sequences. Parasitology Research. 2010;107: 1405–1413. pmid:20697913
  15. 15. Bush O, Lafferty AD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. Parasitology meets ecology on his own terms: Margolis et al revisited. Journal of Parasitology. 1997;83: 575–583. pmid:9267395
  16. 16. Riemann F. Nematoda. In: Introduction to the Study of Meiofauna (ed. Higgins RP and Thiel H), 1988; pp. 293–301. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  17. 17. Galli P, Strona G, Villa AM, Benzoni F, Fabrizio S, Dogila SM, Kritsky DC. Three-dimensional imaging of monogenoidean sclerites by laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscopy. Journal of Parasitology. 2006;92(2): 395–399. pmid:16729702
  18. 18. Marchiori NC, Pariselle A, Pereira J, Agnèse J, Durand J, Vanhove MPM. A comparative study of Ligophorus uruguayense and L. saladensis (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) from Mugil liza (Teleostei: Mugilidae) in southern Brazil. Folia Parasitologica. 2015;62: 024.
  19. 19. Hall TA. BioEdit:a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acid Symposium Series. 1999;41: 95–98.
  20. 20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33: 1870–1874. pmid:27004904
  21. 21. Wu XY, An XL, Xing QZ, Ming QX. Description of Pseudorhabdosynochus seabassi sp. n. (Monogenea: Diplectanidae) from Lates calcarifer and revision of the phylogenetic position of Diplectanum grouperi (Monogenea: Diplectanidae) based on rDNA sequence data. Folia Parasitologica. 2005;52: 231–240. pmid:16270804
  22. 22. Hayward CJ. Helminth ectoparasites of Sillaginidae fishes (Perciformes: Percoidei) have low species richness. Folia Parasitologica. 1997;44: 173–187. pmid:9332977
  23. 23. Reimer L. Monogenea von Fischen der Küsten von Namibia und Mocambique. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Pädagogischen Hochschule ‘Liselotte Herrman’ Güstrow. 1990;1(1): 27–38. (In German, with english abstract).
  24. 24. Řehulková E, Justine J-L, Gelnar M. Endoparasitic dactylogyrids (Monogenea) from the fish digestive system: A new species from the oesophagus of Hoplichthys citrinus (Scorpaeniformes) off the Chesterfield Islands, New Caledonia. 6th International symposium on Monogenea. 2009; Available at: http://www.municz/research/publications/871161; Accessed 08 August 2016.
  25. 25. Nguyen VH. Helminth parasite fauna of some marine fishes in Ha Long bay. PhD thesis, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology. 2011. (in Vietnamese).
  26. 26. Froese R, Pauly D. Editors. FishBase World Wide Web electronic publication [cited 10 December 2016]. Available from: